Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Mar 2.
Published in final edited form as: Bipolar Disord. 2015 Feb 26;17(4):403–408. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12289

Prevalence of Huntington’s disease gene CAG trinucleotide repeat alleles in patients with bipolar disorder

Eliana Marisa Ramos a,b, Tammy Gillis a, Jayalakshmi S Mysore a, Jong-Min Lee a, Isabel Alonso b, James F Gusella a, Jordan W Smoller a, Pamela Sklar c, Marcy E MacDonald a, Roy H Perlis a
PMCID: PMC9980711  NIHMSID: NIHMS653937  PMID: 25726852

Abstract

Objectives:

Huntington’s disease is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by motor, cognitive, and psychiatric symptoms that are caused by HTT CAG trinucleotide repeat alleles of 36 or more units. A greater than expected prevalence of incompletely penetrant HTT CAG repeat alleles observed among individuals diagnosed with major depressive disorder raises the possibility that another mood disorder, bipolar disorder, could likewise be associated with Huntington’s disease.

Methods:

We assessed the distribution of HTT CAG repeat alleles in a cohort of individuals with bipolar disorder. HTT CAG allele sizes from 2,229 Caucasian individuals diagnosed with DSM-IV bipolar disorder were compared to allele sizes in 1,828 control individuals from multiple cohorts.

Results:

We found that HTT CAG repeat alleles > 35 units were observed in only one of 4,458 chromosomes from individuals with bipolar disorder, compared with three of 3,656 chromosomes from control subjects.

Conclusions:

These findings do not support an association between bipolar disorder and Huntington’s disease.

Keywords: bipolar disorder, depression, Huntington’s disease, neurodegenerative disease, polyglutamine expansion, trinucleotide repeat


Huntington’s disease (HD) is a dominantly inherited progressive neurodegenerative disorder caused by the expansion of an unstable polymorphic CAG repeat in the HTT gene (chromosome 4p16.3), resulting in an expanded polyglutamine tract in the Huntingtin protein (1). HD is a rare disorder, with a prevalence of ~1–7 in 100,000 individuals of European ancestry. Alleles with 35 or less CAGs are considered to produce no overt clinical symptoms of HD and can be grouped in two categories: stable normal alleles (with < 27 CAGs), and high–normal alleles, which have in some cases been reported to expand (27–35 CAGs) upon transmission. A third class of alleles between 36–39 repeats shows incomplete HD penetrance, while alleles with 40 or more repeats are fully penetrant and lead to the onset of HD symptoms.

HD is characterized by motor, cognitive, and behavioral manifestations. The psychiatric symptoms that become manifest in many, but not all, HD patients, tend to be depression and apathy, but mania has also been observed. Individual symptoms observed in HD may include elevated or irritable mood, over activity, decreased need for sleep, hypersexuality, impulsiveness and grandiosity, and delusions and hallucinations (2). Older studies reported hypomanic or manic episodes in up to 10% of HD patients (3, 4), with a more recent study noting that the presentation reported was most commonly irritability rather than expansive or elevated mood (5).

Recently, we found that HD-associated CAG repeat alleles were overrepresented among individuals diagnosed with major depression, estimating that 3.3 in 1,000 individuals diagnosed with major depression carry an expanded HTT CAG allele (6). These results suggested that HTT CAG allele sizes, in the reduced-penetrant and fully penetrant ranges, may act to sensitize individuals to the effects of other genetic or environmental factors contributing to the manifestation of depressive symptoms both in HD patients and in individuals diagnosed with major depressive disorder. Here we have evaluated whether there may be a similar overlap in the underlying genetic architecture of HD and bipolar disorder. We determined how often individuals diagnosed with bipolar disorder carry HTT CAG alleles that are associated with HD, genotyping the HTT CAG repeat in 2,529 individuals with a DSM-IV diagnosis of bipolar disorder.

Materials and methods

Bipolar disorder and control sample cohorts

Bipolar disorder cohort.

The patient cohort comprised a total of 2,529 individuals diagnosed with bipolar disorder (62.7% bipolar I disorder) diagnosed by structured interview as previously described (7). In this cohort, 57.1% (1,443) were women and 88.6% had Caucasian, 6.6% African, and 2.2% Asian (self-reported) ancestry.

Control Cohort 1.

This cohort comprised the normal chromosomes 4 of a large cohort of 4,007 HD individuals, utilized previously in studies that assessed the HTT CAG repeat allele distribution in major depression and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients (6, 8). These chromosomes, with the shorter non-expanded HTT CAG repeat alleles, should reflect the distribution of HTT CAG alleles in the general population as HD is a true dominant disorder (9) that is rare (i.e., 1–7 in 100,000 Caucasian individuals).

Control Cohort 2.

A cohort of 1,288 psychiatrically screened controls (with no diagnosis of bipolar disorder or schizophrenia) and 547 DNA samples derived from anonymous cord blood donors, were used as control Group 2 (7). In this control group, all individuals were Caucasian (self-reported) and 49.0% were women.

In the bipolar disorder and control cohorts, all subjects had provided written informed consent for genetic investigation, approved by participating institutions, with the understanding that no results would be returned to them. DNA was provided to the investigators in anonymized form, such that subject recontact would be impossible in any case.

Genotyping

HTT

CAG repeat allele sizes were determined by a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification assay, using fluorescently labelled primers, as previously described (10). The PCR products were run on an ABI PRISM 3730XL automated DNA Sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and analysed using GeneMapper version 3.7 software. A set of genomic DNA standards for which HTT CAG repeat number had been confirmed by DNA sequencing was used to provide CAG allele size standards.

Statistical analysis

Fisher’s exact test was used to compare HTT CAG repeat frequency between the individuals with bipolar disorder and each of the two different comparison control cohorts. We compared the repeat frequency of normal (with < 27 CAGs) and high–normal alleles (27–35 CAGs), as well as stable normal alleles and alleles with a tendency to expand (with ≥ 27 CAGs). Given their relative rarity, high–normal, and abnormal alleles were combined in secondary analyses. Using the Genetic Power Calculator (11), under a dominant model the power of our study to detect association is 0.88. The HTT CAG distribution was also analyzed using the nonparametric Mann–Whitney U-test, since the distribution of allele sizes was highly non-normal. All statistical analyses were performed using PASW Statistics 18 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

In the group of individuals with bipolar disorder, the HTT CAG repeat range varied between nine to 36 repeats, with two out of 5,032 chromosomes having 35 CAG repeats (end of high–normal range) and only one chromosome carried a reduced-penetrance allele with 36 CAG repeats. The individual carrying a 36 CAG repeat was diagnosed with bipolar II disorder, while the two individuals with 35 CAG repeats were bipolar I and bipolar II disorder cases. In order to characterize the prevalence of HTT CAG repeats in bipolar disorder, we used as comparison group for the CAG repeat frequency and distribution, 4,007 non-HD control chromosomes (control Cohort 1) that was also the subject of a prior analysis of major depressive disorder (6). As previously reported, the non-HD control chromosomes HD CAG range varied between nine and 34 HTT CAG repeats (6, 8) with none of these chromosomes having 35 or more CAG repeats. The allele frequencies in the individuals with bipolar disorder were not significantly different from the non-HD control chromosomes (Fisher’s exact test: normal versus high–normal alleles, p = 0.086 and normal versus ≥ 27 CAGs, p = 0.099) (Table 1). However, comparison of the distributions of the allele sizes, assessed using the nonparametric Mann–Whitney U-test, revealed nominally statistically significantly shorter repeat lengths among the non-HD control compared to bipolar disorder chromosomes (Mann–Whitney U-test, p = 0.036) (Fig. 1).

Table 1.

HTT CAG repeat alleles in bipolar disorder

Normal HD allele
(< 27 CAGs)
High–normal HD allele
(27–35 CAGs)
At risk HD allele
(> 35 CAGs)
Bipolar disorder chromosomes 4890 (97.18%) 141 (2.80%) 1 (0.02%)
Caucasian 4326 (97.04%) 131 (2.94%) 1 (0.02%)
Control chromosomes
Cohort 1 3869 (96.56%) 138 (3.44%) 0 (0%)a
Cohort 2 3515 (96.14%) 138 (3.77%) 3 (0.08%)

The allele frequencies in the individuals with bipolar disorder were not different from control Cohort 1 (Fisher’s exact test: normal versus high–normal alleles, p = 0.086 and normal versus ≥ 27 CAGs, p = 0.099), but there was a significant difference with control Cohort 2 chromosomes (p = 0.011 and p = 0.008, respectively). When considering only Caucasian individuals, there was still a nominally significant difference (p = 0.040 and p = 0.030, respectively) when comparing subjects with bipolar disorder with control individuals from Cohort 2.

a

Cohort 1 has 0 alleles with > 35 CAG repeats by design not observation.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

HTT CAG repeat length in 4,007 non-Huntington’s disease (HD) control chromosomes (Cohort 1) and 5,032 bipolar disorder (BP) chromosomes. Insert shows a zoomed view of high–normal and reduced penetrance HD CAG alleles (27 to 38 CAG repeats).

Since the Cohort 1 control group, comprising the non-HD chromosomes from HD patients (defined as ≤ 35 repeats) may underestimate the true frequency of alleles of 36 or more CAG repeats in the general population, we genotyped a second large control cohort, comprising 1,288 psychiatrically screened controls and 547 cord blood DNA samples. In this control Cohort 2, the HTT CAG repeat ranged from nine to 37 CAG repeats, with three alleles having high-end normal alleles (35 CAGs) and three alleles in the reduced penetrance range (one 36 CAG and two 37 CAG repeat alleles) (Table 1). Notably, these six high–normal/reduced-penetrance alleles were all from the psychiatrically screened sample. When comparing allele frequencies of subjects with bipolar disorder with this set of control individuals, there was a significant difference when comparing both normal versus high normal (Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.011) and normal versus ≥ 27 HD CAG alleles (Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.008) alleles, with fewer normal alleles among the control cohort. The nonparametric Mann–Whitney U-test revealed a statistically significantly different distribution of allele sizes between this set of control chromosomes and the bipolar disorder chromosomes (Mann–Whitney U-test, p = 0.004), with shorter repeat numbers among the bipolar disorder chromosomes.

To evaluate whether the apparent under-representation of high-end normal and HD-associated alleles in the cases with bipolar disorder might reflect population stratification due to ancestry differences between the disease cases and the control samples (all self-reported Caucasian), we excluded from the bipolar disorder cohort all samples of non-Caucasian origin. This yielded a total of 4,458 chromosomes from Caucasian individuals diagnosed with bipolar disorder. In this final set, the HTT CAG range and frequency of high-end normal and reduced penetrance alleles remained similar (sizes from nine to 36 repeats, with a single reduced-penetrance allele). After restricting the analysis to individuals self-reported as Caucasian, there was still a nominally significant difference between the allele frequency of normal versus high–normal and normal versus ≥ 27 CAG repeat alleles (Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.04 and p = 0.03, respectively) when comparing subjects with bipolar disorder with control individuals from Cohort 2, again suggesting fewer normal HD counts among controls. However, the Mann–Whitney U-test revealed no significant difference in the distributions of the HTT CAG allele sizes between the control and bipolar disorder Caucasian chromosomes (Mann–Whitney U-test, p = 0.216) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

HTT CAG repeat length in 3,656 control chromosomes (Cohort 2) (from 1,288 psychiatrically screened and 547 cord blood control samples) and 4,458 bipolar disorder (BP) chromosomes, where all individuals have Caucasian origin. Insert shows a zoomed view of high–normal and reduced penetrance Huntington’s disease (HD) CAG alleles (27 to 38 CAG repeats).

Discussion

The genetic architecture of major psychiatric disorders is complex. One rare risk variant, suggested by psychiatric symptoms observed in a proportion of HD patients, may be the HTT CAG repeat, at least in the range of allele sizes reported to be associated with a clinical diagnosis of HD. We hypothesized that these HTT CAG repeat alleles, which encode a functionally important run of polyglutamines in the Huntingtin protein (12), may sensitize certain individuals in the general population to genetic and environmental factors that increase the risk of developing particular psychiatric symptoms. In a prior study, overrepresentation of HD-associated CAG alleles appeared to further increase the risk of developing depression (6). Our current study aimed to determine the prevalence of HD-associated HTT CAG repeat alleles in a clinical population of individuals diagnosed with bipolar disorder, in light of the observation that some HD patients may exhibit manic/hypomanic symptoms as well as depressive symptoms.

We find that one in 2,229 individuals, or about 0.45 in every 1,000 individuals, diagnosed with bipolar disorder carry an expanded HTT CAG allele in the range that has been associated with development of clinical symptoms of HD, whereas approximately 1.64 in every 1,000 individuals from the general population carries an expanded HTT CAG allele. Thus, in contrast to our observations in major depressive disorder, HD seems unlikely to contribute significantly to bipolar disorder risk.

One caveat to this interpretation, relevant to all case–control studies, reflects the composition of the control comparison group, which should be representative of the general population and provide a precise estimate of the expected disease-allele prevalence. In previous studies, we have used as a comparison group the non-HD chromosomes from a large collection of individuals diagnosed with HD. This strategy provides a good representation of the HTT CAG allele distribution in the general population because HD is a truly dominant disorder (9) that is relatively rare (~1–7 in 100,000); therefore, we would expect the non-HD chromosome to be drawn from and reflective of the general population. Nevertheless, this selection criterion excludes reduced-penetrant as well as fully penetrant HD alleles, which do occur at some level in the general population. To eliminate this potential bias, we utilized a second comparison group that included individuals screened to exclude bipolar disorder and schizophrenia, but not necessarily other psychiatric disorders.

A further advantage of this second cohort is restriction to Caucasian origin, reducing the impact of population stratification in the analysis. There are known to be significant geographic differences in the prevalence and distribution of the HTT CAG repeat, related to different ancestral HTT haplotypes (13, 14). The modal HTT CAG repeat length in European and East Asian populations is 17 while African populations have a broader HTT CAG distribution, with most of the alleles having 15 CAG repeats (15, 16). However, despite the apparent advantages, the criteria used to select this second cohort may themselves introduce different biases into the analysis. None of the cord blood samples comprising one-third of the control group can be characterized in terms of psychiatric illness, while even the screened non-psychiatric control group excluded schizophrenia and bipolar disorder only. As the lifetime prevalence of major depression is roughly 17% (17), we cannot exclude the possibility that the reduced penetrance HD alleles observed in the control cohort could be associated with individuals with major depression, previously reported to have an enrichment of these alleles (6)—that is, the screened control cohort may include some misclassified individuals at greater risk to carry expanded alleles (though we note that, based upon prior analyses, even including subjects with major depressive disorder should only modestly increase risk to carry expanded alleles). In addition, we note that the lack of a formal neurologic examination and collection of family neurological history may be insufficient to exclude a diagnosis of HD; although given the extremely low prevalence in unselected populations the impact of misclassification should be extremely modest.

Taken together, our results do not support an obvious association between HTT and bipolar disorder. This finding stands in contrast to the overrepresentation suggested in individuals diagnosed with major depressive disorder. This apparent difference may suggest an area of contrast between the two disorders which otherwise share some heritable risk, with only the latter being sensitive to the effects of the HTT CAG repeat. Further large studies examining the prevalence of the HTT CAG repeat in other psychiatric disorders, such as schizophrenia, among others, may further clarify the subset of disorders that is sensitive to the effects of the CAG repeat that is the root cause of HD.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Drs. Seung Kwak, Jamshid Arajomond, and Ignacio Muñoz-Sanjuan of the CHDI Foundation, Inc.

EMR is the recipient of a scholarship from Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (SFRH/BD/44335/2008). Support is provided from grants from the National Institutes of Health NINDS NS16367 Huntington's Disease Center without Walls (JFG, MEM), NS32765 (MEM), and the CHDI Foundation, Inc. (JFG, MEM). RHP is supported by R01MH086026 from the National Institute of Mental Health.

Footnotes

Disclosures

RHP has received research grant support from Proteus Biomedical; has received consulting fees or served on scientific advisory boards for Proteus Biomedical, Healthrageous, Pamlab, Genomind, and RIDventures; and has received royalties from Concordant Rater Systems. EMR, TG, JSM, J-ML, IA, JFG, JWS, PS, and MEM do not have any conflicts of interest to report.

References

  • 1.MacDonald ME, Ambrose CM, Duyao MP et al. (The Huntington's Disease Collaborative Research Group). A novel gene containing a trinucleotide repeat that is expanded and unstable on Huntington's disease chromosomes. Cell 1993; 72: 971–983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rosenblatt A Neuropsychiatry of Huntington's disease. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 2007; 9: 191–197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mendez MF. Huntington's disease: update and review of neuropsychiatric aspects. Int J Psychiatry Med 1994; 24: 189–208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Folstein SE, Folstein MF. Psychiatric features of Huntington's disease: recent approaches and findings. Psychiatr Develop 1983; 1: 193–205. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Julien CL, Thompson JC, Wild S et al. Psychiatric disorders in preclinical Huntington's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007; 78: 939–943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Perlis RH, Smoller JW, Mysore J et al. Prevalence of incompletely penetrant Huntington's disease alleles among individuals with major depressive disorder. Am J Psychiatry 2010; 167: 574–579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sklar P, Smoller JW, Fan J et al. Whole-genome association study of bipolar disorder. Mol Psychiatry 2008; 13: 558–569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ramos EM, Keagle P, Gillis T et al. Prevalence of Huntington's disease gene CAG repeat alleles in sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients. Amyotroph Lateral Scler 2012; 13: 265–269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lee JM, Ramos EM, Lee JH et al. CAG repeat expansion in Huntington disease determines age at onset in a fully dominant fashion. Neurol 2012; 78: 690–695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Warner JP, Barron LH, Brock DJ. A new polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for the trinucleotide repeat that is unstable and expanded on Huntington's disease chromosomes. Mol Cell Probes 1993; 7: 235–239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Purcell S, Cherny SS, Sham PC. Genetic Power Calculator: design of linkage and association genetic mapping studies of complex traits. Bioinformat 2003; 19: 149–150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Seong IS, Woda JM, Song JJ et al. Huntingtin facilitates polycomb repressive complex 2. Hum Mol Genet 2010; 19: 573–583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Warby SC, Visscher H, Collins JA et al. HTT haplotypes contribute to differences in Huntington disease prevalence between Europe and East Asia. Eur J Hum Genet 2011; 19: 561–566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Squitieri F, Andrew SE, Goldberg YP et al. DNA haplotype analysis of Huntington disease reveals clues to the origins and mechanisms of CAG expansion and reasons for geographic variations of prevalence. Hum Mol Genet 1994; 3: 2103–2114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Falush D Haplotype background, repeat length evolution, and Huntington's disease. Am J Hum Genet 2009; 85: 939–942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Rubinsztein DC, Amos W, Leggo J et al. Mutational bias provides a model for the evolution of Huntington's disease and predicts a general increase in disease prevalence. Nat Genet 1994; 7: 525–530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kessler RC, Petukhova M, Sampson NA, Zaslavsky AM, Wittchen HU. Twelve-month and lifetime prevalence and lifetime morbid risk of anxiety and mood disorders in the United States. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2012; 21: 169–184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES