Skip to main content
PMC home page
Polymers logoLink to Polymers
editorial
. 2023 Feb 10;15(4):892. doi: 10.3390/polym15040892

Eco-Friendly Wood Composites: Design, Characterization and Applications

Viktor Savov 1,*, Petar Antov 1,*, Yonghui Zhou 2, Pavlo Bekhta 3
PMCID: PMC9966963  PMID: 36850175

The ongoing transition from a linear to a circular, low-carbon bioeconomy is crucial for reducing the consumption of global natural resources, minimizing waste generation, reducing carbon emissions, and creating more sustainable growth and jobs, the prerequisites necessary to achieve climate neutrality targets and stop biodiversity loss. In recent years, the wood-based panel industry has faced significantly increasing demands for its various products due to the rising worldwide population, shifts in land use, and growing economies. Using wood more efficiently, the optimization of natural raw material use, and sustainably converting waste into value-added products to meet projected demands for the development of wood-based composites all represent key circular economy principles requiring the reuse, recycling, or upcycling of materials.

Conventional wood composites are produced with synthetic, formaldehyde-based adhesives, commonly created from fossil-derived constituents, such as urea, phenol, melamine, etc. [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Along with their undisputable advantages, these adhesives are characterized by specific problems connected to the emission of hazardous volatile organic compounds (VOCs), including free formaldehyde emissions from finished wood-based composites, which have been linked to several major environmental issues, as well as negative effects on human health, including irritation to skin and eyes, respiratory problems, and cancer [11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. The shift towards a circular, low-carbon bioeconomy, growing environmental concerns, and stringent legislation related to the emission of harmful VOCs have resulted in novel requirements related to the development of sustainable and environmentally friendly wood-based composites [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. In this respect, novel requirements concerning free formaldehyde emissions from wood composites have posed novel challenges for both researchers and industrial practices related to the development of sustainable and ecofriendly wood composites, the optimization of available lignocellulosic raw materials, and the use of alternative natural and renewable feedstocks [26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. The harmful formaldehyde released from wood composites can be reduced by adding formaldehyde scavengers to conventional adhesive systems, through the surface treatment of finished wood composites, or by using novel biobased wood adhesives as environmentally friendly alternatives to traditional thermosetting resins [39,40,41,42,43]. Another alternative to formaldehyde-based adhesives is the manufacture of binderless wood-based panels, since wood represents a natural polymeric material abundant in lignocellulosic constituents, such as cellulose, hemicelluloses, and lignin [44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53].

This Special Issue presents a collection of 10 high-quality original research and review papers providing examples of the most recent advances and technological developments in the fabrication, design, characteristics, and applications of ecofriendly wood and wood-based composites.

In their paper, Taghiyari et al. investigated the effects of nanosilver and heat treatment on the pull-off strength of sealer-clear finish in solid wood species [54]. They found a positive correlation between the density and pull-off adhesion strength in three common solid wood species, i.e., common beech, silver fir, and black poplar. A heat treatment at 145 °C increased the pull-off adhesion strength in all three species due to the formation of novel bonds in the cell walls of the polymers. The thermal degradation of the polymers at 185 °C weakened the formation of the novel bonds’ positive effect, resulting in an unchanged pull-off strength compared with the control specimens. Markedly, the authors reported that the impregnation with a silver nanosuspension decreased the pull-off strength in beech specimens. It was concluded that the density was the decisive factor in determining the pull-off strength, having a significant positive correlation.

In the study by Ghozali et al., a novel in situ modification method for thermoplastic starch preparation (TPS) based on Arenga pinnata palm starch was proposed [55]. It was found that TPS properties could be improved with the starch modification, adding reinforcements and blending with other polymers. In this research, to prepare the modified TPS, the starch modification was carried out through an in situ modification. The modified TPS was obtained by adding Arenga pinnata palm starch (APPS), glycerol, and benzoyl peroxide simultaneously in a twin-screw extruder. The morphology analysis of the TPS revealed that the starch granules were damaged and gelatinized in the extrusion process. No phase separation was observed in the TPS, showing that starch granules with and without benzoyl peroxide were uniformly dispersed in the matrix. In addition, the thermal analysis showed that the addition of benzoyl peroxide increased the thermal stability of the TPS and extended the temperature range of the thermal degradation.

Another piece of research, conducted by Iswanto et al., studied the chemical, physical, and mechanical properties of belangke bamboo (Gigantochloa pruriens) and its application as a reinforcing material in particleboard manufacturing [56]. The results showed that this bamboo had average lignin, holocellulose, and alpha-cellulose contents of 29.78%, 65.13%, and 41.48%, respectively, with a crystallinity of 33.54%. The physical properties of bamboo, including its specific gravity, inner and outer diameter shrinkage, and linear shrinkage, were 0.59%, 2.18%, 2.26%, and 0.18%, respectively. Meanwhile, the bamboo’ s mechanical properties, including compressive strength, shear strength, and tensile strength, were 42.19 MPa, 7.63 MPa, and 163.8 MPa, respectively. Despite the inferior dimensional stability, i.e., higher water absorption and thickness swelling, compared to the uncoated particleboards, the panels reinforced with bamboo strands exhibited acceptable mechanical strength. Markedly, the addition of belangke bamboo strands as a reinforcement (surface coating) in particleboards significantly improved the mechanical properties of the panels, increasing the modulus of elasticity (MOE) and bending strength (MOR) values of the fabricated composites 16 and 3 times, respectively.

A study by Makars et al. aimed to utilize suberinic acids containing residues as adhesives for particleboard manufacturing [57]. The authors investigated the chemical and thermal properties of four different adhesives obtained in different solvents (ethanol, methanol, isopropanol, and 1-butanol), as well as their performance in bonding particleboards. Based on the results of the mechanical characteristics, ethanol was chosen as the most suitable depolymerization medium. The following optimal hot-pressing parameters for manufacturing particleboards were reported: adhesive content 20 wt%; hot-pressing temperature 248 °C; hot-pressing time of 6.55 min.

In their paper, Savov et al. investigated the effect of the adhesive system on the properties of fiberboard panels bonded with hydrolysis lignin and phenol-formaldehyde (PF) resin [58]. The study proposed an alternative technological solution for manufacturing fiberboard panels using a modified hot-pressing regime with hydrolysis lignin as the main adhesive. Markedly, the main novelty of the research was the optimized adhesive system composed of unmodified hydrolysis lignin and a reduced PF resin content. It was concluded that the proposed technology was suitable for manufacturing fiberboard panels, fulfilling the strictest EN standards. Markedly, it was shown that to produce this type of panels, the minimum total content of binders should be 10.6%, and the PF resin content should be at least 14% of the adhesive system.

In another paper, Shahavi et al. investigated the feasibility of using wood leachate (WL) as an inexpensive filler in novel biodegradable poly (lactic acid)/WL composites [59]. In this research, the antibacterial, mechanical, morphological, and thermal properties of the composites were evaluated. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) results indicated a proper filler dispersion in the polymer matrix, and WL powder improved the hydrophobic nature in the adjusted sample’s contact angle experiment. Markedly, the results showed that adding WL filler improved the mechanical properties of the fabricated biocomposites. The PLA–WL biocomposites exhibited antibacterial activity according to the inhibition zone for Escherichia coli bacteria. The authors concluded that the developed poly (lactic acid)–WL biocomposites could be successfully used in a variety of value-added industrial applications, such as functional biopolymer materials.

The paper by Solihat et al. investigated the physical and chemical properties of Acacia mangium lignin isolated from pulp mill byproduct for potential applications in wood composites [60]. This research demonstrated that the lower insoluble acid content of lignin derived from a fractionated step (69.94%) rather than a single step (77.45%) correlated to the lignin yield, total phenolic content, solubility, thermal stability, and molecular distribution. It contradicted the syringyl/guaiacyl (S/G) units’ ratio, where the ethanol fractionation slightly increased the syringyl unit content, increasing the S/G ratio. Hence, the fractionation step resulted in more ruptures and pores on the lignin morphological surface than the ethanol-fractionated step. The results obtained could increase the industrial valorization of lignin in manufacturing wood-based panels with improved properties and a lower environmental footprint.

In their review paper, Sydor et al. performed a comprehensive overview of the recent developments, possibilities, and challenges surrounding the efficient utilization of mycelium-based composites (MBCs) in art, architecture, and interior design applications [61]. It was found that MBCs attracted growing attention due to their role in the development of ecodesign methods. Following the synthesis of these sources of knowledge, it was concluded that MBCs are inexpensive in production, ecological, biodegradable, and offer a high artistic value. The main drawbacks of this natural material are related to its insufficient load capacity, unfavorable water affinity, and unknown durability.

Another interesting paper by Miran Merhar investigated the application of the maximum stress, Tsai–Hill, Tsai–Wu, Puck, Hoffman, and Hashin criteria to beech (Fagus sylvatica) plywood manufactured from differently oriented veneer sheets [62]. Specimens were cut from the manufactured panels at various angles and loaded by bending to failure. The mechanical properties of the beech veneer were also evaluated. The samples were modelled using the finite element method with a composite modulus and considering the different failure criteria, where the failure forces were calculated and compared with the measured values. The authors reported that the calculated forces based on all failure criteria were lower than those measured experimentally. The forces determined using the maximum stress criterion showed the best agreement between the calculated and measured forces.

Last, but not least, a comprehensive review of the latest advancements in the development of fire-resistant biocomposites, including a critical analysis of the flammability of wood and natural fibers as raw materials for the production of biocomposites, was conducted by Madyaratri et al. [63]. In addition, the authors investigated and discussed the feasibility of using lignin as an environmentally friendly and inexpensive flame retardant additive in the production of high-performance biocomposites with enhanced technological and fire properties. The authors concluded that the increased utilization of renewable natural feedstocks represented a prospective and viable approach to manufacturing novel biocomposite materials with engineered properties, improved fire resistance, and a lower environmental footprint.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the project “Properties and application of innovative biocomposite materials in furniture manufacturing”, no. HИC-Б-1215/04.2022, carried out at the University of Forestry, Sofia, Bulgaria.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.B., P.A., Y.Z. and V.S.; Writing and editing P.B., P.A. and V.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

This research received no external funding.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Pizzi A., Papadopoulus A.N., Policardi F. Wood Composites and Their Polymer Binders. Polymers. 2020;12:12051115. doi: 10.3390/polym12051115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Valyova M., Ivanova Y., Koynov D. Investigation of free formaldehyde quantity in production of plywood with modified urea-formaldehyde resin. Int. J. Wood Des. Technol. 2017;6:72–76. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lee T.C., Puad N.A.D., Selimin M.A., Manap N., Abdullah H.Z., Idris M.I. An overview on development of environmental friendly medium density fibreboard. Mater. Today. 2020;29:52–57. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.679. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Savov V., Mihajlova J. Influence of the Content of Lignosulfonate on Physical Properties of Medium Density Fiberboards. ProLigno. 2017;13:247–251. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Valchev I., Savov V., Yordanov I. Reduction of Phenol Formaldehyde Resin Content in Dry-Processed Fibreboards by Adding Hydrolysis Lignin; Proceedings of the 2020 Society of Wood Science and Technology International Convention; Portorož, Slovenia. 12–15 July 2020; pp. 592–602. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jivkov V., Elenska-Valchanova D. Mechanical Properties of Some Thin Furniture Structural Composite Materials; Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Wood Science and Technology; Zagreb, Croatia. 12–13 December 2019; pp. 86–94. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jivkov. V., Petrova B. Challenges for furniture design with thin structural materials; Proceedings of the IFC; Trabzon, Turkey. 2–5 November 2020; pp. 113–123. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Valchev I., Yordanov Y., Savov V., Antov P. Optimization of the Hot-Pressing Regime in the Production of Eco-Friendly Fibreboards Bonded with Hydrolysis Lignin. Period. Polytech. Chem. Eng. 2022;66:125–134. doi: 10.3311/PPch.18284. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Karagiannidis E., Markessini C., Athanassiadou E. Micro-Fibrillated Cellulose in Adhesive Systems for the Production of Wood-Based Panels. Molecules. 2020;25:4846. doi: 10.3390/molecules25204846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bertaud F., Tapin–Lingua S., Pizzi A., Navarrete P., Petit–Conil M. Development of green adhesives for fibreboard manufacturing, using tannins and lignin from pulp mill residues. Cellul. Chem. Technol. 2012;46:449–455. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zakaria R., Bawon P., Lee S.H., Salim S., Lum W.C., Al-Edrus S.S.O., Ibrahim Z. Properties of Particleboard from Oil Palm Biomasses Bonded with Citric Acid and Tapioca Starch. Polymers. 2021;13:3494. doi: 10.3390/polym13203494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ghahri S., Pizzi A., Hajihassani R. A Study of Concept to Prepare Totally Biosourced Wood Adhesives from Only Soy Protein and Tannin. Polymers. 2022;14:1150. doi: 10.3390/polym14061150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Antov P., Savov V., Mantanis G.I., Neykov N. Medium-density fibreboards bonded with phenol-formaldehyde resin and calcium lignosulfonate as an eco-friendly additive. Wood Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021;16:42–48. doi: 10.1080/17480272.2020.1751279. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kristak L., Antov P., Bekhta P., Lubis M.A.R., Iswanto A.H., Reh R., Sedliacik J., Savov V., Taghiayri H., Papadopoulos A.N., et al. Recent Progress in Ultra-Low Formaldehyde Emitting Adhesive Systems and Formaldehyde Scavengers in Wood-Based Panels: A Review. Wood Mater. Sci. Eng. 2022 doi: 10.1080/17480272.2022.2056080. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nasir M., Gupta A., Beg M.D.H., Chua G.K., Kumar A. Physical and Mechanical Properties of Medium-Density Fibreboards Using Soy-Lignin Adhesives. J. Trop. Forest Sci. 2014;26:41–49. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ammar M., Mechi N., Hidouri A., Elaloui E. Fiberboards based on filled lignin resin and petiole fibers. J. Indian Acad. Wood Sci. 2018;15:120–125. doi: 10.1007/s13196-018-0216-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hoareau W., Oliveira F.B., Grelier S., Siegmund B., Frollini E., Castellan A. Fiberboards Based on Sugarcane Bagasse Lignin and Fibers. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2006;291:829–839. doi: 10.1002/mame.200600004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Popovic M., Momčilović M.D., Gavrilović-Grmuša I. New standards and regulations on formaldehyde emission from wood-based composite panels. Zast. Mater. 2020;61:152–160. doi: 10.5937/zasmat2002152P. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Taghiyari H.R., Morrell J.J., Husen A. Emerging Nanomaterials for Forestry and Associated Sectors: An Overview. In: Taghiyari H.R., Morrell J.J., Husen A., editors. Emerging Nanomaterials. Springer; Cham, Switzerland: 2023. pp. 1–24. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tudor E.M., Barbu M.C., Petutschnigg A., Réh R., Krišt’ák L. Analysis of Larch-Bark Capacity for Formaldehyde Removal in Wood Adhesives. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020;17:764. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hemmilä V., Adamopoulos S., Karlsson O., Kumar A. Development of sustainable bio-adhesives for engineered wood panels—A Review. RSC Adv. 2017;7:38604–38630. doi: 10.1039/C7RA06598A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Savov V. Nanomaterials to Improve Properties in Wood-Based Composite Panels. In: Taghiyari H.R., Morrell J.J., Husen A., editors. Emerging Nanomaterials. Springer; Cham, Switzerland: 2023. pp. 135–153. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Khalaf Y., El Hage P., Mihajlova J.D., Bargeret A., Lacroix P., El Hage R. Influence of agricultural fibers size on mechanical and insulating properties of innovative chitosan-based insulators. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021;278:123071. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123071. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wang Z., Kang H., Liu H., Zhang C., Wang Z., Li J. Dual-Network Nanocross-linking Strategy to Improve Bulk Mechanical and Water-Resistant Adhesion Properties of Biobased Wood Adhesives. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020;8:16430–16440. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c04913. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Arias A., González-Rodríguez S., Vetroni Barros M., Salvador R., de Francisco A.C., Piekarski C.M., Moreira M.T. Recent developments in bio-based adhesives from renewable natural resources. J. Clean. Prod. 2021;314:127892. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127892. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tisserat B., Eller F.J., Mankowski M.E. Properties of Composite Wood Panels Fabricated from Eastern Redcedar Employing Furious Bio-based Green Adhesives. BioResources. 2019;14:6666–6685. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pizzi A. Tannins: Prospectives and Actual Industrial Applications. Biomolecules. 2019;9:344. doi: 10.3390/biom9080344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Dunky M. Wood Adhesives Based on Natural Resources: A Critical Review Part III. Tannin- and Lignin-Based Adhesives. Rev. Adhes. Adhes. 2020;8:379–525. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Antov P., Valchev I., Savov V. Experimental and Statistical Modeling of the Exploitation Properties of Eco-Friendly MDF Trough Variation of Lignosulfonate Concentration and Hot-Pressing Temperature; Proceedings of the 2nd International Congress of Biorefinery of Lignocellulosic Materials (IWBLCM 2019); Córdoba, Spain. 4–7 June 2019; pp. 104–109. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Savov V., Valchev I., Antov P. Processing Factors for Production of Eco-Friendly Medium Density Fibreboards Based on Lignosulfonate Adhesives; Proceedings of the 2nd International Congress of Biorefinery of Lignocellulosic Materials (IWBLCM 2019); Córdoba, Spain. 4–7 June 2019; pp. 165–169. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Savov V., Antov P. Engineering the Properties of Eco-Friendly Medium Density Fibreboards Bonded with Lignosulfonate Adhesive. Drv. Ind. 2020;71:157–162. doi: 10.5552/drvind.2020.1968. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Antov P., Savov V., Krišťák Ĺ., Réh R., Mantanis G.I. Eco-Friendly, High-Density Fiberboards Bonded with Urea-Formaldehyde and Ammonium Lignosulfonate. Polymers. 2021;13:220. doi: 10.3390/polym13020220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Antov P., Krišťák Ĺ., Réh R., Savov V., Papadopoulos A.N. Eco-Friendly Fiberboard Panels from Recycled Fibers Bonded with Calcium Lignosulfonate. Polymers. 2021;13:639. doi: 10.3390/polym13040639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Antov P., Savov V., Trichkov N., Krišťák Ĺ., Réh R., Papadopoulos A.N., Taghiyari H.R., Pizzi A., Kunecová D., Pachikova M. Properties of High-Density Fiberboard Bonded with Urea–Formaldehyde Resin and Ammonium Lignosulfonate as a Bio-Based Additive. Polymers. 2021;13:2775. doi: 10.3390/polym13162775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bekhta P., Noshchenko G., Réh R., Kristak L., Sedliačik J., Antov P., Mirski R., Savov V. Properties of Eco-Friendly Particleboards Bonded with Lignosulfonate-Urea-Formaldehyde Adhesives and pMDI as a Crosslinker. Materials. 2021;14:4875. doi: 10.3390/ma14174875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Karthäuser J., Biziks V., Mai C., Militz H. Lignin and Lignin-Derived Compounds for Wood Applications—A Review. Molecules. 2021;26:2533. doi: 10.3390/molecules26092533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Yotov N., Savov V., Valchev I., Petrin S., Karatotev V. Study on possibility for utilisation of technical hydrolysis lignin in composition of medium density fiberboard. Innov. Wood. Ind. Eng. Des. 2017;6:69–74. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ferdosian F., Pan Z., Gao G., Zhao B. Bio-Based Adhesives and Evaluation for Wood Composites Application. Polymers. 2016;9:70. doi: 10.3390/polym9020070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kawalerczyk J., Walkiewicz J., Dziurka D., Mirski R., Brózdowski J. APTES-Modified Nanocellulose as the Formaldehyde Scavenger for UF Adhesive-Bonded Particleboard and Strawboard. Polymers. 2022;14:5037. doi: 10.3390/polym14225037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gonçalves S., Ferra J., Paiva N., Martins J., Carvalho L.H., Magalhães F.D. Lignosulphonates as an Alternative to Non-Renewable Binders in Wood-Based Materials. Polymers. 2021;13:4196. doi: 10.3390/polym13234196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lykidis C. Formaldehyde Emissions from Wood-Based Composites: Effects of Nanomaterials. In: Taghiyari H.R., Morrell J.J., Husen A., editors. Emerging Nanomaterials. Springer; Cham, Switzerland: 2023. pp. 337–360. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Antov P., Lee S., Lubis M.A.R., Yadav S.M. Potential of Nanomaterials in Bio-Based Wood Adhesives: An Overview. In: Taghiyari H.R., Morrell J.J., Husen A., editors. Emerging Nanomaterials. Springer; Cham, Switzerland: 2023. pp. 25–63. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Santos J., Pereira J., Escobar-Avello D., Ferreira I., Vieira C., Magalhães F.D., Martins J.M., Carvalho L.H. Grape Canes (Vitis vinifera L.) Applications on Packaging and Particleboard Industry: New Bioadhesive Based on Grape Extracts and Citric Acid. Polymers. 2022;14:1137. doi: 10.3390/polym14061137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Mirski R., Banaszak A., Bekhta P. Selected Properties of Formaldehyde-Free Polymer-Straw Boards Made from Different Types of Thermoplastics and Different Kinds of Straw. Materials. 2021;14:1216. doi: 10.3390/ma14051216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kibleur P., Aelterman J., Boone M., Bulcke J. Deep learning segmentation of wood fiber bundles in fiberboards. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2022;221:109287. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109287. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Puspaningrum T., Haris Y.H., Sailah I., Yani M., Indrasti N.S. Physical and mechanical properties of binderless medium density fiberboard (MDF) from coconut fiber. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2020;472:012011. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/472/1/012011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Mancera C., Mansouri N.E., Pelach M.A., Francesc F., Salvadó J. Feasibility of incorporating treated lignins in fiberboards made from agricultural waste. Waste Manag. 2012;32:1962–1967. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.05.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Velasquez J.A., Ferrando F., Salvado J. Effects of kraft lignin addition in the production of binderless fiberboard from steam exploded Miscanthus sinensis. Ind. Crops Prod. 2003;18:17–23. doi: 10.1016/S0926-6690(03)00016-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Bouajila A., Limare A., Joly C., Dole P. Lignin plasticisation to improve binderless fiberboard mechanical properties. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2005;45:809–816. doi: 10.1002/pen.20342. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Okuda N., Hori K., Sato M. Chemical changes of kenaf core binderless boards during hot pressing (I): Effects on the binderless board properties. J. Wood Sci. 2006;52:244–248. doi: 10.1007/s10086-005-0761-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Okuda N., Hori K., Sato M. Chemical changes of kenaf core binderless boards during hot pressing (II): Effects on the binderless board properties. J. Wood Sci. 2006;52:249–254. doi: 10.1007/s10086-005-0744-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Suzuki S., Hiroyuki S., Park S.-Y., Saito K., Laemsak N., Okuma M., Iiyama K. Preparation of binderless boards from steam exploded pulps of oil palm (Elaeis guneensis Jaxq.) fronds and structural characteristics of lignin and wall polysaccharides in steam exploded pulps to be discussed for self-bindings. Holzforschung. 1998;52:417–426. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Quintana G., Velasquez J., Betancourt S., Ganan P. Binderless fiberboard from steam exploded banana bunch. Ind. Crops Prod. 2009;29:60–66. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2008.04.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Taghiyari H.R., Ilies D.C., Antov P., Vasile G., Majidinajafabadi R., Lee S.H. Effects of Nanosilver and Heat Treatment on the Pull-Off Strength of Sealer-Clear Finish in Solid Wood Species. Polymers. 2022;14:5516. doi: 10.3390/polym14245516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ghozali M., Meliana Y., Chalid M. Novel In Situ Modification for Thermoplastic Starch Preparation based on Arenga pinnata Palm Starch. Polymers. 2022;14:4813. doi: 10.3390/polym14224813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Iswanto A.H., Madyaratri E.W., Hutabarat N.S., Zunaedi E.R., Darwis A., Hidayat W., Susilowati A., Adi D.S., Lubis M.A.R., Sucipto T., et al. Chemical, Physical, and Mechanical Properties of Belangke Bamboo (Gigantochloa pruriens) and Its Application as a Reinforcing Material in Particleboard Manufacturing. Polymers. 2022;14:3111. doi: 10.3390/polym14153111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Makars R., Rizikovs J., Godina D., Paze A., Merijs-Meri R. Utilization of Suberinic Acids Containing Residue as an Adhesive for Particle Boards. Polymers. 2022;14:2304. doi: 10.3390/polym14112304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Savov V., Valchev I., Antov P., Yordanov I., Popski Z. Effect of the Adhesive System on the Properties of Fiberboard Panels Bonded with Hydrolysis Lignin and Phenol-Formaldehyde Resin. Polymers. 2022;14:1768. doi: 10.3390/polym14091768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Shahavi M.H., Selakjani P.P., Abatari M.N., Antov P., Savov V. Novel Biodegradable Poly (Lactic Acid)/Wood Leachate Composites: Investigation of Antibacterial, Mechanical, Morphological, and Thermal Properties. Polymers. 2022;14:1227. doi: 10.3390/polym14061227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Solihat N.N., Santoso E.B., Karimah A., Madyaratri E.W., Sari F.P., Falah F., Iswanto A.H., Ismayati M., Lubis M.A.R., Fatriasari W., et al. Physical and Chemical Properties of Acacia mangium Lignin Isolated from Pulp Mill Byproduct for Potential Application in Wood Composites. Polymers. 2022;14:491. doi: 10.3390/polym14030491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Sydor M., Bonenberg A., Doczekalska B., Cofta G. Mycelium-Based Composites in Art, Architecture, and Interior Design: A Review. Polymers. 2022;14:145. doi: 10.3390/polym14010145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Merhar M. Application of Failure Criteria on Plywood under Bending. Polymers. 2021;13:4449. doi: 10.3390/polym13244449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Madyaratri E.W., Ridho M.R., Aristri M.A., Lubis M.A.R., Iswanto A.H., Nawawi D.S., Antov P., Kristak L., Majlingová A., Fatriasari W. Recent Advances in the Development of Fire-Resistant Biocomposites—A Review. Polymers. 2022;14:362. doi: 10.3390/polym14030362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Polymers are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES