Dear Editor,
To date, the effect of colorectal cancer (CRC)-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) on liver pre-metastatic niche (PMN) remain incompletely understood.1 To investigate the role of CRC-derived EVs in the remodeling of the liver PMN, we isolated EVs from CT26 cell culture supernatant. The characteristics of EVs (the morphology, size, and markers) were identified by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA), and western blotting (Supplementary Fig. S1a–e). Then, BALB/c mice with an intact liver immune status were pretreated with CRC-derived EVs and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for one month, and a liver metastasis model was established via spleen injection of tumor cells to determine whether EVs influence liver metastasis (Fig. 1a). Two hours after the operation, in vivo imaging indicated that the animal model was successfully established, and the tumor fluorescence intensity in the liver was consistent between the two groups (Supplementary Fig. S2a, b). Amazingly, the liver tumor fluorescence intensity in the EVs group was significantly stronger than that in the PBS group after 24 h (Fig. 1b; Supplementary Fig. S2c, d). The number of liver tumor nodules in the EVs group was also significantly higher than that in the PBS group on day 4 (Fig. 1c; Supplementary Fig. S2e, f). The efficacy of EVs in promoting tumor liver metastasis was consistent regardless of whether the spleen was being preserved when the animal model was established (Supplementary Fig. S3a–e).
Since we confirmed that CRC-derived EVs contributed to tumor early liver metastasis, we speculated that EVs induced liver PMN transformation into the immunosuppressive niche. Increasing evidence confirmed that myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are major regulators of the immune response in pathological conditions and key contributors to tumor progression.2 We analyzed the evolution of MDSCs by flow cytometry in the liver PMN before and after EVs education. We found that EVs education significantly increased the CD11b+Gr1+ cells (especially the CD11b+Ly6GhighLy6Clow subset) number in the liver PMN (Fig. 1d; Supplementary Fig. S4a–e).
Traditionally, MDSCs facilitates tumor immune escape by inhibiting T-cell function.2 However, the mechanism by which the recruited MDSCs induce the liver PMN to enter an immunosuppressive state remains to be elucidated. As a prominent cellular component of the innate immune system, natural killer (NK) cells play a vital role in the early monitoring of tumor immune escape and the regulation of distant metastases.3 Our xenograft assay demonstrated that tumor cells evaded the immune system’s surveillance, suggesting that NK cells had decreased cytotoxicity after EVs education. Moreover, we further confirmed that the expression of NKG2D, the main functionally activated receptor in NK cells, was significantly reduced after EVs education, although the number of NK cells did not change (Fig. 1e; Supplementary Fig. S4f, g). Collectively, our findings suggested that CRC-derived EVs induced liver immunosuppressive PMN formation via recruiting MDSCs and impair NK-cell cytotoxicity.
To further evaluate whether the recruited MDSCs are the key cellular components during liver PMN formation and whether NK cells play a vital role in immune surveillance, anti-Ly6G and anti-asialo GM1 antibodies were injected intraperitoneally to ablate the recruited MDSCs and residential NKs in the liver PMN after EVs education. After MDSCs and NK cells had been successfully ablated (Supplementary Fig. S5b–e; Supplementary Fig. S6b–e), the liver metastatic model was established to confirm the effect of MDSCs and NK cells depletion (Supplementary Fig. S5a; Supplementary Fig. S6a). Interestingly, after MDSCs depletion, no significant difference was found in tumor burden between the two groups. Furthermore, the number of tumor nodules in both groups tended to decrease compared with that in the control group (Fig. 1f), suggesting that MDSCs depletion can reverse the effect of EVs on promoting tumor liver metastasis. On the other hand, after NK cells depletion, no significant difference in tumor burden was found between the two groups, but the number of tumor nodules in the two groups was significantly higher compared with that in the control group (Fig. 1g), indicating that NK cells ablation can enhance the effect of EVs on promoting tumor liver metastasis. Taken together, these results indicated that recruited MDSCs had an important role in the liver immunosuppressive PMN formation and that the function of NK cells was inhibited by MDSCs, resulting in the failure of immune surveillance.
To further explore how EVs initiate the sequential events of liver PMN formation, we investigated the distribution of EVs in vivo. We found that EVs mainly accumulated in the liver and were taken up by hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) (Supplementary Fig. S7a–d; Fig. 1h, i). It is well-known that the activation of HSCs transdifferentiation of quiescent cells into proliferative, fibrogenic myofibroblasts is a central driver of liver extracellular matrix remodeling.4 As expected, after EVs education for one month, HSCs were massively activated and significantly increased α-SMA and fibronectin secretion in vivo (Supplementary Fig. S7e; Fig. 1j). After co-culture with EVs in vitro, the markers of tumor-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), including α-SMA, vimentin, and FAP, were significantly increased in activated HSCs (Supplementary Fig. S7f; Supplementary Fig. S8a–d; Fig. 1k). These results revealed that EVs were mainly taken up by HSCs to trigger HSCs transformation into CAFs, which secrete fibronectin and remodel the liver PMN.
Our previous study revealed that gastric cancer-derived EVs carrying Tgf-β1 remodel the preperitoneal PMN and promote tumor peritoneal metastasis.5 In this study, we also confirmed that Tgf-β1 was the major component in EVs that induced HSCs transformation into CAFs phenotype (Supplementary Fig. S8c, d). In vitro co-culture showed that CAFs further enhanced tumor migration, and the effect was abolished by the Tgf-β1 inhibitor (Fig. 1l). Furthermore, RNA-sequencing analysis and ELISA confirmed that, as an essential signaling pathway for liver PMN remodeling, the chemokine CXCL12/CXCR7 axis was activated after HSCs co-incubated with EVs (Fig. 1m–o; Supplementary Fig. S9a–d; Supplementary Fig. S10a–d; Supplementary Fig. S11 a-g; Supplementary Fig. S12a–h). To confirm the direct link between HSCs-derived CXCL12 and MDSCs, HSCs-derived CXCL12 was depleted to confirm the proportion of recruited CD11b+ Gr1+ cells subset after EVs education. There was no significant difference between the PBS group and EVs with CXCL12 depletion group (Supplementary Fig. S4h, i). Thus, we propose that HSCs are transformed into CAFs in response to EVs, leading to increased CXCL12 secretion, which in turn recruits MDSCs for remodeling of the liver immunosuppressive PMN.
Next, we used the CRISPR–Cas9 method to knock out CRC-derived exosomal Tgf-β1 and further confirmed the Tgf-β1 enrichment in EVs is a key cytokine that induces liver PMN formation (Supplementary Fig. S1f–g; Fig. 1p; Supplementary Fig. S13a–f). Moreover, the expression of TGF-β1 from circulating EVs was significantly higher in CRC patients with synchronous liver metastasis than in those without liver metastasis, and patients with higher TGFB1 expression had worse survival (Fig. 1q, r; Supplementary Fig. S13g–i). Collectively, these results demonstrated that Tgf-β1 enriched in EVs played a vital role in inducing liver PMN formation and promoting tumor liver metastasis, and CRC-derived exosomal TGF-β1 has potential as a molecular marker.
In conclusion, CRC-derived EVs carrying Tgf-β1 activate the HSCs chemokines signaling pathway and induce HSCs to transform into CAFs phenotype. After HSCs activation, MDSCs are further recruited into the liver PMN to inhibit NK-cell cytotoxicity by downregulating the expression of NKG2D. Finally, CRC-derived EVs remodel the liver PMN and promote tumor liver metastasis (Fig. 1s).
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Department of Science and Technology of Sichuan Province (2019YFS0375; 2021YFS0025; 2022YFS0162); 1·3·5 project for disciplines of excellence, West China Hospital, Sichuan University (20HXJS003; ZYGD18003); 1·3·5 project for disciplines of excellence–Clinical Research Incubation Project, West China Hospital, Sichuan University (22HXFH001; 2019HXFH031); a Post-Doctoral Research Project, West China Hospital, Sichuan University (2021HXBH033); a Post-Doctoral Research Project, Sichuan University (20826041E4084); the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2022M712264); and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82103541).
Author contributions
X.Y.Y. and Y.G.Z. carried out experiments, collected and analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript. X.Y.Y. and Y.G.Z. contributed equally to this work. Y.Z., H.F.L., L.L., Y.P.W., X.Z.C., and L.Q. gave assistance in animal experiments and in performing flow cytometry and histopathological analysis. J.H.H. and Z.Q.W. supervised the project, conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. All authors were involved in writing the paper and gave final approval of the submitted and published versions.
Data availability
All relevant data are placed within the article and Supplementary Files, or available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethics declarations
In our study, all animal experimental procedures followed protocols approved by the Animal Care and Use Committees of West China Hospital, Sichuan University. All clinical tissues were obtained from the West China Hospital. All patients signed informed written consent with the approval of the Biological and Medical Ethics Committee of West China Hospital.
Footnotes
These authors contributed equally: Xuyang Yang, Yaguang Zhang
Contributor Information
Junhong Han, Email: hjunhong@scu.edu.cn.
Ziqiang Wang, Email: wangziqiang@scu.edu.cn.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41392-023-01384-w.
References
- 1.Yang X, et al. The key role of exosomes on the pre-metastatic niche formation in tumors. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2021;8:1–15. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.703640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Li K, et al. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells as immunosuppressive regulators and therapeutic targets in cancer. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6:362. doi: 10.1038/s41392-021-00670-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Vivier E, et al. Natural killer cell signaling pathways. Science. 2004;306:1517–1519. doi: 10.1126/science.1103478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tsuchida T, et al. Mechanisms of hepatic stellate cell activation. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017;14:397–411. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2017.38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wei M, et al. Malignant ascites-derived exosomes promote proliferation and induce carcinoma-associated fibroblasts transition in peritoneal mesothelial cells. Oncotarget. 2017;8:42262–42271. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are placed within the article and Supplementary Files, or available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.