Introduction:
Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a rare disease of clonal hematopoietic stem cells with an inherent risk of leukemic transformation, seen in an elderly male.
Case Presentation:
Herein, the authors report a case of CMML in a 72-year-old male who presented with fever and abdominal pain for 2 days with a history of easy fatigability. Examination revealed pallor and palpable supraclavicular nodes. Investigations showed leukocytosis with a monocyte count of 22% of white blood cell count, 17% blast cells in bone marrow aspiration, increased blast/promonocytes, and positive markers in immunophenotyping. The patient is planned for injection of azacitidine, 7 days cycle for a total of six cycles.
Clinical Discussion:
CMML is classified as overlapping myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms. It can be diagnosed based on a peripheral blood smear, bone marrow aspiration and biopsy, chromosomal analysis, and genetic tests. The commonly used treatment options are hypomethylating agents like azacitidine and decitabine, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant, and cytoreductive agents like hydroxyurea.
Conclusion:
Despite various treatment options, the treatment is still unsatisfactory, demanding standard management strategies.
Keywords: case report, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, hematopoietic stem cell transplant, Nepal
Highlights
Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia is an unusual disorder of hematopoietic stem cells.
It is a subtype of myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms.
It is seen in elderly males and has an inherent risk of leukemic transformation.
Despite various treatment options, the treatment is still unsatisfactory.
Introduction
As per the revised (2016) WHO classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a subtype of myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN)1. It is an uncommon disease seen in elderly males with a poor prognosis2,3. It arises from the clonal proliferation of hematopoietic stem cells with an increase in monocytes and dysplasia of myeloid precursors2,3. The age-standardized incidence rates for CMML was 0.34–0.45 per 100,000.
Herein we report a case of CMML in a 72-year-old elderly male. This case has been reported in line with the SCARE 2020 criteria6.
Case presentation
A 72-year-old male presented with fever and abdominal pain for 2 days. The fever was continuous in nature without chills or rigor, and was controlled by taking medications. The maximum recorded temperature was 100°F. He also had epigastric pain for 2 days, localized, nonradiating, and burning in character, with no specific aggravating or relieving factors. He also had a history of easy fatigue and decreased appetite. He was a nonsmoker and nonalcoholic with a history of chronic diseases like coronary artery disease, hypertension, and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (20%) taking medications regularly.
On examination, the averagely built patient appeared ill but conscious, calm, and well-oriented to time, place, and person. His vital parameters were within normal limits. Pallor was present on bilateral lower palpebral conjunctiva and skin, and the right supraclavicular lymph node was palpable. Respiratory, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and nervous system examinations were normal.
At presentation, his hemoglobin level was 3.8 g/dl and a total leukocyte count of 41,800 cells/mm3 with 44% neutrophils, 33% lymphocytes, and 22% monocytes (Table 1). Random blood sugar, liver, and renal functions were within normal range. Peripheral blood smear revealed normocytic normochromic anemia with leukocytosis and thrombocytosis with blast cells. On bone marrow aspiration, excess blast cells (17%) were seen and advised for bone marrow biopsy that suggested a diagnosis of CMML. Multicolor flow cytometry using CD45 versus scatter gating revealed 21.6% blast/promonocytes of myeloid phenotype with 5% mature monocytic component (Fig. 1). Myeloid/monocytic markers/maturation markers such as CD13, CD33, MPO, CD64, and CD36 were positive while immature markers such as CD38, HLA-DR, and CD117 were positive in immunophenotyping. T-cell and B-cell markers were negative. Hence, based on the smear and immunophenotyping findings, a diagnosis of CMML with increased blast/promonocytes was made.
TABLE 1.
Laboratory values before and after treatment
| Hematologic parameter | Result (pretreatment) | Result (after four cycles of treatment) | Reference range |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total leukocyte count (per microliter) | 41,800 | 3200 | 4000–11,000 |
| Neutrophil count (%) | 44 | 32.9 | 40–80 |
| Lymphocyte count (%) | 33 | 54.1 | 20–40 |
| Monocyte count (%) | 22 | 7.2 | 2–10 |
| Hemoglobin (g/dl) | 3.8 | 10.3 | 13–17 |
| Mean cell volume (fl) | 115 | 106 | 80–100 |
| Platelet count (per microliter) | 73,000 | 99,000 | 150,000–450,000 |
| Blast cells (%) | 17 | 0 |
FIGURE 1.

Flow cytometry report of the patient.
The patient is planned for injection of azacitidine 75 mg/m2 for seven days cycle, for a total of six cycles with a total cumulative dose of 117 mg. The patient has completed the fourth cycle of treatment. He is improving clinically with increasing hemoglobin and platelet count, decreasing total leukocyte count, and zero blast cell.
Discussion
CMML is a clonal disorder of hematopoietic stem cells with increased monocytes in peripheral blood and dysplastic features in bone marrow1–3. WHO has classified it under MDS/MPN according to the updated (2016) WHO classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia1. It is a disease of elderly males and uncommon in young adults, however, survival in young adults with CMML is higher than in elder patients7. Our case was also an elderly male aged 72 years. It has an inherent risk of about 15% leukemic transformation over 3–5 years8.
CMML can present as anemia, normocytic or macrocytic, and extramedullary features like splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, and lymph node infiltration3. Our patient had anemia and supraclavicular lymphadenopathy. CMML can be divided into proliferative and dysplastic types which have molecular and clinical differences and the cutoff for white blood cell (WBC) count between the two types is 13×109/l. Based on the percentage of blasts in peripheral blood and bone marrow, it can also be classified into three subtypes, CMML-0 with less than 2% blasts in peripheral blood and less than 5% blasts in bone marrow, CMML-1 with 2–4% blasts in peripheral blood and/or 5–9% blasts in bone marrow, and CMML-2 with 5–19% blasts in peripheral blood, 10–19% in bone marrow, and/or when any Auer rods are present1–3.
CMML can be diagnosed based on the peripheral blood smear, bone marrow aspiration and biopsy, chromosomal analysis, and genetic tests2. According to WHO, the diagnostic criteria of CMML1 includes:
Persistent peripheral blood monocytosis of 1×109/l or greater, with monocytes accounting for 10% or more of the WBC count.
Not meeting WHO criteria for BCR-ABL1 CML, primary myelofibrosis, polycythemia vera, or essential thrombocythemia.
No evidence of PDGFRA, PDGFRB, FGFR1 rearrangement, or PCM1-JAK2 (should be specifically excluded in cases with eosinophilia).
Less than 20% of blasts within the blood and bone marrow.
Dysplasia in one or more myeloid lineages. The diagnosis of CMML can be made even if myelodysplasia is absent or minimal if the other requirements are met.
An acquired clonal cytogenetic/molecular genetic disorder present in hematopoietic cells or
The monocytosis persisted for a minimum of 3 months.
All other causes of monocytosis are excluded.
Our case had findings of monocytosis with a monocyte count accounting for 22% of WBC count, 17% blast cells in bone marrow aspiration, increased blast/promonocytes, and positive markers in immunophenotyping.
Risk stratification in CMML can be done by various prognostic models for CMML such as MD Anderson Prognostic Score (MDAPS), CMML-Specific Cytogenetic Risk Stratification (CPSS), Mayo-French Cytogenetic Risk Stratification System, Mayo Molecular Model (MMM), and CMML-Specific Prognostic Scoring System (CPSS-Mol) to name some few2,9.
Treatment can be started after risk assessment. The commonly used agents for the treatment of CMML are hypomethylating agents like azacitidine and decitabine, with a complete remission rate of 7–17%, and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant, which is the curative treatment option but has a limited role due to its toxicity2,8,10. Our case is planned for a hypomethylating agent, injection of azacitidine 75 mg/m2 for 7 days cycle, for a total of six cycles. Apart from hypomethylating agents and allogeneic stem cell transplant, low-dose cytoreductive agents like cytarabine, etoposide, and hydroxyurea are also options, among which hydroxyurea is commonly used2.
Conclusion
CMML is an uncommon disorder of hematopoietic stem cells with overlapping features of both MDS/MPN. It is a disease in an elderly male with a bad prognosis. A curative treatment is an allogeneic stem cell transplant, while nontransplant options are hypomethylating agents such as azacitidine and decitabine, as well as cytoreductive agents such as hydroxyurea. Despite these treatment options, the treatment of CMML is still unsatisfactory, which opens the door for researchers to work on new therapeutic options.
Provenance and peer review
Not commissioned, externally peer-reviewed.
Ethical approval
NA.
Consent
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in Chief of this journal on request.
Sources of funding
None.
Authors’ contributions
S.G.: led data collection, concept of the study, contributed to writing the case information. S.K.: literature review, writing the initial draft, revising, and editing the manuscript. M.K.: literature review, revised, and edited the initial draft into the final manuscript. B.B.: literature review, revised, and editing the manuscript. A.A.: literature review, revised, and edited the manuscript. A.N.S.: literature review, revised, and edited the manuscript. All authors were involved in manuscript drafting and revising, and approved the final version.
Conflicts of interest disclosure
The authors declare that they have no financial conflict of interest with regard to the content of this report.
Research registration
None.
Guarantor
Dr. Saurab Karki, Military Hospital, Itahari-4, Sunsari, Nepal. Tel: +977 984 109 8336; E-mail: saurabkarki1010@gmail.com
Acknowledgments
None.
Footnotes
Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article.
Published online 7 February 2023
Contributor Information
Shekhar Gurung, Email: drshekhargurung@gmail.com.
Saurab Karki, Email: saurabkarki1010@gmail.com.
Manoj Khadka, Email: khadkamanoj432@gmail.com.
Bhuwan Bhatta, Email: Bhuwanbhatta012@gmail.com.
Ayush Adhikari, Email: ayush_adhikari@ymail.com.
Amar N. Shrestha, Email: shresthaaamar@gmail.com.
References
- 1. Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood 2016;127:2391–405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Kwon J. Diagnosis and treatment of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Blood Res 2021;56:5–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Itzykson R, Duchmann M, Lucas N, et al. CMML: Clinical and molecular aspects. Int J Hematol 2017;105:711–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Rollison DE, Howlader N, Smith MT, et al. Epidemiology of myelodysplastic syndromes and chronic myeloproliferative disorders in the United States, 2001-2004, using data from the NAACCR and SEER programs. Blood 2008;112:45–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Dinmohamed AG, van Norden Y, Visser O, et al. The use of medical claims to assess incidence, diagnostic procedures and initial treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia in the Netherlands. Leuk Res 2015;39:177–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Agha RA, Franchi T, Sohrabi C, et al. For the SCARE group. The SCARE 2020 Guideline: Updating Consensus Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) Guidelines. Int J Surg 2020;84:226–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Patnaik MM, Wassie EA, Padron E, et al. Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia in younger patients: molecular and cytogenetic predictors of survival and treatment outcome. Blood Cancer J 2015;5:e270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Patnaik MM, Tefferi A. Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: 2022 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management. Am J Hematol 2022;97:352–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Patnaik MM. How I diagnose and treat chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Haematologica 2022;107:1503–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Patnaik MM, Tefferi A. Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: 2018 update on diagnosis, risk stratification and management. Am J Hematol 2018;93:824–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
