Skip to main content
microPublication Biology logoLink to microPublication Biology
. 2023 Feb 14;2023:10.17912/micropub.biology.000754. doi: 10.17912/micropub.biology.000754

An atonal homolog, lin-32, regulates hypodermal morphogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans

Sayaka Hori 1, Shohei Mitani 2,§
Reviewed by: Stephanie Maiden
PMCID: PMC9975813  PMID: 36873297

Abstract

The transcription factor atonal contributes to patterning and cell fate determination in specialized epithelial cells in various animals, but its function in hypodermis is unknown. Here, we analyzed the atonal homolog lin-32 in C. elegans to clarify whether atonal acts in hypodermal development. The lin-32 null mutants exhibited bulges and cavities in their head, which were prevented by LIN-32 expression. Fluorescent protein was expressed in hypodermis cells at the embryonic stage by the lin-32 promoter. These results certify that atonal plays an essential role in the development of a broader range of tissues as hypodermis than initially thought.


Figure 1. Expression and function of lin-32 in hypodermal cells.


Figure 1. Expression and function of
lin-32
in hypodermal cells.

(A) The lin-32 null mutants showed various morphologies of head hypodermis. Localization of the hypodermis on left lateral view (orange-colored area). The wild-type animal had a smooth head shape in a differential interference contrast (DIC) image. The lin-32 null mutants exhibited abnormal head shape. The nose tip was curved (white lines) and a cavity was observed (arrowhead). (DIC images). Scale bars = 100 µm. (B, C) The lin-32 gene is necessary for head morphogenesis. (B) All wild-type animals (100%) presented standard heads (n = 6), but 81.2% of the lin-32 null mutants exhibited a change in head morphology (“Aberrant,” n = 11). **p = 0.0090 < 0.01 (Fisher's exact test). (C) Rescue experiment. Head morphological changes in lin-32 null mutants (0% normal, n = 20) were rescued by LIN-32 expression from its own promoter (80.0% normal, n = 25). ***p < 0.0001 (Fisher's exact test). (D) Schematic diagram of hypodermal cell localization (hyp3, hyp4, hyp6, and hyp7) on the dorsal anterior side of the head primordium of a 1.5-fold stage embryo (Sulston et al. 1983). DIC image of a 1.5-fold stage embryo. Fluorescence image of EGFP expressed by the lin-32 promoter. EGFP expression was observed in dorsal hypodermal cells centered around hyp6. Scale bar (white bracket) = 10 µ m.

Description

Here, we provide new insights into the basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor atonal in hypodermis development. Historically, atonal had been identified as a proneural gene, contributing to neural fate determination in various animals. For example, in Caenorhabditis elegans ( C. elegans ) , the atonal homolog lin-32 initiates the neurogenesis touch neurons (Chalfie and Sulston 1981; Mitani et al. 1993). We also have previously reported that lin-32 is essential for optimizing avoidance behaviors via AIB interneuron development (Hori et al. 2018). The atonal gene and its homolog also contribute to patterning and cell fate determination in specialized epithelial cells like those in the retina (Robertson et al. 2012), intestine (VanDussen and Samuelson 2010), and the inner ear sensory epithelia (Bermingham et al. 1999). However, its function in the hypodermis remains unclear.

The epithelial system of C. elegans is constituted by the hypodermis and specialized epithelial cells. In this study, to determine the role of atonal in hypodermis development, we examined the morphology of the head hypodermis in lin-32 null mutants. lin-32 null mutants exhibited morphological changes in the head hypodermis, presenting external bulges and an internal cavity (Fig. 1A). The phenotype was rescued by the expression of LIN-32 driven by its own promoter (Fig. 1B,C). DNA microarray analysis revealed that lin-32 is expressed in a restricted cell lineage within a narrow time window during embryogenesis (Murray et al. 2012). In the hypodermis, lin-32 is predicted to be expressed in hyp4 and hyp6, which are derived from the ABarpapa lineage (Murray et al. 2012). To assess lin-32 -expression in the peripheral area in embryos, we used a lin-32 promoter-driven EGFP and have observed fluorescence in hyp6 and additional cells that have not yet been identified. These results provide insight into the function of lin-32 in the differentiation of the hypodermis. However, we could not identify the causal cell lineage that induced morphological changes in the head, because the number and location of the hypodermal nuclei were substantially altered in the lin-32 null mutants. Considering the principal role of hyp6 in the morphology of the anterior hypodermis (Cinar and Chisholm 2004), we speculate that lin-32 also affects hyp6 development or localization. These findings reveal a novel role of atonal , which is well known as a proneural gene, in a broader range of tissues than initially thought.

Methods

Nematodes and maintenance

We cultured C. elegans strains using modified standard techniques as described previously (Brenner 1974; Hori et al. 2018). The lin-32 ( tm2044 ) mutants were backcrossed with the wild-type animal N2, five times. The information on the strains used is summarized in Table 1.

Microscopy

C. elegans adults were immobilized with M9 buffer containing sodium azide 50 mM on a 5% agarose pad containing 10 mM sodium azide (Wako, 195-11092) (Fig. 1 A,B,C). Eggs were isolated from gravid adults by treating them with a bleaching solution (Fig. 1D). The bleaching solution contained 0.2 mL 4N NaOH (Wako, 194-18865), 0.3 mL 6% bleach (Kao, o17246), and 0.5 mL M9 buffer. Differential interference contrast (DIC) and fluorescence images were obtained using a BX51 microscope equipped with a DP30BW charge-coupled device (CCD) camera (Olympus Optical).

Plasmid construction

In the own promoter rescue experiment (Fig. 1C), pFX_P lin-32 ::LIN-32 was used (Hori et al. 2018). To analyze lin-32 expression (Fig. 1D), pFX_P lin-32 (4.2K)::EGFP was constructed by cloning the lin-32 promoter (from 4.2 kbp of the genomic sequence upstream of the mature lin-32 sequence), which was amplified using PCR, with the N2 genomic DNA as the template. Cloning primers are as follows; ggttccgcgtggatccCTGAAAATTAGAAACTAAATGAG, GCTCACCATgcggccgcCCATGGTTGGTCTGACTGAAAACGAC. The pFX_EGFP plasmid and the PCR fragment of the lin-32 promoter were cut using two restriction enzymes, BamHI (Takara, 1010A) and NotI (Takara, 1166A), and then ligated using ligase (Takara, 6021).

Transgenic lines and strains

To generate lin-32(tm2044); tmEx3143 transgenic animals (Fig. 1C), pFX_P lin-32 ::LIN-32 (20 ng/μl), and pBluescript KS(+)T1(100 ng/μl) were co-injected, along with pFX_ Pnmr-1:: mCherry (80 ng/μl), into FX15206 animals (Hori et al. 2018). To generate tmEx3090 transgenic animals (Fig. 1D) , pFx_P lin-32 (4.2 kb)::EGFP (150 ng/μl) was injected along with pFX_P nmr-1 ::mCherry (50 ng/μl), which acts as an injection marker, into N2 animals.

Quantification and statistical analysis

Statistical analyseswere performed using the GraphPad Prism 6 software (GraphPad software). Pairwise comparisons of frequencies within two groups wereperformed using Fisher’s exact test (Fig. 1B,C).In both analyses,theDIC images were randomized and their normalcy was ascertained in a blinded manner.Figures 1B and 1C are the experimental results of sampling on different days. There is a variable penetrance of incidence and severity of the morphological defect in the lin-32 mutants(Fig. 1B,C). Therefore, we speculate that the penetrance is responsible for the difference in the two results(Fig. 1B,C).The statistical information and the total number of animals analyzed per experiment are indicated in Figure legend.

Reagents

Strain name

allele name

Genotype

Available from

Outcross

Reference

N2

-

Caenorhabditis elegans wild type (ancestral)

CGC

-

FX15206

tm2044

lin-32(tm2044)

Mitani Lab

x 5

Hori S, et al., 2018.

FX15218

tm2044 ; tmEx3143

lin-32(tm2044); tmEx3142[Plin-32::LIN-32 + Pnmr-1::mCherry + pBluescripts KS+T1]

Mitani Lab

x 5

Hori S, et al., 2018.

FX15181

tmEx3090

tmEx3090[Plin-32(4.2 kbp)::EGFP + Pnmr-1::mCherry]

Mitani Lab

-

This paper

Plasmid

Genotype

Description

Available from

Reference

pFx_ Plin-32:: LIN-32

Plin-32::LIN-32

5.1 kbp DNA fragment contained 4.2 kbp of lin-32 promoter and cording region.

Mitani Lab

Hori S, et al., 2018.

pFx_ Plin-32(4.2K):: EGFP

Plin-32::EGFP

4.2 kbp DNA fragment (lin-32 promoter) was joined to EGFP.

Mitani Lab

This paper

pFx_ Pnmr-1:: mCherry

Pnmr-1::mCherry

5.0 kbp DNA fragment (nmr-1 promoter) was joined to mCherry.

Mitani Lab

Hori S, et al., 2018.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgments

We thank members of Mitani Lab for discussion.

Funding

This study was supported by grants provided by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Kakenhi 19K06912, Narishige Neuroscience Research Foundation, and Ohsumi Frontier Science Foundation (Sayaka Hori).

References

  1. Bermingham NA, Hassan BA, Price SD, Vollrath MA, Ben-Arie N, Eatock RA, Bellen HJ, Lysakowski A, Zoghbi HY. Math1: an essential gene for the generation of inner ear hair cells. Science. 1999 Jun 11;284(5421):1837–1841. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5421.1837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brenner S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1974 May 1;77(1):71–94. doi: 10.1093/genetics/77.1.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chalfie M, Sulston J. Developmental genetics of the mechanosensory neurons of Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol. 1981 Mar 1;82(2):358–370. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(81)90459-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cinar HN, Chisholm AD. Genetic analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans pax-6 locus: roles of paired domain-containing and nonpaired domain-containing isoforms. Genetics. 2004 Nov 1;168(3):1307–1322. doi: 10.1534/genetics.104.031724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hori S, Oda S, Suehiro Y, Iino Y, Mitani S. OFF-responses of interneurons optimize avoidance behaviors depending on stimulus strength via electrical synapses. PLoS Genet. 2018 Jun 25;14(6):e1007477–e1007477. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Mitani S, Du H, Hall DH, Driscoll M, Chalfie M. Combinatorial control of touch receptor neuron expression in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development. 1993 Nov 1;119(3):773–783. doi: 10.1242/dev.119.3.773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Murray JI, Boyle TJ, Preston E, Vafeados D, Mericle B, Weisdepp P, Zhao Z, Bao Z, Boeck M, Waterston RH. Multidimensional regulation of gene expression in the C. elegans embryo. Genome Res. 2012 Apr 16;22(7):1282–1294. doi: 10.1101/gr.131920.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Robertson F, Pinal N, Fichelson P, Pichaud F. Atonal and EGFR signalling orchestrate rok- and Drak-dependent adherens junction remodelling during ommatidia morphogenesis. Development. 2012 Aug 8;139(18):3432–3441. doi: 10.1242/dev.080762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sulston JE, Schierenberg E, White JG, Thomson JN. The embryonic cell lineage of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol. 1983 Nov 1;100(1):64–119. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(83)90201-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. VanDussen KL, Samuelson LC. Mouse atonal homolog 1 directs intestinal progenitors to secretory cell rather than absorptive cell fate. Dev Biol. 2010 Aug 4;346(2):215–223. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.07.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from microPublication Biology are provided here courtesy of California Institute of Technology

RESOURCES