Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2023 Feb 1;15(2):e34507. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34507

In Silico Molecular Docking Studies of Phytocompounds From Coleus Amboinicus Against Glucokinase

Soosai Marian Anthony Ammal 1, Sai Sudha 2, Durairaj Rajkumar 1, Adhithya Baskaran 3, Gunasekaran Krishnamoorthy 4, Madurai Kannan Anbumozhi 2,
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC9984118  PMID: 36874339

Abstract

Diabetes is one of the most prevalent metabolic illnesses that can be fatal, and it is the ninth-largest cause of mortality worldwide. Even though there are effective hypoglycemic medications available for the treatment of diabetes, researchers continue to look for a medication that is more effective and has fewer adverse effects by focusing on various metabolic components such as enzymes, transporters, receptors. The enzyme Glucokinase (GCK), which is present mainly in the liver and beta cells of the pancreas, is involved in maintaining blood glucose homeostasis. Hence, the present in silico study is designed to determine the interaction between GCK and compounds (ligands) of Coleus amboinicus. In the current docking investigation, we discovered that important residues, including ASP-205, LYS-169, GLY-181, and ILE-225, significantly influence in ligand binding affinity. Docking tests of these compounds with target proteins revealed that this is a suitable molecule that docks well with the target of diabetes treatment. In conclusion, we believe that the compounds of caryophyllene have anti-diabetic activity based on the present study.

Keywords: torbangun, glucokinase, molecular docking, coleus amboinicus, diabetes mellitus

Introduction

One of the four hexokinase isozymes, Glucokinase (GCK), converts glucose to glucose-6-phosphate in the hepatic and pancreatic cells [1]. The perfect glucose sensor and rate-limiting enzyme GCK regulates the rate at which glucose triggers insulin production [2]. GCK activities regulate the rate of glycogen synthesis and utilization in the liver according to Non-Mechaelis-Menton kinetics, demonstrating that GCKs are not controlled by the reaction product glucose-6-phosphate [3]. GCK is mixed with glucose and the enzyme stimulator glucokinase in its crystal structure, which has a palm-shaped topology with two domains of different sizes, the big and small (GCKA). The enormous gap that separates the two domains acts as the binding site for the phosphorylation of glucose. An accessible hydrophobic allosteric pocket is 20 distances from the catalytic site when the kinase is bound to glucose in its "closed" catalytically active state. In the unbound form of glucose (also known as "open form"), the hydrophobic pocket is concealed between the competing big and small domains. Allosteric sites are where GCKAs connect, and they immediately activate GCKs [4]. Because type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients have impaired insulin action and secretion, increasing hepatic glucose production and decreased glucose-induced release from pancreatic cells, which makes it different from other types of diabetes. Despite the efforts of several research organizations, no single oral anti-diabetic drug can provide adequate, long-term glycemic control [5]. Although the combination of different classes of hypoglycemic agents provides good blood sugar control than the single agent, the risk of drug adverse effects increase [6]. Consequently, there is a growing need for novel medications that are both effective and safe. GCK's strong impact on glucose homeostasis and the fact that activating it lowers blood glucose levels regardless of the cause of hyperglycemia suggests that it may be a suitable therapeutic target for T2DM [7]. Numerous research groups have shown that small-molecule glucokinase enhancers could enhance glycemic control via a dual mechanism of improved hepatic glucose metabolism and increased pancreatic insulin production [8, 9]. Consequently, the ability of GCKA to affect multiple cell types, such as muscle cells and adipocytes, may increase its efficacy and make it a useful tool in the management of diabetes.

The use of plant-based treatments to treat metabolic illnesses like diabetes is growing in popularity. Numerous plants with high flavonoid content are a hidden gold mine for treating diabetes. Torbangun is a flowering plant (Coleus amboinicus Lour). Torbangun leaf extract possesses antioxidant effects, according to research [10]. Understanding how glucokinase interacts with the molecules in Coleus amboinicus is the aim of this study. This study will advance knowledge of the glucokinase activation mechanism and pave the road for the creation of novel GCKAs that could specifically stimulate GCK in the treatment of T2DM.

Materials and methods

Protein preparation

Protein Data Bank (PDB id: 1V4S) provided the 3D structure of glucokinase in the pdb format. Using Autodock tools, solvents, unusual ligands, and residues were removed from protein macromolecules before they have been kept in the pdb format. Hydrogen atoms have been added to macromolecules to improve them, and they were then recorded in the pdbqt format [11].

Ligand molecules

Sixteen bioactive compounds from Coleus amboinicus were obtained from literature searches (Table 1). The ligands were downloaded in the sdf format from PubChem (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). The compounds were then improved using PyRx (version 0.8) by energetically converting the ligands into the most stable configurations (MMFF94) [12].

Table 1. List of selected compounds from Coleus amboinicus.

Sl. No Compound Name
1 alpha-Pinene
2 beta-Caryophyllene
3 alpha-Terpineol
4 beta-Phellandrene
5 beta-Pinene
6 beta-Selinene
7 Carvacrol
8 Caryophyllene_oxide
9 Eucalyptol
10 Eugenol
11 gamma-Terpinene
12 Methyleugenol
13 p-Cymene
14 Terpinolene
15 Thymol
16 alpha-Pinene

Molecular docking

The flexible docking procedure proposed by Trott and Olson was used to carry out the molecular docking with a few minor adjustments. As a result, Python Prescription 0.8, a package that incorporates Auto Dock Vina, was used to conduct the docking analysis of the identified chemicals with our chosen proteins. For the proteins, partial charge and atom type (PDBQT) files have been created (with their earlier formed PDB files as inputs). All of the ligand's bonds were allowed to rotate freely, which made the receptor stiff. Except for the grid box, which was altered in accordance with the active sites of protein molecules, many other parameters were retained at their default values. After the molecular docking investigations were finished and ten combinations for each protein-ligand complex for all phytoconstituents were constructed, text files containing the score data were also made for manual comparison. The conformation with the lowest binding energy (BE, kcal/mol) and root mean square deviation was found to be the ideal docking site (RMSD). To obtain more precise and trustworthy results, a docking exhaustiveness of 10 was chosen for this in-silico experiment, and the number of modes was fixed at 10. After that, PyMOL and the Discovery Studio visualizer were used to construct, display, and analyze the interaction between ligands and proteins [13].

Results

AutoDock Vina in PyRx 0.8 was used to perform the molecular docking study. The energy binding values of the chemical components of Coleus amboinicus were shown in Table 2. Caryophyllene oxide, beta-Caryophyllene, Thymol, and beta-Selinene had the strongest glucokinase affinity.

Table 2. Molecular docking results of glucokinase with selected bio compounds.

S.No. Compound Name Binding energy kcal/mol Hydrogen bond interaction
1 Caryophyllene_oxide -6 -
2 beta-Caryophyllene -5.7 LYS-169 (Pi –alkyl) ILE-225 ( Pi –alkyl
3 Thymol -5.4 GLY-181(H-Bond) ASP-205 (Pi-Anion) LYS-169 (Pi –alkyl) ILE-225 (Pi –alkyl)
4 beta-Selinene -5.3 LYS-169 (Pi –alkyl) ILE-225 ( Pi –alkyl

Discussion

In the pancreas and liver, GCK catalyzes the first and rate-limiting step of glycolysis, which is the conversion of glucose to glucose 6-phosphate [14]. GCK is considered to be the body's primary glucose sensor since changes in its activity modify the threshold for glucose-stimulated insulin generation from pancreatic beta-cells [15,16]. Unlike the other hexokinases, GCK is not sensitive to feedback suppression by physiological amounts of its product glucose 6-phosphate [17-19]. GCK is largely produced in the liver's hepatoparenchymal cells and pancreatic β-cells in humans [20]. GCK controls the rate of insulin secretion inside pancreatic cells to maintain glucose homeostasis, whereas GCK contributes to glycogen synthesis in the liver [21]. Numerous disease symptoms caused by alterations in the human gck locus highlight the need for more precise control over GCK activity in both tissues.

The pharmaceutical industry is very interested in creating GCK activators due to their significance in glucose metabolism and illness [22-25]. Numerous lead compounds that either directly or indirectly stimulate GCK in vivo have been discovered [25]. However, no practical therapeutic agent has yet to be discovered as a result of these attempts. The control of GCK is complex, and various novel regulatory strategies have been identified. Alternate and tissue-specific promoters control GCK transcription and gene expression to various degrees [26-30]. Insulin and glucose, among other hormones and metabolites, control the transcriptional level of GCK [17,31-34].

The different illness symptoms brought on by alterations in the human gck locus emphasize the need for careful regulation of GCK activity in both organs. Permanent neonatal diabetes mellitus (PNDM), a much more serious condition than young-onset T2DM, is brought on by heterozygous inactivating gck mutations (MODY2) [35-37]. On the other hand, there is a direct correlation between the level of enzyme activation and the severity of persistent hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia of infancy (PHHI), which is caused by gain-of-function activating gck mutations [35]. Therefore, we hypothesized that phytocompounds from Coleus amboinicus could activate GCK activity for the conversion of glucose to glucose 6-phosphate after binding with amino acids of GCK, resulting in a decrease in blood glucose by increasing cellular utilization and, potentially, a future application in the treatment of T2DM.

Molecular docking is a simulation method that considers the best location for a molecule to bind to a protein binding site. In this approach, the binding site is selected in the 3D coordinate space of the target, and the binding affinity is computed based on the final orientation of the molecule within the binding site. The importance and sensitivity of binding affinity values are determined by the biggest large negative value (greatest binding affinity or lowest binding energy), which represents the most beneficial conformation of the complex created when the implicated ligand successfully binds with the active pockets of the target.

Additionally, by examining ligand binding modes and direction in the target protein's receptor pocket, the molecular docking model has been used to confirm the anti-diabetic efficiency of Coleus amboinicus compounds (Table 1). The molecular docking investigation was carried out using AutoDock Vina in PyRx 0.8. A molecular docking and virtual screening program with multicore and multithreading capabilities are called AutoDock Vina. The ligand-receptor affinity was measured using the binding free energy (G binding) value. The whole inter-molecular energy, total internal energy, and torsional free energy were added up to determine the binding free energy, which was then subtracted from the energy of the unbound system. The optimal interaction site was determined using the conformation with the least energy binding value.

Figure 1A showed the interaction between glucokinase with Caryophyllene oxide. Compared to other ligands, it showed strong binding with glucokinase in terms of binding energy. This complex showed the binding energy of -6kal/mol, but it does not show any type of interaction with glucokinase protein. Figure 1B showed the interaction between the beta-Caryophyllene with glucokinase. It showed a binding energy of -5.7 kcal/mol and it formed the two pi-alkyl interactions with the amino acid residues of LYS-169 and ILE-225. Figure 1C showed the interaction of Thymol with glucokinase. It formed the four interactions with the binding site of glucokinase. The amino acid GLY-181 form the hydrogen interaction with thymol, and the amino acids like ASP-205, LYS-169, and ILE-225 form the pi-alkyl interactions with glucokinase. Figure 1D showed the interaction between the beta-Selinene and glucokinase. It showed good binding with a binding energy of -5.3kcal/mol. From these results, we observed that all the compounds formed the pi-alkyl interaction with the amino acids of LYS-169 and ILE-225. The several Pi-sigma interactions (Pi-alkyl and Pi-Sulphur), the majority of which involve charge transfer, aid in intercalating the medication in the receptor's binding region. There is an interaction between the pi-electron cloud above an aromatic group and the electron group of any alkyl group in pi-alkyl interactions Figure 2. The presence of these types of interactions in docking studies confirmed that selected compounds had a strong binding affinity with the target protein.

Figure 1. Molecular interaction of glucokinase with (Figure 1A) Caryophyllene_oxide; (Figure 1B) beta-Caryophyllene; (Figure 1C) Thymol; (Figure 1D) beta-Selinene .

Figure 1

Figure 2. Molecular surface representation of glucokinase with selected compounds: beta-Caryophyllene (red), beta-Selinene (blue), Caryophyllene_oxide (Yellow), Thymol (Pink).

Figure 2

As determined by assessing their bonding contacts in terms of H-bond, hydrophobic interactions, and G of the best docked poses, majority of the drugs demonstrated considerable binding in the allosteric region of Glucokinase protein (Table 2). These compounds have a complementary fit in the allosteric region of the GCK protein, according to docking studies.

Conclusions

Natural substances have long been used to cure and prevent illnesses in humans. Based on the aforementioned in silico investigation, we concentrated on the hydrogen and hydrophobic interactions in the position of ASP-205, LYS-169, GLY-181, and ILE-225 residues of the glucokinase protein, and the binding of naturally occurring molecules was seated appropriately on the particular location. As a result, the proposed compounds are offered to the scientific community for further research. The results of this study demonstrated that interactions between Coleus amboinicus compounds and the Glucokinase enzyme were revealed by in silico molecular docking investigations, demonstrating the need for additional research to develop potent glucokinase activators for the treatment of T2DM.

The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Human Ethics

Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study

Animal Ethics

Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.

References

  • 1.Mammalian glucokinase. Printz RL, Magnuson MA, Granner DK. Annu Rev Nutr. 1993;13:463–496. doi: 10.1146/annurev.nu.13.070193.002335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.The network of glucokinase-expressing cells in glucose homeostasis and the potential of glucokinase activators for diabetes therapy. Matschinsky FM, Magnuson MA, Zelent D, et al. Diabetes. 2006;55:1–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pancreatic beta-cell glucokinase: closing the gap between theoretical concepts and experimental realities. Matschinsky FM, Glaser B, Magnuson MA. Diabetes. 1998;47:307–315. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.47.3.307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Structural basis for allosteric regulation of the monomeric allosteric enzyme human glucokinase. Kamata K, Mitsuya M, Nishimura T, Eiki J, Nagata Y. Structure. 2004;12:429–438. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2004.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Type 2 diabetes market. Gershell L. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005;4:367–368. doi: 10.1038/nrd1723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Current therapies and emerging targets for the treatment of diabetes. Wagman AS, Nuss JM. Curr Pharm Des. 2001;7:417–450. doi: 10.2174/1381612013397915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Targeting glucokinase activation for the treatment of type 2 diabetes-a status review. Sarabu R, Grimsby J. https://europepmc.org/article/med/16159025. Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Devel. 2005;8:631–637. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Allosteric activators of glucokinase: potential role in diabetes therapy. Grimsby J, Sarabu R, Corbett WL, et al. Science. 2003;301:370–373. doi: 10.1126/science.1084073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Discovery, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel glucokinase activators. McKerrecher D, Allen JV, Bowker SS, et al. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2005;15:2103–2106. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2005.01.087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Flavonoids: cellular and molecular mechanism of action in glucose homeostasis. Cazarolli LH, Zanatta L, Alberton EH, et al. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2008;8:1032–1038. doi: 10.2174/138955708785740580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.In silico and in vivo analysis to identify the antidiabetic activity of beta sitosterol in adipose tissue of high fat diet and sucrose induced type-2 diabetic experimental rats. Ponnulakshmi R, Shyamaladevi B, Vijayalakshmi P, Selvaraj J. Toxicol Mech Methods. 2019;29:276–290. doi: 10.1080/15376516.2018.1545815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.β-sitosterol circumvents obesity induced inflammation and insulin resistance by down-regulating IKKβ/NF-κB and JNK signaling pathway in adipocytes of type 2 diabetic rats. Jayaraman S, Devarajan N, Rajagopal P, et al. Molecules. 2021;26 doi: 10.3390/molecules26072101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.BIOVIA - BIOVIA: Scientific enterprise software for chemical research: Material science R&D. [ Jan; 2022 ]. 2020. https://www.3dsbiovia.com. https://www.3dsbiovia.com.
  • 14.Hexokinases. Wilson JE. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/BFb0049776. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol. 1995;126:65–198. doi: 10.1007/BFb0049776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hypothesis: structures, evolution, and ancestor of glucose kinases in the hexokinase family. Kawai S, Mukai T, Mori S, Mikami B, Murata K. J Biosci Bioeng. 2005;99:320–330. doi: 10.1263/jbb.99.320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Evolution and regulatory role of the hexokinases. Cárdenas ML, Cornish-Bowden A, Ureta T. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/82182047.pdf. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1998:242–264. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4889(97)00150-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mammalian glucokinase and its gene. Iynedjian PB. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1134312/ Biochem J. 1993;293:1–13. doi: 10.1042/bj2930001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Changes in pancreatic islet glucokinase and hexokinase activities with increasing age, obesity, and the onset of diabetes. Cockburn BN, Ostrega DM, Sturis J, Kubstrup C, Polonsky KS, Bell GI. Diabetes. 1997;46:1434–1439. doi: 10.2337/diab.46.9.1434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Glucose-6-phosphatase overexpression lowers glucose 6-phosphate and inhibits glycogen synthesis and glycolysis in hepatocytes without affecting glucokinase translocation. Evidence against feedback inhibition of glucokinase. Aiston S, Trinh KY, Lange AJ, Newgard CB, Agius L. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:24559–24566. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.35.24559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Isozymes of mammalian hexokinase: structure, subcellular localization and metabolic function. Wilson JE. J Exp Biol. 2003;206:2049–2057. doi: 10.1242/jeb.00241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Evidence from transgenic mice that glucokinase is rate limiting for glucose utilization in the liver. Ferre T, Riu E, Bosch F, Valera A. FASEB J. 1996;10:1213–1218. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.10.10.8751724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Glucokinase activators for diabetes therapy: May 2010 status report. Matschinsky FM, Zelent B, Doliba N, et al. Diabetes Care. 2011;34 Suppl 2:0–43. doi: 10.2337/dc11-s236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Small-Molecule Allosteric Activation of Human Glucokinase in the Absence of Glucose. Bowler JM, Hervert KL, Kearley ML, Miller BG. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2013;4:580–584. doi: 10.1021/ml400061x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Recent updates on glucokinase activators for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Grewal A, Sekhon B, Lather V. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/ben/mrmc/2014/00000014/00000007/art00004. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2014;14:585–602. doi: 10.2174/1389557514666140722082713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Enantioselective synthesis of tatanans A-C and reinvestigation of their glucokinase-activating properties. Xiao Q, Jackson JJ, Basak A, Bowler JM, Miller BG, Zakarian A. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/ben/mrmc/2014/00000014/00000007/art00004#Supp. Nat. Chem. 2013;5:410–416. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Molecular and cellular regulation of human glucokinase. Sternisha SM, Miller BG. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2019;663:199–213. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2019.01.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Multiple elements in the upstream glucokinase promoter contribute to transcription in insulinoma cells. Shelton KD, Franklin AJ, Khoor A, Beechem J, Magnuson MA. Mol Cell Biol. 1992;12:4578–4589. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.10.4578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Analysis of upstream glucokinase promoter activity in transgenic mice and identification of glucokinase in rare neuroendocrine cells in the brain. Jetton TL, Liang Y, Pettepher CC, et al. and gut. J. Biol. Chem. 1994;269:3641–3654. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.The Pal elements in the upstream glucokinase promoter exhibit dyad symmetry and display cell-specific enhancer activity when multimerised. Moates JM, Magnuson MA. Diabetologia. 2004;47:1632–1640. doi: 10.1007/s00125-004-1497-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.BETA2 activates transcription from the upstream glucokinase gene promoter in islet beta-cells and gut endocrine cells. Moates JM, Nanda S, Cissell MA, Tsai MJ, Stein R. Diabetes. 2003;52:403–408. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.52.2.403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Stimulation by insulin of glucokinase gene transcription in liver of diabetic rats. Iynedjian PB, Gjinovci A, Renold AE. J. Biol. Chem. 1988;263:740–744. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.A potential role for fructose-2,6-bisphosphate in the stimulation of hepatic glucokinase gene expression. Wu C, Okar DA, Stoeckman AK, et al. https://www.jbc.org/article/S0021-9258(19)35415-8/pdf. Endocrinology. 2004;145:650–658. doi: 10.1210/en.2003-1290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.The transcription factors HIF-1 and HNF-4 and the coactivator p300 are involved in insulin-regulated glucokinase gene expression via the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B pathway. Roth U, Curth K, Unterman TG, Kietzmann T. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:2623–2631. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M308391200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Glucokinase and cytosolic phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (GTP) in the human liver. Regulation of gene expression in cultured hepatocytes. Iynedjian PB, Marie S, Gjinovci A, et al. J Clin Invest. 1995;95:1966–1973. doi: 10.1172/JCI117880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Update on mutations in glucokinase (GCK), which cause maturity-onset diabetes of the young, permanent neonatal diabetes, and hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia. Osbak KK, Colclough K, Saint-Martin C, Beer NL, Bellanné-Chantelot C, Ellard S, Gloyn AL. Hum Mutat. 2009;30:1512–1526. doi: 10.1002/humu.21110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Circulating glucose levels inversely correlate with Drosophila larval feeding through insulin signaling and SLC5A11. Ugrankar R, Theodoropoulos P, Akdemir F, Henne WM, Graff JM. Commun Biol. 2018;1:110. doi: 10.1038/s42003-018-0109-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young: What Do Clinicians Need to Know? Kim SH. Diabetes Metab J. 2015;39:468–477. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2015.39.6.468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES