Abstract
Objective:
This study aimed to investigate the role of the stromal interaction molecule 1 (STIM1) gene in the survival of the acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML)-M5 cell line (THP-1).
Materials and Methods:
The STIM1 effect was assessed via dicer-substrate siRNA-mediated STIM1 knockdown. The effect of STIM1 knockdown on the expression of AKT and MAPK pathway-related genes and reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation-related genes was tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Cellular functions, including ROS generation, cell proliferation, and colony formation, were also evaluated following STIM1 knockdown.
Results:
The findings revealed that STIM1 knockdown reduced intracellular ROS levels via downregulation of NOX2 and PKC. These findings were associated with the downregulation of AKT, KRAS, MAPK, and CMYC. BCL2 was also downregulated, while BAX was upregulated following STIM1 knockdown. Furthermore, STIM1 knockdown reduced THP-1 cell proliferation and colony formation.
Conclusion:
This study has demonstrated the role of STIM1 in promoting AML cell proliferation and survival through enhanced ROS generation and regulation of AKT/MAPK-related pathways. These findings may help establish STIM1 as a potential therapeutic target for AML treatment.
Keywords: STIM1, Reactive oxygen species, Survival, Proliferation, Therapeutic targets in acute myeloid leukemia
Abstract
Amaç:
Bu çalışmada stromal etkileşim molekülü 1 (STIM1) geninin akut myeloblastik lösemi (AML)-M5 hücre dizisinin (THP-1) sağkalımındaki rolü araştırıldı.
Gereç ve Yöntemler:
STIM1 etkisi, yarıcı substrat siRNA aracılı STIM1 bozulması yoluyla değerlendirildi. STIM1 bozulmasının AKT ve MAPK yolakları ve reaktif oksijen türevleri (ROS) üretimi ile ilişkili genlerin ekspresyonu üzerindeki etkisi RT-qPCR ile test edildi. Hücresel fonksiyonlar, ROS üretimi, hücre proliferasyonu ve koloni oluşumu dahil, STIM1 bozulmasını takiben değerlendirildi.
Bulgular:
Sonuçlar STIM1 bozulmasının, NOX2 ve PKC aşağı düzenlemesi ile hücre içi ROS seviyesini düşürdüğünü ortaya koydu. Bu bulgular AKT, KRAS, MAPK aşağı düzenlemesi ile birlikteydi ve ayrıca CMYC, BCL2’de aşağı düzenlenmişti, BAX ise STIM1 bozulmasını takiben yukarı düzenlenmişti. Ek olarak STIM1 bozulması THP-1 hücre proliferasyonu ve koloni oluşumunu da azaltmıştı.
Sonuç:
Bu çalışma, STIM1'in artmış ROS üretimi ve AKT/MAPK ile ilişkili yolların düzenlenmesi yoluyla AML hücre proliferasyonunu ve sağkalımını desteklemedeki rolünü göstermiştir. Bu bulgular, STIM1'in AML tedavisi için potansiyel bir terapötik hedef oluşturulmasına yardımcı olabilir.
Introduction
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a highly aggressive hematological malignancy that is more common in adults, with a median patient age of 67 years [1]. Childhood AML is the fifth most frequent childhood cancer and its prognosis is still poor compared to other types of leukemia [1]. AML in infants is a unique subset of AML with specific clinical and molecular characteristics. Infants with AML have been classified as high-risk patients because of the high incidence of unfavorable prognostic features and their increased susceptibility to treatment-related toxicity. Advances in the molecular understanding of and therapeutic strategies for AML resulted in clear improvement of the 5-year survival rate of childhood AML, which has reached 70% [2]. Despite that, relapse after remission remains a critical challenge in AML. Therefore, many molecular and biochemical disturbances associated with AML still require more investigation.
Growing evidence in cancer research supports the contribution of disrupted calcium homeostasis to tumor initiation and progression [3,4]. Stromal interaction molecule 1 (STIM1) is located on the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane and it acts as a sensor for calcium storage and regulates calcium influx through store-operated calcium entry (SOCE). Recently, STIM1 was found to play a critical role in the development and metastasis of a variety of cancers, such as brain, prostate, and colorectal cancers and multiple myeloma [5,6,7]. The Human Protein Atlas and Expression Atlas show that STIM1 has an elevated level of expression in many AML cells, including THP-1 cells [8,9], but the role of STIM1 in AML survival is still not fully understood. Furthermore, most of the myeloid leukemia subtypes are associated with increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which has been observed to promote leukemic cell proliferation and survival [10].
There is increasing evidence suggesting an interplay between STIM1 and ROS in cancer cell biology [11,12]. ROS stimulates STIM1 and activates SOCE directly, regardless of calcium ER store depletion [11]. Upregulation of hypoxia inducible factor 1 (HIF1) in response to hypoxia leads to upregulation of STIM1 in hepatocarcinoma cells [13]. In multiple myeloma, STIM1 suppression reduced calcium influx into the cells [14]. Reducing mitochondrial calcium uptake in breast cancer cells resulted in reduced mitochondrial ROS production and inhibition of cell growth and migration [12]. NOX2 is a significant source of intracellular ROS, and its activity was linked to oncogenic signals in AML [15]. Depletion of NOX2 reduced ROS levels and suppressed self-renewal of leukemic stem cells [15]. AKT and MAPK signaling pathways are critical for many cellular functions such as cell proliferation, survival, and differentiation, and their significant roles in carcinogenesis have been reported for a variety of cancers [16]. At certain levels, ROS activate the AKT and MAPK signaling pathways [17].
The effect of STIM1 on ROS generation and AKT and MAPK signaling pathways in AML is still unexplored. Therefore, this study was designed to explore the effect of STIM1 on ROS generation in THP-1 cells and to investigate its involvement in the regulation of cell proliferation and survival. To assist with that, STIM1 was knocked down in THP-1 cells using dicer-substrate siRNA (dsiRNA). ROS levels were subsequently measured and the expression levels of related genes were assessed. Cell proliferation and survival and the expression levels of certain genes related to the AKT and MAPK signaling pathways were evaluated. This study suggests that STIM1 may be involved in the regulation of ROS generation, as well as the proliferation and survival of AML cells through the regulation of AKT and MAPK signaling pathway-relate genes. The findings may provide novel insights into AML pathogenesis and may be useful in improving therapeutic targets for AML in the future.
Materials and Methods
Cell Culture
THP-1 cells were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) and cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute Medium (RPMI-1640, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco, Life Technologies, USA) at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2.
Transfection with dsiRNA
dsiRNA (TriFECTa, Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA, USA) was transfected into THP-1 cells (2x106/mL) at doses of 10 nM for 24 h. STIM1 dsiRNA was transfected to the cells using the Bio-Rad Gene Pulser Xcell Electroporation System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) at a pulse of 300 V for 7 ms. The transfected cells were diluted 20-fold with culture medium and incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2. All experiments were compared against a dsiRNA-negative control.
qRT-PCR Analysis
Total RNA was extracted from cells using the Monarch Total RNA Miniprep Kit (New England BioLabs, Hitchin, UK) 24 h after dsiRNA transfection. The cDNA was synthesized by reverse transcription using Rever Tra Ace qPCR RT Master Mix (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Luna Universal qPCR Master Mix (New England BioLabs, UK) and the StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System (Applied Bioscience, Wilmington, NC, USA) were used to measure gene expression levels after STIM1 knockdown. The 2-(ΔΔCT) comparative threshold cycle (Ct) method was used to analyze the data, where ΔΔCT = (Ct Target sample -Ct Reference gene sample) - (Ct Target control - Ct Reference gene control). All targeted gene primers used in the present study are listed in Table 1. GAPDH was used as the endogenous control.
Table 1. List of primers.

Western Blotting
Western blotting was performed to confirm the suppression of STIM1 protein after dsiSTIM1 transfection. Protein samples (30 µg) were analyzed by SDS-PAGE on 12% gel. Following electro-blotting to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, the membranes were blocked in 5% non-fat dry milk or 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in 0.1% Tris-buffered saline with Tween-20 (TBST) for 1 h at room temperature. Membranes were rinsed in 1X TBST three times and incubated in primary antibody solutions overnight at 4 °C with gentle rocking. The primary antibodies included rabbit monoclonal anti-human STIM1 antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) at 1:500 dilution in 5% non-fat dry milk in 0.1% TBST and rabbit monoclonal anti-human β-actin antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, USA) at 1:2000 dilution in 3% BSA in 0.1% TBST. The membranes were washed the next day with 1X TBST three times and incubated in HRP-conjugated polyclonal anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, USA) at 1:500 dilution in 0.1% TBST including non-fat dry milk or BSA for 1 h at room temperature. After washing with TBST, the membranes were incubated in ECL substrate (Bio-Rad, USA) according to the manufacturer’s directions. After incubation, membranes were imaged using the VersaDoc imaging system (Bio-Rad, USA). Band intensity was measured using Image Lab software version 6.1 (Bio-Rad, USA).
Measurement of Intracellular ROS Levels
Cells were seeded in triplicate at 2x105/mL in a 96-well flat-bottom plate. After 24 h of transfection, the cells were washed with PBS, suspended in 100 µL of PBS loaded with 5 µM CM-H2DCFDA (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA), and incubated for 30 min. Subsequently, cells were washed and suspended in PBS for 1 h. ROS levels were measured using the FLUOstar Omega microplate reader (BMG LABTECH, Ortenberg, Germany) at 485 nm excitation and 520 nm emission. An Olympus IX71 fluorescence microscope (Olympus Corp., Tokyo, Japan) was used to visualize fluorescent dye rising from the cells.
Proliferation Assay
THP-1 cells were seeded at 2x105 cells/mL in triplicate in a 96-well flat-bottom plate after dsiRNA transfection. Cells were incubated for 3 time points of 24, 48, and 72 h. At each time point, cell proliferation was assessed by adding 10 µL of SF cell count reagent (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan) with incubation for 2 h. Absorbance was measured at 450 nm using a microplate reader (Bio-Tek, US).
Colony Formation Assay
THP-1 cells were seeded in triplicate after dsiRNA transfection at 2x103 cells/mL in methylcellulose medium in a 24-well plate and incubated at 37 °C for 8 days. The colonies were counted under an Olympus CKX 41 light microscope (Olympus Corp., Japan) at magnifications of 40x and 200x. The selected colonies were those that consisted of 50 cells or more.
Statistical Analysis
All statistical analysis was carried out using IBM SPSS Statistics 26 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Comparisons between two groups were carried out using the paired-samples Student t-test. Data were considered significant at p<0.05 (*), highly significant at p<0.01 (**), and very highly significant at p<0.001 (***).
Results
STIM1 Knockdown Reduced ROS Generation
STIM1 was efficiently knocked down in THP-1 cells at both mRNA (p=0.001) and protein (p<0.05) levels (Figure 1a). Intracellular ROS levels were measured 24 h after STIM1 knockdown. The results exhibited a significant reduction by 55% (p<0.01) in ROS levels in the dsiSTIM1 transfected group of THP-1 cells compared to the control group, dsiCtrl (Figure 1b). Fluorescence microscopy revealed a reduction of ROS-derived fluorescent signals in the dsiSTIM1 transfected group compared to the signals from the control groups, namely dsiCtrl and the H2O2-positive control (Figure 1b). The expression profiles of targeted genes (RAC1, NOX2, and PKC) included in the NADPH oxidase-derived ROS pathway were tested in THP-1 cells after STIM1 knockdown. The results showed significant downregulation of NOX2 and PKC (p<0.05) following STIM1 knockdown (Figure 1c). No significant change was observed (p>0.05) in the expression of RAC1 in response to STIM1 knockdown (Figure 1c).
Figure 1.

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels after STIM1 knockdown. a) STIM1 knockdown at mRNA and protein levels. b) Percentage of ROS level normalized to control after STIM1 knockdown. Fluorescence microscopy image of cells after incubation with 5 μM CM-H2DCFDA, except unstained group, for 30 min. H2O2 was used as positive control. c) Effect of STIM1 knockdown on the expression of NADPH oxidase-derived ROS pathway-related genes. Data are representative of the mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments. All experiments were carried out in triplicate. Comparisons were made between the control (dsiCtrl) and transfected (dsiSTIM1) groups. *, **, and *** indicate p<0.05, p<0.01, and p<0.001, respectively, based on paired-samples t-tests.
STIM1 Knockdown Downregulated KRAS/MAPK and AKT
The effect of STIM1 on the targeted genes involved in the KRAS/MAPK and PI3K/AKT proliferative and survival pathways was evaluated after suppression of STIM1. Significant downregulation of KRAS (p<0.05), MAPK (p<0.01), and CMYC (p<0.05) was observed following STIM1 knockdown (Figure 2a). A very significant downregulation of AKT by 71% (p<0.01) was detected in THP-1 cells in association with significant upregulation of BAX (p<0.05) and significant downregulation of BCL2 (p<0.05) (Figure 2b). No significant changes were observed in PI3K or NFKB levels (Figure 2b).
Figure 2.

Effect of STIM1 knockdown on the expression of proliferative and survival pathway-related genes. The expression of (a) proliferative and (b) survival pathway-related genes was tested 24 h after STIM1 knockdown. Data are representative of the mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments. All experiments were carried out in triplicate. Comparisons were made between the control (dsiCtrl) and transfected (dsiSTIM1) groups. * and ** indicate p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively, based on paired-samples t-tests.
STIM1 Knockdown Reduced THP-1 Cell Proliferation and Colony Formation
The proliferation rate of THP-1 cells was tested over a period from 24 to 72 h after dsiRNA transfection. Knockdown of STIM1 in THP-1 cells resulted in suppression of cell proliferation (p<0.05) at 24-48 h after knockdown compared to the control, dsiCtrl (Figure 3a). The colony formation ability of THP-1 cells was tested under bright-field microscopy by counting the number of colonies formed by cells transfected with dsiSTIM1 compared to the control (dsiCtrl). The results revealed a significant reduction in the number of colonies formed by THP-1 cells transfected with dsiSTIM1, reaching 35% (p<0.05) compared to the dsiCtrl cells (Figure 3b). In addition, a decrease in the size of colonies formed by cells transfected with dsiSTIM1 compared to the control was observed (Figure 3b).
Figure 3.

THP-1 cell proliferation and colony formation after STIM1 knockdown. a) THP-1 cell proliferation rate was tested over time from 24 to 72 h after STIM1 knockdown. b) Bright-field microscopy showed reduced colony number and size of THP-1 cells transfected with dsiSTIM1, which was supported by statistical results. Data are representative of the mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments. All experiments were carried out in triplicate. Comparisons were made between the control (dsiCtrl) and transfected (dsiSTIM1) groups at each time point. * indicates p<0.05 based on paired-samples t-tests.
Discussion
The current investigation involved the suppression of STIM1 expression in THP-1 cells to determine its role in AML. Given that a certain level of ROS is critical for cancer cell survival [4,18,19], this study evaluated whether STIM1 plays a role in the regulation of ROS levels in AML cells. The study’s findings showed a decline in intracellular ROS levels in response to STIM1 knockdown. This supports the significance of STIM1 in maintaining pro-survival levels of ROS in THP-1 cells. In addition, STIM1 knockdown downregulated NOX2 and PKC, which are ROS generation-related genes. These findings may help explain the mechanism through which STIM1 knockdown reduces ROS levels in AML cells, which could be through the suppression of the expression of NOX2, a ROS-generating membrane-bound enzyme complex, and the suppression of the expression of PKC, the NOX2 cytosolic activator [20]. PKC is important for the initiation of NOX2-mediated ROS generation, where it is crucial for activation of p47phox, which is responsible for activation and translocation of its other subunits (p67phox, p40phox, and a GTPase RAC1 or RAC2) to the plasma membrane to complete the process of NOX2 activation and ROS generation [20,21].
Previous evidence revealed that ROS production through NADPH oxidases is influenced by calcium ions, which are essential for the activation of PKC [20,22]. In addition, numerous recent studies have highlighted the interplay between calcium and ROS in a variety of cancers such as breast, thyroid, and hepatocellular carcinoma [12,23,24]. STIM1 has been shown to have a regulatory effect on calcium influx in acute lymphoblastic leukemia and multiple myeloma cells, with knockdown of STIM1 in these cells associated with a reduction in calcium influx [14,25]. Therefore, STIM1 appears to play a role in regulating ROS generation in THP-1 cells, most likely through regulation of the NADPH oxidase source of ROS. This regularity effect appears to arise through the regulation of NOX2 and PKC expression and could be indirect via calcium-mediated activation of PCK. Despite the importance of RAC1 for NADPH-mediated ROS production, RAC1 was not affected by STIM1 knockdown in the present study, which could support the non-involvement of RAC1 in STIM1-mediated ROS production in THP-1 cells.
The RAS/MAPK signaling pathway is a vital proliferative signaling pathway that has been found to be hyperactive in many cancers, including leukemia [26,27]. The present work evaluated the effect of STIM1 knockdown on the expression of KRAS, MAPK, and CMYC, critical genes involved in the RAS/MAPK signaling pathway. The findings revealed downregulation of KRAS, MAPK, and CMYC following STIM1 knockdown. STIM1’s regularity effect on MAPK signaling activity has previously been reported in acute lymphoblastic leukemia and other cancer cells [28,29]. PI3K/AKT is a crucial survival pathway, and the oncogenic activity of AKT has been reported in many cancers [30]. Interestingly, this study discovered the influence of STIM1 in the regulation of AKT and its downstream genes. Suppression of STIM1 resulted in a significant downregulation of AKT expression. Downregulation of AKT led to upregulation of proapoptotic BAX and downregulation of the antiapoptotic BCL2 genes. These findings indicate that STIM1 knockdown may initiate certain apoptotic effects in THP-1 cells following AKT suppression. This supports previous findings in hepatocellular carcinoma and malignant melanoma cells, where STIM1 knockdown caused AKT inactivation and increased apoptosis susceptibility [31,32]. Even though PI3K and NFKB are known to play roles in cancer cell survival [33], there were no clear changes in their expression levels observed after STIM1 knockdown in the present study.
Knockdown of STIM1 eventually resulted in a reduction of THP-1 cell proliferation and colony formation. Colony size also decreased following STIM1 knockdown, indicating impairment in the ability of cells to survive and maintain their growth. Similar findings were reported in other cancers, such as colorectal cancer, where STIM1 knockdown resulted in inhibition of cancer cell proliferation and colony formation [34]. STIM1 was found to be abundantly expressed in multiple myeloma tissues and cell lines, and the silencing of STIM1 produced a reduction in cell viability and caused cell cycle arrest [14]. The present study may support the role of STIM1 in promoting THP-1 cell proliferation and survival, which occur through maintained pro-survival ROS levels and via ROS-mediated regulation of proliferative and survival pathway-related genes (Figure 4). Recent cancer research revealed an interaction between ROS and the RAS/MAPK and PI3K/AKT proliferative and survival pathways to maintain cancer cell proliferation and survival [18,19,20,35,36]. Further work is still needed to elucidate STIM1/ROS interactions and their roles in AML pathogenesis and to confirm the potential of STIM1 as a therapeutic target for AML treatment.
Figure 4.

Schematic diagram of the mechanism through which STIM1 knockdown reduces THP-1 cell proliferation and survival by reducing reactive oxygen species (ROS) production via downregulation of NOX2 and PKC, and by controlling the proliferation and survival-related genes KRAS, MAPK, CMYC, AKT, BAX, and BCL2.
Conclusion
The present study showed an important finding regarding the role of STIM1 in maintaining THP-1 cell proliferation and survival via regulation of ROS generation and control of the expression of KRAS and AKT pathway-related genes. Further comprehensive work is still needed to support the regularity role of STIM1 in other AML cell lines, which could suggest STIM1 as a potential therapeutic target for AML.
Acknowledgments
We would like to acknowledge the funding from the Malaysian Ministry of Higher Education for the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme with Project Code FRGS/1/2019/skk15/USM/02/2 and Universiti Sains Malaysia for all the support and facilities.
Footnotes
Ethics
Ethics Committee Approval: Not applicable since no patients or animals were included in this study.
Authorship Contributions
Surgical and Medical Practices: E.J.M., S.I.O., N.A.A.R., N.M.; Concept: E.S.A., R.B.S.M.N.M.; Design: E.S.A., R.B.S.M.N.M.; Data Collection or Processing: E.S.A., R.B.S.M.N.M., E.J.M., S.I.O., N.A.A.R., N.M.; Analysis or Interpretation: E.S.A., R.B.S.M.N.M., E.J.M., S.I.O., N.A.A.R., N.M.; Literature Search: E.S.A, R.B.S.M.N.M.; Writing: E.S.A, R.B.S.M.N.M.
Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
Financial Disclosure: This work was financially supported by the Malaysian Ministry of Higher Education under the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS) with Project Code FRGS/1/2019/skk15/USM/02/2.
References
- 1.Chen X, Pan J, Wang S. The epidemiological trend of acute myeloid leukemia in childhood: a population-based analysis. J Cancer. 2019;10:4824–4835. doi: 10.7150/jca.32326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sasaki K, Ravandi F, Kadia TM, DiNardo CD, Short NJ, Borthakur G, Jabbour E, Kantarjian HM. De novo acute myeloid leukemia: a population‐based study of outcome in the United States based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, 1980 to 2017. Cancer. 2021;127:2049–2061. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Liu Y, Jin M, Wang Y, Zhu J, Tan R, Zhao J, Ji X, Jin C, Jia Y, Ren T, Xing J. MCU-induced mitochondrial calcium uptake promotes mitochondrial biogenesis and colorectal cancer growth. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020;5:59. doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-0155-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cárdenas C, Müller M, McNeal A. Selective vulnerability of cancer cells by inhibition of Ca2+ transfer from endoplasmic reticulum to mitochondria. Cell Rep. 2016;14:2313–2324. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.02.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Vashisht A, Trebak M, Motiani RK. STIM and Orai proteins as novel targets for cancer therapy. A Review in the Theme: Cell and Molecular Processes in Cancer Metastasis. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2015;309:C457–C469. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00064.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Liu H, Hughes JD, Rollins S. Calcium entry via ORAI1 regulates glioblastoma cell proliferation and apoptosis. Exp Mol Pathol. 2011;91:753–760. doi: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2011.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yang Y, Jiang Z, Wang B. Expression of STIM1 is associated with tumor aggressiveness and poor prognosis in breast cancer. Pathol Res Pract. 2017;213:1043–1047. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2017.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.STIM1 in the Human Protein Atlas. Available at [Google Scholar]
- 9.Expression Atlas. Available at. [Internet] https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gxa/home.
- 10.Jayavelu AK, Moloney JN, Böhmer FD, Cotter TG. NOX-driven ROS formation in cell transformation of FLT3-ITD-positive AML. Exp Hematol. 2016;44:1113–1122. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2016.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hempel N, Trebak M. Crosstalk between calcium and reactive oxygen species signaling in cancer. Cell Calcium. 2017;63:70–96. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2017.01.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Feno S, Butera G, Vecellio Reane D. Crosstalk between calcium and ROS in pathophysiological conditions. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2019;2019:9324018. doi: 10.1155/2019/9324018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Li Y, Guo B, Xie Q. STIM1 mediates hypoxia-driven hepatocarcinogenesis via interaction with HIF-1. Cell Rep. 2015;12:388–395. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.06.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wang W, Ren Y, Wang L, Zhao W, Dong X, Pan J, Gao H, Tian Y. Orai1 and Stim1 mediate the majority of store-operated calcium entry in multiple myeloma and have strong implications for adverse prognosis. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;48:2273–2285. doi: 10.1159/000492645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Adane B, Ye H, Khan N, Pei S, Minhajuddin M, Stevens BM, Jones CL, D’Alessandro A, Reisz JA, Zaberezhnyy V, Gasparetto M. The hematopoietic oxidase NOX2 regulates self-renewal of leukemic stem cells. Cell Rep. 2019;27:238–254. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.03.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Steelman LS, Chappell WH, Abrams SL, Kempf CR, Long J, Laidler P, Mijatovic S, Maksimovic-Ivanic D, Stivala F, Mazzarino MC, Donia M. Roles of the Raf/MEK/ERK and PI3K/PTEN/Akt/mTOR pathways in controlling growth and sensitivity to therapy-implications for cancer and aging. Aging (Albany NY) 2011;3:192–222. doi: 10.18632/aging.100296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhang J, Wang X, Vikash V, Ye Q, Wu D, Liu Y, Dong W. ROS and ROS-mediated cellular signaling. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2016;2016:4350965. doi: 10.1155/2016/4350965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Reczek CR, Chandel NS. ROS promotes cancer cell survival through calcium signaling. Cancer Cell. 2018;33:949–951. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sillar JR, Germon ZP, De Iuliis GN. The role of reactive oxygen species in acute myeloid leukaemia. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:6003. doi: 10.3390/ijms20236003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Görlach A, Bertram K, Hudecova S. Calcium and ROS: a mutual interplay. Redox Biol. 2015;6:260–271. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2015.08.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Parascandolo A, Laukkanen MO. Carcinogenesis and reactive oxygen species signaling: interaction of the NADPH oxidase NOX1-5 and superoxide dismutase 1-3 signal transduction pathways. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2019;30:443–486. doi: 10.1089/ars.2017.7268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bréchard S, Plançon S, Tschirhart EJ. New insights into the regulation of neutrophil NADPH oxidase activity in the phagosome: a focus on the role of lipid and Ca2+ signaling. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2013;18:661–676. doi: 10.1089/ars.2012.4773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Eun HS, Cho SY, Joo JS, Kang SH, Moon HS, Lee ES, Kim SH, Lee BS. Gene expression of NOX family members and their clinical significance in hepatocellular carcinoma. Sci Rep. 2017;7:11060. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11280-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Xing M. Molecular pathogenesis and mechanisms of thyroid cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13:184–199. doi: 10.1038/nrc3431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Saint Fleur-Lominy S, Maus M, Vaeth M, Lange I, Zee I, Suh D, Liu C, Wu X, Tikhonova A, Aifantis I, Feske S. STIM1 and STIM2 mediate cancer-induced inflammation in T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cell Rep. 2018;24:3045–3060. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.08.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Braicu C, Buse M, Busuioc C, Drula R, Gulei D, Raduly L, Rusu A, Irimie A, Atanasov AG, Slaby O, Ionescu C, Berindan-Neagoe I. A comprehensive review on MAPK: a promising therapeutic target in cancer. Cancers. 2019;11:1618. doi: 10.3390/cancers11101618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Knight T, Irving JAE. Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway activation in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia and its therapeutic targeting. Front Oncol. 2014;4:160. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2014.00160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Cheng H, Wang S, Feng R. STIM1 plays an important role in TGF-β-induced suppression of breast cancer cell proliferation. Oncotarget. 2016;7:16866–16878. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zheng S, Leclerc GM, Li B, Swords RT. Inhibition of the NEDD8 conjugation pathway induces calcium-dependent compensatory activation of the pro-survival MEK/ERK pathway in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Oncotarget. 2018;9:5529–5544. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.23797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Revathidevi S, Munirajan AK. Akt in cancer: mediator and more. Semin Cancer Biol. 2019;59:80–91. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2019.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zhao H, Yan G, Zheng L, Zhou Y, Sheng H, Wu L, Zhang Q, Lei J, Zhang J, Xin R, Jiang L, Zhang X, Chen Y, Wang J, Xu Y, Li D, Li Y. STIM1 is a metabolic checkpoint regulating the invasion and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Theranostics. 2020;10:6483–6499. doi: 10.7150/thno.44025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Feldman B, Fedida-Metula S, Nita J, Sekler I, Fishman D. Coupling of mitochondria to store-operated Ca2+-signaling sustains constitutive activation of protein kinase B/Akt and augments survival of malignant melanoma cells. Cell Calcium. 2010;47:525–537. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2010.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lakshminarayana S, Augustine D, Rao RS, Patil S, Awan KH, Venkatesiah SS, Haragannavar VC, Nambiar S, Prasad K. Molecular pathways of oral cancer that predict prognosis and survival: a systematic review. J Carcinog. 2018;17:7. doi: 10.4103/jcar.JCar_17_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Yang D, Dai X, Li K. Knockdown of stromal interaction molecule 1 inhibits proliferation of colorectal cancer cells by inducing apoptosis. Oncol Lett. 2018;15:8231–8236. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.8437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Grauers Wiktorin H, Aydin E, Hellstrand K. NOX2-derived reactive oxygen species in cancer. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2020;2020:7095902. doi: 10.1155/2020/7095902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kumari S, Badana AK, Malla R. Reactive oxygen species: a key constituent in cancer survival. Biomark Insights. 2018;13:1177271918755391. doi: 10.1177/1177271918755391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
