Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Feb 23.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2022 Sep 26;144(39):18090–18100. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c08050

Design of a flexible, Zn-selective protein scaffold that displays anti-Irving-Williams behavior

Tae Su Choi 1, F Akif Tezcan 1,*
PMCID: PMC9949983  NIHMSID: NIHMS1875853  PMID: 36154053

Abstract

Selective metal binding is a key requirement not only for the functions of natural metalloproteins but also for the potential applications of artificial metalloproteins in heterogeneous environments such as cells and environmental samples. The selection of transition metal ions through protein design can, in principle, be achieved through the appropriate choice and the precise positioning of amino acids that comprise the primary metal coordination sphere. However, this task is made difficult by the intrinsic flexibility of proteins and the fact that protein design approaches generally lack the sub-Å precision required for steric selection of metal ions. We recently introduced a flexible/probabilistic protein design strategy (MASCoT) that allows metal ions to search for optimal coordination geometry within a flexible, yet covalently constrained dimer interface. In a proof-of-principle study, we used MASCoT to generate an artificial metalloprotein dimer, (AB)2, which selectively bound CoII and NiII selectively over CuII (as well as other first-row transition metal ions) through the imposition of a rigid octahedral coordination geometry, thus countering the Irving-Williams trend. In this study, we set out to redesign (AB)2 in order to examine the applicability of MASCoT to the selective binding of other metal ions. We report here the design and characterization of a new flexible protein dimer, B2, which displays ZnII selectivity over all other tested metal ions including CuII both in vitro and in cellulo. Selective, anti-Irving-Williams ZnII binding by B2 is achieved through the formation of a unique tri-nuclear Zn coordination motif in which His and Glu residues are rigidly placed in a tetrahedral geometry. These results highlight the utility of protein flexibility in the design and discovery of selective binding motifs.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1875853-f0001.jpg

Introduction

Up to a third of all proteins are associated with metal ions,13 which are often necessary for the proper folding/assembly of proteins47 and enable them to fulfill essential functions such as signaling,810 small molecule transport,1113 and catalysis.1418 The correct pairing of metalloproteins with their cognate metal ions is essential for these cellular functions.19 In fact, there are very few known cases where the natural metal component of a protein can be substituted by another metal ion in vivo without deleterious consequences.2025 Despite the fact that there is a limited set of metal-coordinating amino acid residues (e.g., His, Asp, Glu, Cys, Met, Tyr), three-dimensional protein structures can achieve some extent of metal selectivity through a suitable combination of such residues in the primary coordination sphere in addition to the further tuning of metal-ligand interactions through secondary sphere effects.19, 2628 Of particular significance is steric selection by proteins, which describes the precise spatial arrangement of the primary-sphere residues to discriminate between metal ions (particularly, those of the d-block) based on their ionic radii and their electronic preferences for specific coordination geometries.10 Yet, all proteins are inherently flexible, meaning that metal binding can perturb the intended coordination geometries of the primary-sphere residues such that steric selection is often overridden.2934 As a result, metal binding affinities of proteins are largely governed by the electronic properties of the metal ions themselves and almost universally follow the Irving-Williams (IW) series (MnII < FeII < CoII < NiII < CuII > ZnII)29, 3538 with rare exceptions.28, 39 For instance, most metalloproteins coordinate CuII–the most dominant member of the IW series–with binding constants that are typically orders of magnitude higher than those of their cognate metal ions.26, 37, 4045 Thus, as a necessity to overcome the restrictions set forth by the IW series, living organisms have evolved sophisticated systems for metal homeostasis and speciation,4647 which actively control concentrations of transition metal ions in cells, use specialized proteins for metal transport and delivery,4851 and compartmentalize folding and metalation.26 In fact, the availability of exchangeable metal ions in cells is tightly regulated by an array of specialized metallosensor proteins and gene transcription factors5255 such that the metal concentrations follow the inverse of the IW series (i.e., MnII > FeII > CoII > NiII > CuII < ZnII) to avoid the non-discriminate binding of the IW-dominant metal ions to cellular proteins.36

While nature has–by necessity–resorted to such active control mechanisms to ensure correct metalation of proteins in cells, it should still be possible to thermodynamically overcome the IW restrictions by the proper design of protein scaffolds that can rigidly impose steric selection.56 Potentially, such artificial metalloproteins could not only be incorporated into cells to perform in vivo tasks (e.g., catalysis,57 control and perturbation of metal homeostasis56, 58) but they could also serve as metal sequestration and remediation agents in environmental/ex vivo settings.59 However, the de novo design of a selective transition-metal-binding protein remains difficult because no current computational design approach possesses the structural precision (on the order of tenths of an Ångstrom) required to sterically distinguish between transition metal ions.6061 To address this challenge, we recently introduced a probabilistic design strategy termed MASCOT (Metal Active Sites through Covalent Tethering).41 In MASCOT, two monomers of a protein are each surface-engineered with a Cys residue to covalently link them by a disulfide bond. Combinations of metal-coordinating residues flanking the Cys residue are then added to furnish a flexible protein homodimer capable of stably coordinating metal ions in the disulfide-linked interface. Such a design offers several advantages: (1) the disulfide bond is sufficiently flexible to allow the protein dimer to explore a wide range of conformational states (i.e., the dimer possesses a shallow energy landscape) in the “search” for a thermodynamically favored metal coordination mode, but also short enough such that the resulting metal-bound dimer is structurally constrained (i.e., it represents a distinct free-energy minimum) and the location of metal binding is largely limited to the disulfide-linked interface; (2) the inherent symmetry of the system can enable the binding of multiple metal ions in the interface, thus giving rise to cooperative binding and mutual rigidification; (3) the surface-exposed nature of the interfacial metal coordination sites ensures that bound metal ions can exchange freely with unbound species so that kinetically trapped species are avoided (i.e., the system is under thermodynamic control).

Using the four-helix bundle protein cytochrome cb562 as a building block for MASCoT, we recently engineered an artificial homodimeric scaffold termed (AB)2 with multiple His-rich motifs surrounding the interfacial disulfide linkage (Figure 1a).56 We found that the flexible (AB)2 scaffold could adopt at least two mutually exclusive conformational states depending on the identity of the bound metal ion. Detailed characterization of these conformations led to the discovery of two cooperative metal coordination motifs that consisted of five histidines and one aqua ligand (5His/1H2O) in a rigidified octahedral geometry, which selectively bound CoII or NiII and sterically disfavored CuII coordination, thus thermodynamically overcoming the IW series. Following up on that proof-of-principle study, here we asked whether our strategy could be applied to discover other selective metal binding motifs. Accordingly, we reengineered the flexible (AB)2 dimer interface with alternative coordination sites.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

(a) Position of metal-binding residues in the B construct remodeled from the His-rich AB variant. Purple or blue sticks represent His residues in the Site A (H67/H71/H97) or in the Site B (H60/H100/H104) and native H63. Yellow (E57) and green (D65/D74/E86) sticks indicate Asp or Glu residues in wild type cytochrome cb562. (b) Metal-induced conformational changes of a disulfide bond–linked B2 interface. Locations of potential metal-binding residues can induce variations in the metal-bound conformations.

We targeted ZnII selectivity over other metal ions in the IW series (including CuII) and heavy metal ions, given the diverse structural and functional roles ZnII ions play in natural metallo-proteins,27, 6266 and the vulnerability of natural ZnII coordination sites to deactivation by heavier metal ions (e.g., CdII, PbII).6769 Indeed, the design of selective ZnII chelators has been broadly pursued using a variety of molecular and macromolecular platforms such as fluorogenic ligands,7071 peptoids,72 and proteins.58, 73 We report here the probabilistic design and the structural, biophysical and biochemical characterization of a reengineered dimeric assembly, B2, which displays ZnII selectivity over all other tested metal ions including CuII. Such selective, anti-IW ZnII binding is achieved thanks to the formation of a unique tri-nuclear Zn coordination motif consisting of His and Glu residues arranged in a tetrahedral geometry. Our results further establish structural flexibility as an invaluable protein design parameter, particularly with respect to the discovery of metal coordination motifs that would be difficult to build using first principles.

Results and Discussion

Design and Characterization of B2.

The previously designed (AB)2 dimer is built from two identical monomers of cytochrome cb562 containing two 3His motifs in two surface sites: Site A (H67/H71/H97) is immediately next to the Cys96 (for covalent dimerization) and Site B (H60/H100/H104) is located two-to-three helix turns away (Figure 1a).56 As in the cases of CoII and NiII, competitive titrations indicated that (AB)2 also bound approximately two equivalents of ZnII with low nM dissociation constants (Figure S1). Yet, unlike CoII and NiII, ZnII could not outcompete CuII: native electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) experiments indicated that (AB)2 preferred to form a 1CuII or a 1ZnII:1CuII heterometallic complex when both metal ions were present in a solution.56 We attributed the non-competitiveness of ZnII to the fact that it almost never occupies 5- or 6-coordinate, all-His coordination sites in proteins.63 Thus, the 2ZnII-bound form of (AB)2 likely does not adopt the same conformation as the 2CoII and 2NiII-bound forms. This observation motivated us to change the location and type of metal-binding residues to induce the formation of new ZnII-binding sites in the dimer interface. Hence, we eliminated the 3His motif in Site A in the AB construct, converting it to the native residues (I67, Q71, T97) of cytochrome cb562 (Figure 1a). We reasoned that in the resulting construct (“B”), the 3His motif of Site B (in combination with the native H63) could pair with one of the native Glu and Asp residues (E57, D65, D74 or E86) from the opposing monomer to form stable, tetrahedral ZnII coordination motifs (Figure 1a). In light of the expected flexibility of the B2 dimer and the placement of metal coordinating residues, we predicted that at least two different conformations could ensue upon binding two metal ions: the antiparallel Conformer-1 or V-shaped Conformer-2 (Figure 1b). In addition, we expected that a third, single-metal-bound structure (Conformer-3) could also form, using only the His residues of the B sites.

We first characterized the structure and metal-binding properties of B2 in solution. Analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) measurements indicated that B2 is a stable dimer both in the absence and presence of metal ions (Figure S2a). We performed ESI-MS experiments on mixtures of B2 (5 μM) and up to three equivalents of mid-to-late first-row transition metal ions (MnII, FeII, CoII, NiII, ZnII, CuII) to determine whether B2 forms stable metal complexes in solution (Figure 2a). In the absence of metal ions, B2 showed a broad charge state distribution, from +9 to +24 (Figure S2b). We chose the most abundant +11 charge state as the representative peak for metal-binding analysis.56 The mass spectra for the MnII, FeII and CoII samples were dominated by the metal-free (apo) form of B2 (Figure 2a), consistent with the low expected affinities of these metal ions according to the IW series. In contrast, we observed dominant peaks for 1NiII-, 1CuII- and 3ZnII-bound B2. Competition titrations using Fura-2 as a chromogenic indicator confirmed that B2 tightly bound one NiII (Kd = 15 nM), three ZnII (Kd, aver. = 34 nM) and one CuII ion (Kd = 3 pM) (Figure 2b, Table S1). Notably, both the NiII and CuII affinities of B2 were considerably lower (3- to 10-fold) than that of (AB)2 (~5 nM for NiII, 0.2 pM for CuII),41, 56 implying that the removal of the Site A motif likely resulted in low-coordinate (i.e., n <5 or 6) Ni- and Cu-binding modes in the dimer interface.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

(a) ESI-MS spectra of B2 in the presence of MnII, FeII, CoII, NiII, CuII, and ZnII. The color of the circles represents NiII (green), CuII (cyan), or ZnII (red) ion bound to B2. The number of circles indicates the number of metal ions bound to B2. (b) Competitive metal-binding titrations of NiII (left), CuII (middle), ZnII (right) using Fura-2. Changes in normalized Fura-2 absorbance at 335 nm (green, cyan, and red data points and black fits) are plotted along with theoretical metal-binding isotherms (grey) in the absence of B2. Simulated equivalence points (0–3 equivalents) for metal binding are indicated on the theoretical metal-binding isotherms. Experimental data points and error bars are presented as mean and standard deviation of three independent measurements.

Next, we set out to crystallize B2 in the presence of first-row transition metal ions and determine the structures of metal-bound forms of B2. MnII, FeII and CoII samples yielded no crystals, whereas we were able to obtain diffraction-quality crystals with NiII, CuII and ZnII. Interestingly, the diffraction analysis of the CuII-B2 cocrystals revealed an apo-B2 structure (2.4 Å resolution) (Figure S2c) despite the pM dissociation constant of the corresponding complex. Possible explanations include the presence of multiple CuII-bound B2 conformations none of which are thermodynamically dominant or crystal packing effects that render the CuII-B2 complex unfavorable compared to apo-B2.

By contrast, the structures of both NiII- and ZnII adducts of B2 accorded with the solution studies. The 1NiII-bound B2 crystal structure (1.89 Å resolution) featured a parallel and slightly tilted arrangement (interfacial angle θint = 35°; Figure 3a) of the disulfide-linked protein monomers, approximating the one of the expected dimer conformations, namely the Conformer-3 (Figure 1b). The NiII coordination comprises four His residues (H60/H100 from one monomer and H100’/H104’ from the other) and two water molecules (Figure S2d), also in agreement with its lower stability compared to the 5His coordination sites in (AB)2. The structure of the 3ZnII-B2 complex (1.7 Å resolution) also revealed a parallel dimer arrangement, but quite distorted from that of the NiII-B2 assembly and adopting a V-shaped architecture (θint = 102°; Figure 3b), consistent with Conformer-2 (Figure 1b). This conformation is induced by an unusual coordination geometry of three ZnII ions. Two of the ZnII ions are equivalent and related to one another by the C2 symmetry of the protein dimer (Figure 3c). They are coordinated to three His residues (H60/H63/H104) from one monomer and a Glu (E57) from the second, completing a nearly ideal tetrahedral geometry (avg. bond angle = 109.4 ± 4.6°, avg. bond distance = 2.0 ± 0.1 Å, Figure 3d). These coordination sites are directly bridged by the third ZnII ion, which coordinates the Ne atoms of H60 residues along with two water molecules (also in a tetrahedral geometry, Figure 3e), thus completing a cooperative and highly rigidified metal coordination network (Figure S3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Crystal structures of (a) 1NiII-B2 (PDB: 8DRD) and (b) 3ZnII-B2 (PDB: 8DRF). Green and red spheres represent NiII and ZnII ions, respectively. Close-up view of the green boxed area is presented in Figure S2d. (c) Close-up of the primary coordination spheres of trinuclear ZnII-binding sites. Green spheres represent water molecules. Contour levels of 2mF0-DFc (gray mesh) electron density are 5.0 σ for ZnII and 2.0 σ for C, N, and O atoms. (d-e) Coordination distances and angles between ZnII and ligands: (d) peripheral ZnII sites coordinated to E57/H60/H104/H63’ and (e) central ZnII site coordinated to H60/H60’/2H2O.

Solution analysis of the ZnII selectivity of B2.

Having determined the ZnII binding properties of B2, we examined if it also displays ZnII selectivity over CuII which would represent anti-IW behavior. Although the per-site binding affinity of the CuII for B2 is >1,000-fold higher than that for the individual ZnII sites, we hypothesized that the higher valency and cooperativity of the trinuclear ZnII sites would enable the out-competition of CuII. Indeed, when the experimentally determined equilibrium constants were used to calculate theoretical fractions of B2 and MII-B2 species (MII = CuII or ZnII), the 3ZnII-B2 complex was predicted to dominate 1CuII-B2 species at [MII] ≥ 2.3 μM (Figure 4a, see Supporting Methods for calculations).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

(a) Theoretical fractionation profiles of B2, CuII-B2, and 3ZnII-B2 species as functions of buffered CuII and ZnII concentrations in 20 mM MOPS and 150 mM NaCl (left) and 20 mM NH4HCO3 (right). The dotted line represents the concentration at which the portion of 3ZnII-B2 or 2ZnII-B2 is equal to CuII-B2. (b) Sample preparation scheme for metal-binding competition. If CuII is first added to B2 and ZnII is added later, the sample is labeled CuII//ZnII. (c) ICP-MS analysis of metal contents in B2 solutions. Using Fe ions of the heme group as an internal standard, the MII equivalent per B2 was evaluated. Under both CuII//ZnII and ZnII//CuII conditions, ZnII outcompetes CuII. Experimental data points and error bars are presented as mean and standard deviation of three independent measurements. (d) ESI-MS spectra of B2 in CuII//ZnII (left) and ZnII//CuII (right). Filled circles represent the equivalents of CuII (cyan) and ZnII (red) ions bound to B2. Half circles indicate a mixture of CuII and ZnII complexes. Spectra in insets correspond to expanded m/z ranges of the 3MII-B2 species. (e) ESI-MS spectra of B2 obtained in 20 mM NH4Ac (pH 6.8). Circles in ESI-MS spectra represent the number of ZnII (red) and PbII (dark grey) ions bound to B2.

We first employed inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) to assess competitive metal binding to B2. For these experiments, mixtures of B2 (5 μM dimer) with various metal compositions were prepared in 20 mM MOPS (pH 7.4) solutions: (1) non-competitive samples containing 15 μM CuII or 15 μM ZnII only; (2) competitive samples containing 15 μM CuII + 15 μM ZnII. The latter samples were prepared in two different ways to ensure that competition occurred under thermodynamic control, in that the protein solution was first incubated either with the competitive metal or ZnII, followed by the addition of ZnII or the competitive metal (Figure 4b). Subsequently, unbound metal ions in the protein solutions were washed out through a buffer exchange prior to ICP-MS measurements. Under non-competitive conditions, the B2 dimer associated with 1.1 equiv. CuII or 2.6 equiv. ZnII (Figure 4c), which are similar to the expected stoichiometries. Under both competitive conditions (CuII//ZnII or ZnII//CuII), we observed that ~2.5 equiv. ZnII and ~0.5 equiv. CuII bound the B2 dimer, consistent with the dominance of ZnII binding over CuII. We note that CuII is frequently bound non-specifically to protein surfaces,41, 56, 73 which may explain its sub-stoichiometric association with B2 under competitive conditions.

We next turned to ESI-MS to investigate distributions of metalated B2 species under competitive conditions (Figure 4d). We used the same solution conditions as above, except that we included the volatile buffering agent ammonium bicarbonate NH4HCO3 (20 mM, pH 7.8) that is compatible with ESI experiments (instead of 20 mM MOPS). Because NH4HCO3 is a metal-coordinating buffer agent, we had to account for the fact that the apparent Kd values of the CuII- and ZnII-B2 complexes would be increased (i.e., weaker binding) due to the formation of metal-ammine complexes.74 Indeed, competitive Fura-2 titrations in 20 mM NH4HCO3 solutions indicated up to ~300-fold weaker B2 binding for CuII and ZnII (particularly for the third coordination site) compared to the previously determined values measured in the presence of MOPS (Figures S4ab). The revised metal fractionations profiles indicated that 2ZnII-B2 species would be the dominant species over the 1CuII-B2 complex starting at [MII] ≈ 0.4 μM, followed by the increasing population of the 3ZnII-B2 complex at [MII] ≈ 2.6 μM (Figure 4a). Indeed, the ESI-MS spectra revealed that 3ZnII-B2, 2ZnII-B2, and 2ZnII+1CuII-B2 species were predominant under both CuII//ZnII and ZnII//CuII conditions (Figure 4d), with no peak detected for the 1CuII-B2 complex. As a control, we also conducted ESI-MS experiments to assess ZnII vs. NiII competition for B2 binding, with the expectation that the latter should not be able to compete the former even at sub-μM levels based on the experimentally determined binding affinities. As expected, both NiII//ZnII and ZnII//NiII samples only displayed ESI-MS peaks for the 3ZnII-B2 complex (Figure S4c).

Finally, in addition to CuII and the metal ions in the IW series, CdII and PbII with closed-shell electronic configurations like ZnII have been reported as competitors to ZnII coordination sites in metalloproteins.6769 To test ZnII selectivity over CdII and PbII, the binding between B2 (5 μM) and CdII (15 μM) or PbII (15 μM) was examined using ESI-MS in 20 mM ammonium acetate (NH4Ac) (pH 6.8). This buffer agent was chosen instead of NH4HCO3 because CdII and PbII form insoluble salts with carbonate (CO32-).75 CdII and PbII did not form a stable complex with B2, while ZnII binding was maintained (Figure 4e). Moreover, in the mixtures of ZnII and CdII or PbII, ZnII always out-competed other metal ions (Figures S4de). Compared to ZnII (bond distance = 2.1 ± 0.1 Å for N donors, 2.3 ± 0.3 Å for O donors), both CdII and PbII form coordination complexes with considerably longer bond distances (2.4 ± 0.3 Å for N donor, 2.6 ± 0.2 Å for O donor).7677 We surmise that B2 cannot adopt the Conformer-2 dimer geometry while also accommodating such long coordination bond distances within the observed trinuclear coordination motif. Taken together, our analytical measurements show that B2 is selective for ZnII coordination over all relevant metal ions including CuII.

Structural analysis of the ZnII selectivity of B2.

To examine ZnII vs. CuII competition for B2 binding at higher metal/protein concentrations and to obtain direct structural information, we carried out competitive co-crystallization studies. In these studies, a solution of 4 mM B2 was first equilibrated with 6 mM CuII or ZnII for 1 h, followed by incubation with the second metal ion (ZnII or CuII) for 24 h to reach thermodynamic equilibrium (Figure 2b). These stock solutions were used for sitting-drop crystallization and the harvested crystals were used for X-ray diffraction analysis. Under both conditions (CuII//ZnII and ZnII//CuII), the observed crystal structures (1.65 and 1.55 Å resolution, respectively) were identical to that of 3ZnII-B2 (i.e., Conformer-2) featuring three interfacial metal coordination sites (Figure S4f). Anomalous diffraction data collected at CuII (9.3 keV) and ZnII (9.7 keV) K-edges confirmed that all interfacial ions were ZnII (Figures 5ab), corroborating our findings from solution analyses.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

(a-b) Anomalous scattering densities of metal ions in the crystal structures of B2 formed in CuII//ZnII or ZnII//CuII conditions. Anomalous densities contoured at 5.0 σ were collected around the K-edge of (a) Cu (~9.0 keV) or (b) Zn (~9.7 keV). Changes in anomalous densities above (top) and below (bottom) the K-edge of ZnII indicate that the metal-binding sites in the B2 interface are occupied by ZnII ions. (c) Normalized Kratky plots of B2 in the presence of CuII (cyan) or ZnII (red) compared with the theoretical plot of 3ZnII-B2 (black) at 200 μM dimer concentration ([MII] = 200 μM). (d) Normalized Kratky plot of B2 in CuII//ZnII and ZnII//CuII conditions presented with the theoretical plot of 3ZnII-B2 (black) at 200 μM dimer concentration ([M1II//M2II] = 200 // 200 μM). All log-scale SAXS plots are shown in Figure S6.

To probe whether the crystallographically observed structures also formed in solution, we performed solution small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) experiments. The samples contained 200 μM B2 and 150 mM NaCl in a MOPS (pH 7.4) buffer solution in the presence of 600 μM CuII or ZnII only (600 μM each), as well as under competitive CuII//ZnII or ZnII//CuII (600 μM each) conditions (Figures 5cd). In all cases, the scattering patterns showed linearities in Guinier analysis, consistent with B2 dimers with a radius of gyration (Rg) of ~20.5 Å (Figure S5). We then compared the scattering patterns of CuII or ZnII-containing samples with the theoretical scattering pattern derived from the 3ZnII-B2 crystal structure (Figure 5c). There was a close agreement between the experimental SAXS pattern of ZnII-bound B22 ~0.8) with the theoretical pattern, indicating that the Zn-B2 complex formed in solution corresponds to the crystal structure of 3ZnII-B2 (Conformer-2). In contrast, there was a large deviation in the case of the CuII-bound B22 ~13.4) from the simulated SAXS pattern of the 3ZnII-B2 structure (Figure 5c). In fact, the pattern for CuII-bound B2 more closely approximated that derived from the 1NiII-B2 crystal structure (χ2 ~2.0) (Figure S6), implying that the CuII-bound B2 conformer may be structurally similar to the 1NiII-B2 complex (Conformer-3). Next, we compared the experimental SAXS patterns of B2 subjected to competitive CuII//ZnII and ZnII//CuII conditions with the theoretical pattern for 3ZnII-B2. Both samples showed very good agreement in the Kratky plots (Figure 5d), with corresponding χ2 values of 1.4 and 2.2, respectively. These observations provide further evidence that B2 selectively binds ZnII in solution over CuII, adopting a solution conformation that is very similar to that observed crystallographically.

Tetrahedral coordination geometry as a driving force for the ZnII selectivity of B2.

The trinuclear coordination motif in Conformer-2 is also available in solution for CuII ions to bind yet the ZnII-bound B2 species completely outcompetes the CuII-bound form. This suggests that the coordination geometries observed in Conformer-2 must disfavor CuII binding. An analysis of the 3ZnII-B2 structure indicates that the sidechains of the coordinating His and Glu residues cannot adopt alternative rotameric conformations due to steric occlusion by the proximal residues (Figure S7). This implies that the observed tetrahedral coordination geometries must be sufficiently rigid to prevent distortion into the preferred tetragonal/square-planar geometry by CuII coordination.

Since we could not experimentally evaluate the binding affinity of CuII ions to the coordination geometries observed in Conformer-2 – because CuII binding likely induces the Conformer-3 geometry – we computationally evaluated the energetic outcome of substituting one of the ZnII ions with CuII using density functional theory (DFT) calculations (Figures 6ac). In these calculations, we modeled metal exchange reactions between 3ZnII-B2 and two different (2ZnII+1CuII)-B2 states (Model 1 and Model 2), wherein hydrated CuII replaces either a peripheral or the central ZnII ion in the trinuclear site (Figures 6de). In these calculations, the positions of the coordinating ligands were fixed in light of their limited ability to explore alternative rotameric states (Figure S7). We found that the replacement of a ZnII ion with CuII raised the overall energy of the systems in both Models 1 and 2, with particularly strong effects observed for the coordinatively saturated peripheral site in Model 1.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

(a–c) Metal configurations of trinuclear metal-binding sites used for 6–31g+(d,p) DFT calculations. Positions of metal ions and metal-binding ligands were extracted from the crystal structure and fixed during DFT calculations. Red/cyan/green spheres represent ZnII, CuII, and water, respectively. In Models 1 and 2 (panels b and c), one of the ZnII ions in (panel a) was replaced with CuII based on the XYZ positions of ZnII. (d) Metal exchange reactions between the 3ZnII configuration and model structures. To calculate energy changes during metal exchanges, free CuII and ZnII ions were considered as aquo complexes. (e) Metal-dependent energy changes between Models 1 and 2 (panels b and c) and 3ZnII-B2 (panel a). On the y-axis, the relative energy of the 3ZnII configuration is set to 0.

To further investigate the role of the primary coordination sphere(s) in Conformer-2 in imposing ZnII selectivity over CuII, we investigated the metal-binding properties of B2 variants in which each of the metal-coordinating His ligands were mutated to Ala (H60A, H63A, and H104A). Competitive metal binding assays showed that none of the B2 variants could compete with Fura-2 for ZnII binding (Figure 7a), while they retained picomolar dissociation constants in the case of CuII (Figure S8a, Table S1). Similarly, ESI-MS spectra showed that the B2 variants could no longer coordinate three ZnII ions (Figure 7b) and selectively bind ZnII over CuII (Figure S8b), establishing that the structural integrity (and the precise coordination geometry) of the trinuclear coordination mode in Conformer-2 is crucial for the observed ZnII selectivity of B2.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

(a) Fura-2 competitive titration assay of H60A, H63A, and H104A mutants of B2 with ZnII. Changes in normalized Fura-2 absorbance at 335 nm (red data points) are plotted along with theoretical metal-binding isotherms (grey line) in the absence of the proteins. Due to the absence of competition by the Ala mutants, the absorbances of Fura-2 reach the saturation point at the concentration of Fura-2 (~5 μM). Experimental data points and error bars are presented as mean and standard deviation of three independent measurements. (b) ESI-MS spectra of Ala mutants of B2 with ZnII. Red circles represent the number of ZnII ion bound to the mutants.

ZnII selectivity of B2 in the E. coli periplasmic space.

We asked if the ZnII selectivity of B2 is also operative in the highly heterogeneous chemical environment of the cellular milieu. Specifically, we targeted the periplasmic space of Escherichia coli (E. coli) cells, which is more permissive in terms of metal/chemical exchange with the external medium compared to the cytosol and thus has proven to be particularly suitable for the development of artificial metalloproteins/metalloenzymes with in vivo functions.5758, 7886 Conveniently, cytochrome cb562 (parent of B2) is equipped with a N-terminal signal sequence for Sec-dependent translocation into the periplasmic space,87 whose oxidative environment enables disulfide bond formation for B2 dimer assembly. In our experiments, B2 was expressed in E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells, whereby the lysogeny broth (LB) growth medium was supplemented with 50 μM of CuII, ZnII, or a combination of CuII and ZnII (Figure 8a). After 16 h of expression at 37 °C, B2 components were extracted using osmotic cold shock and enriched through sequential filtration steps.56, 58

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

(a) Extraction protocol of MII-B2 complexes formed in the periplasm of E. coli BL21 cells. The cells expressing B2 were grown in MII-supplemented (50 μM) LB media, then underwent periplasmic extraction using 20% sucrose osmotic shock. Large aggregates were removed using 100/50 kDa centrifugal filters, and the MII-B2 complexes were enriched with a 30 kDa filter. (b–c) SDS-PAGE analysis of the periplasmic extracts containing MII-B2 complexes. Gels were stained with (b) Coomassie blue for proteinaceous contents and (c) o-dianisidine for heme proteins. (d) ESI-MS spectra of the periplasmic extracts from the cells grown with CuII (top), ZnII (middle), and CuII+ZnII (bottom). Filled circles represent the number of CuII (cyan) and ZnII (red) ions bound to B2 in the periplasm. Inlet ESI-MS spectra correspond to the m/z value of the 3MII-B2 species.

To determine the periplasmic assembly state of B2, we separated proteinaceous components of the periplasmic extracts using SDS-PAGE and stained all proteins with Coomassie blue (Figure 8b) or o-dianisidine (Figure 8c)—a chromogenic peroxidase substrate which leads to selective staining of all heme proteins.88 Compared to the control group that does not have B2-encoded plasmids, considerable amounts of both the B2 dimer and monomer were expressed regardless of metal supplements (Figure 8b). Heme staining further indicated that the dimer and monomer were properly folded through heme incorporation in the periplasm (Figure 8c). We analyzed the metalation state of B2 in the heterogeneous cell extracts by ESI-MS. Interestingly, we detected 1ZnII-, 2ZnII-, and 3ZnII-B2 complexes even without metal supplementation (Figures S9ab), a behavior previously not observed with the (AB)2 variant.56 Subsequent ICP-MS analyses indicated that the LB medium without metal supplements contains ~0.5 μM CuII and ~17 μM ZnII. As a result, even in the CuII-enriched, non-Zn supplemented medium, we observed that B2 formed heterometallic CuII and ZnII-complexes (Figure 8d). Under both the ZnII- and ZnII/CuII-supplemented conditions, we detected 3ZnII-B2 as the major species (Figure 8d), confirming the ZnII selectivity of B2 in the complex chemical environment of the bacterial periplasm.

Conclusions

In the last decade, considerable progress has been made in the design and engineering of artificial metalloproteins with new or improved functions, ranging from enzymatic activities57, 8992 to unnatural reactions.7879, 84, 9396 Despite these advances, our ability to rationally design protein structures to control metal binding and reactivity at different structural levels (primary, secondary and outer-coordination spheres) remains challenging. Against this backdrop, we have introduced a rational/probabilistic design strategy, MASCOT, which is based on the construction of flexible yet covalently constrained protein-protein interfaces that are equipped with metal-binding motifs.41 While the flexibility of such interfaces allows for the thermodynamically-controlled exploration of different metal coordination geometries, their conformationally constrained nature leads to structurally well-defined metal-bound states (i.e., corresponding to distinct energy minima) which not only give rise to cooperative effects but are also only amenable to structural characterization. Using MASCOT, we had previously designed a disulfide-tethered dimer of cytochrome cb562 termed (AB)2 which was capable of selectively binding CoII and NiII ions through the formation of coupled coordination sites that sterically excluded CuII binding.56 Here, we demonstrated that (AB)2 could be reengineered through a minimal amount of mutations to yield a second-generation variant, B2, that displayed an altered selectivity for ZnII binding over CuII, thus also overcoming the restrictions of the Irving-Williams series. This was achieved through the formation of an unusual tri-Zn coordination motif, which, to the best of our knowledge, does not have an analog among natural metalloproteins, although we also note a recent study on the construction of a tetranuclear ZnII cluster in a de novo designed helical bundle protein.97 Despite the fact that this exact metal coordination motif was not foreseen, it has emerged as a result of the flexible design strategy. In light of the fact that MASCOT requires minimal genetic manipulation of a protein (for disulfide tethering or possibly genetic fusion) to create a flexible dimer, we believe that it will be particularly conducive to high-throughput/library design approaches for the discovery of new metal coordination motifs, metal-based reactivities and selectivities.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

We thank Chung-Jui Yu, Ulrich Markel, Alex Hoffnagle, Albert Kakkis, and Vanessa Eng in the Tezcan Group for helpful discussions and comments. This work was funded primarily by the National Institutes of Health (NIH; R01-GM138884) and by NASA (80NSSC18M0093; ENIGMA: Evolution of Nanomachines in Geospheres and Microbial Ancestors (NASA Astrobiology Institute Cycle 8)). Parts of this research were carried out at the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource (supported by the DOE, Office of Basic Energy Sciences contract DE-AC02-76SF00515 and NIH P30-GM133894) and the Advanced Light Source (supported by the DOE, Office of Basic Energy Sciences contract DE-AC02-05CH11231and NIH P30-GM124169-01).

Footnotes

Supporting Information.

This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org

Supporting methods, Tables S1S6, and Figures S1S9 (PDF)

The authors declare no competing financial interest. Coordinate and structure factor files have been deposited into RCSB databank under the following PDB IDs: 8DRD (1NiII-B2), 8DRF (3ZnII-B2), 8DRJ (apo-B2), 8DRL (CuII//ZnII-B2), 8DRM (ZnII//CuII-B2).

REFERENCES

  • (1).Van Stappen C; Deng Y; Liu Y; Heidari H; Wang J-X; Zhou Y; Ledray AP; Lu Y, Designing Artificial Metalloenzymes by Tuning of the Environment beyond the Primary Coordination Sphere. Chem. Rev 2022, 122, 11974–12045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (2).Cvetkovic A; Menon AL; Thorgersen MP; Scott JW; Poole Ii FL; Jenney FE Jr; Lancaster WA; Praissman JL; Shanmukh S; Vaccaro BJ; Trauger SA; Kalisiak E; Apon JV; Siuzdak G; Yannone SM; Tainer JA; Adams MWW, Microbial metalloproteomes are largely uncharacterized. Nature 2010, 466, 779–782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (3).Andreini C; Bertini I; Cavallaro G; Holliday GL; Thornton JM, Metal ions in biological catalysis: from enzyme databases to general principles. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem 2008, 13, 1205–1218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (4).Song WJ; Sontz PA; Ambroggio XI; Tezcan FA, Metals in Protein–Protein Interfaces. Annu. Rev. Biophys 2014, 43, 409–431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (5).Kluska K; Adamczyk J; Krężel A, Metal binding properties, stability and reactivity of zinc fingers. Coord. Chem. Rev 2018, 367, 18–64. [Google Scholar]
  • (6).Ariöz C; Wittung-Stafshede P, Folding of copper proteins: role of the metal? Q. Rev. Biophys 2018, 51, e4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (7).Arnold FH; Zhang J-H, Metal-mediated protein stabilization. Trends Biotechnol. 1994, 12, 189–192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (8).Shimizu T; Huang D; Yan F; Stranava M; Bartosova M; Fojtíková V; Martínková M, Gaseous O2, NO, and CO in Signal Transduction: Structure and Function Relationships of Heme-Based Gas Sensors and Heme-Redox Sensors. Chem. Rev 2015, 115, 6491–6533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (9).Chang CJ, Searching for harmony in transition-metal signaling. Nat. Chem. Biol 2015, 11, 744–747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (10).Haas KL; Franz KJ, Application of Metal Coordination Chemistry To Explore and Manipulate Cell Biology. Chem. Rev 2009, 109, 4921–4960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (11).Solomon EI; Heppner DE; Johnston EM; Ginsbach JW; Cirera J; Qayyum M; Kieber-Emmons MT; Kjaergaard CH; Hadt RG; Tian L, Copper Active Sites in Biology. Chem. Rev 2014, 114, 3659–3853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (12).Shaanan B, Structure of human oxyhaemoglobin at 2.1Å resolution. J. Mol. Biol 1983, 171, 31–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (13).Holm RH; Kennepohl P; Solomon EI, Structural and Functional Aspects of Metal Sites in Biology. Chem. Rev 1996, 96, 2239–2314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (14).Rutledge HL; Cook BD; Nguyen HPM; Herzik MA; Tezcan FA, Structures of the nitrogenase complex prepared under catalytic turnover conditions. Science 2022, 377, 865–869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (15).Ross MO; MacMillan F; Wang J; Nisthal A; Lawton TJ; Olafson BD; Mayo SL; Rosenzweig AC; Hoffman BM, Particulate methane monooxygenase contains only mononuclear copper centers. Science 2019, 364, 566–570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (16).Frandsen KEH; Simmons TJ; Dupree P; Poulsen J-CN; Hemsworth GR; Ciano L; Johnston EM; Tovborg M; Johansen KS; von Freiesleben P; Marmuse L; Fort S; Cottaz S; Driguez H; Henrissat B; Lenfant N; Tuna F; Baldansuren A; Davies GJ; Lo Leggio L; Walton PH, The molecular basis of polysaccharide cleavage by lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases. Nat. Chem. Biol 2016, 12, 298–303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (17).Huang W; Jia J; Cummings J; Nelson M; Schneider G; Lindqvist Y, Crystal structure of nitrile hydratase reveals a novel iron centre in a novel fold. Structure 1997, 5, 691–699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (18).Kleifeld O; Frenkel A; Martin JML; Sagi I, Active site electronic structure and dynamics during metalloenzyme catalysis. Nat. Struct. Biol 2003, 10, 98–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (19).Waldron KJ; Robinson NJ, How do bacterial cells ensure that metalloproteins get the correct metal? Nat. Rev. Microbiol 2009, 7, 25–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (20).Imlay JA, The Mismetallation of Enzymes during Oxidative Stress. J. Biol. Chem 2014, 289, 28121–28128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (21).Smethurst DGJ; Shcherbik N, Interchangeable utilization of metals: New perspectives on the impacts of metal ions employed in ancient and extant biomolecules. J. Biol. Chem 2021, 297, 101374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (22).Bloom AJ, Metal regulation of metabolism. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol 2019, 49, 33–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (23).Nianios D; Thierbach S; Steimer L; Lulchev P; Klostermeier D; Fetzner S, Nickel quercetinase, a promiscuous metalloenzyme: metal incorporation and metal ligand substitution studies. BMC Biochem. 2015, 16, 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (24).Bayliss ME; Prescott JM, Modified activity of Aeromonas aminopeptidase: metal ion substitutions and role of substrates. Biochemistry 1986, 25, 8113–8117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (25).Gu M; Imlay JA, Superoxide poisons mononuclear iron enzymes by causing mismetallation. Mol. Microbiol 2013, 89, 123–134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (26).Tottey S; Waldron KJ; Firbank SJ; Reale B; Bessant C; Sato K; Cheek TR; Gray J; Banfield MJ; Dennison C; Robinson NJ, Protein-folding location can regulate manganese-binding versus copper- or zinc-binding. Nature 2008, 455, 1138–1142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (27).Dudev T; Lim C, Competition among Metal Ions for Protein Binding Sites: Determinants of Metal Ion Selectivity in Proteins. Chem. Rev 2014, 114, 538–556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (28).Kisgeropoulos EC; Griese JJ; Smith ZR; Branca RMM; Schneider CR; Högbom M; Shafaat HS, Key Structural Motifs Balance Metal Binding and Oxidative Reactivity in a Heterobimetallic Mn/Fe Protein. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2020, 142, 5338–5354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (29).Foster AW; Young TR; Chivers PT; Robinson NJ, Protein metalation in biology. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol 2022, 66, 102095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (30).Carrell CJ; Wang X; Jones L; Jarrett WL; Davidson VL; Mathews FS, Crystallographic and NMR Investigation of Cobalt-Substituted Amicyanin. Biochemistry 2004, 43, 9381–9389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (31).Babor M; Greenblatt HM; Edelman M; Sobolev V, Flexibility of metal binding sites in proteins on a database scale. Proteins: Struct., Funct., Bioinf 2005, 59, 221–230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (32).Edington SC; Gonzalez A; Middendorf TR; Halling DB; Aldrich RW; Baiz CR, Coordination to lanthanide ions distorts binding site conformation in calmodulin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E3126–E3134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (33).Zaballa M-E; Abriata LA; Donaire A; Vila AJ, Flexibility of the metal-binding region in apo-cupredoxins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 9254–9259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (34).Eom H; Song WJ, Emergence of metal selectivity and promiscuity in metalloenzymes. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem 2019, 24, 517–531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (35).Frausto da Silva JJR; Williams RJP The biological chemistry of the elements; Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • (36).Foster AW; Osman D; Robinson NJ, Metal Preferences and Metallation. J. Biol. Chem 2014, 289, 28095–28103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (37).Williams RJP, Metallo-Enzymes and Metallo-Proteins, Chemistry of. In Wiley Encyclopedia of Chemical Biology, pp 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • (38).Irving H; Williams RJP, Order of Stability of Metal Complexes. Nature 1948, 162, 746–747. [Google Scholar]
  • (39).Grāve K; Griese JJ; Berggren G; Bennett MD; Högbom M, The Bacillus anthracis class Ib ribonucleotide reductase subunit NrdF intrinsically selects manganese over iron. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem 2020, 25, 571–582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (40).Wang SC; Dias AV; Bloom SL; Zamble DB, Selectivity of Metal Binding and Metal-Induced Stability of Escherichia coli NikR. Biochemistry 2004, 43, 10018–10028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (41).Rittle J; Field MJ; Green MT; Tezcan FA, An efficient, step-economical strategy for the design of functional metalloproteins. Nat. Chem 2019, 11, 434–441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (42).Zhu J; Avakyan N; Kakkis A; Hoffnagle AM; Han K; Li Y; Zhang Z; Choi TS; Na Y; Yu C-J; Tezcan FA, Protein Assembly by Design. Chem. Rev 2021, 121, 13701–13796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (43).Garzon-Rodriguez W; Yatsimirsky AK; Glabe CG, Binding of Zn(II), Cu(II), and Fe(II) ions to Alzheimer’s Aβ peptide studied by fluorescence. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett 1999, 9, 2243–2248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (44).Hunt JA; Ahmed M; Fierke CA, Metal Binding Specificity in Carbonic Anhydrase Is Influenced by Conserved Hydrophobic Core Residues. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 9054–9062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (45).Kakkis A; Gagnon D; Esselborn J; Britt RD; Tezcan FA, Metal-Templated Design of Chemically Switchable Protein Assemblies with High-Affinity Coordination Sites. Angw. Chem. Int. Ed 2020, 59, 21940–21944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (46).Ma Z; Jacobsen FE; Giedroc DP, Coordination Chemistry of Bacterial Metal Transport and Sensing. Chem. Rev 2009, 109, 4644–4681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (47).Maret W, Metalloproteomics, metalloproteomes, and the annotation of metalloproteins. Metallomics 2009, 2, 117–125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (48).Rosenzweig AC, Copper Delivery by Metallochaperone Proteins. Acc. Chem. Res 2001, 34, 119–128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (49).O’Halloran TV; Culotta VC, Metallochaperones, an Intracellular Shuttle Service for Metal Ions. J. Biol. Chem 2000, 275, 25057–25060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (50).Weiss A; Murdoch CC; Edmonds KA; Jordan MR; Monteith AJ; Perera YR; Rodríguez Nassif AM; Petoletti AM; Beavers WN; Munneke MJ; Drury SL; Krystofiak ES; Thalluri K; Wu H; Kruse ARS; DiMarchi RD; Caprioli RM; Spraggins JM; Chazin WJ; Giedroc DP; Skaar EP, Zn-regulated GTPase metalloprotein activator 1 modulates vertebrate zinc homeostasis. Cell 2022, 185, 2148–2163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (51).Jordan MR; Wang J; Weiss A; Skaar EP; Capdevila DA; Giedroc DP, Mechanistic Insights into the Metal-Dependent Activation of ZnII-Dependent Metallochaperones. Inorg. Chem 2019, 58, 13661–13672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (52).Osman D; Foster AW; Chen J; Svedaite K; Steed JW; Lurie-Luke E; Huggins TG; Robinson NJ, Fine control of metal concentrations is necessary for cells to discern zinc from cobalt. Nat. Commun 2017, 8, 1884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (53).Foster AW; Pernil R; Patterson CJ; Scott AJP; Pålsson L-O; Pal R; Cummins I; Chivers PT; Pohl E; Robinson NJ, A tight tunable range for Ni(II) sensing and buffering in cells. Nat. Chem. Biol 2017, 13, 409–414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (54).Osman D; Martini MA; Foster AW; Chen J; Scott AJP; Morton RJ; Steed JW; Lurie-Luke E; Huggins TG; Lawrence AD; Deery E; Warren MJ; Chivers PT; Robinson NJ, Bacterial sensors define intracellular free energies for correct enzyme metalation. Nat. Chem. Biol 2019, 15, 241–249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (55).Young TR; Martini MA; Foster AW; Glasfeld A; Osman D; Morton RJ; Deery E; Warren MJ; Robinson NJ, Calculating metalation in cells reveals CobW acquires CoII for vitamin B12 biosynthesis while related proteins prefer ZnII. Nat. Commun 2021, 12, 1195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (56).Choi TS; Tezcan FA, Overcoming universal restrictions on metal selectivity by protein design. Nature 2022, 603, 522–527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (57).Song WJ; Tezcan FA, A designed supramolecular protein assembly with in vivo enzymatic activity. Science 2014, 346, 1525–1528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (58).Medina-Morales A; Perez A; Brodin JD; Tezcan FA, In Vitro and Cellular Self-Assembly of a Zn-Binding Protein Cryptand via Templated Disulfide Bonds. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2013, 135, 12013–12022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (59).Deblonde GJP; Mattocks JA; Park DM; Reed DW; Cotruvo JA; Jiao Y, Selective and Efficient Biomacromolecular Extraction of Rare-Earth Elements using Lanmodulin. Inorg. Chem 2020, 59, 11855–11867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (60).Guffy SL; Der BS; Kuhlman B, Probing the minimal determinants of zinc binding with computational protein design. Protein Eng. Des. Sel 2016, 29, 327–338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (61).Akcapinar Gunseli B.; Sezerman Osman U., Computational approaches for de novo design and redesign of metal-binding sites on proteins. Biosci. Rep 2017, 37, BSR20160179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (62).Zygiel EM; Nolan EM, Transition Metal Sequestration by the Host-Defense Protein Calprotectin. Ann. Rev. Biochem 2018, 87, 621–643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (63).Laitaoja M; Valjakka J; Jänis J, Zinc Coordination Spheres in Protein Structures. Inorg. Chem 2013, 52, 10983–10991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (64).Shumilina E; Dobrovolska O; Del Conte R; Holen HW; Dikiy A, Competitive cobalt for zinc substitution in mammalian methionine sulfoxide reductase B1 overexpressed in E. coli: structural and functional insight. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem 2014, 19, 85–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (65).Andreini C; Banci L; Bertini I; Rosato A, Zinc through the Three Domains of Life. J. Proteome Res 2006, 5, 3173–3178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (66).Chen AY; Adamek RN; Dick BL; Credille CV; Morrison CN; Cohen SM, Targeting Metalloenzymes for Therapeutic Intervention. Chem. Rev 2019, 119, 1323–1455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (67).Hanas JS; Gunn CG, Inhibition of Transcription Factor IIIADNA Interactions by Xenobiotic Metal Ions. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996, 24, 924–930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (68).Huang M; Krepkiy D; Hu W; Petering DH, Zn-, Cd-, and Pb-transcription factor IIIA: properties, DNA binding, and comparison with TFIIIA-finger 3 metal complexes. J. Inorg. Biochem 2004, 98, 775–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (69).Bittel D; Dalton T; Samson SLA; Gedamu L; Andrews GK, The DNA Binding Activity of Metal Response Element-binding Transcription Factor-1 Is Activated in vivo and in Vitro by Zinc, but Not by Other Transition Metals. J. Biol. Chem 1998, 273, 7127–7133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (70).Lee JH; Lee JH; Jung SH; Hyun TK; Feng M; Kim J-Y; Lee J-H; Lee H; Kim JS; Kang C; Kwon K-Y; Jung JH, Highly selective fluorescence imaging of zinc distribution in HeLa cells and Arabidopsis using a naphthalene-based fluorescent probe. Chem. Commun 2015, 51, 7463–7465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (71).Komatsu K; Kikuchi K; Kojima H; Urano Y; Nagano T, Selective Zinc Sensor Molecules with Various Affinities for Zn2+, Revealing Dynamics and Regional Distribution of Synaptically Released Zn2+ in Hippocampal Slices. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2005, 127, 10197–10204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (72).Ghosh P; Maayan G, A rationally designed peptoid for the selective chelation of Zn2+ over Cu2+. Chem. Sci 2020, 11, 10127–10134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (73).Brodin JD; Medina-Morales A; Ni T; Salgado EN; Ambroggio XI; Tezcan FA, Evolution of Metal Selectivity in Templated Protein Interfaces. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2010, 132, 8610–8617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (74).Burgot J-L Ionic Equilibria in Analytical Chemistry; Springer, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • (75).Weast RC CRC handbook of chemistry and physics; CRC Press, 1977. [Google Scholar]
  • (76).Andreini C; Cavallaro G; Lorenzini S; Rosato A, MetalPDB: a database of metal sites in biological macromolecular structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 41, D312–D319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (77).Putignano V; Rosato A; Banci L; Andreini C, MetalPDB in 2018: a database of metal sites in biological macromolecular structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 46, D459–D464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (78).Jeschek M; Reuter R; Heinisch T; Trindler C; Klehr J; Panke S; Ward TR, Directed evolution of artificial metalloenzymes for in vivo metathesis. Nature 2016, 537, 661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (79).Liang AD; Serrano-Plana J; Peterson RL; Ward TR, Artificial Metalloenzymes Based on the Biotin–Streptavidin Technology: Enzymatic Cascades and Directed Evolution. Acc. Chem. Res 2019, 52, 585–595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (80).Gao L; Zhang Y; Zhao L; Niu W; Tang Y; Gao F; Cai P; Yuan Q; Wang X; Jiang H; Gao X, An artificial metalloenzyme for catalytic cancer-specific DNA cleavage and operando imaging. Sci. Adv 2020, 6, eabb1421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (81).Naughton KJ; Treviño RE; Moore PJ; Wertz AE; Dickson JA; Shafaat HS, In Vivo Assembly of a Genetically Encoded Artificial Metalloenzyme for Hydrogen Production. ACS Synth. Biol 2021, 10, 2116–2120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (82).Grimm AR; Sauer DF; Polen T; Zhu L; Hayashi T; Okuda J; Schwaneberg U, A Whole Cell E. coli Display Platform for Artificial Metalloenzymes: Poly(phenylacetylene) Production with a Rhodium–Nitrobindin Metalloprotein. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 2611–2614. [Google Scholar]
  • (83).Eda S; Nasibullin I; Vong K; Kudo N; Yoshida M; Kurbangalieva A; Tanaka K, Biocompatibility and therapeutic potential of glycosylated albumin artificial metalloenzymes. Nat. Catal 2019, 2, 780–792. [Google Scholar]
  • (84).Ji P; Park J; Gu Y; Clark DS; Hartwig JF, Abiotic reduction of ketones with silanes catalysed by carbonic anhydrase through an enzymatic zinc hydride. Nat. Chem 2021, 13, 312–318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (85).Wittwer M; Markel U; Schiffels J; Okuda J; Sauer DF; Schwaneberg U, Engineering and emerging applications of artificial metalloenzymes with whole cells. Nat. Catal 2021, 4, 814–827. [Google Scholar]
  • (86).Bloomer BJ; Clark DS; Hartwig JF, Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities with Artificial Metalloenzymes in Biosynthesis. Biochemistry 2022, Article ASAP. DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.1c00829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (87).Faraone-Mennella J; Tezcan FA; Gray HB; Winkler JR, Stability and Folding Kinetics of Structurally Characterized Cytochrome c-b562. Biochemistry 2006, 45, 10504–10511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (88).Claiborne A; Fridovich I, Chemical and enzymic intermediates in the peroxidation of o-dianisidine by horseradish peroxidase. 1. Spectral properties of the products of dianisidine oxidation. Biochemistry 1979, 18, 2324–2329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (89).Song WJ; Yu J; Tezcan FA, Importance of Scaffold Flexibility/Rigidity in the Design and Directed Evolution of Artificial Metallo-β-lactamases. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 16772–16779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (90).Yu J; Yang J; Seok C; Song WJ, Symmetry-related residues as promising hotspots for the evolution of de novo oligomeric enzymes. Chem. Sci 2021, 12, 5091–5101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (91).Khare SD; Kipnis Y; Greisen P Jr.; Takeuchi R; Ashani Y; Goldsmith M; Song Y; Gallaher JL; Silman I; Leader H; Sussman JL; Stoddard BL; Tawfik DS; Baker D, Computational redesign of a mononuclear zinc metalloenzyme for organophosphate hydrolysis. Nat. Chem. Biol 2012, 8, 294–300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (92).Studer S; Hansen DA; Pianowski ZL; Mittl PRE; Debon A; Guffy SL; Der BS; Kuhlman B; Hilvert D, Evolution of a highly active and enantiospecific metalloenzyme from short peptides. Science 2018, 362, 1285–1288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (93).Huang J; Liu Z; Bloomer BJ; Clark DS; Mukhopadhyay A; Keasling JD; Hartwig JF, Unnatural biosynthesis by an engineered microorganism with heterologously expressed natural enzymes and an artificial metalloenzyme. Nat. Chem 2021, 13, 1186–1191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (94).Srivastava P; Yang H; Ellis-Guardiola K; Lewis JC, Engineering a dirhodium artificial metalloenzyme for selective olefin cyclopropanation. Nat. Commun 2015, 6, 7789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (95).Drienovská I; Rioz-Martínez A; Draksharapu A; Roelfes G, Novel artificial metalloenzymes by in vivo incorporation of metal-binding unnatural amino acids. Chem. Sci 2015, 6, 770–776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (96).Miller DC; Athavale SV; Arnold FH, Combining chemistry and protein engineering for new-to-nature biocatalysis. Nat. Synth 2022, 1, 18–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (97).Zhang S-Q; Chino M; Liu L; Tang Y; Hu X; DeGrado WF; Lombardi A, De Novo Design of Tetranuclear Transition Metal Clusters Stabilized by Hydrogen-Bonded Networks in Helical Bundles. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018, 140, 1294–1304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

RESOURCES