Skip to main content

This is a preprint.

It has not yet been peer reviewed by a journal.

The National Library of Medicine is running a pilot to include preprints that result from research funded by NIH in PMC and PubMed.

medRxiv logoLink to medRxiv
[Preprint]. 2023 Feb 18:2023.02.17.23286100. [Version 1] doi: 10.1101/2023.02.17.23286100

Comparison of synthesized and acquired high b -value diffusion-weighted MRI for detection of prostate cancer

Karoline Kallis, Christopher C Conlin, Allison Y Zhong, Troy S Hussain, Aritrick Chatterjee, Gregory S Karczmar, Rebecca Rakow-Penner, Anders Dale, Tyler Seibert
PMCID: PMC9949172  PMID: 36824958

Abstract

Background

High b -value diffusion-weighted images (DWI) are used for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). To decrease scan time and improve signal-to-noise ratio, high b -value (>1000 s/mm 2 ) images are often synthesized instead of acquired.

Purpose

Qualitatively and quantitatively compare synthesized DWI (sDWI) to acquired (aDWI) for detection of csPCa.

Study Type

Retrospective

Subjects

151 consecutive patients who underwent prostate MRI and biopsy.

Sequence

Axial DWI with b =0, 500, 1000, and 2000 s/mm 2 using a 3T clinical scanner using a 32-channel phased-array body coil

Assessment

We synthesized DWI for b =2000 s/mm 2 via extrapolation based on monoexponential decay, using b =0 and b =500 s/mm 2 (sDWI 500 ) and b =0, b =500, and b =1000 s/mm 2 (sDWI 1000 ). Differences between sDWI and aDWI were evaluated within regions of interest (ROIs). The maximum DWI value within each ROI was evaluated for prediction of csPCa. Classification accuracy was also compared to Restriction Spectrum Imaging restriction score (RSIrs), a previously validated biomarker based on multi-exponential DWI.

Statistical Tests

Discrimination of csPCa was evaluated via area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Statistical significance was assessed using bootstrap difference (two-sided α=0.05).

Results

Within the prostate, mean ± standard deviation of percent mean differences between sDWI and aDWI signal were -46±35% for sDWI 1000 and -67±24% for sDWI 500 . AUC for aDWI, sDWI 500, sDWI 1000 , and RSIrs within the prostate 0.62[95% confidence interval: 0.53, 0.71], 0.63[0.54, 0.72], 0.65[0.56, 0.73] and 0.78[0.71, 0.86], respectively. When considering the whole field of view, classification accuracy and qualitative image quality decreased notably for sDWI compared to aDWI and RSIrs.

Data Conclusion

sDWI is qualitatively comparable to aDWI within the prostate. However, hyperintense artifacts are introduced with sDWI in the surrounding pelvic tissue that interfere with quantitative cancer detection and might mask metastases. In the prostate, RSIrs yields superior quantitative csPCa detection than sDWI or aDWI.

Full Text Availability

The license terms selected by the author(s) for this preprint version do not permit archiving in PMC. The full text is available from the preprint server.


Articles from medRxiv are provided here courtesy of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Preprints

RESOURCES