Abstract
Maternal viral infection and immune response are known to increase the risk of altered development of the foetal brain. Given the ongoing global pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), investigating the impact of SARS-CoV-2 on foetal brain health is of critical importance. Here, we report the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in first and second trimester foetal brain tissue in association with cortical haemorrhages. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein was sparsely detected within progenitors and neurons of the cortex itself, but was abundant in the choroid plexus of haemorrhagic samples. SARS-CoV-2 was also sparsely detected in placenta, amnion and umbilical cord tissues. Cortical haemorrhages were linked to a reduction in blood vessel integrity and an increase in immune cell infiltration into the foetal brain. Our findings indicate that SARS-CoV-2 infection may affect the foetal brain during early gestation and highlight the need for further study of its impact on subsequent neurological development.
Keywords: human foetal cortex, development, SARS-CoV-2, brain, haemorrhage
Massimo et al. report the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in first and second trimester foetal brain tissue in association with cortical haemorrhages. The haemorrhages were associated with reduced blood vessel integrity and increased immune cell infiltration into the foetal cortex.
Introduction
Prenatal exposure to viral infection and maternal immune activation are associated with an increased risk of adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in the offspring.1–8 Altered neurodevelopment has been linked to several viral infections,9–12 including the association of ZIKA virus infection with microcephaly in the recent 2015 epidemic.13–17 Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been linked to an increased risk of both premature and still birth,18–21 with increasing reports of vertical transmission between the mother and foetus.21–29 More rarely, some studies have also reported that maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection can lead to foetal demise, restricted growth or severe pathology, such as pneumonia and intraventricular haemorrhage.19,30,31 There are also an increasing number of studies that report a maternal immune response that may affect the foetus with subsequent effects on the neonate.32–34
Several studies have reported that SARS-CoV-2 can infect developing human neurons in cerebral organoids,35–37 with others reporting that SARS-CoV-2 infection is higher in the developing choroid plexus within these organoids.38,39 However, the effect of a maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection on foetal brain health has yet to be fully investigated and should be closely monitored.34,40–45 Here, we describe evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in early gestation foetal brain in association with cortical haemorrhages.
Materials and methods
Human tissue
Human foetal tissues were obtained from the Human Development Biology Resource (HDBR), provided by the Joint MRC/Wellcome Trust (grant #MR/R006237/1) (www.hdbr.org). The HDBR provided fresh tissue from foetuses aged 9–21 post-conception weeks (pcw). Of the 661 samples collected during the 21 month period, the majority were from elective terminations (no abnormality recorded), 62 of the samples were recorded to have a chromosomal trisomy (44 trisomy 21, 12 trisomy 18, 1 trisomy 16, 1 trisomy 13 and 3 triploid). Of the 26 haemorrhagic samples examined, 25 were from elective terminations (no abnormality recorded) and 1 was recorded to have trisomy 21. All tissue was fixed for at least 24 h at 4°C in 4% (wt/vol) paraformaldehyde (PFA) in 120 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). COVID-19 patient lung tissue (Supplementary Fig. 8) was obtained as previously described in Bussani et al.46
Immunofluorescence and imaging
Whole brains and whole mount sections were imaged using a Zeiss Axio Imager.Z1 and ApoTome I or a Cairn Custom designed dissection microscope. Brains were then sucrose-treated (15 and 30% sucrose solution sequentially for 24 h each), OCT-embedded, and then 20 μm thick sections were cut using a cryostat.
These sections were then stained in a solution containing 10% BSA and 0.1% triton, using the primary antibodies ACE-2 (1:50 R&D AF933), aquaporin-1 (1:100 Merck ab2219), CD3 (1:100 Bio-Rad MCA1477), CD20 (1:100 Abcam ab219329), CD68 (1:100 DAKO M0814), claudin-5 (1:100 Invitrogen 35-2500 (4C3C2)), cleaved caspase-3 (1:100 Cell Signalling Technology 9661), ERG (1:100 Abcam ab92513), Hopx (1:100 Santa Cruz sc-398703), HuC/D (1:100 Abcam ab184267), IBA-1 (1:100 Abcam ab5076), MAP2 (1:100 Millipore ab5622), Mouse IgG isotype control (1:100 Sigma M5284), nestin (1:100, Sigma N5413), pan-laminin (1:100 Sigma L9393), Rabbit IgG isotype control (1:50 Abcam ab172730 [EPR25A]), SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (1:100-250 Genentech GTX632604 [1A9]), SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein (1:50-150 Sino Biological 40143-R001), S100a9 (1:200 BMA biomedicals T-1026), Sox2 (1:100 R&D Systems AF2018).
The Life technologies secondary antibodies, used at 1:1000, were donkey-anti-goat Alexa fluor 488 (A11055), anti-mouse Alexa fluor 568 (A10037) and 555 (A31570), anti-rabbit Alexa fluor 647 (A31573) and 488 (A21206), and goat anti-rat 555 (A21434) and anti-mouse 594 (A11005). Sections were all stained with DAPI (Sigma D9542) and mounted in Mowiol (Merck Biosciences).
Sections were then imaged using either a Zeiss LSM 800 inverted confocal microscope and a Zeiss Plan-Apochromat 20 × 0.8 objective, or a Zeiss AxioScan slide scanner and a Zeiss Plan-Apochromat 20 × 0.8 M27 objective.
In situ hybridization and imaging
In situ hybridization was performed using locked nucleic acid (LNA) probes for U6 snRNA (miRCURY LNA Detection probe, Qiagen, Cat. No. YD00699002) and SARS-CoV-2 RNA, designed to target the sense strand of ORF1ab and Spike regions of the viral genome. A scrambled sequence probe (YD00699004) was used as a control.
Experiments were performed using a dedicated ISH (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, air-dried frozen tissue sections were incubated with either SARS-CoV-2 (40 nM) or U6 probes (2 nM) for 1 h at 54°C in a hybridizer. After washing with SSC buffer, the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected using an anti-DIG alkaline phosphatase (AP) antibody (1:500) (Roche Diagnostics) supplemented with sheep serum (Jackson Immunoresearch) and bovine serum albumin (BSA). Hybridization was detected by adding NBT-BCIP substrate (Roche Diagnostics). Nuclei were counterstained with nuclear fast red. Images were acquired using a Leica ICC50W light microscope.
Immunohistochemical staining and imaging
Immunohistochemical staining was performed using a standard protocol. Briefly, sections were allowed to dry and were permeabilized for 10 min in 1% Triton X-100 in PBS, followed by blocking in 2% BSA (Roche) and overnight staining at 4°C with the primary antibodies diluted in blocking solution. After endogenous peroxidase inhibition with 3% H2O2, sections were incubated with appropriate biotin-conjugate secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature. Following signal amplification with avidin–biotin-complex–HRP (VECTASTAIN), DAB solution (VECTOR) was applied for 2–3 min. Haematoxylin (Bioptica) was further used to stain nuclei. Haematoxylin and 1% eosin were used for the H&E staining using a standard protocol.
Prussian blue staining was performed using equal parts of hydrochloric acid and potassium ferrocyanide prepared immediately prior to use, which was added to the slides for 20 min. Slides were then washed with distilled water three times and mounted in Mowiol.
Image analysis and quantification
All image analyses and quantifications were conducted using Fiji, and all statistical analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism. Integrated density measurements were conducted using a specified region of interest taken at least three times within the required area and then averaged. A branched blood vessel was classified as any vessel with one branch or more. All datasets were tested for Gaussian distribution (Kolmogorov–Smirnov test) prior to the selection of the appropriate statistical test. All datasets were analysed blind. For all graphs, error bars represent either ± standard deviation or standard error of means as stated in the figure legend. Differences between groups were analysed using a two-tailed Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney test.
Data availability
There are no restrictions on data availability. All data are reported in the article or the Supplementary material.
Results
Incidence of haemorrhages in human foetal cortex during the COVID-19 pandemic
In the 21 months from the start of July 2020 to the middle of April 2022, 661 human foetal tissue samples were collected by the HDBR in the UK. This period covers the time in which foetal tissue collection occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic, as collections were suspended from the end of March 2020 until July 2020. On gross examination of these samples, we observed haemorrhages within the cortical tissue in 26 of these 661 foetal tissue samples (Fig. 1A and B and Supplementary Fig. 1A). Whilst haemorrhages may occasionally occur (Supplementary Fig. 1B and C), they are very rare, with only two cases of similar haemorrhages in cortical tissue observed from images of 300 randomly selected samples from a total of 4917 that were collected by the HDBR between September 1999 to December 2019. It is therefore highly unusual to see this quantity of samples containing this degree of haemorrhage within the last 21 month period.
Figure 1.
Characterization of haemorrhages in human foetal cortex tissue. (A) Whole mount images of human foetal cortex tissue displaying RBC clusters in haemorrhagic tissue collected during the COVID-19 pandemic. (B) Whole mount images of human foetal cortex tissue from one 12 pcw and two 14 pcw foetuses displaying large clusters of red blood cells (RBC) (upper and middle rows) and cortex tissue from a 13 pcw and 15 pcw foetuses without RBC clusters. (C) Quantification of the surface area of individual RBC clusters (n = 2236) in non-haemorrhagic samples (no RBC clusters with a surface area above 0.4 mm2, or less than 20 RBC clusters between 0.1–0.4 mm2/mm2 of tissue) and haemorrhagic samples. (D) Quantification of the number of RBC clusters per 50 mm2 of tissue. (E) Quantification of the percentage of tissue surface area that contains RBC clusters. (F) The total number of foetal cortex samples collected at each age by the HDBR from the receival of the first haemorrhagic sample (5 Oct 2020) until 14 April 2022 (grey bars, lower area of bar) and the number of haemorrhagic samples (red, upper area of bar). Samples younger than 8 pcw are identified by Carnegie stages (CS). (G) Graph showing the number of confirmed COVID-19 cases per day in the UK from 30 January 2020 up to 14 April 2022 (black filled circles), the haemorrhagic foetal cortex samples (red crosses), the times when sample collection was suspended due to lockdown-related closures of labs (blue lines), and the period from which women under 40 were offered a COVID-19 vaccine (yellow shaded area to right). (H) Quantification of the number of RBC clusters/prussian blue positive areas in seven haemorrhagic samples. For each age shown, recent bleeds (orange, left bars) contained RBCs only, mixed bleeds (orange/blue, middle bars) contained both RBCs and Prussian blue deposits and older bleeds (blue, right bars) contained only Prussian blue deposits. Samples are ordered on the x-axis according their age in pcw. (I) Prussian blue staining in a 14 pcw non-haemorrhagic (left) and 14 pcw haemorrhagic (right) cortex. Top dashed box delineates a bleed containing RBCs (orange colour, adjacent upper right image) and the lower dashed box delineates an area positive for Prussian blue (blue colour, adjacent lower right image). Scale bars: (A) 1 cm, (B) 1 mm, (I) 500 µm, (I, inset) 50 µm. Statistics: (C–E) Mann–Whitney test, ***P = 0.0007 (C), 0.0008 (D), ****P < 0.0001. Error bars = standard deviation. Non-haemorrhagic samples n = 13, haemorrhagic n = 13.
We examined the haemorrhages by quantifying the size and number of clusters of red blood cells (RBC) observed in the tissue, in 26 of the 661 human foetal cortex tissue samples collected during the COVID-19 pandemic (including 13/26 of the haemorrhagic samples above, 11–21 pcw (Fig. 1A–F and Supplementary Fig. 1A). Small RBC clusters can occasionally be observed within blood vessels in the cortical tissue (Fig. 1B–E and Supplementary Fig. 1A), all of which had a low surface area. To differentiate these RBC clusters in blood vessels from haemorrhages, we characterized haemorrhages as RBC clusters with either a surface area >0.4 mm2 or an area with over 20 RBC clusters 0.1–0.4 mm2 per mm2 of tissue (13/26 samples, 11–21 pcw; Fig. 1C).
Quantification of RBC clusters within the 26 cortical tissue samples revealed that the average surface area of these clusters was 0.01689 mm2 in non-haemorrhagic samples and 0.04531 mm2 in haemorrhagic samples, with the largest being 1.265 mm2 (Fig. 1C). Compared to non-haemorrhagic samples, haemorrhagic samples contained RBC clusters of a significantly larger surface area (Fig. 1C), a significantly higher number of RBC clusters per mm2 of cortical tissue (Fig. 1D), and a significantly higher percentage of cortical tissue surface area that contained RBC clusters (Fig. 1E).
Timing of the haemorrhages in human foetal cortex tissue
As the number of these haemorrhagic samples received during the pandemic was unexpected, we next examined the number of haemorrhagic samples in relation to confirmed COVID-19 cases in the UK (data from https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/; Fig. 1G and Supplementary Fig. 2A and B). Haemorrhagic samples were received during periods of time when confirmed COVID-19 cases were highest (Fig. 1G and Supplementary Fig. 2A and B). The stage of gestation of these haemorrhagic samples varied from 8 pcw to 22 pcw (Fig. 1F), the upper age limit of tissue samples collected. However, the majority of the haemorrhagic samples were between 12–14 pcw (57.6%, 15/26; Fig. 1F).
To determine whether the haemorrhages were acute or more chronic, we examined the presence of ferric iron deposits, which arise after the lysis of RBCs, using Prussian Blue staining (Fig. 1H and I). Some samples showed RBCs, identifiable as orange cells within the tissue (Fig. 1I), found in areas with no Prussian Blue staining, indicating a recent haemorrhage. Other samples showed Prussian Blue stained areas absent of RBCs, indicating an older haemorrhage, whilst other samples showed a mixed pattern of Prussian Blue staining and RBCs, likely representing an intermediate time point (Fig. 1H and I). Strikingly, haemorrhagic samples that contained more RBC clusters without Prussian Blue staining (recent haemorrhage) contained the lowest number of areas of Prussian Blue alone (older haemorrhage, Fig. 1H), suggesting that these samples may represent different time points from the appearance of the haemorrhage. The more recent haemorrhages were found more often in the younger samples (12–14 pcw) than in the older samples (19–21 pcw). The different ages of haemorrhages present within each sample also indicate that they are not a result of the collection procedure performed.
We next examined the number of cleaved caspase-3 positive cells (Supplementary Fig. 3A and B) to determine if either the more recent or older haemorrhages were associated with an increase in cell death within the cortical tissue. No significant increase in cleaved caspase-3 positive cells were found in either the samples containing more recent or older haemorrhages (Supplementary Fig. 3B) compared to the non-haemorrhagic samples. In line with this finding, the thickness of the cortical wall was also not significantly altered in the haemorrhagic samples compared to the non-haemorrhagic samples (Supplementary Fig. 3C).
Presence of SARS-CoV-2 in human foetal brain tissue
It has previously been reported that SARS-CoV-2 can infect both neuronal/cortical tissue and the choroid plexus in human cerebral organoids.35–39 Choroid plexus tissue was reported to be particularly vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection in these organoids due to a high level of expression of ACE2, a major receptor for SARS-CoV-2.38,39 We therefore examined choroid plexus tissue by immunofluorescence for both the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and nucleocapsid (N) protein, which binds the viral RNA genome (Fig. 2A and B and Supplementary Fig. 4).
Figure 2.
SARS-CoV-2 detection in human foetal cortex and choroid plexus. (A) Immunofluorescence of choroid plexus from foetuses with non-haemorrhagic (upper) and haemorrhagic (lower) cortex, for ACE2 (green, middle left), SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (grey, middle right) and SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (magenta, right) and their merge with DAPI (blue, merged image left). Yellow boxes delineate the area shown on the far right (A′). (B–E) Quantification of the ratio of integrated density of immunofluorescence of the spike protein relative to its isotype control in (B) the choroid plexus from foetuses with non-haemorrhagic (n = 4) and haemorrhagic (n = 5) cortices, (C) non-haemorrhagic (n = 5) and haemorrhagic (n = 10) cortex, and (D) the ventricular zone (VZ) and (E) the cortical plate (CP) of these cortices. (F–G) Immunofluorescence of the cortical plate (CP, upper) and ventricular zone (VZ, lower) of haemorrhagic cortex for (F) DAPI (blue, merged image left) and spike protein (magenta, right) in a 13 pcw foetus, and (G) DAPI (blue, merged image left), MAP2 (grey, neuronal marker, upper middle) or Nestin (neural progenitor marker, lower middle) and spike protein (magenta, right) in another haemorrhagic 13 pcw foetus. (H) ISH for SARS-CoV-2 spike RNA (left) and immunohistochemistry for nucleocapsid protein (right) in a haemorrhagic sample. (I) ISH for SARS-CoV-2 spike RNA (left) and immunohistochemistry for spike protein (right) in a non-haemorrhagic sample. (J and K) Immunofluorescence of the outer subventricular zone (OSVZ, J) and cortical plate (CP, K) for DAPI (blue), SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (magenta) and either Sox2 (green, J) or HuC/D (green, K). Scale bars: (A, H and I) 100 µm, (A′) 25 µm, (F, G, J and K) 50 µm. Statistics: (B and E) unpaired t-test, (C and D) Mann–Whitney test, *P = 0.0247. Error bars = standard deviation.
Of the 26 haemorrhagic cortex tissue samples collected, five also contained choroid plexus tissue. These were analysed alongside four age-matched non-haemorrhagic cases. Consistent with previous reports, we detected a high level of ACE2 expression in the choroid plexus epithelium (Fig. 2A and Supplementary Fig. 4A–C). We also detected a significant level of SARS-CoV-2 spike and nucleocapsid proteins in all five of the choroid plexuses from haemorrhagic samples (average of 2.5 times above background staining, Fig. 2A and B), in comparison to non-haemorrhagic samples (Fig. 2A and B), in aquaporin-1 positive cells (Supplementary Fig. 4D). Notably, we also detected a low level of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in one of the non-haemorrhagic choroid plexus samples (Fig. 2B and Supplementary Fig. 4B).
We next examined the level of SARS-CoV-2 in the cortex tissue of the five samples where choroid plexus was obtained, plus an additional five haemorrhagic cortex samples, alongside age-matched controls. In contrast to the choroid plexus, we detected relatively little SARS-CoV-2 spike protein immunofluorescence in the cortical tissue (average of 1.3 times above background; Fig. 2C–G and Supplementary Figs 5–7), with no significant difference observed between non-haemorrhagic or haemorrhagic samples relative to pre-pandemic age-matched controls (Fig. 2C). Notably, the samples with the highest levels of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein immunofluorescence were 12–14 pcw in age.
We also identified a small, focal area of strong SARS-CoV-2 spike protein staining within the cortex in seven of the haemorrhagic samples by immunofluorescence (Fig. 2D–G, J and K and Supplementary Figs 6 and 7), and low levels in one non-haemorrhagic sample (Supplementary Fig. 5B). Within these samples, SARS-CoV-2 spike protein was detected within the neurons of the cortical plate (MAP2 positive, Fig. 2E–G, HuC/D positive Fig. 2K and Supplementary Fig. 7C), and within the progenitors of the ventricular and subventricular zones (nestin positive radial glia, Fig. 2D, F and G and Supplementary Fig. 6B; Sox2 positive progenitors Fig. 2J and Supplementary Fig. 7D and E; Hopx positive basal radial glia Supplementary Fig. 7E). Spike and nucleocapsid protein could also be detected within discrete areas of the cortex in 5 of the 10 haemorrhagic samples examined by immunohistochemistry (Fig. 2I, right panel, and Supplementary Fig. 8B), and in the cortex of the same non-haemorrhagic sample as above (Supplementary Fig. 8A, same sample as Supplementary Fig. 5B).
Consistent with these results, we detected low levels of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein RNA by in-situ hybridization (ISH) in discrete areas in four of the haemorrhagic samples (of eight examined) within the cortical plate and subplate (Fig. 2H and I, left panels, and Supplementary Fig. 8E) but did not detect significant levels throughout the cortical tissue. Overall, in the 10 haemorrhagic samples examined, SARS-CoV-2 was detected either within the choroid plexus, cortex or both. It was also detected within the choroid plexus of one non-haemorrhagic sample and in the cortex of another. These data indicate the association of SARS-CoV-2 infection with haemorrhagic samples, but that not all infected samples contain haemorrhages.
Presence of SARS-CoV-2 in other human foetal tissues
It has previously been reported that SARS-CoV-2 can infect placenta17,26–28,30,31,47–51 and other foetal tissues, such as the umbilical cord.28 We therefore examined various foetal tissues and placenta collected from three samples with observed cortical haemorrhages. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein was detected by immunofluorescence in the cortex and sparsely in the placenta of an 11 pcw sample (Supplementary Fig. 9A), in the cortex and umbilical cord of a 13 pcw sample (Supplementary Fig. 9B) and in the cortex, amnion, umbilical cord, but not the placenta, in a 9 pcw sample (Supplementary Fig. 9C), indicating the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in tissues with both foetal and maternal origin.
Reduced integrity of endothelial cells within the blood vessels in haemorrhagic human foetal cortex tissue
Haemorrhagic cerebral injury can be associated with changes to blood vessel integrity.52 One method to examine this is to quantify the tight junctions between the endothelial cells of the blood vessels, which enable the blood vessels to create a tight barrier to prevent leakage into the surrounding tissues. These tight junctions increase over the course of foetal brain development as the blood brain barrier develops.52–54
We therefore performed immunofluorescence for the endothelial tight junction protein claudin-5 and identified blood vessels using the vascular basement membrane marker laminin (pan-laminin, Fig. 3A). The percentage of blood vessels that were claudin-5 negative was significantly increased in the cortex of the haemorrhagic samples in comparison to the aged matched, non-haemorrhagic samples (Fig. 3B), although the percentage of these vessels with branching remained unchanged (Fig. 3C). The diameter of these claudin-5 negative vessels was significantly smaller than the claudin-5 positive vessels in the cortex of non-haemorrhagic samples (Fig. 3D, left), but larger diameter vessels were also found to be claudin-5 negative in the cortex of haemorrhagic samples (Fig. 3D, right). Within the cortex of the haemorrhagic samples, vessels adjacent to a site of RBC clusters had significantly less claudin-5 than those away from the site of RBC clusters (Fig. 3A and E). Overall, these data indicate a reduction in blood vessel integrity in the haemorrhagic samples.
Figure 3.
Blood vessel integrity in human foetal cortex tissue. (A) Immunofluorescence of cortex from non-haemorrhagic (upper) and haemorrhagic (away from RBC clusters, middle, and adjacent to RBC clusters, lower) samples, for DAPI (blue, left), pan-laminin (blood vessel basement membrane, green, middle images) and claudin-5 (endothelial cell tight junctions, magenta, right). Dashed boxes delineate areas on the right, dashed line indicates area of RBC clusters, arrow heads show pan-laminin positive blood vessel that is claudin-5 negative, bars indicate area of cortical plate (CP). (B–D) Quantification of the percentage of blood vessels that are claudin-5 negative throughout the cortical wall (B), the percentage of blood vessels with branching (C), the average diameter of claudin-5 positive and negative blood vessels in the non-haemorrhagic and haemorrhagic cortex (D) and the ratio of claudin-5 to pan-laminin integrated density in all blood vessels in haemorrhagic cortex and vessels adjacent to RBC clusters (E). Scale bars: (A) 100 µm, (A′) 50 µm. Statistics: Unpaired t-test (B and C), paired t-test (D and E). ** P = 0.0088 (D) 0.0054 (E), *P = 0.0184 (B), ns = 0.9421 (C), 0.1076 (D), Error bars = standard deviation. Non-haemorrhagic (n = 6) 13–19 pcw, haemorrhagic (n = 9) 12–19 pcw (all SARS-CoV-2 spike protein positive).
Immune cell infiltration in haemorrhagic human foetal cortex tissue
Maternal viral infection can cause altered immune responses in the foetal brain, including increased brain macrophages which can be derived from resident macrophages and infiltrating blood monocytes. Of note, tissue macrophages and monocytes have been linked to pathology in adults infected with COVID-19.55 We found no significant difference in the number of brain macrophages (CD68 positive) in the cortex of haemorrhagic versus non-haemorrhagic samples (Fig. 4A and B), with only a small difference when compared to pre-pandemic controls (Fig. 4B and Supplementary Fig 10).
Figure 4.
Immune cell infiltration in human foetal cortex tissue. (A) Immunofluorescence of cortex from non-haemorrhagic (upper) and haemorrhagic (lower) foetuses for DAPI (blue, left), pan-laminin (blood vessel basement membrane, green, all images) and CD68 (phagocytosing macrophages, magenta, all images). Dashed boxes delineates areas to the right. (B and C) Quantification of the number of CD68 positive cells per mm2 of tissue (B), and the number of clusters of CD68 positive cells (C) in non-haemorrhagic (n = 4) and haemorrhagic (n = 9) cortex, and (B) pre-pandemic cortex (n = 4). (D and E) Quantification of the number per mm2 of tissue (D) and roundness (E) of IBA-1 positive cells in non-haemorrhagic (n = 6), haemorrhagic (n = 7) and pre-pandemic cortex (n = 3). (F) Immunofluorescence of cortex from non-haemorrhagic (left) and haemorrhagic (right) for DAPI (blue, merged larger image), pan-laminin (blood vessel basement membrane, green, merged larger image) and IBA-1 (macrophages, magenta merged larger image and upper and lower smaller images). Dashed boxes delineates areas to the right, yellow arrowheads mark more rounded IBA-1 + cells, blue arrowheads mark less round IBA-1 + cells. (G) Quantification of the number of S100a9 positive cells per mm2 of tissue in non-haemorrhagic (n = 4), haemorrhagic cortex (n = 9) and pre-pandemic cortex (n = 4). (H) Immunofluorescence of cortex from non-haemorrhagic (upper) and haemorrhagic (lower) foetuses for DAPI (blue, left), pan-laminin (blood vessel basement membrane, green, all images) and S100a9 (monocytes, magenta, all images). Dashed boxes delineates areas to the right. (I) Whole mount images of human foetal cortex tissue and immunofluorescence for pan-Laminin (green) and S100a9 (magenta) in non-haemorrhagic (upper) and haemorrhagic (lower) cortex. Scale bars: (A, F, H and I) 200 µm, (A and H, inset) 100 µm, (F and I, inset) 50 µm. Statistics: Mann–Whitney test (B and G), unpaired t-test (C). *P = 0.0275 (B), 0.0213 (C), 0.0393 (D), **P = 0.009 (G). Error bars = standard error of the mean.
However, we did detect a change in the distribution of CD68 positive cells within the cortical tissue, with a significant increase in the number of clusters of CD68 positive cells in the cortex of haemorrhagic samples (Fig. 4C and Supplementary Fig. 10F and G). A cluster of CD68 positive cells was defined as more than 10 CD68 positive cells within an area of 2900 µm2, with the largest cluster 449 353 µm2 with 402 CD68 positive cells. 38% of these clusters were found to overlap with a cluster of RBCs (Supplementary Fig. 10F and G), consistent with a potential macrophage reaction to the haemorrhages.
We also found a significant increase in the number of IBA-1 positive brain macrophages in the cortex of the haemorrhagic samples (Fig. 4D–F). These IBA-1 positive cells displayed a wide variety of morphologies, from rounded to more complex (Fig. 4F). However, IBA-1 positive cells of these varied morphologies were found in both the haemorrhagic and non-haemorrhagic samples, resulting in no significant difference in the roundness of the cells (Fig. 4E). This is consistent with the lack of a significant increase in CD68 positive cells above (Fig. 4B), as the IBA-1 positive cells with a more rounded morphology are often associated with CD68 positivity and phagocytosis.
In addition, a significant increase in monocytes (positive for the marker s100a9) was detected in the cortex of haemorrhagic samples versus non-haemorrhagic and pre-pandemic samples (Fig. 4G–I and Supplementary Fig. 10). Whereas s100a9 positive cells were located within blood vessels of the cortex of non-haemorrhagic samples, (Fig. 4I, upper panels), these were found within the parenchyma of the cortex of haemorrhagic samples (Fig. 4I, lower panels), indicating extravasation into tissue. To determine if more immune cells were present, immunofluorescence was performed for the lymphocyte markers CD3 and CD20 (Supplementary Fig. 1C–E). No CD3 positive cells were found in the cortex and only one CD20 positive cell was found within a blood vessel of a non-haemorrhagic sample, indicating that lymphocyte infiltration was not present. Taken together, these data are consistent with the presence of a macrophage and monocyte immune response within the cortex of haemorrhagic samples.
Discussion
Here we report SARS-CoV-2 infection in human foetal brain in association with haemorrhage, disrupted endothelial integrity and infiltration of immune cells in the developing cortex. This is a timely and important finding as there have been conflicting reports of vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from mother to foetus and limited data on the effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection on foetal brain.18,19,21–24,26,34,42 SARS-CoV-2 was primarily detected in the choroid plexus of haemorrhagic samples, and more sparsely in the cortical neurons and progenitors, consistent with previous findings of increased vulnerability of the choroid plexus to infection in developing organoids.38,39
SARS-CoV-2 was detected in all of the samples presenting with haemorrhages examined, but whether these haemorrhages are a direct consequence of the infection or an indirect consequence of the maternal immune response1,32–34 to SARS-CoV-2 remains to be elucidated. It was also detected in tissue samples from three haemorrhagic samples in the umbilical cord and amnion, as well as sparsely in the placenta. In addition to the haemorrhagic samples, we also detected SARS-CoV-2 spike protein at a lower level in the choroid plexus of one sample and the cortex of another sample that did not display any sign of haemorrhage, nor any reduction in claudin-5 or increase in CD68 or S100a9 positive cells. This may indicate that these samples may either be at an early stage of SARS-CoV-2 infection prior to haemorrhage, a stage post-infection where the haemorrhage has subsided, or that infection with SARS-CoV-2 was not associated with haemorrhage at all in this sample. Further work examining foetal material collected during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic will be important to monitor the number of maternal SARS-CoV-2 infections that may result in such haemorrhages, including in mothers that are asymptomatic.
Strikingly, the haemorrhages are predominately found in the late first and early second trimester of gestation, a period of development in which the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic has not been thoroughly investigated. Specifically, the majority were between 12 and 14 pcw, a critical window of human foetal brain development when the endothelial tight junctions increase to form the blood brain barrier.52–54 Our observations of disrupted foetal cerebral vasculature are consistent with reports of damage to the microvasculature of the adult brain in SARS-CoV-2 infected patients.56–59 Further investigation is needed to understand if these effects on the cortical tissue are long lasting, or are able to resolve with minimal consequence. It is possible that an immune cell response could have a positive outcome, resulting in some resolution of these haemorrhages. However, maternal immune activation can have many long-lasting effects in neurodevelopment.1–6,32–34,41 Therefore, the postnatal follow up of children exposed to SARS-CoV-2 prenatally, such as studies using MRI (https://www.kcl.ac.uk/research/bibs-brain-imaging-in-babies), is of utmost importance. Together, our findings suggest that early human foetal brain is vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection and associated neuropathology, highlighting the importance of maternal and foetal monitoring during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Andrew Copp, Deborah Henderson, Steve Lisgo, Nita Solanky and their teams at the HDBR for their invaluable support; this work would not be possible without them. We also want to thank Grainne McAlonan and Mareike Albert for their expert advice. The authors would like to thank the following funding sources: the Medical Research Council MR/S025065/1 to KRL, MR/V031260/1 to VEM.
Contributor Information
Marco Massimo, Centre for Developmental Neurobiology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK; MRC Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, King’s College London, London, UK.
Carlotta Barelli, Centre for Developmental Neurobiology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK; MRC Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, King’s College London, London, UK.
Catalina Moreno, Centre for Developmental Neurobiology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK; MRC Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, King’s College London, London, UK.
Chiara Collesi, Molecular Medicine Laboratory, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB), 34139 Trieste, Italy; Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Rebecca K Holloway, Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Chancellor’s Building, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK; Dementia Research Institute at The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK; Medical Research Council Centre for Reproductive Health, The Queen’s Medical Research Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK; Barlo Multiple Sclerosis Centre and Keenan Research Institute for Biomedical Science, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Immunology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Berta Crespo, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
Lorena Zentilin, Molecular Medicine Laboratory, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB), 34139 Trieste, Italy.
Anna Williams, Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh BioQuarter, Edinburgh, UK.
Veronique E Miron, Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Chancellor’s Building, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK; Dementia Research Institute at The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK; Medical Research Council Centre for Reproductive Health, The Queen’s Medical Research Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK; Barlo Multiple Sclerosis Centre and Keenan Research Institute for Biomedical Science, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Immunology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mauro Giacca, Molecular Medicine Laboratory, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB), 34139 Trieste, Italy; Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy; British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, School of Cardiovascular Medicine & Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK.
Katherine R Long, Centre for Developmental Neurobiology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK; MRC Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, King’s College London, London, UK.
Competing interests
The authors report no competing interests.
Supplementary material
Supplementary material is available at Brain online.
References
- 1. Estes ML, McAllister AK. Maternal immune activation: Implications for neuropsychiatric disorders. Science. 2016;353:772–777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Choudhury Z, Lennox B. Maternal immune activation and schizophrenia–evidence for an immune priming disorder. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:585742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Solek CM, Farooqi N, Verly M, Lim TK, Ruthazer ES. Maternal immune activation in neurodevelopmental disorders. Dev Dyn. 2018;247:588–619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Boulanger-Bertolus J, Pancaro C, Mashour GA. Increasing role of maternal immune activation in neurodevelopmental disorders. Front Behav Neurosci. 2018;12:230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Lu-Culligan A, Iwasaki A. The role of immune factors in shaping fetal neurodevelopment. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2020;36:441–468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Ji-Xu A, Vincent A. Maternal immunity in autism spectrum disorders: Questions of causality, validity, and specificity. J Clin Med. 2020;9:2590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Han VX, Patel S, Jones HF, Dale RC. Maternal immune activation and neuroinflammation in human neurodevelopmental disorders. Nat Rev Neurol. 2021;17:564–579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Meyer U. Prenatal poly(i:C) exposure and other developmental immune activation models in rodent systems. Biol Psychiatry. 2014;75:307–315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Sawlani V, Shankar JJS, White C. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in a case of congenital rubella encephalitis. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2013;24:e122–e123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Silasi M, Cardenas I, Kwon JY, Racicot K, Aldo P, Mor G. Viral infections during pregnancy. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2015;73:199–213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Racicot K, Mor G. Risks associated with viral infections during pregnancy. J Clin Invest. 2017;127:1591–1599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. de Vries LS. Viral infections and the neonatal brain. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2019;32:100769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Li C, Xu D, Ye Q, et al. Zika virus disrupts neural progenitor development and leads to microcephaly in mice. Cell Stem Cell. 2016:19:120–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Qian X, Nguyen HN, Song MM, et al. Brain-region-specific organoids using mini-bioreactors for modeling ZIKV exposure. Cell. 2016;165:1238–1254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Einspieler C, Marschik PB. The developmental spectrum of prenatal Zika virus exposure. Lancet Child Adolesc Heal. 2020;4:345–346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Shao Q, Herrlinger S, Yang SL, et al. Zika virus infection disrupts neurovascular development and results in postnatal microcephaly with brain damage. Dev. 2016;143:4127–4136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Rosa-Fernandes L, Cugola FR, Russo FB, et al. Zika virus impairs neurogenesis and synaptogenesis pathways in human neural stem cells and neurons. Front Cell Neurosci. 2019;13:64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Crovetto F, Crispi F, Llurba E, et al. Impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on pregnancy outcomes: A population-based study. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;73:1768–1775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Gurol-Urganci I, Jardine JE, Carroll F, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes of pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection at the time of birth in England: National cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;225:522.e1–522.e11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Saccone G, Sen C, Di Mascio D, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes of pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021;57:232–241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Manti S, Leonardi S, Rezaee F, Harford TJ, Perez MK, Piedimonte G. Effects of vertical transmission of respiratory viruses to the offspring. Front Immunol. 2022;13:853009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Varma P, Lybrand ZR, Antopia MC, Hsieh J. Novel targets of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in human fetal brain development suggest early pregnancy vulnerability. Front Neurosci. 2021;14:614680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Fenizia C, Biasin M, Cetin I, et al. Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 vertical transmission during pregnancy. Nat Commun. 2020;11:1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Salem D, Katranji F, Bakdash T. COVID-19 infection in pregnant women: Review of maternal and fetal outcomes. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2021;152:291–298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Cosma S, Carosso AR, Cusato J, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 and first-trimester spontaneous abortion: A case-control study of 225 pregnant patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;224:391.e1–391.e7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Valdespino-Vázquez MY, Helguera-Repetto CA, León-Juárez M, et al. Fetal and placental infection with SARS-CoV-2 in early pregnancy. J Med Virol. 2021;93:4480–4487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Hsu AL, Guan M, Johannesen E, et al. Placental SARS-CoV-2 in a pregnant woman with mild COVID-19 disease. J Med Virol. 2021;93:1038–1044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Stonoga ETS, de Almeida Lanzoni L, Rebutini PZ, et al. Intrauterine transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Emerg Infect Dis. 2021;27:638–641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Marinho PS, da Cunha AJLA, Chimelli L, et al. Case report: SARS-CoV-2 mother-to-child transmission and fetal death associated with severe placental thromboembolism. Front Med. 2021;8:677001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Shende P, Gaikwad P, Gandhewar M, et al. Persistence of SARS-CoV-2 in the first trimester placenta leading to transplacental transmission and fetal demise from an asymptomatic mother. Hum Reprod. 2020;36:899–906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Sukhikh G, Petrova U, Prikhodko A, et al. Vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in second trimester associated with severe neonatal pathology. Viruses. 2021;13:447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Granja MG, Oliveira ACDR, De Figueiredo CS, et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnant women: Neuroimmune-endocrine changes at the maternal-fetal interface. Neuroimmunomodulation. 2021;28:1–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Goenka A, Halliday A, Gregorova M, et al. Young infants exhibit robust functional antibody responses and restrained IFN-γ production to SARS-CoV-2. Cell Reports Med. 2021;2:100327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Shook LL, Sullivan EL, Lo JO, Perlis RH, Edlow AG. COVID-19 in pregnancy: Implications for fetal brain development. Trends Mol Med. 2022;28:319–330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Song E, Zhang C, Israelow B, et al. Neuroinvasion of SARS-CoV-2 in human and mouse brain. J Exp Med. 2021;218:e20202135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Zhang BZ, Chu H, Han S, et al. SARS-CoV-2 infects human neural progenitor cells and brain organoids. Cell Res. 2020;30:928–931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Ramani A, Müller L, Ostermann PN, et al. SARS-Cov-2 targets neurons of 3D human brain organoids. EMBO J. 2020;39:e106230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Pellegrini L, Albecka A, Mallery DL, et al. SARS-CoV-2 infects the brain choroid Plexus and disrupts the blood-CSF barrier in human brain organoids. Cell Stem Cell. 2020;27:951–961.e5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Jacob F, Pather SR, Huang WK, et al. Human pluripotent stem cell-derived neural cells and brain organoids reveal SARS-CoV-2 neurotropism predominates in choroid Plexus epithelium. Cell Stem Cell. 2020;27:937–950.e9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Iqbal A, Burrin C, Aydin E, Beardsall K, Wong H, Austin T. Generation COVID-19—Should the foetus be worried? Acta Paediatr. 2021;110:759–764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. McAlonan GM, Murphy DGM, Edwards AD. Multidisciplinary: Research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7:e35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Cosma S, Borella F, Carosso A, et al. The “scar” of a pandemic: Cumulative incidence of COVID-19 during the first trimester of pregnancy. J Med Virol. 2021;93:537–540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Lu-Culligan A, Chavan AR, Vijayakumar P, et al. Maternal respiratory SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy is associated with a robust inflammatory response at the maternal-fetal interface. Med. 2021;2:591–610.e10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Rosen H, Bart Y, Zlatkin R, et al. Fetal and perinatal outcome following first and second trimester COVID-19 infection: Evidence from a prospective cohort study. J Clin Med. 2021;10:2152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Engert V, Siauw C, Stock A, et al. Severe brain damage in a moderate preterm infant as complication of post-COVID-19 response during pregnancy. Neonatology. 2021;118:505–508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Bussani R, Schneider E, Zentilin L, et al. Persistence of viral RNA, pneumocyte syncytia and thrombosis are hallmarks of advanced COVID-19 pathology. EBioMedicine. 2020;61:103104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Schwartz DA, Bugatti M, Santoro A, Facchetti F. Molecular pathology demonstration of SARS-CoV-2 in cytotrophoblast from placental tissue with chronic histiocytic intervillositis, trophoblast necrosis and COVID-19. J Dev Biol. 2021;9:33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Sharps MC, Hayes DJL, Lee S, et al. A structured review of placental morphology and histopathological lesions associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Placenta. 2020;101:13–29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Facchetti F, Bugatti M, Drera E, et al. SARS-CoV2 vertical transmission with adverse effects on the newborn revealed through integrated immunohistochemical, electron microscopy and molecular analyses of Placenta. EBioMedicine. 2020;59:102951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Hecht JL, Quade B, Deshpande V, et al. SARS-CoV-2 can infect the placenta and is not associated with specific placental histopathology: A series of 19 placentas from COVID-19-positive mothers. Mod Pathol. 2020;33:2092–2103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Fahmi A, Brügger M, Démoulins T, et al. SARS-CoV-2 can infect and propagate in human placenta explants. Cell reports Med. 2021;2:100456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Greene C, Hanley N, Campbell M. Claudin-5: Gatekeeper of neurological function. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2019;16:3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Andrews AM, Lutton EM, Cannella LA, et al. Characterization of human fetal brain endothelial cells reveals barrier properties suitable for in vitro modeling of the BBB with syngenic co-cultures. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2018;38:888–903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Virgintino D, Errede M, Robertson D, et al. Immunolocalization of tight junction proteins in the adult and developing human brain. Histochem Cell Biol. 2004;122:51–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Martinez FO, Combes TW, Orsenigo F, Gordon S. Monocyte activation in systemic COVID-19 infection: Assay and rationale. EBioMedicine. 2020;59:102964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Al-Sarraj S, Troakes C, Hanley B, et al. Invited review: The spectrum of neuropathology in COVID-19. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2021;47:3–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Lee M-H, Perl DP, Nair G, et al. Microvascular injury in the brains of patients with COVID-19. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:481–483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Pavlov V, Beylerli O, Gareev I, Torres Solis LF, Solís Herrera A, Aliev G. COVID-19-Related intracerebral hemorrhage. Front Aging Neurosci. 2020;12:600172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Dixon L, McNamara C, Gaur P, et al. Cerebral microhaemorrhage in COVID-19: A critical illness related phenomenon? Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2020;5:315–322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
There are no restrictions on data availability. All data are reported in the article or the Supplementary material.