Skip to main content
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health logoLink to International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
. 2023 Feb 17;20(4):3594. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043594

Awareness of Common Eye Diseases and Their Risk Factors—A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey among Adults in Poland

Agnieszka Kamińska 1,*, Jarosław Pinkas 2, Iwona Wrześniewska-Wal 2, Janusz Ostrowski 2, Mateusz Jankowski 2
Editor: Stefano Campostrini
PMCID: PMC9959450  PMID: 36834287

Abstract

Public knowledge and awareness of eye diseases may influence individuals’ behaviors toward the use of eye care services and prevention methods. The objective of this study was to assess the awareness of common eye diseases and their risk factors among adults in Poland as well as to identify factors associated with knowledge of eye diseases. This nationwide cross-sectional web-based survey was carried out in December 2022 on a representative sample of 1076 adults in Poland. Most of the respondents had heard of cataracts (83.6%), glaucoma (80.7%), conjunctivitis (74.3%), and hordeolum (73.8%). Awareness of dry eye syndrome was declared by 50% of respondents, and 40% were aware of retinal detachment. Among the respondents, 32.3% had heard of AMD, and 16.4% had heard of diabetic retinopathy. A lack of awareness of glaucoma was declared by 38.1% of respondents, and 54.3% declared a lack of awareness of risk factors for AMD. Gender, age, and the presence of chronic diseases were the most important factors (p < 0.05) associated with awareness of common eye diseases and risk factors for glaucoma and AMD. This study demonstrated a low level of awareness of common eye diseases among adults in Poland. Personalized communication on eye diseases is needed.

Keywords: eye diseases, glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration (AMD), risk factors, prevention, knowledge, awareness, Poland

1. Introduction

More than 2 billion people worldwide have vision impairment [1,2]. Refractive errors and age-related eye diseases are the most common causes of vision impairment [1,2,3]. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that between 2020 and 2030, the global number of people with glaucoma will increase by 1.3 times (from 76 million to 95.4 million) and the global number of people with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) will increase by 1.2 times (from 195.6 million to 243.3 million) [2]. As a result of an aging population, a rise in the number of people with cataracts (especially those aged 70 years and over) has been projected [2]. Moreover, changes in lifestyle and exposure to environmental factors (e.g., air pollution, low humidity, and winds) may also increase the number of people with eye irritation or dry eye symptoms [4,5].

High public knowledge of common eye diseases is important for reducing the global burden of eye diseases [2,6]. Many eye diseases (e.g., glaucoma) can be asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic for a long time [7]. Older people may misinterpret the reduction in vision as part of the normal aging process instead of an eye disease symptom [8]. Low awareness of eye diseases may lead to delays in seeking medical care and prolong the time from the onset of symptoms to diagnosis [2]. Education on common eye diseases may increase the level of public knowledge on eye diseases and change individual behaviors, which may promote early detection and treatment of eye diseases and encourage people at risk to seek regular eye care [9].

Age is the most important factor for numerous eye diseases [2,10]. Genetic predisposition is also a well-described risk factor for age-related eye diseases [11]. However, there are also modifiable risk factors related to lifestyle behaviors [12,13,14]. Tobacco use, nutrition, and occupational exposure are common lifestyle factors associated with eye disorders and diseases [2,12,13,14]. Smokers are at higher risk of AMD, cataracts, uveitis, and optic neuropathies [14,15]. Smoking during pregnancy also increases the risk of strabismus and optic nerve hypoplasia [14]. Obesity increases the risk of cataracts, AMD, and diabetic retinopathy [16]. Vitamin A (beta-carotene) deficiency can cause corneal opacity and macular degeneration [17]. Excessive sunbath (including UV-B exposure), corticosteroid use, and diabetes are well-known factors for cataracts [18]. Scientific data suggest that arterial hypertension [19] and a cholesterol-enriched diet [20,21] may increase the risk for AMD. Diabetic retinopathy is a serious complication of diabetes that can be prevented/delayed with lifestyle changes and proper control of blood glucose levels [22]. Diabetes is also a risk factor for glaucoma [23]. Awareness of risk factors for eye diseases is necessary to implement eye disease prevention at the individual and population levels.

Public knowledge and awareness of common eye diseases (including cataracts, glaucoma, AMD, and dry eye symptoms) were assessed in several cross-sectional studies around the world [24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. However, most of them are focused on local nonrepresentative populations and were carried out over 5 years ago [24,25,26,27,28]. Most of the studies on public awareness of common eye diseases were carried out in low- or middle-income countries in Asia, and there is a gap in up-to-date nationwide data on awareness of common eye diseases in Europe [24,27,28]. Data on awareness of eye diseases (especially age-related ones) and their risk factors may be used by policymakers to implement eye care programs and preventive strategies [31]. Identification of the factors associated with the level of knowledge on eye diseases and their risk factors may form a basis for educational campaigns and personalized communication.

Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the awareness of common eye diseases and their risk factors among adults in Poland as well as to identify factors associated with knowledge of eye diseases.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Population

This is a nationwide cross-sectional web-based survey. Data were generated as a part of the scientific project entitled “Poles’ attitudes towards eye diseases-knowledge about eye diseases, awareness of risk factors, prevention” [32]. Data were collected between 9 and 12 December 2022 using a dedicated web-based research platform managed by a public opinion research company in Poland [33]. Participants were recruited from over 100,000 adults registered on the research platform [33], and nonprobability quota sampling was used. The stratification model included three variables (gender, age, and place of residence) and was based on the Demographic Yearbook published by Statistics Poland [34]. The sampling methods used in this study allowed us to obtain a nationwide representative sample of adults in Poland [35,36].

Participation was voluntary, and the data collection process was anonymous. Informed consent was obtained. Approval (no. 154/2022) of the Ethical Committee of the Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education in Warsaw was obtained.

2.2. Measures

A self-prepared questionnaire was used. During the preparation of the questionnaire, a literature review was performed using the PubMed database [24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. To identify current trends in eye health research, the World Report on Vision published by the WHO was analyzed [2]. The study questionnaire included 9 questions (5 multiple-choice and 4 single-choice) on eye health, preventive behaviors, and knowledge of eye diseases.

Knowledge of eye diseases: Respondents were asked to rate their self-reported level of knowledge of eye diseases using a 5-point Likert scale (very bad, rather bad, moderate, rather good, or very good).

Awareness of common eye diseases: Respondents were asked about the awareness of common eye diseases using the following question: “Have you ever heard of the eye diseases listed below? (tick all that apply): (1) cataract; (2) glaucoma; (3) age-related macular degeneration (AMD); (4) dry eye syndrome; (5) diabetic retinopathy; (6) diabetic macular edema/diabetic maculopathy (DME); (7) retinal detachment; (8) conjunctivitis; (9) barley on the eye (hordeolum); (10) chalazion”.

Awareness of risk factors for glaucoma: Respondents were asked about awareness of risk factors for glaucoma using the following question: “What do you think are the risk factors for glaucoma? (tick all that apply): (1) older age; (2) genetic predisposition (history of glaucoma in the family); (3) tobacco use; (4) excessive alcohol consumption; (5) excessive sunbath; (6) unhealthy diet; (7) arterial hypertension; (8) diabetes; (9) taking selected medications (e.g., steroids); (10) refractive error; or (11) I do not know/none of above”. Based on the literature review [2,15,16,17,18,19,20,21], older age, genetic predisposition, taking selected medications (e.g., steroids), refractive error, arterial hypertension, and diabetes were classified as correct answers.

Awareness of risk factors for AMD: Respondents were asked about awareness of risk factors for AMD using the following question: “What do you think are the risk factors for age-related macular degeneration (AMD)? (tick all that apply): (1) older age; (2) genetic predisposition (history of AMD in the family); (3) Caucasian race; (4) tobacco use; (5) excessive alcohol consumption; (6) unhealthy diet; (7) excessive sunbath; (8) arterial hypertension; (9) dyslipidemia; (10) taking selected medications; or (11) I do not know/none of above”. Based on the literature review [2,15,16,17,18,19,20,21], older age, genetic predisposition, Caucasian race, tobacco use, unhealthy diet, and arterial hypertension were classified as correct answers.

Personal characteristics: A set of questions on sociodemographic characteristics (gender, age, educational level, marital status, place of residence, having children, occupational activity, and economic status), health status (presence of chronic diseases), and wearing spectacles or contact lenses was addressed.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed with the IBM SPSS software v. 28. Descriptive statistics were used to present categorical data. Cross-tabulation with a chi-squared test was used to compare categorical variables. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was also performed. Demographic data, health status, and wearing spectacles/contact lenses were defined as independent variables. Awareness of eye diseases (10 different models, each disease as a dependent variable) and risk factors for glaucoma (6 different models, each risk factor as a dependent variable) or AMD (6 different models, each risk factor as a dependent variable) was analyzed. The strength of association was presented by the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). The statistical significance level was set at p < 0.05.

3. Results

The study population included 1076 adults; 45.8% were males, 44.4% of respondents had at least one chronic disease, and 55.6% wore spectacles or contact lenses (Table 1).

Table 1.

Characteristics of the study population (n = 1076).

Variable n %
Gender
female 583 54.2
male 493 45.8
Age group (years)
18–34 337 31.3
35–49 279 25.9
50–64 298 27.7
65+ 162 15.1
Educational level
higher 443 41.2
less than higher 633 58.8
Married
yes 561 52.1
no 515 47.9
Place of residence
rural area 403 37.5
city < 20,000 inhabitants 136 12.6
city ≥ 20,000 and <100,000 inhabitants 212 19.7
city ≥ 100,000 and <500,000 inhabitants 191 17.8
city ≥ 500,000 inhabitants 134 12.5
Having children
yes 688 63.9
no 388 36.1
Occupational activity
active 653 60.7
passive 423 39.3
Economic status
good 414 38.5
moderate 408 37.9
bad 254 23.6
Presence of chronic diseases
yes 478 44.4
no 598 55.6
Wearing spectacles or contact lenses
yes 598 55.6
no 482 44.8

3.1. Awareness of Common Eye Diseases and Their Risk Factors

A very good or rather good level of knowledge of eye diseases was declared by 10% of respondents, and 46.3% declared a rather bad or very bad level of knowledge of eye diseases (Table 2). Among the respondents, 83.6% had heard of cataracts, 80.7% had heard of glaucoma, and 74.3% of respondents had heard of conjunctivitis. Awareness of dry eye syndrome was declared by 50% of respondents, and 40% were aware of retinal detachment. Among the respondents, 32.3% had heard of AMD, and 16.4% had heard of diabetic retinopathy (Table 2).

Table 2.

Respondents’ knowledge regarding common eye diseases (n = 1076).

Variable n %
Self-reported level of knowledge of eye diseases
very good 18 1.7
rather good 89 8.3
moderate 471 43.8
rather bad 360 33.5
very bad 138 12.8
Have you ever heard of the eye diseases listed below? (tick all you have heard of)
cataract 899 83.6
glaucoma 868 80.7
age-related macular degeneration (AMD) 348 32.3
dry eye syndrome 538 50.0
diabetic retinopathy 176 16.4
diabetic macular edema/diabetic maculopathy (DME) 92 8.6
retinal detachment 430 40.0
conjunctivitis 799 74.3
barley on the eye (hordeolum) 794 73.8
chalazion 259 24.1
What do you think are the risk factors for glaucoma? (tick all that apply)
Correct answers (strong or moderate evidence)
older age 424 39.4
genetic predisposition (history of glaucoma in the family) 292 27.1
taking selected medications (e.g., steroids) 93 8.5
refractive error 105 9.8
arterial hypertension 280 26.0
diabetes 250 23.2
Incorrect answers (lack of evidence or conflicting evidence)
tobacco use 114 10.6
excessive alcohol consumption 76 7.1
excessive sunbath 62 5.8
unhealthy diet 111 10.3
I do not know/none of above 410 38.1
What do you think are the risk factors for age-related macular degeneration (AMD)? (tick all that apply)
Correct answers (strong or moderate evidence)
older age 240 22.3
genetic predisposition (history of AMD in the family) 144 13.4
tobacco use 88 8.2
Caucasian race 21 2.0
unhealthy diet 76 7.1
arterial hypertension 139 12.9
dyslipidemia 85 7.9
Incorrect answers (lack of evidence or conflicting evidence)
excessive alcohol consumption 63 5.9
excessive sunbath 60 5.6
taking selected medications 69 6.4
I do not know/none of above 584 54.3

Older age was the most recognized (39.4%) risk factor for glaucoma. A history of glaucoma in the family was indicated by 27.1% of respondents as a risk factor for glaucoma, while 26% indicated arterial hypertension and 23.2% indicated diabetes. Among the respondents, 38.1% declared a lack of awareness of risk factors for glaucoma, and 10% of respondents incorrectly indicated glaucoma risk factors (Table 2).

A lack of awareness of risk factors for AMD was declared by 54.3% of respondents. Among the respondents, 22.3% correctly indicated that older age is a risk factor for AMD, 13.4% were aware that genetic predisposition is a risk factor for AMD, and 12.9% of respondents indicated arterial hypertension as a risk factor for AMD (Table 2). Details are presented in Table 2.

3.2. Sociodemographic Differences in the Awareness of Eye Diseases and Their Risk Factors

There were significant sociodemographic differences in the percentage of respondents who declared awareness of eye diseases (Table 3). Females compared to males were more aware of 9 of 10 eye diseases analyzed in this study. The percentage of respondents who were aware of eye diseases increased with age (p < 0.05). Respondents with higher education more often declared that they had heard of common eye diseases listed in this study. The percentage of respondents who had heard of eye diseases was higher among those who had children, those with chronic diseases, and those who wear spectacles or contact lenses (Table 3).

Table 3.

Public awareness of selected eye diseases by sociodemographic factors (n = 1076).

Public Awareness of Selected Eye Diseases
Cataract Glaucoma AMD Diabetic
Retinopathy
Dry Eye
Syndrome
Variable % p % p % p % p % p
Gender
male 77.7 <0.001 74.6 <0.001 23.1 <0.001 9.1 <0.001 35.5 <0.001
female 88.5 85.8 40.1 22.5 62.3
Age group (years)
18–34 74.5 <0.001 71.8 <0.001 22.8 <0.001 12.2 0.03 42.7 0.01
35–49 86.0 82.8 29.7 15.4 50.5
50–64 88.9 87.6 40.6 20.8 56.4
65+ 88.3 82.7 41.4 18.5 52.5
Educational level
higher 86.5 0.03 84.0 0.02 37.9 0.001 19.4 0.02 55.1 0.01
less than higher 81.5 78.4 28.4 14.2 46.4
Married
yes 87.2 <0.001 84.1 0.003 30.7 0.2 16.0 0.8 49.9 0.9
no 79.6 76.9 34.2 16.7 50.1
Place of residence
rural area 81.1 0.6 78.9 0.6 28.8 0.1 13.2 0.1 45.7 0.02
city < 20,000 inhabitants 84.6 80.9 32.4 16.2 43.4
city ≥ 20,000 and <100,000 inhabitants 85.4 82.5 30.2 19.8 56.1
city ≥ 100,000 and <500,000 inhabitants 85.3 79.6 37.7 16.2 51.3
city ≥ 500,000 inhabitants 84.3 84.3 38.8 20.9 58.2
Having children
yes 88.4 <0.001 84.2 <0.001 34.6 0.04 18.5 0.01 52.5 0.03
no 75.0 74.5 28.4 12.6 45.6
Occupational activity
active 82.4 0.2 79.2 0.1 29.6 0.02 13.9 0.01 47.9 0.1
passive 85.3 83.0 36.6 20.1 53.2
Economic status
good 85.0 0.6 83.6 0.1 31.2 0.5 16.9 0.6 51.7 0.7
moderate 82.4 79.4 34.6 15.0 49.0
bad 83.1 78.0 30.7 17.7 48.8
Presence of chronic diseases
yes 90.0 <0.001 87.2 <0.001 39.5 <0.001 24.9 <0.001 58.8 <0.001
no 78.4 75.4 26.6 9.5 43.0
Wearing spectacles or contact lenses
yes 87.0 <0.001 83.7 0.01 39.1 <0.001 19.5 0.002 56.7 <0.001
no 79.3 77.0 24.1 12.4 41.7
Diabetic
Macular Edema/
Diabetic
Maculopathy (DME)
Retinal
Detachment
Conjunctivitis Barley on the Eye
(Hordeolum)
Chalazion
Variable % p % p % p % p % p
Gender
male 7.7 0.4 33.1 <0.001 66.3 <0.001 64.7 <0.001 15.6 <0.001
female 9.3 45.8 81.0 81.5 31.2
Age group (years)
18–34 10.7 0.4 33.5 0.03 68.0 0.004 62.9 <0.001 20.5 0.1
35–49 6.8 44.1 74.9 76.3 22.9
50–64 8.1 42.6 80.5 81.2 28.2
65+ 8.0 41.4 74.7 78.4 25.9
Educational level
higher 9.0 0.6 46.0 <0.001 78.6 0.01 78.3 0.01 28.7 0.003
less than higher 8.2 35.7 71.2 70.6 20.9
Married
yes 6.6 0.02 39.2 0.6 77.0 0.03 78.4 <0.001 25.0 0.5
no 10.7 40.8 71.3 68.7 23.1
Place of residence
rural area 6.5 0.2 36.0 0.1 71.7 0.2 70.5 0.3 17.9 0.004
city < 20,000 inhabitants 9.6 44.9 75.7 73.5 25.7
city ≥ 20,000 and <100,000 inhabitants 11.8 39.2 72.2 75.5 29.2
city ≥ 100,000 and <500,000 inhabitants 7.3 40.8 75.9 74.9 25.7
city ≥ 500,000 inhabitants 10.4 47.0 81.3 79.9 30.6
Having children
yes 8.4 0.9 43.5 0.002 77.5 0.001 79.2 <0.001 26.0 0.04
no 8.8 33.8 68.6 64.2 20.6
Occupational activity
active 8.3 0.7 39.7 0.8 73.3 0.9 72.7 0.3 24.3 0.8
passive 9.0 40.4 74.2 75.4 23.6
Economic status
good 9.4 0.7 38.6 0.5 77.1 0.3 75.6 0.4 24.6 0.8
moderate 8.3 39.5 72.3 73.8 24.5
bad 7.5 42.9 72.8 70.9 22.4
Presence of chronic diseases
yes 10.7 0.03 45.0 0.003 79.3 <0.001 81.4 <0.001 28.9 <0.001
no 6.9 36.0 70.2 67.7 20.2
Wearing spectacles or contact lenses
yes 9.4 0.3 42.4 0.07 77.8 0.003 76.9 0.01 27.1 0.01
no 7.5 36.9 69.9 69.9 20.3

All statistically significant variables are bolded.

Females, older respondents, and those with chronic diseases more often (p < 0.05) declared that older age is a risk factor for glaucoma (Table 4). The percentage of respondents who indicated genetic predisposition as a risk factor for glaucoma significantly differed (p < 0.05) by sociodemographic variables (Table 4). Chronically ill respondents more often declared that taking selected medications (e.g., steroids) may increase the risk for glaucoma (p < 0.05). Those who were not married more often declared that refractive error may increase the risk for glaucoma (p < 0.05). There were also sociodemographic differences in the percentage of respondents who were aware that arterial hypertension or diabetes may increase the risk for glaucoma (Table 4).

Table 4.

Public awareness of risk factors for glaucoma by sociodemographic factors (n = 1076).

Public Awareness of Risk Factors for Glaucoma
Older Age Genetic
Predisposition
Taking Selected
Medications
(e.g., Steroids)
Refractive
Error
Arterial
Hypertension
Diabetes
Variable % p % p % p % p % p % p
Gender
male 34.3 0.002 17.6 <0.001 7.5 0.2 9.9 0.9 22.3 0.01 23.1 0.9
female 43.7 35.2 9.6 9.6 29.2 23.3
Age group (years)
18–34 32.3 0.01 23.4 0.04 10.4 0.1 12.8 0.08 19.3 <0.001 18.7 <0.001
35–49 39.4 24.4 10.4 10.0 26.2 21.1
50–64 45.0 31.2 5.7 8.1 24.5 23.5
65+ 43.8 32.1 7.4 6.2 42.6 35.8
Educational level
higher 40.6 0.5 31.6 0.01 10.2 0.1 8.8 0.4 28.7 0.1 24.4 0.5
less than higher 38.5 24.0 7.6 10.4 24.2 22.4
Married
yes 39.2 0.9 27.6 0.7 7.3 0.1 7.7 0.02 27.6 0.2 24.2 0.4
no 39.6 26.6 10.1 12.0 24.3 22.1
Place of residence
rural area 37.7 0.8 23.8 0.2 6.7 0.05 10.9 0.2 23.1 0.1 21.6 0.4
city < 20,000 inhabitants 37.5 29.4 7.4 9.6 23.5 23.5
city ≥ 20,000 and <100,000 inhabitants 40.6 25.5 10.8 12.3 25.9 27.8
city ≥ 100,000 and <500,000 inhabitants 42.9 32.5 13.1 6.3 33.5 20.9
city ≥ 500,000 inhabitants 39.6 29.9 6.0 7.5 26.9 23.9
Having children
yes 41.4 0.07 27.5 0.7 7.7 0.1 8.9 0.2 28.5 0.01 23.7 0.6
no 35.8 26.5 10.3 11.3 21.6 22.4
Occupational activity
active 37.5 0.1 23.9 0.003 9.0 0.6 11.2 0.05 23.1 0.01 19.9 0.001
passive 42.3 32.2 8.0 7.6 30.5 28.4
Economic status
good 39.4 0.4 27.1 0.4 8.2 0.7 9.4 0.9 27.5 0.7 24.2 0.1
moderate 37.3 28.9 9.6 9.6 25.2 20.1
bad 42.9 24.4 7.9 10.6 24.8 26.8
Presence of chronic diseases
yes 47.3 <0.001 33.3 <0.001 10.7 0.03 9.0 0.5 30.5 0.003 28.5 <0.001
no 33.1 22.2 7.0 10.4 22.4 19.1
Wearing spectacles or contact lenses
yes 41.6 0.1 30.3 0.01 9.3 0.4 10.8 0.2 29.1 0.01 25.6 0.04
no 36.7 23.2 7.9 8.5 22.2 20.3

All statistically significant variables are bolded.

The percentage of respondents who declared that genetic predisposition and dyslipidemia are risk factors for AMD was higher (p < 0.05) among females than males (Table 5). The percentage of respondents who indicated older age or arterial hypertension as a risk factor for AMD increased with the age (p < 0.05). Respondents with a passive occupational status more often declared that older age and genetic predisposition are risk factors for AMD (p < 0.05). Those with bad economic status, when compared to those with moderate economic status, more often declared that tobacco use is a risk factor for AMD. Respondents with chronic diseases more often (p < 0.05) indicated older age, genetic predisposition, and dyslipidemia as risk factors for AMD. Those who wore spectacles or contact lenses more often indicated older age and genetic predisposition as risk factors for AMD (Table 5).

Table 5.

Public awareness of risk factors for AMD by sociodemographic factors (n = 1076).

Public Awareness of Risk Factors for AMD
Older Age Genetic
Predisposition
Tobacco Use Unhealthy Diet Arterial
Hypertension
Dyslipidemia
Variable % p % p % p % p % p % p
Gender
male 19.7 0.06 9.7 0.001 7.7 0.6 7.1 0.9 13.4 0.7 5.3 0.003
female 24.5 16.5 8.6 7.0 12.5 10.1
Age group (years)
18–34 16.0 <0.001 10.1 0.1 8.6 0.6 7.1 0.9 7.1 <0.001 7.1 0.5
35–49 21.1 15.1 9.3 7.2 14.0 6.8
50–64 25.8 13.1 8.1 6.4 15.4 9.7
65+ 30.9 17.9 5.6 8.0 18.5 8.0
Educational level
higher 23.9 0.3 15.8 0.05 8.8 0.5 8.6 0.1 14.7 0.2 9.5 0.1
less than higher 21.2 11.7 7.7 6.0 11.7 6.8
Married
yes 22.1 0.9 14.8 0.2 7.5 0.4 7.0 0.9 13.5 0.5 7.7 0.8
no 22.5 11.8 8.9 7.2 12.2 8.2
Place of residence
rural area 19.1 0.06 11.9 0.2 6.2 0.1 6.2 0.4 11.2 0.2 7.9 0.5
city < 20,000 inhabitants 17.6 9.6 14.0 10.3 12.5 5.1
city ≥ 20,000 and <100,000 inhabitants 24.1 16.5 8.5 5.7 15.6 8.0
city ≥ 100,000 and <500,000 inhabitants 26.2 16.8 7.9 8.4 10.5 10.5
city ≥ 500,000 inhabitants 28.4 11.9 8.2 6.7 17.9 6.7
Having children
yes 23.8 0.1 14.8 0.06 7.8 0.6 6.8 0.7 14.1 0.1 8.1 0.7
no 19.6 10.8 8.8 7.5 10.8 7.5
Occupational activity
active 19.1 0.002 11.6 0.04 7.8 0.6 7.5 0.5 12.4 0.5 6.7 0.1
passive 27.2 16.1 8.7 6.4 13.7 9.7
Economic status
good 23.9 0.2 14.5 0.7 8.5 0.04 7.7 0.8 12.3 0.7 8.9 0.6
moderate 19.4 12.5 5.9 6.9 14.0 7.1
bad 24.4 13.0 11.4 6.3 12.2 7.5
Presence of chronic diseases
yes 27.6 <0.001 17.2 0.001 9.8 0.08 7.9 0.3 14.0 0.3 10.3 0.01
no 18.1 10.4 6.9 6.4 12.0 6.0
Wearing spectacles or contact lenses
yes 25.6 0.004 15.3 0.04 8.4 0.8 6.9 0.8 14.0 0.3 8.4 0.5
no 18.3 11.0 7.9 7.3 11.6 7.3

All statistically significant variables are bolded.

3.3. Factors Associated with Knowledge of Common Eye Diseases

Out of 10 different variables included in multivariable logistic regression analysis (Table 6), gender, age, and the presence of chronic diseases were the most important factors associated with higher awareness of common eye diseases (p < 0.05). Wearing spectacles or contact lenses was significantly associated with higher odds of awareness of AMD or dry eye syndrome (p < 0.05). Place of residence, having children, and economic status were significantly associated with higher awareness of only 1 of 10 analyzed eye diseases. There was no impact of occupational activity on awareness of common eye diseases (p > 0.05). Details are presented in Table 6.

Table 6.

Factors associated with awareness of common eye diseases among adults in Poland (n = 1076).

Factors Associated with Awareness of Common Eye Diseases among Adults in Poland
Cataract Glaucoma Age-Related Macular
Degeneration (AMD)
Diabetic Retinopathy Dry Eye Syndrome
Variable OR (95%CI) p OR (95%CI) p OR (95%CI) p OR (95%CI) p OR (95%CI) p
Gender
male 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
female 2.04 (1.43–2.91) <0.001 1.94 (1.39–2.70) <0.001 2.10 (1.58–2.79) <0.001 2.60 (1.77–3.80) <0.001 2.96 (2.27–3.85) <0.001
Age group (years)
18–34 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
35–49 1.72 (1.08–2.73) 0.02 1.80 (1.16–2.79) 0.01 1.61 (1.07–2.42) 0.02 1.24 (0.74–2.08) 0.4 1.49 (1.03–2.16) 0.03
50–64 1.74 (1.04–2.91) 0.04 2.19 (1.35–3.58) 0.002 2.28 (1.51–3.45) <0.001 1.38 (0.82–2.32) 0.2 1.52 (1.04–2.24) 0.03
65+ 1.52 (0.78–2.97) 0.2 1.29 (0.70–2.35) 0.4 2.17 (1.30–3.63) 0.003 0.89 (0.47–1.70) 0.7 1.24 (0.76–2.01) 0.4
Educational level
higher 1.35 (0.93–1.94) 0.1 1.41 (0.99–1.98) 0.05 1.61 (1.21–2.13) 0.001 1.53 (1.07–2.19) 0.02 1.37 (1.05–1.80) 0.02
less than higher 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Married
yes 1.00 0.9 1.00 0.6 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.04 1.00 0.2
no 1.03 (0.67–1.58) 0.90 (0.60–1.33) 1.59 (1.15–2.20) 1.51 (1.01–2.25) 1.25 (0.92–1.71)
Place of residence
rural area 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
city < 20,000 inhabitants 1.20 (0.69–2.09) 0.5 1.06 (0.63–1.76) 0.8 1.08 (0.69–1.67) 0.7 1.17 (0.66–2.06) 0.6 0.82 (0.54–1.25) 0.4
city ≥ 20,000 and <100,000 inhabitants 1.29 (0.80–2.08) 0.3 1.19 (0.76–1.87) 0.4 0.91 (0.62–1.34) 0.6 1.41 (0.88–2.26) 0.2 1.43 (1.00–2.05) 0.05
city ≥ 100,000 and <500,000 inhabitants 1.22 (0.74–2.00) 0.4 0.95 (0.60–1.48) 0.8 1.28 (0.87–1.88) 0.2 1.15 (0.69–1.91) 0.6 1.10 (0.76–1.59) 0.6
city ≥ 500,000 inhabitants 1.13 (0.64–1.98) 0.7 1.29 (0.74–2.25) 0.4 1.27 (0.82–1.98) 0.3 1.48 (0.85–2.57) 0.2 1.44 (0.94–2.22) 0.1
Having children
yes 1.75 (1.11–2.75) 0.02 1.14 (0.74–1.74) 0.6 1.09 (0.75–1.58) 0.6 1.57 (0.98–2.54) 0.06 1.08 (0.76–1.53) 0.7
no 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Occupational activity
active 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
passive 0.91 (0.61–1.38) 0.7 1.11 (0.75–1.64) 0.6 1.05 (0.76–1.45) 0.8 1.31 (0.88–1.97) 0.2 0.99 (0.73–1.35) 0.9
Economic status
good 1.34 (0.85–2.10) 0.2 1.68 (1.10–2.56) 0.02 1.21 (0.84–1.75) 0.3 1.22 (0.78–1.92) 0.4 1.30 (0.92–1.83) 0.1
moderate 0.99 (0.64–1.53) 0.9 1.14 (0.76–1.70) 0.5 1.25 (0.88–1.79) 0.2 0.84 (0.53–1.31) 0.4 1.05 (0.75–1.47) 0.8
bad 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Presence of chronic diseases
yes 1.96 (1.33–2.89) <0.001 1.88 (1.32–2.68) <0.001 1.47 (1.11–1.96) 0.01 2.80 (1.94–4.04) <0.001 1.68 (1.28–2.21) <0.001
no 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Wearing spectacles or contact lenses
yes 1.25 (0.87–1.79) 0.2 1.10 (0.79–1.54) 0.6 1.53 (1.15–2.04) 0.004 1.27 (0.88–1.84) 0.2 1.46 (1.12–1.92) 0.01
no 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Diabetic Macular Edema/Diabetic Maculopathy (DME) Retinal Detachment Conjunctivitis Barley on the Eye
(Hordeolum)
Chalazion
Variable OR (95%CI) p OR (95%CI) p OR (95%CI) p OR (95%CI) p OR (95%CI) Variable
Gender
male 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
female 1.07 (0.68–1.68) 0.8 1.63 (1.25–2.12) <0.001 2.16 (1.61–2.90) <0.001 2.40 (1.78–3.25) <0.001 2.48 (1.82–3.40) <0.001
Age group (years)
18–34 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
35–49 0.59 (0.31–1.11) 0.1 1.42 (0.99–2.04) 0.06 1.29 (0.87–1.92) 0.2 1.66 (1.12–2.48) 0.01 1.09 (0.71–1.67) 0.7
50–64 0.60 (0.31–1.15) 0.1 1.25 (0.85–1.83) 0.3 1.63 (1.05–2.52) 0.03 1.93 (1.25–2.99) 0.003 1.35 (0.88–2.10) 0.2
65+ 0.46 (0.20–1.07) 0.1 1.09 (0.67–1.77) 0.7 1.20 (0.70–2.05) 0.5 1.60 (0.92–2.77) 0.1 1.32 (0.76–2.30) 0.3
Educational level
higher 1.05 (0.66–1.66) 0.9 1.55 (1.19–2.02) 0.001 1.38 (1.02–1.88) 0.04 1.44 (1.06–1.96) 0.02 1.44 (1.06–1.94) 0.02
less than higher 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Married
yes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
no 2.14 (1.26–3.62) 0.01 1.50 (1.10–2.03) 0.01 0.96 (0.67–1.36) 0.8 0.92 (0.64–1.31) 0.6 1.03 (0.73–1.45) 0.9
Place of residence
rural area 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
city < 20,000 inhabitants 1.47 (0.72–2.98) 0.3 1.42 (0.95–2.13) 0.1 1.19 (0.75–1.89) 0.4 1.08 (0.68–1.71) 0.8 1.53 (0.95–2.46) 0.1
city ≥ 20,000 and <100,000 inhabitants 1.79 (0.99–3.22) 0.05 1.05 (0.74–1.50) 0.8 0.95 (0.65–1.40) 0.8 1.22 (0.81–1.82) 0.3 1.77 (1.18–2.65) 0.01
city ≥ 100,000 and <500,000 inhabitants 1.01 (0.51–2.02) 0.9 1.12 (0.78–1.61) 0.6 1.13 (0.75–1.71) 0.6 1.14 (0.75–1.73) 0.5 1.44 (0.94–2.21) 0.1
city ≥ 500,000 inhabitants 1.49 (0.73–3.04) 0.3 1.45 (0.96–2.20) 0.1 1.57 (0.94–2.51) 0.1 1.53 (0.92–2.54) 0.1 1.80 (1.12–2.88) 0.02
Having children
yes 1.74 (0.96–3.17) 0.07 1.65 (1.17–2.34) 0.01 1.21 (0.83–1.78) 0.3 1.42 (0.97–2.09) 0.1 1.16 (0.78–1.73) 0.5
no 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Occupational activity
active 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
passive 1.12 (0.66–1.87) 0.7 0.96 (0.70–1.30) 0.8 0.84 (0.59–1.18) 0.3 0.87 (0.61–1.24) 0.4 0.77 (0.54–1.10) 0.1
Economic status
good 1.48 (0.81–2.70) 0.2 0.88 (0.63–1.23) 0.5 1.32 (0.90–1.92) 0.2 1.45 (0.99–2.11) 0.07 1.17 (0.79–1.73) 0.4
moderate 1.20 (0.66–2.18) 0.6 0.85 (0.61–1.18) 0.3 0.95 (0.66–1.37) 0.8 1.19 (0.82–1.72) 0.4 1.07 (0.73–1.58) 0.7
bad 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Presence of chronic diseases
yes 1.74 (1.10–2.77) 0.02 1.32 (1.01–1.73) 0.04 1.41 (1.03–1.92) 0.03 1.74 (1.27–2.38) <0.001 1.40 (1.03–1.89) 0.03
no 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Wearing spectacles or contact lenses
yes 1.29 (0.81–2.06) 0.3 1.08 (0.82–1.40) 0.6 1.16 (0.86–1.57) 0.3 1.01 (0.74–1.36) 0.9 1.15 (0.85–1.57) 0.4
no 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

All statistically significant variables are bolded.

Females were more likely to indicate older age (OR: 1.42, 95%CI: 1.09–1.84, p = 0.01), genetic predisposition (OR: 2.47, 95%CI: 1.83–3.34, p < 0.001), and arterial hypertension (OR: 1.44, 95%CI: 1.07–1.93, p = 0.02) as risk factors for glaucoma (Table 7). Respondents aged 65 years and over were more likely to indicate arterial hypertension (OR: 2.69, 95%CI: 1.60–4.53, p < 0.001) and diabetes (OR: 2.02, 95%CI: 1.19–3.44) as risk factors for glaucoma. Respondents aged 50–64 years were more likely to indicate older age as a risk factor for glaucoma (OR: 1.59, 95%CI: 1.09–2.32, p = 0.02). Those with higher education were more likely to indicate genetic predisposition as a risk factor for glaucoma (OR: 1.56, 95%CI: 1.16–2.10, p = 0.003). Those who were not married were more likely to indicate refractive error as a risk factor for glaucoma (OR: 1.71, 95%CI: 1.03–2.84, p = 0.04). Respondents who lived in a city with ≥100,000 and <500,000 inhabitants were more likely to indicate arterial hypertension (OR: 1.61, 95%CI: 1.09–2.39, p = 0.02) and taking medication (OR: 1.83, 95%CI: 1.01–3.31, p = 0.04) as risk factors for glaucoma (Table 7). Respondents wearing spectacles or contact lenses were more likely to indicate refractive error as a risk factor for glaucoma (OR: 1.67, 95%CI: 1.07–2.61, p = 0.02). The presence of chronic diseases was associated with a higher awareness of four different risk factors for glaucoma. There was no impact of occupational activity, economic activity, or having children on awareness of risk factors for glaucoma (Table 7).

Table 7.

Factors associated with awareness of risk factors for glaucoma (n = 1076).

Factors Associated with Awareness of Risk Factors for Glaucoma
Older Age Genetic Predisposition (History of Glaucoma in the Family) Taking Selected
Medications
(e.g., Steroids)
Refractive Error Arterial Hypertension Diabetes
Variable OR (95%CI) p OR (95%CI) p OR (95%CI) p OR (95%CI) p OR (95%CI) p OR (95%CI) p
Gender
male 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
female 1.42 (1.09–1.84) 0.01 2.47 (1.83–3.34) <0.001 1.25 (0.79–1.98) 0.3 0.98 (0.64–1.50) 0.9 1.44 (1.07–1.93) 0.02 0.97 (0.72–1.31) 0.8
Age group (years)
18–34 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
35–49 1.39 (0.97–2.01) 0.07 1.20 (0.79–1.82) 0.4 1.11 (0.62–1.99) 0.7 0.78 (0.45–1.36) 0.4 1.46 (0.97–2.22) 0.07 1.24 (0.81–1.91) 0.3
50–64 1.59 (1.09–2.32) 0.02 1.49 (0.98–2.28) 0.06 0.50 (0.25–1.01) 0.05 0.55 (0.30–1.02) 0.06 1.20 (0.77–1.86) 0.4 1.28 (0.81–2.00) 0.3
65+ 1.42 (0.88–2.29) 0.2 1.39 (0.82–2.35) 0.2 0.64 (0.27–1.49) 0.3 0.50 (0.21–1.19) 0.1 2.69 (1.60–4.53) <0.001 2.02 (1.19–3.44) 0.01
Educational level
higher 1.10 (0.84–1.43) 0.5 1.56 (1.16–2.10) 0.003 1.23 (0.78–1.93) 0.4 0.79 (0.51–1.22) 0.3 1.20 (0.89–1.61) 0.2 1.13 (0.83–1.53) 0.4
less than higher 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Married
yes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
no 1.25 (0.92–1.69) 0.2 0.92 (0.66–1.29) 0.6 1.29 (0.76–2.18) 0.4 1.71 (1.03–2.84) 0.04 0.97 (0.69–1.35) 0.9 0.90 (0.63–1.27) 0.5
Place of residence
rural area 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
city < 20,000 inhabitants 0.94 (0.62–1.41) 0.8 1.21 (0.77–1.89) 0.4 1.01 (0.47–2.17) 0.9 0.91 (0.47–1.76) 0.2 0.95 (0.59–1.52) 0.8 1.07 (0.67–1.71) 0.8
city ≥ 20,000 and <100,000 inhabitants 1.06 (0.75–1.50) 0.8 0.97 (0.65–1.45) 0.9 1.54 (0.85–2.79) 0.2 1.13 (0.67–1.91) 0.04 1.07 (0.72–1.59) 0.8 1.33 (0.90–1.97) 0.2
city ≥ 100,000 and <500,000 inhabitants 1.18 (0.82–1.70) 0.4 1.39 (0.94–2.08) 0.1 1.83 (1.01–3.31) 0.04 0.50 (0.25–0.98) 0.7 1.61 (1.09–2.39) 0.02 0.93 (0.60–1.44) 0.7
city ≥ 500,000 inhabitants 0.99 (0.65–1.51) 0.9 1.14 (0.71–1.81) 0.6 0.68 (0.29–1.58) 0.4 0.62 (0.30–1.29) 0.8 1.09 (0.68–1.75) 0.7 1.04 (0.64–1.68) 0.9
Having children
yes 1.09 (0.78–1.54) 0.6 0.75 (0.51–1.10) 0.1 0.87 (0.49–1.56) 0.6 1.24 (0.71–2.15) 0.5 1.06 (0.72–1.56) 0.8 0.78 (0.52–1.15) 0.2
no 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Occupational activity
active 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
passive 1.00 (0.74–1.35) 0.9 1.30 (0.93–1.81) 0.1 0.93 (0.54–1.59) 0.8 0.65 (0.39–1.08) 0.1 1.05 (0.75–1.49) 0.8 1.24 (0.88–1.77) 0.2
Economic status
good 1.00 (0.72–1.40) 0.9 1.28 (0.87–1.88) 0.2 1.06 (0.58–1.93) 0.8 0.84 (0.49–1.44) 0.5 1.25 (0.86–1.82) 0.2 0.95 (0.65–1.38) 0.8
moderate 0.82 (0.59–1.15) 0.2 1.28 (0.88–1.86) 0.2 1.28 (0.72–2.28) 0.4 0.93 (0.54–1.56) 0.8 1.04 (0.71–1.51) 0.9 0.71 (0.49–1.04) 0.08
bad 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Presence of chronic diseases
yes 1.67 (1.28–2.18) <0.001 1.48 (1.10–1.98) 0.01 1.82 (1.15–2.87) 0.01 1.04 (0.67–1.62) 0.9 1.28 (0.95–1.72) 0.1 1.44 (1.06–1.95) 0.02
no 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Wearing spectacles or contact lenses
yes 1.01 (0.78–1.32) 0.9 1.12 (0.83–1.51) 0.5 1.26 (0.79–1.99) 0.3 1.67 (1.07–2.61) 0.02 1.19 (0.89–1.61) 0.2 1.17 (0.86–1.59) 0.3
no 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

All statistically significant variables are bolded.

Out of 10 different variables analyzed in this study, female gender, older age, and the presence of chronic diseases were significantly associated with awareness of selected risk factors for AMD (Table 8).

Table 8.

Factors associated with awareness of risk factors for AMD (n = 1076).

Factors Associated with Awareness of Risk Factors for AMD
Older Age Genetic Predisposition Tobacco Use Unhealthy Diet Arterial Hypertension Dyslipidemia
Variable OR (95%CI) p OR (95%CI) p OR (95%CI) p OR (95%CI) p OR (95%CI) p OR (95%CI) p
Gender
male 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
female 1.22 (0.89–1.65) 0.2 1.77 (1.20–2.60) 0.004 1.02 (0.64–1.62) 0.9 1.05 (0.65–1.71) 0.8 0.91 (0.63–1.33) 0.6 1.89 (1.16–3.11) 0.01
Age group (years)
18–34 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
35–49 1.50 (0.96–2.35) 0.1 1.53 (0.90–2.60) 0.1 1.13 (0.62–2.09) 0.7 1.04 (0.53–2.04) 0.9 2.20 (1.24–3.92) 0.01 1.04 (0.53–2.07) 0.9
50–64 1.69 (1.06–2.67) 0.03 1.05 (0.59–1.87) 0.9 0.84 (0.43–1.64) 0.6 1.00 (0.49–2.07) 0.9 2.64 (1.45–4.78) 0.001 1.40 (0.71–2.76) 0.3
65+ 1.75 (1.01–3.04) 0.048 1.35 (0.69–2.64) 0.4 0.44 (0.18–1.09) 0.08 1.41 (0.58–3.45) 0.5 3.23 (1.58–6.59) 0.001 0.91 (0.38–2.17) 0.8
Educational level
higher 1.14 (0.84–1.56) 0.4 1.38 (0.95–2.01) 0.1 1.18 (0.74–1.89) 0.5 1.41 (0.86–2.30) 0.2 1.27 (0.87–1.86) 0.2 1.57 (0.98–2.51) 0.06
less than higher 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Married
yes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
no 1.26 (0.89–1.78) 0.2 0.87 (0.57–1.34) 0.5 1.24 (0.72–2.13) 0.4 1.03 (0.58–1.82) 0.9 1.11 (0.73–1.71) 0.6 1.23 (0.72–2.10) 0.5
Place of residence
rural area 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
city < 20,000 inhabitants 0.87 (0.52–1.46) 0.6 0.73 (0.38–1.40) 0.3 2.60 (1.37–4.95) 0.004 1.64 (0.82–3.28) 0.2 1.09 (0.60–2.00) 0.8 0.58 (0.25–1.36) 0.2
city ≥ 20,000 and <100,000 inhabitants 1.26 (0.83–1.90) 0.3 1.33 (0.82–2.16) 0.2 1.40 (0.74–2.66) 0.3 0.84 (0.41–1.72) 0.6 1.40 (0.86–2.30) 0.2 0.91 (0.48–1.70) 0.8
city ≥ 100,000 and <500,000 inhabitants 1.46 (0.96–2.23) 0.08 1.42 (0.86–2.35) 0.2 1.31 (0.66–2.58) 0.4 1.25 (0.64–2.43) 0.5 0.88 (0.50–1.55) 0.7 1.23 (0.67–2.26) 0.5
city ≥ 500,000 inhabitants 1.58 (0.99–2.54) 0.06 0.89 (0.47–1.66) 0.7 1.33 (0.62–2.85) 0.5 0.91 (0.40–2.05) 0.8 1.62 (0.92–2.85) 0.1 0.71 (0.32–1.58) 0.4
Having children
yes 1.09 (0.73–1.63) 0.7 1.07 (0.65–1.76) 0.8 1.08 (0.79–2.24) 0.8 0.87 (0.46–1.65) 0.7 0.97 (0.59–1.59) 0.9 1.01 (0.54–1.89) 0.9
no 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Occupational activity
active 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
passive 1.35 (0.95–1.92) 0.1 1.31 (0.85–2.02) 0.2 1.33 (0.79–2.24) 0.3 0.76 (0.42–1.39) 0.4 0.93 (0.60–1.47) 0.8 1.43 (0.85–2.41) 0.2
Economic status
good 1.13 (0.77–1.66) 0.5 1.24 (0.77–2.00) 0.4 0.75 (0.43–1.28) 0.3 1.21 (0.64–2.30) 0.6 1.05 (0.64–1.72) 0.9 1.41 (0.77–2.59) 0.3
moderate 0.77 (0.52–1.13) 0.2 0.97 (0.60–1.57) 0.9 0.48 (0.27–0.85) 0.01 1.06 (0.56–2.02) 0.9 1.18 (0.73–1.90) 0.5 1.00 (0.54–1.85) 0.9
bad 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Presence of chronic diseases
yes 1.44 (1.06–1.96) 0.02 1.59 (1.09–2.31) 0.02 1.49 (0.93–2.38) 0.1 1.33 (0.81–2.19) 0.3 0.98 (0.67–1.44) 0.9 1.70 (1.06–2.75) 0.03
no 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Wearing spectacles or contact lenses
yes 1.24 (0.90–1.70) 0.2 1.23 (0.84–1.81) 0.3 1.10 (0.69–1.77) 0.7 0.89 (0.54–1.46) 0.6 1.03 (0.70–1.52) 0.9 0.92 (0.57–1.48) 0.7
no 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

All statistically significant variables are bolded.

4. Discussion

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first nationwide study on awareness of common eye diseases among adults in Poland. Cataracts and glaucoma were the most recognized eye diseases. AMD and diabetic retinopathy—serious eye diseases—were recognized by less than one-third of the participants. A low level of awareness of lifestyle-related risk factors for glaucoma and AMD was observed. Gender, age, and the presence of chronic disease were the most important factors associated with higher awareness of eye diseases and risk factors for glaucoma and AMD. Factors associated with awareness of eye diseases varied depending on the analyzed diseases. However, there was no impact of economic status, occupational status, and place of residence on awareness of eye diseases.

In this study, over 75% of respondents declared awareness of cataracts, glaucoma, conjunctivitis, and hordeolum. Findings from the study (2017) carried out with 802 adults in Jordan showed that dry eye syndrome was the most recognized eye disease (51.9%), followed by glaucoma (38.8%), diabetic retinopathy (37.3%), and cataracts (31.4%) [29]. In a study from Canada (2006), 69.2% declared awareness of cataracts, 41.2% were aware of glaucoma, and 20.2% were aware of macular degeneration [25]. In Iran (2014), 86.2% of adults declared awareness of diabetic retinopathy, 82.9% were aware of cataracts, and 46.6% were aware of glaucoma [37]. In Bangladesh (2015), 90% of adults declared awareness of cataracts, and 86% were aware of trachoma, but only 4% had heard of diabetic retinopathy, 7% were aware of glaucoma, and 8% were aware of AMD [28]. Little is known about awareness of eye diseases among adults in Europe. Findings from this study showed that adults in Poland are more aware of common eye diseases compared to previously published data. However, most of the studies were published over 5 years ago [25,26,27,28,29], so data should be analyzed carefully, and direct comparisons are difficult. We can hypothesize that the level of awareness of eye diseases increases in line with the development of the country as well as the availability of eye care services.

Previously published [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,37] studies showed that female gender, older age, higher education, and good economic status are associated with better knowledge of eye diseases. In this study, females were also more likely to declare awareness of common eye diseases. Those with higher education were more aware of most of the analyzed eye diseases, which is in line with previously published data. However, findings from this study also showed that the presence of chronic diseases is an important factor associated with better knowledge of eye diseases. Contrary to previously published data [28,29], economic status or occupational status did not influence the awareness of eye diseases. Further studies from high-income countries (especially European) are needed.

In this study, factors associated with awareness of risk factors for glaucoma and AMD were also analyzed. Gender, age, and the presence of chronic diseases were the most important factors associated with awareness of risk factors for glaucoma and AMD. We can hypothesize that older adults are more aware of risk factors for these diseases, as age is a risk factor for eye diseases, so they may seek eye care and may be educated by their primary care physicians or ophthalmologists [2,10]. Females more often seek health-related information [38], so we can hypothesize that gender differences in health information behavior may also influence the awareness of eye diseases. Chronic diseases such as diabetes, arterial hypertension, and dyslipidemia are risk factors for eye diseases [2,19,20,21,22], so we can hypothesize that individuals with chronic diseases were informed about eye complications caused by chronic diseases such as diabetes or hypertension such that they are more aware of eye diseases and their risk factors.

AMD is a significant public health problem, and tobacco use is the major risk factor for AMD [14,15]. In this study, less than one-third of adults in Poland were aware of AMD. Findings from this study revealed that more than half of adults in Poland were unaware of any of the risk factors for AMD, and less than one-tenth were aware of the link between smoking and AMD. This study revealed that education on AMD and AMD preventive programs should be a priority for public health authorities in Poland, as significant gaps in public knowledge on AMD were observed.

Individuals who wear spectacles or contact lenses are more likely to use eye care services and visit ophthalmologists/opticians, as they need regular eye examinations and adjustment of spectacles/contact lenses to the refractive error [39]. However, in this study, wearing spectacles or contact lenses was not significantly associated with awareness of most of the analyzed eye diseases. Moreover, there were no significant differences in awareness of risk factors for glaucoma or AMD based on the status of wearing spectacles or contact lenses. This finding suggests that patients did not receive sufficient eye health education when using eye care services.

4.1. Practical Implications

This study provided nationwide data on awareness of common eye diseases in Poland. The global burden of eye diseases, especially those that are age-related, will increase, so public health interventions are needed to prepare national health systems for future challenges resulting from the growing incidence of eye diseases. A low level of awareness of eye diseases (especially AMD) underlines an urgent need for education programs on eye health. Most adults in Poland were not aware of modifiable risk factors for AMD (tobacco use and unhealthy diet). Moreover, there were no differences in awareness of risk factors for eye diseases between those who wore spectacles/contact lenses and those without refractive errors, which suggests that ophthalmologists do not pay enough attention to educate patients with refractive errors on eye health and eye diseases. Education on eye health and common eye diseases should be included in the National Health Strategy of the Republic of Poland, as vision is a crucial sense that affects individual social and economic activity. Findings from this study may form a basis for educational campaigns.

4.2. Limitations

This study has several limitations typical for cross-sectional studies. Data were self-reported, so recall bias may occur. This analysis was limited to 10 common eye diseases. Questions on diagnosis, symptoms, or treatment methods of common eye diseases were not addressed. The question on the source of knowledge on eye diseases was also missed. Health status and wearing spectacles or contact lenses were self-reported, and medical records were not verified. Nevertheless, this is the first nationwide study on awareness of eye diseases among adults in Poland.

5. Conclusions

A low level of awareness of common eye diseases among adults in Poland was observed. Most adults in Poland were not aware of risk factors for age-related eye diseases, such as glaucoma or AMD. Gender, age, and the presence of chronic diseases were the most important factors associated with higher awareness of common eye diseases and risk factors for glaucoma or AMD. A future educational campaign should include these gaps, and personalized communication on eye diseases should be implemented. Findings from this study indicate the need to strengthen eye health knowledge among adults in Poland.

Author Contributions

A.K.: Conceptualization; Methodology; Data curation; Formal analysis; Investigation; Project administration; Writing—original draft; Writing—review and editing. J.P.: Resources; Writing—review and editing. I.W.-W.: Conceptualization; Writing—review and editing. J.O.: Conceptualization; Writing—review and editing. M.J.: Conceptualization; Formal analysis; Writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education (Warsaw, Poland), approval number: 154/2022.

Informed Consent Statement

Participation in this study was voluntary and informed consent was collected.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

This research received no external funding.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Flaxman S.R., Bourne R.R.A., Resnikoff S., Ackland P., Braithwaite T., Cicinelli M.V., Das A., Jonas J.B., Keeffe J., Kempen J.H., et al. Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990–2020: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob. Health. 2017;5:e1221–e1234. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30393-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.World Health Organization . World Report on Vision. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.GBD 2019 Blindness and Vision Impairment Collaborators. Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: The Right to Sight: An analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet Glob. Health. 2021;9:e144–e160. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30489-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Trott M., Smith L., Veronese N., Pizzol D., Barnett Y., Gorely T., Pardhan S. Eye disease and mortality, cognition, disease, and modifiable risk factors: An umbrella review of meta-analyses of observational studies. Eye. 2022;36:369–378. doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01684-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Arena R., McNeil A., Sagner M., Hills A.P. The Current Global State of Key Lifestyle Characteristics: Health and Economic Implications. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2017;59:422–429. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2017.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sørensen K., Van den Broucke S., Fullam J., Doyle G., Pelikan J., Slonska Z., Brand H., (HLS-EU) Consortium Health Literacy Project European Health literacy and public health: A systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:80. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Irving E.L., Harris J.D., Machan C.M., Robinson B.E., Hrynchak P.K., Leat S.J., Lillakas L. Value of Routine Eye Examinations in Asymptomatic Patients. Optom. Vis. Sci. 2016;93:660–666. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.O’Conor R., Smith S.G., Curtis L.M., Benavente J.Y., Vicencio D.P., Wolf M.S. Mild visual impairment and its impact on self-care among older adults. J. Aging Health. 2018;30:327–341. doi: 10.1177/0898264316676406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kirag N., Temel A.B. The effect of an eye health promotion program on the health protective behaviors of primary school students. J. Educ. Health Promot. 2018;7:37. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_67_17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Voleti V.B., Hubschman J.P. Age-related eye disease. Maturitas. 2013;75:29–33. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2013.01.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Singh M., Tyagi S.C. Genes and genetics in eye diseases: A genomic medicine approach for investigating hereditary and inflammatory ocular disorders. Int. J. Ophthalmol. 2018;11:117–134. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2018.01.20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Merle B.M.J., Moreau G., Ozguler A., Srour B., Cougnard-Grégoire A., Goldberg M., Zins M., Delcourt C. Unhealthy behaviours and risk of visual impairment: The CONSTANCES population-based cohort. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:6569. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24822-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lawrenson J.G., Downie L.E. Nutrition and Eye Health. Nutrients. 2019;11:2123. doi: 10.3390/nu11092123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nita M., Grzybowski A. Smoking and Eye Pathologies. A Systemic Review. Part I. Anterior Eye Segment Pathologies. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2017;23:629–638. doi: 10.2174/1381612822666161129152041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nita M., Grzybowski A. Smoking and Eye Pathologies. A Systemic Review. Part II. Retina Diseases, Uveitis, Optic Neuropathies, Thyroid-Associated Orbitopathy. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2017;23:639–654. doi: 10.2174/1381612823666170111095723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ng Yin Ling C., Lim S.C., Jonas J.B., Sabanayagam C. Obesity and risk of age-related eye diseases: A systematic review of prospective population-based studies. Int. J. Obes. 2021;45:1863–1885. doi: 10.1038/s41366-021-00829-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Faustino J.F., Ribeiro-Silva A., Dalto R.F., Souza M.M., Furtado J.M., Rocha Gde M., Alves M., Rocha E.M. Vitamin A and the eye: An old tale for modern times. Arq. Bras. Oftalmol. 2016;79:56–61. doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.20160018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ang M.J., Afshari N.A. Cataract and systemic disease: A review. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2021;49:118–127. doi: 10.1111/ceo.13892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cougnard-Grégoire A., Delyfer M.N., Korobelnik J.F., Rougier M.B., Malet F., Le Goff M., Dartigues J.F., Colin J., Barberger-Gateau P., Delcourt C. Long-term blood pressure and age-related macular degeneration: The ALIENOR study. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013;54:1905–1912. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-10192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dasari B., Prasanthi J.R., Marwarha G., Singh B.B., Ghribi O. Cholesterol-enriched diet causes age-related macular degeneration-like pathology in rabbit retina. BMC Ophthalmol. 2011;11:22. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-11-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.SanGiovanni J.P., Chew E.Y., Clemons T.E., Davis M.D., Ferris F.L., 3rd, Gensler G.R., Kurinij N., Lindblad A.S., Milton R.C., Seddon J.M., et al. The relationship of dietary lipid intake and age-related macular degeneration in a case-control study: AREDS Report No. 20. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2007;125:671–679. doi: 10.1001/archopht.125.5.671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chatziralli I.P. The Role of Glycemic Control and Variability in Diabetic Retinopathy. Diabetes Ther. 2018;9:431–434. doi: 10.1007/s13300-017-0345-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Costa L., Cunha J.P., Amado D., Pinto L.A., Ferreira J. Diabetes Mellitus as a Risk Factor in Glaucoma’s Physiopathology and Surgical Survival Time: A Literature Review. J. Curr. Glaucoma Pract. 2015;9:81–85. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10008-1190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chew Y.K., Reddy S.C., Karina R. Awareness and knowledge of common eye diseases among the academic staff (non-medical faculties) of University of Malaya. Med. J. Malays. 2004;59:305–311. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Noertjojo K., Maberley D., Bassett K., Courtright P. Awareness of eye diseases and risk factors: Identifying needs for health education and promotion in Canada. Can. J. Ophthalmol. 2006;41:617–623. doi: 10.1016/S0008-4182(06)80035-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sathyamangalam R.V., Paul P.G., George R., Baskaran M., Hemamalini A., Madan R.V., Augustian J., Prema R., Lingam V. Determinants of glaucoma awareness and knowledge in urban Chennai. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2009;57:355–360. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.55073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Shrestha M.K., Guo C.W., Maharjan N., Gurung R., Ruit S. Health literacy of common ocular diseases in Nepal. BMC Ophthalmol. 2014;14:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-14-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Islam F.M., Chakrabarti R., Islam S.Z., Finger R.P., Critchley C. Factors associated with awareness, attitudes and practices regarding common eye diseases in the general population in a rural district in Bangladesh: The Bangladesh population based diabetes and eye study (BPDES) PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0133043. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Haddad M.F., Bakkar M.M., Abdo N. Public awareness of common eye diseases in Jordan. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017;17:177. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0575-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wong P.W., Lau J.K., Choy B.N., Shih K.C., Ng A.L., Chan J.C., Wong I.Y. Epidemiological factors associated with health knowledge of three common eye diseases: A community-based pilot survey in Hong Kong. SAGE Open Med. 2020;8:2050312120943044. doi: 10.1177/2050312120943044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.England K., Azzopardi-Muscat N. Demographic trends and public health in Europe. Eur. J. Public Health. 2017;27((Suppl. 4)):9–13. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckx159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kamińska A., Pinkas J., Goryński P., Jankowski M. A National Registry-Based Epidemiological Study to Evaluate 395 646 Patients Hospitalized Due to Eye Diseases in Poland in 2019. Med. Sci. Monit. 2023;29:e939351. doi: 10.12659/MSM.939351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Nationwide Research Panel Ariadna About Us. [(accessed on 6 January 2023)]. Available online: https://panelariadna.com/
  • 34.Statistics Poland. Demographic Yearbook of Poland 2022. [(accessed on 6 January 2023)]; Available online: https://stat.gov.pl/en/topics/statistical-yearbooks/statistical-yearbooks/demographic-yearbook-of-poland-2022,3,16.html.
  • 35.Żarnowski A., Jankowski M., Gujski M. Use of Mobile Apps and Wearables to Monitor Diet, Weight, and Physical Activity: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Adults in Poland. Med. Sci. Monit. 2022;28:e937948. doi: 10.12659/MSM.937948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Furman F.M., Zgliczyński W.S., Jankowski M., Baran T., Szumowski Ł., Pinkas J. The State of Vaccine Confidence in Poland: A 2019 Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020;17:4565. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Katibeh M., Ziaei H., Panah E., Moein H.R., Hosseini S., Kalantarion M., Eskandari A., Yaseri M. Knowledge and awareness of age related eye diseases: A population-based survey. J. Ophthalmic Vis. Res. 2014;9:223–231. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ek S. Gender differences in health information behaviour: A Finnish population-based survey. Health Promot. Int. 2015;30:736–745. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dat063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ho K.C., Stapleton F., Wiles L., Hibbert P., Alkhawajah S., White A., Jalbert I. Systematic review of the appropriateness of eye care delivery in eye care practice. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2019;19:646. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4493-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available on reasonable request.


Articles from International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES