Skip to main content
The Journal of Biological Chemistry logoLink to The Journal of Biological Chemistry
. 2023 Jan 5;299(2):102871. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2023.102871

Dissociation of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate from IP3 receptors contributes to termination of Ca2+ puffs

Holly A Smith 1, Colin W Taylor 1,
PMCID: PMC9971896  PMID: 36621623

Abstract

Ca2+ puffs are brief, localized Ca2+ signals evoked by physiological stimuli that arise from the coordinated opening of a few clustered inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors (IP3Rs). However, the mechanisms that control the amplitude and termination of Ca2+ puffs are unresolved. To address these issues, we expressed SNAP-tagged IP3R3 in HEK cells without endogenous IP3Rs and used total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy to visualize the subcellular distribution of IP3Rs and the Ca2+ puffs that they evoke. We first confirmed that SNAP-IP3R3 were reliably identified and that they evoked normal Ca2+ puffs after photolysis of a caged analog of IP3. We show that increased IP3R expression caused cells to assemble more IP3R clusters, each of which contained more IP3Rs, but the mean amplitude of Ca2+ puffs (indicative of the number of open IP3Rs) was unaltered. We thus suggest that functional interactions between IP3Rs constrain the number of active IP3Rs within a cluster. Furthermore, Ca2+ puffs evoked by IP3R with reduced affinity for IP3 had undiminished amplitude, but the puffs decayed more quickly. The selective effect of reducing IP3 affinity on the decay times of Ca2+ puffs was not mimicked by exposing normal IP3R to a lower concentration of IP3. We conclude that distinct mechanisms constrain recruitment of IP3Rs during the rising phase of a Ca2+ puff and closure of IP3Rs during the falling phase, and that only the latter is affected by the rate of IP3 dissociation.

Keywords: calcium intracellular release; calcium imaging; cell signaling; ER; inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor

Abbreviations: Ab-IP3R3, IP3R3-selective antibody; BSA, bovine serum albumin; [Ca2+]c, cytosolic free Ca2+ concentration; HBS, HEPES-buffered saline; HEK, human embryonic kidney; HEK-3KO, HEK cell with no IP3Rs; IBC, IP3-binding core; IP3, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate; IP3R, IP3 receptor; ROI, region of interest; ROIpuffs, ROI from which Ca2+ puffs were recorded; TIRF, total internal reflection fluorescence


Intracellular Ca2+ signals regulate many cellular processes. Most Ca2+ signals are initiated by inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) produced when cell-surface receptors stimulate phospholipase C. IP3 binds to the four subunits of a tetrameric IP3 receptor (IP3R), priming it to bind Ca2+, and triggering the opening of an intrinsic Ca2+-permeable channel, through which Ca2+ flows rapidly from the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum to the cytosol (1, 2, 3). Ca2+ puffs are evoked by low stimulus intensities, similar to those likely to occur under physiological conditions. These Ca2+ puffs are brief, localized increases in cytosolic free Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]c) that arise from the coordinated opening of a few channels within a cluster (4, 5, 6, 7). Compelling evidence suggests that the amplitude of a Ca2+ puff reports the number of open IP3Rs. This includes evidence that the amplitudes of steps within the falling phase of a Ca2+ puff match those of the very smallest events (‘Ca2+ blips’), which report the opening of a single IP3R (4). The coordinated openings of IP3Rs are thought, at least in part, to arise from costimulation of all IP3Rs by IP3 and Ca2+ (1). An additional, but essential, level of regulation is provided by Kras-induced actin-binding protein (KRAP), which licenses clustered IP3Rs to respond to IP3 (8).

Most IP3Rs within a cell are mobile, but Ca2+ puffs arise preferentially from immobile clusters of IP3Rs which are tethered near to endoplasmic reticulum-plasma membrane junctions by KRAP (7, 8). These subcellular sites are the same whether Ca2+ puffs are evoked by IP3 produced by endogenous signaling pathways or by photolysis of a caged analog of IP3 (ci-IP3) (6, 9). Ca2+ puffs may both allow local regulation of Ca2+ sensors and contribute to the genesis of global Ca2+ signals, although the role of Ca2+ puffs in the latter is unresolved (10).

Ca2+-induced Ca2+-release between IP3Rs is potentially explosive, but the mechanisms that terminate the activity of Ca2+ puffs are incompletely understood. Delayed feedback inhibition of IP3Rs by substantial local increases in [Ca2+]c probably contributes (11, 12, 13, 14), but it may not be the only mechanism. Evidence for coupled closing of IP3Rs during the falling phase of a Ca2+ puff (15) and conflicting evidence implicating luminal Ca2+ in the regulation of IP3Rs (16, 17) suggest additional factors that may contribute to termination of Ca2+ puffs. The effect of cytosolic Ca2+ on IP3Rs is determined by whether they have IP3 bound (1). The simplest scheme suggests that IP3 binding allows Ca2+ to stimulate channel opening, while Ca2+ inhibits IP3Rs without IP3 bound (18, 19, 20). This scheme suggests that if local increases in [Ca2+]c contribute to terminating Ca2+ puffs, it may be necessary for IP3 to first dissociate from at least one IP3R subunit; in that case, the rate of IP3 dissociation may be an important determinant of how quickly Ca2+ puffs terminate. Furthermore, we might expect coupled closing and inhibition by local increases in [Ca2+]c to be influenced by the density of IP3Rs within the clusters that evoke Ca2+ puffs. These considerations prompted our analyses of the effects of varying IP3R expression and IP3 affinity on Ca2+ puffs.

All three subtypes of IP3R evoke similar Ca2+ puffs (21, 22), but IP3R3 offers advantages for experimental analyses. Plasmids encoding IP3R3 are easy to manipulate, there is an excellent IP3R3-selective antibody, and there are high-resolution structures of IP3R3 in different states (23, 24, 25). We therefore chose human IP3R3 for our analyses of Ca2+ puffs. By expressing SNAP-tagged IP3R3 in cells devoid of native IP3R, we were able to visualize both IP3Rs and the Ca2+ signals they evoke. Our results establish that functional interactions between IP3Rs constrain their recruitment during the rising phase of a Ca2+ puff and that IP3 dissociation from the IP3R contributes to termination of each Ca2+ puff.

Results

SNAP-tagged IP3R3 are reliably identified and evoke normal Ca2+ puffs

To define the subcellular distribution of IP3R3 while measuring the Ca2+ puffs they evoke, human IP3R3 fused to a fast-labeling SNAP-tag (SNAP-IP3R3, Fig. 1A) was expressed in human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells lacking endogenous IP3Rs (HEK-3KO cells) (2). We used an N-terminal tag because it does not disrupt IP3R function (7) and a SNAP-tag (19.4 kDa; smaller than GFP) that allows versatile covalent labeling with fluorophores (Fig. 1B) (26). Our use of HEK-3KO cells (2) and transient expression of SNAP-IP3R3 under control of an inducible promoter ensured that functional responses were entirely mediated by SNAP-IP3R3 homotetrameric channels expressed at appropriate levels (Fig. 1B). Our optimized methods, which required labeling of cells in suspension before plating for analyses using fluorescence microscopy (Fig. 1, A–D), allowed SNAP-IP3R3 to be identified in cells, most of which expressed IP3R3 at modest levels (Fig. 1E) and with the punctate distribution of IP3R clusters typical of native IP3Rs (Fig. 2Aii and see Fig. 3A) (7).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Controlled expression and visualization of SNAP-IP3R3.A, the SNAP-IP3R3 construct. A fast-labeling SNAP-tag (SNAPf) is attached to the N-terminus of human IP3R3 (hIP3R3) via a short peptide linker. B, expression and labeling of SNAP-IP3R3. HEK-3KO cells are transiently transfected with plasmids encoding TetR and SNAP-IP3R3 under a tetracycline-inducible CMV promoter. Addition of doxycycline (1 μg/ml, 48 h) then derepresses expression of SNAP-IP3R3. HEK-SNAP-IP3R3 cells are irreversibly labeled in suspension with a fluorescent SNAP-tag substrate (SNAP-Cell 647-SiR, 1 μM) and plated onto imaging dishes before noninvasive loading with Cal520-AM, ci-IP3/PM, and EGTA-AM for TIRF imaging of Ca2+ puffs evoked by photolysis of ci-IP3. C, TIRF images of HEK-SNAP-IP3R3 cells labeled with SNAP-Cell 647-SiR (1 μM) in the imaging dish according to the manufacturer’s instructions or in-suspension (see Experimental procedures) and recorded under identical conditions. Scale bars represent 10 μm. D, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of intracellular/extracellular fluorescence measured from small ROI (5.6 μm2) for the two labeling methods shown in C. Individual values from 53 cells (points) with mean values from three independent experiments (squares, color-coded) and mean ± S.E.M., ∗p < 0.05, unpaired Student’s t test. E, frequency distributions of whole-cell epifluorescence intensities for HEK-SNAP-IP3R3 cells (3892 cells from one experiment) and mock-transfected HEK-3KO cells (2798 cells from one experiment). The results indicate that ∼40% of cells express detectable SNAP-IP3R3. FU, fluorescence unit. HEK-3KO cell, HEK cell with no IP3Rs; HEK, human embryonic kidney; IP3R, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor; ROI, region of interest; TIRF, total internal reflection fluorescence.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

SNAP-tag labeling reliably reports IP3R distribution.A, TIRF images of HEK-SNAP-IP3R3 cells immunostained with Ab-IP3R3 and labeled with SNAP-Cell 647-SiR (SNAP-647) at high (i) and low (ii) levels of SNAP-IP3R3 expression. Scale bars represent 10 μm, 5 μm in enlargements of boxed areas. B, Manders’ split coefficient values for colocalization of Ab-IP3R3 fluorescence with SNAP-647 fluorescence (M1) and vice versa (M2) for cells expressing different amounts of IP3R3 (see panel C). Individual values from 22 cells from two independent analyses (color-coded) and mean ± S.D. C, relationship between whole-cell fluorescence intensities from the entire TIRF footprint for SNAP-647 and Ab-IP3R3 staining. Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.87, p < 0.0001, n = 34 cells from two independent analyses. D, TIRF images of a HEK-SNAP-IP3R3 cell showing punctate Ab-IP3R3 and SNAP-647 fluorescence. Scale bars represent 10 μm, 5 μm in pseudo-colored enlargements of boxed area. E, fluorescence intensity profiles along the lines (1, 2, 3, 4) shown in D. F, relationship between fluorescence intensities of individual SNAP-647 and Ab-IP3R3 puncta. 2310 puncta from 10 cells from two independent analyses. Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.85, p < 0.0001. Ab-IP3R3, IP3R3-selective antibody; HEK, human embryonic kidney; IP3R, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor; TIRF, total internal reflection fluorescence.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Similar Ca2+puffs are evoked by endogenous IP3R3 and SNAP-IP3R3.A, typical TIRF image of SNAP-IP3R3 in a live cell selected for analysis because the IP3R expression reveals mobile and immobile puncta typical of native expression (7) without the clear delineation of reticular ER that occurs with over-expression. Boxed area (enlarged below) shows the region (19.2 × 19.2 μm) from which Ca2+ puffs were recorded (ROIpuffs). The time-overlay of images captured at 0 s (green) and 60 s (magenta) show immobile SNAP-IP3R3 puncta (white). Scale bars represent 10 μm, 5 μm in enlargements. B, fluorescence traces show Ca2+ puffs evoked by photolysis of ci-IP3 (250-ms UV flash, arrows) in a HEK-IP3R3 or HEK-SNAP-IP3R3 cell. Cal520 fluorescence (F) was recorded in TIRF from a small region (1.76 × 1.76 μm), wherein Ca2+ puffs occurred repeatedly and is expressed relative to fluorescence recorded before the UV flash (F0). Enlargements of boxed areas show individual Ca2+ puffs. C and D, frequency and latency (time from UV flash to first Ca2+ puff) of Ca2+ puffs evoked through SNAP-IP3R3 and endogenous IP3R3. Results show individual cells and mean ± S.D. E, measured properties of Ca2+ puffs (F/F0): amplitude (baseline to peak), rise time (20% to 100% peak amplitude), decay time (100% to 20% peak amplitude), and duration (at half-maximal amplitude). F and G, mean amplitudes (F) and mean kinetic properties (G) of Ca2+ puffs evoked by IP3R3 and SNAP-IP3R3. Results show mean values from single cells and mean ± S.E.M. Results (C, D, F, and G) are from 19 cells from five independent experiments for IP3R3 and from 18 cells from three independent experiments for SNAP-IP3R3. ns p > 0.05, unpaired Student’s t test. HEK, human embryonic kidney; IP3R, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor; ROIpuffs, ROI from which Ca2+ puffs were recorded; TIRF, total internal reflection fluorescence.

We confirmed the specificity of an antibody to IP3R3 (Ab-IP3R3) (27) in immunocytochemical analyses by demonstrating that Ab-IP3R3 stains puncta in HEK-SNAP-IP3R3 cells, but not in HEK-3KO cells (Fig. S1). HEK-SNAP-IP3R3 cells labeled with SNAP-Cell 647-SiR (hereafter, SNAP-647) were immunostained with Ab-IP3R3 and imaged using total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy. The results demonstrate colocalization of immunostaining and SNAP-647 fluorescence (Fig. 2, A, B, D, and E), a tight linear correlation between the intensities of whole-cell immunostaining and SNAP-647 fluorescence (Fig. 2C), and a linear correlation for individual puncta between Ab-IP3R3 and SNAP-647 fluorescence intensities (Figs. 2F and S2). The results so far (Figs. 1 and 2) demonstrate that transfection of HEK-3KO cells with SNAP-IP3R3 and subsequent labeling with SNAP-647 allows near-native levels of IP3R expression and reliable detection of all IP3R3.

We used TIRF microscopy to compare Ca2+ puffs evoked by photolysis of ci-IP3 in HEK-IP3R3 and HEK-SNAP-IP3R3 cells. Since the latter were transiently transfected (Fig. 1B), individual cells differed in their expression of SNAP-IP3R3 (Fig. 1E), we therefore selected cells in which the distribution of IP3R resembled that observed in HeLa cells with tagged endogenous IP3R (7), namely cells with comparatively low SNAP-647 fluorescence intensities in which most IP3R puncta were mobile and a smaller fraction were immobile (Fig. 3A). The results demonstrate that Ca2+ puffs occurred with indistinguishable frequencies and after similar latencies in the two cell types (Fig. 3, B–D). Furthermore, the properties of individual Ca2+ puffs (mean amplitudes, rise times, decay times, and durations) were also indistinguishable for HEK-IP3R3 and HEK-SNAP-IP3R3 cells (Figs. 3, EG and S3).

Our results establish that HEK-SNAP-IP3R3 cells after labeling with SNAP-647 allow reliable identification of all IP3Rs within a cell and unperturbed IP3-evoked Ca2+ puffs. We use these cells to explore the effects of varying IP3R expression and the rate of IP3 dissociation from IP3R on the properties of Ca2+ puffs.

Increased IP3R expression increases the frequency of Ca2+ puffs and the size of IP3R clusters without affecting the properties of Ca2+ puffs

We used SNAP-647 fluorescence intensity measured from the TIRF footprint of the region of interest (ROI) from which Ca2+ puffs were recorded (ROIpuffs, 19.2 × 19.2 μm) to report SNAP-IP3R3 expression in individual HEK-SNAP-IP3R3 cells and compared it with the properties of the Ca2+ puffs evoked by photolysis of ci-IP3. The results demonstrate that over about a 60-fold range of expression there is a positive correlation between SNAP-IP3R3 expression and the frequency of Ca2+ puffs (Fig. 4A): Ca2+ puffs are more frequent in cells with more IP3Rs. The latency to the first detected Ca2+ puff after the photolysis flash decreased as SNAP-IP3R3 expression increased (Fig. 4B). However, the mean properties of individual Ca2+ puffs (amplitude, rise and decay times, and durations) were similar at all levels of SNAP-IP3R3 expression (Fig. 4, CF).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Ca2+puffs are more frequent in cells over-expressing IP3R, but the properties of individual Ca2+puffs are unaffected.A, relationship between SNAP-647 fluorescence intensity (recorded from the 19.2 × 19.2 μm region where Ca2+ puffs were recorded, ROIpuffs) and the frequency of Ca2+ puffs evoked by photolysis (250 ms) of ci-IP3. Regression line shows a positive correlation between the frequency of Ca2+ puffs and SNAP-IP3R3 expression. Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.91, p < 0.0001. Results show 33 cells from five experiments. B, relationship between SNAP-IP3R3 expression and latency to the first Ca2+ puff detected after the UV flash; r = −0.37, p < 0.05. CF, relationships between SNAP-IP3R3 expression and mean puff amplitude (C), mean rise time (D), mean decay time (E), and mean duration (F) of individual Ca2+ puffs. Results show 33 cells from five experiments. FU, fluorescence unit; IP3R, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor; ROIpuffs, ROI from which Ca2+ puffs were recorded.

We next asked how IP3R are distributed within cells expressing different numbers of IP3R. We restricted this analysis to HEK-SNAP-IP3R3 cells in which the SNAP-647 fluorescence intensity measured from ROIpuffs was <20,000 fluorescence units because at higher levels of expression, it was impossible to reliably distinguish individual puncta. The results demonstrate that both the number of SNAP-IP3R3 puncta (Fig. 5A and B) and their mean fluorescence intensity (Fig. 5, A and C) were increased in cells expressing more SNAP-IP3R3. The rightward shifts in the fluorescence intensity distributions for individual puncta as IP3R expression increased indicates that when cells express more IP3Rs, most puncta contain more IP3Rs (Fig. S4). This analysis indicates that clusters of IP3Rs within the TIRF field are more abundant and each cluster includes more IP3Rs in cells with more IP3Rs.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

IP3R clusters are more abundant and contain more IP3Rswith increased expression of IP3R.A, live-cell TIRF images of HEK-SNAP-IP3R3 cells expressing low (i) or high (ii) levels of SNAP-IP3R3. Scale bars represent 5 μm. Images were captured under identical conditions and with identical display values. B and C, relationships between overall SNAP-IP3R3 expression (SNAP-647 fluorescence intensity measured from ROIpuffs) and the number of SNAP-IP3R3 puncta (B, Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.71, p < 0.001) and mean fluorescence intensity of individual puncta (C, r = 0.98, p < 0.0001). Results show 23 cells from four experiments. Analysis was restricted to cells in which puncta could be resolved (SNAP-647 fluorescence <20,000 FU). D, fluorescence intensity distributions for individual puncta from cells expressing the lowest (blue) and highest (red) levels of SNAP-IP3R3 (SNAP-647 fluorescence = 1133 ± 350 and 15,226 ± 1950 FU, respectively; n = 3 cells for each category). Results show number of puncta identified within ROIpuffs (mean ± S.D., n = 3). Arrows indicate the brightest 30% of puncta in cells with fewest IP3Rs and the dimmest 30% in cells with most IP3Rs (about 30% of puncta are expected to be active Ca2+ puff sites, Fig. S5C). The lack of overlap between these two populations indicates that Ca2+ puffs in cells with most IP3Rs are evoked by clusters that contain more IP3Rs. FU, fluorescence unit; HEK, human embryonic kidney; IP3R, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor; ROIpuffs, ROI from which Ca2+ puffs were recorded; TIRF, total internal reflection fluorescence.

These results demonstrate that across a wide range of SNAP-IP3R3 expression (∼60-fold), the properties of individual Ca2+ puffs, including their mean amplitudes, are preserved, but they occur after shorter latencies and they are more frequent in cells with more IP3Rs. Since only a fraction of IP3R puncta are licensed to respond (7), we had to consider whether in cells with most IP3Rs, a few puncta with a normal complement of IP3R might lurk beneath the substantial increase in the average number of IP3Rs per punctum and thereby explain the unaltered properties of individual Ca2+ puffs. To address this issue, we recognize that about 30% of IP3R puncta are competent to evoke Ca2+ puffs (Fig. S5) (7) and therefore compared the brightest 30% of puncta in cells with the fewest SNAP-IP3R3 to the dimmest puncta in cells with most SNAP-IP3R3. The results demonstrate that in cells with most IP3Rs, the number of puncta with fluorescence intensities comparable to the brightest puncta of cells with fewest IP3Rs is far too low to underlie the observed number of sites at which Ca2+ puffs occur (Fig. 5D). This analysis demonstrates that in cells expressing many IP3Rs, puncta that contain more IP3Rs evoke Ca2+ puffs of unaltered amplitude.

We conclude that the amplitude of Ca2+ puffs, indicating the number of open IP3Rs (4, 5, 6, 7), is similar in cells expressing very different numbers of IP3Rs. Since IP3R clusters are larger in cells with more IP3Rs, functional interactions between IP3Rs must determine the number of IP3Rs that contribute to a Ca2+ puff. This conclusion prompted further analysis of the mechanisms that might terminate the activity of IP3R during a Ca2+ puff.

IP3R with reduced affinity for IP3 generate briefer Ca2+ puffs

Since the mechanisms that terminate Ca2+ puffs are unresolved (15, 28), we asked whether IP3 dissociation from IP3R contributes to termination. A point mutation (R568Q) within the conserved IP3-binding core (IBC) of IP3R1 causes a 9-fold reduction of its affinity for IP3 (29). We introduced the same mutation into SNAP-IP3R3 and used it to explore the effects of increasing the rate of IP3 dissociation on Ca2+ puffs (Fig. 6A). We confirmed that SNAP-IP3R3RQ had the same subcellular distribution as SNAP-IP3R3 (Fig. 6B). Since the IBC is highly conserved in all IP3R subtypes and each IBC binds IP3 with the same affinity (30), we expect the IP3R3RQ mutation to exactly replicate the 9-fold decrease in affinity reported for IP3R1RQ (29). The assumption is supported by evidence that the frequency of Ca2+ puffs evoked by photolysis of ci-IP3 is reduced in cells expressing IP3R3RQ (Fig. 6C).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Ca2+puffs are less frequent in cells expressing IP3R with reduced affinity for IP3, but their amplitude is unaffected.A, structure of human IP3R3 showing R568 in the IP3-binding core (IBC) coordinating IP3 (Protein Data Bank, 6DQN) (23). Mutation of R568Q within the IBC of SNAP-IP3R3 reduces its affinity for IP3. B, live-cell TIRF image of a HEK-SNAP-IP3R3RQ cell, enlarged in lower panel. Scale bars represent 5 μm. The punctate distribution is similar to that of SNAP-IP3R3 (Figs. 1C, 2, A and D, and 3A). C–E, relationships between SNAP-IP3R3RQ expression (from ROIpuffs) and the frequency of Ca2+ puffs evoked by photolysis of ci-IP3 (C) (r = 0.75, p < 0.0001), latency to the first Ca2+ puff after the photolysis flash (D), and the mean amplitude of Ca2+ puffs (E) (slopes not significantly different from 0). Results are from 32 cells from five experiments. Linear regression analyses for SNAP-IP3R3 (from Fig. 4, A–C) show that frequencies are lower, latencies are longer, and mean amplitudes of Ca2+ puffs are unaffected in SNAP-IP3R3RQ cells. FU, fluorescence unit; HEK, human embryonic kidney; IP3R, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor; ROIpuffs, ROI from which Ca2+ puffs were recorded; TIRF, total internal reflection fluorescence.

We expected that reducing the affinity of an IP3R for IP3 while maintaining the submaximal concentration of i-IP3 delivered after the UV flash to reduce the number of IP3R occupied by i-IP3 and so reduce the frequency of Ca2+ puffs and increase the latency before the first observed Ca2+ puff. Our results confirm these expectations. As with SNAP-IP3R3, the frequency of Ca2+ puffs increased with increased expression of SNAP-IP3R3RQ, the latencies shortened with increased expression, and the mean amplitude of individual Ca2+ puffs was unaffected by the overall level of SNAP-IP3R3RQ expression (Fig. 6, C–E). However, across a wide range of IP3R3 expression levels, the frequencies of Ca2+ puffs were lower, and the latencies were longer for SNAP-IP3R3RQ than for SNAP-IP3R3 (Fig. 6, C and D).

To allow direct comparisons of cells expressing SNAP-IP3R3 and SNAP-IP3R3RQ, we pooled data from cells in which the SNAP-647 fluorescence intensity measured from ROIpuffs fell within a defined range (1800–5900 FU), which coincided with cells in which the subcellular distribution of IP3R3 resembled that of native IP3Rs. The pooled data confirmed that the average level of IP3R3 expression (Fig. 7A) and mean puff amplitude (Fig. 7C) were indistinguishable for HEK-SNAP-IP3R3 and HEK-SNAP-IP3R3RQ cells, but the frequency of Ca2+ puffs was significantly reduced in the HEK-SNAP-IP3R3RQ cells (Fig. 7B).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

IP3R with reduced affinity for IP3evoke Ca2+puffs that terminate more quickly.A, SNAP-647 fluorescence intensity measured from ROIpuffs for SNAP-IP3R3 and SNAP-IP3R3RQ cells selected for analyses of kinetics of Ca2+ puffs. Selection criteria (1800–5900 FU) were chosen to include cells with near-endogenous expression of IP3R3. B and C, frequency (B) and mean amplitude (C) of Ca2+ puffs evoked by photolysis of ci-IP3 in cells that satisfied the selection criteria. DF, mean rise times (D), decay times (E), and durations (F) of Ca2+ puffs in the analyzed cells, where Ca2+ puffs with ‘square’ temporal profiles were excluded (Fig. S6, A and B). Results show mean ± S.D. (A and B) or S.E.M. (CF) for 11 cells from four experiments for SNAP-IP3R3 or 11 cells from five experiments for SNAP-IP3R3RQ. ns p > 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001, unpaired Student’s t test. FU, fluorescence unit; IP3R, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor; ROIpuffs, ROI from which Ca2+ puffs were recorded.

We next compared the kinetic properties of individual Ca2+ puffs in cells expressing SNAP-IP3R3 or SNAP-IP3R3RQ. Automated analysis of the rise times of Ca2+ puffs is distorted when Ca2+ puffs have a sustained plateau phase (‘square’ puffs) (15) because stochastic fluctuations in fluorescence during the plateau can delay the peak amplitude and thereby erratically extend the computed rise time (Fig. S6A). We therefore excluded ‘square’ Ca2+ puffs from our analyses of the kinetics of individual Ca2+ puffs. The exclusion rate was similar (∼18%) for analyses of SNAP-IP3R3 and SNAP-IP3R3RQ (Fig. S6B), confirming that it did not bias our analyses. We note in passing that although we have not specifically addressed the mechanisms underlying ‘square’ Ca2+ puffs, their similar abundance in cells expressing IP3R3 and IP3R3RQ indicates that ‘square’ Ca2+ puffs are not selectively affected by changes in IP3R affinity. Rise times were indistinguishable in cells expressing SNAP-IP3R3 and SNAP-IP3R3RQ (Fig. 7D), but decay times and the duration of Ca2+ puffs were significantly shorter for SNAP-IP3R3RQ (Figs. 7, E and F and 6, C–E).

If the effects of reducing the affinity of the IP3R for IP3 were solely attributable to reduced occupancy of IP3R by IP3, we would expect Ca2+ puffs evoked by a 9 to 10-fold lower concentration of i-IP3 through normal IP3R to have the same properties as Ca2+ puffs evoked by IP3RRQ. We therefore compared Ca2+ puffs evoked by photolysis of ci-IP3 in HEK-SNAP-IP3R3RQ cells with the usual UV flash duration (250 ms) to those evoked in HEK-SNAP-IP3R3 cells exposed to a 10-fold shorter flash (25 ms). The frequency of the Ca2+ puffs and the relationship between IP3R expression and frequency were similar under the two conditions (Fig. 8, A and B). These results confirm that for the frequency of Ca2+ puffs, a 9 to 10-fold reduction in IP3-binding affinity can be compensated by a comparable increase in i-IP3 concentration, suggesting that steady-state occupancy of IP3R by IP3 may determine the frequency of Ca2+ puffs. As expected, the amplitudes of individual Ca2+ puffs recorded under the two conditions were indistinguishable (Fig. 8C). The more important result is that neither the shorter duration of Ca2+ puffs nor the faster decay times in cells expressing IP3R3RQ were reproduced by exposing IP3R3 to a 10-fold lower concentration of i-IP3 (Fig. 8, DF). Our results show that in cells expressing SNAP-IP3R3, all measured properties of individual Ca2+ puffs are indistinguishable whether evoked by low concentrations of i-IP3 (25-ms flash) or a 10-fold higher concentration (250-ms flash), but the decay times and durations are longer than for IP3R with reduced affinity for IP3 (SNAP-IP3R3RQ) (Fig. 8G).

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Shortened Ca2+puffs from IP3R3RQare not a consequence of reduced occupancy of IP3R by IP3.A, relationship between SNAP-IP3R3 expression (SNAP-647 fluorescence intensity measured from ROIpuffs) and the frequency of Ca2+ puffs recorded after photolysis of ci-IP3 from HEK-SNAP-IP3R3 cells stimulated with a brief UV flash (25 ms). Results are from 30 cells from four experiments; Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.60, p < 0.001. Regression lines (from Figs. 4A and 6C) show results from similar analyses of SNAP-IP3R3 and SNAP-IP3R3RQ stimulated with a 10-fold longer flash (250 ms). BF, frequency of Ca2+ puffs (B), and mean amplitude (C), rise time (D), decay time (E), and duration (F) for individual Ca2+ puffs. Results (mean ± S.E.M., or S.D. for B) are from 11 cells from four experiments for SNAP-IP3R3 (25-ms UV) or 11 cells from five experiments for SNAP-IP3R3RQ (250-ms UV). Selection criteria (SNAP-647 fluorescence intensity of 1800–5900 FU, measured from ROIpuffs) were chosen to include cells with near-endogenous expression of IP3R3 (BF), and square Ca2+ puffs were excluded from analyses of kinetics (DF). ns p > 0.05, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, unpaired Student’s t test. G, overall summary (individual values, mean ± S.E.M.) shows the kinetic properties of Ca2+ puffs evoked by flash photolysis of ci-IP3 with the indicated flash durations for HEK-SNAP-IP3R3 or HEK-SNAP-IP3R3RQ cells (compiled from Figs. 7, DF and 8, DF). FU, fluorescence unit; HEK, human embryonic kidney; IP3R, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor; ROIpuffs, ROI from which Ca2+ puffs were recorded.

Discussion

We developed methods that allowed homomeric IP3R3 to be expressed in HEK cells at levels comparable to expression of endogenous IP3R and, by attaching a SNAP-tag to the expressed IP3R3, we were able to reveal both the subcellular distribution of IP3R3 and the Ca2+ puffs they evoke in response to photolysis of ci-IP3 (Figs. 1 and 2). The expressed SNAP-IP3R3 and native IP3R3 evoked indistinguishable Ca2+ puffs (Fig. 3).

We established that cells with more IP3Rs have more IP3R puncta within the TIRF field, each punctum included more IP3Rs (Fig. 5), and Ca2+ puffs occurred more frequently and after shorter latencies. However, the properties of individual Ca2+ puffs were indistinguishable at all levels of IP3R expression (Fig. 4). We confirmed, by analysis of the fluorescence intensity distributions of puncta in cells expressing different numbers of IP3Rs, that the mean peak amplitude of a Ca2+ puff remained constant even as the number of IP3Rs within a cluster increased (Figs. 4 and 5). These observations demonstrate that functional interactions between IP3Rs within a cluster must constrain the number of IP3Rs activated during the rising phase of a Ca2+ puff.

Local increases in [Ca2+]c are thought to contribute to both rapid recruitment of IP3R activity during the rising phase of a Ca2+ puff (through costimulation of IP3R by Ca2+ and IP3) and to termination of Ca2+ puffs (through delayed inhibition of IP3R by Ca2+). It is, therefore, relevant that the biphasic effects of [Ca2+]c on IP3R is itself regulated by IP3. We, for example, have suggested that IP3 binding to IP3R primes them to open by facilitating the binding of Ca2+ to a stimulatory site; while in the absence of IP3, Ca2+ binds to an inhibitory site that prevents channel opening (18, 19, 20). Others suggest variants of this simple scheme that also have IP3 regulating the effects of Ca2+ on IP3R gating (1, 31). The key point is that the rate of IP3 dissociation from an active IP3R may influence its susceptibility to Ca2+ inhibition. We therefore examined the effect of manipulating the rate of IP3R dissociation on the properties of Ca2+ puffs. We demonstrated that IP3R3 with about a 10-fold lower affinity for IP3 (SNAP-IP3R3RQ) evoked Ca2+ puffs in response to photolysis of ci-IP3. As expected, the Ca2+ puffs mediated by SNAP-IP3R3RQ were less frequent than those mediated by SNAP-IP3R3, consistent with the steady-state occupancy of IP3R by IP3 determining the number of active IP3Rs (Fig. 6). More importantly, while the mean peak amplitudes of the Ca2+ puffs were similar for SNAP-IP3R3 and SNAP-IP3R3RQ, indicating similar numbers of open IP3Rs, the Ca2+ puffs decayed more rapidly for SNAP-IP3R3RQ (Fig. 7). Furthermore, the disparity in decay times between SNAP-IP3R3 and SNAP-IP3R3RQ remained when the intensity of the photolysis flash (and so the intracellular concentration of i-IP3) was reduced for SNAP-IP3R3 cells to provide matched frequencies of Ca2+ puffs in the two cell lines (indicative of comparable IP3R occupancies by i-IP3) (Fig. 8). These analyses establish that the affinity of an IP3R for IP3 affects the rate at which Ca2+ puffs terminate: reducing the affinity for IP3 (increasing the rate of IP3 dissociation) causes Ca2+ puffs to terminate more quickly. We draw two important conclusions from these data. Firstly, the rate of IP3 dissociation from IP3R contributes to termination of Ca2+ puffs. Various mechanisms might align with this conclusion, but it is consistent with a local increase in [Ca2+]c contributing to termination by closing IP3R but only after IP3 has dissociated from active IP3R (1920).

Our second conclusion relates to whether the same mechanism might account for the constraint on the number of IP3Rs recruited within a cluster during the rising phase of a Ca2+ puff and the closure of active IP3Rs during the falling phase. The key observation here is that although Ca2+ puffs evoked by IP3R with reduced affinity for IP3 (SNAP-IP3R3RQ) terminate more quickly, their mean peak amplitude is indistinguishable from that of Ca2+ puffs evoked by normal IP3Rs (Figs. 7 and 8). This implies that different mechanisms constrain the opening of IP3Rs during the rising phase of a Ca2+ puff and closure of open IP3Rs during the falling phase. A speculative explanation is that during the rising phase of a Ca2+ puff, Ca2+ released by active IP3Rs rapidly inhibits neighboring IP3Rs that have not bound IP3, while during the falling phase, dissociation of IP3 (perhaps from only a single IP3R subunit) causes both channel closure and its immediate susceptibility to Ca2+ inhibition, which might then prevent reopening.

We conclude that when presented with more IP3Rs, cells incorporate more of them into clusters, assemble more IP3R clusters, and generate more frequent Ca2+ puffs in response to IP3, but the properties of individual Ca2+ puffs, including their mean peak amplitudes, are unchanged. We suggest that different mechanisms constrain recruitment of IP3Rs during the rising phase of a Ca2+ puff and cause closure of IP3Rs during the falling phase; only the latter is affected by the rate of IP3 dissociation.

Experimental procedures

Materials

Cal520-AM and Calbryte590-AM were from AAT Bioquest. ci-IP3/PM (D-2,3-O-isopropylidene-6-O-(2-nitro-4,5-dimethoxy)benzyl-myo-inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate hexakis(propionoxymethyl) ester) was from SiChem. 35-mm glass-bottom imaging dishes (14-mm micro-well, #1 cover glass) were from Cellvis (IBL Baustoff+Labor GmbH). EGTA-AM, human plasma fibronectin, Pluronic F-127, and doxycycline hydrochloride were from Merck. SNAP-Cell 647-SiR, BsrGI-HF restriction enzyme, Q5 High-Fidelity Master Mix, and Gibson Assembly Master Mix were from New England Biolabs. pcDNA3.2/V5-DEST, pDONR221, pcDNA6/TR and pT-Rex-DEST30 vectors, LR and BP Clonase II enzyme mixes, Pfl23II (a.k.a. BsiWI) and CpoI (a.k.a. RsrII) restriction enzymes, and custom oligonucleotides were from Thermo Fisher Scientific.

Sources of additional materials are provided in relevant sections of Experimental procedures.

Generation of SNAP-IP3R3 constructs

A plasmid encoding human IP3R3 was obtained from Harvard PlasmID Database (Clone ID: HsCD00399229, GenBank Accession: BC172406) and cloned from pENTR223 into pcDNA3.2/V5-DEST using LR Gateway cloning. We tagged human IP3R3 with a SNAP-tag, a self-labeling enzyme tag based on the human DNA repair protein, O6-alkylguanine-DNA-alkyltransferase, which reacts with O6-benzylguanine derivatives conjugated to fluorescent dyes (32). To generate the N-terminally SNAP-tagged human IP3R3 construct (SNAP-IP3R3), PCR was used to amplify an IP3R3 fragment (forward primer: CTCGGCGGTGGTTCTGGTGGTGGTTCTGGTATGAGTGAAATGTCCAGC, reverse primer: GAACCGCGGGCCCTCTAGATCAACCACTTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGC), and BsrGI restriction digest was used to generate a backbone fragment. Gibson assembly was used to introduce a DNA string (GeneArt Strings, Thermo Fisher Scientific) encoding SNAPf (fast-labeling SNAP-tag) with a GGSGGGSG peptide linker between the backbone fragment and the IP3R3 fragment (Fig. 1A). For expression of SNAP-IP3R3 under control of a tetracycline-inducible promoter, SNAP-IP3R3 was transferred from pcDNA3.2 to pDONR221 and then to pT-REx-DEST30 using BP and LR Gateway cloning, respectively.

To generate the construct encoding IP3R3 with reduced affinity for IP3 (SNAP-IP3R3RQ, Fig. 6A), a DNA string was synthesized encoding a region of SNAP-IP3R3 between two restriction sites, BsiWI and RsrII, which contained an Arg to Gln mutation at residue 568 (R568Q, CGC to CAG). A BsiWI/RsrII-restriction digest of SNAP-IP3R3 in pDONR221 was used to generate a fragment encoding the remainder of the construct. Gibson assembly was used to assemble the two fragments, and SNAP-IP3R3RQ was transferred to pT-REx-DEST30 using LR Gateway cloning. Sequences of all coding regions were confirmed using Sanger sequencing (Source BioScience). A silent point mutation was detected in bases (ATC to ATA) encoding Ile2512 in both constructs.

Cell culture

HEK cells lacking all IP3R subtypes (HEK-3KO, #EUR030) or expressing only IP3R3 (HEK-IP3R3, IP3R1/2 knock-out, #EUR033) were generated by CRISPR/Cas9 (2) and obtained from Kerafast. HEK cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium/F-12 with Gluta-MAX (Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Sigma-Aldrich). Cells were maintained at 37 °C in humidified air with 5% CO2 and passaged every 3 to 4 days using Gibco TrypLE Express (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Regular screening confirmed that cells were free of mycoplasma.

To generate cells (HEK-SNAP-IP3R3 cells) expressing SNAP-IP3R under control of the Tet repressor (TetR), we used pcDNA6/TR, a plasmid encoding TetR, and the Invitrogen T-REx expression system. HEK-3KO cells were seeded in 25-cm2 flasks and after 24 h, when they were ∼70% confluent, they were transiently transfected using TransIT-LT1 Transfection Reagent (3 μl/μg DNA; Mirus Bio) with SNAP-IP3R3 in pT-REx-DEST30 (2.6 μg/T25 flask) and pcDNA6/TR (15.8 μg). After 24 and 48 h, medium was exchanged for fresh complete medium containing doxycycline (1 μg/ml) to block activity of TetR and derepress the expression of SNAP-IP3R3 (Fig. 1B).

Labeling of cells with SNAP-tag

HEK-SNAP-IP3R3 cells were used 72 h after transfection for labeling of SNAP-IP3R3 with SNAP-Cell 647-SiR, a cell-permeable, far-red fluorescent label (excitation 645 nm; emission 661 nm). To avoid background labeling, it was essential to label cells in suspension before reattaching them to imaging dishes for microscopy (Fig. 1, C–E). Transfected cells were detached using TrypLE Express, resuspended in fresh complete medium (3 × 105 cells in 300 μl) containing SNAP-Cell 647-SiR (1 μM), and incubated for 15 min at 37 °C with 5% CO2. Cells were then washed three times (650g, 2 min), resuspended in fresh complete medium, plated into a 35-mm glass-bottomed imaging dish (#1 cover glass) coated with 10 μg/ml human fibronectin, and used after 12 to 14 h (Fig. 1B).

Fluorescence microscopy

Fluorescence microscopy used an inverted Olympus IX83 microscope equipped with a 100× oil-immersion TIRF objective (numerical aperture, NA = 1.49) or (for Fig. S1) a 60× oil-immersion objective (NA = 1.45). Illumination for TIRF microscopy was via a Cairn MultiLine LaserBank (488 and 647 nm) and an iLas2-targeted laser illumination system (Cairn Research), through which the excitation angle for TIRF was adjusted to achieve a theoretical penetration depth of 80 to 100 nm. Excitation light of 488 or 647 nm was passed through a quad-band filter set (TRF89902-EM, Chroma Technology), and emitted light was passed through an appropriate band-pass filter within a high-speed filter wheel (Cairn Optospin; peak/bandwidth: 525/50 or 700/75 nm). A 395-nm LED (SPECTRA X-light engine, Lumencor) was used for flash photolysis of ci-IP3. Detection of emitted light was via an EMCCD camera (iXon Ultra 897, Andor; 512 × 512 pixels; pixel size = 0.16 μm at 100× magnification). Image capture used MetaMorph Microscopy Automation and Image Analysis Software (version 7.10.1.161, Molecular Devices), through which image capture (control of shutters, etc.) was fully automated. Both live and fixed cells were imaged at 20 °C.

Immunostaining

About 14 h after labeling, HEK-SNAP-IP3R3 cells in imaging dishes were fixed (20 min) with 4% paraformaldehyde (Alfa Aesar) in PBS (Thermo Fisher Scientific), washed twice in PBS, permeabilized (5 min) with Triton X-100 (0.25% in PBS, Thermo Fisher Scientific), washed twice in PBS, and blocked (1 h) in PBS with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA; Europa Bioproducts). Cells were then incubated (12 h, 4 °C) with primary monoclonal mouse anti-IP3R3 antibody (Ab-IP3R3, 1:200, BD Biosciences, #610313, RRID: AB_397705) in PBS with 3% BSA, washed three times in PBS, and incubated (1 h, 20 °C) with secondary rabbit anti-mouse antibody conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488 (1:400, Thermo Fisher Scientific, #A11059, RRID: AB_2534106) in PBS with 3% BSA for 1 h. Cells were then washed five times in PBS before imaging. All steps were performed under conditions that minimized exposure to light. We confirmed the specificity of Ab-IP3R3 by demonstrating the absence of immunostaining in HEK-3KO cells (Fig. S1).

Quantification of fluorescence images

All TIRF images were first background-corrected by subtracting the gray value of an area from outside a cell using MetaMorph or FIJI (https://fiji.sc/) (33). To quantify the expression of SNAP-IP3R3, fluorescence (647 nm) was measured as the mean gray value from a region (19.2 × 19.2 μm) within which Ca2+ puffs were recorded. We refer to this measure of SNAP-IP3R3 expression as SNAP-647 fluorescence from ROIpuffs. To allow comparisons between experiments, fluorescence (FTetraSpeck) from TetraSpeck beads (Thermo Fisher Scientific, excitation 660 nm, emission 680 nm) was recorded and used to normalize measurements of SNAP-IP3R3 fluorescence (FSNAP). For experiments addressing the effects of varying SNAP-IP3R3 expression (Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 8), normalized values (10, 000 × FSNAP/FTetraSpeck) were used for quantitative analyses.

For comparisons between IP3R3 immunostaining (488 nm) and SNAP-IP3R3 labeling (647 nm) (Fig. 2C), the mean gray value from a ROI demarcating the entire TIRF footprint of the cell was measured. Pixel-based colocalization analysis used the FIJI plugin JACoP (34). Images were manually thresholded before computing Manders’ split coefficients (M); M1 reports the fraction of IP3R3 immunofluorescence coinciding with SNAP-IP3R3 fluorescence, and M2 reports the fraction of SNAP fluorescence coincident with immunofluorescence (Fig. 2B). M values of 1.0 indicate perfect colocalization. Costes’ randomizations (100 iterations, pixel-block size = 5) were generated for each image and used to assess the statistical significance of any colocalization (35).

For fluorescence intensity measurements of individual puncta, ROI (19.2 × 19.2 μm) were background-subtracted (rolling ball = 50 pixel) in FIJI to improve signal-to-noise. The FIJI plugin TrackMate (v 6.0.1) was used for automated detection of IP3R3 immunofluorescent puncta (Fig. 2F) or SNAP-IP3R3 puncta (Fig. 5, B and C) (36).

Within TrackMate, we used an estimated punctum size of 600 nm for spot detection and applied a Laplacian of Gaussian filter to detect spot maxima with sub-pixel accuracy. Briefly, the Gaussian filter smooths noise, while the Laplacian filter is used to identify edges (36). Detected spots were filtered by ‘Quality’ until only genuine puncta (confirmed by manual inspection) were detected; the selection criteria require a punctum to both exceed a critical fluorescence intensity and to fall below a critical size (diameter < 600 nm). To compare fluorescence from immunostaining and SNAP-tag labeling (Fig. 2F), the coordinates of the pixel with the maximum fluorescence intensity for each detected spot in the IP3R3 immunofluorescence image were mapped onto the corresponding pixel of the SNAP-IP3R3 image. We used these point fluorescence intensity measurements to compare expression determined by immunostaining and SNAP-tag labeling. The approach is a valid measure of the fluorescence intensity of the entire punctum because the point intensity is linearly related to total intensity of the spot for the IP3R3 immunofluorescence image (Fig. S2).

High-resolution imaging of Ca2+ puffs

To allow imaging of Ca2+ puffs, cells were loaded with a Ca2+ indicator (Cal520), EGTA to restrict Ca2+ diffusion (4), and ci-IP3 to allow controlled release of intracellular i-IP3 by photolysis. The slow on-rate for Ca2+ binding to EGTA is sufficient to allow EGTA to buffer Ca2+ diffusing between Ca2+ puff sites, which are typically a few μm apart. EGTA thereby restrains propagation of global Ca2+ signals, but the on-rate is too slow for EGTA to intercept Ca2+ diffusing between IP3Rs within sites (200–400 nm) (4, 5, 6, 7). EGTA does not, therefore, significantly affect the properties of individual Ca2+ puffs (437, 38). HEK-SNAP-IP3R3 cells in imaging dishes were washed with Hepes-buffered saline (HBS: 135 mM NaCl, 5.9 mM KCl, 1.2 mM MgCl2, 1.5 mM CaCl2, 11.5 mM glucose, 11.6 mM Hepes, pH 7.3; Merck), incubated (1 h) with Cal520-AM (5 μM) and ci-IP3/PM (1 μM) in HBS with pluronic acid (0.02%, v/v). Cells were then washed and incubated with EGTA-AM (5 μM) in HBS with pluronic acid (0.02%). After 45 min, cells were washed and incubated in HBS for a further 30 min before imaging. All steps were performed at 20 °C with minimal exposure to light.

TIRF microscopy was used to record Cal520 fluorescence (488 nm) within ∼100 nm of the plasma membrane. To achieve the high temporal resolution required to resolve the kinetics of Ca2+ puffs, image streams were captured at 200 frames s-1 (5-ms intervals) from a 19.2 × 19.2 μm ROI (∼25–50% of the TIRF footprint of a cell, referred to as ROIpuffs). Image stacks typically comprised 6000 to 10,000 frames (∼30–50 s). After 2 s of recording, a UV flash lasting 250 ms (25 ms in parts of Fig. 8) was delivered uniformly to the entire field to uncage ci-IP3. A 50:50 mirror in the light path allowed simultaneous excitation by the 488-nm laser and 395-nm LED. Image stacks were streamed directly to RAM in MetaMorph and then exported as.tif files.

Detection and analysis of Ca2+ puffs

Raw image stacks were background-corrected in MetaMorph and frames containing the UV flash artefact were removed in FIJI. Automated detection and analysis of Ca2+ puffs were performed using the detect_puffs plugin in FLIKA, an open-source Python-based image processing and analysis software (39, 40). An F/F0 stack was generated by dividing the fluorescence intensity of each pixel from each frame (F) by the average intensity of that pixel over the first 390 frames before photorelease of i-IP3 (F0). Image stacks (F/F0) were then divided by the SD of the baseline F/F0 images, a Gaussian blur (σ = 2) was applied, and these stacks were then used to identify Ca2+ puffs and measure their properties.

When a global increase in fluorescence obscured Ca2+ puffs, a Butterworth temporal bandpass filter (low frequency cut-off = 0.01) was applied to remove the slow increase in baseline fluorescence. In some cases, global increases in [Ca2+]c completely obscured Ca2+ puffs causing premature termination of the analysis; the shortest of these terminated recordings was ∼12 s. The recording interval was defined as the time from the first Ca2+ puff to either the end of the recording or the time when it became impracticable to resolve Ca2+ puffs against an elevated global [Ca2+]c.

FLIKA uses a threshold-cluster algorithm (41) to identify pixels brighter than a user-defined threshold (0.25 for our analysis). The brightest pixels are considered cluster centers, and adjacent bright pixels are included in the cluster. Each cluster represents a Ca2+ puff, to which a 2D Gaussian is fitted to identify its centroid. The centroid, defined with sub-pixel resolution, reports the center-of-mass of the clustered IP3Rs underlying the Ca2+ puff (37). The centroids of all Ca2+ puffs were mapped onto the TIRF footprint of the cell. To measure the amplitudes and kinetics of individual Ca2+ puffs, an F/F0 trace was produced from a small ROI (1.76 × 1.76 μm) centered on the centroid of the Ca2+ puff. Detected puffs were manually inspected to exclude noisy traces and to ensure the entire F/F0 trace was included in the analysis. In some cases, ‘square’ puffs (detected by eye) were manually removed from analyses of kinetic properties (Fig. S6). Files containing puff properties generated by FLIKA were exported to Microsoft Excel for further analysis.

Identification of Ca2+ puff sites

Ca2+ puffs recur at the same stable sites over many minutes, reflecting Ca2+ release from immobile clusters of IP3Rs (7, 8). In our analyses, Ca2+ puffs that lie within 1 μm (6.25 pixels) of each other were considered to belong to the same Ca2+ puff site. FLIKA successfully identifies these sites when Ca2+ puffs are relatively infrequent and sparsely distributed. However, when Ca2+ puffs are more frequent and more densely packed, FLIKA merges large numbers of Ca2+ puffs into fewer sites, causing the number of sites to be underestimated (Fig. S5, A and B). This occurs because FLIKA assigns Ca2+ puffs to the same site if each successively assessed Ca2+ puff is < 1 μm from the last; hence, a site can grow in a chain-like fashion as densely packed Ca2+ puff centroids become linked across considerable distances. To overcome this difficulty, we used a MATLAB script, ClusterXYpoints (version 1.5.0.0, https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/56150-distance-based-clustering-of-a-set-of-xy-coordinates) (42), to identify Ca2+ puff sites. The XY coordinates of Ca2+ puff centroids generated by FLIKA were saved as .csv files and imported into MATLAB (version R2021a). ClusterXYpoints starts by sorting the XY coordinates of Ca2+ puffs (a.k.a. points) in ascending order. The first point is assigned as a cluster, and the cluster centroid is calculated. If the second point is < 1 μm from the first cluster centroid, it is added to the cluster and the centroid is recalculated. Subsequent points are added to the cluster if they are < 1 μm from the updated centroid of the cluster. If a point is > 1 μm from the current cluster centroid, a new cluster centroid is generated. The process continues until all Ca2+ puffs have been assigned to a site.

ClusterXYpoints detected the same sites as FLIKA when Ca2+ puffs were infrequent, but it identified more sites than FLIKA when Ca2+ puffs were more frequent. At the highest frequencies of Ca2+ puffs, when FLIKA merged most Ca2+ puffs into a single site, ClusterXYpoints continued to identify discrete sites (Fig. S5, A and B). We therefore used ClusterXYpoints to identify the number of Ca2+ puff sites. The problems encountered with ‘coalescing’ Ca2+ puff sites in FLIKA analyses arise only because the centroids of many temporally separated Ca2+ puffs are overlaid for analysis, they therefore have no impact on the analyses of individual Ca2+ puffs.

Epifluorescence imaging of cell populations

For measuring SNAP-IP3R3 expression in cell populations (Fig. 1E), HEK-SNAP-IP3R3 or mock-transfected HEK-3KO cells were labeled with SNAP-Cell 647-SiR. Cells were washed with HBS and loaded with Calbryte590-AM (2 μM) in HBS with pluronic acid (0.02%) for 1 h at 20 °C in darkness. Here, Calbryte590 is used to define cell boundaries rather than as a Ca2+ indicator. Cells were washed and incubated in HBS for a further 1 h before imaging.

Epifluorescence imaging used an EVOS M7000 Cell Imaging System equipped with a 10× objective and a CMOS camera with a large field of view (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Calbryte590 and SNAP-Cell 647-SiR fluorescence were captured using EVOS LED cubes for Texas Red and Cy5, respectively. For image analysis, Calbryte590 fluorescence was used to demarcate whole cells because it is bright and uniformly distributed in the cytosol, making it ideal for automated segmentation. A custom-written ImageJ macro was used for segmentation (available from H.A.S.); the detected cell boundaries were then confirmed by manual inspection. Raw mean SNAP-IP3R3 fluorescence intensity was measured from individual whole-cell ROIs.

Statistical analyses

Most data are presented as mean ± SD or S.E.M. Numbers of cells, Ca2+ puffs, and independent analyses are reported in figure legends. Statistical comparisons used unpaired Student’s t tests; correlation analyses used Pearson’s correlation coefficient; comparisons of frequency distributions used χ2 test for trend (GraphPad Prism 5, GraphPad). The statistical significance of colocalization analyses (Manders’ split coefficients) was determined after Costes’ randomization, where a Costes’ p value > 0.95 indicates that < 0.05 of the randomized images had a Pearson’s correlation coefficient value greater than the nonrandomized image (i.e., p < 0.05) (35).

Data availability

All data required to support the conclusions presented are contained with the article.

Supporting information

This article contains supporting information (Figs. S1–S6) (39, 40).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/T012986/1).

Author contributions

H. A. S. investigation; H. A. S. formal analysis; C. W. T. funding acquisition; C. W. T. supervision; H. A. S. and C. W. T. methodology; H. A. S. and C. W. T. writing–original draft.

Funding and additional information

H. A. S. is supported by an iCASE award from Cairn Research and the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council.

Biography

graphic file with name fx1.jpg

Holly A. Smith is a graduate student in the Department of Pharmacology at the University of Cambridge, where she is completing her PhD with Professor Colin Taylor. Her research explores the function of IP3 receptors and the Ca2+ signals they evoke using high-resolution fluorescence microscopy. She is particularly interested in understanding the mechanisms controlling activity of local Ca2+ signals known as Ca2+ “puffs”. Twitter: @HollyASmith_488

Edited by Roger Colbran

Supporting information

Supplementary figures
mmc1.pdf (510.6KB, pdf)

References

  • 1.Foskett J.K., White C., Cheung K.H., Mak D.O. Inositol trisphosphate receptor Ca2+ release channels. Physiol. Rev. 2007;87:593–658. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00035.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Alzayady K.J., Wang L., Chandrasekhar R., Wagner L.E., 2nd, Van Petegem F., Yule D.I. Defining the stoichiometry of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate binding required to initiate Ca2+ release. Sci. Signal. 2016;9:ra35. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aad6281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Prole D.L., Taylor C.W. Structure and function of IP3 receptors. Cold Spring Harb. Persp. Biol. 2019;11:a035063. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a035063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Parker I., Smith I.F. Recording single-channel activity of inositol trisphosphate receptors in intact cells with a microscope, not a patch clamp. J. Gen. Physiol. 2010;136:119–127. doi: 10.1085/jgp.200910390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Smith I.F., Wiltgen S.M., Shuai J., Parker I. Ca2+ puffs originate from preestablished stable clusters of inositol trisphosphate receptors. Sci. Signal. 2009;2:ra77. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2000466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Keebler M.V., Taylor C.W. Endogenous signalling pathways and caged-IP3 evoke Ca2+ puffs at the same abundant immobile intracellular sites. J. Cell Sci. 2017;130:3728–3739. doi: 10.1242/jcs.208520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Thillaiappan N.B., Chavda A.P., Tovey S.C., Prole D.L., Taylor C.W. Ca2+ signals initiate at immobile IP3 receptors adjacent to ER-plasma membrane junctions. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:1505. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01644-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Thillaiappan N.B., Smith H.A., Atakpa-Adaji P., Taylor C.W. KRAP tethers IP3 receptors to actin and licenses them to evoke cytosolic Ca2+ signals. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:4514. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24739-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lock J.T., Smith I.F., Parker I. Comparison of Ca2+ puffs evoked by extracellular agonists and photoreleased IP3. Cell Calcium. 2017;63:43–47. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2016.11.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lock J.T., Parker I. IP3-mediated global Ca2+ signals arise through two temporally and spatially distinct modes of Ca2+ release. eLife. 2020;9 doi: 10.7554/eLife.55008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bezprozvanny I., Watras J., Ehrlich B.E. Bell-shaped calcium-response curves for Ins(1,4,5)P3- and calcium-gated channels from endoplasmic reticulum of cerebellum. Nature. 1991;351:751–754. doi: 10.1038/351751a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Vais H., Foskett J.K., Ullah G., Pearson J.E., Daniel Mak D.O. Permeant calcium ion feed-through regulation of single inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor channel gating. J. Gen. Physiol. 2012;140:697–716. doi: 10.1085/jgp.201210804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Shuai J., Parker I. Optical single-channel recording by imaging Ca2+ flux through individual ion channels: theoretical considerations and limits to resolution. Cell Calcium. 2005;37:283–299. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2004.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bentele K., Falcke M. Quasi-steady approximation for ion channel currents. Biophys. J. 2007;93:2597–2608. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.104299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wiltgen S.M., Dickinson G.D., Swaminathan D., Parker I. Termination of calcium puffs and coupled closings of inositol trisphosphate receptor channels. Cell Calcium. 2014;56:157–168. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2014.06.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Vais H., Wang M., Mallilankaraman K., Payne R., McKennan C., Lock J.T., et al. ER-luminal [Ca2+] regulation of InsP3 receptor gating mediated by an ER-luminal peripheral Ca2+-binding protein. eLife. 2020;9 doi: 10.7554/eLife.53531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rossi A.M., Riley A.M., Dupont G., Rahman T., Potter B.V.L., Taylor C.W. Quantal Ca2+ release mediated by very few IP3 receptors that rapidly inactivate allows graded responses to IP3. Cell Rep. 2021;37 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Taylor C.W., Tovey S.C. IP3 receptors: toward understanding their activation. Cold Spring Harb. Persp. Biol. 2012;2:a004010. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a004010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Marchant J.S., Taylor C.W. Cooperative activation of IP3 receptors by sequential binding of IP3 and Ca2+ safeguards against spontaneous activity. Curr. Biol. 1997;7:510–518. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(06)00222-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Adkins C.E., Taylor C.W. Lateral inhibition of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors by cytosolic Ca2+ Curr. Biol. 1999;9:1115–1118. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(99)80481-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mataragka S., Taylor C.W. All three IP3 receptor subtypes generate Ca2+ puffs, the universal building blocks of IP3-evoked Ca2+ signals. J. Cell Sci. 2018;131:jcs220848. doi: 10.1242/jcs.220848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lock J.T., Alzayady K.J., Yule D.I., Parker I. All three IP3 receptor isoforms generate Ca2+ puffs that display similar characteristics. Sci. Signal. 2018;11 doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aau0344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Paknejad N., Hite R.K. Structural basis for the regulation of inositol trisphosphate receptors by Ca2+ and IP3. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2018;25:660–668. doi: 10.1038/s41594-018-0089-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Azumaya C.M., Linton E.A., Risener C.J., Nakagawa T., Karakas E. Cryo-EM structure of human type-3 inositol triphosphate receptor reveals the presence of a self-binding peptide that acts as an antagonist. J. Biol. Chem. 2020;295:1743–1753. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.011570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Schmitz E.A., Takahashi H., Karakas E. Structural basis for activation and gating of IP3 receptors. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:1408. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29073-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Liss V., Barlag B., Nietschke M., Hensel M. Self-labelling enzymes as universal tags for fluorescence microscopy, super-resolution microscopy and electron microscopy. Sci. Rep. 2015;5 doi: 10.1038/srep17740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lagos-Cabre R., Ivanova A., Taylor C.W. Ca2+ release by IP3 receptors is required to orient the mitotic spindle. Cell Rep. 2020;33 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lock J.T., Smith I.F., Parker I. Spatial-temporal patterning of Ca2+ signals by the subcellular distribution of IP3 and IP3 receptors. Sem. Cell Dev. Biol. 2019;94:3–10. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2019.01.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Dellis O., Rossi A.M., Dedos S.G., Taylor C.W. Counting functional IP3 receptors into the plasma membrane. J. Biol. Chem. 2008;283:751–755. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M706960200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Iwai M., Michikawa T., Bosanac I., Ikura M., Mikoshiba K. Molecular basis of the isoform-specific ligand-binding affinity of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:12755–12764. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M609833200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mak D.O., Pearson J.E., Loong K.P., Datta S., Fernandez-Mongil M., Foskett J.K. Rapid ligand-regulated gating kinetics of single inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor Ca2+ release channels. EMBO Rep. 2007;8:1044–1051. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7401087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Keppler A., Gendreizig S., Gronemeyer T., Pick H., Vogel H., Johnsson K. A general method for the covalent labeling of fusion proteins with small molecules in vivo. Nat. Biotechnol. 2003;21:86–89. doi: 10.1038/nbt765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Schindelin J., Arganda-Carreras I., Frise E., Kaynig V., Longair M., Pietzsch T., et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Met. 2012;9:676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bolte S., Cordelieres F.P. A guided tour into subcellular colocalization analysis in light microscopy. J. Microsc. 2006;224:213–232. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2006.01706.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Costes S.V., Daelemans D., Cho E.H., Dobbin Z., Pavlakis G., Lockett S. Automatic and quantitative measurement of protein-protein colocalization in live cells. Biophys. J. 2004;86:3993–4003. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.103.038422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Tinevez J.Y., Perry N., Schindelin J., Hoopes G.M., Reynolds G.D., Laplantine E., et al. TrackMate: an open and extensible platform for single-particle tracking. Methods. 2017;115:80–90. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.09.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wiltgen S.M., Smith I.F., Parker I. Superresolution localization of single functional IP3R channels utilizing Ca2+ flux as a readout. Biophys. J. 2010;99:437–446. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.04.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Smith I.F., Wiltgen S.M., Parker I. Localization of puff sites adjacent to the plasma membrane: functional and spatial characterization of Ca2+ signaling in SH-SY5Y cells utilizing membrane-permeant caged IP3. Cell Calcium. 2009;45:65–76. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2008.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ellefsen K.L., Settle B., Parker I., Smith I.F. An algorithm for automated detection, localization and measurement of local calcium signals from camera-based imaging. Cell Calcium. 2014;56:147–156. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2014.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ellefsen K.L., Lock J.T., Settle B., Karsten C.A., Parker I. Applications of FLIKA, a Python-based image processing and analysis platform, for studying local events of cellular calcium signaling. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2019;1866:1171–1179. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2018.11.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Rodriguez A., Laio A. Machine learning. Clustering by fast search and find of density peaks. Science. 2014;344:1492–1496. doi: 10.1126/science.1242072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Marcon Y. MATLAB Central File Exchange; 2021. Distance-Based Clustering of a set of XY Coordinates. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary figures
mmc1.pdf (510.6KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

All data required to support the conclusions presented are contained with the article.


Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES