Abstract
Borrelia miyamotoi is a tick-transmitted spirochete that is genetically grouped with relapsing fever Borrelia and possesses multiple archived pseudogenes that encode variable major proteins (Vmps). Vmps are divided into two groups based on molecular size; variable large proteins (Vlps) and variable small proteins (Vsps). Relapsing fever Borrelia undergo Vmp gene conversion at a single expression locus to generate new serotypes by antigenic switching which is the basis for immune evasion that causes relapsing fever in patients. This study focused on B. miyamotoi vmp expression when spirochetes were subjected to antibody killing selection pressure. We incubated a low passage parent strain with mouse anti-B. miyamotoi polyclonal antiserum which killed the majority population, however, antibody-resistant reisolates were recovered. PCR analysis of the gene expression locus in the reisolates showed vsp1 was replaced by Vlp-encoded genes. Gel electrophoresis protein profiles and immunoblots of the reisolates revealed additional Vlps indicating that new serotype populations were selected by antibody pressure. Sequencing of amplicons from the expression locus of the reisolates confirmed the presence of a predominant majority serotype population with minority variants. These findings confirm previous work demonstrating gene conversion in B. miyamotoi and that multiple serotype populations expressing different vmps arise when subjected to antibody selection. The findings also provide evidence for spontaneous serotype variation emerging from culture growth in the absence of antibody pressure. Validation and determination of the type, number, and frequency of serotype variants that arise during animal infections await further investigations.
Introduction
Borrelia miyamotoi is an emerging tick-borne bacterial pathogen first discovered from Ixodes persulcatus ticks in Japan in 1994 but was not described as a human pathogen until 2011 where the spirochete was isolated from patients in Russia with subsequent clinical identifications in North America and Europe [1–3]. B. miyamotoi is phylogenetically related to the Relapsing Fever (RF) group of borrelial spirochetes that includes B. hermsii, B. turicatae, and B. parkeri among others. However, unlike these RF organisms, B. miyamotoi is not transmitted by Ornithodoros spp. ticks, but rather by Ixodes spp. ticks, the arthropod vector that harbors and transmits the Lyme disease spirochete, Borrelia (Borreliella) burgdorferi [1–4].
RF Borrelia infection of humans, e.g., by B. hermsii, results in a series of febrile episodes between periods of recovery due to antigenic variation by the invading spirochete. This intricate immune evasion strategy creates new serotype populations that evade host antibodies elicited by the initial infecting borreliae [5, 6]. Host antibodies are directed against a surface protein that determines serotype in the infecting population [7–9]. These immunogenic surface proteins are termed variable major proteins (Vmps) and are encoded by archived plasmid-localized pseudogenes that will recombine into a single expression locus [10–15]. Antigenic variation occurs by a gene conversion event whereby a transcriptionally inactive pseudogene is translocated into the active expression site resulting in a new serotype population [5, 10, 16]. Although only a single Vmp is expressed at one time in an organism, mixed populations can coexist that display different Vmp types. The Vmps are separated into two groups by molecular size: approximate 25 kDa proteins termed variable small proteins (Vsps) and larger approximate 37 kDa proteins termed variable large proteins (Vlps). Vlps are subdivided into alpha, beta, delta, and gamma subfamilies [14]. Vmp-like genes in B. miyamotoi with homology to B. hermsii vmps was first reported by Hamase et al and confirmed by DNA sequencing in a study by Barbour [17, 18]. Borrelia spp. genomes consist of an approximate megabase chromosome with linear and circular plasmids that can differ in numbers and sizes in strains and isolates. B. miyamotoi genome sequences are available for strains isolated from North America, Japan, Russia, and the Netherlands and show that B. miyamotoi possesses a collection of plasmid-localized Vmp pseudogenes similar to those of B. hermsii and B. turicatae (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/genomes/16651 and https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/plasmids/16651).
A single expression locus with an active promoter for vsp1 gene expression was described in a genetic analysis of B. miyamotoi strain LB-2001 plasmid-localized vmps [17]. Sequences showed nucleotide differences between the active promoter located on one plasmid and the silent upstream regions of a vsp1 pseudogene paralog. Additionally, the silent vsp1 differed from the expressed vsp1 by a stop codon resulting from a frameshift just two codons downstream from the ATG start indicating the divergence between expressed and silent genes [17]. A study by Wagemakers et al detailed that a parent LB-2001 strain with vsp1 in the expression locus converted into a new serotype (VlpC2) after being subjected to anti-Vsp1 antibodies thereby demonstrating antigenic variation by a gene conversion event in B. miyamotoi [19]. Outside of this finding by the Hovius laboratory, in depth studies into the mechanisms of antigenic variation in B. miyamotoi and subsequent comparisons to gene conversion events reported for B. hermsii and B. turicatae have yet to be investigated.
Our aim was to further characterize B. miyamotoi antigenic variation by gene conversion. To begin this investigation, we subjected B. miyamotoi strain LB-2001 to selection pressure with mouse polyclonal antiserum in vitro that would simulate the response encountered during mammalian infection. Our goal was to elicit cell death with borrelicidal antibodies and to assess whether reisolates with new serotype populations were generated, and if so, to identify vmp pseudogenes that were translocated into the expression locus. Here we show that Vmp-expressing variant populations were selected following pressure with polyclonal anti-B. miyamotoi antibodies and present evidence that new variants also spontaneously emerge by growth in culture.
Materials and methods
Strains and culture passage
B. miyamotoi strain LB-2001 was originally isolated from I. scapularis in the Northeast United States and was maintained by passage in SCID mice [20]. Low passage (≤4) B. miyamotoi strain LB-2001 was kindly supplied by Joppe Hovius, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, and was subcultured to create low passage (<10) freezer stocks. B. miyamotoi strain CT13–2396 was isolated from an infected I. scapularis nymph collected in Connecticut, USA [21]. B. miyamotoi was cultivated in Modified Kelly-Pettenkofer Medium (MKP-F) [22] at 34°C in capped tubes and harvested at 4×107 spirochetes/ml.
PCR of expression site
DNA templates were prepared from 1 ml B. miyamotoi culture pellets (approximately 1 x 107 cells) resuspended in sterile nanopure water (50 μl) and boiled for 5 min with 0.5–1 μl used in the PCR. PCRs were performed in 20 μl volume with 0.1 μM primer and 2X Dream Taq Green polymerase (ThermoFisher). Reaction parameters were 95° C for 2 min (1 cycle); 95° C for 30 sec, 55° C for 30 sec, 72° C for 60 sec (35 cycles); 72° C for 5 min (1 cycle). PCRs using the Vlp25R primer used a 50° C annealing temperature. Amplicons were run on 1% Tris-acetate-EDTA agarose gels. The expression site promoter forward primer, Pexp-F (ATAAAGAATTTGAAAAGTAAGATTCTTGCAC) was designed from the published sequence [17]. The Vlp25R reverse internal primer (CCACTATCAACTGTATTTCTTATTGCTA) was designed from a conserved region of 25 LB-2001 vlp genes after nucleotide sequence alignment using MegAlign Muscle algorithm (DNASTAR Lasergene, Madison, WI) approximately 1 kb into the coding sequence. The 25 Vlps were from subfamilies beta, delta, and gamma. The remaining 4 Vlps of subfamily alpha were aligned as above to design an internal reverse primer, Vlp4R, (CTTGCTTCATCTATTTTTTCTTTTGC). The VlpC2 reverse internal primer (CACCAGCATTCTGAGAAGTAGCTAATTTGGCA) was designed from the CT13-2396 strain GenBank sequence (AXH25_04655, annotated as variable large protein 5).
Antibody killing/Selection assay
Mouse polyclonal anti-B. miyamotoi was generated as previously described by injecting CD-1 outbred mice with 1 x 105 LB-2001 low passage (P4) [23]. B. miyamotoi strain LB-2001 low passage 8 (P8) was subjected to anti-B. miyamotoi antiserum for selection of survivor populations as shown in Fig 2B. Serial doubling dilutions of anti-B. miyamotoi mouse serum were made in 96-well plate starting with 1:5 dilution out to 1:80 in MKP-F media (50 μl). B. miyamotoi (1 x 105 in 50 μl MKP-F) was added to each well (100 μl total volume). P8 culture was the seed culture for the parent controls incubated with either (equally diluted) normal mouse (BALB/c) serum (Innovative Research Inc., Novi, MI), or no serum. Sealed plates were incubated at 34° C for 18 hrs. Borrelial cell viability was checked by dark field microscopy daily. Contents of wells where no spirochetes were observed due to antibody killing were centrifuged for pellet collection, subcultured in fresh MKP-F (4 ml), and incubated at 34° C. Cultures were incubated for 2 weeks with periodic microscopic observation to determine growth for reisolates. Reisolates were culture expanded and stored at -80° C in 20% glycerol. The experiment was repeated using the same mouse antiserum and same parent (P8) grown from glycerol stock.
Fig 2. Polyclonal anti-B. miyamotoi reactivity and use in killing assay.
A) IgG immunoblot of mouse polyclonal anti-B. miyamotoi LB-2001 antiserum against B. miyamotoi LB-2001 whole cell lysate (WCL) and recombinant Vlps. Molecular mass is indicated on the left by kDa. Recombinant proteins in lanes 1–6 are identified right of the panel. B) Step by step illustration of the antibody selection killing assay procedure.
Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), immunoblot, recombinant Vmps
Recombinant proteins VlpC2 (ALU64348.1), VlpD9 (ALU64350), VlpD10 (ALU64352.1), VlpD1 (ALM31565), VlpD8 (ALU64349), and Vsp1 (AJA67245.2) were produced minus signal peptides in E. coli as described previously [24]. The proteins follow the naming scheme as listed by the accession numbers in the National Center for Biotechnology Information database (in parentheses). Recombinant proteins were electrophoresed on SDS-PAGE and silver stained (Pierce Silver Stain, Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL) according to standard procedures and manufacturer’s directions. Proteins (100 ng/individual protein) were transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes for immunoblotting according to standard procedures with mouse anti-B. miyamotoi (1:200), followed by incubation with alkaline phosphatase conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (1:5000) with development by 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate / nitro blue tetrazolium.
Nanopore and Illumina sequencing (NGS) and analysis
Amplicon DNA was sequenced using Oxford Nanopore Technologies’ SQK-NBD112.24 library preparation kit on an R10.4 flow cell using the Mk1B platform (following manufacturer’s protocol). The raw FAST5 and FASTQ sequencing data were submitted to GenBank (see Data Availability). The sequencing data were basecalled with the Guppy (v6.0.1) basecaller using the super accurate (sup) model. The basecalled data were demultiplexed with Guppy (v6.0.1) barcoder with the—detect_mid_strand_barcodes,—trim_barcodes, and—require_barcodes_both_ends parameters. For each demultiplexed dataset the data were filtered by length and quality using NanoFilt (v2.8.0) to select for reads greater than 900bp and q10 and less than 3kb.
The vmp genes were identified in both LB-2001 (GCF_017748095.1) and CT13-2396 (GCA_001767415.1) by classifying all potential transcripts in both genomes using InterProScan (v5.50–84.0) using the PFAM database [25]. The vsp genes contained the PF01441 motif and the vlp genes contained the PF00921 motif per Kuleshov and colleagues [26]. These transcripts were extracted from both genomes and combined into a vsp transcript dataset and vlp transcript dataset. Within both the vsp and vlp datasets it was possible that there would be redundant or nearly redundant transcript sequences, therefore to prevent issues during read mapping we clustered the transcripts in each dataset using cd-hit-est (v4.8.1) using the a percent sequence identity threshold of 95% (-c 0.95) to cluster the transcripts [27]. We assessed the presence of different vmp genes in the expression site by mapping the PCR amplicons to the different vmp transcript datasets. Because the amplicons may have both a vsp and a vlp present (as would be the case if a vsp gene is loaded in the expression site, see Fig 3) we first mapped the reads from each sample against the vsp transcript dataset using minimap2 (v2.22-r1101) (reads_mapped_to_vsp.sam) [28]. The reads that did not have a primary mapping to a vsp transcript were removed as a separate bam file for each sample (reads_unmapped_to_vsp.bam) using samtools view (v1.11) using the -Sbf 0x4 options [29]. The reads_unmapped_to_vsp.bam file was converted to a FASTQ file using samtools fastq and mapped to the vlp transcript dataset using minimap2 (reads_mapped_to_vlp.sam). The primary read mappings were filtered from the reads_mapped_to_vlp.sam file using samtools view with the -SbF 0x900 options (reads_mapped_to_vlp_primary.bam). Using samtools idxstats on the reads_mapped_to_vlp_primary.bam, we determined the number of reads mapping to each vlp gene for each sample. The primary mappings of the reads_mapped_to_vsp.sam file were filtered using samtools view with the -SbF 0x900 options and the same strategy using samtools idxstats employed for vlp genes was used here as well. With the strategy outlined above, we only considered primary read mappings to the different vmp genes when determining the profile of vmp genes found in the expression site for each sample.
Fig 3. PCR of the expression locus for Replicate 1 parents and reisolates.
A) Agarose gel of amplicons using the Vsp1 R primer with PCR illustration below the panel. B) Agarose gel of amplicons using the Vlp25R primer with PCR illustration below the panel. P8C = passage 8 parent stock culture used in the experiments; NSC = parent culture control incubated with no serum; R1 = reisolate 1; R2 = reisolate 2; M = molecular size markers that are denoted left of the panels in kilobase pairs. The black line in panel B indicates the spliced gel with removal of a lane. The juxtaposed lanes originated from the same original gel image.
Amplicon DNA was also sequenced by Illumina. Amplicon libraries from the PCR reactions were generated as previously described [30, 31] and sequencing was performed on the MiSeq system (Illumina, San Diego, CA) using MiSeq Reagent Kits Nano 500V2 according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Illumina). For sequence analysis, we used CLC Genomic Workbench (Qiagen) software, using reference generated from GenBank sequences of B. miyamotoi strain CT13-2396 (GCA_001767415.1) and LB-2001 (GCF_017748095.1). All reads that mapped to a reference sequence were further analyzed using MEGA7, and BLASTn software (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi).
Results
Determination of the vmp within the expression locus by PCR
The serotype of a B. miyamotoi population is determined by the expression of a Vmp-encoding gene that becomes situated in a single promoter-driven expression locus [17]. Therefore, we utilized PCR with a forward primer specific for the promoter region (Pexp-F) paired with reverse primers internal to Vmp pseudogenes to ascertain the gene being expressed in a population (Fig 1A).
Fig 1. PCR of the expression locus.
A) Illustration of the expression site with the active promoter consisting of the consensus ribosome binding site (RBS) and the -10 and -35 elements. ATG is the start codon of the coding sequence for the expressed Vmp, either a Vsp or a Vlp. The promoter specific forward primer (Pexp-F) is paired with a Vsp or Vlp specific internal reverse primer to amplify the gene being expressed for identification by amplicon sequencing. B) PCR amplification results of the vsp1 and vlpC2 genes in the expression site for strain LB-2001 low passage (P8) and high passage (P66), and low passage strain CT13-2396. NTC = no template control. M = molecular size markers that are denoted on left of panel.
The GenBank submissions for strains LB-2001 (GCA_000445425.4; GCF_017748095.1) and CT13-2396 (GCA_001767415.1) indicate that vsp1 and vlpC2 reside in the respective expression sites. (The CT13-2396 gene is annotated as vlp5 and is an exact match for vlpC2). We generated reverse primers specific for vsp1 and vlpC2 to pair with Pexp-F for PCR to evaluate the presence of these genes. The vsp1-specific PCR produced an amplicon in both low passage (P8) and high passage (P66) strain LB-2001 indicating that vsp1 remained in the expression site after multiple culture passages. As predicted, vsp1 was not in the expression site for low passage CT13-2396 (Fig 1B). Conversely, the vlpC2 primer set produced an amplicon in CT13-2396 but not LB-2001 (Fig 1B). Sequencing the amplicons verified their identity and confirmed the GenBank data for these strains. We used PCR to identify genes in the expression locus of a population in the subsequent experiments.
Assessment of anti-B. miyamotoi mouse serum reactivity against Vmps
We used previously reported mouse polyclonal anti-B. miyamotoi serum in the antibody selection killing assay [23]. The mouse antiserum was reactive against several B. miyamotoi proteins when immunoblotted against whole cell lysate, including those migrating around 37 kDa, the approximate size of Vlps, and at 25 kDa where Vsp1 migrates (Fig 2A, lane WCL). Furthermore, antibody reactivity against Vmps in the whole cell lysate was confirmed by blotting against recombinant Vlps and Vsp1 (Fig 2A, lanes 1–6). Vlps contain conserved regions that may exhibit cross-reactive epitopes, therefore antibodies represented in the polyclonal antiserum could have had the potential to eliminate multiple serotypes present in the parent population.
Antibody selection killing assays of B. miyamotoi and evaluation of the vmps in the expression site by PCR and DNA sequencing
Having clonal strains when conducting a genetic experiment is always optimal, however obtaining a B. miyamotoi clone has been problematic. We have been unsuccessful in generating a clone either by plating or serial dilution. We proceeded with the experiments without knowledge of the clonality of the parent stock culture we had obtained.
Low passage (P8) LB-2001 stock culture was grown to mid-logarithmic phase for the assay. Culture aliquots were incubated alone as a no serum control (NSC) or with mouse polyclonal anti-B. miyamotoi serum to apply selection pressure against the parent serotype population. The procedure for the in vitro killing selection is outlined in Fig 2B. After 7 days of antibody co-incubation in wells with dilutions at 1:5 or 1:10, we observed an absence of viable cells visible by dark field microscopy. Antiserum dilutions higher than 1:10 did not result in killing. We centrifuged the media from individual wells where live spirochetes were not observed, and resuspended pellets in fresh MKP-F followed by incubation and checked by microscopy daily for culture growth. Borrelial reisolate growth was observed at day 10, and by week 3 the culture achieved density for cell pellet collection. The experiment was repeated as a biological replicate using the same anti-B. miyamotoi antiserum against P8 culture. The results of each replicate experiment are described below as Replicate 1 and Replicate 2.
In the first experiment (Replicate 1), PCR was performed using the Pexp-F and reverse vsp1 (Vsp1R) primer pair on the parent controls and 2 reisolates that were recovered from antibody selection wells. A vsp1 amplicon was detected and confirmed by DNA sequencing in the parent stock culture, parent incubation control, and reisolate R1 (Fig 3A lanes P8C, NSC, R1 respectively), whereas there was no amplification from reisolate R2 indicating that vsp1 had been replaced by another gene (Fig 3A, lane R2).
Based on the nucleotide alignment of the 29 LB-2001 Vlp genes, we designed the Vlp25R primer from a conserved internal region of 25 Vlp pseudogenes of the delta and gamma subfamilies that shared sequence homology. PCR was performed on reisolate R2 with the Pexp-F and the Vlp25R primer pair generating an approximate 1 kb amplicon demonstrating that a Vlp gene was detectable within the expression locus (Fig 3B, lane R2). The P8 stock culture parent control produced 2 amplicons by PCR with the Pexp-F and Vlp25R primer pair (Fig 3B, lane P8C). The major 2 kb band represented a Vlp pseudogene located downstream from the expression site containing vsp1. However, a minor 1 kb band was also present which indicated a vlp in the expression site (see diagrams below panel Fig 3B). The no serum control parent amplicon pattern had changed from the P8 stock culture parent whereby the 2 kb amplicon was noticeably fainter and the 1 kb band more intense (Fig 3B, lane NSC). In addition, faint amplicons at approximately 0.9 kb were observed in NSC and R2 lanes. These observations suggested that subvariant(s) were present in these populations. Therefore, Illumina and Nanopore sequencing (NGS) of the 1 kb amplicons from the control parent (NSC) and reisolate (R2) were employed to determine their compositions by mapping to reference genomes LB-2001 (GCF_017748095.1) and CT13-2396 (GCA_001767415.1).
Sequencing results from the reisolate (R2) amplicon revealed multiple reads representing a profile of variants with the highest read counts matching Vlp genes bmLB2001_RS06360 and AXH25_RS05380 (CT13-2396 strain) suggesting these were the majority variants (S1 Fig). Conversely, the parent control had a predominant read identifying a match with a different Vlp gene from strain CT13-2396 (AXH25_RS05385). This gene has a 99% nucleotide match to LB-2001 vlpD4 on lpD [protein id ALN43421.1]). Importantly, these results showed a dramatic change in predominant Vlp variant populations that arose in the reisolate differing from the parent following borrelial cell death from antibody selection. Moreover, we found the parent control culture was non-clonal by PCR and with low NGS read counts perhaps representing minority Vlp serotype populations in addition to the Vsp1 serotype (S1 Fig).
The antibody selection experiment was repeated (Replicate 2) under the same conditions, i.e. using the same P8 parent culture and polyclonal mouse antiserum as in Replicate 1. Antibody selection pressure from this experiment also produced a reisolate (R3). PCR analyses of the parent incubation controls (incubated with no serum or with normal mouse serum [commercially purchased BALB/c mouse serum–see Materials and Methods]) using the Pexp-F and Vsp1R primer pair revealed vsp1 in the expression locus as expected (Fig 4A, lanes NSC and NMSC). However, the reisolate produced a 1.7 kb amplicon with this primer pair (Fig 4A, lane R3). Sanger sequence data of the amplicon revealed that a vlp gene had been translocated into the expression locus with a vsp1 gene situated downstream accounting for the 1.7 kb size (Fig 4C). BLAST analysis identified the expressed vlp as strain LB-2001 vlpD4 on plasmid lpD (GenBank protein accession ALN43421.1) with a non-coding vsp1 positioned downstream from vlpD4 on lpD (GenBank protein accession ALN43422.1). vlpD4 has orthologs to strain CT13-2396 genes on lp41 and lp26 (Genbank accessions AXH25_RS05670 and AXH25_RS05385 respectively). The closest match to LB-2001 reference genome (submission GCA_017748085.1) was 87% identity on archived genes located on lp22 (bmLB2001_RS06455), lp31 (bmLB2001_RS05405), and lp38 (bmLB2001_RS05310).
Fig 4. PCR of the expression locus for Replicate 2 parents and reisolate.
A) Agarose gel of amplicons using the Vsp1R primer. B) Agarose gel of amplicons using the Vlp25R primer. C) Illustration of the expression locus of the reisolate R3 denoting vlpD4 in the expression site with archived vsp1 immediately downstream separated by a non-coding sequence. The genes are contiguous and located on lpD of strain LB-2001. Pexp-F forward primer and the Vsp1R and Vlp25R reverse primers are shown by arrows. The vsp1 frameshift with a stop codon is shown with the resulting amino acid sequence change and a potential new translation start with a methionine is underlined. NSC = parent culture control incubated with no serum; NMSC = parent control culture incubated with normal mouse serum; R3 = reisolate 3. M = molecular size markers that are denoted left of the panels in kilobase pairs.
PCR of the reisolate (R3) expression site using the Vlp25R primer produced an expected 1 kb amplicon representing a vlp as found from sequencing the 1.7 kb Vsp1R-generated amplicon (Fig 4B, lane R3), but NGS of this amplicon produced reads that mapped to other vlps in the reference genomes with a high read count for Vlp gene bmLB2001_RS06360 (S2 Fig). In the parent controls (Fig 4B, lanes NSC and NMSC), the presence of the approximately 2 kb amplicon band can be explained whereby vsp1 is in the expression site with a Vlp gene downstream (refer to illustration in Fig 3B). However, like the parent control in Replicate 1, the 2 parent controls, each produced a 1 kb amplicon indicating a Vlp-expressing population(s) in addition to the Vsp1 serotype, thus representing a non-clonal population (Fig 4B, lanes NSC and NMSC). NGS of the 1 kb amplicons for each parent control revealed differences from each other in the number of reads, i.e., the NSC had low read counts of multiple genes, but the NMSC had high read counts for genes bmLB2001_RS06360 and AXH25_RS05385 (S2 Fig). The possibility exists that components in normal mouse serum may account for causing the variation seen between the NMSC and the control incubated without serum. The R3 reisolate also showed a relatively high read count for these two genes suggesting that these populations were not seriously affected by the antibodies and expanded as outgrowths from the parent.
Summarizing the results of Replicates 1 and 2, PCR data showed that i) vsp1 was in the expression locus in parent controls but absent in reisolates R2 and R3; ii) the reisolates represented Vlp variants replacing Vsp1 as the dominant population; and iii) parent incubation controls were polyclonal possessing vlps in the expression site.
Other observations were notable. Of the 13 vsp pseudogenes in the LB-2001 genome, only vsp1 (bmLB2001_RS0-5305 located on lp38) was found in the expression locus by NGS. A limited RNAseq analysis of a population from mouse blood in a previous investigation revealed a similar finding [17]. There are 29 vlp pseudogenes annotated in the LB-2001 genome (GCF_017748095.1) with subfamily representations designated as delta (n = 20), alpha (n = 4), gamma (n = 5), and beta (n = 0). All vlp pseudogenes that were identified by NGS in the parent and reisolates from both Replicates were of the delta subfamily with the alpha, beta, and gamma subfamilies not represented. We designed a separate Vlp reverse internal gene primer (Vlp4R) based on a conserved region from the nucleotide alignment of the alpha subfamily vlp pseudogenes. When paired with the Pexp-F primer, Vlp4R failed to amplify a Vlp alpha subfamily gene in the expression locus for any parent or reisolate.
For Replicate 2 reisolate R3, sequencing data revealed that the coding sequence start for the vlpD4 gene, when located in the expression locus, began with the amino acid translation of MKKRKTLSAII which is not encoded in most of the archived pseudogenes, but is present in 4 members of the delta Vlp subfamily (Fig 5). Vlp amino acid alignments revealed that most archived Vlp delta pseudogenes begin with a conserved motif of MTLFLIIGCNNGGGE extending for about 60 amino acids whereby heterogeneity defining individual Vmp genes proceeds. The genes that code for MKKRKTLSAII may be an indicator for genes that have a higher frequency of recombination into the expression site perhaps by the presence of non-coding upstream homology sequences [12, 15] and should be the subject of further study.
Fig 5. Amino acid alignment of the N-terminal coding sequence for the LB-2001 delta family Vlps as encoded by the archived genes.
The proteins are annotated according to GenBank accession GCF_017748095.1. Shaded areas represent amino acid differences from consensus and illustrate the 4 genes that begin with MKKRKTLSAII and the beginning of divergence for individual pseudogenes translations following N-terminal conservation.
Protein analysis of parents and reisolates
Protein profiles of the Replicate 1 and 2 parent controls and reisolates were compared by SDS-PAGE of whole cell lysates. Gel silver staining showed differences in protein bands around 37 kDa and 25 kDa where the Vlps and Vsps migrate respectively (Fig 6A and 6D). Divergent Vmp profiles between parents and reisolates became clear after immunoblotting with mouse anti-B. miyamotoi serum (Fig 6B and 6E). Vsp1, representative of the predominant serotype in the parents, was diminished or absent in the reisolates and was replaced by Vlp serotypes. We repeated the immunoblots using mouse anti-recombinant VlpD8 antiserum and verified that the immunoreactive bands seen in the anti-whole cell blots were indeed Vlps (Fig 6C and 6F). There is broad homogeneity between Vlps, therefore antigenic cross-reactivity was to be expected from blotting with the anti-recombinant VlpD8. However, it is notable that the two Replicate 1 reisolates were expressing different Vlps as shown by the absence of reactivity against anti-recombinant VlpD8 (Fig 6C). These results provide additional evidence for the changes in the variant populations following the antibody selection assay as seen by the PCR and sequencing data.
Fig 6. Vmp parent and reisolate comparisons by SDS-PAGE and immunoblot.
A) Replicate 1 SDS-PAGE silver stained; B) Replicate 1 immunoblot with mouse anti-B. miyamotoi antiserum; C) Replicate 1 immunoblot with mouse anti-recombinant VlpD8 antiserum; D) Replicate 2 SDS-PAGE silver stained; E) Replicate 2 immunoblot with mouse anti-B. miyamotoi antiserum; F) Replicate 2 immunoblot with mouse anti-recombinant VlpD8 antiserum. P8C = passage 8 parent stock culture control; NSC = parent culture control incubated with no serum; R1 = reisolate 1; R2 = reisolate 2; R3 = reisolate 3. M = molecular size markers that are denoted left and right of the panels in kDa. Arrows on the right of the panels designate molecular migration for Vlp and Vsp bands.
Discussion
Recognition and mechanisms of antigenic variation by gene conversion in B. hermsii and B. turicatae have been well studied and documented for over 40 years [5, 6, 18, 32–34]. Intrigued by recent findings regarding another member of the RF spirochetes, B. miyamotoi, we proposed an initial more comprehensive look at this phenomenon. Previous sequence analysis of selected plasmids of strain LB-2001 provided a description of multiple and diverse vmps demonstrating that B. miyamotoi possessed the genetic makeup capable of serotype switching [17]. Wagemakers et al provided the first in vitro demonstration of gene conversion in B. miyamotoi LB-2001 by a monospecific anti-Vsp1 antibody-mediated selection that killed the majority population resulting in a new population expressing vlpC2 [19]. Our experiment was a modification of the Wagemakers et al study whereby we used a polyclonal anti-B. miyamotoi antiserum to mediate selection on the parent population with subsequent PCR and DNA sequence identifications of the expression locus gene. Armed with antibodies against multiple Vmps in the killing selection assay, we hypothesized that the low passage parent strain would produce new serotypes by antigenic variation to evade the antibody attack.
Genomic sequencing data of the LB-2001 strain from the Barbour (GCA_000445425.4) and Kneubehl et al (GCF_017748095.1) GenBank entries showed that vsp1 was situated in the expression locus. Accordingly, Vsp1 was shown to be the dominant antigen expressed by LB-2001 in the Wagemakers et al study [19]. Likewise in our study vsp1 was present in the expression locus of our parent strain suggesting it was the dominant serotype in the stock culture that was used as the initial parent isolate. This contrasted to the North American strain CT13-2396 that had a different Vmp gene in the expression site, an indication of subtle, yet distinctive, genetic rearrangements that have been reported to occur among B. miyamotoi strains in close geographic proximities in the United States [31].
Variants were reisolated from the antibody selection cultures demonstrating survival or evasion of the polyclonal antibody killing pressure by a population(s). Subsequent PCR analyses of the reisolated variants demonstrated that in the absence of or addition to vsp1 different vlp pseudogenes were detected in the expression locus. NGS and Sanger sequencing demonstrated that the single PCR band observed by gel electrophoresis was comprised of multiple amplicons indistinguishable by size on agarose gels indicating a dominant population but also other minority variant populations that emerged from the antibody selection experiment. This finding was confirmed by protein analyses demonstrating multiple seroreactive Vlp bands in the lysate immunoblots.
We also saw evidence suggesting that serotype populations could arise by continued culture growth absent of selection pressure as seen by changes in the parent strains used in our experiments. The Vsp1 serotype was the majority population in the parents but NGS and PCR analyses revealed profiles of subvariant Vlp-expressing populations. This finding indicated that low passage stock parent cultures, although with an apparent Vsp1 majority serotype, were not clonal but also were comprised of minority Vlp populations, thus introducing two hypotheses for the emergence of the variant serotypes following antibody selection (Fig 7). For the new variant model, polyclonal anti-Vmp antibodies would eliminate spirochetes of corresponding serotypes allowing gene conversion to generate new variants resistant to the antibodies. A subdominant variant model would entail a serotype present in the population unaffected by borrelicidal antibodies that expands following elimination of other serotypes present. Our findings here support the subdominant variant model and additional studies are needed to ascertain whether B. miyamotoi is capable of antigenic switching from a clonal population by the new variant model as described for B. hermsii. The fundamental mechanisms that trigger antigenic variation in response to antibody binding to Vmps or recognition of antibody killing by the borrelial cell have not been explored. Studies in this area are worthy of future research consideration.
Fig 7. Hypothesized models for B. miyamotoi antigenic variation.
The new variant model proposes that anti-Vmp antibodies eliminate the corresponding serotypes expressing those Vmps resulting in antigenic switching by gene conversion to generate a new Vmp serotype population. The subdominant variant model proposes that anti-Vmp antibodies eliminate the corresponding serotypes expressing those Vmps, but has no effect on a variant population that subsequently expands.
Cultures existing as multiple serotype populations are not unique to B. miyamotoi. Ras et al reported that antigenic variation occurred spontaneously in B. turicatae during in vitro cultivation without antibody mediated selection [35]. Low frequency B. hermsii variants have been detected during expansion from either culture or animal infections. The antigenic switches occurred spontaneously and therefore it was inevitable for new serotypes to appear in a population after expansion of more than 100–1000 cells [5, 36, 37].
This study also demonstrated that although we used the same parent strain stocks and polyclonal antibody in the killing assays, reproducibility in producing serotypes was not assured. Sequencing also revealed gene sequences that did not match completely with archived Vlp genes in the current complete LB-2001 assembly (GCF_017748095.1) although there were matches found in the assembly for strain CT13-2396. The LB-2001 genome NGS read data did not indicate missing genes from the assembly. This observation may indicate intragenic recombination occurring prior to vlp translocation to the expression site as has been described for B. hermsii [11, 38]. Additionally, segmental gene conversion may occur within the expression locus. Another possibility is that parent cultures are not static but are in rearrangement flux. For example, Sanger DNA sequencing of the expression site of the Replicate 2 reisolate identified a vmp that had replaced vsp1 as vlpD4 from the Barbour LB-2001 assembly submission (GCA_000445425.4) and to 2 genes from strain CT13-2396. However, there was not an exact nucleotide match for this gene in the Kneubehl et al LB-2001 assembly submission (GCF_017748095.1), the closest being 87% for a few silent genes. An explanation for the discrepancy may be that a vlpD4 homolog was not present in that reference genome suggesting that DNA prepared for genome sequencing may depend on the context of culture passage/history of the isolate. Therefore, a genome sequence generated from a strain may be considered a “snapshot” of the population from which the DNA is purified.
An alternate explanation for multiple variants may be the presence of an additional expression locus. A BLAST search with the expression promoter sequence located on the LB-2001 lp38 (CP072482.1) and lpB (CP010328.2) revealed a match on lpC (KR919748.1) from the Barbour assembly submission (GCA_000445425.4), however this was not seen in the Kneubehl et al assembly (GCF_017748095.1) or the CT13-2396 (GCA_001767415.1) GenBank submissions. Although it seems unlikely for more than a single unique expression site, further investigation should be considered.
The mouse polyclonal antiserum used in the killing experiment was generated from a needle-inoculation infection of a low passage B. miyamotoi LB-2001. The immunoblot profile of this antiserum against B. miyamotoi whole cell lysate was reactive to Vsp1 and bands in the 37 kDa area where Vlps migrate. This observation signifies that either the low passage isolate used to inoculate the mouse was composed of multiple serotypes, or the mouse elicited antibodies against new variants during the infection time frame, or both. This result agrees with an immunoproteomic study from our laboratory whereby several Vlps were identified as immunogenic by needle- or tick-infected mice [24]. A similar finding was reported by Lopez, et al whereby these investigators described multiple immunogenic B. hermsii Vmps in an immunoproteomic study [39]. Having clonal strains when conducting a genetic experiment is always optimal, however obtaining a B. miyamotoi clone has been problematic. We have been unsuccessful in generating a clone either by plating or serial dilution. Our preliminary work in this area has suggested that B. miyamotoi requires a certain cell density for expansion, therefore obtaining a clonal population from a single cell may be challenging.
In this initial look at the phenomenon of B. miyamotoi antigenic variation, we had the limitation of the number of replicates performed and we were not able to truly quantify the different Vmp populations loaded in the expression site solely by the NGS read numbers. Our data should be interpreted as a profile characterization of multiple expressed Vmp populations. Further studies will be required to determine the exact number of Vlp variants in a population and the frequency of individual vmp gene conversions.
In conclusion, our observations of borrelial cell death by exposure to anti-B. miyamotoi antibodies demonstrates that B. miyamotoi antigenically shifts in response to selection pressure. However, the possibility remains whether our findings of reisolated new variant populations are the result of i) gene conversion in response to antibody killing, or ii) the expansion of minority populations resistant to anti-Vmp antibodies, or iii) both. We have also corroborated the results reported by Wagemakers et al who demonstrated gene conversion in vitro when cells were subjected to anti-Vsp1 antibodies. This study was designed to provide initial observations and determination of the extent and possibilities of B. miyamotoi antigenic switching when subjected to antibody killing selection pressure. Validation and determination of the type, number, and frequency of serotype variants that arise during in vivo animal infections remains to be performed preferably by utilizing infected tick challenge. Our investigation and that of others clearly show that B. miyamotoi can switch antigenically in vitro, but how this relates to human infections where relapsing fever presentation is a minority of clinical cases described in the literature is an important question to be answered.
Supporting information
(TIF)
(TIF)
(PDF)
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Christopher C. Ebmeier for mass spectrometry analysis, Irina Goodrich for laboratory technical and administrative assistance, and Meghan Lybecker for a critical evaluation of the manuscript.
Views are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Data Availability
Data generated by this study are freely and openly accessible in the indicated repositories with their associated accession numbers. The Oxford Nanopore Technologies sequencing data are available on NCBI GenBank (BioProject: PRJNA880274, BioSample SAMN32643928). The raw unbasecalled FAST5 data are available in the NCBI SRA repository (SRR23025077). The unfiltered, undemultiplexed FASTQ data are available in the NCBI SRA repository (SRR23195154). Illumina data are available in NCBI (BioProject: PRJNA880274, BioSample: SAMN32963867, SRA data: PRJNA880274).
Funding Statement
Intramural funding by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Vector Borne Diseases. Extramural funding (JEL) was supported by NIH grants AI137412 and AI123651. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Fukunaga M, Takahashi Y, Tsuruta Y, Matsushita O, Ralph D, McClelland M, et al. Genetic and phenotypic analysis of Borrelia miyamotoi sp. nov., isolated from the ixodid tick Ixodes persulcatus, the vector for Lyme disease in Japan. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1995;45(4):804–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Platonov AE, Karan LS, Kolyasnikova NM, Makhneva NA, Toporkova MG, Maleev VV, et al. Humans infected with relapsing fever spirochete Borrelia miyamotoi, Russia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17(10):1816–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Molloy PJ, Telford SR 3rd, Chowdri HR, Lepore TJ, Gugliotta JL, Weeks KE, et al. Borrelia miyamotoi Disease in the Northeastern United States: A Case Series. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163(2):91–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lopez JE, McCoy BN, Krajacich BJ, Schwan TG. Acquisition and subsequent transmission of Borrelia hermsii by the soft tick Ornithodoros hermsi. J Med Entomol. 2011;48(4):891–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Stoenner HG, Dodd T, Larsen C. Antigenic variation of Borrelia hermsii. J Exp Med. 1982;156(5):1297–311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Coffey EM, Eveland WC. Experimental relapsing fever initiated by Borrelia hermsi. II. Sequential appearance of major serotypes in the rat. J Infect Dis. 1967;117(1):29–34. doi: 10.1093/infdis/117.1.29 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Raffel SJ, Battisti JM, Fischer RJ, Schwan TG. Inactivation of genes for antigenic variation in the relapsing fever spirochete Borrelia hermsii reduces infectivity in mice and transmission by ticks. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10(4):e1004056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Connolly SE, Benach JL. Cutting edge: the spirochetemia of murine relapsing fever is cleared by complement-independent bactericidal antibodies. J Immunol. 2001;167(6):3029–32. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.6.3029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Barbour AG, Bundoc V. In vitro and in vivo neutralization of the relapsing fever agent Borrelia hermsii with serotype-specific immunoglobulin M antibodies. Infect Immun. 2001;69(2):1009–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Plasterk RH, Simon MI, Barbour AG. Transposition of structural genes to an expression sequence on a linear plasmid causes antigenic variation in the bacterium Borrelia hermsii. Nature. 1985;318(6043):257–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Meier JT, Simon MI, Barbour AG. Antigenic variation is associated with DNA rearrangements in a relapsing fever Borrelia. Cell. 1985;41(2):403–9. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(85)80013-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Barbour AG, Burman N, Carter CJ, Kitten T, Bergstrom S. Variable antigen genes of the relapsing fever agent Borrelia hermsii are activated by promoter addition. Mol Microbiol. 1991;5(2):489–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Restrepo BI, Carter CJ, Barbour AG. Activation of a vmp pseudogene in Borrelia hermsii: an alternate mechanism of antigenic variation during relapsing fever. Mol Microbiol. 1994;13(2):287–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hinnebusch BJ, Barbour AG, Restrepo BI, Schwan TG. Population structure of the relapsing fever spirochete Borrelia hermsii as indicated by polymorphism of two multigene families that encode immunogenic outer surface lipoproteins. Infect Immun. 1998;66(2):432–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dai Q, Restrepo BI, Porcella SF, Raffel SJ, Schwan TG, Barbour AG. Antigenic variation by Borrelia hermsii occurs through recombination between extragenic repetitive elements on linear plasmids. Mol Microbiol. 2006;60(6):1329–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Barbour AG. Antigenic variation of surface proteins of Borrelia species. Rev Infect Dis. 1988;10 Suppl 2:S399–402. doi: 10.1093/cid/10.supplement_2.s399 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Barbour AG. Multiple and diverse vsp and vlp sequences in Borrelia miyamotoi, a hard tick-borne zoonotic pathogen. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0146283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hamase A, Takahashi Y, Nohgi K, Fukunaga M. Homology of variable major protein genes between Borrelia hermsii and Borrelia miyamotoi. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1996;140(2–3):131–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wagemakers A, Koetsveld J, Narasimhan S, Wickel M, Deponte K, Bleijlevens B, et al. Variable major proteins as targets for specific antibodies against Borrelia miyamotoi. J Immunol. 2016;196(10):4185–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Scoles GA, Papero M, Beati L, Fish D. A relapsing fever group spirochete transmitted by Ixodes scapularis ticks. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2001;1(1):21–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kingry LC, Replogle A, Batra D, Rowe LA, Sexton C, Dolan M, et al. Toward a complete North American Borrelia miyamotoi genome. Genome announcements. 2017;5(5). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wagemakers A, Oei A, Fikrig MM, Miellet WR, Hovius JW. The relapsing fever spirochete Borrelia miyamotoi is cultivable in a modified Kelly-Pettenkofer medium, and is resistant to human complement. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gilmore RD, Mikula S, Harris EK, Van Gundy TJ, Goodrich I, Brandt KS. Borrelia miyamotoi strain LB-2001 retains plasmids and infectious phenotype throughout continuous culture passages as evaluated by multiplex PCR. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2021;12(1):101587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Harris EK, Harton MR, de Mello Marques MA, Belisle JT, Molins CR, Breuner N, et al. Immunoproteomic analysis of Borrelia miyamotoi for the identification of serodiagnostic antigens. Scientific Reports. 2019;9(1):16808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Jones P, Binns D, Chang HY, Fraser M, Li W, McAnulla C, et al. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(9):1236–40. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kuleshov KV, Margos G, Fingerle V, Koetsveld J, Goptar IA, Markelov ML, et al. Whole genome sequencing of Borrelia miyamotoi isolate Izh-4: reference for a complex bacterial genome. BMC Genomics. 2020;21(1):16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Fu L, Niu B, Zhu Z, Wu S, Li W. CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(23):3150–2. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Li H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(18):3094–100. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(16):2078–9. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hojgaard A, Osikowicz LM, Eisen L, Eisen RJ. Evaluation of a novel multiplex PCR amplicon sequencing assay for detection of human pathogens in Ixodes ticks. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2020;11(6):101504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hojgaard A, Osikowicz LM, Maes S, Eisen L, Eisen RJ. Detection of genetic variability in Borrelia miyamotoi (Spirochaetales: Spirochaetaceae) between and within the eastern and western United States. J Med Entomol. 2021;58(6):2154–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Barbour AG, Tessier SL, Stoenner HG. Variable major proteins of Borrellia hermsii. J Exp Med. 1982;156(5):1312–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Barbour AG, Barrera O, Judd RC. Structural analysis of the variable major proteins of Borrelia hermsii. J Exp Med. 1983;158(6):2127–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Schuhardt VT, Wilkerson M. Relapse phenomena in rats infected with single spirochetes (Borrelia recurrentis var. turicatae). J Bacteriol. 1951;62(2):215–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ras NM, Postic D, Ave P, Huerre M, Baranton G. Antigenic variation of Borrelia turicatae Vsp surface lipoproteins occurs in vitro and generates novel serotypes. Res Microbiol. 2000;151(1):5–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Barbour AG, Dai Q, Restrepo BI, Stoenner HG, Frank SA. Pathogen escape from host immunity by a genome program for antigenic variation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(48):18290–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605302103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Crowder CD, Denny RL, Barbour AG. Segregation lag in polyploid cells of the pathogen genus Borrelia: Implications for antigenic variation. Yale J Biol Med. 2017;90(2):195–218. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kitten T, Barrera AV, Barbour AG. Intragenic recombination and a chimeric outer membrane protein in the relapsing fever agent Borrelia hermsii. J Bacteriol. 1993;175(9):2516–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lopez JE, Porcella SF, Schrumpf ME, Raffel SJ, Hammer CH, Zhao M, et al. Identification of conserved antigens for early serodiagnosis of relapsing fever Borrelia. Microbiology. 2009;155(Pt 8):2641–51. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.029918-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
(TIF)
(TIF)
(PDF)
Data Availability Statement
Data generated by this study are freely and openly accessible in the indicated repositories with their associated accession numbers. The Oxford Nanopore Technologies sequencing data are available on NCBI GenBank (BioProject: PRJNA880274, BioSample SAMN32643928). The raw unbasecalled FAST5 data are available in the NCBI SRA repository (SRR23025077). The unfiltered, undemultiplexed FASTQ data are available in the NCBI SRA repository (SRR23195154). Illumina data are available in NCBI (BioProject: PRJNA880274, BioSample: SAMN32963867, SRA data: PRJNA880274).