Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2023 Mar 1;18(3):e0282478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282478

Predictors of death among severe COVID-19 patients admitted in Hawassa City, Sidama, Southern Ethiopia: Unmatched case-control study

Samuel Misganaw 1,*, Betelhem Eshetu 1, Adugnaw Adane 2, Tarekegn Solomon 1
Editor: Colin Johnson3
PMCID: PMC9977030  PMID: 36857375

Abstract

Introduction

Since COVID-19 was announced as a worldwide pandemic, the world has been struggling with this disease. In Ethiopia, there is some information on the epidemiological characteristics of the disease and treatment outcomes of COVID-19 patients. But, there is limited evidence related to predictors of death in COVID-19 patients.

Objective

To assess the predictor of death among severely ill COVID-19 patients admitted in Hawassa city COVID-19 treatment centers.

Methods

An institution-based unmatched case-control study was conducted at Hawassa city COVID-19 treatment centers from May 2021 to June 2021. All severe COVID-19-related deaths from May 2020 to May 2021 were included in the case group whereas randomly selected discharged severe COVID-19 patients were included in the control group. Extracted information was entered into Epi-data 4.6 and exported to SPSS 25 for analysis. Multivariable binary logistic regression was run to assess predictors. The result was presented as an adjusted odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval. Variables with a 95% confidence interval which not included one were considered statistically significant.

Result

A total of 372 (124 cases and 248 controls) patients were included in the study. Multivariable analysis revealed age ≥ 65 years (AOR = 2.62, 95% CI = 1.33–5.14), having shortness of breath (AOR = 1.87, 95% CI = 1.02–3.44), fatigue (AOR 1.78, 95% CI = 1.09–2.90), altered consciousness (AOR 3.02, 95% CI = 1.40, 6.49), diabetic Mellitus (AOR = 2.79, 95% CI = 1.16–6.73), chronic cerebrovascular disease (AOR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.23, 3.88) were found to be predictors of death.

Conclusion

Older age, shortness of breath, fatigue, altered consciousness, and comorbidity were predictors of death in Severe COVID-19 patients.

Introduction

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by a single-stranded RNA virus called severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) [1]. In December 2019, a cluster of patients with pneumonia of unknown cause emerged in Wuhan, China [2]. On January 2020, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was identified as a causative agent for that observed pneumonia cases [3].

World health organization named the disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 “COVID-19” (coronavirus disease 2019). On 11 March 2020, COVID-19 spreads to 144 countries and more than 118,000 cases and 4,000 deaths were reported; and WHO announced it as a pandemic [4]. In Africa, Egypt reported the first COVID-19 case on 14 February followed by Algeria on 25 February 2020 [5, 6], and Ethiopia reported the first COVID-19 case on 13 March 2020 [7].

Even if precautionary measures were practiced to prevent the rapid spread of the disease, the virus was quickly expanding all over the world and causing millions of death. As of the WHO report on 28 September 2021, there have been over 231 million cases and more than 4.7 million deaths worldwide. The United States of America reported the highest number of cases and deaths followed by India [8]. The case fatality rate of the disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 is 3.26–4.16% in Latin America; 5.8% in the United States [9]. In Africa, a total of 5,998,863 cases and 144,957 deaths were reported [8]. As of the EPHI report on 19 September 2021, there were over 332 thousand confirmed COVID-19 cases and more than 5 thousand deaths in Ethiopia [10].

Since COVID-19 was announced as a worldwide pandemic, the world has been struggling with this disease [4], but the pandemic is still ongoing and the number of confirmed cases and mortality rates are changing every day. Virus mutations and appearing of new variants are also challenging to public health as they are more contagious and cause more severe illnesses [11, 12]. Similar to other RNA viruses, SARS-CoV-2 also continually mutates and new variants are appearing [11]. A variant of interest is defined as an isolate of SARS-CoV-2 that has genotypic and/or phenotypic changes compared to the reference genome. A variant of concern is defined as a variant of interest that has evidence of one or more increases in transmissibility or detrimental change in COVID-19 epidemiology, increase in virulence or change in clinical disease presentation; decrease in the effectiveness of available diagnostics, vaccines, therapeutics or public health and social measures [12, 13].

Globally, cases of the Alpha variant have been reported in 193 countries, while 142 countries have reported cases of the Beta variant; 96 countries have reported cases of the Gamma variant and the Delta variant has been reported in 187 countries [8]. In Ethiopia Alpha, Beta, and Delta SARS-COV-2 variants were detected [10].

Based on the WHO report on 28 September 2021, over 3.3 million new cases and over 55,000 new deaths were reported globally during the week of 20–26 September 2021. The African region reported over 87,000 new cases and over 2,500 new deaths in the reported week. The number of deaths in Africa shows a 5% increase as compared to the previous week [8]. In Ethiopia, currently, people neglect the benefit of social distancing, hand washing, staying at home, using a mask, and suffering from the critical phase of COVID-19 [14]. As of the EPHI report on 19 September 2021, Ethiopia was ranked in the fourth position by the number of confirmed cases and in the sixth position by the number of deaths due to COVID-19 in Africa. A total of 9,857 new cases and 201 new deaths were reported during the week of 13–19 September 2021. The weekly number of cases and death increased by 21% compared with the past week. The rate of positivity was higher in Sidama region compared with other regions which was 36% [10].

The severity of the disease and treatment outcome of the patients varies from person to person. It may range from asymptomatic infection to severe disease with complications and lastly even death [15, 16]. It displayed a wide spectrum of clinical signs and symptoms, which included: fever, cough, sore throat, nasal congestion, sputum, headache, diarrhea, fatigue, dyspnea, chest tightness, myalgia, nausea, rhinorrhea, dizziness or confusion, hemoptysis, anorexia, vomiting, chest and abdominal pain [17].

After the first case of COVID-19 disease were reported in China the virus spread around the world and cause millions of deaths. Following that, international studies identified potential predictors of mortality among COVID-19 patients [1820].

Regarding disease severity and predictor of mortality, studies identified different potential risk factors for disease severity and mortality among COVID-19 patients; including older age, male sex, pre-existing comorbidities, patient’s vital sign, and clinical symptoms during admission, radiographic and laboratory findings [19, 2125].

Advanced age, male sex, cardiovascular comorbidities, acute cardiac or kidney injury, and lymphocytopenia, hypertension, diabetes, COPD, and history of CVD), acute organ injury, conferred an increased risk of death [2628]. Age ⩾65 years was identified as a strong predictor of death for COVID-19 patients [20, 21, 29, 30]. Males were more likely to develop severe disease with complications and had much higher mortality than females [19, 22, 3133]. Related to comorbidity status, hypertension, diabetes [20], chronic kidney disease, stroke [34], cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease [21], and liver disease [18] were identified as predictors of death among severe COVID-19 patients.

Patient’s vital signs and presenting symptoms on admission such as SpO2 less than 90%, RR greater than 20 breath /minute, heart rate greater than 100peats/ minute systolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg, dyspnea, cough, breathing difficulty, vomiting and consciousness disorder were identified as a predictor of death [19, 24, 35, 36].

Identification of predictors of death and understanding the characteristic of severe COVID-19 patients is very important to provide efficient, equitable, and appropriate management for COVID-19 patients. In Africa, there are limited data regarding regional predictors of mortality among COVID -19 patients [33].

In Ethiopia, there is some information on epidemiological characteristics of the disease, Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of the population related to the COVID-19 pandemic, and treatment outcome of COVID-19 patients. But there is limited evidence related to predictors of death in COVID-19 in Ethiopia including Hawassa.

To fill the gap it is important to conduct more research on the area of identifying risk factors for disease severity and predictor of death among COVID-19 patients in our local setting. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the predictors of death in severe COVID-19 patients in Hawassa, southern Ethiopia in 2021.

Method and materials

Study setting and period

This study was conducted at Hawassa city COVID-19 treatment centers. Severe COVID-19 patients admitted in the centers from May 2020 to May 2021 were included in the study and data was extracted from 30 May 2021 to 30 June 2021.

Hawassa city is located 273 km south of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. During the pandemic, there was one quarantine center (at Hawassa University), two isolation centers (at pyramid hotel and Dukale wakayo hotel), and two treatment centers (Mehal sub-city and Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital).

The COVID-19 treatment center located in Mehal sub-city has 100 beds including 8 critical beds and two mechanical ventilators. Hawassa University Compressive Specialized Hospital COVID-19 treatment center has 100 beds including six intensive care unit beds of which four of them are equipped with mechanical ventilation.

Study design

An institution-based unmatched case-control study.

Population

Source population

All patients with a confirmed diagnosis of severe COVID-19 using PT-PCR and admitted to COVID-19 treatment centers in Hawassa city.

Study population

All patients admitted to Hawassa city COVID-19 treatment centers with a confirmed diagnosis of severe COVID-19 from May 2020 to May 2021.

Case. Cases were patients admitted to Hawassa city COVID-19 treatment centers from May 2020 to May 2021 with a confirmed diagnosis of severe COVID-19 and whose treatment outcome was death.

Control. Controls were patients admitted to Hawassa city COVID-19 treatment centers from May 2020 to May 2021 with a confirmed diagnosis of severe COVID-19 and who recover from the disease and were discharged.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria

All severe COVID-19 patients who were on treatment and follow-up at the Centers during the study period and whose treatment outcome status is known as dead or discharged were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Severe COVID-19 patients whose chart is incomplete for age, sex, comorbidity, vital sign, and clinical symptom were excluded.

Severe COVID-19 patients whose outcome status is unknown due to transfer to other hospitals or any other reason that resulted in the discharge of the patient before the observation of the outcome were excluded from the study.

Sample size determination

The sample size was calculated via online Open Epi-info from the findings of previous similar studies. The calculation was done for four potential determinants (age ≥65, cough, male sex, and oxygen saturation (spo2) ≤89%) which were consistently significant in many studies. To determine the appropriate sample size; two-sided confidence level, the power of the study, the ratio of controls to cases, the proportion of controls with exposure, relatively least extreme odds ratio to be detected, and lastly, 10% for the incomplete chart was added. Based on this, the maximum calculated sample size was 366 (122 cases and 244 controls) and it was considered the minimum sample size of the study [36] (Table 1).

Table 1. Sample size calculation for assessment of predictor of death among severely ill COVID-19 patients admitted to Hawassa city COVID-19 treatment centers, Hawassa, Sidama, Ethiopia, 2021.

Variables CI Power AOR The ratio of control to case The proportion of control exposed case control 10% Total Ref.
Age ≥65 95% 80% 3.765 2 30.4 33 66 10 109 [21]
Cough 95% 80% 2.06 2 25.7 111 222 33 366 [36]
SPO2 ≤89% 95% 80% 2.959 2 25.7 49 98 15 162 [19]
Male sex 95% 80% 2.876 2 51.4 54 108 16 178

Sample of cases. All confirmed severe COVID-19-related death in the study setting from May 2020 to May 2021 and whose chart is completed related to age, sex, comorbidity, and presenting signs and symptoms.

Sample of controls. From all severe COVID-19 patients who were discharged with recovery from the COVID-19 treatment centers from May 2020 to May 2021, the sample of the control group was selected using a 1:2 case-to-control ratio.

Sampling technique and procedure

From May 2020 to May 2021, a total of 1,032 confirmed COVID-19 patients were admitted to COVID-19 treatment centers in the study area. Of the total admitted patients, 673 patients were severe cases. These severe COVID-19 patients are divided into the case (dead) and control (discharged) groups based on their outcome status. Of the total 673 severe COVID-19 patients, 128 were dead and 545 were discharged. Among the dead, 4 incomplete charts were excluded and 124 patients were included in the study. From the discharge, the sample of control was selected using a 1:2 case-to-control ratio. Finally, 372 (124 cases and 248 controls) were included in the study.

To select the sample of control, a sampling frame was developed using discharged patient’s medical registration number. Then simple random sampling technique was used to select the required number of controls from each COVID-19 treatment center. The number of controls selected from each setting was proportional to the number of selected cases (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Sampling technique for assessment of predictor of death among severely ill COVID-19 patients admitted to Hawassa city COVID-19 treatment centers, Hawassa, Sidama, Ethiopia, 2021.

Fig 1

Variables

Dependent variables

Treatment outcome of COVID-19 patients (Death versus Discharge).

Independent variables

Demographic variables; Age, sex, place of residence

Signs and symptoms during admission; Temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure, fever, cough, sore trout, shortness of breath, chest pain, headache, loss of appetite, fatigue, altered consciousness, joint pain, and vomiting.

Laboratory findings; White blood cell count, hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelets count, creatinine, urea, sodium, potassium, aspartate transaminase, alkaline phosphatase.

Comorbidity; Hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, asthma, chronic obstructed pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, chronic liver disease, neurological disease, cancer, hematologic disease, malnutrition, HIV/AIDS, and tuberculosis.

Data collection technique

Data were extracted from the patient’s card using a standardized data collection tool, which was a modified version of the WHO/ International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infection Consortium (ISARIC) case record form for severe acute respiratory infection clinical characterization [37]. The extracted information about the patients were including demographic data, pre-existing comorbidities, vital signs, clinical symptoms, signs during admission, and the patient’s outcome status.

Data quality and management

Amendment to the tool was made after a pre-test on the data extraction tool conducted on 19 randomly selected charts at shashamene treatment center. Training on the data collection tool was given to four BSC nurse data collectors and one supervisor. Data consistency and completeness were checked before data entry and analysis.

Data management and statistical analysis

The data were coded, entered, cleaned, and stored in epi-data version 4.6 and exported to SPSS version 25 software for analysis. Descriptive statistics were presented by frequency and percentage for categorical variables and median and interquartile range for continuous variables. The statistically significant difference between died and discharged groups in terms of independent variables was assessed by Pearson’s chi-square test for categorical variables and Continuous variables were assessed by the Mann-Whitney U test due to their non-normally distribution. Those variables with p-value < 0.05 was defined as having statistical significance difference in terms of COVID-19 outcome. Multivariable binary logistic regression was run to assess the association between the dependent variable and independent variables. Initially, bivariate analysis was conducted and variables having p-value < 0.25 were further included in multivariate analysis to determine independent risk factors associated with COVID-19 mortality. For the final model, model assumption such as multicollinearity and Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness of fit test was checked and the result of the final model was presented as an adjusted odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval. Variables having a 95% confidence interval that does not include one in the final model were considered independent predictors of COVID-19 death.

Operational definitions

Sever COVID-19 disease. Adolescent or adult with clinical signs of pneumonia (fever, cough, dyspnea, fast breathing) plus one of the following: Respiratory rate ≥ 30 breaths/min;

Peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) < 90% on room air, arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ≤300mmHg (1mmHg = 0.133 kPa).

A child with clinical signs of pneumonia (cough or difficulty in breathing) plus at least one of the following: Central cyanosis or SpO2 < 90%, Severe respiratory distress (e.g. fast breathing, grunting, very severe chest indrawing), general danger sign (inability to breastfeed or drink, lethargy or unconsciousness, or convulsions), fast breathing (in breaths/min): < 2 months: ≥ 60; 2–11 months: ≥ 50; 1–5 years: ≥ 40 [38].

COVID-19 death

A death due to COVID-19 is defined for surveillance purposes as a death resulting from a clinically compatible illness, in a probable or confirmed COVID-19 case, unless there is a clear alternative cause of death that cannot be related to COVID disease (e.g. trauma). There should be no period of complete recovery from COVID-19 between illness and death [39].

Ethical considerations

Ethical approval was obtained from the Hawassa University, College of Medicine and Health Sciences Institutional Review Board. Besides, permission letters were given to respective institutions in the study area, (Hawassa University comprehensive specialized Hospital, Mehal sub city COVID-19 treatment center). Moreover, permission was obtained from the responsible person of each study institute after explaining the purpose and significance of the study. Face masks, sanitizer and gloves were provided for data collectors. The patient data was taken anonymously by using the patient’s medical registration number and the personal information of the patients stayed confidential.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics and clinical presentation

A total of 372 severely ill COVID-19 patients were included in the study (124 cases and 248 controls). The age of the patients ranged from 1 year to 90 years with a median of 46 (IQR: 25) years. The majority 233 (62.6%) of the patients were male. Compared between the two groups, the patients in the death event group had a higher male proportion (70.2% vs. 58.9%), and older age (median 58 vs. 42) than patients who are discharged. In addition, the case group was more likely to present with fever (49.6% vs. 41.1%), shortness of breath (80.6% vs. 68.1%), fatigue (51.6% vs. 37%), and altered consciousness (21% vs. 6.5%) compared to control group (Table 2).

Table 2. Socio-demographic characteristics and presenting symptoms of severe COVID-19 patients in Hawassa city COVID-19 treatment centers, Hawassa, Sidama, Ethiopia, 2021.

Variables Case (n = 124) Control (n = 248) p-value
Median (IQR) age (Years) 58(28) 42(22) 0.001
Age groups (Years)
<65 91(73.4%) 225(90.7%) 0.001
≥65 33(26.6%) 23(9.3%)
Sex
Male 87(70.2%) 146(58.9%) 0.034
Female 37(29.8%) 102(41.1%)
Residence
Rural 35 (28.2%) 69 (27.8%) 0.935
Urban 89 (71.8%) 179 (72.2%)
Fever
Yes 51 (41.1%) 123 (49.6%) 0.123
No 73 (58.9%) 125 (50.4%)
Cough
Yes 111 (89.5%) 222 (89.5%) 1.00
No 13 (10.5%) 26 (10.5%)
Sore throat
Yes 8 (6.5%) 10 (4.0%) 0.305
No 116 (93.5%) 238 (96.0%)
Shortness of breath
Yes 100 (80.6%) 169 (68.1%) 0.011
No 24 (19.4%) 79 (31.9%)
Chest Pain
Yes 36 (29.0%) 86 (34.7%) 0.274
No 88 (71.0%) 162 (65.3%)
Headache
Yes 38 (30.6%) 96 (38.7%) 0.127
No 86 (69.4%) 152 (61.3%)
Loss of appetite
Yes 37 (29.8%) 68 (27.4%) 0.625
No 87 (70.2%) 180 (72.6%)
Fatigue
Yes 64 (51.6%) 92 (37.1%) 0.007
No 60 (48.4%) 156 (62.9%)
Altered consciousness
Yes 26 (21.0%) 16 (6.5%) 0.001
No 98 (79.0%) 232 (93.5%)
Joint pain
Yes 12 (9.7%) 35 (14.1%) 0.225
No 112 (90.3%) 213 (85.9%)
Vomiting
Yes 21(16.9) 31(12.5) 0.245
No 103(83.1) 217(87.5)

Baseline vital signs and laboratory findings

On admission, the median respiratory rate was 32 breaths per minute (IQR: 8) and the median heart rate was 120 beats per minute (IQR: 24 beats/min). The patients in the case group had higher respiratory rate (median 35.8 vs. 30 beats/min) and heart rate (median 105 vs. 98 beats/min). On the laboratory findings, patients in the case group had a lower value of Hematocrit (median 39.8 vs. 41.15), platelets count (median 234 vs. 225), and higher white blood cell count (median 13 vs. 8.4), and urea (median 46.5 vs. 29.6) than the control group (Table 3).

Table 3. Baseline vital signs and laboratory findings of severe COVID-19 patients in Hawassa city COVID-19 treatment centers, Hawassa, Sidama, Ethiopia, 2021.

Variables Case Control p-value
Presenting vital sign
Median (IQR) body temperature in °C 37.2 (1.2) 37.1 (1.2) 0.412
Median (IQR) heart rate per minute 105 (86) 98 (22) 0.003
Median (IQR) respiratory rate per minute 35.81(16) 30 (6) 0.001
Median (IQR) systolic blood pressure 122.5(25) 120 (22) 0.407
Median (IQR) diastolic blood pressure 73.5(18) 73(14) 0.947
Complete cell count
Median (IQR) White blood cell count (x 103/L) 13 (10) 8.4 (6.6) 0.001
Median (IQR) Hemoglobin (g/dL) 12.65 (4.2) 13.2(2.9) 0.052
Median (IQR) Hematocrit (%) 39.8(12.9) 41.15(8.8) 0.179
Median (IQR) platelets count (x 103/L) 234(147) 225(133.5) 0.85
Renal function test
Median (IQR) creatinine (mg/dl) 1.08(0.8) 0.91(0.37) 0.001
Median (IQR) urea (mg/dl) 46.5(30.4) 29.6(20) 0.001
Electrolyte
Median (IQR) sodium (mEq/L) 135 (10) 134(7.7) 0.17
Median (IQR) potassium (mEq/L) 4.3(1.6) 3.9(0.87) 0.039
Liver function test
Median (IQR) Aspartate transaminase (IU/L) 47.65(34.65) 36(31) 0.051
Median (IQR) Alkaline phosphatase (IU/L) 139 (141) 106 (103) 0.154

Comorbidity status of the patients

Of the total participants, 223 (59.9%) patients presented with one or more comorbidity. The proportion of patients presenting with comorbidity was higher in the case group (79% vs. 50%) than in the controls. Diabetes mellitus (37.1% vs. 17.7%), hypertension (35.5% vs. 20.2%), and cerebrovascular disease (17.7% vs. 4.4%) were noted with a higher proportion in the case group than the control group (Table 4).

Table 4. Comorbidity status of severe COVID-19 patients at Hawassa city COVID-19 treatment centers, Hawassa, Sidama, Ethiopia, 2021.

Variable Case (n = 124) # (%) Control (n = 248) # (%) p-value
At least one comorbidity
Yes 98 (79.0) 125 (50.4) 0.001
No 26 (21.0) 123 (49.6)
Hypertension
Yes 44 (35.5) 50 (20.2) 0.001
No 80 (64.5) 198 (79.8)
Cardiovascular disease/non-hypertension/
Yes 15 (12.1) 24 (9.7) 0.473
No 109 (87.9) 224 (90.3)
Diabetes Mellitus
Yes 46 (37.1) 44 (17.7) 0.001
No 78 (62.9) 204 (82.3)
Cerebrovascular disease
Yes 22 (17.7) 11(4.4) 0.001
No 102 (82.3) 237 (95.6)
Asthma
Yes 7 (5.6) 15 (6.0) 0.876
No 117 (94.4) 233 (94)
Obstructive pulmonary disease/non-Asthma/
Yes 1 (3.2) 4 (0.4) 0.026
No 120 (96.8) 247 (99.6)
Kidney disease
Yes 3 (2.4) 7 (2.8) 0.821
No 121 (97.6) 241 (97.2)
Liver disease
Yes 2 (1.6) 3 (1.2) 0.750
No 122 (98.4) 245 (98.8)
Neurological disease
Yes 3 (2.4) 1 (0.4) 0.076
No 121 (97.6) 247 (99.6)
Cancer
Yes 3 (2.4) 1 (0.4) 0.076
No 121 (97.6) 247 (99.6)
Hematologic disease/non-cancer/
Yes 6 (4.8) 3 (1.2) 0.032
No 118 (95.2) 245 (98.8)
Malnutrition
Yes 3 (2.4) 6 (2.4) 1.000
No 121 (97.6) 242 (97.6)
HIV/ADIS
Yes 7 (5.6) 5 (2.0) 0.062
No 117 (94.4) 243 (98.0)
Tuberculosis
Yes 8 (6.5) 7 (2.8) .093
No 116 (93.5) 241 (97.2)

Predictors of death among patients with severe COVID-19

The bivariate logistic regression analysis was initially performed on socio-demographic variables, presenting symptom and comorbidity parameters of the patients. As a result, variables including male sex, age ≥ 65 years, shortness of breath, fatigue, altered consciousness, Diabetic Mellitus, hypertension, and cerebrovascular disease showed significant predictors of death events.

To determine independent risk factors associated with COVID-19 mortality, a multivariable analysis was performed. Variables that have a p-value of < 0.25 in bivariate analysis were selected for multivariate analysis. Multicollinearity effect was not observed (variance inflation factor (VIF) value lies between 1 and 2 in each involved variable). The final model was checked for goodness of fit using Hosmer and Lemeshow test and the value was 0.422 which means the actual model and the expected one has no significant difference.

Based on multivariate analysis results age ≥ 65 years, shortness of breath, fatigue, altered consciousness, diabetic Mellitus, and chronic cerebrovascular disease were the independent predictors of COVID-19 death.

The risk of mortality among severe COVID-19 patients with age ≥ 65 years was 2.62 times higher as compared to the patients with age < 65 years (AOR = 2.62, 95%CI = 1.33–5.14).

Patients who presented with shortness of breath were 87% more likely to have died than a patient without shortness of breath (AOR = 1.87, 95% CI = 1.02–3.44). Mortality among COVID-19 patients who presented with a symptom of fatigue was 78% higher compared to patients without fatigue (AOR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.09–2.90). Altered consciousness also increased the risk of COVID-19 death by 3 times (AOR = 3.02, 95% CI = 1.40–6.49).

The risk of mortality among COVID-19 patients with cerebrovascular disease was 2.79 times higher than patients without cerebrovascular disease (AOR = 2.79, 95%CI = 1.16–6.73). Patients with diabetics were two times as high as the patients without diabetics to die due to COVID-19 disease (AOR = 2.18, 95% CI = 1.23–3.88) (Table 5).

Table 5. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression result of severe COVID-19 patients, Hawassa, Sidama, Ethiopia, 2021.

Variable Case (n = 124) # (%) Control (n = 248) # (%) COR(95%CI) AOR(95%CI)
Age
<65 91(73.4) 225(90.7) 1 1
≥65 33(26.6) 23(9.3) 3.55 (1.98–6.37) 2.62 (1.33–5.14) *
Sex
Male 87(70.2) 146(58.9) 1.64 (1.04–2.6) 1.19 (0.71–1.99)
Female 37(29.8) 102(41.1) 1 1
Fever
Yes 51 (41.1) 123 (49.6) 0.71 (0.46–1.1) 0.77 (0.45–1.28)
No 73 (58.9) 125 (50.4) 1 1
Shortness of breath
Yes 100 (80.6) 169 (68.1) 1.95 (1.16–3.27) 1.87 (1.02–3.44) *
No 24 (19.4) 79 (31.9) 1 1
Headache
Yes 38 (30.6) 96 (38.7) 0.7 (0.44–1.11) 0.75 (0.45–1.25)
No 86 (69.4) 152 (61.3) 1 1
Fatigue
Yes 64 (51.6) 92 (37.1) 1.81 (1.17–2.8) 1.78 (1.09–2.9) *
No 60 (48.4) 156 (62.9) 1 1
Altered consciousness
Yes 26 (21) 16 (6.5) 3.85 (1.98–7.49) 3.02 (1.4–6.49) *
No 98 (79.0) 232 (93.5) 1 1
Joint pain
Yes 12 (9.7) 35 (14.1) 0.65 (0.33–1.31) 0.59 (0.27–1.29)
No 112 (90.3) 213 (85.9) 1 1
Vomiting
Yes 21(16.9) 31(12.5) 1.43 (0.79–2.6) 1.47 (0.75–2.91)
No 103(83.1) 217(87.5) 1 1
Hypertension
Yes 44 (35.5) 50 (20.2) 2.18(1.35–3.52) 1.29 (0.71–2.34)
No 80 (64.5) 198 (79.8) 1 1
Cerebrovascular disease
Yes 22 (17.7) 11(4.4) 4.65 (2.17–9.94) 2.79 (1.16–6.73) *
No 102 (82.3) 237 (95.6) 1 1
Diabetic Mellitus
Yes 46 (37.1) 44 (17.7) 2.73 (1.68–4.46) 2.18 (1.23–3.88) *
No 78 (62.9) 204 (82.3) 1 1
Tuberculosis
Yes 8 (6.5) 7 (2.8) 2.37 (0.84–6.71) 2.9 (0.89–9.38)
No 116 (93.5) 241 (97.2) 1 1

* = significantly associated, AOR = Adjusted odds ratio, COR = crude odds ratio

Discussion

This study assessed the predictors of death in severe COVID-19 patients who were admitted at Hawassa city COVID-19 treatment centers. Age ≥ 65 years, shortness of breath, fatigue, altered consciousness, diabetic Mellitus, and chronic cerebrovascular diseases were the independent predictors of COVID-19 death.

The finding of this study revealed that older age was associated with a higher risk of death among severe COVID-19 patients. Patients with age ≥ 65 years had higher odds of death as compared to patients with age < 65 years. Similar to this finding, studies in the USA reported older age was found as a potential risk factor for death among COVID-19 patients [18, 26, 27]. A cohort study in china also reveals that age ⩾ 65 years was a strong predictor of death for COVID-19 patients [21]. A study conducted in Bangladesh also explained that mortality among hospitalized COVID-19 patients with age> 65 years was 3.59 times more likely higher as compared to the patients with age < 65 years [20]. This is due to there is correlation between age and natural immunity; as natural immunity declines gradually at older ages. As age increases, decreases the production of T cells and immunological responses to pathogens. It leads to less body fitness to fight infection and increased vulnerability and susceptibility to adverse health outcomes or death when exposed to infection [40]. Older people are also vulnerable to adverse drug reactions which may either reduce organ function at an older age or taking multiple drugs due to comorbidities [41, 42].

The result of this study also found that having shortness of breath at admission is a significant factor that predicts a death outcome. Patients who had a history of SOB at presentation had a higher risk of death outcome than those who had no history of SOB. Similarly, studies conducted in Ethiopia [43], Nigeria, and Congo reported shortness of breath as a significant risk factor for death among COVID-19 patients [24, 25, 36]. This is due to that severe pneumonia can cause significant gas exchange disturbances and lead to hypoxemia. Hypoxia reduces the energy production required for cell metabolism and increases the body’s anaerobic digestion. Acidosis and oxygen free radicals accumulated in the cell destroy the phospholipid layer of the cell membrane. As hypoxia continues, the intracellular calcium ion concentration increases significantly, leading to a series of cell damage processes [44]. As a result, shortness of breath is a manifestation of decreased lung function and is considered a sign of a life-threatening condition.

In addition, fatigue was identified as a significant risk factor for death among severe Covid -19 patients in this study. In the same way, a study conducted in china explained patients presented with fatigue were at a 20% higher risk of death than those without fatigue. However, no significant relationships were found between mortality and fever, cough, diarrhea, headache, abdominal pain, dizziness, nausea, and chest pain in this study as well as in the previous study [23].

This study also identified that altered consciousness was a risk factor for mortality among COVID-19 patients. The patient presented with altered consciousness were three times high risk to die than those without altered consciousness. Similarly, a study conducted in china suggested that there was a direct link between consciousness impairment and death in COVID- 19 patients. Patients whose Glasgow coma scale core was less than 9 were at high risk of death than patients with a GCS score >14 [45]. This may be because altered consciousness is a manifestation of organ failure due to continued hypoxemia.

In the present analysis, diabetes was found to be an important predictor of death among severe COVID-19 patients. Patients with diabetics had higher odds of death than patients without diabetics. This result is consistence with other previous studies [20, 22]. A study conducted in Bangladesh explained patients with diabetics were 1.87 times higher than patients without diabetes to die [20]. A study conducted in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia also showed death in severe COVID-19 patients is found to be associated with being diabetic [43]. This could be because diabetes mellitus, especially if poorly controlled, lead to compromised immunity that decreases the body’s ability to fight off any infection [46]. They are more susceptible to being infected by viruses, bacteria, and fungi than individuals without diabetes. Also, the chances of having or developing another chronic illness are higher than in non-diabetic individuals [46, 47]. As a result, these patients might be at an increased risk of SARS-COV-2 infection which could result in a worse disease prognosis.

This study identified risk of death among COVID-19 patients with cerebrovascular disease was higher than without the disease. In a previous study, a history of cerebrovascular disease is associated with a 2.78-fold increased risk of mortality compared to patients without underlying cerebrovascular disease [48]. A cohort study in china also consistently explained the risk of death among COVID-19 patient with cerebrovascular disease were 2.4 times higher than patients without the disease [21].

Conclusion

This study tried to assess the predictors of death among severe COVID-19 patients admitted to Hawassa treatment centers. The study used a relatively larger sample size compared with a study done in Addis Ababa. It also addresses many variables and it is the study in the southern Ethiopian district which may include sociocultural differences from other study areas. Majorities of studies on predictors of death have been conducted in the context of Asian and American countries. In Africa, there are limited data regarding regional predictors of mortality among COVID -19 patients including Ethiopians and this finding may be one input. In conclusion, this study found that age was an important demographic variable that predict death outcomes among severely ill COVID-19 patients. Mortality among severe COVID-19 patients with age ≥65 years was higher as compared to the patients with age < 65 years. Clinical signs and symptoms such as shortness of breath, fatigue, and altered consciousness were the most significant predictor of death in severe COVID-19 patients. Regarding pre-existing comorbidities, having diabetes and cerebrovascular disease at admission were significant predictors to have death outcomes among severely ill COVID-19 patients.

Recommendations

Policymakers and those responsible to develop COVID-19 triage protocols shall give more focus on those risk groups and should be done with a more sensitive triaging method to pick them. If severe COVID-19 patients present with older age, difficulty in breathing, fatigue, altered consciousness, and comorbidities like diabetes and cerebrovascular disease, it is necessary to be alert for further deterioration of the patient’s condition and high risk for death. Therefore, Health care providers should be used these patients’ characteristics as a warning sign in a patient follow-up to provide early detection and intervention for a favorable outcome. Future researchers shall conduct a prospective study to get a chance to include all important variables like laboratory and radiologic findings.

Limitation

Due to the retrospective study design, radiographic and laboratory tests-related variables have high missing values and are not included in logistic regression analysis. The effect of the emergency of a new variant virus on the disease outcome is not covered in this study.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge Hawassa University, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, the administrative body of both treatment centers from which the data was collected. The data collectors are also going to share gratitude for their contribution to data collection.

List of abbreviations

AOR

Adjusted Odds Ratio

BSC

Bachelor of Science

CI

Confidence Interval

COPD

Chronic Obstructed Pulmonary Disease

COVID-19

Corona Virus Disease 2019

EPHI

Ethiopian Public Health Institute

GCS

Glasgow-Coma Scale

HIV/AIDS

Human Immunodeficiency Virus/ Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

IQR

Interquartile Range

PT-PCR

Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction

RNA

Ribonucleic Acid

SARS-COV-2

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona Virus 2

SOB

Shortness of Breath

SPSS

Statistical Package for Social Sciences

SPO2

Peripheral Oxygen Saturation

WHO

World Health Organization

Data Availability

The data used for this study cannot be shared publicly due to the inclusion of sensitive participant information. Data is available upon request from Fanuel Belayneh (Postgraduate Program Coordinator, School of Public Health, Hawassa University) via email (fanuelbelayneh@gmail.com) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this study.

References

  • 1.Adam S and Emma B, Genetic Variants of SARS-CoV-2—What Do They Mean? JAMA, 2021. 325(6): p. 529–531. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.27124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.World Health Organization, Novel Coronavirus (‎ 2019-nCoV)‎: situation report, 1. 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lu H., Stratton C.W., and Tang Y.W., Outbreak of pneumonia of unknown etiology in Wuhan, China: the mystery and the miracle. Journal of medical virology, 2020. 92(4): p. 401–402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.World Health Organization. WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19-11 March 2020. 2020; Available from: https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19—11-march-2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.World Health Organization. COVID-19 cases top 10 000 in Africa. 2020; Available from: https://www.afro.who.int/news/covid-19-cases-top-10-000-africa. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.World Health Organization. A second COVID-19 case is confirmed in Africa. 25 Febuary 2020; Available from: https://www.afro.who.int/pt/node/12312. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.world Health Organization. First case of COVID-19 confirmed in Ethiopia. 13 March 2020; Available from: https://www.afro.who.int/news/first-case-covid-19-confirmed-ethiopia. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.World Health Organization, Weekly COVID-19 Epidemiological Update. 28 September 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Undurraga E.A., Chowell G., and Mizumoto K., COVID-19 case fatality risk by age and gender in a high testing setting in Latin America: Chile, March-August 2020. Infect Dis Poverty, 2021. 10(1): p. 11. doi: 10.1186/s40249-020-00785-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ethiopian public health institute, COVID-19 pandemic preparedness and response in Ethiopia, in Weekly bulletin, Bulletin No:73. September 19, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Detection of new SARS-CoV-2 variants related to mink. ECDC: Stockholm, 12 November 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Sars-cov-2 variant classifications and definitions. October 4, 2021; Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/variants/variant-info.html. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.World health organization. Tracking SARS-CoV-2 variants. 2021. [cited 2021 8 October]; Available from: https://www.who.int/en/activities/tracking-SARS-CoV-2-variants/. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yoseph A., Tamiso A., and Ejeso A., Knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to COVID-19 pandemic among adult population in Sidama Regional State, Southern Ethiopia: A community-based cross-sectional study. PloS one, 2021. 16(1): p. e0246283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Huang C., et al., Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. The lancet, 2020. 395(10223): p. 497–506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.China CDC, The epidemiological characteristics of an outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus diseases (COVID-19)—China, 2020. China CDC weekly, 2020. 2(8): p. 113–122. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.01.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sharma J., et al., Clinical Predictors of COVID-19 Severity and Mortality: A Perspective. Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 2021. 11: p. 674277. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.674277 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gupta S., et al., Factors Associated With Death in Critically Ill Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 in the US. JAMA Intern Med, 2020. 180(11): p. 1–12. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.3596 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pan F., et al. Factors associated with death outcome in patients with severe coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19): a case-control study. International journal of medical sciences 2020. [cited 17 9]; 1281]. doi: 10.7150/ijms.46614 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Noor F.M. and Islam M.M., Prevalence and associated risk factors of mortality among COVID-19 patients: A meta-analysis. Journal of community health, 2020. 45(6): p. 1270–1282. doi: 10.1007/s10900-020-00920-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Du R.-H., et al., Predictors of mortality for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia caused by SARS-CoV-2: a prospective cohort study. European Respiratory Journal, 2020. 55(5). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chidambaram V., et al., Factors associated with disease severity and mortality among patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 2020. 15(11): p. e0241541. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241541 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yang L., et al., Risk factors for predicting mortality of COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 2020. 15(11): p. e0243124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243124 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bepouka B.I., et al., Predictors of mortality in COVID-19 patients at Kinshasa University Hospital, Democratic Republic of the Congo, from March to June 2020. The Pan African Medical Journal, 2020. 37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Abayomi A., et al., Presenting symptoms and predictors of poor outcomes among 2,184 patients with COVID-19 in Lagos State, Nigeria. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2021. 102: p. 226–232. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.10.024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mikami T., et al., Risk factors for mortality in patients with COVID-19 in New York City. Journal of general internal medicine, 2021. 36(1): p. 17–26. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05983-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chilimuri S., et al., Predictors of mortality in adults admitted with COVID-19: Retrospective cohort study from New York City. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2020. 21(4): p. 779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Figliozzi S., et al., Predictors of adverse prognosis in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Clinical Investigation, 2020. 50(10): p. e13362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Biswas M., et al., Association of sex, age, and comorbidities with mortality in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intervirology, 2020: p. 1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chang M.C., et al., Risk factors for disease progression in COVID-19 patients. BMC infectious diseases, 2020. 20(1): p. 1–6. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05144-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Su W., et al., Sex differences in clinical characteristics and risk factors for mortality among severe patients with COVID-19: a retrospective study. Aging (Albany NY), 2020. 12(19): p. 18833. doi: 10.18632/aging.103793 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Li X., et al., Risk factors for severity and mortality in adult COVID-19 inpatients in Wuhan. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2020. 146(1): p. 110–118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mohammed M., et al., Risk Factors Associated with Mortality Among Patients with Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) in Africa. Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2020: p. 1–6. doi: 10.1007/s40615-020-00888-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Tehrani S., et al., Risk factors for death in adult COVID-19 patients: Frailty predicts fatal outcome in older patients. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2021. 102: p. 415–421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sun H., et al., Risk factors for mortality in 244 older adults with COVID‐19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2020. 68(6): p. E19–E23. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16533 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Elimian K.O., et al., Patient characteristics associated with COVID-19 positivity and fatality in Nigeria: retrospective cohort study. BMJ open, 2020. 10(12): p. e044079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.WHO. COVID-19 core case report form acute respiratory infection clinical characterisation data tool. 2020 April 2020. [cited 2021 02/02/2021]; Available from: https://www.elso.org/Portals/0/Files/ECMOCard/Update1/ISARIC%20WHO%20nCoV%20CORE%20CRF%2023.4.20. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.World Health Organization, COVID-19 clinical management: living guidance,. 25 January 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.World Health Organization, International guidelines for certification and classification (coding) of COVID-19 as cause of death. 16 April 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Trzonkowski P., et al., Immunosenescence increases the rate of acceptance of kidney allotransplants in elderly recipients through exhaustion of CD4+ T-cells. Mech Ageing Dev, 2010. 131(2): p. 96–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Leng J. and Daniel R, Impact of aging on viral infections. Microbes and infection, 2010. 12(14–15): p. 1120–1124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lavan A.H. and Gallagher P., Predicting risk of adverse drug reactions in older adults. Therapeutic advances in drug safety, 2016. 7(1): p. 11–22. doi: 10.1177/2042098615615472 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Leulseged T.W., et al., Predictors of death in severe COVID-19 patients at millennium COVID-19 care center in Ethiopia: a case-control study. Pan Afr Med J, 2021. 38: p. 351. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2021.38.351.28831 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lenihan Colin R. and Taylor Cormac T., The impact of hypoxia on cell death pathways. Biochemical Society Transactions, 2013. 41(2): p. 657–663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Xiong W., et al., Association of consciousness impairment and mortality in people with COVID‐19. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 2021. doi: 10.1111/ane.13471 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hodgson K., et al., Immunological mechanisms contributing to the double burden of diabetes and intracellular bacterial infections. Immunology, 2015. 144(2): p. 171–185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Xia C., Rao X., and Zhong J., Role of T lymphocytes in type 2 diabetes and diabetes-associated inflammation. Journal of diabetes research, 2017. 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Florez-Perdomo W.A., et al., Relationship between the history of cerebrovascular disease and mortality in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, 2020. 197: p. 106183. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106183 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Colin Johnson

9 Nov 2022

PONE-D-22-21411Predictors of death among severe COVID-19 patients admitted in Hawassa City, Sidama, Southern Ethiopia: Unmatched case-control studyPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Misganaw,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. Specifically concerns over the written grammar and spelling need to be addressed before the manuscript could be accepted. It was also stated that the manuscript would benefit if it included a comparison to previously published studies on the subject. 

Please submit your revised manuscript by Dec 24 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Colin Johnson, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For more information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. 

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: In the study entitled “Predictors of death among severe COVID-19 patients admitted in Hawassa City, Sidama, Southern Ethiopia: Unmatched case-control study” the authors performed a case-control-based study among the severe COVID-19 patients. The aim of the study was to assess the predictors of death among severe COVID-19 patients. The study is good but have some lacunas as listed below:

Comments:

1. The authors should follow the same pattern to represent the numbers. In some places it is written like 5,998,863 whereas in some other places simply 55 000 is written.

2. Lines 68-69 include both the references in the same [].

3. There are lots of formatting issues and grammatical mistakes in the manuscript. For instance in line 71 no space between (chronic kidney disease[25]).

4. The literature survey is not adequately done. A similar perspective (https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.674277) was published recently and the authors should compare their results with that of the similar work.

5. Lines 80-81. Please correct the statement “But, majorities of studies on predictor of death and disease severity have been conducted with the context of Asian and American countries”. Please see this article where data from around the world was used (https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.674).

6. Line 93, 121 spellings of severe

7. Please check the spellings of severe in full manuscript.

8. Line 225. Gap between 223(59.9%)

9. In some parts of the manuscript, COVID-19 is written whereas in some parts covid-19 is there. Please follow the same notion throughout the manuscript.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 Mar 1;18(3):e0282478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282478.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


5 Dec 2022

Thank you for the comments and information you give to us which will add quality for our manuscript. We tried to incorporate the comments and information given in the revised manuscript. Thank you for your time and considerations.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Colin Johnson

11 Jan 2023

PONE-D-22-21411R1

Predictors of death among severe COVID-19 patients admitted in Hawassa City, Sidama, Southern Ethiopia: Unmatched case-control study

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Misganaw,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Of particular note, please address the concerns of the reviewer regarding the literature search in the Introduction, the advancement in knowledge from the study. 

Please submit your revised manuscript by Feb 25 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Colin Johnson, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The report entitled “Predictors of death among …….case control study” aims to assess the predictor of death among severely ill COVID-19 patients admitted in Hawassa city. The work is good but suffers from the major drawbacks as follows:

· This is a case control study. The data for control was obtained from May 2021 to June 2021 whereas severe COVID-19 deaths were included from a period of May 2020 to May 2021. There is the disparity of the timelines and the authors should discuss the repercussions of taking the different timelines for the analysis.

· In continuation to the above point the virus has changed a lot during the case-control timelines. The authors should discuss how the mutations in the virus can lead to variations in the results.

The literature search in the introduction section is not adequate. The authors should discuss similar studies including PMID = 34760713.

· It is unclear whether age-matched controls were used in the study.

· It is not clear what knowledge is being added by this study. The conclusions made in the study have already been published by several groups. The authors must discuss any unique points that this study caters to.

· The data was analyzed using SPSS 25. The authors should provide the codes also so that the study can be reproduced.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 Mar 1;18(3):e0282478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282478.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


26 Jan 2023

Thank you for your valuable information and constructive comment. We have corrected the comments . and the statement you wrote well described the availability concern. Others comments are addressed accordingly and incorporated in the revised manuscript.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 2

Colin Johnson

16 Feb 2023

Predictors of death among severe COVID-19 patients admitted in Hawassa City, Sidama, Southern Ethiopia: Unmatched case-control study

PONE-D-22-21411R2

Dear Dr. Misganaw,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Colin Johnson, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: All the concerns are addressed. The manuscript can be accepted for the publication in the current format.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Colin Johnson

20 Feb 2023

PONE-D-22-21411R2

Predictors of death among severe COVID-19 patients admitted in Hawassa City, Sidama, Southern Ethiopia: Unmatched case-control study

Dear Dr. Misganaw:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Colin Johnson

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    The data used for this study cannot be shared publicly due to the inclusion of sensitive participant information. Data is available upon request from Fanuel Belayneh (Postgraduate Program Coordinator, School of Public Health, Hawassa University) via email (fanuelbelayneh@gmail.com) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES