Skip to main content
Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis logoLink to Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis
. 2023 Feb 2;7(2):100064. doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2023.100064

Role of factor VIII, IX, and XI in venous thrombosis recurrence risk in adults and children: A systematic review

Alessandra Bosch 1,2,, Elizabeth Uleryk 3, Laura Avila 1,4,5
PMCID: PMC9958483  PMID: 36852262

Abstract

Background

Predicting recurrent venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) is challenging in clinical practice for both adults and children, but it is relevant for clinical management. Identifying laboratory risk factors for VTE recurrence may aid in clinical decision-making.

Objective

The goal of this systematic review is to investigate the predictive role of FVIII, IX, or XI in recurrent VTE in adult and pediatric patients with a first VTE.

Methods

A systematic review of the published literature was conducted in databases MEDLINE In-Process, Other Nonindexed Citations, MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print, EMBASE Classic + EMBASE (OvidSP), and Cochrane (Wiley). We included observational and interventional studies that comprised adults or children with a first VTE, FVIII, FIX, and/or FXI and objectively confirmed VTE recurrence. The quality in prognosis studies tool was used to assess the risk of bias.

Results

We identified 2177 unique studies, of which 19 were included (18 for adults and 1 for children). The risk of bias was overall low to moderate. The studies were heterogenous with regards to population (provoked/unprovoked primary VTE), exposure (type of assay and cut-off values), and statistical analysis results (measures of association and modeling strategy). In adults, contradictory evidence was found for FVIII and FXI as outcome predictors, while no research could establish if FIX predicts VTE recurrence. Data in pediatrics were limited. Given the extensive heterogeneity of the literature, a meta-analysis was not performed.

Conclusions

Overall, there is contradictory evidence that FVIII, FIX, or FXI predict recurrent VTE in adults and children. Addressing heterogeneity is a relevant aspect to consider in future studies investigating prognostic factors for VTE recurrence.

Keywords: adult, pediatrics, prognosis, risk factors, venous thromboembolism

Essentials

  • Venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) recurrence causes morbidity and mortality.

  • Our systematic review explores if factors VIII/IX/XI predict VTE recurrence in adults and children.

  • Contradictory evidence exists for factors VIII and XI, but there is no evidence for factor IX, and data for children is scarce.

  • Factors VIII/IX/XI may not be useful risk factors for VTE recurrence in children and adults.

1. Introduction

After a first venous thromboembolic event (VTE), including deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (PE), it is uncertain which patient is at risk for recurrent events [1]. Recurrent VTE is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in adult patients [2]. Therefore, patients at risk may benefit from extended treatment or secondary prevention with anticoagulation to prevent recurrent events. However, anticoagulation therapy is also associated with clinically relevant bleeding risk [3]. Given the balance of risks and benefits, it is relevant to identify which individuals are at increased risk of recurrence that would benefit from extended-phase treatment.

The triggering event of a VTE is a relevant consideration when evaluating the risk of recurrence. Unprovoked VTE, defined as a VTE that occurs without a transient or persistent risk factor, comprises half of all first VTEs in adult patients [4]. The reported risk of VTE recurrence for unprovoked VTE is approximately 25%, with 4% of recurrent VTE leading to death [5]. It has been shown that extended-phase anticoagulation treatment in patients with unprovoked VTE reduces the risk of recurrence by a factor of 5 while bleeding rates are 2.6 times higher in patients not using anticoagulation, with a case fatality rate of 5% [6,7]. Risk of recurrent VTE, bleeding risks, and patient preferences regarding the cost and inconvenience of treatment play a role in decision-making around extended or indefinite anticoagulation in these patients. In contrast, patients with a provoked first VTE are at a lower risk of recurrence. Hence, anticoagulation is suggested to be discontinued after 3-6 months of treatment or when the provoking factor has subsided [[8], [9], [10]].

In pediatric patients, VTE is an increasing clinical phenomenon [11,12]. Pediatric VTE differs from adult VTE due to different physiology, hemostatic system differences, and underlying conditions in children compared to adults [13]. Pediatric VTE recurrence rate has been reported as 2% to 21%, and the median time to recurrence is 0.5-3.5 years [[14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19]]. To date, recurrent VTE cannot reliably be predicted or prevented in pediatrics. It is expected that these complications have a negative impact on young patients who have decades to live [20].

Though previous studies have suggested that elevated baseline coagulation factor VIII (FVIII), factor IX (FIX), and factor XI (FXI) play a predictive role in primary VTEs [[21], [22], [23], [24], [25]] in adult patients, there is conflicting published data as to whether these factors can predict recurrent VTE in adults and children. The goal of this systematic review is to investigate the predictive role of FVIII, IX, or XI in recurrent VTE in adult and pediatric patients with a first VTE.

2. Methods

A systematic search of published literature was conducted with the assistance of a professional librarian (EU) in databases MEDLINE In-Process, Other NonIndexed Citations, MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print (OvidSP, 1946 to November 8, 2022), Embase Classic + Embase (OvidSP, 1947 to November 7, 2022), and Cochrane (Wiley, until issue 11 of December 2022) to identify studies that investigated the role of FVIII, IX, or XI to predict recurrent VTE in adults and children. Detailed search strategies are listed in the Supplementary Methods. For this systematic review, studies were included that met the following eligibility criteria: (1) interventional and observational studies that included adults or children with a first objectively confirmed provoked or unprovoked VTE; VTE included deep vein thrombosis and PE. (2) The exposure was defined as coagulation FVIII, FIX, or FXI, and (3) the outcome was defined as objectively confirmed VTE recurrence. Studies were excluded for (1) unusual site VTE and (2) studies publishing on the same or overlapping cohorts (only one study was included based on completeness of reporting).

Titles and abstracts of identified studies were screened by 2 authors (A.B. and L.A.), then a full-text review was conducted by both authors (A.B. and L.A.). Studies were included based on the eligibility criteria listed above and on a simple agreement, while disagreement was resolved with discussion. The reference lists of included studies were scanned to identify further eligible studies.

Study data were extracted by 1 reviewer (A.B.) and included the study design, patient and VTE characteristics, FVIII/FIX/FXI testing (time point of measurement, assay type, and cut-offs), recurrent events, and measures of association according to each study. If any relevant data was missing, the study authors were contacted. The data were summarized by coagulation factor (FVIII, IX, and XI) and age group (adult and pediatric studies). In addition, results were displayed according to the incorporation of provoked and unprovoked VTE into the analysis (eg, stratified and adjusted analysis).

The quality in prognosis studies (QUIPS) tool for prognostic factor studies was used to assess the risk of bias [26]. The areas of study participation, attrition, prognostic factor and outcome measurements, study confounders, and statistical analysis and reporting were assessed by authors A.B. and L.A. based on a simple agreement, while disagreement was resolved with discussion. The bias assessment was visualized in a traffic plot, generated with an online tool [27].

No Ethics Review Board approval was needed, as the included papers have already been published. The review protocol was not registered prior to conduction.

3. Results

A total of 2815 references were retrieved. All references were saved in an EndNote library to identify 642 duplicates [28]. Four additional studies were identified by manual review of the reference lists. Subsequently, 2177 unique references were reviewed against our inclusion criteria using Covidence [29]. After title and abstract screening, 64 studies were retrieved in full and reviewed, and 45 further studies were excluded due to duplicate study cohorts or ineligibility due to study design, study population, exposure, or outcome. Nineteen published studies were included in this review [[30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48]]. The study selection flow diagram is shown in Figure 1 [49].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Flow diagram of the study selection process. Source: [49]

Table 1 shows the study design, patient and VTE characteristics, and recurrent events of each of the 19 included studies; the incidence rate is included where reported. The data for each study about the time point of laboratory measurements, laboratory techniques, results of univariable and multivariable analysis on the association between predictors (factor levels) and the outcome (VTE recurrence), and covariates adjusted for models are summarized in Table 2.

Table 1.

Characteristics of included studies, patients, and frequency of outcome.

Study Study design Total no. of participants Age (y) Males (%) Provoked first VTE (%) Duration of follow-up (y) Incidence proportion (No. of recurrent VTEs [%]) Incidence rate (/100 patient-years) Definition provoked VTE
Kraaijenhagen et al. [30] Case-control 185 55 (mean) 54 The majority had unprovoked VTE; no numbers documented N/A N/A N/A Thrombophilias (PC, PS, and AT deficiency)
Meinardi et al. [31] Case-control 329 36 (median) 35 55 N/A 115 (35%) 2.3 <3 Months from surgery, trauma, immobilization for >7 d, oral contraceptives, pregnancy, and malignancy
Goldenberg et al. [32] Prospective cohort 82 12 (median) 46 94 1 (median) 6 (7%) N/A Catheter-related, acute infection, lupus anticoagulant positive, and chronic inflammatory state
Kyrle et al. [33] Prospective cohort 826 48 (mean) 45 0 2.2 (median) 102 (12%) N/A <3 Months from surgery, trauma, pregnancy, malignancy, thrombophilias (PC, PS, and AT deficiency), lupus anticoagulant, and hyperhomocysteinemia
Legnani et al. [34] Prospective cohort 564 67 (median) 50 45 1.6 (median) 53 (9%) 5.7 Recent surgery, trauma, fracture, immobilization, oral contraceptives, pregnancy, puerperium, and hormone replacement therapy
Christiansen et al. [35] Prospective cohort 474 45 (mean) 43 45 7.3 (mean) 90 (19%) 2.59 Surgery, immobilization, trauma, use of a plaster cast <3 mo, oral contraceptive use within 30 d, pregnancy, and the puerperium
Shrivastava et al. [46] Randomized controlled trial (post hoc) 508 52 (median; FVIII <150)
56 (median; FVIII >150 U/dL)
57 (FVIII <150)
40 (FVIII >150 U/dL)
0 2.1 (median) 52 (10.2%) 2.1 (FVIII <150, on warfarin);
3.9 (FVIII >150, on warfarin)
Surgery, trauma, and active malignancy
Tirado et al. [36] Case-control 250 42 (mean) 45 52 N/A 65 (26%) N/A Surgery, immobilization, paralyzed legs, oral contraceptives, pregnancy, indwelling catheters, and autoimmune disease
Legnani et al. [37] Prospective cohort 628 67 (median) 53 0 1.8 (median) 71 (11%) N/A <3 Months surgery, trauma, immobilization, fracture, pregnancy, and the puerperium
Laczkovics et al. [38] Retrospective cohort 361 30 (median) 0 50 11.3 (median) 141 (39%) N/A Surgery, trauma, immobility, oral contraceptive use, pregnancy, puerperium, cesarian section, abortion, FVL, prothrombin mutation, AT/PC/PS deficiency, elevated FVIII, and hyperhomocysteinemia
Kearon et al. [47] Randomized controlled trial (post hoc) 661 57 (mean) 46 0 2.3 (mean) 14 (2%) 0.9 Hospitalization >3 d, fracture or cast of leg, surgery with >30 min anesthesia within 3 mo, and malignancy within 2 y
Rodger et al. [39] Prospective cohort 646 53 (mean) 51 0 1.5 (mean) 91 (14%) N/A <3 Months from leg fracture, lower-extremity plaster cast, immobilization, surgery, and malignancy within 5 y
Mello et al. [40] Prospective cohort 343 36 (median) 34 60 6.1 (median) 69 (20%) N/A <3 Months from surgery, trauma, immobilization, plaster cast, oral contraceptives, <30 d from pregnancy, puerperium, and hormonal replacement therapy
Franco Moreno et al. [48] Prospective cohort 398 61 (median) 55 0 1.8 (median) 65 (16%) N/A Surgery, trauma, immobility, previous hospitalization, hormonal therapy, pregnancy, puerperium, active malignancy, thrombophilia (PC, PS, and AT deficiency) homozygous FVL, homozygous prothrombin mutation, and anticardiolipin antibodies or lupus anticoagulant
Kooiman et al. [41] Case-control 349 54 (mean) 50 64 N/A 72 (21%) N/A Not reported
Nagler et al. [42] Prospective cohort 479 58 (median) 50 45 4.6 (median) 101 (21%) N/A <3 Months from surgery, immobilization, long-distance travel, contraceptives, and pregnancy
Kyrle et al. [43] Prospective cohort 815 53 (mean) 66 0 8.5 (median) 265 (31%) N/A <3 Months from surgery, trauma, pregnancy, malignancy, thrombophilias (PC, PS, and AT deficiency), lupus anticoagulant, and hyperhomocysteinemia
Timp et al. [44] Prospective cohort 3750 48 (mean) 45 69 5.7 (median) 507 (14%) 2.64 Surgery, trauma, immobilization, plaster cast, prolonged travel, oral contraceptives, pregnancy, puerperium, hormone replacement therapy, and malignancy
Otero et al. [45] Prospective cohort 166 64 (median) 54 100 0.5 (trial design) 16 (10%) N/A Cancer-associated thrombosis

AT, antithrombin; CVC, central venous catheter; FVIII, factor VIII; FVL, factor V Leiden; PC, protein C; PS, protein S; VTE, venous thromboembolic event.

Table 2.

Characteristics of factor measurements and statistical analysis performed for the included studies.

Study Timepoint of laboratory measurement Assay type Cut-off for analysis Factor level distribution Univariable statistical analysis performed in study Multivariable statistical analysis performed in study Covariates adjusted for in multivariable analysis where available
FVIII
Kraaijenhagen et al. [30] Unspecified One-stage clotting assay >175 U/dL (90th percentile of the control population) 33% of patients in the recurrent VTE group had FVIII >175 U/dL OR for FVIII above 200 U/dL and VTE recurrence: 45 (95% CI, 6-370)
OR for every 10 U/dL increase of FVIII:
1.24 (95% CI, 1.11-1.38)
OR for FVIII above 200 U/dL and VTE recurrence: unchanged to univariable OR (data not reported) Adjusted for fibrinogen, C-reactive protein, fasting homocysteine concentrations, FVL, and prothrombin mutation
Meinardi et al. [31] After discontinuation of anticoagulants One-stage clotting assay >150%;
>122% (first quartile of the cohort)
40% had a FVIII >150%, with a median FVIII of 140% (no recurrence).
55% had a FVIII >150% (P = .06), with a median FVIII of 158% (recurrence); P = .008
Not reported OR for FVIII >122% and VTE recurrence (in FVL patients):
1.8 (95% CI, 0.7-4.9)
Adjusted for sex, age, observation time, proband state, unprovoked first event, prothrombin mutation, homozygous FVL, hyperhomocysteinemia, and deficiency of antithrombin, protein C, and protein S
Kyrle et al. [33] After discontinuation of anticoagulants One-stage clotting assay >234 U/dL (90th percentile of the cohort) N/A RR for FVIII >234 U/dL and VTE recurrence: 3.4 (95% CI, 2.1-5.6) RR for FVIII >234 U/dL and VTE recurrence: 2.9 (95% CI, 1.6-5.1) Adjusted for age, the presence or absence of a first symptomatic pulmonary embolism, factor V Leiden, factor II G20210A, FIX levels >138 U/dL, and duration of anticoagulation
Legnani et al. [34] After discontinuation of anticoagulants, except in 48 patients’ anticoagulation could not be stopped One-stage clotting assay; chromogenic method 2.98 U/mL for the chromogenic FVIII (90th percentile of the cohort) Unprovoked VTE group had a FVIII of 1.75 U/mL (0.65-5.41)
Provoked VTE group had a FVIII of 1.47 U/mL (0.53-4.14); P < .0001
RR for FVIII >2.98 U/dL and VTE recurrence (unprovoked): 4.4 (95% CI, 1.5-13.2)
RR for FVIII >2.98 U/dL and VTE recurrence (provoked): 3.4 (0.5-24.0).
RR for FVIII >2.98 U/dL and VTE recurrence (unprovoked): 5.4 (95% CI, 1.8-16.8)
RR for FVIII >2.98 U/dL and VTE recurrence (provoked): 2.6 (0.3-19.9).
Adjusted for age, sex, duration of anticoagulation, prothrombin mutation, FVL, and deficiency of antithrombin, protein C, and protein S
Christiansen et al. [35] After discontinuation of anticoagulants One-stage clotting assay 166 U/dL 23% of all patients had a FVIII >166 U/dL HR for FVIII >166 U/dL and VTE recurrence: 1.1 (95% CI, 0.7-1.8) HR for FVIII >166 U/dL and VTE recurrence: 1.3 (95% CI, 0.8-2.1) Adjusted for age, sex, and anticoagulation
Shrivastava et al. [46] After discontinuation of anticoagulants One-stage clotting assay 150 U/dL (75th percentile of the study population) 116 U/dL (median no recurrence); 122 U/dL (median recurrence); P = .55 HR for FVIII >150 U/dL and VTE recurrence: 1.5 (95% CI, 0.8-2.7) HR for FVIII >150 U/dL and VTE recurrence: 1.5 (95% CI, 0.8-2.7) Adjusted for age, sex, time from first VTE, number of prior VTEs, and treatment assignment
Tirado et al. [36] 6 Months after VTE. Vitamin K antagonists were withdrawn for 20 d FVIII clotting activity 232% (90th percentile of the cohort) N/A OR for FVIII >232% and VTE recurrence:
OR 2.3 (95% CI, 1.3-4.1);
OR for FVIII >232% and VTE recurrence: OR 2.6 (95% CI, 1.4-4.8). Adjusted for sex, age, hyperhomocysteinemia, antiphospholipid antibodies, FVL, PT20210A, FXII46C→T and activated protein C resistance, and deficiencies in antithrombin, protein C, and protein S
Laczkovics et al. [38] After discontinuation of anticoagulants One-stage clotting assay 248% used as cut-off (95th percentile of 307 healthy individuals) 10.5% of all patients had a FVIII >248% HR for FVIII >248% and VTE recurrence:
1.0 (95%I, 1.0-1.0, P = .33)
HR for FVIII >248% and VTE recurrence:
1.0 (95% CI, 0.1-1.0, P = .47) for all VTE;
1.0 (95% CI, 1.0-1.0, P = .68) for unprovoked VTE
Adjusted for FVL, prothrombin G20210A variation, hyperhomocysteinemia, and deficiencies in antithrombin, protein C, and protein S
Kearon et al. [47] On anticoagulation, 3 mo after a VTE event One-stage clotting assay >2.59 U/mL (90th percentile of the study population) N/A HR for elevated FVIII (>2.59 U/mL) and recurrent VTE:
0.7 (95% CI, 0.0-4.0)
Not reported Not reported
Rodger et al. [39] On anticoagulation, 5-7 mo after a VTE event One-stage clotting assay >1.55 U/mL for men. >2.0 U/mL for women 1.70 U/mL (mean, no recurrence); 1.83 U/mL (mean, recurrence); P = .005 RR for elevated FVIII (>1.55 U/mL for men; >2.0 U/mL for women) and recurrent VTE: men, RR of 1.6 (95% CI, 1.0-2.5, P < .06, significant in this study);
women, RR of 2.3 (95% CI, 1.3-5.4, P = .005)
RR for elevated FVIII (>1.55 U/mL for men; >2.0 U/mL for women) and recurrent VTE:
RR for men and women statistically not significant (data not reported)
Adjusted for sex, age, weight, height, BMI, abnormal baseline imaging, D-dimer, homocysteine, hemoglobin, prothrombin gene mutation, FVL, ventilation-perfusion scan result, post-thrombotic signs, history or family history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, previous provoked VTE, and oral contraceptive pill or hormone replacement therapy
Mello et al. [40] After discontinuation of anticoagulants One-stage clotting assay 90th percentile 180 mg/dL (no recurrence);
188 mg/dL (recurrence)
Univariable Cox model showed no significant association (data not reported) Not reported
Franco Moreno et al. [48] After discontinuation of anticoagulants Not mentioned Not reported 122 (no recurrence);
134 (recurrence); P < .01
(No unit identified in the paper)
Not reported HR for elevated FVIII and recurrence: 1.01 (95% CI, 1.00-1.02) Adjusted for sex, age, obesity, varicose veins, abnormal D-dimer, prothrombin mutation, and FVL
Kooiman et al. [41] Various time points during follow-up One-stage clotting assay >2.02 U/mL (fifth quintile of the cohort) 1.6 U/mL (median, no recurrence);
1.8 U/mL (median, recurrence)
OR for elevated FVIII (>2.02 U/mL) and VTE recurrence: 5.4 (95% CI, 1.9-15.1) OR for elevated FVIII (>2.02 U/mL) and VTE recurrence: 4.2 (95% CI, 1.4-12.2) Adjusted for sex, age, and malignancy
Nagler et al. [42] One mo after discontinuation of anticoagulants One-stage clotting assay >213% (80th percentile of the cohort) N/A HR for FVIII> 213% and VTE recurrence: 2.3 (95% CI, 1.0-3.2) HR for FVIII >213% and VTE recurrence: 2.2 (95% CI, 1.2-4.0) Adjusted for anticoagulation, age, surgery, pregnancy, contraceptive use at the time of thrombosis, travel, inflammation, sex, previous VTE, and D-dimer
Timp et al. [44] After discontinuation of anticoagulants ELISA Continuous variables used N/A Not reported HR for every unit increase of ln FVIII: 1.6 (95% CI, 0.9-2.9) for model A and 2.3 (95% CI, 1.5-3.3) for model B
Model A adjusted for sex, site of VTE, surgery, pregnancy/puerperium, hormone use, plaster cast, immobility in bed, history of cardiovascular disease, D-dimer, von Willebrand factor, C-reactive protein, factor V, factor X, fibrinogen, and activated protein C ratio
Model B adjusted for sex, site of VTE, surgery, pregnancy/puerperium, hormone use, plaster cast, immobility in bed, history of cardiovascular disease, FVL mutation, D-dimer, and C-reactive protein
Otero et al. [45] After discontinuation of anticoagulants One-stage clotting assay Continuous variables used N/A Significant increase in FVIII levels with VTE recurrence, compared to no recurrence (P = .01) N/A N/A
FIX
Kyrle et al. [33] After discontinuation of anticoagulants One-stage clotting assay >138 U/dL (75th percentile of the cohort) N/A RR for FIX >138 U/dL and VTE recurrence:
1.8 (95% CI, 1.2-2.7)
RR for FIX >138 U/dL and VTE recurrence: 1.3 (95% CI, 0.8-2.0) Adjusted for age, the presence or absence of a first symptomatic pulmonary embolism, factor V Leiden, factor II G20210A, FIX levels >138 U/dL, and duration of anticoagulation
Christiansen et al. [35] After discontinuation of anticoagulants ELISA 129 U/dL 18% of all patients had a FIX >129 U/dL HR for FIX >129 U/dL and VTE recurrence:
0.9 (95% CI, 0.5-1.7)
HR for FIX >129 U/dL and VTE recurrence:
1.2 (95% CI, 0.6-2.1)
Adjusted for age, sex, and anticoagulation
Legnani et al. [37] After discontinuation of anticoagulants Chromogenic assay >1.51 U/mL (75th percentile of the cohort) N/A RR for FIX >1.51 U/dL and VTE recurrence: 3.1 (95% CI, 1.3-7.3) Not reported
Mello et al. [40] After discontinuation of anticoagulants One-stage clotting assay 90th percentile 127 mg/dL (no recurrence);
133 mg/dL (recurrence)
Univariable Cox model showed no significant association (data not reported) Not reported
FXI
Christiansen et al. [35] After discontinuation of anticoagulants Monoclonal antifactor
XI capture antibody and polyclonal antifactor XI tagging antibody
121 U/dL 19% of all patients had a FXI >121 U/dL HR for FXI >121 U/dL and VTE recurrence: 0.6 (95% CI, 0.3-1.1) HR for FXI >121 U/dL and VTE recurrence: 0.6 (95% CI, 0.3-1.1) Adjusted for age, sex, and anticoagulation
Legnani et al. [37] After discontinuation of anticoagulants Chromogenic assay >1.4 U/mL (75th percentile of the cohort) N/A RR for FXI >1.4 U/dL and VTE recurrence: 2.14 (95% CI, 1.01-4.58) Not reported
Kearon et al. [47] On anticoagulation, 3 mo after a VTE event One-stage clotting assay 1.93 U/mL (90th percentile of the study population) N/A HR for elevated FXI (>1.93 U/mL) and recurrent VTE: 0.6 (95% CI, 0.0-3.5) Not reported Not reported
Mello et al. [40] After discontinuation of anticoagulants One-stage clotting assay 90th percentile 126 mg/dL (no recurrence);
124 mg/dL (recurrence)
Univariable Cox model showed no significant association (data not reported) Not reported
Kyrle et al. [43] After discontinuation of anticoagulants One-stage clotting assay >115 U/dL (third tertile of the cohort) N/A N/A HR for recurrence (FXI >115 U/dL was the comparator):
0.7 (95% CI, 0.5-0.99) for FXI <96 U/dL;
1.1 (95% CI, 0.8-1.4) for FXI 96-115 U/dL;
adjusted HR of 0.9 (95% CI, 0.9-0.99) for every 10 U/dL decrease in FXI
Adjusted for age and sex
Pediatric
Goldenberg et al. [32] At the time of the first VTE and after discontinuation of anticoagulation One-stage clotting assay 150 U/dL Time of acute event: median level of FVIII:
poor-outcome group 180 U/dLa;
good-outcome group 117 U/dL (P < .001);
control group 108 U/dL (P < .001).
Timepoint after 3-6 mo: median level of FVIII:
poor-outcome group 168 U/dLa;
control group 108 U/dL (P < .001).
No statistical analysis performed Not reported

FVIII, factor VIII; FVL, factor V Leiden; FIX, factor IX; FXI, factor XI; HR, hazard ratio; OR, odds ratio; RR, relative risk; VTE, venous thromboembolic event

a

Results are for composite outcomes and not only for recurrence.

The measures of association (odds ratio [OR], risk ratio [RR], and hazard ratio [HR] with their 95% CI), where available, are displayed in 4 subgroups in Figure 2, according to the analytical approach of the respective studies for each factor in the stratified analysis, adjusted analysis, or no stratification or adjustment. Due to the heterogeneity of the studies, a meta-analysis was deemed inappropriate, and hence, data were synthesized narratively.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Forest plots of measures of association in uni- and multivariable analysis (OR, RR, and HR with their 95% CI) between VTE recurrence and FVIII, IX, and XI. Note: No overall pooled estimate is shown due to different measures of association (OR, RR, and HR). This forest plot is not intended for comparison but to show the heterogeneity of studies. FVIII, factor VIII; FIX, factor IX; FXI, factor XI; HR, hazard ratio; OR, odds ratio; RR, risk ratio; VTE, venous thromboembolic event. ∗ Results not reported; † HR for every unit increase of ln FVIII; ‡ Adjusted HR for every 10 U/dL decrease of FXI; § Unadjusted measure of association (blue); ¶ Adjusted measure of association (red). Source: [56].

The risk of bias assessment with the QUIPS tool is shown in a traffic plot in Figure 3. In general, most studies adequately defined and measured the prognostic factors and outcome, limiting potential misclassification bias. Attrition contributed to a risk of bias in half of the included studies due to mostly not accounting for the loss to follow-up. In most studies, potential confounders were considered for the statistical analysis. However, most studies had limited descriptions of model development and variable selection in statistical analysis and reporting. Major concerns for the risk of bias are addressed below.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Traffic plot displaying risk of bias assessment using the quality in prognosis studies (QUIPS) tool. Source: [27]

3.1. Studies in adult patients investigating FVIII

The following studies (3 case-control [30,36,41] and 4 prospective cohort studies [33,34,42,48]) reported that FVIII was an independent risk factor for VTE recurrence.

Kraaijenhagen et al. [30] identified FVIII as a risk factor for recurrent VTE in their case-control study, which included 185 adults. Most first events were unprovoked, but no specific proportion was documented. Sixty (32%) participants had recurrent VTE. FVIII was dichotomized at 175 U/dL, which was the 90th percentile of the control population. Univariable analysis showed that for every 10 U/dL increase of FVIII, the risk of recurrent VTE increased by 24% (95% CI, 11%-38%). Compared to controls, the unadjusted OR for a recurrent VTE was 45 (95% CI, 6-370) for FVIII >200 U/dL. The authors commented that the OR did not change after multivariable adjustment, but the data were not reported. The covariates of the model are shown in Table 2.

Kyrle et al. [33] studied the risk of recurrence in a prospective cohort that included 826 patients with unprovoked VTE. Twelve percent (102/826) of participants had a VTE recurrence. FVIII was studied as a binary variable using 234 U/dL as the cut-off (90th percentile of cohort population). FVIII >234 U/dL was associated with a RR of 3.4 (95% CI, 2.1-5.6) for recurrent VTE in univariable analysis and a RR of 2.9 (95% CI, 1.6-5.1) in multivariable analysis (Figure 2). The covariates of the model are shown in Table 2.

Legnani et al. [34] showed that elevated FVIII was associated with an increased risk of recurrent VTE in a prospective cohort of 564 adults. After a first provoked or unprovoked VTE, the frequency of recurrent VTE was 9% (53/564). The cut-off value for chromogenic FVIII used in this study was the 90th percentile of the cohort (2.98 U/mL). The RR for VTE recurrence of provoked first VTE in the univariable analysis was 3.4 (95% CI, 0.5-24) and 2.6 (95% CI, 0.3-19.9) in the multivariable analysis for FVIII >90th percentile. In contrast, the RR for VTE recurrence of the first unprovoked VTE in the univariable analysis was 4.4 (95% CI, 1.5-13.2) and 5.4 (95% CI, 1.8-16.8) in multivariable analysis for elevated FVIII (Figure 2). The covariates of the model are shown in Table 2.

Tirado et al. [36] investigated FVIII as a risk factor for VTE recurrence in their case-control study that included 250 patients with a first provoked unproved VTE. Sixty-five (26%) patients experienced recurrent VTE. The unadjusted OR for recurrent VTE was 2.3 (95% CI, 1.3-4.1) for FVIII levels higher than 232% (90th percentile of cohort) compared to lower FVIII levels, and in multivariable analysis, the OR was 2.6 (95% CI, 1.4-4.8, Figure 2). The covariates of the model are shown in Table 2.

Franco Moreno et al. [48] developed a risk score for VTE recurrence, including FVIII, in a prospective cohort study. A total of 398 patients with a primary unprovoked VTE were included, of which 16% (65/398) had a VTE recurrence. However, the median FVIII level in the recurrent VTE group was reportedly higher than in the nonrecurrent VTE group (134 vs 122, P < .01), but no units were available. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, the adjusted HR for predicting recurrent VTE was 1.01 (95% CI, 1.00-1.02, P = .03, Figure 2) for elevated FVIII. The covariates of the model are shown in Table 2. Of note, no measurement method for FVIII is described in this study, and the cut-off for elevated FVIII used to measure HR was not defined. Attrition is not mentioned in this study.

Kooiman et al. [41] identified FVIII as a risk factor in recurrent VTE in their retrospective case-control study, including 349 patients with provoked and unprovoked PE. Of these patients, 72 (21%) had a previous VTE; therefore, their PE was a recurrent event (cases). For the remaining patients (277/349, 79%), PE was their index event (controls). For FVIII >2.02 U/mL (fifth quintile of cohort), the univariable OR for VTE recurrence was 5.4 (95% CI, 1.9-15.1) compared to the lowest quintile; the adjusted OR was 4.2 (95% CI, 1.4-12.2, Figure 2). The covariates of the model are shown in Table 2.

Nagler et al. [42] studied risk factors of VTE recurrence in a prospective cohort study that included 479 patients with both provoked and unprovoked VTE. Twenty-one percent (101/479) of patients had a VTE recurrence. FVIII was studied as a binary variable at a cut-off of 213% (80th percentile of cohort). In univariable analysis, the HR for FVIII >213% and VTE recurrence was 2.3 (95% CI, 1.0-3.2), and in multivariable analysis, the HR was 2.2 (95% CI, 1.2-4.0, Figure 2). The covariates of the model are shown in Table 2.

While FVIII was reported as an independent risk factor for VTE recurrence in the studies above, the following studies (one case-control [31] and 3 prospective cohort studies [39,44,45]) did not find evidence of FVIII to be a risk factor for recurrent thrombosis in multivariable analysis.

Meinardi et al. [31] investigated the risk of recurrent VTE in Factor V Leiden carriers in a case-control study. A total of 329 patients were included with both provoked and unprovoked primary VT, of which 115 patients (35%) had a recurrent VTE. Fifty-five percent of patients with recurrent VTE had an elevated FVIII >150%, whereas 40% had an elevated FVIII with no recurrent VTE. The adjusted OR for VTE recurrence was 1.8 (95% CI, 0.7-4.9, Figure 2) for FVIII levels >122% (first quartile of the sample). The covariates of the model are shown in Table 2.

Rodger et al. [39] studied predictors of VTE recurrence in a prospective cohort study. This study included 646 patients with primary unprovoked VTE, and 14% (91/646) of patients had a recurrence. The annual risk of recurrent VTE was 9.3% (95% CI, 7.7%-11.3%). The mean FVIII level was 1.83 U/mL for patients with recurrent VTE and 1.70 U/mL for patients without recurrent VTE (P = .005). In univariable analysis, men with an FVIII level >1.55 U/mL had a RR of 1.6 (95% CI, 1.0-2.5, P < .1) for VTE recurrence, while women with an FVIII level >2.0 U/mL had a RR 2.3 (95% CI, 1.3-5.4), P = .005. However, in multivariable analysis, FVIII was not an independent predictor for VTE recurrence in either sex (data not reported). The covariates of the model are shown in Table 2.

Timp et al. [44] developed and validated a model to predict recurrent venous thrombosis after a first VTE in a prospective cohort study. In the population cohort for model development, 3750 patients were included with a first provoked and unprovoked VTE; 14% (507) of patients had a recurrent event. The predictor was log-transformed. For every one unit increase of the natural logarithm of FVIII, the adjusted HR for recurrence was 1.6 (95% CI, 0.9-2.9, Figure 2) for a model that included 15 predictors, and 2.3 (95% CI, 1.5-3.3, Figure 2) for a model that had 12 predictors. The covariates of the model are shown in Table 2. Importantly, only 56% of the patients had blood samples available, and though missing data was imputed for this study, there were no details reported on imputation techniques.

Otero et al. [45] investigated risk factors of VTE recurrence in cancer-associated thrombosis in a prospective cohort study. One hundred sixty-six patients were enrolled for this study with a first cancer-associated thrombotic event; 16 (10%) patients had a recurrent thrombotic event. FVIII was significantly increased in the VTE recurrence group compared to the nonrecurrence group (P = .01; no FVIII levels mentioned). No multivariable analysis was conducted.

Lastly, the following 3 prospective cohort studies [35,38,40] and 2 randomized controlled trials [46,47] did not find evidence of FVIII as a risk factor for VTE recurrence in either univariable or multivariable analysis.

Christiansen et al. [35] studied prothrombotic laboratory abnormalities (including FVIII, IX, and XI) in recurrent VTE in a prospective cohort study. For this study, 474 patients were included with a first provoked or unprovoked VTE; VTE recurred in 90/474 (19%) patients. The FVIII cut-off for the statistical analysis was 166 U/dL. The authors reported no increased risk of recurrence for elevated FVIII where the unadjusted HR was 1.1 (95% CI, 0.7-1.8), and the adjusted HR was 1.3 (95% CI, 0.8-2.1, Figure 2). The covariates of the model are shown in Table 2.

Shrivastava et al. [46] studied predictors (D-dimer and FVIII) for VTE recurrence in the study population of a randomized controlled clinical trial. Five hundred-eight patients were included with a first unprovoked VTE; 52 (10%) had a VTE recurrence. FVIII cut-off was 150 U/dL, which was the 75th percentile of the study population. No significant association between elevated FVIII and VTE recurrence was reported in univariable analysis (HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.8-2.7) or multivariable analysis (HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.8-2.7). The covariates of the model are shown in Table 2.

Laczkovics et al. [38] investigated the risk of VTE recurrence in young women in a prospective cohort study. A total of 361 patients with a primary VTE (provoked and unprovoked) were included; 141 (39%) had a recurrent VTE. FVIII was dichotomized at the 95th percentile of healthy individuals (248% FVIII clotting activity). No significant association between recurrence and FVIII was identified in univariable (HR, 1.0; 95% CI, 1.0-1.0) or multivariable analysis (HR, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.1-1.0 all first VTE; and HR, 1.0; 95% CI, 1.0-1.0 unprovoked first VTE, Figure 2). The covariates of the model are shown in Table 2.

Kearon et al. [47] investigated thrombophilic defects and their role in predicting VTE recurrence for patients during warfarin therapy. Six hundred sixty-one patients were included with a first unprovoked VTE; 14 (2%) experienced a recurrent VTE. The cut-off for elevated FVIII was 2.59 U/mL (90th percentile of the study population). The association between VTE recurrence and elevated FVIII was not significant in univariable analysis (HR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.0-4.0). Multivariable analysis was not performed.

Mello et al. [40] studied risk factors (including FVIII, FIX, and FXI) of recurrent VTE in a prospective cohort study. A total of 343 patients with a first provoked or unprovoked VTE were included; 20% (69/343) had a recurrent VTE. The 90th percentile of the cohort was used as a cut-off for FVIII. The mean FVIII level was 180 mg/dL in the nonrecurrence group and 188 mg/dL in the recurrence group; however, this difference was not statistically significant. Univariable analysis data was not reported, and the coagulation factors were not further studied as risk factors for VTE recurrence.

3.2. Studies in adult patients investigating FIX

The following 4 prospective cohort studies did not identify FIX as an independent risk factor for VTE recurrence [33,35,37,40].

Kyrle et al. [33] also investigated the predictive role of FIX for VTE recurrence; FIX was dichotomized at 138 U/dL (corresponding to the 75th percentile of the patient population). In univariable analysis, a high FIX had a RR of 1.8 (95% CI, 1.2-2.7) for recurrent VTE, and in multivariable analysis, the RR was 1.3 (95% CI, 0.8-2.0, Figure 2). The covariates of the model are shown in Table 2.

Christiansen et al. [35] further investigated FIX levels and the risk of VTE recurrence and found no increased risk of recurrence with elevated FIX (>129 U/dL). The unadjusted HR was 0.9 (95% CI, 0.5-1.7), and the adjusted HR was 1.2 (95% CI, 0.6-2.1, Figure 2). The covariates of the model are shown in Table 2.

Legnani et al. [37] investigated laboratory factors and VTE recurrence in a prospective cohort study, which included 628 patients with unprovoked VTE. Eleven percent (71/628) of patients experienced recurrent VTE. FIX was dichotomized at 1.51 U/dL (75th percentile of the cohort). In univariable analysis, the RR for FIX >1.51 U/dL and VTE recurrence was 3.06 (95% CI, 1.3-7.3). Results for the multivariable analysis were not reported.

Mello et al. [40] also studied the association between FIX dichotomized at the 90th percentile and VTE recurrence. The mean FIX level was 127 mg/dL in the nonrecurrence group and 133 mg/dL in the recurrence group; however, this difference was not statistically significant. Univariable analysis data was not reported, and the coagulation factors were not further studied as risk factors for VTE recurrence.

3.3. Studies in adult patients investigating FXI

Only one prospective cohort study identified FXI as an independent risk factor for VTE recurrence [43], while 3 other prospective cohort studies [35,37,40] and one interventional study [47] did not.

Kyrle et al. [43] concluded that patients with a lower FXI have a decreased risk for recurrent VTE in a prospective cohort study. This study included 815 patients with a first unprovoked VTE; 265 (31%) patients had a recurrence. The adjusted HR for VTE recurrence was 0.9 (95% CI, 0.9-0.99, P = .02, Figure 2) for every 10 U/dL decrease in FXI. FXI levels over 100 IU/dL increased the risk for recurrent VTE linearly. When divided into tertiles, the adjusted HR for recurrence was 0.7 (95% CI, 0.5-0.99, P = .05) for FXI <96 U/dL and 1.1 (95% CI, 0.8-1.4) for FXI 96–115 U/dL compared to FXI >115 U/dL. The covariates of the model are shown in Table 2.

In contrast, Christiansen et al. [35] found no increased risk of recurrence with elevated FXI, dichotomized at a cut-off of 121 U/dL. Both the unadjusted and adjusted HR was 0.6 (95% CI, 0.3-1.1, Figure 2). The covariates of the model are shown in Table 2.

Legnani et al. [37] dichotomized FXI at 1.4 U/dL (75th percentile of cohort). In univariable analysis, the RR for FXI >1.4 U/dL and VTE recurrence was 2.14 (95% CI, 1.01-4.58); no results for the multivariable analysis were reported. Kearon et al. [47] also studied FXI as a predictor for VTE recurrence. The selected cut-off was 1.93 U/mL (90th percentile of the study population). In univariable analysis, FXI was not a predictor for VTE recurrence (HR 0.6; 95% CI, 0.0-3.5); multivariable analysis was not performed.

Lastly, Mello et al. [40] studied the predictive role of FXI dichotomized at the 90th percentile. The mean FXI level was 126 mg/dL in the nonrecurrence group and 124 mg/dL in the recurrence group; however, this difference was not statistically significant. Univariable analysis data were not reported, and the coagulation factors were not further studied as risk factors for VTE recurrence.

3.4. Studies in pediatric patients

Only one prospective cohort study reported on FVIII and VTE recurrence in pediatric patients [32]; no studies were identified that reported on FIX or FXI and VTE recurrence in children.

Goldenberg et al. [32] studied the association between D-dimer and/or FVIII in patients with a first provoked or unprovoked VTE and a composite outcome that included post-thrombotic syndrome, persistent thrombus, and recurrent VTE in a prospective cohort study. In total, VTE recurred in 6/82 (7%) patients, including children. It was found that elevated FVIII and/or elevated D-dimer at baseline and/or follow-up predicted the composite outcome.

4. Discussion

4.1. General interpretation of results

This systematic review identified 19 studies that reported on FVIII, IX, or XI and VTE recurrence in both adults (18 studies) and children (1 study). The results of these studies are conflicting in determining the predictive role of FVIII and FXI for VTE recurrence. FVIII was identified as an independent risk factor for VTE recurrence in 7 studies [30,33,34,36,41,42,48], while the remaining 9 studies did not identify FVIII as an independent risk factor [31,35,[38], [39], [40],[44], [45], [46], [47]]. Similarly, FXI was reported as an independent predictor in 1 study [43], and 4 studies [35,37,40,47] did not find evidence of FXI as an independent risk factor. FIX was not identified as an independent risk factor in any of the 4 included studies [33,35,37,40]. In sum, there is not enough evidence in the existing literature indicating that FVIII, FIX, or FXI are useful risk factors for VTE recurrence, and hence, they may have only limited value for predicting this outcome in adults [51].

In pediatric patients, data is even scarcer. FVIII has only been studied as a composite exposure to predict a composite outcome [32]. FIX and FXI have not been studied in pediatric patients.

Noticeably, the study populations in this review were very heterogeneous in multiple aspects. Firstly, some studies included only unprovoked VTE, whereas provoked and unprovoked VTE were included in other studies. This is relevant, given the difference in risk of recurrent VTE in these 2 distinct populations, as described in the Background section. The studies were categorized into 4 subgroups according to the analytical approach: 1) stratified analysis, unprovoked VTE group, 2) stratified analysis, provoked VTE group, 3) adjusted analysis for provoked in unprovoked/provoked VTE, and 4) provoked/unprovoked with no stratification/adjustment (Figure 2). The measures of association remained conflicting throughout the subgroups, and due to the few studies in each subgroup, further interpretation is hampered. There is no evidence that FVIII, IX, or XI are more prominent risk factors in either provoked or unprovoked primary VTE for VTE recurrence (Figure 2). Importantly, definitions of provoked VTE differed among studies (Table 1). In 2016, the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis published guidelines to classify provoked versus unprovoked primary VTE in an attempt to standardize the description of populations for future studies [1]. If studies adhere to these guidelines, interstudy comparison results will be more accessible and translatable to specific populations, thus enhancing external validity.

Secondly, FVIII, IX, and XI were not all measured with the same assays, and different cut-offs were used to dichotomize the variable for analysis. The International Council for Standardization in Haematology released the laboratory analysis and reporting guidelines in 2020 [52]. According to the guidelines, the aPTT-based one-stage clotting assay is the most common method for measuring FVIII, FIX, and FIX, and results should be reported in U/ml or U/dL. If no standardized calibrator is available for aPTT assays, normal pooled plasma is used, and results are reported in percentage (%). However, it is not valid to assume that pooled normal plasma contains 100 U/dL of FVIII; thus, laboratory results reported in U/ml or U/dL are not necessarily comparable to those reported in % levels. Chromogenic methods are suitable for FVIII and FIX measurements [53]. ELISA tests can evaluate factor antigens, but it has been shown that ELISA FVIII levels correlate the least to other FVIII measuring methods [54].

Furthermore, factor levels were dichotomized using different cut-offs in every study, and results can thus not be compared. Moreover, some studies analyzed the data using factor levels as continuous variables. Additionally, the time point of laboratory measurements varied between studies (Table 2). The timing of laboratory marker measurement plays a role, as the coagulation factor levels are influenced in multiple scenarios. During an acute event, FVIII as an acute phase protein can be elevated substantially from the baseline factor level due to inflammation; thus, FVIII laboratory testing should be performed at a later time point, eg, 3 months after the acute event [21]. It has been shown that elevated baseline FVIII levels are constant over the years; thus, repeat testing is not necessarily required [55]. Factor levels can also be altered during anticoagulant administration. For example, heparins may interfere with FVIII measurements [54] or FIX, as a vitamin K-dependent factor will be lower during warfarin therapy [56]. Additionally, different measures of association (OR, RR, HR) were reported, which cannot be directly compared across all studies [50]. Lastly, the variables used in each study for adjusted measures of association were vastly different between studies (Table 2), meaning that adjusted estimates cannot be directly compared between studies.

The risk of bias for most studies was low to moderate. Most studies scored a moderate risk of bias in statistical analysis and reporting (Figure 3) because they did not detail their model-building strategy. As a positive example, Timp et al. [44] described the model building distinctly and referred to the redundancy of confounders in prediction modeling.

The literature search was comprehensive and systematically approached, and relevant studies were identified. Ideally, the studies would have been combined to conduct a meta-analysis and determine the role of FVIII, FIX, and FXI in recurrent VTE across all studies. Due to the significant heterogeneity in the data regarding patient population, exposure, outcome, and study results, the data were synthesized narratively, which gives an overview of study findings related to this topic [50]. To display the variability of findings, all measures of association (OR, RR, and HR with their 95% CI) are displayed in Figure 2 for the studies that reported these. It is important to note that the purpose of the forest plot in this review is only to show heterogeneity; it cannot be used to compare OR, RR, and HR to each other; therefore, no overall pooled estimate was calculated [50]. When visualizing the measures of association (OR, HR, and RR) for elevated FVIII and VTE recurrence, there seems to be a tendency toward an increased risk of VTE recurrence. However, the data is conflicting and very heterogeneous, as outlined above; thus, the figure should be interpreted with caution.

Patients who have experienced a first VTE are at risk for recurrent thrombosis, regardless of etiology (provoked vs unprovoked) [1,57]. Data remain limited on identifying patients at risk of recurrent VTE and who would benefit from extended-phase anticoagulation even with the risk of bleeding. Based on the systematic review outlined in this study, the existing literature suggests that FVIII, FIX, and FXI are not strong single predictors of VTE recurrence. An individual patient data meta-analysis could be conducted to concretely analyze the published data on FVIII, FIX, FXI, and VTE recurrence. Though resource intensive, such a study would allow the modeling of more complex relationships between outcomes and predictors, while additional predictors could be standardized across all studies [58]. However, it has to be mentioned that variability in measurements is likely to remain in the population (different inclusion and exclusion criteria, provoked vs unprovoked primary VTE), outcome (definition of VTE recurrence), and prognostic factor (FVIII, FIX, and FXI) data, and missing data might be a challenge [59]. If the coagulation factors are not strong single predictors, they could be incorporated into more complex prediction models following current guidelines [60,61]. Examples of such prediction models, including factor VIII, have been previously published [44,62]. Ultimately, prospectively planned meta-analysis studies may overcome many of these challenges by harmonizing study populations, outcome assessments, and measurements of prognostic factors for individual site studies prior to study conduction [63,64]. These efforts could give more precise answers to prognostic factors in VTE recurrence.

Regarding pediatric studies, the challenge in this population is the relative rarity of both VTE and VTE recurrence, making these studies difficult to conduct. It is important to note that adult and pediatric VTE and VTE recurrence are different entities, and adult data does not necessarily apply to pediatrics. Observational studies will be important to establish the role of FVIII, IX, and XI in predicting pediatric VTE recurrence, alongside other possible factors such as D-dimers.

Conclusion

The currently available data on FVIII, IX or XI, and VTE recurrence are limited; it is contradictory for both FVIII and FXI, whereas no evidence exists that FIX levels predict the event. There is no strong evidence that coagulation factor data can be used to identify individuals at risk of recurrent VTE or to inform treatment decisions.

Acknowledgments

Funding

A.B. was supported by the Rudolf-Marx-Research-Grant of the German Society for Thrombosis and Haemostasis Research e.V. (GTH) and by the Clinical Medicine Plus Scholarship of the Prof. Dr. Max Cloetta Foundation.

Author contributions

A.B. was responsible for study design and conduction, analysis, interpretation of the data, and manuscript writing. L.A. contributed to the study concept, design and conduction, analysis, interpretation of data, critical review, and final approval of the manuscript. E.U. was responsible for the study conduction, critical review, and final approval of the manuscript.

Relationship Disclosure

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Lisbeth Eischer for providing insights regarding the cohort studies, including the Austrian study on recurrent venous thromboembolism (AUREC) patient cohort.

Footnotes

Funding information A.B. was supported by the Rudolf-Marx-Research-Grant of the German Society for Thrombosis and Haemostasis Research e.V. (GTH) and by the Clinical Medicine Plus Scholarship of the Prof. Dr. Max Cloetta Foundation.

Handling Editor: P Angchaisuksiri

New systematic review: No evidence that FVIII, IX, and XI are useful risk factors for VTE recurrence in children & adults. To overcome data heterogeneity: Is it time for prospective meta-analyses? #VTE #recurrence #riskfactors #predictors

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpth.2023.100064

Supporting Information

Supplementary Methods
mmc1.docx (30.2KB, docx)

References

  • 1.Kearon C., Ageno W., Cannegieter S.C., Cosmi B., Geersing G.J., Kyrle P.A., et al. Categorization of patients as having provoked or unprovoked venous thromboembolism: guidance from the SSC of ISTH. J Thromb Haemost. 2016;14:1480–1483. doi: 10.1111/jth.13336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Áinle F.N., Kevane B. Which patients are at high risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism)? Blood Adv. 2020;4:5595–5606. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Stevens S.M., Woller S.C., Baumann Kreuziger L.B., Bounameaux H., Doerschug K., Geersing G.J., et al. Executive summary: antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: second update of the CHEST guideline and expert panel report. Chest. 2021;160:2247–2259. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.07.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Prandoni P., Noventa F., Ghirarduzzi A., Pengo V., Bernardi E., Pesavento R., et al. The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism after discontinuing anticoagulation in patients with acute proximal deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. A prospective cohort study in 1,626 patients. Haematologica. 2007;92:199–205. doi: 10.3324/haematol.10516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Khan F., Rahman A., Carrier M., Kearon C., Weitz J.I., Schulman S., et al. Long term risk of symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism after discontinuation of anticoagulant treatment for first unprovoked venous thromboembolism event: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2019;366:l4363. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Khan F., Tritschler T., Kimpton M., Wells P.S., Kearon C., Weitz J.I., et al. Long-term risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism among patients receiving extended oral anticoagulant therapy for first unprovoked venous thromboembolism: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost. 2021;19:2801–2813. doi: 10.1111/jth.15491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Middeldorp S., Prins M.H., Hutten B.A. Duration of treatment with vitamin K antagonists in symptomatic venous thromboembolism. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014:CD001367. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001367.pub3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kearon C., Akl E.A., Ornelas J., Blaivas A., Jimenez D., Bounameaux H., et al. Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: CHEST guideline and expert panel report. Chest. 2016;149:315–352. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2015.11.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chong L.Y., Fenu E., Stansby G., Hodgkinson S., Guideline Development Group Management of venous thromboembolic diseases and the role of thrombophilia testing: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ. 2012;344:e3979. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e3979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ortel T.L., Neumann I., Ageno W., Beyth R., Clark N.P., Cuker A., et al. American Society of Hematology 2020 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Blood Adv. 2020;4:4693–4738. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Raffini L., Huang Y.S., Witmer C., Feudtner C. Dramatic increase in venous thromboembolism in children’s hospitals in the United States from 2001 to 2007. Pediatrics. 2009;124:1001–1008. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-0768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jaffray J., Mahajerin A., Young G., Goldenberg N., Ji L., Sposto R., et al. A multi-institutional registry of pediatric hospital-acquired thrombosis cases: the Children’s Hospital-Acquired Thrombosis (CHAT) project. Thromb Res. 2018;161:67–72. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2017.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Andrew M., Vegh P., Johnston M., Bowker J., Ofosu F., Mitchell L. Maturation of the hemostatic system during childhood. Blood. 1992;80:1998–2005. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Male C., Lensing A.W.A., Palumbo J.S., Kumar R., Nurmeev I., Hege K., et al. Rivaroxaban compared with standard anticoagulants for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in children: a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2020;7:e18–e27. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30219-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Halton J., Brandão L.R., Luciani M., Bomgaars L., Chalmers E., Mitchell L.G., et al. Dabigatran etexilate for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in children (DIVERSITY): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 2b/3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Haematol. 2021;8:e22–e33. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(20)30368-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Avila M.L., Duan L., Cipolla A., Kim A., Kahr W.H., Williams S., Brandão L.R. Postthrombotic syndrome following upper extremity deep vein thrombosis in children. Blood. 2014;124:1166–1173. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-04-570531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Avila M.L., Pullenayegum E., Williams S., Yue N., Krol P., Brandão L.R. Postthrombotic syndrome and other outcomes of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis in children. Blood. 2016;128:1862–1869. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-03-704585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Limperger V., Kenet G., Goldenberg N.A., Heller C., Holzhauer S., Junker R., et al. Impact of high-risk thrombophilia status on recurrence among children with a first non-central-venous-catheter-associated VTE: an observational multicentre cohort study. Br J Haematol. 2016;175:133–140. doi: 10.1111/bjh.14192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Brandão L.R., Albisetti M., Halton J., Bomgaars L., Chalmers E., Mitchell L.G., et al. Safety of dabigatran etexilate for the secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism in children. Blood. 2020;135:491–504. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019000998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zia A., Russell J., Sarode R., Veeram S.R., Josephs S., Malone K., Zhang S., Journeycake J. Markers of coagulation activation, inflammation and fibrinolysis as predictors of poor outcomes after pediatric venous thromboembolism: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Thromb Res. 2017;160:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2017.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jenkins P.V., Rawley O., Smith O.P., O’Donnell J.S. Elevated factor VIII levels and risk of venous thrombosis. Br J Haematol. 2012;157:653–663. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2012.09134.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Meijers J.C.M., Tekelenburg W.L.H., Bouma B.N., Bertina R.M., Rosendaal F.R. High levels of coagulation factor XI as a risk factor for venous thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:696–701. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200003093421004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.van Hylckama Vlieg A., van der Linden I.K., Bertina R.M., Rosendaal F.R. High levels of factor IX increase the risk of venous thrombosis. Blood. 2000;95:3678–3682. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cushman M., O’Meara E.S., Folsom A.R., Heckbert S.R. Coagulation factors IX through XIII and the risk of future venous thrombosis: the longitudinal investigation of thromboembolism etiology. Blood. 2009;114:2878–2883. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-05-219915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bertina R.M. Elevated clotting factor levels and venous thrombosis. Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb. 2003;33:395–400. doi: 10.1159/000083835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hayden J.A., van der Windt D.A., Cartwright J.L., Côté P., Bombardier C. Assessing bias in studies of prognostic factors. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158:280–286. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-4-201302190-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.McGuinness L.A., Higgins J.P.T. Risk-of-bias VISualization (robvis): an R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk-of-bias assessments. Res Synth Methods. 2021;12:55–61. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.The EndNote Team . Clarivate; Philadelphia: 2013. EndNote, v X9 64 bit. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Covidence – Better Systematic Review Management. https://www.covidence.org/ 2022.
  • 30.Kraaijenhagen R.A., in’t Anker P.S., Koopman M.M., Reitsma P.H., Prins M.H., van den Ende A., Büller H.R. High plasma concentration of factor VIIIc is a major risk factor for venous thromboembolism. Thromb Haemost. 2000;83:5–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Meinardi J.R., Middeldorp S., De Kam P.J., Koopman M.M.W., Van Pampus E.C.M., Hamulyák K., et al. The incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism in carriers of factor V Leiden is related to concomitant thrombophilic disorders. Br J Haematol. 2002;116:625–631. doi: 10.1046/j.0007-1048.2001.03303.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Goldenberg N.A., Knapp-Clevenger R., Manco-Johnson M.J., Mountain States Regional Thrombophilia Group Elevated plasma factor VIII and D-dimer levels as predictors of poor outcomes of thrombosis in children. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1081–1088. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kyrle P.A., Minar E., Bialonczyk C., Hirschl M., Weltermann A., Eichinger S. The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism in men and women. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2558–2563. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Cristina L., Benilde C., Michela C., Mirella F., Giuliana G., Gualtiero P. High plasma levels of factor VIII and risk of recurrence of venous thromboembolism. Br J Haematol. 2004;124:504–510. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2003.04795.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Christiansen S.C., Cannegieter S.C., Koster T., Vandenbroucke J.P., Rosendaal F.R. Thrombophilia, clinical factors, and recurrent venous thrombotic events. J Am Med Assoc. 2005;293:2352–2361. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.19.2352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Tirado I., Mateo J., Soria J.M., Oliver A., Martínez-Sánchez E., Vallvé C., et al. The ABO blood group genotype and factor VIII levels as independent risk factors for venous thromboembolism. Thromb Haemost. 2005;93:468–474. doi: 10.1160/TH04-04-0251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Legnani C., Mattarozzi S., Cini M., Cosmi B., Favaretto E., Palareti G. Abnormally short activated partial thromboplastin time values are associated with increased risk of recurrence of venous thromboembolism after oral anticoagulation withdrawal. Br J Haematol. 2006;134:227–232. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2006.06130.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Laczkovics C., Grafenhofer H., Kaider A., Quehenberger P., Simanek R., Mannhalter C., Lechner K., Pabinger I. Risk of recurrence after a first venous thromboembolic event in young women. Haematologica. 2007;92:1201–1207. doi: 10.3324/haematol.10967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Rodger M.A., Kahn S.R., Wells P.S., Anderson D.A., Chagnon I., Le Gal G., et al. Identifying unprovoked thromboembolism patients at low risk for recurrence who can discontinue anticoagulant therapy. CMAJ. 2008;179:417–426. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.080493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mello T.B., Orsi F.L., Montalvao S.A., Ozelo M.C., de Paula E.V., Annichinno-Bizzachi J.M. Long-term prospective study of recurrent venous thromboembolism in a Hispanic population. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2010;21:660–665. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0b013e32833ceaef. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kooiman J., den Exter P.L., Kilicsoy I., Cannegieter S.C., Eikenboom J., Huisman M.V., Klok F.A., Versteeg H.H. Association between micro particle-tissue factor activity, factor VIII activity and recurrent VTE in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2015;40:323–330. doi: 10.1007/s11239-015-1180-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Nagler M., ten Cate H., Prins M.H., ten Cate-Hoek A.J. Risk factors for recurrence in deep vein thrombosis patients following a tailored anticoagulant treatment incorporating residual vein obstruction. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2018;2:299–309. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kyrle P.A., Eischer L., Šinkovec H., Eichinger S. Factor XI and recurrent venous thrombosis: an observational cohort study. J Thromb Haemost. 2019;17:782–786. doi: 10.1111/jth.14415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Timp J.F., Braekkan S.K., Lijfering W.M., van Hylckama Vlieg A., Hansen J.B., Rosendaal F.R., le Cessie S., Cannegieter S.C. Prediction of recurrent venous thrombosis in all patients with a first venous thrombotic event: the Leiden Thrombosis Recurrence Risk Prediction model (L-TRRiP) PLOS Med. 2019;16 doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Otero R., Solier-López A., Sánchez-López V., Oto J., Arellano E., Marín S., et al. Biomarkers of venous thromboembolism recurrence after discontinuation of low molecular weight heparin treatment for cancer-associated thrombosis (HISPALIS-Study) Cancers. 2022;14:2771. doi: 10.3390/cancers14112771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Shrivastava S., Ridker P.M., Glynn R.J., Goldhaber S.Z., Moll S., Bounameaux H., et al. D-dimer, factor VIII coagulant activity, low-intensity warfarin and the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism. J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4:1208–1214. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.01935.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kearon C., Julian J.A., Kovacs M.J., Anderson D.R., Wells P., Mackinnon B., et al. Influence of thrombophilia on risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism while on warfarin: results from a randomized trial. Blood. 2008;112:4432–4436. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-06-163279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Franco Moreno A.I., García Navarro M.J., Ortiz Sánchez J., Martín Díaz R.M., Madroñal Cerezo E., de Ancos Aracil C.L., et al. A risk score for prediction of recurrence in patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism (DAMOVES) Eur J Intern Med. 2016;29:59–64. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2015.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Page M.J., McKenzie J.E., Bossuyt P.M., Boutron I., Hoffmann T.C., Mulrow C.D., et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Riley R.D., Moons K.G.M., Snell K.I.E., Ensor J., Hooft L., Altman D.G., et al. A guide to systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies. BMJ. 2019;364:k4597. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Stampfer M.J., Ridker P.M., Dzau V.J. Risk factor criteria. Circulation. 2004;109(Supplement 1) doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000133446.69171.7d. IV3–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Baker P, Platton S, Gibson C, Gray E, Jennings I, Murphy P, Laffan M, British Society for Haematology et al. Guidelines on the laboratory aspects of assays used in haemostasis and thrombosis. Br J Haematol 2020;191:347–362. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 53.Gardiner C., Coleman R., de Maat M.P.M., Dorgalaleh A., Echenagucia M., Gosselin R.C., Ieko M., Kitchen S. International Council for Standardization in Haematology (ICSH) laboratory guidance for the verification of haemostasis analyser-reagent test systems. Part 2: Specialist tests and calibrated assays. Int J Lab Hematol. 2021;43:907–916. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.13550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Chandler W.L., Ferrell C., Lee J., Tun T., Kha H. Comparison of three methods for measuring factor VIII levels in plasma. Am J Clin Pathol. 2003;120:34–39. doi: 10.1309/C8T8-YNB4-G3W4-5PRF. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Tichelaar V., Mulder A., Kluin-Nelemans H., Meijer K. The acute phase reaction explains only a part of initially elevated factor VIII:C levels: a prospective cohort study in patients with venous thrombosis. Thromb Res. 2012;129:183–186. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2011.09.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Schein J.R., White C.M., Nelson W.W., Kluger J., Mearns E.S., Coleman C.I. Vitamin K antagonist use: evidence of the difficulty of achieving and maintaining target INR range and subsequent consequences. Thromb J. 2016;14:14. doi: 10.1186/s12959-016-0088-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Douketis J., Tosetto A., Marcucci M., Baglin T., Cosmi B., Cushman M., et al. Risk of recurrence after venous thromboembolism in men and women: patient level meta-analysis. BMJ. 2011;342:d813. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Riley R.D., Lambert P.C., Abo-Zaid G. Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting. BMJ. 2010;340:c221. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Abo-Zaid G., Sauerbrei W., Riley R.D. Individual participant data meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies: state of the art? BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:56. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Steyerberg E.W. 2nd ed. Springer; Switzerland: 2019. Clinical prediction models: a practical approach to development, validation, and updating; p. 558. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Harrell FE. Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic and ordinal regression, and survival analysis, http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-19425-7. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015.
  • 62.Nagler M., Van Kuijk S.M.J., Ten Cate H., Prins M.H., Ten Cate-Hoek A.J. Predicting recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with deep-vein thrombosis: development and internal validation of a potential new prediction model (Continu-8) Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8 doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.655226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Turok D.K., Espey E., Edelman A.B., Lotke P.S., Lathrop E.H., Teal S.B., et al. The methodology for developing a prospective meta-analysis in the family planning community. Trials. 2011;12:104. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Seidler A.L., Hunter K.E., Cheyne S., Ghersi D., Berlin J.A., Askie L. A guide to prospective meta-analysis. BMJ. 2019;367:l5342. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Methods
mmc1.docx (30.2KB, docx)

Articles from Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES