Abstract
The prevalence of mental health disorders is rising with the coronavirus of 2019 pandemic, and millions of Americans reside in areas with mental health professional shortages. Primary care providers have an opportunity to provide care for commonly occurring mental health disorders. Using a holistic conceptualization of recovery in mental illness, this report provides evidence-based guidance for initiation, titration, and discontinuation of pharmacotherapy for mild to moderate depression and anxiety in the primary care setting. The use of measurement-based care, selection of appropriate class and agent for individual candidates, and patient education are addressed. Best practices for troubleshooting, titration, and referral are discussed.
Keywords: anxiety, depression, drug therapy, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, mental health, primary health care
Introduction
An estimated 51.5 million or 20.6% of adults in America are living with any mental illness.1 Prevalence of any mental illness is higher among females (24.5%) than males (16.3%) and is higher in younger (29.4% in ages 18–24) than middle-aged (25.0% in ages 26-49) or older adults (14.1% in ages 50 and older).1 Income inequities are associated with the prevalence of depression, with lower rates of depression being correlated with higher income.2 The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has compounded rates of mental illness as well as inequities; depression symptoms have been observed to be as much as 3 times as prevalent during the pandemic, with higher rates observed in persons with lower income, less savings, and more stressors.3
Of the 51.5 million American adults affected by mental illness, 23 million (44.8%) sought and received some form of mental health services in the past year, but 13.3 million perceived an unmet need for mental health services.1 Primary care providers have an opportunity to meet the increasing demand for mental health services by providing holistic, evidence-informed care. From 2012 to 2014, there were approximately 30 million visits to physicians for mental health concerns per year, with a third of those being to primary care physicians.4 The US Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) currently advises that adults in primary care settings receive routine screening for depression alongside appropriate diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up, including initiation of pharmacotherapy as needed.5 The purpose of this review is to outline best practices for pharmacotherapy for the common mental health disorders of depression and anxiety in the primary care setting.
Holistic Care
Given the highly individualized nature of mental illness and recovery, it is important to conceptualize pharmacological treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD) and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) as existing within a broader context of care, including psychotherapy and other behavioral interventions as indicated. For patients with mild to moderate depression, either antidepressants or psychotherapy may be an appropriate initial treatment modality, depending on patient preference and availability of each form of treatment.6 Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), in particular, may be just as effective as antidepressants in treating some patients with MDD, particularly those with atypical, melancholic, or anxious subtypes of depression.6 , 7 Meta-analyses and systematic reviews support the combination of antidepressant treatment and psychotherapy (particularly CBT) for depression because this combination has been associated with improved acute and sustained response8 and reduced risk for relapse and recurrence9 compared with antidepressant treatment alone. Psychotherapy may be even more useful for GAD; a recent meta-analysis observed that psychotherapy had a nearly 2-fold effect on anxiety symptoms as medication.10 Thus, a referral for psychotherapy is advised for depression or anxiety, by itself or alongside medication. However, affordable psychotherapy may be difficult to access, particularly in the context of the current shortage of mental health professionals; referrals to psychotherapy must therefore be made with consideration to the patient’s individual needs and resources. Medication, as an adjunct or alternative to psychotherapy, can be an effective treatment option for MDD or GAD.
Principles of Pharmacotherapy for MDD
Assessment and Diagnosis
As with any condition, obtaining an accurate diagnosis is a fundamental step in effectively treating MDD. Persons with MDD may initially be identified in the primary care setting through routine depression screening, a practice that the USPSTF endorses with a grade B recommendation,5 or via self-disclosure of depressive symptoms. After identification of symptoms, establishing a diagnosis of MDD requires a comprehensive symptom history; ruling out medical disorders that can contribute to depressive symptoms, such as thyroid disease; and evaluating for other mental disorders with depressive features, such as bipolar I or II disorder, anxiety disorders, and substance-related disorders.11 , 12
It is particularly crucial to screen patients with depressive symptoms for a history of mania or hypomania. Patients with bipolar disorder tend to experience depressive episodes more frequently than manic or hypomanic episodes, leading to frequent misdiagnosis of bipolar disorder as MDD.13 Antidepressant monotherapy is an inappropriate treatment regimen for individuals with bipolar disorder because it may increase mood cycling or precipitate a manic or hypomanic episode.13 Assessing for a family history of bipolar disorder13 and using a validated screening tool, such as the Mood Disorder Questionnaire,14 to assess patients for a history of manic or hypomanic episodes can aid clinicians in distinguishing between bipolar disorder and MDD before initiating pharmacotherapy.
Validated measurement tools can assist not only in making an MDD diagnosis, but also in establishing baseline symptom severity and monitoring patient outcomes through the course of treatment.11 Using measurement tools in a systematic manner to monitor patient progress and inform clinical decision-making is known as measurement-based care (MBC).11 MBC is associated with higher rates of response and remission from depression15, 16, 17 and overall higher levels of treatment effectiveness,18 compared with pharmacological treatment that is not guided by validated outcome scales.15 , 17 , 18 The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) is a validated, widely used, patient-reported symptom scale that evaluates each of the 9 symptom criteria for MDD in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5).19 The PHQ-9 aids clinicians in distinguishing among mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe depression, and it includes a question that specifically inquires about suicidal ideation,19 a symptom some patients might not spontaneously disclose. The PHQ-9 is in the public domain and is available in more than 30 languages.20
Goals of Pharmacotherapy for MDD
Routine use of measurement tools aids clinicians in evaluating patients’ progress throughout the course of treatment. A response to treatment for MDD generally implies “a clinically meaningful degree of symptom reduction,”21 usually a reduction of at least 50%.13 Although patients with a response to treatment often experience improved mood and better daily function,21 residual depressive symptoms are a notable predictor of poorer outcomes—including relapse into another major depressive episode (MDE).21, 22, 23 Thus, in treating patients with MDD, full symptom remission should be the goal.11 , 13 , 21 Remission is characterized by an absence, or near absence, of depressive symptoms, and patients in remission typically return to the level of daily functioning they experienced before the MDE.21 The American College of Neuropsychopharmacology Task Force on Response and Remission in Major Depressive Disorder recommended that remission be ascribed only after patients experience 3 consecutive weeks without depressive symptoms.21 A patient may be considered to be in recovery after a 4-month period of remission from the most recent MDE.21 Recovery is only broken when there is a recurrence of depressive symptoms substantial enough to meet criteria for a new MDE.21
Principles of Antidepressant Titration and Discontinuation
With symptom remission being the goal of depression treatment, clinicians should optimize antidepressant dose and length of treatment to achieve and sustain remission. For patients who do not experience symptom improvement within 2 to 4 weeks of initiating an antidepressant, the dose should be increased, unless tolerability is an issue, in which case, switching to a different agent may be appropriate.24 The Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR∗D) trial, the largest prospective, randomized, multistep clinical trial of antidepressant treatment for MDD,25 found average times to remission ranging from 5.4 to 7.4 weeks across all 4 steps of treatment.26 However, only one-third of patients achieved remission with the first antidepressant tried; another one-third of patients achieved remission after switching to a different antidepressant or adding an adjunctive medication.26 Implications of the STAR∗D data suggest that if at least a response is not achieved after 4 weeks at the maximally tolerated dose of an antidepressant, that particular antidepressant choice should be considered unsuccessful,27 and switching to a different antidepressant may result in better outcomes.24 The Figure 28 proposes a stepwise approach for the initial treatment of MDD, including recommendations regarding when to switch antidepressant agents.
Once a patient achieves remission, a clinical practice guideline for the management of adults with major depressive disorder by the Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) recommended continuing treatment for at least 6 to 9 months, as discontinuing antidepressant treatment before 6 months is associated with higher rates of relapse and recurrence of MDD.24 However, for patients with notable risk factors for recurrence (e.g., MDEs of greater frequency, severity, or chronicity; residual depressive symptoms; comorbid medical or psychiatric conditions), it is recommended to continue treatment for 2 years or longer after achieving remission.24 When both patient and clinician agree to discontinue an antidepressant, it is advisable to taper the dose gradually over a period of weeks.24 Abrupt cessation or rapid taper of antidepressants may cause discontinuation symptoms, including sensory disturbances, sleep disturbances, gastrointestinal (GI) upset, dizziness, anxiety, hyperarousal, and dysphoria.29 , 30 Discontinuation symptoms are generally mild, but uncomfortable; begin within the first 3 days of discontinuing an antidepressant or starting a taper; and resolve without treatment within 1 to 2 weeks.30 Antidepressants that are more likely to incite discontinuation symptoms upon cessation are those with short half-lives, such as paroxetine (Paxil) and venlafaxine (Effexor)29 , 30; if a patient has taken an antidepressant with a short half-life for a number of years, it may be advisable to taper over a period of months,30 instead of weeks. Antidepressants with long half-lives, such as fluoxetine, are less likely to cause a discontinuation syndrome.29 , 30
Antidepressant Selection and Troubleshooting
Within the larger classes of antidepressants (i.e., selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor [SSRIs], serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors [SNRIs]), differences among individual agents are relatively minimal,24 and all medications within these 2 classes share the primary mechanism of serotonin reuptake inhibition.13 However, it is common to see individual patients tolerate or respond differently to one antidepressant compared with another within the same class.13 Individual variations in medication response could potentially be influenced by secondary pharmacologic characteristics that are dissimilar among the various antidepressants13; genetic variants affecting the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antidepressants may also influence the variability seen in patients’ responses.31 At the present time, there are no evidence-based methods for perfectly matching an individual patient with the antidepressant that will be most effective and tolerable for that individual.
The CANMAT clinical guideline for the management of adults with MDD asserted that “selecting an antidepressant involves an individualized needs assessment for each patient.”24 The following considerations may be useful in guiding a needs assessment and selecting an initial antidepressant:
-
•
If a patient has taken a specific antidepressant in the past with good efficacy and tolerability, it may be appropriate to prescribe that medication again for the current MDE.
-
•
Response to SSRIs has been found to be similar among first-degree family members as a result of shared genetic and/or environmental factors.31 If a patient reports a family history of positive response to a specific antidepressant, it may be useful to try that antidepressant first.
-
•
When selecting an initial antidepressant, it can be helpful to try and match a medication’s side effect profile to the patient’s symptoms. For instance, a clinician might select a more sedating antidepressant for patients with notable insomnia. The Table presents unique characteristics of individual antidepressants and potential benefits and considerations of select antidepressants.
-
•
SSRIs, SNRIs, bupropion (Wellbutrin), mirtazapine (Remeron), and vortioxetine (Trintellix) are considered to be first-line medication options for MDD.24
-
•
For medications that have instant-release and extended-release formulations (eg, bupropion [Wellbutrin, Wellbutrin SR, Wellbutrin XL), venlafaxine [Effexor, Effexor XR], paroxetine [Paxil, Paxil CR]), patient adherence may be higher with the extended-release formulation. However, medication efficacy and tolerability do not differ between the formulations.24
-
•
Some antidepressants are more costly than others. It is important to consider patients’ financial means, prescription coverage, and the availability of coupons and copay assistance when selecting a medication to prescribe.
-
•
When treating a person of childbearing potential, it is important to ascertain whether the patient is sexually active and their current method of contraception, if using. If the patient desires a pregnancy in the near future or is not using a reliable method of contraception, it is advisable to select an antidepressant with a favorable safety profile during pregnancy—and to avoid antidepressants with potentially higher risks (eg, paroxetine [Paxil, Paxil CR], venlafaxine [Effexor, Effexor XR]), if possible.32 , 33
Table.
Drug | Class | Notes |
---|---|---|
Citalopram (Celexa) | SSRI | Potential benefits
|
Considerations
| ||
Escitalopram (Lexapro) | SSRI | Potential benefits
|
Consideration
| ||
Fluoxetine (Prozac, Prozac weekly) | SSRI | Potential benefits:
|
Consideration
| ||
Paroxetine (Paxil, Paxil CR) | SSRI | Potential benefits
|
Considerations
| ||
Sertraline (Zoloft) | SSRI | Potential benefits
|
Considerations:
| ||
Venlafaxine (Effexor, Effexor XR) | SNRI | Potential benefits
|
Considerations
| ||
Desvenlafaxine (Pristiq) | SNRI | Potential benefits
|
Consideration
| ||
Duloxetine (Cymbalta) | SNRI | Potential benefits
|
Considerations
| ||
Bupropion (Wellbutrin, Wellbutrin SR, Wellbutrin XL) | NDRI | Potential benefits
|
Considerations
| ||
Mirtazapine (Remeron) | Serotonin norepinephrine receptor antagonist | Potential benefits
|
Considerations
| ||
Vortioxetine (Trintellix) | Multimodal antidepressant | Potential benefits:
|
Considerations
| ||
Vilazodone (Viibryd) | Multimodal antidepressant; serotonin partial agonist reuptake inhibitor (SPARI) | Potential benefits
|
Considerations | ||
Trazodone | Serotonin receptor antagonist and reuptake inhibitor | Considerations
|
Buspirone (Buspar) | Non-benzodiazepine anxiolytic | Considerations
|
Hydroxyzine (Atarax, Vistaril) | First-generation antihistamine | Considerations:
|
BP = blood pressure; GI = gastrointestinal; FDA = US Food and Drug Administration; SNRI = serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors; SSRI = selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.
Even with careful medication selection, side effects and tolerability issues may still occur. Common side effects of antidepressants include GI effects (i.e., nausea, diarrhea, constipation), insomnia, agitation, headache, dizziness, xerostomia, and sexual dysfunction.28 The following strategies may be useful in addressing tolerability concerns:
-
•
If side effects are not excessive and the patient is agreeable, consider waiting for several weeks because most side effects are short-term and resolve with time.28
-
•
Decrease the dose or consider a slower titration if side effects are persistent or excessive.28
-
•
Consider switching to a different antidepressant if side effects remain excessive after decreasing the dose or if the patient considers the side effects to be unacceptable.28
-
•
For patients who experience mild activation or insomnia after starting an antidepressant, consider dosing in the morning; for those who experience sedation, dose at bedtime.28
-
•
Serotonin syndrome is a term that refers to a spectrum of clinical findings, from mild to life-threatening, which can occur in the presence of excess serotonergic agonism.34 It is characterized by a combination of mental status changes, autonomic hyperactivity, and/or neuromuscular abnormalities.34 Prescribers must avoid co-administration of an SSRI or SNRI with an MAOI due to the prevalence of severe serotonin syndrome associated with this combination.34 To further minimize risk of serotonin syndrome, prescribers should be mindful of a patient’s overall proserotonergic burden and minimize the concomitant use of agents with serotonergic agonism (including antidepressants, valproate, opioid analgesics [particularly tramadol], antiemetics, triptans, linezolid, ritonavir, dextromethorphan, methylenedioxymethamphetamine [MDMA or “ecstasy”], St. John’s wort, and ginseng).34
Patient Education
Pertinent education points include the medication’s indication (ie, MDD, anxiety), including any off-label use; common side effects, their expected duration, and how to minimize or manage discomfort; potential adverse effects, including when and how to contact the clinician or seek emergency care; known drug–drug interactions; and, for persons of childbearing potential, the known safety data and potential risks associated with taking the antidepressant during pregnancy. The following education points are specific to antidepressants and may also be useful to address at the time of the initial prescription:
-
•
The beneficial effects of antidepressants are not immediate. To promote realistic expectations, it is helpful to inform patients that they may not begin to experience improvement until they have taken the antidepressant consistently for several weeks.
-
•
Abrupt discontinuation of antidepressants may cause uncomfortable discontinuation symptoms, particularly if the medication has been taken for longer than 6 to 8 weeks.30 Patients should be advised not to discontinue their antidepressant abruptly and to consult with their clinician if they desire to taper or stop their medication for any reason.
-
•
On all antidepressant medications, there is a Black Box Warning regarding an increased risk for suicidal thinking and behavior in children, adolescents, and young adults under age 25, compared with placebo.35 Patients under age 25 must be educated about this risk and advised to contact their clinician or seek emergency care if suicidality develops.
-
•
While healthy research participants have not been observed to exhibit significantly greater motor impairment with the combination of alcohol and antidepressants than with alcohol alone, the manufacturers of antidepressants still suggest avoiding alcohol during therapy.36 (Note: bupropion [Wellbutrin, Wellbutrin SR, Wellbutrin XL] increases seizure risk.28 It may be safer to recommend that patients taking bupropion abstain from alcohol, particularly those taking higher doses.)
Pharmacogenetics
Pharmacotherapy for MDD has historically involved quite a bit of trial and error with significant individual variation in symptom response, some of which has been hypothesized as being related to individual genomic differences. Research on the impact of genetics on antidepressant pharmacodynamics (or therapeutic effects) has not yet yielded clinically useful observations. However, genetic differences affecting pharmacokinetics (or the movement and metabolism of drugs) have been associated with drug response phenotypes.37 , 38 Specifically, genes determining the degree of enzymatic activity at CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 can affect the speed and extent to which a person metabolizes several commonly prescribed antidepressants, with more enzymatic activity and thus faster metabolism being associated with less available active medication or antidepressant and thus less symptom response.37 , 38 Genetic profiles for individual patients can be obtained to assist in guiding antidepressant selection. Studies comparing genetic-report-guided prescribing with traditional prescribing have often used lower quality, heterogenous methods with smaller samples, contributing to challenges in data aggregation across studies.37 , 38 Meta-analysis of available data suggests that genetic report-guided prescribing may have a very small positive effect on rate of symptom response, and data are currently insufficient to advise routine use of genetic reports in any setting.37 , 38
Principles of Pharmacotherapy for Anxiety
Assessment and Diagnosis
Anxiety is considered to be a normal reaction to stressors, but in excess, it can impede function.39 Anxiety is fairly common, with as many as 11.7% of adults in the United States reporting regular worry, nervousness, or anxiety.40 Anxiety and depression are commonly comorbid with one another, with 45.7% of persons with lifetime depression having 1 or more anxiety disorders.41 Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is the most common anxiety disorder and is characterized by “persistent and excessive worry that interferes with daily activities.”39 Similar to MDD, use of a validated tool for screening and measurement-based care is advised. The GAD-7 is a brief screening tool, and like the PHQ-9 for assessing MDD, it is based on the symptom criteria from the DSM-5 for GAD.42
Goals of Pharmacotherapy for GAD
Similar to MDD, the goal of pharmacotherapy for GAD is sustained reduction of symptom burden. Anxiety is more likely than depression to emerge earlier in life and to be chronic or sustained (as opposed to episodic).43 Remission or sustained recovery may be less likely for anxiety than for depression, with one longitudinal study describing remission rates for GAD at 1, 2, and 5 years as 15%, 25%, and 38%, respectively.44 , 45 Similarly, in the first phase of the STAR∗D study, depressed patients who had comorbid anxiety were significantly less likely to achieve remission and more likely to experience side effects or adverse events of therapy than persons with nonanxious depression.46 Patients with GAD in primary care settings may be more likely to achieve symptom reduction due to their relatively milder symptom burden at baseline compared with patients in mental health specialty settings.47 Although remission or sustained recovery is the ideal goal of pharmacotherapy for GAD, it may be difficult for some people to attain; thus, reduction in symptom burden and improvement in function are also reasonable goals of therapy.
Pharmacotherapy Options and Strategies for GAD
Several antidepressants, including SSRIs, SNRIs, vilazodone (Viibryd), and mirtazapine (Remeron) are effective for reducing symptoms of anxiety and are considered first-line therapy for long-term management.48 It should be noted that not all antidepressant medications are FDA-approved for treating anxiety disorders. Escitalopram (Lexapro), paroxetine (Paxil, Paxil CR), duloxetine (Cymbalta), and venlafaxine (Effexor, Effexor XR) are approved by the U.S. FDA for treatment of GAD.48 Citalopram (Celexa), desvenlafaxine (Pristiq), vilazodone (Viibryd), and mirtazapine (Remeron) are serotonergic antidepressants that do not have a specific indication for any anxiety disorder; however, data is available to support their effectiveness for treating anxiety if off-label use is considered.49 , 50 A general approach for prescribing a drug off-label includes identifying evidence and support for use, checking for any warnings, discussing the options and rationale with the patient, and documenting evidence, rationale, and patient consent.51
Outcomes between antidepressant classes for anxiety are fairly equivocal, so an SSRI may be preferred as initial therapy due to anticipated overall tolerability.50 Agent selection should be guided by consideration of what has worked for the person or their first-degree relative in the past, matching medication selection with patient illness characteristics, and selecting an agent with a side effect profile that is favorable for a given patient. A desirable effect of antidepressants for persons with depression is activation, or increased energy. However, persons with anxiety may experience the activating effects of antidepressants as restlessness or even increased anxiety or panic. Some antidepressants are associated with more activation than others, and those with the strongest association, bupropion (Wellbutrin, Wellbutrin SR, Wellbutrin XL), fluoxetine (Prozac), and venlafaxine (Effexor, Effexor XR), may be dosed cautiously for persons with a history of anxiety or panic.28
Titration should be undertaken to effect, with persons with GAD sometimes ultimately requiring higher doses of antidepressants than persons with MDD.52 Clinicians should bear in mind that onset of symptom improvement with antidepressants may be delayed in GAD, compared with MDD, with some patients achieving response after 12–24 weeks53 and remission after 6 months.13 Additionally, due to the often chronic and sustained course of GAD, compared with episodic MDD, pharmacotherapy may be continuous. Relapse prevention studies have shown significant benefit for patients maintaining medication treatment, as opposed to switching to placebo, for timeframes up to 18 months.53 However, discontinuation of pharmacotherapy for GAD can be attempted, with care being taken to monitor for and promptly address any re-emergence of symptoms.
Another agent which is available for use in GAD is buspirone (BuSpar), a nonsedating, non–dependence-forming, long-acting agent that reduces anxiety by 5-HT 1A partial agonism and enhancement of dopamine and norepinephrine activity.13 In most cases, clinical effects can be observed 1–2 weeks after initiation, and similar to SSRIs and SNRIs, buspirone can then be titrated to effect.13 Because its mechanism of action is novel, it can be used as an add-on for persons with a partial response to SSRIs or SNRIs, or it can be used as monotherapy for persons who do not tolerate SSRIs or SNRIs due to side effects (including sexual side effects) or weight gain.13 , 48
Noncontrolled options for short-acting relief of anxiety are limited. Hydroxyzine (Atarax, Vistaril) is a first-generation antihistamine that can be used for relief of acute anxiety symptoms.28 With an onset of 15–20 minutes, it can be dosed as needed and taken after acute anxiety begins or on a schedule and taken routinely to reduce anticipated anxiety.28 Routine use should be limited to a few weeks, and if symptoms persist, long-term therapy options such as an SSRI should be considered.28
Use of Benzodiazepines
In September 2020, the FDA issued a safety communication requiring an update to the Boxed Warning for benzodiazepines to address “serious risks of abuse, addiction, physical dependence, and withdrawal reactions.”54 The updated guidance suggests that prescribers carefully weigh anticipated benefits versus risks of benzodiazepines, including assessing risk of abuse, misuse, and addiction; limit to lowest dose and shortest duration of therapy necessary; and conduct careful monitoring for abuse, misuse, and addiction throughout therapy.54 In a recent meta-analysis of therapies for anxiety, pooled data for benzodiazepines indicated a modest positive effect on symptoms of anxiety with a similar effect size to SSRIs, SNRIs, and buspirone, but the tolerability of benzodiazepines was quite a bit worse than SSRIs, SNRIs, and buspirone.55 Ideal use of benzodiazepines should be short-term, judicious in dose, with careful attention to education about and screening for dependence or misuse throughout follow-up.54 , 56
Referral to Specialty Care
The USPSTF recommendation for depression screening in primary care notes that primary care providers should be prepared to treat and follow-up on treatment response, including using referrals to mental health specialists for medication management and counseling services as needed.5 The US Health Resources and Service Administration currently classifies 129 million Americans as residing in a mental health professional shortage area.57 Primary care providers can help alleviate mental health specialty shortages by practicing to the full extent of their training, providing pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic care to persons with mild to moderate symptoms, and reserving referrals for appropriate cases.58 Patients with severe symptoms, comorbidities (including history of hypomania or mania), or atypical or incomplete response to treatment may benefit from consultation with a mental health specialist.
Conclusion
In the current shortage of mental health professionals, primary care providers are in a front-line position to offer evidence-based pharmacotherapy to patients with common mental health disorders, thereby reducing inequities and increasing the public’s access to potentially life-changing treatment. This review offers clinicians a succinct, evidence-informed overview of treatment principles and pharmacologic options for mental health diagnoses commonly encountered in primary care, MDD and GAD. Key messages from this review include that the goal of treatment for mental health disorders should be sustained remission of symptoms, when possible, and that pharmacotherapy is best offered within a broader context of holistic care—including psychotherapy and other behavioral interventions, as needed. Primary care providers are encouraged to practice to the full extent of their training by taking a prominent role in meeting the unmet treatment needs of individuals with common mental health disorders.
Biography
Abby Luck Parish, DNP, AGPCNP-BC, GNP-BC; Brenna Gillis, DNP, PMHNP-BC; and Angelina Anthamatten, DNP, FNP-BC are faculty at Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, Nashville, TN. Dr. Parish can be contacted at abby.parish@vanderbilt.edu.
Footnotes
In compliance with standard ethical guidelines, the authors report no relationships with business or industry that would pose a conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Key substance use and mental health indicators in the United States: results from the 2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/reports/rpt29393/2019NSDUHFFRPDFWHTML/2019NSDUHFFR090120.htm Published September, 2020.
- 2.Brody D.J., Pratt L.A., Hughes J. Prevalence of depression among adults aged 20 and over: United States, 2013–2016. NCHS Data Brief, no 303. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db303.htm Published February 13, 2018. [PubMed]
- 3.Ettman C.K., Abdalla S.M., Cohen G.H., Sampson L., Vivier P.M., Galea S. Prevalence of depression symptoms in US adults before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(9) doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.19686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cherry D., Albert M., McCaig L.F. Mental Health–Related Physician Office Visits by Adults Aged 18 and Over: United States, 2012–2014. NCHS Data Brief, no 311. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db311.htm Published June 6, 2018. [PubMed]
- 5.Siu A.L., the US Preventive Services Task Force Screening for depression in adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 2016;315(4):380–387. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.18392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Parikh S.V., Quilty L.C., Ravitz P., Rosenbluth M., Pavlova B., Grigoriadis S., et al. Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) 2016 clinical guidelines for the management of adults with major depressive disorder: section 2. Psychological treatments. Can J Psychiatry. 2016;61(9):524–539. doi: 10.1177/0706743716659416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Qaseem A., Barry M.J., Kansagara D. Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians. Nonpharmacologic versus pharmacologic treatment of adult patients with Major Depressive Disorder: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164(5):350–359. doi: 10.7326/M15-2570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Karyotaki E., Smit Y., Holdt Henningsen K., et al. Combining pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy or monotherapy for major depression? A meta-analysis on the long-term effects. J Affect Disord. 2016;194:144–152. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.01.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Guidi J., Fava G.A. Sequential combination of pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy in major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2021;78(3):261–269. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.3650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Carl E., Witcraft S.M., Kauffman B.Y., et al. Psychological and pharmacological treatments for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD): a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Cogn Behav Ther. 2020;49(1):1–21. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2018.1560358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lam R.W., McIntosh D., Wang J., et al. Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) 2016 Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Major Depressive Disorder: Section 1. Disease Burden and Principles of Care. Can J Psychiatry. 2016;61(9):510–523. doi: 10.1177/0706743716659416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sadock B.J., Sadock V.A., Ruiz P. Wolters Kluwer; 2015. Kaplan & Sadock’s Synopsis of Psychiatry: Behavioral Sciences/Clinical Psychiatry. 11th ed. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Stahl S.M. Cambridge University Press; 2021. Stahl’s Essential Psychopharmacology: Neuroscientific Basis and Practical Applications. 5th ed. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hirschfeld R.M., Williams J.B., Spitzer R.L., et al. Development and validation of a screening instrument for bipolar spectrum disorder: the Mood Disorder Questionnaire. Am J Psychiatry. 2000;157(11):1873–1875. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.11.1873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Guo T., Xiang Y.T., Xiao L., et al. Measurement-based care versus standard care for major depression: a randomized controlled trial with blind raters. Am J Psychiatry. 2015;172(10):1004–1013. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.14050652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Siniscalchi K.A., Broome M.E., Fish J., et al. Depression screening and measurement-based care in primary care. J Prim Care Community Health. 2020;11 doi: 10.1177/2150132720931261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yeung A.S., Jing Y., Brenneman S.K., et al. Clinical Outcomes in Measurement-based Treatment (Comet): a trial of depression monitoring and feedback to primary care physicians. Depress Anxiety. 2012;29(10):865–873. doi: 10.1002/da.21983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gondek D., Edbrooke-Childs J., Fink E., Deighton J., Wolpert M. Feedback from outcome measures and treatment effectiveness, treatment efficiency, and collaborative practice: a systematic review. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2016;43(3):325–343. doi: 10.1007/s10488-015-0710-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kroenke K., Spitzer R.L., Williams J.B. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(9):606–613. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.American Psychological Association Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9 & PHQ-2) https://www.apa.org/pi/about/publications/caregivers/practice-settings/assessment/tools/patient-health Published January, 2011. Updated June 2020.
- 21.Rush A.J., Kraemer H.C., Sackeim H.A., et al. Report by the ACNP Task Force on response and remission in major depressive disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006;31(9):1841–1853. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.McAllister-Williams R.H., Arango C., Blier P., et al. The identification, assessment and management of difficult-to-treat depression: an international consensus statement. J Affect Disord. 2020;267:264–282. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.02.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Nierenberg A.A., Husain M.M., Trivedi M.H., et al. Residual symptoms after remission of major depressive disorder with citalopram and risk of relapse: a STAR∗D report. Psychol Med. 2010;40(1):41–50. doi: 10.1017/S0033291709006011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kennedy S.H., Lam R.W., McIntyre R.S., et al. Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) 2016 Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Major Depressive Disorder: Section 3. Pharmacological Treatment. [published correction appears in Can J Psychiatry. 2017;62(5):356] Can J Psychiatry. 2016;61(9):540–560. doi: 10.1177/0706743716659417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Rush A.J., Fava M., Wisniewski S.R., et al. Sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression (STAR∗D): rationale and design. Control Clin Trials. 2004;25(1):119–142. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(03)00112-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rush A.J., Trivedi M.H., Wisniewski S.R., et al. Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: a STAR∗D report. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163(11):1905–1917. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.11.1905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rush A.J., Jain S.B. In: Antidepressants: From Biogenic Amines to New Mechanisms of Action. Macaluso M., Preskorn S.H., editors. Springer; 2019. Clinical implications of the STAR∗D trial; pp. 51–99. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Stahl S.M. Cambridge University Press; 2021. Stahl’s Essential Psychopharmacology: The Prescriber’s Guide. 7th ed. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Renoir T. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant treatment discontinuation syndrome: a review of the clinical evidence and the possible mechanisms involved. Front Pharmacol. 2013;4:45. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2013.00045. Published April 16, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Warner C.H., Bobo W., Warner C., Reid S., Rachal J. Antidepressant discontinuation syndrome. Am Fam Physician. 2006;74(3):449–456. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Keers R., Aitchison K.J. Pharmacogenetics of antidepressant response. Expert Rev Neurother. 2011;11(1):101–125. doi: 10.1586/ern.10.186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Anderson K.N., Lind J.N., Simeone R.M., et al. Maternal use of specific antidepressant medications during early pregnancy and the risk of selected birth defects. JAMA Psychiatry. 2020;77(12):1246–1255. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.2453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 92: Use of psychiatric medications during pregnancy and lactation. Obstetr Gynecol. 2008;111(4):1001–1020. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31816fd910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Boyer E.W., Shannon M. The serotonin syndrome. New Engl J Med. 2005;352(11):1112–1120. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra041867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Food and Drug Administration Suicidality and antidepressant drugs. https://www.fda.gov/media/77404/download Published 2007.
- 36.Pfizer Zoloft. [package insert] https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2016/019839S74S86S87_20990S35S44S45lbl.pdf Updated December, 2016.
- 37.Bousman C.A., Arandjelovic K., Mancuso S.G., Eyre H.A., Dunlop B.W. Pharmacogenetic tests and depressive symptom remission: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pharmacogenomics. 2019;20(1):37–47. doi: 10.2217/pgs-2018-0142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Rosenblat J.D., Lee Y., McIntyre R.S. The effect of pharmacogenomic testing on response and remission rates in the acute treatment of major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2018;241:484–491. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.08.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.American Psychiatric Association . American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5. 5th ed. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Adjaye-Gbewonyo D., Boersma P. Early release of selected estimates based on data from the 2021 National Health Interview Survey. National Center for Health Statistics. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhis/earlyrelease/earlyrelease202204.pdf Published April, 2022.
- 41.Kessler R.C., Sampson N.A., Berglund P., et al. Anxious and non-anxious major depressive disorder in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2015;24(3):210–226. doi: 10.1017/S2045796015000189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Spitzer R.L., Kroenke K., Williams J.B., Löwe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(10):1092–1097. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.109254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kessler R.C., Wang P.S. The descriptive epidemiology of commonly occurring mental disorders in the United States. Annu Rev Public Health. 2008;29:115–129. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Yonkers K.A., Warshaw M.G., Massion A.O., Keller M.B. Phenomenology and course of generalised anxiety disorder. Br J Psychiatry. 1996;168(3):308–313. doi: 10.1192/bjp.168.3.308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Yonkers K.A., Dyck I.R., Warshaw M., Keller M.B. Factors predicting the clinical course of generalised anxiety disorder. Br J Psychiatry. 2000;176:544–549. doi: 10.1192/bjp.176.6.544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Fava M., Rush A.J., Alpert J.E., et al. Difference in treatment outcome in outpatients with anxious versus nonanxious depression: a STAR∗D report. Am J Psychiatry. 2008;165(3):342–351. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.06111868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Rodriguez B.F., Weisberg R.B., Pagano M.E., et al. Characteristics and predictors of full and partial recovery from generalized anxiety disorder in primary care patients. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2006;194(2):91–97. doi: 10.1097/01.nmd.0000198140.02154.32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Strawn J.R., Geracioti L., Rajdev N., Clemenza K., Levine A. Pharmacotherapy for generalized anxiety disorder in adult and pediatric patients: an evidence-based treatment review. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2018;19(10):1057–1070. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2018.1491966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Garakani A., Murrough J.W., Freire R.C., et al. Pharmacotherapy of anxiety disorders: current and emerging treatment options. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11 doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.595584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.He H., Xiang Y., Gao F., et al. Comparative efficacy and acceptability of first-line drugs for the acute treatment of generalized anxiety disorder in adults: a network meta-analysis. J Psychiatr Res. 2019;118:21–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Buppert C. The perils of off-label prescribing. J Nurs Pract. 2012;8(7):567–568. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Cassano G.B., Baldini Rossi N., Pini S. Psychopharmacology of anxiety disorders. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2002;4(3):271–285. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2002.4.3/gcassano. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Baldwin D.S., Anderson I.M., Nutt D.J., et al. Evidence-based pharmacological treatment of anxiety disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder: a revision of the 2005 guidelines from the British Association for Psychopharmacology. J Psychopharmacol. 2014;28(5):403–439. doi: 10.1177/0269881114525674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Food and Drug Administration FDA requiring Boxed Warning updated to improve safe use of benzodiazepine drug class. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-requiring-boxed-warning-updated-improve-safe-use-benzodiazepine-drug-class Published September 23, 2020.
- 55.Slee A., Nazareth I., Bondaronek P., Liu Y., Cheng Z., Freemantle N. Pharmacological treatments for generalised anxiety disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. [published correction appears in Lancet. 2019;393(10182):1698] [DOI] [PubMed]
- 56.Hirschtritt M.E., Olfson M., Kroenke K. Balancing the risks and benefits of benzodiazepines. JAMA. 2021;325(4):347–348. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.22106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Health Resources and Services Administration Shortage areas. https://data.hrsa.gov/topics/health-workforce/shortage-areas Published September 29, 2021.
- 58.Brown M., Moore C.A., MacGregor J., Lucey J.R. Primary care and mental health: overview of integrated care models. J Nurs Pract. 2021;17(1):10–14. doi: 10.1016/j.nurpra.2020.07.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]