Abstract
Recently, metal halide perovskites have emerged as promising semiconductor candidates for sensitive X-ray photon detection due to their suitable bandgap energies, excellent charge transport properties, and low material cost afforded by their low-temperature solution-processing preparation. Here, we report an improved methodology for single crystal (SC) growth, thermal and electrical properties of a two-dimensional (2D) layered halide material Rb4Ag2BiBr9, which has been identified as a potential candidate for X-ray radiation detection applications. The measured heat capacity for Rb4Ag2BiBr9 implies that there are no structural phase transitions upon cooling. Temperature dependence of thermal transport measurements further suggest remarkably low thermal conductivities of Rb4Ag2BiBr9 that are comparable to the lowest reported in literature. The bulk crystal resistivity is determined to be 2.59×109 Ω·cm from the current-voltage (I-V) curve. Density of trap states are estimated to be ~1010 cm−3 using the space-charge-limited-current (SCLC) measurements. The fabricated Rb4Ag2BiBr9-based X-ray detector shows good operational stability with no apparent current drift, which may be ascribed to the 2D crystal structure of Rb4Ag2BiBr9. Finally, by varying the X-ray tube current to change the corresponding dose rate, the Rb4Ag2BiBr9 X-ray detector sensitivity is determined to be 222.03 uCGy−1cm−2 (at an electric field of E = 24 V/mm).
Graphical Abstract

INTRODUCTION
The detection of X-ray photons plays an important role for a wide range of applications, such as homeland security, medical imaging, nuclear safety monitoring, and scientific research.1,2,3 In the past decade, many compound semiconductors have been studied for X-ray photon detection, such as cadmium zinc telluride (CdZnTe or CZT), gallium arsenide (GaAs), and thallium bromide (TlBr).4,5,6 CdZnTe detectors offer the superior energy resolution but suffer from the poor hole transport.7 While TlBr is a promising compound semiconductor material, the TlBr detector performance degrades over time due to the charge polarization, which is caused by the bromide anion migration.8 Recently, three-dimensional (3D) halide perovskites with the general chemical formula of ABX3 (where A = Cs+, methylammonium (MA) or formamidinium (FA); B = Pb2+; X = I−, Br−, Cl−) have emerged as potential next-generation room-temperature X-ray detector materials due to a unique combination of their excellent charge carrier transport properties, suitable bandgap energies (MAPbI3: 1.57 eV, FAPbI3: 1.48 eV, CsPbI3: 1.73 eV)9, high semiconductor resistivity (>107 Ω·cm) for leakage current reduction, high average atomic number Z for photon attenuation, and low material cost due to their solution processability. Nevertheless, these 3D perovskites also have some drawbacks including the presence of toxic heavy element lead, and their poor stability in ambient air, which is undesirable for their long-term deployment. For example, FAPbI3 perovskites can undergo facile phase transition from its black polymorph to a yellow phase within a few days when stored in air.10 To remedy the toxicity and instability issues in 3D halide perovskites, lower-dimensional (i.e., 2D, one-dimensional (1D), and zero-dimensional (0D)) perovskites with larger organic cations, which form moisture resistant layers, have been proposed to replace the 3D halide perovskites.11,12
Among the brand new Pb-free multinary semiconductors that have been recently discovered is Rb4Ag2BiBr9, which has a pseudo-2D layered crystal structure. In literature, similar mixed silver-bismuth halides such as Cs2AgBiX6 (X = Cl− or Br−) have been considered for prospective applications in radiation detection.2,29 In fact, Rb4Ag2BiBr9 possesses several advantages over the archetypal lead halide perovskites. As reported in our previous work, Rb4Ag2BiBr9 has excellent air stability with no decomposition or degradation up to 10 months under ambient air, and good thermal stability with no structural phase transition up to 700 K. Here, we report an improved methodology for growing larger SCs of Rb4Ag2BiBr9, which allowed us to evaluate its performance as a potential semiconductor candidate for X-ray radiation detection. Based on heat capacity measurements, Rb4Ag2BiBr9 has no structural phase transitions upon cooling. We fabricated Rb4Ag2BiBr9 SC-based detector that shows good long-term operation stability with an ideal bulk semiconductor resistivity of 2.59×109 Ω·cm, and X-ray detector sensitivity of 222.03 uCGy−1cm−2 (at electric field E= 24 V/mm). The obtained results on Rb4Ag2BiBr9 are discussed together with strategies for further improving the performance of this material for X-ray radiation detection.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Rb4Ag2BiBr9 was originally discovered through slow evaporation of a stoichiometric solution (aqueous hydrobromic acid was used as a solvent) at 90 °C.13 While this technique can produce SCs measuring up to centimeter in size, we further optimized the solution crystal growth method to improve the crystal quality, and to increase the reliability of the preparation method. Based on our most recent results, best quality Rb4Ag2BiBr9 SC growth is achieved by adopting a slow cooling method (Fig. 1a) from 130 °C. The optimized crystal growth methodology produces high quality SCs (Fig. 1b) with dimensions up to 5×4×3 mm3 within a few hours from the start of the crystal growth. Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements (Fig. 1c) on ground crystals of Rb4Ag2BiBr9 suggest that the optimized method yields pure phase samples without impurity inclusions.
Figure 1.

(a) A schematic illustration of the crystal growth process. (b) Photographs of the Rb4Ag2BiBr9 SCs. (c) The obtained SCs do not have any impurity inclusions as judged by the comparison of the measured and calculated PXRD patterns of a crushed polycrystalline powder sample of Rb4Ag2BiBr9.
The optical bandgap energy of the obtained crystals of Rb4Ag2BiBr9 was determined through diffuse reflectance measurements. The diffuse reflectance data plotted as the Kubelka-Munk function F(R) (= α/S = (1−R)2/(2R), where R is the reflectance, α is the absorption coefficient and S is the scattering coefficient)13 against the photon energy is provided in Fig. 2a. The Tauc plots are then calculated (Fig. 2b) based on the Kubelka-Munk function assuming direct and indirect transitions to extract the bandgap energy values of 2.68 eV (direct) and 2.38 eV (indirect) for Rb4Ag2BiBr9. These values are consistent with that reported for samples prepared using the slow evaporation technique.13 Note that the results of DFT calculations suggest that owing to its low-dimensional crystal structure, Rb4Ag2BiBr9 has flat frontier states around the optical band gap leading to slightly indirect nature of its bandgap with a negligible difference of less than 0.01 eV between direct and indirect gaps. Importantly, the measured optical bandgap of Rb4Ag2BiBr9 is comparable to the values found for other silver-bismuth halides studied such as Cs2AgBiX6 (X = Cl− or Br−), which have been reported as prospective materials for radiation detection applications.2,29
Figure 2.

(a) Plot of the diffuse reflectance of Rb4Ag2BiBr9 powder as Kubelka-Munk function F(R) against the photon energy. (b) Calculated Tauc plots of Rb4Ag2BiBr9 based on the Kubelka-Munk function with assumptions of direct (green) and indirect (blue) transitions.
Hybrid organic-inorganic perovskites can exhibit multiple phase transitions in the vicinity of room temperature, which could present challenges for their implementation in practical applications. To study the thermal properties of Rb4Ag2BiBr9, we performed heat capacity and thermal conductivity measurements. Both properties were measured by using a DynaCool-9 setup (Quantum Design) with HCP and TTP options. Fig. 3a shows the temperature dependence of the heat capacity of a Rb4Ag2BiBr9 SC. The Cp(T) curve exhibits no sign of any phase transitions, and at high temperatures, approaches the value expected from the Dulong-Petit law, i.e., Cp = 3nR = 399.1 J mol−1K−1, where n is the number of atoms per molecule and R is the gas constant. At low temperatures, the specific heat of Rb4Ag2BiBr9 can be well described by the formula: Cp(T) = γ ×T+ β ×T3+ζ×T5 with the coefficients γ = −0.05 mJ/mol K2, β = 11.1 mJ/mol K4, and ζ = 0.0047 mJ/mol K6 (see Fig. 3b). The value of the Sommerfeld coefficient (γ) is very close to zero, in agreement with the insulating ground state in this material. From the value of β, one can estimate the Debye temperature to be 141 K. The presence of the T5 contribution indicates the existence of additional (besides acoustic, Debye interactions) low energy excitations to the heat capacity of Rb4Ag2BiBr9. To describe the temperature variation of the specific heat of Rb4Ag2BiBr9 in a wider temperature range, we used a Debye model.15,16 As can be seen from Fig. 3, although overall quite accurate (R2 = 0.9972), the model fails to capture the Cp(T) correctly, especially in the mid-temperature range (ΘD derived from the fit is 145 K). To describe the temperature variation of the specific heat of Rb4Ag2BiBr9 in a wider temperature range, we extend the analysis to also include the optical contributions by using Cp(T) = (1−k)CD(T)+kCE(T), in which the lattice contribution to the specific heat is accounted for by both the Debye and Einstein integrals.14 The k parameter ensures the proper quantity of the oscillator modes involved.14 The least-squares fit (R2 = 0.99992) of this expression to the experimental data (see solid blue line Fig. 3a) yields the following parameters: ΘD = 168 K, ΘE = 50 K, and k = 0.24. The Einstein term gives a relatively large contribution to the total specific heat of Rb4Ag2BiBr9 (cf. large value of k) and brings about a distinct maximum in the Cp/T3 vs. T plot at a temperature Tmax = 9 K (see lower inset in Fig. 3a), which scales very well with the Einstein temperature, ΘE ~ 5*Tmax.15 In order to unveil more details of the phonon structure in this material more studies are required such as inelastic neutron scattering experiments.
Figure 3.

(a) Temperature dependence of the specific heat of a Rb4Ag2BiBr9 SC. The solid lines represent Debye (red line) and Debye-Einstein (blue) models (see text for more details). The lower inset shows the specific heat data in the form of a Cp/T3 vs. T plot. (b) Low-temperature data of Rb4Ag2BiBr9 as a Cp/T vs. T2 function. (c) Temperature dependence of the thermal conductivity of Rb4Ag2BiBr9. The solid orange line presents the minimal phonon thermal conductivity.
Fig. 3c shows the temperature dependence of the thermal conductivity of Rb4Ag2BiBr9, measured along the layer propagation direction (i.e., the ac-plane). The overall shape of κ(T) is typical for non-magnetic insulators, where lattice vibrations govern entirely the heat conduction.17 At low temperatures, the thermal conductivity sharply increases with increasing temperature, forms a pronounced maximum at around 10 K, and then decreases moderately and reaches 0.1 W/mK at room temperature. This value is comparable with the lowest thermal conductivities reported in literature.18 In general, in non-magnetic, insulating crystals the maximum in κ(T) occurs due to the reduction of the thermal scattering at low temperatures, i.e., in the regime where the phonon mean free path becomes larger than the interatomic distances. At higher temperatures, the phonon-phonon scattering dominates the thermal transport. It is worthwhile to compare the measured lattice thermal conductivity of Rb4Ag2BiBr9 with the theoretically achievable minimal phonon contribution, (κL, min). The latter may be calculated using the Debye approximation following the model proposed by David Cahill and Robert Pohl, in which no distinction is made between the transverse and longitudinal acoustic phonon modes.19,20 The results obtained for Rb4Ag2BiBr9 (using ΘD = 141 K and numbers of atoms, n = 2.95×1028 m−3) is shown in Fig. 3c by the solid line. As can be seen from Fig. 3c, the calculated (κL, min) is larger than the measured κ(T), especially at higher temperatures, thus might indicate that some strong phonon-phonon processes might be involved in the reduction of κ(T) in Rb4Ag2BiBr9.
For radiation detection applications, the photon attenuation capability is crucial when energy discrimination is required, especially for resolving high-energy gamma-rays. Fig. 4a compares the photon attenuation capability of Rb4Ag2BiBr9 with single element X-ray detector material silicon (Si), and compound detector materials cadmium telluride (CdTe), 3D perovskite CsPbBr3, and double perovskite Cs2AgBiBr6. Rb4Ag2BiBr9 shows comparable attenuation capability for X-ray photons. The semiconductor bulk resistivity is a basic property that evaluates material’s potential for reducing the detector leakage current, which serves as detector noise, and therefore, could degrade the detector energy resolution. The performed current-voltage (I-V) measurement approximately along the b-axis for Rb4Ag2BiBr9 SC (Fig. 4b) yields a high bulk crystal resistivity of 2.59×109 Ω·cm, which is ideal for further exploring this material’s potential for X-ray photon detection.
Figure 4.

(a) Attenuation coefficient of Rb4Ag2BiBr9 for photons compared to Si, CdTe, CsPbBr3, and Cs2AgBiBr6, from soft X-ray to high-energy gamma-rays. (b) I-V measurement using Rb4Ag2BiBr9 SCs, measurement was conducted at room temperature and under dark environment. (c) Measured SCLC curve for Rb4Ag2BiBr9 SC. (d) Detector stability test at +2 V, compared to the CdZnTe detector at the same bias voltage.
The defect density is another important figure of merit for evaluating semiconductor’s potential for X-ray detection. Fig. 4c shows the space-charge-limited-current (SCLC) measurement for Rb4Ag2BiBr9 SCs. The two transition regimes, namely Ohmic and trap-filled-limited (TFL), are observed. In the Ohmic regime, current is linearly proportional to the voltage, therefore the crystal’s electrical resistivity could be evaluated from this region. In the TFL regime, all defect traps are filled by the injected charge carriers from the metal contacts, therefore, the density of trap states nt could be estimated using the onset voltage VTFL of the TFL regime according to the following formula,21
| (1) |
where ε(=14.07) is the dielectric constant, ε0 is the vacuum permittivity, e is the electronic charge, and L is the crystal thickness. The density of trap states presenting in Rb4Ag2BiBr9 SCs is estimated to be 3.33×1010 cm−3, which is comparable to that for MAPbBr3 (5.80×109 cm−3)22 and Cs2AgBiBr6 (1.44×1010 cm−3)23 double perovskites.
The detector operation stability serves an important role for X-ray detector development, especially when long-term detector operation is required. The Rb4Ag2BiBr9-based X-ray detector stability was checked at a detector bias of +2 V (Fig. 4d). It is noticed that during the 30 seconds continuous detector operation, the detector current is relatively stable with no obvious drift, implying the 2D Rb4Ag2BiBr9 may have much better long-term detector operation stability compared to the 3D halide perovskites such as Cs2AgBiBr6, MAPbI3, and MAPbBr3 (which are known to suffer from the halogen migration issues).2,24,25,26
Furthermore, we measured the charge carrier lifetime for Rb4Ag2BiBr9 SC and powder samples (Fig. 5). The charge carrier lifetime is related to the carrier diffusion length through the equation λ = μгE(where г is the carrier mobility and E is the electric field). In general, long carrier lifetime is essential for enabling sufficient long carrier diffusion length. For Rb4Ag2BiBr9 SCs, the intrinsic carrier lifetime is measured to be 2.9 ns, while the short 206 ps lifetime could be ascribed to the high level of defect traps on crystal surface, which leads to fast charge carrier recombination.10
Figure 5.

Charge carrier lifetime measurements on Rb4Ag2BiBr9 SCs and powders using time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy. The blue lines are the results of deconvolution fitting.
To evaluate the performance of Rb4Ag2BiBr9-based X-ray detectors (a schematic illustration for the fabricated Rb4Ag2BiBr9-based X-ray detector is shown in Fig. 6a), we first conducted the ‘on’ and ‘off’ measurements (Fig. 6b) to demonstrate the sensitive response of Rb4Ag2BiBr9 to X-ray irradiation. The significant increase of current when X-ray beam is turned on implies that Rb4Ag2BiBr9 SCs are highly responsive to soft 8 keV X-rays. Moreover, by varying the X-ray tube current, which corresponds to different dose rate, we determined the Rb4Ag2BiBr9-based X-ray detector sensitivity to be 29.7 uCGy−1cm−2 (at a low electric field of E = 4 V/mm, Fig. 6c). Despite the fact that the determined detector sensitivity for Rb4Ag2BiBr9 is much lower compared to that of the 3D halide perovskites MAPbI3 (1471.7 uCGy−1cm−2 at E = 3.3 V/mm)27 and FAPbBr3 (130 uCGy−1cm−2 at E = 0.5 V/mm)28 (see Table 1 for a comparison of the detector sensitivity), the better long-term operation stability of 2D perovskites is a major advantage warranting further exploration of this material. In addition, we note that the detector sensitivity could be further enhanced dramatically to 222.03 uCGy−1cm−2 when the detector is operated at +60 V (Fig. 6d and 6e), which corresponds to electric field E = 24 V/mm. Finally, it should be stressed that the detector sensitivity measured here for Rb4Ag2BiBr9 is even better than the previous reports of detector sensitivity for the 3D double perovskite Cs2AgBiBr6 at the same electric field (105 uCGy−1cm−2 at E = 25 V/mm).29
Figure 6.

(a) A schematic illustration of the Rb4Ag2BiBr9-based X-ray detectors fabricated in this work. (b) Response of the Rb4Ag2BiBr9-based detector to soft X-rays produced from a Cu X-ray tube. (c) Current density vs. dose rate measurement for determining the X-ray detector sensitivity. (d) Measured detector current density vs. dose rate for extracting the detector sensitivity at different bias voltages. (e) Plot of the detector sensitivity vs. detector bias, from 10 V to 60 V.
Table 1.
A comparison of the detector sensitivity determined for Rb4Ag2BiBr9 with the reported sensitivity values for the related 3D and 2D halide perovskite SCs.
| Material | Dimensionality | X-Ray Tube Anode | Electric Field (V/mm) | Detector Sensitivity (uCGy−1cm−2) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cs2AgBiBr6 | 3D | Tungsten (W) | 25 | 105 | 29 |
| MAPbBr3 | 3D | W | 5 | 529 | 30 |
| MAPbI3 | 3D | W | 3.3 | 1471.7 | 27 |
| FAPbBr3 | 3D | W | 0.5 | 130 | 28 |
| CsPbBr3 | 3D | W | - | 4086 | 34 |
| FA0.85MA0.1Cs0.05PbI2.55Br0.45 | 3D | W | - | (3.5±0.2)×106 | 33 |
| (BA)2CsPb2Br7 | 2D | - | 2.53 | 13260 | 31 |
| BDAPbI4 (BDA=NH3C4H8NH3) | 2D | - | 310 | 242 | 32 |
| Rb4Ag2BiBr9 | 2D | Cu | 24 | 222.03 | This work |
CONCLUSIONS
In summary, we optimized the crystal growth methodology for producing Rb4Ag2BiBr9 SCs. It was found that best quality Rb4Ag2BiBr9 SCs can be realized by adopting the slow cooling of a hot aqueous hydrobromic acid solution at 130 °C. The solution-processed Rb4Ag2BiBr9 SCs are found to have an ideal semiconductor resistivity of 2.59×109 Ω·cm and the fabricated Rb4Ag2BiBr9-based X-ray detector shows desirable good long-term operation stability, which render Rb4Ag2BiBr9 as promising candidates for the use as one of the next-generation low-cost X-ray detector materials. Moreover, the absence of structural phase transitions for Rb4Ag2BiBr9 is further confirmed by the heat capacity measurements. The fabricated X-ray detector made of a Rb4Ag2BiBr9 SC shows a detector sensitivity of 222.03 uCGy−1 cm−2 at an electric field of 24 V/mm. In addition to these performance metrics, the low cost, ease of preparation, high stability and earth-abundant chemical compositions make Rb4Ag2BiBr9 an attractive X-ray detector material candidate for further studies. Future work should be focused on reducing the intrinsic defect density to enhance the X-ray detector performance and doping to enhance the charge carrier transport properties. In addition to the potential practical applications, our results further suggest remarkably low thermal conductivity of Rb4Ag2BiBr9, which is comparable with the lowest thermal conductivities reported in literature. In fact, the measured thermal conductivities at temperatures above 100 K are lower than the minimal phonon thermal conductivity calculated using the Debye model. Therefore, more fundamental studies on Rb4Ag2BiBr9 are warranted to better understand the lattice dynamics of this material.
Supplementary Material
Synopsis:
Improved crystal growth, thermal and electrical transport properties of a lead-free metal halide material Rb4Ag2BiBr9 are reported. Rb4Ag2BiBr9 possesses ultra-low thermal conductivity of 0.1 W/mK with semiconductor resistivity of ~109 Ω·cm and carrier lifetime 2.9 ns at room temperature. The measured sensitivity for a fabricated Rb4Ag2BiBr9 X-ray detector is 222.03 uCGy−1cm−2 (at E = 24 V/mm).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under the award number DE-SC0021158. X-ray response tests were conducted at the X-ray lab located at the Biomolecular Structure Core (BSC)-Norman, University of Oklahoma, which is supported in part by an Institutional Development Award (IDeA) from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (Award P20GM103640), the National Science Foundation (Award 0922269), and the University of Oklahoma Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry. K.G. acknowledges support from the US DOE BES Energy Frontier Research Centre “Thermal Energy Transport under Irradiation” (TETI). Y.-Z. Ma acknowledges support from the Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program of Oak Ridge National Laboratory, managed by UT-Battelle, LLC, for the US Department of Energy.
Footnotes
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
The Supporting Information is available free of charge via the internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
Materials and experimental methods, photographs of Rb4Ag2BiBr9 crystals, X-ray tube dose rate calibration, I-V and SCLC measurements using a different Rb4Ag2BiBr9 sample, response of CZT detector to soft X-rays, electrical resistivity measurement using the CZT crystal, and calculation process for the minimal phonon contribution (thermal conductivity) by Debye model.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
REFERENCES
- 1.Bavdaz M; Peacock A; Owens A Future Space Applications of Compound Semiconductor X-Ray Detectors. Nucl. Instruments Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrometers, Detect. Assoc. Equip 2001, 458 (1–2), 123–131. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zhang Z; Cao D; Huang Z; Danilov EO; Chung CC; Sun D; Yang G Gamma-Ray Detection Using Bi-Poor Cs2AgBiBr6 Double Perovskite Single Crystals. Adv. Opt. Mater 2021, 9 (8), 2001575. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zhang Z; Saparov B Charge Carrier Mobility of Halide Perovskite Single Crystals for Ionizing Radiation Detection. Appl. Phys. Lett 2021, 119 (3), 030502. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zha GQ; Xiang H; Liu T; Xu YD; Wang T; Jie WQ The Analysis of X-Ray Response of CdZnTe Detectors. Sci. China Technol. Sci 2012, 55 (8), 2295–2299. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lioliou G; Whitaker MDC; Barnett AM High Temperature GaAs X-Ray Detectors. J. Appl. Phys 2017, 122 (24), 244506. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hitomi K; Muroi O; Matsumoto M; Hirabuki R; Shoji T; Hiratate Y X-Ray Detection Characteristics of Thallium Bromide Nuclear Radiation Detectors. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci 2000, 47 (3 PART 2), 777–779. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Koch-Mehrin KAL; Bugby SL; Lees JE; Veale MC; Wilson MD Charge Sharing and Charge Loss in High-Flux Capable Pixelated CdZnTe Detectors. Sensors 2021, 21 (9), 3260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Datta A; Fiala J; Becla P; Motakef S Stable Room-Temperature Thallium Bromide Semiconductor Radiation Detectors. APL Mater. 2017, 5 (10), 106109. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Eperon GE; Stranks SD; Menelaou C; Johnston MB; Herz LM; Snaith HJ Formamidinium Lead Trihalide: A Broadly Tunable Perovskite for Efficient Planar Heterojunction Solar Cells. Energy Environ. Sci 2014, 7 (3), 982–988. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Han Q; Bae SH; Sun P; Hsieh YT; Yang Y; Rim YS; Zhao H; Chen Q; Shi W; Li G; Yeng Y Single Crystal Formamidinium Lead Iodide (FAPbI3): Insight into the Structural, Optical, and Electrical Properties. Adv. Mater 2016, 28 (11), 2253–2258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tsai H; Liu F; Shrestha S; Fernando K; Tretiak S; Scott B; Vo DT; Strzalka J; Nie W A Sensitive and Robust Thin-Film x-Ray Detector Using 2D Layered Perovskite Diodes. Sci. Adv 2020, 6 (15). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zheng X; Zhao W; Wang P; Tan H; Saidaminov MI; Tie S; Chen L; Peng Y; Long J; Zhang WH Ultrasensitive and Stable X-Ray Detection Using Zero-Dimensional Lead-Free Perovskites. J. Energy Chem 2020, 49, 299–306. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sharma M; Yangui A; Whiteside VR; Sellers IR; Han D; Chen S; Du MH; Saparov B Rb 4 Ag 2 BiBr 9 : A Lead-Free Visible Light Absorbing Halide Semiconductor with Improved Stability. Inorg. Chem 2019, 58 (7), 4446–4455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fraga GLF; Brandão DE; Sereni JG Specific Heat of X2MnSn (X = Co, Ni, Pd, Cu), X2MnIn (X = Ni, Pd) and Ni2MnSb Heusler Compounds. J. Magn. Magn. Mater 1991, 102 (1–2), 199–207. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tari A The Specific Heat of Matter at Low Temperatures, Imperial College Press, London, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Debye P Zur Theorie Der Spezifischen Wärmen. Ann. Phys 1912, 344 (14), 789–839. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tritt TM Thermal Conductivity Theory, Properties, and Applications, Springer, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gibson QD; Zhao T; Daniels LM; Walker HC; Daou R; Hébert S; Zanella M; Dyer MS; Claridge JB; Slater B; Gaultois MW; Corà F; Alaria J; Rosseinsky MJ Low Thermal Conductivity in a Modular Inorganic Material with Bonding Anisotropy and Mismatch. Science (80-. ) 2021, eabh1619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Giannò K; Sologubenko A; Chernikov M; Ott H; Fisher I; Canfield P Low-Temperature Thermal Conductivity of a Single-Grain Y-Mg-Zn Icosahedral Quasicrystal. Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys 2000, 62 (1), 292–300. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cahill DG; Pohl RO Heat Flow and Lattice Vibrations in Glasses. Solid State Commun. 1989, 70 (10), 927–930. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bube RH Trap Density Determination by Space-Charge-Limited Currents. J. Appl. Phys 1962, 33 (5), 1733–1737. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Shi D; Adinolfi V; Comin R; Yuan M; Alarousu E; Buin A; Chen Y; Hoogland S; Rothenberger A; Katsiev K; Losovyj Y; Zhang X; Dowben PA; Mohammed OF; Sargent EH; Bakr OM Low Trap-State Density and Long Carrier Diffusion in Organolead Trihalide Perovskite Single Crystals. Science (80-. ) 2015, 347 (6221), 519–522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zhang Z; Chung CC; Huang Z; Vetter E; Seyitliyev D; Sun D; Gundogdu K; Castellano FN; Danilov EO; Yang G Towards Radiation Detection Using Cs2AgBiBr6 Double Perovskite Single Crystals. Mater. Lett 2020, 269, 127667. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yakunin S; Dirin DN; Shynkarenko Y; Morad V; Cherniukh I; Nazarenko O; Kreil D; Nauser T; Kovalenko MV Detection of Gamma Photons Using Solution-Grown Single Crystals of Hybrid Lead Halide Perovskites. Nat. Photonics 2016, 10 (9), 585–589. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Futscher MH; Lee JM; McGovern L; Muscarella LA; Wang T; Haider MI; Fakharuddin A; Schmidt-Mende L; Ehrler B Quantification of Ion Migration in CH3NH3PbI3 Perovskite Solar Cells by Transient Capacitance Measurements. Mater. Horizons 2019, 6 (7), 1497–1503. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Oranskaia A; Yin J; Bakr OM; Brédas JL; Mohammed OF Halogen Migration in Hybrid Perovskites: The Organic Cation Matters. J. Phys. Chem. Lett 2018, 9 (18), 5474–5480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Geng X; Zhang H; Ren J; He P; Zhang P; Feng Q; Pan K; Dun G; Wang F; Zheng X; Tian H; Xie D; Yang Y; Ren TL High-Performance Single Crystal CH3NH3PbI3perovskite x-Ray Detector. Appl. Phys. Lett 2021, 118 (6), 063506. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yao M; Jiang J; Xin D; Ma Y; Wei W; Zheng X; Shen L High-Temperature Stable FAPbBr3Single Crystals for Sensitive X-Ray and Visible Light Detection toward Space. Nano Lett 2021, 21 (9), 3947–3955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pan W; Wu H; Luo J; Deng Z; Ge C; Chen C; Jiang X; Yin WJ; Niu G; Zhu L; Yin L; Zhou Y; Xie Q; Ke X; Sui M; Tang J Cs2AgBiBr6 Single-Crystal X-Ray Detectors with a Low Detection Limit. Nat. Photonics 2017, 11 (11), 726–732. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Li L; Liu X; Zhang H; Zhang B; Jie W; Sellin PJ; Hu C; Zeng G; Xu Y Enhanced X-Ray Sensitivity of MAPbBr3 Detector by Tailoring the Interface-States Density. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11 (7), 7522–7528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Xiao B; Sun Q; Wang F; Wang S; Zhang B. Bin; Wang J; Jie W; Sellin P; Xu Y Towards Superior X-Ray Detection Performance of Two-Dimensional Halide Perovskite Crystals by Adjusting the Anisotropic Transport Behavior. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9 (22), 13209–13219. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Shen Y; Liu Y; Ye H; Zheng Y; Wei Q; Xia Y; Chen Y; Zhao K; Huang W; Liu S. (Frank). Centimeter-Sized Single Crystal of Two Dimensional Halide Perovskites Incorporating Straight Chain Symmetric Diammonium Ion for X-Ray Detection. Angew. Chemie 2020, 132 (35), 15006–15012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Liu Y; Zhang Y; Zhu X; Feng J; Spanopoulos I; Ke W; He Y; Ren X; Yang Z; Xiao F; Zhao K; Kanatzidis M; Liu S Triple-Cation and Mixed-Halide Perovskite Single Crystal for High-Performance X-Ray Imaging. Adv. Mater 2021, 33 (8), 2006010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Peng J; Xia CQ; Xu Y; Li R; Cui L; Clegg JK; Herz LM; Johnston MB; Lin Q Crystallization of CsPbBr3 Single Crystals in Water for X-Ray Detection. Nat. Commun 2021, 12 (1), 1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
