Abstract
Background
Tibial nerve stimulation therapy is a treatment option for an overactive bladder. A surface electrode called a Silver Spike Point® electrode, which does not directly puncture the skin as in transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation, but is expected to exert the same therapeutic effect as percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation, was developed. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of tibial nerve stimulation with Silver Spike Point® electrodes for refractory overactive bladder.
Methodology
This was a six-week, single-arm, prospective study on the efficacy and safety of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for patients with refractory overactive bladder. Each treatment lasted 30 minutes and was performed twice a week. The stimulation sites of the tibial nerve were the Sanyinjiao point (SP6) and Zhaohai point (KI6) in both legs. The primary endpoint was the change in the total overactive bladder symptom score.
Results
In total, 29 patients (20 males and nine females: 64.86 ± 17.98 years old) were included in this study. Two women dropped out; one because of an adverse event and the other as requested. Therefore, 27 patients completed the study. The total overactive bladder symptom and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form scores significantly decreased by 2.22 and 2.39 points, respectively (p < 0.01 each). In the frequency volume chart, the numbers of urgency episodes and leaks in 24 hours significantly decreased by 1.53 and 0.44, respectively (p = 0.02 each).
Conclusions
Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation therapy using Silver Spike Point® electrodes was useful for patients with refractory overactive bladder and, thus, has potential as a new treatment option for refractory overactive bladder.
Keywords: ssp, ttns, tns, oab, silver spike point electrode, zhaohai point, sanyinjiao point, transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation, tibial nerve stimulation, refractory overactive bladder
Introduction
The efficacy of tibial nerve stimulation (TNS) for refractory overactive bladder (OAB) has been demonstrated [1,2]. TNS includes percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) with needle electrodes directly inserted into the posterior tibial nerve and transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) using surface electrodes over the skin above the nerve. Currently, it remains unclear whether these therapies are equally effective; however, previous studies reported no significant difference in the efficacy of PTNS and TTNS for OAB [3,4]. Transcutaneous treatment is considered safe because it does not directly puncture the skin, whereas percutaneous treatment is more effective because it directly stimulates nerves in other practice areas [5]. Although electrical stimulation therapy using Silver Spike Point (SSP)® electrodes does not directly puncture the skin and is classified as transcutaneous therapy, its unique electrode shape stimulates deep into the skin with pinpoint accuracy, and similar outcomes to those with percutaneous therapy have been reported [6-8].
Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the usefulness and safety of TTNS with SSP® electrodes for refractory OAB.
Materials and methods
This was a single-arm, prospective study. All procedures were conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki (UMIN000041660) and with the approval of the Institutional Review Board of Dokkyo Medical University (approval number: 29004). Signed informed consent was obtained from all patients before the initiation of treatment.
Patients with refractory OAB that had not been cured after more than three months of drug therapy were included. No age restrictions were imposed. Patients who were pregnant or possibly pregnant or who had a history of urinary tract infection, urinary tract stones, urethral disease, or pelvic surgery within 180 days prior to obtaining consent were excluded. Patients discontinued drug therapy for OAB, washed out for two weeks, and then received TTNS therapy twice a week for six weeks (12 times in total). One treatment was 30 minutes. In this study, we referred to the treatment protocol approved in Japan for magnetic stimulation therapy, a form of neuromodulation. It is envisioned to compare the therapeutic efficacy of this therapy with that of magnetic stimulation therapy in the future if efficacy is found in comparison with the sham group [9]. The stimulation sites of the tibial nerve were the Sanyinjiao point (SP6) and Zhaohai point (KI6) in both legs, and a surface electrode was placed at each site (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Stimulation points and image taken during transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation.
SP6: Sanyinjiao point; KI6: Zhaohai point
SP6 is located on three finger-breadths proximal to the medial malleolus, and KI6 is located on the depression below the medial malleolus [10,11]. Based on previous reports, the optimal stimulation conditions when using the electrodes described below were the low-frequency energization of bidirectional symmetric waves with a pulse width of 50 μs and a frequency of 100 Hz [12]. Surface electrodes and stimulators were SSP® electrodes and SSP Alpha 1® manufactured by Nihon Medix (Chiba, Japan) (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Silver Spike Point® electrode.
SSP® electrodes are metallic electrodes made of brass with silver plating. The tip of the SSP electrode adheres to the skin, deforming the stratum corneum and lowering its electrical resistance. As a result, the current is concentrated at the tip, enabling a point electrical stimulation.
The primary endpoint of this study was the change in the total OAB symptom score (OABSS). Secondary endpoints were subjective therapeutic effectiveness and changes in the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) score, free uroflowmetry, and frequency volume chart (FVC) before and after treatment.
Statistical analysis
The results obtained are shown as the mean ± SD. The Wilcoxon matched pair signed-rank test was performed to evaluate the significance of changes in parameters before and after treatment. The criterion for significance was p-values <0.05. The sample size was set according to the CONTACT study, the primary endpoint of which was total OABSS. A total of 26 patients were needed to yield 80% power to detect a difference of 2.00 points, assuming an SD of 2.50 points and α-error of 0.05 [13]. Therefore, 29 patients were required in consideration of a dropout rate of approximately 10%.
Results
In total, 29 patients (20 males and nine females) were included in this study. The mean age was 64.86 ± 17.98 years (8-92 years). Seven patients had benign prostatic hyperplasia. Previous treatment included various drug therapies administered in the past, including at other hospitals, making it difficult to ascertain the details. Two women (6.90%) dropped out; one because of an adverse event, and the other as requested. Therefore, 27 patients completed the study. Results obtained before and after treatment are shown in Table 1 and Table 2.
Table 1. OABSS, ICIQ-SF, and FVC at baseline and week six.
OABSS: overactive bladder symptom score; ICIQ-SF: International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form; FVC: frequency volume chart
| Before | At six weeks | P-value | |
| OABSS (n = 27) | |||
| Total score, points | 8.81 ± 2.80 | 6.59 ± 3.38 | <0.01 |
| Frequency score, points | 1.04 ± 0.43 | 0.81 ± 0.47 | 0.01 |
| Nocturia score, points | 2.00 ± 0.86 | 1.70 ± 0.90 | 0.09 |
| Urgency score, points | 3.22 ± 1.42 | 2.26 ± 1.73 | <0.01 |
| Urgency incontinence score, points | 2.56 ± 1.59 | 1.81 ± 1.68 | 0.02 |
| ICIQ-SF (n = 23) | |||
| Total score, points | 8.91 ± 5.19 | 6.52 ± 5.63 | <0.01 |
| Frequency of leaks score, points | 2.43 ± 1.61 | 1.87 ± 1.73 | 0.03 |
| Amount of leaks score, points | 2.26 ± 1.48 | 1.83 ± 1.55 | 0.06 |
| Quality of life score, points | 4.22 ± 2.87 | 2.83 ± 2.82 | 0.01 |
| FVC (n = 21) | |||
| Number of voids/daytime | 8.94 ± 2.32 | 8.59 ± 2.32 | 0.33 |
| Number of voids/night | 1.63 ± 1.20 | 1.67 ± 0.98 | 0.83 |
| Number of urgency episodes/24 hour | 3.01 ± 3.64 | 1.48 ± 2.21 | 0.02 |
| Number of leaks/24 hour | 1.10 ± 1.63 | 0.66 ± 1.46 | 0.02 |
| Amount of leaks/24 hour, mL | 81.71 ± 223.17 | 79.71 ± 260.13 | 0.41 |
| Total voided volume/daytime, mL | 1,598.52 ± 536.53 | 1,576.49 ± 566.45 | 0.58 |
| Total voided volume/night, mL | 500.64 ± 262.24 | 545.79 ± 319.81 | 0.35 |
| Nocturnal polyuria index, % | 31.01 ± 11.62 | 33.48 ± 13.99 | 0.29 |
| Mean voided volume, mL | 153.94 ± 60.46 | 160.68 ± 62.52 | 0.45 |
| Maximum voided volume, mL | 273.81 ± 96.83 | 294.29 ± 162.79 | 0.34 |
Table 2. Urodynamic parameters at baseline and week six.
| Before | At six weeks | P-value | |
| Free uroflowmetry (n = 10) | |||
| Voided volume, mL | 117.78 ± 44.74 | 113.37 ± 58.57 | 0.88 |
| Mean flow rate, mL/s | 7.62 ± 3.61 | 7.53 ± 3.03 | 0.72 |
| Maximum flow rate, mL/s | 12.17 ± 6.03 | 13.23 ± 5.16 | 0.96 |
| Post-void residual, mL | 30.30 ± 26.44 | 13.70 ± 17.02 | 0.16 |
| Bladder voiding efficiency, % | 85.21 ± 14.51 | 91.83 ± 8.54 | 0.50 |
The total OABSS and ICIQ-SF scores decreased at week six. Among OABSS subscores, decreases were observed in the urgency score and urgency incontinence score. Among ICIQ-SF subscores, the frequency of leak scores decreased, while the quality of life score improved. Regarding FVC, the number of urgency episodes and leaks in 24 hours significantly decreased. No significant differences were observed in free uroflowmetry.
Discussion
Initially, PTNS was referred to as posterior TNS with needle insertion, that is, PTNS, and was synonymous with TNS. TTNS using surface electrodes without needles has recently been employed.
The exact mechanism of action of TNS is not known. Previous reports suggest that the mechanism of action is similar to sacral neuromodulation, which stimulates the S3 route. TNS ultimately modulates the reflex pathway by stimulating the posterior tibial nerve, a mixed nerve containing L4-S3 fibers [14].
Few studies have reported the use of electrical stimulation therapy using SSP® electrodes to treat urological diseases. Mallmann et al. compared parasacral TNS with TTNS using SSP® electrodes in women with OAB and demonstrated its usefulness [15]. However, its effects on refractory OAB were not examined. The present results demonstrated the efficacy and safety of TTNS with SSP® electrodes for refractory OAB. Total OABSS and frequency, urgency, and urgency incontinence scores significantly decreased. The total ICIQ-SF score and frequency of leaks score also significantly decreased, while the quality of life score significantly improved. Similar to the results obtained for OABSS and ICIQ-SF, the number of 24-hour urgency and leak episodes significantly decreased in FVC. Free flowmetry did not show any significant changes, indicating that TTNS did not affect dysuria. Furthermore, there was only one case of minor adverse events, such as pain, suggesting a high safety profile. SSP® electrodes have a unique conical shape and do not puncture the skin; therefore, their application does not cause pain. Stimulation therapy using SSP® electrodes has already been incorporated in the anesthesia and orthopedic fields. In the field of anesthesiology, acupuncture is more effective than surface electrodes for anesthetic effects, and anesthesia using SSP® electrodes can be considered a middle ground between acupuncture and treatment using surface electrodes [10]. To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate the usefulness and safety of TTNS with SSP® electrodes for refractory OAB. Furthermore, because SSP® electrodes are reusable, the associated medical costs are cheaper than those of conventional disposable surface electrodes [16].
The male predominance of the patient population in this study needs to be considered. Previous studies on the efficacy of TNS, including TTNS, mostly involved female-only or female-dominant patient populations [2-4,15,17,18]. Therefore, although TNS therapy for OAB is already recommended in the guidelines, there have been few studies on a male-dominant population [19]. The present results demonstrated the efficacy and safety of TTNS for refractory OAB in a male-dominant patient population. International Prostatic Symptom Score voiding subscores, post-void residual urine volume (PVR), and bladder voiding efficiency were not affected by the treatment. Pharmacotherapy using anticholinergics or β3 agonists may cause voiding difficulties or increase PVR. Therefore, TTNS with SSP® electrodes may be safe for male patients with OAB.
The limitations of the present study include the absence of a control group because it was a single-arm, prospective study. Furthermore, the lack of studies with a male-dominant OAB patient population may be due to the difficulty of establishing patient backgrounds in male cases because confounding factors associated with comorbidities, such as benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), cannot be excluded. Furthermore, β3 agonists and anticholinergics, which are used in the treatment of OAB, and α1 blockers and phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors, involved in the treatment of BPH, were withdrawn for two weeks before TTNS. Therefore, it was not possible to exclude all confounding factors. However, the present results suggest that TTNS was effective, even in male patients, because significant treatment efficacy was observed even in patients with conditions other than OAB.
Although the long-term effects have been reported for PTNS, the protocol for this study did not evaluate the long-term effects [1]. In addition, none of the literature in other areas evaluated the long-term effects.
Conclusions
TTNS using SSP® electrodes is effective and safe for refractory OAB. Furthermore, TTNS therapy was useful for refractory OAB in a male-dominant patient population. Based on the present results, TTNS using SSP® has the potential as a new treatment option for OAB in men. Because this was a single-arm, prospective study, further accumulation of cases and a randomized controlled trial with a sham group are needed.
The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Human Ethics
Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. The Institutional Review Board of Dokkyo Medical University issued approval 29004
Animal Ethics
Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.
References
- 1.Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for the long-term treatment of overactive bladder: 3-year results of the STEP study. Peters KM, Carrico DJ, Wooldridge LS, Miller CJ, MacDiarmid SA. J Urol. 2013;189:2194–2201. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation: 2 years follow-up outcomes in the management of anticholinergic refractory overactive bladder. Leroux PA, Brassart E, Lebdai S, Azzouzi AR, Bigot P, Carrouget J. World J Urol. 2018;36:1455–1460. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2296-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Effects of transcutaneous and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in Bosnian female patients with an idiopathic overactive urinary bladder. Zonić-Imamović M, Sinanović O, Imamović M, Muftić M, Janković S, Bazardžanović M. Acta Med Acad. 2021;50:235–243. doi: 10.5644/ama2006-124.339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Efficacy of percutaneous and transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in women with idiopathic overactive bladder: a prospective randomised controlled trial. Sonmez R, Yildiz N, Alkan H. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2022;65:101486. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2021.101486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Comparison of percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for long-term pain relief in patients with chronic low back pain. Yokoyama M, Sun X, Oku S, et al. Anesth Analg. 2004;98:1552–1556. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000112312.94043.DF. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.[Electric acupuncture therapy: effectiveness in SSP treatment] Kuge H. https://www.medicalonline.jp/login?backto=https%3A%2F%2Fmol.medicalonline.jp%2Fjournal%2Fdownload%3FGoodsID%3Dan2idonh%2F2014%2F007312%2F026%26name%3D0089-0097j Jpn J Acupunct Man Ther. 2014;73:89–97. [Google Scholar]
- 7.A clinical study of acupuncture and SSP (silver spike point) electro-therapy for dry eye syndrome. Tseng KL, Liu HJ, Tso KY, Woung LC, Su YC, Lin JG. Am J Chin Med. 2006;34:197–206. doi: 10.1142/S0192415X0600376X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.[The effect of S.S.P. treatment by colonoscopy] Yokota H, Kanazawa H, Hitomi K, et al. Gastroenterol Endosc. 1986;28:2306–2313. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Multicenter, randomized, sham-controlled study on the efficacy of magnetic stimulation for women with urgency urinary incontinence. Yamanishi T, Homma Y, Nishizawa O, Yasuda K, Yokoyama O. Int J Urol. 2014;21:395–400. doi: 10.1111/iju.12289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Efficacy of acupuncture on pelvic pain in patients with endometriosis: study protocol for a randomized, single-blind, multi-center, placebo-controlled trial. Liang R, Li P, Peng X, et al. Trials. 2018;19:314. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2684-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Effects of acupressure at the Sanyinjiao point on primary dysmenorrhoea. Chen HM, Chen CH. J Adv Nurs. 2004;48:380–387. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03236.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.New waveform Silver Spike Point: threshold level of deep pain sense of SSP therapy and its effects on the endogenous analgesic system. Ishimaru K. https://mp.medicalonline.jp/mypage/login.php J Jpn Soc Stud Chron Pain. 2012;31:163–167. [Google Scholar]
- 13.A randomized controlled study of the efficacy of tadalafil monotherapy versus combination of tadalafil and mirabegron for the treatment of persistent overactive bladder symptoms in men presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms (CONTACT Study) Yamanishi T, Kaga K, Sakata K, Yokoyama T, Kageyama S, Fuse M, Tokunaga S. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020;39:804–812. doi: 10.1002/nau.24285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Electrical neuromodulation in the management of lower urinary tract dysfunction: evidence, experience and future prospects. Abello A, Das AK. Ther Adv Urol. 2018;10:165–173. doi: 10.1177/1756287218756082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Comparison of parasacral transcutaneous electrical stimulation and transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation in women with overactive bladder syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. Mallmann S, Ferla L, Rodrigues MP, Paiva LL, Sanches PR, Ferreira CF, Ramos JG. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;250:203–208. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Effects of bilateral transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation on constipation severity in geriatric patients: a prospective clinical study. Gokce AH, Gokce FS. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2020;20:101–105. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Comparison of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) protocols for women with refractory overactive bladder (OAB): a prospective randomised trial. Alkis O, Sevim M, Güven Kartal İ, Baser A, İbrahim İvelik H, Aras B. Int J Clin Pract. 2021;75:0. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Posterior tibial nerve stimulation in the management of overactive bladder: a prospective and controlled study. Bellette PO, Rodrigues-Palma PC, Hermann V, et al. Actas Urol Esp. 2009;33:58–63. doi: 10.1016/s0210-4806(09)74003-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.European Association of Urology guidelines on male urinary incontinence. Gacci M, Sakalis VI, Karavitakis M, et al. Eur Urol. 2022;82:387–398. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


