Abstract
Background
Dalbavancin, a semisynthetic lipoglycopeptide with exceptionally long half-life and Gram-positive spectrum, is an attractive option for infections requiring prolonged therapy, including prosthetic joint infections (PJIs).
Objectives
To investigate the prevalence of reduced susceptibility to dalbavancin in a strain collection of Staphylococcus epidermidis from PJIs, and to investigate genomic variation in isolates with reduced susceptibility selected during growth under dalbavancin exposure.
Methods
MIC determination was performed on S. epidermidis isolates from a strain collection (n = 64) and from one patient with emerging resistance during treatment (n = 4). These isolates were subsequently cultured on dalbavancin-containing agar and evaluated at 48 h; MIC determination was repeated if phenotypical heterogeneity was detected during growth. Population analysis profile (PAP-AUC) was performed in isolates where a ≥ 2-fold increase in MIC was detected, together with corresponding parental isolates (n = 21). Finally, WGS was performed.
Results
All strains grew at 48 h on agar containing 0.125 mg/L dalbavancin. PAP-AUC demonstrated significant differences between parental and derived strains in four of the eight analysed groups. An amino acid change in the walK gene coinciding with emergence of phenotypic resistance was detected in the patient isolates, whereas no alterations were found in this region in the in vitro derived strains.
Conclusions
Exposure to dalbavancin may lead to reduced susceptibility to dalbavancin through either selection of pre-existing subpopulations, epigenetic changes or spontaneous mutations during antibiotic exposure. Source control combined with adequate antibiotic concentrations may be important to prevent emerging reduced susceptibility during dalbavancin treatment.
Introduction
Dalbavancin is a semisynthetic intravenous lipoglycopeptide antibiotic whose mode of action is similar to that of vancomycin; it interferes with cell wall synthesis through inhibition of late stages of the peptidoglycan synthesis by binding of the D-Ala-D-Ala terminus of peptidoglycan precursors.1 It has several properties that may be beneficial in the treatment of complex implant-associated infections.2 The antibacterial spectrum covers common pathogens causing these infections, including MDR Staphylococcus epidermidis.1The MIC90 values are lower in S. epidermidis for dalbavancin (0.06–0.12 mg/L) compared with vancomycin (2–4 mg/L),3–5 with a minimum biofilm inhibitory concentration (MBIC90) of 0.25–0.5 mg/L and a minimum biofilm bactericidal concentration (MBBC90) of 4 mg/L,4 both lower than the corresponding values for vancomycin (MBIC90 4 mg/L, MBBC90 > 128 mg/L, respectively).5 This is consistent with in vitro data, whereby dalbavancin was significantly more effective at reducing cultivable S. epidermidis from biofilms compared with vancomycin.6 The pharmakokinetic properties with exceptionally long half-life of dalbavancin (149–250 h)1 together with clinically relevant synovial and bone concentrations including intra-osteoblastic activity7,8 and a favourable safety profile9,10 render dalbavancin an attractive option for prolonged outpatient antibiotic treatment of implant-associated orthopaedic infections such as prosthetic joint infection (PJI) or fracture-related infection.2
However, emergence of reduced susceptibility during dalbavancin exposure has been described in vitro for Staphylococcus aureus,11 as well as after prolonged treatment in the presence of medical implants.12,13 Although the mechanisms remain to be fully understood, WGS demonstrated alterations in the WalKR two-component regulatory system,11 consistent with previously published data on both glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus (GISA) and heteroresistant strains (hGISA).14–16 Because glycopeptide heteroresistance was detected in 77.9% of clinical S. epidermidis PJI isolates in Sweden,17 concern is warranted regarding whether prolonged exposure to dalbavancin, with waning concentrations over time, can promote mutations associated with heteroresistance or select for pre-existing resistant subpopulations during the course of treatment.16,18
In this article, we present a case of an MDR S. epidermidis PJI with emerging dalbavancin resistance during treatment. Furthermore, we investigated the MIC distribution to dalbavancin in a strain collection of S. epidermidis isolated from PJIs. If subpopulations with reduced susceptibility were selected during growth under dalbavancin exposure, these were compared with parental strains using WGS to explore if genomic alterations could be found and associated with reduced susceptibility to dalbavancin.
Materials and methods
Case presentation
An 89-year-old man underwent right-sided total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthrosis. As per Swedish guidelines,19 three doses of cloxacillin as antibiotic prophylaxis were administered, and he was discharged 2 days after surgery. He was readmitted to hospital 13 days post-surgery due to ongoing wound discharge; his C-reactive protein (CRP) level was 117 mg/L and haemoglobin count was 93 g/L. A sterile puncture through uninfected skin yielded 5 mL of brown/red liquid suggestive of haematoma, cultures of which grew an MDR S. epidermidis (isolate P1) susceptible to only linezolid, vancomycin and dalbavancin (Table 1). Debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR), including exchange of mobile parts and five deep-tissue biopsies for microbiological cultures, was performed on day 7 after readmission. S. epidermidis with identical antibiotic susceptibility patterns to the strain isolated from the haematoma grew in all five tissue cultures (isolate P2).
Table 1.
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of four S. epidermidis strains isolated over 42 days from an 89-year-old man with PJI performed by disc diffusion tests, except where noted. Numbers within parentheses are zone diameter for disc diffusion tests or MIC values for gradient tests or broth dilutions
| Isolate Day post-arthroplasty Sample type |
P1 13 Sterile puncture |
P2 20 Tissue biopsy (DAIR) |
P3 48 Evacuated haematoma |
P4 55 Superficial revision |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNP (P1 is reference) | 0 | 1 | 18 | 19 |
| Cefoxitin | R (6) | R (6) | R (6) | R (6) |
| Erythromycin | R (6) | R (6) | R (6) | R (6) |
| Clindamycin | R (6) | R (6) | R (6) | R (6) |
| Gentamicin | R (6) | R (6) | R (6) | R (6) |
| Fusidic acid | R (8) | R (11) | R (6) | R (10) |
| Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole | R (6) | R (10) | R (6) | R (6) |
| Norfloxacin | R (11) | R (14) | R (6) | R (6) |
| Rifampin | R (6) | R (13) | R (6) | R (10) |
| Linezolid | S (29) | S (32) | S (32) | S (36) |
| Tetracycline | S (25) | |||
| Daptomycin (gradient test) | S (1) | S (1) | S (1) | R (2) |
| Vancomycin (gradient test) | S (2) | S (2) | R (4) | R (4) |
| Vancomycin (broth) | R (8) | R (8) | R (8) | |
| Teicoplanin (broth) | R (8) | S (4) | R (8) | |
| Dalbavancin (gradient test) | S (0.064) | S (0.064) | R (1.0) | R (0.5) |
| Dalbavancin (broth) | R (1.0) |
R, resistant; S, susceptible; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism.
Intravenous vancomycin was started post-surgery, with measured concentrations between 15 and 22 mg/L. Wound discharge continued after DAIR, but because the patient suffered a transient ischaemic attack during surgery, removal of the prosthesis was not performed due to high surgical risk. Vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) dressings were applied, and dalbavancin was started on day 10 after DAIR (1000 mg loading dose followed by 500 mg weekly). Staples were removed 3 weeks after DAIR, but wound closure was incomplete and VAC dressings were continued. On day 28 after DAIR, a haematoma was evacuated, cultures of which grew S. epidermidis (isolate P3) with a dalbavancin MIC 1.0 mg/L, classifying it as resistant according to EUCAST breakpoints (accessed 12 November 2019). Finally, a superficial revision was performed on day 35 after DAIR (isolate P4). Dalbavancin was discontinued after five doses, and the patient was started on long-term suppressive doxycycline therapy. Four months later the wound was healed, and CRP was 3 mg/L. At follow-up 18 months after DAIR the patient was pain-free and in good general condition on suppressive doxycycline.
Bacterial isolates
In total, 68 S. epidermidis isolates were included: 4 from the patient and 64 from a strain collection comprising S. epidermidis isolated from PJIs (hip or knee) between 2007 and 2018 in Region Örebro, Sweden. No clinical data were available for the isolates from this strain collection. Species were confirmed by MALDI-TOF MS. For isolates displaying phenotypical heterogeneity during growth on dalbavancin-containing agar, MALDI-TOF MS was repeated after subculturing to exclude contamination. All isolates were stored at −80°C in preservation medium (trypticase soy broth; BD Diagnostic Systems, Sparks, MD, USA) supplemented with 0.3% yeast extract (BD Diagnostic Systems) and 29% horse serum (SVA, Uppsala, Sweden) at the Department of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Microbiology, Örebro University Hospital, Sweden.
For antibiotic susceptibility testing, isolates were subcultured on Mueller–Hinton II agar 3.8% w/v plates (BD Diagnostic Systems) at 36°C. The MICs for dalbavancin and vancomycin were determined on 0.5 McFarland bacterial suspension in 0.85% (w/v) NaCl on Mueller–Hinton II agar plates with gradient strips (Liofilchem, Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy; and Etest, bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France, respectively) incubated for 20 h at 35°C. The DAL0.125 method, a modification of the VAN4 method,20 was developed to screen for S. epidermidis isolates with reduced susceptibility to dalbavancin. Briefly, 10 μL of a 0.5 McFarland bacterial suspension was pipetted on four agar plates containing different antibiotic concentrations (0.064 mg/L, 0.125 mg/L, 0.25 mg/L and 0.5 mg/L). Isolates were incubated at 35°C, and subsequently evaluated according to a protocol of ‘no growth’, ‘growth’ and ‘confluent growth’ at 24 and 48 h. When phenotypical heterogeneity was detected during growth on dalbavancin-containing agar (n = 16), the species was confirmed to be S. epidermidis with MALDI-TOF MS, and isolates were subcultured and re-evaluated by MIC gradient strip test.
Population analysis profile (PAP)-AUC
Ten derived strains with a ≥ 2-fold increase in MIC were observed from 7 of the 16 isolates displaying phenotypical heterogeneity. These derived strains, together with original (parental) strains and the four patient isolates, were further analysed by the PAP-AUC method modified after Wootton et al.21 In brief, 10 μL of a 0.5 McFarland bacterial suspension was plated onto eight BHI agar plates (Brain Heart Infusion Agar; BD Diagnostics, Sparks, MD, USA) containing serial dilutions of dalbavancin at 0.064 mg/L, 0.125 mg/L, 0.25 mg/L, 0.5 mg/L, 1.0 mg/L, 1.5 mg/L and 2.0 mg/L, as well as agar plates without dalbavancin. Plates were incubated at 36°C for 48 h, and colonies were counted both manually and with the Interscience Scan 4000 colony counter (Interscience, Saint-Nom-la-Bretèche, France). All isolates were tested in triplicate. Subsequently, the total number of colonies growing on each plate was transformed to common logarithm cfu/mL through multiplying the counted number by 100 and then taking the logarithm. The chosen maximum of counted colonies was 1000, equalling 106 cfu/mL. An average with SDs of log10cfu/mL was calculated for every concentration. These results were plotted on a graph representing each bacterial isolate, using the parental strain as reference for the derived strains, and AUC was calculated with the trapezoidal rule. Finally, isolates that grew on 2 mg/L agar (n = 8) were subcultured on Mueller–Hinton II agar 14 times, followed by an additional MIC determination.
Genome sequencing and genomic analysis
The 21 isolates where PAP-AUC was performed were further analysed by WGS. All parental isolates of a lineage were assembled using SPAdes,22 and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were called by mapping reads of subsequent isolates against this assembly using the Burrows–Wheeler Aligner (BWA-MEM) as implemented in version 1.0.0 of NASP.23 The GATK Unified Genotyper24 was used with filters set to remove SNPs with <10-fold sequencing depth and 90% unambiguous variant calls after duplicated regions of the assemblies were excluded using NUCmer.25
To identify differences in gene presence/absence, all genomes were assembled using SPAdes,22 filtered for contigs with minimum coverage of 10× and a minimum length of 200 bp, and annotated using Prokka.26 The pan-genome among all isolates was then identified using Roary,27 and raw sequencing reads were mapped back to the reference sequence of each gene using KMA28 to control for spurious assembly discrepancies.
Statistics
The AUC for individual isolates in each test round was compared within the group of parent and derived isolates for each strain using either an independent samples t-test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or one-way non-parametric ANOVA (Kruskal–Wallis test) depending both on the number of isolates in the group and on whether the assumption of homogeneity of variance was met. Version 17 of the SPSS software package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used, and the statistical significance level was set at P < 0.05.
Ethics
The research was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and written informed consent was obtained from the patient.
Results
Antibiotic susceptibility testing
MIC values in the strain collection of S. epidermidis isolated from PJIs ranged from 0.006 to 0.125 mg/L for dalbavancin and from 0.38 to 3 mg/L for vancomycin (Figure 1). Results for DAL0.125 screening for reduced susceptibility were evaluable for 63 isolates after 24 h and for 64 isolates after 48 h (Table 2). Growth at 24 h at a dalbavancin concentration of 0.125 mg/L was detected for isolates with an initial MIC as low as 0.006 mg/L. At 48 h, the number of isolates with growth or confluent growth had increased. Initial MIC values for isolates displaying confluent growth at 48 h on agar containing dalbavancin 0.5 mg/L were 0.032 mg/L, 0.047 mg/L and 0.125 mg/L, respectively. A repeated MIC determination on isolates displaying confluent growth on dalbavancin 0.5 mg/L agar showed no significant differences from initial MIC values.
Figure 1.
Distribution of MIC values determined by gradient tests for both dalbavancin and vancomycin on 64 isolates from a strain collection of S. epidermidis from knee and hip PJIs. EUCAST breakpoints (accessed 12 November 2019) (S): dalbavancin ≤0.125 mg/L, vancomycin ≤2 mg/L.
Table 2.
Results from DAL0.125 screening for reduced susceptibility after 24 and 48 h of incubation for isolates of S. epidermidis from hip and knee PJIs (n = 64) tested on agar plates containing four different concentrations of dalbavancin. The result for one isolate at 24 h was not available
| No growth | Growth | Confluent growth | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 h | 48 h | 24 h | 48 h | 24 h | 48 h | |
| 0.064 mg/L | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 60 | 63 |
| 0.125 mg/L | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 57 | 58 |
| 0.25 mg/L | 4 | 4 | 17 | 9 | 42 | 51 |
| 0.5 mg/L | 13 | 10 | 48 | 50 | 2 | 4 |
In 16 isolates, phenotypic differences in colony morphology were observed after subculturing on agar containing dalbavancin. MALDI-TOF MS confirmed that these isolates were S. epidermidis. On repeated MIC determination, seven of these parental isolates generated 10 derived strains with ≥2-fold changes in MIC values (Table 3), implying an altered status from dalbavancin susceptible to resistant according to EUCAST breakpoints (≤0.125 mg/L, accessed 12 November 2019). These, together with the four patient isolates (one parental and three derived), comprised a collection of 21 isolates (8 parental strains, 13 derived isolates) on which PAP-AUC was performed.
Table 3.
Results from MIC determination of dalbavancin by gradient test on 16 isolates of S. epidermidis from PJIs from knee and hip arthroplasties displaying phenotypic differences in colony morphology after subculturing on agar containing dalbavancin
| Parental strain MIC (mg/L) | Derived isolate A MIC (mg/L) | Derived isolate B MIC (mg/L) | Derived isolate C MIC (mg/L) | Derived isolate D MIC (mg/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.012 | 0.016 | 0.023 | — | — |
| 0.023 | 0.032 | 0.032 | 0.032 | — |
| 0.032 | 0.064 | 0.023 | 0.38a | — |
| 0.032 | 0.032 | 0.5a | — | — |
| 0.032 | 0.75a | 0.25a | 0.094 | — |
| 0.032 | 0.047 | 0.023 | — | — |
| 0.047 | 0.38a | 0.032 | — | — |
| 0.047 | 0.19a | 0.38a | — | — |
| 0.047 | 0.032 | 0.38a | 0.094 | — |
| 0.047 | 1.5a | 0.38a | 0.032 | — |
| 0.047 | 0.064 | 0.023 | — | — |
| 0.047 | 0.064 | 0.094 | 0.047 | — |
| 0.047 | 0.047 | 0.064 | 0.032 | 0.032 |
| 0.047 | 0.032 | 0.094 | 0.094 | — |
| 0.047 | 0.032 | 0.047 | 0.047 | — |
| 0.064 | 0.047 | 0.25a | 0.094 | — |
Denotes alterations with a ≥ 2-fold increase in MIC.
In addition, MIC determination for daptomycin was performed by gradient test on both the four isolates obtained from the patient (Table 1), and the 17 investigated isolates from the collection (Table S1, available as Supplementary data at JAC Online).
PAP-AUC
All 21 isolates displayed growth of colonies on all agar plates containing dalbavancin up to a concentration of 1.5 mg/L. At a concentration of 2 mg/L, nine isolates were inhibited so that no growth was seen. The remaining 10 were also tested on agar plates with a dalbavancin concentration of 4 mg/L, which inhibited an additional eight isolates whereas growth was still detected in two. In general, parental isolates displayed fewer colonies on the dalbavancin-containing agar plates compared with the derived strains. Four isolates (L1, L4, L6 and P1; Figure 2b, c, g and h) showed significant differences, with lower AUCs for parental isolates compared with derived strains.
Figure 2.
PAP performed on Staphylococcus epidermidis isolated from prosthetic joint infections. (a–g) Isolates from the strain collection that developed an increased MIC value during subculturing on dalbavancin-containing agar. (h) Clinical isolates from the patient isolated at different dates during the clinical course (see Table 1). Each graph represents the change of growth of total colonies (log10cfu/mL) at different antibiotic concentrations (mg/L) of dalbavancin. In every part of the figure, the first isolate listed in the legend is the parent strain whereas the others represent the derived isolates. Error bars indicate SD. The P value for the difference between the groups is presented at the bottom left.
For the eight isolates that grew on plates containing 2 mg/L of dalbavancin during PAP-AUC, renewed MIC determination was performed, both after PAP-AUC and after an additional 14 subcultures on agar plates without dalbavancin (Table 4). This revealed decreased MIC values for six of the eight isolates after subculturing.
Table 4.
MIC determination of eight S. epidermidis isolates that displayed growth on agar plates containing 2 mg/L of dalbavancin. Analysis performed after the PAP-AUC and repeated after being subcultured 14 times on agar plates without any antibiotic
| Initial MIC (mg/L) | MIC after PAP-AUC (mg/L) | MIC after 14 subcultures (mg/L) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| L1 | 0.047 | 1 | 1 |
| L2d_a | 0.38 | 1.5 | 1 |
| L3 | 0.032 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| L4d_a | 0.19 | 0.75 | 0.125 |
| L5d_a | 0.38 | 0.25 | 0.094 |
| P1 | 0.064 | 0.094 | 0.064 |
| P3 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 |
| P4 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.38 |
WGS and genomic analysis
Genomic comparison of the patient isolates (P1–4) revealed several SNPs in the core genome (Table S2). It is worth noting that one SNP in the walK gene causing an amino acid change from tyrosine to alanine was present at position 272; mutations in this gene have previously been linked to reduced dalbavancin susceptibility.11,29 Analysis of the accessory genome furthermore revealed the acquisition of the erythromycin resistance gene ermC in conjunction with the replication protein repL in the three subsequent patient isolates (P2–4), as well as a 30 404 bp region in the final two patient isolates (P3–4). This element carries several genes (Table S3) including blaZ and blaR1, which are known to confer resistance to β-lactams, and genes involved in biofilm formation. These latter genes include epsH, which has been speculated to be involved in production of the exopolysaccharide component of the extracellular matrix during biofilm formation.30,31 The presence of the tyrosine recombinase xerC further suggests that this may be a phage-like mobile genetic element. However, searching the public databases did not result in any obvious hits besides other S. epidermidis genomes.
Despite these genomic changes in the patient isolates, we saw no changes in isolates from the strain collection where PAP-AUC was performed. Pairwise comparison of derived isolates with their parental S. epidermidis from the strain collection only showed absence of ermC in isolate L3_d, and no SNPs.
Discussion
We here present a case with emerging dalbavancin resistance in S. epidermidis during PJI treatment, resulting in treatment failure and consequently long-term suppressive antibiotic therapy. Further analysis of S. epidermidis isolates from a PJI strain collection demonstrated that despite being fully susceptible according to EUCAST breakpoints, all 64 tested strains demonstrated growth at 48 h on agar containing dalbavancin up to 0.125 mg/ L, and 54 still grew at a concentration of 0.5 mg/L. Because the long half-life of dalbavancin has been presented as a risk factor for development of reduced antibiotic susceptibility by prolonging the mutant selection window,11,32 these data are of concern.
Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data suggest that two 1500 mg doses 1 week apart result in adequate bone and synovial fluid concentrations above the staphylococcal MIC of 0.125 mg/L for 6–8 weeks, and that the simulated AUC would be similar to that of a 1000 mg loading dose followed by four 500 mg weekly doses.8 However, because the MBIC90 and MBBC90 reported for dalbavancin are considerably higher than the MIC90,2 there might be a risk of introducing an evolutionarily selective pressure on staphylococci in orthopaedic biofilm-associated infections such as PJIs. A similar scenario could occur in abscesses during the last few days before administration of the next dose in a weekly dosing strategy, because animal data have shown that staphylococcal regrowth in tissue fluid commenced 4–5 days after one dose.33 Because the inoculum size matters both in the selection of subpopulations with reduced susceptibility and in the stepwise accumulation of mutations proposed in staphylococcal glycopeptide heteroresistance,14,32 adequate source control is important in preventing the emergence of reduced susceptibility during long-term dalbavancin treatment. In the present case, it is possible that the rivaroxaban-associated haematoma provided beneficial bacterial growth conditions leading to the presence of a large inoculum during treatment with vancomycin and dalbavancin, thus facilitating the evolution of dalbavancin resistance. Because the underlying genetic alterations in reduced susceptibility to dalbavancin are similar to those reported in other staphylococci with reduced glycopeptide susceptibility,11 the risk posed by antibiotic pressure may be comparable for glycopeptides and lipoglycopeptides. Still, the MIC values for dalbavancin are significantly lower than those for vancomycin, and 61% (39/64) of isolates in this study showed a vancomycin MIC of ≥2 mg/L whereas only 2% (1/64) showed a dalbavancin MIC of ≥0.125. Therapeutic drug monitoring is not currently used in clinical routine for dalbavancin in the way it is for vancomycin. However, in an open label randomized clinical trial,34 a dosing regimen of 1000 mg dalbavancin followed by 500 mg on day 8 led to a mean concentration of 21.2 mg/L, but an interindividual variation with a range of 7.6–40.1 mg/L at day 12 after the second dose. Thus, determining serum concentrations during dalbavancin treatment could lead to improved and individualized dosages and dose intervals in order to reduce the mutant selection window.
True vanA-mediated glycopeptide resistance is rare among S. epidermidis, whereas reduced susceptibility due to alterations in cell wall metabolism is more common.35 Heteroresistance comprises a mixed range of susceptibility in what appear to be isogenic bacterial cultures.16 However, MIC determination is insufficient for the detection of heteroresistance in S. epidermidis.18 Further analysis with PAP-AUC (Figure 2a–h) demonstrated significant alterations between the fully susceptible patient strains (P1, P2) and those isolated during treatment failure (P3, P4). This pattern was also seen in three of the in vitro generated groups (L2, L4 and L6), whereas no significant alterations could be detected in the remaining groups.
The development of heteroresistance is not linked to only one mechanism, but rather is a stepwise process. Among the most commonly described alterations are non-synonymous mutations in the genes encoding the WalKR two-component system that contribute to alterations in cell wall metabolism,11,15,36 although several other genes may also be involved.37 Analyses of the genomic data for the patient isolates revealed a novel mutation in walK that, in combination with the detection of other genetic variations across the genomes, was linked to increased resistance. We also observed other genetic variability between these closely related isolates, similar to a recent study in heterogeneity in S. epidermidis PJIs.38 These differences include a likely acquisition of other resistance markers that could indicate the selection pressure under which these isolates thrived.
However, no genetic differences were observed among the in vitro collection, indicating that the regulatory, epigenetic or extracellular mechanisms of persister cells39 could be involved in the observed reduced susceptibility. Consequently, subculturing strains 14 times post-exposure led to a decrease in MIC values for six of eight isolates, even though most isolates still had higher MIC than before PAP-AUC. This could be explained by adaptive resistance, a phenomenon initiated by external stress (e.g. environmental factors such as antibiotic exposure) but reversed when the trigger factor was removed, thus making the bacteria return to a more susceptible phenotype.40 The mechanisms behind this adaptive resistance are believed to include intricate molecular processes, but also epigenetic changes because genetic changes would neither appear, nor reverse, at such a quick pace. Epigenetic mechanisms of the bacterial genome differ from the systems that have been studied in eukaryotes, because the bacterial DNA is not packed in histones. The mechanisms set in place for epigenetic changes in bacteria are associated with modifications of their DNA and RNA, such as methylation of the DNA. This is a defence mechanism that enables bacterial endonucleases to recognize foreign unmethylated DNA and to degrade it.41 Because epigenetic processes are dynamic and dependent on environmental factors, this could be a plausible explanation for the reduced susceptibility to dalbavancin among isolates where no genetic alterations were detected.
Because previous studies42,43 of S. aureus have demonstrated cross-resistance between glycopeptides and daptomycin, and the molecular basis for the genomic evolution has been reported,44 we included MIC determination for daptomycin of the S. epidermidis isolates investigated in the present study. When comparing parental isolates and derived isolates no significant alteration of the MIC values, i.e. ≤1-fold difference in MIC, were found, with one exception, L4.
There are several limitations of the present study. We used a gradient test method rather than broth dilution method for the MIC determination. Gradient tests have been reported to overestimate MIC values for glycopeptides,45 though a recent study found no large discrepancies.46 However, the isolates obtained from the patient reported in the present study displayed 1–2-fold lower MIC values for vancomycin when determined by gradient test compared with the broth microdilution method. Still, all analyses in this study were performed by the same method. Another limitation was that only a subset of the strain collection was analysed by PAP-AUC and WGS. Because these methods are laborious, the strategy was to select strains with a ≥ 2-fold increase in MIC after subculturing on dalbavancin-containing media for further analysis. Furthermore, Illumina sequencing does not allow for detecting epigenetic changes in derived strains; this would have required sequencing and extensive analyses of data from other next-generation sequencing platforms. Still, the demonstration of emergence of resistance to dalbavancin in vivo in a patient as well as the development of S. epidermidis subpopulations with reduced susceptibility in vitro is regarded as a strength.
In conclusion, dalbavancin exposure both in vitro and in vivo can lead to reduced antibiotic susceptibility in S. epidermidis. The mechanisms behind this might include selection of pre-existing heteroresistant subpopulations or persister cells, epigenetic changes or spontaneous mutations in regions involved in cell wall synthesis during antibiotic pressure. Considering the long half-life of dalbavancin in combination with specific challenges in the treatment of PJIs, adequate source control in combination with assurance of adequate serum concentrations may be required to reduce the risk of emergence of reduced dalbavancin susceptibility during treatment.
Supplementary Material
Contributor Information
Jasmina Al Janabi, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Staffan Tevell, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden; Department of Infectious Diseases, Karlstad Hospital and Centre for Clinical Research and Education, Region Värmland, Karlstad, Sweden.
Raphael Niklaus Sieber, Department of Bacteria, Parasites and Fungi, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Marc Stegger, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden; Department of Bacteria, Parasites and Fungi, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Bo Söderquist, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Data availability
The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available from the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) under BioProject Accession number PRJEB55821.
Funding
This work was supported by the research committee of Region Värmland (grant numbers LIVFOU-968115, LIVFOU-939253, LIVFOU-939836); ALF funding for Region Örebro County; and Nyckelfonden at Örebro University Hospital (grant number OLL-935525).
Transparency declarations
B.S. is a member of an advisory board at ADVANZ PHARMA. B.S. also gave a lecture about prosthetic joint infections at Correvio Pharma Corp. in 2019, receiving financial compensation. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Author contributions
B.S., S.T. and M.S. contributed to the design of the work. S.T. collected the medical data. J.A.J. and B.S. performed the microbiological analysis. M.S. and R.N.S. performed the genome sequencing and the bioinformatic analyses. S.T. and J.A.J. wrote the manuscript draft, and M.S., R.N.S. and B.S. made critical revisions. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Supplementary data
Tables S1 to S3 are available as Supplementary data at JAC Online.
References
- 1. Billeter M, Zervos MJ, Chen AYet al. Dalbavancin: a novel once-weekly lipoglycopeptide antibiotic. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 46: 577–83. 10.1086/526772 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Buzón-Martín L, Zollner-Schwetz I, Tobudic Set al. Dalbavancin for the treatment of prosthetic joint infections: a narrative review. Antibiotics (Basel) 2021; 10: 656. 10.3390/antibiotics10060656 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Sader HS, Carvalhaes CG, Streit JMet al. Antimicrobial activity of dalbavancin against clinical isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci from the USA and Europe stratified by species. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 2021; 24: 48–52. 10.1016/j.jgar.2020.11.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Fernandez J, Greenwood-Quaintance KE, Patel R. In vitro activity of dalbavancin against biofilms of staphylococci isolated from prosthetic joint infections. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2016; 85: 449–51. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.05.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Schmidt-Malan SM, Greenwood Quaintance KE, Karau MJet al. In vitro activity of tedizolid against staphylococci isolated from prosthetic joint infections. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2016; 85: 77–9. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.01.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Di Pilato V, Ceccherini F, Sennati Set al. In vitro time-kill kinetics of dalbavancin against Staphylococcus spp. biofilms over prolonged exposure times. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2020; 96: 114901. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2019.114901 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Chauvelot P, Dupieux-Chabert C, Abad Let al. Evaluation of intraosteoblastic activity of dalbavancin against Staphylococcus aureus in an ex vivo model of bone cell infection. J Antimicrob Chemother 2021; 76: 2863–6. 10.1093/jac/dkab299 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Dunne MW, Puttagunta S, Sprenger CRet al. Extended-duration dosing and distribution of dalbavancin into bone and articular tissue. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2015; 59: 1849–55. 10.1128/AAC.04550-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Monteagudo-Martinez N, Solis-Garcia Del Pozo J, Ikuta Iet al. Systematic review and meta-analysis on the safety of dalbavancin. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2021; 20: 1095–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Morata L, Cobo J, Fernández-Sampedro Met al. Safety and efficacy of prolonged use of dalbavancin in bone and joint infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2019; 63: e02280-18. 10.1128/AAC.02280-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Werth BJ, Ashford NK, Penewit Ket al. Dalbavancin exposure in vitro selects for dalbavancin-non-susceptible and vancomycin-intermediate strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Microbiol Infect 2021; 27: 910.e1–8. 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.08.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Werth BJ, Jain R, Hahn Aet al. Emergence of dalbavancin non-susceptible, vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA) after treatment of MRSA central line-associated bloodstream infection with a dalbavancin- and vancomycin-containing regimen. Clin Microbiol Infect 2018; 24: e1––5.. 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.07.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Kussmann M, Karer M, Obermueller Met al. Emergence of a dalbavancin induced glycopeptide/lipoglycopeptide non-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus during treatment of a cardiac device-related endocarditis. Emerg Microbes Infect 2018; 7: 202. 10.1038/s41426-018-0205-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Howden BP, Peleg AY, Stinear TP. The evolution of vancomycin intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA) and heterogenous-VISA. Infect Genet Evol 2014; 21: 575–82. 10.1016/j.meegid.2013.03.047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Howden BP, McEvoy CR, Allen DLet al. Evolution of multidrug resistance during Staphylococcus aureus infection involves mutation of the essential two component regulator WalKR. PLoS Pathog 2011; 7: e1002359. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002359 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. El-Halfawy OM, Valvano MA. Antimicrobial heteroresistance: an emerging field in need of clarity. Clin Microbiol Rev 2015; 28: 191–207. 10.1128/CMR.00058-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Tevell S, Claesson C, Hellmark Bet al. Heterogeneous glycopeptide intermediate Staphylococcus epidermidis isolated from prosthetic joint infections. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2014; 33: 911–17. 10.1007/s10096-013-2025-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Andersson DI, Nicoloff H, Hjort K. Mechanisms and clinical relevance of bacterial heteroresistance. Nat Rev Microbiol 2019; 17: 479–96. 10.1038/s41579-019-0218-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Tevell S, Christensson B, Nilsdotter-Augustinsson Aet al. Handläggning av infektioner vid ortopediska implantat en utmaning för vården [Treatment of orthopaedic implant-associated infections]. Lakartidningen 2019; 116: FR6C. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Hiramatsu K, Aritaka N, Hanaki Het al. Dissemination in Japanese hospitals of strains of Staphylococcus aureus heterogeneously resistant to vancomycin. Lancet 1997; 350: 1670–3. 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)07324-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Wootton M, Howe RA, Hillman Ret al. A modified population analysis profile (PAP) method to detect hetero-resistance to vancomycin in Staphylococcus aureus in a UK hospital. J Antimicrob Chemother 2001; 47: 399–403. 10.1093/jac/47.4.399 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov Det al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012; 19: 455–77. 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Sahl JW, Lemmer D, Travis Jet al. NASP: an accurate, rapid method for the identification of SNPs in WGS datasets that supports flexible input and output formats. Microb Genom 2016; 2: e000074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks Eet al. The genome analysis toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res 2010; 20: 1297–303. 10.1101/gr.107524.110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Delcher AL, Phillippy A, Carlton Jet al. Fast algorithms for large-scale genome alignment and comparison. Nucleic Acids Res 2002; 30: 2478–83. 10.1093/nar/30.11.2478 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014; 30: 2068–9. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Page AJ, Cummins CA, Hunt Met al. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics 2015; 31: 3691–3. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Clausen P, Aarestrup FM, Lund O. Rapid and precise alignment of raw reads against redundant databases with KMA. BMC Bioinformatics 2018; 19:307. 10.1186/s12859-018-2336-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Baseri N, Najar-Peerayeh S, Bakhshi B. Investigating the effect of an identified mutation within a critical site of PAS domain of WalK protein in a vancomycin-intermediate resistant Staphylococcus aureus by computational approaches. BMC Microbiol 2021; 21: 240. 10.1186/s12866-021-02298-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. UniProt Beta . P71057 EPSH_BACSU. https://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/P71057
- 31. UniProt Consortium . UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49: D480–9. 10.1093/nar/gkaa1100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Drlica K, Zhao X. Mutant selection window hypothesis updated. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 44: 681–8. 10.1086/511642 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Dorr MB, Jabes D, Cavaleri Met al. Human pharmacokinetics and rationale for once-weekly dosing of dalbavancin, a semi-synthetic glycopeptide. J Antimicrob Chemother 2005; 55Suppl 2: ii25–30. 10.1093/jac/dki008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Seltzer E, Dorr MB, Goldstein BPet al. Once-weekly dalbavancin versus standard-of-care antimicrobial regimens for treatment of skin and soft-tissue infections. Clin Infect Dis 2003; 37: 1298–303. 10.1086/379015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Howden BP, Davies JK, Johnson PDet al. Reduced vancomycin susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus, including vancomycin-intermediate and heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate strains: resistance mechanisms, laboratory detection, and clinical implications. Clin Microbiol Rev 2010; 23: 99–139. 10.1128/CMR.00042-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Delaune A, Dubrac S, Blanchet Cet al. The WalKR system controls major staphylococcal virulence genes and is involved in triggering the host inflammatory response. Infect Immun 2012; 80: 3438–53. 10.1128/IAI.00195-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Alam MT, Petit RA 3rd, Crispell EKet al. Dissecting vancomycin-intermediate resistance in Staphylococcus aureus using genome-wide association. Genome Biol Evol 2014; 6: 1174––85.. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Widerstrom M, Stegger M, Johansson Aet al. Heterogeneity of Staphylococcus epidermidis in prosthetic joint infections: time to reevaluate microbiological criteria? Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2022; 41: 87–97. 10.1007/s10096-021-04352-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Peyrusson F, Varet H, Nguyen TKet al. Intracellular Staphylococcus aureus persisters upon antibiotic exposure. Nat Commun 2020; 11: 2200. 10.1038/s41467-020-15966-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Fernández L, Breidenstein EB, Hancock RE. Creeping baselines and adaptive resistance to antibiotics. Drug Resist Updat 2011; 14: 1–21. 10.1016/j.drup.2011.01.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Ghosh D, Veeraraghavan B, Elangovan Ret al. Antibiotic resistance and epigenetics: more to it than meets the eye. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2020; 64: e02225-19. 10.1128/AAC.02225-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Tenover FC, Sinner SW, Segal REet al. Characterisation of a Staphylococcus aureus strain with progressive loss of susceptibility to vancomycin and daptomycin during therapy. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2009; 33: 564–8. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2008.12.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Cui L, Tominaga E, Neoh HMet al. Correlation between reduced daptomycin susceptibility and vancomycin resistance in vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006; 50: 1079–82. 10.1128/AAC.50.3.1079-1082.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Chen CJ, Huang YC, Chiu CH. Multiple pathways of cross-resistance to glycopeptides and daptomycin in persistent MRSA bacteraemia. J Antimicrob Chemother 2015; 70: 2965–72. 10.1093/jac/dkv225 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Rybak MJ, Vidaillac C, Sader HSet al. Evaluation of vancomycin susceptibility testing for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: comparison of Etest and three automated testing methods. J Clin Microbiol 2013; 51: 2077–81. 10.1128/JCM.00448-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Leroy AG, Lavigne-Quilichini V, Le Turnier Pet al. Accuracy of gradient diffusion method for susceptibility testing of dalbavancin and comparators. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2022; 20: 457–61. 10.1080/14787210.2021.1976143 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available from the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) under BioProject Accession number PRJEB55821.


