Skip to main content
mSystems logoLink to mSystems
. 2022 Dec 13;8(1):e00970-22. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00970-22

Deterministic Assembly Processes Strengthen the Effects of β-Diversity on Community Biomass of Marine Bacterioplankton

Feng-Hsun Chang a,, Jinny Wu Yang b, Ariana Chih-Hsien Liu a, Hsiao-Pei Lu c, Gwo-Ching Gong d,e, Fuh-Kwo Shiah a,d,f, Chih-hao Hsieh a,f,g,h,i,
Editor: Michaeline B N Albrightj
PMCID: PMC9948717  PMID: 36511690

ABSTRACT

The presence of more species in the community of a sampling site (α diversity) typically increases ecosystem functions via nonrandom processes like resource partitioning. When considering multiple communities, we hypothesize that higher compositional difference (β diversity) increases overall functions of these communities. Further, we hypothesize that the β diversity effect is more positive when β diversity is increased by nonrandom assembly processes. To test these hypotheses, we collected bacterioplankton along a transect of 6 sampling sites in the southern East China Sea in 14 cruises. For any pairs of the 6 sites within a cruise, we calculated the Bray-Curtis index to represent β diversity and summed bacterial biomass as a proxy to indicate the overall function of the two communities. We then calculated deviation of observed mean pairwise phylogenetic similarities among species in two communities from random to represent the influences of nonrandom processes. The bacterial β diversity was found to positively affect the summed bacterial biomass; however, the effect varied among cruises. Cross-cruise comparison indicated that the β diversity effect increased with the nonrandom processes selecting for phylogenetically dissimilar species. This study extends biodiversity-ecosystem functioning research to the scale of multiple sites and enriches the framework by considering community assembly processes.

IMPORTANCE The implications of our analyses are twofold. First, we emphasize the importance of studying β diversity. We expanded the current biodiversity-ecosystem functioning framework from single to multiple sampling sites and investigated the influences of species compositional differences among sites on the overall functioning of these sites. Since natural ecological communities never exist alone, our analyses allow us to more holistically perceive the role of biodiversity in natural ecosystems. Second, we took community assembly processes into account to attain a more mechanistic understanding of the impacts of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning.

KEYWORDS: β diversity, biodiversity-ecosystem functioning, community assembly processes, East China Sea, homogeneous versus heterogeneous selection

INTRODUCTION

Decades of studies have shown that having more species in a single ecological community of a sampling site, i.e., having higher α diversity, often leads to higher ecosystem functions of this community, such as resource use efficiency and community biomass (1, 2). However, when considering multiple communities, the association between the species compositional difference, i.e., β diversity, and the overall functions of these communities is less clear (3). Some studies show a positive association between β diversity and the overall functioning of multiple communities (4), but others show that β diversity is not important in predicting ecosystem functions (5); two recent studies even suggest that β diversity negatively affects the overall functions of multiple communities (6, 7). The differences among ecosystem types might contribute to the variation of the β diversity effect. For example, dispersal limitation determines the β diversity and the overall function of multiple communities (8), and dispersal limitation is widely acknowledged to be effective at different spatial and temporal scales depending on ecosystem type (9). To mechanistically investigate the relationship between β diversity and overall functioning, we chose to depict the community assembly processes that determine the species composition, diversity and subsequently ecosystem functioning of communities. The community assembly processes are worth considering to complement the biodiversity-ecosystem functioning research framework (3, 10).

In fact, community assembly processes are embedded in the calculation of β diversity, because β diversity quantifies how species compositions differ among multiple communities (11, 12). For example, some studies have statistically partitioned β diversity in order to understand whether species composition varies with certain environmental gradients (13, 14). Others have analyzed β diversity by implementing multivariate statistical methods (15, 16), neutral-theory-based process models (17, 18), or statistical null model approaches (1921) in order to infer how the species compositions are determined. When investigating the relationship between β diversity and overall functions of multiple communities, the influences of assembly processes are inherently taken into account.

The influence of assembly processes on species compositions and β diversity among multiple communities can range from completely stochastic to completely deterministic (22, 23). When the influence is completely stochastic, species’ birth, death, presence/absence, and thus population size are all governed by random chance (18, 24). Either due to random environmental fluctuations (i.e., environmental stochasticity) or independent of environments (i.e., demographic stochasticity), species’ random birth, death, and dispersal can cause the species compositions to be different (25). At the other extreme, completely deterministic processes reflect species’ nonrandom growth, death, and dispersal rates, which possibly result from some biotic (e.g., species competition) or abiotic (e.g., habitat filtering) interactions among species (20, 26, but see 27). Depicting the influence of assembly processes on the stochastic-deterministic spectrum helps explain and predict how diversity changes at different spatial and temporal scales (2830).

More importantly, depicting the influence of assembly processes may help explain whether β diversity enhances, decreases, or exerts no clear effects on the overall functions of multiple communities (8, 31). For example, some species can persist and contribute to β diversity due to stochastic processes like random dispersal, but these species are not able to utilize resources and perform ecological functions (24, 32); under such circumstances, β diversity does not necessarily enhance the overall functions of those communities. In contrast, the influence of deterministic assembly processes implies selection of species that can capture resources and survive, so that β diversity should positively affect the overall functions. We therefore argue that when communities are influenced by assembly processes that are more deterministic and less stochastic, β diversity of these communities would have stronger effects on the overall functions of multiple communities.

To depict the assembly processes of multiple communities on the stochastic-deterministic spectrum, we examined the degree of relatedness, i.e., phylogenetic similarity, among species (33, 34), because phylogenetic similarity is considered an imprint left by evolutionary and ecological processes (35, 36). We then apply the null model approach on the phylogenetic similarity among species in a set of multiple communities to infer the relative importance of stochastic versus deterministic assembly processes (20). The null model approach is elaborated in Materials and Methods. In short, the null distribution of phylogenetic similarity is derived by randomization to represent the scenario governed by completely stochastic processes. When phylogenetically similar species are selected by homogenizing deterministic processes, the observed phylogenetic similarity will negatively deviate from random. In contrast, when diversifying deterministic assembly processes select for phylogenetically dissimilar species and increase β diversity, the observed phylogenetic similarity is expected to positively deviate from random.

To investigate the influences of community assembly processes on the association between bacterial β diversity and the overall functions of multiple communities, we collected bacterial samples along a transect of 6 sampling sites in the southern East China Sea (ECS) in 14 cruises (see the map in Fig. 1A). The southern ECS is a hydrographically complex region (37, 38). The inner shelf is dominated by river inputs and coastal currents that are typically nonsaline and rich in terrestrial nutrients (39, 40). In the middle shelf, the Taiwan Warm Current (Taiwan Strait Current) is warm and nutrient depleted at the surface but saline and nutrient rich in the bottom layer (39, 40). To the northeast of Taiwan at the edge of continental shelf, the upwelled subsurface water from the Kuroshio Current brings ample amounts of saline and nutrient-rich water to the ECS (41). Interactions among these water masses vary spatially and seasonally to determine the dynamics of nutrients, chlorophyll a, primary production (42), and bacterial biomass and production (43, 44). These spatial and temporal complexities also create among-cruise variations in deterministic versus stochastic assembly processes for bacterial communities in the southern ECS (45).

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Schematic plots visualizing the sampling sites, analytical flow, and hypotheses. (A) The six sampling sites in the southern East China Sea and indices of β diversity, overall functioning (using biomass as a proxy), and assembly processes of the multiple communities. (Inset) Interpretation of the index of assembly processes (βMPTI ). (B) Expectation of hypothesis I (that bacterial β diversity increases the sum of bacterial community biomass). Each colored line represents the linear model that regresses the summed bacterial community biomass on bacterial β diversity for each cruise, and the regression slope is an indicator of β diversity effect. The regression slopes are shown as colored dots in panel C. (C) Expectation of hypothesis II (that the effect of bacterial β diversity on the sum of bacterial community biomass is stronger when β diversity is increased more by deterministic and less by stochastic assembly processes).

In this study, we first tested hypothesis I: bacterial β diversity increases the summed bacterial community biomass (Fig. 1B). Specifically, for any pair of the 6 sampling sites within a cruise, we calculated the Bray-Curtis index as the bacterial β diversity and the sum of bacterial community biomass as a proxy to indicate the overall function of the two sites. Then, the effect of β diversity could thus be estimated as the slope when regressing the sum of bacterial biomass against the β diversity for each pair of the 6 sampling sites within a cruise (Fig. 1B). Second, we tested hypothesis II: based on cross-cruise comparison, the bacterial β diversity effect is stronger (more positive) when β diversity is increased more by deterministic and less by stochastic assembly processes (Fig. 1C). That is, we expect that the effects of bacterial β diversity (defined as the estimated slope, as explained in Fig. 1B) would be more positive when the observed phylogenetic similarity more positively deviates from random.

RESULTS

In the southern ECS, physical and chemical environments significantly changed from the inner to outer shelf. At the most inner shelf station, temperature and salinity were significantly lower than at other stations, especially in the springtime (P < 0.01) (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). This signaled the runoff of the Min River, which significantly increased nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations and caused the chlorophyll a concentration to be significantly higher at the most inner shelf station than other stations (P < 0.01) (Fig. S1), except for the station northeast of Taiwan (station 9) (Fig. S1). The station at the northeast of Taiwan is impacted by the year-round upwelling of subsurface Kuroshio waters, so that it is generally nutrient rich (37). However, the nutrients supplied by upwelling were lower than those in the river runoff, so that bacterial community biomass at this station was still significantly lower than that at the inner shelf stations (stations 1 and 3; P < 0.01) (Fig. S1).

FIG S1

Box plots of environmental variables and bacterial community biomass of the 6 sampling stations in the southern East China Sea. The color represents the season of the cruise (spring is defined as March, April, and May; summer is defined as June, July, and August; autumn is defined as September, October, and November). Download FIG S1, TIF file, 4.7 MB (4.8MB, tif) .

Copyright © 2022 Chang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

In association with the environmental variations, the bacterial community also showed a clear compositional shift from the inner to outer shelf of the southern ECS (Fig. S2). Specifically, the bacterial communities at the inner shelf were more positively associated with temperature and salinity, while the communities at the outer shelf were more positively associated with total inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus (Fig. S2). These results suggest that the environment is indeed spatially heterogeneous, and such spatial heterogeneity in turn affects the community compositions and biomasses of bacterioplankton in the southern ECS.

FIG S2

Biplot of distance-based redundancy analysis showing the relationships between bacterial communities and environmental variables. Dissimilarities among bacterial communities are the Bray-Curtis dissimilarities between bacterial communities in the same cruise. The red arrows represent the environmental variables that significantly explain the dissimilarities among bacterial communities. HNF biomass (in micrograms of C per liter) is the community biomass of HNF, which are the potential predators of bacteria. The colors of dots represent different sampling stations. Download FIG S2, TIF file, 2.5 MB (2.6MB, tif) .

Copyright © 2022 Chang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

For hypothesis I (Fig. 1B), we found that the sum of bacterial community biomass was positively associated with bacterial β diversity (univariate regression coefficient = 0.17) (Fig. 2), even after accounting for potential confounding environmental variables (Table 1). Our results thus support hypothesis I to some extent. However, this association was highly variable, judging from the low marginal R2 (P value = 0.01) of the generalized linear mixed-effects model (GLMM). When fitting the generalized linear model (GLM) for each cruise, 8 of 14 regression slopes were nonsignificant (colored dashed lines in Fig. 2), indicating that the effect of β diversity was not always positive. In addition, we found that the β mean pairwise taxonomic index (βMPTI) varied significantly among the 14 sampling cruises and seemed to be lower in those 8 cruises (Fig. S3). These results suggest that the effect of bacterial β diversity on the sum of bacterial biomass is generally positive, but it could vary with the community assembly processes.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Association between the summed bacterial community biomass and β diversity. The bold red solid line indicates the regression line fitted by the GLMM, with cruise as the random effect. The shaded area represents the confidence interval of regression. The colored dots represent measurements from different sampling cruises. The thin colored lines are the regression lines fitted by a GLM regressing the sum of pairwise bacterial community biomass on β diversity for each cruise. These regression lines vary substantially among cruises. Colored solid and dashed lines represent significant and nonsignificant regression slopes, respectively.

TABLE 1.

Results of GLMM testing of hypothesis Ia

Independent variableb Regression coefficient SE P
Log (bacterial β diversity) 0.09 0.04 0.04
Log (salinity) −3.86 0.44 <0.01
Log (total inorganic nitrogen) −0.02 0.01 <0.01
a

Hypothesis I is that bacterial Bray-Curtis dissimilarity index increases the sum of bacterial community biomass (Fig. 1A). The model presented here shows the results after backward stepwise selection to statistically control for potential confounding factors. Steps of the backward stepwise selection are listed in Tables S1 and S2. The results indicate that, after accounting for environmental variables, bacterial β diversity positively affected the sum of bacterial community biomass. This conclusion is qualitatively the same as that drawn from the univariate GLMM (Fig. 2).

b

Summed bacterial community biomass was the dependent variable.

FIG S3

Box plot showing the variation of βMPTI among the 14 sampling cruises. The colors represent different sampling cruises. The gray filled boxes indicate the cruises in which the association between β diversity and the summed bacterial community biomass is negative or nonsignificant. Download FIG S3, TIF file, 8.2 MB (8.4MB, tif) .

Copyright © 2022 Chang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S1

The backward selection sequences to test Hypothesis I: Bacterial β diversity (Bray-Cutis dissimilarity index) increases the summed bacterial community biomass (Fig. 1B). Bacterial richness is included as a confounding variable. The bacterial β diversity and Shannon diversity are always included in each step. The variable labeled with an asterisk is the factor with the highest P value in each step and is removed in the next step. Download Table S1, DOCX file, 0.03 MB (31.7KB, docx) .

Copyright © 2022 Chang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S2

The backward selection sequences to test Hypothesis I: Bacterial β diversity (Bray-Cutis dissimilarity index) increases the summed bacterial community biomass (Fig. 1B). The Shannon diversity of bacterial community is included as a confounding variable. The bacterial β diversity and Shannon diversity are always included in each step. The variable labeled with an asterisk is the factor with the highest P value in each step and is removed in the next step. Download Table S2, DOCX file, 0.03 MB (32KB, docx) .

Copyright © 2022 Chang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

We then tested hypothesis II: based on cross-cruise comparison, the bacterial β diversity effect is stronger (more positive) when β diversity is increased more by deterministic and less by stochastic assembly processes (Fig. 1C). We first noticed that βMPTI was generally negative in our study (mean = −1.22; standard deviation = 0.76), indicating that the bacterial communities in the southern ECS were generally subject to homogenizing assembly processes. However, when βMPTI was less negative, bacterial β diversity became higher (univariate regression slope = 0.09 and P value < 0.01) (Fig. 3). These results suggest that β diversity of multiple bacterial communities is increased when deterministic assembly processes weaken the influences of homogenization by selecting for phylogenetically dissimilar species.

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Association between bacterial β diversity and community assembly processes (βMPTI). The bold red line indicates the significant regression line fitted by the GLMM, with cruise as the random effect. The shaded area represents the confidence interval of regression. The colored dots represent measurements from different sampling cruises. The thin lines are the regression lines fitted by the GLM for each sampling cruise.

Through cross-cruise comparison, we further found that when βMPTI became less negative, the effects of bacterial β diversity on the summed bacterial biomass of the two communities became more positive (Fig. 4). This positive relationship remained statistically significant after controlling for bacterial α diversity and environmental factors (Table 2 and Fig. S6). Given these results, hypothesis II is supported, indicating that when nonrandom/deterministic processes select for phylogenetically dissimilar species in the two communities (less negative βMPTI), β diversity is increased and the effect of β diversity on the sum of bacterial communities becomes more positive.

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Positive association between bacterial β diversity effects on the sum of bacterial community biomass and community assembly processes (βMPTI) across cruises. The red line indicates the significant regression line fitted by the GLM. The shaded area represents the confidence interval of regression. Each of the colored dots represents the slope extracted from the GLM regressing the sum of bacterial community biomass on bacterial β diversity for one of the 14 sampling cruises (cf. Fig. 2).

TABLE 2.

Results of GLM testing hypothesis IIa

Independent variableb Regression coefficient SE P
βMPTI 0.79 0.06 <0.01
Log (salinity) −22.81 1.53 <0.01
Log (total inorganic nitrogen) 0.4 0.02 <0.01
Log (phosphate) −0.63 0.03 <0.01
Log (PAR) −0.05 0.02 <0.01
Log (chlorophyll a) 0.37 0.03 <0.01
a

Hypothesis II is that based on cross-cruise comparison, the bacterial β diversity effect is stronger (more positive) when β diversity in increased more by deterministic and less by stochastic assembly processes (Fig. 1C). The model presented here is the results after backward stepwise selection to statistically control for potential confounding factors. Steps of the backward stepwise selection are listed in Table S3. The results indicate that, after accounting for environmental variables, the effect of bacterial β diversity on the summed bacterial community biomass increased with deterministic processes selecting for dissimilar species. This conclusion is qualitatively the same as that drawn from the univariate GLMM (Fig. 3).

b

Bacterial β diversity effects on the summed bacterial community biomass was the dependent variable.

FIG S6

Phylogenetic Mantel correlogram showing significant phylogenetic signals of habitat preferences in the bacterial community in the southern East China Sea. Black and gray dots denote significant and nonsignificant correlations, respectively, relating between-ASV habitat differences to between-ASV phylogenetic distances. Download FIG S6, TIF file, 3.3 MB (3.4MB, tif) .

Copyright © 2022 Chang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S3

Backward selection sequences to test hypothesis II (that based on cross-cruise comparison, the bacterial β diversity effect is stronger [more positive[ when β diversity is increased more by deterministic and less by stochastic assembly processes) (Fig. 1C). The βMPTI is included in each step. The variable labeled with an asterisk is the factor with the highest P value in each step and is removed in the next step. Download Table S3, DOCX file, 0.02 MB (25.7KB, docx) .

Copyright © 2022 Chang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

DISCUSSION

In the southern ECS, we first confirmed that the environment is spatially heterogeneous, and the bacterial composition is thereby affected by spatial heterogeneity (Fig. S1 and S2). Moreover, the degree of spatial heterogeneity varied among cruises. These results are in agreement with previous studies in this region (37, 38, 45). Given the heterogeneous environments and bacterial composition, we investigate the association between bacterial β diversity and the overall function (using biomass as a proxy) of multiple sampling sites.

In general, we found a positive, but highly variable, effect of bacterial β diversity on the summed community biomass of any pair of the 6 sampling sites within a cruise (Fig. 2); however, the β diversity effects were not significant in 8 of the 14 cruises (colored dashed lines in Fig. 2). Current research on the relationship between β diversity and the overall functions of multiple sites has also found similar patterns, showing that β diversity generally has positive effects on ecosystem functions (4, 4649) but that nonsignificant or even negative β diversity effects are not uncommon (6, 7, 50). We acknowledge that variable β diversity in the literature could stem from the difference among ecosystem types, where different levels of habitat heterogeneity, dispersal limitation, and abiotic influences will alter the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning (1). However, because we did not compare β diversity across ecosystems, the systematic discrepancy among ecosystem types should not be responsible for the variable diversity effect in our study. Instead, we found the variability of β diversity effects coincided with the variability of community assembly processes, as indicated by βMPTI (Fig. 3 and Fig. S3). Accordingly, we argue that the variable β diversity effects may be caused by different strengths of deterministic community assembly processes influencing the β diversity (8).

Through cross-cruise analysis, we showed that β diversity effects became more positive when β diversity was increased by deterministic assembly processes selecting for phylogenetically dissimilar species (Fig. 4). This finding is analogous to the studies revealing that bacteria with certain metabolic capabilities are selected by deterministic assembly processes, so that the bacterial communities can utilize resources in the environment; these selected bacterial communities in turn determine the ecosystem functioning (5153). Also relevant but to a lesser extent, other studies show that the function of multiple communities is enhanced when deterministic assembly processes select for species that are dissimilar from each other (54, 55). Based on our data together with these studies, we argue that when bacterial communities are governed more by deterministic, and less by stochastic, assembly processes, bacterial species may experience some niche-based processes, such as interspecific interactions or interactions with the environments (20, 26, but see 27). Bacterial species that undergo some biotic and abiotic interactions are more adapted to survive in an environment (9), so that they should be more capable of capturing resources and produce more biomass. However, we ought to make such arguments with caution, because deterministic processes do not necessarily map to niche-based processes (27, 56, 57). Other specific processes potentially contributing to the influences of deterministic versus stochastic processes, such as dispersal (51, 54), cannot be clearly deciphered in our analyses. Our argument here remains to be validated by further studies that explicitly examine specific niche-based assembly processes and their influences on the biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationship.

When investigating the influence of certain community assembly processes, previous research has been dedicated to study dispersal, and these studies have shown that diversity is maximized at intermediate levels of dispersal that reduce local environmental and demographic stochasticity without imposing too-strong homogenization (5860). However, whether our study is comparable to this line of research is debatable, because the influence of dispersal was not explicitly quantified in our analyses, and we are not able to pinpoint dispersal on the deterministic-stochastic spectrum. Moreover, whether dispersal is a more deterministic or stochastic assembly process might depend on species and cannot be unarguably defined (61, 62). Since dispersal cannot be easily defined and parsed out, we refrain from making inferences based on dispersal or other specific processes like species interactions. In fact, this is one of the limitations of our analytical framework. Our analyses should be viewed as an examination of collective influences of deterministic versus stochastic assembly processes but not an examination of specific ecological processes. Future studies dedicated to examining the influences of specific assembly processes are required and encouraged to validate our arguments.

Some caveats associated with our analytical framework are worth mentioning. First, we are aware that interdependency among α, β, and γ diversity could lead to statistical artifacts (11, 13). We did find that β diversity was correlated with the richness and Shannon diversity of the bacterial communities (correlation coefficients = 0.14 and 0.18, respectively; both P values < 0.01) (Fig. S4A and B). The richness and Shannon diversity were calculated from the combined communities of any pair of the 6 sampling sites in the same sampling cruise. However, the summed bacterial community biomass was not significantly associated with the richness and Shannon diversity (Fig. S4C and D), so the effect of β diversity should not be caused by the confounding correlation between α and β diversity. Moreover, including bacterial α diversity as a covariate for testing the first hypothesis did not negate the positive effect of bacterial β diversity on the summed community biomass (Fig. S5). We thus argue that the positive effect of bacterial β diversity is robust to the interdependency between α and β diversity.

FIG S4

(A and B) Correlation between β diversity and pooled richness (A) and Shannon diversity (B) of the bacterial paired communities. The richness and Shannon diversity were calculated from the combined community composition of the paired communities. The red solid lines indicate the significant positive correlation. The colored dots represent measurements from different sampling cruises. (C and D) Nonsignificant association between the summed bacterial community biomass and pooled richness (C) and Shannon diversity (D) of the bacterial paired communities. The red dashed lines indicate the regression line fitted by the GLMM, with cruise as the random effect. The gray shaded area represents the confidence interval of regression. The thin colored line represents the regression line fitted by GLM for each cruise. Colored solid and dashed lines represent significant and nonsignificant regressions, respectively. Download FIG S4, TIF file, 0.5 MB (552.9KB, tif) .

Copyright © 2022 Chang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S5

Relationships among the summed bacterial community biomass, bacterial β diversity, and pooled richness (A) and Shannon diversity (B). The colored plane is fitted with GLM, with blue indicating lower bacterial community biomass and yellow indicating higher bacterial community biomass. Download FIG S5, TIF file, 0.3 MB (351.5KB, tif) .

Copyright © 2022 Chang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

We are also aware that the community biomass is not a perfect representation of ecosystem functioning; however, it has been commonly used (6367). Biomass per se does not necessarily reflect the resource capture, nutrient recycling, or decomposition rate of a community (1). The functioning of bacterial community should be quantified as a kind of metabolic rate, like enzyme activities (55). Unfortunately, measurements of bacterial metabolism are not available in our data set. Future studies applying metagenomic or metatranscriptomic analyses to our analytical framework will constitute a direct test of the biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationship.

Next, our findings hinge on the assumption that βMPTI, or phylogenetic similarity in general, can be used to infer the collective influences of community assembly processes. First, we acknowledge that phylogenetic similarity might not faithfully approximate community assembly processes (68, 69). However, we observed significant phylogenetic signals (Fig. S6), which somehow demonstrated the relationship between phylogenetic relatedness and ecological similarity (34). Second, we calculated βMPTI in a fashion similar to that used for the net related index (NTI), nearest taxon index (NRI) (33, 70), βNTI, and βNRI (71). βNTI and βNRI were been used to infer the influences of assembly processes that determine the composition of microbial community (7274). We thus cautiously treat the βMPTI as an implication of collective influences of community assembly processes along the deterministic-stochastic spectrum. When the collective influence is more deterministic, we then argue with caution that the communities are subject to certain processes, e.g., environmental filtering (75) or species interaction (76).

Despite these limitations, our analytical framework expands the current biodiversity-ecosystem functioning framework from single communities to multiple communities. Because an ecological community almost never exists alone in nature, expanding to multiple communities allows us to holistically perceive the role of biodiversity in natural ecosystems. In addition, we demonstrate how the influence of community assembly processes could also alter the effect of β diversity on the overall function of multiple communities. Taking the influences of community assembly processes into account equips us with a more mechanistic understanding of the impacts of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning.

In conclusion, we showed that bacterial β diversity positively affected the summed biomass of bacterial communities in the southern ECS. Moreover, this positive effect was stronger when bacterial β diversity was increased by the assembly processes that deterministically (i.e., nonrandomly) selected for phylogenetically dissimilar species. We infer from our findings that when some community assembly processes deterministically influence the bacterial communities in the southern ECS, the bacterial β diversity has a more positive effect on the overall functions of these communities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial community composition and environmental variables.

We collected bacteria from a transect of 6 sampling sites in the southern ECS (see the map in Fig. 1A). We visited this transect in 14 cruises from April 2014 to July 2017, so that a total of 84 samples were obtained. At each sampling site, GoFlo bottles (General Oceanics) mounted on a conductivity, temperature, and depth profiler (CTD profiler; Sea-Bird Electronics, Bellevue, WA, USA) were used to collect ~20 L of seawater from 5 m beneath the surface. The seawater was prefiltered through a screen mesh with 20-μm openings to remove large particles like zooplankton. With the prefiltered seawater, we revealed the taxonomic composition with high-throughput sequencing techniques.

The prefiltered seawater was filtered sequentially through a 1.2-μm- and a 0.2 μm-pore-size filter (Millipore Isopore hydrophilic polycarbonate membrane). The 0.2-μm-pore-size filter was frozen immediately with liquid nitrogen and then stored at −80°C before molecular analysis (77). From the filter, we extracted and sequenced DNA and processed sequences for bacterial composition. The methods of DNA extraction and sequence processing are described briefly here; detailed methods are presented in Text S1. Total DNA was extracted from the 0.2 μm-pore size filter with the PowerWater DNA extraction kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA extracts from the filters were used as templates for PCR to amplify the 16S rRNA gene for bacterial community analysis. PCR was performed in two steps to gain better reproducibility and consistent results (78); see Text S1 for details of the two-step PCR procedures. After obtaining 16S rRNA gene sequences, the DADA2 pipeline was used for quality filtering and assembling sequences into amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) (79); see Text S1 for sequence merging procedures. Taxonomy assignment was performed on ASVs to recognize and select for those classified under the bacteria kingdom based on the Silva 132 database (80). Finally, in order to obtain the phylogeny, we used a maximum-likelihood method (with a negative-edge length of 0) (79) to build phylogenetic trees for bacteria from 16S rRNA genes from all cruises.

TEXT S1

Detailed methods for obtaining bacterial ASVs. Download Text S1, DOCX file, 0.02 MB (22.2KB, docx) .

Copyright © 2022 Chang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

For each sampling station, environmental variables, including temperature, salinity, and photosynthetic active radiation, were recorded by the CTD profiler. In addition, 100-mL seawater samples for chlorophyll a and total dissolved inorganic nitrogen and phosphate concentrations were collected and measured according to standard methods (42).

Bacterial community biomass and β diversity.

To estimate the bacterial community biomass of each sampling site, we preserved 10 mL of prefiltered seawater in glutaraldehyde with a final concentration of 0.1%. The samples were frozen with liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C before counting with a flow cytometer. Prior to processing with the flow cytometer, the samples were stained with SYBR green I and then incubated for 15 min at room temperature in the dark. We determined bacterial density with the CyFlow Space cytometer (Partec) at a rate allowing <1,000 events per s to avoid particle coincidence. Bacterial density was then used to estimate bacterial community biomass with a carbon conversion factor of 2 × 10−14 g C/cell (81). To account for the potential predators of bacteria, we counted the heterotrophic nanoflagellates (HNF) under a fluorescence microscope (82). Specifically, we additionally preserved 50 mL of prefiltered seawater in neutralized formalin with a final concentration of 2% and stored the samples at 4°C. Samples were identified and counted, using an inverted epifluorescence microscope (Nikon TMD 300) at ×200 or ×400 magnification (83). Finally, HNF community biomass was converted using a carbon conversion factor of 4.7 × 10−12 g C/cell (84).

For any pair of the 6 sampling sites (15 pairs in total) within a cruise, we calculated the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity index and the summed bacterial community biomass to represent the bacterial β diversity and as a proxy for the overall function of the paired communities, respectively. Before calculating the β diversity of bacteria, each community was resampled once to achieve the same number of reads, i.e., 13,129, the minimum reads among stations across cruises. Although this procedure addressed the disparity issue (i.e., unequal reads among stations), it is still not appropriate to compare the relative abundance of AVSs across stations (85). Therefore, we applied the method of Chao et al. to rarefy bacterial communities in order to have a fair among-station comparison (8688). With the rarefied compositions, we calculated the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity for any pair of the 6 sampling sites as the β diversity.

Community assembly processes.

To infer the community assembly processes, we calculated the β mean pairwise taxonomic index (βMPTI). The βMPTI extends Webb’s net relatedness index (33, 70) from within a community across two communities (71). The βMPTI quantifies the deviation of the observed mean pairwise phylogenetic distance (MPDobs) in two communities from a null distribution of mean pairwise phylogenetic distance (MPD) in the same two communities. The MPDobs was calculated as the mean branch length among all pairs of species in the two communities. The null distribution of the MPD is generated by random processes so that the distribution represents the values of the MPD if the two communities are assembled completely by random processes. The deviation of MPDobs from the null thus represents the nonrandom/deterministic processes by which the two communities are assembled. To generate a null distribution of MPD by random processes, we first randomly shuffled the phylogeny (i.e., randomly shuffled the tips of the phylogenetic tree) of all species in two communities (i.e., any pairs of the 6 stations within a cruise). With the randomized phylogeny, we calculated the MPD of the two communities. Repeating this randomization technique 999 times, we generated the null distribution of MPD. Finally, βMPTI was calculated as (MPDobs − mean MPDnull)/SD MPDnull, where mean MPDnull represents the mean of the null distribution of MPD and SD MPDnull represents the standard deviation of the null distribution of MPD.

The βMPTI is nearly identical to the β net relatedness index (βNTI). The only difference is that we multiply βNTI by −1, so that the sign of βMPTI intuitively represents whether the observed phylogenetic distance is more similar (more negative) or less similar (less negative) to random. A negative βMPTI means that species in the two communities are more phylogenetically similar than expected from random. A more negative βMPTI thus implies that the two communities are subject to assembly processes selecting for species that are phylogenetically more similar to each other than expected from random. Following the same logic, a less negative or positive βMPTI hints at the assembly processes that select for phylogenetically less similar (i.e., more dissimilar) species than expected from random.

Biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships and impacts of community assembly processes.

With the bacterial β diversity and biomass, we tested hypothesis I (that bacterial β diversity increases the summed bacterial community biomass) (Fig. 1B). To do so, we used a GLMM to regress the sum of bacterial community biomass against β diversity, with cruise as the random effect. The sum of bacterial community biomass and β diversity was log transformed to improve normality. Making cruise a random effect should account for within-cruise autocorrelations. To statistically account for potential confounding factors, we conducted backward selection by first including all environmental variables and removing the variables that were not significant based on P values in a stepwise fashion. The environmental variables include the average temperature, salinity, total dissolved inorganic nitrogen, phosphate, photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), and chlorophyll a concentration (collected at the same depth as the bacterial samples) of the two sampling sites.

Next, we proceeded to test hypothesis II (that based on cross-cruise comparison, the bacterial β diversity effect is stronger [more positive] when β diversity is increased more by deterministic and less by stochastic assembly processes) (Fig. 1C). First, we regressed the bacterial β diversity against βMPTI, in order to check whether, in general, β diversity increased with assembly processes that selected for phylogenetically dissimilar species. Next, the effect of β diversity was estimated for each cruise by conducting GLM that regressed the summed bacterial community biomass on β diversity of any pair of the 6 sampling sites within a cruise. Here, the resulting 14 regression coefficients (i.e., slopes) were regarded as the effects of β diversity on the overall function of the two communities. We finally regressed these regression coefficients against the mean βMPTI of each sampling cruise, to test if the effects of β diversity would increase with the assembly processes that selected for phylogenetically dissimilar species. Similarly, we also conducted backward selection to statistically account for potential confounding environmental variables.

Computation.

We used the phyloseq package to perform sequence subsampling to achieve parity in total number of reads (89), the iNEXT package to perform rarefaction (88), the phangorn package to build phylogenetic trees (79), the picante package to calculate phylogenetic distances to derive βMPTI (90), and the nlme package to perform generalized linear mixed-effect models (GLMM) (91). All packages were built and computation was carried out in R ver. 4.1.1 (92).

Data availability.

The sequence data have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the accession number PRJNA662424.

Supplementary Material

Reviewer comments
reviewer-comments.pdf (256.6KB, pdf)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Hon-Tsen Yu for providing facilities and advice on laboratory work. We also thank Sara Jackrel and Wenxue Wu for feedback on the manuscript.

This work was supported by the National Center for Theoretical Sciences, Foundation for the Advancement of Outstanding Scholarship, and the National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan.

We declare no competing financial interests.

Contributor Information

Feng-Hsun Chang, Email: fhchang422@ntu.edu.tw.

Chih-hao Hsieh, Email: chsieh@ntu.edu.tw.

Michaeline B. N. Albright, Los Alamos National Laboratory

REFERENCES

  • 1.Cardinale BJ, Duffy JE, Gonzalez A, Hooper DU, Perrings C, Venail P, Narwani A, Mace GM, Tilman D, Wardle DA, Kinzig AP, Daily GC, Loreau M, Grace JB, Larigauderie A, Srivastava DS, Naeem S. 2012. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486:59–67. doi: 10.1038/nature11148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tilman D, Isbell F, Cowles JM. 2014. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 45:471–493. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-120213-091917. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mori AS, Isbell F, Seidl R. 2018. β-Diversity, community assembly, and ecosystem functioning. Trends Ecol Evol 33:549–564. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2018.04.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Grman E, Zirbel CR, Bassett T, Brudvig LA. 2018. Ecosystem multifunctionality increases with beta diversity in restored prairies. Oecologia 188:837–848. doi: 10.1007/s00442-018-4248-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Barnes AD, Weigelt P, Jochum M, Ott D, Hodapp D, Haneda NF, Brose U. 2016. Species richness and biomass explain spatial turnover in ecosystem functioning across tropical and temperate ecosystems. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 371:20150279. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Feizabadi MF, Tahmasebi P, Broujeni EA, Ebrahimi A, Omidipour R. 2021. Functional diversity, functional composition and functional β diversity drive aboveground biomass across different bioclimatic rangelands. Basic Appl Ecol 52:68–81. doi: 10.1016/j.baae.2021.01.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Omidipour R, Tahmasebi P, Faal Faizabadi M, Faramarzi M, Ebrahimi A. 2021. Does β diversity predict ecosystem productivity better than species diversity? Ecol Indic 122:107212. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107212. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Leibold MA, Chase JM, Ernest SKM. 2017. Community assembly and the functioning of ecosystems: how metacommunity processes alter ecosystems attributes. Ecology 98:909–919. doi: 10.1002/ecy.1697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lindström ES, Langenheder S. 2012. Local and regional factors influencing bacterial community assembly. Environ Microbiol Rep 4:1–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2011.00257.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bannar-Martin KH, Kremer CT, Ernest M, Leibold MA, Auge H, Chase J, Declerck SAJ, Eisenhauer N, Harpole S, Hillebrand H, Isbell F, Koffel T, Larsen S, Narwani A, Petermann JS, Roscher C, Cabral JS, Supp SR. 2018. Integrating community assembly and biodiversity to better understand ecosystem function: the Community Assembly and the Functioning of Ecosystems (CAFE) approach. Ecol Lett 21:167–180. doi: 10.1111/ele.12895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Anderson MJ, Crist TO, Chase JM, Vellend M, Inouye BD, Freestone AL, Sanders NJ, Cornell HV, Comita LS, Davies KF, Harrison SP, Kraft NJB, Stegen JC, Swenson NG. 2011. Navigating the multiple meanings of β diversity: a roadmap for the practicing ecologist. Ecol Lett 14:19–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01552.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chase JM. 2003. Community assembly: when should history matter? Oecologia 136:489–498. doi: 10.1007/s00442-003-1311-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Baselga A. 2010. Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 19:134–143. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00490.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tatsumi S, Strengbom J, Čugunovs M, Kouki J. 2020. Partitioning the colonization and extinction components of beta diversity across disturbance gradients. Ecology 101:e03183. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dray S, Pélissier R, Couteron P, Fortin M-J, Legendre P, Peres-Neto PR, Bellier E, Bivand R, Blanchet FG, De Cáceres M, Dufour A-B, Heegaard E, Jombart T, Munoz F, Oksanen J, Thioulouse J, Wagner HH. 2012. Community ecology in the age of multivariate multiscale spatial analysis. Ecol Monogr 82:257–275. doi: 10.1890/11-1183.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Soininen J, Heino J, Wang J. 2018. A meta-analysis of nestedness and turnover components of beta diversity across organisms and ecosystems. Global Ecol Biogeogr 27:96–109. doi: 10.1111/geb.12660. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sloan WT, Lunn M, Woodcock S, Head IM, Nee S, Curtis TP. 2006. Quantifying the roles of immigration and chance in shaping prokaryote community structure. Environ Microbiol 8:732–740. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00956.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hubbell SP. 2001. The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography (MPB-32). Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kembel SW. 2009. Disentangling niche and neutral influences on community assembly: assessing the performance of community phylogenetic structure tests. Ecol Lett 12:949–960. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01354.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chase JM, Myers JA. 2011. Disentangling the importance of ecological niches from stochastic processes across scales. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 366:2351–2363. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Stegen JC, Lin X, Konopka AE, Fredrickson JK. 2012. Stochastic and deterministic assembly processes in subsurface microbial communities. ISME J 6:1653–1664. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Vellend M. 2010. Conceptual systhesis in community ecology. Q Rev Biol 85:183–206. doi: 10.1086/652373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Vellend M, Srivastava DS, Anderson KM, Brown CD, Jankowski JE, Kleynhans EJ, Kraft NJB, Letaw AD, Macdonald AAM, Maclean JE, Myers-Smith IH, Norris AR, Xue X. 2014. Assessing the relative importance of neutral stochasticity in ecological communities. Oikos 123:1420–1430. doi: 10.1111/oik.01493. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhou J, Ning D. 2017. Stochastic community assembly: does it matter in microbial ecology? Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 81:e00002-17. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00002-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lande R. 1993. Risks of population extinction from demographic and environmental stochasticity and random catastrophes. Am Nat 142:911–927. doi: 10.1086/285580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Thompson PL, Guzman LM, De Meester L, Horváth Z, Ptacnik R, Vanschoenwinkel B, Viana DS, Chase JM. 2020. A process-based metacommunity framework linking local and regional scale community ecology. Ecol Lett 23:1314–1329. doi: 10.1111/ele.13568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tucker CM, Shoemaker LG, Davies KF, Nemergut DR, Melbourne BA. 2016. Differentiating between niche and neutral assembly in metacommunities using null models of β-diversity. Oikos 125:778–789. doi: 10.1111/oik.02803. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Aguilar P, Sommaruga R. 2020. The balance between deterministic and stochastic processes in structuring lake bacterioplankton community over time. Mol Ecol 29:3117–3130. doi: 10.1111/mec.15538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ofiteru ID, Lunn M, Curtis TP, Wells GF, Criddle CS, Francis CA, Sloan WT. 2010. Combined niche and neutral effects in a microbial wastewater treatment community. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:15345–15350. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000604107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Vanwonterghem I, Jensen PD, Dennis PG, Hugenholtz P, Rabaey K, Tyson GW. 2014. Deterministic processes guide long-term synchronised population dynamics in replicate anaerobic digesters. ISME J 8:2015–2028. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Navarro-Cano JA, Goberna M, Verdú M. 2021. Facilitation enhances ecosystem function with non-random species gains. Oikos 130:2093–2099. doi: 10.1111/oik.08605. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mouquet N, Loreau M. 2003. Community patterns in source-sink metacommunities. Am Nat 162:544–557. doi: 10.1086/378857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Webb CO, Ackerly DD, McPeek MA, Donoghue MJ. 2002. Phylogenies and community ecology. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:475–505. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150448. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Cavender-Bares J, Kozak KH, Fine PVA, Kembel SW. 2009. The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology. Ecol Lett 12:693–715. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01314.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mouquet N, Devictor V, Meynard CN, Munoz F, Bersier LF, Chave J, Couteron P, Dalecky A, Fontaine C, Gravel D, Hardy OJ, Jabot F, Lavergne S, Leibold M, Mouillot D, Münkemüller T, Pavoine S, Prinzing A, Rodrigues ASL, Rohr RP, Thébault E, Thuiller W. 2012. Ecophylogenetics: advances and perspectives. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 87:769–785. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2012.00224.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Gerhold P, Cahill JF, Winter M, Bartish IV, Prinzing A. 2015. Phylogenetic patterns are not proxies of community assembly mechanisms (they are far better). Funct Ecol 29:600–614. doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.12425. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wong GTF, Chao SY, Li YH, Shiah FK. 2000. The Kuroshio edge exchange processes (KEEP) study—an introduction to hypotheses and highlights. Continental Shelf Res 20:335–347. doi: 10.1016/S0278-4343(99)00075-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Liu KK, Peng TH, Shaw PT, Shiah FK. 2003. Circulation and biogeochemical processes in the East China Sea and the vicinity of Taiwan: an overview and a brief synthesis. Deep Sea Res 2 Top Stud Oceanogr 50:1055–1064. doi: 10.1016/S0967-0645(03)00009-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Gong G, Shiah F, Liu K, Wen Y, Liang M. 2000. Spatial and temporal variation of chlorophyll a, primary productivity and chemical hydrography in the southern East China Sea. Continental Shelf Res 20:411–436. doi: 10.1016/S0278-4343(99)00079-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Tseng C, Lin C, Chen S, Shyu C. 2000. Temporal and spatial variations of sea surface temperature in the East China Sea. Continental Shelf Res 20:373–387. doi: 10.1016/S0278-4343(99)00077-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Liu KK, Yung Tang T, Gong GC, Chen LY, Shiah FK. 2000. Cross-shelf and along-shelf nutrient fluxes derived from flow fields and chemical hydrography observed in the southern East China Sea off northern Taiwan. Continental Shelf Res 20:493–523. doi: 10.1016/S0278-4343(99)00083-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Gong G, Wen Y, Wang B, Liu G. 2003. Seasonal variation of chlorophyll a concentration, primary production and environmental conditions in the subtropical East China Sea. Deep Sea Res 2 Top Stud Oceanogr 50:1219–1236. doi: 10.1016/S0967-0645(03)00019-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Shiah F-K, Gong G-C, Chen C-C. 2003. Seasonal and spatial variation of bacterial production in the continental shelf of the East China Sea: possible controlling mechanisms and potential roles in carbon cycling. Deep Sea Res 2 Top Stud Oceanogr 50:1295–1309. doi: 10.1016/S0967-0645(03)00024-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Shiah F-K, Liu K-K, Kao S-J, Gong G-C. 2000. The coupling of bacterial production and hydrography in the southern East China Sea: spatial patterns in spring and fall. Continental Shelf Res 20:459–477. doi: 10.1016/S0278-4343(99)00081-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Yeh Y-C, Peres-Neto PR, Huang S-W, Lai Y-C, Tu C-Y, Shiah F-K, Gong G-C, Hsieh C. 2015. Determinism of bacterial metacommunity dynamics in the southern East China Sea varies depending on hydrography. Ecography 38:198–212. doi: 10.1111/ecog.00986. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.van der Plas F, Manning P, Soliveres S, Allan E, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Verheyen K, Wirth C, Zavala MA, Ampoorter E, Baeten L, Barbaro L, Bauhus J, Benavides R, Benneter A, Bonal D, Bouriaud O, Bruelheide H, Bussotti F, Carnol M, Castagneyrol B, Charbonnier Y, Coomes DA, Coppi A, Bastias CC, Dawud SM, De Wandeler H, Domisch T, Finér L, Gessler A, Granier A, Grossiord C, Guyot V, Hättenschwiler S, Jactel H, Jaroszewicz B, Joly F, Jucker T, Koricheva J, Milligan H, Mueller S, Muys B, Nguyen D, Pollastrini M, Ratcliffe S, Raulund-Rasmussen K, Selvi F, Stenlid J, Valladares F, Vesterdal L, Zielínski D, et al. 2016. Biotic homogenization can decrease landscape-scale forest multifunctionality. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:3557–3562. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1517903113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Silva Pedro M, Rammer W, Seidl R. 2016. A disturbance-induced increase in tree species diversity facilitates forest productivity. Landscape Ecol 31:989–1004. doi: 10.1007/s10980-015-0317-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hautier Y, Isbell F, Borer ET, Seabloom EW, Harpole WS, Lind EM, MacDougall AS, Stevens CJ, Adler PB, Alberti J, Bakker JD, Brudvig LA, Buckley YM, Cadotte M, Caldeira MC, Chaneton EJ, Chu C, Daleo P, Dickman CR, Dwyer JM, Eskelinen A, Fay PA, Firn J, Hagenah N, Hillebrand H, Iribarne O, Kirkman KP, Knops JMH, La Pierre KJ, McCulley RL, Morgan JW, Pärtel M, Pascual J, Price JN, Prober SM, Risch AC, Sankaran M, Schuetz M, Standish RJ, Virtanen R, Wardle GM, Yahdjian L, Hector A. 2018. Local loss and spatial homogenization of plant diversity reduce ecosystem multifunctionality. Nat Ecol Evol 2:50–56. doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0395-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.De Raedt J, Baert JM, Janssen CR, De Laender F. 2019. Stressor fluxes alter the relationship between beta-diversity and regional productivity. Oikos 128:1015–1026. doi: 10.1111/oik.05191. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Mori AS, Isbell F, Fujii S, Makoto K, Matsuoka S, Osono T. 2016. Low multifunctional redundancy of soil fungal diversity at multiple scales. Ecol Lett 19:249–259. doi: 10.1111/ele.12560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Graham E, Crump AR, Resch CT, Fansler S, Arntzen E, Kennedy DW, Fredrickson JK, Stegen JC. 2016. Coupling spatiotemporal community assembly processes to changes in microbial metabolism. Front Microbiol 7:1949. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sengupta A, Volkmann THM, Danczak RE, Stegen JC, Dontsova K, Abramson N, Bugaj AS, Volk MJ, Matos KA, Meira-Neto AA, Barberán A, Neilson JW, Maier RM, Chorover J, Troch PA, Meredith LK. 2021. Contrasting community assembly forces drive microbial structural and potential functional responses to precipitation in an incipient soil system. Front Microbiol 12:754698. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.754698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Xun W, Li W, Xiong W, Ren Y, Liu Y, Miao Y, Xu Z, Zhang N, Shen Q, Zhang R. 2019. Diversity-triggered deterministic bacterial assembly constrains community functions. Nat Commun 10:3833. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11787-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Graham E, Stegen J. 2017. Dispersal-based microbial community assembly decreases biogeochemical function. Processes 5:65. doi: 10.3390/pr5040065. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Liu W, Graham EB, Dong Y, Zhong L, Zhang J, Qiu C, Chen R, Lin X, Feng Y. 2021. Balanced stochastic versus deterministic assembly processes benefit diverse yet uneven ecosystem functions in representative agroecosystems. Environ Microbiol 23:391–404. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Shoemaker LG, Sullivan LL, Donohue I, Cabral JS, Williams RJ, Mayfield MM, Chase JM, Chu C, Harpole WS, Huth A, HilleRisLambers J, James ARM, Kraft NJB, May F, Muthukrishnan R, Satterlee S, Taubert F, Wang X, Wiegand T, Yang Q, Abbott KC. 2020. Integrating the underlying structure of stochasticity into community ecology. Ecology 101:e02922. doi: 10.1002/ecy.2922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Shoemaker LG, Melbourne BA. 2016. Linking metacommunity paradigms to spatial coexistence mechanisms. Ecology 97:2436–2446. doi: 10.1002/ecy.1454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Venail PA, Maclean RC, Meynard CN, Mouquet N. 2010. Dispersal scales up the biodiversity–productivity relationship in an experimental source-sink metacommunity. Proc Biol Sci 277:2339–2345. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.2104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Livingston G, Matias M, Calcagno V, Barbera C, Combe M, Leibold MA, Mouquet N. 2012. Competition-colonization dynamics in experimental bacterial metacommunities. Nat Commun 3:1234. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Thompson PL, Gonzalez A. 2016. Ecosystem multifunctionality in metacommunities. Ecology 97:2867–2879. doi: 10.1002/ecy.1502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Lowe WH, McPeek MA. 2014. Is dispersal neutral? Trends Ecol Evol 29:444–450. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Nemergut DR, Schmidt SK, Fukami T, O'Neill SP, Bilinski TM, Stanish LF, Knelman JE, Darcy JL, Lynch RC, Wickey P, Ferrenberg S. 2013. Patterns and processes of microbial community assembly. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 77:342–356. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00051-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Balvanera P, Pfisterer AB, Buchmann N, He JS, Nakashizuka T, Raffaelli D, Schmid B. 2006. Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecol Lett 9:1146–1156. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00963.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Worm B, Barbier EB, Beaumont N, Duffy JE, Folke C, Halpern BS, Jackson JBC, Lotze HK, Micheli F, Palumbi SR, Sala E, Selkoe KA, Stachowicz JJ, Watson R. 2006. Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services. Science 314:787–790. doi: 10.1126/science.1132294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Stachowicz JJ, Bruno JF, Duffy JE. 2007. Understanding the effects of marine biodiversity on communities and ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 38:739–766. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095659. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Cardinale BJ, Matulich KL, Hooper DU, Byrnes JE, Duffy E, Gamfeldt L, Balvanera P, O'Connor MI, Gonzalez A. 2011. The functional role of producer diversity in ecosystems. Am J Bot 98:572–592. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1000364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Reu JC, Catano CP, Spasojevic MJ, Myers JA. 2022. Beta diversity as a driver of forest biomass across spatial scales. Ecology 103:e3774. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Mayfield MM, Levine JM. 2010. Opposing effects of competitive exclusion on the phylogenetic structure of communities. Ecol Lett 13:1085–1093. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01509.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Pavoine S, Bonsall MB. 2011. Measuring biodiversity to explain community assembly: a unified approach. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 86:792–812. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00171.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Webb CO. 2000. Exploring the phylogenetic structure of ecological communities: an example for rain forest trees. Am Nat 156:145–155. doi: 10.1086/303378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Fine PVA, Kembel SW. 2011. Phylogenetic community structure and phylogenetic turnover across space and edaphic gradients in western Amazonian tree communities. Ecography 34:552–565. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06548.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Stegen JC, Lin X, Fredrickson JK, Konopka AE. 2015. Estimating and mapping ecological processes influencing microbial community assembly. Front Microbiol 6:370. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Dini-Andreote F, Stegen JC, van Elsas JD, Salles JF. 2015. Disentangling mechanisms that mediate the balance between stochastic and deterministic processes in microbial succession. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:E1326–E1332. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1414261112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Wu W, Lu H-P, Sastri A, Yeh Y-C, Gong G-C, Chou W-C, Hsieh C-H. 2018. Contrasting the relative importance of species sorting and dispersal limitation in shaping marine bacterial versus protist communities. ISME J 12:485–494. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Horner-Devine MC, Bohannan BJM. 2006. Phylogenetic clustering and overdispersion in bacterial communities. Ecology 87:S100–S108. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[100:pcaoib]2.0.co;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Cooper N, Rodríguez J, Purvis A. 2008. A common tendency for phylogenetic overdispersion in mammalian assemblages. Proc Biol Sci 275:2031–2037. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Yang JW, Wu W, Chung CC, Chiang KP, Gong GC, Hsieh CH. 2018. Predator and prey biodiversity relationship and its consequences on marine ecosystem functioning—interplay between nanoflagellates and bacterioplankton. ISME J 12:1532–1542. doi: 10.1038/s41396-018-0111-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Berry D, Mahfoudh BK, Wagner M, Loy A. 2011. Barcoded primers used in multiplex amplicon pyrosequencing bias amplification. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:7846–7849. doi: 10.1128/AEM.05220-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP. 2016. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods 13:581–583. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, Peplies J, Glöckner FO. 2013. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res 41:D590–D596. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Ducklow HW, Carlson CA. 1992. Oceanic bacterial production. Adv Microb Ecol 12:113–181. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-7609-5_3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Chen CC, Chiang KP, Gong GC, Shiah FK, Tseng CM, Liu KK. 2006. Importance of planktonic community respiration on the carbon balance of the East China Sea in summer. Global Biogeochem Cycles 20. doi: 10.1029/2005GB002647. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Chiang KP, Lin CY, Lee CH, Shiah FK, Chang J. 2003. The coupling of oligotrich ciliate populations and hydrography in the East China Sea: spatial and temporal variations. Deep Sea Res 2 Top Stud Oceanogr 50:1279–1293. doi: 10.1016/S0967-0645(03)00023-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Charpy L, Blanchot J. 1998. Photosynthetic picoplankton in French Polynesian atoll lagoons: estimation of taxa contribution to biomass and production by flow cytometry. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 162:57–70. doi: 10.3354/meps162057. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. 2014. Waste not, want not: why rarefying microbiome data is inadmissible. PLoS Comput Biol 10:e1003531. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Chao A, Gotelli NJ, Hsieh TC, Sander EL, Ma KH, Colwell RK, Ellison AM. 2014. Rarefaction and extrapolation with Hill numbers: a framework for sampling and estimation in species diversity studies. Ecol Monogr 84:45–67. doi: 10.1890/13-0133.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Chao A, Chiu C-H. 2016. Species richness: estimation and comparison. Wiley StatsRef Statistics Reference Online.
  • 88.Hsieh TC, Ma KH, Chao A. 2016. iNEXT: an R package for rarefaction and extrapolation of species diversity (Hill numbers). Methods Ecol Evol 7:1451–1456. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12613. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. 2013. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One 8:e61217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Kembel SW, Cowan PD, Helmus MR, Cornwell WK, Morlon H, Ackerly DD, Blomberg SP, Webb CO. 2010. Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinformatics 26:1463–1464. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team . 2019. nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. 3.1–148. R-project.
  • 92.R Core Team. 2020. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

FIG S1

Box plots of environmental variables and bacterial community biomass of the 6 sampling stations in the southern East China Sea. The color represents the season of the cruise (spring is defined as March, April, and May; summer is defined as June, July, and August; autumn is defined as September, October, and November). Download FIG S1, TIF file, 4.7 MB (4.8MB, tif) .

Copyright © 2022 Chang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S2

Biplot of distance-based redundancy analysis showing the relationships between bacterial communities and environmental variables. Dissimilarities among bacterial communities are the Bray-Curtis dissimilarities between bacterial communities in the same cruise. The red arrows represent the environmental variables that significantly explain the dissimilarities among bacterial communities. HNF biomass (in micrograms of C per liter) is the community biomass of HNF, which are the potential predators of bacteria. The colors of dots represent different sampling stations. Download FIG S2, TIF file, 2.5 MB (2.6MB, tif) .

Copyright © 2022 Chang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S3

Box plot showing the variation of βMPTI among the 14 sampling cruises. The colors represent different sampling cruises. The gray filled boxes indicate the cruises in which the association between β diversity and the summed bacterial community biomass is negative or nonsignificant. Download FIG S3, TIF file, 8.2 MB (8.4MB, tif) .

Copyright © 2022 Chang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S1

The backward selection sequences to test Hypothesis I: Bacterial β diversity (Bray-Cutis dissimilarity index) increases the summed bacterial community biomass (Fig. 1B). Bacterial richness is included as a confounding variable. The bacterial β diversity and Shannon diversity are always included in each step. The variable labeled with an asterisk is the factor with the highest P value in each step and is removed in the next step. Download Table S1, DOCX file, 0.03 MB (31.7KB, docx) .

Copyright © 2022 Chang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S2

The backward selection sequences to test Hypothesis I: Bacterial β diversity (Bray-Cutis dissimilarity index) increases the summed bacterial community biomass (Fig. 1B). The Shannon diversity of bacterial community is included as a confounding variable. The bacterial β diversity and Shannon diversity are always included in each step. The variable labeled with an asterisk is the factor with the highest P value in each step and is removed in the next step. Download Table S2, DOCX file, 0.03 MB (32KB, docx) .

Copyright © 2022 Chang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S6

Phylogenetic Mantel correlogram showing significant phylogenetic signals of habitat preferences in the bacterial community in the southern East China Sea. Black and gray dots denote significant and nonsignificant correlations, respectively, relating between-ASV habitat differences to between-ASV phylogenetic distances. Download FIG S6, TIF file, 3.3 MB (3.4MB, tif) .

Copyright © 2022 Chang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S3

Backward selection sequences to test hypothesis II (that based on cross-cruise comparison, the bacterial β diversity effect is stronger [more positive[ when β diversity is increased more by deterministic and less by stochastic assembly processes) (Fig. 1C). The βMPTI is included in each step. The variable labeled with an asterisk is the factor with the highest P value in each step and is removed in the next step. Download Table S3, DOCX file, 0.02 MB (25.7KB, docx) .

Copyright © 2022 Chang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S4

(A and B) Correlation between β diversity and pooled richness (A) and Shannon diversity (B) of the bacterial paired communities. The richness and Shannon diversity were calculated from the combined community composition of the paired communities. The red solid lines indicate the significant positive correlation. The colored dots represent measurements from different sampling cruises. (C and D) Nonsignificant association between the summed bacterial community biomass and pooled richness (C) and Shannon diversity (D) of the bacterial paired communities. The red dashed lines indicate the regression line fitted by the GLMM, with cruise as the random effect. The gray shaded area represents the confidence interval of regression. The thin colored line represents the regression line fitted by GLM for each cruise. Colored solid and dashed lines represent significant and nonsignificant regressions, respectively. Download FIG S4, TIF file, 0.5 MB (552.9KB, tif) .

Copyright © 2022 Chang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S5

Relationships among the summed bacterial community biomass, bacterial β diversity, and pooled richness (A) and Shannon diversity (B). The colored plane is fitted with GLM, with blue indicating lower bacterial community biomass and yellow indicating higher bacterial community biomass. Download FIG S5, TIF file, 0.3 MB (351.5KB, tif) .

Copyright © 2022 Chang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TEXT S1

Detailed methods for obtaining bacterial ASVs. Download Text S1, DOCX file, 0.02 MB (22.2KB, docx) .

Copyright © 2022 Chang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Reviewer comments
reviewer-comments.pdf (256.6KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The sequence data have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the accession number PRJNA662424.


Articles from mSystems are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES