Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2023 Jan 29;15(1):e34324. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34324

Extended Scalp Reconstruction With a Free Supraclavicular Graft: A Case Report

Chrysoula Vardaxi 1, Paraskevi Karamitsou 1, James Philip Skliris 2, Spyridon Gougousis 1, Alexandros Poutoglidis 1,
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC9974017  PMID: 36865971

Abstract

Skin restoration after tumor excision, trauma, or burns may be achieved with full or split-thickness skin grafts or local flaps. The success rate of a skin graft depends on several independent factors. The supraclavicular region is considered a reliable donor site for head and neck skin defects because of its easy access. We present a case of a supraclavicular skin graft harvested to cover a skin deficit after the excision of a squamous cell carcinoma of the scalp. The postoperative course was uneventful regarding graft survival, the healing procedure, and the cosmetic outcome. 

Keywords: donor site, tissue transfer, facial plastic surgery, skin reconstruction, supraclavicular graft

Introduction

Using skin flaps and grafts is a well-established and reliable method for skin reconstruction in plastic surgery. Although the surgical technique has been used for several decades, the basic principles remain similar [1]. Free grafts are harvested from distant areas, and their survival depends on the angiogenesis in the recipient site. Grafts are either full thickness containing all skin layers above the subcutaneous tissue, or split-thickness consisting only of the epidermis and a part of the dermis [2]. Thorough consideration of skin color, thickness, and consistency is required to decide the most suitable donor site [1,3]. The most commonly used free grafts for head and neck reconstruction are derived from the major pectoralis muscle, the forearm, and the face [3,4]. The supraclavicular area is also a reliable donor option to cover large head and neck defects due to its similarity in color, thickness, and flexibility [4]. We report a case of a squamous cell carcinoma of the scalp, which was treated successfully with tumor excision followed by skin reconstruction with a supraclavicular graft.

Case presentation

A 70-year-old male presented to our otolaryngology outpatient clinic with the chief complaint of a progressively grown skin lesion on the scalp. The lesion first appeared one year ago. His medical history included hypertension, hypothyroidism, and coronary disease. A thorough physical examination revealed a well-defined, crusted lesion on the scalp of approximately 3.8 cm x 3 cm. Surgical excision was performed under general anesthesia. The lesion was removed with macroscopically negative surgical margins of 1 cm (Figure 1 A). The depth of the excision was up to the periosteum of the skull (Figure 1 B). Once the lesion was removed, the surgical specimen was used to measure the size of the required free skin graft (Figure 1 C and D). The loose skin from the right supraclavicular area was recruited to cover the skin defect in the scalp (Figure 1 E). Thus, a full-thickness graft was created for scalp reconstruction. The donor site was primarily closed with simple interrupted sutures. The graft was incorporated with continuous interlocking absorbable sutures (Figure 1 F).

Figure 1. Description of the surgical procedure.

Figure 1

A: Lesion's removal with macroscopically negative surgical margins of 1 cm; B: Depth of excision up to the periosteum of the skull; C: The surgical specimen; D: Measurement of the size of the required free skin graft from the supraclavicular area; E: Donor site (supraclavicular area); F: Graft's incorporation with continuous interlocking absorbable sutures

At the surface of the graft, numerous buttonholes were created to prevent the formation of a postoperative hematoma. A tight dressing with bolster dressing was recruited to apply adequate pressure on the skin graft. The timeline of the postoperative course and the healing process is demonstrated in Figure 2. A month after the reconstruction, we performed debridement of the crusts (in places where the graft was not integrated properly) at the posterior part of the graft to promote healing by secondary intention.

Figure 2. The timeline of the postoperative course and the healing process.

Figure 2

A: Third postoperative day; B: One week after the surgery; C: Two weeks after the surgery; D: Three weeks after the surgery; E: Four weeks after the surgery; F: Eight weeks after the surgery

The concomitant histology report revealed the presence of a squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the skin with wide negative surgical margins (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Histology report.

Figure 3

A: Well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma with full thickness atypical keratinocytes, hematoxylin and eosin staining (H&E), 10x; B: Focal papillary dermis invasion by malignant cells (arrows), H&E staining, 20x

Discussion

Squamous cell carcinoma is the most common neoplasm of the head and neck area [5]. Excision of skin lesions may require restoration either with local flaps or skin grafts to achieve a decent cosmetic and functional outcome [6]. The most common donor areas to cover skin defects of the head and neck area are the posterior auricular skin, the preauricular skin, the nasolabial fold, the forearm, the thigh, the major pectoralis muscle, and the abdominal area [1,3,7,8]. The supraclavicular area is gaining ground in tissue reconstruction and restoration of small and large deficits [9]. According to some authors, it offers a lower failure rate due to its thinner size [3].

The success of a skin graft surgery is strongly related to the choice of the most appropriate donor site. The recipient site's specific characteristics should be considered to make the proper decision [1,3]. A split-thickness graft could be expanded in case of a large deficit, offering better adherence on the surgical bed but a less favorable aesthetic outcome [1]. Fixation of the graft is paramount to promote the angiogenesis between the graft and the recipient area. It also prevents the formation of a hematoma or a seroma beneath the graft. Applying a tight dressing, such as the tie-over technique, capable of providing pressure on the graft, is usually recommended [1]. Interestingly, Dhillon et al. compared the postoperative outcome in cases where a tie-over dressing was applied to patients with a total absence of dressing, concluding that the fixation of a dressing makes no significant difference in the infection rate or the successful healing of the graft [9].

According to the literature, the supraclavicular artery island flap is a desirable alternative for reconstruction using microsurgical techniques. The features and the use of the supraclavicular graft and other free skin grafts are not inferior to the local flaps [10]. Both options provide similar complication rates with no statistical difference in skin loss or necrosis [4,10].

Conclusions

Tissue transfer is a widely known technique for skin reconstruction. Various sites could be potentially used as donor or recipient areas. The supraclavicular graft is a reliable, safe, and cosmetically acceptable choice for reconstructing head and neck defects.

The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Human Ethics

Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study

References

  • 1.Skin graft. Shimizu R, Kishi K. Plast Surg Int. 2012;2012:563493. doi: 10.1155/2012/563493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Imaging of Surgical Free Flaps in Head and Neck Reconstruction. McCarty JL, Corey AS, El-Deiry MW, Baddour HM, Cavazuti BM, Hudgins PA. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019;40:5–13. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Usefulness of full-thickness skin grafting from the infraclavicular area for facial reconstruction. Kang JK, Lee JS, Yun BM, Shin MS. Arch Craniofac Surg. 2020;21:357–362. doi: 10.7181/acfs.2020.00479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Systematic review of supraclavicular artery island flap vs free flap in head and neck reconstruction. Sukato DC, Timashpolsky A, Ferzli G, Rosenfeld RM, Gordin EA. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;160:215–222. doi: 10.1177/0194599818803603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Twenty-year experience with salvage total laryngectomy: lessons learned. Tsetsos N, Poutoglidis A, Vlachtsis K, Stavrakas M, Nikolaou A, Fyrmpas G. J Laryngol Otol. 2021;135:729–736. doi: 10.1017/S0022215121001687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sebaceous carcinoma of the neck. Karamitsou P, Poutoglidis A, Tsetsos N, et al. Ear Nose Throat J. 2022 doi: 10.1177/01455613211070898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Free skin grafting to reconstruct donor sites after radial forearm flap harvesting: a prospective study with platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) Straub A, Brands R, Borgmann A, et al. J Clin Med. 2022;11:3506. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Head and neck reconstruction using free flaps: a 30-year medical record review. Suh JM, Chung CH, Chang YJ. Arch Craniofac Surg. 2021;22:38–44. doi: 10.7181/acfs.2020.00745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.A comparison of skin graft success in the head & neck with and without the use of a pressure dressing. Dhillon M, Carter CP, Morrison J, Hislop WS, Currie WJ. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2015;14:240–242. doi: 10.1007/s12663-014-0618-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) vs free fasciocutaneous flaps for head and neck reconstruction. Granzow JW, Suliman A, Roostaeian J, Perry A, Boyd JB. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;148:941–948. doi: 10.1177/0194599813476670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES