Abstract
The purpose of this article is to see how machine learning (ML) algorithms and applications are used in the COVID-19 inquiry and for other purposes. The available traditional methods for COVID-19 international epidemic prediction, researchers and authorities have given more attention to simple statistical and epidemiological methodologies. The inadequacy and absence of medical testing for diagnosing and identifying a solution is one of the key challenges in preventing the spread of COVID-19. A few statistical-based improvements are being strengthened to answer this challenge, resulting in a partial resolution up to a certain level. ML have advocated a wide range of intelligence-based approaches, frameworks, and equipment to cope with the issues of the medical industry. The application of inventive structure, such as ML and other in handling COVID-19 relevant outbreak difficulties, has been investigated in this article. The major goal of this article is to 1) Examining the impact of the data type and data nature, as well as obstacles in data processing for COVID-19. 2) Better grasp the importance of intelligent approaches like ML for the COVID-19 pandemic. 3) The development of improved ML algorithms and types of ML for COVID-19 prognosis. 4) Examining the effectiveness and influence of various strategies in COVID-19 pandemic. 5) To target on certain potential issues in COVID-19 diagnosis in order to motivate academics to innovate and expand their knowledge and research into additional COVID-19-affected industries.
Keywords: COVID-19, intelligent system, machine learning (ML), mathematical model, ML tasks
Abbreviations
- ML
Machine learning.
- COV
Corona virus.
- IBV
Infectious bronchitis virus.
- HCOVs
Human corona viruses.
- RT-PCR
Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.
- AI
Artificial intelligence.
- LCT
Lung computed tomography.
- RL
Reinforcement learning.
- CNN
Convolutional neural networks.
- BOW
Bag of words.
- IDF
Inverse document frequency.
- TF
Term frequency.
- PDR
Partial derivative regression.
- NML
Nonlinear machine learning.
- CHFS
Composite hybrid feature extraction.
- GA
Genetic algorithm.
- KNN
K-nearest neighbor.
- LR
Logistics regression.
- MEWS
Modified early warning score.
- NB
Naive Bayes.
- LiR
Linear regression.
- ANFIS
Adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system.
- MLP-ICA
Multi layered perceptron-imperialist competitive algorithm.
- SVR
Support vector regression.
- PLR
Polynomial regression.
- LASSO
Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator.
- STS
Semantic textual similarity.
- VAR
Vector autoregression.
- UL
Unlabeled.
- MLP
Multilayer perceptron.
- STS
Semantic textual similarity.
I. Introduction
Corona virus is a genus of viruses, which infect animals, birds, and cause sickness. The term “corona” derives from the Latin word “corona,” that means “crown,” and alludes to the virus's outer spikes, which are club-shaped and crown-like. Corona viruses are large and live in close proximity to positive-strand ribonucleic acid (RNA) viruses. Corona virus (COV) is a member of the corona viridae family and belongs to the Ortho corona virinae subfamily. Corona viruses are classified into four generation: alpha, beta, gamma, and delta COVs, with alpha and beta COVs infecting mammals and gamma and delta COVs infecting birds, respectively [1]. COV was discovered in the late 1930s after a severe respiration virus in farm chickens was found with the infectious bronchitis virus to be infected [2]. After that in 1960s human corona viruses (HCOVs) was discovered. HCOVs can be transmitted to humans through respiratory tract infections that range from minor to fatal. Whereas a moderate illness is defined as a few cases of a common cold, a lethal infection is defined as severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) or middle east respiratory syndrome (MERS). Both SARS and MERS are Beta COVs, which cause a deadly and contagious respiratory disease. In December 2019, another pathogenic HCOV was discovered in Wuhan, China [3] and identified as a novel corona virus injury. With a population of almost 11 million people, Wuhan is the most important transportation hub [4]. The wild animal market in Wuhan is famous for selling bats, snakes, marmots, chickens, and other live animals, and most of the patients were discovered there before December. A total of 44 cases of pneumonia with an unknown cause were reported in Wuhan between December 31, 2019 to January 3, 2020. During the informed era, the cause of the virus was unknown. However, on January 7, 2020, WHO and the government of China detected the novel corona virus (November 2019), which is a member of the SARS virus family [5]. After January 17, 2020, Ncov- 2019 was swiftly expanded in China's major cities, covering over 7000 cases. As a result, the government of China has taken severe efforts to prevent the spread of this precarious virus from 23 to 2020, including experimentally delaying publicly transit, issuing warnings to inhabitants not to leave their homes, and isolating the biggest afflicted cities. The WHO recognized the disease on January 30, 2020, as the new COVID-19 has spread to 18 nations via person-to-person transmission. As per available data from www.worldometer.com, COVID-19 has impacted 32 118 316 people worldwide as of September 24, 2020, and the WHO has labelled it a pandemic [6]–[8]. The United States has the most confirmed cases, with 7 139 553 persons worldwide affected. With 206 593 deaths, the death rate in the United States has risen. The sudden rise in active cases and death cases in the United States and India shocked the entire world. Similarly, many other nations, such as Brazil, India, Colombia, Russia, Spain, Peru, Mexico, Argentina, and Africa, are among the top ten countries that are badly affected by COVID-19, and their mortality and recovery rates are both high. Some of the statics shown in the following Figs. 1–3.
Similarly, in India, active cases have reached 3 11 05 270 patients, 30 300 762 patients have been recovered, and the death cases has been reached 4 13 640 by July 19, 2021. The statistics of total cases (TC), recovery rates (RR), death rate (DR), as well as Indian positive rate (PR) is shown in Fig. 4.
The lack of sufficient information on early-stage symptoms is a crucial factor in the spread of COVID-19. This has resulted in a situation where citizens are unaware that they are polluted and travel without understanding of disease transmission. As a result, the ubiquitous presence of COVID-19 necessitated the management of congested areas such as bus stops, airports, and train stations. It requires a variety of inspection tools, including thermal sensors, machine learning (ML) [9], and artificial intelligence (AI) [10]–[12]. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was one of the standard procedures for diagnosing COVID-19 [13].
Short sensitivity, as well as time, cannot meet the criteria of swiftly finding and elevating positive instances, and this has become one of RT-significant PCR's drawbacks. As an alternative to this obstacle, X-ray imaging and computer tomography can give a quick screening to detect the problem. ML has lately acquired prominence and is fast developing in resolving numerous challenges such as speech and object recognition, picture classification, and so on, because of the problem's complexity in improving epidemiologic techniques. In comparison to other issue domains, the COVID-19 with ML experiments have been increased dramatically in just two months. This highlights the importance of comprehending the disease's severe character, as well as the need for high-level research employing relevant intelligent computer technologies [14].
Throughout the last decade, the rapid expansion of digital approaches has played a significant role for solving different difficulties in the health sector, as well as illness prevention. The availability of digital machinery to adequately dealing with COVID-19 is also being tracked as a part of the present global health emergency. In the field of health care, the prognosis of a patient's outcome is still a difficult topic. Predicting and diagnosing diseases has become more easier as ML approaches have grown in popularity. Self-learning ML can learn from machines and generate accurate predictions. ML has successfully predicted several diseases, including hepatitis [15], human immunodeficiency virus HIV [16], Ebola virus [17], and others. ML has also been used to combine and analyze large amounts of data from COVID-19 patients. To identify the affected individuals with personalized features, several ML algorithms are used. The success of ML is determined by the data visualization used.
Although ML has demonstrated its effectiveness in identifying diseases, gathering data, organizing health records, and so on, a few systematic models based on Ml have yet to be implemented due to a number of challenges, including a lack of identifying tools, a lack of medical tools, the use of biomedical data, heterogeneity, and so on. To address these issues, feature engineering has progressed by utilizing human inventiveness. However, several health philosophies that are consumed in the generalization of information have expounded on these shortcomings. It is possible that some health sector works will need to be suggested in unique ways. This issue could be overcome by using the ad hoc technique to illustrate the health composition. Nonetheless, supervised models are unable to forecast the most recent prototypes. Nonetheless, extracting relevant data while building predictors can be simple with representation learning [18].
The pandemic's quick spread has resulted in major health-care difficulties, necessitating immediate responses to mitigate the effects. In dealing with the problem, AI has a wide range of applications [19]. COVID-19 is a worldwide pandemic disease, which has presented a threat to human existence. In systematic reviews, ML training methods and other statistical modeling are used by computers to complete many tasks without precise commands were discovered [20]. ML approach are currently employed for prognosis all around the world due to their accuracy. Ml approaches, on the other hand, face a number of obstacles, such as the new internet database's poor quality. One of the issues in training a model or selecting the optimal ML model for prediction, for example, is determining the suitable parameters. To produce predictions based on the available dataset, researchers utilized the better Ml approach, which is fit in the database [21]. Most of the ML technique could be used for data analytics and for extracting hidden patterns [22]. ML techniques are meant to find complicated patterns and interfaces in data when there are unknown and sophisticated risk factor correlation patterns [23].
The rest of this article is organized as follows. Section II describes the associated work done related to COVID-19. Section III describes the different approaches of ML. ML methodology used for COVID-19 briefly explained in Section IV. Article selection strategy and a search method for the literature describes in Section V. Different ML approach for COVID-19 explain in Section VI-I. COVID-19 data processing challenges using intelligent computing approaches describes in Section VII. Discussion and implications explained in Section VIII. Limitations and future scope are described in Section IX. Finally, Section X concludes this article.
II. Associated Work
The COVID-19 virus, which is produced by the SARS-COV-2 viruses, which is require remarkable return of unique strength and competence in above 250 nations throughout the universe. During the first four months of the pandemic, the number of people influenced fluctuated from 2 to 20 million, with 250 000 deaths. All governments around the world took severe efforts to limited the rapid spreading of the COVID-19 illness among individuals, including placing more than 100 of millions of people under quarantine [24]. All of these attempts, however, are limited due to the difficulty in distinguishing between positive and negative people available symptoms of COVID-19. As a result, SARS–CoV-2 viral detection tests are thought to be critical in identifying positive cases of infection and restricting the virus's transmission [25]. The most useful and critical modalities for diagnosing the COVID-19 stage and potential dangers to the patient's lungs are radiology and imaging, notably a chest CT scan [26]. To limit person-to-person transference and improve patient care, COVID-19 must be discovered early. Separation and quarantine of healthy persons from diseased or suspected COVID-19 carriers has recently been discovered to be the most effective technique of preventing COVID-19 transmission [27]. The role of ML techniques in COVID-19 diagnosis revealed important insights, such as whether a lung computed tomography scan is used as a first alternative or screening testing for actual reversed transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR), and the dissimilarity between COVID-19 pneumonitis as wee as other viral pneumonitis used a computed tomography scan of the lungs [28].
III. Approaches of ML
ML is the best rising technique for classification [29]. ML is a method for discovering previously unknown functions, relationships, or structures between input and output variables. Typically, explicit algorithms via automated learning processes have a hard time detecting these relationships [30]. ML algorithms are used to forecast the number of confirmed illnesses and deaths in the next months [31]. There are two parts to ML. The first section employs a genetic algorithm to determine the best weight of database fusion of different node perception outcomes and delete impractical nodes, while the second employs a fault identification neural network to find fault nodes [32].
ML is a branch of AI that includes supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement learning [33]. Common ML models including clustering, classification, dimensionality reduction, regression, reward maximization, and anomaly detection [34].
In the supervised learning paradigm, ML algorithms are trained on labelled datasets, which means that each input has a ground-truth output (continuous or discrete). On the other hand, there is no ground-truth output in unlabeled [35], and the algorithm usually aim to discovered patterns in the dataset. Aim of Reinforcement to improve the cumulative reward, which is most suitable for successive decision-making issues [36]. Unsupervised learning, as shown in Fig. 5, involves clustering analysis and dimensional reduction, whereas supervised learning considers regression and classification. Classification and control are also a part of RL.
A. ML for COVID-19
Recently, three independent perspectives on work on edge detection and computing of (COVID-19) cases have been published. Among the perspectives of view are machine-learning algorithms that recognize (COVID-19) instances (see Table I). ML algorithms for activity recognition and edge computing approaches are examples of imaging processes that can inspire ML approaches, which can assist radiologists in analyzing composite imaging and texture dataset.
TABLE I. Paper Selection Process and Search Strategy.
Different Source | Total Search Query | Applying the selection standard | Total quality evaluation | Total full article reading |
---|---|---|---|---|
IEEE Xplore | 45 | 23 | 20 | 3 |
Elsevier | 206 | 135 | 124 | 11 |
Plos One | 97 | 68 | 65 | 3 |
Springer | 123 | 87 | 82 | 5 |
Science Direct | 265 | 168 | 164 | 4 |
Taylor and Francis | 58 | 38 | 36 | 2 |
Wiley | 36 | 23 | 20 | 3 |
OMIC | 128 | 65 | 63 | 2 |
Hindawi | 148 | 72 | 70 | 2 |
MDPI | 26 | 13 | 11 | 2 |
Total | 1132 | 692 | 655 | 37 |
For the innovative COVID-19, there are different model, which are capable of analyzing medical imaging and distinguishing COVID-19 [37]. ML is one of best technologies that has been successfully considered to a variety of medical fields for the detection of the new evaluation, diagnosis, genotype phenotype associations, prognosis, sickness classification, transcriptome, and death ratio minimization.
The approach of automatic categorization of COVID-19 may be employed by analyzing universal attributes extraction structure of ML to build the more accurate feature, which is a critical model of learning. Convolutional neural networks (CNN), DenseNet, MobileNet, ResNet, Xception, InceptionResNetV2, InceptionV3, NASNet, and VGGNet were picked from a range of deep CNN. The categorization was subsequently accomplished by feeding the collected features into various Ml classifiers, which identified them as COVID-19 or other illnesses cases [35].
Progressive ML algorithms can integrate and evaluate a large amount of data from COVID-19 patients to provide the best understanding of the viral spread pattern, improve diagnostic accuracy, develop new and effective treatment options, and even identify people at chance of the disease based on physiological and genetic characteristics [38]. The prediction of future COVID-19 cases detail analysis using AI, ML, and DL summarize and the authors concluded that AI, ML as well as DL are the key technologies, which can help healthcare organizations to support decision making in real-time to control the spread of the pandemic [104].
IV. Article Selection and a Search Method for the Literature
ML, deep learning, and other intelligent systems have been employed practically everywhere in the world. Many research articles are being conducted with the assistance of these intelligent systems on a daily basis, and various publications are being published in reputable web databases. These intelligent systems, particularly ML and DL, are used in a variety of applications including IoT, healthcare, and cyber physical systems. Following the discovery of a pandemic COVID-19 ebullition in China (Wuhan) in December 2019, the importance of these intelligent technologies in resolving COVID-19 issues has risen dramatically. Since its acknowledgment, a growing number of research projects have been launched on a daily basis. Using these criteria as inspiration, an examination of the degrees of use of ML approach for solving COVID-19 methodology is presented in this article.
We employed an exclusive article searching approach for papers gathering to accomplish this. Keywords “ML technique for COVID-19” have been searched on dissimilar sources such as IEEE Xplore, Elsevier, Google Scholar, Springer, and another database. Fig. 6 depicts the technique for finding papers. Many papers connected to COVID-19 can be located using a keyword search. We only examined publications relating to ML techniques because our focus is on ML approaches. For filtering papers, we employed both inclusion and exclusion strategies.
Inclusion the following are the procedures for filtering papers relevant to COVID-19.
-
1)
Papers relating to ML methods used to solve COVID-19 challenges will be considered.
-
2)
Papers on COVID-19 news, practice guidelines, datasets, biological processes, and other topics are being considered.
Also examined are the following exclusion procedures for refine research papers relevant to COVID-19.
-
1)
COVID-19 related papers or abstract but not accessible.
-
2)
COVID-19 papers have been published in survey reports, reviews, and other venues.
-
3)
Papers, which are not relevant to COVID-19.
All publications that are necessary to employ in this article are considered once these inclusion and exclusion processes have been applied. For the final analysis, a total of 81 papers were considered. Out of the 81 papers, 37 are ML related, and the remaining 44 are unrelated. These 81 publications were culled from a variety of sources, such as IEEE explorer, Elsevier, science direct, Springer, MDPI, Wiley, Taylor and Francis, Hindawi, Google Scholar, Plos One, OMIC, and others. The dataset utilized, method employed, as an input type of text as well as image is used, anticipated outcomes, and utilization levels are all retrieved from each publication examined for the review. According to the exclusion and inclusion criteria, the total number of research was limited to (1132) papers from all databases. The constraint involves considering the research publication of the year (2019–2021), the article types original papers published as journal articles in english only. The publications are organized by author name, year of publication, country, dataset used, method employed, and end results in (see Table II).
TABLE II. (Continued.).
S. No. | Author | Country | Datasets used | Methods applied | Task and Algorithm used | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Khanday et al. [38] | India | 212 reports by GitHub | ML algorithm | Logistic regression, Naive Bayes and classification used | According to the study, logistic regressions and multinomial Nia"ve Bayes are 96% more accurate than commonly used algorithms. |
2 | Burdick et al. [39] | USA | 197 patients of United States health systems | Support vector Kuhntucker model | Logistic regression, classification | Their findings revealed that this algorithm has a higher diagnostic odds ratio (12.58) for anticipating ventilation and effectively triaging patients than a comparator early warning system, such as the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS), which had (0.78) sensitivity, whereas this algorithm had (0.90) sensitivity, resulting in higher specificity (p 0.05), It also indicates that it is capable of accurately identifying 16% more patients than a commonly used scoring method, resulting in fewer false positive findings. |
3 | Varun et al. [40] | USA | Total reported cases are 184 319 | ML algorithm | Convolutional neural networks, classifications | In response to the crisis, New York City's medical and academic centres issued a call to action to AI researchers to leverage their electronic medical record data to better understand SARS-COV-2 patients. Due to a shortage of ventilators and a reported need for a quick and accurate method of triaging patients at risk for respiratory failure, our goal was to develop a machine-learning algorithm for frontline physicians in the emergency department and inpatient floors to better risk-assess patients and predict who would require intubation and mechanical ventilation. |
4 | Luca et al. [41] | Italy | 85 dataset of chest X-rays | ML algorithm | K-nearest neighbors’ classifier | Authors present a method for automatically detecting COVID-19 disease by analyzing medical photos in this publication. We use supervised ML methods to develop a model using 85 chest X-rays that are freely available for research reasons. The experiment demonstrates that the proposed technique is efficient in distinguishing between COVID-19 disease and other lung diseases. |
5 | Constantin et al. [42] | Germany | 500 chest CTs dataset and 152 datasets of COVID-19 patients | Support vector Kuhntucker model | Convolutional neural network, classifications | The researchers discovered that combining ML with a clinically embedded software platform allowing for speedier development, deployment, and adoption in medical practise. Finally, they developed a fully automated lung segmentation and opacity measurement approach that was ready for medical usage and performed at human levels even in difficult situations in just ten days. |
6 | Lamiaa et al. [43] | Egypt | 5000 cases of COVID-19 | ML algorithm | Linear regression model | The results demonstrated that the specified models, such as exponential, 4, 5, and 6 degree polynomial regression models, are brilliant, especially the 4 degree model, which will aid the government in planning operations for one month. They also included a well-known log that will rise through the regression model, resulting in the epidemic peak and end in 2020. There is also a final report on the total number of COVID-19 patients. |
7 | Dan et al. [44] | Israel | Total 6995 patients in Sheba Medical Centre | Support vector Kuhntucker model | Artificial neural network and classifications | The most relevant variables in the models were the APACHE II score, white blood cell count, time from onset of symptoms to admission, oxygen saturation, and blood lymphocytes count. Machine-learning algorithms exhibited excellent efficacy in predicting significant COVID-19 when compared to the most effective strategies available. As a result, artificial intelligence might be utilised to accurately predict COVID-19 patient risk, enhance patient triage and in hospital allocation, better prioritise medical resources and improve overall COVID-19 pandemic management. |
8 | Joep et al. [45] | Netherlands | Total 319 patients | Gradient Boosting algorithm | Logistic regression and classification | The CO-RADS scoring system on chest CT provides a sensitive and specific approach for diagnosing COVID-19, especially if RT–PCR testing are rare during an outbreak. Combining a predictive machine-learning model with diagnostic chest CT for COVID-19 could increase accuracy even more. To improve the model, they look into more possible predictors. However, because up to 9% of RT–PCR positive patients are not diagnosed by chest CT or our ML model, RT–PCR should remain the gold standard of testing. |
9 | Christopher et al. [46] | Germany | Total 368 independent variables | ML algorithm | Naive Bayes and Classifications | They mainly focused on variables and factors that increasing COVID-19 incidence in Germany, using the multimethod ESDA technique, which also provides an appropriate insight into spatial and spatial nonstationaries of COVID-19 occurrence. Variables like infrastructure, built environment densities, and socioeconomic factors all showed a link with COVID-19 after being examined on a county level in Germany. Their findings suggest that avoiding needless travel and social isolation can be effective approaches to limit contamination. |
10 | Hoyt et al. [47] | U.S. | Total 290 patients | Support vector Kuhntucker model | Logistic Regression and Classification | In the entire population, the findings revealed no link between mortality and therapy, although hydroxychloroquine was connected to a statistically significant (p = 0.011) improvement in survival, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.29 and a CI of 0.11–0.75. Despite the fact that the algorithm predicted an adjusted survival of 82.6% in the treated group and 51.2% in the untreated group, the algorithm detected a 31% improvement in the COVID-19 population after ML applications, demonstrating the critical role of ML in medicine. |
11 | María et al. [48] | International | Food for each of the 170 countries | ML algorithm | K-means clustering | According to the data, countries with the highest death rates consume more fats, whereas those with the lowest death rates consume more grains and have a lower overall average calorie intake. |
12 | Shinwoo et al. [49] | USA | Toal 790 Korean immigrants | ML algorithm | Artificial neural network, classifications | Artificial neural network (ANN) analysis, a statistical model capable of investigating complex nonlinear interactions of variables, was applied. The algorithm has properly predicted a person's flexibility, familiarity with everyday discernments, and racial actions toward Asians in the United States since the beginning of the COVID-19 epidemic, offering critical advice for public health. practitioners |
13 | Yigrem et al. [50] | Southern Ethiopia | Total 244 samples | ML algorithm | Logistic regression, classification | More than half of the study participants reported coronavirus disease-related stress, showing that there is a strong association between COVID-19-related stress and health-care employees. |
14 | Abolfazl et al. [51] | USA. | Total database of 57 candidate from the US Centres for Disease and Control and Johns Hopkins University | ML algorithm | ANN, classification | According to Getis-Ord Gi, the results showed that the supplied model (logistic regression) demonstrated that these components and factors define the presence/absence of the COVID-19 hotspot in a geographic information system (p 0.05). As a result, the findings were useful in identifying the impact of potential risk variables connected to COVID-19 for public health decision-makers. |
15 | Rustam et al. [52] | Pakistan | Time series COVID-19 database | LR, LASSO, SVM, ER | Texture data are used as input and supervised learning such as linear regression, LASSO Regression, support vector machine, exponential smoothing used | ES outperforms all other models, followed by LR and LASSO, which are also good at projecting new confirmed instances. |
16 | Sharma [53] | India | CT Image database | Residual neural network | Image data are used as input and custom vision software of Microsoft azure based on ML techniques is used | 91% accuracy achieved |
Peng, Nagata [54] | Brazil | various countries COVID-19 data | Support Vector Regression (SVR) | Text data are used as input and support vector regression and kernel functions used | It is clear that caution is required when using ML. | |
17 | Ardabili et al. [55] | Germany | 5 countries COVID data | MLP, ANFIS | Time-series data as an input and genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization and supervised learning algorithm is used | High generalization |
18 | Nemati et al. [56] | USA | 1182 hospitalized patients COVID-19 dataset | SVM | Text data are used as input | Significant results have been achieved in predicting recovery time |
19 | Sun et al. [57] | USA | COVID-19 patients’ data of Massachusetts, Georgia, and New Jersey | Gradient boosting algorithm | Texture data are used as input | Better prediction rate |
20 | Burdick et al. [58] | USA | COVID-19 Patient Dataset | ML algorithm | Text data are used as input and ML and MEWS used | Good prediction rate |
21 | Kavadi et al. [59] | India | Indian COVID-19 Dataset | Support vector Kuhntucker model | Text data are used as input and propose a partial derivative regression and nonlinear ML (PDR-NML) method is used | Better prediction rate |
22 | Banerjee et al. [60] | U.K. | D-19 data from Midstream | ANN | Text data are used as input | A higher rate of infection detection prediction is attained. |
23 | Wang et al. [61] | China | COVID-19 Data | Logistic model + prophet method | Time-series data as an input and Fb Prophet model used | Good prediction rate |
24 | Han et al. [62] | China | CT datasets | AD3D-MIL algorithm (A Deep 3D-Multiple Instance Learning) | Image data are used as input and attention-based deep 3-D multiple instance learning (AD3D-MIL) is used | An accuracy of 97.9% is obtained |
25 | Vaid et al. [63] | Canada | JHU CSSE database | developed a ML model to uncover hidden patterns based on reported cases and to predict potential infections. | Text data are used as input | Good prediction rate |
26 | Elaziz et al. [64] | Egypt | Two chest X-ray COVID-19 dataset | KNN +Manta-Ray Foraging Optimization | Image data are used as input and CNN used | For two datasets, accuracy of 96.09% and 98.09% was obtained. |
27 | Ahamad et al. [65] | Bangladesh | Patient COVID-19 data | Extreme Gradient Boosting, Decision Tree, RF, SVM, Gradient Boosting Machine | Text data are used as input and Random Forest, XGBoost, Gradient Boosting Machine and SVM is used | XGB outperformed other proposed methods |
28 | Brinati et al. [66] Hasan [67] | Italy | time series COVID-19 dataset | Ensemble empirical mode | Text data are used as input and support vector machines and random forest algorithm used | Better prediction rate |
Wuhan | Decomposition (EEMD) + ANN) | |||||
29 | Farid et al. [68] | Egypt | CT images COVID-19 dataset | SVM, NB, CNN, RF, as well as JRIP | Image data are used as input and Composite hybrid feature extraction (CHFS) used | The proposed CHFS has a higher prediction rate than CNN. |
30 | Shaban et al. [69] | Egypt | CT images COVID-19 dataset | Enhanced KNN | Image data are used as input and Genetic Algorithm (GA) and KNN classifier is used | Good detection rate |
31 | Ou et al. [70] | China | Pandemic COVID-19 data | Neural network | Text data are used as input and support vector machines and RF algorithm used | Good identification rate |
32 | Samuel et al. [71] | USA | COVID-19 dataset | LR, Naive Bayes (NB), Linear regression (LiR), KNN | Text data are used as input and logistics regression (LR) and KNN is used | NB outperformed other techniques |
33 | Pinter et al. [72] | Germany | COVID-19 dataset of Hungary data | Adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system and Multilayered perceptron-imperialist competitive algorithm | Text data are used as input and adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system and multilayered perceptron-imperialist competitive algorithm are used | Good prediction rate |
34 | Carrillo-Larco and Castillo-Cara. [73] | U.K. | COVID-19 patients’ data | K-Means algorithm | Text data are used as input and unsupervised ML used | Better classification rate |
35 | Benıtez-Pena et al. [74] | Spain | patients’ COVID-19 data | RF and Support Vector Regression (SVR) | Text data are used as input | High prediction rate |
36 | Zhong et al. [75] | China | patient COVID-19 blood sample data | SVM, KNN, RF, LR | Text data are used as input | Better severity detection |
37 | Yadav et al. [76] | India | COVID-19 Synthetic dataset | SVR | Text data are used as input and support vector regression (SVR) is used | Polynomial regression, SVR outperformed LiR, |
38 | Chang et al. [101] | Australia | COVID-19 dataset | ABM approach | Australian Census-based epidemic model | Agent based modelling using a fine-grained computational simulation applied |
39 | Zhang et al. [102] | Africa | Africa CDC dataset | PHSM data (Oxford COVID-19 Government response tracker dataset) | Text data are used as input | Descriptive analyses were done to establish the different cases |
40 | Andrikopoulos and Greg [103] | Australia | COVID-19 dataset | Australian Centre for behavioral research in diabetes, diabetes Australia adapted a resource developed | Text data are used as input | It is clear that people with diabetes are at greater risk of serious health impacts in pandemics such as COVID-19 than people without diabetes |
TABLE II. (Continued.).
S. No. | Author | Country | Datasets used | Methods applied | Task and Algorithm used | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Khanday et al. [38] | India | 212 reports by GitHub | ML algorithm | Logistic regression, Naive Bayes and classification used | According to the study, logistic regressions and multinomial Nia"ve Bayes are 96% more accurate than commonly used algorithms. |
2 | Burdick et al. [39] | USA | 197 patients of United States health systems | Support vector Kuhntucker model | Logistic regression, classification | Their findings revealed that this algorithm has a higher diagnostic odds ratio (12.58) for anticipating ventilation and effectively triaging patients than a comparator early warning system, such as the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS), which had (0.78) sensitivity, whereas this algorithm had (0.90) sensitivity, resulting in higher specificity (p 0.05), It also indicates that it is capable of accurately identifying 16% more patients than a commonly used scoring method, resulting in fewer false positive findings. |
3 | Varun et al. [40] | USA | Total reported cases are 184 319 | ML algorithm | Convolutional neural networks, classifications | In response to the crisis, New York City's medical and academic centres issued a call to action to AI researchers to leverage their electronic medical record data to better understand SARS-COV-2 patients. Due to a shortage of ventilators and a reported need for a quick and accurate method of triaging patients at risk for respiratory failure, our goal was to develop a machine-learning algorithm for frontline physicians in the emergency department and inpatient floors to better risk-assess patients and predict who would require intubation and mechanical ventilation. |
4 | Luca et al. [41] | Italy | 85 dataset of chest X-rays | ML algorithm | K-nearest neighbors’ classifier | Authors present a method for automatically detecting COVID-19 disease by analyzing medical photos in this publication. We use supervised ML methods to develop a model using 85 chest X-rays that are freely available for research reasons. The experiment demonstrates that the proposed technique is efficient in distinguishing between COVID-19 disease and other lung diseases. |
5 | Constantin et al. [42] | Germany | 500 chest CTs dataset and 152 datasets of COVID-19 patients | Support vector Kuhntucker model | Convolutional neural network, classifications | The researchers discovered that combining ML with a clinically embedded software platform allowing for speedier development, deployment, and adoption in medical practise. Finally, they developed a fully automated lung segmentation and opacity measurement approach that was ready for medical usage and performed at human levels even in difficult situations in just ten days. |
6 | Lamiaa et al. [43] | Egypt | 5000 cases of COVID-19 | ML algorithm | Linear regression model | The results demonstrated that the specified models, such as exponential, 4, 5, and 6 degree polynomial regression models, are brilliant, especially the 4 degree model, which will aid the government in planning operations for one month. They also included a well-known log that will rise through the regression model, resulting in the epidemic peak and end in 2020. There is also a final report on the total number of COVID-19 patients. |
7 | Dan et al. [44] | Israel | Total 6995 patients in Sheba Medical Centre | Support vector Kuhntucker model | Artificial neural network and classifications | The most relevant variables in the models were the APACHE II score, white blood cell count, time from onset of symptoms to admission, oxygen saturation, and blood lymphocytes count. Machine-learning algorithms exhibited excellent efficacy in predicting significant COVID-19 when compared to the most effective strategies available. As a result, artificial intelligence might be utilised to accurately predict COVID-19 patient risk, enhance patient triage and in hospital allocation, better prioritise medical resources and improve overall COVID-19 pandemic management. |
8 | Joep et al. [45] | Netherlands | Total 319 patients | Gradient Boosting algorithm | Logistic regression and classification | The CO-RADS scoring system on chest CT provides a sensitive and specific approach for diagnosing COVID-19, especially if RT–PCR testing are rare during an outbreak. Combining a predictive machine-learning model with diagnostic chest CT for COVID-19 could increase accuracy even more. To improve the model, they look into more possible predictors. However, because up to 9% of RT–PCR positive patients are not diagnosed by chest CT or our ML model, RT–PCR should remain the gold standard of testing. |
9 | Christopher et al. [46] | Germany | Total 368 independent variables | ML algorithm | Naive Bayes and Classifications | They mainly focused on variables and factors that increasing COVID-19 incidence in Germany, using the multimethod ESDA technique, which also provides an appropriate insight into spatial and spatial nonstationaries of COVID-19 occurrence. Variables like infrastructure, built environment densities, and socioeconomic factors all showed a link with COVID-19 after being examined on a county level in Germany. Their findings suggest that avoiding needless travel and social isolation can be effective approaches to limit contamination. |
10 | Hoyt et al. [47] | U.S. | Total 290 patients | Support vector Kuhntucker model | Logistic Regression and Classification | In the entire population, the findings revealed no link between mortality and therapy, although hydroxychloroquine was connected to a statistically significant (p = 0.011) improvement in survival, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.29 and a CI of 0.11–0.75. Despite the fact that the algorithm predicted an adjusted survival of 82.6% in the treated group and 51.2% in the untreated group, the algorithm detected a 31% improvement in the COVID-19 population after ML applications, demonstrating the critical role of ML in medicine. |
11 | María et al. [48] | International | Food for each of the 170 countries | ML algorithm | K-means clustering | According to the data, countries with the highest death rates consume more fats, whereas those with the lowest death rates consume more grains and have a lower overall average calorie intake. |
12 | Shinwoo et al. [49] | USA | Toal 790 Korean immigrants | ML algorithm | Artificial neural network, classifications | Artificial neural network (ANN) analysis, a statistical model capable of investigating complex nonlinear interactions of variables, was applied. The algorithm has properly predicted a person's flexibility, familiarity with everyday discernments, and racial actions toward Asians in the United States since the beginning of the COVID-19 epidemic, offering critical advice for public health. practitioners |
13 | Yigrem et al. [50] | Southern Ethiopia | Total 244 samples | ML algorithm | Logistic regression, classification | More than half of the study participants reported coronavirus disease-related stress, showing that there is a strong association between COVID-19-related stress and health-care employees. |
14 | Abolfazl et al. [51] | USA. | Total database of 57 candidate from the US Centres for Disease and Control and Johns Hopkins University | ML algorithm | ANN, classification | According to Getis-Ord Gi, the results showed that the supplied model (logistic regression) demonstrated that these components and factors define the presence/absence of the COVID-19 hotspot in a geographic information system (p 0.05). As a result, the findings were useful in identifying the impact of potential risk variables connected to COVID-19 for public health decision-makers. |
15 | Rustam et al. [52] | Pakistan | Time series COVID-19 database | LR, LASSO, SVM, ER | Texture data are used as input and supervised learning such as linear regression, LASSO Regression, support vector machine, exponential smoothing used | ES outperforms all other models, followed by LR and LASSO, which are also good at projecting new confirmed instances. |
16 | Sharma [53] | India | CT Image database | Residual neural network | Image data are used as input and custom vision software of Microsoft azure based on ML techniques is used | 91% accuracy achieved |
Peng, Nagata [54] | Brazil | various countries COVID-19 data | Support Vector Regression (SVR) | Text data are used as input and support vector regression and kernel functions used | It is clear that caution is required when using ML. | |
17 | Ardabili et al. [55] | Germany | 5 countries COVID data | MLP, ANFIS | Time-series data as an input and genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization and supervised learning algorithm is used | High generalization |
18 | Nemati et al. [56] | USA | 1182 hospitalized patients COVID-19 dataset | SVM | Text data are used as input | Significant results have been achieved in predicting recovery time |
19 | Sun et al. [57] | USA | COVID-19 patients’ data of Massachusetts, Georgia, and New Jersey | Gradient boosting algorithm | Texture data are used as input | Better prediction rate |
20 | Burdick et al. [58] | USA | COVID-19 Patient Dataset | ML algorithm | Text data are used as input and ML and MEWS used | Good prediction rate |
21 | Kavadi et al. [59] | India | Indian COVID-19 Dataset | Support vector Kuhntucker model | Text data are used as input and propose a partial derivative regression and nonlinear ML (PDR-NML) method is used | Better prediction rate |
22 | Banerjee et al. [60] | U.K. | D-19 data from Midstream | ANN | Text data are used as input | A higher rate of infection detection prediction is attained. |
23 | Wang et al. [61] | China | COVID-19 Data | Logistic model + prophet method | Time-series data as an input and Fb Prophet model used | Good prediction rate |
24 | Han et al. [62] | China | CT datasets | AD3D-MIL algorithm (A Deep 3D-Multiple Instance Learning) | Image data are used as input and attention-based deep 3-D multiple instance learning (AD3D-MIL) is used | An accuracy of 97.9% is obtained |
25 | Vaid et al. [63] | Canada | JHU CSSE database | developed a ML model to uncover hidden patterns based on reported cases and to predict potential infections. | Text data are used as input | Good prediction rate |
26 | Elaziz et al. [64] | Egypt | Two chest X-ray COVID-19 dataset | KNN +Manta-Ray Foraging Optimization | Image data are used as input and CNN used | For two datasets, accuracy of 96.09% and 98.09% was obtained. |
27 | Ahamad et al. [65] | Bangladesh | Patient COVID-19 data | Extreme Gradient Boosting, Decision Tree, RF, SVM, Gradient Boosting Machine | Text data are used as input and Random Forest, XGBoost, Gradient Boosting Machine and SVM is used | XGB outperformed other proposed methods |
28 | Brinati et al. [66] Hasan [67] | Italy | time series COVID-19 dataset | Ensemble empirical mode | Text data are used as input and support vector machines and random forest algorithm used | Better prediction rate |
Wuhan | Decomposition (EEMD) + ANN) | |||||
29 | Farid et al. [68] | Egypt | CT images COVID-19 dataset | SVM, NB, CNN, RF, as well as JRIP | Image data are used as input and Composite hybrid feature extraction (CHFS) used | The proposed CHFS has a higher prediction rate than CNN. |
30 | Shaban et al. [69] | Egypt | CT images COVID-19 dataset | Enhanced KNN | Image data are used as input and Genetic Algorithm (GA) and KNN classifier is used | Good detection rate |
31 | Ou et al. [70] | China | Pandemic COVID-19 data | Neural network | Text data are used as input and support vector machines and RF algorithm used | Good identification rate |
32 | Samuel et al. [71] | USA | COVID-19 dataset | LR, Naive Bayes (NB), Linear regression (LiR), KNN | Text data are used as input and logistics regression (LR) and KNN is used | NB outperformed other techniques |
33 | Pinter et al. [72] | Germany | COVID-19 dataset of Hungary data | Adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system and Multilayered perceptron-imperialist competitive algorithm | Text data are used as input and adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system and multilayered perceptron-imperialist competitive algorithm are used | Good prediction rate |
34 | Carrillo-Larco and Castillo-Cara. [73] | U.K. | COVID-19 patients’ data | K-Means algorithm | Text data are used as input and unsupervised ML used | Better classification rate |
35 | Benıtez-Pena et al. [74] | Spain | patients’ COVID-19 data | RF and Support Vector Regression (SVR) | Text data are used as input | High prediction rate |
36 | Zhong et al. [75] | China | patient COVID-19 blood sample data | SVM, KNN, RF, LR | Text data are used as input | Better severity detection |
37 | Yadav et al. [76] | India | COVID-19 Synthetic dataset | SVR | Text data are used as input and support vector regression (SVR) is used | Polynomial regression, SVR outperformed LiR, |
38 | Chang et al. [101] | Australia | COVID-19 dataset | ABM approach | Australian Census-based epidemic model | Agent based modelling using a fine-grained computational simulation applied |
39 | Zhang et al. [102] | Africa | Africa CDC dataset | PHSM data (Oxford COVID-19 Government response tracker dataset) | Text data are used as input | Descriptive analyses were done to establish the different cases |
40 | Andrikopoulos and Greg [103] | Australia | COVID-19 dataset | Australian Centre for behavioral research in diabetes, diabetes Australia adapted a resource developed | Text data are used as input | It is clear that people with diabetes are at greater risk of serious health impacts in pandemics such as COVID-19 than people without diabetes |
TABLE II. ML Articles Describing the Dataset, the Author's Identity, the Nation of Publishing, the Method Used in the Article, and the Findings for Analyzing the COVID-19 Disease.
S. No. | Author | Country | Datasets used | Methods applied | Task and Algorithm used | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Khanday et al. [38] | India | 212 reports by GitHub | ML algorithm | Logistic regression, Naive Bayes and classification used | According to the study, logistic regressions and multinomial Nia"ve Bayes are 96% more accurate than commonly used algorithms. |
2 | Burdick et al. [39] | USA | 197 patients of United States health systems | Support vector Kuhntucker model | Logistic regression, classification | Their findings revealed that this algorithm has a higher diagnostic odds ratio (12.58) for anticipating ventilation and effectively triaging patients than a comparator early warning system, such as the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS), which had (0.78) sensitivity, whereas this algorithm had (0.90) sensitivity, resulting in higher specificity (p 0.05), It also indicates that it is capable of accurately identifying 16% more patients than a commonly used scoring method, resulting in fewer false positive findings. |
3 | Varun et al. [40] | USA | Total reported cases are 184 319 | ML algorithm | Convolutional neural networks, classifications | In response to the crisis, New York City's medical and academic centres issued a call to action to AI researchers to leverage their electronic medical record data to better understand SARS-COV-2 patients. Due to a shortage of ventilators and a reported need for a quick and accurate method of triaging patients at risk for respiratory failure, our goal was to develop a machine-learning algorithm for frontline physicians in the emergency department and inpatient floors to better risk-assess patients and predict who would require intubation and mechanical ventilation. |
4 | Luca et al. [41] | Italy | 85 dataset of chest X-rays | ML algorithm | K-nearest neighbors’ classifier | Authors present a method for automatically detecting COVID-19 disease by analyzing medical photos in this publication. We use supervised ML methods to develop a model using 85 chest X-rays that are freely available for research reasons. The experiment demonstrates that the proposed technique is efficient in distinguishing between COVID-19 disease and other lung diseases. |
5 | Constantin et al. [42] | Germany | 500 chest CTs dataset and 152 datasets of COVID-19 patients | Support vector Kuhntucker model | Convolutional neural network, classifications | The researchers discovered that combining ML with a clinically embedded software platform allowing for speedier development, deployment, and adoption in medical practise. Finally, they developed a fully automated lung segmentation and opacity measurement approach that was ready for medical usage and performed at human levels even in difficult situations in just ten days. |
6 | Lamiaa et al. [43] | Egypt | 5000 cases of COVID-19 | ML algorithm | Linear regression model | The results demonstrated that the specified models, such as exponential, 4, 5, and 6 degree polynomial regression models, are brilliant, especially the 4 degree model, which will aid the government in planning operations for one month. They also included a well-known log that will rise through the regression model, resulting in the epidemic peak and end in 2020. There is also a final report on the total number of COVID-19 patients. |
7 | Dan et al. [44] | Israel | Total 6995 patients in Sheba Medical Centre | Support vector Kuhntucker model | Artificial neural network and classifications | The most relevant variables in the models were the APACHE II score, white blood cell count, time from onset of symptoms to admission, oxygen saturation, and blood lymphocytes count. Machine-learning algorithms exhibited excellent efficacy in predicting significant COVID-19 when compared to the most effective strategies available. As a result, artificial intelligence might be utilised to accurately predict COVID-19 patient risk, enhance patient triage and in hospital allocation, better prioritise medical resources and improve overall COVID-19 pandemic management. |
8 | Joep et al. [45] | Netherlands | Total 319 patients | Gradient Boosting algorithm | Logistic regression and classification | The CO-RADS scoring system on chest CT provides a sensitive and specific approach for diagnosing COVID-19, especially if RT–PCR testing are rare during an outbreak. Combining a predictive machine-learning model with diagnostic chest CT for COVID-19 could increase accuracy even more. To improve the model, they look into more possible predictors. However, because up to 9% of RT–PCR positive patients are not diagnosed by chest CT or our ML model, RT–PCR should remain the gold standard of testing. |
9 | Christopher et al. [46] | Germany | Total 368 independent variables | ML algorithm | Naive Bayes and Classifications | They mainly focused on variables and factors that increasing COVID-19 incidence in Germany, using the multimethod ESDA technique, which also provides an appropriate insight into spatial and spatial nonstationaries of COVID-19 occurrence. Variables like infrastructure, built environment densities, and socioeconomic factors all showed a link with COVID-19 after being examined on a county level in Germany. Their findings suggest that avoiding needless travel and social isolation can be effective approaches to limit contamination. |
10 | Hoyt et al. [47] | U.S. | Total 290 patients | Support vector Kuhntucker model | Logistic Regression and Classification | In the entire population, the findings revealed no link between mortality and therapy, although hydroxychloroquine was connected to a statistically significant (p = 0.011) improvement in survival, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.29 and a CI of 0.11–0.75. Despite the fact that the algorithm predicted an adjusted survival of 82.6% in the treated group and 51.2% in the untreated group, the algorithm detected a 31% improvement in the COVID-19 population after ML applications, demonstrating the critical role of ML in medicine. |
11 | María et al. [48] | International | Food for each of the 170 countries | ML algorithm | K-means clustering | According to the data, countries with the highest death rates consume more fats, whereas those with the lowest death rates consume more grains and have a lower overall average calorie intake. |
12 | Shinwoo et al. [49] | USA | Toal 790 Korean immigrants | ML algorithm | Artificial neural network, classifications | Artificial neural network (ANN) analysis, a statistical model capable of investigating complex nonlinear interactions of variables, was applied. The algorithm has properly predicted a person's flexibility, familiarity with everyday discernments, and racial actions toward Asians in the United States since the beginning of the COVID-19 epidemic, offering critical advice for public health. practitioners |
13 | Yigrem et al. [50] | Southern Ethiopia | Total 244 samples | ML algorithm | Logistic regression, classification | More than half of the study participants reported coronavirus disease-related stress, showing that there is a strong association between COVID-19-related stress and health-care employees. |
14 | Abolfazl et al. [51] | USA. | Total database of 57 candidate from the US Centres for Disease and Control and Johns Hopkins University | ML algorithm | ANN, classification | According to Getis-Ord Gi, the results showed that the supplied model (logistic regression) demonstrated that these components and factors define the presence/absence of the COVID-19 hotspot in a geographic information system (p 0.05). As a result, the findings were useful in identifying the impact of potential risk variables connected to COVID-19 for public health decision-makers. |
15 | Rustam et al. [52] | Pakistan | Time series COVID-19 database | LR, LASSO, SVM, ER | Texture data are used as input and supervised learning such as linear regression, LASSO Regression, support vector machine, exponential smoothing used | ES outperforms all other models, followed by LR and LASSO, which are also good at projecting new confirmed instances. |
16 | Sharma [53] | India | CT Image database | Residual neural network | Image data are used as input and custom vision software of Microsoft azure based on ML techniques is used | 91% accuracy achieved |
Peng, Nagata [54] | Brazil | various countries COVID-19 data | Support Vector Regression (SVR) | Text data are used as input and support vector regression and kernel functions used | It is clear that caution is required when using ML. | |
17 | Ardabili et al. [55] | Germany | 5 countries COVID data | MLP, ANFIS | Time-series data as an input and genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization and supervised learning algorithm is used | High generalization |
18 | Nemati et al. [56] | USA | 1182 hospitalized patients COVID-19 dataset | SVM | Text data are used as input | Significant results have been achieved in predicting recovery time |
19 | Sun et al. [57] | USA | COVID-19 patients’ data of Massachusetts, Georgia, and New Jersey | Gradient boosting algorithm | Texture data are used as input | Better prediction rate |
20 | Burdick et al. [58] | USA | COVID-19 Patient Dataset | ML algorithm | Text data are used as input and ML and MEWS used | Good prediction rate |
21 | Kavadi et al. [59] | India | Indian COVID-19 Dataset | Support vector Kuhntucker model | Text data are used as input and propose a partial derivative regression and nonlinear ML (PDR-NML) method is used | Better prediction rate |
22 | Banerjee et al. [60] | U.K. | D-19 data from Midstream | ANN | Text data are used as input | A higher rate of infection detection prediction is attained. |
23 | Wang et al. [61] | China | COVID-19 Data | Logistic model + prophet method | Time-series data as an input and Fb Prophet model used | Good prediction rate |
24 | Han et al. [62] | China | CT datasets | AD3D-MIL algorithm (A Deep 3D-Multiple Instance Learning) | Image data are used as input and attention-based deep 3-D multiple instance learning (AD3D-MIL) is used | An accuracy of 97.9% is obtained |
25 | Vaid et al. [63] | Canada | JHU CSSE database | developed a ML model to uncover hidden patterns based on reported cases and to predict potential infections. | Text data are used as input | Good prediction rate |
26 | Elaziz et al. [64] | Egypt | Two chest X-ray COVID-19 dataset | KNN +Manta-Ray Foraging Optimization | Image data are used as input and CNN used | For two datasets, accuracy of 96.09% and 98.09% was obtained. |
27 | Ahamad et al. [65] | Bangladesh | Patient COVID-19 data | Extreme Gradient Boosting, Decision Tree, RF, SVM, Gradient Boosting Machine | Text data are used as input and Random Forest, XGBoost, Gradient Boosting Machine and SVM is used | XGB outperformed other proposed methods |
28 | Brinati et al. [66] Hasan [67] | Italy | time series COVID-19 dataset | Ensemble empirical mode | Text data are used as input and support vector machines and random forest algorithm used | Better prediction rate |
Wuhan | Decomposition (EEMD) + ANN) | |||||
29 | Farid et al. [68] | Egypt | CT images COVID-19 dataset | SVM, NB, CNN, RF, as well as JRIP | Image data are used as input and Composite hybrid feature extraction (CHFS) used | The proposed CHFS has a higher prediction rate than CNN. |
30 | Shaban et al. [69] | Egypt | CT images COVID-19 dataset | Enhanced KNN | Image data are used as input and Genetic Algorithm (GA) and KNN classifier is used | Good detection rate |
31 | Ou et al. [70] | China | Pandemic COVID-19 data | Neural network | Text data are used as input and support vector machines and RF algorithm used | Good identification rate |
32 | Samuel et al. [71] | USA | COVID-19 dataset | LR, Naive Bayes (NB), Linear regression (LiR), KNN | Text data are used as input and logistics regression (LR) and KNN is used | NB outperformed other techniques |
33 | Pinter et al. [72] | Germany | COVID-19 dataset of Hungary data | Adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system and Multilayered perceptron-imperialist competitive algorithm | Text data are used as input and adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system and multilayered perceptron-imperialist competitive algorithm are used | Good prediction rate |
34 | Carrillo-Larco and Castillo-Cara. [73] | U.K. | COVID-19 patients’ data | K-Means algorithm | Text data are used as input and unsupervised ML used | Better classification rate |
35 | Benıtez-Pena et al. [74] | Spain | patients’ COVID-19 data | RF and Support Vector Regression (SVR) | Text data are used as input | High prediction rate |
36 | Zhong et al. [75] | China | patient COVID-19 blood sample data | SVM, KNN, RF, LR | Text data are used as input | Better severity detection |
37 | Yadav et al. [76] | India | COVID-19 Synthetic dataset | SVR | Text data are used as input and support vector regression (SVR) is used | Polynomial regression, SVR outperformed LiR, |
38 | Chang et al. [101] | Australia | COVID-19 dataset | ABM approach | Australian Census-based epidemic model | Agent based modelling using a fine-grained computational simulation applied |
39 | Zhang et al. [102] | Africa | Africa CDC dataset | PHSM data (Oxford COVID-19 Government response tracker dataset) | Text data are used as input | Descriptive analyses were done to establish the different cases |
40 | Andrikopoulos and Greg [103] | Australia | COVID-19 dataset | Australian Centre for behavioral research in diabetes, diabetes Australia adapted a resource developed | Text data are used as input | It is clear that people with diabetes are at greater risk of serious health impacts in pandemics such as COVID-19 than people without diabetes |
V. ML Approach for COVID-19
ML is a type of ML that uses algorithms for self-learning and prediction. The affected people are identified using ML algorithms based on physiological and personalized features. Inadequate the application of ML for anticipating, screening, and identifying innovative COVID-19 associated research has been summarized in this part.
Randhawa et al. [79] devised a ML technique for the identification of COVID-19 genomes. The authors developed a decision tree approach, and for performance evaluation, they used publically accessible COVID-19 data with Sarbecovirus and Betacorona virus. Classification accuracy, prediction accuracy, and other evaluation metrics are addressed, and based on experimental studies, the proposed model has a 100% accuracy rate. With the use of an advance ML technique known as CNN, Apostolopoulos, and Mpesiana created a current ML technique for the detecting of COVID-19 (CNNs) [80]. The X-ray Image dataset was used to measure the proposed ML model's accuracy, performance, specificity, and sensitivity, were regarded as performance parameters [81]–[83]. Later, experimental investigations were carried out, and the constructed CNN architecture was found to have a high detection rate. Kang et al. [86] developed a novel COVID-19 automatic analysis pipeline that may entirely change the retrieved features from CT images. The authors developed a structured latent image that may encode data from multiple feature characteristics in order to investigate them by recalling images from various investigations. To obtain matching data for the COVID-19 analysis, the authors used both K-nearest neighbor (KNN) and NB techniques.
The proposed model can be used for a variety of classifiers to ensure correctness. The authors achieved a 95% accuracy rate, a 96.6% specificity rate, and a 93.2% sensitivity rate. Cheng et al. [100] developed a ML-based method for predicting COVID patients' ICU transfers. Nursing assessments, laboratory data, electrocardiograms, and time series were used as input types in the authors' random forest (RF) model. The suggested model has demonstrated the importance of shock, inflammation, respiratory failure and renal in the progression of COVID-19. It had 72.8% sensitivity, 76.3% specificity, 79.9% AUC, and 76.2% accuracy, according to the researchers. The researchers stated that the ML based forecasting methods can be used as a testing tool to recognize the scourge of COVID-19 patients and to improve hospital resources by transporting more effective care based on the results of the experiments. Khanday et al. [38] suggested a strategy for detecting pandemics based on clinical text data. Using both ensemble and standard ML algorithms, the authors were able to categorize textual clinical data into four separate classifications. The researchers used 212 clinical records that were classified into four categories: ARDS, SARS, COVID, and both COVID and ARDS. They used different feature to feed the ensemble with features such as report length, bag of words and or inverse document frequency or term frequency, as well as traditional ML classifiers. The author reported that Logistic regression and multinomial Naive Bayes delivered better results with precision, recall, f1score, and accuracy rates of 94%, 96%, 95%, and 96.2%, respectively. Assaf et al. [44] employed ML approaches to accurately estimate COVID-19 risk variables. Different medical center shows of COVID-19 patients were used in the demonstration review. The researchers have only ejected severe covid19 patients at the admission stage because to poor arterial oxygen and oxygen saturation. They compared three different ML approaches for anticipating patient descent to the APACHE-II risk computing score and currently recommended predictors. They looked at 6995 individuals and discovered 162 of them needed to be admitted to the hospital, with 25 of them suffering from severe covid19. The authors found that the predicted models outperformed 92.0% accuracy, 88.0% sensitivity, and 92.7% specificity rates, respectively, based on experimental findings. Table I also presents several other uses of ML for overcoming COVID-19 problems.
VI. COVID-19 Data Processing Challenges Using Intelligent Computing Approaches
The breakout of the COVID-19 epidemic has had an economic and social effect on billions of people across the world. Because these methods have been widely employed in a different application ranging from bioinformatics to image processing the pandemic has encouraged scientists to employ intelligent computer methods in the detection, prevention, and evaluation of COVID-19. The successful implementation of scientific methodologies requires data, whether closed-source or open-source [77]–[78]. Open-source data deliver outstanding quality, transparency, and versatility. Open-source data are thought to be more relevant for COVID-19 detection in the current COVID-19 epidemic. As a result, diagnosing and forecasting COVID-19 from text data like COVID-19 reports and social media dataset, as well as medical imaging like chest X-rays and computer geographics scans, necessitates a mix of intelligent computation technique and open-source data. While epidemiological studies of COVID-19 case describe can be used to analyze virus transmission forecasts, intelligent computer approaches can defeat the constraints of RT-PCR examine kits in identifying COVID-19 from medical imaging. Policymakers can also benefit from social data mining while conducting socioeconomic research.
Although leveraging intelligent computing methods and open source dataset to identify the COVID-19 pandemic provides effective answers, there are significant obstacles to overcome. One of the most pressing issues is improving the quality of medical images for use in clinical practice, as most studies believe that using medical images to diagnose COVID-19 is ineffective. Patients who positive tested for RT-PCR should have a normal chest scan when admitted. As a result, researchers have said that RTPCR should only be used as a primary source of verification and identification, whereas medical imaging should only be used as a secondary diagnosis approach [79]. As a result, demonstrating the association between radiography and RT-PCR testing is a challenge [80]–[81]. The progress of contact fewer work flows to safeguard medical practitioners from COVID-19 influenced individuals is another problem [80].
The majority of the datasets used in the diagnostic are small. As a result, larger datasets are necessary to provide higher observations and accuracy when employing deep learning algorithms. Textual data from online origins may be used to conduct an effective epidemiological analysis of COVID-19. Because most research only looked at a few factors, the analysis of these epidemiological findings is inaccurate. As a result, in order to produce reliable projections, the research analyst must first determine the virus's regional, national, and international spread. Furthermore, considerations such as the deployment of quarantine measures and the distinction between deaths induced by coronavirus and deaths sourced by unidentified disease must be measured when predicting COVID-19 using textual data.
A. Critical Analysis
ML has become a rapidly expanding mode in healthcare, as it has in other real-world applications. Sensors in wearable components display real-time patients’ dataset such as health status, blood sugar level, heart rate, blood pressure, and other critical signs. Health professionals could be used this information to assess each person's health and anticipate the occurrence of disorders in the future. ML approaches are disseminating novel affectivities and chances, making it easier for researchers, physicians, and clinicians to anticipate and understand diseases and advance people's lives.
B. Popular ML Methods
We discovered that many ML articles were used to resolve COVID-19 disputes out of all the articles included for this study. We analyzed the utilization levels of ML approaches among them based on these ML articles. MLP, KNN, SVM, RF, ANFIS, NB, LR, LIR, and other algorithms were discovered, and their statistics are shown in Fig. 7. ML approaches, such as LR, MLP, NB, SVM, KNN, and RF, were mostly employed for COVID-19, which is the top six among other ML methods, according to the analysis done for Fig. 8. In our opinion, the main motivations for using ML approaches, as shown in Fig. 8, have been recognized and articulated. SVMs have mostly been used to classify features. SVM has also equaled employed for COVID-19 associated concerns because it has delivered an effective accuracy rate in several instances. It is also worth noting that SVM is a powerful binary classifier. ANFIS, a ML approach, was also applied. It has been determined that one of the most compelling reasons to use this strategy is that it effectively combines NN and fuzzy logic. As a result, ANFIS was used to deal with the unclear data from the COVID-19 epidemic.
Furthermore, for new COVID-19 data fitting and classification, approaches, such as XGB, NB, AdaBoost, and others, are used. LASSO and RF have also been used to fit COVID-19 associated dataset because they have been shown to be helpful in addressing with fitness functions difficulties. One of the well-known approaches, decision trees, has been predominantly employed for the categorization of COVID-19 genomes because it has proven to be useful in finding modules. It is also been used to keep track of the number of clusters in COVID-19 data to minimize the number of calls. Since it has been proved to be beneficial in data-driven analysis, the K-means technique has been utilized to group heterogeneous elements into COVID-19 clusters.
Other ML algorithms, including as LR and vector autoregression, have also been widely used in a variety of applications, including regression analytic of COVID-19 dataset, as well as predicting and forecasting's COVID-19 time series dataset. In a number of studies, multilayer perceptron (MLP), a type of neural network, has been found to be useful in information processing. As a result, this approach has been used to anticipate the COVID-19 outbreak. As a result, we have given essential arguments for the use of each technique revealed in this research effort, in our opinion.
C. Different ML and Similar Methods Publication Analysis
For searching different keyword such as (“COVID-19”, “ML technique for COVID-19”) were conducted in the usual online databases “IEEE Xplore, Elsevier, Google Scholar, Springer” in order to extract pertinent research articles for this article. We discovered 1132 publications connected to COVID-19 based on searched keywords. We collect 655 research papers among the 692 papers after excluding those that were unrelated to our review process. Following the exclusion, 81 articles are chosen as being related to the subject. We also acknowledged other resources, which are connected to COVID-19, for instance dataset and the kind of data utilized for COVID-19, in addition to these 81 papers. There was a total of 81 papers used in this article.
Because COVID-19 emerged in such a very short duration, most researchers have focused their efforts on COVID-19 detection, identification, and prediction utilizing sophisticated ML algorithms. We discovered that important researchers publish detection-based publications first, followed by prediction based research, from all of the articles we obtained. According to our findings, the top three article categories are 31% for COVID-19 detection, 27% for COVID-19 prediction, and 17% for COVID-19 screening and assessment using intelligent methodologies. The results of this investigation are shown in Fig. 8.
Various researchers have conducted and continue to perform studies in order to detect, forecast, predict, and gather data on active, recovered and death causes of COVID-19 approximately the world since the outbreak in January 2020. The majority of those research works, according to our findings in this article, are mostly focused on using ML and mathematical model. Several models have demonstrated their effectiveness in predicting and forecasting the COVID-19 utilizing existing COVID-19 related data. Even if the COVID-19 pandemic is considered as a terrifying condition in its essence, the future is uncertain. Many individuals are undecided because they are unexpected with the spreadable virus, as well as the variegated, diverse, and vivid human deeds, governments engagement, and difficult situations. The situation's final ambiguity has the potential to confound the forecast accuracy aim.
VII. Discussions and Implications
The COVID-19 epidemic has become a major national security concern in various countries. To get insight into the repercussions and spread of this deadly disease, accurate epidemic prediction models must be developed. This article examines a variety of clever strategies for COVID-19 prognosis. ML approaches have previously demonstrated their efficacy in better understanding viral propagation patterns. Advanced features of ML have enhanced diagnostic speed as well as accuracy, created new efficient therapy improvements, and recognized the large number of affected individuals with physiological attribute [24]. The clinical data and health conditions of COVID-19 patients were studied using ML and other approaches in order to not only recognize any consistent attribute for risk evaluation, but also to classify risk and forecast the balanced trained of present disease dealing and COVID-19 defense. To deal the constantly increasing number of COVID-19 patients around the world, a viable therapeutic technique is urgently required. Because there is no viable treatments for COVID-19, developing an efficient enhancement to create or repurpose a new clinically approved medicine against COVID-19 is becoming increasingly vital.
An ML-based relocation structure was modified at the time to prioritize available drugs for COVID-19 medical trials [82]. In addition, used a drug distinguish feature based on ML to aim to bring out novel drug-like compound against COVID-19 [99]. At this time, numerous efforts have been made to improve analytical achievements using ML [83], [84]. A few examples are as follows: Using a CRISPR based virus recognition system, the ML based transmission of SARS-CoV-2 was validated with great sensitivity and speed [54].
Similarly, because COVID-19 emerged in such a short period of time, many researchers have focused their efforts on detecting and predicting COVID-19 using advanced ML techniques such as taxonomic categorization of COVID-19 genomes, among others [79]. While current research has primarily focused on detection and identification, there are many others areas to noticed and investigate encourage. Afterward the beginning of the pandemic, many doctors and researchers throughout the world have refined many strategies for predicting COVID-19 in various places. However, the bulk of strategies fail due to a lack of exact answers capable of predicting the COVID-19. Each model employs a variety of procedures, constructs a variety of claims, generates a variety of outcomes, and combats uncertainty in a variety of ways.
The information on COVID-19 trends around the world includes healthcare requirements, recovered, social distancing, pressure, tainted, as well as coming cases, and much more. Furthermore, in an era when technique appropriateness is critical, there was no such recognized liability. The majority of statistic revealed that the methods for estimating the number of deaths case caused by COVID-19 were inconsistent. All predicting approaches have shown a wide range of predicted differences due to a lack of exact information. Similarly, discrepancies in prediction can be explained by the forecast of approaching results based on data from specific cases. Apart from the spread of lethal diseases, social isolation, and demographics, many additional aspects such as disability, chronic sickness, inadequate immunity, and so on must be considered. The main disadvantage for researchers is that they are unable to accurately predict pandemics. As a result, in order to generate more predictions, a new study must be conducted to improve prediction methodologies and tools for the majority of biological data. The COVID-19 epidemic is spreading day by day, despite different procedures, precautions, and research publications. As of July 19, 2021, the total number of confirmed cases was 191 231 992, with 174 185 489 recoveries and 4 105 868 death fatalities worldwide. The majority of cases, particularly in India, are expected to continue to expand as social distancing procedures are calmed before pronouncing a constant rejection in new cases.
A. Various Approaches for Assisting in COVID-19 Containment
Various forecast approaches, remedies, and precautions adopted by each individual can temporarily halt the pandemic's spread, assisting in COVID-19 containment. No one knows when this epidemic will come to an end. This lethal disease is unrivalled in terms of its ease of transmission, a slew of symptoms that spread from one person to the next in a poisonous manner, and the scale of the epidemic has wracked the world. The pandemic may be brought to a halt because citizens have grown tired of terror and have been taught to live with a sickness, as previous outbreaks have done in the past. Humans have been exposed to a variety of terrible diseases, including Ebola, smallpox, influenza, and many others. However, all of these diseases have been eradicated following different deaths as a result of the implementation of policy measures, quarantines, and the eradication of a few diseases as a result of the development of vaccinations. The strategies used in the early plagues have become rules for a world looking for new ways to update strength and a feeling of normalcy.
COVID-19’s continuations are expected to be short, but its termination will necessitate a comprehensive agreement that ensures early disease prevention, including new medicines to alleviate symptoms, social protective measures, and a vaccine. Furthermore, different researcher must work on a variety of issues in order to develop drugs. Vaccines are, thus, the long-term approach to stopping this outbreak, which could take months or even years to fully resolve. If the drug is made available all over the world, the pandemic is likely to spread to people who are not now unwell or recovering. The vaccines and natural exemptions will be grouped together to defend the bulk of the populations. So, based on our findings, we can be confident that this space may be organically fielded by detecting drugs utilizing a collection of known illness treatments, such as sars-1, Spanish flu, and others using ML approaches. The importance of ML for COVID-19 has been demonstrated in this article. We have concentrated on a thorough examination of ML approaches for COVID-19, as well as their applications.
B. Limitations of ML
According to our findings, various limitations of ML, such as a lack of recognizing equipment, the use of biomedical data, heterogeneity, and a lack of medical equipment, rendered ML approaches more potent and suited for predicting the COVID-19 pandemic. ML approaches are suited for COVID-19 prediction because they can aid in the improved identification of infections by health systems. Multiple researches with trustworthy data on increasing the efficaciousness of medical check-ups by anticipating adverse consequences and discovering novel ways to accomplish it have been exceeded by ML technologies. When ML was compared with COVID-19 prediction, the majority of ML attributes such as recognition, lack of human involvement, and superior performance built it a more efficient and admired approaches.
This eruption has been labelled a public health emergency by the World Health Organization. Every part of life is affected by technological improvements, and the medical field is one of the most directly linked to people's daily lives [85]. AI has lately been enclosed to the medical area, and it has showed promise in health care because to the high precision of data processing that allows for precise decision-making. By incorporating AI algorithms into the disease's diagnosis, researchers from all over the world aimed to ameliorate clinical diagnosing and slow the virus's spread. This review paper evaluates the outcomes of a variety of AI algorithms used in research to determine, which method is the most accurate and enhances COVID-19 diagnosis the most. There were 37 original articles used in this article, all of which use supervised learning as the major approach, albeit the methods used dissented depending on the research goal. More than half of the study participants reported coronavirus disease-related felt stress, demonstrating a strong association between health-care workers and COVID-19-related perceived stress [50].
VIII. Limitations and Future Scope
This article examines the use of ML methods to COVID-19. The primary goal of this survey was to examine the global impact of this epidemic, as well as the motivation for using ML approaches to COVID-19. We went through all of the ML models used in COVID-19, as well as the effective incentives. Likewise, aside from prediction and identifications, the need for more study in other areas was also highlighted previously. Based on the findings of this article, we highly suggest that many more studies be done using ML on COVID-19 data using approaches that have not previously been deployed. In order to undertake further advanced research, it is also necessary to solve the issues of COVID-19 data scarcity. COVID-19 has a significant influence on a number of industries. More than 200 nations have been recognized as having COVID-19 instances.
We mainly focused on the most pressing issues present in the literatures as well as potential study paths for future research.
-
1)
Because the evidences of COVID-19, disease and other respiratoria illnesses are so standardized, establishing an appropriate DL model that can accurately identify COVID-19 remains a problem [86].
-
2)
A key difficulty for COVID-19 is the lack of a high-quality dataset. This can be attributed to a variety of factors, considering such as 1) different sources and unpublished data; 2) the dispersed cause of COVID-19 data; and 3) data secrecy concerns that limitation of dataset availability [87]. To extend the available different datasets and speed AI research for COVID-19, collaboration across all medical organizations around the world is critical.
-
3)
Variability in the testing procedure between nations and hospitals is a major problem that might result in nonuniformness in the labeling operations.
-
4)
The COVID-19 infectious is quickly mutating in dissimilar parts of the world. As a result, data obtained in one location may not be adequate for inferring interferences in another. [88].
-
5)
Medical personnel are the first line of defense in the fight against the epidemic. To protect children from infections, additional contact-free screening, and diagnosis methods are urgently needed.
-
6)
The majority of current deep learning models were trained on two-dimensional (2-D) pictures. However, because the majority of CT and MRI scan pictures are 3-D, appending another attribute is necessary to maximize the effect of the image [89], [90].
-
7)
As a result of the similar operations of combining medical imaging dataset, the data diversity grows, necessitating the requirement to verify the resilience of ML produced models.
-
8)
The majority of the COVID-19 datasets accessible are small. As a result, transfer discovering is a promising future research path which might aid in the detection of anomalies in tiny datasets while also producing reliable predictions and impressive outcomes [91].
-
9)
According to the research, there appears to be a link among COVID-19 transmission and various medicals problem. As a result, a patient's record of various diseases (kidney, diabetes, heart disease, liver, etc.) can be considered into account in both the COVID-19 forecasting and detecting processes in order to offer a precise and reliable prediction model [61], [92], [93].
-
10)
When equated to exploiting with IoT device, building complicated ML models, analyzing, and interpreting large data requires a lot of computing power. As a result, fog and edge computing may be useful in addressing these problems [94].
-
11)
To improve the interpretation of data gathered from various sensors, several preprocessing processes are necessary (i.e., quality improvement, data cleaning, outlier detection, etc.) [95], [96], [97].
-
12)
Recently NLP applications have restricted the value of a diagnostic scheme like this. To transfer performance to a given domain context, working with methods that assess semantic textual similarity is necessary (i.e., COVID-19) [98].
-
13)
Because it combines diverse data, data fusion is difficult1. It does, however, increase the functioning of the models that arise. In the article, there are several fusion procedures. As a result, adaptive multimodels are critical for handling data from numerous sensors [99].
-
14)
To improve the functioning of working on sound data and X-ray, more complex approaches are required.
-
15)
The explain ability and interpretability of ML approaches is a major problem. Medical professionals must understand, which characteristics are used to identify COVID-19 from non-COVID-19.2 ML should also look at methods to predict infections before symptoms develop. In COVID-19 prediction, diagnosis, screening, and other different ML methodology have showed promising results. However, the majority of these models have not been tested in a real-world setting (e.g., hospitals, emerging service) to demonstrate their efficacy in combating the COVID-19 epidemic. As a result, many challenges must be overcome in order to spread such diagnosing models, include 1) network security consistence in order to allow more authentic communications and desired data on the networks; 2) fog, edge and cloud computing adaptation; and 3) privacy and security issues relating to patient's dataset.
ML is a cutting-edge method with several applications in prediction. For the COVID-19 pandemic, this method will be used to detect high-risk individuals, as well as their mortality rate and other anomalies. It can be used to better understand the virus's nature and forecast future problems.
Fig. 9 depicts how ML may enhance treatment, medication, screening and prediction, forecasting, contact tracking, and drug/vaccine development for the COVID-19 pandemic while reducing human participation in medical practice.
IX. Conclusion
In this article, we mainly focused on the use of different ML applications in COVID-19 disease for different purposes using various algorithms. Based on the findings of this article, it appears that ML have been utilized mostly for COVID-19 forecasting, detection, identification, and screening from December 2019 to the present. ML methods such as LR, RF, KNN, and SVM have been employed to solve COVID-19 difficulties. However, complex ML algorithms such as encouraging, bagging, stacking, and others must be included. Other ML approaches, for example Bayesian networks such as decision tree algorithms such as C4.0, Gaussian Naive Bayes and different clustering algorithm like K-Means, Hierarchical, and K-Medians, must also be used with COVID-19 dataset for successfully classified and detecting the dissimilar symptom. It is also worth noting that ANNs like back propagation, perceptron, and radial basis function based NN must be used with COVID-19 data. CNN and its derivatives have been effectively used to resolve COVID-19 concerns in the instance of DL.
This article examines the methodology of ML algorithms to COVID-19. The primary goal of this survey is to examine the global effect of this pandemic, as well as the motivation for enforcing ML techniques to COVID-19. We went over all of the ML models used in COVID-19, as well as the effective incentives. Similarly, aside from prediction and identifications, the need for more research in other areas was also emphasized above. Based on the findings of the survey, we highly suggest that many more studies be undertaken using ML on COVID-19 data using methodologies that have not yet been deployed. In order to perform further advanced research, it is also necessary to overcome the difficulties of COVID-19 data scarcity.
Biographies
Shrikant Tiwari (Senior Member, IEEE) was born in Maihar, India, in August 15, 1983. He received the M.Tech. degree in computer science and technology from the University of Mysore, Mysore, India, in 2009, and the Ph.D. degree in computer science and engineering from the Department of Computer Science and Engineering (CSE), Indian Institute of Technology (Banaras Hindu University), Varanasi, India, in 2012.
From August 2013 to April 2021, he was working as an Assistant Professor with the Department of CSE, Shri Shankaracharya Technical Campus, Bhilai, India. Since May 2021, he is currently working as a Research Associate with the Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), Varanasi, India. He has authored more than 15 articles. His research interests include biometrics, image processing and pattern recognition, machine learning, and AI.
Dr. Tiwari is a member of Association for Computing Machinery, Institution of Engineering and Technology, Institution of Electronics and Telecommunication Engineers, Computer Society of India, Indian Society for Technical Education, International Association of Engineers, and Science and Engineering Institute.
Prasenjit Chanak (Senior Member, IEEE) received the M.Tech. and Ph.D. degrees in information technology from the Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur, India, in 2011 and 2016, respectively.
He is currently working as an Assistant Professor with the Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), Varanasi. He was an Assistant Professor with the Department of Information and Communications Technology, Atal Bihari Vajpayee-Indian Institute of Information Technology and Management, Gwalior, from December 2016 to August 2020. He has executed various Government of India-sponsored projects from DST, ICSSR, and SERB. He has authored and coauthored more than 60 research papers in different reputed international journals and conferences and 5 Indian patents.
Dr. Chanak was the recipient of several national and international awards like Chester Sall Award by IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, New Jersey, USA, Best Ph.D. thesis Award (First) by Computer Society of India, India, Young Scientist Award by DST, 2017, Government of India, Best Paper Award from ICACC, Kochi, India, 2012, Best Paper Award from (TechSym 2014) Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, India. His research interests include wireless sensor networks, Internet of Things, cyber-physical networks, machine learning, and consumer electronics.
Sanjay Kumar Singh (Senior Member, IEEE) received the B.Tech in computer engineering, the M.Tech. degree in computer applications, and the Ph.D. degree in computer science and engineering. He is currently a Professor with the Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), Varanasi, India. He has authored or coauthored more than 150 national and international journal publications, book chapters, and conference articles. He has four patents filed to his credit. His current research interests include machine learning, deep learning, computer vision, medical image analysis, pattern recognition, and biometrics.
Prof. Singh is a Senior Member of ACM and the Computer Society of India. He is also a Guest Editorial Board member and a reviewer for many international journals of repute.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the ICSSR Project under the Ministry of Education, Government of India under Grant ICSSR/811/14/2021-22.
Footnotes
HealthMap. Contagious Disease Surveillance. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://healthmap.org/en/ (accessed on May 31, 2021)
HealthMap. Contagious Disease Surveillance. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://healthmap.org/en/ (accessed on May 31, 2021)
Contributor Information
Shrikant Tiwari, Email: shrikanttiwari15@gmail.com.
Prasenjit Chanak, Email: prasenjit.cse@iitbhu.ac.in.
Sanjay Kumar Singh, Email: sks.cse@iitbhu.ac.in.
References
- [1].Paules C. I., Marston H. D., and Fauci A. S., “Corona virus infections more than just the common cold,” JAMA, vol. 323, no. 8, pp. 707–708, 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Estola T., “Corona viruses, a new group of animal RNA viruses,” Avian Dis., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 330–336, 1970. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].World Health Organization, “WHO novel corona virus Thailand (ex-China),” Geneva, Swiss, 2020, Accessed: Jul. 14, 2020. [Online]. Available: http://www.who.int/csr/don/14-january-2020-novel-coronavirusthailand/en/ [Google Scholar]
- [4].Lu H., Stratton C. W., and Tang Y. W., “Outbreak of pneumonia of unknown etiology in Wuhan China: The mystery and the miracle,” J. Med. Virol., vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 401–402, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Kwok K. O., Tang A., Wei V. W., Yeoh E. K., Park W. H., and Riley S., “Epidemic models of contact tracing: Systematic review of transmission studies of severe acute respiratory syndrome and middle east respiratory syndrome,” Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J., vol. 17, pp. 186–194, 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Pasupuleti R. R. et al. , “Rapid determination of remdesivir (SARSCoV-2 drug) in human plasma for therapeutic drug monitoring in COVID-19-Patients,” Process Biochem., vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 150–156, 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Wu F. et al. , “A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China,” Nature, vol. 579, no. 7798, pp. 265–269, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Mahmood A. et al. , “COVID-19 and frequent use of hand sanitizers; human health and environmental hazards by exposure pathways,” Sci. Total Environ., vol. 742, no. 44, 2020, Art. no. 140561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Debnath S. et al. , “Machine learning to assist clinical decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic,” Bioelectron. Med., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Van der Schaar M. and Alaa A., “How artificial intelligence and machine learning can help healthcare systems respond to COVID-19,” Mach. Learn., vol. 110, pp. 1–14, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Doanvo A. et al. , “Machine learning maps research needs in covid-19 literature,” Patterns, vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 100–123, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Naseem M. et al. , “Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence and machine learning to combat COVID-19 and existing opportunities for LMIC: A scoping review,” J. Primary Care Community Health, vol. 11, pp. 1–11, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Altan A. and Karasu S., “Recognition of COVID-19 disease from X-ray images by hybrid model consisting of 2D curvelet transform, chaotic salp swarm algorithm and deep learning technique,” Chaos Solitons Fractals, vol. 140, 2020, Art. no. 110071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Jamshidi M. et al. , “Artificial intelligence and COVID-19: Deep learning approaches for diagnosis and treatment,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 109581–109595, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Kayvan Joo A. H., Ebrahimi M., and Haqshenas G., “Prediction of hepatitis C virus interferon/ribavirin therapy outcome based on viral nucleotide attributes using machine learning algorithms,” BMC Res. Notes, vol. 7, no. 1, 2014, Art. no. 565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Klon A. E., Glick M., and Davies J. W., “Application of machine learning to improve the results of high-throughput docking against the HIV-1 protease,” J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 2216–2224, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Ekins S., Freundlich J. S., Clark A. M., Anantpadma M., Davey R. A., and Madrid P., “Machine learning models identify molecules active against the Ebola virus in vitro,” F1000Res, vol. 4, 2015, Art. no. 1091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Bengio Y., Courville A., and Vincent P., “Representation learning: A review and new perspectives,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 1798–1828, Aug. 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Tayarani-N M.-H., “Applications of artificial intelligence in battling against Covid-19: A literature review,” Chaos Solitons Fractals, vol. 142, 2020, Art. no. 110338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Bishop C. M., Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- [21].Shinde G. R. et al. , “Forecasting models for coronavirus disease (COVID-19): A survey of the state-of-the-art,” SN Comput. Sci., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 1–15, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Khan M. A. et al. , “Intelligent cloud based heart disease prediction system empowered with supervised machine learning,” CMC-Comput. Mater. Continua, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 139–151, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- [23].Hossain B. et al. , “Surgical outcome prediction in total knee arthroplasty using machine learning,” Intell. Automat. Soft Comput., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 105–115, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- [24].Alimadadi A. et al. , “Artificial intelligence and machine learning to fight COVID-19,” AI Mach. Learn. Understanding Biol. Processes, vol. 52, pp. 200–202, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Brinati D., Campagner A., Ferrari D., Locatelli M., Banfi G., and Cabitza F., “Detection of COVID-19 infection from routine blood exams with machine learning: A feasibility study,” J. Med. Syst., vol. 44, 2020, Art. no. 135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Day M., “Covid-19: Identifying and isolating asymptomatic people helped eliminate virus in Italian village,” BMJ, vol. 368, 2020, Art. no. 135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Deng X. et al. , “A classification–detection approach of COVID-19 based on chest X-ray and CT by using Keras pre-trained deep learning models,” Comput. Model. Eng. Sci., vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 579–596, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- [28].Kassani S. H. et al. , “Automatic detection of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in X-ray and CT images: A machine learning-based approach,” Biocybernetics Biomed. Eng., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1–18, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Hossain B. et al. , “Surgical outcome prediction in total knee arthroplasty using machine learning,” Intell. Automat. Soft. Comput., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 105–115, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- [30].Zhang C. et al. , “Applying feature-weighted gradient decent k-nearest neighbour to select promising projects for scientific funding,” CMC-Comput., Mater. Continua, vol. 64, no. 3. pp. 1741–1753, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- [31].Hastie T. R. and Tibshirani J. F., The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- [32].Ünlü R. and Namlı E., “Machine learning and classical forecasting methods-based decision support systems for COVID-19,” CMC-Comput., Mater. Continua, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 1383–1139, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- [33].Shirzadi A. et al. , “Novel GIS based machine learning algorithms for shallow landslide susceptibility mapping,” Sensors, vol. 18, no. 11, 2018, Art. no. 3777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Gao K. et al. , “Julia language in machine learning: Algorithms, applications, and open issues,” Comput. Sci. Rev., vol. 37, 2020, Art. no. 100254. [Google Scholar]
- [35].Bishop C. M., Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- [36].Zhang Y. et al. , “Overview on routing and resource allocation-based machine learning in optical networks,” Opt. Fibber Technol., vol. 60, 2020, Art. no. 102355. [Google Scholar]
- [37].Shirzadi A. et al. , “Novel GIS based machine learning algorithms for shallow landslide susceptibility mapping,” Sensors, vol. 18, no. 11, 2018, Art. no. 3777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Khanday A. M. U. D., Rabani S. T., and Khan Q. R., “DinMMU Roufn: Machine learning based approaches for detecting COVID-19 using clinical text data,” Int. J. Inf. Technol., vol. 12, pp. 731–739, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Burdick H. et al. , “Prediction of respiratory decompensation in covid-19 patients using machine learning: The READY trial,” Comput. Biol. Med., vol. 124, 2020, Art. no. 103949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Gulshan V. et al. , “Performance of a deep-learning algorithm vs manual grading for detecting diabetic retinopathy in India,” JAMA Ophthal., vol. 137, pp. 987–993, 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].De Luca G. et al. , “GM-CSF blockade with mavrilimumab in severe COVID-19 pneumonia and systemic hyperinflammation: A single-centre, prospective cohort study,” Lancet Rheumatology, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. E465–E473, 2020, doi: 10.1016/s2665-9913(20)30170-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Constantin I., Lungu M. L., Panaitescu L., Ilie M., Simulating Lungu D., and Nita S., “Simulating for predicting the hourly dew point temperature using artificial neural networks,” J. Environ. Protection Ecol., vol. 15, pp. 1101–1109, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- [43].Lamiaa A. A, Ashraf A. T., and Marwa Y. M., “Prediction of the final size for COVID-19 pidemic using machine learning: A case study of Egypt,” Infect. Dis. Model., vol. 5, pp. 622–634, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Assaf D. et al. , “Utilization of machine-learning models to accurately predict the risk for critical COVID-19,” Intern. Emerg. Med., vol. 15, pp. 1435–1443, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Hermans J. J. R. et al. , “Chest CT for triage during COVID-19 on the emergency department: Myth or truth?,” Emerg. Radiol., vol. 27, pp. 641–651, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Kumar S. U., Kumar D. T., Christopher B. P., and Doss C. G. P., “The rise and impact of COVID-19 in India,” Front. Med., vol. 7, 2020, Art. no. 250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Cohen A. K., Hoyt L. T., and Dull B., “A descriptive study of COVID-19–Related experiences and perspectives of a national sample of college students in spring 2020,” J. Adolesc. Health, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 369–375, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Di Maria F. et al. , “Minimization of spreading of SARS-CoV-2 via household waste produced by subjects affected by COVID-19 or in quarantine,” Sci. Total Environ., vol. 743, 2020, Art. no. 140803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Park S.-J. et al. , “Antiviral efficacies of FDA-Approved drugs against SARS-CoV-2 infection in ferrets,” ASM J., vol. 11, 2020, Art. no. 3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Chekole Y. A. et al. , “Perceived stress and its associated factors during COVID-19 among healthcare providers in Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study,” Adv. Public Health, vol. 2020, 2020, Art. no. 5036861. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/ [Google Scholar]
- [51].Mollalo A., Rivera K. M., and Vahedi B., “Artificial neural network modeling of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) incidence rates across the continental United States,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 17, 2020, Art. no. 4204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].Rustam F. et al. , “COVID-19 future forecasting using supervised machine learning models,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 101489–101499, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- [53].Sharma S., “Drawing insights from COVID-19-infected patients using CT scan images and machine learning techniques: A study on 200 patients,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 27, pp. 37115–37163, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [54].Peng Y. and Nagata M. H., “An empirical overview of nonlinearity and overfitting in machine learning using COVID-19 data,” Chaos Solitons Fractals, vol. 139, 2020, Art. no. 110055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [55].Ardabili S. F. et al. , “COVID-19 outbreak prediction with machine learning,” Algorithms, vol. 13, 2020, Art. no. 249. [Google Scholar]
- [56].Nemati M., Ansary J., and Nemati N., “Machine learning approaches in COVID-19 survival analysis and discharge time likelihood prediction using clinical data,” Patterns, vol. 1, 2020, Art. no. 100074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [57].Sun C. L. F. et al. , “Predicting COVID-19 infection risk and related risk drivers in nursing homes: A machine learning approach,” J. Amer. Med. Directors Assoc., vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 1533–1538, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [58].Burdick H. et al. , “Prediction of respiratory decompensation in covid-19 patients using machine learning: The READY trial,” Comput. Biol. Med., vol. 124, 2020, Art. no. 103949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [59].Kavadi D. P., Patan R., Ramachandran M., and Gandomi A. H., “Partial derivative nonlinear global pandemic machine learning prediction of covid 19,” Chaos Solitons Fractals, vol. 139, 2020, Art. no. 110056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [60].Banerjee A. et al. , “Use of machine learning and artificial intelligence to predict SARS-CoV-2 infection from full blood counts in a population,” Int. Immunopharmacol., vol. 86, 2020, Art. no. 106705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [61].Wang P., Zheng X., Li J., and Zhu B., “Prediction of epidemic trends in COVID-19 with logistic model and machine learning technics,” Chaos, Solitons Fractals, vol. 139, 2020, Art. no. 110058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [62].Han Z. et al. , “Accurate screening of COVID-19 using attention based deep 3D multiple instance learning,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 2584–2594, Aug. 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [63].Vaid S., Cakan C., and Bhandari M., “Using machine learning to estimate unobserved COVID-19 infections in North America,” J. Bone Joint Surg., vol. 102, no. 13, 2020, Art. no. e70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [64].Elaziz M. A., Hosny K. M., Salah A., Darwish M. M., Lu S., and Sahlol A. T., “New machine learning method for image-based diagnosis of COVID-19,” PLoS One, vol. 15, no. 6, 2020, Art. no. e0235187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [65].Ahamad M. M. et al. , “A machine learning model to identify early-stage symptoms of SARS-Cov-2 infected patients,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 160, 2020, Art. no. 113661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [66].Brinati D., Campagner A., Ferrari D., Locatelli M., Banfi G., and Cabitza F., “Detection of COVID-19 infection from routine blood exams with machine learning: A feasibility study,” J. Med. Syst., vol. 44, 2020, Art. no. 135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [67].Hasan N., “A methodological approach for predicting COVID-19 epidemic using EEMD-ANN hybrid model,” Internet Things, vol. 11, 2020, Art. no. 100228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [68].Farid A. A., Selim G. I., and Khater H. A. A., “A novel approach of CT images feature analysis and prediction to screen for corona virus disease (COVID-19),” Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1–9, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- [69].Shaban W. M., Rabie A. H., Saleh A. I., and Abo-Elsoud M. A., “A new COVID-19 patients detection strategy (CPDS) based on hybrid feature selection and enhanced KNN classifier,” Knowl.-Based Syst., vol. 205, 2020, Art. no. 106270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [70].Ou S. et al. , “Machine learning model to project the impact of COVID-19 on US motor gasoline demand,” Nature Energy, vol. 5, pp. 666–673, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [71].Samuel J., Ali G. G., Rahman M., Esawi E., and Samuel Y., “Covid-19 public sentiment insights and machine learning for tweets classification information,” Information, vol. 11, no. 6, 2020, Art. no. 314. [Google Scholar]
- [72].Pinter G., Felde I., Mosavi A., Ghamisi P., and Gloaguen R., “COVID-19 pandemic prediction for Hungary; a hybrid machine learning approach,” Mathematics, vol. 8, no. 6, 2020, Art. no. 890. [Google Scholar]
- [73].Carrillo-Larco R. M. and Castillo-Cara M., “Using country-level variables to classify countries according to the number of confirmed COVID-19 cases: An unsupervised machine learning approach,” Welcome Open Res., vol. 5, no. 56, 2020, Art. no. 56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [74].Benıtez-Pena S., Carrizosa E., Guerrero V., and Dolores M., “Short term predictions of the evolution of COVID-19 in Andalusia,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 295, no. 2, pp. 1–12, Apr. 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [75].Zhong L., Mu L., Li J., Wang J., Yin Z., and Liu D., “Early prediction of the 2019 novel corona virus outbreak in the mainland China based on simple mathematical model,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 51761–51769, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [76].Yadav M., Perumal M., and Srinivas M., “Analysis on novel coronavirus (Covid-19) using machine learning methods,” Chaos Solitons Fractals, vol. 139, 2020, Art. no. 110050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [77].Xu B. et al. , “Open access epidemiological data from the COVID-19 outbreak,” Lancet Infect. Dis., vol. 20, no. 5, 2020, Art. no. 534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [78].Frazer J. S., Shard A., and Herdman J., “Involvement of the opensource community in combating the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic: A review,” J. Med. Eng. Technol., vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 169–176, 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [79].Yan F. and Yang W., “Patients with RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 and normal chest CT,” Radiology, vol. 295, no. 2, pp. E3–E3, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [80].Ai T. et al. , “Correlation of chest CT and RT-PCR testing in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A report of 1014 cases,” Radiology, vol. 296, no. 2, 2020, Art. no. 200642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [81].Shi F. et al. , “Review of artificial intelligence techniques in imaging data acquisition, segmentation and diagnosis for COVID-19,” IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 4–15, 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [82].Zame W. R. et al. , “Machine learning for clinical trials in the era of COVID-19,” Statist. Biopharmaceutical Res., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 506–517, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [83].Catelli R., Gargiulo F., Casola V., De Pietro G., Fujita H., and Esposito M., “Cross lingual named entity recognition for clinical deidentification applied to a COVID-19 Italian data set,” Appl. Soft. Comput., vol. 97, 2020, Art. no. 106779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [84].Hernandez-Matamoros A., Fujita H., Hayashi T., and Perez-Meana H., “Forecasting of COVID19 per regions using ARIMA models and polynomial functions,” Appl. Soft. Comput., vol. 96, 2020, Art. no. 106610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [85].Manigandan S., Ming-Tsang W., Vinoth K. P., Vinay B. R., Arivalagan P., and Kathirvel B., “A systematic review on recent trends in transmission, diagnosis, prevention and imaging features of COVID-19,” Process Biochem., vol. 98, no. 11, pp. 233–240, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [86].Sorlini C. et al. , “The role of lung ultrasound as a frontline diagnostic tool in the era of COVID-19 outbreak,” Intern. Emerg. Med., vol. 16, pp. 749–756, 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [87].Malom Z., Rahman M. M. S., Nasrin S., Taha T. M., and Asari V. K., “COVID_MTNet: COVID-19 detection with multi-task deep learning approaches,” Cornell Univ. Press, 2020, arXiv:2004.03747. [Google Scholar]
- [88].Heo L. and Feig M., “Modelling of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) proteins by machine learning and physics-based refinement,” Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, (bioRxiv) 2020.
- [89].Pu J. et al. , “Any unique image biomarkers associated with COVID-19?,” Eur. Radiol., vol. 30, pp. 6221–6227, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [90].Xu X. et al. , “A deep learning system to screen novel coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia,” Engineering, vol. 6, pp. 1122–1129, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [91].Kermany D. S. et al. , “Identifying medical dignoses and treatable diseases by image-based deep learning,” Cell, vol. 172, pp. 1122–1131.e9, 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [92].Zhao W., Zhang J., Meadows M. E., Liu Y., Hua T., and Fu B., “A systematic approach is needed to contain COVID-19 globally,” Sci. Bull., vol. 65, pp. 876–878, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [93].Murthy S., Gomersall C. D., and Fowler R. A., “Care for critically ill patients with COVID-19,” JAMA, vol. 323, 2020, Art. no. 1499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [94].Rahman A., Hossain M. S., Alrajeh N. A., and Alsolami F., “Adversarial examples—Security threats to COVID-19 deep learning systems in medical IoT devices,” IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 9603–9610, Jun. 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [95].Sethy P. K., Behera S. K., Ratha P. K., and Biswas P., “Detection of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) based on deep features and support vector machine,” Int. J. Math. Eng. Manage. Sci., vol. 5, pp. 643–651, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- [96].Kleinberg B., van der Vegt I., and Mozes M., “Measuring emotions in the COVID-19 real World worry dataset,” Cornell Univ. Press, 2020, arXiv:2004.04225. [Google Scholar]
- [97].Fahmy A. E., El-desouky M. M., and Mohamed A. S. A., “Epidemic analysis of COVID-19 in Egypt, Qatar and Saudi Arabia using the generalized SEIR model,” Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, (medRxiv) 2020.
- [98].Guo X., Mirzaalian H., and Sabir E., “CORD19STS: COVID-19 semantic textual similarity dataset,” Cornell Univ. Press, 2020, arXiv:2007.02461. [Google Scholar]
- [99].Zhavoronkov A. et al. , “Potential COVID-2019 3C-like protease inhibitors designed using generative deep learning approaches,” Insilico Med. Hong Kong Ltd. A, vol. 307, 2020, Art. no. E1. [Google Scholar]
- [100].Cheng F. Y. et al. , “Using machine learning to predict ICU transfer in hospitalized COVID-19 patients,” J. Clin. Med., vol. 9, no. 6, 2020, Art. no. 1668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [101].Chang S. L. et al. , “Modelling transmission and control of the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia,” Nature Commun., vol. 11, 2020, Art. no. 5710. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19393-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [102].Zhang F. et al. , “Predictors of COVID-19 epidemics in countries of the World Health Organization African Region,” Nature Med., vol. 27, pp. 2041–2047, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01491-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [103].Sof A. and Johnson G., “The Australian response to the COVID-19 pandemic and diabetes - Lessons learned,” Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract., vol. 165, 2020, Art. no. 108246, doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [104].Devaraj J. et al. , “Forecasting of COVID-19 cases using deep learning models: Is it reliable and practically significant?,” Results Phys., vol. 21, 2021, Art. no. 103817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]