Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2023 Feb 24;18(2):e0282037. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282037

The Ca2+ concentration impacts the cytokine production of mouse and human lymphoid cells and the polarization of human macrophages in vitro

Yusuf Cem Eskiocak 1,#, Zeynep Ozge Ayyildiz 1,2,#, Sinem Gunalp 1,2,, Asli Korkmaz 1,2,, Derya Goksu Helvaci 3,, Yavuz Dogan 4, Duygu Sag 1,2,5, Gerhard Wingender 1,*
Editor: Nazmul Haque6
PMCID: PMC9956017  PMID: 36827279

Abstract

Various aspects of the in vitro culture conditions can impact the functional response of immune cells. For example, it was shown that a Ca2+ concentration of at least 1.5 mM during in vitro stimulation is needed for optimal cytokine production by conventional αβ T cells. Here we extend these findings by showing that also unconventional T cells (invariant Natural Killer T cells, mucosal-associated invariant T cells, γδ T cells), as well as B cells, show an increased cytokine response following in vitro stimulation in the presence of elevated Ca2+ concentrations. This effect appeared more pronounced with mouse than with human lymphoid cells and did not influence their survival. A similarly increased cytokine response due to elevated Ca2+ levels was observed with primary human monocytes. In contrast, primary human monocyte-derived macrophages, either unpolarized (M0) or polarized into M1 or M2 macrophages, displayed increased cell death in the presence of elevated Ca2+ concentrations. Furthermore, elevated Ca2+ concentrations promoted phenotypic M1 differentiation by increasing M1 markers on M1 and M2 macrophages and decreasing M2 markers on M2 macrophages. However, the cytokine production of macrophages, again in contrast to the lymphoid cells, was unaltered by the Ca2+ concentration. In summary, our data demonstrate that the Ca2+ concentration during in vitro cultures is an important variable to be considered for functional experiments and that elevated Ca2+ levels can boost cytokine production by both mouse and human lymphoid cells.

Introduction

Various cell media have been developed for in vitro cell cultures to optimize the growth and survival of particular cell types. For example, the RPMI1640 media is frequently used for in vitro cultures of mouse and human lymphocytes [13]. However, it was suggested that the Ca2+ concentration of RPMI1640 (0.49 mM) is actually suboptimal for the in vitro stimulation of conventional mouse [4] and human [5] αβ T cells, as measured by cytokine production, and that a 1 mM CaCl2 supplement is required to obtain the maximal cytokine response. Whether the function of unconventional T cells or of other lymphoid and myeloid cells similarly is impacted by the Ca2+ concentration in vitro is currently unknown. Unconventional T cells differ from conventional αβ T cells by their development and functional capabilities. Prominent examples of unconventional T cells are invariant Natural Killer T (iNKT) cells and mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cells, which both express an αβTCR, and γδ T cells, which express a γδTCR. Both iNKT and MAIT cells express a highly conserved invariant TCR α-chain, which recognizes glycolipids or riboflavin derivates in the context of the non-polymorphic MHC class I homologs CD1d or MR1, respectively [69]. γδ T cells are largely MHC-unrestricted and although the antigen for many γδ T cells is not known, some respond to phosphorylated isoprenoid metabolites or lipids [10, 11]. These unconventional T cells develop as memory T cells and can provide a first line of defence during immune responses [12]. B cells are the second main adaptive lymphoid cell type and are characterized by the expression of a BCR [13]. As an example of myeloid cells, we choose here macrophages, which are phagocytic and antigen-presenting effector cells of the innate immune system [14]. Depending on the way of stimulation, macrophages can differentiate into several functionally distinct subsets, often referred to as classically activated M1 or alternatively activated M2 macrophages [1416]. To determine the impact of the Ca2+ concentration on lymphoid and myeloid cells besides conventional αβ T cells, we here compared their immune response in vitro in the presence of normal RPMI1640 medium (RPMInorm) and RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 1 mM Ca2+ (RPMIsuppl). Our data indicated that elevated Ca2+ concentrations during PMA/ionomycin stimulation in vitro increased the cytokine production by both mice and human lymphoid cells for most cytokines tested. Furthermore, the polarization of human macrophages shifted towards an M1 phenotype in the high-Ca2+ environment. Consequently, the Ca2+ concentration during in vitro cultures is an important variable to be considered for functional experiments.

Results

Cytokine production of mouse unconventional T cells and of B cells is augmented by increased Ca2+ concentrations in vitro

Following activation, iNKT cells are able to produce a wide range of cytokines, including Th1 cytokines, like IFNγ and TNF; Th2 cytokines, like IL-4 and IL-13, the Th17 cytokine IL-17A, as well as IL-10 [1719]. When splenic mouse iNKT cells (S1 Fig) were stimulated in vitro with PMA and ionomycin, the increased Ca2+ concentration had no detrimental effect on iNKT cell survival (S2A Fig). However, we observed a marked and significant increase in the production of all cytokines tested (IFNγ, IL-2, IL-4, IL-10, IL-13, IL-17A) by iNKT cells when stimulated in media supplemented with calcium (Fig 1). Similar to iNKT cells, γδ T cells can produce a wide range of cytokines following stimulation [20]. No detrimental effect of the Ca2+ supplementation on γδ T cell survival was observed (S2B Fig). However, we noticed a significant increase in the production of IFNγ, IL-2, and IL-4 by γδ T cells stimulated in elevated Ca2+ levels (Fig 2A–2C). In contrast, the changes for IL-10 and IL-17A remained non-significant (S3A and S3B Fig). We also analysed the impact of Ca2+ levels on B cells. The survival of stimulated B cells was not impaired by the Ca2+ concentration in vitro (S2C Fig). However, an increase in the production of IL-2 and IL-10 was observed (Fig 2D and 2E), while IFNγ (S3C Fig) remained unaffected. Therefore, the PMA/ionomycin stimulation of mouse lymphoid cells in complete RPMI medium supplemented with 1.0 mM Ca2+ improves the detection of numerous cytokines, without impacting the survival of the cells.

Fig 1. Ca2+ supplementation in vitro increases the cytokines production of mouse iNKT cells.

Fig 1

Splenocytes from C57BL/6 mice were stimulated 4 h with 50 ng/ml PMA and 1 μg/ml ionomycin in either normal RPMI1640 medium (RPMInorm) or RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 1 mM Ca2+ (RPMIsuppl). The production of (a) IFNγ, (b) IL-2, (c) IL-4, (d) IL-10, (e) IL-13, and (f) IL-17A by iNKT cells (live CD8α- CD19/CD45R- CD44+ TCRβ/CD3ε+ CD1d/PBS57-tetramer+ cells) was analysed by intracellular cytokine staining (ICCS). Summary graphs (left panels) and representative data (right panels) from gated iNKT cells are shown, respectively. Data were pooled from three independent experiments with three mice per group per experiment (n = 9).

Fig 2. Ca2+ supplementation in vitro increases the production of some cytokines by mouse γδ T and B cells.

Fig 2

Splenocytes from C57BL/6 mice were stimulated 4 h with 50 ng/ml PMA and 1 μg/ml ionomycin in either normal RPMI1640 medium (RPMInorm) or RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 1 mM Ca2+ (RPMIsuppl). The production of (a) IFNγ, (b) IL-2, and (c) IL-4 by γδ T cells (live CD19/CD45R- CD4- CD8α- CD3ε+ γδTCR+ cells) and the production of (d) IL-2 and (e) IL-10 by B cells (live CD3ε- CD4- CD8α- CD19/CD45R+ cells) was analysed by ICCS. Summary graphs (left panels) and representative data (right panels) from gated γδ T cells and B cells are shown, respectively. Data were pooled from three independent experiments with three mice per group per experiment (n = 9).

Cytokine production of human unconventional T cells and of B cells is augmented by increased Ca2+ concentrations in vitro

Having established that increased Ca2+ concentrations during in vitro stimulation can augment the cytokine production of mouse lymphoid cells, we next tested its effect on human lymphoid cells. For primary human iNKT cells, the elevated Ca2+ levels only increased the production of TNF slightly (Fig 3A), without effects on the other cytokines tested (IL-2, IFNγ, IL-4, IL-17A) or on the expression of the activation marker CD69 (S4 Fig). For primary human Vδ2+ T cells, some (TNF, IFNγ) (Fig 3B and 3c) but not all (IL-2, IL-4) were boosted by the Ca2+ supplementation, which did also not influence CD69 expression (S5A–S5C Fig). For primary human MAIT cells, the elevated Ca2+ levels increased the production of all cytokines tested (IL-2, TNF, IFNγ) (Fig 3D–3F), without changes to the expression of CD69 (S5D Fig). A similar effect of the Ca2+ concentrations was noted for primary human B cells (IL-2, TNF, CD69) (Fig 4, S5E Fig). For some immune cells, the low frequency in the peripheral blood makes their analysis directly ex vivo difficult, which is why protocols were established to expand them in vitro. We, therefore, also tested the impact of elevated Ca2+ concentrations on in vitro expanded iNKT and Vδ2+ T cells. For expanded human iNKT cells, the elevated Ca2+ levels only increased the production of TNF slightly (Fig 5B), without effects on the other cytokines tested (IL-2, IFNγ, IL-4, IL-17A) (S6A–S6D Fig) and decreased CD69 expression (Fig 5A). For expanded human Vδ2+ T cells, some (IFNγ, GM-CSF) (Fig 5D and 5E) but not all (CD69, TNF, IL-4) (S6E–S6G Fig) markers were boosted by the Ca2+ supplementation, whereas the production of IL-2 surprisingly decreased (Fig 5C). For all human lymphoid cell populations tested, the Ca2+ supplementation in vitro did not impair the cell survival (S7A–S7F Fig). Therefore, similar to mouse lymphoid cells, the detection of cytokines in primary human lymphoid cells can be improved by increasing the Ca2+ levels during the in vitro stimulation.

Fig 3. Ca2+ supplementation in vitro modulates cytokine production by primary human iNKT cells, Vδ2+ T cells, and MAIT cells.

Fig 3

PBMCs were isolated from the residual leukocyte units of healthy donors. PBMCs were stimulated for 4 h with 25 ng/ml PMA and 1 μg/ml ionomycin in either normal RPMI1640 medium (RPMInorm) or RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 1 mM Ca2+ (RPMIsuppl). (a) Human Vα24i NKT cells (live CD14- CD20- CD3+ 6B11+ cells) were analysed for the expression of TNF. (b, c) Human Vδ2+ T cells (live CD14- CD20- CD3+ γδTCRlow or Vδ2+ cells) were analysed for the expression of (b) TNF and (c) IFNγ. (d-f) Human MAIT cells (live CD14- CD20- CD3+ Vα7.2+ CD161+ cells) were analysed for the production of (d) IL-2, (e) TNF, and (f) IFNγ. Summary graphs (left panels) and representative data (right panels) from gated iNKT cells, Vδ2+ T cells, and MAIT cells are shown, respectively. Data were pooled from three (iNKT cells, Vδ2+ T cells; n = 9) and four independent (MAIT cells; n = 12) experiments with three samples each.

Fig 4. Ca2+ supplementation in vitro increases the cytokine production of primary human B cells.

Fig 4

PBMCs were isolated from residual leukocyte units of healthy donors. PBMCs were stimulated for 4 h with 25 ng/ml PMA and 1 μg/ml ionomycin in either normal RPMI1640 medium (RPMInorm) or RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 1 mM Ca2+ (RPMIsuppl). Human B cells (CD14- CD3- CD20+ cells) were analysed for the production of (a) IL-2 and (b) TNF. Summary graphs (left panels) and representative data (right panels) from gated B cells are shown, respectively. Data were pooled from four independent experiments with three samples each (n = 12).

Fig 5. Ca2+ supplementation in vitro modulates cytokine production by expanded human iNKT cells and Vδ2+ T cells.

Fig 5

(a, b) iNKT cells were expanded ex vivo in the presence of αGalCer. The expanded cells were stimulated for 4 h with 25 ng/ml PMA and 1 μg/ml ionomycin in either normal RPMI1640 medium (RPMInorm) or RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 1 mM Ca2+ (RPMIsuppl). Vα24i NKT cells (live CD14- CD20- CD3+ 6B11+ cells) were analysed for the expression of (a) CD69 and the production of (b) TNF. (c-e) Vδ2+ T cells were expanded in vitro in the presence of Zoledronic acid. Human Vδ2+ T cells (live CD14- CD20- CD3+ Vδ2+ cells) were analysed for the production of (c) IL-2, (d) IFNγ, and (e) GM-CSF. Summary graphs (left panels) and representative data (right panels) from gated iNKT cells and Vδ2+ T cells are shown, respectively. Data were pooled from four (iNKT cells; n = 12) and three (Vδ2+ T cells, n = 9) independent experiments with three samples each.

Increased Ca2+ during in vitro stimulation of macrophages increases cell death and induces a shift toward M1 polarization

Given the clear ability of increased in vitro Ca2+ concentrations to augment the cytokine production of stimulated mouse and human lymphoid cells, we tested next the impact on myeloid cells. To this end, we initially measured the impact of elevated Ca2+ levels on primary human PBMC monocytes and noticed that some (TNF, IFNγ; Fig 6) but not all (IL-2; S5F Fig) cytokines were boosted by the Ca2+ supplementation, without impact on cell survival (S7G Fig). These data suggested that the cytokine detection by primary myeloid cells could benefit from in vitro Ca2+ supplementation as well. Blood monocytes have the ability to differentiate into functionally distinct macrophages subsets and, therefore, we tested next the impact of the Ca2+ concentration on human monocyte-derived macrophages. Primary human monocyte-derived macrophages (M0 macrophages) were polarized into M1 with LPS and IFNγ, into M2a with IL-4 stimulation, or into M2c with IL-10 with or without Ca2+ supplementation. Surprisingly, and in contrast to the findings with human lymphoid cells (S7 Fig), the polarization of M0 macrophages in elevated Ca2+ concentrations increased cell death, regardless of the subtype they were polarized into (Fig 7A–7c). Similar results were seen when M0 macrophages were cultured alone in Ca2+ supplemented medium (S8 Fig). When M0 macrophages were cultured alone or when they were polarized into M1 macrophages, higher Ca2+ levels increased the expression of the M1 markers HLA-DRα and CD86 (S9A Fig). In contrast, when M0 macrophages were cultured alone or when they were polarized into M2a macrophages, Ca2+ supplementation decreased the expression of the M2a markers CD200R and CD206 (S9B Fig). The Ca2+ levels did not influence the expression of CD163 on M2c polarized macrophages (S9C Fig). Importantly, when the expression of the M1 markers HLA-DRα and CD86 was analysed on M2a and M2c macrophages, Ca2+ supplementation increased the expression of HLA-DRα on M2a macrophages (Fig 7D) and of CD86 on both M2 macrophages subsets (Fig 7E and 7F). These data indicate that increased Ca2+ concentrations support phenotypic M1 polarization of human monocyte-derived macrophages in vitro. However, these phenotypic changes appeared not to translate into functional changes, as the production of TNF and CXCL10 by M1 macrophages (Fig 7G and 7H) and the production of TGFβ and IL-4 by M2a and M2c macrophages (Fig 7I and 7J) was not influenced by the Ca2+ supplementation. These data suggest that for myeloid cells the impact of an increased Ca2+ concentration on the cytokine production depends on the activation status of the cells and needs to be tested cell type specifically.

Fig 6. Ca2+ supplementation in vitro increases the cytokine production of primary monocytes.

Fig 6

PBMCs were isolated from residual leukocyte units of healthy donors. PBMCs were stimulated for 4 h with 25 ng/ml PMA and 1 μg/ml ionomycin in either normal RPMI1640 medium (RPMInorm) or RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 1 mM Ca2+ (RPMIsuppl). Human monocytes (CD3- CD20- CD14+ cells) were analysed for production of (a) TNF and (b) IFNγ. Summary graphs (left panels) and representative data (right panels) from gated monocytes are shown, respectively. Data were pooled from four independent experiments with three samples each (n = 12).

Fig 7. Ca2+ supplementation in vitro increases cell death in polarized human macrophages and favours an M1 phenotype.

Fig 7

Primary human monocyte-derived macrophages were cultured untreated (UT) or polarized into M1 (100 ng/ml LPS, 20 ng/ml IFNγ), M2a (20 ng/ml IL-4), or M2c (20 ng/ml IL-10) macrophages for the indicated hours in either normal RPMI1640 medium (RPMInorm) or RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 1 mM Ca2+ (RPMIsuppl) as indicated. (a-c) The bar graphs show the relative percentages of cells positive for LIVE/DEAD Fixable Blue Dead Cell Stain (LDB+ cells), indicating dead cells, for (a) M1, (b) M2a, and (c) M2c macrophage. (d-f) The expression (mean fluorescent intensity, MFI) of (d) HLA-DRα (UT; M2a, 24 hours) and (e, f) CD86 ((e): UT; M2a, 24 hours; (f): UT; M2c, 24 hours) on live macrophages is shown. The data shown are means ± SEM of biological replicates of six donors, pooled from two independent experiments with similar results. (g-j) The production of (g) TNF and (h) CXCL10 by M1 macrophages (6 hours) and of (i) TGFβ, and (j) IL4 by M2a (48 hours) or M2c (48 hours) macrophages was analysed ICCS. The data shown are means ± SEM of biological replicates of five (TGFβ, IL-4) or six donors (CXCL10, TNF), pooled from two independent experiments with similar results.

Discussion

Here we demonstrate that supplementing the RPMI1640 medium with 1 mM Ca2+ can increase the cytokine production by both mice and human lymphoid cells during PMA/ionomycin stimulation in vitro without impacting the survival of the cells. This effect appeared stronger for primary lymphoid cells than in vitro expanded cells. Primary human monocytes responded similarly with an augmented cytokine production to the elevated Ca2+ concentrations. However, for human monocyte-derived macrophages a distinct effect was observed: elevated Ca2+ concentrations in vitro led to increased cell death and promoted phenotypic M1 polarization without impacting cytokine production.

Previous work on conventional mouse [4] and human [21] αβ T cells showed that the 0.49 mM Ca2+ in RPMI1640 are suboptimal to drive cytokine production during in vitro stimulation and a minimal concentration of 1.5 mM was suggested. The basal level of intracellular Ca2+ in T cells is approx. 100 nM and can increases to 1 μM following stimulation [22]. Therefore, it is not self-evident how an increase of the extracellular Ca2+ concentration above 0.49 mM can boost cytokine production by conventional αβ T cells [4, 21]. Irrespective of the mechanism, this observation is important to optimize the analysis of conventional αβ T cells in vitro. Here, we confirmed that unconventional αβ T cells, γδ T cells, and B cells from both mouse and human also produce more cytokines after in vitro stimulation in the presence of elevated Ca2+ levels. The Ca2+ concentration of the extracellular fluid in vivo in humans was measured to be 2.2–2.7 mM [23]. This indicates that the Ca2+ supplementation brings the Ca2+ concentration of the RPMIsuppl medium (approx. 1.8 mM) close to the physiological conditions in vivo.

For primary mouse lymphoid cells, the elevated Ca2+ concentration increased the production of 6 out of 6 cytokines tested for iNKT cells (Fig 1), 3 out of 5 for γδ T cells (Fig 2A–2C; S3A and S3B Fig), and 2 out of 3 for B cells (Fig 2D and 2E; S3C Fig), without a decrease of the production of any of the cytokines tested. Interestingly, the boosting Ca2+ effect appeared weaker for primary human lymphoid cells: the elevated Ca2+ concentration increased the production of 1 out of 5 cytokines tested for iNKT cells (Fig 3A; S4B–S4E Fig), 2 out of 4 for γδ T cells (Fig 3B and 3C; S5A–S5C Fig), 3 out of 3 for MAIT cells (Fig 3D–3F), and 2 out of 2 for B cells (Fig 4), again without any decreases of any of the cytokines tested. The reason for this species difference is unclear at this point. The cytokine response of the in vitro expanded cell lines under increased Ca2+ concentrations was comparable to the primary cells: both primary and expanded iNKT cells showed increased production for 1 (TNF) out of 5 cytokines tested (Figs 3A and 5B; S6A–S6D Fig). Primary γδ T cells showed increased production for 2 (IFNγ, TNF) out of 4 (Fig 3B and 3C; S5B and S5C Fig) and expanded γδ T cells showed increased production for 2 (GM-CSF, IFNγ) out of 5 (Fig 5D and 5E; S6F and S6G Fig) cytokines tested. Surprisingly, expanded γδ T cells showed a decrease of IL-2 with increased Ca2+ (Fig 5C), which is the only instance in which we noticed a decrease in cytokine production.

Similar to the lymphoid cells, primary human monocytes increased the production of 2 out of 3 cytokines tested (Fig 6; S5F Fig) when stimulated in the presence of elevated Ca2+ levels (Fig 6; S5F Fig). However, the data we obtained with human primary monocyte-derived macrophages were in contrast to the ones from lymphoid cells and primary human monocytes. Most importantly, we noticed a clear increase in the frequency of macrophages that died when incubated for more than six hours in the presence of elevated Ca2+ levels (Fig 7A–7C; S8 Fig). Calcium-induced ER-stress [24, 25] and mitochondrial changes [26] can trigger ROS- (reactive oxygen species) production in macrophages, which can lead to cell death [24, 25, 2729]. This might explain why macrophages are more sensitive to the Ca2+ concentration of the medium. Furthermore, we observed a shift towards an M1 phenotype for both M0 macrophages (S9 Fig) as well as M1 and M2 macrophages (Fig 7D–7F) in the presence of elevated Ca2+ levels. However, these phenotypic changes appeared not to translate into functional changes (Fig 7G–7J). Incidentally, ROS-induced NFκB/MAPK activation in macrophages [30, 31] supports M1 polarization [3234]. However, given the large amount of macrophage cell death we observed, we cannot exclude the possibility that the apparent M1 shift is the result of M1 macrophages potentially being less sensitive to this Ca2+-induced cell death. We are aware of only two other studies on the impact of Ca2+ on the cytokine production of macrophages. Both showed that calcium influx can impair LPS-induced IL-12 production of mouse macrophages [35, 36] without affecting the production of TNF or IL-6 [36]. Therefore, it is unclear at this stage whether elevated Ca2+ concentration in vitro can influence the cytokine production of macrophages.

In summary, our data demonstrate that the Ca2+ concentration during in vitro cultures is an important variable to be considered for functional experiments and that supplementing the media with 1 mM Ca2+ can boost the cytokine production by both mice and human lymphoid cells.

Material and methods

Human samples

Residual leukocyte units from healthy donors were provided by Dokuz Eylul University Blood Bank (Izmir, Turkey) after obtaining informed written consent from all donors. The ethical approval for the study was obtained from the ‘Noninvasive Research Ethics Committee’ of the Dokuz Eylul University (approval number: 2018/06-27/3801-GOA). All protocols performed were in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations for human samples.

Mice

All mice were housed in the vivarium of the Izmir Biomedicine and Genome Center (IBG, Izmir, Turkey) in accordance with the respective institutional animal care committee guidelines. C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice were originally purchased from the Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME, USA). All mouse experiments were performed with prior approval by the institutional ethic committee (‘Ethical Committee on Animal Experimentation’ of the Izmir Biomedicine and Genome Center, approval number: 19/2016) in accordance with national laws and policies. All the methods were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines and regulations and following 3R (replacement, reduction, refinement) procedures. These aspects of this study are reported in accordance with the ARRIVE guidelines [37]. Mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation and as all mouse experiments were performed ex vivo, no anaesthesia was required.

Reagents, monoclonal antibodies, and flow cytometry

α-galactosylceramide (αGalCer) was obtained from Avanti Polar Lipids (Birmingham, AL, USA). Monoclonal antibodies were purchased from either BioLegend (San Diego, CA, USA), eBiosciences (San Diego, CA, USA), BD Biosciences (Franklin Lane, NJ, USA), or R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA). The list of antibodies against the mouse and human antigens used in this study, with clone name, vendor, and the conjugated fluorochrome, is given in S1 Table. Anti-mouse CD16/32 (2.4G2) antibody (Tonbo Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA) or Human TruStain FcX (BioLegend) was used to block Fc receptors according to the manufacturers’ recommendations. Unconjugated mouse and rat IgG antibodies were purchased from Jackson ImmunoResearch (West Grove, PA, USA). Dead cells were labelled with Zombie UV Dead Cell Staining kit (BioLegend) or with LIVE/DEAD Fixable Blue Dead Cell Stain kit (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Flow cytometry of fluorochrome-conjugated antigen-loaded CD1d tetramers were performed as described [38]. Cells were analysed with LSR-Fortessa (BD Biosciences), and data were processed with CellQuest Pro (BD Biosciences) or FlowJo (BD Biosciences) software. Graphs derived from digital data are displayed using a ‘bi-exponential display’. Cell were gated as follows: (a) mouse: Vα14i NKT cells (live CD8α- CD19/CD45R- CD44+ TCRβ/CD3ε+ CD1d/PBS57-tetramer+ cells), γδ T cells (live CD19/CD45R- CD4- CD8α- CD3ε+ γδTCR+ cells), and B cells (live CD3ε- CD4- CD8α- CD19/CD45R+ cells); (b) human: Vα24i NKT cells (live CD14- CD20- CD3+ 6B11+), δ2+ T cells ex vivo (live CD14- CD20- CD3high γδTCRlow cells, or live CD14- CD20- CD3+ Vδ2+ cells) and in vitro (live CD14- CD20- CD3+ Vδ2+ cells), MAIT cells (live CD14- CD20- CD3+ Vα7.2+ CD161+ cells), B cells (live CD3- CD14- CD20+ cells), and macrophages (live CD68+ cells). Representative data are shown in S1 Fig.

Cell preparation

Single-cell suspensions from mouse spleens were prepared as described [39]. In brief, the spleens were filtered through a 70 μm cell strainer (BD Biosciences) and red blood cells and dead cells were eliminated through Lymphoprep (StemCell Technologies, Vancouver, Canada) density gradient centrifugation (300 g, 10 min, RT). Human PMBCs were obtained from the residual leukocyte units of healthy donors via density gradient centrifugation (300 g, 30 min, RT) with Ficoll-Paque Plus (GE Healthcare, Chicago IL, USA). To obtain monocytes, a second density gradient centrifugation with 46% iso-osmotic Percoll (GE Healthcare) was performed (400 g, 10 min, RT) [40].

In vitro expansion of human iNKT cells

Human iNKT cells were expanded from resting PBMCs of healthy donors as described before [41]. Briefly, freshly isolated PBMCs (1 x 106 cell/ml, 5 ml/well) were treated with 100 ng/ml αGalCer (KRN7000, Avanti Polar Lipids) and cultured for 13 days. 20 IU/ml human recombinant IL-2 (Proleukin, Novartis, Basel, Switzerland) was added to the cultures every other day starting from day 2. From day 6 onwards, the concentration of IL-2 was increased to 40 IU/ml. At the end of the expansion, an aliquot of each sample was collected and analysed for iNKT cell expansion by flow cytometry. Expansion was done in RPMI 1640 (Gibco, Waltham, MA, USA, or Lonza, Basel, Switzerland) supplemented with 5% (v/v) Human AB serum (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 1% (v/v) Penicillin/Streptomycin, 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Lonza), 1% (v/v) non-essential amino acids (Cegrogen Biotech, Stadtallendorf, Germany), 15 mM HEPES buffer (Sigma-Aldrich), and 55 μM 2-mercaptoethanol (AppliChem, Darmstadt, Germany).

In vitro expansion of human Vδ2+ T cells

Human Vδ2+ T cells were expanded from PBMCs of healthy donors similar to published protocols [4143]. Briefly, freshly isolated PBMCs (1 x 106 cell/ml, 5 ml/well) were cultured with 5 μM Zoledronic acid (Zometa, Novartis) in the presence of 100 IU/ml human recombinant IL-2 (Proleukin, Novartis) for 13 days. IL-2 was replenished every other day and from day 6 onwards the concentration was increased to 200 IU/ml. The cultures were performed in RPMI1640 (Gibco or Lonza) supplemented with 5% (v/v) Human AB serum (Sigma-Aldrich), 1% (v/v) Penicillin/Streptomycin (Gibco), 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Lonza), 1% (v/v) non-essential amino acids (Cegrogen), 15 mM HEPES buffer (Sigma-Aldrich), and 55 μM 2-mercaptoethanol (AppliChem).

Human macrophage generation

Purified monocytes were cultured in RPMI1640 (Gibco or Lonza) medium containing 5% FCS (Corning, NY, USA), 1% Penicillin/Streptomycin (Gibco), and 10 ng/ml human recombinant M-CSF (Peprotech, London, UK) for their differentiation into macrophages. 3 x 106 cells/well were seeded in low-attachment 6-well plates (Corning) and incubated for 7 days at 5% CO2 and 37°C. Macrophages were collected and cultured in 24-well cell culture plates as 5 x 105 macrophages/well for 24 hours in RPMI1640 medium containing 5% FCS, 1% Penicillin/Streptomycin. On the following day, the cell culture media was replaced with fresh media and macrophages were stimulated with the relevant polarization factors as described below. The cells were verified to be over 90% CD68+ by flow cytometry.

In vitro stimulation

Splenocytes were stimulated in vitro with 50 ng/ml PMA and 1 μg/ml ionomycin (both Sigma-Aldrich) for 4 h at 37°C in the presence of both Brefeldin A (GolgiPlug) and Monensin (GolgiStop, both BD Biosciences). As GolgiPlug and GolgiStop were used together, half the amount recommended by the manufacturer where used, as suggested previously [44]. Cells were stimulated in completemouse RPMI medium (RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% (v/v) FCS (Corning), 1% (v/v) Pen-Strep-Glutamine (10.000 U/ml penicillin, 10.000 μg/ml streptomycin, 29.2 mg/ml L-glutamine (Gibco)) and 50 μM 2-mercaptoethanol (AppliChem), containing 0.42 mM Ca2+). For human studies, freshly isolated PBMCs or expanded cell populations were stimulated in vitro with 25 ng/ml PMA and 1 μg/ml PMA for 4 h at 37°C in the presence of Brefeldin A or monensin. Cells were stimulated in completehuman RPMI medium (RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% (v/v) FCS, 1% (v/v) Penicillin/Streptomycin, 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Lonza), 1% (v/v) non-essential amino acids (Cegrogen), 15 mM HEPES buffer (Sigma-Aldrich), and 55 μM 2-mercaptoethanol (AppliChem). Considering the Ca2+ found in the FCS (3.9 mM) [21] the supplemented RPMI medium contained approx. 0.8 mM Ca2+ (RPMInorm). To obtain the RPMIsuppl medium containing elevated Ca2+ concentrations, 1 mM CaCl2 (Sigma-Aldrich) was added to the RPMInorm medium (i.e. approx. 1.8 mM Ca2+).

Human macrophage polarization

Macrophages were stimulated (i) for M1 polarization with 100 ng/ml LPS (InvivoGen, San Diego, CA, USA) and 20 ng/ml IFNγ (R&D Systems) for 6h, 12h, or 24h; (ii) for M2a with 20 ng/ml IL-4 (R&D Systems) for 24h or 48h; or (iii) for M2c with 20 ng/ml IL-10 (R&D Systems) for 24h or 48h. The particular incubation times for the experiments are specified in the figures.

Statistical analysis

Results are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Normal distribution was tested using D’Agastino–Pearson Test. Statistical comparisons were drawn using either a two-tailed paired Student’s t-test (normally distributed data) or Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test (not normally distributed data) (Excel, Microsoft Corporation; GraphPad Prism, GraphPad Software). p-values <0.05 were considered significant and are indicated with (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p <0.0001. Each experiment was repeated at least twice, and background values were subtracted. Graphs were generated with GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software).

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Gating strategy to identify leukocytes and macrophage purity.

(A, B) Exemplary dot plots illustrating the gating strategy employed to identify the indicted (A) mouse or (B) human lymphoid cells. (C) Purity of the differentiated macrophages: human PBMC-derived monocytes were incubated for 7 days in RPMI1640 medium containing 10 ng/ml M-CSF for macrophage differentiation and the percentage of CD68+ macrophages was determined by intracellular staining. Left: representative flow cytometry data (blue = undifferentiated; red = differentiated); Right: Summary data (n = 3; un-diff = undifferentiated; diff = differentiated). (D-F) Evaluation of macrophage polarization. Primary human monocyte-derived macrophages were left unstimulated (UT) or stimulated for 12 h (D) with 100 ng/mL LPS and 20 ng/mL IFN-γ for M1 polarization (M1), (E) with 20 ng/mL IL-4 for M2a polarization (M2a), or (F) with 20 ng/ mL IL-10 for M2c polarization (M2c). Expression of indicated surface markers was analyzed by flow cytometry. The bar graphs indicate mean fluorescent intensity (MFI). The biological replicates of 6 independent donors pooled from 2 independent experiments are shown.

(PDF)

S2 Fig. Stimulation of murine iNKT cells, γδ T cells, or B cells in RPMIsuppl has no negative impact on cell viability.

Splenocytes from C57BL/6 mice were stimulated 4 h with 50 ng/ml PMA and 1 μg/ml ionomycin in either normal RPMI1640 medium (RPMInorm) or RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 1 mM Ca2+ (RPMIsuppl). (a) iNKT cells; (b) Vδ2+ T cells; and (c) B cells were stained and analysed by flow cytometry. The bar graphs show the relative percentages of cells positive for LIVE/DEAD Fixable Blue Dead Cell Stain, indicating dead cells. Data were pooled from three independent experiments with three mice per group per experiment (n = 9).

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Ca2+ supplementation in vitro has no impact on the production of some cytokines by mouse γδ T and B cells.

(a-c) Splenocytes from C57BL/6 mice were stimulated 4 h with 50 ng/ml PMA and 1 μg/ml ionomycin in either normal RPMI1640 medium (RPMInorm) or RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 1 mM Ca2+ (RPMIsuppl). The production of (a) IL-10 and (b) IL-17A by γδ T cells (live CD19/CD45R- CD4- CD8α- CD3ε+ γδTCR+ cells) and the production of (c) IFNγ by B cells (live CD3ε- CD4- CD8α- CD19/CD45R+ cells) was analysed by ICCS. Summary graphs (left panels) and representative data (right panels) from gated γδ T cells and B cells are shown, respectively. Data were pooled from three independent experiments with three mice per group per experiment (n = 9).

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Ca2+ supplementation in vitro has no impact on the expression of CD69 and the production IL-2, IFNγ, IL-4, and IL-17 by primary human iNKT cells.

PBMCs were isolated from the residual leukocyte units of healthy donors. PBMCs were stimulated for 4 h with 25 ng/ml PMA and 1 μg/ml ionomycin in either normal RPMI1640 medium (RPMInorm) or RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 1 mM Ca2+ (RPMIsuppl). Human Vα24i NKT cells (live CD14- CD20- CD3+ 6B11+ cells) were analysed for the expression of the activation marker (a) CD69 and the production of the cytokines (b) IL-2, (c) IFNγ, (d) IL-4, and (e) IL-17. Summary graphs (left panels) and representative data (right panels) from gated iNKT cells are shown, respectively. Data were pooled from three independent experiments with three samples each (n = 9).

(JPG)

S5 Fig. Ca2+ supplementation in vitro has no impact on expression of CD69 on human primary Vγ2+ T cells, MAIT cells, and B cells, and on the production of the IL-2 by human monocytes and IL-4 by Vγ2+ T cells.

PBMCs were isolated from residual leukocyte units of healthy donors and were stimulated for 4 h with 25 ng/ml PMA and 1 μg/ml ionomycin in either normal RPMI1640 medium (RPMInorm) or RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 1 mM Ca2+ (RPMIsuppl). Human Vδ2+ T cells (live CD14- CD20- CD3+ γδTCRlow or Vγ2+ cells) were analysed for the expression of (a) CD69 and the production of (b) IL-2 and (c) IL-4. (d) Human MAIT cells (live CD14- CD20- CD3+ Vα7.2+ CD161+ cells) were analysed for the expression of CD69. (e) Human B cells (CD14- CD3- CD20+ cells) were analysed for the expression of CD69. (f) Human monocytes (CD3- CD20- CD14+ cells) were analysed for the production of IL-2. Summary graphs (left panels) and representative data (right panels) are shown for the cytokine data. Data were pooled from three (Vδ2+ T cells; n = 9) and four (MAIT cells, B cells, monocytes; n = 12) independent experiments with three samples each.

(JPG)

S6 Fig. Ca2+ supplementation in vitro has no impact on the expression of CD69 by expanded Vγ2+ T cells and on the production of some cytokines by expanded human iNKT and Vγ2+ T cells.

iNKT cells were expanded ex vivo in the presence of αGalCer. Vγ2+ T cells were expanded in vitro in the presence of Zoledronic acid. The expanded cells were stimulated for 4 h with 25 ng/ml PMA and 1 μg/ml ionomycin in either normal RPMI1640 medium (RPMInorm) or RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 1 mM Ca2+ (RPMIsuppl). Vα24i NKT cells (live CD14- CD20- CD3+ 6B11+ cells) were analysed for the production of (a) IL-2, (b) IFNγ, (c) IL-4, and (d) IL-17 were measured by ICCS. Human Vδ2+ T cells (live CD14- CD20- CD3+ Vγ2+ cells) were analysed for the expression of (e) CD69 and the production of (f) TNF, (g) IL-4. Summary graphs (left panels) and representative data (right panels) from gated iNKT cells and Vγ2+ T cells are shown, respectively. Data were pooled from four and three independent experiments with three samples each for iNKT cells (n = 12) and Vγ2+ T cells (n = 9), respectively.

(JPG)

S7 Fig. Stimulation of human lymphoid cells in RPMIsuppl has no negative effect on cell viability.

PBMCs were isolated from residual leukocyte units of healthy donors and were stimulated either directly (a-d) or after in vitro expansion of indicated cells (e, f). The cells were stimulated for 4 h with 25 ng/ml PMA and 1 μg/ml ionomycin in either normal RPMI1640 medium (RPMInorm) or RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 1 mM Ca2+ (RPMIsuppl). Primary (a) iNKT cells, (b) Vδ2+ T cells, (c) B cells; and (d) MAIT cells, (e) monocytes, or in vitro expanded (f) iNKT cells and (g) Vδ2+ T cells were stained and analysed by flow cytometry. The bar graphs show the relative percentages of cells positive for LIVE/DEAD Fixable Blue Dead Cell Stain, indicating dead cells. Data were pooled from three (a-b, g) or four (c—f) independent experiment with three samples each (n = 9–12).

(JPG)

S8 Fig. Ca2+ supplementation in vitro increases cell death of M0 macrophages.

Primary human monocyte-derived macrophages were cultured for 6, 12, 24, or 48 hours in either normal RPMI1640 medium (RPMInorm) or RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 1 mM Ca2+ (RPMIsuppl). The bar graphs show the relative percentages of cells positive for LIVE/DEAD Fixable Blue Dead Cell Stain (LDB+ cells), indicating dead cells. Data shown are means ± SEM of biological replicates of six donors, pooled from two independent experiments with similar results.

(JPG)

S9 Fig. Ca2+ supplementation in vitro affects the expression of macrophage polarization markers.

Primary human monocyte-derived macrophages were cultured untreated (MØ) or polarized into M1 (100ng/ml LPS, 20 ng/ml IFNγ, 12 hours), M2a (20 ng/ml IL-4, 24 hours), or M2c (20ng/ml IL-10, 24 hours) macrophages in either normal RPMI1640 medium (RPMInorm) or RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 1 mM Ca2+ (RPMIsuppl). The surface expression (mean fluorescent intensity, MFI) of indicated (a) M1 markers (HLA-DR, CD86, CD64), (b) M2a markers (CD200R, CD206), and an (c) M2c marker (CD163) are shown. The data shown are means ± SEM of biological replicates of six donors, pooled from two independent experiments with similar results.

(JPG)

S1 Table. Details on the antibodies used in this study.

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the Flow Cytometry Core Facility and the vivarium at the Izmir Biomedicine and Genome Center (IBG) for excellent technical assistance. We are grateful to the NIH Tetramer Core Facility (Emory University, Atlanta, USA) for providing the mouse CD1d/PBS57 tetramers.

Abbreviations

αGalCer

α-galactosylceramide

FCS

fetal calf serum

ICCS

intracellular cytokine staining

iNKT

invariant Natural Killer T

MAIT

mucosal-associated invariant T

MFI

mean fluorescent intensity

PBMCs

peripheral blood mononucleated cells

ROS

reactive oxygen species

RT

room temperature

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was funded by grants from the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK, #117Z216, GW), the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO, #IG3073; GW), and the H2020 Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions (#777995, GW, DS). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Moore GE, Gerner RE, Franklin HA. Culture of Normal Human Leukocytes. Jama. 1967;199(8):519–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sato K, Kondo M, Sakuta K, Hosoi A, Noji S, Sugiura M, et al. Impact of culture medium on the expansion of T cells for immunotherapy. Cytotherapy. 2009;11(7):936–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Xu H, Wang N, Cao W, Huang L, Zhou J, Sheng L. Influence of various medium environment to in vitro human T cell culture. Vitro Cell Dev Biology—Animal. 2018;54(8):559–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zimmermann J, Radbruch A, Chang H. A Ca2+ concentration of 1.5 mM, as present in IMDM but not in RPMI, is critical for maximal response of Th cells to PMA/ionomycin. Eur J Immunol. 2015;45(4):1270–3. doi: 10.1002/eji.201445247 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Leney-Greene MA, Boddapati AK, Su HC, Cantor JR, Lenardo MJ. Human Plasma-like Medium Improves T Lymphocyte Activation. Iscience. 2020;23(1):100759. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2019.100759 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Crosby CM, Kronenberg M. Tissue-specific functions of invariant natural killer T cells. Nat Rev Immunol. 2018;1. doi: 10.1038/s41577-018-0034-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cameron G, Godfrey DI. Differential surface phenotype and context‐dependent reactivity of functionally diverse NKT cells. Immunol Cell Biol. 2018;96(7):759–71. doi: 10.1111/imcb.12034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Godfrey DI, Koay HF, McCluskey J, Gherardin NA. The biology and functional importance of MAIT cells. Nat Immunol. 2019;20(9):1110–28. doi: 10.1038/s41590-019-0444-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Toubal A, Nel I, Lotersztajn S, Lehuen A. Mucosal-associated invariant T cells and disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2019;19(10):643–57. doi: 10.1038/s41577-019-0191-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Vantourout P, Hayday A. Six-of-the-best: unique contributions of γδ T cells to immunology. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2013;13(2). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Legut M, Cole DK, Sewell AK. The promise of γδ T cells and the γδ T cell receptor for cancer immunotherapy. Cell Mol Immunol. 2015;12(6):656–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Godfrey DI, Uldrich AP, McCluskey J, Rossjohn J, Moody DB. The burgeoning family of unconventional T cells. Nature Immunology. 2015;16(11). doi: 10.1038/ni.3298 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Baba Y, Kurosaki T. B Cell Receptor Signaling. Curr Top Microbiol. 2015;393:143–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mosser DM, Edwards JP. Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8(12):958–69. doi: 10.1038/nri2448 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Murray PJ. Macrophage Polarization. Annu Rev Physiol. 2016;79(1):541–66. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-022516-034339 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ginhoux F, Schultze JL, Murray PJ, Ochando J, Biswas SK. New insights into the multidimensional concept of macrophage ontogeny, activation and function. Nat Immunol. 2016;17(1):34–40. doi: 10.1038/ni.3324 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Constantinides MG, Bendelac A. Transcriptional regulation of the NKT cell lineage. Curr Opin Immunol. 2013;25(2):161–7. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2013.01.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lee YJ, Holzapfel KL, Zhu J, Jameson SC, Hogquist KA. Steady-state production of IL-4 modulates immunity in mouse strains and is determined by lineage diversity of iNKT cells. Nat Immunol. 2013;14(11):1146–54. doi: 10.1038/ni.2731 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sag D, Krause P, Hedrick CC, Kronenberg M, Wingender G. IL-10–producing NKT10 cells are a distinct regulatory invariant NKT cell subset. J Clin Invest. 2014;124(9):3725–40. doi: 10.1172/JCI72308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Papotto PH, Ribot JC, Silva-Santos B. IL-17+ γδ T cells as kick-starters of inflammation. Nature Immunology. 2017;18(6). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Leney-Greene MA, Boddapati AK, Su HC, Cantor J, Lenardo MJ. Human plasma-like medium improves T lymphocyte activation. Biorxiv. 2019;740845. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2019.100759 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Feske S. Calcium signalling in lymphocyte activation and disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7(9):690–702. doi: 10.1038/nri2152 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Goldstein DA. Serum Calcium. In: HK W, WD H, JW H, editors. Clinical Methods: The History, Physical, and Laboratory Examinations [Internet]. 3rd edition. Boston: Butterworths; 1990. p. Chapter 143. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK250/ [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Li G, Scull C, Ozcan L, Tabas I. NADPH oxidase links endoplasmic reticulum stress, oxidative stress, and PKR activation to induce apoptosis. J Cell Biology. 2010;191(6):1113–25. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201006121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tavakoli S, Asmis R. Reactive Oxygen Species and Thiol Redox Signaling in the Macrophage Biology of Atherosclerosis. Antioxid Redox Sign. 2012;17(12):1785–95. doi: 10.1089/ars.2012.4638 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bernardi P, Krauskopf A, Basso E, Petronilli V, Blalchy‐Dyson E, Lisa FD, et al. The mitochondrial permeability transition from in vitro artifact to disease target. Febs J. 2006;273(10):2077–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2006.05213.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fortes GB, Alves LS, Oliveira R de, Dutra FF, Rodrigues D, Fernandez PL, et al. Heme induces programmed necrosis on macrophages through autocrine TNF and ROS production. Blood. 2012;119(10):2368–75. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-08-375303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Miller JL, Velmurugan K, Cowan MJ, Briken V. The Type I NADH Dehydrogenase of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Counters Phagosomal NOX2 Activity to Inhibit TNF-α-Mediated Host Cell Apoptosis. Plos Pathog. 2010;6(4):e1000864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Soumyarani VS, Jayakumari N. Oxidatively modified high density lipoprotein promotes inflammatory response in human monocytes–macrophages by enhanced production of ROS, TNF-α, MMP-9, and MMP-2. Mol Cell Biochem. 2012;366(1–2):277–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kohchi C, Inagawa H, Nishizawa T, Soma GI. ROS and innate immunity. Anticancer Res. 2009;29(3):817–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Takada Y, Mukhopadhyay A, Kundu GC, Mahabeleshwar GH, Singh S, Aggarwal BB. Hydrogen Peroxide Activates NF-κB through Tyrosine Phosphorylation of IκBα and Serine Phosphorylation of p65 EVIDENCE FOR THE INVOLVEMENT OF IκBα KINASE AND Syk PROTEIN-TYROSINE KINASE*. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(26):24233–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hucke S, Eschborn M, Liebmann M, Herold M, Freise N, Engbers A, et al. Sodium chloride promotes pro-inflammatory macrophage polarization thereby aggravating CNS autoimmunity. J Autoimmun. 2016;67:90–101. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2015.11.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zhou Y, Zhang T, Wang X, Wei X, Chen Y, Guo L, et al. Curcumin Modulates Macrophage Polarization Through the Inhibition of the Toll-Like Receptor 4 Expression and its Signaling Pathways. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2015;36(2):631–41. doi: 10.1159/000430126 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Qin L, Liu Y, Wang T, Wei SJ, Block ML, Wilson B, et al. NADPH Oxidase Mediates Lipopolysaccharide-induced Neurotoxicity and Proinflammatory Gene Expression in Activated Microglia*. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(2):1415–21. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M307657200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sutterwala FS, Noel GJ, Clynes R, Mosser DM. Selective Suppression of Interleukin-12 Induction after Macrophage Receptor Ligation. J Exp Medicine. 1997;185(11):1977–85. doi: 10.1084/jem.185.11.1977 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Liu X, Wang N, Zhu Y, Yang Y, Chen X, Fan S, et al. Inhibition of Extracellular Calcium Influx Results in Enhanced IL-12 Production in LPS-Treated Murine Macrophages by Downregulation of the CaMKKβ-AMPK-SIRT1 Signaling Pathway. Mediat Inflamm. 2016;2016:6152713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sert NP du, Hurst V, Ahluwalia A, Alam S, Avey MT, Baker M, et al. The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. Plos Biol. 2020;18(7):e3000410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Matsuda JL, Naidenko OV, Gapin L, Nakayama T, Taniguchi M, Wang CR, et al. Tracking the Response of Natural Killer T Cells to a Glycolipid Antigen Using Cd1d Tetramers. J Exp Medicine. 2000;192(5):741–54. doi: 10.1084/jem.192.5.741 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sag D, Özkan M, Kronenberg M, Wingender G. Improved Detection of Cytokines Produced by Invariant NKT Cells. Sci Reports. 2017;7(1):16607. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16832-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Menck K, Behme D, Pantke M, Reiling N, Binder C, Pukrop T, et al. Isolation of Human Monocytes by Double Gradient Centrifugation and Their Differentiation to Macrophages in Teflon-coated Cell Culture Bags. J Vis Exp Jove. 2014;(91):51554. doi: 10.3791/51554 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Fallarini S, Magliulo L, Paoletti T, Lalla C de, Lombardi G. Expression of functional GPR35 in human iNKT cells. Biochem Bioph Res Co. 2010;398(3):420–5. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.06.091 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kondo M, Izumi T, Fujieda N, Kondo A, Morishita T, Matsushita H, et al. Expansion of Human Peripheral Blood &gamma;&delta; T Cells using Zoledronate. J Vis Exp. 2011;(55). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wang RN, Wen Q, He WT, Yang JH, Zhou CY, Xiong WJ, et al. Optimized protocols for γδ T cell expansion and lentiviral transduction. Molecular Medicine Reports. 2019;19(3). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Maecker HT. HIV Protocols. Methods Mol Biology. 2009;485:375–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Nazmul Haque

28 Sep 2022

PONE-D-22-15126The Ca2+ concentration in vitro impacts the cytokine production of mouse and human lymphoid cells and the polarization of human macrophagesPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Wingender,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Nov 12 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Nazmul Haque

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. To comply with PLOS ONE submissions requirements, in your Methods section, please provide additional information on the animal research and ensure you have included details on (1) methods of sacrifice, (2) methods of anesthesia and/or analgesia, and (3) efforts to alleviate suffering

3.  We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

4. We note that the grant information you provided in the ‘Funding Information’ and ‘Financial Disclosure’ sections do not match. 

When you resubmit, please ensure that you provide the correct grant numbers for the awards you received for your study in the ‘Funding Information’ section

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The current manuscript is well written. However, the following points need to be addressed before publishing -

1# If the author shift the word ‘in vitro’ to the end of the sentence the title sounds more familiar.

2# In the method section author wrote that ‘Antibodies were purchased 357 from either BioLegend (USA), BD Biosciences (USA), or eBiosciences (USA).’ However, there is an international format for writing chemical reagents in a scientific paper. The author needs to be specific with company name by particular reagent. Furthermore, the author is suggested to recheck all manuscript to follow the same rule while mention company manes.

3# The ‘Cell preparation’ section in Methods seeking brief explanation of procedures of cell isolations.

4# The author used 1 mM CaCl2 for stimulating cells in vitro. What is the rationale of using this single concentration? Is this stimulation is dose independent?

5# Under the section ‘Human macrophage polarization’, the author wrote that ‘The incubation times are specified in the text.’ However, they are suggested to write it here. There is no problem if they want to keep it in the text as an addition.

6# The authors are strongly suggested to add positive and negative controls in their experiment.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 Feb 24;18(2):e0282037. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282037.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


11 Oct 2022

Editors

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming.

Response: We followed PLOS ONE’s guidelines to our best knowledge throughout.

2. To comply with PLOS ONE submissions requirements, in your Methods section, please provide additional information on the animal research and ensure you have included details on (1) methods of sacrifice, (2) methods of anesthesia and/or analgesia, and (3) efforts to alleviate suffering.

Response: We added the method of sacrifice of the mice (cervical dislocation) to the Material and Methods section. All mouse experiments were performed ex vivo, therefore, no anaesthesia was required. However, we added a statement that we followed 3R guidelines to the relevant section in the Material and Methods section.

3. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

Response: We ticked the option “URLs/accession numbers/DOIs” during the online submission by mistake. No data related to this manuscript need to be deposited and, therefore, we removed the tick now during the resubmission.

4. We note that the grant information you provided in the ‘Funding Information’ and ‘Financial Disclosure’ sections do not match. When you resubmit, please ensure that you provide the correct grant numbers for the awards you received for your study in the ‘Funding Information’ section.

Response: Unfortunately, this point is not entirely clear to us. We found on the editorialmanager.com website, the ‘Funding Information’ section (tab ‘Manuscript Data’) but not the ‘Financial Disclosure’ section. All information provided in the ‘Funding Information’ section is complete and correct. No information on funding was initially added to the manuscript text as the PLOS ONE guidelines (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines) explicitly state “Do not include funding sources in the Acknowledgments or anywhere else in the manuscript file. Funding information should only be entered in the financial disclosure section of the submission system”. Upon inquiry with PLOS ONE (plosone@plos.org), we were informed that “The Financial Disclosure written in your manuscript must match your Funding Information in the Manuscript Data Tab. Therefore, we encourage you to correct your Financial Disclosure in your manuscript.” Following this advice, we now added a ‘Financial disclosure’ section to the main text.

Reviewer #1

1. If the author shift the word ‘in vitro’ to the end of the sentence the title sounds more familiar.

Response: We thank the reviewer for this suggestion and the title was changed accordingly.

2. In the method section author wrote that ‘Antibodies were purchased 357 from either BioLegend (USA), BD Biosciences (USA), or eBiosciences (USA).’ However, there is an international format for writing chemical reagents in a scientific paper. The author needs to be specific with company name by particular reagent. Furthermore, the author is suggested to recheck all manuscript to follow the same rule while mention company manes.

Response: We thank the reviewer to bring this ambiguity to our attention. We double-checked that Material & Method section and belief to have stated now the specific vendor for every reagent mentioned, including for the utilized antibodies.

3. The ‘Cell preparation’ section in Methods seeking brief explanation of procedures of cell isolations.

Response: We extended the information provided under ‘Cell Preparation’ to make the paragraph self-explanatory without the need to revert to previous publications.

4. The author used 1 mM CaCl2 for stimulating cells in vitro. What is the rationale of using this single concentration? Is this stimulation is dose independent?

Response: It was shown previously (Zimmermann et al. 2015, PMID: 25545753) that supplementing RPMI media with 1 mM of CaCl2 is required to obtain the maximal cytokine production by stimulated conventional CD4+ T cells. The goal of our study was to clarify whether this observation would also be relevant for unconventional T cells (iNKT cells, MAIT cells, �� T cells) and human macrophages (as an example of myeloid cells). Therefore, we think that Ca2+-titration experiments would not be in line with our aim and would distract from our main finding.

5. Under the section ‘Human macrophage polarization’, the author wrote that ‘The incubation times are specified in the text.’ However, they are suggested to write it here. There is no problem if they want to keep it in the text as an addition.

Response: We thank the reviewer for bringing this omission to our attention. We added now the range of incubation times to the Material & Method section.

6. The authors are strongly suggested to add positive and negative controls in their experiment.

Response: We agree with the reviewer that negative and positive controls are essential for all experiments. All our experiments included an untreated (e.g. unstimulated) control (i.e. negative control). Our positive control was the cell stimulation with PMA/ionomycin (lymphoid cells, monocytes), LPS/IFN� (M1), IL-4 (M2a), or IL-10 (M2c) in standard RPMI medium. Our experimental groups were the stimulation with Ca2+-supplemented RPMI medium. Therefore, all our experiments were performed with the relevant negative and positive controls.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.pdf

Decision Letter 1

Nazmul Haque

28 Nov 2022

PONE-D-22-15126R1The Ca2+ concentration impacts the cytokine production of mouse and human lymphoid cells and the polarization of human macrophages in vitroPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Wingender,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jan 12 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Nazmul Haque

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: No

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The author answered that 'It was shown previously (Zimmermann et al. 2015, PMID: 25545753) that supplementing RPMI media with 1 mM of CaCl2 is required to obtain the maximal cytokine production by stimulated conventional CD4+ T cells. '

They are suggested to add this explanation in their manuscript in the most suitable place.

Reviewer #2: The manuscript entitled ‘The Ca2+ concentration in vitro impacts the cytokine production of mouse and human lymphoid cells and the polarization of human macrophages’, by Yusuf Cem Eskiocak et al gives evidence for an impact of Ca 2+ concentration in culture media on the functional response of immune cells in ex vivo assay systems.

The manuscript highlights an observation known for decades but not addressed in detail.

Major comments:

1.) The authors use standard isolation procedures to isolate T cell subsets and they polarize monocytes to macrophages M1/M2 but do not show the success of their manipulation. Pheno/genotypic markers need to be used to precisely characterize the invariant NK-T cells, mucosal-associated invariant T cells, γδ T cells after isolation/stimulation. The same is true for monocyte-macrophage differentiation.

2.) I have a lot of issues open concerning the description of the methods and materials used.

a. For human samples an approval number of the Ethic committee is provided but this is not the case for animals.

b. ARRIVE guidelines are cited with no reference

c. All antibodies used were given with a clone identification but without the given concentration and conjugation with either Brilliant Ultra Violet 395, Pacific Blue, Violet 500, Brilliant Violet 570,358 Brilliant Violet 605, Brilliant Violet 650, Brilliant Violet 711, Brilliant Violet 785, FITC, PerCP-359 Cy5.5, PerCP-eF710, PE, PE-CF594, PE-Dazzle594, PE-Cy7, APC, AF647, eF660, AF700, 360 APC-Cy7, or APC-eF780 and therefor it is hard to follow.

d. No concentration is given on the blocking mAbs.

e. What kind of Flow Cytometer is used and which program for calculation and graphical display?

f. When it comes to statistic paired tests are not appropriate and it is easy for the authors to provide unpaired alternative tests.

3.) The reviewer has the impression that the authors show too many Figures 1-7 and additional half-a-dozen Figures in the Supplements. I would recommend to extract the important issues and combine Figures, describe the irrelevant in the results and add the necessary controls of T cell and macrophage subsets in the Supplements.

Minor comments:

1.) When providing information on materials used, the authors should provide more information. BioLegend should read BioLegend® Inc., San Diego, CA for the first time and thereafter BioLegend every second/third time. I ‘know’ this is work.

2.) Also the English language needs to be improved for clarity.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 Feb 24;18(2):e0282037. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282037.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


29 Dec 2022

Reviewer #1

The author answered that 'It was shown previously (Zimmermann et al. 2015, PMID: 25545753) that supplementing RPMI media with 1 mM of CaCl2 is required to obtain the maximal cytokine production by stimulated conventional CD4+ T cells.' They are suggested to add this explanation in their manuscript in the most suitable place.

Response: We thank the reviewer for this suggestion and we highlighted this point better now in the introduction.

Reviewer #2

The manuscript highlights an observation known for decades but not addressed in detail.

Response: That calcium in the medium is require for in vitro responses by immune cells is indeed know for decades, but this is not the topic of our study. That the calcium concentration in the commonly used RPMI1640 medium is insufficient for maximal cytokine responses of conventional T cells was first reported in 2015. We now extent this finding to other, unconventional T cells (iNKT cells, MAIT cells, �� T cells) and to macrophages as an example of myeloid cells. We do believe that our data are of significant interest to researchers utilizing in vitro experiments to study unconventional T cells and macrophages.

1.) The authors use standard isolation procedures to isolate T cell subsets and they polarize monocytes to macrophages M1/M2 but do not show the success of their manipulation. Pheno/genotypic markers need to be used to precisely characterize the invariant NK-T cells, mucosal-associated invariant T cells, γδ T cells after isolation/stimulation. The same is true for monocyte-macrophage differentiation.

Response: To illustrate our gating and the purity of the analysed cell populations, we now included a new supplemental figure (S1 Fig).

2.) I have a lot of issues open concerning the description of the methods and materials used.

a. For human samples an approval number of the Ethic committee is provided but this is not the case for animals.

Response: This information was already provided in the manuscript, under the section ’Mice’: “All mouse experiments were performed with prior approval by the institutional ethic committee (‘Ethical Committee on Animal Experimentation’ of the Izmir Biomedicine and Genome Center, approval number: 19/2016) in accordance with national laws and policies.”

b. ARRIVE guidelines are cited with no reference

Response: We thank the reviewer for pointing out this inadvertent omission. We added the reference in the revised version of the manuscript.

c. All antibodies used were given with a clone identification but without the given concentration and conjugation with either Brilliant Ultra Violet 395, Pacific Blue, Violet 500, Brilliant Violet 570,358 Brilliant Violet 605, Brilliant Violet 650, Brilliant Violet 711, Brilliant Violet 785, FITC, PerCP-359 Cy5.5, PerCP-eF710, PE, PE-CF594, PE-Dazzle594, PECy7, APC, AF647, eF660, AF700, 360 APC-Cy7, or APC-eF780 and therefor it is hard to follow.

Response: To further clarify this point, we added a new supplemental table showing the clone, conjugate, source, ID, and dilution for each antibody used in this study.

d. No concentration is given on the blocking mAbs.

Response: We assume the reviewer refers to the reagents used to block the Fc receptors. We thank the reviewer for pointing out this inadvertent omission. We added now the clarification “… according to the manufacturers’ recommendations”

e. What kind of Flow Cytometer is used and which program for calculation and graphical display?

Response: We thank the reviewer for pointing out this inadvertent omission. This information has been added now to the Material and Methods section.

f. When it comes to statistic paired tests are not appropriate and it is easy for the authors to provide unpaired alternative tests.

Response: The use of paired tests for the statistical analysis of the reported data (cell frequencies in percentages, geometric MFIs) is in line with the common procedure in the field. Furthermore, we previously verified internally that such data are normally distributed (D’Agostino - Pearson omnibus normality test after combining values from repetitive experiments (n>10, GraphPad Prism)), demonstrating in our opinion that a paired test is appropriate. However, should the reviewer outline for which experiment the usage of a paired test is inappropriate and why, we are happy to revaluate our analysis.

3.) The reviewer has the impression that the authors show too many Figures 1-7 and additional half-a-dozen Figures in the Supplements. I would recommend to extract the important issues and combine Figures, describe the irrelevant in the results and add the necessary controls of T cell and macrophage subsets in the Supplements.

Response: We understand the concern of the reviewer; however, we think that combining figures or removing parts of them would reduce the clarity or required information content, respectively.

Minor comments:

1.) When providing information on materials used, the authors should provide more information. BioLegend should read BioLegend® Inc., San Diego, CA for the first time and thereafter BioLegend every second/third time. I ‘know’ this is work.

Response: We did not see the usage of ® in other recent PLOS One publications and, similar, the location of the company headquarters appears not to be a journal requirement. However, we included now the requested information on the company headquarters in the revised manuscript.

2.) Also the English language needs to be improved for clarity.

Response: If the reviewer refers to the English in which the manuscript is written, then we are surprised to see this comment, as we are confident that the understandability and clarity of the English utilized throughout meets PLOS One standards, not alone as three papers from the laboratory were recently (2021, 2022) published in PLOS One. However, should the reviewer point out specific issues, we would be happy to improve the text were necessary.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Point-to-point reply_R2.pdf

Decision Letter 2

Nazmul Haque

7 Feb 2023

The Ca2+ concentration impacts the cytokine production of mouse and human lymphoid cells and the polarization of human macrophages in vitro

PONE-D-22-15126R2

Dear Dr. Wingender,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Nazmul Haque

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Thank you for addressing the majority of the issues addressed. Also the modifications are well done and adequate.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Fischer Michael B.

**********

Acceptance letter

Nazmul Haque

15 Feb 2023

PONE-D-22-15126R2

The Ca2+ concentration impacts the cytokine production of mouse and human lymphoid cells and the polarization of human macrophages in vitro

Dear Dr. Wingender:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Nazmul Haque

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Gating strategy to identify leukocytes and macrophage purity.

    (A, B) Exemplary dot plots illustrating the gating strategy employed to identify the indicted (A) mouse or (B) human lymphoid cells. (C) Purity of the differentiated macrophages: human PBMC-derived monocytes were incubated for 7 days in RPMI1640 medium containing 10 ng/ml M-CSF for macrophage differentiation and the percentage of CD68+ macrophages was determined by intracellular staining. Left: representative flow cytometry data (blue = undifferentiated; red = differentiated); Right: Summary data (n = 3; un-diff = undifferentiated; diff = differentiated). (D-F) Evaluation of macrophage polarization. Primary human monocyte-derived macrophages were left unstimulated (UT) or stimulated for 12 h (D) with 100 ng/mL LPS and 20 ng/mL IFN-γ for M1 polarization (M1), (E) with 20 ng/mL IL-4 for M2a polarization (M2a), or (F) with 20 ng/ mL IL-10 for M2c polarization (M2c). Expression of indicated surface markers was analyzed by flow cytometry. The bar graphs indicate mean fluorescent intensity (MFI). The biological replicates of 6 independent donors pooled from 2 independent experiments are shown.

    (PDF)

    S2 Fig. Stimulation of murine iNKT cells, γδ T cells, or B cells in RPMIsuppl has no negative impact on cell viability.

    Splenocytes from C57BL/6 mice were stimulated 4 h with 50 ng/ml PMA and 1 μg/ml ionomycin in either normal RPMI1640 medium (RPMInorm) or RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 1 mM Ca2+ (RPMIsuppl). (a) iNKT cells; (b) Vδ2+ T cells; and (c) B cells were stained and analysed by flow cytometry. The bar graphs show the relative percentages of cells positive for LIVE/DEAD Fixable Blue Dead Cell Stain, indicating dead cells. Data were pooled from three independent experiments with three mice per group per experiment (n = 9).

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. Ca2+ supplementation in vitro has no impact on the production of some cytokines by mouse γδ T and B cells.

    (a-c) Splenocytes from C57BL/6 mice were stimulated 4 h with 50 ng/ml PMA and 1 μg/ml ionomycin in either normal RPMI1640 medium (RPMInorm) or RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 1 mM Ca2+ (RPMIsuppl). The production of (a) IL-10 and (b) IL-17A by γδ T cells (live CD19/CD45R- CD4- CD8α- CD3ε+ γδTCR+ cells) and the production of (c) IFNγ by B cells (live CD3ε- CD4- CD8α- CD19/CD45R+ cells) was analysed by ICCS. Summary graphs (left panels) and representative data (right panels) from gated γδ T cells and B cells are shown, respectively. Data were pooled from three independent experiments with three mice per group per experiment (n = 9).

    (TIF)

    S4 Fig. Ca2+ supplementation in vitro has no impact on the expression of CD69 and the production IL-2, IFNγ, IL-4, and IL-17 by primary human iNKT cells.

    PBMCs were isolated from the residual leukocyte units of healthy donors. PBMCs were stimulated for 4 h with 25 ng/ml PMA and 1 μg/ml ionomycin in either normal RPMI1640 medium (RPMInorm) or RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 1 mM Ca2+ (RPMIsuppl). Human Vα24i NKT cells (live CD14- CD20- CD3+ 6B11+ cells) were analysed for the expression of the activation marker (a) CD69 and the production of the cytokines (b) IL-2, (c) IFNγ, (d) IL-4, and (e) IL-17. Summary graphs (left panels) and representative data (right panels) from gated iNKT cells are shown, respectively. Data were pooled from three independent experiments with three samples each (n = 9).

    (JPG)

    S5 Fig. Ca2+ supplementation in vitro has no impact on expression of CD69 on human primary Vγ2+ T cells, MAIT cells, and B cells, and on the production of the IL-2 by human monocytes and IL-4 by Vγ2+ T cells.

    PBMCs were isolated from residual leukocyte units of healthy donors and were stimulated for 4 h with 25 ng/ml PMA and 1 μg/ml ionomycin in either normal RPMI1640 medium (RPMInorm) or RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 1 mM Ca2+ (RPMIsuppl). Human Vδ2+ T cells (live CD14- CD20- CD3+ γδTCRlow or Vγ2+ cells) were analysed for the expression of (a) CD69 and the production of (b) IL-2 and (c) IL-4. (d) Human MAIT cells (live CD14- CD20- CD3+ Vα7.2+ CD161+ cells) were analysed for the expression of CD69. (e) Human B cells (CD14- CD3- CD20+ cells) were analysed for the expression of CD69. (f) Human monocytes (CD3- CD20- CD14+ cells) were analysed for the production of IL-2. Summary graphs (left panels) and representative data (right panels) are shown for the cytokine data. Data were pooled from three (Vδ2+ T cells; n = 9) and four (MAIT cells, B cells, monocytes; n = 12) independent experiments with three samples each.

    (JPG)

    S6 Fig. Ca2+ supplementation in vitro has no impact on the expression of CD69 by expanded Vγ2+ T cells and on the production of some cytokines by expanded human iNKT and Vγ2+ T cells.

    iNKT cells were expanded ex vivo in the presence of αGalCer. Vγ2+ T cells were expanded in vitro in the presence of Zoledronic acid. The expanded cells were stimulated for 4 h with 25 ng/ml PMA and 1 μg/ml ionomycin in either normal RPMI1640 medium (RPMInorm) or RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 1 mM Ca2+ (RPMIsuppl). Vα24i NKT cells (live CD14- CD20- CD3+ 6B11+ cells) were analysed for the production of (a) IL-2, (b) IFNγ, (c) IL-4, and (d) IL-17 were measured by ICCS. Human Vδ2+ T cells (live CD14- CD20- CD3+ Vγ2+ cells) were analysed for the expression of (e) CD69 and the production of (f) TNF, (g) IL-4. Summary graphs (left panels) and representative data (right panels) from gated iNKT cells and Vγ2+ T cells are shown, respectively. Data were pooled from four and three independent experiments with three samples each for iNKT cells (n = 12) and Vγ2+ T cells (n = 9), respectively.

    (JPG)

    S7 Fig. Stimulation of human lymphoid cells in RPMIsuppl has no negative effect on cell viability.

    PBMCs were isolated from residual leukocyte units of healthy donors and were stimulated either directly (a-d) or after in vitro expansion of indicated cells (e, f). The cells were stimulated for 4 h with 25 ng/ml PMA and 1 μg/ml ionomycin in either normal RPMI1640 medium (RPMInorm) or RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 1 mM Ca2+ (RPMIsuppl). Primary (a) iNKT cells, (b) Vδ2+ T cells, (c) B cells; and (d) MAIT cells, (e) monocytes, or in vitro expanded (f) iNKT cells and (g) Vδ2+ T cells were stained and analysed by flow cytometry. The bar graphs show the relative percentages of cells positive for LIVE/DEAD Fixable Blue Dead Cell Stain, indicating dead cells. Data were pooled from three (a-b, g) or four (c—f) independent experiment with three samples each (n = 9–12).

    (JPG)

    S8 Fig. Ca2+ supplementation in vitro increases cell death of M0 macrophages.

    Primary human monocyte-derived macrophages were cultured for 6, 12, 24, or 48 hours in either normal RPMI1640 medium (RPMInorm) or RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 1 mM Ca2+ (RPMIsuppl). The bar graphs show the relative percentages of cells positive for LIVE/DEAD Fixable Blue Dead Cell Stain (LDB+ cells), indicating dead cells. Data shown are means ± SEM of biological replicates of six donors, pooled from two independent experiments with similar results.

    (JPG)

    S9 Fig. Ca2+ supplementation in vitro affects the expression of macrophage polarization markers.

    Primary human monocyte-derived macrophages were cultured untreated (MØ) or polarized into M1 (100ng/ml LPS, 20 ng/ml IFNγ, 12 hours), M2a (20 ng/ml IL-4, 24 hours), or M2c (20ng/ml IL-10, 24 hours) macrophages in either normal RPMI1640 medium (RPMInorm) or RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 1 mM Ca2+ (RPMIsuppl). The surface expression (mean fluorescent intensity, MFI) of indicated (a) M1 markers (HLA-DR, CD86, CD64), (b) M2a markers (CD200R, CD206), and an (c) M2c marker (CD163) are shown. The data shown are means ± SEM of biological replicates of six donors, pooled from two independent experiments with similar results.

    (JPG)

    S1 Table. Details on the antibodies used in this study.

    (PDF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Point-to-point reply_R2.pdf

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES