Abstract
Background
Foetal kidney length (FKL) measurements and comparisons to normal charts can be used to assess the development of the foetal kidneys throughout the entire course of pregnancy. This study was designed to assess FKL between 20 — 40 weeks' gestation, establish reference ranges for FKL and determine the relationship between FKL and gestational age (GA) in normal pregnancy.
Methods
This descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted between March-August 2022, at the Obstetric Units and Radiology Departments of the two tertiary health facilities, one secondary facility and one radio-diagnostic facility in Bayelsa State, Southern Nigeria. Transabdominal ultrasound scan was used to evaluate the foetal kidneys. The relationship between foetal kidney dimensions and GA was explored using Pearson's correlation analysis. Linear regression analysis was done to define the relationship between GA and mean kidney length (MKL). A nomogram predicting GA from MKL was constructed. Level of significance was set at p<0.05.
Results
There was a very strong significant correlation between foetal renal dimensions and GA. The correlation coefficient between GA and mean FKL, width and anteroposterior diameter were 0.89 (p=0.001), 0.87 (p=0.001) and 0.82 (p=0.001), respectively. A unit change in mean FKL corresponded to a 79% change in GA (ɼ2), showing a very strong association between mean FKL and GA. The regression equation: GA = 9.87 + 5.91 x MKL, was derived for estimation of GA for a given MKL.
Conclusions
Our study revealed a significant relationship between FKL and GA. The FKL can therefore be reliably used to estimate GA.
Keywords: Foetal kidney length, Normal pregnancy, Gestational age
Introduction
The definitive foetal kidney begins to develop in the first trimester as a fusion of the ureteric bud and metanephric mesoderm. Development of the kidney begins at seven weeks, and by 11 weeks' gestation, the kidney begins to function properly. As early as 9 to 12 weeks' gestation, prenatal ultrasonography (USS) can detect the foetal kidneys, which have a lobular appearance and are located in the paraspinal area (1). The average length of the kidney is about 1 cm at 12 weeks, and 2.7 cm at 20 weeks (1). Corticomedullary differentiation takes place between 15 and 20 weeks, and by 20 weeks, an echogenic cortex with the hypoechogenic, dark renal pyramids of the medulla should be seen (1).
Renal length measurements and comparisons to normal charts can be used to assess the development of the foetal kidneys throughout the entire course of pregnancy (2–4). The ultrasonogram is regarded as a good tool for evaluating growth and anomalies associated with the foetal kidneys and can aid in the early diagnosis and treatment of some kidney-related abnormalities. Nevertheless, several ultrasound-based studies have demonstrated that beyond the detection of renal anomalies, a relationship exists between foetal kidney length (FKL) and gestational age of the developing foetus and should be considered when estimating the duration of pregnancy (3–5).
There are a number of surrogate measurements such as gestational sac (GS), crown-rump length (CRL), biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), femur length (FL) and abdominal circumference (AC), used for estimating the GA of the foetus. However, none has been reported to be the most accurate or reliable for estimating GA. In fact, Benson and Doubilet reported that the accuracy of ultrasound foetal biometric measurements decreases as pregnancy advances (6) Other authors (7,8) have suggested that using a combination of these surrogate foetal measurements is more accurate than using each in isolation, and yet, others (5,9) have opined that FKL appears to be a better measure for GA. So, even if it is clear that sonography of foetal kidney size is of benefit for detecting foetal kidney abnormalities, its use as a potential ‘stand-alone’ measure to estimate GA of pregnancy, especially when dates are unsure, needs further evaluation (5,9,10).
The need for an accurate estimation of gestational age, especially in a high-risk pregnancy for obstetricians and paediatricians alike, cannot be overemphasized. It will enable adequate and comprehensive care to ensure safe maternal and foetal outcomes. Transvaginal sonography, which may be used between 14 and 17 weeks of gestation, and transabdominal ultrasound scan USS, which can be used from 18 weeks of gestation and upwards, are both reliable methods for measuring the foetal kidney (2).
Literature on the relationship between FKL and GA of pregnancy is sparse in our setting. This study therefore sought to assess FKL between 20 – 40 weeks' gestation, establish reference ranges for FKL dimensions, and determine the relationship between FKL and GA in normal pregnancy among a sample of pregnant women in Southern Nigeria.
Materials and Methods
Study setting: This descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted at the Obstetric Units and Radiology Departments of the Federal Medical Centre, Yenagoa, Niger Delta University Teaching Hospital, Okolobiri, Diete Koki Memorial Hospital, Yenagoa, and Silhouette Radio-diagnostic Consultants, Yenagoa, all in Bayelsa State, South-South Nigeria. The first two study centres are tertiary health facilities that provide specialised gynaecological services to women in Bayelsa State and serve as referral centres for other hospitals in Bayelsa State, and surrounding Rivers and Delta States, both in South-South Nigeria. The third study centre is a secondary health institution. The fourth study centre is the biggest Radio-diagnostic Institution in Bayelsa State, Nigeria. The study was conducted from March – August 2022.
Ethics: Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Research and Ethics Committee of the Federal Medical Centre, Yenagoa, Bayelsa State, Nigeria (FMCY/REC/ECC/2022/628).
Sample size: The sample size of 423 for this study was calculated using the Fisher's formula (11). All consenting women with normal singleton pregnancy between 20 — 40 weeks' GA were recruited for the study. Women with multiple gestation, medical conditions in pregnancy, foetal congenital or amniotic fluid abnormalities, intrauterine foetal growth restriction, foetal renal structural or functional abnormalities, indistinct renal borders on USS, and those who smoke or are unsure of their last menstrual period were excluded from the study.
Study recruitment: Four hundred and twenty-three consecutive consenting, eligible women were recruited for this study. The women were recruited from the antenatal clinics of the study centres.
Women who met the inclusion criteria for the study were counselled, and after obtaining written informed consent, were enrolled. A structured questionnaire was used to obtain and document the study participants' sociodemographic characteristics and other clinical information. Gestational age was calculated from the last menstrual period, which was correlated with the GA from an early USS. The women were thereafter referred to the Radiology Departments of the study centres for USS evaluation of the foetus and foetal kidneys.
Procedure: Ultrasound scans were performed transabdominally, and were performed by four Consultant Radiologists (one for each centre), with special interest and expertise in foetal renal scans. With the patient lying supine, and the abdomen and pelvis exposed, adequate ultrasound gel was applied to the lower anterior abdominal wall/pelvis. The gel served to remove air from the skin, and for ease of transducer movement. A real-time, grayscale, 3.5 MHz curvilinear array transducer of a 2012 Philips HD11 ultrasound machine was used to obtain measurements of all foetal biometric parameters. The probe was moved back and forth on the skin, and in orthogonal planes, with gain adjusted, as required, for good image quality. Estimated gestational age, foetal biometric parameters and estimated foetal weight (EFWT) were determined using the Hadlock's method, which included foetal BPD, HC, FL and AC measurements taken at specific reference points (12).
The right and left foetal kidneys were visualised using the superiorly placed liver and stomach respectively as land marks. The longitudinal axis of each kidney was measured by orientating the probe through 90° on either side of the abdominal aorta. The largest longitudinal image of the superior and inferior outer poles of each kidney was obtained and frozen on the monitor screen. The kidney length was measured from the superior outer pole to the inferior outer pole, using electronic calipers. To reduce inter- and intraobserver error, three measurements were obtained for each kidney, and the mean value (in millimeters) was recorded. The adrenal glands were excluded from these measurements.
Data analysis: Data from the study proforma was checked daily for completeness and correctness, and were entered directly into a statistical software, Statistical Product and Service Solutions version 25.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), which was used for data cleaning and analysis. Categorical variables (parity and age-group) were summarised using frequencies and percentages, while continuous variables (maternal height and weight, estimated gestational age, kidney length, width, and anteroposterior diameter) were summarised using mean and standard deviation after a normality (Shapiro-Wilk) test revealed that the variables were normally distributed. The mean kidney dimensions were calculated by dividing the sum of the right and left kidney dimensions by 2. The relationship between the kidney dimensions and estimated gestational age, maternal height and weight was explored using the Pearson's correlation analysis. The mean kidney length had the strongest correlation with the estimated gestational age; hence, it was used in a logistic regression analysis in defining the relationship between estimated gestational age and mean kidney dimension. The equation was thereafter used in predicting gestational ages at different kidney lengths, thereby, producing a nomogram. Level of significance was set at p<0.05.
Results
Sociodemographic and obstetric characteristics of study participants: The mean age of the women was 29.03 ± 6.35 years. The median parity was 1, with a range of 0 to 7. Mean body mass index and gestational age were 27.75 ± 4.12 kg/m2 and 31.8 ± 5.5 weeks, respectively (Table 1).
Table 1.
Maternal sociodemographic and obstetric characteristics
| Characteristics | Frequency (n = 423) | Percent |
| Age (years) | ||
| <20 | 24 | 5.7 |
| 20 – 24 | 85 | 20.1 |
| 25 – 29 | 136 | 32.2 |
| 30 – 34 | 105 | 24.8 |
| >35 | 73 | 17.3 |
| Age range in years | 16 – 40 | |
| Mean age ± SD in years | 29.4 ± 5.6 | |
| Weight in kg (mean ± SD) | 71.67 ± 9.08 | |
| Height in metres (mean ± SD) | 1.59 ± 0.63 | |
| Parity | ||
| Nulliparity | 170 | 40.2 |
| Primiparity | 107 | 25.3 |
| Multiparity | 109 | 25.8 |
| Grand-multiparity | 37 | 8.7 |
| Median parity (range) | 1 (0 – 8) | |
| GA (weeks) | ||
| 20 – 24 | 99 | 23.4 |
| 25 – 28 | 82 | 19.4 |
| 29 – 32 | 81 | 19.1 |
| 33 – 36 | 81 | 19.1 |
| 37 – 40 | 80 | 18.9 |
| Gestational age in weeks (mean ± SD) | 30.79 ± 4.28 |
SD = Standard Deviation.
Foetal kidney dimensions: The mean right and left kidney lengths were 2.40 ± 0.32 cm and 2.20 ± 0.06 cm, respectively, at 20 weeks' gestation; and 4.75 ± 0.15 cm and 5.00 ± 0.45 cm, respectively, at 40 weeks' gestation. The mean kidney anteroposterior diameter and kidney width were 1.89 ± 0.32 cm and 2.24 ± 0.47 cm, respectively. The mean kidney length ranged from 2.30 ± 0.10 cm at 20 weeks' gestation to 3.70 ± 0.82 cm at 40 weeks, while the mean anteroposterior diameter was 1.15 ± 0.08 cm at 20 weeks and 1.89 ± 0.32cm at 40 weeks' gestation. The mean kidney width followed the same trend, increasing from 1.30 ± 0.07 cm at 20 weeks to 2.24 ± 0.47 cm at 40 weeks' gestation (Table 2).
Table 2.
Right, left and mean foetal kidney dimensions at different GA among the study participants
| GA in weeks |
*Freq | Right kidney dimensions in cm | Left kidney dimensions in cm | Mean kidney dimensions in cm | ||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||
| Length | ¶AP Diameter | Width | Length |
¶AP Diameter |
Width | Length |
¶AP Diameter |
Width | ||
| 20 | 19 | 2.40 ± 0.32 | 1.00 ± 0.08 | 1.40 ± 0.07 | 2.20 ± 0.16 | 1.30 ± 0.09 | 1.20 ± 0.07 | 2.30 ± 0.10 | 1.15 ± 0.08 | 1.30 ± 0.07 |
| 21 | 20 | 2.50 ± 0.20 | 1.10 ± 0.07 | 1.50 ± 0.09 | 2.30 ± 0.23 | 1.40 ± 0.08 | 1.30 ± 0.09 | 2.40 ± 0.20 | 1.25 ± 0.07 | 1.40 ± 0.09 |
| 22 | 19 | 2.60 ± 0.14 | 1.20 ± 0.08 | 1.60 ± 0.11 | 2.40 ± 0.25 | 1.50 ± 0.06 | 1.40 ± 0.11 | 2.50 ± 0.13 | 1.35 ± 0.15 | 1.50 ± 0.11 |
| 23 | 20 | 2.70 ± 0.16 | 1.30 ± 0.07 | 1.70 ± 0.08 | 2.50 ± 0.18 | 1.60 ± 0.18 | 1.50 ± 0.16 | 2.60 ± 0.17 | 1.45 ± 0.17 | 1.60 ± 0.16 |
| 24 | 21 | 2.85 ± 0.05 | 1.50 ± 0.10 | 1.90 ± 0.10 | 2.70 ± 0.11 | 1.80 ± 0.10 | 1.65 ± 0.05 | 2.78 ± 0.08 | 1.65 ± 0.10 | 1.78 ± 0.08 |
| 25 | 20 | 2.90 ± 0.07 | 1.50 ± 0.11 | 1.91 ± 0.09 | 2.70 ± 0.07 | 1.80 ± 0.11 | 1.70 ± 0.06 | 2.80 ± 0.12 | 1.75 ± 0.09 | 1.85 ± 0.09 |
| 26 | 20 | 2.90 ± 0.08 | 1.60 ± 0.03 | 2.00 ± 0.04 | 2.80 ± 0.09 | 1.90 ± 0.10 | 1.70 ± 0.07 | 2.85 ± 0.08 | 1.75 ± 0.11 | 1.85 ± 0.10 |
| 27 | 20 | 2.90 ± 0.09 | 1.50 ± 0.04 | 2.10 ± 0.05 | 2.80 ± 0.08 | 1.90 ± 0.09 | 1.70 ± 0.06 | 2.85 ± 0.05 | 1.70 ± 0.10 | 1.90 ± 0.11 |
| 28 | 22 | 2.87 ± 0.05 | 1.60 ± 0.05 | 2.00 ± 0.05 | 2.76 ± 0.05 | 1.87 ± 0.05 | 1.67 ± 0.05 | 2.82 ± 0.05 | 1.72 ± 0.05 | 1.82 ± 0.05 |
| 29 | 20 | 2.90 ± 0.08 | 1.60 ± 0.06 | 2.00 ± 0.06 | 2.80 ± 0.07 | 1.90 ± 0.08 | 1.70 ± 0.05 | 2.85 ± 0.05 | 1.75 ± 0.05 | 1.85 ± 0.05 |
| 30 | 21 | 2.80 ± 0.08 | 1.60 ± 0.06 | 1.80 ± 0.05 | 3.00 ± 0.05 | 1.80 ± 0.06 | 2.20 ± 0.04 | 2.90 ± 0.07 | 1.70 ± 0.08 | 2.00 ± 0.05 |
| 31 | 20 | 3.96 ± 0.35 | 2.20 ± 0.10 | 2.25 ± 0.06 | 3.85 ± 0.06 | 1.92 ± 0.31 | 2.31 ± 0.31 | 3.90 ± 0.20 | 2.05 ± 0.20 | 2.28 ± 0.13 |
| 32 | 20 | 4.10 ± 0.72 | 1.65 ± 0.05 | 1.95 ± 0.15 | 3.50 ± 0.10 | 1.50 ± 0.31 | 2.15 ± 0.05 | 3.80 ± 0.31 | 1.58 ± 0.18 | 2.05 ± 0.05 |
| 33 | 21 | 3.90 ± 0.10 | 2.00 ± 0.10 | 2.35 ± 0.05 | 4.30 ± 0.20 | 1.90 ± 0.10 | 2.45 ± 0.05 | 4.10 ± 0.15 | 1.95 ± 0.10 | 2.40 ± 0.05 |
| 34 | 20 | 4.40 ± 0.11 | 2.16 ± 0.25 | 2.71 ± 0.31 | 4.26 ± 0.81 | 2.20 ± 0.10 | 2.90 ± 0.35 | 4.34 ± 0.36 | 2.18 ± 0.13 | 2.64 ± 0.33 |
| 35 | 20 | 3.88 ± 0.37 | 2.10 ± 0.25 | 2.30 ± 0.44 | 4.10 ± 0.38 | 2.00 ± 0.12 | 2.50 ± 0.41 | 3.86 ± 0.37 | 2.07 ± 0.19 | 2.63 ± 0.43 |
| 36 | 20 | 4.39 ± 0.57 | 2.07 ± 0.19 | 2.40 ± 0.39 | 4.23 ± 0.64 | 2.18 ± 0.19 | 2.50 ± 0.33 | 4.31 ± 0.59 | 2.13 ± 0.16 | 2.47 ± 0.26 |
| 37 | 21 | 4.40 ± 0.28 | 2.50 ± 0.15 | 3.00 ± 0.34 | 4.50 ± 0.38 | 2.00 ± 0.29 | 2.50 ± 0.21 | 4.45 ± 0.72 | 2.25 ± 0.20 | 2.75 ± 0.33 |
| 38 | 20 | 4.60 ± 0.37 | 1.90 ± 0.23 | 2.70 ± 0.14 | 4.30 ± 0.25 | 2.00 ± 0.16 | 2.30 ± 0.24 | 4.45 ± 0.69 | 1.95 ± 0.29 | 2.50 ± 0.22 |
| 39 | 21 | 4.75 ± 0.67 | 1.90 ± 0.10 | 3.30 ± 0.31 | 4.50 ± 0.12 | 1.90 ± 0.18 | 2.80 ± 0.25 | 4.60 ± 0.40 | 1.90 ± 0.24 | 3.05 ± 0.25 |
| 40 | 18 | 4.75 ± 0.15 | 2.05 ± 0.06 | 2.81 ± 0.20 | 5.00 ± 0.45 | 2.80 ± 0.10 | 2.80 ± 0.05 | 4.79 ± 0.31 | 2.38 ± 0.08 | 2.78 ± 0.13 |
| Total | 423 | 3.74 ± 0.81 | 1.85 ± 0.37 | 2.27 ± 0.48 | 3.66 ± 0.88 | 1.95 ± 0.33 | 2.21 ± 0.51 | 3.70 ± 0.82 | 1.89 ± 0.32 | 2.24 ± 0.47 |
Freq – Frequency
AP – Anteroposterior
Relationship between foetal kidney dimensions and GA, maternal weight and maternal height: There was a very strong significant correlation between foetal renal dimensions and GA (Table 3). The correlation coefficient between GA and mean kidney length, width and anteroposterior diameter were 0.89 (p =0.001), 0.87 (p=0.001) and 0.82 (p=0.001), respectively. A unit change in mean kidney length corresponded to a 79% change in GA (ɼ2) showing a very strong association between mean kidney length and GA. There was significant statistical correlation between maternal height and FKL. Maternal weight on the other hand, did not show any significant statistical correlation with FKL (Table 3).
Table 3.
Correlation between foetal kidney dimensions and GA, maternal weight and maternal height
| Kidney parameters | Correlation coefficient (ɼ) |
Square of correlation coefficient (ɼ2) |
p-value |
| Gestational age | |||
| Right kidney length | 0.86 | 0.74 | 0.001 |
| Right kidney ¶AP diameter | 0.79 | 0.62 | 0.001 |
| Right kidney width | 0.78 | 0.61 | 0.001 |
| Left kidney length | 0.86 | 0.74 | 0.001 |
| Left kidney ¶AP diameter | 0.68 | 0.46 | 0.001 |
| Left kidney width | 0.85 | 0.72 | 0.001 |
| Mean kidney length | 0.89 | 0.79 | 0.001 |
| Mean kidney ¶AP diameter | 0.82 | 0.67 | 0.001 |
| Mean kidney width | 0.87 | 0.76 | 0.001 |
| Maternal weight | |||
| Right kidney length | -0.02 | 0.000 | 0.668 |
| Right kidney ¶AP diameter | 0.06 | 0.004 | 0.175 |
| Right kidney width | 0.12 | 0.014 | 0.016 |
| Left kidney length | -0.08 | 0.006 | 0.116 |
| Left kidney ¶AP diameter | 0.18 | 0.032 | 0.001 |
| Left kidney width | -0.04 | 0.002 | 0.397 |
| Mean kidney length | -0.05 | 0.003 | 0.291 |
| Mean kidney ¶AP diameter | 0.13 | 0.017 | 0.008 |
| Mean kidney width | 0.04 | 0.002 | 0.444 |
| Maternal height | |||
| Right kidney length | 0.15 | 0.023 | 0.002 |
| Right kidney ¶AP diameter | 0.20 | 0.040 | 0.001 |
| Right kidney width | 0.22 | 0.048 | 0.001 |
| Left kidney length | 0.19 | 0.036 | 0.001 |
| Left kidney ¶AP diameter | 0.09 | 0.008 | 0.058 |
| Left kidney width | 0.26 | 0.068 | 0.001 |
| Mean kidney length | 0.18 | 0.032 | 0.001 |
| Mean kidney ¶AP diameter | 0.16 | 0.026 | 0.001 |
| Mean kidney width | 0.25 | 0.063 | 0.001 |
AP – Anteroposterior
Estimation of GA from mean kidney length: Figure 2 shows the regression equation: GA = 9.87 + 5.91 x MKL, defining the relationship between mean kidney length and GA. This equation/formula can be used to estimate the GA for a given mean kidney length (Table 4).
Figure 2.
Line graph showing the relationship between GA (in weeks) and mean kidney length (in cm)
Table 4.
Nomogram showing estimated GA from FKL
| Mean kidney length (cm) |
Estimated GA |
95% CI for estimated GA |
|
|
| |||
| Minimum | Maximum | ||
| 2.1 | 22.3 | 20.5 | 24.0 |
| 2.2 | 22.9 | 21.1 | 24.7 |
| 2.3 | 23.5 | 21.7 | 25.3 |
| 2.4 | 24.1 | 22.2 | 25.9 |
| 2.5 | 24.7 | 22.8 | 26.5 |
| 2.6 | 25.2 | 23.3 | 27.1 |
| 2.7 | 25.8 | 23.9 | 27.8 |
| 2.8 | 26.4 | 24.5 | 28.4 |
| 2.9 | 27.0 | 25.0 | 29.0 |
| 3.0 | 27.6 | 25.6 | 29.6 |
| 3.1 | 28.2 | 26.1 | 30.3 |
| 3.2 | 28.8 | 26.7 | 30.9 |
| 3.3 | 29.4 | 27.3 | 31.5 |
| 3.4 | 30.0 | 27.8 | 32.1 |
| 3.5 | 30.6 | 28.4 | 32.7 |
| 3.6 | 31.2 | 29.0 | 33.4 |
| 3.7 | 31.7 | 29.5 | 34.0 |
| 3.8 | 32.3 | 30.1 | 34.6 |
| 3.9 | 32.9 | 30.6 | 35.2 |
| 4.0 | 33.5 | 31.2 | 35.8 |
| 4.1 | 34.1 | 31.8 | 36.5 |
| 4.2 | 34.7 | 32.3 | 37.1 |
| 4.3 | 35.3 | 32.9 | 37.7 |
| 4.4 | 35.9 | 33.4 | 38.3 |
| 4.5 | 36.5 | 34.0 | 38.9 |
| 4.6 | 37.1 | 34.6 | 39.6 |
| 4.7 | 37.7 | 35.1 | 40.2 |
| 4.8 | 38.2 | 35.7 | 40.8 |
| 4.9 | 38.8 | 36.2 | 41.4 |
| 5.0 | 39.4 | 36.8 | 42.1 |
Discussion
The advent and introduction of USS in clinical practice have improved patient evaluation, early diagnosis, treatment, monitoring and prognosis of many clinical conditions. It is a good tool for estimating GA and evaluating growth and abnormalities associated with the foetal kidneys. Despite the fact that the kidney size is affected by growth variations, which appear to mainly affect the anteroposterior and transverse diameters, the kidney length appears to be more stable. This makes it a suitable foetal biometric parameter for the estimation of GA.
This study revealed a mean maternal age ± SD of 29.4 ± 5.6 years, with an age range of 16 – 40 years. These correspond with the reproductive age-group, and are in consonance with the reports of other authors within and outside Nigeria (5,13–15). The index study revealed a significant statistical correlation between maternal height and FKL. This is in contrast with the observations of Edevbie et al. (13), Cohen et al. (16) and Nahid et al. (17), where there was no significant correlation between maternal height and FKL. Maternal weight on the other hand, did not show any significant statistical correlation with FKL. This observation is in agreement with those of Cohen et al. (16) and Nahid et al. (17), but in contrast with that of Edevbie et al. (13), which reported a weak positive correlation between the two variables. The reasons for these variations may not be readily understood; however, the GA at which the anthropometric measurements were taken, the type of study conducted, the sample size and the sample population may have played a role.
Our study revealed a linear increase in FKL with increasing GA. A unit change in mean kidney length corresponded to a 79% change in GA (ɼ2). This correlation is in tandem with the reports of other authors (4,5,7,10,13,14,17–19). This finding supports the fact that FKL can be used for the estimation of GA. When pregnant women present or book late, unsure of their last menstrual periods, the obstetrician is saddled with the responsibility of estimating the GA, in order to date pregnancy and subsequently prevent poor foeto-maternal outcomes. In early pregnancy, GA is usually estimated accurately by using the gestational sac diameter and CRL, and later in pregnancy, other foetal biometric parameters (BPD, HC, FL, AC) become more appropriate. Researches have suggested that FKL is more accurate in estimating GA compared to the other biometric indices in the second half of pregnancy (4,7,13,20–22).
This study revealed that the right FKL (3.74 ± 0.81 cm) was slightly longer than the left FKL (3.66 ± 0.88 cm). This finding is in contrast with the reports of Abonyi et al. (4), Toosi and Rezaie-Delui (22) and Fitzsimons (23), where the left FKL was longer than the right FKL. However, Konje et al. (7) and Kansaria and Parulekar(21) found no significant difference in the lengths of the right and left kidneys. The differential lengths of the right and left kidneys may be due to the differences in genetic makeup and socioeconomic class of people around the globe (24,25).
A nomogram showing the relationship between FKL and EGA was produced from this research. This includes the reference ranges from 20 weeks' GA (kidney length of 2.1 cm) to 40 weeks (kidney length of 5.0 cm). These reference ranges are very similar to the values reported from other centres within Nigeria (4,5,13). However, reference ranges from outside Nigeria were lower than those obtained from our study (19,26,27). This indicates that the reference ranges for other populations may not be reliable for our local population. Therefore, every region should have its own indigenous chart to be used for its local population.
This study is limited by the fact that it is regional-based, and its findings and reference ranges may not reflect those obtainable from other regions of the world. Some of our patients were obese. Obesity limits the optimal visualisation of the kidneys and subsequent assessment of their lengths. However, with our high-resolution ultrasound scan machine, we were able to surmount this limitation. This limitation notwithstanding, our study provides crucial data on the relationship between FKL and GA in normal pregnancy among a sample of pregnant women in our region. The strength of our paper lies in the fact that it is a multicentre study. Ultrasound scans were performed by only four Consultant Radiologists (one for each centre), with special interest and expertise in foetal renal scans, limiting inter-observer differences, and increasing the reliability of our findings.
In conclusion, our study revealed a strong correlation between FKL and EGA. The FKL increases with advancing gestation. The FKL can therefore be used to estimate GA. The nomogram from this research will serve as a reference chart for our local population.
Figure 1.
Sonogram of foetal kidney lengths and widths measurements (yellow dotted lines) at 39 weeks' gestational age; Right kidney length = 4.76 cm, Right kidney width = 2.42 cm; Left kidney length = 4.45 cm, Left kidney width = 2.20 cm
Acknowledgement
We appreciate all the patients and staff of all the health facilities used for this study, for all the roles they played in making this research successful.
References
- 1.Rosenblum S, Pal A, Reidy K. Renal development in the fetus and premature infant. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;22:58–66. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2017.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zalel Y, Lotan D, Achiron R, Mashiach S, Gamzu R. The early development of the fetal kidney - an in utero sonographic evaluation between 13 and 22 weeks' gestation. Prenat Diagn. 2002;22:962–965. doi: 10.1002/pd.436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Osho ES, Ibitoye BO, Adetiloye VA, Adeyemi AB, Aderibigbe AS, Omisore AD. Ultrasonic determination of gestational age by assessment of fetal kidney size in the third trimester in southwest Nigeria. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2019;144:271–276. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Abonyi EO, Eze CU, Agwuna KK, Onwuzu WS. Sonographic estimation of gestational age from 20 to 40 weeks by fetal kidney lengths' measurements among pregnant women in Portharcourt, Nigeria. BMC Med Imaging. 2019;19:72. doi: 10.1186/s12880-019-0371-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Akintomide A, Efanga S. Fetal kidney length: A likely sole index for gestational age determination in late pregnancy and certain abnormalities. Niger J Med. 2022;31:138. doi: 10.4103/NJM.NJM_199_21. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Benson CB, Doubilet PM. Sonographic prediction of gestational age: accuracy of second- and third-trimester fetal measurements. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991;157:1275–1277. doi: 10.2214/ajr.157.6.1950881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Konje JC, Abrams KR, Bell SC, Taylor DJ. Determination of gestational age after the 24th week of gestation from fetal kidney length measurements: Fetal gestation by kidney length. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;19:592–597. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00704.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ugur MG, Mustafa A, Ozcan HC, Tepe NB, Kurt H, Akcil E, Gunduz R. Fetal kidney length as a useful adjunct parameter for better determination of gestational age. Saudi Med J. 2016;37:533–537. doi: 10.15537/smj.2016.5.14225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bharatnur S, Dawson S, Hebbar S. Kidney length, a visceral parameter predicts foetal age between 24 to 40 weeks of gestation. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2019;8:492. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ansari SM, Saha M, Paul AK, Mia SR, Sohel A, Karim R. Ultrasonographic study of 793 foetuses: Measurement of normal foetal kidney lengths in Bangladesh. Australas Radiol. 1997;41:3–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1673.1997.tb00457.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Araoye MO. Subjects Selection. Research Methodology with statistics for Health and Social sciences. Ilorin: Nathadex publishers; 2003. pp. 115–129. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, Deter RL, Park SK. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements--a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;151:333–337. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(85)90298-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Edevbie JP, Akhigbe AO. Ultrasound measurement of fetal kidney length in normal pregnancy and correlation with gestational age. Niger J Clin Pract. 2018;21:960–966. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_373_15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gayam S, Bai G, Paul S. Fetal Kidney Length for Determining Gestational Age in Third Trimester. Obs Rev: J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;4:49–54. doi: 10.17511/joog.2018.i03.02. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ghaleb MM, Shokri AIAF, Sokkary MSESE, Shourbagy MMAE. Role of ultrasonographic measurement of fetal kidney length in determination of gestational age during third trimester of pregnancy. Open J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;11:221–232. doi: 10.4236/ojog.2021.113022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cohen HL, Cooper J, Eisenberg P, Mandel FS, Gross BR, Goldman MA, Barzel E, Rawlinson KF. Normal length of fetal kidneys: sonographic study in 397 obstetric patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991;157:545–548. doi: 10.2214/ajr.157.3.1872242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yusuf N, Moslem F, Haque JA. Fetal Kidney Length: Can be a New Parameter for Determination of Gestational Age in 3rd Trimester. TAJ J Teach Assoc. 2007;20:147–150. doi: 10.3329/taj.v20i2.3078. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Shivalingaiah N, Sowmya K, Ananya R, Kanmani T, Marimuthu P. Fetal kidney length as a parameter for determination of gestational age in pregnancy. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;3:424–427. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chatterjee S, Yadav K, Prakash P, Shekhawat K. Foetal kidney length as a parameter for determination of gestational age in pregnancy by ultrasonography. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;5:1949–1952. doi: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20161696. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Luther N, Patnaik VVG, Puri N, Mittal A. Role of fetal kidney length in estimation of gestational age. J Anat Soc India. 2016;65:S57. doi: 10.1016/j.jasi.2016.08.186. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kansaria J, Parulekar S. Nomogram for Foetal Kidney Length. Bombay Hosp J. 2009;51:155–162. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Seilanian Toosi F, Rezaie-Delui H. Evaluation of the normal fetal kidney length and its correlation with gestational age. Acta Med Iran. 2013;51:303–306. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fitzsimons RB. Kidney length in the newborn measured by ultrasound. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1983;72:885–887. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1983.tb09835.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Tarnoki DL, Tarnoki AD, Littvay L, Bata P, Berczi V, Garami Z, Karlinger K. Genetic and environmental variance of renal parenchymal thickness: a twin study. Croat Med J. 2013;54:550–554. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2013.54.550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tarnoki DL, Tarnoki AD, Bata P, Littvay L, Garami Z, Berczi V, Karlinger K. Different genetic impact in the development of renal length and width: a twin study. Intern Med J. 2015;45:63–67. doi: 10.1111/imj.12631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Peter M, Nayak AK, Giri PP, Jain MK. Fetal kidney length as a parameter for determination of gestational age from 20th week to term in healthy women with uncomplicated pregnancy. Int J Res Med Sci. 2017;5:1869–1873. doi: 10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20171808. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Joshi BR, Chaurasia AK, Khanal UP. Determination of Gestational Age by Fetal Kidney Length Measurement After the 20th Week in Healthy Women With Uncomplicated Pregnancy in Tertiary Care Centre. J Nepal Paediatr Soc. 2021;41:380–386. doi: 10.3126/jnps.v41i3.35604. [DOI] [Google Scholar]