Skip to main content
Plants logoLink to Plants
. 2023 Feb 4;12(4):693. doi: 10.3390/plants12040693

Anthocyanin Content and Fusarium Mycotoxins in Pigmented Wheat (Triticum aestivum L. spp. aestivum): An Open Field Evaluation

Marco Gozzi 1, Massimo Blandino 2, Chiara Dall’Asta 1, Petr Martinek 3, Renato Bruni 1,*, Laura Righetti 1,*,†,
Editors: Emilie Widemann, Sarfraz Shafiq
PMCID: PMC9965368  PMID: 36840042

Abstract

Twelve Triticum aestivum L. spp. aestivum varieties with pigmented grain, namely one red, six purple, three blue, and two black, were grown in open fields over two consecutive years and screened to investigate their risk to the accumulation of multiple Fusarium-related mycotoxins. Deoxynivalenol (DON) and its modified forms DON3Glc, 3Ac-DON, 15Ac-DON, and T-2, HT-2, ZEN, and Enniatin B were quantified by means of UHPLC-MS/MS, along with 14 different cyanidin, petunidin, delphinidin, pelargonidin, peonidin, and malvidin glycosides. A significant strong influence effect of the harvesting year (p = 0.0002) was noticed for DON content, which was more than doubled between harvesting years growing seasons (mean of 3746 µg kg−1 vs. 1463 µg kg−1). In addition, a striking influence of varieties with different grain colour on DON content (p < 0.0001) emerged in combination with the harvesting year (year×colour, p = 0.0091), with blue grains being more contaminated (mean of 5352 µg kg−1) and red grain being less contaminated (mean of 715 µg kg−1). The trend was maintained between the two harvesting years despite the highly variable absolute mycotoxin content. Varieties accumulating anthocyanins in the pericarp (purple coloration) had significantly lower DON content compared to those in which aleurone was involved (blue coloration).

Keywords: secondary metabolism, biotic stress, pigmented wheat, deoxynivalenol, UHPLC-MS/MS

1. Introduction

Triticum species went through a long domestication process and subsequent intensive breeding [1]. The resulting large intraspecific variability of cultivated wheat, along with the contribution of wild relatives, guarantees the availability of multiple traits of agronomic, dietary, and even gastronomic relevance [2]. Such biodiversity is constantly exploited to breed new cultivars needed to provide adequate yields, innovative technological or nutritional properties, and to improve wheat resistance to biotic and abiotic stress.

Within the available germplasm, pigmented Triticum aestivum L. spp. aestivum lines recently emerged for multiple reasons. These varieties are reputed as good sources of bioactive compounds, mainly carotenoids, phlobaphenes, phenolic acids, anthocyanins, and other polyphenols valuable for their contribution to human health [3]. In agricultural practice, varieties with red grain controlled by dominant R-1 alleles located in the long arm of hexaploid wheat chromosomes 3A, 3B, and 3D (R-A1, R-B1, and R-D1, respectively) are widely used. This grain colour is determined by catechin and proanthocyanidin [4]. Recessive alleles cause white tinging of the grain. In addition to varieties with red and white grain, there are forms with the presence of anthocyanins. Belonging to this group are wheat genotypes with a purple pericarp, which is conditioned by Pp genes. According to Tereshchenko et al. [5], a dark purple pericarp results from complementary action of the dominant alleles, Pp-D1 (7D) and Pp3 (2A). Presence of the dominant alleles, Pp-A1 and Pp3, results in light purple colour, and the grain will remain uncoloured in the presence of the recessive Pp3 allele even if two others alleles (Pp-A1 and Pp-D1) are in the dominant state [6]. The complementary action of Pp3 and Pp1 genes was explained by the interaction of their products resulting in a functional regulatory complex for anthocyanin biosynthesis [7]. In addition to the purple pericarp, there is a blue aleurone conditioned by Ba genes (Ba1, Ba2, and Ba3) located in the fourth group of homologous chromosomes (4B, 4A and 4D, respectively) [8,9,10]. Since the genes can be jointed to each other, a black wheat genotype can be created by combining genes for blue aleurone and purple pericarp. In caryopses of pigmented wheat, more than forty different anthocyanins are selectively located in the pericarp or in the outer aleurone layers, giving the grain characteristic colours (purple, blue, black, or red) according also to their quality and quantity [11,12].

Overall, the accumulation of anthocyanins is considered a recently evolved trait in wild relatives of wheat, resulting from environmental adaptation to various forms of stress [13]. Their presence in common wheat is instead the consequence of multiple and independent gene transfers occurring during breeding from, among others, diploid T. boeoticum Boiss., tetraploid T. turgidum L. subsp. abyssinicum Vavilov/now T. aethiopicum Jakubz. var. arraseita (Hochst. and Körn.) Philat./, and decaploid Thinopyrum ponticum (Podp.) [11]. In planta, these secondary metabolites are involved in multiple roles, serving as a protection from frost, excessive UV exposure, osmotic disbalance, and drought. Their contribution is mostly related to their antioxidant properties and to the regulation of ROS-induced signalling cascades [14]. More recently, a high anthocyanin content was also linked to a reduced susceptibility to pathogen attacks in various crops and in fruits, both in pre- and post-harvest conditions, in agreement with the great flexibility of flavonoids [15]. Regarding phlobaphenes, but not yet for anthocyanins, a correlation between antifungal defence and accumulation of these secondary metabolites was recently suggested in maize with regard to mycotoxin accumulation related to Fusarium infection [16]. A larger body of evidence is instead available for sorghum, in which anthocyanins are actively involved in phytoalexin response against invading fungi [17]. Furthermore, since the consumption of wheat rich in anthocyanins requires the use of wholegrain flour, maintaining it is after milling the pericarp and/or the aleurone layer, it is crucial to verify the possible sanitary risk associate to the accumulation of contaminants, such as mycotoxins, which are generally located in the external kernel layers [18]. Fusarium head blight (FHB) is a major fungal disease in wheat, determining significant losses in yield and crop quality. FHB is caused mainly by Fusarium graminearum and F. culmorum, and is able to produce a variety of mycotoxins that accumulate in kernels, leading to harmful consequences after food and feed consumption [19]. Fusarium mycotoxins include, among others, trichothecenes such as deoxynivalenol (DON), T-2, HT-2, and other co-occurring toxins, such as enniatins (ENNs) and zearalenone (ZEN). Cereal crops can also biotransform many of the above-mentioned compounds to modified forms [20]. For instance, DON is transformed by adding a glucose moiety, giving rise to deoxynivalenol glucoside (DON3Glc), the most common and abundant masked mycotoxin [21].

As reported by Atanasova-Penichon et al. [22] and Etzerodt et al. [23], polar secondary metabolites with antioxidant properties may counteract toxigenic Fusaria and mycotoxin accumulation in wheat, although anthocyanin were not evaluated in depth in this regard. In further metabolomics studies, anthocyanins were deemed as resistance-related metabolites in barley and in wheat cultivar Sumai-3 [24,25]. Landoni et al. [16] found that the accumulation of anthocyanins and phlobaphenes is related to a lower contamination by fumonisin B1 in maize kernels. Finally, Choo et al. [26] demonstrated that black barley is more resistant to DON accumulation than yellow barley.

As reported for other secondary metabolites, anthocyanin biosynthesis and accumulation are strongly influenced by environmental factors, including climate, water availability, temperature, and ultimately growing seasons. This highlights the need for evaluations considering multiple harvests in the same location and a wider range of pigments [27].

An exact assessment of the effect of anthocyanins in wheat grain on mycotoxin accumulation would be possible if we compared genotypes imprinting each other only with individual genes responsible for individual grain colours. Near-isogenic lines derived from common spring wheat seeded Novosibirskaya 67 will be available in the future [28], with the possibility to also develop lines with different contents of anthocyanins.

This study is therefore aimed at investigating the susceptibility of pigmented wheat genotypes to Fusarium-related mycotoxins. To obtain reliable results, the investigation was carried out in open fields over a period of two years by comparing the anthocyanin profile and the accumulation of multiple mycotoxins in twelve wheat varieties of different colour and genetic background.

2. Results and Discussion

The two growing seasons showed a similar meteorological trend throughout the wheat crop cycle (Table 1), with the rainfall concentrated after sowing (November) and between stem elongation and flowering (April and May). The precipitation during the ripening stage (June) was higher in 2020 than 2019 (113 vs. 40 mm), while during flowering (May), the rainfall was similar between the two years. In addition, during flowering, 2020 had higher temperature than 2019, as described by differences in GDD data (Table 1).

Table 1.

Monthly rainfall, rainy days, and growing degree days (GDD) from the sowing (November) to the end of ripening stage (June) in the two growing seasons.

Growing Season Month Rainfall Rainy Days GDD 1
(mm) (days) (Σ °C d−1)
2018–2019 November 124 5 292
December 11 1 151
January 6 1 141
February 43 7 195
March 17 4 314
April 116 7 393
May 178 9 478
June 40 4 667
November–June 535 39 2632
November–March 200 19 1093
April–June 335 21 1539
2019–2020 November 314 12 249
December 132 8 193
January 5 1 168
February 1 0 229
March 62 7 285
April 81 10 414
May 122 7 579
June 113 7 624
November–June 830 52 2741
November–March 514 28 1124
April–June 317 24 1617

Source: Rete Agrometeorologica del Piemonte—Regione Piemonte—Assessorato Agricoltura—Settore Fitosanitario, sezione di Agrometeorologia. 1 Accumulated growing degree days for each experiment using a 0 °C base value.

We opted for a precise quantification and profiling of a wide range of glycosides and aglycones, including delphinidin and malvidin, that were seldomly evaluated in previous investigations. As expected, significant differences emerged between blue, purple, red, and black varieties, both from a quantitative and qualitative standpoint (Table 2). The total anthocyanins content for each cultivar and breeding line returns in Figure 1 as the deviation from the overall mean value. The dataset underwent a full factorial ANOVA, returning both the harvest year (p < 0.0001) and the cultivar or breeding line (p < 0.0001) as significant factors, while their interaction was not significant (p = 0.0672). Purple cultivar AnthograinTM provided the best results in both harvest years (11171 and 4451 µg kg−1 in 2020 and 2019, respectively), with Ceraso (6676 and 1458 µg kg−1), Rosso (9690 and 2895 µg kg−1), AF Zora (9488 and 2810 µg kg−1), and KM 98-18 (6345 and 2650 µg kg−1) providing above-average contents. Overall, blue and black-grained wheats proved to be more varied in chemical composition, with the black ones showing quantities above LOQ for all 14 anthocyanins tested, while red and purple ones had only 9–10 types.

Table 2.

Occurrence of anthocyanins in twelve varieties of coloured common wheat. Three biological replicates and three replicates were considered for each variety. Data are reported as means ± SD. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.005) among varieties within the same harvest year.

Year Grain Colour Variety Cyanidin Dephinidin Peonidin Petunidin Malvidin Pelargonidin Total ACNs
µg kg−1
3-O-Glc 3-O-Rut O-MalHex 3-O-Glc 3-O-Rut 3-O-Glc 3-O-Rut O-MalHex 3-O-Glc 3-O-Rut 3-O-Glc 3-O-Glc 3-O-Rut O-MalHex
2020 Black AF Zora 735 ± 36 b 1867 ± 89 a 398 ± 92 c 622 ± 53 a 1041 ± 97 a 644 ± 149 b 1583 ± 345 a 1660 ± 409 b 127 ± 6 a 353 ± 27 a 122 ± 0 86 ± 11 b 99 ± 14 b 34 ± 4 c 9488 ± 930
KM 98-18 415 ± 84 c 1983 ± 399 ab 225 ± 26 c 419 ± 51 b 1185 ± 18 9 a 241 ± 35 c 576 ± 78 c 597 ± 90 d 106 ± 5 a 387 ± 51 a 118 ± 2 27 ± 2 c 30 ± 2 de <LOD 6345 ± 1012
Blue Skorpion 278 ± 48 d 1449 ± 240 b 93 ± 21 d 323 ± 28 c 838 ± 93 b 129 ± 20 d 420 ± 66 c 251 ± 55 e 99 ± 4 ab 293 ± 27 b 113 ± 1 32 ± 4 c 41 ± 7 d <LOQ 4372 ± 630
AF Oxana 146 ± 29 d 967 ± 213 c 29 ± 3 e 289 ± 37 c 817 ± 152 b 58 ± 4 d 236 ± 48 d 61 ± 6 f 90 ± 4 b 253 ± 42 b 111 ± 4 <LOQ 25 ± 1 e 25 ± 0 c 3074 ± 551
KM 72-18 164 ± 45 d 752 ± 273 c 32 ± 8 e 255 ± 40 c 508 ± 123 c 66 ± 11 d 217 ± 50 d 74 ± 30 f 90 ± 5 b 197 ± 45 bc 109 ± 3 <LOD 27 ± 0 e 150 ± 27 b 2453 ± 591
Purple AnthograinTM CDC 1362 ± 180 a 1459 ± 154 b 2194 ± 239 a <LOD <LOD 1354 ± 185 a 729 ± 81 b 3517 ± 341 a <LOD 72 ± 0.2 c 111 ± 3 97 ± 9 b 64 ± 5 c 37 ± 2 c 11110 ± 1158
Ceraso 451 ± 31 c 2077 ± 282 a 281 ± 19 c 412 ± 33 b 1211 ± 172 a 287 ± 24 c 593 ± 83 c 758 ± 90 c 104 ± 5 a 379 ± 51 a 118 ± 3 29 ± 1 c 31 ± 2 d 35 ± 2 c 6766 ± 720
Jumiko 87 ± 9 e 124 ± 6 e 142 ± 16 d <LOD 118 ± 5 d 273 ± 27 c 262 ± 19 d 735 ± 77 c <LOD 74 ± 1 c <LOD 26 ± 0 c 25 ± 0 d 50 ± 4 c 1891 ± 135
KM 106-18 94 ± 14 e 206 ± 28 e 169 ± 12 d <LOD 122 ± 6 d 224 ± 24 c 321 ± 41 d 650 ± 54 cd <LOD 75 ± 2 c <LOD 30 ± 2 c 30 ± 3 d 174 ± 42 b 1970 ± 185
Merlot 244 ± 41 d 464 ± 74 d 277 ± 50 c <LOD 111 ± 0 d 587 ± 122 b 842 ± 157 b 1665 ± 368 b <LOD 75 ± 1 c <LOD 77 ± 14 b 79 ± 14 bc 365 ± 16 a 4471 ± 823
Rosso 571 ± 14 c 1443 ± 94 b 794 ± 34 b <LOD <LOD 1071 ± 20 a 1699 ± 82 a 3367 ± 104 a <LOD 77 ± 1 c <LOD 135 ± 3 a 167 ± 10 a 49 ± 9 c 9664 ± 348
Red Aubusson 28 ± 5 f 59 ± 32 f 25 ± 1 e 118 ± 0 d 125 ± 22 d 52 ± 1 d 57 ± 3 e 66 ± 4 f <LOQ 80 ± 1 c <LOD <LOQ <LOQ 212 ± 14 ab 437 ± 206
Mean ± SD 381 ± 376 1071 ± 742 388 ± 680 348 ± 158 608 ± 465 416 ± 422 628 ± 526 1117 ± 1215 103 ± 14 193 ± 133 115 ± 5 60 ± 40 56 ± 44 113 ± 12 5170 ± 3495
3-O-Glc 3-O-Rut O-MalHex 3-O-Glc 3-O-Rut 3-O-Glc 3-O-Rut O-MalHex 3-O-Glc 3-O-Rut 3-O-Glc 3-O-Glc 3-O-Rut O-MalHex Total ACNs
2019 Black AF Zora 151 ± 14 b 413 ± 54 a 97 ± 25 c 214 ± 28 a 324 ± 67 ab 209 ± 51 b 509 ± 76 a 509 ± 145 b 78 ± 5 163 ± 35 95 ± 3 13 ± 4 13 ± 2 4 ± 2 2818 ± 161
KM 98-18 129 ± 7 b 596 ± 52 a 111 ± 34 b 194 ± 18 ab 474 ± 43 a 125 ± 26 c 296 ± 14 bc 321 ± 97 c 75 ± 3 228 ± 14 96 ± 0 <LOQ <LOQ <LOQ 2650 ± 86
Blue Skorpion 38 ± 6 d 275 ± 57 b 7 ± 2 e 136 ± 5 b 252 ± 34 b 44 ± 4 d 166 ± 38 c 57 ± 14 e 70 ± 1 137 ± 19 92 ± 3 <LOQ <LOQ <LOQ 1275 ± 149
AF Oxana 47 ± 3 d 404 ± 26 a 3 ± 1 e 175 ± 9 b 423 ± 20 a 37 ± 1 d 175 ± 8 c 38 ± 6 e 72 ± 1 185 ± 9 92 ± 1 <LOQ <LOQ <LOD 1639 ± 51
KM 72-18 73 ± 36 c 393 ± 156 ab 3 ± 2 e 186 ± 45 ab 324 ± 96 ab 42 ± 5 d 187 ± 55 c 36 ± 3 e 78 ± 8 176 ± 49 96 ± 6 <LOQ <LOQ 31 ± 8 1593 ± 461
Purple AnthograinTM CDC 436 ± 56 a 381 ± 73 b 711 ± 64 a <LOD <LOQ 655 ± 70 a 329 ± 58 b 1789 ± 140 a 63 ± 2 <LOD <LOD 22 ± 3 6 ± 2 65 ± 9 4451 ± 457
Ceraso 65 ± 13 c 131 ± 21 c 118 ± 24 b <LOD 88 ± 2 c 195 ± 34 bc 196 ± 39 c 572 ± 84 b <LOQ <LOD <LOD 19 ± 3 11 ± 3 <LOQ 1458 ± 229
Jumiko 14 ± 6 e 53 ± 3 d 28 ± 13 d <LOD 89 ± 2 c 79 ± 25 d 56 ± 11 e 186 ± 77 d <LOQ <LOD <LOD <LOQ <LOD 9 ± 1 504 ± 133
KM 106-18 33 ± 5 d 73 ± 4 d 72 ± 9 c <LOD 86 ± 0 c 123 ± 9 c 97 ± 9 d 345 ± 30 c <LOQ <LOD <LOD <LOQ <LOQ 18 ± 2 780 ± 72
Merlot 33 ± 3 d 77 ± 4 d 37 ± 3 d <LOD 88 ± 2 c 147 ± 5 c 107 ± 7 d 333 ± 17 c <LOQ <LOD <LOD 5 ± 0.4 <LOQ 83 ± 45 844 ± 41
Rosso 167 ± 85 b 258 ± 122 bc 222 ± 109 b <LOD 86 ± 0 c 381 ± 164 b 419 ± 206 ab 1238 ± 565ab <LOQ <LOD <LOD 23 ± 13 17 ± 12 <LOQ 2866 ± 1276
Red Aubusson <LOQ 49 ± 0 d <LOQ <LOD 86 ± 0 c <LOQ 35 ± 0 e 39 ± 2 e <LOQ <LOD <LOD <LOQ <LOD 59 ± 5 82 ± 112
Mean ± SD 108 ± 120 258 ± 182 128 ± 204 181 ± 29 211 ± 153 185 ± 185 215 ± 146 455 ± 540 73 ± 6 178 ± 33 94 ± 2 16 ± 8 12 ± 51 39 ± 31 1747 ± 1240

Legend: 3-O-Glc: 3-O-glucoside; 3-O-Rut: 3-O-rutinoside; O-MalHex: O-malonyl-hexoside; ACNs: total anthocyanines.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Deviation from the mean value calculated for total anthocyanins (expressed as the sum of all the metabolites detected within this study) for each variety and for each harvest year.

Overall, the pattern obtained was in accordance with previous reports, as purple-grained wheats were richer in peonidin and had limited content in petunidin, while malvidin glucoside was absent. Its presence was consistent in both blue and black ones, which were the sole varieties containing delphinidin glycosides [16]. Blue-grained wheats instead had higher amounts of cyanidin, malvidin, and petunidin, while red varieties were reported in the literature as the less rich in total anthocyanins and devoid of pelargonidin derivatives [11].

It must be noticed, however, that anthocyanin distribution within a single colour group was not uniform, and few exceptions were registered. For instance, despite being listed as purple varieties, AnthograinTM and Ceraso differed for being rich in cyanidin, delphinidin and malvidin derivatives, which were absent or very scarce in other purple-grained wheats. Ceraso, despite being registered as a purple cultivar, interestingly had a phytochemical profile almost superimposable to blue ones, therefore showing a unique pattern. A large phytochemical variability must be then expected even within chromatic groupings. Additionally, several genes are responsible for the genetic basis of the purple colour of the grain [6,29], but detailed evaluation is often lacking in varieties that are under continuous development. The purple-grained wheats used in our experiment have an evidently different genetic determination of the pericarp colour, where AnthograinTM is visually darker and AF Jumiko is lighter, and this is also consistent with Table 2. The genetic composition of Purple pericarp (Pp) alleles in the purple genotypes used in this study is unknown to us.

In absolute terms, the anthocyanin content for all varieties was lower than the literature data for the available varieties and with consistent differences between harvest years, which may be related to distinct agronomic and distinct environmental conditions, including mycotoxin exposure. However, if we refer to the 2019 and 2020 growing seasons, the agronomic cycle was not so different and, for instance, flowering of wheat took place after the same number of days from sowing. In particular, the significantly lower test weight between years, besides contributing to a dilution effect for anthocyanin content due to endosperm/pericarp ratio favouring the former, might be a sign of a different FHB pressure between 2019 and 2020.

Beyond the effects of environmental conditions on the anthocyanin profile, the high accumulation of mycotoxins, likely due to a relevant fungal infection, potentially altered biosynthetic pathways for anthocyanins in both harvest years. It was often reported, in other crops than wheat, that anthocyanins may increase as a consequence of Fusarium infection, albeit different behaviour was reported for scarcely and heavily infected plants [30]. It remains unclear if variations in anthocyanin profile and content could be a consequence of an alteration in plant biochemistry induced directly by mycotoxin exposure during the active part of the infection, or the result of previous elicitation exerted by biological exposure to Fusarium, e.g., by simple contact of wheat and fungal hyphae.

The whole potential array of compounds associated with Fusarium infection in wheat was screened, namely DON and its major modified form DON3Glc, 3Ac-DON, and 15Ac-DON, together with other relevant Fusarium mycotoxins, such as T-2, HT-2, ZEN, and Enniatin B (Table 3). The overall mycotoxins occurrence is within 471–9603 µg kg−1 for DON, <LOQ-357 µg kg−1 for DON3Glc, <LOD-98 µg kg−1 for ZEN, 22–951 µg kg−1 for Enniatin B. T-2, and HT-2 in all samples were <LOD or <LOQ, except for a sample of the variety KM 72-18 (year 2019), in which HT-2 was quantified at 21 µg kg−1 (data not shown). Acetylated forms of DON were not detected in any samples. Biotransformation rate, expressed as DON3Glc/TDON (where TDON is the sum of DON and DON3Glc), was in the range of 0.025–0.066 with a mean value of 0.047. Regarding the co-occurrence, solely DON and Enniatin B were detected in all the varieties analyzed.

Table 3.

Occurrence of mycotoxins in twelve varieties of coloured common wheat. Three biological replicates and three technical replicates were considered for each variety. Data are reported as means ± SD. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.005) among varieties within the same harvest year.

Year Grain Colour Variety DON DON3Glc 3/15Ac-DON ZEN Enniatin B T-2 HT-2
mg kg−1
2020 Black AF Zora 2.327 ± 1.021 d 0.101 ± 0.034 d <LOD 0.012 ± 0.000 d 0.247 ± 0.138 d <LOQ <LOD
KM 98-18 3.280 ± 2.093 c 0.141 ± 0.060 c <LOD 0.045 ± 0.014 b 0.518 ± 0.388 b <LOQ <LOQ
Blue Skorpion 7.235 ± 2.594 b 0.289 ± 0.060 b <LOD 0.098 ± 0.047 a 0.418 ± 0.317 c <LOQ <LOQ
AF Oxana 9.603 ± 2.767 a 0.357 ± 0.092 a <LOD 0.088 ± 0.037 a 0.681 ± 0.314 b <LOQ <LOQ
KM 72-18 6.769 ± 3.163 b 0.329 ± 0.103 a <LOD 0.057 ± 0.020 b 0.951 ± 0.366 a <LOQ <LOQ
Purple AnthograinTM CDC 1.466 ± 0.561 d 0.084 ± 0.010 d <LOD 0.028 ± 0.013 c 0.281 ± 0.227 d <LOD <LOD
Ceraso 2.333 ± 1.406 d 0.100 ± 0.054 d <LOD 0.034 ± 0.007 c 0.554 ± 0.509 b <LOD <LOQ
Jumiko 2.562 ± 0.271 d 0.177 ± 0.017 c <LOD 0.023 ± 0.021 c 0.317 ± 0.192 c <LOD <LOD
KM 106-18 3.889 ± 1.008 c 0.174 ± 0.033 c <LOD 0.040 ± 0.032 b 0.416 ± 0.103 c <LOQ <LOQ
Merlot 3.460 ± 0.494 c 0.152 ± 0.030 c <LOD 0.032 ± 0.015 c 0.194 ± 0.071 de <LOD <LOD
Rosso 1.555 ± 0.247 d 0.107 ± 0.028 d <LOD 0.027 ± 0.014 c 0.129 ± 0.066 e <LOD <LOD
Red Aubusson 0.471 ± 0.128 e 0.033 ± 0.007 e <LOD 0.01 ± 0.000 d 0.125 ± 0.057 e <LOD <LOD
Mean ± SD 3.746 ± 2.991 0.170 ± 0.109 n.d. 0.046 ± 0.033 0.403 ± 0.326 n.d. n.d
2019 Black AF Zora 1.058 ± 0.176 cd 0.054 ± 0.013 b <LOD <LOD 0.083 ± 0.011 c <LOD <LOD
KM 98-18 1.046 ± 0.299 cd 0.046 ± 0.013 c <LOD <LOQ 0.121 ± 0.068 b <LOD <LOQ
Blue Skorpion 3.212 ± 0.772 a 0.127 ± 0.026 a <LOD 0.081 ± 0.000 0.130 ± 0.047 ab <LOD <LOD
AF Oxana 3.922 ± 0.266 a 0.105 ± 0.018 a <LOD <LOD 0.103 ± 0.012 b <LOD <LOQ
KM 72-18 1.377 ± 0.352 c 0.059 ± 0.021 b <LOD <LOQ 0.171 ± 0.043 a <LOD 0.021 ± 0.000
Purple AnthograinTM CDC 0.539 ± 0.121 f 0.030 ± 0.000 d <LOD <LOD 0.034 ± 0.012 d <LOQ <LOQ
Ceraso 0.653 ± 0.199 e <LOQ <LOD 0.010 ± 0.000 0.026 ± 0.000 e <LOD <LOD
Jumiko 0.752 ± 0.060 e 0.029 ± 0.006 d <LOD <LOD 0.044 ± 0.014 d <LOD <LOD
KM 106-18 0.960 ± 0.361 d 0.033 ± 0.008 d <LOD <LOD 0.039 ± 0.005 d <LOD <LOD
Merlot 2.039 ± 0.986 bc 0.053 ± 0.015 b <LOD <LOD 0.022 ± 0.000 e <LOD <LOD
Rosso 1.040 ± 0.449 0.057 ± 0.013 b <LOD <LOD 0.038 ± 0.027 d <LOD <LOD
Red Aubusson 0.961 ± 0.114 d 0.054 ± 0.015 b <LOD <LOQ 0.058 ± 0.037 <LOQ <LOQ
Mean ± SD 1.463 ± 1.096 0.053 ± 0.034 n.d. 0.052 ± 0.021 0.079 ± 0.011 n.d. n.d.

Based on statistical analysis, results show a strong highly significant influence effect of the harvesting year (p = 0.0002) on DON content, which is more than doubled for the harvesting year 2020 (mean of 3746 µg kg−1 vs. 1463 µg kg−1). In addition, a striking influence of genotype with different grain colour on DON content (p < 0.0001) emerged as well, also in combination with the harvesting year (year*colour, p = 0.0091) with the blue grain found as the more contaminated (mean of 5352 µg kg−1) and red grain found as the less contaminated (mean of 715 µg kg−1) (Figure 2). This trend is also maintained between the two harvesting years, in spite of the highly variable absolute mycotoxin content.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Box plot describing the DON and DON3Glc content in pigmented grains clustered according to the group and the harvest year. Data are log normalized.

This phenomenon is of particular interest because, to the best of our knowledge, it was reported so far. Both the effects mentioned above were found as significant according to ANOVA analysis and, particularly, a post-hoc Tuckey test showed a significant difference between blue and the other grain colours. The content of DON3Glc follows the trend described above for DON, with a higher DON3Glc content detected for the harvesting year 2020 (mean of 170 µg kg−1) and for blue grain (mean of 211 µg kg−1), even in that case we saw an effect of the harvesting year (p = 0.0021) and colour (p = 0.0240) very similar to what was reported for DON. We also found a positive correlation between the DON and DON3Glc content, considering all varieties for both years, based on Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r = 0.927, p < 0.0001), consistently with the current literature [31]. About the DON3Glc/TDON ratio, previously reported as correlated to resistance to FHB in durum and common wheat, the highest value was found for red grain (0.059) and the lowest for blue grain (0.038), consistently with what was observed regarding the contamination by DON [32]. However, this difference was not found as significant. Regarding the presence of Enniatin B, an emerging mycotoxin, we found an effect of the harvesting year (p = 0.001), with a greater contamination for the year 2020, but an influence of the genotype (grain colour) only for the year 2019. We also found a significant positive correlation between DON and Enniatin B content only for 2020 and not for 2019; this is probably due to the different chemical structure, metabolic pathway, and main Fusarium species involved in biosynthesis [33]. Finally, we were able to quantify ZEN in 32 out of 72 samples, of which 30 are from the harvesting year 2020, in accordance with a greater overall mycotoxin contamination. The maximum concentration detected for ZEN was 98 µg kg−1 for the blue grain cultivar Skorpion, year 2020.

During both years a correlation was observed between the chromatic typology of wheat and the presence of DON and its derivatives (Figure 2). Based on Pearson’s test, DON was positively correlated with total petunidin (r = 0.5338; p < 0.0001) and malvidin content (r = 0.4025; p = 0.0005) in wheat genotype, while no significant correlation was found with other compounds.

While observing the overall contamination, the blue and black varieties were found to be more contaminated, while the red and purple ones showed an overall lower occurrence of mycotoxin. While it would be incorrect to argue of a greater or lesser resistance to Fusarium, it is nevertheless possible to note a possible histological pattern for such data. In fact, in black and blue-grained wheats, anthocyanins are accumulated in the inner aleurone layer, whereas in purple types, these secondary metabolites are concentrated directly in the pericarp that is the outer layer directly exposed to the first contact with Fusarium. This distinct location potentially led to a different dynamic in exposure to the pathogen, or to a possible greater protection during the initial stages of infection in spikelet.

Blue-grained wheats in this study are also characteristically less resistant, and for instance, the cultivar Skorpion is considered extremely susceptible to Fusarium infection [34]. This hypothesis is seemingly reinforced by Tukey’s post-hoc test on DON, suggesting that the only really different group is that of blue grains. In our case, the wheats with black grain (AF Zora, KM 98-18) are the result of a combination of the Ba2 gene and genes for purple pericarp. Black wheat, on the other hand, does not significantly differentiate from purple. In this case, it seems that in the black grain, the purple pericarp may have a protective role, saving the deeper blue aleurone against Fusarium attack. However, this hypothesis needs to be verified with further experiments to be able to compare near-isogenic lines, which differ only for the genes responsible for the anthocyanin biosynthesis, especially considering that the number of replicates considered in the present study is limited and post-hoc test may suffer from distortion with low sample size experiments. Furthermore, if the hypothesis is valid, it makes sense to further investigate the Fusarium resistance mechanisms among the current purple-grained wheats grain. This would lead to knowledge to drive breeding in order to create varieties with black-grained wheat with an enhanced resistance to mycotoxins accumulation. This is a point of reflection, given that both blues and blacks have a similar genetic, but blacks also have anthocyanins in the pericarp and are not limited to the inner aleurone layer. The fact that the blue-grained varieties conditioned by the Ba2 gene in this study were susceptible to mycotoxin accumulation is a problem that may prevent their use in practice. It would be very appropriate to carry out a special study evaluating the importance of various donors carrying all individual Ba genes in terms of resistance to FHB or other factors causing plant stress. At the same time, the sole conventional red cultivar tested (Aubusson), despite providing the lowest amount of anthocyanins, was the less affected by mycotoxin contamination. This observation suggests that other defensive compounds than anthocyanins are involved in determining a greater resistance to mycotoxin accumulation for this cultivar.

Since the genes for the red, purple, and blue colour of the grain lie in different chromosomes, they can be combined with each other in the breeding process. A detailed study should be carried out with common varieties with red grain and with different degrees of resistance to FHB in relation to important phenolic compounds in the grain. For an exact evaluation of the effect of anthocyanins in wheat grain on mycotoxin accumulation, it should be appropriate to compare almost isogenic lines, differing from each other in individual genes for grain colour. This approach would make it possible to eliminate the interfering effects of unknown genes in the genetic background. Some near-isogenic lines for purple grain colouration were already created [35], while near-isogenic lines for blue colouration are also being gradually created [10]. It will be important that these lines are derived from the same recipient variety. It is clear that the presence of coloured substances in plant tissues has an evolutionary significance [36] and it is likely that the anthocyanin colouration of the grain affects mycotoxins accumulation in wheat. Further studies will be needed to confirm this hypothesis.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemicals

Analytical standards of DON and its acetylated forms of 3Ac-DON and 15Ac-DON (100 mg L−1 in acetonitrile), DON3Glc (50 mg L−1 in acetonitrile), T-2 toxin (100 mg L−1 in acetonitrile), HT-2 toxin (100 mg L−1 in acetonitrile), ZEN (100 mg L−1 in acetonitrile), and ENN B (1 g L−1 in methanol), were purchased from Romer Labs (Getzersdorf, Austria). UHPLC-grade methanol, acetonitrile, acetic acid, and water were purchased from VWR Chemicals (Radnor, PA, USA). Ammonium acetate was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Analytical standards of cyanidin 3-O-glucoside chloride, cyanidin 3-O-rutinoside chloride, malvidin 3-O-glucoside chloride, peonidin 3-O-glucoside chloride, pelargonidin 3-O-glucoside chloride, delphinidin 3-O-glucoside chloride, and petunidin 3-O-glucoside chloride were purchased from Extrasynthese (Genay Cedex, France).

3.2. Samples

Samples from twelve varieties of pigmented common wheat (T. aestivum L. spp. aestivum L.), grown in a sandy loam soil at Cigliano (NW Italy, 45°18′ N, 8°01′ E; altitude 237 m) were collected over two harvesting years (2019 and 2020). These varieties are characterized by four different grain colours (one red, chosen as a conventional control, 6 purple, 3 blue, and 2 black varieties) as described in Table 4 and in Figures S1 and S2.

Table 4.

Pigmented wheat varieties compared in the two growing seasons field experiment.

Grain Color Variety Status Registration Responsible of Selection
Red (control) Aubusson Cultivar 2003 Limagrain Italia S.p.A., Fidenza (PR), Italy
Purple AnthograinTM CDC Cultivar 2018 Hetland Seeds Ltd., Naicam, SK, Canada
Ceraso Cultivar 2014 Saatzucht Donau GesmbH. and CoKG, Austria
AF Jumiko Cultivar 2018 Agrotest Fyto, Ltd., Kroměříž, Czech Republic
KM 106-18 Breeding line Agrotest Fyto, Ltd., Kroměříž, Czech Republic
Merlot Cultivar 2015 Saatzucht Donau GesmbH. and CoKG, Austria
Rosso Cultivar 2011 Saatzucht Donau GesmbH. and CoKG, Austria
Blue Skorpion Cultivar 2011 1 Agrotest Fyto, Ltd., Kroměříž, Czech Republic
AF Oxana Cultivar 2019 Agrotest Fyto, Ltd., Kroměříž, Czech Republic
KM 72-18 Breeding line Agrotest Fyto, Ltd., Kroměříž, Czech Republic
Black AF Zora Cultivar 2021 Agrotest Fyto, Ltd., Kroměříž, Czech Republic
KM 98-18 Breeding line Agrotest Fyto, Ltd., Kroměříž, Czech Republic

1 registered in Austria, since 2012 it has been included in the European list of varieties.

The daily temperatures and precipitation were measured at a meteorological station near the experimental area. According to the wheat development, the daily temperatures were reported as growing degree days (GDD), using a 0 °C base value (Table 1). The agronomic technique commonly adopted in the area was applied. Briefly, the previous crop was maize, and the field was ploughed each year, incorporating the debris into the soil. Planting was conducted in 12 cm-wide rows at a seeding rate of 450 seeds m−2 in November. A total of 160 kg N ha–1 was applied, split equally at wheat tillering, growth stage (GS) 23, and at the beginning of the stem elongation (GS31). No fungicide was applied to control fungal diseases; in particular, at flowering (GS61-65) no fungicide treatment was carried out to control FHB infection. The sowing and harvest dates, together with the dates of the main GS, for each growing season are described by Scarpino and Blandino [37]. Treatments were assigned to an experimental unit using a completely randomized block design with three replicates. The plots measured 7 × 1.5 m.

The grain yields were obtained by harvesting the whole plot using a Walter Wintersteiger cereal plot combine harvester. The harvested grains were mixed thoroughly, and 4 kg grain samples were taken from each plot, ground using a ZM 200 Ultra Centrifugal Mill (Retsch GmbH, Haan, Germany) and representative sub-samples of each wholegrain flour were used directly to analyze the anthocyanin and the mycotoxin content. A further subsample of grain (500 g) was taken from each plot to determine the test weight (TW) using a GAC® 2000 Grain Analyzer (Dickens-John Auburn, IL, USA).

3.3. Sample Preparation for Mycotoxin Analysis

Samples were extracted according to Malachová et al. [38] with some modifications; 2 mL of acetonitrile/water (80:20, v/v) mixture acidified with 0.1% formic acid was added to 0.5 g of ground wheat. The samples were extracted for 90 min using a platform shaker (Ika Werke, Breisgau, Germany) at a speed of 200 strokes/min and subsequently centrifugated for 2 min at 3000 rpm (radius 17.8 cm) at room temperature. Next, 1000 µL of supernatant were transferred into vials and then injected into the UHPLC-MS/MS system.

Three biological replicates and three technical replicates for each variety and each year were analyzed (N = 3 × 3 × 12 × 2 = 216).

3.4. UHPLC-MS/MS Mycotoxin Analysis

UHPLC-MS/MS analysis was carried out on UHPLC Dionex Ultimate 3000 coupled to a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer TSQ Vantage (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with an electrospray source (ESI). The chromatographic separation was obtained using a Sunshell column (Chromanik Technologies, Osaka, Japan) 2.1 × 100 mm, 2.6 µm particle size, heated to 40 °C. 2 µL of sample extract injected into the UHPLC system, and the flow rate was set up to 0.35 mL min−1. Gradient elution was performed by using water (eluent A) and methanol (eluent B), both acidified with 0.2% v/v CH3COOH. Ammonium acetate was added to the eluent A at the final concentration of 5 mM. Initial conditions were set at 98% A and 2% B for 2 min, then eluent B was increased to 20%. After an isocratic step (6 min), eluent B was further increased to 90%, and this condition was maintained for 10 min until the return to the initial condition. The total run time was 26.5 min. Mass spectrometric analysis was performed both in positive and negative ionization mode in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM), spray voltage 3000 V, capillary temperature 270 °C, vaporizer temperature 200 °C, sheath gas pressure 50 units, and auxiliary gas pressure 5 units. The following quantifier transitions were measured: DON m/z 355 > 295 (CE 13 eV) and m/z 355 > 265 (CE 19 eV), DON3Glc m/z 517 > 457 (CE 17 eV) and m/z 517 > 427 (CE 24 eV), 3Ac-DON and 15AcDON m/z 397 > 307 (CE 18 eV) and m/z 397 > 59 (CE 20 eV), T-2 m/z 484 > 215 (CE 19 eV) and m/z 484 > 185 (CE 22 eV), HT-2 m/z 442 > 263 (CE 11 eV), ZEN m/z 317 > 175 (CE 26 eV) and m/z 317 > 131 (CE 32 eV), ENN B m/z 640 > 528 (CE 20 eV), m/z 640 > 314 (CE 31 eV), m/z 640 > 214 (CE 26 eV), m/z 640 > 196 (CE 29 eV), m/z 640 > 186 (CE 37 eV), and m/z 640 > 86 (CE 44 eV). Calibration curves were set up using external standards (range 1 µg kg−1–2500 µg kg−1) for target analyte quantification. Data acquisition was performed by Thermo Xcalibur 2.2 software (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

3.5. Extraction of Anthocyanins

Samples were extracted according to Zaupa et al. [39] with some modifications. For instance, 1.5 mL of ethanol/water/formic acid (97:2:1, v/v/v) mixture was added to 150 mg of ground wheat. The samples were extracted for 15 min using a platform shaker (Ika Werke, Breisgau, Germany) at a speed of 200 strokes/min and subsequently centrifugated for 10 min at 10,000 rpm (radius 9.5 cm) at 4 °C. Next, 1 mL of clear supernatant was evaporated to dryness using a centrifugal vacuum concentrator (Labconco, Kansas City, MO, USA) and re-dissolved in a mixture of 100 µL of methanol/water (50:50, v/v) and then transferred into vials prior to being injected into the UHPLC-MS/MS system.

3.6. UHPLC-MS/MS Anthocyanins Analysis

UHPLC-MS/MS analysis was carried out on the UHPLC Dionex Ultimate 3000, coupled to a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer TSQ Vantage (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with an electrospray source (ESI). The chromatographic separation was obtained using a Sunshell column (Chromanik Technologies, Osaka, Japan) 2.1 × 100 mm, 2.6 µm particle size, heated to 40 °C. Additionally, 2 µL of sample extract was injected into the UHPLC system and the flow rate was set up to 0.35 mL min−1. Gradient elution was performed by using water (eluent A) and acetonitrile (eluent B), both acidified with 0.1% v/v HCOOH. Initial conditions were set at 99% A and 1% B for 10 min, then eluent B was increased to 80%. After an isocratic step (4 min), the gradient was returned to the initial condition. The total run time was 23.5 min. Mass spectrometric analysis was performed in positive ionization mode in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM), spray voltage 3500 V, capillary temperature 270 °C, vaporizer temperature 300 °C, sheath gas pressure 50 units, and auxiliary gas pressure 10 units.

The following quantifier transitions were measured: cyanidin 3-O-glucoside m/z 449 > 287 (CE 30 eV), cyanidin 3-O-rutinoside m/z 595 > 287 (CE 30 eV), cyanidin O-malonyl-hexoside m/z 535 > 287 (CE 30 eV), delphinidin 3-O-glucoside m/z 465 > 303 (CE 30 eV), delphinidin O-rutinoside m/z 611 > 303 (CE 30 eV), peonidin 3-O-glucoside m/z 463 > 301 (CE 30 eV), peonidin O-rutinoside m/z 609 > 301 (CE 30 eV), peonidin O-malonyl-hexoside m/z 549 > 301 (CE 30 eV), petunidin 3-O-glucoside m/z 479 > 317 (CE 30 eV), petunidin O-rutinoside m/z 625 > 317 (CE 30 eV), malvidin 3-O-glucoside m/z 493 > 331 (CE 30 eV), pelargonidin 3-O-glucoside m/z 433 > 271 (CE 30 eV), pelargonidin O-rutinoside m/z 579 > 271 (CE 30 eV), and pelargonidin O-malonyl-hexoside m/z 519 (CE 30 eV). Calibration curves were set up using external standards (range 5 µg kg−1–6500 µg kg−1) for target analyte quantification. The concentration of cyanidin O-malonyl-hexoside was expressed as cyanidin 3-O-glucoside equivalents. The concentration of delphinidin rutinoside was expressed as delphinidin 3-O-glucoside equivalents. The concentration of peonidin O-rutinoside and peonidin O-malonyl-hexoside were expressed as peonidin 3-O-glucoside equivalents. The concentration of petunidin O-rutinoside was expressed as petunidin 3-O-glucoside equivalents. The concentration of pelargonidin O-rutinoside and pelargonidin O-malonyl-hexoside was expressed as pelargonidin 3-O-glucoside equivalents. Data acquisition was performed by Thermo Xcalibur 2.2 software (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

3.7. Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS v.25.0 (SPSS Italia, Bologna, Italy). Three independent technical replicates were considered for each biological replicate, and three biological replicates were considered for each variety and each year. Data were log normalized prior to statistical analysis. ANOVA followed by Tukey post-hoc test (α = 0.05) and Pearson’s correlation test (α = 0.01) was run using Statistica 13.5.0.17 (Tibco Software Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA).

4. Conclusions

The collected data highlighted a remarkable susceptibility of blue-pigmented wheat varieties and breeding lines to mycotoxin contamination, compared to genotypes with different anthocyanin content and histological placement in the grain. To enhance the use of wholegrain flour from blue-grained wheat in bakery products with superior antioxidant capacity, it will be necessary to substantially improve their susceptibility to mycotoxin accumulation.

Multiple reports suggested that anthocyanins may have a positive effect on oxidative stress, and also resistance against Fusarium biotic stress. Scaling up these evaluations to field-grown plants proved to be a challenge and the first results did not provide a clear and unequivocal correlation between anthocyanin content and mycotoxin accumulation, although the black-grained varieties of wheat, genetically similar to the blue one, but with anthocyanins also in the pericarp layer, showed lower mycotoxin content. A leading result, however, was that varieties and breeding lines accumulating these pigments in the pericarp (purple colouration) had significantly lower DON content if compared to those in which aleurone is involved (blue colouration). This evidence is relevant in terms of further experimental design. As histological distribution may affect the interplay between pigmented wheat and mycotoxin presence, further investigations should not look just at the phytochemical profile of pigmented wheat, but also at their histological properties and at the composition of individual alleles responsible for anthocyanin biosynthesis. Investigations with techniques capable of unveiling the spatial distribution of mycotoxins and plant defense metabolites in pigmented wheat kernels, such as MALDI mass spectrometry imaging, seem to be warranted.

Acknowledgments

We thank Limagrain Italia S.p.A., Fidenza (PR), Italy; Hetland Seeds Ltd., Naicam, SK, Canada; Saatzucht Donau GesmbH. & CoKG, Austria and Agrotest Fyto, Ltd., Kroměříž, Czech Republic for providing unique wheat samples with coloured grain, Debora Giordano for coordinating the collection of these varieties and Luca Calani for supporting in anthocyanin determination. M.B. thanks the support of the project NUTRACORE of the Regione Piemonte (POR FESR 2014–2020), P.M. thanks the support of the project QK1910343 of the Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants12040693/s1, Figure S1. Appearance of ears of used varieties, Figure S2. Appearance of grains of different colour selected between the cultivars /breeding lines considered in this study: Aubusson (top left), Merlot (top right), Skorpion (bottom left) and AF Zora (bottom right).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.B., M.B. and L.R.; methodology, L.R.; investigation, M.G.; formal analysis, C.D.; writing—original draft, M.G., M.B. and R.B.; writing—review and editing, C.D., P.M., R.B. and L.R.; resources, M.B., C.D., R.B. and L.R.; project administration, M.B. and R.B.; supervision, R.B, C.D. and L.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

This research received no external funding.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Gill B.S., Appels R., Botha-Oberholster A.M., Buell C.R., Bennetzen J.L., Chalhoub B., Chumley F., Dvořák J., Iwanaga M., Keller B., et al. A Workshop Report on Wheat Genome Sequencing: International Genome Research on Wheat Consortium. Genetics. 2004;168:1087–1096. doi: 10.1534/genetics.104.034769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mourad A.M.I., Alomari D.Z., Alqudah A.M., Sallam A., Salem K.F.M. Advances in Plant Breeding Strategies: Cereals. Volume 5. Springer International Publishing; Cham, Switzerland: 2019. Recent Advances in Wheat (Triticum Spp.) Breeding; pp. 559–593. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gupta R., Meghwal M., Prabhakar P.K. Bioactive Compounds of Pigmented Wheat (Triticum Aestivum): Potential Benefits in Human Health. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021;110:240–252. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.02.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Himi E., Maekawa M., Miura H., Noda K. Development of PCR Markers for Tamyb10 Related to R-1, Red Grain Color Gene in Wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2011;122:1561–1576. doi: 10.1007/s00122-011-1555-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tereshchenko O., Gordeeva E., Arbuzova V., Börner A., Khlestkina E. The D Genome Carries a Gene Determining Purple Grain Colour in Wheat. Cereal Res. Commun. 2012;40:334–341. doi: 10.1556/CRC.40.2012.3.2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gordeeva E.I., Shoeva O.Y., Khlestkina E.K. Marker-Assisted Development of Bread Wheat near-Isogenic Lines Carrying Various Combinations of Purple Pericarp (Pp) Alleles. Euphytica. 2015;203:469–476. doi: 10.1007/s10681-014-1317-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Shoeva O.Y., Gordeeva E.I., Khlestkina E.K. The Regulation of Anthocyanin Synthesis in the Wheat Pericarp. Molecules. 2014;19:20266–20279. doi: 10.3390/molecules191220266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jeewani D.C., Zhonghua W., Wenhui J., Chandana Nishantha M.D.L., Wenzhi N., Tianxiang L. Structural Genes Encoding F3′5′h in 4d Chromosome Control the Blue Grain Trait in Wheat. Trop. Agric. Res. Ext. 2021;24:35. doi: 10.4038/tare.v24i1.5506. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Qualset C.O., Soliman K.M., Jan C.C., Dvorak J., Vogt H.E. Release of Wheat Germplasm: A Blue Aleurone Translocation Stock-UC66049. University of California; Davis, CA, USA: 1983. Agronomy Progress Report No. 139. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Watanabe N., Martinek P. Pyramiding Ba (Blue aleurone) genes to develop darker blue grain wheat: Prospect of nine-dose of Ba gene. Breed. Res. 2022;24:152. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lachman J., Martinek P., Kotíková Z., Orsák M., Šulc M. Genetics and Chemistry of Pigments in Wheat Grain—A Review. J. Cereal Sci. 2017;74:145–154. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2017.02.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Saini P., Kumar N., Kumar S., Mwaurah P.W., Panghal A., Attkan A.K., Singh V.K., Garg M.K., Singh V. Bioactive Compounds, Nutritional Benefits and Food Applications of Colored Wheat: A Comprehensive Review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020;61:3197–3210. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2020.1793727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jia Y., Selva C., Zhang Y., Li B., McFawn L.A., Broughton S., Zhang X., Westcott S., Wang P., Tan C., et al. Uncovering the Evolutionary Origin of Blue Anthocyanins in Cereal Grains. Plant J. 2020;101:1057–1074. doi: 10.1111/tpj.14557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Santos-Buelga C., Mateus N., de Freitas V. Anthocyanins. Plant Pigments and Beyond. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014;62:6879–6884. doi: 10.1021/jf501950s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lin Y., Fan L., He J., Wang Z., Yin Y., Cheng Y., Li Z. Anthocyanins Contribute to Fruit Defense against Postharvest Green Mold. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2021;181:111661. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2021.111661. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Landoni M., Puglisi D., Cassani E., Borlini G., Brunoldi G., Comaschi C., Pilu R. Phlobaphenes Modify Pericarp Thickness in Maize and Accumulation of the Fumonisin Mycotoxins. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:1417. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58341-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chandrashekar A., Satyanarayana K.V. Disease and Pest Resistance in Grains of Sorghum and Millets. J. Cereal Sci. 2006;44:287–304. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2006.08.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Spaggiari M., Righetti L., Galaverna G., Giordano D., Scarpino V., Blandino M., Dall’Asta C. HR-MS Profiling and Distribution of Native and Modified Fusarium Mycotoxins in Tritordeum, Wheat and Barley Whole Grains and Corresponding Pearled Fractions. J. Cereal Sci. 2019;87:178–184. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2019.03.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Simsek S., Burgess K., Whitney K.L., Gu Y., Qian S.Y. Analysis of Deoxynivalenol and Deoxynivalenol-3-Glucoside in Wheat. Food Control. 2012;26:287–292. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.01.056. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.McCormick S.P., Kato T., Maragos C.M., Busman M., Lattanzio V.M.T., Galaverna G., Dall-Asta C., Crich D., Price N.P.J., Kurtzman C.P. Anomericity of T-2 Toxin-Glucoside: Masked Mycotoxin in Cereal Crops. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015;63:731–738. doi: 10.1021/jf504737f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Berthiller F., Crews C., Dall’Asta C., de Saeger S., Haesaert G., Karlovsky P., Oswald I.P., Seefelder W., Speijers G., Stroka J. Masked Mycotoxins: A Review. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2013;57:165–186. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201100764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Atanasova-Penichon V., Barreau C., Richard-Forget F. Antioxidant Secondary Metabolites in Cereals: Potential Involvement in Resistance to Fusarium and Mycotoxin Accumulation. Front. Microbiol. 2016;7:566. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Etzerodt T., Gislum R., Laursen B.B., Heinrichson K., Gregersen P.L., Jørgensen L.N., Fomsgaard I.S. Correlation of Deoxynivalenol Accumulation in Fusarium-Infected Winter and Spring Wheat Cultivars with Secondary Metabolites at Different Growth Stages. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016;64:4545–4555. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b01162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bollina V., Kushalappa A.C., Choo T.M., Dion Y., Rioux S. Identification of Metabolites Related to Mechanisms of Resistance in Barley against Fusarium Graminearum, Based on Mass Spectrometry. Plant Mol. Biol. 2011;77:355–370. doi: 10.1007/s11103-011-9815-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gunnaiah R., Kushalappa A.C. Metabolomics Deciphers the Host Resistance Mechanisms in Wheat Cultivar Sumai-3, against Trichothecene Producing and Non-Producing Isolates of Fusarium Graminearum. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2014;83:40–50. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Choo T.M., Vigier B., Savard M.E., Blackwell B., Martin R., Wang J., Yang J., Abdel-Aal E.S.M. Black Barley as a Means of Mitigating Deoxynivalenol Contamination. Crop. Sci. 2015;55:1096–1103. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2014.05.0405. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yang L., Wen K.S., Ruan X., Zhao Y.X., Wei F., Wang Q. Response of Plant Secondary Metabolites to Environmental Factors. Molecules. 2018;23:762. doi: 10.3390/molecules23040762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Watanabe N. Wheat Near-Isogenic Lines. Sankeisha; Nagoya, Japan: 2003. p. 156. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gordeeva E., Shamanin V., Shoeva O., Kukoeva T., Morgounov A., Khlestkina E. The Strategy for Marker-Assisted Breeding of Anthocyanin-Rich Spring Bread Wheat (Triticum Aestivum l.) Cultivars in Western Siberia. Agronomy. 2020;10:1603. doi: 10.3390/agronomy10101603. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chrpová J., Orsák M., Martinek P., Lachman J., Trávníčková M. Potential Role and Involvement of Antioxidants and Other Secondary Metabolites of Wheat in the Infection Process and Resistance to Fusarium spp. Agronomy. 2021;11:2235. doi: 10.3390/agronomy11112235. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ovando-Martínez M., Ozsisli B., Anderson J., Whitney K., Ohm J.B., Simsek S. Analysis of Deoxynivalenol and Deoxynivalenol-3-Glucoside in Hard Red Spring Wheat Inoculated with Fusarium Graminearum. Toxins. 2013;5:2522–2532. doi: 10.3390/toxins5122522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Amarasinghe C.C., Simsek S., Brûlé-Babel A., Fernando W.G.D. Analysis of Deoxynivalenol and Deoxynivalenol-3-Glucosides Content in Canadian Spring Wheat Cultivars Inoculated with Fusarium Graminearum. Food Addit. Contam. Part A. 2016;33:1254–1264. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2016.1198050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jestoi M. Emerging Fusarium-Mycotoxins Fusaproliferin, Beauvericin, Enniatins, and Moniliformin—A Review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2008;48:21–49. doi: 10.1080/10408390601062021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Martinek P., Škorpík M., Chrpová J., Fučík P. Schweiger, J. Development of the New Winter Wheat Variety Skorpion with Blue Grain. Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed. 2013;49:90–94. doi: 10.17221/7/2013-CJGPB. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Morgounov A., Karaduman Y., Akin B., Aydogan S., Baenziger P.S., Bhatta M., Chudinov V., Dreisigacker S., Govindan V., Güler S., et al. Yield and Quality in Purple-Grained Wheat Isogenic Lines. Agronomy. 2020;10:86. doi: 10.3390/agronomy10010086. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Khlestkina E.K. Genes Determining the Coloration of Different Organs in Wheat. Russ. J. Genet. Appl. Res. 2013;3:54–65. doi: 10.1134/S2079059713010085. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Scarpino V., Blandino M. Effects of Durum Wheat Cultivars with Different Degrees of Fhb Susceptibility Grown under Different Meteorological Conditions on the Contamination of Regulated, Modified and Emerging Mycotoxins. Microorganisms. 2021;9:408. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9020408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Malachová A., Sulyok M., Beltrán E., Berthiller F., Krska R. Optimization and Validation of a Quantitative Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometric Method Covering 295 Bacterial and Fungal Metabolites Including All Regulated Mycotoxins in Four Model Food Matrices. J. Chromatogr. A. 2014;1362:145–156. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.08.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zaupa M., Calani L., del Rio D., Brighenti F., Pellegrini N. Characterization of Total Antioxidant Capacity and (Poly)Phenolic Compounds of Differently Pigmented Rice Varieties and Their Changes during Domestic Cooking. Food Chem. 2015;187:338–347. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.04.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.


Articles from Plants are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES