Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 10;15(4):889. doi: 10.3390/nu15040889

Table 3.

Findings from published reports on the effects of free or added sugar consumption on cognition in healthy subjects.

Author and Year Design Timeframe/
Follow-Up
Subjects Tasks/Measures Intervention/
Independent Variable
Significant Findings
Human studies
Adan & Serra-Grabulosa, 2010 [179]. RCT 0–30 min (unclear) Fasted adults, aged 18–25y; n = 72; glucose group, n = 18. RAVLT
Purdue-Pegboard
JoLO
WCST
CalCAP
Digit Span of WAIS
VAS
75 g glucose ↑ Perdue pegboard assembly
↑ Reaction time
-No effect of glucose on learning or memory
Azari, 1991 [191]. Double-blind,
Repeated measures trial.
30 min Aged 19–25; n = 18.
Fasted with standardized breakfast.
Word list recall and recognition 30 g or 100 g glucose -No effect of glucose
Benton & Owens, 1993 [202]. RCT 15 min Young adults, mean age 21y; n = 153 Word list recall
Spatial memory test
Wechsler story
Blood glucose
50 g glucose -No effect of glucose solution
Brandt, 2015 [177]. Double-blind,
placebo-controlled trial. (Glucose compared to aspartame)
15 min Fasted young adults; mean age 19.47y; n = 41; BMI = 18.5 to 30 kg/m2 Word recall task (recognition, recollection or familiarity). 25 g glucose ↓ Familiarity
Chong et al., 2019 [8]. Cross-sectional survey NA Adults aged ≥ 60 years FFQ (total sugars, free sugars, fructose, glucose, sucrose, maltose, lactose)
MMSE
↑ Total and free sugar intake. ↓ MMSE score
Flint & Turek, 2003 [203]. Randomised placebo-controlled trial.
(Comparison groups: 10, 100, and 500 mg/kg, or 50 g glucose or saccharin placebo)
2 min Fasted adults aged 18–50 (n = 67) TOVA program 100 mg/kg glucose ↓ Attention (impaired impulsivity and disinhibition)
Gagnon et al., 2010 [178]. Double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.
(Glucose compared to saccharin)
15 min Fasting older adults (aged 60 years and over; n = 44) STROOP
Trail making tests A and B
Computerised dual task
50 g glucose ↑ Switching
↑ Inhibition
↑ Trail Making Test A, but not B.
↑ Attention
Gui et al., 2021 [44]. Cross-sectional survey NA Children; mean age 8.6 years; n = 6387 FFQ (SSB) ↑ SSB consumption ↓ Executive functions
↑ Risk of executive dysfunction
Hope et al., 2013 [176]. Double-blind placebo-controlled experimental trial. Immediate Adults; mean age 25.1y; n = 12.
Tested after consumption of standardised breakfast.
Erikson Flanker Task 25 g glucose ↓ Sensorimotor processing speed
Kennedy & Scholey, 2000 [180]. Randomised crossover design.
(Glucose compared to saccharin)
20 min Fasted young adults; aged 19–30; n = 20 Serial threes
Serial sevens
25 g glucose solution ↑ Performance on Serial Sevens
Macpherson et al., 2015 [181]. Repeated measures RCT.
(Glucose compared to saccharin)
5–30 min (unclear) Fasting young adults; mean age 20.6y; n = 24; Fasting older adults; mean age 72.5y; n = 24 Memory task
Tracking task
25 g glucose solution Older adults:
↑ Recognition memory
↑ Tracking precision
Younger adults:
No effects
Martin & Benton, 1999 [194]. RCT.
4 block design: glucose vs placebo; fasted vs breakfast (mean 1049 ± 767 kJ; 42.6 ± 30.3 g carbohydrate).
20 min Female adults; mean age 22.6y; n = 80 Brown–Petersen task 50 g glucose (fasted condition) ↑ Recall
50 g glucose (breakfast condition) -No effect of glucose
Miao et al., 2021 [28]. Prospective cohort study (FHS). 19y (mean) Adults; n = 1384 FFQ (SSB)
Clinical surveillance
↑ SSB ↑ Dementia
↑ AD
Munoz-Garcia et al., 2020 [45]. Prospective cohort study 6y University graduates; aged over 55y; n = 1069 FFQ (SSB)
STICS-m
↑ SSB ↓ Cognition
Owen et al., 2010 [182]. Between-participant, double-blind,
placebo-controlled design.
15 min Fasted young adults; aged 18–30; n = 90 Word presentation
Immediate word recall
Face presentation
Implicit memory task
Delayed word recall
Delayed word recognition
Face recognition
25 g glucose ↓ Word recognition (increased errors)
60 g glucose ↑ Immediate free recall
↑ Word recognition
↑ Implicit memory
Scholey et al., 2009 [183]. RCT.
(Glucose compared to saccharin)
20 min Fasted young adults (mean age 21.6 years; n = 120 Word recognition
Tracking task
25 g glucose solution ↑ tracking performance
-No effect on memory
Stollery & Christian, 2016 [175]. Experimental.
glucose or saccharin (no sugar).
10 min Fasting adults; n = 31 Object location binding task 30 g glucose ↑ Object location binding memory
↑ Location memory
Sunram-Lea et al., 2011. Double-blind, placebo-controlled, balanced,
crossover trial.
(Glucose compared to saccharin)
15 min Fasted young adults; n = 30 Immediate word recall
Serial threes
Serial sevens
Corsi block-tapping task
Delayed word recall
Delayed word recognition
15 g, 25 g, 50 g, or 60 g glucose solution U-shaped dose-response.
-Spatial WM, immediate recall, delayed recall, and recognition memory were all improved at 25 g only.
Ye et al., 2011 [46]. Cross-sectional survey. NA Aged 45–75y; n = 1500 FFQ (Sucrose, glucose, fructose, galactose, lactose, maltose, fruit juice, or sugar-sweetened solid foods).
MMSE
Word list learning
Digit span
Clock drawing Figure copying STROOP
Verbal fluency tests
↑ Total sugars/added sugars/sucrose/glucose/fructose ↓ MMSE
-No effect of increased natural fructose, galactose, lactose, maltose, fruit juice, or sugar-sweetened solid foods.
Zhang et al., 2022 [47]. Cross-sectional survey NA Aged 13–18y; n = 1427 FFQ (SSB)
Questionnaire
↑ SSB ↓ Inhibition
↓ WM
↓ Cognitive flexibility
Animal studies
Beecher et al., 2021 [10]. Longitudinal experimental study.
(Sucrose compared to water)
12 weeks Adolescent mice; n = 46 Elevated-plus-maze
Novelty suppressed feeding
Marble burying
Open field test
Forced swimming test
NOR
MWM
Pathology tests
25% sucrose solution ↓ Episodic and spatial memory
↓ Overall density of dentate gyrus proliferating cells
↑ Locomotor activity
Fierros-Campuzano et al., 2022 [48]. Longitudinal experimental study.
(Fructose compared to water)
12 weeks Adolescent male Wistar rats; aged 5–6 weeks; n = 60 Barnes Maze
Pathology tests
10% fructose solution ↓ Spatial memory
↓ Neurogenesis in hippocampus
↑ Inflammatory markers in PFC
↑ GFAP expression in hippocampus and PFC
Hamelin et al., 2022 [49]. Longitudinal experimental study.
(Sucrose compared to water or artificial sweetener)
6 weeks Adult male mice; n = 297 Mouse gambling task
Pathology tests
1% sucrose solution (25% daily sugar intake). ↓ DA and DA turnover in PFC
↓ Decision-making
↓ c-Fos expression in prelimbic cortex, nucleus accumbens, and striatum.
↑ Activity in BLA
Hsu et al., 2015 [50]. Longitudinal experimental study.
(Sucrose or fructose compared to water)
30 days Adolescent (n = 38) and adult (n = 38) male Sprague Dawley rats. Barnes maze test
Y-maze
SSB (11% sucrose) Adolescents:
↓ Spatial learning
Adults:
-No effect observed
HFCS (11%) Adolescents:
↓ spatial learning and memory retention
↑ Hippocampal inflammatory markers
Adults:
-No effect observed
Kageyama et al., 2022 [60]. Longitudinal experimental study. 40 days Postnatal, adolescent, and adult Sprague Dawley rats (n = 7–8 per group). Pathology results 20% HFCS ↓ BDNF expression in childhood and adolescence
-No effect in adult rats
Lee et al., 2021 [51]. Longitudinal experimental study.
(Comparison of high sucrose to high-fat and control diets)
21 days Older Sprague Dawley rats; 15 months old; n = 36; high sucrose group, n = 17 T-maze Sucrose as 70% of carbohydrate kcal ↓ Cognitive learning
Lemos et al., 2016 [52]. Longitudinal experimental study. 9 weeks Male Wistar rats; 12 weeks old; n = 6–8 rats per group. Open field test
Object displacement
NOR
Forced Swimming test
Western Blot
35% sucrose ↓ Memory performance
↑ Inhibitory Adenosine A1 receptor in hippocampus
Messier et al., 2007 [204]. Repeated measures RCT.
(Comparison of high-fructose diet to high-fat and control diets)
3 months 7-week-old C57BL/6 mice; n = 38; fructose group n = 8 Operant bar pressing task 15% fructose ↑ Learning (on 2 of 5 testing days)
Miles et al., 2021 [205]. Longitudinal experimental study. 14 days Adult male Wistar rats; 8 weeks old; n = 16 Location Discrimination task
Pairwise Discrimination acquisition and reversal learning
Processing speed
10% sucrose (approx. 70 mL per day) -No effect of sucrose
Noble et al., 2019 [53]. Longitudinal experimental study. 30 days (Postnatal day 26 to 56) Juvenile, male Sprague Dawley rats (n = 24). Zero Maze
Novel object in context task
11% w/v HFCS ↓ later-life hippocampal-dependent episodic contextual memory
-No impact on glucose tolerance, weight, anxiety
Reichelt et aal., 2022 [57]. Longitudinal experimental study. 28 days male albino Sprague Dawley rats; 4 weeks old; n = 32 Object-in-place task
Locomotor behaviour
Biconditional discrimination
Immunohistochemistry
200 mL 10% sucrose, 2 h per day. ↓ Context-appropriate responses
↓ Hippocampal PV+ cells
Ross et al., 2009 [206]. Longitudinal experimental study. 18 weeks Male Sprague Dawley rats; n = 29. Spatial Water Maze 60% fructose ↓ Retention performance
-No impact on acquisitional performance
Sanguesa et al., 2018 [61]. Longitudinal experimental study.
(Comparison of fructose, glucose, water)
28 weeks Female, adult, Sprague Dawley rats; n = 36;
control, n = 12; Fructose, n = 12; glucose, n = 12
NOR
MWM
Immunohistochemistry
10% w/v fructose ↓ NOR
↓ BDNF
↓ IRS-2 protein expression
↓ Akt phosphorylation
Wong et al., 2017 [54]. Longitudinal experimental study. 24 days Adolescent and young adult Sprague Dawley rats; n = 48 Object and place recognition memory
Delay-discounting task
Progressive ratio
T-maze forced alternation.
10% sucrose solution, 2 h per day. ↓ Spatial memory
Wu et al., 2015 [55]. Longitudinal experimental study. 8 months Male Sprague Dawley rats; 8 weeks old; n = 19 MWM 10% fructose solution ↓ Spatial learning and memory
Xu & Reichelt, 2018 [56]. Longitudinal experimental study. 28 days Male Sprague Dawley rats; 3 weeks old; n = 36 Open field test
NPR
NOR
Immunohistochemistry
10% sucrose, 2 h per day ↓ NPR
↓ NOR
↓ Hippocampal PV+ cells

Abbreviations: RCT, randomised control trial; mins, minutes; y, years; RAVLT, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Memory Test; JoLO, Benton Judgement of Line Orientation Test; WCST, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test; CalCAP,, California Computerized Assessment Package; WAIS, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale; VAS, Visual Analogue Scale; ↑ increased/increasing; ↓ decreased/decreasing; MMSE, the Mini Mental State Examination; TOVA, Test Of Variables of Attention program; SSB, sugar-sweetened beverage; FHS, Framingham Heart Study; STICS-m, Spanish version of the modified Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status; WM, working memory; NOR, novel object recognition; MWM, Morris Water Maze; PFC, prefrontal cortex; GFAP, Glial fibrillary acidic protein; DA, dopamine; BLA, basolateral amygdala; HFCS, high-fructose corn syrup; AD, Alzheimer’s disease; BDNF, brain-derived neurotrophic factor.