Skip to main content
The Journal of Biological Chemistry logoLink to The Journal of Biological Chemistry
. 2022 Dec 31;299(3):102860. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2022.102860

Exploration of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases from eukaryotic parasites for drug development

Jasmita Gill 1, Amit Sharma 1,2,3,
PMCID: PMC9978631  PMID: 36596362

Abstract

Parasitic diseases result in considerable human morbidity and mortality. The continuous emergence and spread of new drug-resistant parasite strains is an obstacle to controlling and eliminating many parasitic diseases. Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) are ubiquitous enzymes essential for protein synthesis. The design and development of diverse small molecule, drug-like inhibitors against parasite-encoded and expressed aaRSs have validated this enzyme family as druggable. In this work, we have compiled the progress to date towards establishing the druggability of aaRSs in terms of their biochemical characterization, validation as targets, inhibitor development, and structural interpretation from parasites responsible for malaria (Plasmodium), lymphatic filariasis (Brugia,Wuchereria bancrofti), giardiasis (Giardia), toxoplasmosis (Toxoplasma gondii), leishmaniasis (Leishmania), cryptosporidiosis (Cryptosporidium), and trypanosomiasis (Trypanosoma). This work thus provides a robust framework for the systematic dissection of aaRSs from these pathogens and will facilitate the cross-usage of potential inhibitors to jump-start anti-parasite drug development.

Keywords: Plasmodium, Brugia, giardia, Toxoplasma gondii, leishmania, Cryptosporidium, trypanosoma, aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, drug discovery

Abbreviations: aaRS, aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase; AlaRS, alanyl-tRNA synthetase; ArgRS, arginyl-tRNA synthetase; AsnRS, asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase; AspRS, aspartyl-tRNA synthetase; CysRS, cysteinyl-tRNA synthetase; GluRS, glutamyl-tRNA synthetase; HisRS, histidyl-tRNA synthetase; IleRS, isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase; LysRS, lysyl-tRNA synthetase; MetRS, methionyl-tRNA synthetase; PfArgRS, Plasmodium falciparum arginyl-tRNA synthetase; PheRS, phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase; ProRS, prolyl-tRNA synthetase; ThrRS, threonyl-tRNA synthetase; TrpRS, tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase; TyrRS, tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase; UBI, urea-based inhibitor


Multiple eukaryotic parasites are responsible for the prevalence and continuous spread of more than a billion infections worldwide, thus burdening public health initiatives and the economy (1, 2). Effective treatment and control of parasitic diseases needs the development of novel drugs as this process is further impeded by the periodic and inevitable development of drug resistance in parasites, and insecticide resistance in vectors. Such barriers to effective treatment could permit the resurgence of parasitic diseases, so there is an urgent need for novel anti-parasite drug scaffolds.

Eukaryotic parasites can cause diverse diseases of varying severity in hosts, including both animals and humans. The parasites Plasmodium, Toxoplasma gondii, and Cryptosporidium of the phylum Apicomplexa are responsible for causing malaria, toxoplasmosis and cryptosporidiosis respectively (1, 2, 3). Plasmodium species are responsible for the most acute forms of infection in humans after the proliferation and killing of red blood cells, with estimated 241 million malaria cases in 85 endemic countries (1, 2, 3) (Fig. 1). Plasmodium vivax is more geographically widespread than Plasmodium falciparum and both are responsible for causing severe infections but only the former for relapses. T. gondii, an intracellular parasite, infects animals; however, they are also pathogenic in immunocompromised humans and can cause infections via food-borne illnesses (4). This parasite is estimated to persist chronically in 25 to 30% of the global population (4). After the human hosts ingest cysts, sporozoites are released. These sporozoites infect epithelial cells of the intestine, where the sporozoites develop into tachyzoites which multiply and infect more cells (Fig. 1). These stages together account for some symptoms of the disease (4) (Fig. 1), and limited drugs are available for the treatment of toxoplasmosis. Cryptosporidium affects bovine calves by infecting epithelial cells of the intestine, causing gastrointestinal disease leading to severe and chronic diarrhea. It can further cause direct or indirect human exposure and have debilitating effects, especially in immunocompromised individuals (5). Cryptosporidium hominis and Cryptosporidium parvum are known to cause intestinal infections in humans (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Life cycle of eukaryotic parasites in the human host. Trypanosoma brucei gambiense: The infected tsetse fly injects metacyclic trypomastigotes into the host’s bloodstream where they transform into bloodstream trypomastigotes. The trypomastigotes multiply through binary fission in blood, lymph, and other body fluids and are ingested by the tsetse flies that bite the infected human host. Plasmodium spp.: The infected female Anopheles mosquito, while taking a blood meal, injects sporozoites into the human host. The sporozoites infect the liver cells where they mature into schizonts. Upon the rupture of these schizonts, merozoites are released into the bloodstream. The merozoites infect the red blood cells and mature into rings, trophozoites and schizonts, which rupture and release more merozoites into the bloodstream. Some merozoites mature into male and female gametocytes which the mosquito ingests when it takes blood meal from an infected host. Leishmania spp.: The female sandfly injects promastigotes into the human bloodstream while taking a blood meal. The promastigotes are phagocytosed by immune cells like macrophages. Once inside the macrophage, the promastigote matures into amastigote. The amastigote multiplies inside these cells through division and, upon rupturing of the cells, infects other cells. The amastigotes are ingested by sandflies when they take blood meal from an infected human. Brugia spp.: The third-stage Brugia larvae enter the human host via bites of Mansonia and Aedes mosquitoes. The larvae develop into adult worms in the human lymphatic system. The adult worms produce microfilariae which enter the bloodstream and are ingested by mosquitoes when they take a blood meal. Toxoplasma gondii: Humans are an intermediate host for Toxoplasma gondii. They are infected by the ingestion of T. gondii cysts, mostly through contaminated food. Upon ingestion, the excystation occurs, and sporozoites are released. These sporozoites infect the intestinal epithelial cells, where the sporozoites develop into tachyzoites. The tachyzoites undergo asexual reproduction and go on to infect more cells. Some of these tachyzoites invade tissue systems, forming bradyzoites through encystation. The bradyzoites can remain undetected in the human host for a long time, becoming active only when the host’s immune status is compromised. Cryptosporidium spp.: The sporulated oocyst of Cryptosporidium can enter the human host through the ingestion of fecally contaminated water or food. The oocyst releases sporozoites in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The parasites infect the epithelial cells in the GI tract and undergo asexual (producing schizonts and merozoites) and sexual (producing and macro- and micro-gametes) life cycles. Following the fertilization of gametes, the zygote produces two kinds of oocysts: thick-walled and thin-walled. The thin-walled oocysts continue infecting cells within the host, whereas the thick-walled oocysts are transmitted into the environment through faeces. Giardia spp.: The Giardia cysts enter human hosts through the oral ingestion of contaminated food or water. The cysts shed their external hard cover in the small intestine and release trophozoites which remain in the lumen. The trophozoites replicate through longitudinal binary fission. Some of them form cysts which are infectious and are passed in the stool.

Similarly, trypanosomatid parasites Trypanosoma and Leishmania of phylum Euglenozoa are two important parasites that cause human diseases (6, 7). T. brucei causes African trypanosomiasis (sleeping sickness), where they proliferate inside the bloodstream and the human lymphatic system and subsequently affect the central nervous system often leading to fatality (Fig. 1). Trypanosoma cruzi causes the chronic and fatal Chagas disease which affects 6 to 7 million people worldwide. Leishmaniasis is one of the neglected tropical diseases (7). The two Leishmania parasites Leishmania major and Leishmania donovani are responsible for human infections (Fig. 1) of varying severity, causing cutaneous leishmaniasis and visceral leishmaniasis (kala-azar) with an estimated 700,000 to 1 million new cases annually. Cutaneous leishmaniasis causes skin sores, while visceral leishmaniasis, the serious form of the disease, causes injury to internal organs (7). There is a lack of effective drugs for these Trypanosomatid parasites, compounded by the threat of the emergence of resistance to available drugs. Other eukaryotic parasites with anaerobic metabolism, like Giardia (causes giardiasis), Trichomonas (trichomoniasis), and Entamoeba (amebiasis), are also a public health problem (8). Although nitroimidazole drugs can be used, resistance remains a significant issue. The helminth parasites Brugia malayi and Wuchereria bancrofti cause lymphatic filariasis (elephantiasis) in humans, which is triggered by the immune system’s reaction to adult worms and can lead to permanent disability (9) (Fig. 1). In this work only Brugia parasite will be discussed. The treatment of such diverse parasitic diseases urgently requires the identification of robust drug targets and the continued development and design of novel drugs in order to tackle drug resistance. One such family of essential enzymes, the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs), which tend to be conserved within different parasites, hold promise as a target for anti-parasite drug development.

aaRSs as antiparasitic drug targets

The aaRSs family of enzymes (also known as aminoacyl-tRNA ligases) are ubiquitous since they catalyze the linking of cognate amino acid that corresponds to the tRNA anticodon triplet (2, 10, 11, 12, 13) (Fig. 2). The enzymatic reaction comprises of two steps; first, aaRS utilizes an ATP molecule to activate the cognate amino acid to generate an active aminoacyl-adenylate intermediate (amino acid-AMP) releasing pyrophosphate (PPi). Second, the cognate tRNA binds to the enzyme, which transfers the amino acid to the 3′ end of tRNA, releasing AMP (1, 10, 11, 12, 13). The resulting aminoacylated tRNA, an essential substrate for protein translation, is then transported by elongation factors to the ribosome to carry out protein synthesis (Fig. 2). Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases also contain editing domains that ensure high fidelity of tRNA charging (12, 13). The aaRSs reduce errors by hydrolyzing misactivated amino acids (pretransfer to the tRNA) (Fig. 2) and misacylated tRNAs utilizing separate posttransfer-editing domains (11). Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are thus essential enzymes for protein synthesis (i) for providing aminoacylated-tRNA with the cognate amino acid and (ii) for ensuring the accuracy of protein translation (Fig. 2). The aaRSs are also important for several other cellular processes beyond their catalytic roles, including regulation of transcription, biosynthesis of signal molecules, and mitochondrial RNA cleavage (10, 11, 12, 13). The aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are categorized into two classes, I and II, on the basis of their structure, where class I aaRSs are mostly monomeric and contain the Rossman fold catalytic domain (2, 12, 13) (Fig. 3). On the other hand, class II has a characteristic antiparallel beta-sheet fold surrounded by alpha-helices. Aminoacyl tRNA synthetases are prominently conserved in their catalytic domain due to their specific function; however, their sequence, structure, and function are seen to be relatively diverse across species. Structural and experimental data show that eukaryotic parasite aaRSs enzymes are excellent drug targets with multiple druggable sites; an ATP-binding pocket, the adjoining amino acid–binding pocket, and a tRNA recognition site (2, 10, 11, 12, 13) (Fig. 4). The editing domains that are present on some aaRSs are additional targets for drugs. Some parasite aaRSs are localized to the cytosol (also simply referred to as the cytoplasm) and another subcellular organelle, apicoplast, a vestigial nonphotosynthetic plastid. The apicoplast is essential for parasite survival as it plays a crucial role in lipid metabolism in malaria parasites. The parasites are dependent on the apicoplast and on the mitochondria, and some aaRSs are dual localized in the cytosol and the apicoplast (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13). Thus, aaRSs in multiple organelles are potential drug targets in parasites.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The critical role of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases in protein synthesis. Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) charge tRNAs with the corresponding amino acids. These aminoacylated tRNAs bind to elongation factors for transport to the ribosome. At the A-site of the ribosome, aminoacylated tRNAs bind and recognize the presented codon on the mRNA by base pairing. Then, the nascent protein chain is transfered from a tRNA located at the ribosome’s P-site, thereby elongating the chain by one amino acid. A stop codon at the A-site triggers the accommodation of a release factor instead of a tRNA, which leads to release of the polypeptide chain (i.e. termination).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Classification of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases into class I and II and subclasses a, b and c. The parasites for which inhibitors have been developed against specific aaRSs are listed; Cp: Cryptosporidium parvum, Tb: Trypanosoma brucei, Tc: Trypanosoma cruzi, Pf: Plasmodium falciparum, Pv: Plasmodium vivax, Tg: Toxoplasma gondii, Gl: Giardia lamblia, Bm: Brugia malayi, Lm: Leishmania major, Ld: Leishmania donovani. aaRS, aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The potential druggable sites on aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. The sites for likely interaction between aaRS (belonging to either class I or II) and a compound/inhibitor/drug which can inhibit the enzyme activity are highlighted; 1. ATP-binding site, 2. anticodon-binding site, 3. amino-acid–binding site, 4. editing site, and 5. auxiliary site.

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are well-established drug targets for antibacterial and antifungal activities (14, 15, 16). Several inhibitors have been developed, of which an antibiotic, the isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase (IleRS) inhibitor mupirocin, and the LeuRS inhibitor tavaborole, which is an antifungal, are approved for clinical treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and fungal-infective onychomycosis (14, 15, 16). As drug targets, aaRSs have promising potential because the parasite, like all life forms, is reliant on protein translation. Moreover, due to the specific requirement of active and fast proliferation, parasites are sensitive towards disruption in the critical machinery of protein translation.

Inhibitors against parasite aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases

In this work we summarize advancements in exploring parasite aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases as drug targets by consolidating experimental data on biochemical characterization, validation, inhibitor development, and three-dimensional structural dissections for aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (in alphabetical order starting from alanyl-tRNA synthetase (AlaRS)) from seven eukaryotic pathogens Brugia spp., Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia spp., Leishmania spp., Plasmodium spp., T. gondii, and Trypanosoma spp. This work will facilitate research integration and provide new directions for antipathogen drug discovery.

Alanyl-tRNA synthetase

A single nuclear gene in the parasite Plasmodium encodes for AlaRS, giving rise to two proteins with different localizations, that is, the cytosol and the apicoplast (17, 18). Plasmodium AlaRS also contains a second active site with editing activity since glycine and serine are the most common mischarging events due to their similar size (19). AlaRS presents an opportunity to target aminoacylation and the editing activities occurring in two distinct parasite compartments. Several potential P. falciparum AlaRS inhibitors were screened in silico using homology models, revealing one compound A5, (4-{2-nitro-1-propenyl}-1,2-benzenediol), that was validated to inhibit parasite growth at micromolar levels while producing sparse cytotoxicity (Table 1) (Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5) (18). In another study, a pre-validated MNP library (marine natural product; a specific group of bacterial extract prefractions with demonstrated activity against Leishmania) was used and four potential L. major AlaRS inhibitors decreased the overall tRNA-AlaRS aminoacylation activity (20, 21). The three promising mixes (1881C, 2059D, and 2096D) affected aminoacylation with inhibition ranging from 80% to 99% (Table 1). Interestingly, cross-reactivity is also seen with T. cruzi AlaRS, which indicates a broad-spectrum potential and no effect on the human homolog (20). AlaRS is yet to be explored in four of the seven pathogens Brugia, Cryptosporidium, Giardia and Toxoplasma, discussed in this review (20). The first three-dimensional structure of parasite AlaRS remains to be determined; however, similar to Plasmodium, homology-modeled structures from bacteria and fungi could be explored for in silico docking.

Table 1.

Inhibitors developed for aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases against eukaryotic parasites up till June 2022

aaRSs Inhibitor(s) Parasite Binding mechanism Reference
AlaRS A3; A5 Plasmodium falciparum Active site a Khan et al., 2011 (18)
Natural marine product library (1881C, 2059D, and 2096D) Leishmania major
Trypanosoma cruzi
Active site a Kelly et al., 2020 (20)
ArgRS hemin Plasmodium falciparum Not known Jain et al., 2016 (22)
AsnRS Variolin B Brugia malayi Active site a Sukuru et al., 2006 (27)
Natural product extracts (L-aspartate-B-hydroxamate Brugia malayi Pretransfer editing site a Danel et al., 2011 (28)
TAM B (from Streptomyces sp. 17944 extracts) Brugia malayi Pretransfer editing site a Yu et al., 2011 (29)
WS9326D (from Streptomyces sp. 9078 extracts) Brugia malayi Pretransfer editing site a Yu et al., 2012 (30)
Adipostatins A-D (from Streptomyces sp. 4875 extracts) Brugia malayi Pretransfer editing site a Rateb et al., 2015 (31)
HisRS 15 fragments Trypanosoma cruzi Auxiliary site Koh et al., 2015 (33)
IleRS apicoplast Mupirocin Plasmodium falciparum Active site a Istvan et al., 2011 (35)
IleRS Thiaisoleucine Plasmodium falciparum Active site a Istvan et al., 2011 (35)
NSC70422 (Ile-AMP analog) Trypanosoma brucei Active site a Cestari and Stuart 2013 (36)
LeuRS Benzoxaborole derivatives Trypanosoma brucei Post-transfer editing site Ding et al., 2011 (37)
2-Pyrrolinone derivatives Trypanosoma brucei Active site (predicted; 3D model of active site) Zhao et al., 2012 (40)
N-(4-sulfamoylphenyl)thioureas derivatives Trypanosoma brucei Active site (predicted; 3D model of active site) Zhang et al., 2013 (41)
3,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid and derivatives Giardia lamblia Active site a Zhang et al., 2012 (42)
AN2690 Leishmania donovani Active site a Minhas et al., 2018 (39), Tandon et al., 2020 (38)
Benzoxaborole derivatives (AN6426, AN8432) Plasmodium falciparum Editing active site Sonoiki et al., 2016 (43)
Benzoxaborole derivative (AN6426) Cryptosporidium parvum Toxoplasma gondii Editing active site Palencia et al., 2016 (44)
Series of α-phenoxy-N sulfonylphenyl acetamides (Compound 28g) Trypanosoma brucei Active site (predicted; 3D model of active site) Xin et al., 2020 (45)
Amides (Compound 74 and 91) Trypanosoma brucei Active site (predicted; 3D model of active site) Li et al., 2021 (46)
LysRS Cladosporin Plasmodium falciparum Active site Khan et al., 2014 (50)
Compound 5 Plasmodium falciparum Cryptosporidium parvum Active site Baragana et al., 2019 (52)
ASP3026 (anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitor) Plasmodium falciparum Active site Zhou et al., 2020 (56)
Cladosporin derivatives, CL-2 Plasmodium falciparum Active site Babbar et al., 2021 (54)
Cladosporin derivatives, Cla-B, Cla-C Plasmodium falciparum Active site Babbar et al., 2021 (55)
LysRS2 apicoplast M-26, M-37 Plasmodium falciparum Active site a Hoen et al., 2013 (51)
MetRS Aminoquinoline derivatives (Compound 1) Trypanosoma brucei Active site (predicted model) Shibata et al., 2011 (57)
Urea-based inhibitor series (Compound 2 and 26) Trypanosoma brucei Active site (predicted model) Shibata et al., 2012 (59)
Series of urea-based inhibitors (UBIs) Trypanosoma brucei Active site Koh et al., 2014 (60)
MSMLR library of small molecules: 12 compounds Trypanosoma brucei Active site a Pedro-Rosa et al., 2015 (62)
Fluro-imidazopyridine (Compound-1717) Giardia intestinalis
Giardia lamblia
Not known Ranade et al., 2015 (67)
Michaels et al., 2020 (68)
REP3123 and REP8839,
C1, C2, C3
Plasmodium falciparum Active site (predicted; in silico) Hussain et al., 2015 (65)
Ursolic acid antileishmanial
antitrypanosomal
Active site (predicted; in silico) Labib et al., 2016 (63)
Imidazopyridine-containing compounds (2093, 2114, 2259) Cryptosporidium parvum
Cryptosporidium hominis
Active site a Buckner et al., 2019 (66)
Compound 1 and 26 Trypanosoma brucei Active site Zhang et al., 2020 (61)
DDD806905 Leishmania major Allosteric ligand-binding site Torrie et al., 2020 (69)
PheRS Bicyclic azetidines (BRD7929, BRD8494) Cryptosporidium parvum Active site and an auxiliary site Funkhouser-Jones et al., 2020 (71)
Bicyclic azetidine (BRD7929) Cryptosporidium parvum Active site a Vinayak et al., 2020 (70)
Bicyclic azetidine (BRD1389) Plasmodium vivax Active site Sharma et al., 2021 (75)
Bicyclic azetidine (BRD7929) Toxoplasma gondii Active site Radke et al., 2022 (72)
Plasmodium falciparum Active site Sharma et al., 2022 (74)
ProRS Halofuginone Plasmodium falciparum Active site Herman et al., 2015 (76) and Jain et al., 2014 (80)
Halofuginol (derivative of halofuginone) Plasmodium falciparum
Plasmodium berghei
Active site a Herman et al., 2015 (76)
Halofuginone Toxoplasma gondii Active site Jain et al., 2015 (78)
Febrifugine and halofuginone derivatives Plasmodium falciparum Active site Jain et al., 2014 (80) Jain et al., 2017 (81)
1-(pyridin-4-yl) pyrrolidin-2-one derivatives Plasmodium falciparum Okaniwa et al., 2021 (83)
Double drugging: halofuginone and ATP analog L95 Toxoplasma gondii Active site Manickam et al., 2022 (82)
ThrRS Borrelidin Plasmodium falciparum Plasmodium yoelii Active site a Otoguro et al., 2003 (86)
Borrelidin analogs Plasmodium falciparum Active site a Suguwara et al., 2013 (87)
T1-T11 Plasmodium falciparum Active site a Khan et al., 2011 (18)
Borrelidin Trypanosoma brucei Active site a Kalidas et al., 2014 (88)
Borrelidin Leishmania donovani Active site a Chadha et al., 2018 (89)
Natural marine product library (1438C, 1758C, 2059D, and 2096B) Leishmania major Active site a Kelly et al., 2020 (20)
TrpRS apicoplast Indolmycin Plasmodium falciparum Active site a Pasaje et al., 2016 (95)
TyrRS Fisetin Leishmania major
Leishmania donovani
Active site Larson et al., 2011 (96)
Anand et al., 2016 (97)
ML901 Plasmodium falciparum Active site Xie et al., 2022 (100)
a

Predicted binding mechanism: The inhibitor has been experimentally validated to inhibit aminoacylation/pretransfer editing activity of the aaRS enzyme and thus is predicted to bind at the active/pretransfer-editing site. However, structural interpretation or validation is not available.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Inhibitors developed and three-dimensional structures of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases from eukaryotic parasites (January 2006 till June 2022). The cytoplasmic aaRSs are shown in black font where AlaRS corresponds to Alanyl-tRNA synthetase. The apicoplast aaRSs are shown in purple font. Red font color denotes where three-dimensional structure is known in complex with an inhibitor. aaRS, aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase; AlaRS, Alanyl-tRNA synthetase.

Arginyl-tRNA synthetase

P. falciparum cytoplasmic arginyl-tRNA synthetase (PfArgRS) is a class I monomeric enzyme. IC50, a half-maximal inhibitory concentration, measures the potency of a compound in inhibiting enzyme activity. Hemin, an iron-containing porphyrin, binds PfArgRS and inhibits its aminoacylation activity with IC50 of ∼2 μM (Table 1) (22). Hemin induced a dimeric form of PfArgRS, making it inactive and thus incapable of recognizing the cognate tRNAArg. Increased levels of hemin, particularly in chloroquine-treated malaria parasites, led to decreased levels of tRNAArg. At the same time, the human ArgRS can recognize the tRNAArg even in the presence of hemin. However, the binding site of hemin on the three-dimensional structure of PfArgRS is unknown. ArgRS has been explored only in P. falciparum and is among the least studied aaRSs. The structure of PfArgRS can be utilized for homology modeling and docking in the other six pathogens discussed, and aminoacylation activity inhibition can be tested using established approaches (22).

Asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase

The cytoplasmic AsnRS was first characterized as a druggable target in the nematode B. malayi (23). BmAsnRS catalyzes the production of diadenosine triphosphate, and binding studies involving BmAsnRS show a possible role of AsnRS in modulating immune cell function (24, 25). The solution structure of B. malayi AsnRS revealed a lysine-rich region in its N-terminus, which interacts with tRNA (26).

In silico docking followed by experimental testing of docked compounds against B. malayi AsnRS revealed 45 compounds with mid-micromolar IC50s (27). A marine natural product called Variolin B inhibited ∼50% of Brugia AsnRS activity at 50 μM concentration (Table 1) (27). BmAsnRS can recognize and edit misacylation before the transfer to tRNA, and thus a “pre-transfer assay” identifies compounds and allows for screening inhibitors. Natural product extracts (L-aspartate-B-hydroxamate, an asparagine analog) were identified using this approach (Table 1) (28). TAM B (isolated from Streptomyces sp 17944 extracts), belonging to the tirandamycins class of compounds was shown to kill adult B. malayi parasites (29) (Fig. 1). Another study from the same group revealed a compound WS936D from Streptomyces sp 9078 extracts (WS9326A derivatives) that inhibits B. malayi AsnRS aminoacylation, thereby killing adult B. malayi parasites at low nanomolar concentrations (30). These compounds did show selectivity, as no notable cytotoxicity was observed in human hepatic cells (30). Another study discovered four novel alkylresorcinols called adipostatins A, B, C, and D (from active strain Streptomyces sp. 4875), which all inhibit B. malayi AsnRS with apparent IC50s estimated at 15 μm for adipostatins A, B, and C and 30 μM for adipostatin D (31). They also kill adult parasites in vitro without any notable general cytotoxicity in host cells (Table 1) (31). AsnRS remains to be explored in six of the seven pathogens discussed, and only apo structure is known from Brugia. The efficient high-throughput screening platform with recombinant B. malayi could be reoriented for other pathogens (31).

Histidyl-tRNA synthetase

The first structures of eukaryotic histidyl-tRNA synthetase (HisRS) were determined from T. cruzi and T. brucei (32). While the T. cruzi structure was apo, T. brucei HisRS is a complex with L-His and histidyladenylate, wherein the binding interactions are vastly distinct from bacterial or human homologs. Upon L-His binding, a rearrangement occurs in the active site, which was not significant during the formation of the first product histidyladenylate after L-His reacts with ATP (32). Fifteen newly identified fragments (from a library of 680) are structurally bound in a new “fragment-binding pocket” in T. cruzi HisRS, which is essentially a narrow groove proximal to the bound L-His (Table 1) (33, 34). It is suggested that the fragments likely compete for binding with ATP or the product HAMP or possibly both, causing inhibition of HisRS. This pocket can potentially achieve the desired “selectivity” since this pocket is absent in human HisRS. However, low affinities of these fragments warranted very high concentrations, which is not desirable; thus, enzyme inhibition has to be considered with caution (33). Nevertheless, these fragments can be utilized as a starting point for developing inhibitors of trypanosomatid HisRS and for the other six pathogens discussed, in which HisRS has not been explored as a drug target yet. Available structures of T. cruzi and T. brucei HisRS can be explored to address the significance of the “fragment-binding site”.

Isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase

Mupirocin, an established drug against bacterial IleRS, inhibits the P. falciparum growth in the blood stage in a nanomolar range (35) (Fig. 1). This study analyzed P. falciparum parasites resistant to mupirocin that have mutations in their apicoplast IleRS, validating it as a drug target (35). Also, the cytoplasmic Plasmodium IleRS was inhibited by isoleucine analog thiaisoleucine. Both mupirocin and thiaisoleucine showed the elimination of cultured parasites in vivo (Table 1) (35). Twenty small molecules were identified from compounds available from National Cancer Institute that were similar to the intermediate Ile-AMP. These could kill T. brucei forms in the bloodstream (Table 1) (36) (Fig. 1). Compound NSC70422 notably showed good selectivity against mammalian cells and cured T. brucei–infected mice with low cell toxicity as it acted as a competitive inhibitor of the TbIleRS (36). IleRS is yet to be explored in five of seven pathogens. The three-dimensional structure of parasite IleRS is unavailable, but structures of bacterial and fungal IleRS can be used for in silico docking.

Leucyl-tRNA synthetase

A modeled structure of T. brucei Connective Polypeptide 1 (editing) domain based upon Candida albicans LeuRS was utilized to develop several benzoxaborole compounds, since AN2690 (5-fluro-1.3-dihydro-1-hydroxy-2,1-benzoxaborole) has been used as an antifungal successfully against C. albicans (37). These compounds also inhibited T. brucei LeuRS aminoacylation activity by targeting the LeuRS-editing site. Further, ex vivo growth was inhibited at low micromolar IC50s with negligible host toxicity (Table 1) (37). Similarly, the Connective Polypeptide 1 domain of L. donovani LeuRS was critical for editing the mischarged tRNA and aminoacylation activity (38). AN2690 also had a low-to-moderate affinity to LdLeuRS (Kd = 30 μM) as it inhibits parasite growth in vitro and in vivo in BALB/c mice while exhibiting negligible toxicity in host cells (39). Zhao et al. revealed a novel set of compounds with a 2-pyrrolinone scaffold by in silico screening (SPECS chemical library) of modeled TbLeuRS active site (Table 1) (40). Another novel class of TbLeuRS inhibitors (N-(4-sulfamoylphenyl)thioureas), similarly targeting a 3D in silico model of the synthetic active site, were identified by screening and then modifying the small, targeted library of potential aaRSs inhibitors (41). They mimic the intermediate aminoacyl-AMP; however, most compounds had poor permeability and poor inhibitions except compound 59, which had IC50 = 1.1 μM. In a separate study, 3,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid and its derivatives, including 3,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid propyl ester (viz., compounds 2, 3, and 4), were good at killing the Giardia lamblia parasites with IC₅₀ values of 1.79, 5.51, and 2.56 μM, respectively (Table 1) (42) and the derivatives notably exhibited reduced toxicity and enhanced activity. These were an aqueous ethanol extract of dicaffeoylquinic acids containing Artemisia argyi (42). Similarly, in a separate study, two 3-aminomethyl compounds (termed AN6426 and AN8432) were potent against multidrug-resistant P. falciparum W2 strain with 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50s: 310 nM and 490 nM) (Table 1) (43). The treatment was effective against Plasmodium berghei infection after oral administration once a day for 4 days in a murine model.

AN6426 also inhibits growth in human cells for C. parvum and T. gondii. Similar inhibition activity is seen against Cryptosporidium and Toxoplasma parasites as it targets the LeuRS-editing site (Table 1) (44). In T. gondii, it prevents the proliferation of Toxoplasma parasites in human fibroblasts at mid-micromolar concentrations. Also, their activity intensifies in the presence of amino acid norvaline which can be mischarged to tRNALeu and is a substrate for post-transfer editing by LeuRS. AN6426 and tRNALeu form a covalent adduct in the enzyme’s editing site, either blocking aminoacylation if it interacts with the tRNALeu acceptor end or blocking post-transfer editing if it interacts, for example, with ATP (44). Recent studies identified a series of α-phenoxy-N sulfonylphenyl acetamides as inhibitors of T. brucei LeuRS using a 3D in silico model of the active site. Compound 28 g was the most potent, with an IC50 of 0.70 μM, and potency higher by 250-fold than the starting hit, that is compound 1 (Table 1) (45). In a subsequent study, utilizing the initial hit compound thiourea ZCL539, a follow-up series of amides were designed and synthetized and proven effectual against T. brucei LeuRS. Compounds 74 and 91 were the most potent compounds with IC50 of 0.24 and 0.25 μM (about 700-fold higher potent than the starting hit) (Table 1) (46). LeuRS and its inhibitors that target the editing active site are well-studied in all seven pathogens discussed except Brugia, and apo structure is available from P. falciparum for in silico approaches.

Lysyl-tRNA synthetase

The natural product cladosporin, a fungal secondary metabolite, is active against blood and liver stage growth of P. falciparum at a nanomolar range. Cladosporin targets the cytosolic lysyl-tRNA synthetase (LysRS), as parasites that overexpress LysRS are resistant to cladosporin (47). The apo structure of LysRS from Entamoeba histolytica in a complex with small ligands shows that conformational changes occur upon lysine binding in the catalytic domain, similar to the earlier reports on bacterial LysRS structures (48). Three-dimensional structures of PfLysRS in apo form and complex with substrates show cladosporin interacting with the ATP-binding site as it mimics the natural substrate adenosine (49, 50). In silico docking revealed two potent compounds, M-26 and M-37, showing delayed death inhibition by inhibiting aminoacylation activity by recombinant P. falciparum apicoplast LysRS (Table 1) (51). Baragana et al. reported selective inhibitors of the apicomplexan LysRS, of which compound 5, when given at a low oral dosage (1.5 mg/kg once daily for 4 days), reduced parasitemia by over 90% in a malaria mouse model as it also inhibits C. parvum LysRS and growth of C. parvum parasites in vitro (Table 1) (52). In addition, compound 5 reduced the parasite burden by almost two times when given orally for 7 days in two separate mouse models of cryptosporidiosis (52). This study also reported the 3D structure of C. parvum LysRS in complex with cladosporin and L-Lys. LysRS-1 (KRS-1) from L. donovani is an essential gene (53).

Cladosporin, due to its poor bioavailability and high metabolic instability, is unable to progress toward being a drug candidate. It became appropriate to explore analogs of cladosporin against PfLysRS with slight stereochemical or functional modifications. Four sets of analogs designed by making modifications in the scaffold of cladosporin were assessed in enzyme and parasite assays (Table 1) (54). The most potent compound, CL-2, performed better than cladosporin, and additional H-bonds were noted along with increased aqueous solubility. CL-2 binds to the adenosine pocket itself. The IC50 for CL-2 was 0.1 μM in the ATP hydrolysis assay, and the EC50 values for CL-2 were 0.08 and 4.0 μM (54). EC50 measures the concentration of the compound to obtain a 50% killing in a cell-based assay. The same group later reported another set of derivatives of cladosporin, Cla-B and Cla-C, where the tetrahydropyran frame was replaced with a piperidine ring having functional implications (55). Complex structures with Cla-B and Cla-C reveal similar binding orientations as PfLysRS with cladosporin bound (Table 1) (55). However, the orientation of the piperidine ring varies from that of the tetrahydropyran ring of the cladosporin. Screening of 1215 bioactive compounds led to the discovery of ASP3026, an anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitor, as a PfLysRS inhibitor with nanomolar potency and > 80-fold more effective than the human LysRS (Table 1) (56). ASP3026 occupies the same site as cladosporin with few structural adjustments. ASP3026 is already used in clinical trials against B-cell lymphoma and solid tumors (56). LysRS is among the well-studied aaRSs from P. falciparum and C. parvum, thus providing a robust platform to explore LysRS in the other pathogens.

Methionyl-tRNA synthetase

T. brucei methionyl-tRNA synthetase (MetRS) is an essential enzyme as its gene knockout showed growth defects (57). Further, several effective compounds showed more than 95% inhibition of aminoacylation activity at 50 nM concentration (57). Compound 1 was most effective in T. brucei mouse model with delivery at 25 mg/kg/day for 3 days showing high parasite suppression and delayed death and low mammalian cell toxicity (Table 1) (Fig. 1). Subsequently, L. major MetRS complexed with products methionyladenylate and pyrophosphate showed significant rearrangements in the overall structure of LmMetRS and/or tRNA (as compared to bacterial MetRS) that are vital to enable tRNAMet to access the methionyladenylate intermediate at the active site (58).

In the first major study to develop improved inhibitors of T. brucei MetRS, urea-based scaffolds held promise, firstly due to increased bioavailability and secondly, their likely permeability through the blood-brain barrier (Table 1) (59, 60). Urea-based compounds inhibited parasite growth with low EC50 values (0.15 μM) and low toxicity to host cells. Compounds 2 and 26 showed superior membrane permeation in the in vitro MDR1-MDCKII model (which predicts and classifies compounds with blood barrier permeability) and improved oral pharmacokinetic properties in mice. Compound 26 also showed good suppressive activity against T. brucei rhodesiense in the mouse model, and compound 2 was seen to have entered the central nervous system in mice (59). Subsequently, several urea-based inhibitors (UBIs) were designed against TbMetRS having IC50 of ∼19 nM (Table 1) (60). UBIs bind to TbMetRS through conformational selection and very optimal binding in two pockets—the L-Met pocket and another conserved auxiliary pocket which is likely to be involved in tRNA binding. The UBIs do not compete with ATP for binding but rather interact with it via an h-bond. Thus, the omnipresent ATP-binding mode of MetRSs can be employed to design inhibitors for other disease-causing pathogens (60). A beneficial fluorination site for inhibitors targeting T. brucei MetRS was identified after the structural evaluation of TbMetRS complexes (Table 1) (61). One series of compounds has a 1,3-dihydro-imidazol-2-one containing linker, while a second series includes a rigid fused aromatic ring. These distinct series inhibit parasite growth with high potency and EC50< 19 nM with low toxicity in mammalian cells. Selectivity was achieved in the range of 20- to 200-fold (61). 5-fluoroimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine, when incorporated into compounds, imparts bioavailability and improved efficacy (61). In another study, a large number of inhibitors of TbMetRS was identified (1270) from MLSMR library by BioFocus DPI containing small molecules in molecular weight range 350 to 410 g/mol and containing both natural and synthetic products (Table 1) (62). Fifty two of fifty four compounds chosen for low-throughput screening were active in T. brucei aminoacylation activity assay. Twelve of the fifty four hit compounds inhibit the growth of T. brucei in culture, most likely via inhibition of TbMetRS (62).

Ursolic acid, a natural derivative taken from a reliable source of fresh leaves of Ochrosia elliptica Labill., of family Apocynaceae, displays potent antitrypanosomal and antileishmanial activities (Table 1) (63). The IC50 values were encouraging, between 1.53 and 8.79 μg/ml and almost the same as that of pentamidine, an existing treatment for leishmaniasis though it has many side effects. Ursolic acid exhibited considerable affinity to MetRS with free binding energies from −42.54 to −63.93 kcal/mol (63). Further, two new compounds containing the tetracyclic core of the Yohimbine and Corynanthe alkaloids showed potent inhibition TbMetRS aminoacylation activity and T. brucei parasite proliferation. Testing of multiple hydroxyalkyl δ-lactam, δ-lactam, and piperidine analogs revealed one particular hydroxyalkyl δ-lactam derivative to be more effective against T. brucei. Still, they did not affect the aminoacylation activity of TbMetRS (Table 1) (64).

Two bacterial MetRS inhibitors, REP3123 and REP8839, affected P. falciparum pathogen survival at various stages, viz., ring, trophozoite, and schizont (Table 1) (65) (Fig. 1). Three compounds, C1, C2, and C3, identified in silico were experimentally validated as they diminished protein translation by acting against PfMetRS as they stopped the progression of parasite growth from the ring to the trophozoite stage (65) (Fig. 1). Class of imidazopyridine-containing compounds has shown promise against C. parvum and C. hominis infections in culture, likely via inhibition of Cryptosporidium MetRS (Table 1) (66). Compounds 2093, 2114, and 2259 showed the best in vivo activity; 2093 was not genotoxic. These compounds gradually stalled C. parvum infection in mouse models with no considerable side effects (66). This study points out that selectivity can be achieved over the human MetRS if treatment by these inhibitors is for short durations (e.g., < 1 week). A new class inhibitor, compound-1717, a fluro-imidazopyridine, targets Giardia intestinalis MetRS and has ‘cidal’ anti-Giardia activity as it inhibited trophozoites growth (Fig. 1) at 500 nM with a therapeutic index of ∼100 (Table 1) (67). Compound-1717 satisfies Lipinski’s rule of 5 that determines the druggability of a molecule [Molecular mass less than 500 Da, high lipophilicity (expressed as partition coefficient LogP of less than 5), fewer than five hydrogen bond donors, less than ten hydrogen bond acceptors, and molar refractivity between 40–130]. It was later seen to be highly effective in clearing Giardia infection within 3 days at variable doses in a mouse model of giardiasis (68). Subsequently, another structurally novel class of inhibitors that contain a 4,6-diamino-substituted pyrazolopyrimidine core (the MetRS02 series) was identified (69). These compounds interestingly bind to an allosteric pocket in L. major MetRS. They also exhibit a noncompetitive mode of inhibition in enzymatic studies (Table 1) (69). Compound DDD806905 worked against promastigotes (Fig. 1) but did not work in vivo. MetRS is the most widely studied aaRS in this review, as it has been investigated in all pathogens discussed here except T. gondii.

Phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase (FRS)

Bicyclic azetidines have been explored as inhibitors for parasite phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetases (PheRS). Cryptosporidium PheRS was validated as the molecular target of bicyclic azetidines. The most potent compound, BRD7929 eliminated parasites in vitro exponentially, with a half-life of ∼9.5 h and ∼95 h was needed to kill 99.9% C. parvum parasites (Table 1) (70). Bicyclic azetidines have shown good selectivity as they eliminate parasites effectively in a mouse model with a once-daily dosing regimen. BRD7929 once-daily cured cryptosporidiosis in highly immunosuppressed mice and is thus promising for use in malnourished children and immunocompromised patients (70). Further, two compounds, bicyclic azetidines BRD7929 and BRD8494, were most potent across multiple stages of C. parvum growth in vitro across multiple stages, likely via inhibition of PheRS (Table 1) (71). BRD7929 was the most potent, possibly due to greater hydrophobicity. Series of bicyclic azetidines inhibit T. gondii growth in vitro and provide protection in a mouse model against acute and chronic toxoplasmosis (Table 1) (72). They are potent against tachyzoites (Fig. 1) at low nanomolar levels, and treatment of bradyzoites in vitro at EC90 concentrations leads to the complete killing of parasites. These compounds also exhibit better selectivity towards inhibiting T. gondii PheRS, thereby inhibiting parasite growth in vitro and in vivo. In particular, BRD7929 has an overall good bioavailability, potency, and desirable selective profile which has remained a major challenge for aaRSs inhibitors so far.

P. falciparum genome encodes for three different PheRS, wherein one complex PfPheRS is localized to the cytosol and the apicoplast and a third unique PfPheRS is localized in the mitochondria (73). A recent study revealed that BRD7929 had higher affinity and potent selective inhibition against P. falciparum cytoplasmic PheRS than the human PheRS (Table 1) (74). BRD7929 inhibits P. falciparum growth at nanomolar concentrations (EC50 5 nM [Dd2 strain], 9 nM [3D7 strain]). It exhibited single-dose efficacy and promising pharmacokinetic properties in a mouse model. Three-dimensional structure of cytoplasmic PfPheRS with BRD7929 reveals binding of the inhibitor at the L-Phe pocket and an adjacent auxiliary pocket which is interesting as it is a departure from most aaRSs where inhibitors occupy one or the other or both two substrate-binding sites (Table 1) (74). These drugs are shown to kill parasites in vitro and in vivo in all stages of the parasite life cycle (Fig. 1). Bicyclic azetidines are also competitive inhibitors of L-Phe in P. vivax PheRS, as BRD1389 binds similarly to the L-Phe pocket and an adjacent auxiliary pocket (75). Thus, in both these studies, Pf and Pv cytoplasmic PheRS show a similar binding mode.

PheRS has been explored as a druggable target only recently, and different bicyclic azetidines are now established as potent and promising inhibitors of PheRS from Plasmodium, Cryptosporidium, and Toxoplasma. PheRS holds a promise as an advanced target in parasites as it has shown the much-desired selectivity. Achieving selectivity remains a challenge in aaRSs since most of them share high homology with the human homologs and this is a major hindrance to successful progression from inhibitors to drugs. These inhibitors could be cross-tested for the other four pathogens discussed in this review.

Prolyl-tRNA synthetase

Halofuginone, a synthetic derivative of febrifugine, binds to the L-Pro and tRNA sites in Plasmodium prolyl-tRNA synthetase (ProRS), confirming the enzyme to be a functional target of both febrifugine and halofuginone (76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81). Febrifugine is well-established as a traditional Chinese herbal remedy for malaria fever for over a century (77). Halofuginone also kills T. gondii parasites suggesting the broad efficacy of this compound (78, 79). Halofuginone though highly potent in killing Plasmodium parasites causes cytotoxicity to host cells (77). Thus, many halofuginone and febrifugine derivatives with better safety profiles and improved therapeutic indices were designed for PfProRS (Table 1) (76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81). Halofuginol, a new derivative of halofuginone was designed by modifying the linker region by replacing the ketone group with a secondary alcohol, is effective against the liver and blood stages (Fig. 1) of the parasite in a mouse model. Halofuginol demonstrated efficacy and tolerance in a P. berghei–infected mouse model (administrated orally or intraperitoneally at a 25 mg/kg dosage) (Table 1) (76).

In a recent study, “double drugging” of T. gondii ProRS by halofuginone and a novel ATP mimetic shows simultaneous binding at all three pockets in the active site since ATP mimetic L95 binds in the ATP site (82). Both L95 and halofuginone are effective at nM concentrations when used individually (82). Double drugging while managing dosage is a critical step towards likely achieving selectivity for ProRS and other aaRSs. Another study identified novel 1-(pyridin-4-yl)pyrrolidin-2-one derivatives as the cytoplasmic PfProRS inhibitors (83). Compound 1 and its enantiomer 1-S, when tested against resistant Pf strains and the development of liver schizonts (Fig. 1), showed potent low nanomolar activity. The slow killing and growth inhibition were seen in Pf and Pv field isolates. Thus, these derivatives show an encouraging off-target profile and oral efficacy in a Pf malaria murine model (83). Halofuginone and its derivatives are well-established and promising inhibitors of ProRS from Plasmodium and Toxoplasma. ProRS can be similarly explored in the remaining five of the seven pathogens discussed here.

Threonyl-tRNA synthetase

Borrelidin is a likely inhibitor for P. falciparum threonyl-tRNA synthetase (ThrRS), belonging to class II, as it successfully inhibits the proliferation of parasites in culture and the asexual erythrocytic parasitic life-cycle, indicating cytosolic inhibition (Fig. 1) (Table 1) (84, 85, 86). However, no effect is seen in the apicoplast despite PfThrRS exhibiting dual localization (84, 85). Increased concentrations of L-Thr in culture reduced parasite sensitivity indicating Thr utilization and PfThrRS as the target for borrelidin. Subsequent studies showed in vivo effects of borrelidin as low doses cured mice of lethal rodent malaria infections caused by Plasmodium yoelii and possibly induced protective immune responses (85, 86). Borrelidin though an excellent inhibitor of PfThrRS (it shows antimalarial activity against drug-resistant Pf parasites with IC50 of 0.93 ng/ml) faces the challenge of cytotoxicity. In this direction, borrelidin analogs and borrelidin-like series are promising and show reduced host cytotoxicity (87). Khan et al. discovered novel inhibitors of PfThrRS by in silico screening using structural models revealing compounds with moderate inhibition of P. falciparum growth (18).

Eight potential L. major ThrRS inhibitors were screened using a prevalidated MNP library (20, 21). Two compounds inhibited the aminoacylation activity at ∼50%, and four (1438C, 1758C, 2059D, and 2096B) inhibited the activity by greater than 75%, which continued to perturb aminoacylation throughout experiments. Of these four, 2059D and 2096B also inhibit L. major AlaRS (Table 1). Borrelidin, well-established as a natural product inhibitor of bacterial ThrRS, also inhibits T. brucei ThrRS by inhibiting parasite growth (88). Further, knockdown of T. brucei ThrRS studies results in rapid cell death. Borrelidin shows a strong affinity for the L. donovani ThrRS (Kd: 0.04 μM), and it also inhibits the promastigote stage of parasites (Fig. 1) (IC50: 21 μM) (Table 1) (89). Borrelidin and its analogs are well-established as inhibitors of ThrRS from Plasmodium, Trypanosoma, and Leishmania and they can be explored using established approaches in four of the seven pathogens discussed here.

Tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase

Two genes encode two tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetases (TrpRS), belonging to class I, in T. brucei, wherein the first recognizes the tRNA in the cytosol, and the second recognizes the tRNA inside the mitochondria (90). The second enzyme is needed for aminoacylation of the imported thiolated and the edited tRNATrp as it has a high substrate specificity (90). Parasite-specific subdomains with structural differences are seen in TrpRS from Giardia lamblia, C. parvum, T. brucei, and B. histolytica, and P. falciparum which can guide selective drug design (91, 92, 93, 94). The activation reaction mechanism is different in eukaryote G. lamblia compared to human TrpRS as three critical residues which stabilize interactions with a beta-hairpin are absent while retaining the overall dimer structure (91). An inhibitor of the bacterial TrpRS called indolmycin, a natural tryptophan analog, was explored against P. falciparum TrpRS. Indolmycin, isolated from the bacteria Streptomyces griseus, affects parasite growth by specifically inhibiting the apicoplast PfTrpRS but not the cytosolic PfTrpRS (Table 1) (95). The structure of the catalytic domain of cytoplasmic PfTrpRS is available in complex with L-tryptophan (93).

Tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase

The first three-dimensional structure of the L. major cytoplasmic tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase (TyrRS), belonging to class I, showed a pseudo-dimer with unique asymmetric domains and only a single functional, active site (near N-terminus) along with an anticodon site (near the C-terminus) (96). L. donovani TyrRS is characterized and validated as an essential enzyme (97). Fisetin (3,3′,4′,7-tetrahydroxyflavone), a flavonoid, inhibits parasite growth by inhibiting LdTyrRS aminoacylation activity, as seen earlier for trypanosomal TyrRS (96, 97). The structure of L. donovani TyrRS in complex with tyrosyl-adenylate consists of two “pseudo” monomers, wherein the N-terminal monomer is able to perform amino acid activation, while the C-terminal monomer lacks this canonical function (98). The structure of the LdTyrRS with bound to tyrosyl-adenylate revealed an “extra pocket” near the adenine-binding region, which is absent in human TyrRS (98). P. falciparum TyrRS is localized in the cytosol and is present in the infected erythrocytes (99). The extracellular activity of the PfYRS was detected via mimicking host cytokines to then induce pro-inflammatory responses in the host (99).

A recent study has identified adenosine 5′-sulfamate (a close mimic of AMP), and then ML901 from Takeda Pharmaceutical compound library, which showed potent activity against all strains of P. falciparum and also showed 800- to 5000-fold selectivity towards the parasite (100). In vivo study in mice engrafted with P. falciparum–infected RBCs showed that a single dose [50 mg/kg intraperitoneal injection] can reduce parasitemia to baseline with no cytotoxicity. ML901 targets the PfTyrRS by a unique “reaction hijacking” mechanism. The PfYRS binds to ATP and tyrosine; the tRNATyr then binds to the tyrosine-releasing AMP. This would normally make a “charged” tRNA but when inhibitor ML901 is present, this drug binds to the tyrosine of Tyr-tRNATyr instead and the uncharged tRNATyr is released thereby inhibiting the PfTyrRS and stalling protein synthesis (100). This unique, promising approach may achieve the desired selectivity for aaRSs.

Other structurally and functionally characterized aaRSs

Aspartyl-tRNA synthetase

The first apo structure of the aspartyl-tRNA synthetase (AspRS), belonging to class II, from E. histolytica, was determined early on (101). The T. brucei genome encodes two separate genes for AspRS, though the cell contains a single tRNAAsp isoacceptor. In vitro data shows that mitochondrial TbAspRS2 aminoacylates cytosolic and mitochondrial tRNAAsp, whereas the cytosolic TbAspRS1 only recognizes cytosolic tRNAAsp. Thus, cytosolic and mitochondrial tRNAAsp are derived from the same nuclear gene product but are physically distinct, offering dual potential as drug targets (102). Structural data reveals that the N-terminus of the P. falciparum AspRS contains a motif that may provide a strong RNA binding to plasmodial AspRS, and plasmodial insertion is required for AspRS dimerization and thereby for its aminoacylation activity and other functions (103). AspRS has been reported in Entamoeba, Trypanosoma, and Plasmodium but is yet to be explored in five of seven pathogens discussed. AspRS has been reported in Entamoeba, Trypanosoma, and Plasmodium with 3D structures available from E. histolytica which can be utilized to develop first-ever inhibitors of AspRS.

Glutamyl-tRNA synthetase

The transcript of GltX, one of the glutamyl tRNA synthetases (GluRS), is expressed during the asexual blood stages of Babesia bovis, which confirms that the complete bipartite signal is in control of directing the reporter protein into the apicoplast, a compartment distinct from the nucleus and the mitochondrion (104). Further, the Gln-tRNA(Gln) biosynthesis in the Plasmodium apicoplast is achieved by a vital indirect aminoacylation pathway, where GluRS is first targeted in the apicoplast in the blood stages as it glutamylates tRNAGlu and tRNAGln (105). GluRS remains to be explored as no structure or inhibitor has been reported from the seven pathogens discussed here.

Cysteinyl-tRNA synthetase

The cysteinyl-tRNA synthetase (CysRS), belonging to class I, is encoded by a single gene in P. falciparum and is dual-targeted to the cytosol and the apicoplast (106). Similar to the other well-studied dual location ThrRS, inhibition of CysRs will have dual effects, that is, first killing the parasites via inhibition of cytosolic translation and concurrently disrupting the apicoplast protein translation. CysRS has been partially studied in P. falciparum and remains to be explored in six of the seven pathogens discussed here, as no inhibitors have been discovered.

Concluding remarks

The aaRSs are universally conserved enzymes essential for protein synthesis. Remarkable progress in the past two decades has thrust parasite-encoded aaRSs into focus as promising drug targets for many pathogens. Biochemical and structural studies have elucidated inhibition mechanisms that target various sites on these enzymes. Indeed, a remarkable example of double drugging of this enzyme family has also been validated wherein two unrelated and individually potent drugs co-bind to the ProRS, occupying all the substrate-binding sites on the enzyme (82). There is a wealth of knowledge on inhibitor identification, design, and development against numerous eukaryotic parasite aaRSs. These studies are based on various technologies that include in silico docking, high-throughput screening, enzyme inhibition assays, chemical modifications of hit compounds, and animal models. The libraries of hit compounds generated so far for individual pathogens can be tested across many more eukaryotic pathogens allowing cross-usage of existing and new inhibitors. These parasite aaRSs tend to have conserved 3D structures and conserved catalytic sites in their aminoacylation domains. Evaluating sequence conservation in the inhibitor-binding residues in drug bound complexes may validate new hit compounds which could be used to target more than one pathogen. We have, in an earlier study, proposed “STOPP”, that is, structure-based targeting of orthologous pathogen proteins (107). Essential enzymes that are conserved (between hosts and pathogens and within different parasites) have the potential to be excellent drug targets if new compounds and chemical entities can differentiate subtle sequence/structure variations in the binding region. This knowledge can be leveraged when synthesizing novel chemical entities. Such structure-based targeting of orthologous proteins will jump-start inhibitor discovery across pathogen-encoded aaRSs.

Resistance to antiparasitic drugs remains a significant issue and warrants special focus during the preclinical stages of inhibitor development. Early evaluations of inhibitors can put them on a robust path and make them promising scaffolds. Due to the universal nature of aaRSs enzymes, selectivity remains a challenge for developing successful drugs against parasite aaRSs even though these parasites, in some cases, are evolutionarily distinct and cause different diseases. The selectivity of an inhibitor towards parasite aaRS and not the human host aaRS is crucial as this results in host cytotoxicity. This issue of selectivity warrants attention and requires a thorough understanding of the structural underpinnings for specific drug design. The data consolidated in this work will pave the way for further dissection of aaRSs from eukaryotic pathogens and will steer the modification of promising inhibitors and scaffolds into selective drug-like compounds. Parasite-encoded aaRSs are undoubtedly exciting and promising druggable targets that warrant continued scrutiny for the development of anti-infective drugs.

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.

Acknowledgments

A. S. is recipient of JC Bose National fellowship from Department of Science and Technology, Govt. of India.

Author contributions

A. S. conceptualization; J. G. writing-original draft; J. G. and A. S. writing-review & editing.

Edited by Karin Musier-Forsyth

References

  • 1.Bloom D.E., Cadarette D. Infectious disease threats in the twenty-first century: strengthening the global response. Front. Immunol. 2019;10:549. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pham J.S., Dawson K.L., Jackson K.E., Lim E.E., Pasaje C.F., Turner K.E., et al. Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases as drug targets in eukaryotic parasites. Int. J. Parasitol. Drugs Drug Resist. 2013;4:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2013.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Seeber F., Steinfelder S. Recent advances in understanding apicomplexan parasites. F1000Research. 2016;5:1369. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.7924.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Webster J.P. Toxoplasmosis of animals and humans. Parasites Vectors. 2010;3:112. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tzipori S., Widmer G. A hundred-year retrospective on cryptosporidiosis. Trends Parasitol. 2008;24:184–189. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2008.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Golding N. Review of “Trypanosomes and trypanosomiasis” by stefan magez and magdalena radwanska (Editors) Parasites Vectors. 2013;6:365. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mann S., Frasca K., Scherrer S., Henao-Martínez A.F., Newman S., Ramanan P., et al. A review of leishmaniasis: current knowledge and future directions. Curr. Trop. Med. Rep. 2021;8:121–132. doi: 10.1007/s40475-021-00232-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cai W., Ryan U., Xiao L., Feng Y. Zoonotic giardiasis: an update. Parasitol. Res. 2021;120:4199–4218. doi: 10.1007/s00436-021-07325-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Newman T.E., Juergens A.L. StatPearls [Internet] StatPearls Publishing; Treasure island (FL): 2022. Filariasis. [Updated 2022 may 3] Available from: [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cusack S. Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1997;7:881–889. doi: 10.1016/s0959-440x(97)80161-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rubio Gomez M.A., Ibba M. Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. RNA. 2020;26:910–936. doi: 10.1261/rna.071720.119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kwon N.H., Fox P.L., Kim S. Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases as therapeutic targets. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2019;18:629–650. doi: 10.1038/s41573-019-0026-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Schimmel P. The emerging complexity of the tRNA world: mammalian tRNAs beyond protein synthesis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018;19:45–58. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bouz G., Zitko J. Inhibitors of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases as antimycobacterial compounds: an up-to-date review. Bioorg. Chem. 2021;110 doi: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2021.104806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nakama T., Nureki O., Yokoyama S. Structural basis for the recognition of isoleucyl-adenylate and an antibiotic, mupirocin, by isoleucyl-TRNA synthetase. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:47387–47393. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109089200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Rock F.L., Mao W., Yaremchuk A., Tukalo M., Crépin T., Zhou H., et al. An antifungal agent inhibits an aminoacyl-TRNA synthetase by trapping TRNA in the editing site. Science. 2007;316:1759–1761. doi: 10.1126/science.1142189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jackson K.E., Pham J.S., Kwek M., De Silva N.S., Allen S.M., Goodman C.D., et al. Dual targeting of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases to the apicoplast and cytosol in Plasmodium falciparum. Int. J. Parasitol. 2012;42:177–186. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2011.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Khan S., Sharma A., Jamwal A., Sharma V., Pole A.K., Thakur K.K., et al. Uneven spread of cis- and trans-editing aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase domains within translational compartments of P. Falciparum. Sci. Rep. 2011;1:188. doi: 10.1038/srep00188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sokabe M., Okada A., Yao M., Nakashima T., Tanaka I. Molecular basis of alanine discrimination in editing site. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2005;102:11669–11674. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0502119102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kelly P., Hadi-Nezhad F., Liu D.Y., Lawrence T.J., Linington R.G., Ibba M., et al. Targeting tRNA-synthetase interactions towards novel therapeutic discovery against eukaryotic pathogens. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2020;14 doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Schulze C.J., Bray W.M., Woerhmann M.H., Stuart J., Lokey R.S., Linington R.G. "Function-first" lead discovery: mode of action profiling of natural product libraries using image-based screening. Chem. Biol. 2013;20:285–295. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2012.12.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jain V., Yogavel M., Sharma A. Dimerization of arginyl-tRNA synthetase by free heme drives its inactivation in plasmodium falciparum. Structure. 2016;24:1476–1487. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2016.06.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kron M., Petridis M., Milev Y., Leykam J., Härtlein M. Expression, localization and alternative function of cytoplasmic asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase in Brugia malayi. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2003;129:33–39. doi: 10.1016/s0166-6851(03)00080-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kron M.A., Wang C., Vodanovic-Jankovic S., Howard O.M., Kuhn L.A. Interleukin-8-like activity in a filarial asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2012;185:66–69. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2012.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ramirez B.L., Howard O.M., Dong H.F., Edamatsu T., Gao P., Hartlein M., et al. Brugia malayi asparaginyl-transfer RNA synthetase induces chemotaxis of human leukocytes and activates G-protein-coupled receptors CXCR1 and CXCR2. J. Infect. Dis. 2006;193:1164–1171. doi: 10.1086/501369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Crepin T., Peterson F., Haertlein M., Jensen D., Wang C., Cusack S., et al. A hybrid structural model of the complete Brugia malayi cytoplasmic asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase. J. Mol. Biol. 2011;405:1056–1069. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.11.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sukuru S.C., Crepin T., Milev Y., Marsh L.C., Hill J.B., Anderson R.J., et al. Discovering new classes of Brugia malayi asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase inhibitors and relating specificity to conformational change. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 2006;20:159–178. doi: 10.1007/s10822-006-9043-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Danel F., Caspers P., Nuoffer C., Härtlein M., Kron M.A., Page M.G. Asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase pre-transfer editing assay. Curr. Drug Discov. Technol. 2011;8:66–75. doi: 10.2174/157016311794519947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yu Z., Vodanovic-Jankovic S., Ledeboer N., Huang S.X., Rajski S.R., Kron M., et al. Tirandamycins from Streptomyces sp. 17944 inhibiting the parasite Brugia malayi asparagine tRNA synthetase. Org. Lett. 2011;13:2034–2037. doi: 10.1021/ol200420u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yu Z., Vodanovic-Jankovic S., Kron M., Shen B. New WS9326A congeners from Streptomyces sp. 9078 inhibiting Brugia malayi asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase. Org. Lett. 2012;14:4946–4949. doi: 10.1021/ol302298k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Rateb M.E., Yang D., Vodanovic-Jankovic S., Yu Z., Kron M.A., Shen B. Adipostatins A-D from Streptomyces sp. 4875 inhibiting Brugia malayi asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase and killing adult Brugia malayi parasites. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 2015;68:540–542. doi: 10.1038/ja.2015.22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Merritt E.A., Arakaki T.L., Gillespie J.R., Larson E.T., Kelley A., Mueller N., et al. Crystal structures of trypanosomal histidyl-tRNA synthetase illuminate differences between eukaryotic and prokaryotic homologs. J. Mol. Biol. 2010;397:481–494. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.01.051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Koh C.Y., Siddaramaiah L.K., Ranade R.M., Nguyen J., Jian T., Zhang Z., et al. A binding hotspot in Trypanosoma cruzi histidyl-tRNA synthetase revealed by fragment-based crystallographic cocktail screens. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2015;71:1684–1698. doi: 10.1107/S1399004715007683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Verlinde C.L., Fan E., Shibata S., Zhang Z., Sun Z., Deng W., et al. Fragment-based cocktail crystallography by the medical structural genomics of pathogenic protozoa consortium. Curr. Top Med. Chem. 2009;9:1678–1687. doi: 10.2174/156802609790102383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Istvan E.S., Dharia N.V., Bopp S.E., Gluzman I., Winzeler E.A., Goldberg D.E. Validation of isoleucine utilization targets in Plasmodium falciparum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2011;108:1627–1632. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011560108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Cestari I., Stuart K. Inhibition of isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase as a potential treatment for human African Trypanosomiasis. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288:14256–14263. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.447441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ding D., Meng Q., Gao G., Zhao Y., Wang Q., Nare B., et al. Design, synthesis, and structure-activity relationship of Trypanosoma brucei leucyl-tRNA synthetase inhibitors as antitrypanosomal agents. J. Med. Chem. 2011;54:1276–1287. doi: 10.1021/jm101225g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tandon S., Manhas R., Tiwari N., Munde M., Vijayan R., Gourinath S., et al. Deciphering the interaction of benzoxaborole inhibitor AN2690 with connective polypeptide 1 (CP1) editing domain of Leishmania donovani leucyl-tRNA synthetase. J. Biosci. 2020;45:63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Manhas R., Tandon S., Sen S.S., Tiwari N., Munde M., Madhubala R. Leishmania donovani parasites are inhibited by the benzoxaborole AN2690 targeting leucyl-tRNA synthetase. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018;62:e00079-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00079-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zhao Y., Wang Q., Meng Q., Ding D., Yang H., Gao G., et al. Identification of Trypanosoma brucei leucyl-tRNA synthetase inhibitors by pharmacophore- and docking-based virtual screening and synthesis. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2012;20:1240–1250. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2011.12.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zhang F., Du J., Wang Q., Hu Q., Zhang J., Ding D., et al. Discovery of N-(4-sulfamoylphenyl)thioureas as Trypanosoma brucei leucyl-tRNA synthetase inhibitors. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2013;11:5310–5324. doi: 10.1039/c3ob40236c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zhang Y.H., Xue M.Q., Bai Y.C., Yuan H.H., Zhao H.L., Lan M.B. 3,5-Dicaffeoylquinic acid isolated from Artemisia argyi and its ester derivatives exert anti-leucyl-tRNA synthetase of Giardia lamblia (GlLeuRS) and potential anti-giardial effects. Fitoterapia. 2012;83:1281–1285. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2012.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sonoiki E., Palencia A., Guo D., Ahyong V., Dong C., Li X., et al. Antimalarial benzoxaboroles target plasmodium falciparum leucyl-tRNA synthetase. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016;60:4886–4895. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00820-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Palencia A., Liu R.J., Lukarska M., Gut J., Bougdour A., Touquet B., et al. Cryptosporidium and Toxoplasma parasites are inhibited by a benzoxaborole targeting leucyl-tRNA synthetase. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016;60:5817–5827. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00873-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Xin W., Li Z., Wang Q., Du J., Zhu M., Zhou H. Design and synthesis of α-phenoxy-N-sulfonylphenyl acetamides as Trypanosoma brucei Leucyl-tRNA synthetase inhibitors. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2020;185 doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.111827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Li Z., Xin W., Wang Q., Zhu M., Zhou H. Design and synthesis of N-(3-sulfamoylphenyl)amides as Trypanosoma brucei leucyl-tRNA synthetase inhibitors. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2021;217 doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2021.113319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hoepfner D., McNamara C.W., Lim C.S., Studer C., Riedl R., Aust T., et al. Selective and specific inhibition of the plasmodium falciparum lysyl-tRNA synthetase by the fungal secondary metabolite cladosporin. Cell Host Microbe. 2012;11:654–663. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2012.04.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Bonnefond L., Castro de Moura M., Ribas de Pouplana L., Nureki O. Crystal structures of Entamoeba histolytica lysyl-tRNA synthetase reveal conformational changes upon lysine binding and a specific helix bundle domain. FEBS Lett. 2014;588:4478–4486. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2014.10.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Khan S., Garg A., Camacho N., Van Rooyen J., Kumar Pole A., Belrhali H., et al. Structural analysis of malaria-parasite lysyl-tRNA synthetase provides a platform for drug development. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2013;69:785–795. doi: 10.1107/S0907444913001923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Khan S., Sharma A., Belrhali H., Yogavel M., Sharma A. Structural basis of malaria parasite lysyl-tRNA synthetase inhibition by cladosporin. J. Struct. Funct. Genomics. 2014;15:63–71. doi: 10.1007/s10969-014-9182-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Hoen R., Novoa E.M., López A., Camacho N., Cubells L., Vieira P., et al. Selective inhibition of an apicoplastic aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase from Plasmodium falciparum. Chembiochem. 2013;14:499–509. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201200620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Baragaña B., Forte B., Choi R., Nakazawa Hewitt S., Bueren-Calabuig J.A., Pisco J.P., et al. Lysyl-tRNA synthetase as a drug target in malaria and cryptosporidiosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2019;116:7015–7020. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1814685116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Chadha S., Mallampudi N.A., Mohapatra D.K., Madhubala R. Genetic validation of Leishmania donovani lysyl-tRNA synthetase shows that it is indispensable for parasite growth and infectivity. mSphere. 2017;2:e00340-17. doi: 10.1128/mSphereDirect.00340-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Babbar P., Das P., Manickam Y., Mankad Y., Yadav S., Parvez S., et al. Design, synthesis, and structural analysis of cladosporin-based inhibitors of malaria parasites. ACS Infect. Dis. 2021;7:1777–1794. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.1c00092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Babbar P., Sato M., Manickam Y., Mishra S., Harlos K., Gupta S., et al. Inhibition of plasmodium falciparum lysyl-tRNA synthetase via a piperidine-ring scaffold inspired cladosporin analogues. Chembiochem. 2021;22:2468–2477. doi: 10.1002/cbic.202100212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Zhou J., Huang Z., Zheng L., Hei Z., Wang Z., Yu B., et al. Inhibition of Plasmodium falciparum Lysyl-tRNA synthetase via an anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitor. Nucl. Acids Res. 2020;48:11566–11576. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Shibata S., Gillespie J.R., Kelley A.M., Napuli A.J., Zhang Z., Kovzun K.V., et al. Selective inhibitors of methionyl-tRNA synthetase have potent activity against Trypanosoma brucei Infection in Mice. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011;55:1982–1989. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01796-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Larson E.T., Kim J.E., Zucker F.H., Kelley A., Mueller N., Napuli A.J., et al. Structure of Leishmania major methionyl-tRNA synthetase in complex with intermediate products methionyladenylate and pyrophosphate. Biochimie. 2011;93:570–582. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2010.11.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Shibata S., Gillespie J.R., Ranade R.M., Koh C.Y., Kim J.E., Laydbak J.U., et al. Urea-based inhibitors of trypanosoma brucei methionyl-tRNA synthetase: selectivity and in vivo characterization. J. Med. Chem. 2012;55:6342–6351. doi: 10.1021/jm300303e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Koh C.Y., Kim J.E., Wetzel A.B., de van der Schueren W.J., Shibata S., Ranade R.M., et al. Structures of Trypanosoma brucei methionyl-tRNA synthetase with urea-based inhibitors provide guidance for drug design against sleeping sickness. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2014;8 doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Zhang Z., Barros-Álvarez X., Gillespie J.R., Ranade R.M., Huang W., Shibata S., et al. Structure-guided discovery of selective methionyl-tRNA synthetase inhibitors with potent activity against Trypanosoma brucei. RSC Med. Chem. 2020;11:885–895. doi: 10.1039/d0md00057d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Pedró-Rosa L., Buckner F.S., Ranade R.M., Eberhart C., Madoux F., Gillespie J.R., et al. Identification of potent inhibitors of the Trypanosoma brucei methionyl-tRNA synthetase via high-throughput orthogonal screening. J. Biomol. Screen. 2015;20:122–130. doi: 10.1177/1087057114548832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Labib R.M., Ebada S.S., Youssef F.S., Ashour M.L., Ross S.A. Ursolic acid, a natural pentacylcic triterpene from Ochrosia elliptica and its role in the management of certain neglected tropical diseases. Pharmacogn Mag. 2016;12:319–325. doi: 10.4103/0973-1296.192207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Lepovitz L.T., Meis A.R., Thomas S.M., Wiedeman J., Pham A., Mensa-Wilmot K., et al. Design, synthesis, and evaluation of novel anti-trypanosomal compounds. Tetrahedron. 2020;76 doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2020.131086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Hussain T., Yogavel M., Sharma A. Inhibition of protein synthesis and malaria parasite development by drug targeting of methionyl-tRNA synthetases. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015;59:1856–1867. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02220-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Buckner F.S., Ranade R.M., Gillespie J.R., Shibata S., Hulverson M.A., Zhang Z., et al. Optimization of methionyl tRNA-synthetase inhibitors for treatment of Cryptosporidium infection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019;63:e02061-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02061-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Ranade R.M., Zhang Z., Gillespie J.R., Shibata S., Verlinde C.L., Hol W.G., et al. Inhibitors of methionyl-tRNA synthetase have potent activity against Giardia intestinalis trophozoites. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015;59:7128–7131. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01573-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Michaels S.A., Shih H.W., Zhang B., Navaluna E.D., Zhang Z., Ranade R.M., et al. Methionyl-tRNA synthetase inhibitor has potent in vivo activity in a novel Giardia lamblia luciferase murine infection model. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020;75:1218–1227. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Torrie L.S., Robinson D.A., Thomas M.G., Hobrath J.V., Shepherd S.M., Post J.M., et al. Discovery of an allosteric binding site in kinetoplastid methionyl-tRNA synthetase. ACS Infect. Dis. 2020;6:1044–1057. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.9b00453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Vinayak S., Jumani R.S., Miller P., Hasan M.M., McLeod B.I., Tandel J., et al. Bicyclic azetidines kill the diarrheal pathogen Cryptosporidium in mice by inhibiting parasite phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase. Sci. Transl. Med. 2020;12 doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aba8412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Funkhouser-Jones L.J., Ravindran S., Sibley L.D. Defining stage-specific activity of potent new inhibitors of Cryptosporidium parvum growth in vitro. mBio. 2020;11:e00052-20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00052-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Radke J.B., Melillo B., Mittal P., Sharma M., Sharma A., Fu Y., et al. Bicyclic azetidines target acute and chronic stages of Toxoplasma gondii by inhibiting parasite phenylalanyl t-RNA synthetase. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:459. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28108-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Sharma A., Sharma A. Plasmodium falciparum mitochondria import tRNAs along with an active phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase. Biochem. J. 2015;465:459–469. doi: 10.1042/BJ20140998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Sharma M., Mutharasappan N., Manickam Y., Harlos K., Melillo B., Comer E., et al. Inhibition of Plasmodium falciparum phenylalanine tRNA synthetase provides opportunity for antimalarial drug development. Structure. 2022;30:962–972.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2022.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Sharma M., Malhotra N., Yogavel M., Harlos K., Melillo B., Comer E., et al. Structural basis of malaria parasite phenylalanine tRNA-synthetase inhibition by bicyclic azetidines. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:343. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20478-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Herman J.D., Pepper L.R., Cortese J.F., Estiu G., Galinsky K., Zuzarte-Luis V., et al. The cytoplasmic prolyl-tRNA synthetase of the malaria parasite is a dual-stage target of febrifugine and its analogs. Sci. Transl. Med. 2015;7:288ra77. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa3575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Keller T.L., Zocco D., Sundrud M.S., Hendrick M., Edenius M., Yum J., et al. Halofuginone and other febrifugine derivatives inhibit prolyl-tRNA synthetase. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2012;8:311–317. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Jain V., Yogavel M., Oshima Y., Kikuchi H., Touquet B., Hakimi M.A., et al. Structure of prolyl-tRNA synthetase-halofuginone complex provides basis for development of drugs against malaria and toxoplasmosis. Structure. 2015;23:819–829. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2015.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Mishra S., Malhotra N., Kumari S., Sato M., Kikuchi H., Yogavel M., et al. Conformational heterogeneity in apo and drug-bound structures of Toxoplasma gondii prolyl-tRNA synthetase. Acta Crystallogr. F Struct. Biol. Commun. 2019;75:714–724. doi: 10.1107/S2053230X19014808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Jain V., Kikuchi H., Oshima Y., Sharma A., Yogavel M. Structural and functional analysis of the anti-malarial drug target prolyl-tRNA synthetase. J. Struct. Funct. Genomics. 2014;15:181–190. doi: 10.1007/s10969-014-9186-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Jain V., Yogavel M., Kikuchi H., Oshima Y., Hariguchi N., Matsumoto M., et al. Targeting prolyl-tRNA synthetase to accelerate drug discovery against malaria, leishmaniasis, toxoplasmosis, cryptosporidiosis, and coccidiosis. Structure. 2017;25:1495–1505.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2017.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Manickam Y., Malhotra N., Mishra S., Babbar P., Dusane A., Laleu B., et al. Double drugging of prolyl-tRNA synthetase provides a new paradigm for anti-infective drug development. PLoS Pathog. 2022;18 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1010363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Okaniwa M., Shibata A., Ochida A., Akao Y., White K.L., Shackleford D.M., et al. Repositioning and characterization of 1-(Pyridin-4-yl)pyrrolidin-2-one derivatives as plasmodium cytoplasmic prolyl-tRNA synthetase inhibitors. ACS Infect. Dis. 2021;7:1680–1689. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.1c00020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Ishiyama A., Iwatsuki M., Namatame M., Nishihara-Tsukashima A., Sunazuka T., Takahashi Y., et al. Borrelidin, a potent antimalarial: stage-specific inhibition profile of synchronized cultures of plasmodium falciparum. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 2011;64:381–384. doi: 10.1038/ja.2011.6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Azcárate I.G., Marín-García P., Camacho N., Pérez-Benavente S., Puyet A., Diez A., et al. Insights into the preclinical treatment of blood-stage malaria by the antibiotic borrelidin. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2013;169:645–658. doi: 10.1111/bph.12156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Otoguro K., Ui H., Ishiyama A., Kobayashi M., Togashi H., Takahashi Y., et al. In vitro and in vivo antimalarial activities of a non-glycosidic 18-membered macrolide antibiotic, borrelidin, against drug-resistant strains of Plasmodia. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 2003;56:727–729. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.56.727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Sugawara A., Tanaka T., Hirose T., Ishiyama A., Iwatsuki M., Takahashi Y., et al. Borrelidin analogues with antimalarial activity: design, synthesis and biological evaluation against plasmodium falciparum parasites. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2013;23:2302–2305. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2013.02.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Kalidas S., Cestari I., Monnerat S., Li Q., Regmi S., Hasle N., et al. Genetic validation of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases as drug targets in Trypanosoma brucei. Eukaryot. Cell. 2014;13:504–516. doi: 10.1128/EC.00017-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Chadha S., Vijayan R., Gupta S., Munde M., Gourinath S., Madhubala R. Genetic manipulation of Leishmania donovani threonyl tRNA synthetase facilitates its exploration as a potential therapeutic target. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2018;12 doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Charrière F., Helgadóttir S., Horn E.K., Söll D., Schneider A. Dual targeting of a single tRNA(Trp) requires two different tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetases in Trypanosoma brucei. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006;103:6847–6852. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602362103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Arakaki T.L., Carter M., Napuli A.J., Verlinde C.L., Fan E., Zucker F., et al. The structure of tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase from Giardia lamblia reveals divergence from eukaryotic homologs. J. Struct. Biol. 2010;171:238–243. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2010.04.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Merritt E.A., Arakaki T.L., Gillespie R., Napuli A.J., Kim J.E., Buckner F.S., et al. Crystal structures of three protozoan homologs of tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2011;177:20–28. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2011.01.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Khan S., Garg A., Sharma A., Camacho N., Picchioni D., Saint-Léger A., et al. An appended domain results in an unusual architecture for malaria parasite tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase. PLoS One. 2013;8 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Koh C.Y., Kim J.E., Napoli A.J., Verlinde C.L., Fan E., Buckner F.S., et al. Crystal structures of Plasmodium falciparum cytosolic tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase and its potential as a target for structure-guided drug design. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2013;189:26–32. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2013.04.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Pasaje C.F., Cheung V., Kennedy K., Lim E.E., Baell J.B., Griffin M.D., et al. Selective inhibition of apicoplast tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase causes delayed death in Plasmodium falciparum. Sci. Rep. 2016;6 doi: 10.1038/srep27531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Larson E.T., Kim J.E., Castaneda L.J., Napuli A.J., Zhang Z., Fan E., et al. The double-length tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase from the eukaryote Leishmania major forms an intrinsically asymmetric pseudo-dimer. J. Mol. Biol. 2011;409:159–176. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.03.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Anand S., Madhubala R. Twin attributes of tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase of Leishmania donovani: a housekeeping protein translation enzyme and a mimic of host chemokine. J. Biol. Chem. 2016;291:17754–17771. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.727107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Barros-Álvarez X., Kerchner K.M., Koh C.Y., Turley S., Pardon E., Steyaert J., et al. Leishmania donovani tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase structure in complex with a tyrosyl adenylate analog and comparisons with human and protozoan counterparts. Biochimie. 2017;138:124–136. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2017.04.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Bhatt T.K., Khan S., Dwivedi V.P., Banday M.M., Sharma A., Chandele A., et al. Malaria parasite tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase secretion triggers pro-inflammatory responses. Nat Commun. 2011;2:530. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Xie S.C., Metcalfe R.D., Dunn E., Morton C.J., Huang S.C., Puhalovich T., et al. Reaction hijacking of tyrosine tRNA synthetase as a new whole-of-life-cycle antimalarial strategy. Science. 2022;376:1074–1079. doi: 10.1126/science.abn0611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Merritt E.A., Arakaki T.L., Larson E.T., Kelley A., Mueller N., Napuli A.J., et al. Crystal structure of the aspartyl-tRNA synthetase from Entamoeba histolytica. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2010;169:95–100. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2009.10.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Charrière F., O'Donoghue P., Helgadóttir S., Maréchal-Drouard L., Cristodero M., Horn E.K., et al. Dual targeting of a tRNAAsp requires two different aspartyl-tRNA synthetases in Trypanosoma brucei. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:16210–16217. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.005348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Bour T., Akaddar A., Lorber B., Blais S., Balg C., Candolfi E., et al. Plasmodial aspartyl-tRNA synthetases and peculiarities in Plasmodium falciparum. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:18893–18903. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.015297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Pedroni M.J., Luu T.N., Lau A.O. Babesia bovis: a bipartite signal directs the glutamyl-tRNA synthetase to the apicoplast. Exp. Parasitol. 2012;131:261–266. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2012.04.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Mailu B.M., Ramasamay G., Mudeppa D.G., Li L., Lindner S.E., Peterson M.J., et al. A nondiscriminating glutamyl-tRNA synthetase in the plasmodium apicoplast: the first enzyme in an indirect aminoacylation pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288:32539–32552. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.507467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Pham J.S., Sakaguchi R., Yeoh L.M., De Silva N.S., McFadden G.I., Hou Y.M., Ralph S.A. A dual-targeted aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase in Plasmodium falciparum charges cytosolic and apicoplast tRNACys. Biochem J. 2014;458:513–523. doi: 10.1042/BJ20131451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Jain V., Sharma A. Repurposing of potent drug candidates for multiparasite targeting. Trends Parasitol. 2017;33:158–161. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2016.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES