Skip to main content
International Journal of Molecular Sciences logoLink to International Journal of Molecular Sciences
. 2023 Feb 9;24(4):3456. doi: 10.3390/ijms24043456

Novel Erlotinib–Chalcone Hybrids Diminish Resistance in Head and Neck Cancer by Inducing Multiple Cell Death Mechanisms

József Murányi 1, Cintia Duró 2, Bianka Gurbi 1, István Móra 1, Attila Varga 1, Krisztina Németh 3, József Simon 4, Miklós Csala 1,*, Antal Csámpai 2,*
Editors: Magdalena Cal, Zsolt Szakonyi
PMCID: PMC9964293  PMID: 36834866

Abstract

In a search for novel therapeutic options for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs) generally treated with limited therapeutic success, we synthesized a series of novel erlotinib–chalcone molecular hybrids with 1,2,3-triazole and alkyne linkers and evaluated them for their anticancer activity on Fadu, Detroit 562 and SCC-25 HNSCC cell lines. Time- and dose-dependent cell viability measurements disclosed a significantly increased efficiency of the hybrids compared to the 1:1 combination of erlotinib and a reference chalcone. The clonogenic assay demonstrated that hybrids eradicate HNSCC cells in low micromolar concentrations. Experiments focusing on potential molecular targets indicate that the hybrids trigger the anticancer effect by a complementary mechanism of action that is independent of the canonical targets of their molecular fragments. Confocal microscopic imaging and real-time apoptosis/necrosis detection assay pointed to slightly different cell death mechanisms induced by the most prominent triazole- and alkyne-tethered hybrids (6a and 13, respectively). While 6a featured the lowest IC50 values on each of the three HNSCC cell lines, in Detroit 562 cells, this hybrid induced necrosis more markedly compared to 13. The therapeutic potential indicated by the observed anticancer efficacy of our selected hybrid molecules validates the concept of development and justifies further investigation to reveal the underlying mechanism of action.

Keywords: erlotinib, chalcone, hybrid, HNSCC, necrosis, apoptosis, paclitaxel, resistance, cancer

1. Introduction

Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs) represent the sixth most common cancer worldwide, accounting for approximately 660,000 new diagnoses and 325,000 deaths annually. The main risk factors are tobacco and alcohol consumption, but infection with human papillomavirus or Epstein–Barr virus is also responsible for the development of the disease [1,2].

The topological diversity and the high genomic heterogeneity of the individual HNSCC tumors make it difficult to identify predictive biomarkers of therapeutic value. The principal modalities of curative therapy for HNSCCs are surgery, radiation, and systemic therapy [3].

Since human epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has a pivotal role in carcinogenesis and HNSCCs show significantly increased EGFR expression, several EGFR inhibitors were developed and tested for HNSCC treatment in the past few decades [4]. The currently available types of EGFR inhibitors are monoclonal antibodies (e.g., cetuximab) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (such as gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib and lapatinib). Despite effective EGFR inhibition, these compounds have relatively low response rates in HNSCC patients in monotherapy, and the development of resistance is a general problem, which compromises the chances of cure. EGFR antisense DNA represents a promising approach by inhibition of EGFR expression in tumor cells; however, a therapeutic breakthrough has yet to be achieved. Therefore, the combination of EGFR inhibitors with other therapeutic agents has emerged as a promising strategy to overcome resistance and improve clinical outcomes [5].

Although recent advances in immunotherapy led to a better survival rate than achievable by conventional chemotherapy in a small fraction of HNSCC patients, the overall clinical response rate is still below that observed in many other tumor types. It follows that the necessary improvement in the survival of HNSCC patients requires novel strategies based on the identification of better molecular targets and therapeutic agents [3].

Fragment-based drug discovery is a promising recent approach to developing potent hybrid compounds for cancer treatment by coupling different pharmacophore residues into new multitarget anticancer agents [6,7,8]. The enhanced efficiency of hybrid anticancer drugs with more than one molecular target in the cells lies in the fact that they trigger multiple signal transduction pathways, finally leading to the multiplied stimulation of cell death. In principle, hybrid anticancer agents might have a real potential to overcome certain disadvantages of single cancer drugs, such as resistance and adverse effects.

In attempting to target HNSCCs with enhanced efficacy, we envisaged exploring the concept of fragment-based drug design for the development of novel hybrid compounds. Accordingly, erlotinib (1, Scheme 1) was selected as the fragment displaying EGFR inhibitory activity with a terminal alkyne moiety that makes this molecule feasible for well-established coupling reactions used for chemical hybridizations.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Synthesis of the group of erlotinib–chalcone hybrids with 1,2,3-triazole linker.

Following the strategy of fragment-based drug design, we selected representative types of chalcones to be incorporated in erlotinib-based hybrid molecules as an additional pharmacophore unit with significant potency in contributing to antiproliferative activity. As it has been extensively reviewed, chalcone derivatives represent a highly potent class of anticancer drug candidates featuring manifold mechanisms of action in cancer cells [9,10,11,12]. For instance, a great number of their representatives were found to induce significant cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase leading to apoptosis; moreover, they exhibited higher efficacy due to their inhibitory activity in tubulin polymerization, enzyme dynamics [13] and signal transductions induced by nuclear factor κB [14]. Highlighting the importance of cell cycle arrest, 1,2,3-triazole-tethered cinchona-chalcone hybrids demonstrated substantial antiproliferative activity in the highly treatment-resistant PANC-1 pancreatic carcinoma cells, exerting extensive inhibitory effects in the subG1, S and G2/M phases [15].

It is also of note that diverse chalcone derivatives have a real potency even in the therapy of drug resistance as they display promising in vitro and in vivo effects on both drug-susceptible and drug-resistant cancers while also being capable of acting on a variety of targets, such as aromatase, breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and ATP binding cassette subfamily G member 2 (ABCG2) [16,17].

In the context of our recent program, it is of particular relevance that focused mechanistic studies identified highly potent 1,2,3-triazole-tethered chalcone hybrids inducing apoptosis, G2/S arrest, inhibition of the ATR-mediated activation of Chk1 and disruption of mitochondrial membrane potential in a panel of human cancer cell lines [18,19]. Mitochondrial damage could be achieved in both drug-sensitive and multidrug-resistant (MDR) lung carcinoma cells by such ferrocene-based triazole-containing cinchona-chalcone hybrids [20], which were also found to exhibit significant antiproliferative activity in HepG2 hepatoma and HT-29 colorectal adenocarcinoma human tumor cell cultures [21].

We envisaged introducing 1,2,3-triazole and alkyne moieties as linkers to tether erlotinib and chalcone fragments in the target hybrid molecules. On the one hand, given the presence of the ethynyl group in erlotinib, this choice of linkers is reasonable from the synthetic aspect, and on the other hand, their introduction in the molecular architecture might significantly attenuate the antiproliferative activity of a hybrid therapeutic agent. Accordingly, the 1,2,3-triazole ring, a privileged pharmacophore unit readily available by “click” chemistry, is capable of forming a variety of noncovalent interactions with diverse enzymes, proteins and receptors by hydrogen bonds as well as van der Waals and dipole–dipole forces [22,23,24,25]; thus, this heterocycle has been extensively utilized as a valuable pharmacophoric motif in bioactive compounds with diverse activities, including antimalarial [26,27,28], antibacterial [29,30], antiviral [31,32] and anticancer [15,18,19,20,21,28,32,33,34] effects. The presented selection of examples from the recent literature underlines that the 1,2,3-triazole ring is worth being incorporated as a linker in the target chalcone-containing hybrids.

Besides the synthetic feasibility of well-established protocols of Sonogashira coupling, the beneficial feature of the introduction of an acetylenic linker into anticancer drug candidates is also justified by characteristic literature examples reporting on alkyne derivatives identified as potent antitumor agents of natural and synthetic origin [35,36,37,38,39,40,41].

Finally, it is of note that our current strategy in fragment-based drug design is further supported by a previous research that demonstrated that both 1,2,3-triazole-linked and alkyne-tethered hybrid molecules with identical terminal pharmacophores display antiproliferative activity in a panel of human cancer cell lines [42].

2. Results

2.1. Chemistry

Starting from erlotinib (1) and azidochalcones 2ac, 3ac and 4a,b as coupling partners, the target hybrids with 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazole linkers with alternative chalcone constitutions (5a,b,d, 6a,b,d and 7a,b, respectively: Scheme 1) were accessed in acceptable-to-good yields (33–85%) by straightforward synthetic routes based on the well-established copper-catalyzed alkyne-azide cycloaddition [43]. The reactions were conducted at room temperature for a prolonged reaction time (12 h) using copper(I) iodide as a catalyst in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) that served both as solvent and ligand. The hybrids with a 4-aminophenyl group at the terminal position of the chalcone fragment (5d and 6d) were obtained in low overall yields (22% and 23%, respectively) by standard cycloaddition/acid-catalyzed N-deprotection sequence employed in a one-pot protocol without isolation of the tert-butoxycarbonyl-protected intermediate (Scheme 1(5c) and (6c)). The azidochalcone components were prepared by Claisen–Schmidt condensation of the appropriate arylaldehyde and methyl ketone, as described in previous works (23a: [15], 23b: [21] and 4a: [28]) and in the Supplementary Materials (SM) (23c and 4b: Section S1).

Since the initial cell viability inhibition screening (discussed in detail in Section 2.2) identified 6a as the most active member of the hybrids with the 1,2,3-triazol linker (Scheme 1), we selected 3,4,5-trimethoxyhenyl derivatives 13 and 14 as targeted structures expected to have promising anticancer properties in the series of the possible alkyne-tethered erlotinib–chalcone hybrids. Accordingly, following a simple synthetic route, alkyne-containing aldehyde intermediates 10 and 11 were first obtained in mediocre yields (44% and 48%) by using a well-established protocol of Sonogashira coupling of 1 with 4-bromobenzaldehyde (8) and 2-iodobenzaldehyde (9), respectively (Scheme 2). In the second step, hybrids 13 and 14 were accessed by base-catalyzed Claisen–Schmidt condensation of 3,4,5-trimethoxyacetophenone 12a with aldehyde components 10 and 11, respectively (Scheme 2). The relatively low isolated yields of 13 and 14 might be due to the competing conjugate addition of 12a to the activated carbon-carbon triple bond in the aldehyde components and/or uncontrolled polymerization processes. Finally, 12a was also subjected to Claisen–Schmidt condensation with benzaldehyde to afford chalcone 15 as a reference compound [44] (Figure 1).

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Synthesis of the group of erlotinib–chalcone hybrids with alkyne linker.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The novel hybrids emerged as the most potent model compounds in the viability assays (6a, 13 and 14), which were selected for further biological studies (red) using erlotinib (1) and chalcone (15) as reference fragments (blue) exploited in structure design.

2.2. In Vitro Cell Viability Inhibition Screening of Novel Erlotinib–Chalcone Hybrid Molecules on HNSCC Cell Lines

The synthesized compounds were screened for their anticancer activities against three HNSCC cell lines (Fadu, Detroit 562 and SCC-25) using the CellTiter-Glo luminescent cell viability assay (Figure 2). The screening was performed at a 10 μM concentration and 72 h treatment time, and untreated cells (cultured in 0.2% DMSO-containing medium) were used as reference. The efficacy of the compounds that constitute the two fundamental moieties of our molecular hybrids, i.e., 1 and 15, were also assessed. Although 3a, 5b, 6d and 15 were also found to be more potent antiproliferative agents than 1, among the tested hybrid molecules, 6a, 13 and 14 showed the highest efficacy (Figure 1 and Figure 2). These compounds proved to be significantly more potent than either 1 or 15 and were selected for further investigation.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

In vitro cell viability inhibition screening of the synthesized hybrid compounds on Fadu, Detroit 562 and SCC-25 NHSCC cell lines using CellTiter-Glo cell viability assay. Cells were treated for 72 h at 10 µM. The most effective 6a, 13 and 14 hybrid molecules were selected for further investigation. Erlotinib (1) and chalcone (15) as reference fragments were also assessed. Data are presented as mean ± SD; n = 3.

2.3. Time- and Dose-Dependent Effects of Selected Hybrid Molecules on the Viability of HNSCC Cells

The viability inhibition potency of the selected hybrid molecules (6a, 13, 14) was further investigated on HNSCC cells using the CellTiter-Glo cell viability assay (Figure 3). Molecular fragments of the hybrids (1 and 15) as well as their combination (1:1 mixture) were tested as reference models.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Dose- and time-dependent effects of the selected hybrid molecules on the viability of Fadu, Detroit 562 and SCC-25 cells. Hybrids (6a, 13 and 14) and the reference compounds (1: erlotinib, 15: chalcone and their combination in 1:1 ratio) were applied for 24 h or 72 h followed by 72 h postincubation period. Cell viability was determined by CellTiter-Glo assay. Curves were fitted by GraphPad Prism 8 software (nonlinear regression, variable slope; n = 4).

Erlotinib significantly inhibited the viability of all tested cancer cells in the nanomolar range; however, it was far from being able to completely eradicate the cancer cells even at the highest concentration applied (10 µM). On the other hand, the effect of 15 (reference chalcone) was only detectable in the micromolar range. It must be pointed out as a novel finding that the most prominent hybrids (6a, 13 and 14), showed superior potency not only to 1 and 15 when applied as single agents but also to the 1:1 combination of these reference compounds.

Among the hybrids, 6a showed the highest efficiency both in the short term (24 h treatment) and long term (72 h treatment + 72 h postincubation). The results of the short-term treatment suggest that hybrids 13 and 14 have no direct cytotoxic effect, while 6a showed significant viability inhibition on Fadu and SCC25 cells; however, it proved to be less efficient against Detroit 562 cells.

The long-term treatment revealed the outstanding potency of the hybrids superior to that produced by their molecular components (1 and 15) either as single agents or in combination. According to the cell viability measurement, all three HNSCC cell lines were eradicated by the selected hybrids in the micromolar range. The IC50 values (Table 1) as well as the combination indexes (Figure 4) demonstrate that Fadu cells are the most sensitive and SCC-25 are the most resistant to the hybrids in our experiments. Dose-dependent combination indexes also reveal that the combination of 1 + 15 has only an additive effect, while each of the three hybrids exhibits strong synergism on all of the three HNSCC cell lines in the micromolar range. On the other hand, combination indexes of the hybrids indicate antagonism in the nanomolar range, which can be reasoned by the fact that the hybrids proved to be less effective in the nanomolar range compared to 1.

Table 1.

IC50 values of hybrids (6a, 13 and 14) and reference fragments (1 and 15) as single agents and in 1:1 combination, after 72 h treatment and 72 h postincubation. IC50 values were determined by GraphPad Prism 8 software (nonlinear regression, variable slope, best fit values are presented, n = 4).

IC50 Values (nM)
1 15 1 + 15 6a 13 14
Fadu 1199 1880 362 389 770 658
Detroit 562 4035 3074 1488 673 810 1264
SCC-25 180 2777 173 725 1935 1444

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Concentration-dependent visualization of combination index of hybrids (6a, 13 and 14) and their fragments: erlotinib (1) and chalcone (15) in 1:1 mixture. Combination index was calculated by CompuSyn using the mean values of cell viability data measured by CellTiter-Glo after 72 h treatment and 72 h postincubation. Total concentration means the overall concentration of 1 and 15 either in combination or in hybridized form.

2.4. Colony Formation Assay

A colony formation assay was performed in order to verify the elimination of HNSCC cells even after a single-dose treatment with hybrid molecules 6a, 13 and 14. Therefore, cells were treated only for 24 h at a 2.5 µM concentration followed by a 7-day-long postincubation period in complete medium. Untreated cells were used as control, and 1 and 15 served as references.

In this experimental setup, erlotinib has no significant anticancer effect as it is demonstrated in Figure 5. Chalcone 15 proved to be more effective against Detroit 562 and Fadu cells than SCC-25 cells; however, it was far from being able to eliminate these cancer cells. Triazole-tethered hybrid 6a was identified as the sole investigated compound able to completely eradicate the whole cell population of all three HNSSC cell lines tested, while 13 caused total lethality on Detroit 562 cells and proved to be highly efficient on Fadu cells as well. Surviving cancer cells were visible on each investigated cell line after the treatment with hybrid 14. Since this compound proved to be the less effective one among the three hybrids in the colony formation assay, it has been excluded from further experiments.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Colony formation assay of HNSCC cells using 2.5 uM concentration, 24 h treatment time and 1-week-long postincubation in treatment-free cell culture medium. C: control (medium containing 0.2% DMSO); 1: erlotinib; 6a, 13 and 14: hybrids; 15: chalcone.

2.5. Apoptosis and Necrosis Quantitation Assay

The mechanism of action of the most potent hybrids, 6a and 13, was investigated by an apoptosis-necrosis detection assay on the HNSCC cells. Paclitaxel, the emblematic apoptosis-inducing agent used in current HNSCC therapy, was employed as a positive control for apoptosis, and untreated cells served as a negative control. Nuclei were labeled with DRAQ5 (blue). Early apoptosis was defined here as annexin V-positive (green color) and EthD-III (pink color)-negative cells, while late apoptosis/necrosis was defined as both annexin V- and EthD-III-positive cells. As shown in Figure 6, hybrid 6a resulted in the formation of several early apoptotic Fadu and SCC-25 cells but only late apoptotic/necrotic Detrotic-562 cells. In the case of treatment with 13, early apoptosis was detectable in several Fadu and Detroit 562 cells but not in SCC-25 cells. Plasma membrane blebbing, as another potential morphological marker of apoptosis [45,46], was also revealed in some Annexin V-positive cells.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Apoptosis-necrosis detection assay on Fadu, Detroit 562 and SCC-25 HNSCC cells by confocal laser scanning microscopy. The cells were treated for 28 h at 2.5 µM. Paclitaxel was used as a positive control and untreated cells as a negative control. Nuclei were visualized by membrane-permeable dye DRAQ5 (blue). CF488A-labeled Annexin V stains apoptotic cells with green fluorescence. Membrane-impermeable Ethidium Homodimer III stains the nuclei of necrotic cells and late apoptotic cells exclusively (pink color). Plasma membrane blebs are marked with yellow arrows.

2.6. Mitochondrial Membrane Potential Detection

Mitochondrial membrane potential as an indicator of mitochondrial function was investigated by the membrane-permeant JC-1 dye [47]. Mitochondrial uncoupling agent 2,4-Dinitrophenol (DNP) was used as a positive control [48]. Compared to the nontreated cells, where the well-functioning mitochondria appear with red color, both hybrids 6a and 13 resulted in a significant reduction in membrane potential as indicated by the diffuse green color in Figure 7. Complementing the results of the Apoptosis and Necrosis Quantitation Assay, characteristic morphologic alterations were observed on the confocal images of JC-1-labeled cells as well. Vacuolated cytoplasm (bubble-like formation) was detectable in all three HNSCC cell lines after treatment with 13. In contrast, vacuolated cytoplasm was not detectable in Detroit 562 cells treated by 6a and only detectable in Fadu and SCC-25 cells, as shown in Figure 8. Upon treatment with 13, nuclear shrinkage, as another morphological marker of programmed cell death [49], was also more pronounced than that caused by 6a in Detroit 562 cells.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Mitochondrial Membrane Potential Using the Cationic JC-1 Dye. Nontreated cells were used as negative control, with their well-functioning mitochondria represented with red color. Mitochondrial uncoupling agent 2,4-Dinitrophenol (DNP) was used a positive control. Diffusive green color indicates the diminished mitochondrial membrane potential in DNP-treated cells. Hybrids 6a and 13 resulted in significant mitochondrial dysfunction (at 2.5 µM after 28 h treatment) in HNSCC cells. Nuclei were visualized by membrane-permeable dye DRAQ5 (blue).

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Morphological changes in Detroit 562 cells. Besides mitochondrial dysfunction (green color), JC-1 Dye (labels the well-functioning mitochondria with red color) revealed vacuolated cytoplasm and nuclear shrinkage in Detroit 562 cells, after 28 h of treatment with hybrid 13 at 2.5 µM. DNP was used as positive control for mitochondrial membrane depolarization. Nuclei were visualized by membrane-permeable dye DRAQ5 (blue).

2.7. Real-Time Apoptosis Detection

The effects of hybrids 6a and 13 were further characterized by using RealTime-Glo™ Annexin V Apoptosis and Necrosis Assay on Detroit 562 cells. In this experiment, DNS released as a marker of necrosis induced a fluorescent signal (red curve), while annexin V binding as a marker of apoptosis resulted in a luminescent signal (blue curve). Detroit 562 cells were monitored for 48 h in a CO2-incubated plate reader in the presence of the compounds. The intensive increment in the luminescent signal and subsequent appearance of the necrotic signal a few hours later refer to apoptosis, while the parallel increase in the two signals is the marker of necrosis. In correlation with the images obtained by the Apoptosis and Necrosis Quantitation Assay, the effect of 6a proved to be rather necrotic in Detroit 562 cells, while the effect of 13 in character was in between apoptosis and necrosis when compared to paclitaxel, which served as a positive control of apoptosis (Figure 9).

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Real-time apoptosis detection in Detroit 562 cells. The cells were treated with the compounds at 2.5 µM and monitored for 48 h. DNS release as a marker of necrosis provided fluorescent signal (red curve), while annexin V binding as a marker of apoptosis resulted in luminescent signal (blue curve). Intensive increment of luminescent signal, which was followed a few hours later by the appearance of the fluorescent signal, refers to apoptosis. Paclitaxel was used as a positive control of apoptosis. While hybrid 6a resulted in necrotic-like cell death, the effect of hybrid 13 proved to be more apoptotic-like.

3. Discussion

The main purpose of developing erlotinib–chalcone hybrids was to identify the first members of a novel class of anticancer small molecules as efficient drug candidates capable of overcoming erlotinib resistance in cancer therapy. The synthesized compounds were evaluated for their anticancer potential on three HNSCC cell lines, Fadu, Detroit 562 and SCC-25. The initial screening revealed an interesting structure-activity relationship regarding the dramatic difference observed in the effects of the triazole-tethered isomer pair 5a and 6a. While 5a proved to be one of the least efficient hybrids, 6a was identified as the most potent one. The only structural difference is the site (ortho vs. para position) of conjugation to the triazole linker on the phenol ring in the chalcone moiety. The strict “ortho vs. para” rule related to relative activity was not discernible in their analogs 13 and 14 containing the acetylenic linker, since both hybrids displayed similar activity against the investigated HNSCC cells. These structural differences highlight the pivotal role of the linker and the site of conjugation in building up the cancer-specific efficacy of these hybrids. According to the results of the screening, the three most prominent hybrids 6a, 13 and 14 were selected for further investigation.

Time- and concentration-dependent cell viability measurements (based on quantitation of the ATP level) revealed that hybrids are significantly more effective than their molecular fragments (1 and 15), used either as single agents or in a 1:1 combination.

The short-term treatment (24 h) was expected to exclude the unfavorable cytotoxic effect of the hybrids. As it is shown in Figure 3, none of the tested compounds were able to reduce the viability of the cells to zero even at 10 µM, the highest concentration used. However, hybrid 6a resulted in robust viability inhibition exclusively on Fadu and SCC-25 cells after 24 h, while Detroit 562 cells remained less affected. One possible explanation for the enhanced activity on Fadu and SCC-25 is the significant oxidative stress induced in these cells by 6a containing the triazole linker. The oxidative effect was significantly lower in the case of the treatments with acetylene-tethered hybrids 13 and 14 as indicated by the results obtained by the Glutathione assay (SM: Figure S3 in Section S4.4), which was used for the investigation of oxidative stress.

The long-term treatment (72 h) followed by 72 h of postincubation was aimed to assess the survival of the cancer cells, which is the main cause of the early development of drug resistance. The long-term viability inhibition assay revealed a highly promising overwhelming efficacy of the studied hybrids, which is superior to that produced by their fragments. The hybrids were exclusively able to diminish the viability of HNSCC cells employed in the lower micromolar range. The IC50 values (Table 1) demonstrate that Fadu cells are the most sensitive against the hybrids, while SCC-25 cells are the most tolerant. Among the hybrids, 6a proved to be the most potent one on all three cell lines. However, it is important to mention that the IC50 value characterizing hybrid 13 was found to be very close to that measured for 6a on Detroit 562 cells.

It is well known that persistent cancer cells are prominently responsible for the early development of drug resistance, treatment failure and recurrent disease [50,51]. Since the capability of overcoming resistance in HNSCC cells was regarded as the most important effectiveness criterion for the hybrids, we performed a colony formation assay to assess their potency in the eradication of cancer cells even after an exposure of 24 h at 2.5 µM, serving as a model experiment to mimic a single-dose treatment in vitro. In this experimental setup, 1 and 15 were not able to significantly reduce the number of cancer cell colonies. Among the selected hybrids, only 6a was able to totally eradicate all three cancer cells, while 13 abolished Detroit 562 cells totally and Fadu cells almost completely. Since hybrid 14 proved to be less effective than 6a and 13, it has been excluded from further experiments.

In search of a plausible reason for the effectual surplus of the two most prominent hybrids 6a and 13, we undertook further investigation by focusing on the potential targets selected on the basis of the following considerations related to documented mechanisms of action of the incorporated molecular fragments. Erlotinib, as the common structural element of hybrids, is a well-known inhibitor of EGFR [52]. In agreement with clinical experiences, our results also underline that the inhibition of EGFR might be able to reduce the proliferation rate of tumor cells to a limited extent, but this effect is not sufficient to eliminate them completely. Western blot analysis revealed that the superior anticancer effect of hybrids 6a and 13 is independent of EGFR, since these hybrids were not able to inhibit EGFR even at 5 uM, much above their IC50 values. Data from the Western blot analysis can be found in the SM (Figure S1 in Section S4.2).

In the case of chalcones, several potential molecular targets have been previously identified as it was detailed in the Introduction. One of their most relevant mechanisms of action is the inhibition of tubulin polymerization [13,53]. Accordingly, we also carried out a tubulin polymerization assay; however, this experiment revealed that, contrary to reference chalcone 15, its hybrid derivatives 6a and 13 have no significant impact on this cellular process in vitro. The results of the tubulin polymerization assay can be found in the SM (Figure S2 in Section S4.3). Cell cycle analysis was also performed on all three HNSCC cell lines; however, neither 15 nor the hybrids induced any significant changes after 18 h treatment. Only erlotinib (1) produced a remarkable increment in the G0/G1 phase and decrement in the S phase. The results of the cell cycle analysis can also be found in the SM (Figure S4 in Section S4.5). Based on the molecular target exploration, we concluded that the effectual surplus of our hybrids is independent of the canonical targets of their molecular precursors.

Thus, the following additional experiments briefly discussed in the following paragraphs were focused on attempting to collect further information on such potential cell death mechanisms that might be responsible for the superior anticancer efficacy of the hybrids.

Upon treatment with 6a, confocal microscopic images—generated by the Apoptosis and Necrosis Quantitation Assay—indicated apoptosis in Fadu and SCC-25 cells and marked necrotic cell death in Detroit 562 cells. In the case of treatment with 13, a sign of apoptosis was detectable in Fadu and Detoit 562 cells, but apoptosis was less typical in SCC-25 cells (Figure 5).

Lysosomes also have an important role in cell death pathways. Triggered by lysosomal membrane permeabilization (LMP) [54], lysosomal cell death usually remains functional even in apoptosis-resistant cancer cells. The potential effect of the hybrids on the lysosomes was investigated by a Galectin-3 puncta assay, which is a reliable tool to detect LMP [55]. Hybrids were not able to induce LMP in HNSCC cells according to the Galectin-3 puncta assay as demonstrated by confocal images outlined in the SM (Figure S5 in Section S4.6).

Mitochondria have a pivotal role in intrinsic apoptosis and are also implicated in other forms of regulated cell death, including necroptosis, ferroptosis and pyroptosis [56]. Since mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP) is a crucial event for most apoptotic pathways, mitochondrial membrane potential is a frequently investigated marker in correlation with MOMP [57]. A JC-1-dye-based mitochondrial potential assay confirmed that the membrane potential of mitochondria was significantly decreased in hybrid-treated cells. Besides mitochondrial dysfunction, confocal microscopic images also disclosed striking morphological changes in these cells. Besides the enlarged membrane blebs detected in several Annexin V-positive cells, JC-1 dye revealed vacuolated cytoplasm in the treated cells as well. More interestingly, the investigated hybrids showed different specificity towards each cell type. In correlation with the previous experiments, the real-time apoptosis-necrosis assay confirmed that hybrid 13 induces more apoptosis-like cell death than 6a in Detroit 562 cells.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Cell Culturing

Fadu (human pharyngeal carcinoma), Detroit 562 (human pharyngeal carcinoma) and SCC-25 (human tongue carcinoma) cell lines were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville, MD, USA). Cell lines were cultured according to the instructions provided by ATCC. The authentication of the cell lines was validated by STR DNA analysis (Eurofins Scientific, Luxemburg). All cell lines were routinely screened for the absence of mycoplasma infection (DAPI staining).

4.2. CellTiter-Glo Cell Viability Assay

Fadu, Detroit 562 and SCC-25 head and neck cancer cells were seeded at 1000 cell/well onto a flat bottom white 96-well plate (BRANDplates®, cat. no.: 781965). After 48 h, cells were treated for the desired time and concentration. In the initial screening assay, compounds were applied at 10 µM for 72 h. In dose-dependent experiments, 2-fold serial dilution was used (from 10 µM to 156 nM). In the first case of dose-dependent assays, a 24 h long treatment was used. In the second case, 72 h of treatment was applied, which was followed by a 72 h long postincubation in treatment-free medium. The viability of the cells was measured by the CellTiter-Glo® luminescent cell viability assay (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The luminescence signal was recorded using a microplate reader (BioTek Synergy 2 Multi-Mode Reader, BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA). Dose–response curves (using a nonlinear regression model) were generated and IC50 values were calculated by GraphPad Prism 8 software. The combination index was calculated by CompuSyn software using the mean values of cell viability data measured by CellTiter-Glo after 72 h of treatment and 72 h of postincubation.

4.3. Colony Formation Assay

The long-term survival of cancer cells after treatment was investigated by a clonogenic assay. Cells were seeded in a transparent 6-well cell culture plate (VWR) (density: 750 cells/well). After seeding, cells were incubated for 72 h before the treatment. Cells were treated with the compounds at 2.5 µM for 24 h. After the treatment, the medium was removed, and the cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Cells were further incubated in their corresponding medium for 7 days. Thereafter, the medium was removed and cells were washed with PBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min. After fixation, cells were washed with PBS, and 0.5% w/v crystal violet (CV) solution was added. After 1 h, the CV solution was removed, and cells were washed thoroughly with water. Images were created by Corel Photo-Paint 2019.

4.4. Apoptosis and Necrosis Quantitation Assay

Fadu, Detroit 562 and SCC-25 head cells were seeded in eight-well Ibidi® μ-Slide microscopic slides (2 × 103 cells/well) and allowed to adhere for 48 h. Cells were then treated at a 2.5 µM concentration in cell culture medium supplemented with 10% FBS and incubated in a humidified, 5% CO2 atmosphere incubator for 28 h at 37 °C. Apoptosis and Necrosis Quantitation Kit Plus (Biotium, cat. no.: 30065) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For nuclear staining of live cells, DRAQ5 was used (5 µM, 30 min). Images of cells were acquired with a confocal laser microscope (Zeiss Confocal LSM 710, Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany). (Objective: Plan-Apochromat 63×/1.40 Oil DIC M27. Pinhole: 0.99 AU. Laser wavelength: 488 nm and 633 nm. Detection wavelength: 504–536 nm; 602–631 nm; and 692–758 nm).

4.5. Mitochondrial Membrane Potential Detection

Fadu, Detroit 562 and SCC-25 head cells were seeded in eight-well Ibidi® μ-Slide microscopic slides (2 × 103 cells/well) and allowed to adhere for 48 h. Cells were then treated (6a, 13 and paclitaxel) at a 2.5 µM concentration in cell culture medium supplemented with 10% FBS and incubated in a humidified, 5% CO2 atmosphere incubator for 28 h at 37 °C. 2,4-Dinitrophenol was added to nontreated cells only 1 h before the JC-1 dye. After the treatment, JC-1 mitochondrial dye (5 µg/mL) and DRAQ-5 nuclear dye (5 µM) were added to the cells. The cells were incubated in a 5% CO2 atmosphere incubator for 30 min at 37 °C. Images of cells were acquired with a confocal laser microscope (Zeiss Confocal LSM 710, Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany). (Objective: Plan-Apochromat 63×/1.40 Oil DIC M27. Pinhole: 1.01 AU. Laser wavelength: 488 nm and 633 nm. Detection wavelength: 520–540 nm; 583–602 nm; and 683–758 nm).

4.6. Real-Time Apoptosis Detection

Detroit 562 cells were seeded at 1000 cell/well onto a black, half-area, and clear-bottom 96-well plate. After 48 h of adherence, cells were treated for the compounds at 2.5 µM. Reagents of the RealTime-Glo™ Annexin V Apoptosis and Necrosis Assay were added according to the manufacturer’s instructions (https://worldwide.promega.com (accessed on 1 October 2021)). Luminescent and fluorescent signals were detected every 5 min during the 48 h long treatment by a Clariostar Multi-Mode Plate Reader (BMG LABTECH). The plate reader maintained the 5% CO2 atmosphere and 37 °C during the measurement. Data were evaluated by MS Excel and GraphPad Prism 8 software.

5. Conclusions

The development of hybrids was aimed to enhance the anticancer efficacy of erlotinib (1) and some representative chalcones displayed as single agents by their incorporation into hybrids with potential multitarget character containing acetylenic and triazole linkers between these pharmacophoric molecular fragments. Thus, the novel hybrids were accessed by copper(I)-catalyzed azide-alkyne [2 + 3] cycloadditions and Sonogashira coupling reactions followed by standard Claisen–Smith condensation. Since tumor heterogeneity and, consequently, drug resistance in HNSCC represent a great unmet medical need for more efficient drug therapies, the novel hybrids were tested in three HNSCC cell lines Fadu, Detroit 562 and SCC-25. The investigation of the hybrids was focused on such features of their anticancer potential, which may be manifested in their pronounced ability to overcome resistance in these cancers.

A screening assay, followed by time- and dose-dependent cell viability measurements, demonstrated that the most prominent hybrids (6a, 13 and 14) have an efficacy superior to their molecular fragments erlotinib (1) and reference chalcone (15) and revealed specific structure–activity relationships. These hybrids showed very strong synergism in the low micromolar range in all three HNSCC cell lines. Hybrid 6a resulted in the total eradication of all the investigated cancer cells at 2.5 µM, while 13 also proved to be markedly efficient against Fadu and Detroit 562 cells. Experiments focusing on the mechanism of action indicated that the enhanced efficacy of the most potent hybrids is independent of the canonical molecular targets of their precursors, pointing to the need for further explorations directed to disclose the cause of their prominent efficacy. On the other hand, phosphatidylserine exposure, a decrease in mitochondrial membrane potential cytoplasmic vacuolization and nuclear shrinkage are typical markers of programmed cell death, which were observed in hybrid-treated HNSCC cells. Further experiments supported that the effect of 13 might be related to necroptosis in Detroit 562 cells. Although the exact mechanism of action of these hybrids remains unclear, their prominent anticancer efficacy demonstrated in the experiments justifies a highly promising therapeutic potential, which warrants further investigation. Finally, the expected new biological results with particular regard to the identification of cellular target(s) and mechanism of action might be taken into account in a rational design and synthesis of further hybrids with enhanced anticancer activity explorable in the therapy of HNSCC-related diseases.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dániel Hutai and Henriette Tanai for the technical assistance in the synthetic work and biological experiments, respectively.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms24043456/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.M. and A.C.; methodology, J.M., C.D., B.G., I.M., A.V., K.N., J.S. and A.C.; software, J.M., B.G., I.M. and A.V.; validation, J.M., B.G., A.V. and J.S.; formal analysis, C.D., B.G., I.M., K.N. and J.S.; investigation, J.M., C.D., I.M., B.G., A.V. and A.C.; resources, M.C. and A.C.; data curation, B.G., A.V., K.N. and J.S.; writing—original draft preparation, J.M., C.D., M.C. and A.C.; writing—review and editing, J.M., M.C. and A.C.; visualization, J.M. and A.C.; supervision, J.M. and A.C.; project administration, C.D. and I.M.; funding acquisition, M.C. and A.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data generated and analyzed during our research are not available in any public database or repository but will be shared by the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

This work was funded by the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA K_129037), the National Research, Development and Innovation Office, Hungary (NVKP_16-1-2016-0036 and 2018-1.2.1-NKP-2018-00005), the ELTE Thematic Excellence Programme supported by the Hungarian Ministry for Innovation and Technology (SzintPlusz_1117), the grant NKFIH K 124813 (National Research, Development and Innovation Office, Budapest, Hungary) and the Higher Education Institutions Excellence Program (NKFIH FIKP, 2020-4.1.1.-TKP2020). Project no. TKP2021-EGA-24 has been implemented with the support provided by the Ministry of Innovation and Technology of Hungary from the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund, financed under the TKP2021-EGA funding scheme.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R.L., Laversanne M., Soerjomataram I., Jemal A., Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021;71:209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Johnson D.E., Burtness B., Leemans C.R., Lui V.W.Y., Bauman J.E., Grandis J.R. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 2020;6:92. doi: 10.1038/s41572-020-00224-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Goel B., Tiwari A.K., Pandey R.K., Singh A.P., Kumar S., Sinha A., Jain S.K., Khattri A. Therapeutic approaches for the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma-An update on clinical trials. Transl. Oncol. 2022;21:101426. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2022.101426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lurje G., Lenz H.J. EGFR signaling and drug discovery. Oncology. 2009;77:400–410. doi: 10.1159/000279388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Papini F., Sundaresan J., Leonetti A., Tiseo M., Rolfo C., Peters G.J., Giovannetti E. Hype or hope—Can combination therapies with third-generation EGFR-TKIs help overcome acquired resistance and improve outcomes in EGFR-mutant advanced/metastatic NSCLC? Crit. Rev. Oncol./Hematol. 2021;166:103454. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fortin S., Bérubé G. Advances in the development of hybrid anticancer drugs. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2013;8:1029–1047. doi: 10.1517/17460441.2013.798296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kucuksayan E., Ozben T. Hybrid Compounds as Multitarget Directed Anticancer Agents. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2017;17:907–918. doi: 10.2174/1568026616666160927155515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zheng W., Zhao Y., Luo Q., Zhang Y., Wu K., Wang F. Multi-Targeted Anticancer Agents. Curr Top. Med Chem. 2017;17:3084–3098. doi: 10.2174/1568026617666170707124126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sharma V., Kumar V., Kumar P. Heterocyclic chalcone analogues as potential anticancer agents. Anticancer Agents Med. Chem. 2013;13:422–432. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Karthikeyan C., Moorthy N.S., Ramasamy S., Vanam U., Manivannan E., Karunagaran D., Trivedi P. Advances in chalcones with anticancer activities. Recent Pat. Anticancer. Drug Discov. 2015;10:97–115. doi: 10.2174/1574892809666140819153902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mahapatra D.K., Bharti S.K., Asati V. Anti-cancer chalcones: Structural and molecular target perspectives. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015;98:69–114. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gao F., Huang G., Xiao J. Chalcone hybrids as potential anticancer agents: Current development, mechanism of action, and structure-activity relationship. Med. Res. Rev. 2020;40:2049–2084. doi: 10.1002/med.21698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Shukla S., Sood A.K., Goyal K., Singh A., Sharma V., Guliya N., Gulati S., Kumar S. Chalcone Scaffolds as Anticancer Drugs: A Review on Molecular Insight in Action of Mechanisms and Anticancer Properties. Anticancer Agents Med. Chem. 2021;21:1650–1670. doi: 10.2174/1871520620999201124212840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Srinivasan B., Johnson T.E., Lad R., Xing C. Structure-activity relationship studies of chalcone leading to 3-hydroxy-4,3’,4’,5’-tetramethoxychalcone and its analogues as potent nuclear factor kappaB inhibitors and their anticancer activities. J. Med. Chem. 2009;52:7228–7235. doi: 10.1021/jm901278z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jernei T., Duró C., Dembo A., Lajkó E., Takács A., Kőhidai L., Schlosser G., Csámpai A. Synthesis, Structure and In Vitro Cytotoxic Activity of Novel Cinchona-Chalcone Hybrids with 1,4-Disubstituted- and 1,5-Disubstituted 1,2,3-Triazole Linkers. Molecules. 2019;24:4077. doi: 10.3390/molecules24224077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Riaz S., Iqbal M., Ullah R., Zahra R., Chotana G.A., Faisal A., Saleem R.S.Z. Synthesis and evaluation of novel α-substituted chalcones with potent anti-cancer activities and ability to overcome multidrug resistance. Bioorg. Chem. 2019;87:123–135. doi: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2019.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Xiao J., Gao M., Diao Q., Gao F. Chalcone Derivatives and their Activities against Drug-resistant Cancers: An Overview. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2021;21:348–362. doi: 10.2174/1568026620666201022143236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Latif A.D., Jernei T., Podolski-Renić A., Kuo C.Y., Vágvölgyi M., Girst G., Zupkó I., Develi S., Ulukaya E., Wang H.C., et al. Protoflavone-Chalcone Hybrids Exhibit Enhanced Antitumor Action through Modulating Redox Balance, Depolarizing the Mitochondrial Membrane, and Inhibiting ATR-Dependent Signaling. Antioxidants. 2020;9:519. doi: 10.3390/antiox9060519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yadav P., Lal K., Kumar A., Guru S.K., Jaglan S., Bhushan S. Green synthesis and anticancer potential of chalcone linked-1,2,3-triazoles. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017;126:944–953. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2016.11.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Podolski-Renić A., Bősze S., Dinić J., Kocsis L., Hudecz F., Csámpai A., Pešić M. Ferrocene-cinchona hybrids with triazolyl-chalcone linkers act as pro-oxidants and sensitize human cancer cell lines to paclitaxel. Metallomics. 2017;9:1132–1141. doi: 10.1039/C7MT00183E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kocsis L., Szabó I., Bősze S., Jernei T., Hudecz F., Csámpai A. Synthesis, structure and in vitro cytostatic activity of ferrocene-Cinchona hybrids. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2016;26:946–949. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2015.12.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bonandi E., Christodoulou M.S., Fumagalli G., Perdicchia D., Rastelli G., Passarella D. The 1,2,3-triazole ring as a bioisostere in medicinal chemistry. Drug Discov. Today. 2017;22:1572–1581. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2017.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bozorov K., Zhao J., Aisa H.A. 1,2,3-Triazole-containing hybrids as leads in medicinal chemistry: A recent overview. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2019;27:3511–3531. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2019.07.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pereira D., Pinto M., Correia-da-Silva M., Cidade H. Recent Advances in Bioactive Flavonoid Hybrids Linked by 1,2,3-Triazole Ring Obtained by Click Chemistry. Molecules. 2021;27:230. doi: 10.3390/molecules27010230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Dheer D., Singh V., Shankar R. Medicinal attributes of 1,2,3-triazoles: Current developments. Bioorg. Chem. 2017;71:30–54. doi: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2017.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chu X.M., Wang C., Wang W.L., Liang L.L., Liu W., Gong K.K., Sun K.L. Triazole derivatives and their antiplasmodial and antimalarial activities. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019;166:206–223. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.01.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Feng L.S., Xu Z., Chang L., Li C., Yan X.F., Gao C., Ding C., Zhao F., Shi F., Wu X. Hybrid molecules with potential in vitro antiplasmodial and in vivo antimalarial activity against drug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum. Med. Res. Rev. 2020;40:931–971. doi: 10.1002/med.21643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pingaew R., Saekee A., Mandi P., Nantasenamat C., Prachayasittikul S., Ruchirawat S., Prachayasittikul V. Synthesis, biological evaluation and molecular docking of novel chalcone-coumarin hybrids as anticancer and antimalarial agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2014;85:65–76. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.07.087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhang B. Comprehensive review on the anti-bacterial activity of 1,2,3-triazole hybrids. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019;168:357–372. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.02.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Xu Z. 1,2,3-Triazole-containing hybrids with potential antibacterial activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2020;206:112686. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Rani A., Singh G., Singh A., Maqbool U., Kaur G., Singh J. CuAAC-ensembled 1,2,3-triazole-linked isosteres as pharmacophores in drug discovery: Review. RSC Adv. 2020;10:5610–5635. doi: 10.1039/c9ra09510a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Slavova K.I., Todorov L.T., Belskaya N.P., Palafox M.A., Kostova I.P. Developments in the Application of 1,2,3-Triazoles in Cancer Treatment. Recent Pat. Anticancer Drug Discov. 2020;15:92–112. doi: 10.2174/1574892815666200717164457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lal K., Yadav P. Recent Advancements in 1,4-Disubstituted 1H-1,2,3-Triazoles as Potential Anticancer Agents. Anticancer Agents Med. Chem. 2018;18:21–37. doi: 10.2174/1871520616666160811113531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Liang T., Sun X., Li W., Hou G., Gao F. 1,2,3-Triazole-Containing Compounds as Anti-Lung Cancer Agents: Current Developments, Mechanisms of Action, and Structure-Activity Relationship. Front. Pharmacol. 2021;12:661173. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.661173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Siddiq A., Dembitsky V. Acetylenic anticancer agents. Anticancer Agents Med. Chem. 2008;8:132–170. doi: 10.2174/187152008783497073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kim J., Park E.J. Cytotoxic anticancer candidates from natural resources. Curr. Med. Chem. Anticancer Agents. 2002;2:485–537. doi: 10.2174/1568011023353949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Christensen L.P. Bioactive C(17) and C(18) Acetylenic Oxylipins from Terrestrial Plants as Potential Lead Compounds for Anticancer Drug Development. Molecules. 2020;25:2568. doi: 10.3390/molecules25112568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wang S., Liu L., Guo X., Li G., Wang X., Dong H., Li Y., Zhao W. Synthesis of novel natural product-like diaryl acetylenes as hypoxia inducible factor-1 inhibitors and antiproliferative agents. RSC Adv. 2019;9:13878–13886. doi: 10.1039/C9RA02525A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Yang C., Shao Y., Li K., Xia W. Bioactive selaginellins from Selaginella tamariscina (Beauv.) Spring. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2012;8:1884–1889. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.8.217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zhang G.G., Jing Y., Zhang H.M., Ma E.L., Guan J., Xue F.N., Liu H.X., Sun X.Y. Isolation and cytotoxic activity of selaginellin derivatives and biflavonoids from Selaginella tamariscina. Planta Med. 2012;78:390–392. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1298175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wang C., Carter-Cooper B., Du Y., Zhou J., Saeed M.A., Liu J., Guo M., Roembke B., Mikek C., Lewis E.A., et al. Alkyne-substituted diminazene as G-quadruplex binders with anticancer activities. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2016;118:266–275. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2016.04.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ruddarraju R.R., Murugulla A.C., Kotla R., Chandra Babu Tirumalasetty M., Wudayagiri R., Donthabakthuni S., Maroju R., Baburao K., Parasa L.S. Design, synthesis, anticancer, antimicrobial activities and molecular docking studies of theophylline containing acetylenes and theophylline containing 1,2,3-triazoles with variant nucleoside derivatives. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2016;123:379–396. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2016.07.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Rostovtsev V.V., Green L.G., Fokin V.V., Sharpless K.B. A stepwise huisgen cycloaddition process: Copper(I)-catalyzed regioselective “ligation” of azides and terminal alkynes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002;41:2596–2599. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20020715)41:14<2596::AID-ANIE2596>3.0.CO;2-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bonesi M., Loizzo M.R., Statti G.A., Michel S., Tillequin F., Menichini F. The synthesis and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory activity of chalcones and their pyrazole derivatives. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010;20:1990–1993. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.01.113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Aoki K., Satoi S., Harada S., Uchida S., Iwasa Y., Ikenouchi J. Coordinated changes in cell membrane and cytoplasm during maturation of apoptotic bleb. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2020;31:833–844. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E19-12-0691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sebbagh M., Renvoizé C., Hamelin J., Riché N., Bertoglio J., Bréard J. Caspase-3-mediated cleavage of ROCK I induces MLC phosphorylation and apoptotic membrane blebbing. Nature Cell Biol. 2001;3:346–352. doi: 10.1038/35070019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sivandzade F., Bhalerao A., Cucullo L. Analysis of the Mitochondrial Membrane Potential Using the Cationic JC-1 Dye as a Sensitive Fluorescent Probe. Bio. Protoc. 2019;9:e3128. doi: 10.21769/BioProtoc.3128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Desquiret V., Loiseau D., Jacques C., Douay O., Malthièry Y., Ritz P., Roussel D. Dinitrophenol-induced mitochondrial uncoupling in vivo triggers respiratory adaptation in HepG2 cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)—Bioenerg. 2006;1757:21–30. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2005.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Tait S.W.G., Green D.R. Caspase-independent cell death: Leaving the set without the final cut. Oncogene. 2008;27:6452–6461. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Bukowski K., Kciuk M., Kontek R. Mechanisms of Multidrug Resistance in Cancer Chemotherapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:3233. doi: 10.3390/ijms21093233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Shen S., Vagner S., Robert C. Persistent Cancer Cells: The Deadly Survivors. Cell. 2020;183:860–874. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Dowell J., Minna J.D., Kirkpatrick P. Erlotinib hydrochloride. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2005;4:13–14. doi: 10.1038/nrd1612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Liu W., He M., Li Y., Peng Z., Wang G. A review on synthetic chalcone derivatives as tubulin polymerisation inhibitors. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2022;37:9–38. doi: 10.1080/14756366.2021.1976772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Aits S., Jaattela M., Nylandsted J. Methods for the quantification of lysosomal membrane permeabilization: A hallmark of lysosomal cell death. Methods Cell Biol. 2015;126:261–285. doi: 10.1016/bs.mcb.2014.10.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Aits S., Kricker J., Liu B., Ellegaard A.M., Hamalisto S., Tvingsholm S., Corcelle-Termeau E., Hogh S., Farkas T., Holm Jonassen A., et al. Sensitive detection of lysosomal membrane permeabilization by lysosomal galectin puncta assay. Autophagy. 2015;11:1408–1424. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2015.1063871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Bock F.J., Tait S.W.G. Mitochondria as multifaceted regulators of cell death. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020;21:85–100. doi: 10.1038/s41580-019-0173-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Dadsena S., Jenner A., García-Sáez A.J. Mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization at the single molecule level. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2021;78:3777–3790. doi: 10.1007/s00018-021-03771-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The data generated and analyzed during our research are not available in any public database or repository but will be shared by the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.


Articles from International Journal of Molecular Sciences are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES