Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2023 Feb 14;13(5):3007–3019. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.2c06301

Regeneration and Degradation in a Biomimetic Polyoxometalate Water Oxidation Catalyst

Ludwig Schwiedrzik †,‡,*, Tina Rajkovic , Leticia González †,*
PMCID: PMC9990072  PMID: 36910868

Abstract

graphic file with name cs2c06301_0008.jpg

Complete understanding of catalytic cycles is required to advance the design of water oxidation catalysts, but it is difficult to attain, due to the complex factors governing their reactivity and stability. In this study, we investigate the regeneration and degradation pathways of the highly active biomimetic water oxidation catalyst [Mn3+2Mn4+2V4O17(OAc)3]3–, thereby completing its catalytic cycle. Beginning with the deactivated species [Mn3+4V4O17(OAc)2]4– left over after O2 evolution, we scrutinize a network of reaction intermediates belonging to two alternative water oxidation cycles. We find that catalyst regeneration to the activated species [Mn4+4V4O17(OAc)2(OH)(H2O)] proceeds via oxidation of each Mn center, with one water ligand being bound during the first oxidation step and a second water ligand being bound and deprotonated during the final oxidation step. ΔΔG values for this last oxidation are consistent with previous experimental results, while regeneration within an alternative catalytic cycle was found to be thermodynamically unfavorable. Extensive in silico sampling of catalyst structures also revealed two degradation processes: cubane opening and ligand dissociation, both of which have low barriers at highly reduced states of the catalyst due to the presence of Jahn–Teller effects. These mechanistic insights are expected to spur the development of more efficient and stable Mn cubane water oxidation catalysts.

Keywords: artificial photosynthesis, polyoxometalate, Jahn−Teller axis, electrocatalysis, regeneration, degradation, density functional theory

1. Introduction

Humanity’s overreliance on fossil fuels is the main driver of the current climate and energy crises, the effects of which are increasingly being felt across the globe.13 Searching for alternatives, researchers have worked for decades to develop new technologies for converting solar to chemical energy.4,5 Among these, artificial water splitting plays a prominent role, promising to create renewable H2 from water and sunlight.6,7 Water splitting is a four-electron redox reaction consisting of two half-reactions: water oxidation and hydrogen evolution. Since water oxidation is considered the more challenging of the two, great efforts have been made to develop efficient water oxidation catalysts.713 Inspired by the oxygen-evolving complex (OEC), which contains the tetramanganese cubane active center responsible for water oxidation in natural photosynthesis, a large number of biomimetic catalysts featuring four metal centers in a cubane arrangement have been synthesized and investigated.1328

Among such systems, those featuring Co4O4 and Mn4O4 cubane cores have been intensively studied, often as model systems for the natural OEC or for heterogeneous catalysts relevant for industrial-scale water splitting. In this context, the cubanes’ ability to flexibly redistribute electrons between metal centers has been leveraged to explain their high water oxidation activity.1820 Jahn–Teller (JT) effects have been noted to significantly alter the structure2937 and even the reactivity of Mn-containing catalysts featuring Mn3+ centers.3841 Such distortions are present in d4 metal centers such as Mn3+ and lead to the elongation of one bond axis and concomitant shortening of the other two bond axes in an octahedral coordination environment. They represent a form of structural flexibility that, when taken together with the aforementioned facile electron redistribution, makes Mn-oxo cubane catalysts featuring Mn3+ centers particularly promising candidates for increasing the efficiency of the water oxidation reaction.4044

In this work, we focus on the bioinspired water oxidation catalyst [Mn3+2Mn4+2V4O17(OAc)3]3– (abbreviated as 3344-OAc, where the numbers indicate the oxidation states of the Mn atoms; see Figure 1a).45 This highly active multicenter catalyst (turnover number (TON) > 12 000; turnover frequency (TOF) > 200 min–1)46 consists of an Mn4O4 cubane core, surrounded on three sides by a hexadentate V4O13 vanadate ligand and three bidentate acetate ligands on the remaining sides. A prior combined experimental and theoretical study showed that 3344-OAc is actually a precatalyst that must first undergo activation by oxidation of two Mn centers to yield an Mn4+4 configuration of the cubane core as well as exchange of one acetate with an OH and an H2O ligand before the actual O2 evolution can be catalyzed (Figure 1b, black arrow). The activated species was determined to be [Mn4+4V4O17(OAc)2(OH)(H2O)] (4444-OH-H2O).40 Further theoretical work led to the proposal of a feasible mechanism for O2 evolution, consisting of three proton-coupled electron transfers (PCET) and one electron transfer (ET) step (Figure 1b, upper half of blue cycle).41 After O2 evolution, the catalyst was found to remain as [Mn3+4V4O17(OAc)2]4– (3333-o-o), a deactivated species with two cofacial open coordination sites (o) that must undergo regeneration before being able to catalyze another turnover. The question of how 4444-OH-H2O is regenerated from 3333-o-o has thus far remained unanswered, leaving the understanding of the catalytic cycle incomplete.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(a) Three-dimensional structure of [Mn3+2Mn4+2V4O17(OAc)3]3– or 3344-OAc with color legend (left) and its ChemDraw structure (right). (b) Reactivity scheme of 3344-OAc, consisting of activation (black arrow), the proposed iWNA cycle between 4444-OH-H2O and 3333-o-o (blue), and the alternative proposed iDC cycle between 4444-O-O and 3333-o-o (gray). O2 evolution occurs in the upper half of each cycle, while the lower half corresponds to catalyst regeneration. (c) Different types of O–O bond formation mechanisms in multicenter water oxidation catalysts: intramolecular nucleophilic attack by an OH ligand on a neighboring terminal oxyl ligand (iWNA) and intramolecular direct coupling between two neighboring terminal oxo ligands (iDC).

In our proposed water oxidation cycle, O–O bond formation is achieved by the intramolecular attack of an OH ligand bound to one Mn center on a cofacial metal-oxyl group, as in the iWNA mechanism shown in Figure 1c.41 This is one variant of the so-called “water nucleophilic attack” (WNA) type of mechanism, which has been often invoked to explain the reactivity of the OEC, as well as that of a large number of synthetic water oxidation catalysts.8,12,13,47,48 In catalysts where multiple terminal metal-oxo groups are present in close proximity (including the OEC), an alternative form of O–O bonding has been proposed, coined a direct coupling (DC) type of mechanism—an intramolecular variant of which (iDC) is also shown in Figure 1c.12,13,16,47,49,50 While no species featuring two cofacial oxo or oxyl ligands have been invoked so far for our tetramanganese catalyst, this does not rule out that an iDC-type water oxidation cycle could exist alongside the previously proposed iWNA-type. We hypothesize that O–O bond formation according to the iDC mechanism could best be achieved by first binding water ligands at a low redox state, followed by combined deprotonation and metal-centered oxidation through a series of PCET steps (Figure 1b, lower half of gray cycle), leading to a highly oxidized catalyst with terminal oxo ligands, [Mn4+4V4O17(OAc)2(O)2]4– (termed 4444-O-O).

Previous work on 3344-OAc paid particular attention to the role of JT effects in the reactivity of the catalyst. These effects have been noted to affect the structure and reactivity of the OEC as well as other synthetic catalysts containing d4 metal centers;2939 JT effects have even been linked to increased water oxidation activity in heterogeneous catalysts.4244,51 In 3344-OAc, we found that JT effects play a pivotal role in multiple reaction steps. During activation, JT-elongated bonds provided key weak points for water attack and subsequent ligand exchange.40 We observed similar behavior for the O2 dissociation step of the water oxidation mechanism.41 Finally, we showed that during O2 evolution, a reorientation of JT-distorted bonds precedes the formation of the O–O bond, which is itself concerted with an ET from the reactive ligands to a Mn center and the emergence of JT distortions at that same metal center.41

The obvious importance of JT effects for the reactivity of 3344-OAc motivated some of us to study in depth the relative stability of structures featuring different orientations of JT-distorted bonds across all relevant redox states of the catalyst, resulting in a set of heuristic rules for the comparison among such structures.52 In this context, we found that JT axes were energetically favorable when oriented toward the acetate or water ligands, but not toward the vanadate ligand, so that the vanadate appeared to stabilize the catalyst, which itself is overall quite flexible. The presence of a number of structures featuring open coordination sites as more stable alternatives to fully coordinated complexes at the lowest oxidation state of the catalyst (3333) was also noted and rationalized as an especially strong JT effect.53

In this work, we set out to investigate the regeneration mechanism of the 3344-OAc catalyst from the deactivated 3333-o-o form to the 4444-OH-H2O one (lower half of the blue cycle in Figure 1b), formally

1. 1

by sampling the large number of structures that could be involved in that process. To this end, we propose a network of intermediates that connect the two species, featuring a variety of ligand configurations from the two open coordination sites of the deactivated species to the H2O and OH ligands of the activated catalyst. By comparing the stabilities of these various intermediates, we aim at uncovering a feasible regeneration mechanism for 3344-OAc, thereby closing the proposed iWNA cyle. At the same time, we investigate the possibility of an iDC-type water oxidation cycle (shown in gray in Figure 1b). We focus on regeneration via binding of water ligands at a low oxidation state and a series of PCET steps, leading to a highly oxidized catalyst with terminal oxo ligands, 4444-O-O, that is able to carry out O2 evolution according to the iDC mechanism. Finally, we expect that the exhaustive sampling of reaction intermediate structures here undertaken can shed further light on the role of JT effects in the reactivity and stability of 3344-OAc and its derivatives.

2. Methods

2.1. Nomenclature

The presence of up to four Mn3+ centers across multiple oxidation states of our catalyst, which show distinctive JT bond distortions, necessitates sampling a large number of redox isomers (structures that differ in the assignment of oxidation states to specific Mn centers) and JT isomers (structures that differ in the x-, y-, or z-orientation of their elongated JT bond axes). To differentiate between these isomers, we use a specific nomenclature and abbreviated structural representation that is illustrated in Figure 2. Figure 2a shows the full and abbreviated ChemDraw structures of the most stable JT isomer of the deactivated species 3333-o-o, which features four Mn3+ centers, each with a JT axis pointing to the z-direction (highlighted in red), and which will therefore be referred to as zzzz-o-o. Further representative examples with other oxidation states are shown in Figures 2b–d. Figure 2b is a 3334-o-o structure, and because MnA, MnB, and MnD are Mn3+ centers with JT axes in the z-direction and MnC is an Mn4+ center without a JT axis, it is labeled as zz4z-o-o. Figure 2c is a 3344-o-o species, where MnA and MnB are Mn4+ centers without JT axes, while MnC and MnD are Mn3+ centers with a JT axis in the y- and z-direction, respectively; it is therefore labeled as 44yz-o-o. Finally, in Figure 2d, we depict a 3444-o-o structure, with MnA, MnB, and MnC being Mn4+ centers and thus having no JT axes, and MnD being a Mn3+ center with a JT axis in the x-direction, thus labeled as 444x-o-o. The 4444 oxidation state of the catalyst does not show redox or JT isomerism.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(a) Full ChemDraw structure of zzzz-o-o, the most stable isomer of the deactivated species 3333-o-o, and its abbreviated ChemDraw structure with Mn centers labeled A–D and O atoms labeled 1–4. The Mn3+ centers and their respective JT axes are highlighted in red. The accompanying text box contains a descriptor consisting of two parts, the first with letters corresponding to the JT axis orientations at the Mn3+ centers ABCD (in this case, zzzz) and the second giving ligand configuration (in this case, o o, representing open coordination sites at MnB and MnA). (b–d) Abbreviated ChemDraw structures for zz4z-o-o (3334 oxidation state), 44yz-o-o (3344), and 444x-o-o (3444), respectively.

Furthermore, the catalyst was investigated in a variety of ligand configurations that are exemplified in Figure 3 for the oxidation state 4444. Figure 3a shows the full and abbreviated ChemDraw structures of 4444-OH-H2O, a structure with an OH ligand bound to MnB and an H2O ligand bound to MnA. Figure 3b displays 4444-o-o, a structure with an open coordination site at each of the reactive centers MnA and MnB, while Figures 3c and 3d provide two examples each of structures with an open coordination site at MnA and a ligand bound to MnB (4444-H2O-o and 4444-OH-o) and vice versa (4444-o-H2O and 4444-o-OH). Finally, Figure 3e depicts a structure with terminal oxo ligands bound to both MnA and MnB (4444-O-O). Other ligand configurations featuring, e.g., acetate ligands bound to MnA and MnB were not investigated here, as this would go beyond the scope of the present study; the reader is instead referred to other work covering the speciation of the catalyst both from an experimental and theoretical point of view.40,45,46,52,54

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(a) Full ChemDraw structure of the activated species 4444-OH-H2O, showing the redox state of each Mn center, and its abbreviated ChemDraw structure with Mn centers labeled A-D, O atoms labeled 1–6. Ligands at MnA and MnB are highlighted in blue. The accompanying text box contains a descriptor consisting of two parts; in the first, each number corresponds to the redox state of the Mn4+ centers ABCD that have no JT axes (in this case, 4444) and the ligand configuration (in this case, OH H2O, representing the OH ligand at MnB and the H2O ligand at MnA). (b–e) Abbreviated ChemDraw structures for 4444-o-o (panel (b)), 4444-H2O-o and 4444-OH-o (panel (c)), 4444-o-H2O and 4444-o-OH (panel (d)), and 4444-O-O (panel (e)).

2.2. Sampling Procedure

In all investigated ligand configurations, the catalyst exhibits an idealized CS symmetry, meaning that symmetry-equivalent structures were considered degenerate and therefore not sampled separately. Therefore, all Boltzmann populations are weighted by the degeneracy of the corresponding isomers. Even considering the idealized CS symmetry of 3344-OAc derivatives, the complete characterization of a single ligand configuration would have included 136 individual redox and JT isomers, an intractable task considering the number of ligand configurations investigated in this study. Therefore, we made use of the heuristic rules for the relative stability of redox and JT isomers derived by Mai et al.52 to predict the most stable isomers for each oxidation state. In the case of the 4444 and 3444 oxidation states, the total number of symmetry-unique isomers is small enough so that all of them could be sampled. However, for the 3344, 3334, and 3333 oxidation states, only those isomers predicted by heuristics52 to be within less than 12 kcal/mol of the most stable isomer within each oxidation state were targeted for sampling. A detailed analysis of the utility and accuracy of the heuristics used for sampling target selection can be found in section I in the Supporting Information (SI).

Sampling was performed according to a multistep protocol adapted from Mai et al.52 Guess geometries for each isomer targeted for sampling were initially obtained from preoptimizations with geometric constraints, wherein a specific JT configuration was enforced by setting the bond length of the corresponding Mn–O bond(s) within the cubane core to a value of 2.30 Å (in some cases, the opposing bond additionally had to be constrained to 2.20 Å; see section II in the SI for details). These guess geometries were then optimized without constraints, resulting in one or more stable isomers for the particular oxidation state and ligand configuration under investigation. As not every targeted isomer corresponded to a stable minimum on the potential energy surface, many of the unconstrained optimizations resulted in virtually identical structures; only the most stable of these for each redox and JT isomer is reported herein.

2.3. Computational Details

All single point, optimization, and frequency calculations were performed using the Orca 4.2.1 package,55,56 with the zeroth order regular approximation (ZORA),5759 Grimme’s D3 dispersion correction,60 and the conductor-like polarized continuum model C-PCM for implicit solvation with surface type vdw_gaussian.61 The resolution of identity for Coulomb integrals and numerical chain-of-sphere integration for the Hartree–Fock exchange integrals (RIJCOSX) was used to accelerate the calculations.62 Constrained preoptimizations used the looseopt keyword for looser optimization convergence thresholds, with the unrestricted BP86 functional63,64 and the ZORA-SVP basis set with def2/J general auxiliary basis set.65 For simplicity, the C-PCM parameters of acetonitrile were used. Final unconstrained optimizations and numerical frequency calculations of isomers made use of the unrestricted B3LYP functional,66,67 with the double-ζ ZORA-def2-SVP basis set and SARC/J decontracted auxiliary basis set.65 To simulate the ACN:H2O 9:1 (v/v) solvent mixture employed in experiments,45,46 the C-PCM parameters for acetonitrile were combined with a custom epsilon value of 41.589 (9:1 weighted average of the epsilon values of ACN and H2O).41 Finally, single point electronic energies were refined using the larger triple-ζ ZORA-def2-TZVP basis set65 with otherwise identical parameters to the final optimization protocol. The JT configuration of optimized structures was determined by comparing the lengths of Mn–O bonds within the cubane core, with the longest bond determining the x-, y-, or z-orientation of the JT axis on each Mn3+ center. All obtained structures were evaluated according to their numerically calculated vibrational frequencies; those showing negative frequencies were excluded from the results discussed herein. In all our calculations, an all-atom model of the complex using the high-spin configuration was employed, as is common in the literature.40,41,52,54,6870 Oxidation states are reported based on the Mulliken spin populations computed for individual atoms.

Final reported Gibbs energies are based on the refined electronic energies calculated using the ZORA-def2-TZVP basis set in combination with thermochemical corrections from the final optimizations and frequency calculations carried out using the ZORA-def2-SVP basis set. To account for energy differences between different ligand configurations, reference energies of the isolated ligands were calculated at the same final level of theory. Free energies in solution have been corrected for concentration effects using the package “GoodVibes”,71 setting the concentrations of all catalyst intermediates to a standard reference value of 1 M and the concentration of the 10% water in solution to 5.53 M.72 Furthermore, to account for differing protonation states between structures, an energy correction term was calculated using the approach of Van Voorhis and co-workers, wherein the standard free energy of a proton in solution is added for each proton abstracted from the cluster.8 As in our previous work,41 we used a 9:1 weighted average of the standard free energy of a proton in acetonitrile (11.0622 eV) and of a proton in water (11.5305 eV)73 to approximate the standard free energy of a proton in the ACN:H2O 9:1 (v/v) solution mixture used in the experiment, giving 11.1090 eV.

In order to study possible instances of catalyst degradation, Climbing Image-Nudged Elastic Band (CI-NEB)74 calculations, as implemented in ORCA 5.0.3,55,56 were performed on several examples of intermediates showing various structural defects. Here, the unrestricted B3LYP functional66,67 was used with the ZORA-def2-SVP basis set,65 D3 dispersion correction,60 and C-PCM (acetonitrile, epsilon = 41.589) with surface type vdw_gaussian.61 Barrier heights for reactions studied using CI-NEB reported herein are calculated based on the electronic energy difference between the NEB climbing image and the reactant species, computed using ZORA-def2-SVP, and should therefore be taken as approximate, most likely upper bounds.

3. Results

A total of 558 individual isomers were sampled across all oxidation states and ligand configurations, resulting in 159 stable minima. All investigated combinations of oxidation states and ligand configurations are shown in Figure 4. In the following, obtained results will be summarized for each ligand configuration, focusing on the most stable minima for each oxidation state—i.e., listing all structures with a Boltzmann population of at least 5% at thermal equilibrium (T = 298.15 K) for that ligand configuration and oxidation state. A full list of all optimized structures can be found in Tables S2–S9 in the SI.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Scheme of all investigated oxidation pathways and their intermediates. Ligand exchange reactions are indicated by blue arrows, oxidation steps by black arrows, and proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) steps by gray arrows. The starting 3333-o-o and final 4444-OH-H2O structures (derived from prior work40,41) are highlighted in orange.

Analysis of the bond lengths between each metal center and its coordinating atoms revealed several structures showing varying degrees of ligand dissociation; these structures are marked with an asterisk (*), and corresponding large interatomic distances are noted explicitly. To study the processes leading to the formation of such partially dissociated intermediates, NEB calculations were performed between representative examples of these intermediates and nondissociated structures of identical oxidation state and comparable ligand configuration. The energy values given for intermediates and their various isomers are relative Gibbs energies calculated at the B3LYP-D3/ZORA-def2-TZVP//B3LYP-D3/ZORA-def2-SVP level of theory, while barrier heights are the relative electronic energy between the reactant and the climbing image of a CI-NEB simulation carried out only at the B3LYP-D3/ZORA-def2-SVP level of theory.

We begin at the lowest oxidation state with the ligand configuration featuring two open coordination sites, 3333-o-o, which is the starting point of catalyst regeneration. The most stable isomer is zzzz-o-o* (0.0 eV relative Gibbs energy, 68% Boltzmann population at T = 298.15 K), which is used as a reference structure throughout this work. It features two slightly longer-than-average bond lengths within the cubane core caused by strong JT effects (r(MnC–O4) = 2.579 Å, r(MnD–O3) = 2.549 Å). Two other populated JT isomers were found: zzyz-o-o* (0.04 eV, 26%, r(MnD–O3) = 2.776 Å) and zzzz-o-o (0.06 eV, 5%). A NEB calculation between zzzz-o-o and zzzz-o-o* revealed a low kinetic barrier between them amounting to 0.25 eV or 5.7 kcal/mol. Oxidation to the 3334 state yields a mixed population consisting of zz4z-o-o* (3.95 eV, 90%, r(MnD–O3 = 2.519 Å) and zz4x-o-o (4.01 eV, 10%). A corresponding NEB calculation between zz4x-o-o and zz4z-o-o* showed that the elongation within the cubane core of the bond between MnD and O3 is effectively barrierless, with an activation energy of only 0.04 eV or 0.9 kcal/mol. Further oxidation states are dominated by single isomers: zz44-o-o (8.71 eV, 100%) for the 3344 oxidation state, 4z44-o-o (14.49 eV, 100%) for the 3444 oxidation state, and finally 4444-o-o (21.19 eV, 100%) for the 4444 oxidation state.

Moving on to the ligand configuration featuring a H2O bound at MnB and an open coordination site at MnA, the most stable structures found at the lowest oxidation state (corresponding to 3333-H2O-o in Figure 4) are xzxx-H2O-o* (0.05 eV, 57%, r(MnC–O2) = 2.548 Å, r(MnB–O5) = 3.526 Å, r(MnD–OAc) = 4.450 Å) and zzzx-H2O-o* (0.05 eV, 43%, r(MnC–O4) = 2.884 Å, r(MnB–O5) = 3.851 Å). These structures, along with all but one of the others found for this ligand configuration and oxidation state, feature dissociated ligands—the sole exception being zxyx-H2O-o (0.50 eV), which is however unpopulated at thermal equilibrium. At the 3334 oxidation state, two stable, populated intermediates could be identified: z4yx-H2O-o (3.94 eV, 53%) and zz4x-H2O-o (3.96 eV, 47%). The next oxidation leads to z4y4-H2O-o (8.51 eV, 100%); further oxidation yields a mixture of z444-H2O-o (13.95 eV, 79%) and 444x-H2O-o (14.00 eV, 21%); and finally 4444-H2O-o (20.22 eV, 100%) is obtained.

For the ligand configuration with an open coordination site at MnB and H2O bound at MnA, the most stable isomer corresponding to 3333-o-H2O is xzzx-o-H2O* (−0.37 eV, 100%, r(MnC–O4) = 3.014 Å), featuring an unusual combination of opened cubane core and protonated O4. A NEB calculation between the unpopulated xzxx-o-H2O (0.43 eV) and xzzx-o-H2O* reveals a very low barrier of only 0.17 eV or 3.8 kcal/mol for conversion to the O4-protonated species. The remaining oxidation states are dominated by only one populated species. Accordingly, starting at the 3334 oxidation state with zzy4-o-H2O (3.92 eV, 98%), oxidation to the 3344 oxidation state yields 4z4x-o-H2O (8.38 eV, 100%), further oxidation to the 3444 oxidation state yields 4z44-o-H2O (13.57 eV, 100%), and finally oxidation to 4444 yields 4444-o-H2O (20,11 eV, 100%).

Next, we examine the most stable intermediates for the ligand configuration featuring an open coordination site at MnB and OH bound at MnA. For the lowest oxidation state, the most stable isomer of 3333-o-OH is xzyz-o-OH (1.86 eV, 95%). Oxidation to the 3334 oxidation state yields a mixed population of yz4x-o-OH (5.25 eV, 63%) and yzy4-o-OH (5.26 eV, 37%). Further oxidation to the 3344 oxidation state gives 4zy4-o-OH (9.28 eV, 99%), then oxidation to the 3444 oxidation state gives 4z44-o-OH (14.04 eV, 100%), and finally oxidation to the 4444 oxidation state gives 4444-o-OH (20.23 eV, 100%).

All isomers found for 3333-OH-o, the lowest oxidation state for the ligand configuration featuring OH bound at MnB and an open coordination site at MnA, have at least one partially dissociated ligand. The most stable isomers are xxxx–OH-o* (1.88 eV, 71%, r(MnB–O3) = 2.531 Å, r(MnD–OAc) = 4.810 Å) with an acetate ligand dissociated from one of its metal centers resulting in an open coordination site at MnD and yyyx-OH-o* (1.90 eV, 29%, r(MnB–O4) = 2.807 Å, r(MnC–OAc) = 6.651 Å) with a corresponding open coordination site at MnC. A NEB calculation was performed between the unpopulated isomers zzyx-OH-o* (2.84 eV, r(MnC–OAc) = 2.564 Å, r(MnD–OAc) = 2.556 Å) and zxyx-OH-o* (2.03 eV, r(MnD–OAc) = 4.157 Å) to investigate the transition between a strongly distorted and a fully dissociated Mn–OAc bond, finding a very low barrier of only 0.08 eV or 1.9 kcal/mol. Moving on to the 3334 oxidation state, only one populated isomer, z4yz-OH-o (5.44 eV, 99%), could be optimized. Oxidation to the 3344 oxidation state yields z44x-OH-o (9.50 eV, 100%); further oxidation to 3334 then results in z444-OH-o (14.45 eV, 100%), and finally oxidation to 4444 gives 4444-OH-o (20.35 eV, 100%).

The final ligand configuration investigated as part of the regeneration half of the iWNA cycle from 3333-o-o to 4444-OH-H2O features an OH and an H2O ligand. One should note that the ligands at the two binding sites MnA and MnB are essentially interchangeable due to their hydrogen-bonded nature. However, thermodynamically it is more favorable to have H2O bound to MnB for all oxidation states except the 4444 oxidation state. At the 3333 oxidation state, the most stable structures are yzzx-H2O-OH* (1.91 eV, 93%, r(MnB–O5) = 3.166 Å) with a dissociated H2O ligand and xxyx-H2O–OH (1.98 eV, 5%). To obtain an approximate barrier height for the dissociation of an H2O ligand, a NEB calculation was performed between xxyx-H2O-OH and yzzx-H2O-OH*, resulting in a low barrier of 0.23 eV or 5.4 kcal/mol. Oxidizing to the 3334 oxidation state results in a mixed population of yz4x-H2O-OH (5.13 eV, 84%) and xz4x-H2O-OH (5,18 eV, 13%). Further oxidation to the 3344 oxidation state gives both 4z4x-H2O-OH (9.05 eV, 91%) and 44yx-H2O-OH (9.10 eV, 6%), while further oxidation to the 3444 oxidation state yields a mixture of 4z44-H2O-OH (13.69 eV, 58%) and 444x-H2O-OH (13.71 eV, 42%). The final oxidation step leads to 4444-OH-H2O (19.26 eV, 70%) and 4444-H2O-OH (19.28 eV, 30%), illustrating the typically small energy difference between the two protonation states.

We turn now to intermediates from a possible alternative iDC-type water oxidation cycle (gray in Figure 1b). The two iDC regeneration pathways we investigated (Figure 4) start from 3333-o-o and proceed through the binding of water and a combination of PCET steps and one-electron oxidations all the way to 4444-O-O, which contains two terminal oxo groups, ready to form an O–O bond by direct coupling. The initial intermediates of the first pathway feature an H2O ligand bound to MnB and an OH ligand bound to MnA, resulting in two JT isomers: yzzx-H2O-OH* (1.91 eV, 93%, r(MnB-O5) = 3.166 Å) and xxyx-H2O-OH (1.98 eV, 5%). The first PCET step also results in a mixture of isomers, yy4x-HO-HO (7.09 eV, 54%), with O6 as the H-bond donor and O5 as the acceptor, and xx4x-OH-OH (7.10 eV, 40%) with O5 as the H-bond donor. Also at this step, a NEB calculation was performed between the unpopulated isomers 4xyx-OH-OH (7.31 eV) and 4xxx-OH-OH* (7.40 eV, r(MnD–OAc = 2.548 Å)), both with O5 as the H-bond donor and O6 as the H-bond acceptor. The barrier for the transition from the JT-distorted MnD–OAc bond of 4xyx-OH-OH to the very strongly JT-distorted MnD–OAc bond of 4xxx-OH-OH* was found to be very low at 0.17 eV or 4.0 kcal/mol. The second PCET step gives a mixed population of 4y4x-OH-O (13.30 eV, 34%), 4x4x-OH-O (13.30 eV, 27%), x44x-O-OH (13.31 eV, 18%), and y44x-O-OH (13.32 eV, 14%). The final PCET step yields 444x-O-O (19.66 eV, 100%), which can be oxidized to 4444-O-O (23.58 eV, 100%). Some spin delocalization across the Mn–O bonds can be observed for the deprotonated terminal oxo groups (see Table S8 in the SI).

Finally, the initial intermediates of the second iDC regeneration pathway investigated also feature an H2O and an OH ligand: yzzx-H2O-OH* (1.91 eV, 93%, r(MnB–O5) = 3.166 Å) and xxyx-H2O-OH (1.98 eV, 5%), then yz4x-H2O-OH (5.13 eV, 84%) and xz4x-H2O-OH (5,18 eV, 13%). The first PCET step yields a mixed population of y44x-HO-HO (10.64 eV, 30%) with O6 being the H-bond donor and O5 the acceptor, x44x-HO-HO (10.65 eV, 24%) with the same H-bonding configuration, y44x-OH-OH (10.66 eV, 16%) with the inverted configuration of O5 being the H-bond donor and O6 the acceptor, x44x-OH-OH (10.66 eV, 11%) with the same inverted configuration, and 4x4x-HO-HO (10.67 eV, 11%) once again having O6 as the donor. A further PCET step gives a mixture of 444x-OH-O (16.90 eV, 87%) and 444x-O-OH (16.95 eV, 13%). The final PCET step results in the same final product as the previous pathway, 4444-O-O (23.58 eV, 100%). Again, some spin delocalization across the Mn–O bonds can be observed for the deprotonated terminal oxo groups (see Table S9 in the SI).

4. Discussion

4.1. Structural Analysis

Analyzing the distributions of the interatomic distances between the Mn centers and each of their coordinating atoms reveals a common pattern (see section III in the SI), shown exemplarily in Figure 5a for r(MnB–O3). A peak at ∼1.9 Å represents both the undistorted bonds found at Mn4+ centers as well as the slightly shorter bonds not corresponding to the main JT axis at Mn3+ centers. A second peak at ∼2.3 Å represents bonds lengthened by JT distortions. Outliers above 2.5 Å correspond to structures featuring very strongly distorted or even fully dissociated bonds, which will be discussed in detail below.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Interatomic distance distributions (in Å) for selected atom pairs highlighted in blue in the insets. (a) r(MnB–O3), showing two peaks: one at ∼2.3 Å for JT-distorted bonds and one around 1.9 Å for bonds not lengthened by JT effects. An outlier above 2.5 Å represents possibly dissociated structures. (b) r(MnC–OV), where OV is the nearest O atom of the vanadate ligand. The presence of a second peak of ∼2.1 Å indicates that bonds to the vanadate ligand are affected by JT distortions. (c) r(O1–V), where V is the nearest V atom of the vanadate ligand. Outliers below 2.6 Å show that an attractive interaction between these two atoms can pull them up to 0.4 Å closer together.

This pattern of interatomic distance distributions marked by two main peaks is found essentially in all Mn centers and coordinating atoms, showing that JT distortions are possible along all bond axes, including those to the vanadate ligand (see Figure 5b). Overall, we predict 78 structures bearing at least one JT axis oriented toward the vanadate ligand, 18 of which have a Boltzmann population of >5% at thermal equilibrium, marking them as being among the most stable isomers. While the majority of these structures belong to the 3333 and 3334 oxidation states, 17 such structures were found at the 3344 and 1 structure was found even at the 3444 oxidation state. This is a surprising result because it diverges somewhat from the assumption that the seemingly chemically inert vanadate ligand was unlikely to participate in the formation of JT axes.52

Rather, it appears that JT distortions in bonds to the vanadate ligand are possible, although they result in bonds that are more stable than is the case for other ligands (bonds to the vanadate lengthened by JT distortions are on average 0.1–0.2 Å shorter than JT-lengthened bonds to other ligands), and no instances of bond dissociation were observed for the vanadate ligand.

Interestingly, we obtained a number of structures featuring an interatomic distance smaller than 2.5 Å between O1 and one of the vanadium atoms (Figure 5c), indicating a certain degree of interaction between the two atoms. As previously noted by Mai et al., the experimental X-ray structure obtained at the 3344 oxidation state features three elongated Mn–O1 bonds, which were originally rationalized as being caused by attractive electrostatic interactions between O1 and the vanadate ligand,45 but are more likely a result of dynamic disorder in the crystal structure between different JT isomers separated by low kinetic barriers.52 Now, however, we find structures in the 3333 and 3334 oxidation state, all of which have three JT axes pointed at O1 and significantly lower than average distances between O1 and the vanadate ligand. This implies that the hypothesized attractive interaction of this pairing could be observed, but only at the lowest oxidation states and with the cooperation of three JT axes pushing O1 toward the vanadate ligand.

4.2. Catalyst Degradation

The appearance of numerous outliers in the interatomic distance analysis prompted us to investigate in depth structures featuring very strongly distorted or even fully dissociated bonds between Mn centers and their coordinating atoms. We discovered two types of potential catalyst degradation processes: (i) cubane opening, where intracubane Mn–O bonds are extended up to 3.0 Å, in one case followed by protonation of O4 by a neighboring H2O ligand; and (ii) ligand dissociation, where Mn–OH2 distances up to 3.9 Å and Mn–OAc distances up to 6.7 Å can be observed. Structures bearing one or even several of these distortions were found both in the 3334 oxidation state, where they appear in a small number of mostly unpopulated isomers, and in the 3333 oxidation state, where they are far more common and often among the most stable isomers obtained. In all these structures, Mn-ligand bond distortions and dissociations are consistent with the JT axes of their respective Mn3+ centers. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that here, as in other parts of the catalytic cycles,40,41 JT effects lower barriers for bond breakage and formation at Mn3+ centers, in this case potentially facilitating catalyst degradation through cubane opening and ligand dissociation.

To better understand the kinetics of these degradation processes, NEB calculations were performed between representative examples of structures bearing strongly distorted or dissociated bonds and nondissociated isomers of identical oxidation state and comparable ligand configuration. In this way, approximate barrier heights for different types of cubane opening and ligand dissociation processes could be obtained. Six such calculations were performed (see Figure 6 and section IV in the SI); in some cases (NEB 1, NEB 2), the minimum energy pathway obtained from the NEB calculation fluctuates between several JT isomers due to the near-degeneracy of many isomers at the 3333 oxidation state. However, the emergence of JT distortions consistent with the studied degradation process was observed before bond cleavage in two simulations (NEB 3, NEB 4), while in the remaining calculations, such JT distortions were already present in the reactant structure.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

CI-NEB calculations carried out between relatively intact isomers and examples featuring at least one form of structural distortion. Mn3+ centers and their JT axes are marked in red; ligands at MnA and MnB are highlighted in blue. Activation energies ΔEA (kcal/mol) correspond to the electronic energy of the climbing image relative to the reactant, computed at the B3LYP-D3/ZORA-def2-SVP level of theory. Gibbs energy differences ΔΔG (in kcal/mol) are calculated at the B3LYP-D3/ZORA-def2-TZVP//B3LYP-D3/ZORA-def2-SVP level of theory.

The barriers of all degradation processes investigated using NEB simulations were found to be small (<0.25 eV or 5.8 kcal/mol), pointing to the high reactivity of the catalyst at the 3333 and 3334 oxidation states. The catalyst’s propensity for quickly dissociating ligands is enabled by the presence of JT effects at Mn3+ centers, which can extend Mn-ligand bonds and thereby lower reaction barriers for bond dissociation. Based on these results, it appears that all of these extremely fast reactions are potentially reversible, depending on the ΔΔG between reactant and product. For example, the products of NEB 1 and NEB 2 featuring extended intracubane Mn–O bonds, zzzz-o-o* and zz4z-o-o*, are in equilibrium with their “intact” reactants. In these two cases, cubane opening does not seem to interfere with oxidative regeneration of the catalyst and is simply a form of a particularly strong JT effect. Similarly, the H2O and acetate ligand dissociations studied in NEB 4 and NEB 5, respectively, appear to be reversible, showing that (partial) ligand dissociation does not necessarily impede regeneration. This is plausible in the case of H2O, which is abundant in the reaction mixture under experimental conditions.45,46 However, the dissociation of acetate from the complex bears further investigation (see below).

While NEB 5 shows that extreme distortion of an Mn–OAc bond (r(MnD–OAc) = 2.548 Å in the product) is reversible, this is not the case in NEB 6. In the latter, the bidentate acetate ligand is fully dissociated from MnD, with the remainder being bound as a monodentate ligand at MnA and leaving behind an additional open coordination site. This far more dramatic reaction is associated with a large negative ΔΔG, pushing the system irreversibly toward the degraded product. NEB 3 falls into the same category; there, a combination of cubane opening and protonation by an H2O ligand at O4 irreversibly results in the formation of a unique degradation product, xzzx-o-H2O*, that is fully 0.37 eV lower in energy than the next most stable isomer, zzzz-o-o*. It would seem that this process could cause potentially irreversible damage to the catalyst, as the breaking of a μ-oxo bridge in the cubane core might interfere with the facile transfer of electrons between Mn centers, leading to a reduction in catalytic activity as this degradation product accumulates and possibly disintegrates even further. However, the irreversible protonation at O4 first requires H2O to be bound as a ligand, which is thermodynamically quite unfavorable at the 3333 oxidation state: The most stable isomer that includes an H2O ligand bound to either active site is the thermally unpopulated xzyz-H2O-o* (0.29 eV, r(MnD–O3) = 2.619 Å); this isomer, in turn, is 0.29 eV less stable than the reference structure without H2O ligands, zzzz-o-o*. Alternatively, O4 could be protonated by a solvent water molecule to form xzzx-o-H2O*. As the catalyst has been shown in experiments to catalyze over 12 000 turnovers,46 we can safely assume that deactivation by solvent-based protonation of O4 must be associated with a substantial kinetic barrier. The further investigation of this intriguing process would require the inclusion of explicit solvent dynamics and is therefore beyond the scope of this work.

4.3. Catalyst Regeneration (iWNA Cycle)

Leaving aside possible degradation products (in particular, xzzx-o-H2O*), we now turn to the question of how 4444-OH-H2O is regenerated from 3333-o-o within the iWNA catalytic cycle of 3344-OAc. As noted above, this regeneration reaction formally involves oxidation as well as ligand binding steps, making the detailed characterization of a single preferred reaction pathway extremely difficult. The binding of new water ligands to 3344-OAc could occur at any oxidation state and has been shown to be subject to reaction barriers of widely differing heights in the context of catalyst activation.40 Therefore, we choose to focus here solely on the thermodynamics of catalyst regeneration by identifying the most stable intermediates for each oxidation state and ligand configuration, shown in Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Most stable intermediates for each oxidation state (left) and ligand configuration (top), together comprising the most thermodynamically favorable regeneration pathways within the iWNA cycle. For each structure, the text box specifies JT isomer, relative Gibbs free energy (in eV), and relative Boltzmann population at 298.15 K within the given oxidation state. The starting 3333-o-o and final 4444-OH-H2O structures are highlighted in orange, intermediates with a relative population smaller than 5.0% are shaded in gray. Ligand exchange reactions are indicated by blue arrows, and oxidation steps are indicated by black arrows.

To simplify the discussion, let us imagine that in place of the many JT and redox isomers that we have sampled, only the most stable isomer for each combination of redox state and ligand configuration were thermally populated. This would allow us to more easily compare intermediates featuring different ligand configurations at the same oxidation state, enabling us to estimate which of these intermediates could be populated at thermal equilibrium (orange and white boxes in Figure 7). Although unpopulated intermediates (gray boxes in Figure 7) may also play a role in catalyst regeneration depending on the reaction conditions (e.g., applied overpotential in electrocatalysis), a regeneration pathway featuring only the most stable intermediates would result in the lowest thermodynamic overpotential.7,75,76

Starting at the 3333 oxidation state, an isomer of the o-o ligand configuration (zzzz-o-o*, 0.00 eV, 74.4%) is in thermodynamic equilibrium with a structure bearing dissociated H2O and acetate ligands (xzxx-H2O-o*, 0.05 eV, 25.0%). It appears that having open coordination sites at both MnA and MnB is the most stable ligand configuration at the 3333 oxidation state. Oxidation to the 3334 state results in an equilibrium between structures with one open coordination site as well as one H2O ligand, zzy4-o-H2O (3.92 eV, 64.6%) and z4yx-H2O-o (3.94 eV, 15.3%), and a structure with two open coordination sites, zz4z-o-o* (3.95 eV, 20.1%). Oxidizing to the 3344 oxidation state, the o-H2O configuration with an open coordination site at MnB and H2O bound to MnA becomes the most stable by far (4z4x-o-H2O, 8.38 eV, 99.4%). This behavior is also found at the 3444 oxidation state, where 4z44-o-H2O (13.57 eV, 98.8%) is the only significantly populated intermediate. At the highest oxidation state 4444, the expected final product 4444-OH-H2O (19.26 eV, 100%) is also the most stable structure.

Table 1 shows the oxidation potentials of the oxidation steps connecting the thermally populated intermediates in Figure 7 (ranges are given where several intermediates are populated). We note that the potential of the last oxidation step is the highest of the overall reaction: 1.41 V versus normal hydrogen electrode (NHE) for 4z44-o-H2O to 4444-OH-H2O. This value is just below the redox potential of the 3444-OH-H2O to 4444-OH-H2O oxidation observed experimentally during catalyst activation, 1.47 eV vs NHE,40 but slightly higher than the potential of the same oxidation step in a comparable OEC mimic, 1.3 V vs NHE.77 These results indicate that oxidative regeneration of the 3344-OAc catalyst is energetically comparable to its activation as well as to parallel processes in comparable structures.

Table 1. Oxidation Potentials versus Normal Hydrogen Electrode ENHE for Oxidation Steps between Thermally Populated Intermediates Shown in Figure 7.

oxidation step ENHEa [V]
33333334 [−0.33; −0.41]
33343344 [0.15; 0.18]
33443444 0.91
34444444 1.41
a

Potential ranges are given where several populated intermediates are present.

4.4. Alternative Regeneration Pathways (iDC Cycle)

Finally, we discuss two alternative regeneration pathways enabling an iDC-type water oxidation cycle. We hypothesized that O2 evolution according to such a mechanism could best be enabled by first binding water ligands at a low redox state (3333 or 3334), followed by combined deprotonation and metal-centered oxidation through a series of PCET steps, leading to a highly oxidized catalyst with terminal oxo ligands (4444-O-O). For the pathway starting from 3333-H2O-OH, already the first PCET step leads to a structure (yy4x-HO-HO) that is 1.65 eV higher in energy than the next most stable isomer belonging to the iWNA cycle, z4yz-OH-o. A similar result is obtained when starting instead from 3334-H2O-OH, with the first PCET step leading to y44x-HO-HO, which is 1.14 eV less stable than the next most stable isomer from the iWNA cycle, z44x-OH-o. All further intermediates from these two iDC regeneration pathways are also far less stable than iWNA regeneration intermediates at the same oxidation state. We therefore conclude that these particular iDC-type regeneration pathways play no significant role in the reactivity of our catalyst, although a different type of DC water oxidation cycle may, of course, yet be discovered.

5. Conclusion

We determined the most favorable regeneration mechanism of the biomimetic polyoxometalate water oxidation catalyst [Mn3+2Mn4+2V4O17(OAc)3]3– (3344-OAc), thereby completing the iWNA-type catalytic cycle. Starting from its least oxidized 3333-o-o form with two open coordination sides, the first H2O ligand is able to bind at the 3334 oxidation state. This oxidation state shows the greatest diversity of populated ligand configurations. Afterward, the reaction converges to a single pathway leading via 3344-o-H2O and 3444-o-H2O back to the activated species 4444-OH-H2O as the final product. The second H2O ligand is bound and deprotonated together with the final oxidation step. The catalyst’s ability to access a variety of JT as well as redox isomers and ligand configurations is key to achieving a highly efficient catalytic cycle, starting with initial activation of the precatalyst 3344-OAc to 4444-OH-H2O,40 then O2 evolution leaving behind the deactivated 3333-o-o,41 and finally regeneration of 4444-OH-H2O.

Additionally, we investigated the feasibility of an alternative iDC-type water oxidation cycle, initiated by binding water ligands to 3333-o-o followed by a series of PCET steps to attain a highly oxidized species with two cofacial terminal oxo ligands (4444-O-O). However, this alternative regeneration pathway did not turn out to be thermodynamically favorable.

Since JT effects play a major role in determining the reactivity and stability of this polyoxometalate water oxidation catalyst, a tremendous in silico sampling effort was indispensable to characterize the involved structures, resulting in 159 individual stable minima found. This large-scale theoretical investigation not only offers unprecedented insight into the regeneration of 3344-OAc, but has additionally produced several unforeseen results. Our sampling revealed that the vanadate ligand is far less inert than previously thought.52 Having the ability to participate in the formation of surprisingly stable JT-distorted bonds, this hexadentate ligand even demonstrated an ability to additionally interact with the cubane core of the catalyst at the apical O1 atom, facilitated by three JT axes cooperatively pushing O1 toward the vanadate.

Equally unexpectedly, we found many strongly distorted or partially dissociated structures using our multistep sampling approach. Two types of degradation processes were identified: cubane opening and ligand dissociation. All barriers of investigated reactions were quite low, underlining the role of JT effects in facilitating the reactivity of the catalyst. Thus, in the 3333 and 3334 oxidation states, the catalyst in many ways appears to be less stable than at higher oxidation states; however, the majority of the investigated catalyst degradation reactions were found to be reversible. Only for specific ligand configurations in the 3333 oxidation state, some forms of ligand dissociation reactions may be irreversible. Most interestingly, a unique degradation product was discovered, which is most likely formed by protonation of O4 by solvent water. While the kinetics of this process remain unknown, we argue that a fairly high kinetic barrier is required to explain the high turnover observed in the experiments,46 as the O4-protonated structure is more stable than the deactivated catalyst 3333-o-o. Nevertheless, this unusual structure offers a first glimpse at how a loss of catalytic activity over time could occur in 3344-OAc.

Looking to the future, greater understanding of the fundamental principles involved in catalyst degradation could be achieved through simulations in explicit solvation, thereby contributing to the goal of imbuing this highly efficient molecular catalyst with greater stability. From an experimental point of view, the proposal of a complete catalytic cycle for 3344-OAc opens up many avenues for further investigation, both to verify the accuracy of our proposal as well as to operationalize the insights gained from these simulations. Chief among these is the importance of JT effects for increasing the water oxidation activity of catalysts that include d4 metal centers. This structure–property relationship is already well-known in heterogeneous catalysis,4244,51 and it is high time it were applied to the development of molecular catalysts for artificial water splitting.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the Austrian Science Fund FWF (Project Nos. I3987-N28 and I6116–N) and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG (TRR234 “CataLight”, Project ID No. 364549901, subproject C3). The authors thank the Vienna Scientific Cluster for the generous allocation of computational resources and the University of Vienna for continuous support.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acscatal.2c06301.

  • Analysis of heuristics for sampling target selection, tables of stable isomers, interatomic distance analysis, and nudged elastic band simulation results (PDF)

  • Cartesian coordinates of relevant structures (PDF)

Author Contributions

L.S. and L.G designed the research. L.S. and T.R. performed the research. L.S. analyzed the data. L.S and L.G. wrote the paper.

Open Access is funded by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF).

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

cs2c06301_si_001.pdf (1.6MB, pdf)
cs2c06301_si_002.pdf (137.2KB, pdf)

References

  1. Chow J.; Kopp R. J.; Portney P. R. Energy Resources and Global Development. Science 2003, 302 (5650), 1528–1531. 10.1126/science.1091939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Friedlingstein P.; Jones M. W.; O’Sullivan M.; Andrew R. M.; Bakker D. C. E.; Hauck J.; Le Quéré C.; Peters G. P.; Peters W.; Pongratz J.; Sitch S.; Canadell J. G.; Ciais P.; Jackson R. B.; Alin S. R.; Anthoni P.; Bates N. R.; Becker M.; Bellouin N.; Bopp L.; Chau T. T. T.; Chevallier F.; Chini L. P.; Cronin M.; Currie K. I.; Decharme B.; Djeutchouang L. M.; Dou X.; Evans W.; Feely R. A.; Feng L.; Gasser T.; Gilfillan D.; Gkritzalis T.; Grassi G.; Gregor L.; Gruber N.; Gürses Ö.; Harris I.; Houghton R. A.; Hurtt G. C.; Iida Y.; Ilyina T.; Luijkx I. T.; Jain A.; Jones S. D.; Kato E.; Kennedy D.; Klein Goldewijk K.; Knauer J.; Korsbakken J. I.; Körtzinger A.; Landschützer P.; Lauvset S. K.; Lefèvre N.; Lienert S.; Liu J.; Marland G.; McGuire P. C.; Melton J. R.; Munro D. R.; Nabel J. E. M. S.; Nakaoka S.-I.; Niwa Y.; Ono T.; Pierrot D.; Poulter B.; Rehder G.; Resplandy L.; Robertson E.; Rödenbeck C.; Rosan T. M.; Schwinger J.; Schwingshackl C.; Séférian R.; Sutton A. J.; Sweeney C.; Tanhua T.; Tans P. P.; Tian H.; Tilbrook B.; Tubiello F.; van der Werf G. R.; Vuichard N.; Wada C.; Wanninkhof R.; Watson A. J.; Willis D.; Wiltshire A. J.; Yuan W.; Yue C.; Yue X.; Zaehle S.; Zeng J. Global Carbon Budget 2021. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2022, 14 (4), 1917–2005. 10.5194/essd-14-1917-2022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Pörtner H.-O., Roberts D. C., Tignor M., Poloczanska E. S., Mintenbeck K., Alegría A., Craig M., Langsdorf S., Löschke S., Möller V., Okem A., Rama B., Eds. IPCC. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K. and New York, 2022; p 3056. [Google Scholar]
  4. Cook T. R.; Dogutan D. K.; Reece S. Y.; Surendranath Y.; Teets T. S.; Nocera D. G. Solar Energy Supply and Storage for the Legacy and Nonlegacy Worlds. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110 (11), 6474–6502. 10.1021/cr100246c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Faunce T. A.; Lubitz W.; Rutherford A. W.; MacFarlane D.; Moore G. F.; Yang P.; Nocera D. G.; Moore T. A.; Gregory D. H.; Fukuzumi S.; Yoon K. B.; Armstrong F. A.; Wasielewski M. R.; Styring S. Energy and Environment Policy Case for a Global Project on Artificial Photosynthesis. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6 (3), 695–698. 10.1039/c3ee00063j. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lubitz W.; Reijerse E. J.; Messinger J. Solar Water-Splitting into H2 and O2: Design Principles of Photosystem II and Hydrogenases. Energy Environ. Sci. 2008, 1 (1), 15–31. 10.1039/b808792j. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dau H.; Limberg C.; Reier T.; Risch M.; Roggan S.; Strasser P. The Mechanism of Water Oxidation: From Electrolysis via Homogeneous to Biological Catalysis. ChemCatChem. 2010, 2 (7), 724–761. 10.1002/cctc.201000126. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wang L.-P.; Wu Q.; Van Voorhis T. Acid–Base Mechanism for Ruthenium Water Oxidation Catalysts. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 49 (10), 4543–4553. 10.1021/ic100075k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Schilling M.; Böhler M.; Luber S. Towards the Rational Design of the Py5-Ligand Framework for Ruthenium-Based Water Oxidation Catalysts. Dalton Trans. 2018, 47 (31), 10480–10490. 10.1039/C8DT01209A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Betley T. A.; Wu Q.; Van Voorhis T.; Nocera D. G. Electronic Design Criteria for O–O Bond Formation via Metal–Oxo Complexes. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47 (6), 1849–1861. 10.1021/ic701972n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rivalta I.; Brudvig G. W.; Batista V. S. Oxomanganese Complexes for Natural and Artificial Photosynthesis. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2012, 16 (1), 11–18. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2012.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Shaffer D. W.; Xie Y.; Concepcion J. J. O–O Bond Formation in Ruthenium-Catalyzed Water Oxidation: Single-Site Nucleophilic Attack vs. O–O Radical Coupling. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46 (20), 6170–6193. 10.1039/C7CS00542C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Schilling M.; Luber S. Computational Modeling of Cobalt-Based Water Oxidation: Current Status and Future Challenges. Front. Chem. 2018, 6, 100. 10.3389/fchem.2018.00100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Li X.; Siegbahn P. E. M. Water Oxidation Mechanism for Synthetic Co–Oxides with Small Nuclearity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135 (37), 13804–13813. 10.1021/ja4053448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. McCool N. S.; Robinson D. M.; Sheats J. E.; Dismukes G. C. A Co4O4 “Cubane” Water Oxidation Catalyst Inspired by Photosynthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133 (30), 11446–11449. 10.1021/ja203877y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wang L.-P.; Van Voorhis T. Direct-Coupling O2 Bond Forming a Pathway in Cobalt Oxide Water Oxidation Catalysts. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2011, 2 (17), 2200–2204. 10.1021/jz201021n. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Fernando A.; Aikens C. M. Reaction Pathways for Water Oxidation to Molecular Oxygen Mediated by Model Cobalt Oxide Dimer and Cubane Catalysts. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119 (20), 11072–11085. 10.1021/jp511805x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Nguyen A. I.; Ziegler M. S.; Oña-Burgos P.; Sturzbecher-Hohne M.; Kim W.; Bellone D. E.; Tilley T. D. Mechanistic Investigations of Water Oxidation by a Molecular Cobalt Oxide Analogue: Evidence for a Highly Oxidized Intermediate and Exclusive Terminal Oxo Participation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137 (40), 12865–12872. 10.1021/jacs.5b08396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hodel F. H.; Luber S. What Influences the Water Oxidation Activity of a Bioinspired Molecular CoII4O4 Cubane? An In-Depth Exploration of Catalytic Pathways. ACS Catal. 2016, 6 (3), 1505–1517. 10.1021/acscatal.5b02507. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hodel F. H.; Luber S. Redox-Inert Cations Enhancing Water Oxidation Activity: The Crucial Role of Flexibility. ACS Catal. 2016, 6 (10), 6750–6761. 10.1021/acscatal.6b01218. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Soriano-López J.; Musaev D. G.; Hill C. L.; Galán-Mascarós J. R.; Carbó J. J.; Poblet J. M. Tetracobalt-Polyoxometalate Catalysts for Water Oxidation: Key Mechanistic Details. J. Catal. 2017, 350, 56–63. 10.1016/j.jcat.2017.03.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Liao R.-Z.; Kärkäs M. D.; Lee B.-L.; Åkermark B.; Siegbahn P. E. M. Photosystem II Like Water Oxidation Mechanism in a Bioinspired Tetranuclear Manganese Complex. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 54 (1), 342–351. 10.1021/ic5024983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Dismukes G. C.; Brimblecombe R.; Felton G. A. N.; Pryadun R. S.; Sheats J. E.; Spiccia L.; Swiegers G. F. Development of Bioinspired Mn4O4–Cubane Water Oxidation Catalysts: Lessons from Photosynthesis. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42 (12), 1935–1943. 10.1021/ar900249x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mukherjee S.; Stull J. A.; Yano J.; Stamatatos T. C.; Pringouri K.; Stich T. A.; Abboud K. A.; Britt R. D.; Yachandra V. K.; Christou G. Synthetic Model of the Asymmetric [Mn3CaO4] Cubane Core of the Oxygen-Evolving Complex of Photosystem II. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2012, 109 (7), 2257–2262. 10.1073/pnas.1115290109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kanady J. S.; Lin P.-H.; Carsch K. M.; Nielsen R. J.; Takase M. K.; Goddard W. A.; Agapie T. Toward Models for the Full Oxygen-Evolving Complex of Photosystem II by Ligand Coordination To Lower the Symmetry of the Mn3CaO4 Cubane: Demonstration That Electronic Effects Facilitate Binding of a Fifth Metal. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136 (41), 14373–14376. 10.1021/ja508160x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Zhang C.; Chen C.; Dong H.; Shen J.-R.; Dau H.; Zhao J. A Synthetic Mn4Ca-Cluster Mimicking the Oxygen-Evolving Center of Photosynthesis. Science 2015, 348 (6235), 690–693. 10.1126/science.aaa6550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lee H. B.; Agapie T. Redox Tuning via Ligand-Induced Geometric Distortions at a YMn3O4 Cubane Model of the Biological Oxygen Evolving Complex. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58 (22), 14998–15003. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b00510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Li M.; Liao R.-Z. Water Oxidation Catalyzed by a Bioinspired Tetranuclear Manganese Complex: Mechanistic Study and Prediction. ChemSusChem 2022, 15 (15), e202200187 10.1002/cssc.202200187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kanady J. S.; Tsui E. Y.; Day M. W.; Agapie T. A Synthetic Model of the Mn3Ca Subsite of the Oxygen-Evolving Complex in Photosystem II. Science 2011, 333 (6043), 733–736. 10.1126/science.1206036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Gatt P.; Petrie S.; Stranger R.; Pace R. J. Rationalizing the 1.9 Å Crystal Structure of Photosystem II—A Remarkable Jahn–Teller Balancing Act Induced by a Single Proton Transfer. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51 (48), 12025–12028. 10.1002/anie.201206316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Krewald V.; Neese F.; Pantazis D. A. On the Magnetic and Spectroscopic Properties of High-Valent Mn3CaO4 Cubanes as Structural Units of Natural and Artificial Water-Oxidizing Catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135 (15), 5726–5739. 10.1021/ja312552f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Tsui E. Y.; Agapie T. Reduction Potentials of Heterometallic Manganese–Oxido Cubane Complexes Modulated by Redox-Inactive Metals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2013, 110 (25), 10084–10088. 10.1073/pnas.1302677110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Yamaguchi K.; Yamanaka S.; Isobe H.; Saito T.; Kanda K.; Umena Y.; Kawakami K.; Shen J.-R.; Kamiya N.; Okumura M.; Nakamura H.; Shoji M.; Yoshioka Y. The Nature of Chemical Bonds of the CaMn4O5 Cluster in Oxygen Evolving Complex of Photosystem II: Jahn-Teller Distortion and Its Suppression by Ca Doping in Cubane Structures. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2013, 113 (4), 453–473. 10.1002/qua.24280. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lee C.; Aikens C. M. Water Splitting Processes on Mn4O4 and CaMn3O4 Model Cubane Systems. J. Phys. Chem. A 2015, 119 (35), 9325–9337. 10.1021/acs.jpca.5b03170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Krewald V.; Retegan M.; Cox N.; Messinger J.; Lubitz W.; DeBeer S.; Neese F.; Pantazis D. A. Metal Oxidation States in Biological Water Splitting. Chem. Sci. 2015, 6 (3), 1676–1695. 10.1039/C4SC03720K. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Fernando A.; Aikens C. M. Theoretical Investigation of Water Oxidation Catalysis by a Model Manganese Cubane Complex. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120 (38), 21148–21161. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b03029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Yamaguchi K.; Shoji M.; Isobe H.; Yamanaka S.; Umena Y.; Kawakami K.; Kamiya N. On the Guiding Principles for Understanding of Geometrical Structures of the CaMn4O5 Cluster in Oxygen-Evolving Complex of Photosystem II. Proposal of Estimation Formula of Structural Deformations via the Jahn–Teller Effects. Mol. Phys. 2017, 115 (5), 636–666. 10.1080/00268976.2016.1278476. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kanady J. S.; Mendoza-Cortes J. L.; Tsui E. Y.; Nielsen R. J.; Goddard W. A.; Agapie T. Oxygen Atom Transfer and Oxidative Water Incorporation in Cuboidal Mn3MOn Complexes Based on Synthetic, Isotopic Labeling, and Computational Studies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135 (3), 1073–1082. 10.1021/ja310022p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Drosou M.; Zahariou G.; Pantazis D. A. Orientational Jahn–Teller Isomerism in the Dark-Stable State of Nature’s Water Oxidase. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021, 60 (24), 13493–13499. 10.1002/anie.202103425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Cárdenas G.; Trentin I.; Schwiedrzik L.; Hernández-Castillo D.; Lowe G. A.; Kund J.; Kranz C.; Klingler S.; Stach R.; Mizaikoff B.; Marquetand P.; Nogueira J. J.; Streb C.; González L. Activation by Oxidation and Ligand Exchange in a Molecular Manganese Vanadium Oxide Water Oxidation Catalyst. Chem. Sci. 2021, 12 (39), 12918–12927. 10.1039/D1SC03239A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Schwiedrzik L.; Brieskorn V.; González L. Flexibility Enhances Reactivity: Redox Isomerism and Jahn–Teller Effects in a Bioinspired Mn4O4 Cubane Water Oxidation Catalyst. ACS Catal. 2021, 11 (21), 13320–13329. 10.1021/acscatal.1c03566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Robinson D. M.; Go Y. B.; Mui M.; Gardner G.; Zhang Z.; Mastrogiovanni D.; Garfunkel E.; Li J.; Greenblatt M.; Dismukes G. C. Photochemical Water Oxidation by Crystalline Polymorphs of Manganese Oxides: Structural Requirements for Catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135 (9), 3494–3501. 10.1021/ja310286h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Maitra U.; Naidu B. S.; Govindaraj A.; Rao C. N. R. Importance of Trivalency and the Eg1 Configuration in the Photocatalytic Oxidation of Water by Mn and Co Oxides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2013, 110 (29), 11704–11707. 10.1073/pnas.1310703110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Indra A.; Menezes P. W.; Driess M. Uncovering Structure–Activity Relationships in Manganese-Oxide-Based Heterogeneous Catalysts for Efficient Water Oxidation. ChemSusChem 2015, 8 (5), 776–785. 10.1002/cssc.201402812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Schwarz B.; Forster J.; Goetz M. K.; Yücel D.; Berger C.; Jacob T.; Streb C. Visible-Light-Driven Water Oxidation by a Molecular Manganese Vanadium Oxide Cluster. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55 (21), 6329–6333. 10.1002/anie.201601799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Huber F. L.; Amthor S.; Schwarz B.; Mizaikoff B.; Streb C.; Rau S. Multi-Phase Real-Time Monitoring of Oxygen Evolution Enables in Operando Water Oxidation Catalysis Studies. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2018, 2 (9), 1974–1978. 10.1039/C8SE00328A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Guo Y.; Li H.; He L.-L.; Zhao D.-X.; Gong L.-D.; Yang Z.-Z. The Open-Cubane Oxo–Oxyl Coupling Mechanism Dominates Photosynthetic Oxygen Evolution: A Comprehensive DFT Investigation on O–O Bond Formation in the S4 State. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19 (21), 13909–13923. 10.1039/C7CP01617D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Vinyard D. J.; Khan S.; Brudvig G. W. Photosynthetic Water Oxidation: Binding and Activation of Substrate Waters for O–O Bond Formation. Faraday Discuss. 2015, 185, 37–50. 10.1039/C5FD00087D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Siegbahn P. E. M. Theoretical Studies of O–O Bond Formation in Photosystem II. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47 (6), 1779–1786. 10.1021/ic7012057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Sproviero E. M.; Gascón J. A.; McEvoy J. P.; Brudvig G. W.; Batista V. S. Quantum Mechanics/Molecular Mechanics Study of the Catalytic Cycle of Water Splitting in Photosystem II. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130 (11), 3428–3442. 10.1021/ja076130q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Yu X.; Qian K.; Du L.; Zhang J.; Lu N.; Miao Z.; Li Y.; Kobayashi H.; Yan X.; Li R. A Strong Jahn–Teller Distortion in Mn3O4–MnO Heterointerfaces for Enhanced Silver Catalyzed Formaldehyde Reforming into Hydrogen. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2022, 6 (12), 3068–3077. 10.1039/D2SE00436D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Mai S.; Holzer M.; Andreeva A.; González L. Jahn-Teller Effects in a Vanadate-Stabilized Manganese-Oxo Cubane Water Oxidation Catalyst. Chem.–Eur. J. 2021, 27 (68), 17066–17077. 10.1002/chem.202102539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Dau H.; Liebisch P.; Haumann M. The Manganese Complex of Oxygenic Photosynthesis: Conversion of Five-Coordinated Mn(III) to Six-Coordinated Mn(IV) in the S2–S3 Transition Is Implied by XANES Simulations. Phys. Scr. 2005, 2005 (T115), 844. 10.1238/Physica.Topical.115a00844. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Mai S.; Klingler S.; Trentin I.; Kund J.; Holzer M.; Andreeva A.; Stach R.; Kranz C.; Streb C.; Mizaikoff B.; González L. Spectral Signatures of Oxidation States in a Manganese-Oxo Cubane Water Oxidation Catalyst. Chem.–Eur. J. 2021, 27, 17078–17086. 10.1002/chem.202102583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Neese F. The ORCA Program System. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2012, 2 (1), 73–78. 10.1002/wcms.81. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  56. Neese F. Software Update: The ORCA Program System, Version 4.0. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2018, 8 (1), e1327 10.1002/wcms.1327. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  57. Pantazis D. A.; Chen X.-Y.; Landis C. R.; Neese F. All-Electron Scalar Relativistic Basis Sets for Third-Row Transition Metal Atoms. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2008, 4 (6), 908–919. 10.1021/ct800047t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. van Lenthe E.; Baerends E. J.; Snijders J. G. Relativistic Regular Two-component Hamiltonians. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 99 (6), 4597–4610. 10.1063/1.466059. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. van Lenthe E.; Baerends E. J.; Snijders J. G. Relativistic Total Energy Using Regular Approximations. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 101 (11), 9783–9792. 10.1063/1.467943. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. Grimme S.; Antony J.; Ehrlich S.; Krieg H. A Consistent and Accurate Ab Initio Parametrization of Density Functional Dispersion Correction (DFT-D) for the 94 Elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132 (15), 154104. 10.1063/1.3382344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Barone V.; Cossi M. Quantum Calculation of Molecular Energies and Energy Gradients in Solution by a Conductor Solvent Model. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102 (11), 1995–2001. 10.1021/jp9716997. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  62. Helmich-Paris B.; de Souza B.; Neese F.; Izsák R. An Improved Chain of Spheres for Exchange Algorithm. J. Chem. Phys. 2021, 155 (10), 104109. 10.1063/5.0058766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Perdew J. P. Density-Functional Approximation for the Correlation Energy of the Inhomogeneous Electron Gas. Phys. Rev. B 1986, 33 (12), 8822–8824. 10.1103/PhysRevB.33.8822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Becke A. D. Density-Functional Exchange-Energy Approximation with Correct Asymptotic Behavior. Phys. Rev. A 1988, 38 (6), 3098–3100. 10.1103/PhysRevA.38.3098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Weigend F.; Ahlrichs R. Balanced Basis Sets of Split Valence, Triple Zeta Valence and Quadruple Zeta Valence Quality for H to Rn: Design and Assessment of Accuracy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2005, 7 (18), 3297–3305. 10.1039/b508541a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Becke A. D. Density-functional Thermochemistry. III. The Role of Exact Exchange. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98 (7), 5648–5652. 10.1063/1.464913. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  67. Lee C.; Yang W.; Parr R. G. Development of the Colle-Salvetti Correlation-Energy Formula into a Functional of the Electron Density. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37 (2), 785–789. 10.1103/PhysRevB.37.785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Siegbahn P. E. M. O–O Bond Formation in the S4 State of the Oxygen-Evolving Complex in Photosystem II. Chem.–Eur. J. 2006, 12 (36), 9217–9227. 10.1002/chem.200600774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Siegbahn P. E. M. Substrate Water Exchange for the Oxygen Evolving Complex in PSII in the S1, S2, and S3 States. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135 (25), 9442–9449. 10.1021/ja401517e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Siegbahn P. E. M. The S2 to S3 Transition for Water Oxidation in PSII (Photosystem II), Revisited. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018, 20 (35), 22926–22931. 10.1039/C8CP03720E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Luchini G.; Alegre-Requena J. V.; Funes-Ardoiz I.; Paton R. S. GoodVibes: Automated Thermochemistry for Heterogeneous Computational Chemistry Data. F1000Res. 2020, 9, 291. 10.12688/f1000research.22758.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  72. Harvey J. N.; Himo F.; Maseras F.; Perrin L. Scope and Challenge of Computational Methods for Studying Mechanism and Reactivity in Homogeneous Catalysis. ACS Catal. 2019, 9 (8), 6803–6813. 10.1021/acscatal.9b01537. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  73. Rossini E.; Knapp E.-W. Proton Solvation in Protic and Aprotic Solvents. J. Comput. Chem. 2016, 37 (12), 1082–1091. 10.1002/jcc.24297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Henkelman G.; Uberuaga B. P.; Jónsson H. A Climbing Image Nudged Elastic Band Method for Finding Saddle Points and Minimum Energy Paths. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 113 (22), 9901–9904. 10.1063/1.1329672. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  75. Nørskov J. K.; Rossmeisl J.; Logadottir A.; Lindqvist L.; Kitchin J. R.; Bligaard T.; Jónsson H. Origin of the Overpotential for Oxygen Reduction at a Fuel-Cell Cathode. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108 (46), 17886–17892. 10.1021/jp047349j. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  76. Nørskov J. K.; Bligaard T.; Rossmeisl J.; Christensen C. H. Towards the Computational Design of Solid Catalysts. Nat. Chem. 2009, 1, 37–46. 10.1038/nchem.121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Yao R.; Li Y.; Chen Y.; Xu B.; Chen C.; Zhang C. Rare-Earth Elements Can Structurally and Energetically Replace the Calcium in a Synthetic Mn4CaO4-Cluster Mimicking the Oxygen-Evolving Center in Photosynthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143 (42), 17360–17365. 10.1021/jacs.1c09085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

cs2c06301_si_001.pdf (1.6MB, pdf)
cs2c06301_si_002.pdf (137.2KB, pdf)

Articles from ACS Catalysis are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES