Abstract
Fibrils of the protein α-synuclein (Asyn) are implicated in the pathogenesis of Parkinson Disease, Lewy Body Dementia, and Multiple System Atrophy. Numerous forms of Asyn fibrils have been studied by solid-state NMR and resonance assignments have been reported. Here, we report a new set of 13C, 15N assignments that are unique to fibrils obtained by amplification from postmortem brain tissue of a patient diagnosed with Lewy Body Dementia.
Keywords: α-Synuclein, Fibrils, Lewy Body Dementia, Polymorphism, Parkinson Disease
Biological Context
Alpha-synuclein (Asyn) is a 140-residue protein found in the presynaptic termini of neurons in the brain (Clayton and George 1999). While elucidation of the exact function of this protein in the brain remains elusive (Lautenschlager et al. 2018), the aggregation of Asyn in the form of fibrils has been a pathological hallmark of Parkinson Disease (PD), Lewy Body Dementia (LBD) and Multiple System Atrophy (MSA), all which can be classified as α-synucleinopathies. Dementia occurs frequently in PD, sometimes beginning at approximately the same time as motor symptoms (Dementia with Lewy bodies or DLB), or up to 20 years after motor symptoms begin (PD with dementia or PDD). The term LBD encompasses the spectrum of clinical presentations classified as DLB and PDD.
Asyn fibrils have been reported to have a range of tertiary and quaternary structures (Schweighauser et al. 2020, Tuttle et al. 2016), contributing to an emerging understanding of the precise relationships of in vitro and in vivo conditions. The in vitro structures depend on various factors such as mutations (Comellas et al. 2011, Khalaf et al. 2014, Kruger et al. 1998, Lemkau et al. 2012, Lemkau et al. 2013, Polymeropoulos et al. 1997, Zarranz et al. 2004), cytosolic components (Guilarte 2010, Kwakye et al. 2015, Shin and Chung 2012), lipids (Bodner et al. 2009, Bodner et al. 2010, Jakubec et al. 2021, Mahapatra et al. 2021), and metals (Uversky et al. 2001). Growing evidence indicates that distinct polymorphs are associated with pathologic Asyn accumulation in α-synucleinopathies, as detailed by previously reported in vivo studies (Frieg et al. 2022, Schweighauser et al. 2020, Yang et al. 2022). Therefore, structural determination of these fibrils is vital for advancing the understanding of disease etiology, and to aid the development of polymorph-specific clinical diagnostic tools and novel therapeutics.
We isolated insoluble Asyn fibrils from postmortem LBD tissue. Then, to analyze LBD fibril structure by SSNMR, we amplified the Asyn fibril seeds using uniform [13C, 15N] labeled wild-type Asyn. Here, we report the 13C and 15N chemical shifts for the amplified Asyn fibrils from an LBD autopsy case.. The spectra of these ex vivo fibrils exhibit resonances that differ from those of previously reported in vitro fibril preparations. These findings demonstrate a different arrangement of β-strands, supporting the hypothesis that fibril structure is directly linked to disease phenotype.
Methods And Experiments
Protein expression and purification
Expression of uniform [13C, 15N] labeled wild-type Asyn was carried out in E. coli BL21 (DE3)/pET28a-AS in modified Studier medium M (Studier 2005). The labeling medium contained 3.3 g/L [13C]glucose, 3 g/L [15N]ammonium chloride, 11 mL/L [13C, 15N]Bioexpress (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Inc., Tewksbury, MA), 1 mL/L BME vitamins (Sigma), and 90 μg/mL kanamycin. After a preliminary growth in medium containing natural abundance (NA) isotopes, the cells were transferred to the labeling medium at 37 °C to an OD600 of 1.2, at which point the temperature was reduced to 25 °C and protein expression induced with 0.5 mM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) and grown for 15 h to a final OD600 of 4.1 and harvested.
Protein purification was done as described previously (Barclay et al. 2018). Briefly, cells were lysed chemically in the presence of Turbonuclease (Sigma) to digest nucleic acids. Purification began with a heat denaturation of the cleared lysate, followed by ammonium sulfate precipitation (Kloepper et al. 2006). The resolubilized protein was bound to QFF anion exchange resin (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Marlborough, MA) and eluted using a linear gradient of 0.2–0.6 M NaCl. Fractions containing Asyn monomer, which eluted at about 0.3 M NaCl, were pooled, concentrated, and run over a 26/60 Sephacryl S-200 HR gel filtration column (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) equilibrated in 50 mM Tris-HCl, 100 mM NaCl, pH 8 buffer. Fractions were pooled, concentrated to ~20 mg/mL Asyn, and dialyzed at 4 °C into 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.6, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT, and stored at a concentration of ~14 mg/mL at −80 °C until use. Yields were 95 mg purified AS protein/L growth medium for the uniform [13C, 15N] labeled monomer.
Preparation of Insoluble fraction seeds from LBD, MSA and control postmortem tissue
The protocol to sequentially extract human postmortem brain tissue was adapted from Appel-Cresswell et al2. Briefly, gray matter dissected from tissue was sequentially homogenized in four buffers (3 ml/g wet weight of tissue) using Kimble Chase Konte™ dounce tissue grinders (KT885300-0002). In the first step, 300mg of dissected grey matter tissue was homogenized using 20 strokes of Pestle A in High Salt (HS) buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 750 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA plus Sigma P2714 Protease Inhibitor (PI) cocktail). The homogenate was centrifuged at 100,000 ×g for 20 min at 4 °C and the pellet was homogenized in the next buffer using 20 strokes of Pestle B. Extractions using Pestle B were performed in HS buffer with 1% Triton X-100 with PI, then HS buffer with 1% Triton X-100 and 1 M sucrose, and with 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4 buffer. In the final centrifugation, the resulting pellet was resuspended in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4 buffer (3 ml/g wet weight of tissue). The aliquots of insoluble fraction were stored at −80 °C until use. Similar extraction protocol was followed for LBD, MSA and control cases.
Amplification of isotopically labelled LBD fibrils from LBD insoluble fraction seeds
We amplified LBD-fibrils from gray matter dissected from the caudate region. We incubated insoluble fraction seeds with an Asyn monomer preparation containing isotopically labeled Asyn monomer supplemented with control fraction. The control fraction preparation was derived from E.Coli transformed with an empty expression vector, and was purified with the same protocol as the natural abundance Asyn monomer (JBC, 2017 V292, Pg9034). Asyn monomer and control fraction was filtered through a 50k MWCO Amicon Ultra centrifugation filter (Millipore, UFC805204) before use, to remove any preformed aggregates.
Insoluble fraction (10 μL) containing 3.3 μg wet wt. of tissue was bought to a final volume of 30 μL by addition of 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0 plus 100 mM NaCl buffer (fibril buffer) in a 1.7mL microcentrifuge tube. The insoluble fraction was sonicated for 2 min at amplitude 50 in a bath sonicator (Qsonica model Q700) with a cup horn (5.5 inch) attachment at 4 °C. To the sonicated seeds, 1.5 μL of 2% Triton X-100 was added. To this mixture, 50k Amicon ultra filtered isotopically labelled Asyn monomer was added to a final concentration of 2 mg/mL in a final volume of 100 μL. This mixture underwent quiescent incubation at 37 °C for 3 days, completing the 1st round of sonication plus incubation. After the first round, the mixture was sonicated at 1 min at amplitude 50, and then an additional 300 μL of 2 mg/mL Asyn monomer was added. The mixture underwent quiescent incubation at 37 °C for 2 days (2nd round). Then, sonication for 1 min at amplitude 50 and quiescent incubation for 2 days was repeated for the third round, followed by sonication for 1 min at amplitude 50 and quiescent incubation for 3 days for the 4th round. At the end of 4th round, LBD-amplified fibrils were stored at 4 °C until use.
Further expansion of the LBD-amplified fibrils was performed by centrifuging 60 μL of 4th round LBD-amplified fibrils at 21,000 xg for 15 min at 4 °C. The pellet was resuspended in 100 μL of fibril buffer and sonicated for 1 min at amplified 50. To this mixture, Asyn monomer was added to a final concentration of 2 mg/mL in a final volume of 400 μL in fibril buffer. This mix was quiescently incubated at 37 °C for 2 days (5th round). At the end of 5th round, samples were centrifuged at 21,000 xg for 15 min at 4 °C and the top 300 μL of spent Asyn monomer was moved to a separate tube. The pellet was resuspended by trituration and sonicated for 1 min at amplified 50. After sonication, the previously removed 300 μL of 5th round monomer was added back. Next, an additional 2.5 mg/mL of Asyn monomer was added to bring the total volume to 800 μL. This mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 2 days to complete 6th round of incubation. The increased monomer concentration (2.5 mg/mL instead of 2 mg/mL) was calculated based on the average decrease in free Asyn monomer due to its incorporation into amplified fibrils. The 6th round fibrils were stored at 4 °C until use.
Solid-state NMR spectroscopy
Magic-angle spinning (MAS) SSNMR experiments were performed at magnetic field of 11.7 T (500 MHz 1H frequency) or 17.6 T (750 MHz 1H frequency) using Agilent Technologies VNMRS spectrometers. Spinning was controlled with a Varian MAS controller to 11,111 ± 30 Hz or 22,222 ± 15 Hz (11.7 T) and 16,667 ± 15 Hz or 33,333 ± 30 Hz (17.6 T), with two minor exceptions indicated in Table 1. All experiments were done with a variable-temperature (VT) airflow setting of 0 °C, primarily to keep samples cool from RF and MAS heating, without freezing out molecular motions. The 11.7 T magnet was equipped with a 1.6 mm HCDN T3 probe (Varian), with pulse widths of about 1.8 μs for 1H and 13C, and 3.2 μs for 15N. The 17.6 T magnet was equipped with a HXYZ T3 probe (Varian) tuned to HCN triple resonance mode with pulse widths of about 1.9 μs for 1H, 2.6 μs for13C, and 3.0 μs for 15N. All experiments utilized 1H-13C or 1H-15N tangent ramped CP (Metz et al. 1994) and ~100 kHz SPINAL-64 decoupling during evolution and acquisition periods (Comellas et al. 2011, Fung et al. 2000). Where applicable, SPECIFIC CP was used for 15N-13Cα and 15N-13C’ transfers (Baldus et al. 1998), 13C-13C homonuclear mixing was performed using DARR (Takegoshi et al. 2001). Chemical shifts were externally referenced to the downfield peak of adamantane at 40.48 ppm (Morcombe and Zilm 2003). NUS schedules using biased exponential sampling were prepared using the nus-tool application in NMRbox (Maciejewski et al. 2017). Data conversion and processing was done with NMRPipe (Delaglio et al. 1995). NUS data was first expanded with the nusExpand.tcl script in NMRPipe, converted, and processed using the built-in SMILE reconstruction function (Ying et al. 2017). Peak picking and chemical shift assignments were performed using NMRFAM-Sparky (Lee et al. 2015).
Table 1:
Residue | 15N | 13C’ | 13CA | 13CB | 13CG | 13CD | 13CE | 13CZ | 15ND/15NE/15NZ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-- | -- | -- | -- | - | - | -- | -- | - | -- |
K34 | 125.5 | 174.5 | 56.1 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
E35 | 121.9 | 176.3 | 53.4 | 35.7 | 35.6 | 183.4 | |||
G36 | 117.5 | 173.6 | 48.4 | ||||||
V37 | 118.6 | 172.4 | 60.0 | 35.7 | 21.9/24.5 | ||||
L38 | 127.8 | 173.8 | 52.6 | 47.3 | 27.5 | 25.3/29.0 | |||
Y39 | 131.3 | 173.9 | 56.3 | 43.4 | 128.0 | 133.0 | 117.5 | 157.3 | |
V40 | 127.1 | 173.8 | 60.0 | 34.4 | 19.9/22.1 | ||||
G41 | 111.6 | 170.2 | 44.7 | ||||||
S42 | 116.9 | 175.4 | 56.5 | 68.7 | |||||
K43 | 123.4 | 176.6 | 56.6 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
V49 | - | - | - | - | |||||
H50 | - | 175.8 | 51.7 | 31.5 | 125.1 | 129.4 | 140.3 | −/− | |
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
E61 | - | 173.1 | - | - | - | - | |||
Q62 | 122.6 | 174.3 | 54.5 | - | - | - | - | ||
V63 | 124.6 | 173.9 | 61.2 | 35.5 | 21.1/− | ||||
T64 | 124.8 | 172.3 | 60.8 | 68.5 | 23.4/23.4 | ||||
N65 | 126.5 | 173.0 | 51.9 | 42.0 | 174.4 | 113.9 | |||
V66 | 125.0 | 177.0 | 59.9 | 34.4 | 20.9/23.0 | ||||
G67 | 112.6 | 171.9 | 47.4 | ||||||
G68 | 100.7 | 172.1 | 44.4 | ||||||
A69 | 121.8 | 175.0 | 50.0 | 22.1 | |||||
V70 | 124.5 | 175.8 | 61.7 | 32.7 | 19.7/21.2 | ||||
V71 | 131.0 | 173.9 | 61.3 | 34.7 | 19.7/22.1 | ||||
T72 | 124.7 | 174.6 | 60.1 | 71.4 | 22.5 | ||||
G73 | 117.8 | 172.1 | 49.0 | ||||||
V74 | 117.6 | 173.8 | 59.4 | 37.4 | 20.3/23.3 | ||||
T75 | 123.4 | 171.8 | 61.7 | 68.8 | 22.9 | ||||
A76* | 131.2 | 174.2 | 49.7 | 21.7 | |||||
V77* | 122.4 | 172.2 | 60.6 | 36.7 | 20.6/25.1 | ||||
A78 | 130.3 | 175.7 | 50.7 | 23.1 | |||||
Q79 | 122.6 | 174.1 | 54.6 | 37.6 | 34.7 | 179.3 | 112.4 | ||
K80 | 126.5 | 173.9 | 54.7 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
T81 | 124.7 | 172.8 | 61.9 | 69.9 | 21.1 | ||||
V82 | 127.0 | 175.4 | 60.1 | - | −/− | ||||
E83 | 118.3 | 175.9 | 55.3 | ||||||
G84 | 124.4 | 175.0 | 49.8 | ||||||
A85 | 124.7 | 174.5 | 49.9 | - | |||||
G86 | 110.3 | 172.5 | 44.2 | ||||||
S87* | 119.7 | 174.4 | 56.4 | 67.4 | |||||
I88* | 128.2 | 173.2 | 60.1 | 44.4 | 27.8/17.6 | 16.9 | |||
A89 | 129.1 | 175.2 | 50.3 | 22.5 | |||||
A90 | 126.3 | 174.4 | 49.7 | 22.2 | |||||
A91 | 123.7 | 175.4 | 50.3 | 23.2 | |||||
T92 | 117.3 | 173.3 | 61.2 | 70.8 | 20.5 | ||||
G93 | 116.8 | 170.3 | 44.9 | ||||||
F94 | 129.0 | 173.1 | 56.9 | 43.5 | 137.4 | 131.2 | 129.3 | 140.3 | |
V95 | 128.5 | 173.0 | 60.9 | 35.6 | −/− | ||||
K96 | 129.0 | 175.1 | 54.5 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Two sets of shifts observed for at least one atom in the residue. Primary shift is reported here.
Assignments And Data Deposition
Chemical Shift Assignments and Extent of Assignments
Chemical shift assignments were performed for the LBD Asyn fibrils amplified using uniform [13C, 15N] labeling (uCN). Resonance assignments were determined using 2D 13C-13C, 2D 15N-13Cα, 2D 15N-13C’, 3D 15N-13Cα-13CX, 3D 15N-13C’-13CX, 3D 15N-13C’-13Cα and 3D 13Cα-15N-13C’ data sets following standard procedures (Comellas and Rienstra, 2013; Higman, 2018). The complete list of data sets used for performing assignments using 13C-detection is presented in Supplementary Table 1. The 2D 13C-13C spectrum serves as a conformational fingerprint of the fibril and provides some initial insights into the structure Figure 1A. Globally, the resolved peaks display line widths, including scalar couplings, of < 0.4 ppm in the direct 13C dimension, similar to those observed for in vitro Asyn fibrils and indicative of a highly ordered core (Barclay et al., 2018; Comellas et al., 2011a). Particular residue types including Thr, Val, and Gly, as well as select spin systems including L38, N65, Q79, I88, and F94 are particularly well resolved in the 2D. The Lys and Glu regions, which account for 20% of the primary sequence between residues 30 and 100, are broad and poorly resolved as with the in vitro form, indicating disorder or partial mobility for the majority of these residues. In contrast to the in vitro form, the Ala regions are poorly resolved in the 2D 13C-13C, but the signals are of comparable intensity to the resolved regions, indicating that the alanines are highly ordered but of similar structure throughout the core. Interestingly, S87 displays two sets of peaks that combine to approximately half of the intensity of the strong peaks, while I88 shows broadening for the peaks arising from backbone correlations, suggesting at least two conformations for this region. In the 3D spectra, a few additional residues, namely A76 and V77, also show two sets of peaks but for the side chain atoms. In addition, the Asyn sequence contains 10 Thr residues all located between residues 22 and 92, but at least 11 appear in the 2D 13C-13C spectrum. The 2D 15N-13C’ (Figure 1A) and 15N-13Cα (Figure 1B) spectra also serve as structural fingerprints for the fibril, with a focus on the backbone atoms. Critically, these highlight the benefit of adding a 15N dimension to disambiguate shifts, particularly for the Ala and Gly regions, which comprise 30% of the primary sequence between residues 30 and 100, as well as for key core residues like V71, V74, T75 and V77. Overall, there appears to be a predominant defined conformation that likely displays some localized heterogeneity. Figure 2 demonstrates representative strips corresponding to assignments from 3D 15N-13Cα-13CX, 3D 15N-13C’-13CX, and 3D 13Cα-15N-13C’ from T72 to A76.
Acknowledgments
Support for this work was provided by: grants from the Michael J. Fox Foundation; NIH grants NS110436, NS097799, and NS075321 from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and National Institute on Aging and P41GM136463 from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences. CDS was supported by the Intramural Research Programs of NIDDK and NHLBI at the National Institutes of Health. We thank Deborah Berthold for assistance with production of isotopically-labeled recombinant Asyn protein.
Funding
Support for this work was provided by: grants from the Michael J. Fox Foundation; NIH grants NS110436, NS097799, and NS075321 from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and National Institute on Aging and P41GM136463 (CMR) from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences.
Footnotes
Ethics approval
All experiments comply with the current laws of the United states, the country in which they were performed
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Contributor Information
Alexander M. Barclay, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Dhruva D. Dhavale, Washington University School of Medicine
Collin G. Borcik, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Moses H. Milchberg, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Paul T. Kotzbauer, Washington University School of Medicine
Chad M. Rienstra, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Data availability
Resonance assignments are available through the Biological Magnetic Resonance Data Bank (http://bmrb.io), Accession Number 51678.
References
- 1.Baldus M., Petkova A. T., Herzfeld J. and Griffin R. G. (1998). "Cross Polarization in the Tilted Frame: Assignment and Spectral Simplification in Heteronuclear Spin Systems." Molecular Physics 95(6): 1197–1207. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Barclay A. M., Dhavale D. D., Courtney J. M., Kotzbauer P. T. and Rienstra C. M. (2018). "Resonance Assignments of an Alpha-Synuclein Fibril Prepared in Tris Buffer at Moderate Ionic Strength." Biomol NMR Assign 12(1): 195–199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bodner C. R., Dobson C. M. and Bax A. (2009). "Multiple Tight Phospholipid-Binding Modes of Alpha-Synuclein Revealed by Solution Nmr Spectroscopy." J Mol Biol 390(4): 775–790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bodner C. R., Maltsev A. S., Dobson C. M. and Bax A. (2010). "Differential Phospholipid Binding of Alpha-Synuclein Variants Implicated in Parkinson's Disease Revealed by Solution Nmr Spectroscopy." Biochemistry 49(5): 862–871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Clayton D. F. and George J. M. (1999). "Synucleins in Synaptic Plasticity and Neurodegenerative Disorders." J Neurosci Res 58(1): 120–129. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Comellas G., Lemkau L. R., Nieuwkoop A. J., Kloepper K. D., Ladror D. T., Ebisu R., Woods W. S., Lipton A. S., George J. M. and Rienstra C. M. (2011). "Structured Regions of Alpha-Synuclein Fibrils Include the Early-Onset Parkinson's Disease Mutation Sites." J Mol Biol 411(4): 881–895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Comellas G., Lopez J. J., Nieuwkoop A. J., Lemkau L. R. and Rienstra C. M. (2011). "Straightforward, Effective Calibration of Spinal-64 Decoupling Results in the Enhancement of Sensitivity and Resolution of Biomolecular Solid-State Nmr." J Magn Reson 209(2): 131–135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Delaglio F., Grzesiek S., Vuister G. W., Zhu G., Pfeifer J. and Bax A. (1995). "Nmrpipe - a Multidimensional Spectral Processing System Based on Unix Pipes." Journal of Biomolecular Nmr 6(3): 277–293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Frieg B., Antonschmidt L., Dienemann C., Geraets J. A., Najbauer E. E., Matthes D., De Groot B. L., Andreas L. B., Becker S., Griesinger C. and Schröder G. F. (2022). "The 3d Structure of Lipidic Fibrils of A-Synuclein." bioRxiv: 2022.2003.2002.481946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fung B. M., Khitrin A. K. and Ermolaev K. (2000). "An Improved Broadband Decoupling Sequence for Liquid Crystals and Solids." J Magn Reson 142(1): 97–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Guilarte T. R. (2010). "Manganese and Parkinson's Disease: A Critical Review and New Findings." Environ Health Perspect 118(8): 1071–1080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jakubec M., Barias E., Furse S., Govasli M. L., George V., Turcu D., Iashchishyn I. A., Morozova-Roche L. A. and Halskau 0. (2021). "Cholesterol-Containing Lipid Nanodiscs Promote an Alpha-Synuclein Binding Mode That Accelerates Oligomerization." FEBS J 288(6): 1887–1905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Khalaf O., Fauvet B., Oueslati A., Dikiy I., Mahul-Mellier A. L., Ruggeri F. S., Mbefo M. K., Vercruysse F., Dietler G., Lee S. J., Eliezer D. and Lashuel H. A. (2014). "The H50q Mutation Enhances Alpha-Synuclein Aggregation, Secretion, and Toxicity." J Biol Chem 289(32): 21856–21876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kloepper K. D., Woods W. S., Winter K. A., George J. M. and Rienstra C. M. (2006). "Preparation of Alpha-Synuclein Fibrils for Solid-State Nmr: Expression, Purification, and Incubation of Wild-Type and Mutant Forms." Protein Expr Purif 48(1): 112–117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kruger R., Kuhn W., Muller T., Woitalla D., Graeber M., Kosel S., Przuntek H., Epplen J. T., Schols L. and Riess O. (1998). "Ala30pro Mutation in the Gene Encoding Alpha-Synuclein in Parkinson's Disease." Nat Genet 18(2): 106–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kwakye G. F., Paoliello M. M., Mukhopadhyay S., Bowman A. B. and Aschner M. (2015). "Manganese-Induced Parkinsonism and Parkinson's Disease: Shared and Distinguishable Features." Int J Environ Res Public Health 12(7): 7519–7540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lautenschlager J., Stephens A. D., Fusco G., Strohl F., Curry N., Zacharopoulou M., Michel C. H., Laine R., Nespovitaya N., Fantham M., Pinotsi D., Zago W., Fraser P., Tandon A., St George-Hyslop P., Rees E., Phillips J. J., De Simone A., Kaminski C. F. and Schierle G. S. K. (2018). "C-Terminal Calcium Binding of Alpha-Synuclein Modulates Synaptic Vesicle Interaction." Nat Commun 9(1): 712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lee W., Tonelli M. and Markley J. L. (2015). "Nmrfam-Sparky: Enhanced Software for Biomolecular Nmr Spectroscopy." Bioinformatics 31(8): 1325–1327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lemkau L. R., Comellas G., Kloepper K. D., Woods W. S., George J. M. and Rienstra C. M. (2012). "Mutant Protein A30p Alpha-Synuclein Adopts Wild-Type Fibril Structure, Despite Slower Fibrillation Kinetics." J Biol Chem 287(14): 11526–11532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lemkau L. R., Comellas G., Lee S. W., Rikardsen L. K., Woods W. S., George J. M. and Rienstra C. M. (2013). "Site-Specific Perturbations of Alpha-Synuclein Fibril Structure by the Parkinson's Disease Associated Mutations A53t and E46k." PLoS One 8(3): e49750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Maciejewski M. W., Schuyler A. D., Gryk M. R., Moraru I. I., Romero P. R., Ulrich E. L., Eghbalnia H. R., Livny M., Delaglio F. and Hoch J. C. (2017). "Nmrbox: A Resource for Biomolecular Nmr Computation." Biophysical Journal 112(18): 1529–1534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mahapatra A., Mandal N. and Chattopadhyay K. (2021). "Cholesterol in Synaptic Vesicle Membranes Regulates the Vesicle-Binding, Function, and Aggregation of Alpha-Synuclein." J Phys Chem B 125(40): 11099–11111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Metz G., Wu X. L. and Smith S. O. (1994). "Ramped-Amplitude Cross-Polarization in Magic-Angle-Spinning Nmr." Journal of Magnetic Resonance Series A 110(2): 219–227. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Morcombe C. R. and Zilm K. W. (2003). "Chemical Shift Referencing in Mas Solid State Nmr." Journal of Magnetic Resonance 162(2): 479–486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Polymeropoulos M. H., Lavedan C., Leroy E., Ide S. E., Dehejia A., Dutra A., Pike B., Root H., Rubenstein J., Boyer R., Stenroos E. S., Chandrasekharappa S., Athanassiadou A., Papapetropoulos T., Johnson W. G., Lazzarini A. M., Duvoisin R. C., Di Iorio G., Golbe L. I. and Nussbaum R. L. (1997). "Mutation in the Alpha-Synuclein Gene Identified in Families with Parkinson's Disease." Science 276(5321): 2045–2047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Schweighauser M., Shi Y., Tarutani A., Kametani F., Murzin A. G., Ghetti B., Matsubara T., Tomita T., Ando T., Hasegawa K., Murayama S., Yoshida M., Hasegawa M., Scheres S. H. W. and Goedert M. (2020). "Structures of Alpha-Synuclein Filaments from Multiple System Atrophy." Nature 585(7825): 464–469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Shin H. W. and Chung S. J. (2012). "Drug-Induced Parkinsonism." J Clin Neurol 8(1): 15–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Studier F. W. (2005). "Protein Production by Auto-Induction in High-Density Shaking Cultures." Protein Expression and Purification 41 (1): 207–234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Takegoshi K., Nakamura S. and Terao T. (2001). "C-13-H-1 Dipolar-Assisted Rotational Resonance in Magic-Angle Spinning Nmr." Chemical Physics Letters 344(5-6): 631–637. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Tuttle M. D., Comellas G., Nieuwkoop A. J., Coveil D. J., Berthold D. A., Kloepper K. D., Courtney J. M., Kim J. K., Barclay A. M., Kendall A., Wan W., Stubbs G., Schwieters C. D., Lee V. M., George J. M. and Rienstra C. M. (2016). "Solid-State Nmr Structure of a Pathogenic Fibril of Full-Length Human Alpha-Synuclein." Nat Struct Mol Biol 23(5): 409–415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Uversky V. N., Li J. and Fink A. L. (2001). "Metal-Triggered Structural Transformations, Aggregation, and Fibrillation of Human Alpha-Synuclein. A Possible Molecular Nk between Parkinson's Disease and Heavy Metal Exposure." J Biol Chem 276(47): 44284–44296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Yang Y., Shi Y., Schweighauser M., Zhang X., Kotecha A., Murzin A. G., Garringer H. J., Cullinane P. W., Saito Y., Foroud T., Warner T. T., Hasegawa K., Vidal R., Murayama S., Revesz T., Ghetti B., Hasegawa M., Lashley T., Scheres S. H. W. and Goedert M. (2022). "Structures of Alpha-Synuclein Filaments from Human Brains with Lewy Pathology." Nature 610(7933): 791–795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ying J., Delaglio F., Torchia D. A. and Bax A. (2017). "Sparse Multidimensional Iterative Lineshape-Enhanced (Smile) Reconstruction of Both Non-Uniformly Sampled and Conventional Nmr Data." J Biomol NMR 68(2): 101–118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zarranz J. J., Alegre J., Gomez-Esteban J. C., Lezcano E., Ros R., Ampuero I., Vidal L., Hoenicka J., Rodriguez O., Atares B., Llorens V., Tortosa E. Gomez, Del Ser T., Munoz D. G. and De Yebenes J. G. (2004). "The New Mutation, E46k, of Alpha-Synuclein Causes Parkinson and Lewy Body Dementia." Ann Neurol 55(2): 164–173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Resonance assignments are available through the Biological Magnetic Resonance Data Bank (http://bmrb.io), Accession Number 51678.