Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2022 Nov 29;61(49):19663–19667. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c03329

31P ParaCEST: 31P MRI-CEST Imaging Based on the Formation of a Ternary Adduct between Inorganic Phosphate and Eu-DO3A

Giulia Vassallo , Francesca Garello , Silvio Aime , Enzo Terreno , Daniela Delli Castelli †,*
PMCID: PMC9946289  PMID: 36445702

Abstract

graphic file with name ic2c03329_0006.jpg

Development of the field of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) contrast agents is hampered by the limited sensitivity of the technique. In water, the high proton concentration allows for an enormous amplification of the exchanging proton pool. However, the 1H CEST in water implies that the number of nuclear spins of the CEST-generating species has to be in the millimolar range. The use of nuclei other than a proton allows exploitation of signals different from that of water, thus lowering the concentration of the exchanging pool as the source of the CEST effect. In this work, we report on the detection of a 31P signal from endogenous inorganic phosphate (Pifree) as the source of CEST contrast by promoting its exchange with the Pi bound to the exogenous complex 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7-triacetic acid (Pibound). The herein-reported results demonstrate that this approach can improve the detectability threshold by 3 orders of magnitude with respect to the conventional 1H CEST detection (considered per single proton). This achievement reflects the decrease of the bulk concentration of the detected signal from 111.2 M (water) to 10 mM (Pi). This method paves the way to a number of biological studies and clinically translatable applications, herein addressed with a proof-of-concept in the field of cellular imaging.

Short abstract

This work illustrates the possibility to perform 31P-based chemical exchange saturation transfer magnetic resonance imaging detection by exploiting the interaction between a paramagnetic complex and the biologically relevant inorganic phosphate (Pi). A detectability enhancement of 3 orders of magnitude in the concentration of the paramagnetic probe was observed. A proof-of-concept of the potential of this approach in cellular imaging is provided.


The magnetic resonance imaging chemical exchange saturation transfer (MRI-CEST) technique was proposed (and generally intended) to generate a frequency-encoded contrast on the “bulk” water resonance through the exploitation of molecules endowed with exchangeable protons.14 This indirect contrast allows for an amplification of the proton MRI detection threshold of these molecules by exploiting their effect on the much more intense signal of the bulk water. The experiment consists of saturating the NMR signal of the protons in chemical exchange with water and then measuring the saturation transfer (ST) on the NMR signal of the bulk solvent. The ST efficiency depends on several parameters (among which are the exchange rate of the mobile protons, the intensity, shape, and duration of the saturation field, the magnetic field strength, etc.), and it is proportional to the fraction of saturated exchanging nuclei belonging to the contrast agent (N°CA) over the arrival, detected, spins (N°Bulk):

graphic file with name ic2c03329_m001.jpg

where [CA] is the concentration of the CEST contrast agent and [Bulk] is the concentration of the MRI-detected pool. Considering 1H MRI-CEST, the arrival pool is the bulk water (n = 2), whose concentration is approximately 55.6 M. Such a high value severely limits the efficiency of proton CEST detection, whose lower bound, as considered per single proton resonance, is in the millimolar range. It goes without saying that a reduction of the [Bulk] term yields to proportionally improve the detection threshold, thus allowing the indirect visualization of nuclei present in concentrations much lower than millimolar. Recently, Bar-Shir and co-workers applied this concept,5,6 showing a 900-fold signal amplification in the 19F MRI-CEST detection of an inhalable fluorinated anesthetic. The required shift of the resonance to be saturated was obtained by promoting a host–guest supramolecular interaction with a macrocyclic ligand. This approach led to an increase in the CEST detectability (per nucleus) of 3 orders of magnitude, enabling a micromolar detection of the saturated pool, due to a reduction in the concentration of the bulk site. An analogous approach was at the basis of the development of 129Xe-based hyperCEST.7,8 Inspired by these works, we deemed it of interest to explore a route for the detection of endogenous 31P resonances. 31P ST experiments were reported as early as the 1980s and were used to assess the exchange rate between inorganic phosphate (Pi) and γ-adenosine triphosphate (γ-ATP) in kidneys or phosphocreatine and γ-ATP in the heart; despite this, 31P as the source of MRI-CEST contrast agents had never been proposed.9,10 Indeed, 31P has sufficient NMR receptivity (ca. 7% compared to 1H) and it is present in different endogenous molecules at sufficiently high concentrations to directly act as the reporter of the CEST effect. Among the 31P-containing endogenous molecules, Pi appears to be an excellent candidate because it displays a quite constant concentration in different physiological fluids (about 1–3 mM in the extracellular medium and 10 mM in the intracellular compartment).11,12 To create the conditions to detect 31P MRI-CEST on Pi (i.e., to have two exchangeable Pi sites with sufficiently different chemical shift values), we exploited the interaction between Pi and a coordinatively unsaturated paramagnetic lanthanide complex, here represented by 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7-triacetic acid (Eu-DO3A; Scheme 1).1316 The large shift induced on the coordinated phosphate moiety (Pibound) allows one to match the basic conditions for CEST detection (Δω > kex).

Scheme 1. Schematic Representation of the Ternary Adduct between Eu-DO3A and Pi (in the HPO42– Form).

Scheme 1

The 31P NMR spectrum (14 T, 295 K) of an aqueous solution containing Eu-DO3A (40 μM) and Pi (10 mM) at pH 7.0 showed only the Pifree signal because the Pibound signal could not be observed due to its very low concentration (and likely for the signal broadening induced by coordination to the paramagnetic center). However, when a 31P Z-spectrum was acquired for the same solution at 295 or 310 K, sharp CEST peaks at −134 and −120 ppm, respectively, from Pifree were observed, which highlighted the occurrence of a large ST effect (ca. 70% at 295 K and 49% at 310 K) consequent to saturation of the Pibound pool (Figure 1). Measuring the CEST effect as a function of the intensity of the saturation pulse (the so-called ω plot),17 the exchange rates of Pibound were calculated to be 2.10 and 3.03 kHz at 295 and 310 K, respectively, values sufficiently smaller than Δω (ca. 6 kHz), thus confirming a match with the condition required to detect CEST contrast.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

31P Z-spectrum at 14 T of a solution containing 40 μM Eu-DO3A and 10 mM Pi (pH 7.0). Acquisition temperatures: 295 K, red line; 310 K, black line. The peak at 0 ppm corresponds to the saturation of Pifree, whereas the peak at −134 or −120 ppm refers to the saturation of Pi bound to Eu-DO3A. Acquisition parameter: 150 points; 16 scans each; B1 = 22 μT.

Next, the 31P ST % contrast was measured as a function of the concentration of Eu-DO3A (Figure 2A) to assess the minimum amount of paramagnetic probe necessary to achieve the ST detection limit, placed at 5%. The obtained value, around 2.5 μM, was about 3 orders of magnitude lower than the amount required for 1H CEST detection for conventional paraCEST agents.1820

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(a) Plot of ST as a function of the concentration of Eu-DO3A in a solution of 10 mM Pi at pH 7.0 (black squares, 295 K; empty circles, 310 K). (b) pH dependence of the 31P ST effect for a solution containing a 40 μM Eu-DO3A complex in a solution of 10 mM Pi, measured upon saturation of the frequency for the individual pH readout (black squares, 295 K; empty circles, 310 K).

The pH dependence of the 31P ST effect was measured in the pH 6–8 interval. As well-documented by others,2123 the chemical shift difference between Pifree and Pibound showed a clear pH dependence (Figure S1). The pH dependence of the ST contrast at 295 K (Figure 2B), measured upon saturation of the resonance frequency at the Δω values reported in Figure S1, showed a steep linear increase between pH 6 and 7, followed by deflection and stabilization of the effect between pH 7.5 and 8.

The observed behavior can be interpreted by considering the pH-dependent speciation of Pi. The pKa for the acid/base equilibrium for the H2PO4/HPO42– conjugated pair (H2PO4 ⇌ HPO42– + H+) is 7.2. This means that in the examined pH range the molar fraction of HPO42– rises from 10% to 90%. Because binding of the Eu-DO3A complex to HPO42– is likely stronger than that to H2PO4, the concentration of Pibound increases upon moving from pH 6 to 8, thus enhancing the ST efficiency. However, beyond pH 7, ST % reached a plateau. Likely, this finding suggests that the CEST maximum is the result of a balance between the highest concentration of HPO42– and the increase in the exchange rate of Pibound, which may reduce the ST efficiency. The same consideration can be done for the pH dependence at 310 K except that in the same pH range the plateau has not been reached.

Competition experiments with other anions present in biological fluids for which the interaction with Eu-DO3A was already reported (e.g., carbonate and lactate)24 were performed at pH 7.0. The Z-spectra reported in Figure S2 clearly showed that the presence of bicarbonate and lactate did not affect the 31P CEST contrast. Measurements carried out by performing a titration of a solution containing 10 mM Pi and 40 μM Eu-DO3A with increasing concentration of lactate from 0 to 20 mM displayed that there is no ST difference up to 20 mM lactate, thus suggesting that the competition starts when the concentration of lactate is much higher than that of Pi (see the Supporting Information).

To assess the potential of this approach in imaging applications, 31P MRI-CEST images and localized spectroscopy experiments were carried out on a solution containing 40 μM Eu-DO3A and 10 mM Pi at pH 7.0 on a 7 T preclinical MRI scanner equipped with a 1H/31P double-resonant-volume radio-frequency coil (40 mm).

The parameters for 31P MRI-CEST image acquisition are the following: pulse sequence Turbo RARE spin–echo, TE 13.9 ms, TR 10 s, averages 384, rare factor 8, slice 1, slice thickness 20 mm, FOV 40 × 40 mm, matrix 32 × 32, and excitation bandwidth 35088 Hz. ST module: block pulse, length 2 s, bandwidth 0.6 Hz, amplitude 12 μT, and total acquisition time 4 h 16 min. The saturation pulse was placed off-resonance (+134 ppm offset) and on-resonance (−134 ppm offset) and referred to the frequency of Pifree. The Z-spectrum and on- and off-resonance images (Δω ± 134 ppm) are reported in Figure 3. The difference in the intensity of the 31P signal in the MRI configuration resulted in a CEST effect of 50%. Interestingly, because of the lowering of the magnetic field strength from 14 to 7 T, this result was obtained using a saturating pulse with significantly lower amplitude (12 μT vs 22 μT). The parameters used for 31P MRI-CEST localized spectroscopy are the following: pulse sequence image-selected in vivo spectroscopy (ISIS), TR 10 s, averages 2 (16 total ISIS average), saturation frequency range ±150 ppm, voxel size 40 × 40 × 20 mm, block pulse, amplitude 12 μT, acquisition time per single point 38 s; total acquisition time 3h 12 min.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Top: Off-resonance (A) and on-resonance (B) 31P MRI-CEST of a solution of 40 μM Eu-DO3A and 10 mM Pi (pH 7.0) acquired at +134/–134 ppm at 7.0 T (ST % = 50). Bottom: 31P Z-spectrum of the same solution in the MRS-CEST configuration.

These results highlight the possibility of measuring a 31P ST % value by performing an on/off experiment in MRS-CEST localized spectroscopy in less than 2 min. The potential of the method for cellular imaging applications was tested by ex vivo labeling murine breast cancer cells (TS/A).25 The Eu-DO3A complex was entrapped in the cytosol by using the hypotonic swelling method, which consists of inducing a transient opening of pores on the cellular membrane when the cells are suspended in hypotonic solutions.26 During the hypotonic phase, Eu-DO3A quickly entered the cells, and after few minutes, the isotonicity was restored and the cells were washed to remove the noninternalized complex. The internalization efficiency was assessed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry analyses, and an amount of Eu-DO3A of ca. 120 μM/cell was calculated. The total Pi concentration in the cell pellet was determined by NMR by integrating the Pi signal against a phosphocreatine standard on the cell lysate, and it was found to be 7.1 mM. Next, a pellet of about 2 × 107 labeled cells was subjected to 31P MRI-CEST experiment. A ST % value of 20% was measured (Figure 4), thus demonstrating the feasibility of this approach for cellular MRI applications.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

31P Z-spectrum of TS/A cells labeled with Eu-DO3A (blue line) and unlabeled (black line). The Pibound peak appeared around −115 ppm.

Interestingly, the Δω value between Pibound and Pifree in the Eu-DO3A-labeled cells was significantly lower than the value observed in aqueous solution at the same pH (assuming an intracellular pH around 7.2/7.4) and temperature (−115 ppm vs −134 ppm). The origin of the shift might arise, at least in part, from the nonisotropic cellular environment and from possible subtle changes in the molecular geometry of the ternary adduct in the intracellular environment.

In conclusion, the herein-reported results demonstrate that endogenous Pi in the presence of the Eu-DO3A complex can generate an efficient 31P CEST effect, with a detection sensitivity 3 orders of magnitude higher than the 1H detection of conventional paraCEST agents. However, the low concentration of the detected spins implies an overall decrease of the NMR detectability, thus requiring longer acquisition times. Nevertheless, the switch from MRI to MRS setting, where the CEST effect is measured in a selected volume, in front of the loss of spatial localization of the contrast, one may have the advantage of completing the experiment in a shorter time. Given the small lower limit of detection, we surmised that a possible application could be in the field of cellular MRI, where cells could be monitored without the need to load them with a high amount of labeling agent. In this proof-of-concept, we have shown that labeling cells with the Eu-DO3A complex at low micromolar concentration is sufficient for activation of the 31P CEST contrast associated with the intracellular Pi. Several other applications can be envisaged. In the extracellular region, where an intravenously injected dose of Eu-DO3A distributes, the method may allow an accurate pH mapping. Inside the cell, the method may be applied to detect creatin kinase activity, for which 1H CEST detection, based on the signals of creatin and phosphocreatine, has been recently proposed.27

More work will allow improvement of the performance of this approach in terms of acquisition conditions and typology of the paramagnetic shift reagent. However, the herein-reported observations definitively show that a new chapter is now open in the field of multinuclear paraCEST domain with detection of the heteronuclear CEST response of endogenous molecules.

Acknowledgments

Financial support from the Italian Ministry for University to support the Multi-Modal Molecular Imaging Italian Node within Euro-Bioimaging ERIC is gratefully acknowledged.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c03329.

  • Sample preparation, cell labeling experiments, 31P CEST experiments for the NMR configuration, 31P CEST (on/off) experiments for the MRI configuration, 31P CEST (Z-spectrum) experiments for the MRS configuration, and Figures S1–S3 (PDF)

Author Contributions

The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

ic2c03329_si_001.pdf (495.7KB, pdf)

References

  1. Yadav N. N.; Xu J.; Xu X.; Liu G.; McMahon M. T.; van Zijl P. C. M.. General Theory of CEST Image Acquisition and Post-Processing. In Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer Imaging: Advances and Applications McMahon M. T., Gilad A. A., Bulte J. W. M., van Zijl P. C. M., Eds.; Jenny Stanford Publishing: New York, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  2. Jones K. M.; Pollard A. C.; Pagel M. D. Clinical applications of chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging: JMRI 2018, 47 (1), 11–27. 10.1002/jmri.25838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Terreno E.; Castelli D. D.; Aime S. Encoding the frequency dependence in MRI contrast media: the emerging class of CEST agents. Contrast media molecular imaging 2010, 5 (2), 78–98. 10.1002/cmmi.369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Sherry A. D.; Woods M. Chemical exchange saturation transfer contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2008, 10, 391–411. 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.9.060906.151929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Shusterman-Krush R.; Tirukoti N. D.; Bandela A. K.; Avram L.; Allouche-Arnon H.; Cai X.; Gibb B. C.; Bar-Shir A. Single Fluorinated Agent for Multiplexed 19 F-MRI with Micromolar Detectability Based on Dynamic Exchange. Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) 2021, 60 (28), 15405–15411. 10.1002/anie.202100427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Goren E.; Avram L.; Bar-Shir A. Versitile non-luminescent color palette based on guest exchange dynamics in paramagnetic cavitands. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 3072. 10.1038/s41467-021-23179-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jayapaul J.; Schröder L. Molecular Sensing with Host Systems for Hyperpolarized 129Xe. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) 2020, 25 (20), 4627. 10.3390/molecules25204627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Du K.; Zemerov S. D.; Carroll P. J.; Dmochowski I. J. Paramagnetic Shift and Guest Exchange Kinetics in ConFe4-n Metal-Organic Capsules. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 59 (17), 12758–12767. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c01816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Koretsky A. P.; Wang S.; Klein M. P.; James T. L.; Weiner M. W. 31P NMR Saturation Transfer Measurments of Phosphorous Exchange Reactions in Rat Heart and Kidney in Situ. Biochemistry 1986, 25, 77–84. 10.1021/bi00349a012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Balaban R. S.; Koretsky A. P. Interpretaion of 31P NMR saturation transfer experiments:what you can’t see might confuse you. Focus on “Standard magnetic resonance-based measurments pf the Pi→ATP rate do not index the rate of oxidative phosphorylation in cardiac and skeletal mucles. Am. J. Physiol. Cell. Physiol. 2011, 301 (1), C12–C15. 10.1152/ajpcell.00100.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rickard J. E.; Sheterline P. Cytoplasmic concentrations of inorganic phosphate affect the critical concentration for assembly of actin in the presence of cytochalasin D or ADP. Journal of molecular biology 1986, 191 (2), 273–280. 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90264-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bevington A.; Kemp G. J.; Russel R. G. G. In Phosphate and Mineral Homeostasis; Massry S. G., Olmer M., Ritz E., Eds.; AEMB, 1986, Vol. 208, pp 469–478. [Google Scholar]
  13. Dickins R. S.; Gunnlaugsson T.; Parker D.; Peacock R. D. Reversible anion binding in aqueous solution at a cationic heptacoordinate lanthanide centre: selective bicarbonate sensing by time-delayed luminescence. Chem. Commun. 1998, 1643. 10.1039/a804255a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Aime S.; Gianolio E.; Terreno E.; Giovenzana G. B.; Pagliarin R.; Sisti M.; Palmisano G.; Botta M.; Lowe M. P.; Parker D. Ternary Gd (III)L-HSA adducts: evidence for the replacement of inner-sphere water molecules by coordinating groups of the protein. Implications for the design of contrast agents for MRI. Journal of biological inorganic chemistry: JBIC: a publication of the Society of Biological Inorganic Chemistry 2000, 5 (4), 488–497. 10.1007/PL00021449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Botta M.; Aime S.; Barge A.; Bobba G.; Dickins R. S.; Parker D.; Terreno E. Ternary complexes between cationic GdIII chelates and anionic metabolites in aqueous solution: an NMR relaxometric study. Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) 2003, 9 (9), 2102–2109. 10.1002/chem.200204475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Elst L. V.; Van Haverbeke Y.; Goudemant J.; Muller R. N. Stability assesment of gadolinium complexes by P-31 and H-1 relaxometry. Magn. Reson. Med. 1994, 31 (4), 437–444. 10.1002/mrm.1910310413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dixon T. W.; Ren J.; Lubag A. J. M.; Ratnakar J.; Vinogradov E.; Hancu I.; Lenkinski R. E.; Sherry A. D. A Concentration-Indipendendent Method to Measure Exchange Rates in PARACEST Agents. Magn. Reson. Med. 2010, 63, 625–632. 10.1002/mrm.22242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Patel A.; Abozeid S. M.; Cullen P. J.; Morrow J. R. Co(II) Macrocyclic Complexes Appended with Fluorophores as paraCEST and cellCEST Agents. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 59, 16531–16544. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c02470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Morrow J. R.; Chowdhury M. S. I.; Abozeid S. M.; Patel A.; Raymond J. J.. Transition Metal ParaCEST, LipoCEST, and Cell CEST Agents as MRI Probes. In Encyclopedia of Inorganic and Bioinorganic Chemistry; Scott R.A., Ed.; John Wiley, 2011; Vol. 22. [Google Scholar]
  20. Sherry A. D.; Delli Castelli D.; Aime S.. Prospects and limitations of paramagnetic chemical exchange saturation transfer agents serving as biological reporters in vivo. NMR Biomed. 2022, e4698; 10.1002/nbm.4698 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Moon R. B.; Richards J. H. Determination of intracellular pH by 31P magnetic resonance. J. Biol. Chem. 1973, 248 (20), 7276–7278. 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)43389-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Yoza N.; Ueda N.; Nakashima S. pH-dependence of 31P-NMR spectroscopic parameters of monofluorophosphate, phosphate, hypophosphate, phosphonate, phosphinate and their dimers and trimers. Fresenius J. Anal Chem. 1994, 348, 633–638. 10.1007/BF00325563. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Raghunand N.; Guntle G. P.; Gokhale V.; Nichol G. S.; Mash E. A.; Jagadish B. Design, synthesis, and evaluation of 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7-triacetic acid derived, redox-sensitive contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of medicinal chemistry 2010, 53 (18), 6747–6757. 10.1021/jm100592u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Bruce J. I.; Dickins R. S.; Govenlock L. J.; Gunnlaugsson T.; Lopinski S.; Lowe M. P.; Parker D.; Peacock R. D.; Perry J. J. B.; Aime S.; Botta M. The Selectivity of Reversible Oxy-Anion Binding in Aqueous Solution at a Chiral Europium and Terbium Center: Signaling of Carbonate Chelation by Changes in the Form and Circular Polarization of Luminescence Emission. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 9674–9684. 10.1021/ja001797x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Nanni P.; de Giovanni C.; Lollini P. L.; Nicoletti G.; Prodi G. TS/A: a new metastasizing cell line from a BALB/c spontaneous mammary adenocarcinoma. Clinical & experimental metastasis 1983, 1 (4), 373–380. 10.1007/BF00121199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Di Gregorio E.; Ferrauto G.; Gianolio E.; Aime S. Gd loading by hypotonic swelling: an efficient and safe route for cellular labeling. Contrast media & molecular imaging 2013, 8 (6), 475–486. 10.1002/cmmi.1574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Chen Y. W.; Liu H. Q.; Wu Q.; Huang Y. H.; Tung Y. Y.; Lin M. H.; Lin C. H.; Chen T. C.; Lin E. C.; Hwang D. W. pH Mapping of Skeletal Muscle by Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (CEST) Imaging. Cells 2020, 9 (12), 2610. 10.3390/cells9122610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ic2c03329_si_001.pdf (495.7KB, pdf)

Articles from Inorganic Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES