Skip to main content
Biotechnology Reports logoLink to Biotechnology Reports
. 2023 Feb 22;37:e00788. doi: 10.1016/j.btre.2023.e00788

Genome of the epiphytic bacterium Achromobacter denitrificans strain EPI24, isolated from a macroalga located in the Colombian Caribbean

Albert Nicolás Niño Corredor a, Natalia Beatriz Comba González a, Mauricio Acelas b, Dolly Montoya Castaño a,
PMCID: PMC9974418  PMID: 36874444

Highligths

  • Achromobacter denitrificans strain EPI24 genome was studied.

  • The genome of A. denitrificans strain EPI24 is ∼6.95 Mb long, has a G + C content of 67.33%.

  • A total of 6603 protein-coding genes were predicted.

  • A. denitrificans strain EPI24 genome confirmed the presence of genes encoding for laccases, demonstrating the potential of epiphytic bacteria from U. lactuca in the laccase production.

  • Enzyme repertoire of A. denitrificans may have promising biotechnological applications.

Keywords: Genome, Epiphytic bacterium, Laccases, Achromobacter denitrificans, Ulva lactuca

Abstract

Marine macroalgae are being recognized as reservoirs of biologically active compounds, as their surfaces are susceptible to the colonization of microorganisms which can produce enzymes with a wide range of molecular architectures. Among these bacteria, Achromobacter is responsible for the biosynthesis of laccases. In this research, we performed a bioinformatic pipeline to annotate the sequenced complete genome of the epiphytic bacterium Achromobacter denitrificans strain EPI24, from the macroalgal surface of the Ulva lactuca species; this strain showed laccase activity which has been previously assessed on plate assays. The genome of A. denitrificans strain EPI24 has a size of ∼6.95 Mb, a GC content of 67.33%, and 6,603 protein-coding genes. The functional annotation of the A. denitrificans strain EPI24 genome confirmed the presence of genes encoding for laccases, which could have functional properties of interest in processes such as the biodegradation of phenolic compounds under versatile and efficient conditions.

1. Introduction

Currently, phenolic dyes are an environmental problem owing to recalcitrance. These important and diverse xenobiotic compounds have been used in the textile industry because of efficiency and low cost. However, the inappropriate disposal of wastewater is a big challenge that disturbs all aquatic environments in the whole world. Wastewater containing phenolic compounds affects humans and other organisms for their high toxicity [1,2].

Achromobacter has been described as a potential bioremediation agent of industrial wastewater and soils containing minerals, salts, polycyclic aromatic, and phenolic compounds [3]. The degradation of phenolic dyes implies the breakdown of the aromatic ring by oxidases such as laccases along with other enzymes. Some lacasse type enzymes such as polyphenol oxidase (PPO) and Multicopper oxidase (MCO) have been associated with physiological response to toxic levels of heavy metals and tolerance to oxidative stress [4]. Although fungal and some bacterial laccase types have been investigated, those of marine origin could be more interesting in different biotechnological applications due to their wide versatility and physicochemical and kinetic properties such as salt tolerance and thermostability, etc.; inherent advantages of the changing conditions in the marine ecosystems [5].

Achromobacter belongs to the Alcaligenaceae family, order Burkholderiales of the class β-Proteobacteria [6]. This genus is obligately aerobic, asporogenous, chemo-organotrophic and comprises 19 officially recognized species [7]. Achromobacter denitrificans is a gram-negative bacterium of 0.8–1.2 × 2.5–3.0 µm in size, motile by peritrichous flagella. A non-fermenting, oxidase- and catalase-positive bacterium. A. denitrificans grows at 30 °C, in LB medium and marine agar. This bacterium has been found in a wide variety of environments ranging from soil to water and may be part of the microbiota of the ear and the gastrointestinal and respiratory tracts in some people [8].

Studies of epiphytic bacteria from marine macroalgae of the Ulva genus identified Vibrio, Pseudomonas and Achromobacter genera as representatives of the culturable bacterial community from this macroalga [9]. Regarding, recent studies have described Gram negative bacteria of the genera Pseudoalteromonas, Shewanella, Halomonas, Roseobacter, Marinomonas, and Vibrio and some Gram positive bacteria such as Bacillus genus, as part of the culturable epiphytic component from Ulva [[10], [11], [12], [13], [14]]. In this study, we obtained a strain belonging to the Achromobacter sp., being the first record of this genus within the bacterial epiphytes found in U. lactuca sampled in the Colombian Caribbean Sea. This work aims to present the draft genome of the U. lactuca epiphyte A. denitrificans strain EPI24, focusing on genes involved in the laccase activity to highlight on its potential application in the biodegradation process of phenolic compounds as dyes.

2. Data description

The A. denitrificans strain EPI24 was isolated from the U. lactuca surface. The raw algal material was searched in an area of rockyshore “La Punta de la Loma”, Santa Marta – Colombia, in the intertidal zone, 10 km south of the river Gaira. EPI24 was inoculated according to the methodology proposed in previous research [11] (Table 1). The bacterium was cultivated in LB agar and incubated at 30 °C for 48 h. The agar plate screening for positive laccase production was performed with three assays with different phenolic substrates (guaiacol, 2,6-Dimethoxyphenol and tannic acid) as described by Dhiman [15].

Table 1.

General features and genome sequencing project information of Achromobacter denitrificans strain EPI24 according to the MIGS recommendations.

Item Description
General feature
Classification Domain Bacteria Phylum Proteobacteria
Class Betaproteobacteria Order Burkholderiales Family Alcaligenaceae
Genus Achromobacter
Gram stain Negative
Cell shape Short rod
Investigation
Investigation type Bacteria
Project name Genome sequencing of Achromobacter denitrificans EPI24
Collection date 23/11/2019
Geographic location (Latitude and location) 11°07′00’’N 74°14′01’’W
Geographic location (Country and/or sea, region) Colombia: Santa Marta
Environment (biome) Caribbean sea
Environment (material) Ulva lactuca
Biotic relationship Epiphytic bacterium
Trophic level Chemoorganotroph
Relationship to oxygen Aerobe
Sequencing
Sequencing method Illumina MiSeq
Assembly Spades
Finishing strategy Complete; 56,32 X coverage

Previous studies have shown some strains of the Achromobacter sp. as lacasses producers, these strains were isolated from contaminated sediments or agro-industrial residues [16,17]. A. denitrificans strain EPI24 was chosen for genome sequencing to supply more information on laccases-producing marine epiphytic bacteria. The genomic DNA of A. denitrificans EPI24 was isolated with the gBac Mini DNA Bacteria Kit (IBI SCIENTIFIC®). The resulting DNA was sequenced making use of the Illumina paired-end MiSeq platform [18]. A total of 1444,648 paired-end reads were obtained and filtered with the Trimmomatic v0.38 tool [19]. Once the low-quality reads were removed, the reads with the required quality were assembled with SPAdes v3.13.1 [20], using the strain A. denitrificans NCTC8582 (ID GCA_013343095.1_ASM1334309v1) as reference genome.

The A. denitrificans EPI24 complete genome includes one circular chromosome of 6943,456 bp (6.94 Mb), GC content equivalent to 67.33% and 6603 CDSs (Fig. 1.). The assignment of this strain to a species of genus Achromobacter was evaluated with two genome-to-genome approaches for the sequence comparison: The first was the average nucleotide identity (ANI) analysis with the EzGenome ANI web resource (http://www.ezbiocloud.net/ezgenome/ani) [21] and the second the TCS parameter (Tetra correlation score) evaluated with the JSpeciesWS server [22]. Our results are consistent with the size and GC content submitted in the genomes of Achromobacter sp. (genome size of 6.24 Mb, GC content of 64.8% and 5578 CDSs for Achromobacter sp. B7 and genome size of 6.91 Mb, GC content of 67.0% and 6390 CDSs for A. xylosoxidans NH44784–1996) [23,24]. Differences in the number of predicted CDSs may be due to the sequencing method, number, quality of the reads and the bioinformatic pipeline used.

Fig. 1.

Fig 1

Circular representation of the Achromobacter denitrificans EPI24 genome. From the outside to the center: The scale, chromosome (gray), COG categories (different colors described in the right chart), CDSs on forward strand (red), CDSs on reverse strand (yellow), GC content (black) and GC skew (purple).

A number of 6603 protein-coding genes were predicted with the functional annotation performed by the PATRIC/RAST platforms [25]. Of them, 1387 (21%) were classified as hypothetical proteins, 57 tRNA and 11 rRNA. The Gene functional categories were identified based on the cluster of orthologous groups (COG) by the Eggnog Mapper Platform [26]. The most important categories corresponded to energy production and conversion (C), amino acid transport and metabolism (E), transcription (K), metabolism and transport of inorganic ions (P) and metabolism and transport of lipids (I) (Fig. 1.). Genes assigned to the inorganic ion transport and metabolism category (6.4%) could be involved in the homeostasis of essential ions that serve as prosthetic groups of different enzymes like laccases and cytochromes. In addition, there is evidence for biphenyl catabolism, arsenite oxidation, haloaromatic acid degradation, detoxification of chromium, and hydrocarbon degradation by members of the Achomobacter genus [27].

The functional annotation predicted two gene sequences that could be involved in the laccase activity previously evidenced in plate assays [15]. The expression of laccase-type enzymes can be explained by the presence of natural phenolic compounds as lignin and antioxidants on the macroalgal surface [28]. Previous studies have shown that the macroalgae cell wall contain lignin in a low proportion (5,5 – 6,7%) [[29], [30], [31]]. In addition, these compounds can also be present in the marine environment as pollutants because of anthropic activities [32]. In the Santa Marta region studies reported the presence of dissolved hydrocarbons and hydrocarbon polycyclic aromatics [33]. In addition, Ulva has been used as a low-cost absorbent for removing phenolic compounds in polluted environments [34,35].

The in-silico analysis of gene sequences identified a product of 587 amino acids predicted as multicopper oxidase (MCO) (100% of identity) and a sequence of 242 amino acids corresponding to a multicopper polyphenol oxidase (PPO) (99.21% of identity). All bacteria present a diversity of strategies to sense and respond to environmental stressor agents. The identification of these enzymes can be explained by inherent mechanisms to overcome the presence of heavy metals, toxic compounds and maintain copper homeostasis [36,37]. Besides, these enzymes may provide protection from the oxidizing stress caused by the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROSs) by Ulva to prevent the colonization of pathogen microorganisms [38,12].

According to the CDD database, the multicopper oxidase belongs to the copA family [39]. This family group laccases and l-ascorbate oxidases, which showed a typical signal sequence known as TAT (twin arginine translocation signal). copA family enzymes cross the inner membrane through cofactors that bind metals, as well as copper-binding motifs. In functional terms, these enzymes play important roles in detoxification, transport and binding of proteins, cations and iron-carrying compounds [40].

The results of the multiple alignment performed with the amino acid sequences of multicopper oxidases showed the presence of aminoacidic motifs for the binding of tri nuclear copper, which start in a histidine residue (H101) and end in another histidine residue (H145). In this region, the interaction between the ligand and the copper takes place. The following two conserved regions correspond to interface domains [41], where internal interactions occur (Fig. 2.).

Fig. 2.

Fig 2

Multiple amino acid sequence alignment of multicopper oxidases from Achromobacter denitrificans strain EPI24 and other species. The amino acid sequences used were: predicted multicopper oxidase from A. denitrificans EPI24, AAF32269.1 from Aeromonas veronii bv. Sobri, CAC07979.1 from Cupriavidus metallidurans CH34, NP_250,755.1 from Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO, AAN52530.1 from Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAK and AAO27999.1 from Xylella fastidiosa. Amino acids highlighted in red are conserved, amino acids in blue are modifications and blue circles represent copper binding sites. Frames correspond to: a putative interface domain 2 (polypeptide binding site) colored violet, interface domain 3 colored yellow. The black triangle represents the twin arginine translocation (RR) signal and T2, T3 are sites where copper binds.

The putative domain interface 3 starts in a histidine residue (H101) and ends in a glutamine residue (Q151), while the putative interface domain 2 starts in a phenylalanine residue (F48) and ends in a valine residue (V159). The multiple alignment also showed the twin arginine translocation domain (RR), which is characteristic in periplasmic proteins that cross the inner membrane. This domain could have metal-containing cofactors or copper-binding sites [39].

The genomic analysis of the epiphytic bacterium A. denitrificans EPI24 identified the responsible genes for the laccase activity. Multiple alignment of protein sequences of bacterial laccases showed that these enzymes are highly conserved. This indicates a huge importance in different mechanisms related to pigment production, morphogenesis, toxin oxidation, metals homeostasis, detoxification of xenobiotics and tolerance to oxidizing agents and UV light [4,42]. Our genome sequencing effort shows that the epiphytic bacteria A. denitrificans strain EPI24, isolated from the macroalgae U. lactuca, is a promissory source of lacasses with a potential application in bioremediation of phenolic compounds.

3. Nucleotide sequence accession number

The genome sequence of Achromobacter denitrificans strain EPI24 was submitted at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under accession number PRJEB56270. EPI24 is available in the Bank of Strains and Genes of the Instituto de Biotecnología de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia under strain code IBUN-04284.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This article was funded by the Fondo Colombia Biodiversa of the Fundación Alejandro Ángel Escobar (FAAE). The authors thank the Instituto de Biotecnología de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia. ANLA (Autoridad Nacional de Licencias Ambientales) and Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible granted permission to collect samples and perform this research (Contrato de Acceso a Recursos Genéticos y sus Productos Derivados No. 121 of 22/01/2016, OTROSÍ No. 22).

Data availability

  • Data will be made available on request.

References

  • 1.Al-Tohamy R., Ali S.S., Li F., Okasha K.M., Mahmoud Y.A.G., Elsamahy T., Jiao H., Fu Y., Sun J. A critical review on the treatment of dye-containing wastewater: ecotoxicological and health concerns of textile dyes and possible remediation approaches for environmental safety. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2022;231 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.113160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Le T.N., Le X.A., Tran T.D., Lee K.J., Kim M.Il. Laccase-mimicking Mn–Cu hybrid nanoflowers for paper-based visual detection of phenolic neurotransmitters and rapid degradation of dyes. J. Nanobiotechnology. 2022;20(1):1–15. doi: 10.1186/s12951-022-01560-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gargouri B., Karray F., Mhiri N., Aloui F., Sayadi S. Application of a continuously stirred tank bioreactor (CSTR) for bioremediation of hydrocarbon-rich industrial wastewater effluents. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011;189(1–2):427–434. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.02.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Arregui L., Ayala M., Gómez-Gil X., Gutiérrez-Soto G., Hernández-Luna C.E., Herrera De Los Santos M., Levin L., Rojo-Domínguez A., Romero-Martínez D., Saparrat M.C.N., Trujillo-Roldán M.A., Valdez-Cruz N.A. Laccases: structure, function, and potential application in water bioremediation. Microb. Cell Fact. 2019;18(1):1–33. doi: 10.1186/s12934-019-1248-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rao T.E., Imchen M., Kumavath R. 1st. Vol. 80. Elsevier Inc; 2017. Marine Enzymes; pp. 149–163. (Advances in Food and Nutrition Research). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rosenberg E. Vol. 7. Springer; Berlin Heidelberg: 2014. (The Prokaryotes). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Al-Asadi S.A., Al-Kahachi R.E.S., Alwattar W.M.A., Bootwala J., Sabbah M.A. Genomic Insights into Achromobacter mucicolens IA antibiotic resistance. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022;10(2):1–18. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01916-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Soumana I.H., Linz B., Harvill E.T. Environmental origin of the genus Bordetella. Front. Microbiol. 2017;8(JAN):1–10. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kong M.K., yu Chan K. A study on the bacterial flora isolated from marine algae. Botanica Marina. 1979;22(2):83–98. doi: 10.1515/botm.1979.22.2.83. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Comba González N.B., Niño Corredor A.N., López Kleine L., Montoya Castaño D. Temporal changes of the epiphytic bacteria community from the marine macroalga Ulva lactuca (Santa Marta, Colombian-Caribbean) Curr. Microbiol. 2021;78(2):534–543. doi: 10.1007/s00284-020-02302-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Comba González N., Ramírez Hoyos M., López Kleine L., Montoya Castaño D. Production of enzymes and siderophores by epiphytic bacteria isolated from the marine macroalga Ulva lactuca. Aquat. Biol. 2018;27:107–118. doi: 10.3354/ab00700. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Egan S., Harder T., Burke C., Steinberg P., Kjelleberg S., Thomas T. The seaweed holobiont: understanding seaweed-bacteria interactions. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2012;37(3):462–476. doi: 10.1111/1574-6976.12011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rodrigues V., Onime L., Huws S., Odaneth A., Lali A. Diversity of Ulvan and cellulose depolymerizing bacteria associated with the green macroalgae Ulva Spp. J. Appl. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2017;2(4):136–142. doi: 10.15406/jabb.2017.02.00037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tujula N.A., Crocetti G.R., Burke C., Thomas T., Holmström C., Kjelleberg S. Variability and abundance of the epiphytic bacterial community associated with a green marine Ulvacean alga. ISME J. 2010;4(2):301–311. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2009.107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.K.Dhiman P.Shirkot. Bioprospecting and characterization of laccase producing bacteria from paddy fields of Himachal Pradesh. NISCAIR-CSIR; India 56: 2018. pp. 334–341.http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/44280 [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Neifar M., Chouchane H., Mahjoubi M., Jaouani A., Cherif A. Pseudomonas extremorientalis BU118: a new salt-tolerant laccase-secreting bacterium with biotechnological potential in textile azo dye decolourization. 3 Biotech. 2016;6(1):1–9. doi: 10.1007/s13205-016-0425-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Unuofin J.O., Okoh A.I., Nwodo U.U. Utilization of agroindustrial wastes for the production of laccase by Achromobacter xylosoxidans HWN16 and Bordetella bronchiseptica HSO16. J. Environ. Manage. 2019;231(October 2018):222–231. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Neal-McKinney J.M., Liu K.C., Lock C.M., Wu W.-.H., Hu J. Comparison of MiSeq, MinION, and hybrid genome sequencing for analysis of Campylobacter jejuni. Sci. Rep. 2021;11(1):5676. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84956-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bolger A.M., Lohse M., Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(15):2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bankevich A., Nurk S., Antipov D., Gurevich A.A., Dvorkin M., Kulikov A.S., Lesin V.M., Nikolenko S.I., Pham S., Prjibelski A.D., Pyshkin A.V., Sirotkin A.V., Vyahhi N., Tesler G., Alekseyev M.A., Pevzner P.A. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 2012;19(5):455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lee I., Ouk Kim Y., Park S.-.C., Chun J. OrthoANI: an improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2016;66(2):1100–1103. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.000760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Richter M., Rosselló-Móra R., Oliver Glöckner F., Peplies J. JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics. 2016;32(6):929–931. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jakobsen T.H., Hansen M.A., Jensen P.Ø., Hansen L., Riber L., Cockburn A., Kolpen M., Rønne Hansen C., Ridderberg W., Eickhardt S., Hansen M., Kerpedjiev P., Alhede M., Qvortrup K., Burmølle M., Moser C., Kühl M., Ciofu O., Givskov M., Bjarnsholt T. Complete genome sequence of the cystic fibrosis pathogen Achromobacter xylosoxidans NH44784-1996 complies with important pathogenic phenotypes. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(7):8–11. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.C. Zhong, M. Nelson, G. Cao, M.J. Sadowsky, T. Yan, Complete genome sequence of the hydrocarbon-degrading strain Achromobacter sp. B7, isolated during petroleum hydrocarbon bioremediation in the Valparaiso Region, Chile Valentina. 4–5 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 25.Davis J.J., Wattam A.R., Aziz R.K., Brettin T., Butler R., Butler R.M., Chlenski P., Conrad N., Dickerman A., Dietrich E.M., Gabbard J.L., Gerdes S., Guard A., Kenyon R.W., Machi D., Mao C., Murphy-Olson D., Nguyen M., Nordberg E.K., Stevens R. The PATRIC Bioinformatics Resource Center: expanding data and analysis capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;48(D1):D606–D612. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Huerta-Cepas J., Forslund K., Coelho L.P., Szklarczyk D., Jensen L.J., von Mering C., Bork P. Fast genome-wide functional annotation through orthology assignment by eggNOG-Mapper. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2017;34(8):2115–2122. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hong Y.H., Ye C.C., Zhou Q.Z., Wu X.Y., Yuan J.P., Peng J., Deng H., Wang J.H. Genome sequencing reveals the potential of Achromobacter sp. HZ01 for bioremediation. Front. Microbiol. 2017;8(AUG):1–14. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Freile-Pelegrín Y., Robledo D. Bioactive Compounds from Marine Foods. John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2013. Bioactive phenolic compounds from algae; pp. 113–129. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Espiñeira J.M., Novo Uzal E., Gómez Ros L.V., Carrión J.S., Merino F., Ros Barceló A., Pomar F. Distribution of lignin monomers and the evolution of lignification among lower plants. Plant Biol. 2011;13(1):59–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2010.00345.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sırakaya S. Pros and cons of Ulva lactuca and Cladophora glomerata grown in freshwater as feed. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022 doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24532-1. 0123456789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yaich H., Garna H., Besbes S., Paquot M., Blecker C., Attia H. Chemical composition and functional properties of Ulva lactuca seaweed collected in Tunisia. Food Chem. 2011;128(4):895–901. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.03.114. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Cotas J., Leandro A., Monteiro P., Pacheco D., Figueirinha A., Gonçalves A.M.M., da Silva G.J., Pereira L. Seaweed phenolics: from extraction to applications. Mar. Drugs. 2020;18(8):384. doi: 10.3390/md18080384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.INVEMAR. (2019). Diagnóstico y evaluación de la calidad de las aguas marinas y costeras en el Caribe y Pacífico Colombianos 2018. Red de Vigilancia Para La Conservación y Protección de Lasaguas Marinas y Costeras de Colombia –REDCAM, 4, 218. https://www.invemar.org.co/documents/10182/43044/Informe+REDCAM_2018.pdf/49465eac-e85c-4193-bac3-b8382a6b9b05.
  • 34.Abbas M., Mohammed Al-Hermizy S., Abudi Z., Ibrahim T. Phenol biosorption from polluted aqueous solutions by Ulva lactuca alga using batch mode unit. J. Ecol. Eng. 2019;20(6):225–235. doi: 10.12911/22998993/109460. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Moghazy R.M., Labena A., Husien S. Eco-friendly complementary biosorption process of methylene blue using micro-sized dried biosorbents of two macro-algal species (Ulva fasciata and Sargassum dentifolium): full factorial design, equilibrium, and kinetic studies. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019;134:330–343. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.04.207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.De Vrind J.P.M., Brouwers G.J., Corstjens P.L.A.M., Den Dulk J., De Vrind-De Jong E.W. The cytochrome c maturation operon is involved in manganese oxidation in Pseudomonas putida GB-1. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1998;64(10):3556–3562. doi: 10.1128/aem.64.10.3556-3562.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hengst M.B., Andrade S., González B., Correa J.A. Changes in epiphytic bacterial communities of intertidal seaweeds modulated by host, temporality, and copper enrichment. Microb. Ecol. 2010;60(2):282–290. doi: 10.1007/s00248-010-9647-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Breider S., Sehar S., Berger M., Thomas T., Brinkhoff T., Egan S. Genome sequence of Epibacterium ulvae strain DSM 24752T, an indigoidine-producing, macroalga-associated member of the marine Roseobacter group. Environ. Microbiomes. 2019;14(1):1–8. doi: 10.1186/s40793-019-0343-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Shee Ping N., Palombo E.A., Bhave M. The heavy metal tolerant soil bacterium Achromobacter sp. AO22 contains a unique copper homeostasis locus and two mer operons. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012;22(6):742–753. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1111.11042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Janusz G., Pawlik A., Świderska-Burek U., Polak J., Sulej J., Jarosz-Wilkołazka A., Paszczyński A. Laccase properties, physiological functions, and evolution. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21(3) doi: 10.3390/ijms21030966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gong S., Park C., Choi H., Ko J., Jang I., Lee J., Bolser D.M., Oh D., Kim D.-.S., Bhak J. A protein domain interaction interface database: interPare. BMC Bioinform. 2005;6(1):207. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-6-207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Chauhan P.S., Goradia B., Saxena A. Bacterial laccase: recent update on production, properties and industrial applications. Biotech. 2017;7(5):1–20. doi: 10.1007/s13205-017-0955-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

  • Data will be made available on request.


Articles from Biotechnology Reports are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES