Abstract
After the COVID-19 pandemic, telepharmacy has become increasingly widely used as an alternative to pharmaceutical care by remote pharmacists. Patients with diabetes mellitus are one of the patients who get benefit the most from telepharmacy practices, which allow patients to consult without meeting face to face and minimize the risk of virus transmission. The authors conduct an assessment of the benefits and limitations of using telepharmacy that are used throughout the world and then hopes that they can become a reference in the development of telepharmacy in the future. A total of 23 relevant articles were used for analysis in this narrative review after searching for articles in three sources, including PubMed, Google Scholar and ClinicalTrials.gov, until October 2022. This narrative review shows that telepharmacy plays an important role in improving clinical outcomes, patient therapy adherence and reduce the number of patient visit and hospitalization, but telepharmacy also has limitations in its use related to security and privacy, as well as pharmacist intervention that has not been maximized. However, telepharmacy has great potential to facilitate diabetes mellitus patients in pharmaceutical services.
Keywords: diabetes mellitus, telepharmacy, benefits, limitations, pharmacist, COVID-19
Introduction
The application of information and communication technology in the health sector is currently being widely used, especially since the COVID-19 pandemic.1 The provision of health services through information technology is proven to help ease the burden on the health sector. One of them is telepharmacy. Telepharmacy has been highlighted as an effective and innovative strategy to help overcome this problem.2 The National Association of Boards of Pharmacy in the United States defines telepharmacy as the provision of pharmacist care to patients remotely by registered pharmacists using telecommunications. Telepharmacy allows pharmacists with remote access to efficiently contribute their clinical expertise to multiple clinics and patients, while alleviating the strain on healthcare resources.3–5
Several telepharmacy services include clinical pharmacy services, patient consultation and monitoring, drug selection counseling, prescription checks, and dispensing. Telepharmacy services are very helpful for people with long-term illnesses who take medications regularly and need to see a physician.6 Telepharmacy has been shown to potentially be used as an alternative method of dealing with drug-related problems in diabetic patients because it is able to provide quality pharmaceutical services to remote areas and reach patients who are located far from hospitals, clinics, pharmacies or other health care facilities.7 Although, it has many benefits, there are still many limitations in the development and use of telepharmacy technology in society, especially in patients with diabetes mellitus. In this literature review, the authors discuss and evaluate the applications, benefits and limitations of using telepharmacy for diabetic patients so that they can become a reference and consideration in the development of telepharmacy.
Methods
We conducted a search for journals with the keywords “Diabetes Mellitus”, “Telepharmacy”, “Telephone”, and “Pharmacist” in three journal sources: PubMed, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov. This narrative review was prepared based on studies related to the implementation of pharmaceutical services for outpatients with diabetes mellitus using communication technology. Selection Criteria: The authors use all original research and clinical reports published from 2012 to October 2022 regarding telepharmacy in diabetes mellitus outpatients and select research articles that explain the practice of pharmaceutical services by pharmacists through information technology, either via fax, email, messages, telephone, or special tools. The authors exclude irrelevant articles, which are the results of telepharmacy research, but the results do not evaluate the effect on the health of research subjects, research articles that do not clearly state the role of pharmacists in interventions, and other sources such as book chapters, article abstracts only, conference reports, reviews, posters, discussion results, and articles that only contain research designs. All of the articles identified were examined by authors G.N.I, K.M.E and S.A.R for inclusion. The findings were later discussed by the authors to reach a consensus. The procedure for selecting research articles is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow chart of literature search.
Results
Of the total number of articles found, 23 articles passed the selection process and could be used in the analysis, all of which are written in English. Twenty-three selected articles reported on the use of telepharmacy in patients with diabetes mellitus in countries including the United States, Denmark, Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, Iran, Jordan, Taiwan, the United Kingdom, Ethiopia and Brazil. The scope of the implementation of telepharmacy includes counseling, monitoring patient therapy, prescription reviews, and dispensing.
Most of the research articles generally use the telephone as an information technology used in conducting pharmaceutical services, but some use web-based programs, special devices, and via messages or e-mail. Telepharmacy contributes to the improvement of pharmaceutical services in diabetes mellitus outpatients who require regular monitoring to avoid drug-related problems and unwanted side effects.
Of the 23 articles analyzed, 21 articles explained that telepharmacy services were in the form of counseling to monitor patient adherence and clinical outcomes. Counseling through telepharmacy is proven to be an effective form of pharmaceutical services with significant improvements in clinical outcomes and patient therapy adherence. However, the telepharmacy has many obstacles and limitations, such as, the lack of education and training for patients in telepharmacy services, especially in telepharmacy with special devices.
Data and explanations regarding the application, benefits, and limitations of using telepharmacy in diabetes mellitus outpatients are shown in Table 1.
Table 1.
Application, Benefits and Limitations of Telepharmacy in Diabetes Mellitus
| Citation | Study Design | Purposes | Model of Pharmaceutical Services | Description of Intervention | Sample Size | Strength | Limitation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jarab et al (2012), Jordan37 | RCT | To evaluate the impact of clinical pharmacist-led pharmaceutical program on clinical outcomes and self-behaviour | Counseling | Counseling and follow-up via telephone for 8 weeks | 156 | Significant improvement in the intervention group on fasting blood glucose levels, blood pressure, total cholesterol, LDL-C, serum triglycerides, and medication adherence | There was no significant reduction in smoking behavior due to the lack of interventions given |
| McFarland et al (2012), USA41 | RCT | To compare the effect of medication therapy management by clinical pharmacy specialist who use Care Coordination Home Telehealth (CCHT) with clinical pharmacist who did not use CCHT | Counseling, home pharmacy care | Monitoring and communication using messaging device to monitor blood glucose and follow-up telephone with clinical pharmacy specialist | 103 | HbA1c decreased <7% in 69% of the intervention group | Device purchase costs are needed, training and device use training are needed for patients |
| Odegard et al (2012), USA17 | RCT | To evaluate the impact of intervention on medication adherence for diabetic patients | Counseling | Telephone-initiated adherence support by pharmacist following computer-generated missed refill alerts | 265 | Telepharmacy made a significant change in the patient’s MPR value at the 12th month of intervention | Not identified |
| O’Conno r et al (2014), USA18 | RCT | To evaluate the impact of intervention on medication adherence | Home pharmacy care, counseling | Monitoring, follow-up, education and reminders to take medication via telephone for 2–6 weeks | 2378 | The decrease in HbA1c value and increase in adherence to therapy were not significant between the the intervention group and the control group | Counseling and follow-up via telephone only takes an average of 5 minutes |
| Olesen et al (2014), Denmark42 | RCT | To investigate the impact of pharmaceutical care on medication adherence, hospitalitation and mortality of elderly | Home pharmacy care, counseling | Visits by the pharmacist for education and telephone follow-up at 3, 6 and 9 months | 517 | No significant differences in medication adherence, mortality and hospitalisation between intervention and control groups | Prescription by fax does not go well |
| Jyun et al (2015), Taiwan34 | RCT | To assess change in HbA1c levels and medical expenses | Home pharmacy care, counseling | Monitoring and follow-up treatment via telephone | 100 | A significant decrease in HbA1C levels | There is no significant reduction in costs |
| Shane McWhorter et al (2015), USA24 | RCT | To assess clinical outcomes and measurements with the use of telemonitoring device | Home pharmacy care, counselling | Monitoring daily blood glucose and blood pressure, and follow-up phone calls by pharmacist | 150 |
|
Costs are required to purchase equipment, patients who are rarely exposed to technology can experience difficulties |
| Jahangard-Rafsanjani et al (2015), Iran13 | RCT | To investigate the efficacy of pharmacist-delivered diabetes support for patients in middle-income country | Counseling and Home pharmacy care | Monthly visits and follow-up calls to strengthen adherence to therapy and resolve drug therapy problems and provide diabetes education (diet, use of blood glucose monitoring devices) | 85 |
|
Not identified |
| Aguiar et al (2016), Brazil33 | RCT | To evaluate the effect of a pharmacist-physician collaborative care model on clinical outcomes for patients with uncontrolled type 2 diaates | Home-care Pharmacy and Counseling | Telephone consultation, and monitoring medication therapy adherence | 80 | Counseling and monitoring of therapy resulted in significant improvement in clinical assessment (HbA1C, and blood sugar,) with no change in the consumption of anti-diabetic drugs | Not identified |
| Lee et al (2017), Malaysia40 | RCT | To examine the effects of telemonitoring program with feedback in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients fasting during Ramadhan | Home pharmacy care | Using a web-enabled glucometer (MyGlucoHealth) to monitor patient’s blood glucose and messages alert | 85 | In the intervention group, patients had lower hypoglycaemia situation, and decrease in HbA1c reaching 1.07%. | Training and guidance is required for the use of tools, the cost of purchasing tools |
| Lyons et al (2017), UK16 | RCT | To test the effectiveness of pharmacist-led service to improve medication adherence | Counseling and Home pharmacy care | Telephone consultation with pharmacist, medicines reminder chart | 677 | Medication adherence reached ≥90% in the intervention group, Achievement of HbA1c values (<7%) reached 66.7% | Not identified |
| Siaw et al (2017), Taiwan45 | Randomized controlled cross-over study | To evaluate the impact of mHealth clinical pharmacist on HbA1c, blood pressure and LDL in African-American and Latinos diabetic patients | Counseling | Phone consultation with clinical pharmacist regularly | 411 |
Average cost savings US$ 91.01 per patient |
Not identified |
| Erku et al (2017), Ethiopia14 | RCT | To evaluate the impact of intervention on medication adherence, and hospital admissions in patients with type 2 DM | Drug therapy monitoring, counseling | Medication therapy management to review patient’s medication regimen, customized education, and education on health promoting behaviors, and regular telephone counselling | 127 |
|
Not identified |
| Choudhry et al (2018), USA35 | RCT | To evaluate the effect of intervention to improve medication adherence | Counseling | Telephone consultation | 4078 | 10% increase in diabetes mellitus outpatient adherence | Imbalance of pharmacist workload with salary received |
| Sarayani et al (2018), Iran44 | RCT | To evaluate the efficacy of a telephone based intervention to improve clinical outcomes in type 2 DM | Counseling | Consultation by phone calls with trained pharmacist for 3 months | 84 | Telepharmacy has a significant effect on reducing HbA1c levels and medication adherence scores | Not identified |
| Cohen et al (2019), USA29 | RCT | To determine the effect of pharmacist-led telehealth for improving diabetes medication adherence | Counseling | Special electronic device (The Health Buddy) and telephone-based consultation | 30 | Significant improvement in adherence to therapy and HbA1c values | The Health Buddy device requires a landline telephone and a three-prong power plug to operate |
| Lauffenburger et al (2019), USA12 | RCT | To evaluate the impact of telephone-based intervention on HbA1C for poorly-controlled diabetic patients | Counseling | Telephone consultation and monitoring on medication adherence, lifestyle modifications, and treatment intensification for 12 months | 1400 | Significant change in HbA1c value, no significant change in medication adherence | Assistance by pharmacists in controlling diet and exercise is inadequate, lifestyle change assistance by pharmacists has not been fully accepted by patients. |
| Lauffenburger et al (2019), USA39 | RCT | To evaluate whether delivering more intensive insulin-adherence interventions was more effective than delivering a lower-intensity intervention | Counseling |
|
5596 | Significant blood sugar control in the high intensity intervention group | The group that received moderate intensity had more emergency visits and hospitalization than the low intensity group |
| Peasah et al (2019), USA43 | Prospective, RCT | To evaluate the effectiveness of student pharmacist led telephone follow up to improve HbA1c | Counseling, Pemantauan Terapi Obat | Weekly phone call fo 12 weeks to monitor medication adherence, side effects and DRP | 78 | The telepharmacy given had the effect of reducing HbA1c levels by 0.35% in the intervention group | Not identified |
| McConnell et al (2020), USA36 | RCT | To test the impact of connecting physicians and pharmacists to address medication adherence | Counseling | Counseling via telephone to follow up patient medication adherence | 2602 | No significant improvement in patient medication adherence | The challenge of communication between physicians and pharmacists to be able to provide the right information to address adherence issues |
| Arain et al (2021), USA15 | RCT | To examine the effectiveness of an in-home electronic medication dispensing system (MDS) on improving medication adherence and health perception | Dispensing | Use of non-surgical devices in the form of pre-packaged medication administration on time with medication administration reminders. | 50 | Drug delivery technology can improve medication adherence in adults | The risk of MDS not functioning properly, the user does not clearly understand the function of the device |
| Tourkmani et al (2021), Saudi Arabia10 | Prospective single cohort pre/post intervention | To assess the impact of virtual clinics on glycaemic control among patients with type 2 DM | Counseling | Medication counseling and therapeutic interventions using virtual clinic by telephone | Not mentioned | Significant decrease in HbA1c values from 9.98 ± 1.33 pre intervention to 8.32 ± 1.31 post intervention, decreased patient visits to the hospital in 64% of the patients. |
|
| Khan et al (2022), Saudi Arabia38 | RCT | To evaluate the impact of pharmacist-based diabetic intervention on disease knowledge, medication adherence and self-care management | Counseling | Counseling and monitoring via telepharmacy services (calls, messages or emails) for 6 months | 109 |
|
Not identified |
Abbreviation: RCT, randomized controlled trial.
Discussion and Future Perspectives
The use of information and communication technology in health practice is increasing, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic took place.8 The practice of pharmacy through telepharmacy has been carried out since 2000 in the United States for asthma patients.9 Telepharmacy has proven to be an innovative new approach to providing pharmaceutical services, both independently and in multidisciplinary care, by pharmacists.10 Over time, forms of service through telepharmacy are becoming increasingly diverse and are applied to various patient conditions. Outpatients with diabetes mellitus are one of the groups that can benefit the most from telepharmacy because they need to be checked on regularly by pharmacists and other health workers.11 Patients with diabetes mellitus who use telepharmacy have shown better clinical outcomes and better adherence to therapy. Because of this, our study focuses on the benefits, advantages, and drawbacks of telepharmacy practice in outpatients with diabetes mellitus.
Our study shows that telepharmacy in patients with diabetes mellitus has been widely used in various countries with various forms of service in prescribing, drug administration, counseling, drug therapy monitoring, therapy adherence monitoring, dispensing, and patient activity management. The results of this study show that telepharmacy services have a lot of potential, especially for outpatients with diabetes mellitus.
Telepharmacy Benefits
Telepharmacy can help provide convenience while improving the quality of drug use, especially in terms of patient therapy compliance. This is due to the pharmaceutical services provided by clinical pharmacists in providing education about the drug therapy currently being used by patients,12–14 regular reminders of when to take drugs,15–18 and regular follow-up calls by pharmacists so that patients become more aware of the therapy they are currently undergoing.
Telepharmacy has also helped cut down on the number of hospitalizations and doctor visits that patients have to make.10,14 This could be because pharmacists use pharmaceutical care plans and services, which include preventing and treating problems with drug therapy that can lead to serious problems and the need to stay in the hospital.19 Several similar studies also found that pharmacist-led self-care counseling and training cut down on the number of hospitalizations and complications caused by diabetes.20
Several studies examining the effectiveness of telepharmacy services in the COVID-19 era show that telepharmacy improves drug delivery practices, helping to improve patient access to pharmaceutical services.21,22 Therefore, the fact that telepharmacy exists can help make up for the lack of pharmacists in rural or remote areas, where diabetic patients and other patients can easily get access to pharmaceutical services.23 In addition, telepharmacy also offers a more comfortable environment for pharmacists and patients to consult with patients without the risk of transmitting viruses.22
Significant improvements in dietary and physical activity behaviors were also seen with the use of telepharmacy, which is likely due to the provision of education and educational materials regarding types and proportions of healthy diets and encouraging patients to engage in regular physical activity.13,24
Telepharmacy Limitations
Telepharmacy practice, which is now widely used, still has some limitations. Consultation and counseling by pharmacists through telepharmacy focus more on improving patient adherence and clinical outcomes, not many telepharmacies provide education and information about self-management and self-activity of diabetes mellitus patients such as education about foot care, smoking, diet management, and weight reduction. There is a strong relationship between patient knowledge about the disease and medication adherence. It is hypothesized that well-informed patients have a better understanding of their disease and treatment process.25
Compared to traditional pharmaceutical services, telepharmacy is more vulnerable to privacy and security risks.26 For the broader application of telepharmacy, there are concerns about the privacy and security of the telehealth system. The telepharmacy provider must be responsible for ensuring regulatory compliance, patient confidentiality, and system security at all times. In addition to knowledge of the legal aspects of telepharmacy,27 it is important for providers to know and practice telepharmacy ethics. These ethical standards must be observed when pharmacists work remotely from home or make outpatient visits at their respective residences.28
Some of the telepharmacy services provided also require special devices that are usually used to monitor the patient’s daily blood sugar levels,15,29 telepharmacy that uses special devices also needs to provide comprehensive training to patients before using these devices, considering that diabetes mellitus patients are usually in their old age and are rarely exposed to technology, so they may experience difficulties.
With the rapid advancement of technology in the health sector, education on telepharmacy is very important, not only for pharmacists but also for patients. To get more people to use it, a formal continuing education program could keep pharmacists up to date on how telepharmacy is used today.30–32
Future Developments
Going forward, many steps need to be done to ensure the use of telepharmacy services growing and getting better. Pharmacist associations and pharmacists need to advocate for laws and regulations regarding telepharmacy that can guarantee security, privacy and legacy. Telepharmacy education not only for pharmacists but also for patients is also very important, the more telepharmacy education the more telepharmacy can be used widely. To facilitate communication between pharmacists and patients, a powerful, secure, and needs-based telepharmacy platform must be considered during creation. Additionally, there is a critical need for formal education programs to support pharmacists in maintaining their knowledge of modern telepharmacy procedures and their proficiency in offering pharmaceutical services. The general patients, and diabetes patients, feel secure during the consultation and, ultimately, can increase the existence of pharmacists as high-quality health workers.
Limitations
This literature review has limitations; maybe not all articles discuss the role of telepharmacy in patients with diabetes mellitus, because it depends on how the role of the pharmacist is described in articles. In addition, this study also focuses on discussing the benefits of telepharmacy in improving clinical outcomes and patient compliance, so that the output regarding cost and operational effectiveness is not discussed. However, the authors hoped that this literature review can become a reference in the future development of telepharmacy, especially for diabetes mellitus patients whose goal is to continue to provide high-quality pharmaceutical services.
Conclusion
Telepharmacy might be a different option for pharmaceutical services, even though there are still some restrictions on its use. It has been shown to be successful in giving interventions with notable results in clinical conditions and adherence to therapy in patients with diabetes mellitus. This literature review demonstrates the enormous potential of telepharmacy and serves as a guide for the creation of telepharmacy that can effectively assist patients, particularly those with diabetes mellitus, in receiving pharmaceutical services.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the Rector of Universitas Padjadjaran for funding the APC and Academic Leadership Grant 2022. In addition, we would like to thank the Minister of Education and Culture, Republic of Indonesia for the Matching Fund-Kedaireka Grant 2022.
Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
References
- 1.Le T, Toscani M, Colaizzi J. Telepharmacy: a new paradigm for our profession. J Pharm Pract. 2020;33(2):176–182. doi: 10.1177/0897190018791060 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Taylor AM, Bingham J, Schussel K, et al. Integrating innovative telehealth solutions into an interprofessional team-delivered chronic care management pilot program. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018;24(8):813–818. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.8.813 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Casey MM, Sorensen TD, Elias W, Knudson A, Gregg W. Current practices and state regulations regarding telepharmacy in rural hospitals. Am J Health Pharm. 2010;67:13. doi: 10.2146/ajhp090531 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Keeys C, Kalejaiye B, Skinner M, et al. Pharmacist-managed inpatient discharge medication reconciliation: a combined onsite and telepharmacy model. Am J Health Pharm. 2014;71(24). doi: 10.2146/ajhp130650 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sankaranarayanan J, Murante LJ, Moffett LM, Retrospective A. Evaluation of remote pharmacist interventions in a telepharmacy service model using a conceptual framework. Telemed E Health. 2014;20(10). doi: 10.1089/tmj.2013.0362 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Win AZ. Telepharmacy: time to pick up the line. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2017;13(4):882–883. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2015.06.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Iftinan GN, Wathoni N, Lestari K. Telepharmacy: a potential alternative approach for diabetic patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021;14:2261–2273. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S325645 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Di Cerbo A, Morales-Medina JC, Palmieri B, Iannitti T. Narrative review of telemedicine consultation in medical practice. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015;9:65–75. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S61617 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bynum A, Hopkins D, Thomas A, Copeland N, Irwin C. The effect of telepharmacy counseling on metered-dose inhaler technique among adolescents with asthma in rural Arkansas. Telemed J E Health. 2001;7(3):3. doi: 10.1089/153056201316970902 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.M Tourkmani A, J ALHarbi T, Rsheed AMB, et al. The impact of telemedicine on patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus during the COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia: findings and implications. J Telemed Telecare. 2021. doi: 10.1177/1357633X20985763 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ghosh A, Gupta R, Misra A. Telemedicine for diabetes care in India during COVID19 pandemic and national lockdown period: guidelines for physicians. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020;14(4). doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.04.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lauffenburger JC, Ghazinouri R, Jan S, et al. Impact of a novel pharmacist-delivered behavioral intervention for patients with poorly-controlled diabetes: the ENhancing outcomes through Goal Assessment and Generating Engagement in Diabetes Mellitus (ENGAGE-DM) pragmatic randomized trial. PLoS One. 2019;14(4):4. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214754 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jahangard-Rafsanjani Z, Sarayani A, Nosrati M, et al. Effect of a community pharmacist–delivered diabetes support program for patients receiving specialty medical care: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Educ. 2015;41(1):127–135. doi: 10.1177/0145721714559132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Erku DA, Ayele AA, Mekuria AB, Belachew SA, Hailemeskel B, Tegegn HG. The impact of pharmacist-led medication therapy management on medication adherence in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled study. Pharm Pract. 2017;15(3):1–7. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2017.03.1026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Arain MA, Ahmad A, Chiu V, Kembel L. Medication adherence support of an in-home electronic medication dispensing system for individuals living with chronic conditions: a pilot randomized controlled trial. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21(1):1–16. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01979-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lyons I, Barber N, Raynor DK, Wei L. The Medicines Advice Service Evaluation (MASE): a randomised controlled trial of a pharmacist-led telephone based intervention designed to improve medication adherence. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25(10):759–769. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004670 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Odegard PS, Christensen DB. MAP study: RCT of a medication adherence program for patients with type 2 diabetes. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2012;52(6):753–762. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2012.11001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.O’Connor PJ, Schmittdiel JA, Pathak RD, et al. Randomized trial of telephone outreach to improve medication adherence and metabolic control in adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(12):3317–3324. doi: 10.2337/dc14-0596 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Xin C, Xia Z, Jiang C, Lin M, Li G. Effect of pharmaceutical care on medication adherence of patients newly prescribed insulin therapy: a randomized controlled study. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015;9:797–802. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S84411 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Antoine SL, Pieper D, Mathes T, Eikermann M. Improving the adherence of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with pharmacy care: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. BMC Endocr Disord. 2014;14:0–7. doi: 10.1186/1472-6823-14-53 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Peláez Bejarano A, Villar Santos P, Robustillo-Cortés MDLA, Sánchez Gómez E, Santos Rubio MD. Implementation of a novel home delivery service during pandemic. Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2021;28(e1):E120–E123. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2020-002500 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Killeen RM, Grindrod K, Ong SW. Innovations in practice: telepharmacy’s time has arrived. Can Pharm J. 2020;153(5):252–255. doi: 10.1177/1715163520945732 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.McFarland R. Telepharmacy for remote hospital inpatients in north-west Queensland. J Telemed Telecare. 2017;23(10):861–865. doi: 10.1177/1357633X17732367 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Shane-McWhorter L, McAdam-Marx C, Lenert L, et al. Pharmacist-provided diabetes management and education via a telemonitoring program. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2015;55(5):516–526. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2015.14285 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zullig LL, Peterson ED, Bosworth HB. Ingredients of successful interventions to improve medication adherence. JAMA. 2013;310(24):2611–2612. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.282818 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yang YT, Kozhimannil KB. Medication abortion through telemedicine. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127(2):313–316. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001251 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Schwamm LH, Chumbler N, Brown E, et al. Recommendations for the implementation of telehealth in cardiovascular and stroke care: a policy statement from the American heart association. Circulation. 2017;135(7):e24–e44. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000475 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Abimbola S, Keelan S, Everett M, et al. The medium, the message and the measure: a theory-driven review on the value of telehealth as a patient-facing digital health innovation. Health Econ Rev. 2019;9(1). doi: 10.1186/s13561-019-0239-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cohen LB, Taveira TH, Wu WC, Pirraglia PA. Pharmacist-led telehealth disease management program for patients with diabetes and depression. J Telemed Telecare. 2020;26(5). doi: 10.1177/1357633X18822575 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Clifton GD, Byer H, Heaton K, Haberman DJ, Gill H. Provision of pharmacy services to underserved populations via remote dispensing and two-way videoconferencing. Am J Health Pharm. 2003;60(24):2577–2582. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/60.24.2577 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lam AY, Rose D. Telepharmacy services in an urban community health clinic system. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2009;49(5):652–659. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2009.08128 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Margolis SA, Ypinazar VA. Tele-pharmacy in remote medical practice: the royal flying doctor service medical chest program. Rural Remote Health. 2008;8(2):937. doi: 10.22605/rrh937 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Aguiar PM, da Silva CHP, Chiann C, Dórea EL, Lyra DP, Storpirtis S. Pharmacist–physician collaborative care model for patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes in Brazil: results from a randomized controlled trial. J Eval Clin Pract. 2018;24(1):22–30. doi: 10.1111/jep.12606 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Chen JH, Ou HT, Lin TC, Lai ECC, Yang Kao YH. Pharmaceutical care of elderly patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Clin Pharm. 2016;38(1):88–95. doi: 10.1007/s11096-015-0210-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Choudhry NK, Isaac T, Lauffenburger JC, et al. Effect of a remotely delivered tailored multicomponent approach to enhance medication taking for patients with hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and diabetes the STIC2IT cluster randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(9):1182. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3189 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.McConnell M, Rogers W, Simeonova E, Wilson IB. Architecting process of care: a randomized controlled study evaluating the impact of providing nonadherence information and pharmacist assistance to physicians. Health Serv Res. 2020;55(1):136–145. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13243 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Jarab AS, Alqudah SG, Mukattash TL, Shattat G, Al-Qirim T. Randomized controlled trial of clinical pharmacy management of patients with type 2 diabetes in an outpatient diabetes clinic in Jordan. J Manag Care Pharm. 2012;18(7):516–526. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2012.18.7.516 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Khan YH, Alzarea AI, Alotaibi NH, et al. Evaluation of impact of a pharmacist-led educational campaign on disease knowledge, practices and medication adherence for type-2 diabetic patients: a prospective pre- and post-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(16):10060. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lauffenburger JC, Lewey J, Jan S, et al. Effectiveness of targeted insulin-adherence interventions for glycemic control using predictive analytics among patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw open. 2019;2(3):e190657. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0657 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lee JY, Wong CP, Tan CSS, Nasir NH, Lee SWH. Telemonitoring in fasting individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus during ramadan: a prospective, randomised controlled study. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1). doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10564-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mcfarland M, Davis K, Wallace J, et al. Use of home telehealth monitoring with active medication therapy management by clinical pharmacists in veterans with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus. Pharmacotherapy. 2012;32(5):420–426. doi: 10.1002/j.1875-9114.2011.01038.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Olesen C, Harbig P, Buus KM, Barat I, Damsgaard EM. Impact of pharmaceutical care on adherence, hospitalisations and mortality in elderly patients. Int J Clin Pharm. 2014;36(1):163–171. doi: 10.1007/s11096-013-9898-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Peasah SK, Granitz K, Vu M, Jacob B. Effectiveness of a student pharmacist–led telephone follow-up intervention to improve hemoglobin A1C in diabetic patients. J Pharm Pract. 2020;33(6):832–837. doi: 10.1177/0897190019857409 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sarayani A, Mashayekhi M, Nosrati M, et al. Efficacy of a telephone-based intervention among patients with type-2 diabetes; a randomized controlled trial in pharmacy practice. Int J Clin Pharm. 2018;40(2):345–353. doi: 10.1007/s11096-018-0593-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Siaw MYL, Ko Y, Malone DC, et al. Impact of pharmacist-involved collaborative care on the clinical, humanistic and cost outcomes of high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes (IMPACT): a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2017;42(4):475–482. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12536 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

