In the published article, there was an error in Figure 9. Figure 9 should have been a bar graph of RT-qPCR, but since the relative expression trends of RT-qPCR are the same to that of RNA-seq, we unintentionally put the bar graph of gene expression from RNA-seq in Figure 9. We have corrected Figure 9 to a combined graph from the gene expression of RT-qPCR and RNA-seq.
Figure 9.
Correlation of the expression between miRNAs and the hub genes at eight durations of different drought treatments (25% PEG solution PEG6000). bdi-miR408-5p_1ss19TA target CCX1(A, B); osa-miR444a-3p.2 target MADS47 (C, D); bdi-miR528-p3_2ss15TG20CA target HOX24 (E, F); tae-miR9774_L-2R-1_1ss11GT target carC (G, H); and ata-miR169a-3p target PAO2 (I, J).
In the last sentence of “Correlation analysis of miRNAs and their candidate hub genes for drought resistance”, “The relative expression of tae-miR9774_ L-2R-1_ 1ss11GT increased overall, but the relative expression of its target genes decreased”, the first “increased” should be “decreased”, and “but the relative expression of its target genes decreased” should be removed.
The corrected sentence appears below:
“The relative expression of tae-miR9774_ L-2R-1_ 1ss11GT and target gene carC decreased overall”.
The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.