Skip to main content
Autophagy logoLink to Autophagy
editorial
. 2022 Dec 29;19(3):745–746. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2022.2161154

AutophagosOMES: identification of autophagosomal cargo in CD4+ T cells by proteomics

Faris Jafri 1, Megan Moore 1, Shree Padma Metur 1, Daniel J Klionsky 1,
PMCID: PMC9980638  PMID: 36576209

ABSTRACT

Macroautophagy/autophagy, a cellular process that sequesters and breaks down cellular components in the lysosome/vacuole, is important in various events where cell composition undergoes changes. Broadly, autophagy is involved in T cell regulation including maintaining cell homeostasis. One process where a cell alters its composition is in the activation of helper T cells in the immune system. When helper (CD4+) T cells are activated by antigens, they both grow and alter their cellular components to become effector T cells. Autophagy is the process that facilitates the breakdown of these cellular components and is therefore hypothesized to have a role in CD4+ T cell activation. Previous research has concluded that CD4+ T cell activation induces autophagy, providing an avenue for further research aimed at examining the ways in which this induced autophagy affects CD4+ T cell proliferation and function. Toward this end, Zhou et al. researched the autophagosomal cargo present within CD4+ T cells and the impact this cargo has on CD4+ T cell proliferation.

KEYWORDS: Autophagy, cargo, mass spectrometry, proliferation, purification, T cells


Macroautophagy (hereafter autophagy) is a eukaryotic catabolic process that plays essential roles in differentiation, activation, maintenance of cellular homeostasis and memory generation in lymphocytes [1–3]. Specifically, activation of CD4+ T cells is accompanied by dramatic changes in their proteome, most likely facilitated by autophagy [4,5]. Therefore, a systematic identification of the autophagosomal contents in CD4+ T cells will provide insights into changes in the proteome during activation and proliferation. Toward answering this problem, Zhou et al. purify autophagosomes from murine CD4+ T cells and identify the cargo proteins via mass spectrometry [6].

Mouse models were constructed using two alleles, PTPRCa/CD45.1 and PTPRCb/CD45.2. In mice with the autophagy-related gene Atg7 deleted in PTPRCb, T-cell proliferation decreases compared to T cell proliferation with both wild-type PTPRC/CD45 and PTPRCa/CD45.1. Zhou et al. used another mouse model with MAP1LC3B/LC3B, the homolog of yeast Atg8 in mice, labeled to detect the specific protein components in autophagy from T cells. Both models demonstrated that knocking out Atg7 impairs the activation of T cells exposed to toxins and therefore leads to decreased CD4+ T cell proliferation.

Zhou et al. employed an affinity labeling method using LC3B fused to APEX2 (LC3B-AP2), as this showed the highest reproducibility in a previously published study [7]. In the presence of biotin phenols and hydroxyl-peroxide, APEX2 can transform the former into highly reactive radicals that can covalently conjugate with nearby proteins. These proteins can then be identified by affinity purification and mass spectrometry-based profiling. Because LC3B is embedded in both the outer and inner autophagosomal membrane, the authors treated the sample with proteinase K to degrade cytosolic proteins bound to LC3B while those inside the autophagosome are protected. The authors first confirmed the colocalization of biotin with APEX2 through confocal imaging, observing significant overlap between biotin and APEX2, indicating that the proteins being biotinylated are proximal to APEX2 enzymes. They also confirmed the autophagosomal enrichment of LC3B-AP2 by performing confocal imaging with LAMP1, a lysosomal marker, observing partial colocalization. The authors then utilized a proteinase K protection assay confirming that the LC3B-AP2 labeling is identifying lumenal proteins within the autophagosome. Using mass spectrometry following proteinase K treatment the authors found several autophagic receptors including SQSTM1, NBR1 and TAX1BP1 lending support for the success of their methods in identifying autophagosomal proteins.

Next, the authors analyzed 112 proteinase K-protected and streptavidin-enriched proteins. From these, 7 candidate proteins are significantly upregulated following bafilomycin A1 treatment, an inhibitor that prevents the lysosomal degradation of LC3 that is sequestered within autophagosomes. Upon further analysis, IL7R/IL-7Rɑ (a component of the heterodimeric interleukin 7 receptor) shows the highest fold change among all biological replicates. IL7R is constantly internalized and recycled through membrane-enveloped organelles. To ensure that IL7R is part of the autophagosomal cargo, the authors performed immunostaining of IL7R with LC3 or WIPI2 (early autophagosomal markers) and observed colocalization that increases upon bafilomycin A1 treatment. Furthermore, the authors performed flow cytometry for IL7R expression levels from the spleen of atg7−/− mice to validate whether the lack of autophagy impairs IL7R degradation. IL7R is upregulated both at the surface and whole-cell level in naive atg7−/− CD4+ T cells (undifferentiated T cells that have yet to be exposed to an antigen for differentiation), suggesting that ILR7 is degraded by autophagy. However, no similar significant effects are observed in effector T cells (differentiated helper T cells).

After determining that IL7R levels are higher in autophagy knockout mice, Zhou et al. tried to link increased IL7R to decreased IL2R assembly. This link explains the role of autophagy in modulating CD4+ T cell behavior because IL2R is part of a signaling pathway that leads to CD4+ T cell proliferation. Zhou et al. observed that IL2R levels are the same in the wild-type and atg7−/− cells, but IL2 signaling in atg7−/− cells leads to lower IL2RA/IL2Rɑ levels. These lower IL2RA levels then decrease the flux through the IL2 signaling pathway as measured by a decrease in the phosphorylation of the downstream effector STAT5. IL7 and IL2 receptors form by the combination of IL2RG/gamma chain with IL7R or IL2RA-IL2RB, respectively. Zhou et al. found that the colocalization of IL2RG with IL2RA is decreased in the atg7−/− knockout cells. IL7R can compete with IL2RA for binding to limiting levels of IL2RG. Thus, autophagy can play a role in maintaining an adequate pool of free IL2RG by restricting the level of IL7R, allowing the free IL2RG to combine with IL2RA more frequently in CD4+ cells. This hypothesis would explain the higher levels of IL2R and higher CD4+ T cell proliferation in cells that are autophagy competent.

Through the results of this study the authors determined that the autophagic degradation of IL7R is crucial for T cell proliferation. In cells where autophagy is inhibited, IL7R competitively inhibits IL2R signaling through sequestration of the limited amount of IL2RG, interfering with subsequent downstream signaling that is crucial for proliferation of CD4+ T cells. Thus, autophagy plays a key role in the transition from IL7R-mediated homeostasis to IL2R-mediated expansion in effector T cells. It is also possible that autophagy regulation is directly involved in CD4+ T cell differentiation. IL2 signaling is antagonistic to differentiation into CD4+ Th17 cells through suppressing expression of IL6ST/IL-6Rβ. Thus, the decreased IL2 signaling in autophagy-deficient cells may be influential in differentiating cells into CD4+ Th17 cells. This study also supports the validity of using the LC3B-AP2 mouse model in overcoming the obstacles of traditional methods toward identifying autophagosomal constituents. However, the authors note that proteins embedded either in large complexes or with very few electron-rich amino acid residues exposed at the surface have a lower chance of being tagged by biotin-phenol radicals. Overall, this paper bolsters the observation that autophagy is involved in shaping the proteomic landscape of the CD4+ T cell at different points in its life cycle [6].

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences [GM131919].

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

References

  • [1].Yang Z, Klionsky DJ.. An overview of the molecular mechanism of autophagy. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2009;335:1–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Metur SP, Klionsky DJ. Adaptive immunity at the crossroads of autophagy and metabolism. Cell Mol Immunol. 2021;18(5):1096–1105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Hubbard VM, Valdor R, Patel B, et al. Macroautophagy regulates energy metabolism during effector T cell activation. J Immunol. 2010;185(12):7349–7357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Grant MM, Scheel-Toellner D, Griffiths HR. Contributions to our understanding of T cell physiology through unveiling the T cell proteome. Clin Exp Immunol. 2007;149(1):9–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Subbannayya Y, Haug M, Pinto SM, et al. The proteomic landscape of resting and activated CD4+ T cells reveal insights into cell differentiation and function. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;22(1):275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Zhou D, Borsa M, Puleston DJ, et al. Mapping autophagosome contents identifies interleukin-7 receptor-alpha as a key cargo modulating CD4+ T cell proliferation. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):5174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Le Guerroue F, Eck F, Jung J, et al. Autophagosomal content profiling reveals an LC3C-dependent piecemeal mitophagy pathway. Mol Cell. 2017;68(4):786–796 e6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Autophagy are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES