Skip to main content
Biosensors logoLink to Biosensors
editorial
. 2023 Feb 18;13(2):292. doi: 10.3390/bios13020292

Investigation of Biomolecule Interactions: Optical-, Electrochemical-, and Acoustic-Based Biosensors

Ieva Plikusiene 1,2,*, Almira Ramanaviciene 1,*
PMCID: PMC9954023  PMID: 36832058

1. Background

Today, optical, electrochemical, and acoustic affinity biosensors; immunosensors; and immunoanalytical systems play an important role in the detection and characterization of a number of biological substances, including viral antigens, specific antibodies, and clinically important biomarkers [1,2]. In recent years, advancements in acousto-optic techniques have been made across a variety of medical application fields, particularly in improving the resolution, detection speed, and imaging depth. Theoretical modeling strategies, numerical simulation methods, and recent medical applications have been reviewed [3]. The main advantages of biosensors and immunosensors based on optical and acoustic methods in comparison to other signal transducers are the non-destructive nature of analytical signal registration, real-time measurements, the fast and accurate direct label-free detection of various analytes, and the possibility to perform multiple detections of the analyte with the same surface. Acoustic methods can also provide information about the changes in viscoelastic properties during biosensing layer formation and about the specific interaction with biomolecules. Analytical systems based on electrochemical signal transducers are characterized by high sensitivity, short response time, and low cost. In addition, the impact of non-specific binding of various molecules present in the sample on the registered analytic signal is low; measurements can be performed in turbid, opaque, and colored solutions; the same surface can be analyzed by a few different electrochemical methods after biomolecule interaction; and the dimensions of electrochemical biosensors can be easily reduced, allowing them to be integrated directly into microelectronic devices. They can be suitable for automated detection of a single analyte, or adapted for ultrasensitive multiplexed detection of tumor markers using a disposable immunosensor array [4]. Recently, the practical applications of such analytical systems have expanded significantly from clinical diagnostics to food analysis, quality control of products, environmental studies, and monitoring of industrial processes [5,6]. This can be performed on high molecular weight proteins or low molecular weight molecules.

2. Optical Immunosensors and Immunoanalytical Systems

Optical immunosensors and immunoanalytical systems are based on different measurements such as absorbance, index of refraction, scattering, reflectance, photoluminescence, or polarization. The goal of silicon photonic evanescent field biosensors is to bring together the information-rich signal data offered by lab-scale diagnostics at a significantly low cost, with the portability and rapid detection time offered by paper-based assays [7]. Promising immunosensors based on label-free optical methods, such as surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and spectroscopic ellipsometry (SE), can measure changes in the refractive index during biomolecule immobilization or during interactions with an analyte at the solid–liquid interface [8]. SE is extremely sensitive when applied in total internal reflection configuration due to the change in light phase. Additionally, by using SE in total internal reflection mode in combination with SPR, the highest sensitivity is achieved; this method is named total internal reflection ellipsometry (TIRE) [9]. The application of SPR and TIRE for measurements and investigations in real time yields low limits of detection of the analytes of interest, provides the possibility of calculating the affinity of antibodies during their interaction with the antigen, and can follow the formation process of immune complexes. The affinity of an antibody to specific antigens demonstrates how fast and effectively the immune complex is formed. Furthermore, the evaluation of association and dissociation rate constants provides important information about the thermodynamics of such processes [10,11,12,13]. The combination of SE and SPR in TIRE has been successfully applied in the study of the interactions between various mutations (alpha, beta, and gamma) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and specific antibodies present in human blood post-vaccination or after recovery from COVID-19 [9,13,14]. Furthermore, TIRE has been used for the detection of the bovine leukaemia virus antigen gp51 with immunosensors based on a native antibody- or antibody reduced fragment-modified sensing surface. It has also been used for the study of antibody–antigen binding kinetics in real time [9,15]. Additionally, this method was successfully applied in the study of bovine serum albumin (BSA) covalent immobilization on an Al2O3/ZnO nanolaminate sensing surface and on ZnO nanowires [16,17], and in the study of receptors of granulocyte colony stimulating factor and ligand interactions [11,12,14,18]. Recently, TIRE has attracted a lot of attention for its application in antibody–antigen interaction measurements and immunosensor design, due to its elevated sensitivity compared to SPR [10,13,19,20]. The TIRE method is capable of detecting minuscule changes in the refractive index of the surrounding environment caused by the immobilization of either antigens or antibodies and interactions with the target analyte.

3. Acoustic Method for Immunosensing

The acoustic method of quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation (QCM-D) has been applied to measuring the shifts in frequency (ΔF) and energy dissipation (ΔD) of vibrational resonance overtones during protein immobilization and affinity interactions with targeted biomolecules [21]. QCM-D is able to detect changes in surface mass density during the formation of monolayers of biomolecules in real time and to evaluate the viscoelastic properties of such layers due to the measurement of ΔD. Simultaneous measurements of ΔF and ΔD allow one to obtain information about biomolecules orientation on the surface [22,23]. This method has previously been used to study novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid proteins and specific antibody interactions, providing a new opportunity to evaluate antibody flexibility [21]. Additionally, it was shown that parameters registered by QCM-D and plotted as ΔD/ΔF can be successfully applied for the evaluation and distinction between specific antibody fragment interactions with bovine leukaemia virus antigen gp51 and non-specific interactions with BSA [24].

4. Electrochemical Biosensors and Immunosensors

Electrochemical biosensors and immunosensors are the most common and widely used for the quantitative detection of various biomolecules and other clinically important analytes. They are very promising and have become a viable alternative to existing laboratory methods. Electrochemical immunosensors have been successfully applied for the direct label-free detection of specific antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein using electrodes with or without a gold nanostructure [25,26,27]. L-cysteine was incorporated into screen-printed carbon electrodes with electrodeposited gold nanostructures for further covalent immobilization of recombinant SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins (rSpike). Using cyclic voltammetry and differential pulse voltammetry, the affinity interactions of rSpike with specific antibodies were investigated [27]. However, different immunoassay formats and various signal amplification strategies are required for the ultra-sensitive detection of biomolecules. Challenging bioanalytical problems, such as sensitivity and specificity, can be resolved by using various nanoparticles, such as noble metals or metal oxide nanoparticles, as signal amplifying tags [28]. Electrochemical glucose biosensors based on electrochemically synthetized gold nanostructures have been developed, the best enzyme glucose oxidase immobilization methods have been selected, and various glucose detection strategies have been used to develop biosensors that exhibit analytical parameters suitable for glucose detection in human blood or food products [29,30,31]. Therefore, the scientific impact of nanoscience and nanotechnology on the development of sensitive analytical systems is significant [32,33]. One of the novel topics which has recently emerged in the development of sustainable energetic systems is the development of microbial fuel cells based on electro-catalytic processes [34].

This Special Issue of Biosensors entitled “Optical-, Electrochemical- and Acoustic-based Biosensors for the Investigation of Biomolecule Interactions” is dedicated to all aspects of biosensors and immunosensors regarding the mentioned developments in signal transducers and applications in the direct, label-free or the indirect, ultra-sensitive, and labeled detection of different analytes of interest. It is also dedicated to the evaluation of biomolecule interaction kinetics and to exhibiting the advantages of nanomaterials in practical applications. As an introduction to the present Special Issue, this editorial has summarized some aspects of the development and practical applications of optical, electrochemical, and acoustic biosensors and immunosensors. Original research papers and review articles are welcome.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.P. and A.R.; methodology, I.P. and A.R; writing—original draft preparation, I.P. and A.R; writing—review and editing, I.P. and A.R.; funding acquisition, I.P. and A.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

This research was funded by a grant (No. S-MIP-22-46) from the Research Council of Lithuania.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Liustrovaite V., Drobysh M., Rucinskiene A., Baradoke A., Ramanaviciene A., Plikusiene I., Samukaite-Bubniene U., Viter R., Chen C.-F., Ramanavicius A. Towards an electrochemical immunosensor for the detection of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2022;169:037523. doi: 10.1149/1945-7111/ac5d91. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Plikusiene I., Maciulis V., Ramanavicius A. Spectroscopic ellipsometry and quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation for the assessment of polymer layers and for the application in biosensing. Polymers. 2022;14:1056. doi: 10.3390/polym14051056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Omidali M., Mardanshahi A., Särestöniemi M., Zhao Z., Myllylä T. Acousto−Optics: Recent studies and medical applications. Biosensors. 2023;13:186. doi: 10.3390/bios13020186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lai G., Yan F., Ju H. Dual signal amplification of glucose oxidase-functionalized nanocomposites as a trace label for ultrasensitive simultaneous multiplexed electrochemical detection of tumor markers. Anal. Chem. 2009;81:9730–9736. doi: 10.1021/ac901996a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Aydin M., Aydin E.B., Sezgintürk M.K. In: Chapter One–Advances in Immunosensor Technology. Makowski G.S.B.T.-A., editor. Volume 102. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2021. pp. 1–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ramanaviciene A., German N., Kausaite-minkstimiene A., Voronovic J. Biosensors and Bioelectronics Comparative study of surface plasmon resonance, electrochemical and electroassisted ehemiluminescence eethods based immunosensor for the determination of antibodies against human growth hormone. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2012;36:48–55. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2012.03.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Puumala L.S., Grist S.M., Wickremasinghe K., Al-Qadasi M.A., Chowdhury S.J., Liu Y., Mitchell M., Chrostowski L., Shekhar S., Cheung K.C. An optimization framework for silicon photonic evanescent-field biosensors using sub-wavelength gratings. Biosensors. 2022;12:840. doi: 10.3390/bios12100840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bužavaite-Verteliene E., Maciulis V., Anulyte J., Tolenis T., Baškys A., Plikusiene i., Balevicius Z. Total internal reflection ellipsometry approach for bloch furface waves biosensing applications. Biosensors. 2022;12:584. doi: 10.3390/bios12080584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Baleviciute I., Balevicius Z., Makaraviciute A., Ramanaviciene A., Ramanavicius A. Study of antibody/antigen binding kinetics by total internal reflection ellipsometry. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013;39:170–176. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2012.07.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Plikusiene I., Maciulis V., Ramanaviciene A., Balevicius Z., Buzavaite-verteliene E., Ciplys E., Slibinskas R., Simanavicius M., Zvirbliene A., Ramanavicius A. Evaluation of kinetics and thermodynamics of interaction between immobilized SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein and specific antibodies by total internal reflection ellipsometry. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021;594:195–203. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.02.100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Plikusiene I., Balevicius Z., Ramanaviciene A., Talbot J., Mickiene G., Balevicius S., Stirke A., Tereshchenko A., Tamosaitis L., Zvirblis G., et al. Evaluation of affinity sensor response kinetics towards dimeric ligands linked with spacers of different rigidity: Immobilized recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor based synthetic receptor binding with genetically engineered dimeric analyte d. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2020;156:112112. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2020.112112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Balevicius Z., Talbot J., Tamosaitis L., Plikusiene I., Stirke A., Mickiene G., Balevicius S., Paulauskas A., Ramanavicius A. Modelling of immunosensor response: The evaluation of binding kinetics between an immobilized receptor and structurally-different genetically engineered ligands. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 2019;297:126770. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2019.126770. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Plikusiene I., Maciulis V., Juciute S., Maciuleviciene R., Balevicius S., Ramanavicius A., Ramanaviciene A. Investigation and comparison of specific antibodies’ affinity interaction with SARS-CoV-2 Wild-Type, B.1.1.7, and B.1.351 spike protein by total internal reflection ellipsometry. Biosensors. 2022;12:351. doi: 10.3390/bios12050351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Balevicius Z., Baleviciute I., Tumenas S., Tamosaitis L., Stirke A., Makaraviciute A., Ramanaviciene A., Ramanavicius A. In situ study of ligand-receptor interaction by total internal reflection ellipsometry. Thin Solid Films. 2014;571:744–748. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2013.10.090. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Balevicius Z., Ramanaviciene A., Baleviciute I., Makaraviciute A., Mikoliunaite L., Ramanavicius A. Evaluation of intact- and fragmented-antibody based immunosensors by total internal reflection ellipsometry. Sensors Actuators, B Chem. 2011;160:555–562. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2011.08.029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Plikusiene I., Maciulis V., Graniel O., Bechelany M., Balevicius S., Vertelis V., Balevicius Z., Popov A., Ramanavicius A., Ramanaviciene A. Total internal reflection ellipsometry for kinetics-based assessment of bovine serum albumin immobilization on ZnO nanowires. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2021;9:1345–1352. doi: 10.1039/D0TC05193D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Balevicius Z., Paulauskas A., Plikusiene I., Mikoliunaite L., Bechelany M., Popov A., Ramanavicius A., Ramanaviciene A. Towards the application of Al2O3/ZnO nanolaminates in immunosensors: Total internal reflection spectroscopic ellipsometry based evaluation of BSA immobilization. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2018;6:8778–8783. doi: 10.1039/C8TC03091J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mickiene G., Dalgėdienė I., Zvirblis G., Dapkunas Z., Plikusiene I., Buzavaite-Verteliene E., Balevičius Z., Rukšėnaitė A., Pleckaityte M. Human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF)/stem cell factor (SCF) fusion proteins: Design, characterization and activity. PeerJ. 2020;8:e9788. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Buzavaite-Verteliene E., Plikusiene I., Tolenis T., Valavicius A., Anulyte J., Ramanavicius A., Balevicius Z. Hybrid tamm-surface plasmon polariton mode for highly sensitive detection of protein interactions. Opt. Express. 2020;28:29033–29043. doi: 10.1364/OE.401802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Maciulis V., Malinovskis U., Erts D., Ramanavicius A., Ramanaviciene A., Balevicius S., Juciute S., Plikusiene I. Porous aluminium oxide coating for the development of spectroscopic ellipsometry based biosensor: Evaluation of human serum albumin adsorption. Coatings. 2020;10:1018. doi: 10.3390/coatings10111018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Plikusiene I., Maciulis V., Juciute S., Ramanavicius A., Balevicius Z. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science Investigation of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein interaction with a specific antibody by combined spectroscopic ellipsometry and quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022;626:113–122. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.06.119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bittrich E., Rodenhausen K.B., Eichhorn K.-J., Hofmann T., Schubert M., Stamm M., Uhlmann P. Protein adsorption on and swelling of polyelectrolyte brushes: A simultaneous ellipsometry-quartz crystal microbalance study. Biointerphases. 2010;5:159–167. doi: 10.1116/1.3530841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Phan H.T.M., Bartelt-Hunt S., Rodenhausen K.B., Schubert M., Bartz J.C. Investigation of bovine serum albumin (BSA) attachment onto self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) using combinatorial quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation (QCM-D) and spectroscopic ellipsometry (SE) PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0141282. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Makaraviciute A., Ruzgas T., Ramanavicius A., Ramanaviciene A. Antibody fragment immobilization on planar gold and gold nanoparticle modified quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation sensor surfaces for immunosensor applications. Anal. Methods. 2014;6:2134–2140. doi: 10.1039/C4AY00070F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zukauskas S., Rucinskiene A., Ratautaite V., Ramanaviciene A., Pilvenyte G., Bechelany M., Ramanavicius A. Electrochemical biosensor for the determination of specific antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24:718. doi: 10.3390/ijms24010718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Drobysh M., Liustrovaite V., Baradoke A., Rucinskiene A., Ramanaviciene A., Ratautaite V., Viter R., Chen C.-F., Plikusiene I., Samukaite-Bubniene U., et al. Electrochemical determination of interaction between SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein and specific antibodies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23:6768. doi: 10.3390/ijms23126768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Drobysh M., Liustrovaite V., Baradoke A., Viter R., Chen C.-F., Ramanavicius A., Ramanaviciene A. determination of rSpike protein by specific antibodies with screen-printed carbon electrode modified by electrodeposited gold nanostructures. Biosensors. 2022;12:593. doi: 10.3390/bios12080593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Popov A., Brasiunas B., Kausaite-minkstimiene A., Ramanaviciene A. Metal nanoparticle and quantum dot tags for Signal amplification in electrochemical immunosensors for biomarker detection. Chemosensors. 2021;9:85. doi: 10.3390/chemosensors9040085. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sakalauskiene L., Popov A., Kausaite-Minkstimiene A., Ramanavicius A., Ramanaviciene A. The Impact of glucose oxidase immobilization on dendritic gold nanostructures on the performance of glucose Biosensors. Biosensors. 2022;12:320. doi: 10.3390/bios12050320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.German N., Popov A., Ramanavicius A., Ramanaviciene A. Development and practical application of glucose biosensor based on dendritic gold nanostructures modified by conducting polymers. Biosensors. 2022;12:641. doi: 10.3390/bios12080641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ramanaviciene A., German N., Kausaite-Minkstimiene A., Ramanavicius A. Glucose biosensor based on dendritic gold nanostructures electrodeposited on graphite electrode by different electrochemical methods. Chemosensors. 2021;9:188. doi: 10.3390/chemosensors9080188. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ramanaviciene A., Popov A., Baliunaite E., Brasiunas B., Kausaite-Minkstimiene A., Tamer U., Kirdaite G., Bernotiene E., Mobasheri A. Magneto-Immunoassay for the detection and quantification of human growth hormone. Biosensors. 2022;12:65. doi: 10.3390/bios12020065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Maciulis V., Ramanaviciene A., Plikusiene I. Recent advances in synthesis and application of metal oxide nanostructures in chemical sensors and biosensors. Nanomaterials. 2022;12:4413. doi: 10.3390/nano12244413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Reinikovaite V., Zukauskas S., Zalneravicius R., Ratautaite V., Ramanavicius S., Bucinskas V., Vilkiene M., Ramanavicius A., Samukaite-Bubniene U. Assessment of Rhizobium anhuiense bacteria as a potential biocatalyst for microbial biofuel cell design. Biosensors. 2023;13:66. doi: 10.3390/bios13010066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.


Articles from Biosensors are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES