Summary
Antibody-secreting cells (ASCs) are key contributors to humoral immunity through immunoglobulin production and the potential to be long-lived. ASC persistence has been recognized in the autoimmune thymus (THY); however, only recently has this population been appreciated in healthy THY tissue. We showed that the young female THY was skewed toward higher production of ASCs relative to males. However, these differences disappeared with age. In both sexes, THY ASCs included Ki-67+ plasmablasts which required CD154(CD40L) signals for their propagation. Single cell RNA-sequencing revealed that THY ASCs were enriched for an interferon responsive transcriptional signature relative to those from bone marrow and spleen. Flow cytometry confirmed that THY ASCs had increased levels of Toll-like receptor 7 as well as CD69 and major histocompatibility complex class II. Overall, we identified fundamental aspects of THY ASC biology which may be leveraged for future in depth studies of this population in both health and disease.
Subject areas: Immunity, Components of the immune system, Cell, Transcriptomics
Graphical abstract
Highlights
-
•
Thymus ASCs are selectively increased in young female Prdm1-eYFP mice
-
•
Thymus ASCs contain a CD154(CD40L) dependent Ki-67+ plasmablast population
-
•
Ectopic in vivo CD40 ligation does not increase total thymus ASC numbers
-
•
Thymus ASCs possess an interferon responsive gene signature
Immunity; Components of the immune system; Cell; Transcriptomics
Introduction
Humoral, or antibody (Ab) mediated, immunity is essential in preventing infection from a wide variety of bacterium and viruses. This is in part because of the many functions of Ab molecules which include neutralization, opsonization, and activation of various effector cell types.1 Based on namesake alone, it is no surprise that antibody-secreting cells (ASCs) are key contributors to the humoral immune system. Not only do these cells continuously secrete Abs2 but a segment of the population has been shown to be long-lived in both mice2,3,4,5 and humans.6,7,8
ASCs also possess numerous immunomodulatory roles which can be partially attributed to their ability to secrete cytokines.9,10,11 For instance, ASC production of interleukin-10 (IL-10) has been associated with the suppression of neuroinflammation12 and attenuation of the response to Salmonella infection.13 In the latter case, this has been linked with expression of LAG-3.13 In contrast, ASCs have also demonstrated production of proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α)14 and IL-1715 which play roles in gut homeostasis and response to Trypanosoma cruzi infection, respectively. Aside from the above, ASCs influence homeostatic processes such as hematopoiesis.16,17 Although hematopoietic regulatory capacity has been ascribed to bone marrow (BM) ASCs, whether ASCs regulate hematopoietic processes in other organs such as the thymus (THY) remains to be determined.
Historically, the presence of ASCs in the human THY has been associated with autoimmune diseases such as myasthenia gravis.18,19,20 In addition, mouse models of lupus have demonstrated disease-associated expansion of THY ASCs.21 In these instances, THY ASCs are continuously produced and secrete pathogenic autoantibodies. Aside from providing clues as to autoimmune etiology, studying ASCs in the healthy THY may reveal important insights as to their everyday function. In this regard, human studies have identified ASC populations in the neonatal THY which are preserved and potentially expanded over the course of aging.22,23 Histological analyses in humans have shown these cells to be located within the perivascular space (PVS) of the THY medulla22,23 and recent RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) experiments have inferred an intra-THY development of these cells.22 From a functional standpoint, THY ASC Abs have been shown to be virally and bacterially reactive,22,23 but it is unclear as to what percentages these reactivities occupy within the total THY ASC Ab repertoire. This is of particular interest because the human THY is thought to be enriched for autoreactive B cell clones24 and experiments using mice have shown the ability of autoreactive THY B cells to class switch following their interactions with developing T lymphocytes.25 Along these lines, recent work using BALB/c mice demonstrated the presence of IgE-secreting THY ASCs which were critical to mast cell development.26 As informative as these studies are, they failed to consider potential sex differences and provided only a limited comparison of THY ASCs to their peripheral counterparts. The former point is relevant because numerous sex differences exist within the immune system.27
In this report, we compared the development and phenotypic characteristics of female and male THY ASCs versus their cellular equivalents in the BM and spleen (SPL). Production of THY ASCs favored females in youth (3-month (mo.)-old mice) and reached similarity between the sexes by middle age (12-mo.-old), an observation which was unique when compared to BM and SPL. As in the SPL, the THY possessed a Ki-67+ plasmablast (PB) population which was significantly reduced on the in vivo blockade of CD154(CD40L) signaling. Like their peripheral counterparts, THY ASCs also required the expression of BLIMP-1 as its deletion ablated this population. Via single cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq), we identified three developmental lineages which were shared between ASCs isolated from the BM, SPL and THY. However, closer inspection of VDJ and transcriptional patterns revealed an immunoglobulin repertoire and interferon (IFN) responsive gene signature that was unique to THY ASCs and included increased expression of genes such as Tlr7 and Ly6c2. Overall, these data provide a valuable resource to be leveraged for future exploration of THY ASCs.
Results
Young female mice have increased numbers of THY ASCs relative to males
Previous work has identified the presence of ASCs in the THY of humans22,23 and mice21,28; however, they remain to be fully characterized. To begin addressing this deficiency, we used 3-mo.-old Prdm1-enhanced yellow fluorescence protein (eYFP) reporter mice to examine ASCs in the THY. These mice possess a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) that expresses enhanced yellow fluorescent protein (eYFP) downstream of the Prdm1 gene29 and can be used to identify ASCs when combined with the surface expression of selected proteins. Via flow cytometry, ASCs were identified as CD138HI IgD−/LO CD90.2-/LO Prdm1-eYFP+ (Figure 1A). In agreement with previous studies,30,31 3-mo.-old female mice had increased overall cellularity in the THY compared to age-matched males (Figure 1B). Percentages (Figure 1C) and numbers (Figure 1D) of ASCs were both significantly increased in female THY relative to male mice. The BM and SPL did not demonstrate similar phenotypes (Figures S1A–S1F) lending specificity to observations in the THY.
To functionally validate THY ASCs, we purified them via fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) (Figures S1G and S1H) and performed enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISpot) assays for IgM (Figure 1E) and total IgG (Figure 1F). As with BM and SPL, the THY ASC population possessed cells capable of IgM or IgG secretion, thus confirming their functional identity (Figures 1E, 1F, and S1I). Further comparison to BM and SPL ASCs showed that THY ASCs expressed ASC-associated proteins such as CD267(TACI),32,33 CD44,34,35,36 Sca-1(Ly-6A/E)37 and CD184(CXCR4)33 (Figure 1G). In addition, THY ASCs expressed membrane immunoglobulin (mIgκ+λ) like that observed for ASCs from the BM and SPL (Figure 1G).17,38,39 In some instances, organ-to-organ expression differences were evident (Figures S1J–S1N). For example, BM ASCs expressed the highest amounts of CD267(TACI) as assessed by flow cytometric geometric mean fluorescence intensity (gMFI) (Figure S1J), whereas THY ASCs expressed the highest levels of CD44 (Figure S1K).
Finally, BLIMP-1, encoded for by Prdm1, is a key regulator of ASC differentiation and function.40,41,42 For instance, the genetic ablation of Prdm1 in B cells leads to the loss of ASCs in the SPL following immunization.43 To determine the importance of BLIMP-1 for the formation of THY ASCs, we bred mice with a conditional allele of Prdm143 to a strain possessing the B cell specific Mb1(Cd79a)-Cre.44 Here we performed analyses using 3–5-mo.-old mice which were not age matched. In the absence of the Prdm1-eYFP reporter, THY ASCs were identified as CD138HI IgD−/LO CD90.2-/LO CD267(TACI)+ CD44+ (Figure 1H). Mice with the Prdm1Fl/FlMb1+/+ genotype were wildtype (WT) and possessed a distinct ASC population (Figure 1H). This population was lost in Prdm1Fl/FlMb1+/Cre ASC knockout (KO) mice (Figures 1H and 1I) demonstrating the conserved reliance on BLIMP-1 for the generation of THY ASCs. Taken together, these data support the existence of bona fide ASCs which are preferentially increased in the young female THY of Prdm1-eYFP mice.
THY ASCs contain a plasmablast population and are not recently immigrated
Using cell surface markers such as CD45R(B220) and CD19, ASCs in the BM and SPL can be subdivided into 3 populations. Population 1 is CD45R(B220)+ CD19+ and includes Ki-67+ PBs, whereas populations 2 and 3 are B220- CD19+ and B220- CD19−, respectively.3,45 These latter two populations represent more mature plasma cells. To investigate these populations in the THY, we performed flow cytometry on ASCs from 3- to 5-mo.-old female and male C57BL/6J mice with ASCs identified as in Figure 1H. THY ASCs were relatively balanced between compartments P1-P3 (Figures 2A and 2B). In contrast, SPL ASCs were composed largely of populations P1 and P2 (Figures 2A and 2B). To further confirm the existence of THY ASCs with a PB phenotype, we performed intracellular staining for the proliferation marker Ki-67 (Figure 2C). A wide range of Ki-67 positivity existed within the THY ASC population (Figure 2D). As a whole, the percentage of Ki-67+ ASCs was significantly lower in the THY compared to the SPL (Figure 2D) which agreed with the differential skewing of P1-P3 amongst the organs. In contrast, THY B cells (CD45R(B220)+ CD19+ CD138-/LO) had a slightly increased percentage of Ki-67+ cells relative to those in the SPL (Figure 2D). Analysis of Ki-67+ ASCs in THY and SPL demonstrated significantly higher CD45R(B220) expression compared to Ki-67- ASCs. This confirmed that CD45R(B220) could be used as a marker to enrich for PBs within the THY ASC compartment.
PBs are generally considered to be short-lived3 and their presence in the THY could be indicative of a local B cell response. This would agree with previous work which has shown THY B cells to possess an activated phenotype.46,47 To lend support to this notion, we evaluated the THY for B cell-T cell conjugates by flow cytometrically analyzing live cell doublets (Figure 2F) similar to previous studies.48 Using this method, we were able to identify putative B cell-T cell (B-T) conjugates that were TCRβ+ CD19+ mIgκ+λ+ (Figure 2G). As expected, both B-T doublets and TCRβ+ CD19− mIgκ+λ− (Non-B-T) doublets had increased cell size (FSC-A) relative to CD19+ mIgκ+λ+ (B) singlets (Figures 2G–2I). When compared to Non-B-T doublets and B singlets, B-T doublets possessed increased levels of CD69, CD95(Fas) and GL7 which suggested an activated phenotype (Figures 2H and 2J–2L).
In line with the above, recent studies in BALB/c mice have utilized techniques such as parabiosis and intravenous (i.v.) Ab labeling to support that THY ASCs are not recent immigrants and are generated locally.26 To test this in mice on the C57BL/6 background, we injected PBS (PBS) or 1 μg of αCD45-PE Abs i.v. into 3-mo.-old Prdm1-eYFP mice (Figure S2A). After 5 min (min.) or 24 h, we euthanized mice and analyzed the distribution of αCD45-PE staining within the peripheral blood (BLD), BM, SPL and THY. αCD45-PE labeled cells within a tissue are indicative of localization within the tissue vasculature or having trafficked the bloodstream during the labeling period.49,50,51 As expected, cells from the BLD of mice infused with αCD45-PE for 5 min possessed >99% labeling demonstrating the efficacy of our protocol (Figure S2B). αCD45-PE labeling of ASCs revealed organ specific staining patterns (Figure S2C). In agreement with previous studies,3,26 BM ASCs demonstrated low levels of labeling (∼11.8%) after 5 min, whereas that of SPL ASCs was more extensive (∼42.7%) (Figure S2D). In the THY, 0% of ASCs were labeled after 5 min (Figure S2D). At 24 h, we observed high percentages of αCD45-PE+ ASCs in the BM (∼41.0%) and SPL (∼58.8%); however, THY ASCs remained unlabeled (Figure S2D). The lack of αCD45-PE staining on THY ASCs was not due to absence of CD45 as ex vivo staining with αCD45-APC demonstrated similarities in CD45 expression amongst ASCs from all 3 organs (Figure S2E). In total, these results demonstrate the presence of PBs within the THY ASC population and suggest that THY ASCs are not recently immigrated.
CD154(CD40L)-derived signals are required for production of THY PBs
The context in which a B cell is activated can influence ASC differentiation. For example, ASCs can be generated via either a T cell independent or T cell dependent immune response.52 It has been shown that THY B cells class switch when activated in the presence of T cell-derived signals and genetic ablation of TCRα, MHC II or CD40 led to a significant loss of class switched THY B cells.25 As such, we hypothesized that inhibition of B cell-T cell signaling would lead to a reduction in THY ASCs. To test this, cohorts of 3–4-mo.-old female and male Prdm1-eYFP mice were treated intraperitoneally (i.p.) with isotype control IgG or αCD154(CD40L) blocking Abs for 1 month (Figures 3A and S3A). Subsequently, mice were euthanized and ASC populations were assessed. CD154 blockade did not affect total THY cell numbers (Figure 3B) but it did lead to a significant reduction in THY ASCs (Figure 3C). For comparison, 1-month inhibition of CD154 reduced total SPL numbers (Figure S3B) while also having decreased the total ASC population (Figure S3C). The above effects were evident for both sexes.
We hypothesized that any loss of ASCs would largely be because of a decrease in the proliferative, and presumably short-lived, PB compartment. As such, we repeated the above experiments and assessed ASC populations at both 2- and 4-weeks following isotype control or αCD154 administration (Figures 3D–3M and S3D–S3M). Because of availability, these experiments were performed with 3-5-mo.-old C57BL/6J mice purchased and used directly from The Jackson Laboratory. As such, these mice were not strictly age or litter matched as in previous experiments. Within the THY, total cellularity was unaffected by the loss of CD154 signals (Figure 3E) and there was a trend toward the reduction of total THY ASCs in mice treated with αCD154 Abs for 2- and 4-weeks (Figure 3F). Examination of THY ASC populations P1-P3 demonstrated little difference in percentages after 2 weeks of blockade (Figure 3G). However, THY P1 was significantly reduced in numbers at 2 weeks (Figure 3H). At 4 weeks post αCD154 treatment, THY P1 was significantly decreased in both percentages and absolute numbers. (Figures 3I and 3J). Perhaps not surprisingly, we observed a significant decrease of proliferating Ki-67+ THY ASCs in mice injected with αCD154 Abs (Figures 3K and 3L). Impairment of CD154 also reduced the percentage of Ki-67+ THY B cells which was most evident at 2 weeks (Figure 3M). Results in the SPL were largely similar albeit with greater penetrance (Figures S3E–S3M). Evaluation of CD40 expression (Figure 3N) demonstrated minimal protein on the surface of THY ASCs which was reduced when compared to ASCs from the SPL (Figure 3O). In contrast, THY B cells possessed increased levels of CD40 compared to their splenic counterparts (Figure 3P). Based on CD40 expression, most of the effects observed in the THY were likely driven via the loss of CD40 signaling by THY B cells. Overall, these data indicate the importance of CD154 signals in the production and/or maintenance of THY ASCs with a particular emphasis on the Ki-67+ PB population.
In vivo CD40 activation does not increase numbers of total THY ASCs
Given the previous data, we wanted to know if ectopic CD154(CD40L):CD40 signals would be sufficient to drive expansion of THY ASCs. To address this, 3-4-mo.-old female and male Prdm1-eYFP mice were treated i.p. with isotype control IgG2a or αCD40 agonistic Abs on days −1 and 0 and then euthanized on days 2, 4, 6 and 28 post-injection (Figure 4A). Data from isotype control treated mice were pooled owing to no clear variation between timepoints. Evaluation of female and male THY showed a transient decrease in overall cellularity which recovered by day 28 after αCD40 injection (Figures 4B and 4C). The THY ASC population showed no change in cell numbers across the time course (Figures 4D and 4E). This could have been because of the lack of B cell activation in the THY. To eliminate this possibility, the THY B cell compartment was also analyzed. CD40 stimulation did not alter the overall number of THY B cells (Figures 4F and 4G); however, we did observe changes that were indicative of activation. These included increased cell size (FSC-A), CD95(Fas) and GL7 (Figures 4H–4N). For the most part, these changes were temporally regulated with a peak at days 4–6 and subsequent return to baseline by day 28. To confirm that our protocol was sufficient to generate ASCs, at least in other organs, we examined the effects of αCD40 treatment in the SPL. In both sexes, SPL cell numbers were increased (days 2–6) following stimulation (Figures 4O and 4P). This was in part because of SPL B cell expansion (data not shown). Importantly, ASCs were also increased in the short term on CD40 ligation (Figures 4Qand 4R). Overall, these data suggest that αCD40 ligation in vivo can transiently increase ASCs. However, this is tissue restricted as ectopic CD40 stimulation alone does not expand THY ASCs.
ASC subsets exist with divergent gene ontology associations
The above data indicated that THY ASCs were potentially divergent when compared to those from the BM and SPL. To better understand these differences, we FACS-purified ASCs from the BM, SPL and THY and performed scRNA-seq to assess single cell gene expression (scGEX) as well as VDJ (scVDJ) usage via the 10x Genomics platform (Figure 5A). This was done with cells separately isolated from pools of 3 female and 3 male 3-mo.-old Prdm1-eYFP mice. Similar to previous data,22,53 expression of Sdc1, Prdm1, Xbp1 and Ell2 was readily detectable amongst ASCs (Figures 5B and S4A) validating cell identity. Clustering of ASCs led to the classification of 12 clusters labeled 0–11 (Figure 5C). Although there was some variability between the sexes regarding cluster contribution to total ASCs, Cluster 0 was a consistent majority within the THY of both female and male mice (Figure 5D). In contrast, BM and SPL showed a greater prevalence for “minor” clusters such as Cluster 4 (Figure 5D).
To better understand transcriptional differences between clusters, we utilized the scran package to identify marker genes that were significantly enriched in a cluster as indicated by an area under the curve (AUC) > 0.60 and false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05 (Table S1). The AUC represents the probability that expression of a given gene from a cell in a particular cluster is greater than any random cell from another cluster. When comparing clusters, Cluster 11 possessed the most marker genes (4,782 total, Figure S4B and Table S1). We observed a dichotomy in terms of the contribution of Ig versus non-Ig genes to the total number of marker genes. Clusters 0-1 and 7-8 were skewed toward Ig marker genes (>30% of total genes, Figure S4B and Table S1) whereas Clusters 3, 5 and 9-11 were dominated by non-Ig genes (>95% of total genes, Figure S4B and Table S1). This difference was mostly because of a lack of non-Ig marker genes in clusters 0-1 and 7-8.
To further assess non-Ig cluster marker genes, Metascape54 was used to identify gene ontology (GO) associations (Table S2). We focused on GO Biological Processes and only considered terms which possessed a gene overlap of ≥10. We identified multiple instances where clusters shared a degree of similarity (Figures S4C–S4H). Clusters 0, 3, 8, 9 and 11 shared enrichment for protein-related biological processes such as cytoplasmic translation (GO:0002181) and those related to ribosome production (GO:0022613, GO:0042254, GO:0042255) (Figure S4C and Table S2). Metabolic biological processes were enriched in many clusters (Figure S4D and Table S2) and included terms such as oxidative phosphorylation (GO:0006119) and ATP usage/metabolism (GO:0042775, GO:0046034) which was in agreement with what is known regarding ASC metabolism.55,56,57 In addition, multiple clusters (Clusters 1–2, 4–6) were enriched for events related to RNA processing (Figure S4F) and chromatin organization (GO:0006325) (Figure S4G). However, GO analysis identified some distinguishing features. Clusters 5 and 11 were enriched for terms related to the mitotic cell cycle (GO:0000278) (Figure S4E) whereas Clusters 2 and 8 were correlated with immune processes such as antigen processing and presentation (GO:0019882, GO:0048002) and/or myeloid cell homeostasis (GO:0002262) (Figure S4H). Many of the clusters and associated ontologies that we observed shared commonality with earlier single-cell ASC studies56 lending validity to our analyses. However, our analyses suggest that ASC clusters exist with distinct functions such as those related to immune regulation.
ASCs are a composite of divergent lineages which display organ-specific changes in gene expression
The above analyses suggested some fundamental differences existed between ASC clusters. In some instances, these differences were related to UMAP position. A prime example was Clusters 0-1 and 7-8 that possessed a high percentage of Ig marker genes relative to other clusters and were segregated on the right portion of the UMAP plots (Figure 5C). This suggested that ASCs might have divergent lineages or “fates”. To investigate this, we performed pseudotime analysis using the tradeSeq package.58 Lineages were rooted (pseudotime = 0) at Cluster 11 based on its gene ontology association with mitosis (Figure S4E and Table S2) and high expression of cell cycle genes such as Ccna2 (Figure S4I). Pseudotime analysis revealed 3 lineages with Lineages 1 and 2 being the most similar whereas Lineage 3 was divergent (Figure 5E). Not surprisingly, THY ASCs from both female and male mice possessed the greatest percentage of Lineage 3 “only” cells as Lineage 3 contained a large proportion of Cluster 0 (Figure 5F). For all lineages, proliferation genes such as Mki67 (Figure 5G) showed a decrease over pseudotime. Lineages 1 and 2 demonstrated increased expression of key ASC regulatory genes such as Jchain,59 Mzb160,61 and Cd7462 by the termination of pseudotime (Figure 5G). In contrast, Lineage 3 showed no such increase (Figure 5G). This pattern of gene expression was pervasive amongst the lineages (Figures S5A–S5C) and perhaps indicative of the fate of Lineages 1 and 2 being that of a mature, long-lived PC rather than Lineage 3 which may be destined for a short lifespan. In agreement, Lineage 3 displayed downregulation of Birc5 (Figure S5C) which encodes for Survivin, a key regulator of multiple myeloma growth and survival.63,64 Of note, the gene most highly associated with Lineage 3 and that displayed increased expression over pseudotime was the long non-coding RNA (lncRNA), Gm42418 (Figure S5C). This lncRNA has been shown to associate with the NLRP3 inflammasome in macrophages following stimulation with lipopolysaccharide and nigericin.65 Taken together, these data support the divergence of multiple ASCs lineages whose relative percentages may be dictated in part by tissue of residence.
ASCs display sex- and organ-specific differences in VDJ repertoire
Previous studies in BM and SPL from unimmunized C57BL/6J mice demonstrated that IgM was the dominant ASC isotype in both organs.17 To test this in THY, we performed flow cytometry for membrane IgM (mIgM) versus membrane IgA (mIgA) staining of ASCs from 3-mo.-old Prdm1-eYFP similar to published reports.17,38 mIgM and mIgA expressing ASCs were observed in BM, SPL and THY (Figure 6A). SPL and THY ASCs possessed significantly higher percentages of mIgM+ cells when compared to BM ASCs (Figure 6B). In contrast, BM ASCs had a higher level of mIgA positivity, at least relative to SPL (Figure 6C). Analysis of isotype usage within our 10x Genomics VDJ-enriched libraries further confirmed that IgM (coded by Ighm) was the dominant isotype expressed by ASCs from female and male BM, SPL and THY (Figure 6D). All 3 organs demonstrated clear isotype switching to IgA as well as the various IgG isotypes. In contrast with recent studies in BALB/c mice,26 we did not observe a high amount of IgE (Ighe) expressing ASCs in the THY which may simply be due to strain differences66,67 or animal housing.68
Next, we wanted to better understand how sex and organ could influence the ASC immunoglobulin repertoire. To that end, high confidence contigs were generated and clonotypes were identified based on Ig gene usage and complementarity-determining region (CDR) 3 nucleotide sequences using scRepertoire.69 Clonotypes were merged with the scGEX data and overlaid onto cluster UMAP plots (Figure 6E) from Figure 5C. Of cells with assigned clonotypes, BM and SPL ASCs possessed a bias toward representation from the left side of the UMAP which contained Clusters 2–6 and 9–11 whereas THY ASCs had the best overall representation across their total clusters (Figure 6E). Examination of the data showed that clusters were differentially represented in our VDJ dataset (Figure 6F). For example, Clusters 3 and 9-10 demonstrated >50% detection of high confidence VDJ contigs within their respective ASC pools which contrasted with Clusters 0 and 7-8 which had the least representation. Many of the clusters showed evidence of clonal expansion (i.e., hyperexpanded clones (0.1 < x ≤ 1)) which was not an artifact of depth of clonal detection/assignment as detection of hyperexpanded clones was not dependent on percentages of ASCs with VDJ contigs per cluster (Figure 6F). We next assessed clonal similarity between clusters using the Jaccard similarity index (Figure 6G) in which higher numbers represented higher similarity. Overall, clusters appeared to be clonally distinct from one another regardless of similarity in UMAP space and depth of analysis (e.g., Clusters 3 and 9-10) (Figures 5C and 6F). In this instance, Cluster 3 had similarity indices to Clusters 9 and 10 of 0.059 and 0.042, respectively (Figure 6G), whereas Clusters 9 and 10 had a similarity index of 0.018. For comparison, Clusters 5 and 6 demonstrated the highest similarity with a score of 0.287 (Figure 6G) on a scale from 0 to 1.
Finally, we examined clonality based on sample (i.e., organ and sex) (Figures 6H and 6I). Variability in clonal sizes was observed when female and male ASCs were compared in either the BM or SPL. However, this may have in part been because of the higher clonotype representation in the male BM and SPL versus the female samples (Figure 6H). Within the THY, ASC clone sizes were mostly medium (0.001 < x ≤ 0.01) to large (0.01 < x ≤ 0.1) and consistent across sexes (Figure 6H). Similar to what was observed for clusters, there was minimal overlap between samples when organs from a particular sex were evaluated (Figure 6I). For example, the male THY demonstrated similarity scores of 0.154 and 0.130 when compared to male BM and SPL, respectively. In addition, similarity was low between sexes. This was on display for all three organs as female versus male BM, SPL and THY had Jaccard indices of 0.151, 0.118 and 0.134 (Figure 6I). Overall, these data imply that the clonal repertoire of ASCs is dictated by the tissue of residence as well as by the sex in which those cells develop.
THY ASCs possess an interferon responsive gene expression signature
Our data showed that organ site could influence ASC lineage composition and repertoire. To further evaluate organ-specific differences, we examined gene expression changes within clusters as determined by organ (e.g., THY versus SPL) using a Log2 Fold Change > |0.5| and an Adjusted p value <0.05 as cut-offs for significance (Tables S3, S4, and S5). When comparing THY clusters to those from the SPL (Figure 7A and Table S3) and BM (Figure 7B and Table S4), most gene changes were present as downregulated in the THY. This was primarily limited to Clusters 0-3 which made up the bulk of THY ASCs. To put these gene changes into context, we performed GO analysis (Tables S6 and S7) as above but decreased the threshold to 5 for the number of non-Ig genes included in a category. Genes downregulated in THY ASCs versus those of the SPL (Table S6) and BM (Table S7) were enriched for categories involved in both protein production (e.g., GO:0006412, GO:0042254) and metabolism (e.g., GO:0006119, GO:0009060). Although there was some variation between clusters and sexes, these observations were generally applicable and may indicate THY ASCs being less “fit”. Although the number of genes upregulated in clusters from THY ASCs was limited, there was significant association with categories related to antigen processing and presentation of peptide antigen (GO:0048002), response to IFN-gamma (γ) (GO:0034341), regulation of innate immune response (GO:0045088) and response to virus (GO:0009615) among others (Figure 7C, Tables S6 and S7). Most of these categories showed overlap of genes which included Tlr7, Irf7 and a variety of IFN-stimulated genes (e.g., Isg15). Examination of IFN receptor gene expression suggested that Type I IFN receptor genes Ifnar1 and Ifnar2 were the primary receptors expressed by ASCs; however, a small percentage of cells possessed transcripts for Ifngr1, Ifngr2 and Ifnlr1 (Figure 7D).
To confirm some of these findings, we performed intracellular flow cytometry on BM, SPL and THY ASCs for CD287(TLR7).70 This target was chosen in part because of its role in suppressing the reactivation of endogenous retroviruses which can lead to the development of T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL)71 as well as its functional link to autoimmune disease development.72,73 CD287(TLR7) was detectable in ASCs from all 3 organs (Figure 7E). However, THY ASCs demonstrated the highest percentage of CD287(TLR7)+ cells (Figure 7F). Total THY B cells also displayed an increased percentage of CD287(TLR7)+ cells relative to those from BM and SPL (Figure 7G). Our gene ontology analysis suggested that THY ASC clusters possessed an IFN-inducible, or related, gene signature which was not surprising because CD287(TLR7) stimulation can induce IFN production.74 As such, we consistently observed increased expression of Ly6c2 in THY ASC clusters relative to other organs (Tables S3 and S4). The Ly6c2 gene product is part of the Ly-6C cell surface complex which can be induced by both Type I and Type II IFNs.75,76 In agreement with our scRNA-seq data, Ly-6C expression was significantly increased on the surface of THY ASCs (Figures 7H and 7I) as ∼81% of THY ASCs were Ly-6C+ compared to ∼39% and 36% of BM and SPL ASCs, respectively (Figure 7I). Although only ∼10% of THY B cells expressed Ly-6C, this was still increased over those from the BM and SPL (Figure 7J). IFN-γ signaling can also induce expression of major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC II)77 and at least in females, we observed increased gene expression of H2-Ab1 and H2-Eb1 from THY Clusters 0 and 1 compared to those from the BM. Using an Ab that recognizes I-A/I-E (MHC II), we performed flow cytometry which revealed the highest MHC II surface expression on ASCs from THY (Figures 7K and 7L). This was not unique to ASCs as THY B cells possessed a similar phenotype (Figure 7M) as previously reported.47 In addition, THY ASCs displayed increased expression of cell surface CD69 which can also be induced by IFNs78 (Figures 7N and 7O). In agreement with earlier studies,46 THY B cells also possessed increased CD69 levels (Figure 7P). Further evaluation of CD69 and MHC II showed a pattern of co-expression on the surface of THY ASCs (Figure 7Q). Compared to those from BM and SPL, both THY ASCs (Figure 7R) and B cells (Figure 7S) had increased percentages of CD69+ MHC II+ cells. Taken together, these data indicate that our scRNA-seq dataset can be leveraged to identify THY ASC phenotypes related to various cell signaling/stimulatory events.
Age-associated accumulation of THY ASCs is sex dependent
Aging in mice has been associated with the accumulation of ASCs in tissues such as BM and SPL.13,17,79 Furthermore, ELISpot data from humans is indicative of increased ASCs in the THY with age.23 To determine if percentages and/or numbers of mouse THY ASCs fluctuate with age, we performed flow cytometry on THY from middle-age (12-mo.-old) Prdm1-eYFP mice and compared these results to our 3-mo.-old dataset (Figures S6A–S6D). As controls for age-associated ASC accumulation, we also assessed BM and SPL (Figures S6E–S6J). As expected, THY cellularity decreased with age (Figure S6B) and this was accompanied by increased ASC percentages in the THY of both sexes (Figure S6C). However, male THY demonstrated increased numbers of ASCs with age that was not apparent in females (Figure S6D). Notably, percentages and numbers of ASCs increased in the BM and SPL with age for both sexes (Figures S6F, S6G, S6I, and S6J) with SPL ASCs having accumulated to a greater degree in females.
RNA-seq of young and old BM PCs previously identified age-associated transcriptional changes which included increased TLR expression.17 As such, we were curious as to whether some of the organ specific ASC (and B cell) phenotypes identified above would be maintained in middle-age 12-mo.-old mice (Figures S7A–S7O). THY ASCs from middle-aged mice maintained increased CD287(TLR7) (Figures S7A and S7B), Ly-6C (Figures S7D and S7E) and MHC II (Figures S7G and S7H) levels relative to ASCs from BM and SPL. Regarding Ly-6C, female ASCs from SPL and THY displayed higher expression relative to males, although the sample number was relatively low (Figure S7E). In contrast, CD69 was no longer upregulated by THY ASCs (Figures S7J and S7K) and was downregulated in female THY ASCs relative to males. As a result, THY ASCs were not enriched for a CD69+ MHC II+ population when compared to BM and SPL (Figures S7M and S7N). In comparison, expression differences identified in young THY B cells were maintained in middle-age (Figures S7C, S7F, S7I, S7L, and S7O). Of note, total B cells from a 12-mo.-old female SPL displayed increased CD287(TLR7) positivity relative to males. This was similar to that observed for female and male age-associated B cells from the DEF6:SWAP-70 double knockout lupus mouse model.80 Collectively, these results suggest that aging impacts the THY ASC compartment and that this is at least partially sex dependent. Furthermore, these data indicate that not all THY B lineage cells age equivalently.
Discussion
In this study, we provide a comprehensive resource which compares female and male ASCs found in the THY to their counterparts in organs such as the BM and SPL. From these comparisons, we identified characteristics that set THY ASCs apart and may lend themselves to unique cellular functions and regulatory mechanisms.
Initial assessment of ASC production demonstrated higher ASC numbers in young female mice relative to males. However, this sex-bias was limited to the THY and disappeared by middle-age as a result of selective ASC expansion in the male THY whereas ASC numbers remained static in the aging female THY. These data may be indicative of an upper limit of THY ASC carrying capacity which at least in females can be reached early in age. In contrast, BM and SPL demonstrated age-associated expansion of ASCs in both sexes. The surrounding environment is a key determinant of ASC accumulation and maintenance.81 To that end, how the ASC niche evolves in aging BM and SPL may be in direct contrast to that in the THY thus ultimately limiting the carrying capacity of the THY. On face value, this could be partially explained by age-associated atrophy of the THY which would inherently limit the physical space that ASCs could occupy. For example, the THY epithelium undergoes extensive remodeling over the course of aging which includes contraction of the medullary epithelium.82 Notably, THY B cells localize in the medullary space as do ASCs although the latter has been mostly associated with perivascular spaces within the medulla.22,23,26 In addition, neutrophils significantly increase in the aging BM and SPL83 and these cells have been shown to promote ASC production/maintenance through B cell activating factor (BAFF) production.84,85 Although this may explain the numerical cap on THY ASCs, it does not inherently resolve as to why the female THY has enhanced ASC production at early age. One potential explanation may be differences in sex hormones as testosterone has been shown to reduce BAFF in young male mice86 and BAFF transgenic mice are known to possess increased number of THY B cells.87 Of course, this implies that THY ASC populations are inherently more susceptible to fluctuations in locally available survival factors which is something that remains to be determined.
A major question exists as to how and where THY ASCs are generated. A recent study performed histopathology, i.v. Ab labeling and long-term parabiosis experiments in BALB/c mice to support the intra-thymic generation of ASCs.26 In addition, data from humans lend further evidence for the local generation of THY ASCs.22 We performed similar i.v. labeling experiments which confirmed observations in BALB/c mice and our analysis of THY live cell doublets identified putative B cell-T cell conjugates with enhanced levels of activation markers. Furthermore, we demonstrated the presence of proliferating (i.e., Ki-67+) THY B cells and PBs which were significantly reduced on Ab-mediated blockade of CD154(CD40L) signals. Notably, magnitude differences were evident between experiments performed with Prdm1-eYFP and C57BL/6J mice. This may have been a result of different compositions within the ASC compartments (e.g., Ki-67+ PBs) as these studies were performed with different strains, age-matched littermates (Prdm1-eYFP) versus not (C57BL/6J) and in different institutions. Regardless, the data indicated that at least a portion of THY ASCs were generated in a T cell dependent manner which agreed with T cell receptor (TCR) transgenic experiments performed with BALB/c mice.26 Even though CD154 signals contributed to THY ASC generation/maintenance, we were not able to transiently augment their numbers on αCD40 stimulation in vivo which contrasted with what we observed in the SPL. This may be a result of different activation/signaling requirements which would agree with previous in vitro studies comparing activation stimuli of THY and SPL B cells.88,89 In addition, these data could also argue for the local generation of THY ASCs as we did not observe a clear “spillover” from the peripheral SPL into the THY. This presumably would have been observable in the male THY which had lower ASC numbers at young age. Of course, we cannot rule out the potential influence on ASCs of THY gating mechanisms which are known to temporally regulate the entry of THY progenitors.90 To do so would require experiments such as the transfer of ASC-depleted THY tissue into μMT B cell deficient mice. This would then allow for the examination of ASC production from pre-existing THY B cells without the potential caveat of immigrating B cells and/or ASCs.
ASCs continue to gain prominence as an immunomodulatory population due in part to their ability to secrete immunosuppressive as well as inflammatory factors.9,10,11 In addition, this same secretory ability may influence their potential to regulate BM hematopoiesis.16,17 As a result, understanding ASC biology is of growing importance as the repertoire of ASC functions seems to depend on the context in which ASCs exist. Along these lines, recent studies have utilized RNA-seq at both bulk13,17,91,92 and single cell56,93 levels in an attempt to define different ASC subsets or functional states. In general, these datasets have provided valuable resources that have led to the determination of critical ASC regulatory mechanisms. In this report, we compared ASCs from the female and male BM, SPL and THY using scRNA-seq. Our data were not only confirmatory to previous studies56 but also provided unique insights into THY ASCs and illustrated their divergence from their BM and SPL counterparts. Via analysis of developmental trajectory (i.e., pseudotime), we defined 3 ASC lineages with the third of these appearing destined for a shorter lifespan as exemplified by reduced expression of genes related to ASC function (e.g., Jchain, Mzb1, Cd74) and survival (e.g., Birc5). In conjunction with previous studies,25,47,94 our data supported the derivation of THY ASCs from potentially autoreactive THY B cells. As such, it is preferential that THY ASCs were enriched for Lineage 3 as this may be an evolutionary failsafe to prevent the long-standing presence of autoreactive ASCs. In this regard, it would be interesting to transcriptionally profile THY resident autoreactive ASCs that exist in diseases such as myasthenia gravis.18 Would their gene signature resemble that of Lineages 1 and 2 rather than Lineage 3?
Regarding the potential function(s) for THY ASCs, our transcriptional profiling revealed significant anti-viral and IFN gene ontology enrichment within genes specifically upregulated in THY ASC clusters. This included genes that code for protein products including TLR7, Ly-6C and MHC II, the latter being a key factor in antigen presentation. Accordingly, flow cytometry demonstrated immunoglobulin staining on the surface of THY ASCs making it reasonable to hypothesize that autoreactive ASCs could internalize self-antigen in the THY microenvironment and present that same self-antigen to selecting T cells, thus playing a role previously attributed to total THY B cells.25,47,94 There is precedent for this behavior as ASCs in the LN have been shown to present antigen to T follicular helper cells and suppress their behavior following model antigen immunization.62 This would explain the minimal overlap of immunoglobulin clonotypes in THY ASCs compared to those in the BM and SPL. Previous work has demonstrated that some THY ASC-derived Abs are specific for viral and bacterial antigens; however, these data are far from comprehensive. Thus, the generation of autoreactive THY ASCs under normal conditions, regardless of their longevity, remains a distinct possibility and is in agreement with previous data in which autoreactive THY B cells in mice present antigen to negatively selecting CD4 single positive T cells.25,47 However, comparison of THY TCR repertoires and autoreactivity in ASC wildtype and knockout mice is needed to further support a role for ASCs in thymocyte selection. Alternatively, the same TCR comparisons performed in animals in which ASCs lack components of the antigen presentation machinery (e.g., MHC II) would provide a pathway specific analysis. If this hypothesis is true, the sex bias in early life THY ASC numbers may contribute to the phenotypic and functional differences observed in T cells from females and males.95
In considering how the THY environment may shape resident ASC function, an open question is the potential source of IFN-inducing pathogen associated molecular patterns as well as the cellular sources of IFN in the THY. Endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) can be found in both the human96 and mouse71 THY and intact TLR signaling, in particularly TLR7, is critical in preventing reactivation of these ERVs.71 As TLR7 signaling is a potent inducer of Type I IFN, this regulatory loop would explain the constitutive IFN-α expression in the human THY.97 In this instance, IFN-α was produced by THY plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Given the level of TLR7 expression, one could ask if THY ASCs can themselves produce IFNs? Our data would not necessarily support this as we did not see clear IFN (e.g., Ifnb) induction in THY ASCs. However, this could be a consequence of single cell sequencing technologies which do not efficiently capture low expression genes,98 thus the idea of direct TLR7-mediated IFN induction in THY ASCs warrants further investigation. Finally, is the observed IFN gene signature of THY ASCs a result of direct IFN stimulation or is this inherited from upstream B cell progenitors? Transcriptome data demonstrated Type I IFN receptor expression by at least a portion of THY ASCs raising the possibility of their direct responsiveness to this cytokine family. Combined with the above, THY ASCs may propagate their own feedforward IFN signaling loop for unknown reasons, although this remains conjecture at this point.
In summary, the data presented here support the concept that THY ASCs develop independently of their peripheral counterparts and possess a gene signature that is dictated by their local microenvironment (e.g., IFN signaling in the THY71). Importantly, we have developed a comprehensive scRNA-seq data resource that can be utilized by researchers to develop testable hypotheses investigating the development, maintenance and function of THY ASCs.
Limitations of the study
The work presented here focused on the comparisons of female and male ASCs from BM, SPL and THY. This was done for multiple reasons which include: 1) Well-established roles of BM (i.e., residency) and SPL (i.e., production and residency) in ASC biology and 2) lack of tissue digestion required to analyze ASCs in all 3 organs. This latter point being important as some cell surface markers are inherently sensitive to enzymatic digestion which may inadvertently skew results. However, future studies evaluating the relatedness of gut and THY ASCs will be important. For example, plasmacytoid dendritic cells are known to transport microbial antigens from the gut to the THY thus it is plausible that these ASC populations share significant overlap in their immunoglobulin repertoires. In this sense, comparison of these populations may further elucidate how tissue residency independent of Ab reactivities may shape ASC behavior. In addition, we were not in position to perform scRNA-seq on aging THY ASCs. As bulk RNA-seq has provided clues to age-associated changes in BM plasma cell behavior,17 a similar analysis either at bulk or single cell levels may be just as informative regarding functionality of THY ASCs.
STAR★Methods
Key resources table
REAGENT or RESOURCE | SOURCE | IDENTIFIER |
---|---|---|
Antibodies | ||
CD138-BV421 (Clone: 281-2) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 562610; RRID: AB_11153126 |
IgD-BV605 (Clone: 11-26c.2a) | BioLegend | Cat# 405727; RRID: AB_2562887 |
IgD-APC (Clone: 11-6c.2a) | BioLegend | Cat# 405714; RRID: AB_10643423 |
CD90.2(Thy-1.2)-BV605 (Clone: 53-2.1) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 563008; RRID: AB_2665477 |
CD90.2(Thy-1.2)-APC (Clone: 53-2.1) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 553007; RRID: AB_398526 |
CD45R(B220)-PerCP/Cy5.5 (Clone: RA3-6B2) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 552771; RRID: AB_394457 |
CD45R(B220)-BV711 (Clone: RA3-6B2) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 563892; RRID: AB_2738470 |
CD19-BUV395 (Clone: 1D3) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 563557; RRID: AB_2722495 |
CD19-PE (Clone: 1D3) | BioLegend | Cat# 152408; RRID: AB_2629817 |
CD19-eFluor 450 (Clone: eBio1D3) | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat# 48-0193-82; RRID: AB_2734905 |
TCRβ-BV605 (Clone: H57-597) | BioLegend | Cat# 109241; RRID: AB_2629563 |
CD16/32-Unlabeled (Clone: 93) | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat# 14-0161-86; RRID: AB_467135 |
CD44-PE/Cy7 (Clone: IM7) | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat# 25-0441-81; RRID: AB_469622 |
CD267(TACI)-PE (Clone: 8F10) | BioLegend | Cat# 133403; RRID: AB_2203542 |
CD267(TACI)-AF647 (Clone: 8F10) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 558453; RRID: AB_647119 |
GL7-AF647 (Clone: GL7) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 561529; RRID: AB_10716056 |
CD95(Fas)-PE (Clone: Jo2) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 554258; RRID: AB_395330 |
CD69-PE/Cy7 (Clone: H1.2F3) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 561930; RRID: AB_10893591 |
I-A/I-E(MHC II)-AF647 (Clone: M5/114.15.2) | BioLegend | Cat# 107618; RRID: AB_493525 |
Ly-6C-PE (Clone: HK1.4) | BioLegend | Cat# 128008; RRID: AB_1186132 |
CD287(TLR7)-PE (Clone: A04B10) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 565557; RRID: AB_2739295 |
Mouse IgG1-PE isotype control (Clone: MOPC-21) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 554680; RRID: AB_395506 |
CD45-PE (Clone: 30F11) | BioLegend | Cat# 103106; RRID: AB_312971 |
CD45-APC (Clone: 30F11) | BioLegend | Cat# 103112; RRID: AB_312977 |
Igκ-PE (Clone: RMK-45) | BioLegend | Cat# 409505; RRID: AB_2563580 |
Igκ-FITC (Clone: RMK-45) | BioLegend | Cat# 409510; RRID: AB_2563585 |
Igλ-PE (Clone: RML-42) | BioLegend | Cat# 407308; RRID: AB_1027659 |
Igλ-FITC (Clone: R26-46) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 553434; RRID: AB_394854 |
Ly-6A/E(Sca-1)-PE/Cy7 (Clone: D7) | BioLegend | Cat# 108113; RRID: AB_493597 |
CD184(CXCR4)-APC (Clone: L276F12) | BioLegend | Cat# 146507; RRID: AB_2562784 |
Mouse IgG2b-FITC isotype control (Clone: RTK4530) | BioLegend | Cat# 400606; RRID: AB_326550 |
Ki-67-FITC (Clone: 11F6) | BioLegend | Cat# 151212; RRID: AB_2814055 |
Rat IgG2a-FITC isotype control (Clone: RTK2758) | BioLegend | Cat# 400506; RRID: AB_2736919 |
CD40-FITC (Clone: 3/23) | BioLegend | Cat# 124608; RRID: AB_1134096 |
Mouse IgG-Unlabeled | SouthernBiotech | Cat# 0107-01; RRID: AB_2732898 |
Anti-mouse IgG+IgA+IgM (H+L) | Millipore Sigma | Cat# SAB3701043-2MG |
Goat anti-mouse IgM-HRP | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat# 62-6820; RRID: AB_2533954 |
Goat anti-mouse IgG-HRP | SouthernBiotech | Cat# 1015-05; RRID: AB_2794194 |
InVivoMab polyclonal Armenian hamster IgG isotype control | Bio X Cell | Cat# BE0091; RRID: AB_1107773 |
InVivoMab anti-mouse CD154(CD40L) (Clone: MR-1) | Bio X Cell | Cat# BE0017-1; RRID: AB_1107601 |
InVivoMab rat IgG2a isotype control (Clone: 2A3) | Bio X Cell | Cat# BE0089; RRID: AB_1107769 |
InVivoMab anti-mouse CD40 (Clone: FGK4.5/FGK45) | Bio X Cell | Cat# BE0016-2; RRID: AB_1107647 |
Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins | ||
InVivoPure pH 7.0 Dilution Buffer | Bio X Cell | Cat# IP0070 |
Bovine Serum Albumin (DNase- and Protease-free) | Fisher Scientific | Cat# BP9706100 |
APRIL | Fisher Scientific | Cat# 7907-AP-010CF |
IL-6 | Fisher Scientific | Cat# PMC0066 |
Critical commercial assays | ||
Platinum II Host-Start PCR Master Mix (2x) | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat# 14000012 |
Chromium Next GEM Single Cell 5' Library and Gel Bead Kit v1.1 | 10x Genomics | Cat# 1000165 |
Chromium Next GEM Chip G Single Cell Kit | 10x Genomics | Cat# 1000120 |
Chromium Single Cell V(D)J Enrichment Kit, Mouse B Cell | 10x Genomics | Cat# 1000072 |
Chromium i7 Multiplex Kit | 10x Genomics | Cat# 120262 |
Beckman Coulter SPRIselect | Fisher Scientific | Cat# NC0406406 |
Dynabeads MyOne Silane | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat# 37002D |
Collibri Library Quantification Kit | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat# A38524500 |
High Sensitivity DNA Kit | Agilent | Cat# 5067-4626 |
AEC Substrate Set | BD Biosciences | Cat# 551951; RRID: AB_2868954 |
eBioscience Fixable Viability (Live-Dead) Dye eFluor 780 | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat# 65-0865-14 |
Foxp3/Transcription Factor Staining Buffer Set | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat# 00-5523-00 |
Deposited data | ||
ASC scRNA-Seq GEX and VDJ data | This paper | GEO: GSE193701 |
Original code related to scRNA-Seq analysis | This paper | https://github.com/vari-bbc/Pioli_2022_ASCs_code |
Experimental models: Organisms/strains | ||
Mouse: C57BL/6J | The Jackson Laboratory | JAX: 000664; RRID: IMSR_JAX:000664 |
Mouse: B6.Cg-Tg(Prdm1-EYFP)1Mnz/J | The Jackson Laboratory | JAX: 008828; RRID: IMSR_JAX:008828 |
Mouse: B6.129-Prdm1tm1Clme/J | The Jackson Laboratory | JAX: 008100; RRID: IMSR_JAX:008100 |
Mouse: B6.C(Cg)-Cd79atm1(cre)Reth/EhobJ | The Jackson Laboratory | JAX: 020505; RRID: IMSR_JAX:020505 |
Oligonucleotides | ||
Prdm1-eYFP Genotyping Forward Primer: TTCCACAGCTCTGAGGGTCT | The Jackson Laboratory | https://www.jax.org/Protocol?stockNumber=008828&protocolID=25522 |
Prdm1-eYFP Genotyping Reverse Primer: CGGTGGTGCAGATGAACTT | The Jackson Laboratory | https://www.jax.org/Protocol?stockNumber=008828&protocolID=25522 |
Prdm1 Floxed Genotyping Forward Primer: CAATGCTTGTCTAGTGTC |
The Jackson Laboratory | https://www.jax.org/Protocol?stockNumber=008100&protocolID=22773 |
Prdm1 Floxed Genotyping Reverse Primer: AGTAGTTGAATGGGAGC |
The Jackson Laboratory | https://www.jax.org/Protocol?stockNumber=008100&protocolID=22773 |
Mb1 (Cd79a) Genotyping Wildtype Forward Primer: CTCTTTACCTTCCAAGCACTGA |
The Jackson Laboratory | https://www.jax.org/Protocol?stockNumber=029412&protocolID=20206 |
Mb1 (Cd79a) Genotyping Common Reverse Primer: ACTGAGGCAGGAGGATTGG |
The Jackson Laboratory | https://www.jax.org/Protocol?stockNumber=029412&protocolID=20206 |
Mb1 (Cd79a) Genotyping Mutant Forward Primer: CATTTTCGAGGGAGCTTCA |
The Jackson Laboratory | https://www.jax.org/Protocol?stockNumber=029412&protocolID=20206 |
Software and algorithms | ||
FlowJo (v10) | BD Biosciences | RRID: SCR_008520 |
GraphPad Prism 8 | GraphPad Software | RRID: SCR_002798 |
Adobe Illustrator | Adobe | RRID: SCR_010279 |
Adobe Photoshop | Adobe | RRID: SCR_014199 |
Cell Ranger v6.0 | 10x Genomics | https://support.10xgenomics.com/single-cell-gene-expression/software/downloads/latest |
DropletUtils v1.12.2 | Lun et al.99 | https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/DropletUtils.html |
scuttle v1.2.0 | Amezquita et al.100; McCarthy et al.101 | https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/scuttle.html |
Seurat v4.0.3 | Stuart et al.102 | https://satijalab.org/seurat/ |
dittoSeq v1.4.1 | Bunis et al.103 | https://bioconductor.org/packages/devel/bioc/vignettes/dittoSeq/inst/doc/dittoSeq.html |
scran v1.20.1 | Lun et al., 2016 | https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/scran.html |
Slingshot v2.0.0 | Street et al.104 | https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/slingshot.html |
tradeSeq v1.6.0 | Van den Berge et al.58 | https://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/tradeSeq.html |
scRepertoire v1.3.5 | Borcherding et al.69 | http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/vignettes/scRepertoire/inst/doc/vignette.html |
Resource availability
Lead contact
Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact, Peter Dion Pioli (peter.pioli@usask.ca).
Materials availability
Materials underlying this article will be shared by the lead contact upon request.
Experimental model and subject details
Experimental animals
Mouse strains C57BL/6J (Stock #: 000664), B6.Cg-Tg(Prdm1-EYFP)1Mnz/J (Stock #: 008828), B6.129-Prdm1tm1Clme/J (Stock #: 008100) and B6.C(Cg)-Cd79atm1(cre)Reth/EhobJ (Stock #: 020505) were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory. Mice were considered young at 3-5 mo.of age. Mice were considered middle-aged at 12 mo.of age. Female and male mice were utilized for all experiments. Animal care and use were conducted according to the guidelines of the Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine (WMed) Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) as well as the University of Saskatchewan (USask) University Animal Care Committee (UACC) Animal Research Ethics Board. All animals were housed and/or bred in the WMed vivarium or the USask Lab Animals Services Unit.
Method details
Isolation of bone marrow, spleen and thymus tissue
All tissues were processed and collected in calcium and magnesium-free 1xphosphate buffered saline (PBS). Spleen (SPL) and thymus (THY) were dissected and crushed between the frosted ends of two slides. Bone marrow (BM) was isolated from both femurs and tibias by cutting off the end of bones and flushing the marrow from the shaft using a 23-gauge needle. Cell suspensions were centrifuged for 5 minutes at 4 °C and 600g. Red blood cells were lysed by suspending cells in 3 mL of 1x red blood cell lysis buffer on ice for ∼3 minutes. Lysis was stopped with the addition of 7 mL of 1x PBS. Cell suspensions were counted in a hemocytometer using Trypan Blue to exclude dead cells and passed through 40-μm filters before use.
Whole blood was obtained via cardiac puncture and immediately transferred to EDTA containing tubes on ice. 100 μL was directly mixed with 3 mL of 1x red blood cell lysis buffer and placed on ice for ∼3 minutes. Lysis was stopped with the addition of 7 mL of 1x PBS.
Immunostaining
All staining procedures were performed in 1x PBS +0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA). Samples were labeled with a CD16/32 blocking antibody (Ab) to eliminate non-specific binding of Abs to cells via Fc receptors. All Abs utilized are listed in the key resources table. For surface staining, cells were incubated on ice for 30 minutes with the appropriate Abs. Unbound Abs were washed from cells with 1x PBS +0.1% BSA followed by centrifugation for 5 minutes at 4 °C and 600g. Supernatants were decanted and cell pellets were resuspended in an appropriate volume of 1x PBS +0.4% BSA +2 mM EDTA for flow cytometric analysis. Before analysis, cells were strained through a 40 μM filter mesh.
Intracellular staining was performed using the Foxp3/Transcription Factor Staining Buffer Set. Cells were surface stained as described above. Afterwards, cell pellets were resuspended in 1 mL of buffer #1 and incubated at room temperature (RT) for 30 minutes in the dark. Subsequently, 2 mL of buffer #2 were added and cells centrifuged for 5 minutes at RT and 600g. Supernatants were discarded and cells were blocked with total mouse IgG at RT in the dark for 20-30 minutes. Cells were then incubated with either target specific or isotype control Abs. Following this incubation, 2 mL of buffer #2 were added and cells centrifuged for 5 minutes at RT and 600g. Finally, cells were washed with 3 mL of 1x PBS +0.1% BSA and centrifuged for 5 minutes at RT and 600g. Cells were prepped for flow cytometric analysis as described above. For all intracellular stains, eBioscience Fixable Viability (Live-Dead) Dye eFluor 780 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Catalog # 65-0865-14) was added to samples to assess dead cell content. The stock solution was diluted 1:250 and 10 μL was added to ∼5 x 106 cells per stain. Live-Dead stain was added concurrent with surface staining Abs.
Flow cytometry and fluorescence-activated cell sorting
Flow cytometry was performed on a Fortessa (BD Biosciences) located in the Flow Cytometry and Imaging Core at WMed. Total cells were gated using side scatter area (SSC-A) versus forward scatter (FSC-A) area. Singlets were identified using sequential gating of FSC-width (W) versus FSC-A, SSC-W versus SSC-A and FSC-height (H) versus FSC-A. Additional flow cytometry experiments were performed on a CytoFLEX (Beckman Coulter) located in the Cancer Cluster at USask. Total cells were gated using side scatter area (SSC-A) versus forward scatter (FSC-A) area. Singlets were identified using sequential gating of SSC-H versus SSC-A and FSC-H versus FSC-A. All data were analyzed using FlowJo (v10) software.
Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) was performed on a Melody (BD Biosciences) located in the Flow Cytometry and Imaging Core at WMed. Prior to sorting, cells were resuspended at a final concentration of 2x107 cells per mL in αMEM supplemented with HEPES (25 mM), Penicillin-Streptomycin (100 U/mL), L-glutamine (2 mM), Gentamicin (50 μg/mL) and EDTA (2 mM) and subsequently passed through a 40 μM filter mesh. Total cells were gated using SSC-A versus FSC-A. Singlets were identified using sequential gating of FSC-W versus FSC-A, SSC-W versus SSC-A and FSC-H versus FSC-A.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISpot) plates (Millipore Sigma, Cat# MSIPS4W10) were briefly incubated at RT for 1 minute with 15 μL of 35% ethanol (EtOH). EtOH was removed and wells were washed 3 times with 150 μL of 1x PBS. Subsequently, wells were coated overnight (O/N) at 4 °C with 100 μL of capture Ab. The capture Ab (Millipore Sigma, Cat# SAB3701043-2MG) recognized mouse total IgG+IgM+IgA isotypes and was pre-diluted in 1x PBS to a final concentration of 5 μg/mL before use. The next day, coating Abs were removed and wells were washed 3 times with 150 μL RPMI 1640. Plates were subsequently blocked with 150 μL RPMI for a minimum of 2 hours at 37 °C in a 5% CO2/20% O2 tissue culture incubator. Blocking solution was removed and 100 μL of RPMI supplemented with a proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) (10 ng/mL), interleukin (IL)-6 (10 ng/mL), heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (10%), Penicillin-Streptomycin (100 U/mL), L-glutamine (2 mM), Gentamicin (50 μg/mL), sodium pyruvate (1 mM), non-essential amino acids (1x), non-essential vitamins (1x) and 2-mercaptoethanol (10-05 M). ASCs from BM, SPL and THY were directly FACS-purified into wells with a target number of 100 cells per well. Cells were then incubated O/N (>12 hours) at 37 °C in a 5% CO2/20% O2 tissue culture incubator. The next day, culture supernatants and cells were removed. Wells were washed 3 times with 150 μL of 1x PBS then an additional 3 times with 150 μL of 1x PBS +0.1% Tween-20 + 1% BSA. Secondary Abs conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRP) were added at a volume of 100 μL per well and plates were incubated for 2 hours at RT. Anti-IgM-HRP (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# 62-6820) and anti-IgG-HRP (SouthernBiotech, Cat# 1015-05) were diluted 1:25,000 and 1:50,000 in 1x PBS +0.1% Tween-20 + 1% BSA before use, respectively. Following incubation, Abs were removed plates washed 3 times with 150 μL of 1x PBS +0.1% Tween-20 + 1% BSA. An additional 3 washes with 150 μL of 1x PBS were performed. To reveal “spots”, 100 μL of Developing Solution from the AEC Substrate Set (BD Biosciences, Cat# 551951) was added to each well. Plates were shaken at 200 rpm for 30 minutes at RT. Developing Solution was removed and plates were washed 5 times with 150 μL of H2O. Well backing was removed and plates were dried at RT after which “spots” were visualized with a CTL ELISPOT reader. Additional wells lacking capture Abs or the use of secondary detection reagents were developed to gauge background. Using Adobe Photoshop, auto-contrast was uniformly applied to wells and brightness was set to 100 for visualization.
In vivo CD45 labeling
Young (3-4 mo.old) mice received either 1x PBS or αCD45-PE (1 μg) antibody in a 100 μL volume via intravenous (i.v.) injection into the retro-orbital (r.o.) sinus. Mice were euthanized 5 minutes or 24 hours post-injection for analysis.
In vivoCD154(CD40L) blockade
Young (3-5 mo.old) mice received a total of 600 μg or 1200 μg of hamster IgG isotype control or anti-mouse CD154(CD40L) (MR-1) antibodies. Administration was split evenly amongst 6 or 12 total intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections (100 μg per injection, 100 μl volume) over a 2-week or 4-week span after which mice were euthanized for analysis. Antibodies were supplied by Bio X Cell and pre-diluted to 1000 μg/mL using InVivoPure pH 7.0 Dilution Buffer.
In vivo CD40 stimulation
On days -1 and 0, young (3-4 mo.old) mice were administered 100 μg (100 μl volume) of rat IgG2a isotype control or agonistic anti-mouse CD40 antibodies per injection via the i.p. route. Antibodies were supplied by Bio X Cell and pre-diluted to 1000 μg/mL using InVivoPure pH 7.0 Dilution Buffer. Mice were euthanized for analysis on days 2, 4, 6 and 28 following the last injection.
10x genomics single cell library preparation, sequencing and analysis
ASCs from BM, SPL and THY were FACS-purified and collected into 1x PBS +0.1% BSA. Recovery was verified by hemocytometer count and/or analysis via flow cytometry. Cells were concentrated in a volume of 40 μL following centrifugation for 10 minutes at 4 °C and 600g. A volume of 37.8 μL of cells was loaded into a Chromium Next GEM Chip G and single cell gel emulsions were generated on a 10x Genomics Chromium Controller. 10x Genomics barcoded full-length cDNA was then synthesized on a Veriti 96-Well Thermal Cycler (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using the standard 10x Genomics protocol. Following initial recovery and cleanup, cDNA was amplified 18 cycles based upon manufacturer recommendations.
V(D)J-enriched libraries and gene expression (GEX) libraries were generated using the Chromium Single Cell V(D)J Enrichment Kit, Mouse B Cell (10x Genomics, Cat# 1000072) and Chromium Next GEM Single Cell 5' Library and Gel Bead Kit v1.1 (10x Genomics, Cat# 1000165), respectively. All libraries were sample indexed for multiplexing with the Chromium i7 Multiplex Kit (10x Genomics, Cat# 120262) following standard 10x Genomics protocols. All completed libraries were visualized and quantified using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. Furthermore, qPCR utilizing the Collibri Library Quantification Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# A38524500) was performed to verify the suitability of each library for sequencing. V(D)J libraries were pooled in tandem based upon organ and population (e.g., Female and Male THY ASC) and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq inhouse. All 6 GEX libraries were pooled and sequenced simultaneously on a NovaSeq 6000 at the Van Andel Institute Genomics Core.
Reads were aligned to the mm10 reference genome (‘refdata-gex-mm10-2020-A’ provided by 10x) to obtain unique molecular identifier (UMI) counts using the cellranger count pipeline v6.0.2 with default parameters. The filtered counts matrices, with non-cell-associated barcodes removed, were imported into R v4.1.0 as a SingleCellExperiment object using DropletUtils v1.12.2.99 Low total UMI counts or number of genes detected indicate low-quality cells while a high percent of reads mapping to mitochondrial genes suggest lysed cells.105 To filter by these metrics, median absolute deviations (MAD) for these metrics were calculated for each sample separately and 3 MAD from the median was used as a cutoff, as implemented in the ‘perCellQCMetrics’ and ‘quickPerCellQC’ functions in the scuttle package v1.2.0.100,101 A total of 3122 cells, with 1359 from the female bone marrow sample, were removed due to high mitochondrial gene expression but none were removed based on the other two metrics.
The filtered SingleCellExperiment object was converted to a Seurat (v4.0.3) object for ‘integration’ (batch correction) across the samples and for cluster identification using the standard Seurat integration workflow.102 Briefly, the Seurat object was split based on the sample. UMI counts were normalized for total expression in each cell and log-transformed. The top 2000 most variable genes within each sample were identified, from which the ‘anchor’ genes for integration were chosen using the ‘SelectIntegrationFeatures’ function. The ‘FindIntegrationAnchors’ and ‘IntegrateData’ functions were used to perform batch correction using a method that utilizes mutual nearest neighbors (MNN) to identify biologically correspondent cells between datasets.102 The corrected expression values were scaled and used for Principal Component Analysis (PCA). The top 30 principal components (PComs) were chosen for downstream analyses based on an elbow plot. For visualization, Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) was performed on the top 30 PComs. Similarly, a shared nearest neighbor graph of the cells was constructed using the top 30 PComs and used for unsupervised clustering using the Louvain algorithm. Clustering was done at multiple resolutions ranging from 0.1 to 0.9, but the 0.3 resolution clustering was chosen for subsequent analyses. Various UMAP plots and bar charts were plotted using the dittoSeq v1.4.1 package.103
Marker genes for clusters were identified using the ‘findMarkers’ function in scran v1.20.1 with the parameters, ‘pval.type=”any”’, ‘direction=”up”’, ‘test.type=”wilcox”’, ‘min.prop=0.75’ and setting block to the sample. This performs pairwise comparisons of each cluster to every other cluster, testing for up-regulation using Wilcoxon rank sum tests in each sample (i.e., block) separately; the p-values for each gene across all block levels are combined using Stouffer's Z-score method and the reported area under the curve (AUC) is a weighted average of the AUCs across all the block levels. For each gene and cluster, the summary effect size is the effect size from the pairwise comparison with the lowest p-value and the combined p-value is computed using Simes' method. The ‘min.prop’ parameter affects only the ‘Top’ column in the results. With ‘min.prop’ set to 0.75, genes with Top <= N are top N marker genes in at least 0.75 of the comparisons. Differentially expressed genes between samples within each cluster were identified using the ‘FindMarkers’ function in Seurat with ‘logfc.threshold’ set to 0.5. Only comparisons where both groups had greater than 20 cells were tested.
Pseudotime trajectories were inferred on the UMAP embedding using the ‘slingshot’ function in the Slingshot v2.0.0 package,104 with the parameter ‘approx_points=150’ and setting the root at cluster 11, which had high expression of proliferative marker genes. To test for genes associated with pseudotime, the tradeSeq v1.6.0 package58 was used. For genes with a count of at least 3 in at least 100 cells, a negative binomial generalized additive model (GAM) was fitted using the ‘fitGAM’ function, providing the batches (i.e., sample) using the ‘U’ argument. Pseudotime-associated genes were identified using the ‘associationTest’ function. Smoothed expression along pseudotime was plotted for various genes using the functions ‘predictSmooth’ and ‘plotSmoothers’.
For VDJ analysis, reads were aligned to the mm10 VDJ reference provided by 10x (‘refdata-cellranger-vdj-GRCm38-alts-ensembl-5.0.0’) and assembled into contigs using the cellranger vdj pipeline v6.0.2 with default parameters. The ‘filtered_contig_annotations.csv’ files were read into R and combined for use with the scRepertoire v1.3.5 R package69 using the ‘combineBCR’ function. Clonotype information was merged with the Seurat object using the ‘combineExpression’ function; this also calculated clonotype frequencies within each sample. Overlap of clonotypes was assessed by the Jaccard index using the ‘clonalOverlap’ function with the parameters, ‘cloneCall="gene+nt"’ and ‘method="jaccard"’. IgH constant region gene expression was visualized using the ‘vizGenes’ function with the following parameters, ‘gene="C"’ and ‘chain="IGH"’.
Code is available at: https://github.com/vari-bbc/Pioli_2022_ASCs_code. Sequencing data has been deposited in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database and is accessible under accession number GSE193701.
Quantification and statistical analysis
The numbers of mice used (n =) or replicates performed per experiment are listed in the Figure Legends. For non-genomics data, statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism (v8.4.2) software. Quantification of cell numbers and various flow cytometry data are graphically represented as mean ± SEM. A Student’s t-Test was used for statistical comparisons between 2 groups. For comparisons among 3 or more groups, a one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s or Dunnett’s correction was utilized. Both paired and unpaired tests were utilized where appropriate. Statistically significant p-values are shown within each figure.
Acknowledgments
Funding was provided by the Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine (WMed) and the University of Saskatchewan (USask) College of Medicine via intramural startup funds. This work was further supported by the National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R03AG071955. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The authors thank WMed students Michael Crone, Matthew Kornas and Patrick Renner for their technical assistance. The authors thank the Van Andel Genomics Core and Bioinformatics and Biostatistics Core for providing sequencing facilities and analysis services, respectively.
Author contributions
K.T.P. and P.D.P. designed experiments. K.T.P. and P.D.P. conducted and analyzed experiments. K.H.L. performed bioinformatics analyses. P.D.P. wrote the manuscript and all authors approved of the manuscript.
Declaration of interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Inclusion and diversity
We support inclusive, diverse and equitable conduct of research.
Published: February 15, 2023
Footnotes
Supplemental information can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.106223.
Supplemental information
Data and code availability
-
•
Single cell RNA-sequencing data have been deposited in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database and is accessible under accession number GSE193701 which is listed in the key resources table. Flow cytometry data reported in this study will be shared by the lead contact upon request.
-
•
All original code is publicly available at https://github.com/vari-bbc/Pioli_2022_ASCs_code.
-
•
Any information required for data reanalysis is available from the lead contact upon request.
References
- 1.Forthal D.N. Functions of antibodies. Microbiol.Spectr. 2014;2 doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.AID-0019-2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Slifka M.K., Antia R., Whitmire J.K., Ahmed R. Humoral immunity due to long-lived plasma cells. Immunity. 1998;8:363–372. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80541-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chernova I., Jones D.D., Wilmore J.R., Bortnick A., Yucel M., Hershberg U., Allman D. Lasting antibody responses are mediated by a combination of newly formed and established bone marrow plasma cells drawn from clonally distinct precursors. J. Immunol. 2014;193:4971–4979. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1401264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Manz R.A., Löhning M., Cassese G., Thiel A., Radbruch A. Survival of long-lived plasma cells is independent of antigen. Int. Immunol. 1998;10:1703–1711. doi: 10.1093/intimm/10.11.1703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Manz R.A., Thiel A., Radbruch A. Lifetime of plasma cells in the bone marrow. Nature. 1997;388:133–134. doi: 10.1038/40540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Amanna I.J., Carlson N.E., Slifka M.K. Duration of humoral immunity to common viral and vaccine antigens. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007;357:1903–1915. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa066092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Halliley J.L., Tipton C.M., Liesveld J., Rosenberg A.F., Darce J., Gregoretti I.V., Popova L., Kaminiski D., Fucile C.F., Albizua I., et al. Long-lived plasma cells are contained within the CD19(-)CD38(hi)CD138(+) subset in human bone marrow. Immunity. 2015;43:132–145. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.06.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Landsverk O.J.B., Snir O., Casado R.B., Richter L., Mold J.E., Réu P., Horneland R., Paulsen V., Yaqub S., Aandahl E.M., et al. Antibody-secreting plasma cells persist for decades in human intestine. J. Exp. Med. 2017;214:309–317. doi: 10.1084/jem.20161590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fillatreau S. Regulatory functions of B cells and regulatory plasma cells. Biomed. J. 2019;42:233–242. doi: 10.1016/j.bj.2019.05.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pioli P.D. Plasma cells, the next generation: beyond antibody secretion. Front. Immunol. 2019;10:2768. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wang A.A., Gommerman J.L., Rojas O.L. Plasma cells: from cytokine production to regulation in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Mol. Biol. 2021;433:166655. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2020.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rojas O.L., Pröbstel A.K., Porfilio E.A., Wang A.A., Charabati M., Sun T., Lee D.S.W., Galicia G., Ramaglia V., Ward L.A., et al. Recirculating intestinal IgA-producing cells regulate neuroinflammation via IL-10. Cell. 2019;177:492–493. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.03.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lino A.C., Dang V.D., Lampropoulou V., Welle A., Joedicke J., Pohar J., Simon Q., Thalmensi J., Baures A., Flühler V., et al. LAG-3 inhibitory receptor expression identifies immunosuppressive natural regulatory plasma cells. Immunity. 2018;49:120–133.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.06.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fritz J.H., Rojas O.L., Simard N., McCarthy D.D., Hapfelmeier S., Rubino S., Robertson S.J., Larijani M., Gosselin J., Ivanov I.I., et al. Acquisition of a multifunctional IgA+ plasma cell phenotype in the gut. Nature. 2011;481:199–203. doi: 10.1038/nature10698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bermejo D.A., Jackson S.W., Gorosito-Serran M., Acosta-Rodriguez E.V., Amezcua-Vesely M.C., Sather B.D., Singh A.K., Khim S., Mucci J., Liggitt D., et al. Trypanosoma cruzi trans-sialidase initiates a program independent of the transcription factors RORgammat and Ahr that leads to IL-17 production by activated B cells. Nat. Immunol. 2013;14:514–522. doi: 10.1038/ni.2569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Meng L., Almeida L.N., Clauder A.K., Lindemann T., Luther J., Link C., Hofmann K., Kulkarni U., Wong D.M., David J.P., Manz R.A. Bone marrow plasma cells modulate local myeloid-lineage differentiation via IL-10. Front. Immunol. 2019;10:1183. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pioli P.D., Casero D., Montecino-Rodriguez E., Morrison S.L., Dorshkind K. Plasma cells are obligate effectors of enhanced myelopoiesis in aging bone marrow. Immunity. 2019;51:351–366.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.06.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hill M.E., Shiono H., Newsom-Davis J., Willcox N. The myasthenia gravis thymus: a rare source of human autoantibody-secreting plasma cells for testing potential therapeutics. J. Neuroimmunol. 2008;201–202:50–56. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2008.06.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yamamoto Y., Matsui N., Uzawa A., Ozawa Y., Kanai T., Oda F., Kondo H., Ohigashi I., Takizawa H., Kondo K., et al. Intrathymic plasmablasts are affected in patients with myasthenia gravis with active disease. Neurol. Neuroimmunol. Neuroinflamm. 2021;8:e1087. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000001087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zografou C., Vakrakou A.G., Stathopoulos P. Short- and long-lived autoantibody-secreting cells in autoimmune neurological disorders. Front. Immunol. 2021;12:686466. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.686466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hidalgo Y., Núñez S., Fuenzalida M.J., Flores-Santibáñez F., Sáez P.J., Dorner J., Lennon-Dumenil A.M., Martínez V., Zorn E., Rosemblatt M., et al. Thymic B cells promote germinal center-like structures and the expansion of follicular helper T cells in lupus-prone mice. Front. Immunol. 2020;11:696. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cordero H., King R.G., Dogra P., Dufeu C., See S.B., Chong A.M., Uhlemann A.C., Ho S.H., Kalfa D.M., Bacha E.A., et al. Intrathymic differentiation of natural antibody-producing plasma cells in human neonates. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:5761. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26069-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Nuñez S., Moore C., Gao B., Rogers K., Hidalgo Y., Del Nido P.J., Restaino S., Naka Y., Bhagat G., Madsen J.C., et al. The human thymus perivascular space is a functional niche for viral-specific plasma cells. Sci. Immunol. 2016;1:eaah4447. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aah4447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Rother M.B., Schreurs M.W.J., Kroek R., Bartol S.J.W., van Dongen J.J.M., van Zelm M.C. The human thymus is enriched for autoreactive B cells. J. Immunol. 2016;197:441–448. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1501992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Perera J., Zheng Z., Li S., Gudjonson H., Kalinina O., Benichou J.I.C., Block K.E., Louzoun Y., Yin D., Chong A.S., et al. Self-antigen-driven thymic B cell class switching promotes T cell central tolerance. Cell Rep. 2016;17:387–398. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.09.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kwon D.I., Park E.S., Kim M., Choi Y.H., Lee M.S., Joo S.H., Kang Y.W., Lee M., Jo S.B., Lee S.W., et al. Homeostatic serum IgE is secreted by plasma cells in the thymus and enhances mast cell survival. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:1418. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29032-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Klein S.L., Flanagan K.L. Sex differences in immune responses. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2016;16:626–638. doi: 10.1038/nri.2016.90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Haba S., Nisonoff A. IgE-secreting cells in the thymus: correlation with induction of tolerance to IgE. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1992;89:5185–5187. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.11.5185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Fooksman D.R., Nussenzweig M.C., Dustin M.L. Myeloid cells limit production of antibody-secreting cells after immunization in the lymph node. J. Immunol. 2014;192:1004–1012. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1300977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gui J., Morales A.J., Maxey S.E., Bessette K.A., Ratcliffe N.R., Kelly J.A., Craig R.W. MCL1 increases primitive thymocyte viability in female mice and promotes thymic expansion into adulthood. Int. Immunol. 2011;23:647–659. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxr073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Min H., Montecino-Rodriguez E., Dorshkind K. Reassessing the role of growth hormone and sex steroids in thymic involution. Clin.Immunol. 2006;118:117–123. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2005.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Cheng Q., Pelz A., Taddeo A., Khodadadi L., Klotsche J., Hoyer B.F., Alexander T., Thiel A., Burmester G.R., Radbruch A., Hiepe F. Selective depletion of plasma cells in vivo based on the specificity of their secreted antibodies. Eur. J. Immunol. 2020;50:284–291. doi: 10.1002/eji.201948144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Shen P., Roch T., Lampropoulou V., O'Connor R.A., Stervbo U., Hilgenberg E., Ries S., Dang V.D., Jaimes Y., Daridon C., et al. IL-35-producing B cells are critical regulators of immunity during autoimmune and infectious diseases. Nature. 2014;507:366–370. doi: 10.1038/nature12979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Matsumoto M., Baba A., Yokota T., Nishikawa H., Ohkawa Y., Kayama H., Kallies A., Nutt S.L., Sakaguchi S., Takeda K., et al. Interleukin-10-producing plasmablasts exert regulatory function in autoimmune inflammation. Immunity. 2014;41:1040–1051. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Suzuki-Yamazaki N., Yanobu-Takanashi R., Okamura T., Takaki S. IL-10 production in murine IgM(+) CD138(hi) cells is driven by Blimp-1 and downregulated in class-switched cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 2017;47:493–503. doi: 10.1002/eji.201646549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Underhill G.H., Minges Wols H.A., Fornek J.L., Witte P.L., Kansas G.S. IgG plasma cells display a unique spectrum of leukocyte adhesion and homing molecules. Blood. 2002;99:2905–2912. doi: 10.1182/blood.v99.8.2905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wilmore J.R., Jones D.D., Allman D. Protocol for improved resolution of plasma cell subpopulations by flow cytometry. Eur. J. Immunol. 2017;47:1386–1388. doi: 10.1002/eji.201746944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Blanc P., Moro-Sibilot L., Barthly L., Jagot F., This S., de Bernard S., Buffat L., Dussurgey S., Colisson R., Hobeika E., et al. Mature IgM-expressing plasma cells sense antigen and develop competence for cytokine production upon antigenic challenge. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:13600. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Pinto D., Montani E., Bolli M., Garavaglia G., Sallusto F., Lanzavecchia A., Jarrossay D. A functional BCR in human IgA and IgM plasma cells. Blood. 2013;121:4110–4114. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-09-459289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Minnich M., Tagoh H., Bönelt P., Axelsson E., Fischer M., Cebolla B., Tarakhovsky A., Nutt S.L., Jaritz M., Busslinger M. Multifunctional role of the transcription factor Blimp-1 in coordinating plasma cell differentiation. Nat. Immunol. 2016;17:331–343. doi: 10.1038/ni.3349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Shaffer A.L., Lin K.I., Kuo T.C., Yu X., Hurt E.M., Rosenwald A., Giltnane J.M., Yang L., Zhao H., Calame K., Staudt L.M. Blimp-1 orchestrates plasma cell differentiation by extinguishing the mature B cell gene expression program. Immunity. 2002;17:51–62. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(02)00335-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Tellier J., Shi W., Minnich M., Liao Y., Crawford S., Smyth G.K., Kallies A., Busslinger M., Nutt S.L. Blimp-1 controls plasma cell function through the regulation of immunoglobulin secretion and the unfolded protein response. Nat. Immunol. 2016;17:323–330. doi: 10.1038/ni.3348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Shapiro-Shelef M., Lin K.I., McHeyzer-Williams L.J., Liao J., McHeyzer-Williams M.G., Calame K. Blimp-1 is required for the formation of immunoglobulin secreting plasma cells and pre-plasma memory B cells. Immunity. 2003;19:607–620. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(03)00267-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hobeika E., Thiemann S., Storch B., Jumaa H., Nielsen P.J., Pelanda R., Reth M. Testing gene function early in the B cell lineage in mb1-cre mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:13789–13794. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605944103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Pracht K., Meinzinger J., Daum P., Schulz S.R., Reimer D., Hauke M., Roth E., Mielenz D., Berek C., Côrte-Real J., et al. A new staining protocol for detection of murine antibody-secreting plasma cell subsets by flow cytometry. Eur. J. Immunol. 2017;47:1389–1392. doi: 10.1002/eji.201747019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ferrero I., Anjuere F., Martin P., Martinez del Hoyo G., Fraga M.L., Wright N., Varona R., Marquez G., Ardavin C. Functional and phenotypic analysis of thymic B cells: role in the induction of T cell negative selection. Eur. J. Immunol. 1999;29:1598–1609. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Perera J., Meng L., Meng F., Huang H. Autoreactive thymic B cells are efficient antigen-presenting cells of cognate self-antigens for T cell negative selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:17011–17016. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1313001110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Radomir L., Cohen S., Kramer M.P., Bakos E., Lewinsky H., Barak A., Porat Z., Bucala R., Stepensky P., Becker-Herman S., Shachar I. T cells regulate peripheral naive mature B cell survival by cell-cell contact mediated through SLAMF6 and SAP. J. Immunol. 2017;199:2745–2757. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1700557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Anderson K.G., Mayer-Barber K., Sung H., Beura L., James B.R., Taylor J.J., Qunaj L., Griffith T.S., Vezys V., Barber D.L., Masopust D. Intravascular staining for discrimination of vascular and tissue leukocytes. Nat. Protoc. 2014;9:209–222. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2014.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Ruscher R., Hogquist K.A. Intravenous labeling and analysis of the content of thymic perivascular spaces. Bio.Protoc. 2018;8:e2757. doi: 10.21769/bioprotoc.2757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Thanabalasuriar A., Neupane A.S., Wang J., Krummel M.F., Kubes P. iNKT cell emigration out of the lung vasculature requires neutrophils and monocyte-derived dendritic cells in inflammation. Cell Rep. 2016;16:3260–3272. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.07.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Nutt S.L., Hodgkin P.D., Tarlinton D.M., Corcoran L.M. The generation of antibody-secreting plasma cells. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2015;15:160–171. doi: 10.1038/nri3795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Scharer C.D., Patterson D.G., Mi T., Price M.J., Hicks S.L., Boss J.M. Antibody-secreting cell destiny emerges during the initial stages of B-cell activation. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:3989. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17798-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Zhou Y., Zhou B., Pache L., Chang M., Khodabakhshi A.H., Tanaseichuk O., Benner C., Chanda S.K. Metascape provides a biologist-oriented resource for the analysis of systems-level datasets. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:1523. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09234-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Lam W.Y., Becker A.M., Kennerly K.M., Wong R., Curtis J.D., Llufrio E.M., McCommis K.S., Fahrmann J., Pizzato H.A., Nunley R.M., et al. Mitochondrial pyruvate import promotes long-term survival of antibody-secreting plasma cells. Immunity. 2016;45:60–73. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.06.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Lam W.Y., Jash A., Yao C.H., D'Souza L., Wong R., Nunley R.M., Meares G.P., Patti G.J., Bhattacharya D. Metabolic and transcriptional modules independently diversify plasma cell lifespan and function. Cell Rep. 2018;24:2479–2492.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.07.084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Price M.J., Patterson D.G., Scharer C.D., Boss J.M. Progressive upregulation of oxidative metabolism facilitates plasmablast differentiation to a T-independent antigen. Cell Rep. 2018;23:3152–3159. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.05.053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Van den Berge K., Roux de Bézieux H., Street K., Saelens W., Cannoodt R., Saeys Y., Dudoit S., Clement L. Trajectory-based differential expression analysis for single-cell sequencing data. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:1201. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14766-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Hendrickson B.A., Conner D.A., Ladd D.J., Kendall D., Casanova J.E., Corthesy B., Max E.E., Neutra M.R., Seidman C.E., Seidman J.G. Altered hepatic transport of immunoglobulin A in mice lacking the J chain. J. Exp. Med. 1995;182:1905–1911. doi: 10.1084/jem.182.6.1905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Andreani V., Ramamoorthy S., Pandey A., Lupar E., Nutt S.L., Lämmermann T., Grosschedl R. Cochaperone Mzb1 is a key effector of Blimp1 in plasma cell differentiation and beta1-integrin function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2018;115:E9630–E9639. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1809739115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Rosenbaum M., Andreani V., Kapoor T., Herp S., Flach H., Duchniewicz M., Grosschedl R. MZB1 is a GRP94 cochaperone that enables proper immunoglobulin heavy chain biosynthesis upon ER stress. Genes Dev. 2014;28:1165–1178. doi: 10.1101/gad.240762.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Pelletier N., McHeyzer-Williams L.J., Wong K.A., Urich E., Fazilleau N., McHeyzer-Williams M.G. Plasma cells negatively regulate the follicular helper T cell program. Nat. Immunol. 2010;11:1110–1118. doi: 10.1038/ni.1954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Abdi J., Rastgoo N., Chen Y., Chen G.A., Chang H. Ectopic expression of BIRC5-targeting miR-101-3p overcomes bone marrow stroma-mediated drug resistance in multiple myeloma cells. BMC Cancer. 2019;19:975. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6151-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Romagnoli M., Trichet V., David C., Clément M., Moreau P., Bataille R., Barillé-Nion S. Significant impact of survivin on myeloma cell growth. Leukemia. 2007;21:1070–1078. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Zhang P., Cao L., Zhou R., Yang X., Wu M. The lncRNA Neat1 promotes activation of inflammasomes in macrophages. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:1495. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09482-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Morokata T., Ishikawa J., Ida K., Yamada T. C57BL/6 mice are more susceptible to antigen-induced pulmonary eosinophilia than BALB/c mice, irrespective of systemic T helper 1/T helper 2 responses. Immunology. 1999;98:345–351. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2567.1999.00890.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Teufelberger A.R., Van Nevel S., Hulpiau P., Nordengrün M., Savvides S.N., De Graeve S., Akula S., Holtappels G., De Ruyck N., Declercq W., et al. Mouse strain-dependent difference toward the Staphylococcus aureus allergen serine protease-like protein D reveals a novel regulator of IL-33. Front. Immunol. 2020;11:582044. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.582044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Wilmore J.R., Gaudette B.T., Gomez Atria D., Hashemi T., Jones D.D., Gardner C.A., Cole S.D., Misic A.M., Beiting D.P., Allman D. Commensal microbes induce serum IgA responses that protect against polymicrobial sepsis. Cell Host Microbe. 2018;23:302–311.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2018.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Borcherding N., Bormann N.L., Kraus G. scRepertoire: an R-based toolkit for single-cell immune receptor analysis. F1000Res. 2020;9:47. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.22139.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Renner P., Crone M., Kornas M., Pioli K.T., Pioli P.D. Intracellular flow cytometry staining of antibody-secreting cells using phycoerythrin-conjugated antibodies: pitfalls and solutions. Antib.Ther. 2022;5:151–163. doi: 10.1093/abt/tbac013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Yu P., Lübben W., Slomka H., Gebler J., Konert M., Cai C., Neubrandt L., Prazeres da Costa O., Paul S., Dehnert S., et al. Nucleic acid-sensing Toll-like receptors are essential for the control of endogenous retrovirus viremia and ERV-induced tumors. Immunity. 2012;37:867–879. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.07.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Brown G.J., Cañete P.F., Wang H., Medhavy A., Bones J., Roco J.A., He Y., Qin Y., Cappello J., Ellyard J.I., et al. TLR7 gain-of-function genetic variation causes human lupus. Nature. 2022;605:349–356. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04642-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Murakami Y., Fukui R., Tanaka R., Motoi Y., Kanno A., Sato R., Yamaguchi K., Amano H., Furukawa Y., Suzuki H., et al. Anti-TLR7 antibody protects against lupus nephritis in NZBWF1 mice by targeting B cells and patrolling monocytes. Front. Immunol. 2021;12:777197. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.777197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Saitoh S.I., Abe F., Kanno A., Tanimura N., Mori Saitoh Y., Fukui R., Shibata T., Sato K., Ichinohe T., Hayashi M., et al. TLR7 mediated viral recognition results in focal type I interferon secretion by dendritic cells. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:1592. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01687-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Jutila M.A., Kroese F.G., Jutila K.L., Stall A.M., Fiering S., Herzenberg L.A., Berg E.L., Butcher E.C. Ly-6C is a monocyte/macrophage and endothelial cell differentiation antigen regulated by interferon-gamma. Eur. J. Immunol. 1988;18:1819–1826. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830181125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Schlueter A.J., Krieg A.M., de Vries P., Li X. Type I interferon is the primary regulator of inducible Ly-6C expression on T cells. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 2001;21:621–629. doi: 10.1089/10799900152547885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Collins T., Korman A.J., Wake C.T., Boss J.M., Kappes D.J., Fiers W., Ault K.A., Gimbrone M.A., Jr., Strominger J.L., Pober J.S. Immune interferon activates multiple class II major histocompatibility complex genes and the associated invariant chain gene in human endothelial cells and dermal fibroblasts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1984;81:4917–4921. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.15.4917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Atzeni F., Schena M., Ongari A.M., Carrabba M., Bonara P., Minonzio F., Capsoni F. Induction of CD69 activation molecule on human neutrophils by GM-CSF, IFN-gamma, and IFN-alpha. Cell.Immunol. 2002;220:20–29. doi: 10.1016/s0008-8749(03)00002-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Benet Z., Jing Z., Fooksman D.R. Plasma cell dynamics in the bone marrow niche. Cell Rep. 2021;34:108733. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Ricker E., Manni M., Flores-Castro D., Jenkins D., Gupta S., Rivera-Correa J., Meng W., Rosenfeld A.M., Pannellini T., Bachu M., et al. Altered function and differentiation of age-associated B cells contribute to the female bias in lupus mice. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:4813. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25102-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Lightman S.M., Utley A., Lee K.P. Survival of long-lived plasma cells (LLPC): piecing together the puzzle. Front. Immunol. 2019;10:965. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Baran-Gale J., Morgan M.D., Maio S., Dhalla F., Calvo-Asensio I., Deadman M.E., Handel A.E., Maynard A., Chen S., Green F., et al. Ageing compromises mouse thymus function and remodels epithelial cell differentiation. Elife. 2020;9:e56221. doi: 10.7554/eLife.56221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Tomay F., Wells K., Duong L., Tsu J.W., Dye D.E., Radley-Crabb H.G., Grounds M.D., Shavlakadze T., Metharom P., Nelson D.J., Jackaman C. Aged neutrophils accumulate in lymphoid tissues from healthy elderly mice and infiltrate T- and B-cell zones. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2018;96:831–840. doi: 10.1111/imcb.12046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Kuley R., Draves K.E., Fuller D.H., Giltiay N.V., Clark E.A., Giordano D. B cell activating factor (BAFF) from neutrophils and dendritic cells is required for protective B cell responses against Salmonella typhimurium infection. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0259158. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Parsa R., Lund H., Georgoudaki A.M., Zhang X.M., Ortlieb Guerreiro-Cacais A., Grommisch D., Warnecke A., Croxford A.L., Jagodic M., Becher B., et al. BAFF-secreting neutrophils drive plasma cell responses during emergency granulopoiesis. J. Exp. Med. 2016;213:1537–1553. doi: 10.1084/jem.20150577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Wilhelmson A.S., Lantero Rodriguez M., Stubelius A., Fogelstrand P., Johansson I., Buechler M.B., Lianoglou S., Kapoor V.N., Johansson M.E., Fagman J.B., et al. Testosterone is an endogenous regulator of BAFF and splenic B cell number. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:2067. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04408-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Walters S.N., Webster K.E., Daley S., Grey S.T. A role for intrathymic B cells in the generation of natural regulatory T cells. J. Immunol. 2014;193:170–176. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1302519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Inaba M., Inaba K., Adachi Y., Nango K., Ogata H., Muramatsu S., Ikehara S. Functional analyses of thymic CD5+ B cells. Responsiveness to major histocompatibility complex class II-restricted T blasts but not to lipopolysaccharide or anti-IgM plus interleukin 4. J. Exp. Med. 1990;171:321–326. doi: 10.1084/jem.171.1.321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Inaba M., Inaba K., Fukuba Y., Mori S., Haruna H., Doi H., Adachi Y., Iwai H., Hosaka N., Hisha H., et al. Activation of thymic B cells by signals of CD40 molecules plus interleukin-10. Eur. J. Immunol. 1995;25:1244–1248. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830250517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Foss D.L., Donskoy E., Goldschneider I. The importation of hematogenous precursors by the thymus is a gated phenomenon in normal adult mice. J. Exp. Med. 2001;193:365–374. doi: 10.1084/jem.193.3.365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Price M.J., Hicks S.L., Bradley J.E., Randall T.D., Boss J.M., Scharer C.D. IgM, IgG, and IgA influenza-specific plasma cells express divergent transcriptomes. J. Immunol. 2019;203:2121–2129. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1900285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Wilmore J.R., Gaudette B.T., Gómez Atria D., Rosenthal R.L., Reiser S.K., Meng W., Rosenfeld A.M., Luning Prak E.T., Allman D. IgA plasma cells are long-lived residents of gut and bone marrow that express isotype- and tissue-specific gene expression patterns. Front. Immunol. 2021;12:791095. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.791095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Neumeier D., Pedrioli A., Genovese A., Sandu I., Ehling R., Hong K.L., Papadopoulou C., Agrafiotis A., Kuhn R., Shlesinger D., et al. Profiling the specificity of clonally expanded plasma cells during chronic viral infection by single-cell analysis. Eur. J. Immunol. 2022;52:297–311. doi: 10.1002/eji.202149331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Yamano T., Nedjic J., Hinterberger M., Steinert M., Koser S., Pinto S., Gerdes N., Lutgens E., Ishimaru N., Busslinger M., et al. Thymic B cells are licensed to present self antigens for central T cell tolerance induction. Immunity. 2015;42:1048–1061. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Dodd K.C., Menon M. Sex bias in lymphocytes: implications for autoimmune diseases. Front. Immunol. 2022;13:945762. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.945762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Passos V., Pires A.R., Foxall R.B., Nunes-Cabaço H., Sousa A.E. Expression of human endogenous retroviruses in the human thymus along T cell development. Front. Virol. 2022;2:8. doi: 10.3389/fviro.2022.826393. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Colantonio A.D., Epeldegui M., Jesiak M., Jachimowski L., Blom B., Uittenbogaart C.H. IFN-alpha is constitutively expressed in the human thymus, but not in peripheral lymphoid organs. PLoS One. 2011;6:e24252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Papalexi E., Satija R. Single-cell RNA sequencing to explore immune cell heterogeneity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2018;18:35–45. doi: 10.1038/nri.2017.76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Lun A.T.L., Riesenfeld S., Andrews T., Dao T.P., Gomes T., participants in the 1st Human Cell Atlas Jamboree. Marioni J.C. EmptyDrops: distinguishing cells from empty droplets in droplet-based single-cell RNA sequencing data. Genome Biol. 2019;20:63. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1662-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Amezquita R.A., Lun A.T.L., Becht E., Carey V.J., Carpp L.N., Geistlinger L., Marini F., Rue-Albrecht K., Risso D., Soneson C., et al. Orchestrating single-cell analysis with Bioconductor. Nat. Methods. 2020;17:137–145. doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0654-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.McCarthy D.J., Campbell K.R., Lun A.T.L., Wills Q.F. Scater: pre-processing, quality control, normalization and visualization of single-cell RNA-seq data in R. Bioinformatics. 2017;33:1179–1186. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Stuart T., Butler A., Hoffman P., Hafemeister C., Papalexi E., Mauck W.M., 3rd, Hao Y., Stoeckius M., Smibert P., Satija R. Comprehensive integration of single-cell data. Cell. 2019;177:1888–1902.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Bunis D.G., Andrews J., Fragiadakis G.K., Burt T.D., Sirota M. dittoSeq: universal user-friendly single-cell and bulk RNA sequencing visualization toolkit. Bioinformatics. 2020;36:5535–5536. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa1011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Street K., Risso D., Fletcher R.B., Das D., Ngai J., Yosef N., Purdom E., Dudoit S. Slingshot: cell lineage and pseudotime inference for single-cell transcriptomics. BMC Genom. 2018;19:477. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-4772-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Ilicic T., Kim J.K., Kolodziejczyk A.A., Bagger F.O., McCarthy D.J., Marioni J.C., Teichmann S.A. Classification of low quality cells from single-cell RNA-seq data. Genome Biol. 2016;17:29. doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-0888-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
-
•
Single cell RNA-sequencing data have been deposited in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database and is accessible under accession number GSE193701 which is listed in the key resources table. Flow cytometry data reported in this study will be shared by the lead contact upon request.
-
•
All original code is publicly available at https://github.com/vari-bbc/Pioli_2022_ASCs_code.
-
•
Any information required for data reanalysis is available from the lead contact upon request.