ABSTRACT
Botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) has been widely used in several urological functional disorders including neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO), overactive bladder (OAB), lower urinary tract dysfunction, and interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS). Chronic inflammation is found in a large proportion of patients with OAB and IC/BPS. The chronic inflammation activates sensory afferents which resulting in central sensitization and bladder storage symptoms. Because BoNT-A can inhibit the sensory peptides released from the vesicles in sensory nerve terminals, the inflammation can be reduced and symptom subsided. Previous studies have demonstrated that the quality of life improved after BoNT-A injections, both in neurogenic and non-NDO. Although the use of BoNT-A in treatment of IC/BPS has not been approved by FDA, intravesical BoNT-A injection has been included in the AUA guideline as the fourth line therapy. Generally, intravesical injections of BoNT-A are well tolerated, though transient hematuria and urinary tract infection can occur after the procedure. In order to prevent these adverse events, experimental trials have been conducted to test if BoNT-A can be delivered into the bladder wall without intravesical injection under anesthesia such as using liposomes encapsulated BoNT-A or application of low energy shock wave on the bladder to facilitate BoNT-A penetrating across the urothelium and treat OAB or IC/BPS. This article reviews current clinical and basic researches of BoNT-A on OAB and IC/BPS.
KEYWORDS: Botulinum toxin, Interstitial cystitis, Overactive bladder
INTRODUCTION
The clinical applications of botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) in Urology included (1) neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO), (2) refractory idiopathic overactive bladder (OAB), (3) interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS), (4) lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia or primary bladder neck obstruction, (5) chronic pelvic pain syndrome, and (6) neurogenic or nonneurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction in children. This review article will focus on the applications in OAB and IC/BPS.
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF UROTHELIAL DYSFUNCTION IN OVERACTIVE BLADDER AND INTERSTITIAL CYSTITIS/BLADDER PAIN SYNDROME
The bladder epithelium, known as urothelium, provides passive barrier to prevent absorption of urine and its content. Recent evidence suggests the urothelium might be a responsive organ with sensory and transducer functions [1]. Bladder sensation can be transmitted by the myelinated A-d nerves and unmyelinated C-fibers. Many C-fibers in the bladder urothelium contain sensory neuropeptides which can modulate the micturition reflex and cause detrusor overactivity (DO) [2].
Chronic inflammation is found in a large proportion of patients with OAB and IC/BPS [3]. Chronic inflammation leads to increase of urothelial cell apoptosis, lower adhesive protein E-cadherin, and lower tight junction protein zonula occludens-1 expression [4]. The chronic inflammatiZ:\02-Medknow_XML\03-Despatch\2023\JATS\IJC\AOP\18on in the IC/BPS bladders also inhibits the basal cell proliferation, causing defective apical cell maturation and impaired barrier function [5]. In order to abolish the inflammation and restore normal sensory and motor function, BoNT-A has been used to treat OAB and IC/BPS [6].
MECHANISM OF BOTULINUM TOXIN A ON OVERACTIVE BLADDER AND INTERSTITIAL CYSTITIS/BLADDER PAIN SYNDROME
The action of BoNT-A is initiated by the heavy chain of BoNT-A binding to the SV2 on the neuronal surface and internalization of toxin in the nerve terminal [7]. The light chain of BoNT-A cleaves synaptosome-associated protein 25 (SNAP-25) and inhibits signal transmission by disrupting the fusion of neurotransmitter-containing vesicles. BoNT-A also alters the release of adenosine triphosphate (ATP), neurotrophins, and nitric oxide (NO) in the urothelium. In patients who responded to BoNT-A injection or liposome encapsulated BoNT-A (lipotoxin) instillation, immunohistochemistry staining showed the presence of cleaved SNAP-25 and decrease of purinergic receptors P2 ×3 in the bladder urothelium [8-10].
After BoNT-A injection in patients with OAB and IC/BPS, previous studies have shown effective improvement of bladder storage symptoms with reduction of urinary nerve growth factor (NGF) levels [11-13]. BoNT-A can inhibit COX-2 and EP4 expressions in the bladder tissue and block inflammation and overactivity [14]. Moreover, BoNT-A has a neuromodulatory or anti-inflammatory effect, resulting in long-term sensory effect, possibly through central nervous system desensitization [15].
After BoNT-A injection, the release of acetylcholine from parasympathetic nerves is blocked [9,16]. In humans with NDO, the bladder muscarinic receptors M2 and M3 and purinergic receptors P2X2 and P2X3 are reduced after detrusor BoNT-A injections. The BoNT-A effect on inhibiting DO is acting through the inhibition of both the sensory and motor arms of the micturition reflex [17]. Therefore, the bladder capacity increases and voiding pressure decreases after BoNT-A injection. The bladder wall is very thin, if the injecting needle is inserted too deep, BoNT-A could be injected outside the bladder wall. Therefore, suburothelial BoNT-A injection might be a better administrating route to deliver BoNT-A into the bladder wall, and ensure all the BoNT-A solution can be kept in the bladder wall [18].
THERAPEUTIC EFFECTS OF BOTULINUM TOXIN A ON OVERACTIVE BLADDER
OAB is often managed from behavioral therapy and oral pharmacotherapy, if failed, the refractory OAB will be treated with 3rd line or 4th line invasive therapy [19,20]. Currently, about 70% of OAB can be adequately treated by combined oral medications such as antimuscarinics plus mirabegron [21]. For refractory OAB, we should consider systemic etiology, neurogenic factors, or bladder outlet obstruction at the bladder neck. A video urodynamic study can find out occult bladder outlet obstruction in OAB patients with small prostate and refractory to medical treatment [Figure 1]. Patients might also have a tight bladder neck and urethral sphincter and bladder diverticulum [22].
Previous studies have demonstrated that the quality of life improved after BoNT-A injections, both in neurogenic and nonneurogenic DO [23]. However, therapeutic effect would decrease gradually with time, at 6–9 months after the prior treatment, repeat BoNT-A injection is necessary to maintain the therapeutic efficacy [24]. BoNT-A injection can also reduce bladder urgency frequency sensation. Intravesical injection of BoNT-A can effectively block ATP as well as acetylcholine (Ach) release, which is postulated to ameliorate acute pain and urgency sensation [25]. BoNT-A significantly inhibits the release of ATP and neurotrophins from urothelial cells and increased release of NO [9,10]. Reduction of urgency severity is associated with long-term therapeutic effect after intravesical BoNT-A injection for OAB [15]. OAB patients with a greater improvement in urgency severity score are associated with a higher global assessment response after BoNT-A injection, indicating the importance of sensory effect on the treatment outcome of OAB [15].
For OAB treatment, BoNT-A can be injected in different option: (1) injecting in the suburothelium or detrusor muscle at twenty sites of bladder body, with or without including trigone; (2) injecting at forty sites to cover the whole bladder wall, or (3) injecting at the trigone alone [25] [Figure 2]. Injecting at trigone has similar therapeutic effect as bladder body but carries a less risk of large postvoid residual (PVR) volume and acute urinary retention (AUR) [26]. However, the therapeutic effect of BoNT-A injection at bladder base (the area above interureteric ridge) is a little inferior to that of bladder body injection [27]. After several clinical trials and double-blind, dose-ranging trials, the results suggested that 100 U BoNT-A is the dose that has best balanced benefits with safety in general OAB patients [28].
Several phase 3 clinical trials of BoNT-A on OAB patients confirm the safety and efficacy of this treatment, and 100 U BoNT-A is the optimal dose for OAB. An European randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial revealed that BoNT-A 100 U was well tolerated and demonstrated significant and clinically relevant improvements in all OAB symptoms, patient-reported benefit, and health-related quality of life in patients inadequately managed by anticholinergics [29]. The EMBARK Study Group demonstrated BoNT-A 100 U showed significant, clinically relevant improvement in all OAB symptoms and health-related quality of life in patients inadequately treated with anticholinergics and was well tolerated [30]. Herschorn et al. also showed that BoNT-A had significantly greater decreases in urinary incontinence than solifenacin with a third of patients achieving a 100% incontinence reduction [31]. Long-term BoNT-A treatment consistently decreased OAB symptoms and improved quality of life with no new safety signals [32].
In OAB patients with urinary incontinence, BoNT-A 100U demonstrated significant improvements across the individual domains of the quality of life questionnaires, regardless of clean intermittent catheterization [CIC]) or urinary tract infection (UTI) status and provided a positive impact on practical aspects of patients’ daily lives [33]. However, the efficacy of intravesical BoNT-A injection for detrusor hyperactivity and impaired contractility (DHIC) patients was limited and short term [34]. Nevertheless, the adverse events do not increase in DHIC after BoNT-A injection. Intravesical BoNT-A might not be a good indication in patients with DHIC and high PVR volume. Physicians should inform patients of the potential benefits and risks of BoNT-A injection for treatment of DHIC.
Repeated BoNT-A injections for refractory OAB are safe and effective. The most common reasons for discontinuing medication were poor efficacy and CIC-related issues [35]. However, large PVR volume and dysuria after BoNT-A injection remain the most bothersome adverse events in OAB patients. The maximum effects occur at 1–2 months; then the voiding efficiency (defined by the percentage of voided volume in total bladder capacity) will gradually return [36]. Patients planned for BoNT-A injection should be informed about this possible treatment result in advance [36]. In case, patients had PVR larger than 200 mL, CIC might be necessary to avoid subsequent UTI. Frail elderly patients are more vulnerable to experiencing complications. Around 60% of the frail elderly patients had PVR >150 mL and 11% of the patients had AUR after BoNT-A treatment. Catheter indwelling or CIC may be needed more frequently in the frail elderly after BoNT-A injection for OAB. We also observed that the cumulative success rate was significantly lower in the frail OAB elderly [37].
THERAPEUTIC EFFECTS OF BOTULINUM TOXIN A ON INTERSTITIAL CYSTITIS/BLADDER PAIN SYNDROME
Although the use of BoNT-A in treatment of IC/BPS has not been approved by FDA, intravesical BoNT-A injection has been included in the AUA guideline as the 4th line therapy [38]. Intradetrusor BoNT-A may be administered if other treatments fail to provide adequate symptom control and quality of life improvement. However, patients must be willing to accept the possible consequence that CIC is necessary after BoNT-A treatment [38]. After BoNT-A injection, bladder pain reduction and functional and cystoscopic bladder capacities increased are noted. Pain, frequency episodes, and symptom scores improved and the effects remained in more than 50% of patients for 9 months. Significantly, better success rate was achieved in IC/BPS patients who received repeated injections of 100 U BoNT-A for 3–4 times every 6 months than that in patients treated with single BoNT-A injection [39-41].
In the pathophysiology studies, BoNT-A can block the transient receptor potential vanilloid receptor subtype 1 (TRPV1) trafficking to the membrane during bladder inflammation and inhibit the inflammatory sensitization of TRPV1 [42]. Intravesical BoNT-A injections could reduce both urinary NGF and brain-derived neurotrophins levels in IC/BPS patients and render an analgesic effect [11]. BoNT-A administration to the rat bladder can also decrease the amount of spinal cord C-fos protein expression due to chronic bladder inflammation, suggesting BoNT-A can have an anti-inflammatory effect [43,44].
The urothelium of patients with IC/BPS might be in a status of persistent or chronic inflammation and injury that may relate to the limited expression of cell proliferation proteins [45]. In electron microscopic findings, significant urothelial defects in the umbrella cells were noted, defects of umbrella cells may play an important role in the pathogenesis of IC/BPS [46] [Figure 3]. Previous animal and human bladder studies have shown that BoNT-A injection can reduce the expressions of P2X3, CGRP, TRPV1 from the sensory nerves, indicating BoNT-A can inhibit the releases of these neuropeptides mediating pain and urgency sensation [47,48].
Early clinical study demonstrated BoNT-A injection plus hydrodistention can reduce bladder pain and improve IC symptoms. NGF mRNA levels were reduced in the responders versus nonresponders and in patients with reduced versus nonreduced pain visual analog scale, after BoNT-A injection [11]. Our previous study had demonstrated that the dose of 100 U BoNT-A is adequate to achieve symptomatic improvement. Although 200 U BoNT-A seems to be more effective, the adverse effect of difficulty in urination and urine retention might be a problem to be solved [39]. Based on this study, we prefer to treat IC/BPS with 100 U BoNT-A.
After BoNT-A treatment, the apoptotic cells and the activation of mast cells decreased after repeat BoNT-A injections [6] [Figure 4]. The proliferative markers Ki-67 and adhesive protein E-cadherin increased after repeated intravesical BoNT-A injections [6]. The apoptotic markers Bax and p-p38 expressions were downregulated in the patients who underwent three repeated intravesical BoNT-A injections and had symptomatic improvement [6]. Under cystoscopic hydrodistention, improvement of MBC, and glomerulations grade are noted after repeated intravesical BoNT-A injections [49].
The cumulative success rates of the patients receiving single injection or different numbers of repeated BoNT-A injections revealed that patients who received 3 or 4 repeat BoNT-A injections had better success rate than single injection [41] [Figure 5]. However, we found the BoNT-A effect on Hunner’s IC is limited. Several clinical trials confirmed the efficacy and safety of BoNT-A injection in IC/BPS. A prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial revealed 100 U of BoNT-A effectively reduced bladder pain symptoms in patients with IC/BPS, with acceptable adverse events [50]. Pinto et al. also showed that BoNT-A 100 U caused significant and clinically relevant improvements in bladder pain and quality of life in patients with IC/BPS refractory to common therapy, and the treatment was well tolerated [51]. A recent systematic review with meta-analysis revealed BoNT-A intravesical injections significantly improve some of the most relevant symptoms affecting IC/BPS patients [52].
ADVERSE EFFECTS OF BOTULINUM TOXIN A ON OVERACTIVE BLADDER AND INTERSTITIAL CYSTITIS/BLADDER PAIN SYNDROME
Regarding the adverse effects of BoNT-A on OAB and IC/BPS, the dose-dependent occurrence of UTI is the most bothersome adverse events [53], with occasional report of de novo urinary retention [54]. Autonomic dysreflexia after BoNT-A injection might occur in neurogenic DO due to spinal cord injury but rarely in patients with OAB or IC/BPS [55]. The risk factors for increasing adverse events after BoNT-A injection for DO include male gender, baseline PVR volume ≥100 mL, comorbidity, and BoNT-A dose >100 U [36]. Interestingly, these adverse events are more frequently occurred in OAB than IC/BPS patients. Elderly patients with OAB may have an increased risk of large PVR volume and a lower long-term success rate after BoNT-A injection [37]. Generally, intravesical injections of BoNT-A are well tolerated, though transient hematuria and UTI can occur after the procedure. Systemic reactions after local injections are rarely reported. Generalized paralysis has never been reported. Nevertheless, there are some reports describing a transient, mild muscular weakness in the upper limbs after BoNT-A injection [56].
FUTURE PERSPECTIVES OF BOTULINUM TOXIN A THERAPY OF OVERACTIVE BLADDER AND INTERSTITIAL CYSTITIS/BLADDER PAIN SYNDROME
In order to prevent these adverse events, experimental trials have been conducted to test if BoNT-A protein can be delivered into the bladder wall without injection under anesthesia. Animal study demonstrated liposomes have the ability to carry BoNT-A molecules across the urothelial barrier [57]. A pilot multicenter trial confirmed intravesical instillation of mixed 80 mg liposomes and 200 U BoNT-A significantly decreased daily frequency and urgency episodes in patients with OAB, without an increase in PVR or risk of UTI. Only 50% of OAB patients responded to treatment and the effect on urgency urinary incontinence was limited in short-term follow-up [58].
Our recent study also showed BoNT-A instillation plus low energy show wave therapy applied on the bladder of IC/BPS patients could decrease bladder pain symptom [59]. Immunohistochemistry staining demonstrated the presence of cleaved SNAP-25 in the bladder mucosa, indicating BoNT-A molecules could penetrate across the urothelium after low energy shock wave applications on the bladder [60]. If the treatment is effective, this administration might replace the BoNT-A injection to treat OAB or IC/BPS.
CONCLUSIONS
BoNT-A suppresses DO and modulates sensory function, inflammation, and glandular function. Patients may experience less urgency and urinary incontinence, which are associated with a better quality of life. Adverse events such as large PVR, AUR, and UTI are common, patients must be well informed before treatment. In frail patients and DHIC, BoNT-A injection should be performed carefully to prevent AUR and subsequent UTI. Clinical trials of BoNT-A for IC/BPS have shown promising therapeutic effects in reducing bladder pain. Decrease of inflammation and apoptosis, improvement of barrier protein, and proliferation protein expressions were noted after BoNT-A treatment. Patients might have symptom relapsed after BoNT-A injection. Therefore, repeated injections provided a longer therapeutic duration.
Financial support and sponsorship
This study was supported by the grant of Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Grant TCMMP109-02-01.
Conflicts of interest
Dr. Yuan-Hong Jiang and Hann-Chorng Kuo, the editorial board member at Tzu Chi Medical Journal, had no role in the peer review process of or decision to publish this article. The other author declared no conflicts of interest in writing this paper.
REFERENCES
- 1.Birder L. Role of the urothelium in bladder function. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 2004;215:48–53. doi: 10.1080/03008880410015165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Khera M, Somogyi GT, Kiss S, Boone TB, Smith CP. Botulinum toxin A inhibits ATP release from bladder urothelium after chronic spinal cord injury. Neurochem Int. 2004;45:987–93. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2004.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Apostolidis A, Jacques TS, Freeman A, Kalsi V, Popat R, Gonzales G, et al. Histological changes in the urothelium and suburothelium of human overactive bladder following intradetrusor injections of botulinum neurotoxin type A for the treatment of neurogenic or idiopathic detrusor overactivity. Eur Urol. 2008;53:1245–53. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.02.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Shie JH, Kuo HC. Higher levels of cell apoptosis and abnormal E-cadherin expression in the urothelium are associated with inflammation in patients with interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome. BJU Int. 2011;108:E136–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09911.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shie JH, Liu HT, Kuo HC. Increased cell apoptosis of urothelium mediated by inflammation in interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome. Urology. 2012;79:13.e7–13. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.09.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shie JH, Liu HT, Wang YS, Kuo HC. Immunohistochemical evidence suggests repeated intravesical application of botulinum toxin A injections may improve treatment efficacy of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome. BJU Int. 2013;111:638–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11466.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jiang YH, Liao CH, Kuo HC. Current and potential urological applications of botulinum toxin A. Nat Rev Urol. 2015;12:519–33. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2015.193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dong M, Yeh F, Tepp WH, Dean C, Johnson EA, Janz R, et al. SV2 is the protein receptor for botulinum neurotoxin A. Science. 2006;312:592–6. doi: 10.1126/science.1123654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cruz F. Targets for botulinum toxin in the lower urinary tract. Neurourol Urodyn. 2014;33:31–8. doi: 10.1002/nau.22445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Smith CP, Gangitano DA, Munoz A, Salas NA, Boone TB, Aoki KR, et al. Botulinum toxin type A normalizes alterations in urothelial ATP and NO release induced by chronic spinal cord injury. Neurochem Int. 2008;52:1068–75. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2007.11.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Liu HT, Kuo HC. Intravesical botulinum toxin A injections plus hydrodistension can reduce nerve growth factor production and control bladder pain in interstitial cystitis. Urology. 2007;70:463–8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.04.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Liu HT, Chancellor MB, Kuo HC. Urinary nerve growth factor levels are elevated in patients with detrusor overactivity and decreased in responders to detrusor botulinum toxin-A injection. Eur Urol. 2009;56:700–6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.04.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Liu HT, Kuo HC. Urinary nerve growth factor level could be a potential biomarker for diagnosis of overactive bladder. J Urol. 2008;179:2270–4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chuang YC, Yoshimura N, Huang CC, Wu M, Chiang PH, Chancellor MB. Intravesical botulinum toxin A administration inhibits COX-2 and EP4 expression and suppresses bladder hyperactivity in cyclophosphamide-induced cystitis in rats. Eur Urol. 2009;56:159–66. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kuo HC. Reduction of urgency severity is associated with long-term therapeutic effect after intravesical onabotulinumtoxin A injection for idiopathic detrusor overactivity. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011;30:1497–502. doi: 10.1002/nau.21132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kanai A, Zabbarova I, Oefelein M, Radziszewski P, Ikeda U, Andersson KE. Mechanisms of action of botulinum neurotoxins, β3-adrenergic receptor agonists, and PDE5 inhibitors in modulating detrusor function in overactive bladders: ICI-RS 2011. Neurourol Urodyn. 2012;31:300–8. doi: 10.1002/nau.21246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Schulte-Baukloh H, Priefert J, Knispel HH, Lawrence GW, Miller K, Neuhaus J. Botulinum toxin A detrusor injections reduce postsynaptic muscular M2, M3, P2X2, and P2X3 receptors in children and adolescents who have neurogenic detrusor overactivity: A single-blind study. Urology. 2013;81:1052–7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.12.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kuo HC. Clinical effects of suburothelial injection of botulinum A toxin on patients with nonneurogenic detrusor overactivity refractory to anticholinergics. Urology. 2005;66:94–8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wagg A, Cardozo L, Chapple C, Diaz DC, de Ridder D, Espuna-Pons M, et al. Overactive bladder and continence guidelines: Implementation, inaction or frustration? Int J Clin Pract. 2008;62:1588–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01870.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lightner DJ, Gomelsky A, Souter L, Vasavada SP. Diagnosis and treatment of overactive bladder (non-neurogenic) in adults: AUA/SUFU guideline amendment 2019. J Urol. 2019;202:558–63. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kuo HC. How to choose appropriate medication for overactive bladder – Findings from the largest integrated clinical trial database analysis of mirabegron studies. Tzu Chi Med J. 2022;34:23–8. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_167_20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kuo HC. Videourodynamic precision diagnosis and treatment of female lower urinary tract symptoms. Urol Sci. 2021;32:94–101. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kalsi V, Apostolidis A, Popat R, Gonzales G, Fowler CJ, Dasgupta P. Quality of life changes in patients with neurogenic versus idiopathic detrusor overactivity after intradetrusor injections of botulinum neurotoxin type A and correlations with lower urinary tract symptoms and urodynamic changes. Eur Urol. 2006;49:528–35. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Grosse J, Kramer G, Stöhrer M. Success of repeat detrusor injections of botulinum a toxin in patients with severe neurogenic detrusor overactivity and incontinence. Eur Urol. 2005;47:653–9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lawrence GW, Aoki KR, Dolly JO. Excitatory cholinergic and purinergic signaling in bladder are equally susceptible to botulinum neurotoxin a consistent with co-release of transmitters from efferent fibers. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2010;334:1080–6. doi: 10.1124/jpet.110.169342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kuo HC. Bladder base/trigone injection is safe and as effective as bladder body injection of onabotulinumtoxinA for idiopathic detrusor overactivity refractory to antimuscarinics. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011;30:1242–8. doi: 10.1002/nau.21054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kuo HC. Comparison of effectiveness of detrusor, suburothelial and bladder base injections of botulinum toxin a for idiopathic detrusor overactivity. J Urol. 2007;178:1359–63. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Dmochowski R, Chapple C, Nitti VW, Chancellor M, Everaert K, Thompson C, et al. Efficacy and safety of onabotulinumtoxinA for idiopathic overactive bladder: A double-blind, placebo controlled, randomized, dose ranging trial. J Urol. 2010;184:2416–22. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.08.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Chapple C, Sievert KD, MacDiarmid S, Khullar V, Radziszewski P, Nardo C, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U significantly improves all idiopathic overactive bladder symptoms and quality of life in patients with overactive bladder and urinary incontinence: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Eur Urol. 2013;64:249–56. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nitti VW, Dmochowski R, Herschorn S, Sand P, Thompson C, Nardo C, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of patients with overactive bladder and urinary incontinence: Results of a phase 3, randomized, placebo controlled trial. J Urol. 2017;197:S216–23. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.10.109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Herschorn S, Kohan A, Aliotta P, McCammon K, Sriram R, Abrams S, et al. The efficacy and safety of onabotulinumtoxinA or solifenacin compared with placebo in solifenacin naïve patients with refractory overactive bladder: Results from a multicenter, randomized, double-blind phase 3b trial. J Urol. 2017;198:167–75. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Nitti VW, Ginsberg D, Sievert KD, Sussman D, Radomski S, Sand P, et al. Durable efficacy and safety of long-term onabotulinumtoxinA treatment in patients with overactive bladder syndrome: Final results of a 3.5-year study. J Urol. 2016;196:791–800. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.03.146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Everaert K, Gruenenfelder J, Schulte-Baukloh H, Egerdie RB, Khalaf K, Joshi M, et al. Impact of onabotulinumtoxinA on quality of life and practical aspects of daily living: A pooled analysis of two randomized controlled trials. Int J Urol. 2015;22:1131–7. doi: 10.1111/iju.12912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wang CC, Lee CL, Kuo HC. Efficacy and safety of intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injection in patients with detrusor hyperactivity and impaired contractility. Toxins (Basel) 2016;8:82. doi: 10.3390/toxins8030082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Dowson C, Watkins J, Khan MS, Dasgupta P, Sahai A. Repeated botulinum toxin type A injections for refractory overactive bladder: Medium-term outcomes, safety profile, and discontinuation rates. Eur Urol. 2012;61:834–9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kuo HC, Liao CH, Chung SD. Adverse events of intravesical botulinum toxin a injections for idiopathic detrusor overactivity: Risk factors and influence on treatment outcome. Eur Urol. 2010;58:919–26. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Liao CH, Kuo HC. Increased risk of large post-void residual urine and decreased long-term success rate after intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injection for refractory idiopathic detrusor overactivity. J Urol. 2013;189:1804–10. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hanno PM, Erickson D, Moldwin R, Faraday MM American Urological Association. Diagnosis and treatment of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome: AUA guideline amendment. J Urol. 2015;193:1545–53. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kuo HC, Chancellor MB. Comparison of intravesical botulinum toxin type A injections plus hydrodistention with hydrodistention alone for the treatment of refractory interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome. BJU Int. 2009;104:657–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08495.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Pinto R, Lopes T, Frias B, Silva A, Silva JA, Silva CM, et al. Trigonal injection of botulinum toxin A in patients with refractory bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis. Eur Urol. 2010;58:360–5. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.02.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kuo HC. Repeated onabotulinumtoxin-A injections provide better results than single injection in treatment of painful bladder syndrome. Pain Physician. 2013;16:E15–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Yiangou Y, Facer P, Ford A, Brady C, Wiseman O, Fowler CJ, et al. Capsaicin receptor VR1 and ATP-gated ion channel P2X3 in human urinary bladder. BJU Int. 2001;87:774–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2001.02190.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Pinto R, Lopes T, Silva J, Silva C, Dinis P, Cruz F. Persistent therapeutic effect of repeated injections of onabotulinum toxin a in refractory bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis. J Urol. 2013;189:548–53. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Vemulakonda VM, Somogyi GT, Kiss S, Salas NA, Boone TB, Smith CP. Inhibitory effect of intravesically applied botulinum toxin A in chronic bladder inflammation. J Urol. 2005;173:621–4. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000143189.19835.f3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Jhang JF, Jiang YH, Hsu YH, Ho HC, Kuo HC. Decreased urothelial cytoskeleton and cell proliferation protein expression suggest interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome patients with Hunner's lesion and grade 3 glomerulation might be different from the other type patients. Int J Urol. 2021;28:823–30. doi: 10.1111/iju.14585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Jhang JF, Ho HC, Jiang YH, Lee CL, Hsu YH, Kuo HC. Electron microscopic characteristics of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome and their association with clinical condition. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0198816. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Apostolidis A, Popat R, Yiangou Y, Dasgupta P, Anand P, Fowler CJ. A possible explanation for the exceptional efficacy of botulinum toxin treatment for detrusor overactivity. Neurourol Urodyn. 2004;23:608. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Chuang YC, Yoshimura N, Huang CC, Chiang PH, Chancellor MB. Intravesical botulinum toxin a administration produces analgesia against acetic acid induced bladder pain responses in rats. J Urol. 2004;172:1529–32. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000137844.77524.97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kuo HC. Repeated intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injections are effective in treatment of refractory interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome. Int J Clin Pract. 2013;67:427–34. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kuo HC, Jiang YH, Tsai YC, Kuo YC. Intravesical botulinum toxin-A injections reduce bladder pain of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome refractory to conventional treatment –A prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35:609–14. doi: 10.1002/nau.22760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Pinto RA, Costa D, Morgado A, Pereira P, Charrua A, Silva J, et al. Intratrigonal onabotulinumtoxinA improves bladder symptoms and quality of life in patients with bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis: A pilot, single center, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial. J Urol. 2018;199:998–1003. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.10.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Giannantoni A, Gubbiotti M, Bini V. Botulinum neurotoxin A intravesical injections in interstitial cystitis/bladder painful syndrome: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Toxins (Basel) 2019;11:510. doi: 10.3390/toxins11090510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ginsberg D, Gousse A, Keppenne V, Sievert KD, Thompson C, Lam W, et al. Phase 3 efficacy and tolerability study of onabotulinumtoxinA for urinary incontinence from neurogenic detrusor overactivity. J Urol. 2012;187:2131–9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.01.125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kuo HC. Therapeutic satisfaction and dissatisfaction in patients with spinal cord lesions and detrusor sphincter dyssynergia who received detrusor botulinum toxin a injection. Urology. 2008;72:1056–60. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.04.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.MacDonald R, Fink HA, Huckabay C, Monga M, Wilt TJ. Botulinum toxin for treatment of urinary incontinence due to detrusor overactivity: A systematic review of effectiveness and adverse effects. Spinal Cord. 2007;45:535–41. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3102070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Apostolidis A, Papaefstathiou E, Gatsos S. Intravesical botox for overactive bladder: How to minimize complications and manage failures. Curr Drug Targets. 2020;21:1527–36. doi: 10.2174/1389450121666200621194732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Chuang YC, Tyagi P, Huang CC, Yoshimura N, Wu M, Kaufman J, et al. Urodynamic and immunohistochemical evaluation of intravesical botulinum toxin A delivery using liposomes. J Urol. 2009;182:786–92. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.03.083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Kuo HC, Liu HT, Chuang YC, Birder LA, Chancellor MB. Pilot study of liposome-encapsulated onabotulinumtoxinA for patients with overactive bladder: A single-center study. Eur Urol. 2014;65:1117–24. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Chuang YC, Kaufmann JH, Chancellor DD, Chancellor MB, Kuo HC. Bladder instillation of liposome encapsulated onabotulinumtoxinA improves overactive bladder symptoms: A prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial. J Urol. 2014;192:1743–9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Jhang JF, Kuo HC. Novel applications of non-invasive intravesical botulinum toxin a delivery in the treatment of functional bladder disorders. Toxins (Basel) 2021;13:359. doi: 10.3390/toxins13050359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]