Abstract
212Three-dimensional (3D) printing is a modern, computer-aided, design-based technology that allows the layer-by-layer deposition of 3D structures. Bioprinting, a 3D printing technology, has attracted increasing attention because of its capacity to produce scaffolds for living cells with extreme precision. Along with the rapid development of 3D bioprinting technology, the innovation of bio-inks, which is recognized as the most challenging aspect of this technology, has demonstrated tremendous promise for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Cellulose is the most abundant polymer in nature. Various forms of cellulose, nanocellulose, and cellulose derivatives, including cellulose ethers and cellulose esters, are common bioprintable materials used to develop bio-inks in recent years, owing to their biocompatibility, biodegradability, low cost, and printability. Although various cellulose-based bio-inks have been investigated, the potential applications of nanocellulose and cellulose derivative-based bio-inks have not been fully explored. This review focuses on the physicochemical properties of nanocellulose and cellulose derivatives as well as the recent advances in bio-ink design for 3D bioprinting of bone and cartilage. In addition, the current advantages and disadvantages of these bio-inks and their prospects in 3D printing-based tissue engineering are comprehensively discussed. We hope to offer helpful information for the logical design of innovative cellulose-based materials for use in this sector in the future.
Keywords: 3D bioprinting, Nanocellulose, Cellulose derivative, Tissue engineering, Bio-ink, Bone
1. Introduction
Three-dimensional (3D) printing allows the layer-by-layer deposition of 3D structures. Bioprinting, a 3D printing technology, has become widely used technique because of its capacity to establish scaffolds for living cells with extreme precision[1]. Owing to reproducibility, structural complexity, and high-precision control of the distribution of constituents such as cells, 3D-bioprinted scaffolds have received considerable attention 213in tissue engineering (TE)[2]. In addition, numerous studies have reported the use of 3D bioprinting in a wide range of TE applications, particularly in the fabrication of skin[3], heart[4], bone, and cartilage tissues[5]. At present, 3D bioprinting is a rather established technique, and can be categorized into several main methods: inkjet, extrusion, laser-assisted, and stereolithography methods[6]. However, bio-ink is the most important component, particularly in TE. Generally, several basic properties of bio-inks, including biocompatibility, printability, biodegradability, and mechanical properties, are taken into account in TE.
Cellulose, one of the most prevalent natural polymers, is a linear polymer comprising β-D-glucose. It is not only found in plants, but also in bacteria and algae. The hydrogen bond crosslink between β-D-glucose molecules makes cellulose rigid, and cellulose also has high biocompatibility as a natural polymer; therefore, cellulose, which is an abundant natural resource, is used to make bio-ink and claims an important place in the field of TE. Currently, nanocellulose and cellulose derivatives, which are the main forms of cellulose used in TE, are used as the main component of TE scaffolds and often as conditioning agents for other natural polymer inks (alginate [Alg] and gelatin).
The objective of this review is to present recent developments in 3D bioprinting using nanocellulose and cellulose derivatives in bone and cartilage TE that have been developed in the last five years. We also elaborate their potential applications in this emerging field.
2. Nanocellulose
Nanoscale cellulose derivatives are referred to as nanocellulose. Their intrinsic properties, including morphology, size, mechanical strength, and crystallinity, are determined by various sources and preparation methods. They are further divided into three categories: nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC), nanocrystalline cellulose (NCC), and bacterial nanocellulose (BNC) (Table 1). These intrinsic properties have led to their widespread use in the field of bone TE (Table 2).
Table 1.
Types, typical sizes, crystallinity and functions of nanocellulose
| Type of nanocellulose | Typical size | Crystallinity | Mechanical strength | Characteristic |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC) | High aspect ratio; lengths: 0.5-2 μm; diameters: 5-60 nm | Contain both amorphous and crystalline regions; crystallinity about 60% | Tensile strength: 1 GPa, Young’s modulus: 30 GPa | Good biocompatibility, biodegradability, water retention |
| Nanocrystalline cellulose (NCC) | High aspect ratio (˜70); the smallest nanoscale dimensions of any nanocellulose; lengths: 0.05-0.5 μm; diameters: 3-5 nm | Crystallization zone only; highly crystalline (54-88%) | Tensile strength: 7.5 GPa, Young’s modulus: 120 GPa | High mechanical strength, high crystallinity, good biocompatibility, biodegradability |
| Bacterial nanocellulose (BNC) | Lengths: several micrometers; diameters: 20-100 nm | Super high crystallinity (up to 95%) | Young’s modulus up to 70 GPa | High water absorption, high air permeability, porous structure, good biocompatibility, biodegradability, high purity, simple purification process, expensive |
Table 2.
A summary of nanocellulose based bio-inks for 3D bioprinting applications in bone and cartilage TE
| Bio-ink formulation | 3D bioprinting method | 3D bioprinting patterns | Bio-ink and scaffold properties | Effect on cell-loaded bio-ink | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NFC/Alg/poly (2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) | Extrusion-based 3D printing | 3D-printed grids (20 × 20 × 0.4 mm3) |
|
|
[15] |
| NFC/Alg/polydopa-mine nanoparticles | Extrusion-based 3D printing | A grid structure (20 mm × 20 mm, 6 layers) |
|
|
[22] |
| NCC/CS/HEC/glycerophosphate | Extrusion-based 3D printing | Solid cylindrical scaffolds (8 mm diameter × 2 mm thickness) |
|
|
[31] |
| Nanocellulose blends (NCB) | Extrusion-based 3D printing | Square grids (40 × 40 × 1.7 mm3, a single layer) |
|
|
[37] |
| Aqueous counter collision (ACC)-BNC | Extrusion-based 3D printing | A grid (5 × 5 × 1 mm3) |
|
|
[51] |
| BNC/silk fibroin/gelatin | Extrusion-based 3D printing | Small grids (10 × 10 × 0.4 mm3, 2 layers) / large grids (20 × 20 × 0.6 mm3,15 layers) |
|
|
[52] |
2.1. NFC
2.1.1. Physicochemical properties and preparation of NFC
NFC is nanoscale cellulose obtained by degrading lignocellulosic biomass[7]. Owing to its nanoscale size, nanocellulose has good mechanical capabilities, strong cell adhesion, good biocompatibility, and water retention. NFC is composed of many entangled nanofibers that contain amorphous and crystalline regions[8]. NFC was previously prepared via high-pressure homogenization and grinding, and pretreatment is necessary to produce high-caliber NFC and reduce clogging and high-energy requirements in homogenizers.Themostcommonpretreatmentmethodsare enzymatic reactions[9] and 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl free radical (TEMPO)-mediated oxidation[10], which weaken the interactions between plant cell walls. With a typical average length of approximately 0.5-2 μm, an average diameter of approximately 5-60 nm, a tensile strength of 1 GPa, and a modulus of 30 GPa, the size and strength of NFC are mostly dependent on the source and preparation technique. Moreover, many methods have been developed to modify the properties of NFCs. One of the examples is improving their hydrophilicity through physical adsorption and plasma discharge, which has led to their widespread use in various fields.
2.1.2. NFC 3D bioprinting in cartilage and bone repair
Owing to its remarkably high fidelity and biocompatibility, NFC bio-ink is a great material for 3D printing of TE scaffolds[11]. NFC is frequently used to modify the rheological characteristics of bio-inks and enhance their 214printability. Additionally, NFC is similar in size to collagen fibers, so NFC-based scaffolds have unique advantages in cartilage regeneration[12]. Given that chondrocytes exhibit high cell viability in Alg inks[13], their low ink viscosity limits their development in 3D bioprinting. Therefore, many researchers have mixed NFC with Alg to compensate for its low zero-shear viscosity for cartilage repair. Markstedt et al. prepared NFC-Alg bio-ink for cartilage TE[14] with high print resolution and fidelity, which combines the rheological characteristics of NFC with the crosslinking capabilities of Alg. Despite cell loss on scaffolds filled with human nasal chondrocytes (hNCs) as a result of shearing during printing, after 7 day of culture, the cell survival rate was considerably improved. Trachsel et al. created double network (DN) polymer hydrogels employing Alg and poly (2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) (PEOXA)[15]. DN usually consists of a primary covalent cross-linked network that provides elasticity and a secondary non-covalent cross-linked network that provides ductility; therefore, DN tends to have high strength[16]. PEOXA-Alg hydrogels can sequester living cells after enzymatic and ionic crosslinking to form DN. In addition, NFC can be added to the DN solution to enhance the viscosity and shear-thinning. With the addition of NFC, the viscosity of the ink increases, while the bio-ink displays quick shear recovery characteristics. This rapid shear recovery is also the reason why the NFC scaffold gives a high print resolution while maintaining the viability of the cells in the ink (avoiding shear damage). In addition to having 3D structures with high shape integrity after double crosslinking, the DN-NFC bio-ink-printed cartilage constructs loaded with human auricular chondrocytes (hACs) also showed up to 90% cell activity after 21 days of cell encapsulation. Therefore, we are aware that the NFC characteristics are not affected by these sophisticated multiple crosslinks.
The sulfated version of Alg has recently received increased attention because of its ability to bind a variety of growth factors and promote chondrocyte proliferation and collagen II deposition[17]. Müller et al. added NFC to alginate sulfate to increase the printability and mechanical strength of the bio-ink and bioprinted NFC-alginate sulfate bio-inks loaded with bovine chondrocytes[18]. As expected, the addition of NFC significantly improved the printability of alginate sulfate without affecting its osteogenic properties.
In clinically applicable in vivo investigations, NFC-Alg composite hydrogel scaffolds have shown remarkable cartilage-promoting characteristics. Apelgren et al. implanted 3D-bioprinted constructs (5 × 5 × 1.2 mm), which was prepared using three sets of NFC-Alg bioinks loaded with hNCs, human bone marrow-derived 215mesenchymal stem cells (hBMSCs), and a mixture of both, subcutaneously on the backs of nude mice[19]. The NFC aids in enhancing the ink’s capacity to print in this situation as well. After 60 days, the explanted constructs all had significant levels of cellular activity, and from days 30 to 60, both hNCs and mixed groups displayed increased chondrogenesis and proliferation of glycosaminoglycan (GAG)-positive cells. This study demonstrated that NFC-based hydrogel scaffolds may exert their benefits in animal models while retaining cell viability; therefore, we anticipate their widespread clinical application in the future.
TEMPO-oxidized NFC (T-NFC) has a significant nucleation impact on hydroxyapatite due to the carboxylate groups acquired following its modification[20] and has been reported in conjunction with Alg for 3D printing in bone TE[21]. Im et al. used bio-ink obtained from Alg, T-NFC, and polydopamine nanoparticles (PDANPs) to obtain osteogenic structures via 3D bioprinting[22]. Compared to pure Alg gels, the recovery rate and compressive strength of the T-NFC-containing hydrogels were enhanced. More importantly, the expression of osteogenesis-related genes (alkaline phosphatase [ALP], Runx2, and OPN) was enhanced in composite 3D-bioprinted scaffolds loaded with MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts containing T-NFC and PDANPs, along with calcium production and deposition (biomineralization) on the scaffolds. Given its excellent printability, mechanical strength, and capacity to trigger osteogenesis, this T-NFC-containing bio-ink has great potential for use in bone TE. Interestingly, as a viscosity modifier for bio-inks, T-NFC not only increases the viscosity, but also reduces it when the ink viscosity is too high to prevent the restriction of cell activity and proliferation. Bioactive glass (BG) is frequently utilized in osteogenic bioinks because of its excellent biocompatibility and ability to stimulate osteogenesis by forming a hydroxyapatite layer on its surface[23]. A BG-modified gelatin-Alg bio-ink for 3D bioprinting was developed by Ojansivu et al. However, after bioprinting, the high viscosity of the ink due to the inclusion of BG caused a sharp decline in the activity of the loaded cells[24]. After adjusting the ink viscosity by adding T-NFC, the hBMSCs in the printed scaffolds exhibited high activity and proliferative capacity without altering the osteogenic capabilities of BG. The fact that T-NFC interferes with crosslinking by competing with the Alg ink for cations produced by BG may be the cause of this viscosity-modulating action. Monfared et al. added Ca2+ as an ionic crosslinking agent to T-NCF, and the strong physical interaction with the carboxyl group of T-NCF was used as the first crosslink. In the case of water-soluble vitamin B as a photoinitiator, the poly (ethylene glycol) (PEG)-added ink was photo-crosslinked under blue light after 3D printing as the second crosslink[25]. By varying the T-NCF to Ca2+ ratio, the mechanical characteristics, stability, and fidelity of this double-crosslinked hydrogel scaffold may be modified. For instance, its hardness can be changed between 1 and 45 kPa. The carboxylic acid group in T-NFC can not only enhance the nucleation of hydroxyapatite to promote osteogenesis, but can also be used as a crosslinking target to adjust the rheological properties of the ink, and its functional diversity has greatly improved its applications in bone TE.
2.2. NCC
2.2.1. Physicochemical properties and preparation of NCC
NCC is the smallest of nanocellulose products, with a length of 0.05–0.5 μm and a diameter of 3–5 nm[26]. Compared with NFC, which contains amorphous regions, NCC contains only crystalline regions, which gives it a more rigid structure[7]. NCC is renowned for its high mechanical strength (~7,500 MPa), high aspect ratio (~70), amphiphilicity, and high crystallinity[27]. The preparation of NCC is more complex than that of NFC. Cellulose powder is first obtained by washing and mechanical grinding of lignocellulosic biomass, followed by purification via alkali treatment or acid-chlorite treatment to remove impurities, and finally, by acid hydrolysis to obtain NCC[28]. The crystalline portions that are acid-resistant are maintained during acid hydrolysis, whereas the non-crystalline parts are hydrolyzed because they are not acid-resistant. NCC preparation methods have a direct effect on both morphological traits and physical properties. For example, the enzymatic hydrolysis of NCC has better mechanical and heat properties than acid hydrolysis. The sphereshaped NCC obtained via combined hydrochloric and sulfuric acid hydrolysis has greater heat resistance than the usual rod-shaped NCC[27].
NCC has various applications in medicine, including TE, medication delivery systems, and antibacterial agents. In bone TE, NCC can be used as an enhancer, additive, or biomaterial to enhance the mechanical and biocompatibility of scaffolds[29].
2.2.2. NCC 3D bioprinting in cartilage and bone repair
NCC promotes gelation of composite hydrogels through intermolecular hydrogen bonding to improve the mechanical properties of scaffolds for 3D bioprinting[30]. Maturavongsadit et al. prepared a bio-ink consisting of thermogelling chitosan (CS), NCC, β-glycerophosphate (BGP), and hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC) to develop an optimal CS-NCC-based bio-ink for 3D bioprinting (Figure 1A and B)[31]. The ink is a heat-sensitive hydrogel with fast gelation caused by the formation of hydrogen bonds between CS and NCCs at 37°C (Figure 1C). 216The inclusion of NCC also enhances viscosity, Young’s modulus, yield stress, and energy storage modulus, which significantly enhances printing as well as mechanical properties of the scaffold. More significantly, because the addition of NCC causes ALP activity to peak by day 7, osteogenesis occurs more quickly in the NCC group than in the control group, with enhanced mineral deposition and elevated expression of osteogenic markers. This may be related to the enhanced mechanical properties of the scaffold[32].
Figure 1.

Schematic illustration of the 3D bioprinting process. (A) Bio-ink consisting of CS, NCC, BGP, and HEC. (B) Cell-loaded CS-NCCs bio-inks printed by 3D bioprinter. (C) Rapid gelation of 3D-bioprinted knee meniscus at 37°C[31]. Images reproduced with permission.
Dutta et al. used 1% NCC/Alg/Gel+BMP2 bio-ink-printed scaffolds for in vivo studies using a rat CCD-1 calvarial defect model[33]. In contrast to the positive (BMP2-treated groups) and negative control groups, the 1% NCC/ Alg/Gel+BMP2 group showed a significant increase in bone volume and reduction in bone defects. Additionally, no significant inflammatory response was observed at the implantation site, demonstrating the biocompatibility of NCC. However, the addition of NCC resulted in low swelling efficiency, indicating a reduction in the capacity to absorb water, which may be related to the improved crosslinking ability of the composite scaffold. Interestingly, Patel et al. also prepared NCC/Alg/Gel bio-ink at different concentrations, but the expansion efficiency of the obtained scaffolds was positively correlated with the concentration of NCC[34]. Nevertheless, the composite scaffolds prepared by the two investigators showed similar improvements in mineralization potential, osteogenic gene expression, mechanical strength, and cellular activity. Additionally, the authors discovered that an NCC concentration of 1% was ideal for the survival of hBMSCs and that cell activity declined with the increase in NCC concentration. Surface charge may be responsible for this phenomenon[35].
While commonly used techniques to obtain NCC and NFC bio-inks often have high costs and low recovery rates, a technology called American Value-Added Pulping (AVAP®) allows the preparation of NCC, NFC, and nanocellulose blends (NCB) at low cost[36]. Jessop et al. prepared a bio-ink loaded with human nasoseptal chondrocytes by mixing NCB obtained using the AVAP technique with Alg[37]. Compared to NCC-Alg and NFC-Alg, the NCB-Alg bio-ink has better stability and fidelity, which may be related to the greater entanglement between the hybrids. Under scanning electron microscopy (SEM), NCB-Alg has a superior high-porosity structure (Figure 2E and G) compared to 2.5% Alg bio-ink (Figure 2A and C), which facilitates chondrocyte adhesion while maintaining its round chondrogenic phenotype (Figure 2F and H), indicating that maintaining round 217cell morphology is a requirement for chondrogenesis[38]. This also indicated that NCB-Alg had a suitable nanoenvironment for chondrogenesis.
Figure 2.

SEM after bioprinting of Alg and nanocellulose blends ink. (A and C) Alg bio-ink without cells. (B and D) Alg bio-ink loaded with human nasal septal chondrocytes after 3 weeks of culture. (E and G) NCB-Alg bio-ink without cells. (F and H) NCB-Alg bio-ink loaded with human nasal septal chondrocytes after 3 weeks of culture[37]. Images reproduced with permission.
2.3. BNC
2.3.1. Physicochemical properties and preparation of BNC
The majority of cellulose is derived from plants. However, microorganisms are also an important source of cellulose, especially BNC. It is believed that bacterial cellulose is mainly synthesized to protect against ultraviolet radiation and enhance bacterial colonization while retaining moisture[39].
Unlike plant cellulose, BNC does not contain lignin or hemicellulose. Therefore, no complex steps, such as acidification and mechanical intervention, are required for purification, and only purification using the low energy consumption of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution is required. Moreover, BNC has a high-water content, up to 99%, unmatched by other biomaterials, as well as the ability to absorb water of more than 100 times its weight. Additionally, BNC has a nanofiber network that is similar to the extracellular matrix (ECM)[40], which has a significant impact on cell adhesion and migration. BNC is renowned for other qualities, including strong mechanical properties 218(Young’s modulus up to 78 GPa), porous structure, and excellent biocompatibility[41]. Therefore, BNC has become a highly valued material for 3D printing in TE.
Different bacterial sources produce BNC with different properties. Among these, Acetobacter xylinum and Gluconacetobacter xylinus are the most widespread sources. A. xylinum can polymerize up to 200,000 glucose molecules per second via cellulose synthase[42]. Polymerized glucose chains are assembled from sub-elementary fibrils to microfibrils, and then further into tight ribbons. BNC are more expensive than other cellulose derivatives because of the high cost of the medium used to make BNC. However, numerous techniques, including strain mutagenesis, have been used to boost the production of synthetic cellulose from A. xylinum[43].
To optimize BNC for TE, different methods have been investigated to modify it, including in situ and ex situ modifications. In situ modification refers to changing the environment and conditions of bacterial culture (Figure 3A)[44]. Classical in situ modifications are often used to modulate the porosity of BNC scaffolds for bone TE. For example, Zaborowska et al. placed paraffin wax microspheres in a bacterial medium and made scaffolds after BNC generation, and then removed the paraffin wax microspheres to obtain bone scaffolds with large porosity[45]. Ex situ modifications refer to physical or chemical modifications after their formation (Figure 3B)[44]. Fang et al. used hydroxyapatite to modify the generated BNC to stimulate osteoblast proliferation and differentiation[46].
Figure 3.

(A) In situ modifications: adding modified materials to the culture medium and changing the conditions of the medium. (B) Ex situ modifications: adding modified materials to the generated BC.
2.3.2. BNC 3D bioprinting in cartilage and bone repair
BNC is limited in 3D printing because of the complex protofibrous structure that causes it to frequently clog the nozzles of 3D printers and discourage cell migration[47]. Therefore, obtaining BNC dispersions is important for the preparation of BNC-based scaffolds. Given that TEMPO-oxidized NFC easily forms nanofibrous monomers in aqueous solutions, TEMPO-mediated oxidation is also widely used to decompose BNC and has been extensively investigated for the preparation of bone TE scaffolds. At present, maleic acid (MA) is considered an excellent reagent for the preparation of nanocellulose monomers[48]. Wang et al. obtained a dispersed BNC-gel composite ink by untwisting the tight protofibrous BNC network using MA and obtained a bone TE scaffold containing primary 219MC3T3-E1 cells using 3D printing and implanted it into the skull defect of a Sprague-Dawley rat[49]. MA-treated scaffolds exhibited excellent mechanical properties and maintained MC3T3-E1 cell function. Kondo et al. invented a new technique for the decomposition of biomaterials into nanofibers using aqueous counter collision (ACC)[50]. ACC can effectively decompose BNC without chemical additives. Apelgren et al. used ACC to prepare a bacterial cellulose bio-ink containing hNCs, then used 3D bioprinting to prepare a bioprinted grid (5 × 5 × 1 mm3), which was inserted into nude mice[51]. The skin graft was sutured to the scaffold to assess its biocompatibility. ACC-BNC bio-ink has high fidelity and viscosity than hydrolyzed BNC and has been used to print complex structures, such as biological auricles. Cartilage formation was observed in the biological network scaffold, as well as in the GAG deposition. After transplantation, the skin grafts revealed no adverse consequences, such as necrosis or inflammation, while the proliferation of chondrocytes was observed. This novel BNC bio-ink can also retain high biocompatibility in animal studies, paving the way for its clinical use.
Owing to its excellent mechanical properties and high fidelity, BNC is often used in addition to other bio-inks to modulate their properties. Huang et al. applied BNC to a silk fibroin (SF)/gelatin composite hydrogel scaffold to improve its mechanical properties and print resolution[52]. The scaffolds were also made macroporous and microporous via 3D printing and freeze-drying, respectively. The interconnected macropores and micropores promote cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation, as well as cartilage regeneration and cartilage-related gene expression[53]. The authors discovered that when the BNC concentration was increased, the scaffold displayed improved pore connectivity, cell content, and cell survival. Moreover, the authors demonstrated that the BCN-0.70 wt% bio-ink had the best print resolution and used it for the 3D printing of human meniscus models. Furthermore, the scaffold had a stable structure, and the BCN-0.70 wt% scaffold showed considerably reduced mass loss 1 month after subcutaneous implantation in nude mice compared to the control group.
3. Cellulose derivatives for 3D printing
The reaction of cellulose with chemical reagents can lead to different cellulose derivatives, the most common being cellulose ethers[54] and cellulose esters[55]. The hydroxyl group of cellulose is replaced with methyl, carboxymethyl, and acetate groups to produce cellulose derivatives. Cellulose derivatives have different properties because of their substitution by different groups. Some properties of the original component can be retained and result in unexpected interactions between the components in the final 3D product[56], which makes them a promising option for personalized medicine. Moreover, cellulose derivatives are widely used in 3D printing TE because of their low toxicity, biodegradability, and biocompatibility (Table 3).
Table 3.
A summary of recent studies on 3D printing of cellulose derivatives-based materials for bone and cartilage TE
| Cellulose derivatives type | Ink composition | Cell lines | Bio-ink | Functions | Biomedical applications | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MC | MC/Alg/calcium phosphate cement (CPC) | Human chondrocytes (hCh) | Yes | • Increase of the ink viscosity | Bone and cartilage TE | [69] |
| MC | MC/Alg/plasma/calcium phosphate cement (CPC) | Mesenchymal stromal cells I primary osteoprogenitor cells | Yes |
|
Bone TE | [70] |
| MC | MC/Alg/non-viral vector-pDNA complexes | Mesenchymal stromal cells | Yes |
|
Bone and cartilage TE | [71] |
| CMC | CMC/glycol chitosan/ lactoferrin | MC3T3 cells/ bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells | Yes |
|
Bio-ink preparation | [81] |
| CMC | CMC/gelatin/beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) | Primary stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth | No |
|
Bone TE | [85] |
| HPMC | HPMC/calcium magnesium phosphate | None | No |
|
Bone TE | [89] |
| HPMC | HPMC-MA (hydroxy propyl methyl cellulose of methacrylation)∕silk fibroin | Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell | Yes |
|
Cartilage TE | [90] |
| HEC | HEC/ CNCs∕glycerophosphate∕ CS | Pre-osteoblast cells (MC3T3-E1) | Yes | • Enhanced gel kinetics | Bone TE | [31] |
3.1. Methylcellulose
3.1.1. Physicochemical properties and preparation of methylcellulose
Methylcellulose (MC) occupies an extremely important position among all cellulose derivatives. It is usually used as an additive in food and drugs because of its high biocompatibility[57]. MC is an ether cellulose derivative generated via the partial substitution of the three reactive hydroxyl groups of AGU (at C2, C3, and C6) in cellulose with methoxy groups. Unlike cellulose, which is insoluble in water, MC hydrogels have controlled solubility, which allows them to be widely employed in TE and regenerative medicine. The link between the structural domains generated by the hydrophilic hydroxyl groups and hydrophobic methoxy groups provides the foundation for the controllable solubility of MC. At low temperatures, the hydrophobic methoxy groups in MC interfere with the formation of hydrogen bonds between hydroxyl groups, allowing water molecules to enter the polysaccharide structure and electrostatically bind to the polar side chains, and subsequently forming hydrated layers around the methyl group (−OCH3) to reach a sol state[58]. When the temperature increases, the MC aqueous solution absorbs heat energy and the hydrogen bonds break down, resulting in intramolecular hydrophobic associations between MC molecules and the destruction of the hydrated layer. This is the basis for its use as a thermally reversible hydrogel[59]. Thermally reversible injectable MC hydrogels have been investigated for bone defect repair, using temperature changes to induce gelation, allowing the encapsulated cells to maintain their viability and stimulate osteogenesis[60]. The temperature at which the transition from sol to gel occurs for MC is defined as the lower critical solution temperature (LCST)[61]. LCST of MC hydrogels is particularly important because cell activity is highly temperature-dependent. The LCST of MC depends on a variety of variables, including concentration, degree of substitution (DS), molecular weight, sugar alcohols and anions. At the same time, the high viscosity of MC-based inks indicates good printability. It is generally accepted that 10% MC is suitable for printing, and the viscosity of MC is related to its concentration and temperature[62]. In addition, the viscosity of MC is susceptible to sterilization methods; γ-irradiation significantly reduces the viscosity and stability[63]. Owing to its properties, MC is widely used as a bio-ink for 3D bioprinting. It can be added to other 220inks to increase their printability and then removed by adjusting the LCST.
MC can be prepared in a variety of ways and is broadly classified into two types: homogeneous distribution[64] (a more regular distribution of methyl substituents along the chains) and heterogeneous distribution[65] (random distribution of the substituents). MC derivatives with DS between 1.3 and 2.5 are water soluble, while those with DS more than 2.5 are soluble in organic solvents[59].
3.1.2. MC 3D bioprinting in cartilage and bone repair
MC is applied in bone TE in three main aspects: (i) as a support ink, (ii) as a sacrificial ink, and (iii) to increase the viscosity of the blended bio-ink.
Given the low viscosity of Alg inks described earlier, MC plays a similar role to nanocellulose for printing high-fidelity scaffolds obtained by mixing with Alg[66]. Ahlfeld et al. proposed the use of a self-setting calcium phosphate cement (CPC) and Alg-MC bio-ink by multichannel 3D plotting to simulate a multilayered osteochondral tissue structure[67]. CPC is commonly accepted as the best bone replacement material because of its similarity to the mineral composition of bone and its in vivo conversion into calcium-deficient nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (HAp), which is absorbed by osteoclasts for bone reconstruction[68]. To simulate the three-layer configuration of the osteochondral region, the uppermost layer consists of a human mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)-laden Alg-MC fraction resembling the articular cartilage surface, the calcified cartilage region consists of a biphasic interwoven network of cell-laden Alg-MC and CPC, and the lowermost layer, the subchondral bone, consists of CPC. Between days 7 and 21, the cells remain highly active as they start to migrate aggressively from the Alg-MC to the CPC chain and exhibit an extended, elongated morphology[67]. Kilian et al. used human chondrocyte (hCh)-loaded Alg-MC ink together with CPC using 3D plotting to construct the osteochondral replacement scaffold described above (Figure 4A and B)[69]. A significant formation of cartilage ECM (i.e., sulfated glycosaminoglycans, collagen type II) on the scaffold was found[69].
Figure 4.

(A) Multi-layered osteochondral tissue defects require zone-specific hierarchical repair strategies. (B) Multi-channel 3D plotting allows the fabrication of artificial full-thickness osteochondral plugs[69]. Image reproduced with permission. (C) 3D multichannel plotting of the scaphoid bone consisting of CPC with mc10 as support ink[62]. Image reproduced with permission. (D) Full and section view of the designed CAD model. The channel branches from one into four channels[70]. (E) The plotted scaffold was manually perfused with undiluted phenol red solution; after perfusion, only the hydrogel was stained, evidencing perfusion through the plotted channel structure[70]. Image reproduced with permission.
Ahlfeld et al. developed an MC-based supportive hydrogel ink for 3D plotting to create clinically relevant geometries, including critical overhangs and cavities[62]. They designed MC as a support ink to co-print a human scaphoid bone model with CPC (Figure 4C) and used MC as a sacrificial ink to create the cavity[62]. As plasma contains a huge variety of angiogenic factors, in a recent study, CPC/ plasma-Alg-MC was used to print a pre-vascularized bone tissue scaffold. The plasma-Alg-MC formed the lumen wall of the constructs, and CPC was used as an external scaffold (Figure 4D and E). Cells were found to cover the surface of the lumen after 35 days[70].
221Precise temporal and spatial representation of signaling molecules, such as gene complexes, is a considerable challenge for many researchers. Researchers have sought to prepare a gene-activated bio-ink that can be combined with 3D bioprinting to engineer tissue scaffolds that can spatially and temporally control gene expression within the tissues. Gonzalez-Fernandez et al. mixed MC with Alg to obtain pore-forming bio-inks loaded with bone marrow MSCs[71]. Using MC as a sacrificial ink, the scaffold could progressively form pores and release chondrogenic molecules (combination of TGF-β3, BMP2, and SOX9) within a controlled range to facilitate early transfection of the encapsulated MSCs in vivo and in vitro. The addition of MC also improved the printability of the ink and the high fidelity of the scaffold. However, the sacrifice of MC also disrupts the mechanical properties of the scaffold, which may be challenging when grafting into bone defects that are subject to high stress.
3.2. Carboxymethyl cellulose
3.2.1. Physicochemical properties and preparation of carboxymethyl cellulose
Carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) is a water-soluble cellulose derivative obtained via chemical modification. This modification is performed by replacing the hydroxyl group on the glucopyranose chains of cellulose with carboxymethyl groups (−CH2COOH)[72]. It has a wider range of use than MCs, such as drug administration, biomedical regeneration, textiles, paper, wastewater treatment, and food products. CMC is considered a promising scaffold biomaterial for 3D bioprinting in TE because of its easy chemical modification, good viscosity, shear-thinning, and pH-responsiveness[73]. These characteristics primarily depend on the cellulose source and CMC production method[74]. The transition between sol and gel that occurs with pH changes makes them special pH-responsive hydrogels. CMC has excellent structural and mechanical stability at pH 3–10[75]. When the pH is greater than 10, the hydrogen bonds between CMC molecules are broken, resulting in a sharp decrease in the viscosity of the CMC and loss of mechanical stability; conversely, when pH is less than 3, CMC forms precipitates[76].
CMC is mainly prepared via the Williamson-ether reaction in two steps: alkylation and etherification. CMC can also be formed by generating cellulose triacetate (CTA) intermediates in a mildly acidic medium, followed by in situ esterification reactions[72].
3.2.2. CMC 3D bioprinting in cartilage and bone repair
Since the carboxyl group in CMC can act as a nucleation site for calcium ions and improve the biomineralization process, CMC is often combined with other substances to prepare bone scaffolds[77]. CMC, as a negatively charged substance, also plays an important role in TE. Chen et al. printed a composite scaffold composed of hydroxyapatite and polymers (gelatin, CS, and CMC)[78]. Positively charged CS and negatively charged CMC can establish powerful electrical interactions to enhance the mechanical properties of the scaffold. The hybrid membrane composed of CS, CMC, and hydroxyapatite exhibited good cell viability and osteocalcin expression and promoted the infiltration of bone tissue in vivo[79]. Janarthanan et al. added Schiff’s 222base reaction[80] to enhance the interaction between CMC and CS and prepared a CMC-glycolic chitosan (GC) 3D printing bio-ink[81]. The aldehyde group of CMC and amine group of GC form an imine bond (C=N) through Schiff’s base reaction, and there is also an ionic interaction between the two, which greatly improves the stability of the scaffold. The advantages of this hydrogel scaffold include the lack of any toxic chemical crosslinking agents, fast gel formation (gelation can occur in less than 40 s), and stability of the gel over a range of pH values. Furthermore, lactoferrin was loaded into the hydrogel scaffold, and the loaded bone marrow MSCs showed high activity and a tendency to differentiate. Sathish et al.[82] developed a composite trimeric bio-ink comprising gelatin, CMC, and Alg. Additionally, the electrostatic attraction caused by the positive charge of gelatin versus the negative charge of CMC enhances the mechanical characteristics of the material[83]. Simultaneously, creating the bone tissue scaffold was equally creative. The author first used 3D printing technology to make negative meniscal molds from polylactic acid filaments and then extruded composite hydrogel bio-inks loaded with MG63-osteosarcoma cells into the negative meniscal molds (Figure 5). The scaffold exhibited excellent cellular compatibility and proliferation. From day 1 to 7, as the incubation time increased, cellular growth inside the scaffold and collagen secretion from the scaffold increased. This scaffold was created by injecting a cell-loaded bio-ink into a 3D model. This method is effective for preventing cell loss resulting from shearing in conventional 3D bioprinting.
Figure 5.

Schematic representation of the preparation of GCA bio-ink and 3D scaffolds. (A) Gelatin-CMC-Alg (GCA) bio-ink loaded with MG 63 osteosarcoma cells. (B) A computer-designed polylactic acid-based meniscus negative mold was printed using 3D printing technology, and then the GCA bio-ink was extruded into the negative mold, and finally demolded to become a 3D-Bio-GCA scaffold.
Calcium phosphate has a chemical composition and structure similar to those of bones. However, its use is limited because of its mechanical strength and microporosity. A range of CMC and other cellulose-based additives have been used as binders or gelling agents to maintain cohesion in calcium phosphate formulations[84]. A study by Montelongo et al. showed that novel bioink formulations with a high β-TCP (75%) to gelatin (25%) ratio are stabilized by the addition of 3% CMC for successful 3D printing of macroporous scaffolds[85]. The scaffold had high porosity and compressive strength, and the 75% TCP+CMC composition promoted early osteogenic commitment and cell adhesion.
Mohan et al. fabricated a composite scaffold of NFC and CMC using a combination of direct ink writing (DIW) and freeze-drying (Figure 6)[86]. The scaffolds were obtained using DIW to establish large pores and then using freezedrying to obtain micropores. Finally, the mechanical properties and wet resilience of the scaffold were further improved via dehydrothermal treatment (DHT). Excellent biocompatibility and high levels of osteoblastic activity were observed on the scaffolds. DHT can not only enhance the hydrogen bond between CMC and NFC to increase the mechanical properties, but also adjust the pore size via water removal. No cellulose degradation was observed 223after DHT. Therefore, this technique may inspire pore size adjustment and mechanical property improvement of cellulose-based scaffolds.
Figure 6.

Development of 3D bioscaffolds with macroporous and interconnect microporous morphology from bicomponent ink containing NFC and CMC via the combination of DIW 3D printing, freeze-drying and DHT techniques.
3.3 Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose
Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) is also a cellulose ether derivative; however, it is available in different substitution types with limits on methoxy and hydroxypropoxy groups[87]. These groups provide various characteristics, including flexibility, hydration, gelation temperature, and LCST behavior. Moreover, in medical engineering, HPMC is mainly used as a material for encapsulating drugs[88] or as an ink tackifier in TE scaffolds[89]. Götz et al. prepared degradable bone implants using extrusion-based 3D printing with HPMC and calcium magnesium phosphate polymers[89]. The addition of HPMC increased the viscosity and shear-thinning behavior of the ink. Ni et al. integrated SF and HPMC for printing a bone marrow MSCs-laden DN hydrogel for cartilage tissue repair[90]. The β-sheet structure between SF molecules is formed via low-power ultrasonication of SF and acts as the rigid first network, whereas the HPMC-methacrylate anhydride (MAn) crosslink acts as the soft second network. HPMC modified with MA forms a tight bond between SF and HPMC-MAn because of the exposure of more hydrogen bonds that interact with the β-sheet. Simultaneously, the presence of HPMC has a synergistic effect on the gelation of SF[91]. This DN hydrogel combines the advantages of the two different hydrogels and has good mechanical properties[92]. Moreover, loaded bone marrow MSCs have high activity and proliferative tendencies. At the same time, high expression of cartilage-related genes, such as high mobility group-box gene9 (Sox 9) and collagen type II (Col II), was detected.
3.4. HEC
Owing to its excellent shear-thinning behavior and outstanding rheological properties[93], along with its biocompatibility, HEC is often used as an additive in bioengineered inks to meet the bioprinting requirements. Li et al. added HEC to several bio-inks with different crosslinks to evaluate its effects on the fidelity, degradation, and rheology of bio-inks[94]. The results show that HEC can improve the fidelity of these bio-inks without affecting their crosslinks. In addition, HEC improves the LCST of the gel, enabling 3D bioprinting at near body temperature. HEC increases the swelling rate to ensure a water-rich environment in the scaffold for increased cell activity and nutrient delivery. Therefore, HEC can be used to modify bio-inks in several ways. Maturavongsadit et al. prepared cell-laden nanocellulose/CS-based bio-inks for 3D bioprinting[31]. The authors added HEC as a gelling agent to the CS-NCC bio-ink to improve its gelation kinetics. The glyoxal groups in HEC interact with the amine group of CS via covalent crosslinking through the Schiff’s base reaction[95]. With the addition of HEC, the gelation time of this hydrogel was significantly reduced without affecting the biocompatibility of the 3D-bioprinted bone tissue scaffold.
4. Conclusion and outlook
In this review, we focus on the applications of nanocellulose and cellulose derivatives in 3D bioprinting for bone and cartilage TE. As it meets the basic requirements of bio-inks and is easily modified, nanocellulose has been widely used in 3D printing. T-NFC modified by TEMPO oxidation has a good nucleation effect on hydroxyapatite and is suitable for bone TE, while the anionic carboxylic acid group in T-NFC can form ionic crosslinks with cations to enhance the mechanical 224properties of the scaffold. NCC has the best tensile strength because it contains only crystalline regions, and is often used as a key element for improving the mechanical properties of scaffolds. BNC has the highest water content and strongest water absorption capacity for cell survival, as well as a porous nanofiber mesh structure that promotes cell adhesion, and is quite popular in 3D bioprinting. Particularly, BNC can be used as a pore size modifier for TE with different pore size requirements[96,97]. In situ and ex situ BNC modifications are well established. However, preparing well-dispersed BNC and eliminating potential endotoxins from bacteria is laborious and expensive.
Cellulose derivatives also meet the basic requirements of bio-inks and have certain advantages. MC is often cleared for final processing into complex or porous structures during TE scaffold preparation because of its biological inertness and its characteristics as a temperatureresponsive polymer. The carboxyl group in CMC can act as a nucleation site for calcium ions to improve bone mineralization. As a negatively charged polymer, it can form strong electrical interactions with positively charged polymers (e.g., CS and gelatin) to improve the fidelity of the scaffold, which is important in bone TE.
Nanocellulose and cellulose derivatives are promising candidates for the development of biologically fabricated structures. However, there is currently relatively little in vivo clinical evidence in this area. Also, their potential in this area has not yet been fully realized. For example, the temperature responsiveness of MCs or the pH responsiveness of CMCs can be exploited to prepare stimuli-responsive hydrogels suitable for 3D bioprinting. Inspired by the NCC and NFC mixed ink, the use of BNC and NCC or NFC to prepare mixed ink can be exploited in their respective emerging fields. We hope that this review will inspire researchers to design novel bio-inks based on cellulose and its derivatives for use in bone and cartilage TE.
Acknowledgments
Not applicable.
Funding
This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81871775), Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No. LBY21H060001, LGF21H060002), and Medical and Health Research Project of Zhejiang Province (NO. 2020RC115, 2020KY929).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Author contributions
Conceptualization: Lei Zhang, Guojing Yang
Writing – original draft: Lan Lin, Songli Jiang
Writing – review & editing: Jiandi Qiu, Jun Yang, Xiaoyi Jiao, Xusong Yue, Xiurong Ke
All authors agree and approve the manuscript for publication.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Availability of data
Not applicable.
References
- 1.Zhang YS, Yue K, Aleman J, et al. 3D bioprinting for tissue and organ fabrication. Ann Biomed Eng . 2017;45:148–163. doi: 10.1007/s10439-016-1612-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439–016-1612–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mota C, Camarero-Espinosa S, Baker MB, et al. Bioprinting: from tissue and organ development to in vitro models. Chem Rev . 2020;120:10547–10607. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00789. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tarassoli SP, Jessop ZM, Al-Sabah A, et al. Skin tissue engineering using 3D bioprinting: An evolving research field. J Plast Reconst Aesthet Surg . 2018;71:615–623. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2017.12.006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2017.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Alonzo M, AnilKumar S, Roman B, et al. 3D Bioprinting of cardiac tissue and cardiac stem cell therapy. Transl Res . 2019;211:64–83. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2019.04.004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trsl.2019.04.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mei Q, Rao J, Bei HP, et al. 3D bioprinting photo-crosslinkable hydrogels for bone and cartilage repair. Int J Bioprinting . 2021;7:367. doi: 10.18063/ijb.v7i3.367. https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v7i3.367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Heinrich MA, Liu W, Jimenez A, et al. 3D Bioprinting: from benches to translational applications. Small . 2019;15:e1805510. doi: 10.1002/smll.201805510. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201805510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Thomas P, Duolikun T, Rumjit NP, et al. Comprehensive review on nanocellulose: Recent developments, challenges and future prospects. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater . 2020;110:103884. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.225Piras CC, Fernández-Prieto S, De Borggraeve WM. Nanocellulosic materials as bioinks for 3D bioprinting. Biomater Sci . 2017;5:1988–1992. doi: 10.1039/c7bm00510e. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7bm00510e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Banvillet G, Depres G, Belgacem N, et al. Alkaline treatment combined with enzymatic hydrolysis for efficient cellulose nanofibrils production. Carbohydr Polym . 2021;255:117383. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Isogai A, Saito T, Fukuzumi H. TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers. Nanoscale . 2011;3:71–85. doi: 10.1039/c0nr00583e. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0nr00583e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Piras CC, Fernandez-Prieto S, De Borggraeve WM. Nanocellulosic materials as bioinks for 3D bioprinting. Biomater Sci . 2017;5:1988–1992. doi: 10.1039/c7bm00510e. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7bm00510e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Starborg T, Kalson NS, Lu Y, et al. Using transmission electron microscopy and 3View to determine collagen fibril size and three-dimensional organization. Nat Protoc . 2013;8:1433–1448. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.086. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2013.086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rouillard AD, Berglund CM, Lee JY, et al. Methods for photocrosslinking alginate hydrogel scaffolds with high cell viability. Tissue Eng C: Methods . 2011;17:173–179. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2009.0582. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEC.2009.0582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Markstedt K, Mantas A, Tournier I, et al. 3D bioprinting human chondrocytes with nanocellulosealginate bioink for cartilage tissue engineering applications. Biomacromolecules . 2015;16:1489–1496. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00188. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Trachsel L, Johnbosco C, Lang T, et al. Doublenetwork hydrogels including enzymatically crosslinked Poly-(2-alkyl-2-oxazoline)s for 3D bioprinting of cartilageengineering constructs. Biomacromolecules . 2019;20:4502–4511. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.9b01266. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.9b01266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yasuda K, Ping Gong J, Katsuyama Y, et al. Biomechanical properties of high-toughness double network hydrogels. Biomaterials . 2005;26:4468–4475. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Öztürk E, Arlov Ø, Aksel S, et al. Sulfated hydrogel matrices direct mitogenicity and maintenance of chondrocyte phenotype through activation of FGF signaling. Adv Funct Mater . 2016;26:3649–3662. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201600092. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201600092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Müller M, Öztürk E, Arlov Ø, et al. Alginate Sulfatenanocellulose bioinks for cartilage bioprinting applications. Ann Biomed Eng . 2017;45:210–223. doi: 10.1007/s10439-016-1704-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Apelgren P, Amoroso M, Lindahl A, et al. Chondrocytes and stem cells in 3D-bioprinted structures create human cartilage in vivo. PloS One . 2017;12:e0189428. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189428. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Morimune-Moriya S, Kondo S, Sugawara-Narutaki A, et al. Hydroxyapatite formation on oxidized cellulose nanofibers in a solution mimicking body fluid. Polym J . 2014;47:158–163. https://doi.org/10.1038/pj.2014.127. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Abouzeid RE, Khiari R, Beneventi D, et al. Biomimetic mineralization of three-dimensional printed Alginate/ TEMPO-Oxidized cellulose nanofibril scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules . 2018;19:4442–4452. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.8b01325. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.8b01325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Im S, Choe G, Seok JM, et al. An osteogenic bioink composed of alginate, cellulose nanofibrils, and polydopamine nanoparticles for 3D bioprinting and bone tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol . 2022;205:520–529. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.02.012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ojansivu M, Vanhatupa S, Björkvik L, et al. Bioactive glass ions as strong enhancers of osteogenic differentiation in human adipose stem cells. Acta Biomater . 2015;21:190–203. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.04.017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2015.04.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ojansivu M, Rashad A, Ahlinder A, et al. Wood-based nanocellulose and bioactive glass modified gelatin-alginate bioinks for 3D bioprinting of bone cells. Biofabrication . 2019;11:035010. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ab0692. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758–5090/ab0692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Monfared M, Mawad D, Rnjak-Kovacina J, et al. 3D bioprinting of dual-crosslinked nanocellulose hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. J Mater Chem B . 2021;9:6163–6175. doi: 10.1039/d1tb00624j. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1tb00624j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Mtibe A, Linganiso LZ, Mathew AP, et al. A comparative study on properties of micro and nanopapers produced from cellulose and cellulose nanofibres. Carbohydr Polym . 2015;118:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.10.007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Karimian A, Parsian H, Majidinia M, et al. Nanocrystalline cellulose: Preparation, physicochemical properties, and applications in drug delivery systems. Int J Biol Macromol . 2019;133:850–859. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.04.117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.04.117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Murizan NIS, Mustafa NS, Ngadiman NHA, et al. Review on nanocrystalline cellulose in bone tissue engineering applications. Polymers . 2020;12:2818. doi: 10.3390/polym12122818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.226Osorio DA, Lee BEJ, Kwiecien JM, et al. Cross-linked cellulose nanocrystal aerogels as viable bone tissue scaffolds. Acta Biomater . 2019;87:165–165. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.01.049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.01.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wang K, Nune KC, Misra RD. The functional response of alginate-gelatin-nanocrystalline cellulose injectable hydrogels toward delivery of cells and bioactive molecules. Acta Biomater . 2016;36:143–151. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.03.016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Maturavongsadit P, Narayanan LK, Chansoria P, et al. Cell-laden nanocellulose/chitosan-based bioinks for 3D bioprinting and enhanced osteogenic cell differentiation. ACS Appl Bio Mater . 2021;4:2342–2353. doi: 10.1021/acsabm.0c01108. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.0c01108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Murphy WL, McDevitt TC, Engler AJ. Materials as stem cell regulators. Nat Mater . 2014;13:547–557. doi: 10.1038/nmat3937. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Dutta SD, Hexiu J, Patel DK, et al. 3D-printed bioactive and biodegradable hydrogel scaffolds of alginate/ gelatin/cellulose nanocrystals for tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol . 2021;167:644–658. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.12.011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Patel DK, Dutta SD, Shin WC, et al. Fabrication and characterization of 3D printable nanocellulose-based hydrogels for tissue engineering. RSC Adv . 2021;11:7466–7478. doi: 10.1039/d0ra09620b. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ra09620b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hosseinidoust Z, Alam MN, Sim G, et al. Cellulose nanocrystals with tunable surface charge for nanomedicine. Nanoscale . 2015;7:16647–16657. doi: 10.1039/c5nr02506k. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5nr02506k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Nelson KIM, Retsina T. Innovative nanocellulose process breaks the cost barrier. TAPPI J . 2014;13:19–23. https://doi.org/10.32964/tj13.5.19. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Jessop ZM, Al-Sabah A, Gao N, et al. Printability of pulp derived crystal, fibril and blend nanocellulose-alginate bioinks for extrusion 3D bioprinting. Biofabrication . 2019;11:045006. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ab0631. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758–5090/ab0631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Barna M, Niswander L. Visualization of cartilage formation: insight into cellular properties of skeletal progenitors and chondrodysplasia syndromes. Dev Cell . 2007;12:931–941. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.04.016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2007.04.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Williams WS, Cannon RE. Alternative environmental roles for cellulose produced by acetobacter xylinum. Appl Environ Microbiol . 1989;55:2448–2452. doi: 10.1128/aem.55.10.2448-2452.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Dugan JM, Gough JE, Eichhorn SJ. Bacterial cellulose scaffolds and cellulose nanowhiskers for tissue engineering. Nanomedicine Lond . 2013;8:287–298. doi: 10.2217/nnm.12.211. https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm.12.211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Swingler S, Gupta A, Gibson H, et al. Recent advances and applications of bacterial cellulose in biomedicine. Polymers . 2021;13:412. doi: 10.3390/polym13030412. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13030412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Salgado L, Blank S, Esfahani RAM, et al. Missense mutations in a transmembrane domain of the Komagataeibacter xylinus BcsA lead to changes in cellulose synthesis. BMC Microbiol . 2019;19:216. doi: 10.1186/s12866-019-1577-5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866–019-1577–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ishikawa A, Matsuoka M, Tsuchida T, et al. Increase in cellulose production by sulfaguanidine-resistant mutants derived fromacetobacter xylinumsubsp.sucrofermentans. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem . 2014;59:2259–2262. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.59.2259. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Stumpf TR, Yang X, Zhang J, et al. In situ and ex situ modifications of bacterial cellulose for applications in tissue engineering. Mat Sci Eng C Mater biol Appl . 2018;82:372–383. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.11.121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.11.121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zaborowska M, Bodin A, Bäckdahl H, et al. Microporous bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for bone regeneration. Acta Biomater . 2010;6:2540–2547. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.01.004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Fang B, Wan YZ, Tang TT, et al. Proliferation and osteoblastic differentiation of human bone marrow stromal cells on hydroxyapatite/bacterial cellulose nanocomposite scaffolds. Tissue Eng Part A . 2009;15:1091–1098. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0110. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Krontiras P, Gatenholm P, Hägg DA. Adipogenic differentiation of stem cells in three-dimensional porous bacterial nanocellulose scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl biomater . 2015;103:195–203. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.33198. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.33198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Bian H, Chen L, Dai H, et al. Integrated production of lignin containing cellulose nanocrystals (LCNC) and nanofibrils (LCNF) using an easily recyclable di-carboxylic acid. Carbohydr Polym . 2017;167:167–176. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.03.050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.03.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Wang X, Tang S, Chai S, et al. Preparing printable bacterial cellulose based gelatin gel to promote in vivo bone regeneration. Carbohydr Polym . 2021;270:118342. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kondo T, Kose R, Naito H, et al. Aqueous counter collision using paired water jets as a novel means of preparing bio-nanofibers. Carbohydr Polym . 2014;112:284–290. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.05.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.227Apelgren P, Karabulut E, Amoroso M, et al. In vivo human cartilage formation in three-dimensional bioprinted constructs with a novel bacterial nanocellulose bioink. ACS Biomater Sci Eng . 2019;5:2490–2490. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00157. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Huang L, Du X, Fan S, et al. Bacterial cellulose nanofibers promote stress and fidelity of 3D-printed silk based hydrogel scaffold with hierarchical pores. Carbohydr polym . 2019;221:146–156. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.05.080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.05.080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Matsiko A, Gleeson JP, O’Brien FJ. Scaffold mean pore size influences mesenchymal stem cell chondrogenic differentiation and matrix deposition. Tissue Eng Part A . 2015;21:486–497. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2013.0545. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEA.2013.0545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Arca HC, Mosquera-Giraldo LI, Bi V, et al. Pharmaceutical Applications of Cellulose Ethers and Cellulose Ether Esters. Biomacromolecules . 2018;19:2351–2376. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.8b00517. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.8b00517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Ratanakamnuan U, Atong D, Aht-Ong D. Cellulose esters from waste cotton fabric via conventional and microwave heating. Carbohydr Polym . 2012;87:84–94. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.07.016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Yang J, An X, Liu L, et al. Cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, and their derivatives as multi-components of bio-based feedstocks for 3D printing. Carbohydr Polym . 2020;250:116881. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Ahlfeld T, Guduric V, Duin S, et al. Methylcellulose - a versatile printing material that enables biofabrication of tissue equivalents with high shape fidelity. Biomater Sci . 2020;8:2102–2110. doi: 10.1039/d0bm00027b. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0bm00027b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Bonetti L, De Nardo L, Farè S. Thermo-responsive methylcellulose hydrogels: from design to applications as smart biomaterials. Tissue Eng Part B Rev . 2021;27:486–153. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2020.0202. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEB.2020.0202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Nasatto P, Pignon F, Silveira J, et al. Methylcellulose, a cellulose derivative with original physical properties and extended applications. Polymers . 2015;7:777–803. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym7050777. [Google Scholar]
- 60.Kim MH, Kim BS, Park H, et al. Injectable methylcellulose hydrogel containing calcium phosphate nanoparticles for bone regeneration. Int J Biol Macromol . 2018;109:57–64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.12.068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.12.068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Altomare L, Bonetti L, Campiglio CE, et al. Biopolymer-based strategies in the design of smart medical devices and artificial organs. Int J Artif Organs . 2018;41:337–359. doi: 10.1177/0391398818765323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Ahlfeld T, Köhler T, Czichy C, et al. A methylcellulose hydrogel as support for 3D plotting of complex shaped calcium phosphate scaffolds. Gels (Basel, Switzerland) . 2018;4:68. doi: 10.3390/gels4030068. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels4030068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Hodder E, Duin S, Kilian D, et al. Investigating the effect of sterilisation methods on the physical properties and cytocompatibility of methyl cellulose used in combination with alginate for 3D-bioplotting of chondrocytes. J Mater Scimater Med . 2019;30:10. doi: 10.1007/s10856-018-6211-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856–018-6211–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Ke H, Zhou J, Zhang L. Structure and physical properties of methylcellulose synthesized in NaOH/urea solution. Polym Bull . 2006;56:349–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289–006-0507–5. [Google Scholar]
- 65.de Carvalho Oliveira G, Filho GR, Vieira JG, et al. Synthesis and application of methylcellulose extracted from waste newspaper in CPV-ARI Portland cement mortars. J Appl Poly Sci . 2010;118:1380–1385. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.32477. [Google Scholar]
- 66.Schütz K, Placht AM, Paul B, et al. Three-dimensional plotting of a cell-laden alginate/methylcellulose blend: towards biofabrication of tissue engineering constructs with clinically relevant dimensions. J Tissue Engregen Med . 2017;11:1574–1587. doi: 10.1002/term.2058. https://doi.org/10.1002/term.2058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Ahlfeld T, Doberenz F, Kilian D, et al. Bioprinting of mineralized constructs utilizing multichannel plotting of a self-setting calcium phosphate cement and a cell-laden bioink. Biofabrication . 2018;10:045002. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/aad36d. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758–5090/aad36d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Bernhardt A, Schumacher M, Gelinsky M. Formation of osteoclasts on calcium phosphate bone cements and polystyrene depends on monocyte isolation conditions. Tissue Eng Part C Methods . 2015;21:160–170. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2014.0187. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEC.2014.0187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Kilian D, Ahlfeld T, Akkineni AR, et al. 3D Bioprinting of osteochondral tissue substitutes - in vitro-chondrogenesis in multi-layered mineralized constructs. Sci Rep . 2020;10:8277. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65050-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598–020-65050–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Ahlfeld T, Cubo-Mateo N, Cometta S, et al. A novel plasma-based bioink stimulates cell proliferation and differentiation in bioprinted, mineralized constructs. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces . 2020;12:12557–12572. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c00710. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c00710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Gonzalez-Fernandez T, Rathan S, Hobbs C, et al. Pore-forming bioinks to enable spatio-temporally defined gene delivery in bioprinted tissues. JCR . 2019;301:13–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.228Rahman MS, Hasan MS, Nitai AS, et al. Recent developments of carboxymethyl cellulose. Polymers . 2021;13:1345. doi: 10.3390/polym13081345. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13081345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Zennifer A, Senthilvelan P, Sethuraman S, et al. Key advances of carboxymethyl cellulose in tissue engineering & 3D bioprinting applications. Carbohydr Poly . 2021;256:117561. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Rachtanapun P, Jantrawut P, Klunklin W, et al. Carboxymethyl bacterial cellulose from nata de coco: effects of NaOH. Polymers . 2021;13:348. doi: 10.3390/polym13030348. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13030348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Gaihre B, Jayasuriya AC. Fabrication and characterization of carboxymethyl cellulose novel microparticles for bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl . 2016;69:733–743. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.07.060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.07.060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Mallakpour S, Tukhani M, Hussain CM. Recent advancements in 3D bioprinting technology of carboxymethyl cellulose-based hydrogels: Utilization in tissue engineering. Adv Colloid Interface Sci . 2021;292:102415. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2021.102415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2021.102415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Singh BN, Panda NN, Mund R, et al. Carboxymethyl cellulose enables silk fibroin nanofibrous scaffold with enhanced biomimetic potential for bone tissue engineering application. Carbohydr Poly . 2016;151:335–347. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.05.088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.05.088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Chen S, Shi Y, Zhang X, et al. 3D printed hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds with enhanced mechanical properties. Ceram Int . 2019;45:10991–10996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.02.182. [Google Scholar]
- 79.Jiang H, Zuo Y, Zou Q, et al. Biomimetic spiral-cylindrical scaffold based on hybrid chitosan/cellulose/nano-hydroxyapatite membrane for bone regeneration. ACS App Mater Interfaces . 2013;5:12036–12044. doi: 10.1021/am4038432. https://doi.org/10.1021/am4038432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Resmi R, Parvathy J, John A, et al. Injectable selfcrosslinking hydrogels for meniscal repair: A study with oxidized alginate and gelatin. Carbohydr Poly . 2020;234:115902. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.115902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.115902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Janarthanan G, Tran HN, Cha E, et al. 3D printable and injectable lactoferrin-loaded carboxymethyl celluloseglycol chitosan hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. Mat Sci Eng . 2020;113:111008. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.111008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.P BS, S G, J P, et al. Tricomposite gelatin-carboxymethylcellulose-alginate bioink for direct and indirect 3D printing of human knee meniscal scaffold. Intbiol Macromol . 2022;195:179–189. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.11.184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Duhoranimana E, Karangwa E, Lai L, et al. Effect of sodium carboxymethyl cellulose on complex coacervates formation with gelatin: Coacervates characterization, stabilization and formation mechanism. Food Hydrocoll . 2017;69:111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2017.01.035. [Google Scholar]
- 84.Kobayashi H, Fujishiro T, Belkoff SM, et al. Longterm evaluation of a calcium phosphate bone cement with carboxymethyl cellulose in a vertebral defect model. J Biomedmater Res A . 2009;88:880–888. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.31933. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.31933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Montelongo SA, Chiou G, Ong JL, et al. Development of bioinks for 3D printing microporous, sintered calcium phosphate scaffolds. J Mater Sci Mater Med . 2021;32:94. doi: 10.1007/s10856-021-06569-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856–021-06569–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Mohan T, Dobaj Stiglic A, Beaumont M, et al. Generic method for designing self-standing and dual porous 3d bioscaffolds from cellulosic nanomaterials for tissue engineering applications. ACS Appl Bio Mater . 2020;3:1197–1209. doi: 10.1021/acsabm.9b01099. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.9b01099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Al-Tabakha MM. HPMC capsules: current status and future prospects. JPPS . 2010;13:428–442. doi: 10.18433/j3k881. https://doi.org/10.18433/j3k881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Koehl NJ, Shah S, Tenekam ID, et al. Lipid based formulations in hard gelatin and hpmc capsules: a physical compatibility study. Pharm Res . 2021;38:1439–1454. doi: 10.1007/s11095-021-03088-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095–021-03088–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Götz LM, Holeczek K, Groll J, et al. Extrusion-based 3D printing of calcium magnesium phosphate cement pastes for degradable bone implants. Materials (Basel, Switzerland) . 2021;14:5197. doi: 10.3390/ma14185197. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14185197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Ni T, Liu M, Zhang Y, et al. 3D Bioprinting of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-laden silk fibroin double network scaffolds for cartilage tissue repair. Bioconjug Chem . 2020;31:1938–1947. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.0c00298. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.0c00298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Luo K, Yang Y, Shao Z. Physically crosslinked biocompatible silk-fibroin-based hydrogels with high mechanical performance. Adv Funct Mater . 2016;26:872–880. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201503450. [Google Scholar]
- 92.Gong JP. Why are double network hydrogels so tough? Soft Matter . 2010;6:2583–2590. https://doi.org/10.1039/b924290b. [Google Scholar]
- 93.Maestro A, González C, Gutiérrez JM. Shear thinning and thixotropy of HMHEC and HEC water solutions. J Rheol . 2002;46:1445–1457. [Google Scholar]
- 94.229Li X, Deng Q, Wang S, et al. Hydroxyethyl cellulose as a rheological additive for tuning the extrusion printability and scaffold properties. 3D Prin Add Man . 2021;8:87–98. doi: 10.1089/3dp.2020.0167. https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2020.0167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Maturavongsadit P, Paravyan G, Shrivastava R, et al. Thermo-/pH-responsive chitosan-cellulose nanocrystals based hydrogel with tunable mechanical properties for tissue regeneration applications. Mater . 2020;12:100681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtla.2020.100681. [Google Scholar]
- 96.Cakmak AM, Unal S, Sahin A, et al. 3D printed polycaprolactone/gelatin/bacterial cellulose/hydroxyapatite composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Poly . 2020;12:1962. doi: 10.3390/polym12091962. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12091962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Aki D, Ulag S, Unal S, et al. 3D printing of PVA/ hexagonal boron nitride/bacterial cellulose composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Mater Des . 2020;196:109094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109094. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
