Abstract
Objective:
ADH1B, ADH1C and ALDH2 genes are mainly responsible for alcohol metabolism in the body. Several single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of these genes have been reported to be associated with alcohol dependence and are considered risk factors for various human diseases. This study aims to identify the prevalence of three SNPs of ADH1B (rs1229984), ADH1C (rs698) and ALDH2 (rs671) in 235 unrelated individuals living in Thai Nguyen province, the northeast region of Vietnam.
Methods:
The target genotypes were identified by using PCR direct sequencing, and their frequencies were compared to previous reports.
Result:
Our data showed that allele frequencies of ADH1B*2 (rs1229984), ADH1C*2 C (rs698) and ALDH2*2 (rs671) were 68.8%, 8.3% and 20.4%, respectively. The ADH1B*2 and ADH1C*2 frequencies were similar to those of the Kinh ethnic individuals living in the south region of Vietnam, while the ALDH2*2 frequency was higher. Compared to data from other countries, ADH1B*2 frequency is similar to the Philippines (60.5%) and Mongolia (62.9%) but significantly different from the other populations. The ADH1C*2 frequency is not so different compared to Japanese (5.7%) and Chinese (7.1%) but is quite different in other populations. ALDH2*2 frequency was lower than Japanese (29.3%), Indonesian (30%) and higher than other countries. Regarding the risk of alcoholism, the percentage of Vietnamese people in this study with genotypes related to alcohol dependence is 8.1%. In contrast, the carrier has genotypes protecting against alcoholism with high frequency, 91.9%. Among them, the individuals can cause high acetaldehyde accumulation accounting for 33.2%.
Conclusion:
This study helps to understand the genetic polymorphisms of alcohol metabolism genes in the community living in Thai Nguyen province, northeast of Vietnam, and provides valuable scientific data relating to alcohol consumption behavior as well as public health protection.
Key Words: ADH1B, ADH1C, ALDH2, genetic polymorphisms, Thai Nguyen, Vietnamese
Introduction
Alcohol abuse is a global problem, constituting the seventh leading risk factor for death and disability (Degenhardt et al., 2018). According to the World Health Organization (2019), global cancer deaths causing alcohol consumption account for 4.2% of all cancers in 2016 (World Health Organization, 2019). In humans, the rate of alcohol elimination depends on various genetic and environmental factors such as sex, age, race, food, biological rhythms, exercise, medication and alcoholism (Cederbaum, 2012). Alcohol is eliminated mainly through pathways consisting of oxidative and non - oxidative metabolism, a small part of alcohol is excreted in the breath (0.7%), urine (0.3%) and sweat (0.1%). Many studies suggested that alcohol metabolism occurs mainly through oxidation in the liver with the participation of alcohol dehydrogenases (ADHs), aldehyde dehydrogenases (ALDHs) (Zakhari, 2006; Cederbaum, 2012). In human, ADH1B and ADH1C are enzymes that play a major function in alcohol metabolism. For first step, ADHs metabolize alcohol to acetaldehyde, a highly toxic and known as carcinogen. And then, acetaldehyde is broken down into a less toxic compound mainly by ALDH2 enzyme metabolism (Zakhari, 2006; Cederbaum, 2012; Edenberg and McClintick, 2018).
It is known that polymorphisms of ADH1B, ADH1C and ALDH2 genes have impacts on their coding enzyme activities. For instance, ADH1B*2 allele (rs1229984) is associated a higher alcohol metabolizing activity, compared to the wild type ADH1B*1 allele (Eng et al., 2007; Borinskaya et al., 2009). As the result, people carrying ADH1B*2/*2 genotype showed elevated acetaldehyde in their blood (Bosron and Li, 1986). In contrast, ADH1C*2 (rs698) is about 1.5 to 2-fold less active than the ancestor phenotype of ADH1C*1 (Edenberg and McClintick, 2018). In the case of the ALDH2 gene, the appearance of one or both ALDH2*2 allele (rs671) can cause a severe decrease in the enzymatic activity down to 5-20% (Ye et al., 2018).
A large meta-analysis showed that carriers of the ADH1B*1 and ADH1C*2 alleles, the less active ethanol metabolizing alcohol dehydrogenase and the highly active ALDH2*1 allele has increased risk of alcoholism (Cederbaum, 2012). This likely reflects low accumulation of acetaldehyde in these individuals. The association of ADH1C with alcohol dependence is less robust than that of ADH1B. Recent studies suggest that presence of a single ADH1B*2 allele strongly reduced the risk alcohol dependence, and in those homozygous for ADH1B*2, the risk was even further reduced. In addition, people carrying ALDH2*2 against heavy drinking, alcohol dependence and have high blood acetaldehyde levels (Edenberg and McClintick, 2018). Acetaldehyde may stimulate carcinogenesis by disrupting DNA synthesis and repair, inhibiting DNA methylation by interacting with retinoid metabolism (Seitz and Stickel, 2007; Brooks and Zakhari, 2014). Genetic polymorphisms of genes related alcohol-metabolism pathway result in differences between individuals in exposure to acetaldehyde, leading to possible carcinogenic effects and some diseases in human (Druesne-Pecollo et al., 2009).
Using alcohol and alcoholic beverages is a habit imbued with traditional culture in many countries, including Vietnam. Alcohol is used in daily activities, holidays, festivals, associations, working communication. Alcohol abuse in Vietnam has caused many serious consequences for public health, family happiness, social safety and order. According to Luu and Nguyen (2018), Vietnam is currently assessed as a country with high alcohol consumption in Southeast Asia, only after Thailand. The search interviewed 5,200 people in 12 provinces/cities representing regions of Vietnam and showed that the average amount of alcohol used by Vietnamese person is relatively large, nearly 60% of surveyed people using alcohol, nearly 50% of men who are using alcohol at a moderate or more and 8% at the level of addiction or heavy addiction. In terms of perceived physical health, the majority of Vietnamese interviewed subjectively believed that drinking alcohol was healthier. In terms of perceived mental health, the notion that drinking alcohol helps relieve nervous tension is still common (Luu and Nguyen, 2018). Studies on gene encoding alcohol metabolism enzymes in Vietnamese are still limited. Iron et al (1992) studied ADH1B gene polymorphism (rs1229984) in 42 Vietnamese people and showed ADH1B*1 and ADH1B*2 accounted for 77.4% and 22.6%, respectively (Iron et al., 1992). Mutant allele frequencies of ADH1B*2, ADH1C*2 and ALDH2*2 in 124 Kinh ethnic individuals living in Ho Chi Minh city, the south of Vietnam are 64.6%, 8.1% and 13.6%, respectively (Edenberg and McClintick, 2018). Thai Nguyen province belongs to the northeast of Vietnam, there are many ethnic minorities living here which using alcohol in daily activities and encouraging each other to drink in quantity. This study aimed to detect popularity of 3 SNPs ADH1B (rs1229984), ADH1C (rs698) and ALDH2 (rs671) in Vietnamese group living in Thai Nguyen province, Vietnam. The obtained data would be oriented basis for screening genetic identifying individuals at risk of diseases to provide appropriate lifestyle and clinical advice.
Materials and Methods
Subjects
This study recruited 235 unrelated healthy volunteers from January to June of 2021 at Thai Nguyen General Hospital of Viet Nam (age from 20 to 77, 134 males and 101 females), including 107 young voluntary blood donors and 128 people for annual health checkups. The purpose of study was explained to all individuals and their informed consents were obtained before sample collection. This study was approved by ethics committees of the Thai Nguyen General Hospital, Ministry of Health of Viet Nam with the ID 59/HĐĐĐ-BVTWTN.
DNA extraction
The peripheral blood of each volunteer (1ml) was obtained and placed in an EDTA tube and stored at -80 oC before DNA extraction. Then, genomic DNA was extracted from 200 µl subject’s peripheral blood using ExgeneTM Blood SV mini Kit (GeneAll Biotechnology Co. LTD, Seoul, Korea) according to manufacturer’s protocol and stored at -20oC.
PCR and Sanger sequencing
Primers for PCR and sequencing of the ADH1B (exon 3), ADH1C (exon 8) and ALDH2 (exon 12) were designed according to reference sequences in the GeneBank with accession NG_011435.1; NC_000004.12; NG_012250.2, respectively (Table 1). All primers were synthesized and provided by PHUSA Biochem, Can Tho, Vietnam. PCR reactions were carried out in a 25 μL final volume including 12.5μL Taq 2x Master mix (BioLabs, England); 0.5 μL of each PCR primer (10 μmol/L); 0.5 – 1.0 μL of template DNA (20 - 30 ng total genomic DNA); and deionized water. The thermo cycle was as following: denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, following by 35 cycles of 95 °C for 45s, 56-60°Cfor 30-45s, 72°C for 30s and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. The obtained amplicons were purified using MultiScreen PCR filter plate (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). The purified PCR products were sequenced using ABI Prism BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit Version 3.1 (Applied Biosystems), on an ABI genetic analyzer 3500 (Applied Biosystems).
Table 1.
Primers Used for ADH1B (exon 3), ADH1C (exon 8) and ALDH2 (exon 12) Amplification and Sequencing
| Gene region | Forward primer (5′–3′)a | Reverse primer (5′–3′)b | Fragment size (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADH1B exon 3 | GGCTTTAGACTGAATAACCTTGGG | GGGAAAGAGGAAACTCCTGAAGTC | 458 |
| ADH1C exon 8 | TTATCCTCAGTTATAGCAGTCTGG | CATCCTTCCACCTTTTCATTCTC | 364 |
| ALDH2 exon 12 | CCAAGAGTGATTTCTGCAATCTCG | CAGGTCCTGAACTTCCAGCAG | 312 |
a,b, These primers used for sequencing
Sequence and statistical analysis
The sequencing data were analyzed by comparison with the standard sequences of the ADH1B, ADH1C and ALDH2 gene (NG_011435.1; NC_000004.12; NG_012250.2) using BioEdit (Raleigh, NC) sequence alignment editor software.
Allele and genotype frequencies were computed using gene counting methods. Chi Square (χ2) and Fisher-exact test were used to assess the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium for each variant and the differences of allele frequencies between Vietnamese populations in this study and other populations, p < 0.050 was considered as statistically significance.
Results
Genotype and allele frequencies of ADH1B*2 (rs1229984), ADH1C*2 (rs698) and ALDH2*2 (rs671)
The genotypes of each SNPs were presented in the Figure 1 and their frequencies were calculated as showed in the Table 2. For ADH1B gene, rs1229984 has homozygous mutant genotype *2/*2 with the highest frequency 47.2% (n=111), heterozygous mutant genotype *1/*2 ranks second with 42.6% frequency (n=100), the homozygous wild-type genotype *1/*1 has the lowest frequency of 10.2% with 24 cases, the number of individuals carrying at least one mutant allele ADH1B*2 account for 89.8%. Based on the genotype frequency of the study samples, we have determined the variant allele frequency of ADH1B*2 is 68.5%, the variant ADH1B*2 has higher twice frequency of ADH1B*1 (31.5%). For ADH1C gene, rs678 polymorphism has homozygous wild-type genotype *1/*1 with the highest frequency 83.8% (n=197), the homozygous mutant genotype *2/*2 has the lowest frequency of 0.4% (n= 1). However, variant allele frequency of ADH1C*2 is 8.3% because heterozygous mutant genotype *1/*2 accounts 15.8% (n=37). Therefore, ADH1C*2 allele is eleven times lower than ADH1C*1 (91.7%). For ALDH2 gene, homozygous wild-type genotype *1/*1 with the highest frequency 63.8% (n=150), heterozygous mutant genotype *1/*2 ranks second with 31.5% frequency (n=74), the homozygous mutant genotype *2/*2 has the lowest rate of 4.7% with 11 cases, the number of individuals carrying at least one mutant allele ALDH2*2 account for 36.2%, variant allele frequency of ALDH2*2 is 20.4%, ALDH2*1 allele frequency is nearly four times higher than ALDH2*2 allele (79.6%). Besides, allele and genotype frequencies of ADH1B, ADH1C and ALDH2 did not deviate the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (p>0.050).
Figure 1.
Sequence of 3 SNPs rs1229984 (ADH1B), rs698 (ADH1C) and rs671 (ALDH2) (a) rs1229984 (ADH1B*1/*1: homozygous for the ADH1B p.Arg48; ADH1B*1/*2: heterozygous for the ADH1B p.Arg48His; ADH1B*2/*2: homozygous for the ADH1B p.His48); (b), rs698 (ADH1C*1/*1: homozygous for the ADH1C p.Ile350; ADH1C*1/*2: heterozygous for the ADH1B p.Ile350Val; ADH1C*2/*2: homozygous for the ADH1C p.Val48); (c), rs671 (ALDH2*1/*1: homozygous for the ALDH2 p.Glu487; ALDH2*1/*2: heterozygous for the ALDH2 p.Glu487Lys; ALDH2*2/*2: homozygous for the ALDH2 p.Lys487)
Table 2.
Allele and Genotype Frequencies of ADH1B (rs1229984), ADH1C (rs698) and ALDH2 (rs671)
| Gene | Polymorphism | Nucleotide change | Protein change | Genotypes and alleles | N | Frequencies | HWP value | χ2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observed frequency (%) |
Expected frequency (%) |
||||||||
| ADH1B exon 3 | rs1229984 | c.254G>A | p.Arg48His | *1/*1 | 24 | 10.2 | 10.1 | 0.989 | 0.027 |
| *1/*2 | 100 | 42.6 | 43.3 | ||||||
| *2/*2 | 111 | 47.2 | 46.6 | ||||||
| *1 | 148 | 31.5 | |||||||
| *2 | 322 | 68.5 | |||||||
| ADH1C exon 8 | rs698 | c.1418A>G | p.Ile350Val | *1/*1 | 197 | 83.8 | 84.1 | 0.914 | 0.179 |
| *1/*2 | 37 | 15.8 | 15.2 | ||||||
| *2/*2 | 1 | 0.4 | 0.7 | ||||||
| *1 | 431 | 91.7 | |||||||
| *2 | 39 | 8.3 | |||||||
| ALDH2 exon 12 | rs671 | c.1606G>A | p.Glu487Lys | *1/*1 | 150 | 63.8 | 63.3 | 0.946 | 0.112 |
| *1/*2 | 74 | 31.5 | 32.5 | ||||||
| *2/*2 | 11 | 4.7 | 4.2 | ||||||
| *1 | 374 | 79.6 | |||||||
| *2 | 96 | 20.4 | |||||||
Allele frequencies of ADH1B*2, ADH1C*2 and ALDH2*2 in comparison with other populations
Mutant alleles of ADH1B*2, ADH1C*2, and ALDH2*2 identified in the study population were compared with reported data from different geographical areas. As shown in Table 3, the frequency of the ADH1B*2 allele was relatively high, ranking 4th out of 39 compared to other populations. This result was comparable to the Philippines (60.5%), Mongolia (62.9%), and the Vietnamese Kinh ethnic group (64.6%) with a p-value >0.050 and significantly higher than other populations with a p-value <0.001, except Malays with 0.010< p-value <0.050). The frequency of the ADH1C*2 allele ranked 11th of 14 in the comparison populations. There was no significant difference compared to the Japanese (5.7%), Chinese (7.1%), and Kinh ethnic group of Vietnam frequency (8.1%) with p-value>0.050 but significant difference in other populations with p-value <0.001). Lastly, the ALDH2*2 allele with a high frequency (20.4%) ranked 3rd out of 27 comparison populations, which was statistically higher than those observed from the remaining population except Japanese (29.3%) and Indonesian (30%) with p-value < 0.050, p-value < 0.010 and p-value < 0.001, respectively.
Table 3.
Comparison of ADH1B*2, ADH1C*2 and ALDH2*2 Frequencies in Vietnamese Individuals and Previous Study Populations
| Population | ADH1B*2 | ADH1C*2 | ALDH2*2 | References | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | N | % | N | % | |||||||||
| Asian | ||||||||||||||
| Vietnamese | 235 | 68.5 | 235 | 8.3 | 235 | 20.4 | present study | |||||||
| 42 | 22.6*** | - | - | - | - | (Iron et al., 1992) | ||||||||
| Vietnamese (Kinh) | 124 | 64.6 | 124 | 8.1 | 124 | 13.6* | (Coriell Institute for medical research, 2008; Edenberg and McClintick, 2018) | |||||||
| Filipinos | 57 | 60.5 | - | - | 86 | 0.6*** | (Goedde et al., 1992) | |||||||
| Malays | 65 | 59.2* | - | - | 73 | 3.4*** | ||||||||
| Thais | 111 | 33.3*** | - | - | 111 | 5.0*** | ||||||||
| Laos | 1050 | 33.7*** | - | - | - | - | (Li et al., 2007) | |||||||
| Indonesian | - | - | - | - | 100 | 30.0** | (Septelia, 2002) | |||||||
| Chinese | 480 | 77.5*** | - | - | - | - | (Guo et al., 2008) | |||||||
| - | - | 105 | 7.1 | - | - | (Chao et al., 2000) | ||||||||
| Chinese (Han, Hui, Tibetan, Mongolian, Uygur) |
584 | 38.6*** | 584 | 12.4* | 584 | 9.2*** | (Wei et al., 2018) | |||||||
| Japanese | 2299 | 78.2*** | - | - | - | - | (Matsuo et al., 2006) | |||||||
| - | - | 465 | 5.7 | - | - | (Shimizu et al., 2013) | ||||||||
| - | - | - | - | 1944 | 29.3*** | (Yoshimasu et al., 2014) | ||||||||
| Koreans | 177 | 80.5*** | - | - | - | - | (Goedde et al., 1992) | |||||||
| - | - | - | - | 481 | 15.9* | (Lee et al., 1997) | ||||||||
| - | - | 100 | 13.5* | - | - | (Kim et al., 2004) | ||||||||
| Mongolian | 35 | 62.9 | - | - | 35 | 8.6*** | (Shen et al., 1997) | |||||||
| Uzbeks | 161 | 28.6*** | - | - | 161 | 1.6*** | (Ahn et al., 2009) | |||||||
| Kirghizia | 102 | 33.3*** | - | - | - | - | (Borinskaya et al., 2009) | |||||||
| Tadjikistan | 90 | 28.4*** | - | - | - | - | ||||||||
| Kazakhstan | 64 | 19.5*** | - | - | - | - | ||||||||
| Indians | 167 | 9.9*** | - | - | 179 | 2.0*** | (Goedde et al., 1992) | |||||||
| - | - | 100 | 33*** | - | - | (Singh et al., 2015) | ||||||||
| Sri Lankan | 128 | 5.0*** | - | - | - | - | (Coriell Institute for medical research, 2008; Edenberg and McClintick, 2018) | |||||||
| Pakistan | 81 | 15.9*** | - | - | - | - | (Li et al., 2007) | |||||||
| Armenia | 39 | 10.3*** | - | - | - | - | (Borinskaya et al., 2009) | |||||||
| Iranians | 41 | 24.4*** | - | - | - | - | ||||||||
| European | ||||||||||||||
| Turkism | 211 | 16.1*** | - | - | 211 | 0.0*** | (Kayaalti and Soylemezoglu, 2010) | |||||||
| - | - | 80 | 55*** | - | - | (Vatansever et al., 2015) | ||||||||
| Finnish | 85 | 1.2*** | - | - | 85 | 0*** | (Goedde et al., 1992) | |||||||
| Hungarians | 115 | 5.2*** | - | - | 117 | 1.3*** | ||||||||
| Germans | 233 | 4.1*** | - | - | 233 | 0*** | ||||||||
| Swedish | 90 | 0.6*** | - | - | 90 | 0*** | ||||||||
| Polish | 54 | 5.6*** | - | - | 54 | 0*** | (Cichoż-Lach et al., 2006) | |||||||
| 172 | 5.5*** | 172 | 59.3*** | - | - | (Cichoż-Lach et al., 2010) | ||||||||
| Spanish | 255 | 7.6*** | - | - | - | - | (García-Martín et al., 2010) | |||||||
| - | - | 255 | 44.7*** | 255 | 0*** | (Vidal et al., 2004) | ||||||||
| Russians | 23 | 8.7*** | - | - | 23 | 0*** | (Ahn et al., 2009) | |||||||
| Crezch Gypsies/Roma | 285 | 7.4*** | - | - | - | - | (Hubáček et al., 2018) | |||||||
| Czech/Slavic | 286 | 5.9*** | - | - | - | - | ||||||||
| Caucasians | - | - | 131 | 45*** | - | - | (Foley et al., 2004) | |||||||
| American | ||||||||||||||
| Mexican American | 104 | 4.3*** | 104 | 50*** | 104 | 0*** | (Konishi et al., 2003) | |||||||
| Mexican Huichols | 97 | 0*** | - | - | 97 | 0.5*** | (Gordillo-Bastidas et al., 2010) | |||||||
| Mexican Mestizo | 218 | 3.4*** | - | - | 227 | 0*** | ||||||||
| Population | ADH1B*2 | ADH1C*2 | ALDH2*2 | References | ||||||||||
| N | % | N | % | N | % | |||||||||
| American | ||||||||||||||
| Colombian | 148 | 8.4*** | 148 | 27.7*** | 148 | 0*** | (Méndez and Rey, 2015) | |||||||
| African | ||||||||||||||
| Africans | 37 | 0*** | - | - | 49 | 0*** | (Goedde et al., 1992) | |||||||
| Niger | 45 | 12.2*** | - | - | - | - | (Iron et al., 1992) | |||||||
| African-Trinidadian | - | - | 45 | 12.2 | - | - | (Montane-Jaime et al., 2006) | |||||||
| Other | ||||||||||||||
| Australia | - | - | - | - | 37 | 0*** | (Goedde et al., 1992) | |||||||
| Jewish | 108 | 18.5*** | - | - | - | - | (Neumark et al., 2004) | |||||||
| American Jewish | - | - | - | - | 129 | 8.1*** | (Fischer et al., 2007) | |||||||
N, number of subjects; *p < 0.05; *p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001
Combination of ADH1B, ADH1C and ALDH2 genotypes in Vietnamese individuals
Data analysis reports of Cederbaum (2012) and Edenberg (2018) showed that individuals with different alleles of ADH1B (rs1229984), ADH1C (rs698) and ALDH2 (rs671) polymorphisms express likely phenotype such as increacing or reducing risk for alcholism and exposuring to acetaldehyde, leading to possible carcinogenic effects and some diseases in human (Cederbaum, 2012; Edenberg and McClintick, 2018). Individuals in this study carry ADH1C genotype without any ADH1B*2 and ALDH2*2 relating to drinking habits that lead to risk for alcoholism with low frequency (8.1%). In contrast, people carry genotypes at least an allele ADH1B*2 or ALDH2*2 protecting against alcoholism accounts for high frequency, 91.9%. Individuals protect against alcoholism can cause high acetaldehyde accumulation accounting for 33.2%. Some genotype combinations of ADH1B, ADH1C and ALDH2 polymorphisms have not been appeared in this studying population (Table 4).
Table 4.
Genotypes Frequency of ADH1B (rs1229984), ADH1C (rs698) and ALDH2 (rs671) Polymorphisms in Combination
| Genotype | N | (%) | Phenotype | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADH1B (rs1229984) |
ADH1C
(rs698) |
ALDH2 (rs671) | 235 | 100 | Likely phenotype | % |
| *1/*1 | *1/*1 | *1/*1 | 14 | 6 | Increasing risk of alcoholism/risk for alchohol dependence | 8.1 |
| *1/*1 | *1/*2 | *1/*1 | 5 | 2.1 | ||
| *1/*1 | *2/*2 | *1/*1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| *1/*1 | *1/*1 | *1/*2 | 3 | 1.3 | Reducing the risk for alcoholism/protecting against alcoholism | 58.7 |
| *1/*1 | *1/*2 | *1/*2 | 2 | 0.9 | ||
| *1/*1 | *2/*2 | *1/*2 | 0 | 0 | ||
| *1/*2 | *1/*1 | *1/*1 | 43 | 18.2 | ||
| *1/*2 | *1/*2 | *1/*1 | 16 | 6.8 | ||
| *1/*2 | *2/*2 | *1/*1 | 1 | 0.4 | ||
| *2/*2 | *1/*1 | *1/*1 | 71 | 30.2 | ||
| *2/*2 | *1/*2 | *1/*1 | 2 | 0.9 | ||
| *2/*2 | *2/*2 | *1/*1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| *1/*1 | *1/*1 | *2/*2 | 0 | 0 | Reducing the risk for alcoholism/protecting against alcoholism/higher acetaldehyde accumulation | 33.2 |
| *1/*1 | *1/*2 | *2/*2 | 0 | 0 | ||
| *1/*1 | *2/*2 | *2/*2 | 0 | 0 | ||
| *1/*2 | *1/*1 | *1/*2 | 23 | 9.8 | ||
| *1/*2 | *1/*1 | *2/*2 | 5 | 2.1 | ||
| *1/*2 | *1/*2 | *1/*2 | 9 | 3.8 | ||
| *1/*2 | *1/*2 | *2/*2 | 3 | 1.3 | ||
| *1/*2 | *2/*2 | *1/*2 | 0 | 0 | ||
| *1/*2 | *2/*2 | *2/*2 | 0 | 0 | ||
| *2/*2 | *1/*1 | *1/*2 | 35 | 14.9 | ||
| *2/*2 | *1/*1 | *2/*2 | 3 | 1.3 | ||
| *2/*2 | *1/*2 | *1/*2 | 0 | 0 | ||
| *2/*2 | *1/*2 | *2/*2 | 0 | 0 | ||
| *2/*2 | *2/*2 | *1/*2 | 0 | 0 | ||
| *2/*2 | *2/*2 | *1/*2 | 0 | 0 | ||
N, number of subjects
Discussion
Polymorphism of alcohol metabolizing genes in Vietnamese was interested since 1992, in a report about the frequency of ADH1B*2 (rs1229984) in Vietnamese Orientals (Iron et al., 1992). Later, a study on the frequencies of ADH1B*2, ADH1C*2, and ALDH2*2 alleles in the Kinh individuals living in Ho Chi Minh City was reported (Edenberg and McClintick, 2018). However, neither data of people living in the north of Vietnam nor northeastern areas like Thai Nguyen were shown so far. This study identified the prevalence of three SNPs relating to alcohol metabolism activity in Thai Nguyen residents. With the identified frequencies of ADH1B*2, ADH1C*2 and ALDH2*2, all genotypes and alleles examined in this study were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. This proves that those alleles’ frequency has been inherited stably in the population and the study subjects represent Vietnamese people. The frequency of ADH1B*2 was similar to data reported by Edenberg (Edenberg and McClintick, 2018), but significantly higher than that found by Iron (p<0.001) (Iron et al., 1992). This difference is possibly due to the small number of subjects investigated. Besides that, there is a significant difference in ALDH2*2 frequency in our study in comparison with Edenberg’s analysis (Edenberg and McClintick, 2018) (p<0.050). Subjects in our study were people living in Thai Nguyen province. In addition to the Kinh which is the major ethnic group of Vietnam, there are also other ethnic minorities co-living here, such as Tay, Mong, Nung and Dao...(United Nations Population Fund in viet nam, 2011). Therefore, we suggest that the difference in ALDH2*2 allele frequency in our study compared with the Kinh group may be due to the mixed ethnic background of the current study subjects. The similar figure was previously found when comparing allelic frequencies of ADH1B*2, ADH1C*1 and ALDH2*2 among different Chinese ethnic groups as shown in the study of Wei et al in Chinese people (Wei et al., 2018). Given the diversity of ethnicity in Vietnam, it is necessary to expand the study of ADH1B, ADH1C and ALDH2 polymorphisms not only in Kinh people but also in other ethnic minority groups in Vietnam. The comparing result showed that ADH1B*2, ADH1C*2 and ALDH2*2 allele frequency exhibit differences between populations in Asia, Europe, Africa and other continents. However, these mutant variants have significant differences between regions of each continent, even between countries in each area. ADH1B*2 allele frequency was shown to be common in parts of Asia comparing other continents, especially, selection distribution in East Asia and following in Southeast Asia. And ADH1C*2 has a significantly lower frequency in Asia and Africa, higher in West Asia, America and Europe. Whereas, ALDH2*2 was detected only in Asian and Jewish populations, almost absent in the rest of the continents (Table 3). Our comparing analysis is also similar to results from previous reviews (Cederbaum, 2012; He et al., 2015; Vatansever et al., 2015; Yokoyama et al., 2015; Edenberg and McClintick, 2018).
Many studies around the world have shown that people carrying ADH1B*2 strongly reduce the risk of alcoholism, even further decrease in those homozygous for ADH1B*2 and independent of that of ALDH2*2. The presence of unique ALDH2*2 was suggested protective against heavy drinking and alcoholism. Meanwhile, ADH1C*2 with lower alcohol metabolism activity compared with ADH1C*1, which tends to be inherited together with ADH1B*2 and has a protective role against alcoholism (Edenberg and McClintick, 2018). Genetic variants of ADH1B*2, ADH1C*1 and ALDH2*2 were not only involved in alcoholism and behavioral disorders but also associated with alcohol relating diseases. In fact, these alleles protect some people from alcoholism but can cause alcohol-related health problems (Zakhari, 2006; National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 2007; Cederbaum, 2012; Hurley and Edenberg, 2012). In total, two combined genotypes that were previously reported to associate with alcohol dependence and protection against alcoholism were 8.1% and 91.9%. Individuals carry ADH1C genotype with at least one ADH1B*2 and ALDH2*2 causing high acetaldehyde accumulation accounting for 33.2% (Table 4).
Many reports have been conducted to elucidate the relationship between these SNPs and human diseases. A meta-analysis demonstrated that rs1229984 polymorphism may be an important protective factor for alcoholic liver cirrhosis, especially for Asians (He et al., 2015). The ADH1B*2/*2 genotype was significantly more prevalent in the alcohol-related group than in the alcohol-unrelated group in patients with symptomatic Brugada syndrome (Wu et al., 2019) and significantly decreased the odds of lung cancer and developing hemorrhagic stroke than other genotypes (Govind et al., 2020; Lin et al., 2021). For the ADH1C gene, ADH1C*1/*1 individuals consuming alcohol are at higher risk for alcoholic pancreatitis than ADH1C*1/*2 and ADH1C*2/*2 genotypes (Vatansever et al., 2015). The ALDH2*2 was related to ischemic stroke risk and may be a risk factor for this condition. The ALDH2*1/*1 genotype was more frequently in an alcoholic population and patients with liver diseases, meanwhile ALDH2*1/*2 was associated with a decreased risk of alcoholic liver cirrhosis comparing to ALDH2*1/*1 (Wang et al., 2020). With the relatively high prevalence of ADH1B*2/*2, ADH1C*1/*1, ALDH2*1/*2 and ALDH2*2/*2 in study subjects, they are predicted to be at increased risk of diseases if they abuse alcohol. According to Micu et al., (2019), in addition to ethanol-metabolizing enzymes involved in alcohol abuse leading to alcohol dependence, there are also psychological and social factors. Vietnam is currently assessed as a country with high alcohol consumption, especially among men. Social factors greatly influence the alcohol abuse of Vietnamese because drinking alcoholic beverages has become a cultural feature of Vietnamese used in daily life and public relations. On the other hand, Luu and Nguyen, (2018) showed that Vietnameses have misconceptions when using alcoholic beverages. Most Vietnamese interviewed subjectively believe that drinking alcohol is healthier, but the concept of drinking alcohol to relieve nervous tension is still common. From the research and analysis results, we suggested that Vietnamese will have a very high risk of accumulating acetaldehyde, causing serious health and behavioral problems if they abuse alcohol. Therefore, it is necessary to change lifestyle to avoid drinking too much alcohol and further study these genetic polymorphisms in alcohol-related diseases in Vietnamese, contributing to elucidating the influence of these polymorphisms.
This is the first study on the polymorphism of ADH1B, ADH1C and ALDH2 (rs1229984, rs689, rs671) in Vietnamese people living in Thai Nguyen, the northeast region of Vietnam. Our result supports useful scientific information for genetic screening strategies in identifying individuals at risk of diseases and giving appropriate lifestyle as well as clinical advice.
Author Contribution Statement
Conceptualization: Ha Hai Nguyen, Yen Hoang Thi Thu. Data curation: Yen Hoang Thi Thu, Nhung Phuong Vu, Huong Bui Thi Thu, Yen Thi Nguyen, Hai Dinh Nguyen, Anh Thi Phuong Le. Formal analysis: Yen Hoang Thi Thu, Nhung Phuong Vu. Investigation: Yen Hoang Thi Thu, Huong Bui Thi Thu, Yen Thi Nguyen, Hai Dinh Nguyen, Anh Thi Phuong Le. Methodology: Ha Hai Nguyen, Yen Hoang Thi Thu. Supervision: Ha Hai Nguyen. Validation: Nhung Phuong Vu, Huong Bui Thi Thu. Writing of original manuscript: Yen Hoang Thi Thu. Review and editing of manuscript: Ha Hai Nguyen, Nhung Phuong Vu, Yen Hoang Thi Thu.
Acknowledgements
General: This study was conducted at Thai Nguyen University of Sciences (TNUS)-Thai Nguyen University (TNU) and Institute of Genome Research (IGR)-Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology (VAST). The sample collection was supported by Department of Immunology and Molecular Genetics - Thai Nguyen General Hospital.
Funding Statement
The funding and equipment of this study was supported by TNUS-TNU and IGR-VAST.
Ethical Declaration
This study was approved by ethics committees of the Thai Nguyen General Hospital, Ministry of Health of Viet Nam with the ID 59/HĐĐĐ-BVTWTN.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Ahn KS, Abdiev S, Rahimov B, et al. Alcohol dehydrogenase 1B and Aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 Polymorphisms in Uzbekistan. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2009;10:17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Borinskaya S, Kal’ina N, Marusin A, et al. Distribution of the alcohol dehydrogenase ADH1B*47His allele in Eurasia. Am J Hum Genet. 2009;84:89–2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.12.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bosron WF, Li TK. Genetic polymorphism of human liver alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenases, and their relationship to alcohol metabolism and alcoholism. J Hepatology. 1986;6:502. doi: 10.1002/hep.1840060330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brooks PJ, Zakhari S. Acetaldehyde and the genome: beyond nuclear DNA adducts and carcinogenesis. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2014;55:77–1. doi: 10.1002/em.21824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cederbaum AI. Alcohol metabolism. Clin Liver Dis. 2012;16:667–5. doi: 10.1016/j.cld.2012.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chao YC, Wang LS, Hsieh TY, et al. Chinese alcoholic patients with esophageal cancer are genetically different from alcoholics with acute pancreatitis and liver cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:2958–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.02328.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cichoż-Lach H, Celiński K, Wojcierowski J, et al. Genetic polymorphism of alcohol-metabolizing enzyme and alcohol dependence in Polish men. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2010;43:257–1. doi: 10.1590/s0100-879x2010007500006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cichoż-Lach H, Partycka J, Nesina I, et al. Genetic polymorphism of alcohol dehydrogenase 3 in alcohol liver cirrhosis and in alcohol chronic pancreatitis. Alcohol Alcoholism. 2006;41:14–7. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agh225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Degenhardt L, Charlson F, Ferrari A, et al. The global burden of disease attributable to alcohol and drug use in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Psychiatry. 2018;5:987–2. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30337-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Druesne-Pecollo N, Tehard B, Mallet Y, et al. Alcohol and genetic polymorphisms: effect on risk of alcohol-related cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:173. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70019-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Edenberg HJ, McClintick JN. Alcohol dehydrogenases, aldehyde dehydrogenases, and alcohol use disorders: A Critical Review. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2018;42:2281–7. doi: 10.1111/acer.13904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eng MY, Luczak SE, Wall TL. ALDH2, ADH1B, and ADH1C genotypes in Asians: a literature review. Alcohol Res Health. 2007;30:22–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fischer M, Wetherill LF, Carr LG, et al. Association of the aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 promoter polymorphism with alcohol consumption and reactions in an American Jewish population. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007;31:1654–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00471.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Foley P, Loh E, Innes D, et al. Association studies of neurotransmitter gene polymorphisms in alcoholic Caucasians. Ann N Y Acad Sci U S A. 2004;1025:39–6. doi: 10.1196/annals.1316.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- García-Martín E, Martínez C, Serrador M, et al. Alcohol dehydrogenase 2 genotype and risk for migraine. J Headache Pain. 2010;50:85–1. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2009.01396.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goedde HW, Agarwal DP, Fritze G, et al. Distribution of ADH2 and ALDH2 genotypes in different populations. Hum Genet. 1992;88:344–6. doi: 10.1007/BF00197271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gordillo-Bastidas E, Panduro A, Gordillo-Bastidas D, et al. Polymorphisms of alcohol metabolizing enzymes in indigenous Mexican population: unusual high frequency of CYP2E1* c2 allele. Alcohol Res Health. 2010;34:142–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2009.01075.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Govind P, Pavethynath S, Sawabe M, et al. Association between rs1229984 in ADH1B and cancer prevalence in a Japanese population. Mol Clin Oncol. 2020;12:503. doi: 10.3892/mco.2020.2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guo YM, Wang Q, Liu YZ, et al. Genetic polymorphisms in cytochrome P4502E1, alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenases and the risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Gansu Chinese males. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:1444–9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.1444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- He L, Deng T, Luo HS. Alcohol dehydrogenase 1C (ADH1C) gene polymorphism and alcoholic liver cirrhosis risk: A meta analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8:11117. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hubáček JA, Šedová L, Olišarová V, et al. Distribution of ADH1B genotypes predisposed to enhanced alcohol consumption in the Czech Roma/Gypsy population. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2018;26:284–8. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a5090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hurley TD, Edenberg HJ. Genes encoding enzymes involved in ethanol metabolism. Alcohol Res. 2012;34:339–4. doi: 10.35946/arcr.v34.3.09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Iron A, Groppi A, Fleury B, et al. Polymorphism of class I alcohol dehydrogenase in French, Vietnamese and Niger populations: genotyping by PCR amplification and RFLP analysis on dried blood spots. Ann Genet. 1992;35:152–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kayaalti Z, Soylemezoglu T. Distribution of ADH1B, ALDH2, CYP2E1*6, and CYP2E1*7B genotypes in Turkish population. Alcohol. 2010;44:415–3. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2010.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim MS, Lee DH, Kang HS, et al. Genetic polymorphisms of alcohol-metabolizing enzymes and cytokines in patients with alcohol induced pancreatitis and alcoholic liver cirrhosis. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2004;43:355–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Konishi T, Calvillo M, Leng AS, et al. The ADH3*2 and CYP2E1 c2 alleles increase the risk of alcoholism in Mexican American men. Exp Mol Pathol. 2003;74:183–9. doi: 10.1016/s0014-4800(03)00006-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee KH, Kwak BY, Kim JH, et al. Genetic polymorphism of cytochrome P-4502E1 and mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenase in a Korean population. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1997;21:953–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li H, Mukherjee N, Soundararajan U, et al. Geographically separate increases in the frequency of the derived ADH1B*47His allele in eastern and western Asia. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81:842–6. doi: 10.1086/521201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lin CH, Nfor ON, Ho CC, et al. Association of ADH1B polymorphism and alcohol consumption with increased risk of intracerebral hemorrhagic stroke. J Transl Med. 2021;19:1–8. doi: 10.1186/s12967-021-02904-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luu BN, Nguyen TT. Consumption of alcohol beverages in Viet Nam - Some national investigation results In Eds National Economics University publishing company. Ha noi. 2018:62. [Google Scholar]
- Matsuo K, Wakai K, Hirose K, et al. Alcohol dehydrogenase 2 His47Arg polymorphism influences drinking habit independently of aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 Glu487Lys polymorphism: analysis of 2,299 Japanese subjects. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:1009–3. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Méndez C, Rey M. Characterization of polymorphisms of genes ADH2, ADH3, ALDH2 and CYP2E1 and relationship to the alcoholism in a Colombian population. Colomb Med. 2015;46:176–2. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Micu SI, Manea ME, Popoiag R, et al. Alcoholic liver cirrhosis, more than a simple hepatic disease–A brief review of the risk factors associated with alcohol abuse. J Mind Med Sci. 2019;6:232–6. [Google Scholar]
- Montane-Jaime K, Moore S, Shafe S, et al. ADH1C*2 allele is associated with alcohol dependence and elevated liver enzymes in Trinidad and Tobago. Alcohol. 2006;39:81–6. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2006.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neumark YD, Friedlander Y, Durst R, et al. Alcohol dehydrogenase polymorphisms influence alcohol-elimination rates in a male Jewish population. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2004;28:10–4. doi: 10.1097/01.ALC.0000108667.79219.4D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Seitz HK, Stickel F. Molecular mechanisms of alcohol-mediated carcinogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7:599–2. doi: 10.1038/nrc2191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Septelia IW. Distridution of genetic polymorphism of aldehyde dehydrogenase -2 (ALDH2) in Indonesian subjects. Med J Indones. 2002;11:135–2. [Google Scholar]
- Shen YC, Fan JH, Edenberg HJ, et al. Polymorphism of ADH and ALDH genes among four ethnic groups in China and effects upon the risk for alcoholism. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1997;21:1272–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shimizu M, Ishii Y, Okubo M, et al. Effects of ADH1C, ALDH2, and CYP2A6 polymorphisms on individual risk of tobacco-related lung cancer in male Japanese smokers. J Cancer Ther. 2013;4:29–5. [Google Scholar]
- Singh D, Negi TS, Upadhyay G, et al. Polymorphism of alcohol metabolizing gene ADH3 predisposes to development of alcoholic pancreatitis in North Indian population. Front Mol Biosci. 2015;2:67. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2015.00067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vatansever S, Tekin F, Salman E, et al. Genetic polymorphisms of ADH1B, ADH1C and ALDH2 in Turkish alcoholics: lack of association with alcoholism and alcoholic cirrhosis. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2015;15:37. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2015.242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vidal F, Lorenzo A, Auguet T, et al. Genetic polymorphisms of ADH2, ADH3, CYP4502E1 DraI and PstI, and ALDH2 in Spanish men: lack of association with alcoholism and alcoholic liver disease. J Hepatol. 2004;41:744. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2003.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang W, Wang C, Xu H, et al. Aldehyde Dehydrogenase, Liver Disease and Cancer. Int J Biol Sci. 2020;16:921–4. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.42300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wei Q, Ye Y, Chen F, et al. Polymorphism study of nine SNPs associated with subjective response to alcohol in Chinese Han, Hui, Tibetan, Mongolian and Uygur populations. Forensic Sci Res. 2018;3:124–9. doi: 10.1080/20961790.2018.1468538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu Q, Hayashi H, Hira D, et al. Genetic variants of alcohol-metabolizing enzymes in Brugada syndrome: Insights into syncope after drinking alcohol. J Arrhythm. 2019;35:752–9. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ye Y, Chen F, Lu X, et al. Correlation of genetic polymorphism, alcoholic beverage type and ethanol metabolism. J Forensic Med. 2018;34:142–6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5619.2018.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yokoyama A, Yokoyama T, Matsui T, et al. Alcohol dehydrogenase-1B (rs1229984) and aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 (rs671) genotypes are strong determinants of the serum triglyceride and cholesterol levels of Japanese alcoholic men. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0133460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yoshimasu K, Mure K, Hashimoto M, et al. Genetic alcohol sensitivity regulated by ALDH2 and ADH1B polymorphisms as indicator of mental disorders in Japanese employees. Alcohol Alcohol. 2014;50:39–5. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agu080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zakhari S. Overview: how is alcohol metabolized by the body? Alcohol Res Health. 2006;29:245–4. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

