Abstract
Objective
To evaluate the therapeutic effects of applying internal fixation with a T-shaped locking plate that was used on the distal radius in fractures of the anterior process of the calcaneus (APC) with calcaneocuboid (CC) joint injury.
Methods
This retrospective study enrolled adult patients diagnosed with APC with CC joint injury that had received internal fixation with a T-shaped locking plate of the distal radius. Group NA underwent open reduction with ‘not-across’ CC joint plate fixation; and group A underwent open reduction with ‘across’ CC joint locking plate fixation. The outcomes were assessed using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, a visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score and radiological evaluations.
Results
A total of 72 patients were enrolled in the study; 36 in each group. At 1 month after surgery, the outcomes of group NA were superior to group A in terms of AOFAS and VAS scores. Compared with group A, group NA showed significantly lower intraoperative blood loss, operation time and length of hospital stay. There were no significant differences in the postoperative improvement of Bolher's and Gissane's angles between the two groups.
Conclusion
Early functional recovery was faster in group NA than group A.
Keywords: Internal fixation, T-shaped plates, calcaneocuboid joint injury, the anterior process fracture of calcaneus
Introduction
Calcaneus fractures are relatively common in clinical medicine and they account for approximately 2% of total fractures, with approximately 75% involving the subtalar joint and approximately 20–45% involving the calcaneocuboid (CC) joint.1,2 At present, most studies on fracture classification and treatment methods emphasize the importance of anatomical reduction of the subtalar articular surface of the calcaneus, while ignoring the impact of anterior tuberosity fractures of the calcaneus and injury of the CC joint on foot function.3–6
The calcaneus anterior process is a saddle-shaped protuberance in front of the calcaneus, varying in length, width and shape. While stabilizing the lateral column of the foot, it articulates with the cuboid and navicular and forms the anterior part of the subtalar joint, the upper posterior part of the calcaneocuboid joint, and serves as the junction of the extensor digitalis brevis, the calcaneocuboid dorsal ligament and the split ligament. The bifurcated ligament is a type of elastic fibre bundle ligament that originates from the lateral side of calcaneus anterior process, which is divided into internal and external bands. The lateral band is the calcaneocuboid ligament, which arrives at the medial back side of the calcaneocuboid. The medial cord is the calcanavicular ligament, which is attached to the lateral surface of the scaphoid.
The most commonly used classification of the fracture of the anterior process calcaneus (APC) is the Degan Classification.4 With increasing knowledge of the APC, almost all authors agree that surgery is not necessary for Degan type I and Degan type II fractures.7,8 Surgical treatment by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is mainly used for large dislocated APC (Degan type III).3,8–10 ORIF is the most common method for achieving anatomic reduction and it allows for better functional activity and earlier return to normal walking. However, it has been reported that ORIF is more likely to result in wound complications.10 APC involving the CC joint destroys the stability of the CC joint surface. Only by restoring the normal structure of the joint can a good prognosis be achieved. There is still much controversy as to whether fractures involving the CC joint require cross-articular fixation. Some scholars believe that comminuted fractures of the anterior calcaneus should be fixed across the calcaneocuboid joint to increase the stability of the fracture fixation.12–14 However, others believe that, as the CC joint is part of linked joints around the calcaneus,3,4,15,16 movement of the other joints, especially the subtalar joint, will be restricted after fixation and will cause the foot to lose its normal biomechanical properties, leading to joint problems and degenerative changes.9,11,17–22 To reduce the incidence of complications, methods of ORIF with T-shaped locking plates that do not cross the CC joint have been developed.12 There are increasing numbers of studies investigating the therapeutic effects of the use of open reduction and internal fixation with T-shaped locking plates in the repair of fractures of the APC.12,14,23
The functional recovery of the foot benefits from the anatomical reduction and stable internal fixation of APC with CC joint injury.20 With open reduction and internal fixation, T-locking plates that do not across the calcaneocuboid joint may be sufficient to provide considerable clinical benefit. The aim of this current study was to objectively evaluate the therapeutic effects of applying internal fixation with a T-shaped locking plate that was used on the distal radius in fractures of the APC with CC joint injury.
Patients and methods
Patient population
This retrospective study enrolled consecutive adult patients diagnosed with APC with CC joint injury in the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China between January 2015 and December 2020. The inclusion criteria for these patients were as follows: (i) aged ≥18 years; (ii) a Degan type III injury; (iii) surgery involving ORIF with T-shaped locking plates; (iv) follow-up >12 months. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (i) patients with open wounds; (ii) patients with fractures combined with other tarsal fractures; (iii) patients treated with multiple plates. The patients were retrospectively divided into two groups: group A contained patients with fractures involving the articular surface of the calcaneocuboid or with articular surface collapse that underwent an ‘across’ CC joint locking plate fixation; and group NA contained patients that had larger fractures without displacement that underwent a ‘not-across’ joint plate fixation.
Ethical approval from the Medical Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University was obtained for this study (no. SZS2022017). All methods were carried out in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. All patient details have been de-identified. The reporting of this study conforms to STROBE guidelines.24
Surgical procedures
Treatment plans were formulated based on preoperative X-ray and three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) examinations. For group NA (Figure 1), open reduction and a ‘not-across’ CC joint plate was used. For group A (Figure 2), open reduction and ‘across’ CC joint locking plate fixation was used. Before surgery, ice was applied to the ankle and an intravenous drip of mannitol was used to alleviate swelling in the foot. During the operation, general anaesthesia was used and the patient was placed in a lying position on the contralateral side with a balloon tourniquet on the lower extremity. The calcaneocuboid articular surface and subtalar articular surface bone masses were then reduced under direct vision, using multiple Kirschner wires to temporarily fix the fractured bone masses. The prepared T-shaped plate of the distal radius was then fitted to the calcaneus.
Figure 1.
Preoperative and postoperative lateral calcaneus X-rays and three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) scans of a 55-year-old female patient with a fracture of the anterior process of the calcaneus that received open reduction and ‘across’ calcaneocuboid joint locking plate fixation (group A): (a) preoperative lateral X-ray image; (b) preoperative 3D-CT image; (c) postoperative lateral X-ray image at 1 month after surgery and (d) postoperative 3D-CT image at 6 months after surgery.
Figure 2.
Preoperative and postoperative lateral calcaneus X-rays and three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) scans of a 31-year-old male patient with a fracture of the anterior process of the calcaneus that received open reduction and ‘not-across’ calcaneocuboid joint plate fixation (group NA): (a) preoperative lateral X-ray image; (b) preoperative 3D-CT image; (c) postoperative lateral X-ray image at 1 month after surgery and (d) postoperative 3D-CT image at 6 months after surgery.
For group NA, a locking plate ‘not-across’ the CC joint was used. After confirming the incision, a full-thickness skin incision was cut and the skin flaps were quickly peeled from the lateral wall. Care should be taken to protect the peroneus brevis tendon beneath the incision. Two or three Kirschner wires were then placed in the talus and cuboid as traction to expose the calcaneus cuboid, articular surface and lateral wall. The front fracture of the calcaneus was then reduced under direct vision, restoring the flat joint surface of the CC and was temporarily fixed with Kirschner wires. The distal radius T-shaped locking plate was then attached to the front of the calcaneus, confirming the placement of the CC joint and the anterior bone mass of the calcaneus under direct vision. A C-arm X-ray machine and fluoroscopy were then used from the side to check the axis of the calcaneus. The articular surface of the calcaneus was checked. Finally, the front and body of the calcaneus were fixed with screws. For group A, a locking plate across the CC joint was selected.
Data collection
Data were collected from patients aged ≥18 years old who had both radiographic and 3D-CT images of the ankle and foot taken between the initial emergency and the final follow-up from a retrospective search of the hospital image database using the search terms ‘calcaneocuboid joint’ and ‘the anterior process fracture of calcaneus’ in the radiographic reports.
Radiographic evaluation
Two designated surgeons (Z.L.Q and K.W.C) measured all imaging parameters including Bohler’s angle and Gissane’s angle for each study participant from the radiographic reports.
Functional evaluation
Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were used to assess subjective pain perception prior to surgery, 1 month after surgery and at 6 months after surgery (0–10 scale, with 0 being painless and 10 being the most painful). In addition, the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgery (AOFAS) scores were used to determine improvements in the quality of functional outcomes prior to surgery, 1 month after surgery and at 6 months after surgery.
Statistical analyses
All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Continuous data are presented as mean ± SD. Categorical data are presented as n of patients (%). Paired-sample t-test was used to compare continuous data and χ2-test was used to compare categorical data. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
This retrospective study enrolled 72 patients with fractures of the APC: 36 patients in group A and 36 patients in group NA. The clinical and demographic characteristics of the two groups are presented in Table 1. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the clinical and demographic characteristics.
Table 1.
Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with a fracture of the anterior process of the calcaneus that received either ‘across’ calcaneocuboid joint locking plate fixation (group A) or ‘not-across’ calcaneocuboid joint plate fixation (group NA).
| Characteristic | Group NA n = 36 | Group A n = 36 |
|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 43.53 ± 9.71 | 46.00 ± 12.29 |
| Sex, male/female | 11/25 | 9/27 |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 23.67 ± 3.92 | 23.11 ± 3.58 |
| High work loadinga | 5 (13.89%) | 6 (16.67%) |
| Follow-up, months | 19.86 ± 4.20 | 20.47 ± 3.92 |
| Cause of fractures | ||
| High altitude falling | 26 (72.22%) | 29 (80.56%) |
| Sports sprain | 10 (27.78%) | 7 (19.44%) |
Data presented as mean ± SD or n of patients (%).
aStanding for long periods and having a high level of exercise at work.
No significant between-group differences (P ≥ 0.05); paired-sample t-test was used to compare continuous data and χ2-test was used to compare categorical data.
The functional and radiological parameters of both groups are summarized in Table 2. Except for Gissane’s angle at 1 and 6 months after surgery, all other parameters were significantly different at these two time-points compared with the preoperative values in both groups (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). There were no significant differences in the preoperative parameters between the two groups. At 1 month after surgery, the AOFAS and VAS scores of group NA were significantly better than those of group A (P < 0.05 for both comparisons).
Table 2.
Functional and radiological results of patients with a fracture of the anterior process of the calcaneus that received either ‘across’ calcaneocuboid joint locking plate fixation (group A) or ‘not-across’ calcaneocuboid joint plate fixation (group NA).
| Characteristic | Group NA n = 36 | Group A n = 36 | Statistical analysisa |
|---|---|---|---|
| AOFAS score | |||
| Preoperative | 39.94 ± 3.34 | 41.19 ± 4.34 | NS |
| 1 month after surgery | 81.28 ± 4.89* | 76.42 ± 4.37* | P < 0.01** |
| 6 months after surgery | 83.22 ± 4.86* | 82.39 ± 6.12* | NS |
| VAS pain score | |||
| Preoperative | 8.00 ± 0.68 | 7.83 ± 0.70 | NS |
| 1 month after surgery | 1.58 ± 0.65* | 2.14 ± 0.68* | P < 0.01** |
| 6 months after surgery | 1.39 ± 0.49* | 1.44 ± 0.61* | NS |
| Bohler’s angle, | |||
| Preoperative | 20.44 ± 3.10 | 20.50 ± 3.49 | NS |
| 1 month after surgery | 28.17 ± 2.55* | 27.17 ± 2.90* | NS |
| 6 months after surgery | 28.56 ± 2.47* | 27.78 ± 2.44* | NS |
| Gissane’s angle, | |||
| Preoperative | 122.00 ± 6.30 | 124.06 ± 5.78 | NS |
| 1 month after surgery | 122.17 ± 3.61 | 121.69 ± 4.10 | NS |
| 6 months after surgery | 122.28 ± 3.72 | 121.56 ± 4.07 | NS |
Data presented as mean ± SD.
aPaired-sample t-test was used to compare continuous data; *significant difference compared with the preoperative value, P < 0.05; **significant difference between the two groups, P < 0.05; NS, no significant between-group difference (P ≥ 0.05).
AOFAS, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society; VAS, visual analogue scale.
Surgical parameters and related complications of the two groups are presented in Table 3. Intraoperative blood loss, operation time and length of hospital stay were significantly lower in group NA compared with group A (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). Surgical complications occurred in 10 patients during hospitalization and there was no significant difference between the two groups. Three patients developed superficial wound infection on the third day after surgery. Cephalosporin was injected intravenously for 3 days and the wound was cleaned with iodine wet compress. All patients were discharged after complete resolution of symptoms.
Table 3.
Surgical parameters of patients with a fracture of the anterior process of the calcaneus that received either ‘across’ calcaneocuboid joint locking plate fixation (group A) or ‘not-across’ calcaneocuboid joint plate fixation (group NA).
| Characteristic | Group NA n = 36 | Group A n = 36 | Statistical analysisa |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intraoperative blood loss, ml | 84.36 ± 10.86 | 100.86 ± 13.05 | P < 0.01 |
| Operative time, min | 74.53 ± 8.37 | 84.36 ± 10.86 | P < 0.01 |
| Length of hospital stay, days | 6.64 ± 1.27 | 7.83 ± 1.95 | P < 0.01 |
| Complications | |||
| Incision infection | 2 | 1 | NS |
| Delayed wound healing | 2 | 3 | NS |
| Screw breakage | 0 | 2 | NS |
Data presented as mean ± SD or n of patients.
aPaired-sample t-test was used to compare continuous data and χ2-test was used to compare categorical data; NS, no significant between-group difference (P ≥ 0.05).
Discussion
The purpose of this current study was to compare the clinical efficacy of two different approaches to the surgical repair of Degan type III fractures of the APC. To date, a variety of surgical and conservative treatment options have been described in a few studies, which were dominated by case reports.15,16,23,25,26 Case numbers were low and there was often no uniform classification or treatment consensus.12 Most classifications of calcaneus fractures, such as the AO classification,27 Essex-Lopresti classification28 and the Sanders classification,29 do not or only partially describe APC. The most commonly used classification of APC is that of the Degan classification.13 According to radiographs, fractures of the APC can be classified into three different types as follows: (i) type I represents undisplaced avulsion fractures outside the joint; (ii) type II represents displaced extrarticular fractures; and (iii) type III represents large intrarticular calcaneal process fractures.13
Since the APC was first described in 1931,30 only a few case reports and case series have been published, suggesting a variety of treatment recommendations.7,13,14,25 Treatment methods include the following non-surgical treatments: fixed calf cast, forearm crutches to relieve pressure on the foot used for 2–10 weeks and the use of elastic bandages and early functional treatment of the whole body to adapt to the symptoms.31 Others have recommended open reduction and internal fixation or open arthroscopic resection for surgical treatment.12,15,32 Open reduction and stable internal fixation have since been established as the standard treatment for most fractures of the APC.7 In a series of clinical studies, more than two-thirds of patients obtained good-to-excellent results.5,10,22,33–36 Conservative treatments resulted in fracture consolidation after almost 2.5 years, especially in patients that had delayed treatment.10 To some extent, treatment is not satisfactory in terms of the long-term prognosis, as ankylosis and disturbances in bone union may occur and may require surgery.26 Patients that receive more invasive surgery may experience postoperative incision exudation and wound infection requiring lengthy hospital stays.37Although more surgeons are tending to use a minimal incision lateral approach and percutaneous fixation with wires and screws or sinus tarsi that reduces the wound size and soft tissue damage of the lateral approach, the operation is not only more difficult and often longer, but also may not result in anatomical reduction.12,32 As described in a previous study, six of 20 patients experienced complications such as malunion or screw positioning deviation and one patient had delayed wound healing.11 Nevertheless, this approach improves the geometry of the calcaneus and reduces the wound infection rate. Displaced APC with joint involvement may benefit from acute open reduction and internal fixation to restore the anatomy and reduce the risk of post-traumatic arthritis.12 A series of cases described injuries extending to the calcaneal joints, indicating that they are often not combined with separate fixation, resulting in persistent symptoms requiring surgical removal of bone debris or delayed fixation.7,14 Therefore, the best treatment for displaced or large acute fractures with calcaneal joint involvement or displacement is open reduction and internal fixation.7,12,14 In a review of APC fracture management, a total of 17 fractures received acute surgical treatment.38 These procedures include removal of fracture fragments, open reduction with a single cancellous screw or other fixation.1,3,8 A previous study demonstrated that isolated APC can be fixed using locking plates and screws in patients with effective functional recovery 6 months after surgery.12 In summary, while these surgical techniques have been shown to be effective in treating calcaneal intra-articular fractures, there is no evidence that any of them is superior.10,20,22,35,39
Longer plate fixation may also result in traumatic arthritis and ankylosis as patients are only able to perform functional exercise later.7,12 Because the tibiotalar joint, subtalar, talar navicular and calcaneocuboid joints are linked, crossing the CC joint is likely to seriously affect the normal mechanical function of the middle tarsal joint, the subtalar joint, and valgus, and will adversely affect normal walking.3,11 Good joint mobility is necessary for early postoperative functional exercise. Patients often delay weight-bearing rehabilitation due to poor joint mobility and postoperative pain. In addition, according to mechanical principles, the steel plate and loose screws might be broken by mechanical force in patients treated with the ‘across’ the CC joint approach. The use of ORIF with the ‘across’ the CC joint approach can provide good fracture visualization, but it does more damage to the soft tissues, thereby increasing the risk of wound dehiscence, flap devascularization, injury to the sural nerve and infection.9,11,20,22
This current study compared the therapeutic effectiveness of two surgical fixation methods for APC fractures with CC joint injury (Degan type III) that involved fixation ‘across’ or ‘not-across’ the CC joint. Based on the evidence obtained, the ‘not-across’ approach (group NA) was more effective than the ‘across’ approach (group A) for the restoration of joint function in terms of clinical outcomes and radiological evaluations, as assessed by the improvement in the AOFAS score, Bohler's angle and Gissane's angle, although differences between the two groups did not reach statistical significance for all measures. It is generally accepted that AOFAS verification alone is insufficient.40 Most of the published studies on APC fractures have only reported subjective results with ‘satisfactory’ clinical outcomes, describing the healing process as ‘smooth or only illustrating radiological results’.5,13 Most previous studies on Degan type III fractures have insufficient sample sizes and lack objective data collection.4,7 This current study, therefore, has some reference value for the treatment of Degan type III fractures of the APC using relatively objective parameters.
The high incidence of calcaneal fracture complications has always been a challenge for surgeons. In terms of complications, the present study demonstrated a greater rate of broken screws in group A that was treated with plate fixation ‘across’ the CC joint compared with the ‘not-across’ approach (group NA), but the difference between the two groups did not reach statistical significance. A slower postoperative recovery of function and a greater tendency toward soft tissue damage can lead to complications such as necrosis, dehiscence, tendinitis or nerve damage.21,41 Full weight-bearing walking can only be done after the fracture has healed, as faulty bone union and plate fracture may result. Clinical studies have also shown that early postoperative weight-bearing is associated with better functional outcomes.1,2 If reliable fixation can be achieved, the sooner the patient begins weight-bearing activities, the better the functional results.42,43 The current results showed that, in terms of the functional outcome as measured by AOFAS and VAS pain scores, the ‘not-across’ approach (group NA) was superior to that of the ‘across’ approach (group A) at 1 month postoperatively.
This current study had several limitations. First, the number of patients included in the study was small because APC fractures are rare. Secondly, these fractures are intra-articular fractures, but the quality of the anterior articular surface cartilage was not evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging during long-term follow-up. Fractures of the APC are more common in young adults that exercise. If the sample size could be further increased, the recovery of function could be specifically evaluated. Thirdly, the study could have lacked objective outcome scores because of the differences in the recovery methods used by patients.
In conclusion, good clinical efficacy was demonstrated for the use of a T-shaped plate in the surgical treatment of Degan type III fractures of the APC. It was further shown that, the short-term postoperative functional recovery of the ‘not-across’ approach was significantly better than that of the ‘across’ approach, which might accelerate the initiation of rehabilitation exercises and help patients return to normal life as soon as possible.
Research Data
Research Data for Comparison of two surgical strategies for fractures of the anterior process of the calcaneus with or without bridging plate fixation by Xi Hua, Junxin Zhang, Hao Liu, Yuehong Guan, Kangwu Chen and Zhonglai Qian in Journal of International Medical Research
Acknowledgements
The authors thank all of the patients involved in this study.
Footnotes
Author contributions: K.W.C. and Z.L.Q. designed the study and performed the clinical diagnosis and treatment; X.H. wrote the manuscript; J.X.Z., H.L. and X.H. collected the patient information; Y.H.G. provided help in writing the manuscript.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Funding: The authors disclose receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (grant no. 82272542) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (grant no. BK20220095).
ORCID iD: Xi Hua https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3659-1688
References
- 1.Eastwood DM, Gregg PJ, Atkins RM. Intra-articular fractures of the calcaneum. Part I: Pathological anatomy and classification. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993; 75: 183–138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Potter MQ, Nunley JA. Long-term functional outcomes after operative treatment for intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91: 1854–1860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hirschmann A, Walter WR, Alaia EF, et al. Acute Fracture of the Anterior Process of Calcaneus: Does It Herald a More Advanced Injury to Chopart Joint? AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018; 210: 1123–1130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Massen FK, Baumbach SF, Herterich V, et al. Fractures to the anterior process of the calcaneus – Clinical results following functional treatment. Injury 2019; 50: 1781–1786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rammelt S, Zwipp H. Calcaneus fractures: facts, controversies and recent developments. Injury 2004; 35: 443–461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wang ZJ, Huang XL, Chu YC, et al. Applied anatomy of the calcaneocuboid articular surface for internal fixation of calcaneal fractures. Injury 2013; 44: 1428–1430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cibura C, Lülsdorff R, Ramczykowski T, et al. Introduction of a modified Degan classification to specify treatment algorithms in fractures of the anterior process of the calcaneus. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23: 942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fascione F, Di Mauro M, Guelfi M, et al. Surgical treatment of displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures by a minimally invasive technique using a locking nail: A preliminary study. Foot Ankle Surg 2019; 25: 679–683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kir MC, Ayanoglu S, Cabuk H, et al. Mini-plate fixation via sinus tarsi approach is superior to cannulated screw in intra-articular calcaneal fractures: A prospective randomized study. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2018; 26: 2309499018792742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Rammelt S, Amlang M, Barthel S, et al. Percutaneous treatment of less severe intraarticular calcaneal fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468: 983–990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chen J, Yang Z, Kong C, et al. Minimally invasive dual incision with mini plate internal fixation improves outcomes over 30 months in 20 patients with Sanders type III calcaneal fractures. J Orthop Surg Res 2020; 15: 167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cullen SE, Khan A, Park C, et al. Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of a Calcaneal Anterior Process Fracture Using a Locking Plate. Cureus 2021; 13: e18519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Degan TJ, Morrey BF, Braun DP. Surgical excision for anterior-process fractures of the calcaneus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982; 64: 519–524. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dhinsa BS, Latif A, Walker R, et al. Fractures of the anterior process of the calcaneum; a review and proposed treatment algorithm. Foot Ankle Surg 2019; 25: 258.–. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Halm JA, Schepers T. Resection of Small Avulsion Fractures of the Anterior Process of the Calcaneus for Refractory Complaints. J Foot Ankle Surg 2017; 56: 135–141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ochman S, Evers J, Raschke MJ. Fractures of the anterior process of the calcaneus. Oper Orthop Traumatol 2013; 25: 579–591 [Article in German, English abstract]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Amlang M, Zwipp H, Pompach M, et al. Interlocking Nail Fixation for the Treatment of Displaced Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures. JBJS Essent Surg Tech 2017; 7: e33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ding L, He Z, Xiao H, et al. Risk factors for postoperative wound complications of calcaneal fractures following plate fixation. Foot Ankle Int 2013; 34: 1238–1244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Epstein N, Chandran S, Chou L. Current concepts review: intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus. Foot Ankle Int 2012; 33: 79–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Griffin D, Parsons N, Shaw E, et al. Operative versus non-operative treatment for closed, displaced, intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2014; 349: g4483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Long C, Fang Y, Huang FG, et al. Sanders II-III calcaneal fractures fixed with locking plate in elderly patients. Chin J Traumatol 2016; 19: 164–167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Takasaka M, Bittar CK, Mennucci FS, et al. Comparative study on three surgical techniques for intra-articular calcaneal fractures: open reduction with internal fixation using a plate, external fixation and minimally invasive surgery. Rev Bras Ortop 2016; 51: 254–260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Trnka HJ, Zettl R, Ritschl P. Fracture of the anterior superior process of the calcaneus: an often misdiagnosed fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1998; 117: 300–302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of. Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med 2007; 147: 573–577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gibbons L, Cunningham P. Anterior process of the Calcaneum – Not to be missed. Int Emerg Nurs 2017; 30: 36–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Massen FK, Baumbach SF, Böcker W, et al. Fractures of the anterior process of the calcaneus – frequently overlooked injuries following ankle sprains. Unfallchirurg 2018; 121: 730–738 [Article in German, English abstract]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Meinberg EG, Agel J, Roberts CS, et al. Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium-2018. J Orthop Trauma 2018; 32: S1–S170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Essex-Lopresti P. The mechanism, reduction technique, and results in fractures of the os calcis. Br J Surg 1952; 39: 395–419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sanders R, Fortin P, DiPasquale T, et al. Operative treatment in 120 displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures. Results using a prognostic computed tomography scan classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993; 290: 87–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Christopher F. Fracture of the anterior process of the calcaneus. J Bone Joint Surg 1931; 13: 877–879. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Schepers T, Ginai AZ, Van Lieshout EM, et al. Demographics of extra-articular calcaneal fractures: including a review of the literature on treatment and outcome. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2008; 128: 1099–1106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lui TH. Endoscopic excision of symptomatic nonunion of anterior calcaneal process. J Foot Ankle Surg 2011; 50: 476–479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Dayton P, Feilmeier M, Hensley NL. Technique for minimally invasive reduction of calcaneal fractures using small bilateral external fixation. J Foot Ankle Surg 2014; 53: 376–382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Peng Y, Liu J, Zhang G, et al. Reduction and functional outcome of open reduction plate fixation versus minimally invasive reduction with percutaneous screw fixation for displaced calcaneus fracture: a retrospective study. J Orthop Surg Res 2019; 14: 124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tomesen T, Biert J, Frolke JP. Treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures with closed reduction and percutaneous screw fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93: 920–928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Vicenti G, Solarino G, Caizzi G, et al. Balloon-assisted reduction, pin fixation and tricalcium phosphate augmentation for calcaneal fracture: A retrospective analysis of 42 patients. Injury 2018; 49: S94–S99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Fan B, Zhou X, Wei Z, et al. Cannulated screw fixation and plate fixation for displaced intra-articular calcaneus fracture: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg 2016; 34: 64–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kim SH, Kim JS, Young KW, et al. Surgical Excision of Symptomatic Non United Fragment of Anterior Process Fractures of the Calcaneus. Korean J Sports Med 2012; 30: 34–40. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Yeap EJ, Rao J, Pan CH, et al. Is arthroscopic assisted percutaneous screw fixation as good as open reduction and internal fixation for the treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures? Foot Ankle Surg 2016; 22: 164–169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.SooHoo NF, Shuler M, Fleming LL. Evaluation of the Validity of the AOFAS Clinical Rating Systems by Correlation to the SF-36. Foot Ankle Int 2003; 24: 50–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sanders R, Vaupel ZM, Erdogan M, et al. Operative treatment of displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures: long-term (10–20 Years) results in 108 fractures using a prognostic CT classification. J Orthop Trauma 2014; 28: 551–563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hyer CF, Atway S, Berlet GC, et al. Early weight bearing of calcaneal fractures fixated with locked plates: a radiographic review. Foot Ankle Spec 2010; 3: 320–323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Talarico LM, Vito GR, Zyryanov SY. Management of displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures by using external ring fixation, minimally invasive open reduction, and early weightbearing. J Foot Ankle Surg 2004; 43: 43–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Research Data for Comparison of two surgical strategies for fractures of the anterior process of the calcaneus with or without bridging plate fixation by Xi Hua, Junxin Zhang, Hao Liu, Yuehong Guan, Kangwu Chen and Zhonglai Qian in Journal of International Medical Research


