Skip to main content
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2023 Feb 28;17(2):e0011083. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011083

Bothrops (Fer-de-lance) snakebites in the French departments of the Americas (Martinique and Guyana): Clinical and experimental studies and treatment by immunotherapy

Dabor Resiere 1,2, Hatem Kallel 3, Jonathan Florentin 1,2, Stephanie Houcke 3, Hossein Mehdaoui 1,2, José María Gutiérrez 4, Remi Neviere 1,*
Editor: Ana M Moura-da-Silva5
PMCID: PMC9974124  PMID: 36854042

Abstract

Snakebite envenomation is a relevant medical hazard in French Guiana and Martinique, two French territories in the Americas. All snakebite envenomations in Martinique are inflicted by the endemic viperid species Bothrops lanceolatus, whereas Bothrops atrox is responsible for the majority of snakebites in French Guiana, although other venomous snake species also occur in this South American territory. This review summarizes some of the key aspects of the natural history of these species, as well as of their venom composition, the main clinical manifestations of envenomations, and their treatment by antivenoms. B. atrox venom induces the typical set of clinical manifestations characteristic of Bothrops sp. venoms, i.e., local tissue damage and systemic alterations associated with coagulopathies, hemorrhage, hemodynamic alterations, and acute kidney injury. In the case of B. lanceolatus venom, in addition to some typical features of bothropic envenomation, a unique and severe thrombotic effect occurs in some patients. The pathogenesis of this effect remains unknown but may be related to the action of venom components and inflammatory mediators on endothelial cells in the vasculature. A monospecific antivenom has been successfully used in Martinique to treat envenomations by B. lanceolatus. In the case of French Guiana, a polyvalent antivenom has been used for some years, but it is necessary to assess the preclinical and clinical efficacy against viperid venoms in this country of other antivenoms manufactured in the Americas.

Introduction

Overseas France includes island territories in the Atlantic, Pacific Indian Oceans and peri-Antarctic region, and French Guiana in South America. Among these territories, French Guiana and Martinique, a French Lesser Antilles island in the Caribbean Sea, are habitats for many animal species, including hundreds of snake species (Fig 1). In French Guiana and Martinique, Bothrops species are responsible for the vast majority of snakebite envenomations [13]. Among the hundred species of snakes identified in French Guiana, most cases of snakebites are caused by snakes of the genus Bothrops, accounting for 80% to 90% of all snakebite cases, mainly from Bothrops atrox [2]. In Martinique, Bothrops lanceolatus, a venomous pit-viper species, is endemic to this French Caribbean island [3]. Hence, B. atrox and B. lanceolatus may be considered the species responsible for most medically significant snakebite envenomations in these French overseas territories of the Americas.

Fig 1. French overseas territories of French Guyana on the northern Atlantic coast of South America in the Guyanas) and Martinique Island in the Caribbean sea.

Fig 1

1. Bothrops atrox and Bothrops lanceolatus snakes natural history

B. atrox is the most abundant venomous snake in French Guiana [2]. There is no integrative systematic review available, and its taxonomic status remains controversial based on limited animal sampling, which provided genetic evidence that B. atrox probably represents a complex of several lineages across the species distribution [4]. The non-monophyly of B. atrox mitochondrial DNA lineages was recently confirmed by other studies based on a more comprehensive geographic sampling [5]. Considering the current taxonomy, B. atrox is mostly endemic to the Amazon rainforest [6]. The species is predominantly nocturnal, presenting a higher encounter rate at night but may also be active during the day [7]. In French Guiana, B. atrox inhabits forested areas, although it may be found in disturbed habitats around human settlements, including pastures and crops, and urban areas [8]. B. atrox is especially active at night when adults are often seen on the ground hunting, while juveniles frequently hunt in vegetation (up to heights of 1.5 m) [7]. Regarding food preferences, this snake is a generalist, feeding on centipedes, fish, amphibians, lizards, other snakes, rodents, marsupials, and birds [9]. Juveniles prefer ectothermic animals (frogs, lizards, and centipedes), and adults prefer endothermic animals, mostly rodents [9].

B. lanceolatus is the only venomous snake in Martinique [3]. This species, together with B. caribbaeus, endemic to the neighboring island of Saint Lucia [5], originated as a consequence of the long-distance dispersal of the South American mainland species of the complex B. asper/B. atrox, with which they form a sister clade [5]. B. lanceolatus and B. caribbaeus form a monophyletic group divergent at the molecular level from all other South American species of Bothrops. It is estimated that the timing of the split of these Lesser Caribbean species from the B. asper/B. atrox clade occurred during the late Miocene or early Pliocene 4.2 to 8.9 million years ago [5]. The geographical distribution of this species in Martinique seems to be disjunct, with two isolated populations confined to humid upland regions in the northern and southern portions of the island [10]. B. lanceolatus is an inhabitant of tropical moist forest and tropical wet forest, primarily in upland regions. It also occupies rocky hillsides and tends to be arboreal, having been found as high as 20 m above ground [10]. When young, B. lanceolatus feeds chiefly on lizards, later on birds, and when adults, mostly on rats. In the dense woods, it lies quiet, seldom disturbed but by the singing of some birds that live in the wilderness. The night is the time of its wandering, and it has been seen in the roads crossed by people during the day [10]. B. lanceolatus has most recently been assessed for The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species in 2015 [11].

2. Bothrops atrox and Bothrops lanceolatus venoms

Over the past decades, proteomic studies of viperid snake venoms, including those of Bothrops sp., indicate that the predominant components playing a role in toxicity are zinc-dependent metalloproteinases (SVMPS), phospholipases A2 (PLA2s), and serine proteinases. Other components include vasoactive peptides, disintegrins, L-amino acid oxidases, cysteine-rich secretory proteins (CRISPs), and C-type lectin-like components [12].

2.1 Bothrops atrox venom

There are important regional differences in the composition of the venoms of B. atrox along the Amazon, which are likely to have implications in the pathophysiology and clinical manifestations of envenomations [13]. Indeed, B. atrox venom variability occurs among wild specimens from different geographical areas and different habitats, life span of individuals (juvenile versus adults), body size, and gender [14]. Venom properties vary ontogenetically in Bothrops species of the same genus, likely caused by differences in the feeding habits of juveniles and adults [15]. A study has compared the clinical, epidemiological, and laboratory aspects of envenomation to the size of B. atrox snakes, suggesting that small snakes (juveniles) are associated primarily with moderate local pathology and with systemic hemorrhagic and coagulopathic manifestations. In contrast, larger snakes were responsible for severe cases and characterized by major local effects (necrosis, edema, phlyctenae, compartment syndrome, and infection) [16].

An initial study of the transcriptome of a young male adult specimen of B. atrox captured in the Amazonas State of Brazil and maintained in captivity revealed that the major classes of transcripts expressed in venom gland are those of class III metalloproteinases and PLA2 [17]. Proteomic and other types of biochemical and functional studies have shown variations in the composition and actions of the venoms of B. atrox from specimens collected in different localities in South America [1323]. Proteomics has been extensively used to understand B. atrox venom composition, from Colombia, Brazil, Ecuador, and Peru [13,2123] (Table 1). Adult venoms south of the Amazon contain a higher proportion of PIII SVMPs, whereas adult venoms from northern regions contain higher amounts of PI SVMPs and PLA2s [2123].

Table 1. Relative abundance of different protein families in the venom proteomes of some populations of B. atrox (data from [13,23]).

Venom component Colombia Meta [23] Colombia Magdalena [13] Venezuela Puerto Ayacucho [13] Brazil Amazonas [23] Brazil Presidente Figueiredo Amazonas [13] Brazil Monte Alegre Para [13]
PIII metalloproteinase 3.1% 4.8% 54.0 49.1% 68.0% 69.0%
PI metalloproteinase 45.4% 21.0% 31.0 23.0% 16.0% 10.5%
Phospholipase A2 24.1% 48.0% 7.7 14.3% 8.0% 12.8%
Serine proteinase 10.9% 19.0% 2.3 4.6% 4.3% 2.6%
CRISPs 2.6% 2.1 3.8 1.8% 2.2% 3.6%
L-amino acid oxidase (LAAO) 4.7% 2.0 1.2 2.1% 1.5% 1.5%
C-type lectin-like protein 7.1 - - 0.7% - -
Disintegrin 1.7 3.1 - <0.1 - -

Notably, proteomic characterization of venom of B. atrox endemic of French Guiana is lacking. An approximation could be done based on the study of the proteome of the venom of this species from the locality of El Paují (Venezuela) since this location is close to the Territory of French Guiana. This venom has a predominance of PI and PIII SVMPs over other protein families [13] (Table 2).

Table 2. Relative abundance of different protein families in the venom proteomes of two populations of B. atrox and B. lanceolatus (data from [13,38]).

Venom component B. atrox (Sao Gabriel, Brazil) [13] B. atrox (El Paují, Venezuela) [13] B. lanceolatus (Martinique) [38]
PIII metalloproteinase 66.0% 20.0% 48.4%
PI metalloproteinase 18% 65% 25.8%
Phospholipase A2 8.5% 8.5% 8.6%
Serine proteinase 2.5% 2.2% 14.4%
CRISPs 2.7% 2.8% -
L-amino acid oxidase (LAAO) 1.4% 1.5% 2.8%
C-type lectin-like protein 0.9% - -
Disintegrin - - -

Hemorrhagic syndrome and its pathophysiological consequences remains the most important cause of lethality associated with B. atrox envenomation [24,25]. Since early studies on biochemical characterization of venom components, B. atrox venom is known as a rich source of thrombin-like enzymes, classified as Snake Venom Serine Proteinases (SVSPs), which directly hydrolyze fibrinogen, generating feeble fibrin clots [26]. Adding to thrombin-like enzymes, disturbances in hemostasis are also evoked by some toxins in the SVMPs group. The procoagulant mechanism of SVMPs is the direct activation of factors II and X, resulting in the formation of endogenous thrombin [9,24,27]. B. atrox venom hemorrhagic toxins are well characterized and are involved in the local and systemic effects of human victims of snakebite [2831]. Thromboelastographic and thromboelastometric studies showing the action of Bothrops venoms on human plasma and fibrinogen have recently deciphered coagulotoxic effects of these venoms [18,32]. Significant procoagulant plasma potency was observed with B. atrox venom [18,32].

Hemorrhage is primarily attributed to PI- and PIII-class SVMPs that induce vascular lesions. The different degrees of hemorrhagic activity of SVMPs have been attributed to their hydrolytic activity of extracellular matrix components such as laminin and type IV collagen, and also to the fact that PIII-class SVMPs bind to targets present on the basement membrane, allowing the concentration of the enzyme adjacent to the capillaries and venules, making more productive the hydrolysis and rupture of the vessel [29,33]. The disruptive action of hemorrhagic SVMPs is potentiated by the alterations in hemostasis induced by procoagulant and thrombin-like enzymes. Together with these procoagulant and hemorrhagic enzymes, B. atrox venom PLA2s also contribute to local tissue damage due to their myotoxic activity, causing lysis of muscle cells and release of intracellular proteins that also enhance the reactive proinflammatory status of the tissues close to the bite [34]. In addition, B. atrox venom contains toxins that directly induce inflammatory effects, leading to plasma exudation and accumulation of polymorphonuclear and mononuclear leukocytes and macrophages to the injury site [35,36].

In line with the well-known hemostatic disturbances, B. atrox venoms can elicit coagulotoxic effects in prey captured by snakes, in which hemorrhage, plasma extravasation, and the rapid formation of endogenous thrombin can result in prey incapacitation through circulatory shock or intravascular thrombosis. It is clear that, in the evolution of the venom of B. atrox, there has been a strong selection for generating coagulotoxic proteins. At the same time, the venom lacks neurotoxic and cardiotoxic components. B. atrox venom is weakly lethal in mice, with relatively high Median Lethal Dose (LD50). The LD50 of B. atrox venom from French Guiana in mice is 131 μg/20 g body weight [37]. In human accidents, the lethality rates are also relatively low, although fatalities may occur in severe cases; in addition, the venom often induces coagulopathies, hemorrhage, and extensive tissue damage [9].

2.2. Bothrops lanceolatus venom

B. lanceolatus venom contains a variety of toxins, which belong to SVMPs, SVSPs, and PLA2, and L-amino acid oxidases, among others [38] (Table 2). Bites from B. lanceolatus induce local tissue damage similar to that of B. atrox but infrequently elicit systemic bleeding and incoagulability. In sharp contrast, B. lanceolatus envenomations may be complicated by multiple systemic thrombotic events within 48 h after the bite [3]. SVMPs, which induce local hemorrhage and edema formation, are the most abundant components of this venom [38]. Myotoxic PLA2s are, however, less abundant in B. lanceolatus venom mixture. In line with this proteomic profile, this venom induces hemorrhage, whereas the content of PLA2s is low, and PLA2-induced myotoxic activity is relatively weak, especially compared to other Bothrops species [38]. As compared to other snake venoms, low B. lanceolatus venom PLA2 activity has been previously found when determined in the absence of detergent with egg yolk as substrate. Activation of PLA2 from B. lanceolatus venom has been attributed to the catalytic property of the enzyme itself rather than the dissociation of PLA2 inhibitors such as in the cases of other Bothrops species [39]. Deleterious effects such as hemolytic activity, formation of edema, and vascular permeability increase have been consistenly attributed to bioactive components of B. lanceolatus venom [4042].

B. lanceolatus venom largely lacks in vivo defibrinogenating activity [38,43]. In vitro, B. lanceolatus venom can clot purified human fibrinogen, indicating the presence of a thrombin-like enzyme [44], but appears to be devoid of defibrinating activity after intravenous injection in mice [38,43]. The basis for the in vivo thrombotic action of this venom remains elusive and does not seem to be due to a procoagulant action of the venom on plasma [38,43]. While venom of B. caribbaeus can induce platelet aggregation and agglutination in vitro and profound thrombocytopenia in vivo [45], B. lanceolatus venom induces mild thrombocytopenia [46]. Unlike B. atrox, B. lanceolatus venom is not coagulant when tested on human citrated plasma, which may indicate an absence of prothrombin or factor X activators [38,43]. However, recent thromboelastographic studies have reevaluated the procoagulant toxicity trait of venoms of the Bothrops genus [18,32]. Using this methodological approach, B. lanceolatus venom was procoagulant in recalcified and phospholipid-enriched plasma [18].

The mechanisms behind the thrombotic effect induced by B. lanceolatus venom are unknown. Proposed mechanisms include direct vascular endothelium injury by venom toxins and vascular endothelial cell activation related to inflammatory processes. While B. lanceolatus seems to exert a weak direct endothelial cell toxicity, endothelial activation/dysfunction can induce thrombosis via activation of the inflammatory response [40,4750]. Activation of vascular endothelial cells by B. lanceolatus venom is supported by studies showing increased production of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, as well as tissue factor expression [47]. B. lanceolatus venom can elicit strong complement activation leading to high C3a, C4a, and C5a anaphylatoxins levels [47,48]. Complement activation induced by this venom is further accompanied by an intense lipid mediators’ release, which includes LTB4, PGE2, and TXB2 along with cytokine (IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α) production and chemokine (CCL2, CCL5, and CXCL8) and osteopontin up-regulation [4850]. These outcomes show that B. lanceolatus venom causes a strong inflammatory reaction in the blood, which might favor thrombus formation by inducing a procoagulant phenotype in endothelial cells.

3. Envenomation in humans

3.1. B. atrox envenomation in French Guiana

In South America, epidemiological studies suggest that the majority of snakebite cases are caused by different species of snakes of the genus Bothrops. A study carried out in the Amazonian state of Rondônia, Brazil, a region with a high incidence of snakebites, showed that most victims are adult men (20 to 50 years) living in rural areas of the Brazilian agricultural frontier, who are bitten during work activities [51]. A higher incidence of envenomations occurred during the rainy season and during the diurnal period of the day, while most venomous snakes have nocturnal habits [51,52]. Likewise, B. atrox is responsible for the majority of snakebites in French Guiana [2].

Clinical features of B. atrox envenomation in French Guiana resemble the classic syndrome associated with bites from viperids, including local effects at the bite site (pain, edema, blistering, bleeding, necrosis) and systemic effects (hypotension, coagulopathies, systemic hemorrhages) [2,8,5355]. The venoms of snakes of the genus Bothrops are hemorrhagic, damaging the vascular endothelium and consuming coagulation factors, i.e., inducing venom-induced consumption coagulopathy, and eliciting inflammation [5558]. Blister formation typically occurs following bites by B. atrox and has been related to inflammatory processes and poor local prognosis as they increase the risk of infection and necrosis [59]. Complications of B. atrox envenomation may also include compartment syndrome of the bitten muscle, wound infection, hemodynamic instability and shock, and acute kidney injury (AKI) [2].

Though the precise number of snakebites is unknown, an estimated annual incidence of envenomation in French Guiana exceeded 20 cases per 100,000 inhabitants, with a case fatality rate of 3% [1]. From 2007 to 2015, 283 patients with snakebite envenomations were admitted to Cayenne General Hospital. Among them, 43 (15.8%) were considered severe, and 4 ultimately led to death (1.4% case fatality rate in people suffering real envenomations) [60,61]. From 2016 to 2019, similar results were observed in a prospective observational study conducted on 133 patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of Cayenne General Hospital for snakebite envenomation [2]. In this work, envenomation was considered severe in 26.2% of cases. Snake identification was performed in 51% of cases, and B. atrox was identified in 43.6% of cases. The main clinical manifestations were edema (98.5%), pain (97.7%), systemic hemorrhage (18%), blisters (14.3%), and local hemorrhage (14.3%). Circulatory shock (1.5%), AKI (15%), and systemic hemorrhage (18%) were the most frequent complications. The elapsed time from snakebite to the development of systemic hemorrhage was 4.5 h. Infections such as abscesses (65%), necrotizing fasciitis (18.6%), and cellulitis (27.9%) were recorded in this group of the patients. In this series, overall mortality was 1.5% [2].

AKI is the main systemic complication and a common cause of death in Bothrops envenomation [62]. Several epidemiological studies describe a great variation in AKI incidence ranging from 6% in B. atrox to 38.5% in B. asper [50]. Proposed mechanisms of Bothrops venom-induced AKI include the direct action of venom on the kidney, the hemodynamic alterations, myoglobinuria, hemoglobinuria, glomerular microthrombi deposit due to coagulation abnormalities, and immunologic mechanisms [6264]. In experimental models using viperid snake species, kidney hemodynamic changes varied according to the snake species but typically presented renal vascular resistance and glomerular filtration rate decreases [65]. Overall, a multifactorial origin of AKI is proposed, which emphasizes the role of hemodynamic disorders with bleeding or fibrin deposits in tubular structures, inflammatory processes, formation of immune complexes, and nephrotoxic action of venom.

Administration of antivenom is the only specific treatment to counteract Bothrops snakebite envenomation [12,66]. Antivenom typically comprises concentrated immunoglobulins, which are refined to produce F(ab′)2 fragments, although some antivenoms are made of whole IgG molecules. There are two main types of antivenom, namely monospecific (or monovalent) antivenom, which is generated against the venom of a single snake species, and polyspecific (or polyvalent) antivenom, which is made using the venom of multiple snake species as immunogens [66].

In French Guyana, Bothrops envenomations are treated with Antivipmyn-Tri, a polyvalent antivenom for Bothrops and other viperid species (Instituto Bioclon, Mexico) [53,67]. This antivenom neutralizes the lethal, hemorrhagic, and in vitro coagulant activities of venoms of B. atrox endemic of French Guiana [68]. In this study, the intravenous route of injection was used to assess lethality. Since 2014, Antivipmyn-Tri has been used in this country, and preliminary preclinical and clinical reports of its efficacy and safety in envenomings by various species have been presented [2,53,6870]. Retrospective studies that evaluated the efficacy in severe Bothrops envenomations in French Guiana (Saint-Laurent-du-Maroni, Western Guiana Hospital, and Cayenne General Hospital) failed to demonstrate evidence of clinical benefit [53]. However, another study showed that the time from Bothrops snakebite to achieve normal dosages of coagulation parameters was shorter in patients who received antivenom than in those who did not [2]. These conflicting findings urge for more detailed evaluations and also for the need to consider the possibility of using of other antivenoms available in the region and to compare their efficacy and safety with Antivipmyn-Tri in French Guiana envenomed patients.

Immunological and functional in vitro assays and preclinical efficacy of a freeze-dried antivenom manufactured in Costa Rica (Polival-ICP) against the lethal, hemorrhagic, coagulant, and myotoxic effects have recently highlighted the therapeutic potential of this antivenom against B. atrox venom endemic of French Guiana [37]. Regarding neutralization by antivenoms, Polival-ICP antivenom was effective in neutralizing lethality of B. atrox venom, while in contrast, Antivipmyn-Tri antivenom did not neutralize lethal activity even at the highest antivenom level tested [37]. In this study, the intraperitoneal route of injection was used for assessing lethality. Compared with Antivipmyn-Tri, Polival-ICP showed significantly higher neutralizing activity against hemorrhagic and in vitro coagulant activities of the venom. Polival-ICP and Antivimpyn showed similar neutralizing profile against myotoxicity [37]. These results are in agreement with previous studies showing the efficacy of Polival-ICP against the venoms of B. atrox from Colombia, Peru, Brazil, and Ecuador [71,72]. Moreover, several polyvalent antivenoms manufactured in Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, Perú, Bolivia, and Costa Rica also neutralize toxic activities of the venom of B. atrox from various localities in South America [71]. Interestingly, strong cross-reactivity of Bothrofav antivenom against Bothrops venoms has been shown in the neutralization of the procoagulant activity B. atrox from French Guiana [18], and this antivenom was also shown to be effective in the neutralization of other toxic activities of B. atrox venom [42]. Overall, there is an urgent need to evaluate the efficacy and safety of some of these antivenoms in the treatment of snakebite envenomation in French Guiana and to develop standard treatment protocols to be applied in this region.

3.2. B. lanceolatus envenomation in Martinique

In Martinique, B. lanceolatus is the only venomous snake, responsible for about 15 envenomations treated in hospitals yearly (about 3.82 per 100,000 inhabitants) [1]. The estimated mortality rate is 0.051 per 100,000 inhabitants per year [1]. B. lanceolatus venom induces local and systemic effects comparable to the typical bothropic syndrome, but the envenomation is characterized by a unique predominant prothrombotic profile. Envenomation is characterized by intense local reactions featured by extensive swelling, erythema, bleeding at the bite site, ecchymosis, and pain [3,73]. About 40% of the envenomed patients also develop systemic manifestations, such as hypo or hypertension, weakness, headache, and dyspnea [3,73]. These envenomations are often associated with systemic multifocal thrombotic complications, usually occurring within the first hours to a week after the bite, even after a moderate envenomation limited to local signs [46,7476]. Thrombosis involves cerebral, myocardial, and pulmonary vessels and may lead to death or major functional sequelae if cases are not treated with specific antivenom [3,46,7679]. Clinical reports indicate that anticoagulant therapy with heparin does not improve the outcomes [73,77,78]. At the same time, only rapid treatment with the monospecific commercial antivenom (Bothrofav, Sanofi-Pasteur, France) can prevent these thrombotic events [3,73].

Up to 50% of the patients envenomed by B. lanceolatus develop thrombocytopenia, while disseminated intravascular coagulation is rare [73,78,79]. Thrombocytopenia, minimally altered prothrombin time, normal activated partial thromboplastin time, and elevated fibrinogen concentration are typical features in B. lanceolatus envenomed patients who will further develop thrombosis [73,78]. The exact mechanism of thrombosis in these envenomations remains unknown, while there is not successful animal model suitable to reproduce the thrombotic manifestations [38]. As previously mentioned, a potent systemic inflammatory response [46,47], as evidenced by activation of complement products, eicosanoids release, interleukins production, and chemokines up-regulation in the human whole blood. Such inflammatory phenomena could be the main factors explaining the development of thrombotic events in B. lanceolatus envenomed patients, since such systemic inflammation in the absence of defibrinogenation might induce a procoagulant phenotype in endothelial cells.

Following the toxicological characterization of B. lanceolatus venom using various in vitro assays and in vivo mouse studies, the efficacy of monospecific Bothrofav antivenom against this venom currently in use in Martinique has been demonstrated. The monospecific antivenom, Bothrofav, manufactured by Sanofi-Pasteur, was introduced in Martinique in 1991 and has proven highly effective in preventing the development of life-threatening disturbances in these envenomations [78,80]. Experimental studies consistently showed that Bothrofav antivenom was highly effective in neutralization of all toxic and enzymatic activities of the venom of B. lanceolatus [43,81]. Third-generation antivenomics of Bothrofav antivenom confirmed the ability of this antivenom to immunocapture the toxins present in the venom of B. lanceolatus, thus underscoring the high neutralizing efficacy of this antivenom [82].

The systematic use of Bothrofav in Martinique has led to the almost complete disappearance of serious complications of B. lanceolatus envenomations and a significant reduction in thrombosis and other systemic disturbances in these envenomations [73,78,80]. However, since 2004, thromboembolic complications of the ischemic stroke type, particularly localized in the territory of the posterior and inferior cerebellar artery (PICA), have been observed in several patients after envenomation, despite a well-conducted antivenom therapy [76]. Several hypotheses were put forward to explain the reduced efficacy of the antivenom. Firstly, the activity of this antivenom developed nearly 20 years ago was reduced. Secondly, at the time of production, venoms of only few snake specimens were used to produce antivenom, which may not be representative of the variety of B. lanceolatus antigens exhibited by the venom. In line with this, WHO recommends a collection of at least 20 to 50 snakes of different sizes and geographical locations for the production of snake antivenom [83]. Hence, in response to the observed decrease in the neutralizing power of Bothrofav, a new Bothrofav2 has been marketed and used in ATU at the University Hospital of Martinique since February 2011 with a highly effective therapeutic effect [3].

Besides Bothrofav, Polival-ICP polyvalent antivenom has also been evaluated for its neutralizing ability after the characterization of venom proteomes of B. lanceolatus and B. caribbaeus snakes. Immunodepletion findings with Polival-ICP correlate well with neutralization results, since it cross reacts with B. lanceolatus SVMPs, L-amino acid oxidases, and PLA2s, and since a majority of venom components are recognized by antivenom antibodies in western blots and immunodepletion experiments [38]. However, since the severe thrombotic effect induced by B. lanceolatus venom has not been reproduced in the mouse model, it is not known whether Polival-ICP is able to neutralize this clinically relevant effect.

4. Unresolved issues and therapeutic perspectives

Several issues related to snakebite envenomation in French Guiana and Martinique remain unresolved to date and demand further experimental and clinical research. Some of these issues in Martinique are as follows: What are the pathophysiological mechanisms of envenomation by B. lanceolatus, particularly regarding the severe thrombotic effect described in human patients? Which SVMP is responsible for endothelial lesions of the microcirculation, which may lead to thrombosis? What is the role of inflammation in the thrombotic effect? What is the role of coronary angiography in case of thrombotic damage in patients suffering envenomations by B. lanceolatus? Will it be possible one day to consider the manufacture of a bivalent Bothrofav, specific for B. lanceolatus and B. caribbaeus? Would reducing the time in administering the antivenom following bites allow better control of complications? What is the benefit of using the ELISA test for assessing venom concentration in case of clinical worsening despite well-conducted antivenom therapy? What is the benefit of using metalloproteinase inhibitors in treating thrombotic stroke in these envenomations? Will Bothrofav continue to be available in Martinique?

In the case of French Guiana, some pending issues are as follows: Which is the most appropriate antivenom for the treatment of envenomations by B. atrox? What is the optimum dosage regime for antivenoms used in French Guiana? How can the time lapse between the bite and access to the hospital be reduced in French Guiana in order to avoid complications? Is it feasible to prevent local and systemic complications of these envenomations by the use of enzyme inhibitors? Would it be possible to correlate these experimental findings with the clinical observations and also with the dosage of antivenom needed in human cases?

It is therefore urgent to set up fundamental, translational, and clinical studies to better understand the mechanisms of these envenomations and treat their clinical consequences, with the identification of effective therapies: effective and safe antivenoms, antithrombotic treatments, inhibitors of the action of venom on the vascular endothelium, and aftercare active not only on Bothrops but also on envenomations inflicted by other tropical venomous snakes. The question of research funding by the French health authorities, with the support of international organizations such as the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) and the World Health Organization (WHO), is therefore crucial. There is also an urgent need to develop regional collaborative and multidisciplinary approaches for the improvement of snakebite in the region and to allow access to safe, affordable antivenoms.

5. Concluding remarks and perspectives

Snakebite envenomation in French Guiana poses a significant challenge from the public health perspective. In the absence of a specific antivenom for French Guiana, it is necessary to undertake a detailed preclinical assessment of the various antivenoms available in Central and South America in order to identify the best option for the treatment of B. atrox envenomation in French Guiana. Moreover, protocols for the management of snakebites should be evaluated and updated, especially regarging antivenom dosage and management of complications. Another aspect that needs to be considered has to do with the availability and accessibility of antivenoms in remote rural regions and on the training of medical and nursing staff in the treatment of envenomations. Strategies for the rapid transportation of patients to health facilities need to be carefully considered, as well as the promotion of regional cooperation platforms with neighbouring countries and with regional health authorities, such as PAHO.

Although rare, envenomations by B. lanceolatus are nevertheless an important public health problem in Martinique. The clinical picture and management principles are now well established, but the search for specific therapeutics and antivenom drugs still pose unresolved problems. Preliminary clinical data available at the University Hospital of Martinique show the excellent efficacy and tolerance of an early infusion of the antivenom Bothrofav, to prevent complications of envenomation. We have thus been able to establish a harmonized protocol for managing envenomation in Martinique and include all patients in a specialized toxicology program. A joint project for Bothrofav to treat envenomations by B. lanceolatus and B. caribbaeus is also under development and will mark the beginning of a medical collaboration between the two islands, Martinique and Saint Lucia. Further studies are still needed to optimize the modalities of administration of this antivenom.

Key Learning Points

  • Snakebite envenomation is a relevant medical hazard in French Guiana and Martinique, two French territories in the Americas.

  • B. atrox is responsible for the majority of snakebites in French Guiana, while B. lanceolatus is the only venomous snake in Martinique.

  • B. atrox venom typically induces coagulopathies and hemorrhage, while B. lanceolatus venom has a thrombotic effect in some patients.

  • Bothrofav, a monospecific antivenom, has been successfully used in Martinique to treat envenomations.

  • It is necessary to evaluate several antivenoms for their efficacy and safety in B. atrox envenomings.

Top Five Papers

  1. Gutiérrez JM, Calvete JJ, Habib AG, Harrison RA, Williams DJ, Warrell DA. Snakebite Envenoming. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17063. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.63

  2. Resiere D, Houcke S, Pujo JM, Mayence C, Mathien C, NkontCho F, et al. Clinical Features and Management of Snakebite Envenoming in French Guiana. Toxins. 2020;12:662. doi: 10.3390/toxins12100662

  3. Bourke LA, Zdenek CN, Tanaka-Azevedo AM, Silveira GPM, Sant’Anna SS, Grego KF, et al. Clinical and Evolutionary Implications of Dynamic Coagulotoxicity Divergences in Bothrops (Lancehead Pit Viper) Venoms. Toxins. 2022;14:297. doi: 10.3390/toxins14050297

  4. Monteiro WM, Contreras-Bernal JC, Bisneto PF, Sachett J, Mendonça da Silva I, Lacerda M, et al. Bothrops atrox, the Most Important Snake Involved in Human Envenomings in the Amazon: How Venomics Contributes to the Knowledge of Snake Biology and Clinical Toxinology. Toxicon X. 2020;6:100037. doi: 10.1016/j.toxcx.2020.100037

  5. Resiere D, Villalta M, Arias AS, Kallel H, Nèviére R, Vidal N, et al. Snakebite Envenoming in French Guiana: Assessment of the Preclinical Efficacy against the Venom of Bothrops atrox of Two Polyspecific Antivenoms. Toxicon. 2020;173:1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2019.11.001

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-18-CE17-0026-01 to RN; ANR-18-CE17-0026-03 to DR) https://anr.fr/ Project-ANR-18-CE17-0026 The funders had no role in study design data collection and analysis decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Chippaux J-P. Incidence and Mortality Due to Snakebite in the Americas. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11:e0005662. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005662 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Resiere D, Houcke S, Pujo JM, Mayence C, Mathien C, NkontCho F, et al. Clinical Features and Management of Snakebite Envenoming in French Guiana. Toxins. 2020;12:662. doi: 10.3390/toxins12100662 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Resiere D, Hossein M, Megarbane B. Snake Bites by Bothrops lanceolatus in Martinique. Med Sante Trop. 2018;28:37–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Campbell JA, Lamar WW, Brodie ED. The venomous reptiles of the western hemisphere. Vol. 1. No. 2. Ithaca [NY]: Comstock Pub. Associates; 2004. ISBN: 9780801441417.
  • 5.Wüster W, Thorpe RS, Salomão MDG, Thomas L, Puorto G, Theakston RDG, et al. Origin and Phylogenetic Position of the Lesser Antillean Species of Bothrops (Serpentes, Viperidae): Biogeographical and Medical Implications. BZO. 2002;68. doi: 10.1017/S0968047002000110 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.de Fraga R, Magnusson WE, Abrahão CR, Sanaiotti T, Lima AP. Habitat Selection by Bothrops atrox (Serpentes: Viperidae) in Central Amazonia, Brazil. Copeia. 2013;2013:684–690. doi: 10.1643/CE-11-098 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Oliveira ME, Martins M. When and where to find a pitviper: activity patterns and habitat use of the Lancehead, Bothrops atrox, in Central Amazonia, Brazil. Herpetol Nat Hist. 2001;8:101–110. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chippaux JP, Theakston RDG. Epidemiological Studies of Snake Bite in French Guiana. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1987;81:301–304. doi: 10.1080/00034983.1987.11812123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Monteiro WM, Contreras-Bernal JC, Bisneto PF, Sachett J, Mendonça da Silva I, Lacerda M, et al. Bothrops atrox, the Most Important Snake Involved in Human Envenomings in the Amazon: How Venomics Contributes to the Knowledge of Snake Biology and Clinical Toxinology. Toxicon X. 2020;6:100037. doi: 10.1016/j.toxcx.2020.100037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dewynter M, Rufray V. Le statut de conservation de Bothrops lanceolatus. 2012. https://www.martinique.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/etude_sur_le_bothrops_-_rapport_final.pdf
  • 11.IUCN Bothrops Lanceolatus: Dewynter, M.: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019: E.T50957018A50957026 2015.
  • 12.Gutiérrez JM, Calvete JJ, Habib AG, Harrison RA, Williams DJ, Warrell DA. Snakebite Envenoming Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17063. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.63 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Calvete JJ, Sanz L, Pérez A, Borges A, Vargas AM, Lomonte B, et al. Snake Population Venomics and Antivenomics of Bothrops atrox: Paedomorphism along Its Transamazonian Dispersal and Implications of Geographic Venom Variability on Snakebite Management. J Proteome. 2011;74:510–527. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2011.01.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Guércio RA, Shevchenko A, Shevchenko A, López-Lozano JL, Paba J, Sousa MV, et al. Ontogenetic variations in the venom proteome of the Amazonian snake Bothrops atrox. Proteome Sci. 2006;4:11. doi: 10.1186/1477-5956-4-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Furtado MFD, Maruyama M, Kamiguti AS, Antonio LC. Comparative Study of Nine Bothrops Snake Venoms from Adult Female Snakes and Their Offspring. Toxicon. 1991;29:219–226. doi: 10.1016/0041-0101(91)90106-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nascimento da Costa T, Mota-da-Silva A, Colombini M, Moura-da-Silva AM, Medeiros de Souza R, et al. Relationship between Snake Size and Clinical, Epidemiological and Laboratory Aspects of Bothrops atrox Snakebites in the Western Brazilian Amazon. Toxicon. 2020;186:160–167. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2020.08.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Neiva M, Arraes FB, de Souza JV, Rádis-Baptista G, Prieto da Silva AR, Walter ME, et al. Transcriptome analysis of the Amazonian viper Bothrops atrox venom gland using expressed sequence tags (ESTs). Toxicon. 2009;53:427–436. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2009.01.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bourke LA, Zdenek CN, Tanaka-Azevedo AM, Silveira GPM, Sant’Anna SS, Grego KF, et al. Clinical and Evolutionary Implications of Dynamic Coagulotoxicity Divergences in Bothrops (Lancehead Pit Viper) Venoms. Toxins. 2022;14:297. doi: 10.3390/toxins14050297 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sousa LF, Portes-Junior JA, Nicolau CA, Bernardoni JL, Nishiyama-Jr MY, Amazonas DR, et al. Functional Proteomic Analyses of Bothrops atrox Venom Reveals Phenotypes Associated with Habitat Variation in the Amazon. J Proteome. 2017;159:32–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2017.03.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hatakeyama DM, Tasima LJ, Bravo-Tobar CA, Serino-Silva C, Tashima AK, Rodrigues CFB, et al. Venom Complexity of Bothrops atrox (Common Lancehead) Siblings. J Venom Anim Toxins. 2020;26:e20200018. doi: 10.1590/1678-9199-JVATITD-2020-0018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tasoulis T, Isbister GK. A Review and Database of Snake Venom Proteomes. Toxins (Basel). 2017;9:290. doi: 10.3390/toxins9090290 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Calvete JJ, Borges A, Segura Á, Flores-Díaz M, Alape-Girón A, Gutiérrez JM, et al. Snake Venomics and Antivenomics of Bothrops Colombiensis, a Medically Important Pitviper of the Bothrops atrox-asper Complex Endemic to Venezuela: Contributing to Its Taxonomy and Snakebite Management. J Proteome. 2009;72:227–240. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2009.01.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Núñez V, Cid P, Sanz L, De La Torre P, Angulo Y, Lomonte B, et al. Snake Venomics and Antivenomics of Bothrops atrox Venoms from Colombia and the Amazon Regions of Brazil, Perú and Ecuador Suggest the Occurrence of Geographic Variation of Venom Phenotype by a Trend towards Paedomorphism. J Proteome. 2009;73:57–78. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2009.07.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Larréché S, Chippaux J-P, Chevillard L, Mathé S, Résière D, Siguret V, et al. Bleeding and Thrombosis: Insights into Pathophysiology of Bothrops Venom-Related Hemostasis Disorders. IJMS. 2021;22:9643. doi: 10.3390/ijms22179643 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Oliveira SS, Alves EC, Santos AS, Pereira JPT, Sarraff LKS, Nascimento EF, et al. Factors Associated with Systemic Bleeding in Bothrops Envenomation in a Tertiary Hospital in the Brazilian Amazon. Toxins (Basel). 2019;11:22. doi: 10.3390/toxins11010022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Petretski JH, Kanashiro M, Silva CP, Alves EW, Kipnis TL. Two Related Thrombin-like Enzymes Present in Bothrops atrox Venom. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2000;33:1293–1300. doi: 10.1590/s0100-879x2000001100005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hofmann H, Bon C. Blood coagulation induced by the venom of Bothrops atrox. 2. Identification, purification, and properties of two factor X activators. Biochemistry. 1987;26:780–787. doi: 10.1021/bi00377a019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Freitas-de-Sousa LA, Amazonas DR, Sousa LF, Sant’Anna SS, Nishiyama MY Jr, Serrano SM, et al. Comparison of venoms from wild and long-term captive Bothrops atrox snakes and characterization of Batroxrhagin, the predominant class PIII metalloproteinase from the venom of this species. Biochimie. 2015;118:60–70. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2015.08.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Freitas-de-Sousa LA, Colombini M, Lopes-Ferreira M, Serrano SMT, Moura-da-Silva AM. Insights into the Mechanisms Involved in Strong Hemorrhage and Dermonecrosis Induced by Atroxlysin-Ia, a PI-Class Snake Venom Metalloproteinase. Toxins (Basel). 2017;9:239. doi: 10.3390/toxins9080239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Silva de Oliveira S, Freitas-de-Sousa LA, Alves EC, de Lima Ferreira LC, da Silva IM, de Lacerda MVG, et al. Fatal Stroke after Bothrops Snakebite in the Amazonas State, Brazil: A Case Report. Toxicon. 2017;138:102–106. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2017.08.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Cintra ACO, De Toni LGB, Sartim MA, Franco JJ, Caetano RC, Murakami MT, et al. Batroxase, a New Metalloproteinase from B. atrox Snake Venom with Strong Fibrinolytic Activity. Toxicon. 2012;60:70–82. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2012.03.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sousa L, Zdenek C, Dobson J, op den Brouw B, Coimbra F, Gillett A, et al. Coagulotoxicity of Bothrops (Lancehead Pit-Vipers) Venoms from Brazil: Differential Biochemistry and Antivenom Efficacy Resulting from Prey-Driven Venom Variation. Toxins. 2018;10:411. doi: 10.3390/toxins10100411 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Escalante T, Ortiz N, Rucavado A, Sanchez EF, Richardson M, Fox JW, et al. Role of collagens and perlecan in microvascular stability: exploring the mechanism of capillary vessel damage by snake venom metalloproteinases. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e28017. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wellmann IAM, Ibiapina HNS, Sachett JAG, Sartim MA, Silva IM, Oliveira SS, et al. Correlating Fibrinogen Consumption and Profiles of Inflammatory Molecules in Human Envenomation’s by Bothrops atrox in the Brazilian Amazon. Front Immunol. 1874;2020:11. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01874 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Moreira V, Dos-Santos MC, Nascimento NG, da Silva HB, Fernandes CM, D’Império et al. Local Inflammatory Events Induced by Bothrops atrox Snake Venom and the Release of Distinct Classes of Inflammatory Mediators. Toxicon. 2012;60:12–20. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2012.03.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Moreira V, Teixeira C, Borges da Silva H, D’Império Lima MR, Dos-Santos MC. The Crucial Role of the MyD88 Adaptor Protein in the Inflammatory Response Induced by Bothrops atrox Venom. Toxicon. 2013;67:37–46. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2013.02.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Resiere D, Villalta M, Arias AS, Kallel H, Nèviére R, Vidal N, et al. Snakebite Envenoming in French Guiana: Assessment of the Preclinical Efficacy against the Venom of Bothrops atrox of Two Polyspecific Antivenoms. Toxicon. 2020;173:1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2019.11.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gutiérrez JM, Sanz L, Escolano J, Fernández J, Lomonte B, Angulo Y, et al. Snake Venomics of the Lesser Antillean Pit Vipers Bothrops caribbaeus and Bothrops lanceolatus: Correlation with Toxicological Activities and Immunoreactivity of a Heterologous Antivenom. J Proteome Res. 2008;7:4396–4408. doi: 10.1021/pr8003826 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.de Araújo AL, Radvanyi F, Bon C. Purification of an acidic phospholipase A2 from Bothrops lanceolatus (fer de lance) venom: molecular and enzymatic properties. Toxicon. 1994;32:1069–1081. doi: 10.1016/0041-0101(94)90391-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Delafontaine M, Villas-Boas I, Mathieu L, Josset P, Blomet J, Tambourgi D. Enzymatic and Pro-Inflammatory Activities of Bothrops lanceolatus Venom: Relevance for Envenomation. Toxins. 2017;9:244. doi: 10.3390/toxins9080244 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.de Faria L, Antunes E, Bon C, de Araújo AL. Pharmacological characterization of the rat paw edema induced by Bothrops lanceolatus (Fer de lance) venom. Toxicon. 2001;39:825–830. doi: 10.1016/s0041-0101(00)00213-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.de Araújo AL, de Souza AO, da Cruz-Höfling MA, Flores CA, Bon C. Bothrops lanceolatus (Fer de lance) venom induces oedema formation and increases vascular permeability in the mouse hind paw. Toxicon. 2000;38:209–221. doi: 10.1016/s0041-0101(99)00145-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Bogarín G, Romero M, Rojas G, Lutsch C, Casadamont M, Lang J, et al. Neutralization, by a Monospecific Bothrops lanceolatus Antivenom, of Toxic Activities Induced by Homologous and Heterologous Bothrops Snake Venoms. Toxicon. 1999;37:551–557. doi: 10.1016/S0041-0101(98)00193-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.de Araújo A, Kamiguti A, Bon C. Coagulant and anticoagulant activities of Bothrops lanceolatus (Fer de lance) venom. Toxicon. 2001;39:371–375. doi: 10.1016/s0041-0101(00)00139-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Herrera C, Rucavado A, Warrell DA, Gutiérrez JM. Systemic effects induced by the venom of the snake Bothrops caribbaeus in a murine model. Toxicon. 2013;63:19–31. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2012.10.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Malbranque S, Piercecchi-Marti MD, Thomas L, Barbey C, Courcier D, Bucher B, et al. Fatal Diffuse Thrombotic Microangiopathy after a Bite by the “Fer-de-Lance” Pit Viper (Bothrops lanceolatus) of Martinique. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008;78:856–861. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Delafontaine M, Villas-Boas IM, Pidde G, van den Berg CW, Mathieu L, Blomet J, et al. Venom from Bothrops lanceolatus, a Snake Species Native to Martinique, Potently Activates the Complement System. J Immunol Res. 2018;2018:1–11. doi: 10.1155/2018/3462136 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Silva de França F., Gabrili JJM, Mathieu L, Burgher F, Blomet J, Tambourgi DV. Bothrops Lanceolatus Snake (Fer-de-Lance) Venom Triggers Inflammatory Mediators’ Storm in Human Blood. Arch Toxicol. 2021;95:1129–1138. doi: 10.1007/s00204-020-02959-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Arruda VA, de Queiroz Guimarães A, Hyslop S, Ferreira de Araújo PM, Bon C, Lôbo de Araújo A. Bothrops lanceolatus (Fer de lance) Venom Stimulates Leukocyte Migration into the Peritoneal Cavity of Mice. Toxicon. 2003;41:99–107. doi: 10.1016/s0041-0101(02)00238-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Barbosa-Souza V, Contin DK, Filho WB, de Araújo AL, Irazusta SP, da Cruz-Höfling MA. Osteopontin, a Chemotactic Protein with Cytokine-like Properties, Is up-Regulated in Muscle Injury Caused by Bothrops lanceolatus (Fer-de-Lance) Snake Venom. Toxicon. 2011;58:398–409. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2011.07.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Roriz KRPS, Zaqueo KD, Setubal SS, Katsuragawa TH, Silva RRD, Fernandes CFC, et al. Epidemiological study of snakebite cases in Brazilian Western Amazonia. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2018;51:338–346. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0489-2017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ferreira AAFE, Reis VPD, Boeno CN, Evangelista JR, Santana HM, Serrath SN, et al. Increase in the risk of snakebites incidence due to changes in humidity levels: A time series study in four municipalities of the state of Rondônia. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2020;53:e20190377. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0377-2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Heckmann X, Lambert V, Mion G, Ehrhardt A, Marty C, Perotti F, et al. Failure of a Mexican Antivenom on Recovery from Snakebite-Related Coagulopathy in French Guiana. Clin Toxicol. 2021;59:193–199. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2020.1786108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kallel H, Mayence C, Houcke S, Mathien C, Mehdaoui H, Gutiérrez JM, et al. Severe Snakebite Envenomation in French Guiana: When Antivenom Is Not Available. Toxicon. 2018;146:87–90. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2018.04.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.de Souza CA, Kayano AM, Setúbal SS, Pontes AS, Furtado JL, Kwasniewski FH, et al. Local and systemic biochemical alterations induced by Bothrops atrox snake venom in mice. J Venom Res. 2012;3:28–34. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Moura-da-Silva AM, Contreras-Bernal JC, Cirilo Gimenes SN, Freitas-de-Sousa LA, Portes-Junior JA, da Silva Peixoto P, et al. The relationship between clinics and the venom of the causative Amazon pit viper (Bothrops atrox). PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14:e0008299. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008299 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Silva de Oliveira S, Campos Alves E, Dos Santos Santos A, Freitas Nascimento E, Tavares Pereira JP, et al. Bothrops snakebites in the Amazon: recovery from hemostatic disorders after Brazilian antivenom therapy. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2020;58:266–274. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2019.1634273 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Setúbal SDS, Pontes AS, Nery NM, Rego CMA, Santana HM, de Lima AM, et al. Human neutrophils functionality under effect of an Asp49 phospholipase A2 isolated from Bothrops atrox venom. Toxicon X. 2020;6:100032. doi: 10.1016/j.toxcx.2020.100032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Gimenes SNC, Sachett JAG, Colombini M, Freitas-de-Sousa LA, Ibiapina HNS, Costa AG, et al. Observation of Bothrops atrox Snake Envenoming Blister Formation from Five Patients: Pathophysiological Insights. Toxins (Basel). 2021;13:800. doi: 10.3390/toxins13110800 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Mutricy R, Egmann G, Marty C, Houcke S, Adenis A, Douine M, et al. Predictors of Complications of Snake Envenomation in Cayenne, French Guiana, 2007–2015. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44:115–117. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4929-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Mutricy R, Heckmann X, Douine M, Marty C, Jolivet A, Lambert V, et al. High Mortality Due to Snakebites in French Guiana: Time Has Come to Re-Evaluate Medical Management Protocols. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12:e0006482. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006482 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Albuquerque PLMM, Paiva JHHGL, Martins AMC, Meneses GC, da Silva GB Júnior, Buckley N, et al. Clinical Assessment and Pathophysiology of Bothrops Venom-Related Acute Kidney Injury: A Scoping Review. J Venom Anim Toxins. 2020;26:e20190076. doi: 10.1590/1678-9199-JVATITD-2019-0076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Albuquerque P, da Silva G Junior, Meneses G, Martins A, Lima D, Raubenheimer J, et al. Acute Kidney Injury Induced by Bothrops Venom: Insights into the Pathogenic Mechanisms. Toxins. 2019;11:148. doi: 10.3390/toxins11030148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Rodrigues Sgrignolli L, Florido Mendes GE, Carlos CP, Burdmann EA. Acute Kidney Injury Caused by Bothrops Snake Venom. Nephron Clin Pract. 2011;119:c131–c137. doi: 10.1159/000324228 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Sitprija V. Snakebite nephropathy. Nephrology (Carlton). 2006;11:442–448. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2006.00599.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.World Health Organization. WHO Guidelines for the Production, Control and Regulation of Snake Antivenom Immunoglobulins. Geneva: WHO; 2017.
  • 67.Nadaud A, Perotti F, de Haro L, Boels D. Snake Envenomations in French Guiana: First Clinical Assessment of an Antivenom Imported from Mexico. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2019;38:193–194. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2018.06.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Estévez J, Magaña P, Chippaux JP, Vidal N, Mancilla R, Paniagua JF, et al. Study on the venoms of the principal venomous snakes from French Guiana and the neutralization. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 2008;101:353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Otero-Patino R, Silva-Haa JJ, Barona Acevedo MJ, Torro Castano MF, Quintana Castillo JC, Diaz Cadavid A, et al. Bothrops bites in Colombia: a multicenter study on the efficacy and safety of Antivipmyn-Tri, a polyvalent antivenom produced in Mexico. Iatreia. 2007;20:244–262. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Fuchs J, Faber K, Tuchscherer DT, Tsakiris DA, Weiler S, Hofer KE. Bite by a Juvenile Bothrops venezuelensis (Venezuelan Lancehead) Resulting in Severe Envenomation: A Case Report. Toxicon. 2020;180:39–42. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2020.04.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Segura A, Castillo MC, Núñez V, Yarlequé A, Gonçalves LRC, Villalta M, et al. Preclinical Assessment of the Neutralizing Capacity of Antivenoms Produced in Six Latin American Countries against Medically-Relevant Bothrops Snake Venoms. Toxicon. 2010;56:980–989. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2010.07.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Laines J, Segura Á, Villalta M, Herrera M, Vargas M, Alvarez G, et al. Toxicity of Bothrops Sp Snake Venoms from Ecuador and Preclinical Assessment of the Neutralizing Efficacy of a Polyspecific Antivenom from Costa Rica. Toxicon. 2014;88:34–37. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2014.06.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Resiere D, Mégarbane B, Valentino R, Mehdaoui H, Thomas L. Bothrops Lanceolatus Bites: Guidelines for Severity Assessment and Emergent Management. Toxins. 2010;2:163–173. doi: 10.3390/toxins2010163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Thomas L, Tyburn B, Ketterlé J, Biao T, Mehdaoui H, Moravie V, et al. Prognostic Significance of Clinical Grading of Patients Envenomed by Bothrops lanceolatus in Martinique. Trans R Soc Trop. 1998;92:542–545. doi: 10.1016/S0035-9203(98)90907-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Merle H, Donnio A, Ayeboua L, Plumelle Y, Smadja D, Thomas L. Occipital Infarction Revealed by Quadranopsia Following Snakebite by Bothrops lanceolatus. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005;73:583–585. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Thomas L, Chausson N, Uzan J, Kaidomar S, Vignes R, Plumelle Y, et al. Thrombotic Stroke Following Snake Bites by the “Fer-de-Lance” Bothrops lanceolatus in Martinique despite Antivenom Treatment: A Report of Three Recent Cases. Toxicon. 2006;48:23–28. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2006.04.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Estrade G, Garnier D, Bernasconi F, Donatien Y. Pulmonary embolism and disseminated intravascular coagulation after being bitten by a Bothrops lanceolatus snake. A propos of a case. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1989;82:1903–1905. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Thomas L, Tyburn B, Bucher B, Pecout F, Ketterle J, Plumelle Y, et al. Prevention of Thromboses in Human Patients with Bothrops lanceolatus Envenoming in Martinique: Failure of Anticoagulants and Efficacy of a Monospecific Antivenom. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1995;52:419–426. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1995.52.419 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Bucher B, Canonge D, Thomas L, Tyburn B, Robbe-Vincent A, Choumet V, et al. Clinical Indicators of Envenoming and Serum Levels of Venom Antigens in Patients Bitten by Bothrops Lanceolatus in Martinique. Trans R Soc Trop. 1997;91:186–190. doi: 10.1016/S0035-9203(97)90219-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Thomas L, Tyburn B, Lang J, Ketterle J. Early Infusion of a Purified Monospecific F(Ab’)2 Antivenom Serum for Bothrops lanceolatus Bites in Martinique. Lancet. 1996;347:406. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)90590-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Resiere D, Arias AS, Villalta M, Rucavado A, Brouste Y, Cabié A, et al. Preclinical Evaluation of the Neutralizing Ability of a Monospecific Antivenom for the Treatment of Envenomings by Bothrops lanceolatus in Martinique. Toxicon. 2018;148:50–55. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2018.04.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Pla D, Rodríguez Y, Resiere D, Mehdaoui H, Gutiérrez JM, Calvete JJ. Third-Generation Antivenomics Analysis of the Preclinical Efficacy of Bothrofav Antivenom towards Bothrops lanceolatus Venom. Toxicon X. 2019;1:100004. doi: 10.1016/j.toxcx.2018.100004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Theakston RDG, Warrell DA, Griffiths E. Report of a WHO Workshop on the Standardization and Control of Antivenoms. Toxicon. 2003;41:541–557. doi: 10.1016/s0041-0101(02)00393-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES