Skip to main content
Hepatology Forum logoLink to Hepatology Forum
editorial
. 2023 Jan 17;4(1):1–2. doi: 10.14744/hf.2023.2023.0004

The role of magnetic resonance elastography in the evaluation of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

Ilkay S Idilman 1,, Musturay Karcaaltincaba 1
PMCID: PMC9951892  PMID: 36843890

Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is a diagnostic tool for the evaluation of chronic liver diseases in terms of the presence and assessment of hepatic fibrosis. Propagating waves transmitted through a passive driver to the liver region produced by an active driver are the fundamentals of the technique. These waves produce microscopic shear displacement, which can be imaged by a phase contrast MR sequence. The stiffness of the tissues can be evaluated on stiffness maps that are produced automatically. The mean liver stiffness measurement (LSM) can be calculated from the region of interest drawn on the four obtained slices and expressed in kilopascals (kPa).[1]

Liver biopsy was accepted as the best way to assess hepatic fibrosis, which has several disadvantages such as invasiveness and capability of small parenchymal evaluation that causes lower reproducibility. Today, several noninvasive biochemical techniques, such as fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score, AST to platelet ratio index, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) index, and imaging methods including vibration-controlled transient elastography and MRE, are used for identifying and assessing liver fibrosis. MRE can assess a larger portion of the liver with excellent intra- and interobserver agreement in contrast with liver biopsy assessment.[1,2] It is shown that MRE is a valuable imaging method for identifying liver fibrosis that has a good correlation with liver biopsy in several chronic liver diseases and NAFLD.[3,4] MRE has also been shown to be superior to other noninvasive methods in assessing liver fibrosis.[5,6] Risk stratification is important in patients with NAFLD. A diet and exercise program is recommended in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFL). However, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is characterized by the presence of inflammation, ballooning, and/or fibrosis, indicating the progressive forms of the disease. NASH patients with significant hepatic fibrosis (stage ≥2) are at risk for liver-related morbidities and are candidates for clinical trial participation.[7] It was shown that MRE is a useful tool for the discrimination of NASH from NAFL and for the detection of significant fibrosis.[8,9]

MRE can also be used in the follow-up of NAFLD patients noninvasively. A recent study showed a 15% increase in MRE-LSM is the strongest predictor of progression to advanced fibrosis in patients with NAFLD.[10] Tamaki et al.[7] also proposed that a combination of MRE with FIB-4 score (MEFIB index) can be used for detecting patients with NAFLD and significant fibrosis for enrollment in NASH clinical trials.Beyond that, MRE-LSM is shown to be a significant predictor of the development of cirrhosis as well as baseline LSM is predictive of the development of liver-related events such as decompensation or death.[11] A recent study that evaluated the MEFIB index showed excellent negative predictive value for hepatic decompensation in patients with NAFLD-related cirrhosis. In this study, the investigators also observed that MRE-LSM is associated with hepatic decompensation, hepatocellular carcinoma, and death in patients with NAFLD-related cirrhosis.[12]

In conclusion, MRE-LSM is a useful tool for the detection and assessment of hepatic fibrosis in patients with NAFLD. MRE-LSM can also be used for the evaluation of disease progression as well as the prediction of disease courses in NAFLD patients.

Footnotes

How to cite this article: Idilman IS, Karcaaltincaba M. The role of magnetic resonance elastography in the evaluation of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology Forum 2023; 4(1):1–2.

References

  • 1.Idilman IS, Li J, Yin M, Venkatesh SK. MR elastography of liver: current status and future perspectives. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2020;45(11):3444–3462. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02656-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Serai SD, Obuchowski NA, Venkatesh SK, Sirlin CB, Miller FH, Ashton E, et al. Repeatability of MR elastography of liver: A meta-analysis. Radiology. 2017;285(1):92–100. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017161398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Singh S, Venkatesh SK, Loomba R, Wang Z, Sirlin C, Chen J, et al. Magnetic resonance elastography for staging liver fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a diagnostic accuracy systematic review and individual participant data pooled analysis. Eur Radiol. 2016;26(5):1431–1440. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3949-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Singh S, Venkatesh SK, Wang Z, Miller FH, Motosugi U, Low RN, et al. Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance elastography in staging liver fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13(3):440–451.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.09.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bi J, Liu L, Qin T. Comparison of magnetic resonance elastography and transient elastography in the diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Palliat Med. 2021;10(8):8692–8700. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-1176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chen J, Talwalkar JA, Yin M, Glaser KJ, Sanderson SO, Ehman RL. Early detection of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease by using MR elastography. Radiology. 2011;259(3):749–756. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11101942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tamaki N, Imajo K, Sharpton S, Jung J, Kawamura N, Yoneda M, et al. Magnetic resonance elastography plus Fibrosis-4 versus FibroScan-aspartate aminotransferase in detection of candidates for pharmacological treatment of NASH-related fibrosis. Hepatology. 2022;75(3):661–672. doi: 10.1002/hep.32145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Xiao G, Zhu S, Xiao X, Yan L, Yang J, Wu G. Comparison of laboratory tests, ultrasound, or magnetic resonance elastography to detect fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A meta-analysis. Hepatology. 2017;66(5):1486–1501. doi: 10.1002/hep.29302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kim D, Kim WR, Talwalkar JA, Kim HJ, Ehman RL. Advanced fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: noninvasive assessment with MR elastography. Radiology. 2013;268(2):411–419. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13121193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ajmera VH, Liu A, Singh S, Yachoa G, Ramey M, Bhargava M, et al. Clinical utility of an increase in magnetic resonance elastography in predicting fibrosis progression in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2020;71(3):849–860. doi: 10.1002/hep.30974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gidener T, Ahmed OT, Larson JJ, Mara KC, Therneau TM, Venkatesh SK, et al. Liver stiffness by magnetic resonance elastography predicts future cirrhosis, decompensation, and death in NAFLD. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;19(9):1915–1924.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.09.044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ajmera V, Kim BK, Yang K, Majzoub AM, Nayfeh T, Tamaki N, et al. Liver stiffness on magnetic resonance elastography and the MEFIB index and liver-related outcomes in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participants. Gastroenterology. 2022;163(4):1079–1089.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.06.073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Hepatology Forum are provided here courtesy of Turkish Association for the Study of the Liver

RESOURCES