Skip to main content
BMC Medical Education logoLink to BMC Medical Education
. 2023 Mar 2;23:140. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04128-0

Correction: Content and strength of conflict of interest policies at scandinavian medical schools: a cross sectional study

Alice Fabbri 1,2,, Shai Mulinari 3, Martin Johansson 4,5, Weda Ghaur 6, Abdullah Muhammad Khalil 7, Andreas Lundh 8,9,10
PMCID: PMC9983203  PMID: 36864431

Correction To: BMC Medical Education (2022) 22:812

10.1186/s12909-022-03881-y.

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors informed us that due to an error while merging the data, Table 1 includes some inaccurate data. Please find below the amended version of the table. To reflect these changes, one sentence of the results section should be amended.

Previous version: “On average, Norwegian schools had stricter policies (mean score: 0.9) followed by Sweden (mean score: 0.7) and Denmark (mean score: 0.5)”.

Amended version: “On average, Norwegian schools had stricter policies (mean score: 0.8) followed by Sweden (mean score: 0.7) and Denmark (mean score: 0.5)”.

Table 1.

Number of medical schools with policies for each item and strength of the policy

Country DENMARK
(n = 4)
NORWAY
(n = 4)
SWEDEN
(n = 7)
TOTAL
(n = 15)
Items No. of schools with no or permissive policy (score = 0) No. of schools with moderate policy (score = 1) No. of schools with restrictive policy
(score = 2)
No. of schools with no or permissive policy (score = 0) No. of schools with moderate policy (score = 1) No. of schools with restrictive policy (score = 2) No. of schools with no or permissive policy (score = 0) No. of schools with moderate policy (score = 1) No. of schools with restrictive policy (score = 2) No. of schools with no or permissive policy (score = 0) No. of schools with moderate policy (score = 1) No. of schools with restrictive policy (score = 2)
1.Gifts 1 3 0 0 3 1 0 7 0 1 13 1
2.Consulting 1 0 3 0 2 2 0 7 0 1 9 5
3.Speaking 4 0 0 2 2 0 0 7 0 6 9 0
4.Honoraria 3 1 0 0 2 2 0 1 6 3 4 8
5.Ghostwriting 2 0 2 3 1 0 4 1 2 9 2 4
6.Disclosure 0 4 0 0 2 2 0 7 0 0 13 2
7.Sales representatives 4 0 0 2 2 0 7 0 0 13 2 0
8.On-site education 3 1 0 3 1 0 5 2 0 11 4 0
9.Travel or off-site events 2 1 1 1 0 3 0 7 0 3 8 4
10.Medical school curriculum 4 0 0 3 1 0 6 1 0 13 2 0
11.Samples 4 0 0 3 1 0 7 0 0 14 1 0
Mean item score* 0.5 0.8 0.7 0.7
Enforcement of policies
No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes
Oversight 1 3 1 3 0 7 2 13
Sanctions 1 3 1 3 0 7 2 13

* Calculated as the sum of the scores divided by number of items (i.e., 11) and number of institutions.

Footnotes

The online version of the original article can be found at 10.1186/s12909-022-03881-y.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Fabbri, et al. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22812. 10.1186/s12909-022-03881-y.

Articles from BMC Medical Education are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES