Abstract
Introduction:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of chlorhexidine (CHX), sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), calcium hydroxide (CH) and double antibiotic paste (DAP) mixed with silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) against Enterococcus faecalis.
Methods and materials:
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC), and biofilm formation inhibition (after 72 h) of the experimental substances alone or mixed with AgNPs were measured against E. faecalis using microtiter plate method. Bacterial cultures turbidity was measured using a spectrophotometer. All procedures were performed in triplicates.
Results:
The MIC values for CHX, NaOCl, CH and DAP were equal to 0.012, 1.25, 1.6 and 0.156 mg/mL, and their MBC’s were 0.025, 2.5, 0 and 0.625 mg/mL. After mixing them with AgNPs, the MIC’s for CHX, NaOCl, CH and DAP were reduced to 0.0032, 0.158, 0.2 and 0.0391 mg/mL, while their MBC’s were reduced to 0.0064, 0.0632, 0.401 and 0.0156 mg/mL. Biofilm formation inhibition occurred in higher dilutions of all irrigants and medicaments as they were mixed with Ag NPs.
Conclusions:
Adding AgNPs resulted in an increased antimicrobial activity at the tested dilutions for all experimental substances. More investigations in in vivo conditions are required to confirm the results of this study.
Key Words: Calcium Hydroxide, Chlorhexidine, Double Antibiotic Paste, Enterococcus Faecalis; Silver Nanoparticles, Sodium Hypochlorite
Introduction
The ultimate purpose of a root canal therapy is to eradicate microorganisms and to avoid recontamination of pulpal space [1]. Studies have shown that instrumentation debrides only 70% of the canal walls; hence, one of the final goals in root canal treatment is to facilitate entrance of irrigants to dentinal tubules to enhance the course of disinfection [2]. Common endodontic irrigants are used during treatment, which include sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX), mixture of tetracycline, acid and detergent (MTAD), and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). However, there are some disadvantages associates to each.
NaOCl is regarded as a gold standard endodontic irrigant thanks to its antibacterial potency and organic dissolving characteristics [3]. Its drawbacks are the unpleasant odor and taste, toxicity and reduction in dentine flexural strength [4]. CHX is another common irrigant, which has antibacterial potency and good substantivity [5, 6], but the organic components in root canal system can negatively affect its antibacterial activity [7].
In addition to canal instrumentation and irrigation, intracanal inter appointment medicaments seem to be necessary for eradicating the infected tissues and microorganisms in some cases [8, 9]. Calcium hydroxide (CH) is the most common intracanal medicament with high pH that leads to its antibacterial property. However, it is shown that its material effectiveness against some microorganisms is limited [10, 11].
Another intracanal medicament known as triple antibiotic paste (TAP) is a mixture of metronidazole, ciprofloxacin and minocycline that seems to be a promising medicament effective in root canal disinfection and revascularization [12, 13]. However, there is a potential risk of tooth discoloration related to the presence of minocycline in this mixture [14]. Hence, double antibiotic paste (DAP) was introduced later and regarded as an effective antibacterial medicament comparable to TAP [15]. Long period of contact time and bacterial resistance are some of the concerns with this antibiotic medicament [12]. Due to shortcomings of the aforementioned irrigants and medicaments in root canal treatment, their combination was employed to overcome the drawbacks, and also to improve their characteristics.
As most irrigants and medicaments are not clinically efficient to remove all endodontic pathogens at their minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), it is appropriate to mixed them with silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) not only to use their lowest diluted form and decrease their side effects, but also to increase their anti-microbial potency.
Recently, nanotechnology has attracted the attention of researchers in the field of dentistry, especially in endodontic science. Amongst different nanoparticles, AgNPs have shown the highest antibacterial property and biocompatibility for root canal purposes [16, 17]. Moreover, studies have attested the enhancement in antibacterial capacity of different antibiotics when combined with AgNPs [18, 19]. Also, researches have shown higher antibacterial activity of CH in combination with AgNPs in comparison with CH alone [20, 21]. The aim of present investigation was to evaluate the synergistic antimicrobial effects of common irrigants and medicaments in combination with AgNPs against Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) in planktonic and biofilm forms.
Materials and Methods
Bacterial strains and media
In this study, E. faecalis )PTCC1778) was used as the chief isolated bacteria from the root canal infections [22]. To culture this bacterium in anaerobic blood agar plates (CDC, BioMerieux, Durham, NC), brain-heart infusion (BHI) was used along with 5 g yeast extract/L and 5% v/v vitamin K+hemin (BHI-YE). To maintain 37°C anaerobic environment, gas-generating sachets (Gas-Pak EZ; Becton, Dickinson and Company, New Jersey USA) were used.
Preparation of experimental substances
Ag NPs were prepared according to a previous method explained by Abbaszadegn et al. [23]. In short, laboratory glassware were placed in 1:3 of HCl/HNO3 solution. Next, they were rinsed three times by distilled water. Then, a total of 1 mL of 0.01 M AgNO3 aqueous solution was added to 20 mL of 6.2 mM 1-dodecyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride ([C12mim][Cl]) aqueous solution, under constant stirring. Afterward, we added the prepared 0.4 M NaBH4 aqueous solution gradually until the observation of golden color in the solution. Subsequently, to remove the excess volume of ionic liquids, the solution was centrifuged for 20 min. Finally, the suspension was kept in room temperature and concentration was calculated as 5.7× 10-8 Mol/L [24].
To prepare a saturated solution of CH paste 16 mg of CH powder (Golchai Co, Tehran, Iran), was mixed with 1 mL of distilled water or AgNPs.
A saturated solution of DAP was prepared by dissolving 300 mg USP grade antibiotic powder (Samen Medical, Mashhad, Iran) comprised of equal portions of ciprofloxacin and metronidazole in 3 mL distilled water (50 mg of each antibiotic/mL).
It is worth mentioning that CH and DAP mixture were stirred at room temperature for 4 h. Then to clarify the solutions, mixtures were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 15 min.
NaOCl (2.25%), CHX (2%) (Cerkamed Dental-Medical company, Pawłowski, Poland) and CH were used alone or mixed with Ag NPs in the experimental groups.
In each group, 5 plates were prepared and the tests were performed in triplicates: Group 1; CH and 1 mL of distilled water, Group; CH and 1 mL of AgNPs, Group 3; DAP and 1 mL of distilled water, Group 4, DAP and 1 mL of AgNPs, Group 5; CHX, Group 6; CHX and 1 mL of AgNPs, Group 7; NaOCl, Group 8; NaOCl and 1 mL of AgNPs, Group 9; 1 mL of AgNPs (positive control) and Group 10; 1 mL of distilled water (negative control).
Determination of minimum inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations
The bacterial tests were done according to Clinical Laboratory and Standard Institute (CLSI) instructions [25]. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) is the lowest concentration of an antimicrobial agent, which inhibits the growth of a microorganism, and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) is the lowest concentration of an antibacterial agent required to kill a particular bacterium. Two-fold dilution method was used to determine the MIC and MBC of each substance against E. faecalis [26]. BHI-YE-cultured E. faecalis was treated with 0, 1:10 to 1:64000 dilutions of each experimental material in sterile 96-well plates under standard protocols for 24 h. A spectrophotometer was employed to measure the turbidity of the bacterial cultures based on optical density at 540 nm. In practice, MIC is defined as the lowest concentration of an agent that causes change equal to or less than 0.050 in turbidity [26, 27]. MBC was determined by bacterial cultures from the wells equal or more than MIC, and they were smeared on blood agar plates following 48 h of incubation.
MBC was defined as the lowest concentration of an antimicrobial agent that no visible bacterial colonies could survive on the agar plates after a 48-h incubation [27].
Determination of biofilm formation
E. faecalis cultures (106 colony-forming units/mL) in BHI-YE were treated in 96-well micro titer plates with 1:1 to 1:64 dilutions of each experimental solutions for 24 h [28]. Biofilm was washed twice with saline, fixed with 10% formaldehyde according to previous studies, then washed twice with saline again and stained with 0.5% crystal violet for 30 min. Biofilm was washed 3 times with saline, afterwards, the process of extracting crystal violet from the biofilm cells by 200 mL 2-propanol was done for 1 h. Then we diluted the extract (1:5) with 2-propanol and read at 490 nm with 2-propanol, which was used as a blank control. Biofilm formation was read at 72 h to assure the ability of the agent to inhibit biofilm formation over time. The actual bacterial biofilm mass was represented by optical absorbance of the diluted crystal violet stain. A higher absorbance shows higher biofilm mass.
Results
Table 1 shows the MIC and MBC values. With respect to biofilm formation, the inhibition was obtained at dilutions 8, 2 and 4, and 2 times higher than MIC’s of NaOCl, CHX, CH and DAP, where they mixed with AgNPs.
Table1.
MIC, MBC (mg/mL) of the experimental materials against E. faecalis (* not measureable)
| Groups | MIC | MBC |
|---|---|---|
| CH | 1.6 | - |
| CH+AgNPs | 0.2 | 0.401 |
| DAP | 0.156 | 0.625 |
| DAP+AgNPs | 0.0391 | 0.0156 |
| CHX | 0.012 | 0.025 |
| CHX+AgNPs | 0.0032 | 0.0064 |
| NaOCl | 1.25 | 2.5 |
| NaOCl+AgNPs | 0.0158 | 0.0632 |
Discussion
In this study, we found that adding AgNPs resulted in an increased antimicrobial activity for all the tested irrigants and medicaments. The present study was designed to investigate the synergistic effect of NaOCl, CHX, CH and DAP in combination with AgNPs against E. faecalis in planktonic and biofilm models.
E. faecalis is the dominant microorganism in persistent endodontic infections and it is found in 30 to 90% of treated root canals. Moreover, it is resistant to a variety of antibiotics as well as to high pH of intracanal medicaments. Furthermore, it invades dentin and binds to immobilized collagen [29, 30]. It is shown that NaOCl or CHX do not have sufficient ability to eliminate E. faecalis [31]. Also, Sabrah et al. [32] showed that DAP and TAP have a significant antibacterial effect against E. faecalis, although they were not effective against the established biofilm.
In this study, AgNPs were added to common irrigants and medicaments to investigate the possible antibacterial potency leading to microbial synergism against E. faecalis. Abbaszadegan et al. [24] revealed that AgNPs with a positive surface charge have effective antibacterial potency against E. faecalis as the most challenging microorganism. Furthermore, studies have proven that AgNPs are less harmful than the other metal nanoparticles and nontoxic to mammalian cells in dilutions less than 7.4×10-4 mol/L [33-35]. Besides, AgNPs has high bactericidal potency and good biocompatibility in low dilutions [36]. Therefore, in the present study AgNPs at 5.7×10 -8 mol/L was selected as a test material. The synergistic effects of AgNPs with antibiotics were previously established through increasing bacterial bonds, resulting in antimicrobial potency [37, 38]. Also, it was shown that AgNPs have synergistic effect with CH against E. faecalis [21].
Although CH is the most common intracanal medicament and is still regarded as the gold standard inter appointment dressing, there are numerous studies that have shown its failure against E. faecalis and C. albicans [39-41]. We also reached the same findings; however, when it was combined with AgNPs, their combination resulted in an increased antibacterial activity confirmed by the reduction in its MIC and MBC and biofilm inhibition test. Our finding was in line with Javidi et al. [21].
Hoshino et al. [42] introduced triple antibiotic paste (TAP), and DAP as a potent intracanal medicaments in endodontics with siginificant antibacterial effects. Sabrah et al. [15] demonstrated that DAP had similar antibacterial activity relative to triple antibiotic paste and was effective against E. faecalis and P. gingivalis without tooth discoloration. Therefore, we selected DAP to be included in this investigation. Some previous studies showed the synergistic effect of AgNPs and antibiotics against some microorganisms [37, 38]; however, no previous study was available to support the synergistic effects of TAP or DAP in combination with AgNPs in endodontics. In the present investigation, the efficacy of these antibiotic medicaments with or without AgNPs was confirmed.
To the best of our knowledge, in the literature there is no report on the evaluation of possible antimicrobial synergistic effect between endodontic irrigants and AgNPs. However, there are numerous studies demonstrating the bactericidal effects of NaOCl and CHX alone or in combination against E. faecalis in infected root canals and dentinal tubules [31, 43]. In the present study, NaOCl as the gold standard irrigant in endodontics was tested at concentration of 2.5% due to its matchless antibacterial activity, low toxicity and tissue dissolving capacity [44]. Estrela et al. [45] revealed that 2% CHX was the effective agent against most microorganisms. Consistently, we also found that 2.5% NaOCl and 2% CHX were efficient irrigants against planktonic and biofilm E. faecalis. Furthermore, we found that 2% CHX was more potent than 2.5% NaOCl. It is worth mentioning that there is a controversy regarding the higher antibacterial potency of CHX relative to NaOCl, which might be due to different methods, dilutions and contact time tested [46-49].
In our study, we showed that AgNPs was able to increase the antimicrobial activity of NaOCl and CHX. Han et al. [50] showed that NaOCl caused structural changes in bacterial membrane, and bacterial LPS have a protective mechanism against NaOCl. The synergistic effect of NaOCl and AgNPs were observed in the current study, this might have been due to the alteration of AgNPs in highly conserved lipopolysaccharide of E. faecalis leading to higher efficiency of NaOCl.
The possible mechanism for synergistic effect of AgNPs with CHX is the positive charge of these two irrigants that might have resulted in their higher antibacterial activity when they came in contact with each other. Amongst experimented combined materials, CH+AgNPs showed the least and CHX+AgNPs showed the most antibacterial potency.
Further studies should be performed on the cytotoxicity of these materials as they are merged as well as to investigate the possible interactions between such mixtures and root canal filling materials. Also, future researches should focus on animal or in vitro models in combination with microorganisms commonly found in infected root canal.
Conclusion
Within the limitations of this study, we found that adding AgNPs to endodontic irrigants and medicaments could lead to improvement in their antibacterial potency against E. faecalis. Further investigations are desired to evaluate other characteristics of these combined materials and their effects on dentin, periodontium and root canal filling material.
Acknowledgment
The authors thank the Vice-Chancellery of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences for supporting this research (Grant # 93-01-03-8607). This manuscript is based on the undergraduate thesis by Fariba Yaghoobi and Ramin Motamedi. The authors also wish to thank Mr. H. Argasi at the Research Consultation Center (RCC) of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences for his invaluable assistance in editing this manuscript.
Conflict of Interest:
‘None declared’.
References
- 1.Shabahang S, Pouresmail M, Torabinejad M. In vitro antimicrobial efficacy of MTAD and sodium hypochlorite. J Endod. 2003;29(7):450–2. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200307000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Peters O, Schönenberger K, Laib A. Effects of four Ni–Ti preparation techniques on root canal geometry assessed by micro computed tomography. Int Endod J. 2001;34(3):221–30. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00373.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Siqueira JF, Rôças IN, Favieri A, Lima KC. Chemomechanical reduction of the bacterial population in the root canal after instrumentation and irrigation with 1% 25% and 525% sodium hypochlorite. J Endod. 2000;26(6):331–4. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200006000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Spangberg L, Engström B, Langeland K. Biologic effects of dental materials: 3 Toxicity and antimicrobial effect of endodontic antiseptics in vitro. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1973;36(6):856–71. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(73)90338-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Delany GM, Patterson SS, Miller CH, Newton CW. The effect of chlorhexidine gluconate irrigation on the root canal flora of freshly extracted necrotic teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1982;53(5):518–23. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(82)90469-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Abbaszadegan A, Gholami A, Ghahramani Y, Ghareghan R, Ghareghan M, Kazemi A, Iraji A, Ghasemi Y. Antimicrobial and cytotoxic activity of Cuminum cyminum as an intracanal medicament compared to chlorhexidine gel. Iran Endod J. 2016;11(1) doi: 10.7508/iej.2016.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Khedmat S, Aligholi M, Sadeghi S. Influence of bovine serum albumin on the antibacterial activity of endodontic irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis. Iran Endod J. 2010;4(4):139–43. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mohammadi Z, Giardino L, Mombeinipour A. Antibacterial substantivity of a new antibiotic‐based endodontic irrigation solution. Aust Endod J. 2012;38(1):26–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4477.2010.00263.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mozayeni MA, Haeri A, Dianat O, Jafari AR. Antimicrobial effects of four intracanal medicaments on enterococcus faecalis: an in vitro study. Iran Endod J. 2014;9(3):195–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Atila‐Pektaş B, Yurdakul P, Gülmez D, Görduysus Ö. Antimicrobial effects of root canal medicaments against Enterococcus faecalis and Streptococcus mutans. Int Endod J. 2013;46(5):413–8. doi: 10.1111/iej.12004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wang Z, Shen Y, Haapasalo M. Effectiveness of endodontic disinfecting solutions against young and old Enterococcus faecalis biofilms in dentin canals. J Endod. 2012;38(10):1376–9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.06.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Vijayaraghavan R, Mathian VM, Sundaram AM, Karunakaran R, Vinodh S. Triple antibiotic paste in root canal therapy. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2012;4(6) doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.100214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mohammadi Z, Jafarzadeh H, Shalavi S, Yaripour S, Sharifi F, Kinoshita J-I. A Review on Triple Antibiotic Paste as a Suitable Material Used in Regenerative Endodontics. Iran Endod J. 2018;13(1) doi: 10.22037/iej.v13i1.17941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kim J-H, Kim Y, Shin S-J, Park J-W, Jung I-Y. Tooth discoloration of immature permanent incisor associated with triple antibiotic therapy: a case report. J Endod. 2010;36(6):1086–91. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.03.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sabrah AH, Yassen GH, Gregory RL. Effectiveness of antibiotic medicaments against biofilm formation of Enterococcus faecalis and Porphyromonas gingivalis. J Endod. 2013;39(11):1385–9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Esteban-Cubillo A, Pecharromán C, Aguilar E, Santarén J, Moya JS. Antibacterial activity of copper monodispersed nanoparticles into sepiolite. Nanotechnology. 2006;41(16):5208–12. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Desai VS, Kowshik M. Antimicrobial activity of titanium dioxide nanoparticles synthesized by sol-gel technique. Res J Microbiol. 2009;4(3):97–103. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fayaz AM, Balaji K, Girilal M, Yadav R, Kalaichelvan PT, Venketesan R. Biogenic synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their synergistic effect with antibiotics: a study against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Nanomedicine. 2010;6(1):103–9. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2009.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kora AJ, Rastogi L. Enhancement of antibacterial activity of capped silver nanoparticles in combination with antibiotics, on model gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria. Bioinorg Chem Appl. 2013 doi: 10.1155/2013/871097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Afkhami F, Pourhashemi SJ, Sadegh M, Salehi Y, Fard MJK. Antibiofilm efficacy of silver nanoparticles as a vehicle for calcium hydroxide medicament against Enterococcus faecalis. J Dent. 2015;43(12):1573–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Javidi M, Afkhami F, Zarei M, Ghazvini K, Rajabi O. Efficacy of a combined nanoparticulate/calcium hydroxide root canal medication on elimination of Enterococcus faecalis. Aust Endod J. 2014;40(2):61–5. doi: 10.1111/aej.12028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Molander A, Reit C, Dahlen G, Kvist T. Microbiological status of root‐filled teeth with apical periodontitis. Int Endod J. 1998;31(1):1–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Abbaszadegan A, Gholami A, Abbaszadegan S, Aleyasin ZS, Ghahramani Y, Dorostkar S, Hemmateenejad B, Ghasemi Y, Sharghi H. The Effects of Different Ionic Liquid Coatings and the Length of Alkyl Chain on Antimicrobial and Cytotoxic Properties of Silver Nanoparticles. Iran Endod J. 2017;12(4):481–7. doi: 10.22037/iej.v12i4.17905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Abbaszadegan A, Ghahramani Y, Gholami A, Hemmateenejad B, Dorostkar S, Nabavizadeh M, Sharghi H. The effect of charge at the surface of silver nanoparticles on antimicrobial activity against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria: a preliminary study. J Nanomater. 2015;2015:53. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Schwalbe R, Steele-Moore L, Goodwin AC. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing protocols. Crc Press; 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Song J-H, Kim S-K, Chang K-W, Han S-K, Yi H-K, Jeon J-G. In vitro inhibitory effects of Polygonum cuspidatum on bacterial viability and virulence factors of Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus. Arch Oral Biol. 2006;51(12):1131–40. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2006.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Huang R, Li M, Gregory RL. Effect of nicotine on growth and metabolism of Streptococcus mutans. Eur J Oral Sci. 2012;120(4):319–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2012.00971.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Reiter KC, Villa B, da Silva Paim TG, Sambrano GE, de Oliveira CF, d'Azevedo PA. Enhancement of antistaphylococcal activities of six antimicrobials against sasG-negative methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus: an in vitro biofilm model. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;74(2):101–5. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.05.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Santos KR. Association of Enterococcus faecalis with different forms of periradicular diseases. J Endod. 2004;30(5):315–20. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200405000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Love R. Enterococcus faecalis–a mechanism for its role in endodontic failure. Int Endod J. 2001;34(5):399–405. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00437.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Estrela C, Silva JA, Alencar AHGd, Leles CR, Decurcio DA. Efficacy of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine against Enterococcus faecalis: a systematic review. J Appl Oral Sci. 2008;16(6):364–8. doi: 10.1590/S1678-77572008000600002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sabrah AH, Yassen GH, Liu W-C, Goebel WS, Gregory RL, Platt JA. The Effect of Diluted Triple and Double Antibiotic Pastes on Dental Pulp Stem Cells and Established Enterococcus faecalis Biofilm. Clin Oral Investig. 19(8):2059–66. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1423-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sondi I, Salopek-Sondi B. Silver nanoparticles as antimicrobial agent: a case study on E coli as a model for Gram-negative bacteria. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2004;275(1):177–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Miura N, Shinohara Y. Cytotoxic effect and apoptosis induction by silver nanoparticles in HeLa cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009;390(3):733–7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.10.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nabavizadeh M, Ghahramani Y, Abbaszadegan A, Jamshidzadeh A, Jenabi P, Makarempour A. In Vivo Biocompatibility of an Ionic Liquid-protected Silver Nanoparticle Solution as Root Canal Irrigant. Iran Endod J. 2018;13(3):293. doi: 10.22037/iej.v13i3.17386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Gomes-Filho JE, Silva FO, Watanabe S, Cintra LTA, Tendoro KV, Dalto LG, Pacanaro SV, Lodi CS, de Melo FFF. Tissue reaction to silver nanoparticles dispersion as an alternative irrigating solution. J Endod. 2010;36(10):1698–702. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Niakan S, Niakan M, Hesaraki S, Nejadmoghaddam MR, Moradi M, Hanafiabdar M, Allamezadeh R, Sabouri M. Comparison of the antibacterial effects of nanosilver with 18 antibiotics on multidrug resistance clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii. Jundishapur J Micro. 2013;6(5) [Google Scholar]
- 38.McShan D, Zhang Y, Deng H, Ray PC, Yu H. Synergistic antibacterial effect of silver nanoparticles combined with ineffective antibiotics on drug resistant Salmonella typhimurium DT104. J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2015;33(3):369–84. doi: 10.1080/10590501.2015.1055165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lin Y-h, Mickel AK, Chogle S. Effectiveness of selected materials against Enterococcus faecalis: part 3 The antibacterial effect of calcium hydroxide and chlorhexidine on Enterococcus faecalis. J Endod. 2003;29(9):565–6. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200309000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Tronstad L, Andreasen J, Hasselgren G, Kristerson L, Riis I. pH changes in dental tissues after root canal filling with calcium hydroxide. J Endod. 1981;7(1):17–21. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(81)80262-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mohammadi Z, Shalavi S, Yazdizadeh M. Antimicrobial activity of calcium hydroxide in endodontics: a review. Chonnam Med J. 2012;48(3):133–40. doi: 10.4068/cmj.2012.48.3.133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hoshino E, Kurihara‐Ando N, Sato I, Uematsu H, Sato M, Kota K, Iwaku M. In‐vitro antibacterial susceptibility of bacteria taken from infected root dentine to a mixture of ciprofloxacin, metronidazole and minocycline. Int Endod J. 1996;29(2):125–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1996.tb01173.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Luddin N, Ahmed HMA. The antibacterial activity of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine against Enterococcus faecalis: A review on agar diffusion and direct contact methods. J Conserv Dent. 2013;16(1) doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.105291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Walton R. Current concepts of canal preparation. Dent Clin North Am. 1992;36(2):309–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Estrela C, Ribeiro RG, Estrela CR, Pécora JD, Sousa-Neto MD. Antimicrobial effect of 2% sodium hypochlorite and 2% chlorhexidine tested by different methods. Braz Dent J. 2003;14(1):58–62. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402003000100011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ayhan H, Sultan N, Cirak M, Ruhi M, Bodur H. Antimicrobial effects of various endodontic irrigants on selected microorganisms. Int Endod J. 1999;32(2):99–102. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.1999.00196.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ringel AM, Patterson SS, Newton CW, Miller CH, Mulhern JM. In vivo evaluation of chlorhexidine gluconate solution and sodium hypochlorite solution as root canal irrigants. J Endod. 1982;8(5):200–4. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(82)80354-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Siqueira JF, Rôças IN, Santos SR, Lima KC, Magalhães FA, de Uzeda M. Efficacy of instrumentation techniques and irrigation regimens in reducing the bacterial population within root canals. J Endod. 2002;28(3):181–4. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200203000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kuruvilla JR, Kamath MP. Antimicrobial activity of 25% sodium hypochlorite and 02% chlorhexidine gluconate separately and combined, as endodontic irrigants. J Endod. 1998;24(7):472–6. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80049-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Han X, Wang Z, Chen M, Zhang X, Tang C, Wu Z. Acute Responses of Microorganisms from Membrane Bioreactors in the Presence of NaOCl: Protective Mechanisms of Extracellular Polymeric Substances. Environ Sci Technol. 2017;51(6):3233. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b05475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
