Abstract
Background and Aim
The study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and platelet values in predicting intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) in the first trimester, together with the aspartate aminotransferase/platelet ratio index (APRI) score.
Materials and Methods
This study consisted of a patient group diagnosed with ICP (n=49) and a control group (n=62). Laboratory tests of both groups were analyzed retrospectively.
Results
The first-trimester APRI score and AST and ALT values were found to be statistically significantly higher than those of the control group. The platelet value was found to be statistically significantly lower in the study group, even though it was within the normal reference range.
Conclusion
The first-trimester APRI score was found to be effective in predicting ICP. In addition, the first-trimester AST, ALT, and platelet values were found to be effective in predicting ICP diagnosed in the third trimester even though if not as much as the APRI score.
Keywords: APRI score, intrahepatic cholestasis, prediction, pregnancy
Introduction
Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is a pregnancy-specific liver disorder with a complex etiology and characterized by pruritus, increased bile acids, and liver transaminases, usually in the late second and third trimesters. The incidence of ICP varies between 0.2% and 2% in different countries and populations.[1,2] The cause of intrahepatic cholestasis remains unclear but is related to genetic factors, reproductive hormones, and environmental factors.[3,4] ICP appears to be linked to an increased proportion of serious adverse fetal outcomes including fetal distress, sudden intrauterine death, preterm labor, meconium staining of amniotic fluid, low birth weight, and respiratory distress syndrome of the neonates.[5–8] Despite numerous hypotheses (placenta microstructure disorders and fetal arrhythmia), the mechanisms by which fetal complications occur are also unclear.[3,9–11]
ICP is not typically associated with ongoing hepatic impairment after pregnancy. Pruritus spontaneously resolves, and deranged liver function tests typically normalize within 4 weeks of delivery. It has been reported that women with this disease during pregnancy have an increased risk of developing hepatobiliary and immune-mediated and cardiovascular diseases later in life.[12,13] Therefore, ICP might be a predictor for the development of liver and biliary disease in the future.[14] Although many studies predict diseases in the early weeks of gestation such as preeclampsia and gestational diabetes, which have similar adverse obstetric outcomes, it is noteworthy that such studies are less common for ICP. Aspartate aminotransferase/platelet ratio index (APRI) score, which is one of the parameters used for this purpose, is one of the noninvasive tests showing liver damage and is found to be effective in evaluating fibrosis in liver diseases.[15–19] In another study, the first-trimester APRI score was found to be valuable in predicting ICP.[20]
In this study, we aimed to investigate the effectiveness of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and platelet values in predicting ICP in the first trimester, together with the APRI score.
Materials and Methods
The present study was a retrospective analysis of data from all women with ICP who were admitted to the Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology between 2017 and 2021. As the data were collected retrospectively, informed consent was not needed. This study was approved by the local ethics committee according to the principles outlined by the Declaration of Helsinki (E-71522473-050.01.04-5774-02). The hospital records were searched to identify all patients diagnosed with ICP.
The study group consisted of 49 cases (n=49) diagnosed with ICP, and a control group, cases with completely normal pregnancy follow-up without cholestasis or any other diseases (n=62).
The diagnosis of ICP was based on the following criteria[21]: (1) the presence of pruritus, predominantly located on hands and feet, that resolved within hours or days after delivery; (2) abnormalities in liver-function tests suggestive of ICP; (3) elevated levels of fasting serum bile acid of more than 10 mmol/L; (4) no skin lesions caused by systemic diseases that could lead to pruritus; and (5) spontaneous resolution of clinical symptoms and laboratory findings after delivery. Patients with multiple pregnancies, pregestational or gestational diabetes, liver and biliary tract disease, hematological disease, dermatological disease, infectious diseases, and any chronic systemic diseases were not included in the study. Age, gravida, parity, body mass index (BMI), platelet level, AST level, ALT level of the patients in both groups, and fasting bile acid levels were recorded when ICP was diagnosed in the study group. APRI score was calculated as stated in the literature [(AST/upper limit of normal)/platelet count (109 L–1) × 100].[22]
In the post hoc power analysis of the research obtained with Gpower 3.1.9.2, the reference article values and the effect size were taken as 0.8, and the power was found to be 0.98.[20] Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS 24.0 package program (SPSS, Inc. and Lead Tech., Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used in compliance with normal distribution. Comparison of the levels of variables with homogeneous distribution between study and control groups was performed using Student’s t-test, and the comparison of variables with heterogeneous distribution was made using the Mann–Whitney U test. Homogeneously distributed parameters were shown as mean±standard deviation (SD) and heterogeneously distributed parameters as median (min–max). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to determine cutoffs for the first-trimester APRI score and AST, ALT, and platelet values to predict the development of ICP. For all statistical analyses, a two-tailed p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
There was no difference between the study and control groups in terms of age, BMI, gravida, and parity (p>0.05). The first-trimester APRI score and AST and ALT values were found to be statistically significantly higher than those of the control group. The platelet value was found to be statistically significantly lower in the study group, even though it was within the normal reference range (p1=0.001, p2=0.001, p3=0.001, and p4=0.005) (Table 1).
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics of patients in the first trimester of pregnancy
| Variables | Without cholestasis (n=62) | With cholestasis (n=49) | p | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean±SD | Median (min–max) | Mean±SD | Median (min–max) | ||
| Age (years) | 28±5 | 27 (17–40) | 28±4 | 29 (19–38) | 0.352 |
| Gravida | 2.59±1.27 | 2 (1–7) | 2.35±1.15 | 2 (1–5) | 0.296 |
| Parity | 1.19±0.9 | 1 (0–3) | 1.04±0.93 | 1 (0–4) | 0.287 |
| Body mass index | 25.76±1.05 | 25.8 (24–28.6) | 26.1±1.85 | 26.35 (21.2–29.3) | 0.127 |
| AST (IU/L) | 16.08±3.36 | 16 (11–25) | 20.22±6.7 | 18 (12–36) | 0.001 |
| ALT (IU/L) | 14.18±5.29 | 13 (7–31) | 20.03±8.73 | 17 (7–39) | 0.001 |
| Platelet (109 L–1) | 282.75±56.02 | 274 (173–443) | 251.85±60.74 | 240 (153–388) | 0.005 |
| APRI score | 0.146±0.036 | 0.145 (0.09–0.274) | 0.214±0.092 | 0.188 (0.085–0.471) | 0.001 |
SD: Standard deviation; Min: Minimum; Max: Maximum; AST: Aspartate aminotransferase; ALT: Alanine aminotransferase; APRI: Aspartate Aminotransferase/Platelet Ratio Index.
While the third-trimester APRI score and AST and ALT values were found to be statistically significantly higher in the study group compared with the control group, there was no statistically significant difference in terms of platelet values (p1=0.001, p2=0.001, p3=0.001, and p4=0.896) (Table 2).
Table 2.
Baseline characteristics of patients in the third trimester of pregnancy
| Variables | Without cholestasis (n=62) | With cholestasis (n=49) | p | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean±SD | Median (min–max) | Mean±SD | Median (min–max) | ||
| AST (IU/L) | 18.81 ± 6.61 | 17 (9–46) | 77.1 ± 46.08 | 61 (17–210) | 0.001 |
| ALT (IU/L) | 11.87 ± 4.48 | 11 (5–28) | 109.69 ± 77.52 | 93 (8–331) | 0.001 |
| Platelet (109 L–1) | 244.64 ± 57.83 | 242.5 (140–366) | 243.81 ± 59.53 | 243 (144–443) | 0.896 |
| Total bilirubin (mg/dL) | – | – | 0.89 ± 0.63 | 0.76 (0.1–3.2) | – |
| ALP (IU/L) | – | – | 191.98 ± 66.3 | 182 (102–403) | – |
| GGT (IU/L) | – | – | 26.67 ± 33.7 | 18 (3–225) | – |
| Fasting bile acid | – | – | 28.44 ± 28.24 | 16.09 (10.2–129.3) | – |
| APRI score | 0.203 ± 0.08 | 0.186 (0.086–0.412) | 0.809 ± 0.471 | 0.659 (0.127–2.595) | 0.001 |
SD: Standard deviation; Min: Minimum; Max: Maximum; AST: Aspartate aminotransferase; ALT: Alanine aminotransferase; ALP: Alkaline phosphatase; GGT: Gamma-glutamyl transferase; APRI: Aspartate aminotransferase/platelet ratio index.
It was determined that the development of ICP was predicted by AST, ALT, and platelet levels, especially the first-trimester APRI score (Fig. 1 and 2).
Figure 1.

Receiver operating characteristic curves of first-trimester APRI score and AST and ALT values for the diagnosis of intrahepatic cholestasis in pregnancy.
Figure 2.

Receiver operating characteristic curve of first-trimester platelet value for the diagnosis of intrahepatic cholestasis in pregnancy.
The first-trimester APRI score is statistically significant in determining the development of third-trimester ICP (p=0.001), and the receiver operating characteristic curve value is 0.758. When the cutoff value for the APRI score is accepted as ≥0.148, its sensitivity is 79.6% and specificity is 56.5% (Table 3).
Table 3.
ROC curve for APRI score and AST, ALT, and platelet values for the prediction of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy
| AUC | Cutoff | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Confidence interval | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APRI score | 0.758 | ≥0.148 | 79.6 | 56.5 | 0.663–0.852 | 0.001 |
| AST (IU/L) | 0.706 | ≥16.5 | 63.3 | 61.3 | 0.610–0.802 | 0.001 |
| ALT (IU/L) | 0.712 | ≥14.5 | 69.4 | 66.1 | 0.615–0.809 | 0.001 |
| Platelet (109 L–1) | 0.654 | ≤269.5 | 69.4 | 54.8 | 0.547–0.761 | 0.005 |
ROC: Receiver operating characteristic; APRI: Aspartate aminotransferase/platelet ratio index; AST: Aspartate aminotransferase; ALT: Alanine aminotransferase; AUC: Area under curve.
Discussion
Many studies aim to predict ICP in early pregnancy. For this purpose, biochemical parameters such as aneuploidy screening, maternal lipid profile, and efficacy of sulfated progesterone metabolites used in the first and second trimesters are evaluated.[23–25]
Among the parameters used in the first and second trimesters, aneuploidy screening, only the decrease in the first-trimester PAPP-A MoM value, was found to be significant.[23] In their studies investigating the relationship between maternal lipid profile and pregnancy complications, Zhang et al.[24] found that the first-trimester serum total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol levels increased in patients diagnosed with ICP compared with pregnant women in the normal population and stated that this situation may have a fundamental role in the development of ICP. Abu-Hayyeh et al.[25] stated that the levels of sulfated metabolites of progesterone evaluated in early pregnancy were higher in patients who developed ICP in the later periods of these pregnancies, and these metabolites were effective in predicting ICP in the early weeks of gestation.
Tolunay et al.[20] found that the first-trimester APRI score was high in pregnant women diagnosed with ICP in the third trimester. Numerous studies have demonstrated that the APRI score is a noninvasive index of hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis.[26,27] AST, which is one of the parameters used in calculating the APRI score, increases as a result of cell damage in liver fibrosis, and the platelet count decreases as a result of portal hypertension secondary to this damage. Although a high APRI score was found to be effective for ICP prediction in our study, similar to the study by Tolunay et al., [20] there are some differences between the two studies. First, although the lower limit of fasting bile acid level was accepted as 10 μmol/L (min. 10.2 μmol/L, max. 129.3 μmol/L for our study) for the diagnosis of ICP in our study, there are data suggesting that this value is below the classical diagnostic value in Tolunay et al.’s[20] study (min. 0.7 μmol/L, max. 34 μmol/L). The first-trimester APRI score in patients diagnosed with ICP in the third trimester is higher in our study than in the study by Tolunay et al.[20] (0.214±0.092 vs 0.7±0.1). In the study conducted by Tolunay et al.,[20] it was seen that the APRI score of the first trimester (before the development of cholestasis) in patients with ICP was close to the APRI score, which indicates the formation of fibrosis in various liver diseases. This suggests that in the study by Tolunay et al.,[20] there is a condition such as the presence of a liver disease characterized by fibrosis before the development of cholestasis in patients who develop ICP. In addition, in our study, no statistically significant positive correlation was found between the first-trimester APRI score and the third-trimester fasting bile acid values shown by Tolunay et al.[20] The reason for this situation may be that the parameters used in the measurement of the APRI score are mostly related to liver parenchymal damage, and the fasting bile acid level is more related to the disorder in the extrahepatic biliary system outside the liver parenchyma. Therefore, trying to find a correlation between these two situations may not be entirely correct. In our study, we concluded that the high first-trimester AST and ALT values and low platelet values are also valuable in predicting ICP, although not as much as the APRI score. The changes in these markers are consistent with changes in complete blood count and biochemical parameters seen in liver fibrosis. However, the prediction of all these parameters, including the APRI score, for ICP suggests that there is a condition that does not show itself with the presence of macroscopic and microscopic fibrosis in the liver in pathological examination in pregnant women with cholestasis, but is seen in the form of molecular changes.
The limitations of this study include its retrospective nature and the absence of a biopsy to evaluate liver pathology in pregnant women with cholestasis.
Conclusion
First-trimester APRI score was found to be effective in predicting ICP. In addition, first-trimester AST, ALT, and platelet values were found to be effective in the prediction of ICP diagnosed in the third trimester, even though if not as much as the APRI score. Evaluation of the changes in APRI score and these parameters, which are routinely used in clinical practice, may contribute to the detection of ICP in the early weeks of gestation. As a result, with the application of appropriate monitoring and treatment methods, obstetric and perinatal outcomes, which may develop as a result of ICP, can be improved. Prospective randomized studies are needed to better evaluate the effectiveness of these parameters.
Footnotes
How to cite this article: Gok K, Takmaz T, Kose O, Tuten N, Acikgoz AS, Bostanci MS, Ozden S. Can first-trimester aspartate aminotransferase/platelet ratio index score predict intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy? Hepatology Forum 2023; 4(1):30–34.
Ethics Committee Approval
The Sakarya University Clinical Research Ethics Committee granted approval for this study (date: 29.01.2021, number: E-71522473-050.01.04-5774-02).
Peer-review
Externally peer-reviewed.
Author Contributions
Concept – KG, SO; Design – KG, SO; Supervision – KG, MSB, SO; Data Collection and/or Processing – KG, MSB, OK; Analysis and/or Interpretation – KG, TT, NT, ASA, OK; Literature Search – KG, TT, NT, ASA; Writing – KG, ASA; Critical Reviews – KG, MSB, SO.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Financial Disclosure
The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.
References
- 1.Wood AM, Livingston EG, Hughes BL, Kuller JA. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: A review of diagnosis and management. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2018;73(2):103–109. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Shao Y, Chen J, Zheng J, Liu CR. Effect of histone deacetylase HDAC3 on cytokines IL-18, IL-12 and TNF-α in patients with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2017;42(4):1294–1302. doi: 10.1159/000478958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Geenes V, Williamson C. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15(17):2049–2066. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.2049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Joshi D, James A, Quaglia A, Westbrook RH, Heneghan MA. Liver disease in pregnancy. Lancet. 2010;375(9714):594–605. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61495-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ovadia C, Seed PT, Sklavounos A, Geenes V, Di Ilio C, Chambers J, et al. Association of adverse perinatal outcomes of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy with biochemical markers: results of aggregate and individual patient data meta-analyses. Lancet. 2019;393(10174):899–909. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31877-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Labbe C, Delesalle C, Creveuil C, Dreyfus M. Cholestases intrahepatiques gravidiques (CIG) précoces et tardives: étude des complications materno-fœtalesEarly and later intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP): Study of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018;46(4):388–394. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2018.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mei Y, Gao L, Lin Y, Luo D, Zhou X, He L. Predictors of adverse perinatal outcomes in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy with dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32(3):472–476. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1384461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yang J, Chen C, Liu M, Zhang S. Women successfully treated for severe intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy do not have increased risks for adverse perinatal outcomes. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019;98(27):e16214. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Geenes VL, Lim YH, Bowman N, Tailor H, Dixon PH, Chambers J, et al. A placental phenotype for intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Placenta. 2011;32(12):1026–1032. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2011.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ibrahim E, Diakonov I, Arunthavarajah D, Swift T, Goodwin M, McIlvride S, et al. Bile acids and their respective conjugates elicit different responses in neonatal cardiomyocytes: role of Gi protein, muscarinic receptors and TGR5. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):7110. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25569-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Güven D, Altunkaynak BZ, Altun G, Alkan I, Kocak I. Histomorphometric changes in the placenta and umbilical cord during complications of pregnancy. Biotech Histochem. 2018;93(3):198–210. doi: 10.1080/10520295.2017.1410993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Marschall HU, Wikström Shemer E, Ludvigsson JF, Stephansson O. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and associated hepatobiliary disease: a population-based cohort study. Hepatology. 2013;58(4):1385–1391. doi: 10.1002/hep.26444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wikström Shemer E, Marschall HU, Ludvigsson JF, Stephansson O. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and associated adverse pregnancy and fetal outcomes: A 12-year population-based cohort study. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;120(6):717–723. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ropponen A, Sund R, Riikonen S, Ylikorkala O, Aittomäki K. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy as an indicator of liver and biliary diseases: A population-based study. Hepatology. 2006;43(4):723–728. doi: 10.1002/hep.21111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Peleg N, Issachar A, Sneh-Arbib O, Shlomai A. AST to Platelet Ratio Index and fibrosis 4 calculator scores for non-invasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Dig Liver Dis. 2017;49(10):1133–1138. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2017.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cordie A, Salama A, El-Sharkawy M, El-Nahaas SM, Khairy M, Elsharkawy A, et al. Comparing the efficiency of Fib-4, Egy-score, APRI, and GUCI in liver fibrosis staging in Egyptians with chronic hepatitis C. J Med Virol. 2018;90(6):1106–1111. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Xiao G, Zhu S, Xiao X, Yan L, Yang J, Wu G. Comparison of laboratory tests, ultrasound, or magnetic resonance elastography to detect fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A meta-analysis. Hepatology. 2017;66(5):1486–1501. doi: 10.1002/hep.29302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yilmaz Y, Yonal O, Kurt R, Bayrak M, Aktas B, Ozdogan O. Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis with the aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index (APRI): Usefulness in patients with chronic liver disease: APRI in chronic liver disease. Hepat Mon. 2011;11(2):103–106. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Subasi CF, Aykut UE, Yilmaz Y. Comparison of noninvasive scores for the detection of advanced fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;27(2):137–141. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tolunay HE, Kahraman NC, Varli EN, Ergani SY, Obut M, Çelen S, et al. First-trimester aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index in predicting intrahepatic cholestasis in pregnancy and its relationship with bile acids: A pilot study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021;256:114–117. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Manzotti C, Casazza G, Stimac T, Nikolova D, Gluud C. Total serum bile acids or serum bile acid profile, or both, for the diagnosis of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;7(7):CD012546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012546.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wai CT, Greenson JK, Fontana RJ, Kalbfleisch JD, Marrero JA, Conjeevaram HS, et al. A simple noninvasive index can predict both significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2003;38(2):518–526. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2003.50346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tayyar AT, Tayyar A, Atakul T, Yayla CA, Kilicci C, Eser A, et al. Could first-and second-trimester biochemical markers for Down syndrome have a role in predicting intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy? Arch Med Sci. 2018;14(4):846–850. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2017.69865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhang Y, Lan X, Cai C, Li R, Gao Y, Yang L, et al. Associations between maternal lipid profiles and pregnancy complications: A prospective population-based study. Am J Perinatol. 2021;38(8):834–840. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3402724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Abu-Hayyeh S, Ovadia C, Lieu T, Jensen DD, Chambers J, Dixon PH, et al. Prognostic and mechanistic potential of progesterone sulfates in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and pruritus gravidarum. Hepatology. 2016;63(4):1287–1298. doi: 10.1002/hep.28265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Li SM, Li GX, Fu DM, Wang Y, Dang LQ. Liver fibrosis evaluation by ARFI and APRI in chronic hepatitis C. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(28):9528–9533. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i28.9528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Suominen JS, Lampela H, Heikkilä P, Lohi J, Jalanko H, Pakarinen MP. APRi predicts native liver survival by reflecting portal fibrogenesis and hepatic neovascularization at the time of portoenterostomy in biliary atresia. J Pediatr Surg. 2015;50(9):1528–1531. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.11.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
