Abstract
Background and Aim:
The emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) as a highly pathogenic strain in veterinary and human medicine is a growing global problem. This study aimed to evaluate MRSA isolates of human and animal origin against various antibiotics in Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Materials and Methods:
The susceptibility test was carried out by the disk diffusion method using Mueller-Hinton agar against nine antibiotic disks. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains were genetically confirmed through mecA gene detection encoding for methicillin resistance by polymerase chain reaction.
Results:
All 240 S. aureus strains isolated from animals and humans were resistant to penicillin G (P) (100% and 99%, respectively), followed by ampicillin (AMP), amoxicillin (AML), oxacillin (OX), erythromycin (E), clindamycin (DA), tetracycline (TE), gentamicin (GEN), and ciprofloxacin (CIP). Eighty-three MRSA strains were resistant to OX (100%), P (100%), AMP (99.27%), AML (95.52%), E (87.77%), TE (71.33%), DA (63.24%), GEN (38.81%), and CIP (26.87%).
Conclusion:
The antimicrobial resistance pattern of S. aureus human isolates was similar to their animal counterpart, with 77.20% of MRSA strains classified as multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. These findings indicate an increase in MDR S. aureus strains of animal origin in Yogyakarta, thus raising public health concerns about MRSA zoonotic spread.
Keywords: antimicrobial resistance, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, multi-drug resistance, Staphylococcus aureus
Introduction
Staphylococcus aureus, which has evolved into methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), is a bacterium resistant to various antibiotics, also known as a superbug [1, 2]. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus is recognized as a major problem in hospitals worldwide [3]. Staphylococcus aureus resistance can interfere with the wound-healing process, leading to a prolonged wound-healing process, and increased mortality and morbidity [4, 5]. Estimated costs due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial infections might result in extra healthcare costs and productivity losses. The prevalence of MRSA infections is increasing worldwide; from 94,000 infection cases in America, the morbidity rate of MRSA infections has reached 18,650 cases. The prevalence of MRSA infections in Asia reaches 70%, whereas the prevalence of MRSA infections in Java, and Bali, Indonesia, reaches 3.1% [6]. Asia is a region with the highest prevalence rates of healthcare- and community-associated MRSA worldwide. Most hospitals in Asia are endemic for MDR S. aureus, with proportions estimated to be ~28% (in Hong Kong and Indonesia) to >70% (in Korea) among all clinical S. aureus isolates in the early 2010s [7, 8]. In western countries, novel MRSA from farm animals is considered a public health threat. The prevalence of MRSA in bovine milk ranged from 1.1% in Japan [9] to 52.2% in Egypt [10]. There is a high prevalence of S. aureus and MRSA isolated from milk of dairy water buffaloes with mastitis in the Philippines. Most MRSA isolates are still susceptible to common antibiotics. Nevertheless, ~37.5% of the isolates were considered MDR [11]. The emergence of MRSA in livestock has been implicated in the use of antimicrobials as growth promoters and for preventive and therapeutic measures [12–14].
There is a great concern for mastitis treatment caused by MRSA because MRSA is resistant to β-lactams and exhibits MDR patterns to other commonly used antibiotics [15, 16]. Moreover, there is an increasing concern about the public health risk of MRSA from livestock because resistance genes can spread from food animals to humans by direct contact or through food chain circulation [14, 17]. Antibiotics used in agriculture are often the same or similar to antibiotic compounds used clinically [18]. If not controlled properly, this overreliance on similar compounds in both fields can increase the risk of antimicrobial resistance in veterinary and human medicine. High MRSA levels in hospitals and the community as well as in livestock have led to an increased economic burden on the healthcare sector and the use of anti-MRSA agents, further promoting the development of resistant strains. Effective infection control strategies and choosing the appropriate antimicrobial agents for each cultured isolate remain the best methods to prevent further MRSA transmission and alleviate the burden of associated diseases.
The evaluation of S. aureus isolates of animal and human origin needs to be carried out continuously to determine the resistance developments of these bacteria so that control strategies can be pursued. This study aimed to evaluate MRSA isolates of human and animal origin against various antibiotics in Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Materials and Methods
Ethical approval
Ethical permission (consent form) was obtained from the main management of the laboratory for providing human isolates and from the farmers for collecting milk samples.
Study period and location
This study was conducted from February 2021 to June 2022 at the Clinical Pathology Laboratory, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Bacterial isolates
Staphylococcus aureus strains (240) used in this study were retrieved from the Department of Clinical Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing (174 human isolates) and the Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine (66 animal isolates), Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Clinical human and animal samples were streaked onto a blood agar base containing 5% defibrinated fresh sheep blood and incubated at 37°C for 18–24 h. Colonies consistent with S. aureus were streaked to single colonies and identified according to their colony morphology and biochemical and microbiological test results. All samples were also identified based on Gram staining, fermentation on mannitol salt agar (MSA), and catalase and coagulase tests. The catalase test was performed by placing a drop of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) on a microscope slide. A small amount of bacterial isolate was added to H2O2, and oxygen bubbles were observed as catalase-positive. The coagulase test was performed by cultivating the bacteria in the tube coagulase test using rabbit plasma. Coagulation was observed at 6 and 24 h. Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) was used as a quality-control organism.
Antimicrobial susceptibility test
All S. aureus isolates were inoculated into the nutrient broth (NB; Oxoid UK) and incubated at 37°C for 18–24 h. The cultures were diluted with fresh NB to give a turbidity equivalent to 0.05 McFarland. Susceptibility tests were performed by the disk diffusion method of the Kirby–Bauer test, as described by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [19], using Mueller-Hinton agar (Difco, USA) supplemented with 20 g/L NaCl. The antibiotics disks (Oxoid, UK) used were gentamicin (GEN) 10 μg, ampicillin (AMP) 10 μg, oxacillin 5 (OX) μg, tetracycline (TE) 30 μg, clindamycin (DA) 10 μg, penicillin G (P) 10 μg, erythromycin (E) 15 μg, and amoxicillin (AML) 25 μg. Inhibition zones were measured after 18 and 24 h incubation at 35°C. OX was used as an indicator of methicillin susceptibility disks. An inhibition zone diameter of ≤14 mm was reported as methicillin-resistant, 15–17 mm as intermediate, and ≥18 mm as methicillin-sensitive. The isolates were reported as sensitive, intermediate, and resistant based on CLSI guidelines.
DNA isolation and purification
A QIAmp DNA mini kit (Qiagen, Germany) was used to purify DNA from S. aureus according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The bacterial strains were cultivated on blood agar base (Oxoid, Germany) containing 5% defibrinated sheep blood for 24 h at 37°C. Five to 10 S. aureus colonies were suspended with 180 μL TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl and 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid [EDTA] [pH 8]) containing 5 μL lysostaphin (1.8 U/μL; Sigma, USA) in 2 mL microfuge tubes. The suspension was incubated for 1 h at 37°C, and 25 μL proteinase K (14.8 mg/mL; Sigma) and 200 μL AL buffer (containing AL1 and AL2 reagents; Qiagen) were then added. The suspensions were incubated for 30 min at 56°C and then for 10 min at 95°C before being spun at 6000× g for a few seconds. A total of 420 μL ethanol was added to each sample and placed in a spin QIAmp column. After centrifugation at 6000× g for 1 min, the spin columns were placed in a clean collection tube, and the sample was washed twice with 500 μL AW buffer (Qiagen). After the second wash and centrifugation at 6000× g for 3 min, the QIAmp spin columns were placed in a clean 2 mL microfuge tube, and DNA was eluted twice with 200 and 100 μL AE buffer (Qiagen). DNA was stored at −20°C.
Molecular identification
Molecular identification was made according to the amplification of the 23S rRNA and nuc genes with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with the program and primer design described previously in Table-1 [20]. The reaction mixture (25 μL) contained 1 μL primer 1 (20 pmol), 1 μL primer 2 (20 pmol; IDT, USA), 12.5 μL PCR mix containing Taq DNA polymerase, MgCl2 and deoxynucleotide triphosphates (MyTaq Red Mix, Bioline, UK), 2 μL DNA template, and 8.5 μL distilled water. DNA of the isolates was prepared with the QIAmp DNA mini kit (Qiagen) as described by the manufacturer. Gene amplification was carried out with a thermal cycler (Benchmark, UK). The PCR products were separated by gel electrophoresis in a 1.5% (w/v) agarose gel (Invitrogen, USA) in 1 × TBE buffer (containing Tris base, boric acid, and EDTA). A 100 bp DNA ladder (Invitrogen) was used as a size marker. The resulting bands were visualized using Redsafe (Intron, Korea) staining under ultraviolet transillumination.
Table-1.
Oligonucleotide primers and PCR programs used for amplifying the genes encoding 23S rRNA [20], nuc [20], and mecA [21] genes.
| Target gene | Sequence (5´ -3´) | PCR program |
|---|---|---|
| 23S rRNA | ACG GAG TTA CAA AGG ACG AC AGC TCA GCC TTA ACG AGT AC | 35 cycles of 95°C for 15 s, 64°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 10 s |
| nuc | GCG ATT GAT GGT GAT ACG GTT ACG CAA GCC TTG ACG AAC TAA AGC | 37 cycles of 94°C for 60 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 5 s |
| mecA | AAA ATC GAT GGT AAA GGT TGG AGT TCT GCA GTA CCG GAT TTG | 35 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 10 s |
PCR=Polymerase chain reaction
Detection of the mecA gene encoding MRSA
Methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains were considered from MDR S. aureus against five or more antibiotics, including OX (50% MDR) from the nine antibiotics used in this study. The selected strains were confirmed by detecting the mecA gene encoding for methicillin resistance by PCR, as described previously by Widianingrum et al. [21]. The primers used to detect the mecA gene are listed in Table-1.
Results
Staphylococcus aureus strains
Based on the results of cultural and biochemical properties, along with amplification of the nuc and 23S rRNA genes specific to S. aureus, all 240 human and animal isolates examined in this study were identified as S. aureus. All 240 cultures investigated were Gram-positive and positive for catalase, coagulase, and fermented mannitol in MSA. The identification of the isolates was then confirmed by PCR amplification of the species-specific gene encoding 23S rRNA and the thermonuclease nuc gene. The amplicons of these genes showed a uniform size of ~1250 and 279 bp, respectively (Figures-1 and 2).
Figure-1.
Amplicons of the gene encoding 23SrRNA of selected Staphylococcus aureus strains with a molecular size of 1250 bp. Lane K+: S. aureus control strain, Lane 1–5: selected S. aureus, Lane K-: negative isolate. Lane M: 100 bp molecular-size DNA ladder.
Figure-2.
Amplicons of the nuclease (nuc) gene of selected Staphylococcus aureus strains, with a molecular size of 279 bp. Lane K+: S. aureus control positive strain, Lane 2: A negative isolate, Lane 3-10: S. aureus selected strains. Lane M: 100 bp molecular-size DNA ladder.
Antimicrobial resistance
Staphylococcus aureus isolates were subjected to an antibiotic susceptibility test against nine antimicrobial agents. Antibiotics commonly used in human and veterinary medical cases in relevance were also considered. The resistance percentage of S. aureus against nine antibiotics is summarized in Table-2. The results of antimicrobial susceptibility are shown in Figure-3. Staphylococcus aureus strains were resistant to P (99% and 100%), followed by AMP (97% and 88%), AML (95% and 90%), OX (90% and 70%), E (67% and 70%), DA (56% and 22%), TE (46% and 50%), GEN (37% and 47%), and ciprofloxacin (CIP) (28% and 0%) for human and animal isolates, respectively (Figure-3 and Table-2). Staphylococcus aureus isolated from humans and animals were still susceptible to CIP (72% and 100%), GEN (63% and 53%), TE (54% and 50%), and DA (44% and 78%), respectively (Figure-4 and Table-2).
Table-2.
Antibiotic susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from humans and animals (bovine and goat) in Indonesia.
| Antibiotic | Resistant (%) | Sensitive (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|||
| Human (n = 174) | Animals (n = 66) | Human (n = 174) | Animals (n = 66) | |
| CIP (5 μg) | 48/174 (28%) | 0/20 (0%) | 125/174 (72%) | 20/20 (100%) |
| GEN (10 μg) | 64/173 (37%) | 23/49 (47%) | 109/173 (63%) | 26/49 (53%) |
| AMP (10 μg) | 169/173 (97%) | 58/66 (88%) | 5/173 (3%) | 8/66 (12%) |
| OX (5 μg) | 156/173 (90%) | 46/66 (70%) | 18/173 (10%) | 20/66 (30%) |
| TE (30 μg) | 80/174 (46%) | 33/66 (50%) | 94/174 (54%) | 33/66 (50%) |
| DA (10 μg) | 98/174 (56%) | 8/37 (22%) | 76/174 (44%) | 29/37 (78%) |
| P (10 μg) | 173/174 (99%) | 37/37 (100%) | 1/174 (1%) | 0/37 (0%) |
| E (15 μg) | 116/174 (67%) | 46/66 (70%) | 58/174 (33%) | 20/66 (30%) |
| AML (25 μg) | 165/174 (95%) | 18/20 (90%) | 8/174 (5%) | 2/20 (10%) |
CIP=Ciprofloxacin, GEN=Gentamicin, AMP=Ampicillin, OX=Oxacillin, TE=Tetracycline, DA=Clindamycin, P=Penicillin G, E=Erythromycin, AML=Amoxycillin
Figure-3.
Resistance of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from humans and animals against several antibiotics. CIP5=Ciprofloxacin (5 µg), GENT10=Gentamicin (10 µg), AMP10=Ampicillin (10 µg), OX5=Oxacillin (5 µg), TE30=Tetracycline (30 µg), DA10=Clindamycin (10 µg), P10=Penicillin G (10 µg), E15=Erythromycin (15 µg), AML25=Amoxycillin (25 µg).
Figure-4.
Susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from humans and animals against several antibiotics. CIP5=Ciprofloxacin (5 µg), GENT10=Gentamicin (10 µg), AMP10=Ampicillin (10 µg), OX5=Oxacillin (5 µg), TE30=Tetracycline (30 µg), DA10=Clindamycin (10 µg), P10=Penicillin G (10 µg), E15=Erythromycin (15 µg), AML25=Amoxycillin (25 µg).
Multidrug-resistant in MRSA isolates
Methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains were considered MDR S. aureus when resistant for more than five antibiotics, including OX (50% MDR) from the nine antibiotics used in this study. Eighty-three MRSA-selected strains with MDR were identified by detecting the mecA gene encoding for methicillin resistance by PCR. The resistance pattern of MRSA strains is shown in Table-3. Figure-5 shows a positive control (MRSA), a PCR product of the S. aureus-specific mecA gene 532 bp (lane K+). A negative control PCR product applied on lane K- showed no band on the figure. The PCR product of the mecA gene 532 bp for the selected isolates was applied on lanes 1–10, which showed clear bands confirming that all isolates were MRSA. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains were resistant to OX (100%), P (100%), AMP (99.27%), AML (95.52%), E (87.77%), TE (71.33%), DA (63.24%), GEN (38.81%), and CIP (26.87%). The mean of MRSA strains resistant to nine antibiotics was ~77.20% (Table-3).
Table-3.
Antibiotic resistance of the MRSA-selected isolates from humans and animals (n = 83).
| Source of isolates | mecA gene 532 bp | Resistance to antibiotics | % MDR | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||||||
| CIP5 | GENT10 | AMP10 | OX5 | TE30 | DA10 | P10 | E15 | AML25 | |||
| Human (n = 68) | + | 18/67 (26.87%) | 26/67 (38.81%) | 67/68 (98.53%) | 68/68 (100%) | 29/68 (42.65%) | 43/68 (63.24%) | 68/68 (100%) | 50/68 (73.53%) | 64/67 (95.52%) | 71.02% |
| Animal (n = 15) | + | 0 | 0/15 (0%) | 15/15 (100%) | 15/15 (100%) | 15/15 (100%) | 0 | 15/15 (100%) | 15/15 (100%) | 0 | 83.33% |
| Total isolates (n = 83) | 100% | 26.87% | 38.81% | 99.27% | 100% | 71.33% | 63.24% | 100% | 87.77% | 95.52% | 77.20%* |
CIP5=Ciprofloxacin (5 µg), GENT10=Gentamicin (10 µg), AMP10=Ampicillin (10 µg), OX5=Oxacillin (5 µg), TE30=Tetracycline (30 µg), DA10=Clindamycin (10 µg), P10=Penicillin G (10 µg), E15=Erythromycin (15 µg), AML25=Amoxycillin (25 µg). R=Resistant, S=Sensitive, 0=Not determined, MDR=Multi-drug resistance,
Mean of MRSA strains resistant to 9 antibiotics=77.20%. MRSA=Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, MDR=Multidrug-resistant
Figure-5.
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) product of Staphylococcus aureus-specific mecA gene 532 bp. A positive control (Lane K+), negative control (Lane K-no band), Lane 1–10: PCR product of mecA gene 532 bp for the selected isolates was applied, which showed clear bands confirmed that all the isolates were MRSA, Lane M: 100 bp molecular-size DNA ladder.
Discussion
According to biochemical test results, along with the amplification of the nuc and 23S rRNA genes specific to S. aureus, all 240 human and animal isolates examined in the study were identified as S. aureus. The identification of the isolates was confirmed through PCR amplification of species-specific genes encoding 23S rRNA (1250 bp) and the thermonuclease nuc gene (279 bp). The presence of these two genes can be used as a specific marker for S. aureus species [22, 23].
Staphylococcus aureus isolated from human and animal cases in this study were multi-resistant to various antibiotics, such as P, AMP, AML, OX, and E, with a resistance range of 70%–100%, indicating a high prevalence of MDR bacteria occurring in Yogyakarta (Table-2 and Figure-3). It is also particularly interesting that the antimicrobial resistance pattern of S. aureus human isolates is similar to animal isolates. This finding indicates an increase in MDR strains among S. aureus of animal origin in Yogyakarta, especially compared to a previous similar study in Indonesia, indicating that the antibiotic resistance of S. aureus isolates from humans (80%) was higher than bovine (76.92%) and goat (41.67%) [21]. Staphylococcus aureus isolates from animals in Indonesia were resistant to AMP, GEN, TE, and OX. These drugs are commonly used in veterinary medicine in Indonesia [21]. Staphylococcus aureus is also considered the primary cause of mastitis in cattle, water buffaloes, and goats in Asia [11, 18, 21]. In Egypt [24], 100% of S. aureus isolates were resistant to AMP and OX from 77 isolates of cow and buffalo milk suspected of MRSA and 84.8% of S. aureus were resistant to AMP and 74.1% to OX from 112 isolates of cow and buffalo milk.
Staphylococcus aureus is resistant to β-lactams, such as AMP, P, TE, and OX [16, 24]. Widianingrum et al. [21] reported an increase in the resistance of S. aureus to AMP, GEN, TE, and OX, indicating that the use of antibiotics commonly used in humans, now also widely used in animals, contributes to the current similar resistance phenomenon. The resistance pattern that originally occurred only in the human medical field now also occurs in animals. Improper hygiene and poor farm management practices contributed to the presence of S. aureus in the milk [8, 24, 25]. The hand-milked technique of dairy animals can also be a possible mode of transmission leading to the high prevalence of S. aureus infections [11].
With the increasing resistance of S. aureus strains to various antibiotics, it is necessary to constantly evaluate the use of antibiotics in humans and animals. Prescribing antibiotics is inappropriate regarding which compounds to use, the dosage, and the duration of administration will cause severe effects, particularly bacterial resistance. Antimicrobial resistance can be challenging to control and develop rapidly, thus further contributing to possible bacterial infection outbreaks in a population. A bacterial sensitivity test using various antibiotics determines the right antibiotic before prescribing a treatment plan. This study indicated that S. aureus isolates collected mainly from Yogyakarta are still susceptible to CIP for humans and animals (72% and 100%), GEN for humans (63%), and DA for animals (78%; Table-2 and Figure-4).
Staphylococcus aureus strains were once almost uniformly susceptible to β-lactams resistant to semisynthetic P (e.g., methicillin and OX), the class of antibiotics most commonly used for skin infections. This particular strain is widely known as MRSA, which implies that the bacteria already have cross-resistance to all β-lactams, including all P and cephalosporin [16]. The MRSA strains in this study were confirmed by detecting the mecA gene encoding for methicillin resistance with PCR. This finding was further supported by the disk diffusion test result in which all isolates tested were resistant to most of the nine antibiotics used in the study. Eighty-three MRSA human and animal strains in this study were resistant to OX (100%), P (100%), AMP (99.27%), AML (95.52%), E (87.77%), TE (71.33%), DA (63.24%), GEN (38.81%), and CIP (26.87%). The antimicrobial resistance pattern of S. aureus animal isolates is similar to human isolates. From these data, the mean of MRSA strains of human and animal isolates resistant to nine antibiotics is ~77.20% (Table-3). Widianingrum et al. [21] reported that the average of the prevalent MRSA strains of human and animal origin in Indonesia is 35.7%. This study confirmed that the prevalence of MRSA increased compared to previous studies [6, 21]. For many years, MRSA has been considered only a human pathogen until reports of MRSA mastitis (udder infection) in dairy cattle appeared in 1972 [26]. It has become increasingly important in veterinary medicine, with MRSA infections commonly reported in companion and farm animals [21, 27].
This finding indicates an increased prevalence of MDR MRSA among S. aureus of animal origin and the spread of MRSA among hospital-acquired and livestock-associated infections in Yogyakarta. In 2006, the prevalence of MRSA infections in Asia reached 70%, whereas it reached 3.1% in Java and Bali [6]. In early 2010, most hospitals in Asia were endemic for MDR MRSA, with reported proportions estimated from 28% (in Hong Kong and Indonesia) to >70% (in Korea) among all clinical S. aureus isolates [8].
This study has limitations, as this study could not determine whether original infections in human medical cases were acquired from zoonotic disease or as a nosocomial infection from a hospital. This study provided an opportunity to find a correlation between MRSA in dairy cattle and goats and the possibility of infection in workers close to dairy animals. The correlation of MRSA infections between livestock and workers will significantly contribute to the spreading pattern of MRSA infections, as reported previously in a study of MRSA prevalence among workers and dairy cattle in the Italian province of Ragusa [28]. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus infection cases in Indonesia have not been widely studied in humans and animals. The closeness between humans and animals, livestock, and products of animal origin that are consumed allows the transmission of S. aureus or MRSA infections [17, 20].
As reviewed by Chen and Huang [8], MDR S. aureus remains an important medical organism and is associated with a considerable disease burden in Asia. The high transmissibility of S. aureus strains in crowded living conditions in Asia constitutes a substantial public health threat, especially in resource-poor countries, where diagnostic facilities are primarily lacking, and appropriate therapy is frequently unaffordable. Implementation of surveillance systems at the international level is urgently needed to gain insights into the current epidemiology of S. aureus in resource-limited Asian countries.
This study on MRSA from human and animal isolates, including MRSA strains in Yogyakarta, described the development of the resistance of these bacteria, which could be used to pursue antimicrobial resistance control strategies.
Conclusion
Staphylococcus aureus isolated from humans and animals used in this study were MDR against nine antibiotics in the range of 71.02%–83.33%, indicating the high prevalence of MDR currently occurring in Yogyakarta. It is also particularly interesting that the antimicrobial resistance pattern of S. aureus human isolates is similar to their animal counterparts. These findings indicated an increased MRSA prevalence among S. aureus of animal origin in Yogyakarta. The MRSA strains observed in this study revealed ~77.02% MDR, further confirming the spread of MRSA in animal and human medicine in Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Authors’ Contributions
MF, SIOS, OS, DAD, AZA, FA, MW, FBL, and CMS: Contributed to the conception of the study, designed, conducted the experiments, and analyzed the data. MF, OS, DAD, AZA, and MW: Contributed to sample preparation. SIOS, FA, and FBL: Drafted the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia through the WCR project No. 2715/UN1/DITLIT/DIT-LIT/PT/2021) and the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Universitas Gadjah Mada No. 1842/UN.1/FKH/HK4/2022. We thank Dr. Agung Panji Widiyanto and Dr. Nurul Fitria for helping in collecting human samples.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Veterinary World remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published institutional affiliation.
References
- 1.Lakhundi S, Zhang K. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus:Molecular characterization, evolution, and epidemiology. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2018;31(4):e00020–18. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00020-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.World Health Organization. Antimicrobial resistance. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020. [Retrieved on 02-08-2022]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/antimicrobial-resistance . [Google Scholar]
- 3.Khan H.A, Baig F.K, Mehboob R. Nosocomial infections:Epidemiology, prevention, control and surveillance. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2017;7(5):478–482. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Haghighat S, Siadat S.D, Sorkhabadi S.M.R, Sepahi A.A, Mahdavi M. Cloning, expression and purification of autolysin from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus:Potency and challenges study in Balb/c mice. Mol. Immunol. 2017;82(2):10–18. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2016.12.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Turner N.A, Sharma-Kuinkel B.K, Maskarinec S.A, Eichenberger E.M, Shah P.P, Carugati M, Holland T.L, Fowler V.G., Jr Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus:An overview of basic and clinical research. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019;17(4):203–218. doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0147-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Santosaningsih D, Santoso S, Setijowati N, Rasyid H.A, Budayanti N.S, Suata K, Widhyatmoko D.B, Purwono P.B, Kuntaman K, Damayanti D, Prakoeswa C.R.S, Laurens M, van Nierop J.W.I, Nanninga G.L, Oudenes N, de Regt M, Snijders S.V, Verbrugh H.A, Severin J.A. Prevalence and characterisation of Staphylococcus aureus causing community-acquired skin and soft tissue infections on Java and Bali, Indonesia. Trop. Med. Int. Health. 2018;23(1):34–44. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mendes R.E, Mendoza M, Singh K.K.B, Castanheira M, Bell J.M, Turnidge J.D, Lin S.S.F, Jones R.N. Regional resistance surveillance program results for 12 Asia-Pacific Nations 2011. ASM. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013;57(11):5721–5726. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01121-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chen C.J, Huang Y.C. New epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus infection in Asia. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2014;20(7):605–623. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hata E, Katsuda K, Kobayashi H, Uchida I, Tanaka K, Eguchi M. Genetic variation among Staphylococcus aureus strains from bovine milk and their relevance to methicillin-resistant isolates from humans. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2010;48(6):2130–2139. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01940-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Elhaig M.M, Selim A. Molecular and bacteriological investigation of subclinical mastitis caused by Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus agalactiae in domestic bovine from Ismailia, Egypt. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2015;47(2):271–276. doi: 10.1007/s11250-014-0715-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Badua A.T, Boonyayatra S, Awaiwanot N, Gaban P.B.V, Mingala C.N. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) associated with mastitis among water buffaloes in the Philippines. Heliyon. 2020;6(12):e05663. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cuny C, Wieler L.H, Witte W. Livestock-associated MRSA:The impact on humans. Antibiotics (Basel) 2015;4(4):521–543. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics4040521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zaman S.B, Hussain M.A, Nye R, Mehta V, Mamun K.T, Hossain N. A review on antibiotic resistance:Alarm bells are ringing. Cureus. 2017;9(6):e1403. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Van T.T.H, Yidana Z, Smooker P.M, Coloe P.J. Antibiotic use in food animals worldwide, with a focus on Africa:Pluses and minuses. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2020;20:170–177. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2019.07.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wang D, Wang Z, Yan Z, Wu J, Ali T, Li J, Lv Y, Han B. Bovine mastitis Staphylococcus aureus:Antibiotic susceptibility profile, resistance genes and molecular typing of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive strains in China. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2015;31:9–16. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2014.12.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lee A.S, de Lencaster H, Garau J, Kluytmans J, Malhotra-Kumar S, Peschel A, Harbath S. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 2018;4:18033. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2018.33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Marshall B.M, Levy S.B. Food animals and antimicrobials:Impacts on human health. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2011;24(4):718–733. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00002-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sharma C, Rokana N, Chandra M, Singh B.P, Gulhane R.D, Gill J.P.S, Ray P, Puniya A.K, Panwar H. Antimicrobial resistance:Its surveillance, impact, and alternative management strategies in dairy animals. Front. Vet. Sci. 2018;4:237. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing;Twenty-Third Informational Supplement;Publication M100–S23. Wayne, PA, USA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Salasia S.I.O, Tato S, Sugiyono N, Ariyanti D, Prabawati F. Genotypic characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovines, humans, and food in Indonesia. J. Vet. Sci. 2011;12(4):353–361. doi: 10.4142/jvs.2011.12.4.353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Widianingrum D.C, Windria S, Salasia S.I.O. Antibiotic resistance and methicillin- resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine crossbred, Etawa goat, and human. Asian J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 2016;11(2):122–129. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Salasia S.I.O, Khusnan Z, Lämmler C, Zschöck M. Comparative studies on pheno-and genotypic properties of Staphylococcus aureus, isolated from bovine subclinical mastitis in Central Java in Indonesia and Hesse in Germany. J. Vet. Sci. 2004;5(2):103–109. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Szweda P, Schielmann M, Frankowska A, Kot B, Zalewska M. Antibiotic resistance in Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from cows with mastitis in Eastern Poland and analysis of susceptibility of resistant strains to alternative nonantibiotic agents:Lysostaphin, nisin and polymyxin B. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2014;76(3):355–362. doi: 10.1292/jvms.13-0177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Abo-Shama U.H. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from cattle, buffalo, sheep and goat's raws milk in Sohag Governorate, Egypt. Assiut. Vet. Med. J. 2014;60(141):63–72. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Guimaraes F.F, Manzi M.P, Joaquim S.F, Richini-Fereira V.B, Langoni H. Outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)-associated mastitis in a closed dairy herd. J. Dairy Sci. 2017;100(1):726–730. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Devriese L.A, Van Damme L.R, Fameree L. Methicillin (cloxacillin)-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from bovine mastitis cases. Zentralbl Veterinarmed B. 1972;19(7):598–605. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0450.1972.tb00439.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mohammed S, Nigatu S. Review on livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and its zoonotic importance. Int. J. Microbiol. Res. 2015;6(3):164–174. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Antoci E, Pinzone M.R, Nunnari G, Stefani S, Cacopardo B. Prevalence and molecular characteristics of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among subjects working on bovine dairy farms. Infez. Med. 2013;21(2):125–129. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]