Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2023 Jan 30;15(1):e34371. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34371

Hydrocephalus As Possible Prodromal Manifestation of COVID-19: A Report of Two Cases

Giovanni Torelli 1, Rocco Severino 1,✉, Chiara Caggiano 2, Matteo Torelli 3, Luca de Martino 1, Giuseppe Russo 1
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC9975901  PMID: 36874689

Abstract

Although the etiopathology of normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) is still not completely defined, several studies in recent years have highlighted the role of neuro-inflammation mediators in its development. During COVID-19, the infected host develops a multifaceted inflammatory syndrome, that may lead to an uncontrolled immune system response also localized in the host nervous system. In fact, the target of the viral Spike protein, the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors, is widely expressed in different areas of CNS such as the olfactory epithelium, and the choroid plexus. As for idiopathic NPH, the massive release of inflammatory mediators may result in altered CSF dynamics and consequent sudden clinical decompensation.

We report the cases of two patients with a known iNPH condition, in which neurological symptoms suddenly worsened, requiring hospitalization, without any evident precipitating cause. Both patients tested positive for the COVID-19 virus shortly after the neurological impairment, which had occurred, therefore, during the incubation period of the infection.

On the basis of our experience we advise, in cases of NPH patients with sudden neurological worsening, to perform a molecular COVID-19 swab at the moment of clinical impairment. We, therefore, recommend considering SARS-CoV-2 infection in the differential diagnosis of a sudden and otherwise unexplainable impairment of hydrocephalic patients. Furthermore, we believe clinicians should invite NPH patients to adopt adequate preventive measures to protect them from SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Keywords: ace-2 receptor, altered csf dynamics, neuro-inflammation, covid-19, hydrocephalus

Introduction

Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) is defined as the presence of a dilated ventricular system with concomitant specific neurological signs (gait disorders, urinary incontinence, and cognitive decline) without intracranial hypertension [1]. When caused by other diseases (e.g., trauma, sub-arachnoidal hemorrhage, neoplasms, infections) NPH is defined as secondary (sNPH) [2], to distinguish it from a more frequent idiopathic form (iNPH) in which no other etiology can be recognized [3]. Despite NPH has been first described in the 1960s [4], its pathophysiology has been only partly explained. In particular, in recent years several studies have highlighted the role of neuro-inflammation in the genesis of NPH, both in the idiopathic [5-8] and in post-hemorrhagic secondary forms [9,10].

Since the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic only three cases of previously healthy patients who developed NPH after COVID-19 infection have been described [11-13], suggesting that NPH may have been a complication of the neuro-inflammation response triggered by SARS-CoV2 in the nervous system.

In our article we report the cases of two patients with a known iNPH condition, in which neurological symptoms suddenly worsened, requiring hospitalization, without any evident precipitating cause. Both patients tested positive for the COVID-19 virus shortly after the neurological impairment, which had occurred, thereby, during the incubation period of the infection. We, therefore, suggest that COVID-19 infection in its prodromal phase should be considered in the differential diagnosis in cases of NPH patients with sudden and otherwise unexplained neurological decline.

Case presentation

Case 1

A 79-year-old unvaccinated man presented with a history of progressive gait instability in the previous months and cognitive decline. He performed a brain MRI almost five months before the hospitalization, showing ventriculomegaly with NPH features (Figures 1A, 1B). He was admitted to our department complaining of a recent impairment of gait difficulties and an episode of loss of consciousness, with a negative molecular COVID-19 test. General examination was unremarkable, while the neurological examination was consistent with an NPH condition, showing mild ideo-motor slowdown and magnetic gait. A head CT scan showed an enlarged ventricular system with no evidence of CSF flow obstructions or signs of acute intracranial hypertension. After 24 hours the patient presented a sudden worsening of the neurological status with walking inability for severe gait instability. A new CT scan showed no variations in the size of the ventricular system nor other evident causes of the clinical deterioration (Figures 1C, 1D). A new COVID-19 molecular test, performed the following day for the onset of hyperpyrexia, resulted positive. The patient was then transferred to the COVID-19 area of our hospital where he gradually recovered. Once tested negative he returned to our department. The proposed ventriculoperitoneal shunting procedure was refused by the patient.

Figure 1. Radiological findings of Case 1.

Figure 1

(A, B) Axial and coronal MRI, performed by the patient five months before the hospitalization, showing ventriculomegaly with features of NPH. (C, D) CT scan, performed at the time of neurological deterioration with negative COVID test, showing no substantial modifications of the ventricular system volume. The white arrows highlight the common features of NPH: Evans Index (A, C)>0.28; 0.31; callosal angle (B, D) < 100°.

Case 2

A 20-year-old unvaccinated female with a history of chronic migraine presented at our hospital complaining of a sudden worsening of the headache, unresponsive to her usual therapies, with concomitant nausea. At admission the patient was alert and oriented; neurological examination and vital signs were both normal. The molecular COVID-19 test was negative. Brain MRI showed dilated ventricles without CSF flow obstruction or space-occupying masses (Figures 2A, 2B). The patient was then scheduled for CSF depletive test.

Figure 2. Radiological findings of Case 2 .

Figure 2

(A, B) MRI performed at the hospital admission: the axial and coronal images show ventriculomegaly with enlargement of third ventricle (red asterisk) and reduction of callosal angle (78°, white arrow). (C) Head CT scan performed at the time of neurological impairment, with negative COVID-19 test: no volume alteration of the ventricular system.

The following day the patient presented a severe impairment of the neurological status with lethargy. The new CT scan was substantially unchanged compared to the admission images (Figure 2C). An urgent procedure of external ventricular drain (EVD) placement was performed, with an initial improvement of the neurological status. Two days after the admission, the routine COVID-19 molecular control test resulted positive. The subsequent period of isolation was uneventful without the necessity of special therapies. Once the molecular swab tested negative, the patient returned to our department and underwent a ventriculoperitoneal shunting procedure and was then discharged with complete resolution of her migraine.

Discussion

Despite NPH has been first described almost 60 years ago [4], its pathophysiology still remains controversial and not completely clarified. In the last few years several studies focused on the role of inflammation mediators, such as cytokines and chemokines, in the pathogenesis of NPH [14-16]. It has been demonstrated, in fact, that the activation of NFKB and Toll-like receptor 4 inflammation pathway in the choroid plexus of rats induces CSF hypersecretion [10]. Nevertheless, different studies demonstrated high levels of other inflammatory mediators, in particular, TNF a [5,17,18], in the CSF of NPH patients, with a decrease in their level after shunt surgery [17,19]. Even if the role of inflammatory molecules in the alteration of CSF dynamics has not completely been revealed, these results suggest that an inflammation condition is present in the choroid plexus of NPH patients and may play a significant role in the genesis of hydrocephalus.

During COVID-19, the infected host develops a multifaceted inflammatory syndrome, that may lead to an uncontrolled immune system response [20]. CNS is recognized as a frequent target of SARS-CoV-2, due to a high representation of the Angiotensin Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor that is a target of the virus Spike protein [21]. ACE2 receptor is known to be diffusely expressed in different areas of CNS, such as the olfactory epithelium, the temporal gyrus and posterior cingulate cortex and the choroid plexus [22,23]. In the infected choroid plexus, an alteration of its microscopical structure occurs, with syncytia formation, loss of integrity of the homeostatic barrier and activation of the cytokine production pathways [24,25]. As for idiopathic NPH, the massive release of inflammatory mediators [26,27] may result in the alteration of CSF dynamics and the consequent development of ventricle dilatation.

Considering these results, we believe that the sudden neurological impairment of our patients could be explained as a prodromal manifestation of SARS-CoV-2 infection. In fact, all our patients tested positive for molecular swabs the day after their clinical worsening, meaning that they were already infected by the virus. Even if we were not able to test CSF for COVID-19 antibodies due to laboratory limitations, the temporal succession of neurological impairment and diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection, as well as the demonstration of a common inflammation condition in both diseases make, in our opinion, the hypothesis of correlation between the two events highly plausible. Moreover, the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in the CSF of infected patients has been found in a study by Alexopoulos [28], supporting our hypothesis of an interaction between the inflammatory response triggered by the virus infection and the CSF environment. We can furthermore assume that the cephalalgia complained during COVID-19 infection may be a sign of an altered CSF dynamic.

To our knowledge there are no other cases reported in the literature of an NPH worsening shortly before the evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Other authors reported cases of patients with “delayed” development of NPH after COVID-19 (one week three months from infection), requiring surgery for the treatment of the hydrocephalus [11-13]. All these patients did not have other risk factors for NPH or significant medical history apart from a recent SARS-CoV-2 infection. As for our article, the main limitation of these reports is undoubtedly their mainly observational and empiric nature.

Conclusions

On the basis of our experience, we advise in NPH patients with sudden clinical worsening, to perform a molecular COVID-19 swab at the moment of clinical impairment and, in case of a negative result, to repeat the test in the following days. In addition to explaining the clinical worsening, significant benefits of an early diagnosis of COVID-19 (e.g., isolation of the patient, protection of the medical staff, activation of specific therapeutic protocols) are obtainable through widely accessible, reliable and low-cost molecular tests. We, therefore, recommend considering SARS-CoV-2 infection in the differential diagnosis of a sudden and otherwise unexplainable impairment of hydrocephalic patients. Furthermore, we believe clinicians should invite NPH patients to adopt adequate preventive measures to protect them from SARS-CoV-2 infection. Further studies, focusing on the molecular interaction between SARS-CoV-2, choroid plexus and CSF dynamics alteration, are needed to support our hypothesis.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Dr. Lorenzo Cuomo, Neurosurgeon, for the inestimable value of his teachings.

The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Human Ethics

Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study

References

  • 1.The diagnosis and treatment of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Gallia GL, Rigamonti D, Williams MA. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2006;2:375–381. doi: 10.1038/ncpneuro0237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Revisiting secondary normal pressure hydrocephalus: does it exist? A review. Daou B, Klinge P, Tjoumakaris S, Rosenwasser RH, Jabbour P. Neurosurg Focus. 2016;41:0. doi: 10.3171/2016.6.FOCUS16189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a review for general practitioners. Nassar BR, Lippa CF. Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2016;2:2333721416643702. doi: 10.1177/2333721416643702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.The special clinical problem of symptomatic hydrocephalus with normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure. Observations on cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics. Hakim S, Adams RD. J Neurol Sci. 1965;2:307–327. doi: 10.1016/0022-510x(65)90016-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cerebrospinal fluid levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha and aquaporin 1 in patients with mild cognitive impairment and idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Castañeyra-Ruiz L, González-Marrero I, Carmona-Calero EM, et al. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2016;146:76–81. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.04.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Levels of selected pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in cerebrospinal fluid in patients with hydrocephalus. Czubowicz K, Głowacki M, Fersten E, Kozłowska E, Strosznajder RP, Czernicki Z. Folia Neuropathol. 2017;55:301–307. doi: 10.5114/fn.2017.72389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: pathophysiology and diagnosis by CSF biomarkers. Jeppsson A, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, Wikkelsø C. Neurology. 2013;80:1385–1392. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31828c2fda. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Selected pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in cerebrospinal fluid in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Sosvorova L, Vcelak J, Mohapl M, Vitku J, Bicikova M, Hampl R. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25617881/ Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2014;35:586–593. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mechanisms of neuroinflammation in hydrocephalus after intraventricular hemorrhage: a review. Holste KG, Xia F, Ye F, Keep RF, Xi G. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2022;19:28. doi: 10.1186/s12987-022-00324-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Inflammation-dependent cerebrospinal fluid hypersecretion by the choroid plexus epithelium in posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus. Karimy JK, Zhang J, Kurland DB, et al. Nat Med. 2017;23:997–1003. doi: 10.1038/nm.4361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Unusual post-COVID-19 presentation with Tetraventricular hydrocephalus: a case report. Saini C, Zaid GK, Gachechiladze L, Krishnan R. Neurol Clin Pract. 2022;12:0–7. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000001174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Normal pressure hydrocephalus associated with COVID-19 infection: a case report. Vasconcelos TM, Nóbrega PR, Ferreira GM, et al. BMC Infect Dis. 2022;22:216. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07184-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.COVID-19 infection presenting with severe hydrocephalus and acute stroke: a case report. Oredipe O, Johal AS, Onuegbu C, et al. Cureus. 2022;14:0. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Inflammatory markers in cerebrospinal fluid from patients with hydrocephalus: a systematic literature review. Lolansen SD, Rostgaard N, Oernbo EK, Juhler M, Simonsen AH, MacAulay N. Dis Markers. 2021;2021:8834822. doi: 10.1155/2021/8834822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.The peripheral immune response after stroke-a double edge sword for blood-brain barrier integrity. Li Y, Zhu ZY, Huang TT, et al. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2018;24:1115–1128. doi: 10.1111/cns.13081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.The evolving role of neuro-immune interaction in brain repair after cerebral ischemic stroke. Wang X, Xuan W, Zhu ZY, et al. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2018;24:1100–1114. doi: 10.1111/cns.13077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Normal pressure hydrocephalus triggers intrathecal production of TNF-alpha. Tarkowski E, Tullberg M, Fredman P, Wikkelsö C. Neurobiol Aging. 2003;24:707–714. doi: 10.1016/s0197-4580(02)00187-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Comparison of cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers between idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and subarachnoid hemorrhage-induced chronic hydrocephalus: a pilot study. Lee JH, Park DH, Back DB, et al. Med Sci Monit. 2012;18:0–25. doi: 10.12659/MSM.883586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.The impact of selected cytokines in the follow-up of normal pressure hydrocephalus. Sosvorova L, Mohapl M, Vcelak J, Hill M, Vitku J, Hampl R. Physiol Res. 2015;64:0–90. doi: 10.33549/physiolres.933069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Innate immunological pathways in COVID-19 pathogenesis. Paludan SR, Mogensen TH. Sci Immunol. 2022;7:0. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abm5505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Neuropathogenesis and neurologic manifestations of the coronaviruses in the age of coronavirus disease 2019: a review. Zubair AS, McAlpine LS, Gardin T, Farhadian S, Kuruvilla DE, Spudich S. JAMA Neurol. 2020;77:1018–1027. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.2065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.The spatial and cell-type distribution of SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 in the human and mouse brains. Chen R, Wang K, Yu J, et al. Front Neurol. 2020;11:573095. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.573095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Hoffmann M, Kleine-Weber H, Schroeder S, et al. Cell. 2020;181:271–280. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.SARS-CoV-2 targets glial cells in human cortical organoids. McMahon CL, Staples H, Gazi M, Carrion R, Hsieh J. Stem Cell Reports. 2021;16:1156–1164. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2021.01.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.SARS-CoV-2 infects the brain choroid plexus and disrupts the blood-CSF barrier in human brain organoids. Pellegrini L, Albecka A, Mallery DL, et al. Cell Stem Cell. 2020;27:951–961. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2020.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Fine tuning the cytokine storm by IFN and IL-10 following neurotropic coronavirus encephalomyelitis. Savarin C, Bergmann CC. Front Immunol. 2018;9:3022. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.03022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.The nervous system during COVID-19: caught in the crossfire. Natale NR, Lukens JR, Petri WA Jr. Immunol Rev. 2022;311:90–111. doi: 10.1111/imr.13114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in the CSF, blood-brain barrier dysfunction, and neurological outcome: studies in 8 stuporous and comatose patients. Alexopoulos H, Magira E, Bitzogli K, et al. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2020;7 doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES