Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2023 Feb 13;88(5):3132–3147. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.2c02937

Solvent-Mediated Tunable Regiodivergent C6- and N1-Alkylations of 2,3-Disubstituted Indoles with p-Quinone Methides

Douaa Adris , Yunus Taskesenligil , Volkan Akyildiz , Selcuk Essiz , Nurullah Saracoglu †,*
PMCID: PMC9990074  PMID: 36779866

Abstract

graphic file with name jo2c02937_0010.jpg

Indium-catalyzed, solvent-enabled regioselective C6- or N1-alkylations of 2,3-disubstituted indoles with para-quinone methides are developed under mild conditions. Notably, highly selective and switchable alkylations were selectively achieved by adjusting the reaction conditions. Moreover, scalability and further transformations of the alkylation products are demonstrated, and this operationally simple methodology is amenable to the late-stage C6-functionalization of the indomethacin drug. The reaction pathways were explained with the support of experimental and density functional theory studies.

Introduction

Indole is one of the most significant heteroaromatic structural units found in numerous bioactive natural products, medicinal compounds, and synthetic compounds and plays an important role in their bioactivity.1 Particularly, the substructures of 2,3-disubstituted indole skeletons (as fused or substitutions) are medicinally and synthetically valuable scaffolds and present as a core structural motif in numerous pharmaceutically relevant compounds.25 Velbanamine and a small subgroup of tetracyclic natural bases belonging to the Iboga family are representative fused indole substructure examples (Figure 1).6

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Representative compounds with biologically active 2,3-disubstituted/fused indole motifs.

The 2,3-disubstituted indole scaffold is also a basic structural motif for the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) indomethacin.7 Therefore, there is interest in the development of efficient methods to access 2,3-disubstituted indoles. Most of these methods for functionalized 2,3-disubstituted/fused indoles include the architecture of the parent heterocycle by cyclization via different transition metals and metal-free catalysis conditions using phenylhydrazine, aniline, and nitrobenzene as main substrates.8 Other approaches to these functionalized indoles involve derivatization of the indole nucleus via cross-coupling methodology or direct C–H/N–H activation.9

Meanwhile, N1, C3, and C6 positions of 2,3-disubstituted indoles may exhibit mainly three types of nucleophilic behavior toward electrophiles due to their electronic nature (Scheme 1a). The C3- and N1-positions of 2,3-disubstituted indoles have been well documented as the most reactive sites among the three positions (N1, C3, C6), and the majority of their reactions were focused on the C3- and N1-positions.1012 Furthermore, 2,3-disubstituted/fused indoles can couple with electrophiles to permit Friedel–Crafts-type remote C6-functionalization, which is relatively more difficult (Scheme 1a). In this context, significant progress has been recently achieved via remote C6–H functionalization of indoles. Limited elegant approaches, such as template-assisted C6-olefination,13 ligand-controlled C6-borylation,14 C6-arylation via a transient mediator,15 and C6-alkylation with σ-activation,16 are available for the remote C(sp2)–H activation (Scheme 1a, middle side). In addition, Lewis and Bronsted acid promoted Friedel–Crafts-type reactions were also reported for the C6–H alkylation (Scheme 1a, right side).1723 Within this scope, Zheng, You, and co-workers, pioneers in the field, first described scandium triflate-catalyzed direct C6 alkylation of 2,3-disubstituted indoles with aziridines via Friedel–Crafts-type functionalization.17 Subsequently, Shi and co-workers reported another pioneering study via chemo- and regiospecific C6-alkylation of 2,3-disubstituted indoles using 3-indolylmethanols with organocatalysts.18 Also, Zhang and co-workers described chiral phosphoric acid (CPA)-catalyzed remote C6-enantioselective C–H functionalization of 2,3-disubstituted indoles with isatin-derived N-Boc ketimine through the dual H-bonds and π–π interaction strategy.19 However, the enantioselective C6-functionalization of 2,3-disubstituted indoles with benzofuran-derived azadienes using chiral phosphoric acid led to a range of enantioenriched heterotriarylmethanes.20 Recently, electrophiles such as o-hydroxybenzyl alcohol,21 trifluoromethylated 3-indolylmethanol,22 and carbene23 have been utilized in the Friedel–Crafts-type C6-alkylations of 2,3-disubstituted indoles.

Scheme 1. Context of the Work.

Scheme 1

p-Quinone methides (p-QMs) have attracted considerable attention as powerful acceptors in 1,6-nucleophilic conjugate addition reactions with a wide range of carbon and heteroatom nucleophiles.24 To date, indoles have been also tested as donor molecules on this 1,6-conjugate addition platform to access triarylmethanes.25,26 Despite those elegant advancements using this concept, the synthesis of triarylmethanes on the benzenoid ring of the indole motif is still challenging and there are a limited number of examples.27,28 In 2016, Yao, Lin, and co-workers disclosed a single example (in a yield of 66%, its structure was drawn incorrectly in the article) of C6-alkylation of 2,3-dimethylindole with p-QM under metal-free conditions (Scheme 1b).29 Later, Zhang and co-workers reported another single example (in a yield of 83%, 62% ee) of CPA-catalyzed remote C6-enantioselective C–H alkylation of a 2,3-fused indole with a p-QM.19 In 2020, Lin, Sun, and co-workers reported the synthesis of an unsymmetrical diarylmethane (1 example) and triarylmethanes (5 examples) through p-TsOH-catalyzed 1,6-conjugate addition of 2,3-dimethyl/fused indoles to in situ generated p-QM intermediates (Scheme 1b).26 Consequently, the preceding examples of the C6-functionalization of indoles with p-QMs suffered from limited substrate scope (in terms of both indoles and p-QMs). However, the development of efficient protocols for the chemoselective functionalization through both C6–H and N1–H bonds of unprotected indoles is still a difficult problem and challenge. Herein, we describe In(OTf)3-catalyzed divergent alkylations (from C6 and N1 positions) of unprotected 2,3-disubstituted/fused indoles with p-QMs (Scheme 1c). The high chemoselectivity was made feasible by a delicate choice of solvents. To our knowledge, this protocol represents the first comprehensive examples of tunable chemoselective alkylations of unprotected 2,3-disubstituted/fused indoles. The present strategy is highly tunable depending on the catalyst, temperature, and solvent employed.

Results and Discussion

In continuation of our research interest in C–H and N–H alkylation reactions,27 2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-carbazole (1a) and p-QM 2d were selected as the model substrates to optimize the reaction conditions (Table 1). The initial experiments were conducted in 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE) at room temperature for 12 h by using 10 different metal triflates as Lewis acid promoters (Table 1, entries 1–10). Zn(OTf)2 (10 mol %) and Gd(OTf)3 (10 mol %) were found to promote the reaction quite well, giving the N1-alkylation product 4ad in 82 and 77% yields, respectively (entries 1 and 2), whereas Bi(OTf)3 (10 mol %) furnished C6-alkylation product 3ad in an 84% yield (entry 3). Subsequently, when other Lewis acids such as Cu(OTf)2 and LiOTf were tested for the reaction, no alkylation products were detected, and only starting materials were recovered (entries 4 and 5). The subsequent screening of other triflates, such as scandium(III), tin(II), silver(I), ytterbium(III), and indium(III) triflates, revealed that the desired C6-alkylation product 3ad was generated with excellent regioselectivity and yields (entries 6–10). We also checked the reaction with Bronsted acids in DCE (Table 1, entries 11 and 12). When TfOH was sufficient to promote the reaction, 3ad was obtained in 82% yield (entry 11). In contrast, NaHSO4 as the solid heterogeneous acid catalyst afforded N1-alkylation product 4ad (entry 12). Furthermore, when the reaction was performed with HFIP as a catalyst, any alkylation products were not formed (Table 1, entry 13). Notably, entries 1, 6, and 10 indicated that the catalysts such as Zn(OTf)2, Sc(OTf)3, and In(OTf)3 played an important role in regioselective switching. Next, to test the effect of the solvent with these catalysts, further additional optimization was conducted (Table 1, entries 14–24). Using THF and DMSO instead of DCE as a solvent for the Zn(OTf)2-catalyzed reaction, no product 3ad or 4ad was detected (entries 14 and 15). To our surprise, different solvents showed a noticeable effect on the Sc(OTf)3-catalyzed reaction (Table 1, entries 16 and 17). DCM showed the same effect as DCE (entry 16), while THF switched the regioselectivity for the product from 3ad to 4ad (in 85% yield) (entry 17). Based on these results, we further extensively screened various solvents for the indium(III)-catalyzed reaction (Table 1, entries 18–24). Interestingly, the reaction in ethyl acetate afforded 3ad as a major product in 56% yield and with almost 2:1 regioselectivity (entry 18), while the reaction in dioxane gave 4ad as a major product in 84% yield and with almost 10:1 regioselectivity (entry 22).

Table 1. Optimization of Reaction Conditionsa.

graphic file with name jo2c02937_0008.jpg

entry catalyst solvent 3ad (yield, %) 4ad (yield, %)b
1 Zn(OTf)2 DCE   82
2 Gd(OTf)3 DCE   77
3 Bi(OTf)3 DCE 84  
4 Cu(OTf)2 DCE    
5 LiOTf DCE    
6 Sc(OTf)3 DCE 84  
7 Sn(OTf)2 DCE 80  
8 AgOTf DCE 72  
9 Yb(OTf)3 DCE 75  
10 In(OTf)3 DCE 87  
11 TfOH DCE 82  
12 NaHSO4 DCE   81
13 HFIP DCE    
14 Zn(OTf)2 THF    
15 Zn(OTf)2 DMSO    
16 Sc(OTf)3 DCM 80  
17 Sc(OTf)3 THF trace 85
18 In(OTf)3 EtOAc 56 25
19 In(OTf)3 DCM 88  
20 In(OTf)3 MeCN 74  
21 In(OTf)3 CH3NO2 78  
22 In(OTf)3 dioxane 9 84
23c In(OTf)3 THF trace 90
24 In(OTf)3 toluene 92 trace
a

Reaction conditions. For 3ad; 1a (0.20 mmol), catalyst (10 mol %), 2d (0.22 mmol), solvent (2 mL).

b

Isolated yield.

c

For 4ad; 1a (0.30 mmol), catalyst (10 mol %), 2d (0.20 mmol), solvent (2 mL).

When dichloromethane, acetonitrile, and nitromethane were applied to the reaction instead of DCE, similar results were found (entries 19–21). Significantly, the use of THF in the In(III)-catalyzed reaction system gave the best result for the N1-alkylation product 4ad with a 90% yield (entry 23). We found the yield of C6-alkylation product 3ad was improved to 92% with toluene as solvent (entry 24). Based on the above results, 10 mol % In(OTf)3 is the preferred catalyst for these regioselective reactions. Furthermore, the use of THF for N1-alkylation and toluene for C6-alkylation as solvent were determined to be the other optimal reaction parameters at room temperature for 12 h (entries 23 and 24).

Under the established optimized reaction conditions, we attempted to survey the substrate scope of various p-QM substrates 2ax for C6-alkylation of 1a (Schemes 2a). By employing 1a as the coupling partner, we first investigated the generality of p-QMs 2ax. A series of C6-alkylated products 3aa–ax were obtained in good to excellent yields (75–92% yield) under the optimized conditions (entry 24, Table 1). To our delight, this indium(III)-catalyzed 1,6-hydroarylation reaction in toluene demonstrated a broad scope for the p-QM reaction partner. In the case of p-QM 2a without any substituent on the phenyl ring, the reaction proceeded well and delivered the corresponding product 3aa in 88% yield. p-QMs bearing a halogen group at the para-position of aryl ring afforded C6-alkylated indoles 3ab–ae in good to excellent yields (78–92%). A series of p-QMs including both electron-donating substituents (2fh) such as methyl, tert-butyl, and methoxy and electron-withdrawing substituents (2ik) such as carboxylic acid, nitro, and trifluoromethyl at the para-position of the phenyl ring were well tolerated to yield the desired products (3af–ak) in the range of 83–89% yields under the optimal conditions. The p-QM 2l bearing a diphenylamine group at the para-position of the aryl ring was also a suitable reaction partner for the 1,6-addition 3al in 80% yield. Even the reactions of substrates 2mr with sterically hindered ortho-monosubstituted (Br, OAc, and OH), meta-monosubstituted (OH), meta/meta-disubstituted (Br), and ortho-/meta-disubstituted (OMe) aromatic rings proceeded efficiently and led to the corresponding products 3am–ar in excellent yields between 82 and 90%. Further, p-QMs 2s and 2u bearing naphth-2-yl and pyren-1-yl groups were also compatible and delivered the addition products 3as and 3au in 75% and 82% yields, respectively, whereas p-QMs 2t bearing an anthracen-9-yl group failed to yield 3at due to the possible steric effect of the anthracene ring. On the other hand, the corresponding p-QM 2v of terephthalaldehyde gave tandem double 1,6-conjugate addition product 3av in 83% yield. Finally, p-QMs 2wx bearing the heterocyclic ring were used as a substrate instead of the carbocyclic aryl ring under standard conditions. First, N-tosylindole-substituted p-QM 2x gave the desired product 3ax in an excellent yield of 85%. Second, N-methylindole-substituted p-QM 2w was employed as the substrate; however, no reaction occurred under the standard conditions. This result indicated that the reactivity of N-methylindole-substituted p-QM 2w is lower than that of N-tosylindole-substituted p-QM 2x in the conjugate addition with 1a. We hypothesize that the electron-rich N-methylindole ring provides electrons by resonance, reducing the reactivity of the corresponding p-QM. With the optimized conditions in hand, we next evaluated the substrate scope of 2,3-disubstituted indole derivatives. As depicted in Scheme 2b, a wide range of 2,3-disubstituted indoles were suitable reaction partners for p-QM 2d and provided the desired products in good to excellent yields. Pleasantly, 5-, 7-, and 8-membered fused-ring substrate triad 1bd provided C6-alkylation products 3bd–dd with high yields and regioselectivity. Also, indoles 1eg bearing dimethyl, ethyl/methyl, and phenyl/ethyl on the 2,3-positions tolerated C6-alkylation with high efficiencies (3ed–gd, 84–88%). With 6-membered fused-ring indoles 1hj bearing electron-donating groups (−Me and −OMe) and an electron-withdrawing group (−Cl) on the 5-position, the expected products 3hd–jd were obtained in high yields (73–87%). Notably, the N-protected 6-membered fused-ring indoles 1kl with N-methyl and N-benzyl groups also exhibited pleasing results, and the corresponding products 3kd–ld were obtained in high yields (86% and 74%). The N-acetyl-protected indole 1m failed to react with p-QM 2a under the standard reaction conditions. This result can be attributed to the π-electron-withdrawing effect of the acetyl substituent. The structures of the C(6)–H alkylation products were elucidated utilizing NMR spectroscopy and high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS). As a representative example, the alkylation at the C6-position of 3ad was also determined by a nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) study. NOE correlations between the C(7)–H and N(1)-H, hydrogens (see green arrow) agree with the alkylation depicted (Scheme 2a). To demonstrate the practicality of the current protocol, a gram-scale synthesis of 3ad was also investigated under the optimized standard reaction conditions, and the yield of the desired product was only slightly decreased with no effect on regioselectivity (Scheme 2a). This result reveals that the current transformation can be used to synthesize C6-alkylated indoles with practical usefulness.

Scheme 2. Substrate Scope for C(6)–H Alkylation.

Scheme 2

Reaction conditions: 1 (0.20 mmol), In(OTf)3 (10 mol %), 2 (0.22 mmol), toluene (2 mL).

Large-scale synthesis of 3ad (1.39 g, 2.55 mmol).

As depicted in Scheme 3, the N(1)–H alkylation reactions of various 2,3-disubstituted/fused indoles 1bj mediated by In(OTf)3 in THF were also explored under the optimized conditions (Table 1, entry 23). In this context, the N-alkylation product 4aa was generated and isolated in 85% yield (Scheme 3a). On the other hand, the p-QMs (2b,c, 2fh, and 2jl) containing different electron-donating and -withdrawing groups such as fluoro, chloro, methyl, tert-butyl, methoxy, nitro, trifluoromethyl, and diphenylamine at the para-position of the phenyl ring were suitable substrates to react with 1a in this transformation, affording the corresponding alkylation products 4ab–ac, 4af–ah, and 4aj–al in 63–90% yields.

Scheme 3. Substrate Scope for N(1)–H Alkylation.

Scheme 3

Reaction conditions: 1 (0.30 mmol), In(OTf)3 (10 mol %), 2 (0.20 mmol), THF (2 mL).

Additionally, when the electron-donating and -withdrawing ortho-substituted p-QMs 2mn were used as the substrates for the reaction, the alkylation process took place at the nitrogen atom in indole derivative 1a to afford the corresponding products 4am–an in 75% and 90% yields, respectively (Scheme 3a). Furthermore, the introduction of mono- and disubstitution at the meta-position did not significantly affect the yield of products 4ap (84% yield) and 4aq (82% yield) (Scheme 3a). p-QMs with other aromatic rings, such as naphthalene and pyrene, were also tested, giving satisfactory results. The corresponding products 4as and 4au were obtained in good yields (74% and 80%) (Scheme 3a). Unfortunately, in the case of anthracenyl-substituted p-QM 2t, no product (4at) formation was observed (Scheme 3a). It is assumed that steric hindrance due to the size of the anthracene ring blocks the approach of the nucleophile. When the terephthalaldehyde-p-QM 2v was used, both p-QM groups reacted and the desired product 4av was obtained in 82% yield (Scheme 3a). Both the 5-, 7-, and 8-membered fused-ring-indoles 1bd and indoles 1ef including substituents such as dimethyl and ethyl/methyl on 2,3-positions can react efficiently with 4-(4-bromobenzylidene)-2,6-di-tert-butylcyclohexa-2,5-dien-1-one (2d) to give the N(1)–H alkylation products 4bd–fd in 70–80% yields (Scheme 3b). Nevertheless, a complex mixture was obtained when 1g was reacted with 2d under standard conditions, and no desired product 4gd was isolated (Scheme 3b). Notably, substrates containing methyl, methoxy, and chloride groups at the C5-position of 6-membered fused-ring-indole 2a also provided the target products (4hd–4jd) in moderate yields (40–64%) (Scheme 3b). To examine the synthetic potential of the protocol, postfunctionalizations of the C6-alkylation products were also performed (Scheme 4).

Scheme 4. Follow-Up Chemistry.

Scheme 4

Initially, the retro-Friedel–Crafts alkylation of 3ad was attempted with AlCl3 as a tert-butyl acceptor in toluene/nitromethane to afford the corresponding para-substituted phenol 5 in 78% yield (Scheme 4a).27 Subsequently, bromo-substituted C6-alkylated product 3ad was explored for cross-coupling reaction with thiophene-2-boronic acid (6) in the presence of Pd(PPh3)4, Na2CO3, and 1,2-dimethoxyethane:water (2:1), which afforded the corresponding product 7 with 85% yield (Scheme 4b).30 Finally, to demonstrate the applicability of our strategy to the late-stage functionalization of a medicinal relevant molecule, we subjected a pharmaceutically relevant drug to our C6-alkylation protocol: an NSAID indomethacin could be decorated with diarylmethane moieties (8d, 8f, and 8k) with 82–89% yields (Scheme 4c).

To elucidate the reaction mechanism of the regioselective alkylations of 2,3-disubstituted/fused indoles with p-QMs, a series of control experiments were then performed (Scheme 5). For this, we tested the interconversion between these two different alkylation products 3ad and 4ad. When the pure 4ad was subjected to the conditions for C6-alkylation, 3ad was isolated in 90% yield as a sole product (Scheme 5a). On the contrary, when the pure 3ad was subjected to the conditions for N-alkylation, the reaction did not proceed (Scheme 5a). Moreover, no conversion from 3ad to 4ad was observed, even when the N-alkylation reaction time was prolonged to 24 h. Under the thermal conditions in THF (Scheme 5b), the progress of the reaction was further investigated. The reaction between 1a and 2d with the 10 mol % In(OTf)3 catalyst system in THF for 4 h in a sealed tube at 90 °C surprisingly provided 3ad in 89% yield instead of 4ad (Scheme 5b). In addition, when the stirring of 4ad occurred under the same catalyst system in THF for 4 h in a sealed tube at 90 °C, the conversion of 4ad to 3ad was observed in 87% yield (Scheme 5b). When the reaction between 2d with N-methyl-protected indole 1k for 12 h was conducted only in THF as a solvent, 3kd was isolated in 85% yield (Scheme 5c). These control experiments disclose that the N-alkylated product is probably the kinetically controlled product and the C-alkylated product is the thermodynamically controlled product. Furthermore, we also investigated whether our catalyst system would work on ortho-quinone methides (o-QMs), a reactive intermediate, to access the corresponding C- and N-alkylated products 10 and 11 (Scheme 5d). o-Hydroxybenzyl alcohol 9 was selected as a representative o-QM precursor to test In(OTf)3-catalyzed target reactions. Gratifyingly, the use of the reaction conditions for the C-alkylation provided product 10 with 89% yield. However, an unstable or not isolable product was observed when the N-alkylation conditions were employed. These reactions indicate that the C-alkylation conditions are more suitable for the generation and trapping of the o-quinone methide intermediate 12.

Scheme 5. Control Experiments.

Scheme 5

From the above experimental results, it can be seen that the solvent, Lewis acid, and temperature strongly affect the course of the reaction. Based on the results of the optimization and control experiments, together with the related reports,26,10a a plausible reaction mechanism for the N- and C-alkylation was proposed, as shown in Scheme 6a. Three pathways are possible via hydrogen bonding- and metal coordination-assisted catalyst (paths 1–3). With 1a and 2d as representative examples, this might involve initial activation of the substrates by In(OTf)3 to form 12-membered transition state A (TS1). We assume that less membered transition state A facilitates the N-nucleophilic attack of 1a to generate the zwitterionic intermediate B and form the C–N bond. Finally, intramolecular proton transfer from N–H and the regeneration of the In(OTf)3 catalyst affords the desired product 4ad (at room temperature in THF, path 1). In contrast, pathway 2 for the C–H functionalization involves a 15-membered transition state C (TS2) between catalyst, donor, and acceptor compounds leading to an increase in the nucleophilicity at the C6-position of the indole ring. Next, the Friedel–Crafts-type nucleophilic addition of 1a to 2d generates intermediate D. Eventually, proton transfer, catalyst regeneration, and isomerization occur to afford the desired product 3ad (at room temperature in toluene or in heating conditions, path 2). However, the steric crowding 4ad would be selectively activated by In(OTf)3 to yield the intermediate E, followed by C–N bond cleavage to form the intermediates F and G, which produces 3ad (under heating conditions or at room temperature in toluene, path c).

Scheme 6. Proposed Mechanism and Gibbs Free Energy Profile.

Scheme 6

To gain detailed insights into the above reaction mechanism, we performed a series of DFT computations using the Gaussian 16 program31 to explain the experimental results, particularly the interconversion between kinetic and thermodynamic products. The DFT method, hybrid functional B3LYP, was performed using model substrates bearing the bromine group (1a, 2d, 3ad, 4ad, intermediates, and transition states).3235 The energy diagram is depicted in Scheme 6b. We further computed their vibrational frequencies to characterize each stationary structure. In all computations, Ahlrichs’ def2-TZVP basis set was utilized.36 The solvation model based on density (SMD) was used to evaluate the effects of toluene (ε = 2.3741) and THF (ε = 7.4257) on the computed Gibbs energies.37 As depicted in Scheme 6b, first, the interaction of 2d and In(OTf)3 leads to complex H with a relative energy of −10.8 and −13.0 kcal mol–1 in toluene and THF, respectively. Subsequently, the nucleophilic attack by the indole 1a bifurcates into two paths which are N1- and C6-attacks. Our computations showed that N1-alkylation proceeds apparently barrierless. For the N1-alkylation, HB, the computed reaction-free energies are 23.2 and 22.7 kcal mol–1 with toluene and THF, respectively. For C6-alkylation, HD, while the computed reaction-free energies are 12.7 and 12.1 kcal mol–1, the activation-free energies are 19.3 and 20.0 kcal mol–1 with toluene and THF, respectively. The Gibbs free energies indicated that N1-alkylation in THF has lower energy by 0.5 kcal mol–1 compared to N1-alkylation in toluene. Additionally, we determined that the reaction barrier for C6-alkylation in toluene is lower in energy by 0.7 kcal mol–1 than C6-alkylation in THF. However, the N1-functionalized product 4ad is higher in energy compared to the C6-functionalized product 3ad by 7.6 and 8.2 kcal mol–1 in toluene and THF, respectively. The DFT results are rationally explained and supported our experimental observations that the C6-alkylation is more thermodynamically favorable, while the N1-alkylation is more kinetically favorable. Remote hydrogen bonding interactions between indole NH and catalyst lower the energy of the steps and promote the formation of the intermediates or transition states.

Conclusion

In summary, we have developed highly regiodivergent alkylation reactions of 2,3-disubstituted indoles with p-QMs via indium(III)-catalyst in different solvents. The reactions feature kinetic and thermodynamic control, mild conditions, a broad substrate scope, and good functional group tolerance, providing an efficient method for the synthesis of C6- and N1-alkylated indole derivatives. Essentially, the reaction parameters (such as catalyst, solvent, and temperature) are found to be crucial for achieving in receiving high regioselectivity. Experimental and DFT studies supported that the reactions proceed through kinetic and thermodynamic control. Furthermore, the synthetic utility of the current approach and the alkylation products were demonstrated by scaling up to gram-scale, removing the tert-butyl group, and aryl–aryl coupling. Moreover, the protocol was successful for the late-stage modification of indomethacin as a biorelevant motif.

Experimental Section

General Methods

Commercially available reagents and solvents were used without further purification. NMR spectra were recorded at 400 MHz (1H) and at 100 MHz (13C{1H}), respectively. Chemical shifts (δ) are given in parts per million (ppm). Coupling constants (J) are reported in hertz (Hz). Signal multiplicities are abbreviated as follows: singlet (s), doublet (d), triplet (t), quartet (q), doublet of doublets (dd), multiple (m), and broad (b). Structural assignments were made with additional information from NOE experiments. High-resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were recorded using a quadrupole time-of-flight (QTOF) spectrometry device. Column chromatography was carried out using silica gel (70–230 mesh).

Starting Materials

Substituted indoles (1am), 2-(hydroxy(phenyl)methyl)phenol (9), and para-quinone methides (2ax) were prepared following the reported procedures, respectively.10b,12d,38,39

General Procedure A: The Synthesis of C6-Alkylation Products

To a solution of indole (1am or indomethacin) (0.20 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and p-QM (2ax) (0.22 mmol, 1.1 equiv) in toluene (0.1 M) was added In(OTf)3 (10 mol %), and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 12 h. After the reaction was complete (monitored by TLC), the solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography using hexane/EtOAc solvent mixture as the eluent.

Large-Scale Synthesis of 3ad

To a solution of indole 2a (514 mg, 3.0 mmol) and p-QM (2ax) (1.23 g, 3.3 mmol) in toluene (0.1 M) was added In(OTf)3 (169 mg, 0.3 mmol, 10 mol %), and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 12 h. After the reaction was complete (monitored by TLC), the solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography using hexane/EtOAc (95:5) to give the compound 3ad (1.39 g, 85% yield).

(±)-2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-(phenyl(2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-carbazol-7-yl)methyl)phenol (3aa)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (95:5), orange solid (82 mg, 88% yield; mp 83–84 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.33 (bs, 1H), 7.25 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.17–7.12 (m, 2H), 7.09–7.02 (m, 3H), 6.88 (s, 2H), 6.83–6.77 (m, 2H), 5.46 (s, 1H), 4.97 (s, 1H), 2.62–2.51 (m, 4H), 1.81–1.72 (m, 4H), 1.27 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 152.0, 145.8, 138.2, 135.8, 135.4, 135.0, 134.0, 129.6, 128.0, 126.2, 126.0, 125.8, 121.4, 117.3, 111.3, 109.9, 57.1, 34.4, 30.4, 23.4, 23.30, 23.26, 21.0. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C33H40NO [M + H]+, 466.3104; found, 466.3086.

(±)-2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-((4-fluorophenyl)(2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-carbazol-7-yl)methyl)phenol (3ab)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (95:5), orange solid (80 mg, 83% yield; mp 92–93 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.54 (bs, 1H), 7.43 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.19–7.13 (m, 2H), 7.03–6.94 (m, 6H), 5.61 (s, 1H), 5.16 (s, 1H), 2.79–2.69 (m, 4H), 1.97–1.90 (m, 4H), 1.44 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 161.2 (d, J = 243.6 Hz), 152.1, 141.52 (d, J = 2.3 Hz), 138.0, 135.8, 135.5 (2C), 134.9, 134.1, 130.9 (d, J = 7.8 Hz), 126.1, 121.3, 117.4, 114.7 (d, J = 21.0 Hz), 111.2, 110.0, 56.3, 34.4, 30.4, 23.4, 23.30, 23.26, 21.0. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C33H39FNO [M + H]+, 484.3010; found, 484.3016.

(±)-2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-((4-chlorophenyl)(2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-carbazol-7-yl)methyl)phenol (3ac)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (95:5), orange solid (85 mg, 85% yield; mp 108–109 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.56 (bs, 1H), 7.39 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.26–7.21 (m, AA’ part of AA’BB’ system, 2H), 7.11–7.07 (m, BB’ part of AA’BB’ system, 2H), 6.98 (s, 2H), 6.93 (s, 1H), 6.91–6.87 (m, 1H), 5.55 (s, 1H), 5.13 (s, 1H), 2.75–2.69 (m, 4H), 1.91 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 4H), 1.40 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 152.1, 144.4, 137.6, 135.8, 135.5, 134.5, 134.1, 131.5, 130.9, 128.1, 126.13, 126.06, 121.2, 117.4, 111.2, 110.0, 56.4, 34.4, 30.4, 23.32, 23.28, 23.2, 21.0. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C33H39ClNO [M + H]+, 500.2715; found, 500.2715.

(±)-4-((4-Bromophenyl)(2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-carbazol-7-yl)methyl)-2,6-di-tert-butylphenol (3ad)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (95:5), orange solid (100 mg, 92% yield; mp 119–120 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.36 (bs, 1H), 7.27–7.22 (m, 3H), 6.91–6.88 (m, 2H), 6.84 (s, 2H), 6.79–6.73 (m, 2H), 5.39 (s, 1H), 4.98 (s, 1H), 2.60–2.51 (m, 4H), 1.78–1.72 (m, 4H), 1.26 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 152.2, 145.0, 137.5, 135.8, 135.6 (2C), 134.5, 134.2, 131.4, 131.1, 126.1, 121.2, 119.7, 117.5, 111.3, 110.0, 56.6, 34.4, 30.4, 23.4, 23.30, 23.27, 21.0. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C33H38BrNO [M ]+, 543.2131; found, 543.2126.

(±)-2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-((4-iodophenyl)(2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-carbazol-7-yl)methyl)phenol (3ae)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (95:5), orange solid (92 mg, 78% yield; mp 114–115 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.60–7.54 (m, 3H), 7.36 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 6.95 (s, 2H), 6.91–6.85 (m, 4H), 5.49 (s, 1H), 5.10 (s, 1H), 2.73–2.67 (m, 4H), 1.92–1.85 (m, 4H), 1.37 (s, 18H).13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 152.1, 145.6, 137.4, 137.0, 135.7, 135.5, 134.3, 134.1, 131.6, 126.1, 126.0, 121.2, 117.4, 111.2, 110.0, 91.1, 56.6, 34.4, 30.4, 23.3 (2C), 23.2, 21.0. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C33H39INO [M + H]+, 592.2071; found, 592.2061.

(±)-2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-((2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-carbazol-7-yl)(p-tolyl)methyl)phenol (3af)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (95:5), orange solid (82 mg, 85% yield; mp 108–109 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.52 (bs, 1H), 7.36 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.08–7.02 (m, 4H), 6.99 (s, 2H), 6.94 (s, 1H), 6.93–6.89 (m, 1H), 5.52 (s, 1H), 5.07 (s, 1H), 2.73–2.67 (m, 4H), 2.33 (s, 3H), 1.93–1.85 (m, 4H), 1.38 (s, 18H).13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 151.9, 142.7, 138.5, 135.8, 135.3 (2C), 135.1, 133.8, 129.4, 128.7, 126.1, 125.9, 121.4, 117.2, 111.2, 109.9, 56.7, 34.4, 30.4, 23.33, 23.28, 23.2, 21.03, 21.01. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C34H42NO [M + H]+, 480.3261; found, 480.3242.

(±)-2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-((4-(tert-butyl)phenyl)(2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-carbazol-7-yl)methyl)phenol (3ag)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (95:5), orange solid (91 mg, 87% yield; mp 119–120 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.29 (bs, 1H), 7.24 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.18–7.14 (m, AA’ part of AA’BB’ system, 2H), 6.98–6.94 (m, BB’ part of AA’BB’ system, 2H), 6.89 (s, 2H), 6.81 (t, J = 3.4 Hz, 2H), 5.41 (s, 1H), 4.95 (s, 1H), 2.61–2.53 (m, 4H), 1.80–1.73 (m, 4H), 1.27 (s, 18H), 1.20 (s, 9H).13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 151.9, 148.5, 142.6, 138.5, 135.8, 135.3, 135.2, 133.8, 129.1, 126.2, 125.9, 124.9, 121.4, 117.2, 111.3, 109.9, 56.7, 34.4 (2C), 31.5, 30.4, 23.4, 23.28, 23.26, 21.0. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C37H48NO [M + H]+, 522.3730; found, 522.3729.

(±)-2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-((4-methoxyphenyl)(2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-carbazol-7-yl)methyl)phenol (3ah)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (95:5), orange solid (85 mg, 86% yield; mp 104–105 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.54 (s, 1H), 7.37 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.09–7.05 (m, AA’ part of AA’BB’ system, 2H), 7.00 (s, 2H), 6.94 (s, 1H), 6.91 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 6.84–6.79 (m, BB’ part of AA’BB’ system, 2H), 5.53 (s, 1H), 5.08 (s, 1H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 2.74–2.67 (m, 4H), 1.90 (s, 4H), 1.39 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 157.6, 151.9, 138.6, 138.0, 135.8, 135.3 (2C), 133.9, 130.4, 126.1, 125.9, 121.3, 117.2, 113.4, 111.2, 109.9, 56.2, 55.2, 34.4, 30.4, 23.34, 23.29, 23.2, 21.0. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C34H42NO2 [M + H]+, 496.3210 found, 496.3213.

(±)-4-((3,5-Di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)(2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-carbazol-7-yl)methyl)benzoic Acid (3ai)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (95:5), orange solid (90 mg, 88% yield; mp 146–147 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.07–7.91 (m, 3H), 7.58 (s, 1H), 7.36 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.25–7.17 (m, 2H), 6.97–6.90 (m, 3H), 6.86 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 5.59 (s, 1H), 5.10 (s, 1H), 2.68 (s, 4H), 1.87 (s, 4H), 1.35 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 172.2, 152.4, 137.3, 136.0, 135.7, 134.4, 134.3, 130.6, 130.2, 129.8, 126.4, 126.3, 125.7, 121.4, 117.7, 111.4, 110.2, 57.3, 34.6, 30.6, 23.50, 23.49, 23.4, 21.2. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C34H40NO3 [M + H]+, 510.3003; found, 510.3006.

(±)-2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-((4-nitrophenyl)(2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-carbazol-7-yl)methyl)phenol (3aj)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (95:5), orange solid (85 mg, 83% yield; mp 103–104 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.16–8.10 (m, AA’ part of AA’BB’ system, 2H), 7.66 (s, 1H), 7.41 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.35–7.30 (m, BB’ part of AA’BB’ system, 2H), 6.97–6.94 (m, 3H), 6.87 (dd, J = 8.1, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 5.66 (s, 1H), 5.16 (s, 1H), 2.72 (t, J = 5.7 Hz, 4H), 1.95–1.86 (m, 4H), 1.39 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 153.8, 152.4, 146.2, 136.3, 135.8, 134.5, 133.5, 130.3, 126.5, 126.0, 123.3 (2C), 121.0, 117.7, 111.2, 110.1, 57.0, 34.4, 30.3, 23.3 (2C), 23.2, 21.0. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C33H39N2O3 [M + H]+, 511.2955; found, 511.2940.

(±)-2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-((2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-carbazol-7-yl)(4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)methyl)phenol (3ak)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (95:5), yellow solid (95 mg, 89% yield; mp 112–113 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.58 (bs, 1H), 7.52–7.49 (m, AA’ part of AA’BB’ system, 2H), 7.38 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.29–7.24 (m, BB’ part of AA’BB’ system, 2H), 6.95 (s, 2H), 6.92 (s, 1H), 6.87 (dd, J = 8.1, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 5.60 (s, 1H), 5.11 (s, 1H), 2.74–2.67 (m, 4H), 1.93–1.84 (m, 4H), 1.37 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 152.3, 150.0, 137.1, 135.8, 135.6, 134.3, 134.1, 129.8, 128.1 (q, J = 32.2 Hz), 126.3, 126.1, 124.9 (q, J = 4.2 Hz), 124.5 (q, J = 271.5 Hz), 121.2, 117.6, 111.3, 110.0, 56.9, 34.4, 30.4, 23.31, 23.28, 23.2, 21.0. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C34H39F3NO [M + H]+, 534.2978; found, 534.2951.

(±)-2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-((4-(diphenylamino)phenyl)(2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-carbazol-7-yl)methyl)phenol (3al)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (95:5), orange solid (101 mg, 80% yield; mp 115–116 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.36 (s, 1H), 7.26 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.12–7.07 (m, 4H), 6.97–6.92 (m, 6H), 6.90–6.82 (m, 8H), 5.42 (s, 1H), 4.96 (s, 1H), 2.61–2.53 (m, 4H), 1.80–1.72 (m, 4H), 1.28 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 152.0, 148.0, 145.5, 140.6, 138.3, 135.8, 135.32, 135.29, 134.0, 130.4, 129.2, 126.2, 126.1, 124.5, 123.7, 122.3, 121.4, 117.3, 111.3, 110.0, 56.5, 34.4, 30.4, 23.4, 23.33, 23.28, 21.1. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C45H49N2O [M + H]+, 633.3839; found, 633.3814.

(±)-4-((2-Bromophenyl)(2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-carbazol-7-yl)methyl)-2,6-di-tert-butylphenol (3am)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (95:5), yellow solid (90 mg, 83% yield; mp 102–103 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.59–7.55 (m, 1H), 7.51 (bs, 1H), 7.38 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.22–7.17 (m, 1H), 7.09–7.03 (m, 2H), 6.96 (s, 2H), 6.92 (s, 1H), 6.89 (dd, J = 8.1, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 5.98 (s, 1H), 5.11 (s, 1H), 2.74–2.68 (m, 4H), 1.93–1.86 (m, 4H), 1.39 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 152.1, 145.0, 136.7, 135.8, 135.3, 134.0, 133.6, 132.8, 131.5, 127.5, 127.0, 126.4, 126.1, 125.6, 121.4, 117.3, 111.5, 110.0, 56.1, 34.4, 30.4, 23.32, 23.29, 23.2, 21.0. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C33H38BrNO [M]+, 543.2131; found, 543.2139.

(±)-2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-((2-hydroxyphenyl)(2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-carbazol-7-yl)methyl)phenol (3an)(19)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (95:5), orange solid (82 mg, 85% yield; mp 123–124 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.45 (s, 1H), 7.29 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.08–6.97 (m, 2H), 6.91 (s, 2H), 6.87 (s, 1H), 6.83 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 6.75–6.71 (m, 3H), 5.53 (s, 1H), 5.02 (s, 1H), 2.61–2.53 (m, 4H), 1.81–1.72 (m, 4H), 1.27 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 154.0, 152.5, 136.0, 135.9, 135.6, 134.4, 132.9, 131.8, 130.4, 127.7, 126.6, 126.0, 120.9, 120.5, 117.9, 116.5, 111.0, 110.0, 51.9, 34.4, 30.4, 23.29, 23.26, 23.2, 21.0. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C33H40NO2 [M + H]+, 482.3054; found, 482.3031.

(±)-2-((3,5-Di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)(2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-carbazol-7-yl)methyl)phenyl Acetate (3ao)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (95:5), orange solid (86 mg, 82% yield; mp 153–154 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.61 (s, 1H), 7.41 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.29–7.24 (m, 1H), 7.15–7.08 (m, 2H), 6.98–6.91 (m, 5H), 5.70 (s, 1H), 5.12 (s, 1H), 2.76–2.68 (m, 4H), 1.95 (s, 3H), 1.94–1.84 (m, 4H), 1.40 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.9, 152.0, 148.7, 137.6, 136.4, 135.8, 135.4, 134.0, 133.8, 130.7, 126.9, 126.2, 125.9, 125.5, 122.7, 121.2, 117.4, 111.3, 109.9, 51.4, 34.3, 30.3, 23.32, 23.26, 23.2, 21.0, 20.6. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C35H42NO3 [M + H]+, 524.3159; found, 524.3160.

(±)-2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-((3-hydroxyphenyl)(2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-carbazol-7-yl)methyl)phenol (3ap)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (95:5), orange solid (87 mg, 90% yield; mp 139–140 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.42 (s, 1H), 7.39 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.13 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.02 (s, 2H), 6.95–6.90 (m, 2H), 6.75 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.68–6.63 (m, 1H), 6.55 (s, 1H), 5.52 (s, 1H), 5.12 (s, 1H), 2.75–2.63 (m, 4H), 1.94–1.86 (m, 4H), 1.41 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 155.4, 152.0, 147.7, 137.9, 135.8, 135.4, 134.8, 134.1, 129.1, 126.2, 126.0, 122.1, 121.4, 117.2, 116.6, 112.8, 111.4, 109.8, 56.9, 34.4, 30.4, 23.3, 23.2 (2C), 21.0. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C33H40NO2 [M + H]+, 482.3054; found, 482.3057.

(±)-2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-((3,5-dibromophenyl)(2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-carbazol-7-yl)methyl)phenol (3aq)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (95:5), orange solid (108 mg, 87% yield; mp 115–116 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.62 (s, 1H), 7.55 (t, J = 1.7 Hz, 1H), 7.43 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.30 (d, J = 1.7 Hz, 2H), 6.98 (s, 2H), 6.95 (s, 1H), 6.90 (dd, J = 8.1, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 5.52 (s, 1H), 5.18 (s, 1H), 2.78–2.71 (m, 4H), 1.98–1.89 (m, 4H), 1.43 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 152.4, 149.9, 136.4, 135.8, 135.7, 134.4, 133.4, 131.6, 131.3, 126.4, 126.0, 122.6, 121.1, 117.7, 111.2, 110.1, 56.6, 34.4, 30.4, 23.3 (2C), 23.2, 21.0. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C33H37Br2NO [M]+, 621.1236; found, 621.1242.

(±)-2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-((2,5-dimethoxyphenyl)(2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-carbazol-7-yl)methyl)phenol (3ar)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (95:5), orange solid (95 mg, 90% yield; mp 108–109 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.49 (s, 1H), 7.34 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.99 (s, 2H), 6.93 (s, 1H), 6.90 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.81 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 6.72 (dd, J = 8.8, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 6.62–6.57 (m, 1H), 5.93 (s, 1H), 5.06 (s, 1H), 3.67 (s, 3H), 3.64 (s, 3H), 2.73–2.65 (m, 4H), 1.92–1.85 (m, 4H), 1.38 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 153.4, 151.8, 151.7, 137.8, 135.9, 135.8, 135.1, 134.7, 133.6, 126.2, 125.9, 121.3, 117.2, 117.1, 112.0, 111.1, 111.0, 109.8, 56.6, 55.6, 49.7, 34.3, 30.4, 23.4, 23.2 (2C), 21.0. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C35H44NO3 [M + H]+, 526.3316; found, 526.3300.

(±)-2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-(naphthalen-2-yl(2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-carbazol-7-yl)methyl)phenol (3as)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (95:5), orange solid (77 mg, 75% yield; mp 113–114 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.83–7.79 (m, 1H), 7.75–7.70 (m, 2H), 7.54 (s, 1H), 7.51 (s, 1H), 7.45–7.41 (m, 2H), 7.40–7.33 (m, 2H), 7.06 (s, 2H), 6.99–6.94 (m, 2H), 5.73 (s, 1H), 5.11 (s, 1H), 2.73–2.67 (m, 4H), 1.94–1.86 (m, 4H), 1.38 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 152.0, 143.4, 137.9, 135.8, 135.4, 134.7, 134.0, 133.4, 132.0, 128.5, 127.9, 127.6, 127.5, 127.4, 126.3, 126.0, 125.7, 125.3, 121.5, 117.3, 111.4, 110.0, 57.2, 34.4, 30.4, 23.33, 23.29, 23.2, 21.0. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C37H42NO [M + H]+, 516.3261; found, 516.3260.

(±)-2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-(pyren-1-yl(2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-carbazol-7-yl)methyl)phenol (3au)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (95:5), orange solid (97 mg, 82% yield; mp 153–154 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.40 (d, J = 9.4 Hz, 1H), 8.18–8.07 (m, 3H), 8.04 (s, 2H), 8.01–7.95 (m, 2H), 7.66 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.40 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.33 (s, 1H), 7.10 (s, 2H), 7.03–6.98 (m, 1H), 6.89 (s, 1H), 6.67 (s, 1H), 5.14 (s, 1H), 2.74–2.67 (m, 2H), 2.64–2.56 (m, 2H), 1.89–1.82 (m, 4H), 1.39 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 152.1, 139.8, 138.3, 135.9, 135.5, 135.1, 133.9, 131.4, 130.8, 129.8, 129.1, 127.9, 127.6, 127.3, 126.8, 126.6, 126.0, 125.8, 125.1, 124.9 (2C), 124.8, 124.5, 124.2, 121.6, 117.4, 111.6, 109.9, 53.5, 34.4, 30.4, 23.3, 23.21, 23.18, 21.0. HRMS (APCI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C43H43NO [M]+, 591.3496; found, 591.3462.

(±)-4,4′-(1,4-Phenylenebis((2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-carbazol-7-yl)methylene))bis(2,6-di-tert-butylphenol) (3av)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (95:5), orange solid (142 mg, 83% yield; mp 179–180 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.50–7.44 (m, 2H), 7.38–7.33 (m, 2H), 7.07–7.03 (m, 4H), 7.00 (s, 4H), 6.95–6.89 (m, 4H), 5.54 (s, 2H), 5.09–5.05 (m, 2H), 2.74–2.66 (m, 8H), 1.92–1.84 (m, 8H), 1.39 (s, 36H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 151.9, 143.01, 142.95, 138.42, 138.40, 135.8, 135.3, 135.25, 135.21, 133.8, 129.1, 126.2, 125.9, 121.4, 117.1, 111.3, 109.9, 56.7, 34.4, 30.4, 23.34, 23.27, 23.2, 21.0 (Due to a mixture of diastereomer, all 13C{1H} NMR signals could not be resolved). HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C60H73N2O2 [M + H]+, 853.5667; found, 853.5642.

(±)-2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-((2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-carbazol-7-yl)(1-tosyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methyl)phenol (3ax)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (95:5), orange solid (112 mg, 85% yield; mp 140–141 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.06 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.78–7.72 (m, AA’ part of AA’BB’ system, 2H), 7.55 (s, 1H), 7.41 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.32–7.23 (m, 3H), 7.16 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.10–7.01 (m, 5H), 6.97 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 5.58 (s, 1H), 5.16 (s, 1H), 2.79–2.68 (m, 4H), 2.40 (s, 3H), 1.93 (d, J = 4.5 Hz, 4H), 1.41 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 152.2, 144.6, 135.9 (2C), 135.7, 135.5, 135.3, 134.1, 133.5, 131.0, 129.8, 128.9, 126.8, 126.4, 125.6, 125.4, 124.5, 123.1, 121.0, 120.7, 117.5, 113.8, 110.7, 109.9, 48.7, 34.4, 30.4, 23.33, 23.27, 23.2, 21.6, 21.0. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C42H47N2O3S [M + H]+, 659.3302; found, 659.3300.

(±)-4-((4-Bromophenyl)(1,2,3,4-tetrahydrocyclopenta[b]indol-6-yl)methyl)-2,6-di-tert-butylphenol (3bd)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (95:5), orange solid (451 mg, 85% yield; mp 102–103 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.70 (s, 1H), 7.41–7.34 (m, 3H), 7.06–7.00 (m, 2H), 6.97–6.93 (m, 3H), 6.89–6.86 (m, 1H), 5.51 (s, 1H), 5.11 (s, 1H), 2.86–2.80 (m, 4H), 2.57–2.49 (m, 2H), 1.38 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 152.1, 144.9, 143.7, 141.2, 137.0, 135.5, 134.4, 131.3, 131.0, 126.0, 123.1, 121.6, 119.7, 119.6, 118.1, 112.1, 56.4, 34.4, 30.4, 28.7, 25.9, 24.5. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C32H36BrNO [M]+, 529.1959; found, 529.1979.

(±)-4-((4-Bromophenyl)(5,6,7,8,9,10-hexahydrocyclohepta[b]indol-3-yl)methyl)-2,6-di-tert-butylphenol (3cd)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (95:5), orange solid (97 mg, 87% yield; mp 111–112 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.58 (bs, 1H), 7.41–7.35 (m, 3H), 7.05–7.00 (m, 2H), 6.96 (s, 2H), 6.91–6.86 (m, 2H), 5.51 (s, 1H), 5.11 (s, 1H), 2.83–2.78 (m, 4H), 1.92–1.87 (m, 2H), 1.81–1.75 (m, 4H), 1.38 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 152.1, 144.9, 137.4, 137.1, 135.4, 134.34, 134.27, 131.3, 131.0, 127.6, 126.0, 121.1, 119.6, 117.4, 113.6, 111.0, 56.4, 34.4, 31.8, 30.4, 29.6, 28.7, 27.5, 24.8. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C34H41BrNO [M + H]+, 558.2366; found, 558.2341.

(±)-4-((4-Bromophenyl)(6,7,8,9,10,11-hexahydro-5H-cycloocta[b]indol-3-yl)methyl)-2,6-di-tert-butylphenol (3dd)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (95:5), yellow solid (92 mg, 80% yield; mp 106–107 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.58 (s, 1H), 7.43–7.37 (m, 3H), 7.08–7.04 (m, 2H), 6.98 (s, 2H), 6.92–6.88 (m, 2H), 5.52 (s, 1H), 5.13 (s, 1H), 2.90–2.80 (m, 4H), 1.78–1.72 (m, 4H), 1.50–1.45 (m, 4H), 1.40 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 152.1, 145.0, 137.0, 135.5, 135.4, 135.1, 134.3, 131.3, 131.0, 127.0, 126.0, 121.0, 119.6, 117.3, 111.5, 111.0, 56.5, 34.4, 34.3, 30.4, 29.5, 29.4, 26.1, 25.9, 22.3. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C35H42BrNO [M]+, 571.2444; found, 571.2451.

(±)-4-((4-Bromophenyl)(2,3-dimethyl-1H-indol-6-yl)methyl)-2,6-di-tert-butylphenol (3ed)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (95:5), yellow solid (91 mg, 88% yield; mp 119–120 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.58 (s, 1H), 7.40–7.35 (m, 3H), 7.04–7.00 (m, 2H), 6.95 (s, 2H), 6.90–6.86 (m, 2H), 5.51 (s, 1H), 5.11 (s, 1H), 2.33 (s, 3H), 2.22 (s, 3H), 1.38 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 151.0, 143.8, 136.3, 134.3, 134.1, 133.2, 130.2, 130.0, 129.5, 126.6, 125.0, 120.0, 118.6, 116.6, 109.8, 105.8, 55.3, 33.3, 29.3, 10.5, 7.4. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C31H36BrNO [M]+, 517.1975; found, 517.1978.

(±)-4-((4-Bromophenyl)(2-ethyl-3-methyl-1H-indol-6-yl)methyl)-2,6-di-tert-butylphenol (3fd)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (95:5), white solid (89 mg, 84% yield; mp 93–94 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.62 (bs, 1H), 7.42–7.35 (m, 3H), 7.05–7.00 (m, 2H), 6.95 (s, 2H), 6.91–6.86 (m, 2H), 5.51 (s, 1H), 5.10 (s, 1H), 2.74 (q, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 2.23 (s, 3H), 1.38 (s, 18H), 1.26 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H).13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 152.1, 144.9, 137.4, 136.4, 135.5, 135.2, 134.3, 131.3, 131.0, 127.8, 126.0, 121.1, 119.6, 117.7, 111.0, 106.0, 56.5, 34.4, 30.4, 19.4, 14.0, 8.4. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C32H39BrNO [M + H]+, 532.2210; found, 532.2197.

(±)-4-((4-Bromophenyl)(3-ethyl-2-phenyl-1H-indol-6-yl)methyl)-2,6-di-tert-butylphenol (3gd)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (95:5), light yellow solid (102 mg, 86% yield; mp 99–100 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.88 (s, 1H), 7.57–7.51 (m, 3H), 7.48–7.43 (m, 2H), 7.41–7.32 (m, 3H), 7.07–7.02 (m, 2H), 7.00–6.91 (m, 4H), 5.53 (s, 1H), 5.10 (s, 1H), 2.90 (q, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.38 (s, 18H), 1.34 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 152.2, 144.6, 138.8, 136.1, 135.6, 134.1, 133.7, 133.4, 131.3, 131.1, 128.8, 127.7, 127.42, 127.38, 126.0, 121.6, 119.7, 118.9, 115.3, 111.4, 56.5, 34.4, 30.4, 17.9, 15.6. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C37H41BrNO [M + H]+, 594.2366; found, 594.2361.

(±)-4-((4-Bromophenyl)(6-methyl-2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-carbazol-7-yl)methyl)-2,6-di-tert-butylphenol (3hd)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (95:5), white solid (97 mg, 87% yield; mp 131–132 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.48 (bs, 1H), 7.38–7.32 (m, 2H), 7.24 (s, 1H), 6.97–6.93 (m, 2H), 6.85 (s, 2H), 6.64 (s, 1H), 5.60 (s, 1H), 5.09 (s, 1H), 2.71–2.66 (m, 4H), 2.26 (s, 3H), 1.92–1.83 (m, 4H), 1.36 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 152.0, 144.0, 136.4, 135.4, 134.3, 134.2, 134.0, 131.4, 131.0, 127.5, 126.3, 126.2, 119.5, 118.8, 111.6, 109.5, 53.3, 34.3, 30.4, 23.34, 23.27, 23.2, 21.0, 20.3. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C34H41BrNO [M + H]+, 558.2366; found, 558.2367.

(±)-4-((4-Bromophenyl)(6-methoxy-2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-carbazol-7-yl)methyl)-2,6-di-tert-butylphenol (3id)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (95:5), yellow solid (95 mg, 83% yield; mp 129–130 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.48 (bs, 1H), 7.35–7.30 (m, 2H), 7.00–6.96 (m, 2H), 6.93–6.88 (m, 3H), 6.66 (s, 1H), 5.83 (s, 1H), 5.08 (s, 1H), 3.71 (s, 3H), 2.72–2.66 (m, 4H), 1.94–1.86 (m, 4H), 1.37 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 152.0, 151.9, 144.7, 135.3, 134.5, 134.3, 131.1, 130.8, 130.2, 128.3, 126.32, 126.29, 119.2, 112.1, 109.8, 99.5, 56.4, 49.8, 34.4, 30.4, 23.4 (2C), 23.2, 21.1. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C34H41BrNO2 [M + H]+, 574.2315; found, 574.2325.

(±)-4-((4-Bromophenyl)(6-chloro-2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-carbazol-7-yl)methyl)-2,6-di-tert-butylphenol (3jd)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (95:5), white solid (85 mg, 73% yield; mp 231–232 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.59 (bs, 1H), 7.46 (s, 1H), 7.38–7.34 (m, 2H), 6.98–6.94 (m, 2H), 6.87 (s, 2H), 6.74 (s, 1H), 5.89 (s, 1H), 5.11 (s, 1H), 2.71–2.63 (m, 4H), 1.92–1.84 (m, 4H), 1.36 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 152.2, 143.3, 135.6, 135.5, 134.5, 134.2, 133.5, 131.2, 131.0, 127.4, 126.3, 125.7, 119.7, 118.3, 112.7, 109.8, 53.2, 34.4, 30.4, 23.2, 23.1, 23.0, 20.8. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C33H38BrClNO [M + H]+, 578.1820; found, 578.1802.

(±)-4-((4-Bromophenyl)(9-methyl-2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-carbazol-7-yl)methyl)-2,6-di-tert-butylphenol (3kd)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (95:5), yellow solid (96 mg, 86% yield; mp 78–79 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.39–7.35 (m, 3H), 7.04–7.01 (m, 2H), 6.98–6.96 (m, 3H), 6.86–6.82 (m, 1H), 5.53 (s, 1H), 5.10 (s, 1H), 3.53 (s, 3H), 2.74–2.68 (m, 4H), 1.96–1.84 (m, 4H), 1.38 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 152.1, 145.1, 136.8, 135.8, 135.4, 134.4, 131.2 (2C), 131.0, 126.0, 125.5, 120.6, 119.6, 117.4, 109.3, 109.0, 56.7, 34.4, 30.4, 28.9, 23.2 (2C), 22.1, 21.1. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C34H41BrNO [M + H]+, 558.2366; found, 558.2370.

(±)-4-((9-Benzyl-2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-carbazol-7-yl)(4-bromophenyl)methyl)-2,6-di-tert-butylphenol (3ld)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (95:5), orange solid (94 mg, 74% yield; mp 183–184 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.44 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.39–7.34 (m, 2H), 7.30–7.24 (m, 3H), 7.01–6.95 (m, 4H), 6.94–6.88 (m, 4H), 5.50 (s, 1H), 5.22–5.11 (m, 2H), 5.10 (s, 1H), 2.81–2.75 (m, 2H), 2.69–2.61 (m, 2H), 1.96–1.86 (m, 4H), 1.36 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 152.0, 145.0, 138.2, 137.2, 136.7, 135.7, 135.4, 134.3, 131.2, 131.0, 128.7, 127.2, 126.2, 126.0, 125.8, 121.0, 119.6, 117.5, 109.8, 109.7, 56.6, 46.2, 34.3, 30.3, 23.3, 23.2, 22.2, 21.2. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C40H45BrNO [M + H]+, 634.2679; found, 634.2651.

General Procedure B: The Synthesis of N1-Alkylation Products

To a solution of indole (1am) (0.30 mmol, 1.5 equiv) and p-QM (2av) (0.20 mmol, 1.0 equiv) in THF (0.1 M) was added In(OTf)3 (10 mol %), and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 12 h. After the reaction was complete (monitored by TLC), the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved in DCM (10 mL) and the organic phase was washed with water (3 × 10 mL). The aqueous phase was extracted three times with DCM (10 mL). The organic phases were combined, dried over Na2SO4, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatography using hexane/EtOAc solvent mixture as the eluent.

(±)-2,6-Di-tert-Butyl-4-(phenyl(1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-9H-carbazol-9-yl)methyl)phenol (4aa)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (98:2), yellow solid (80 mg, 86% yield; mp 81–82 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.51 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.35–7.28 (m, 3H), 7.18–7.13 (m, 2H), 7.06 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.00 (s, 2H), 6.98–6.95 (m, 1H), 6.91 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.85 (s, 1H), 5.24 (s, 1H), 2.83–2.77 (m, 2H), 2.51–2.45 (m, 2H), 1.90–1.83 (m, 4H), 1.39–1.36 (m, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 153.1, 140.9, 136.7, 136.4, 135.7, 129.9, 128.3, 128.2, 128.0, 127.2, 125.4, 120.4, 118.5, 117.5, 111.2, 110.4, 62.2, 34.4, 30.3, 23.9, 23.7, 23.1, 21.3. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C33H40NO [M + H]+, 466.3104; found, 466.3075.

(±)-2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-((4-fluorophenyl)(1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-9H-carbazol-9-yl)methyl)phenol (4ab)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (98:2), yellow solid (79 mg, 82% yield; mp 76–77 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.48 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.10–6.93 (m, 8H), 6.85 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 6.78 (s, 1H), 5.22 (s, 1H), 2.79–2.75 (m, 2H), 2.47–2.43 (m, 2H), 1.87–1.82 (m, 4H), 1.35 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 161.9 (d, J = 245.9 Hz), 153.2, 136.7 (d, J = 3.2 Hz), 136.6, 136.2, 135.8, 129.8 (d, J = 8.1 Hz), 129.6, 128.0, 125.3, 120.4, 118.6, 117.5, 115.2 (d, J = 21.4 Hz), 111.1, 110.6, 61.5, 34.4, 30.3, 23.9, 23.6, 23.0, 21.2. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C33H39FNO [M + H]+, 484.3010; found, 484.2987.

(±)-2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-((4-chlorophenyl)(1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-9H-carbazol-9-yl)methyl)phenol (4ac)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (98:2), yellow solid (84 mg, 84% yield; mp 92–93 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.48 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.29–7.24 (m, 2H), 7.06–7.01 (m, 3H), 6.98–6.93 (m, 3H), 6.86 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.76 (s, 1H), 5.23 (s, 1H), 2.81–2.74 (m, 2H), 2.48–2.41 (m, 2H), 1.87–1.79 (m, 4H), 1.35 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 153.2, 139.5, 136.6, 136.1, 135.9, 133.0, 129.6, 129.3, 128.5, 128.1, 125.3, 120.5, 118.7, 117.6, 111.1, 110.7, 61.6, 34.4, 30.3, 23.9, 23.7, 23.0, 21.2. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C33H38ClNO [M]+, 499.2636; found, 499.2613

(±)-2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-((4-chlorophenyl)(1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-9H-carbazol-9-yl)methyl)phenol (4ad)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (98:2), yellow solid (98 mg, 90% yield; mp 93–94 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.48 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.29–7.24 (m, 2H), 7.06–7.01 (m, 3H), 6.98–6.93 (m, 3H), 6.86 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.76 (s, 1H), 5.23 (s, 1H), 2.81–2.74 (m, 2H), 2.48–2.41 (m, 2H), 1.87–1.79 (m, 4H), 1.35 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 153.2, 139.5, 136.6, 136.1, 135.9, 133.0, 129.6, 129.3, 128.5, 128.1, 125.3, 120.5, 118.7, 117.6, 111.1, 110.7, 61.6, 34.4, 30.3, 23.9, 23.7, 23.0, 21.2. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C33H39BrNO [M + H]+, 544.2210; found, 544.2226.

(±)-2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-((1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-9H-carbazol-9-yl)(p-tolyl)methyl)phenol (4af)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (98:2), yellow solid (85 mg, 89% yield; mp 94–95 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.51 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.15–7.11 (m, AA’ part of AA’BB’ system, 2H), 7.07–7.03 (m, 3H), 7.00 (s, 2H), 6.98–6.92 (m, 2H), 6.82 (s, 1H), 5.22 (s, 1H), 2.84–2.78 (m, 2H), 2.55–2.46 (m, 2H), 2.37 (s, 3H), 1.87 (s, 4H), 1.38 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 153.0, 137.8, 136.8, 136.7, 136.4, 135.7, 130.0, 129.0, 128.2, 128.0, 125.3, 120.3, 118.4, 117.4, 111.2, 110.3, 61.9, 34.4, 30.3, 23.9, 23.7, 23.1, 21.3, 21.2. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C34H42NO [M + H]+, 480.3261; found, 480.3231.

(±)-2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-((4-(tert-butyl)phenyl)(1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-9H-carbazol-9-yl)methyl)phenol (4ag)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (98:2), yellow solid (89 mg, 85% yield; mp 93–94 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.48 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.34–7.28 (m, AA’ part of AA’BB’ system, 2H), 7.06–7.00 (m, 3H), 6.97–6.89 (m, 4H), 6.78 (s, 1H), 5.19 (s, 1H), 2.81–2.75 (m, 2H), 2.52–2.40 (m, 2H), 1.88–1.80 (m, 4H), 1.34 (s, 18H), 1.32 (s, 9H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 153.0, 150.1, 137.8, 136.7, 136.4, 135.6, 130.1, 128.0, 127.9, 125.3, 125.1, 120.2, 118.4, 117.4, 111.3, 110.2, 61.8, 34.5, 34.3, 31.4, 30.3, 23.8, 23.7, 23.1, 21.3. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C37H47NO [M]+, 521.3652; found, 521.3632.

(±)-2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-((4-methoxyphenyl)(1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-9H-carbazol-9-yl)methyl)phenol (4ah)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (98:2), yellow solid (83 mg, 84% yield; mp 84–85 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.48 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.06–7.01 (m, 3H), 6.97–6.89 (m, 4H), 6.86–6.81 (m, 2H), 6.78 (s, 1H), 5.20 (s, 1H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 2.80–2.74 (m, 2H), 2.53–2.40 (m, 2H), 1.88–1.80 (m, 4H), 1.35 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 158.6, 153.0, 136.7, 136.3, 135.7, 133.0, 130.1, 129.4, 128.0, 125.2, 120.3, 118.4, 117.4, 113.6, 111.2, 110.3, 61.6, 55.2, 34.3, 30.3, 23.9, 23.7, 23.1, 21.3. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C34H42NO2 [M + H]+, 496.3210; found, 496.3193.

(±)-2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-((4-nitrophenyl)(1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-9H-carbazol-9-yl)methyl)phenol (4aj)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (98:2), yellow solid (73 mg, 71% yield; mp 90–91 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.18–8.13 (m, 2H), 7.49 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.29–7.25 (m, 2H), 7.07–7.03 (m, 1H), 6.98–6.93 (m, 3H), 6.84 (s, 1H), 6.80 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 5.28 (s, 1H), 2.79–2.75 (m, 2H), 2.48–2.41 (m, 2H), 1.88–1.82 (m, 4H), 1.35 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 153.6, 148.5, 147.1, 136.4, 136.2, 135.9, 129.0, 128.4, 128.2, 125.4, 123.6, 120.8, 119.0, 117.8, 111.2, 110.9, 61.8, 34.4, 30.2, 23.8, 23.6, 22.9, 21.2. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C33H39N2O3 [M + H]+, 511.2955; found, 511.2947.

(±)-2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-((1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-9H-carbazol-9-yl)(4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)methyl)phenol (4ak)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (98:2), yellow solid (86 mg, 81% yield; mp 86–87 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.47–7.41 (m, AA’ part of AA’BB’ system, 2H), 7.38 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.14–7.08 (m, BB’ part of AA’BB’ system, 2H), 6.93 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 6.88–6.82 (m, 3H), 6.76–6.71 (m, 2H), 5.14 (s, 1H), 2.70–2.64 (m, 2H), 2.36–2.30 (m, 2H), 1.77–1.70 (m, 4H), 1.24 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 153.4, 145.1, 136.6, 136.1, 136.0, 129.5 (q, J = 32.5 Hz), 129.0, 128.5, 128.1, 125.4, 125.3 (q, J = 3.3 Hz), 124.2 (q, J = 272.0 Hz), 120.6, 118.8, 117.7, 111.0, 110.9, 61.8, 34.4, 30.2, 23.9, 23.6, 23.0, 21.2. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C34H39F3NO [M + H]+, 534.2978; found, 534.2973.

(±)-2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-((4-(diphenylamino)phenyl)(1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-9H-carbazol-9-yl)methyl)phenol (4al)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (98:2), yellow solid (80 mg, 63% yield; mp 75–76 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.46 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.25–7.20 (m, 4H), 7.06 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 4H), 7.01–6.95 (m, 8H), 6.93 (s, 2H), 6.89 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.75 (s, 1H), 5.17 (s, 1H), 2.79–2.72 (m, 2H), 2.48–2.42 (m, 2H), 1.87–1.80 (m, 4H), 1.33 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 153.2, 147.9, 147.0, 136.9, 136.5, 135.8, 135.3, 130.3, 129.4, 129.2, 128.2, 125.4, 124.3, 124.0, 122.9, 120.5, 118.6, 117.6, 111.4, 110.5, 61.9, 34.6, 30.5, 24.1, 23.9, 23.3, 21.4. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C45H49N2O [M + H]+, 633.3839; found, 633.3844.

(±)-4-((2-Bromophenyl)(1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-9H-carbazol-9-yl)methyl)-2,6-di-tert-butylphenol (4am)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (98:2), yellow solid (82 mg, 75% yield; mp 82–83 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.60 (dd, J = 7.6, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.47 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.22–7.13 (m, 2H), 7.02 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 6.96 (s, 1H), 6.93–6.86 (m, 2H), 6.81 (s, 2H), 6.69 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 5.22 (s, 1H), 2.79–2.74 (m, 2H), 2.48–2.41 (m, 1H), 2.32–2.25 (m, 1H), 1.85–1.77 (m, 4H), 1.34–1.32 (m, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 153.2, 140.3, 137.0, 136.6, 135.8, 133.0, 130.1, 129.0, 128.6, 128.0, 127.6, 125.3, 124.3, 120.5, 118.5, 117.4, 111.0, 110.6, 62.6, 34.3, 30.3, 23.72, 23.68, 23.0, 21.3. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C33H39BrNO [M + H]+, 544.2210; found, 544.2184.

(±)-2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-((2-hydroxyphenyl)(1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-9H-carbazol-9-yl)methyl)phenol (4an)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (98:2), yellow solid (87 mg, 90% yield; mp 83–84 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.48 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.10–6.93 (m, 8H), 6.85 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.78 (s, 1H), 5.21 (s, 1H), 2.76 (s, 2H), 2.44 (s, 2H), 1.88–1.80 (m, 4H), 1.34 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 153.2, 136.69, 136.66, 136.6, 136.2, 135.8, 129.9, 129.8, 129.6, 128.0, 125.2, 120.4, 118.6, 117.5, 115.3, 115.1, 111.1, 110.6, 61.5, 34.4, 30.2, 23.9, 23.6, 23.0, 21.2. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C33H40NO2 [M + H]+, 482.3054; found, 482.3051.

(±)-2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-((3-hydroxyphenyl)(1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-9H-carbazol-9-yl)methyl)phenol (4ap)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (98:2), yellow solid (81 mg, 84% yield; mp 98–99 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.46 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.16 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.01 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 6.97–6.90 (m, 3H), 6.85 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.71 (d, J = 9.9 Hz, 3H), 6.50 (s, 1H), 5.19 (s, 1H), 4.76 (s, 1H), 2.78–2.72 (m, 2H), 2.48–2.42 (m, 2H), 1.86–1.78 (m, 4H), 1.33 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 155.6, 153.1, 142.8, 136.6, 136.3, 135.7, 129.6, 129.5, 128.0, 125.4, 120.8, 120.4, 118.5, 117.4, 115.0, 114.2, 111.2, 110.4, 61.9, 34.3, 30.3, 23.8, 23.6, 23.0, 21.2. HRMS (APCI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C33H40NO2 [M + H]+, 482.3054; found, 482.3045.

(±)-2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-((3,5-dibromophenyl)(1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-9H-carbazol-9-yl)methyl)phenol (4aq)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (98:2), yellow solid (102 mg, 82% yield; mp 96–97 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.68–7.59 (m, 1H), 7.50 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.26–7.23 (m, 2H), 7.08–6.97 (m, 2H), 6.91–6.87 (m, 3H), 6.73 (s, 1H), 5.25 (s, 1H), 2.81–2.74 (m, 2H), 2.47–2.39 (m, 2H), 1.90–1.82 (m, 4H), 1.35 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 153.4, 145.1, 136.5, 136.0, 135.8, 133.1, 130.1, 128.22, 128.15, 125.2, 123.0, 120.8, 118.9, 117.8, 111.2, 110.8, 61.2, 34.4, 30.2, 23.9, 23.6, 23.0, 21.2. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C33H37Br2NO [M]+, 621.1236; found, 621.1220.

(±)-2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-(naphthalen-2-yl(1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-9H-carbazol-9-yl)methyl)phenol (4as)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (98:2), yellow solid (76 mg, 74% yield; mp 101–102 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.87–7.82 (m, 1H), 7.78 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 7.76–7.71 (m, 1H), 7.54–7.44 (m, 4H), 7.33 (dd, J = 8.6, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.07–7.02 (m, 3H), 7.00–6.93 (m, 3H), 5.24 (s, 1H), 2.84–2.77 (m, 2H), 2.56–2.41 (m, 2H), 1.88–1.81 (m, 4H), 1.36 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 153.2, 138.5, 136.8, 136.4, 135.8, 133.2, 132.7, 129.6, 128.2, 128.05, 128.01, 127.6, 126.9, 126.6, 126.1, 126.0, 125.4, 120.4, 118.6, 117.5, 111.1, 110.5, 62.3, 34.4, 30.3, 24.0, 23.7, 23.0, 21.3. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C37H42NO [M + H]+, 516.3261; found, 516.3244.

(±)-2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-(pyren-1-yl(1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-9H-carbazol-9-yl)methyl)phenol (4au)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (98:2), orange solid (94 mg, 80% yield; mp 135–136 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.20 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 8.16 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 8.11–7.98 (m, 6H), 7.75 (s, 1H), 7.50 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.46 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.06–7.01 (m, 1H), 6.98–6.87 (m, 4H), 5.21 (s, 1H), 2.79–2.73 (m, 2H), 2.31–2.23 (m, 1H), 2.12–2.05 (m, 1H), 1.76–1.66 (m, 4H), 1.28 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 153.2, 137.2, 136.7, 135.9, 134.3, 131.4, 130.9, 130.7, 130.3, 129.1, 128.2, 128.0, 127.5, 127.4, 126.6, 126.0, 125.5, 125.4, 125.3, 124.82, 124.75, 124.73, 123.1, 120.7, 118.6, 117.5, 110.8, 110.6, 60.5, 34.4, 30.3, 24.2, 23.7, 22.9, 21.3. HRMS (APCI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C43H45NO [M]+, 591.3496; found, 591.3484.

(±)-4,4′-(1,4-Phenylenebis((1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-9H-carbazol-9-yl)methylene))bis(2,6-di-tert-butylphenol) (4av)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (98:2), yellow solid (146 mg, 82% yield; mp 76–77 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.52–7.46 (m, 2H), 7.09–7.02 (m, 6H), 6.99–6.93 (m, 6H), 6.91–6.87 (m, 2H), 6.81 (s, 2H), 5.22 (s, 1H), 5.20 (s, 1H), 2.81–2.75 (m, 4H), 2.49–2.43 (m, 4H), 1.88–1.81 (m, 8H), 1.37 (s, 18H), 1.35 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 153.1, 140.0, 136.7, 136.30, 136.28, 135.73, 129.70, 129.7, 128.2, 128.0, 125.4, 125.3, 120.38, 120.35, 118.5, 117.5, 111.2, 111.1, 110.44, 110.40, 62.0, 61.9, 34.4, 30.3, 24.0, 23.7, 23.1, 23.0, 21.3 (Due to a mixture of diastereomer, all 13C{1H} NMR signals could not be resolved). HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C60H73N2O2 [M + H]+, 853.5667; found, 853.5646.

(±)-4-((4-Bromophenyl)(2,3-dihydrocyclopenta[b]indol-4(1H)-yl)methyl)-2,6-di-tert-butylphenol (4bd)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (98:2), yellow solid (85 mg, 80% yield; mp 96–97 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.49–7.41 (m, 3H), 7.24–7.19 (m, 1H), 6.97–6.92, 7.11–7.04 (m, 2H), (m, 4H), 6.75 (s, 1H), 5.26 (s, 1H), 2.80 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 2.39–2.30 (m, 2H), 2.24–2.16 (m, 1H), 2.03–1.95 (m, 1H), 1.37 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 153.5, 145.7, 141.4, 140.1, 135.9, 131.5, 129.7, 129.5, 125.8, 124.6, 121.3, 120.2, 119.5, 119.3, 118.4, 110.4, 62.5, 34.4, 30.3, 28.7, 27.3, 24.0. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C32H36BrNO [M]+, 529.1975; found, 529.1953.

(±)-4-((4-Bromophenyl)(7,8,9,10-tetrahydrocyclohepta[b]indol-5(6H)-yl)methyl)-2,6-di-tert-butylphenol (4cd)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (98:2), yellow solid (78 mg, 70% yield; mp 90–91 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.51 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.44–7.39 (m, AA’ part of AA’BB’ system, 2H), 7.08–7.03 (m, 1H), 7.02–6.99 (m, BB’ part of AA’BB’ system, 2H), 6.98–6.93 (m, 4H), 6.90 (s, 1H), 5.22 (s, 1H), 2.91–2.80 (m, 2H), 2.72–2.57 (m, 2H), 1.85–1.71 (m, 4H), 1.51–1.46 (m, 2H), 1.35 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 153.1, 140.1, 139.8, 136.1, 135.9, 131.4, 129.8, 129.3, 128.4, 125.0, 121.1, 120.2, 118.7, 117.4, 115.6, 110.6, 61.4, 34.4, 31.6, 30.3, 28.2, 28.1, 26.8, 24.2. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C34H40BrNO [M]+, 557.2288; found, 557.2278.

(±)-4-((4-Bromophenyl)(6,7,8,9,10,11-hexahydro-5H-cycloocta[b]indol-5-yl)methyl)-2,6-di-tert-butylphenol (4dd)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (98:2), light yellow solid (87 mg, 76% yield; mp 93–94 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.52 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.43–7.38 (m, 2H), 7.04–6.98 (m, 3H), 6.95 (s, 2H), 6.88 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.79 (s, 1H), 6.75 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 5.20 (s, 1H), 2.90–2.82 (m, 4H), 1.73–1.67 (m, 2H), 1.47–1.34 (m, 6H), 1.31 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 153.2, 139.7, 137.2, 136.2, 135.9, 132.9, 131.4, 129.8, 129.5, 125.2, 121.1, 120.2, 118.5, 117.5, 113.3, 111.7, 61.5, 34.3, 30.7, 30.2, 29.1, 26.4, 25.7, 23.7, 23.2. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C35H42BrNO [M]+, 571.2444; found, 571.2440.

(±)-4-((4-Bromophenyl)(2,3-dimethyl-1H-indol-1-yl)methyl)-2,6-di-tert-butylphenol (4ed)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (98:2), yellow solid (81 mg, 78% yield; mp 87–88 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.50 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.45–7.39 (m, 2H), 7.05–6.97 (m, 5H), 6.94–6.89 (m, 1H), 6.78–6.72 (m, 2H), 5.23 (s, 1H), 2.28 (s, 3H), 2.24 (s, 3H), 1.34 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 153.2, 140.0, 136.2, 135.9 (2C), 133.0, 131.5, 129.9, 129.3, 125.3, 121.2, 120.4, 118.6, 117.8, 111.4, 107.9, 62.1, 34.4, 30.2, 11.6, 9.0. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C31H36BrNO [M]+, 517.1975; found, 517.1966.

(±)-4-((4-Bromophenyl)(2-ethyl-3-methyl-1H-indol-1-yl)methyl)-2,6-di-tert-butylphenol (4fd)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (98:2), yellow solid (77 mg, 72% yield; mp 78–79 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.49 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.43–7.38 (m, 2H), 7.04–7.00 (m, 5H), 6.90–6.84 (m, 1H), 6.73 (s, 1H), 6.68 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 5.20 (s, 1H), 2.76 (qd, J = 7.5, 1.9 Hz, 2H), 2.29 (s, 3H), 1.32 (s, 18H), 1.04 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 153.2, 139.9, 139.0, 136.0, 135.9, 131.4, 129.8, 129.44, 129.38, 125.2, 121.2, 120.4, 118.6, 117.8, 112.0, 107.2, 61.8, 34.3, 30.2, 18.6, 14.5, 8.8. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C32H38BrNO [M]+, 531.2131; found, 531.2120.

(±)-4-((4-Bromophenyl)(6-methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-9H-carbazol-9-yl)methyl)-2,6-di-tert-butylphenol (4hd)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (98:2), yellow solid (68 mg, 61% yield; mp 89–90 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.44–7.38 (m, 2H), 7.27 (s, 1H), 6.98–6.94 (m, 4H), 6.80–6.69 (m, 3H), 5.22 (s, 1H), 2.77–2.71 (m, 2H), 2.45–2.40 (m, 5H), 1.86–1.79 (m, 4H), 1.35 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 153.2, 140.1, 136.2, 135.8, 134.9, 131.4, 129.9, 129.4, 128.3, 127.8, 125.4, 122.0, 121.1, 117.4, 110.7, 110.2, 61.6, 34.4, 30.3, 23.9, 23.6, 23.0, 21.4, 21.2. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C34H40BrNO [M]+, 552.2288; found, 552.2267.

(±)-4-((4-Bromophenyl)(6-methoxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-9H-carbazol-9-yl)methyl)-2,6-di-tert-butylphenol (4id)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (98:2), yellow solid (73 mg, 64% yield; mp 103–104 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.43–7.39 (m, 2H), 6.98–6.95 (m, 2H), 6.95–6.93 (m, 3H), 6.70–6.66 (m, 2H), 6.59 (dd, J = 8.8, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 5.23 (s, 1H), 3.84 (s, 3H), 2.74–2.70 (m, 2H), 2.48–2.43 (m, 2H), 1.87–1.81 (m, 4H), 1.34 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 153.5, 153.2, 140.1, 136.9, 135.9, 131.7, 131.4, 129.9, 129.3, 128.4, 125.3, 121.2, 111.9, 110.3, 109.9, 100.0, 61.7, 55.8, 34.4, 30.3, 23.8, 23.6, 23.0, 21.3. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C34H40BrNO2 [M]+, 573.2237; found, 573.2225.

(±)-4-((4-Bromophenyl)(6-chloro-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-9H-carbazol-9-yl)methyl)-2,6-di-tert-butylphenol (4jd)

Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent hexane/EtOAc (98:2), yellow solid (46 mg, 40% yield; mp 79–80 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.43–7.38 (m, 3H), 6.95–6.91 (m, 2H), 6.89 (s, 2H), 6.87–6.83 (m, 1H), 6.67–6.61 (m, 2H), 5.23 (s, 1H), 2.71–2.66 (m, 2H), 2.47–2.42 (m, 2H), 1.86–1.78 (m, 4H), 1.32 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 153.3, 139.6, 137.7, 136.0, 134.8, 131.5, 129.9, 129.2, 128.8, 125.1, 124.4, 121.4, 120.5, 117.2, 112.1, 110.4, 61.8, 34.3, 30.2, 23.6, 23.4, 22.8, 21.0. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C33H37BrClNO [M]+, 577.1742; found, 577.1746.

Synthetic Applications

(±)-4-((4-Bromophenyl)(2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-carbazol-7-yl)methyl)phenol (5)

To a solution of the compound 3ad (109 mg, 0.2 mmol) in toluene (0.02 M) at rt was added a solution of AlCl3 (240 mg, 1.8 mmol) in MeNO2 (2.25 M) in one portion. The mixture was immediately heated to 60 °C in a preheated oil bath and maintained at this temperature for 10 min. The mixture was subsequently cooled and poured into a separatory funnel containing ice and Et2O (1:1). The layers were separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted with Et2O (3 × 20 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was purified by column chromatography using hexane/EtOAc (90:10) to give product 5. Broken white solid (67 mg, 78% yield; mp 122–123 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.54 (bs, 1H), 7.42–7.34 (m, 3H), 7.03–6.94 (m, 4H),6.88 (s, 1H), 6.85 (dd, J = 8.1, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 6.75–6.69 (m, BB’ part of AA’BB’ system, 2H), 5.54 (s, 1H), 4.83 (bs, 1H), 2.74–2.63 (m, 4H), 2.00–1.76 (m, 4H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 154.1, 144.4, 136.9, 136.6, 135.9, 134.5, 131.4, 131.3, 130.7, 126.4, 121.2, 120.0, 117.7, 115.3, 111.3, 110.1, 55.7, 23.5, 23.4, 23.3, 21.1. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C25H22BrNO [M]+, 431.0879; found, 431.0864.

(±)-2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-((2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-carbazol-7-yl)(4-(thiophene-2-yl)phenyl)methyl)phenol (7)

Compound 3ad (109 mg, 0.20 mmol) and thiophene-2-boronic acid (6) (31 mg, 0.24 mmol) were dissolved in 1,2-dimethoxyethane/water (15 mL, 2:1 v/v), and Na2CO3 (42 mg, 0.40 mmol) was added. After degassing, Pd(PPh3)4 (5 mg, 4 μmol) was added, and the mixture was boiled at 100 °C for 18 h. Then the mixture was cooled to room temperature and the solution was extracted with DCM (3 × 10 mL). The organic phases were combined, washed with water (3 × 10 mL), dried over Na2SO4, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude material was purified via silica gel column chromatography using hexane/EtOAc (95:5) to give the compound 7. Orange solid (93 mg, 85% yield; mp 129–130 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.55 (bs, 1H), 7.52–7.48 (m, AA’ part of AA’BB’ system, 2H), 7.36 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.27 (dd, J = 3.6, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.24 (dd, J = 5.2, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.18–7.10 (m, BB’ part of AA’BB’ system, 2H) 7.06 (dd, J = 5.2, 3.6 Hz, 1H), 7.00 (s, 2H), 6.95 (s, 1H), 6.91 (dd, J = 8.1, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 5.55 (s, 1H), 5.07 (s, 1H), 2.70 (t, J = 5.7 Hz, 4H), 1.95–1.82 (m, 4H), 1.37 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 152.2, 145.4, 144.8, 138.1, 135.9, 135.6, 134.8, 134.1, 132.0, 130.1, 128.1, 126.24, 126.22, 125.7, 124.4, 122.8, 121.5, 117.5, 111.4, 110.1, 56.9, 34.5, 30.5, 23.5, 23.4, 23.3, 21.1. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C37H41NOS [M]+, 547.2903; found, 547.2878.

(±)-2-(6-((4-Bromophenyl)(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)methyl)-1-(4-chlorobenzoyl)-5-methoxy-2-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)acetic Acid (8d)

Compound 8d was synthesized by following general procedure A. Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent DCM/MeOH (99:1), yellow solid (120 mg, 82% yield; mp 199–200 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.56–7.48 (m, AA’ part of AA’BB’ system, 2H), 7.35–7.30 (m, BB’ part of AA’BB’ system, 2H), 7.30–7.27 (m, AA’ part of AA’BB’ system, 2H), 6.90 (s, 1H), 6.77–6.72 (m, BB’ part of AA’BB’ system, 2H), 6.70 (s, 2H), 6.32 (s, 1H), 5.69 (s, 1H), 5.02 (s, 1H), 3.72 (s, 3H), 3.70 (s, 2H), 2.43 (s, 3H), 1.32 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 176.5, 168.3, 154.0, 152.1, 143.9, 139.4, 136.2, 135.5, 133.7, 133.3, 131.1, 131.04, 131.00, 130.5, 130.1, 129.1, 128.6, 125.8, 119.7, 116.1, 111.7, 99.8, 56.3, 49.4, 34.4, 30.5, 30.2, 13.2. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C40H42BrClNO5 [M + H]+, 730.1929; found, 730.1915.

(±)-2-(1-(4-Chlorobenzoyl)-6-((3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)(p-tolyl)methyl)-5-methoxy-2-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)acetic Acid (8f)

Compound 8f was synthesized by following general procedure A. Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent DCM/MeOH (99:1), white solid (117 mg, 88% yield; mp 128–129 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.58–7.50 (m, AA’ part of AA’BB’ system, 2H), 7.32–7.27 (m, BB’ part of AA’BB’ system, 2H), 7.03–6.95 (m, AA’ part of AA’BB’ system, 2H), 6.92 (s, 1H), 6.80–6.76 (m, BB’ part of AA’BB’ system, 2H), 6.75 (s, 2H), 6.39 (s, 1H), 5.75 (s, 1H), 5.00 (bs, 1H), 3.74 (s, 3H), 3.70 (s, 2H), 2.46 (s, 3H), 2.34 (s, 3H), 1.34 (s, 18H).13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 177.3, 168.4, 154.1, 151.9, 141.5, 139.3, 136.0, 135.2, 135.0, 134.2, 133.6, 131.2, 131.1, 130.5, 129.2, 129.0, 128.7, 128.4, 125.8, 116.2, 111.8, 99.8, 56.4, 49.4, 34.4, 30.5, 30.3, 21.2, 13.1. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C41H45ClNO5 [M + H]+, 666.2981; found, 666.2972.

(±)-2-(1-(4-Chlorobenzoyl)-6-((3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)(4 (trifluoromethyl)phenyl)methyl)-5-methoxy-2-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)acetic Acid (8k)

Compound 8k was synthesized by following general procedure A. Purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluent DCM/MeOH (99:1), broken white solid (128 mg, 89% yield; mp 179–180 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.56–7.49 (m, AA’ part of AA’BB’ system, 2H), 7.47–7.41 (m, AA’ part of AA’BB’ system, 2H), 7.34–7.28 (m, BB’ part of AA’BB’ system, 2H), 7.04–6.97 (m, BB’ part of AA’BB’ system, 2H), 6.92 (s, 1H), 6.73 (s, 2H), 6.35 (s, 1H), 5.80 (s, 1H), 5.05 (s, 1H), 3.73 (s, 3H), 3.71 (s, 2H), 2.44 (s, 3H), 1.34 (s, 18H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 177.1, 168.2, 153.9, 152.1, 148.9, 139.3, 136.2, 135.5, 133.6, 132.9, 131.0, 130.3, 129.6, 129.4, 129.0, 128.7, 127.9 (q, J = 32.1 Hz), 125.7, 124.8 (q, J = 3.4 Hz). 124.4 (q, J = 271.5 Hz), 116.0, 111.6, 99.7, 56.1, 49.8, 34.3, 30.4, 30.1, 13.1. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: calcd for C41H42ClF3NO5 [M + H]+, 720.2698; found, 720.2691.

Control Experiment

(±)-2-(Phenyl(2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-carbazol-7-yl)methyl)phenol (10)(26)

To a solution of indole (1a) (34.2 mg, 0.20 mmol) and 2-(hydroxy(phenyl)methyl)phenol (9) (44.0 mg, 0.22 mmol) in toluene (0.1 M), In(OTf)3 (11.2 mg, 0.02 mmol, 10 mol %) was added, and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 12h. After the reaction was complete (monitored by TLC), the solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography using hexane/EtOAc (80:20) solvent mixture to give the compound 10. White solid (63 mg, 89% yield; mp 74–75 °C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.53 (bs, 1H), 7.43 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.38–7.26 (m, 3H), 7.21–7.13 (m, 3H), 6.98–6.93 (m, 2H), 6.90–6.81 (m, 3H), 5.80 (s, 1H), 4.95 (bs, 1H), 2.77–2.62 (m, 4H), 1.97–1.84 (m, 4H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 153.8, 143.2, 135.9, 135.0, 134.7, 131.2, 130.6, 129.6, 128.6, 127.9, 126.8, 126.6, 121.1, 120.7, 118.1, 116.4, 111.2, 110.1, 51.5, 23.35, 23.33, 23.2, 21.0.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for financial support from Atatürk University, The Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit, Turkey (FAD-2019-7025 and FAD-2018-6642). Y.T. and V.A. thank The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK - BIDEB 2211/C and 2211/A National Ph.D. Scholarship Program in the Priority Fields in Science and Technology) for a scholarship. We would like to thank Prof. Dr. Cavit Kazaz for his help with the NOE experiments. The authors also thank İbrahim Hakki Demircioglu and Oguzhan Dalkilic (Atatürk University, DAYTAM) for their help with HRMS analyses.

Data Availability Statement

The data underlying this study are available in the published article and its online Supporting Information.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.joc.2c02937.

  • 1H NMR, 13C NMR and HRMS spectra for all compounds; computational details (PDF)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

jo2c02937_si_001.pdf (11.8MB, pdf)

References

  1. a Bartoli G.; Bencivenni G.; Dalpozzo R. Organocatalytic strategies for the asymmetric functionalization of indoles. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 4449–4465. 10.1039/b923063g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Kochanowska-Karamyan A. J.; Hamann M. T. Marine indole alkaloids: Potential new drug leads for the control of depression and anxiety. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 4489–4497. 10.1021/cr900211p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Wan Y.; Li Y.; Yan C.; Yan M.; Tang Z. Indole: A privileged scaffold for the design of anti-cancer agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 183, 111691. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.111691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ma S.; Long D.; Chen P.; Shi H.; Li H.; Fang R.; Wang X.; Xie X.; She X. Synthesis of 2,3-disubstituted indoles via a tandem reaction. Org. Chem. Front. 2020, 7, 2689–2695. 10.1039/D0QO00765J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Milne R. J.; Heel R. C. Ondansetron. Drugs 1991, 41, 574–595. 10.2165/00003495-199141040-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. a Rice L. M.; Hertz E.; Freed M. E. Antidepressant Agents. Derivatives of 2,3-Polymethyleneindoles. J. Med. Chem. 1964, 7, 313–319. 10.1021/jm00333a014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Baxter B. L.; Gluckman M. I. Iprindole: an antidepressant which does not block REM sleep. Nature 1969, 223, 750–752. 10.1038/223750a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lewis-Wambi J. S.; Kim H.; Curpan R.; Grigg R.; Sarker M. A.; Jordan V. C. The selective estrogen receptor modulator bazedoxifene inhibits hormone-independent breast cancer cell growth and down-regulates estrogen receptor α and cyclin D1. Mol. Pharmacol. 2011, 80, 610–620. 10.1124/mol.111.072249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. a Cossy J.; Mirguet O.; Pardo D. G. Ring expansion: synthesis of the velbanamine piperidine core. Synlett 2001, 2001, 1575–1577. 10.1055/s-2001-17454. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Calaza M. I.; Cativiela C. Stereoselective synthesis of quaternary proline analogues. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 3427–3448. 10.1002/ejoc.200800225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Shen T. Y.; Windholz T. B.; Rosegay A.; Witzel B. E.; Wilson A. N.; Willett J. D.; Holtz W. J.; Ellis R. L.; Matzuk A. R.; Lucas S.; Stammer C. H.; Wolly F. W.; Sarett L. H.; Risley E. A.; Nuss G. W.; Winter C. A. Non-steroid anti-inflammatory agents. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1963, 85, 488–489. 10.1021/ja00887a038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Liang T.; Li J.; Liu Y.; Wu C.; Wang J.; Lan J.; Liu K. Y. Progress in the synthesis of 2,3-disubstituted indole by cyclization. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 36, 2619–2633. 10.6023/cjoc201605024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. a Ackermann L.; Vicente R.; Kapdi A. R. Transition-metal-catalyzed direct arylation of (hetero)arenes by C–H bond cleavage. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 9792–9826. 10.1002/anie.200902996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Chen X.; Engle K. M.; Wang D. H.; Yu J. Q. Palladium (II)-catalyzed C–H activation/C–C cross-coupling reactions: versatility and practicality. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 5094–5115. 10.1002/anie.200806273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Cho S. H.; Kim J. Y.; Kwak J.; Chang S. Recent advances in the transition metal-catalyzed twofold oxidative C–H bond activation strategy for C–C and C–N bond formation. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 5068–5083. 10.1039/c1cs15082k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Wencel-Delord J.; Dröge T.; Liu F.; Glorius F. Towards mild metal-catalyzed C–H bond activation. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 4740–4761. 10.1039/c1cs15083a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Kuhl N.; Hopkinson M. N.; Wencel-Delord J.; Glorius F. Beyond Directing Groups: Transition-Metal-Catalyzed C–H Activation of Simple Arenes. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 10236–10254. 10.1002/anie.201203269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Yamaguchi J.; Yamaguchi A. D.; Itami K. C–H Bond Functionalization: Emerging Synthetic Tools for Natural Products and Pharmaceuticals. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 8960–9009. 10.1002/anie.201201666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g Ackermann L. Carboxylate-assisted ruthenium-catalyzed alkyne annulations by C–H/Het–H bond functionalizations. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 281–295. 10.1021/ar3002798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. a Chen M.; Sun J. Catalytic Asymmetric N-Alkylation of Indoles and Carbazoles through 1,6-Conjugate Addition of Aza-para-quinone Methides. Angew. Chem. 2017, 129, 4654–4658. 10.1002/ange.201701947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Wang L.; Zhou J.; Ding T. M.; Yan Z. Q.; Hou S. H.; Zhu G. D.; Zhang S. Y. Asymmetric N-hydroxyalkylation of indoles with ethyl glyoxalates catalyzed by a chiral phosphoric acid: highly enantioselective synthesis of chiral N,O-aminal indole derivatives. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 2795–2799. 10.1021/acs.orglett.9b00757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fang X.; Li Q.; Shi R.; Yao H.; Lin A. Controllable Pd-Catalyzed Allylation of Indoles with Skipped Enynes: Divergent Synthesis of Indolenines and N-Allylindoles. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 6084–6088. 10.1021/acs.orglett.8b02481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. a Lombardi L.; Bellini D.; Bottoni A.; Calvaresi M.; Monari M.; Kovtun A.; Palermo V.; Melucci M.; Bandini M. Allylic and allenylic dearomatization of indoles promoted by graphene oxide by covalent grafting activation mode. Chem.—Eur. J. 2020, 26, 10427–10432. 10.1002/chem.202001373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Lu C. J.; Chen Y. T.; Wang H.; Li Y. J. Palladium-catalyzed dearomative allylation of indoles with cyclopropyl acetylenes: access to indolenine derivatives. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2021, 19, 635–644. 10.1039/D0OB02103B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Pan H. P.; Zhu Z. Q.; Qiu Z. W.; Liu H. F.; Ma J. D.; Li B. Q.; Feng N.; Ma A. J.; Peng J. B.; Zhang X. Z. Dearomatization of 2,3-disubstituted indoles via 1,8-addition of propargylic (aza)-para-quinone methides. J. Org. Chem. 2021, 86, 16518–16534. 10.1021/acs.joc.1c01857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Qiu X. Y.; Li Z. H.; Zhou J.; Lian P. F.; Dong L. K.; Ding T. M.; Bai H. Y.; Zhang S. Y. Chiral Phosphoric Acid-Catalyzed Enantioselective Dearomative Electrophilic Hydrazination: Access to Chiral Aza-Quaternary Carbon Indolenines. ACS Catal. 2022, 12, 7511–7516. 10.1021/acscatal.2c02164. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Yang G.; Lindovska P.; Zhu D.; Kim J.; Wang P.; Tang R. Y.; Movassaghi J. Q.; Yu J. Q. Pd(II)-catalyzed meta-C–H olefination, arylation, and acetoxylation of indolines using a U-shaped template. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 10807–10813. 10.1021/ja505737x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Feng Y.; Holte D.; Zoller J.; Umemiya S.; Simke L. R.; Baran P. S. Total synthesis of verruculogen and fumitremorgin A enabled by ligand-controlled C–H borylation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 10160–10163. 10.1021/jacs.5b07154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Yang Y.; Li R.; Zhao Y.; Zhao D.; Shi Z. Cu-catalyzed direct C6-arylation of indoles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 8734–8737. 10.1021/jacs.6b05777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Leitch J. A.; McMullin C. L.; Mahon M. F.; Bhonoah Y.; Frost C. G. Remote C6-selective ruthenium-catalyzed C–H alkylation of indole derivatives via σ-activation. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 2616–2623. 10.1021/acscatal.7b00038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Liu H.; Zheng C.; You S. L. Catalytic C6 functionalization of 2, 3-disubstituted indoles by scandium triflate. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 1047–1054. 10.1021/jo402511b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhou L. J.; Zhang Y. C.; Zhao J. J.; Shi F.; Tu S. J. Organocatalytic arylation of 3-indolylmethanols via chemo-and regiospecific C6-functionalization of indoles. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 10390–10398. 10.1021/jo501989x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhou J.; Zhu G. D.; Wang L.; Tan F. X.; Jiang W.; Ma Z. G.; Kang J. C.; Hou S. H.; Zhang S. Y. Remote C6-Enantioselective C–H Functionalization of 2,3-Disubstituted Indoles through the Dual H-Bonds and π–π Interaction Strategy Enabled by CPAs. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 8662–8666. 10.1021/acs.orglett.9b03276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Huang W. J.; Ma Y. Y.; Liu L. X.; Wu B.; Jiang G. F.; Zhou Y. G. Chiral Phosphoric Acid-Catalyzed C6 Functionalization of 2,3-Disubstituted Indoles for Synthesis of Heterotriarylmethanes. Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 2393–2398. 10.1021/acs.orglett.0c04002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wu Q.; Li G. L.; Yang S.; Shi X. Q.; Huang T. Z.; Du X. H.; Chen Y. A chemo-and regioselective C6-functionalization of 2,3-disubstituted indoles: highly efficient synthesis of diarylindol-6-ylmethanes. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2019, 17, 3462–3470. 10.1039/C9OB00283A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ling Y.; An D.; Zhou Y.; Rao W. Ga (OTf)3-catalyzed temperature-controlled regioselective Friedel–Crafts alkylation of trifluoromethylated 3-indolylmethanols with 2-substituted indoles: divergent synthesis of trifluoromethylated unsymmetrical 3,3′-and 3,6′-bis(indolyl)methanes. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 3396–3401. 10.1021/acs.orglett.9b01135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kong L.; Han X.; Chen H.; Sun H.; Lan Y.; Li X. Rhodium (II)-Catalyzed Regioselective Remote C–H Alkylation of Protic Indoles. ACS Catal. 2021, 11, 4929–4935. 10.1021/acscatal.1c01052. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. a Lima C. G.; Pauli F. P.; Costa D. C.; de Souza A. S.; Forezi L. S.; Ferreira V. F.; de Carvalho da Silva F. para-Quinone methides as acceptors in 1,6-nucleophilic conjugate addition reactions for the synthesis of structurally diverse molecules. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 2020, 2650–2692. 10.1002/ejoc.201901796. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Wang J. Y.; Hao W. J.; Tu S. J.; Jiang B. Recent developments in 1,6-addition reactions of para-quinone methides (p-QMs). Org. Chem. Front. 2020, 7, 1743–1778. 10.1039/D0QO00387E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Singh G.; Pandey R.; Pankhade Y. A.; Fatma S.; Anand R. V. Construction of Oxygen-and Nitrogen-based Heterocycles from p-Quinone Methides. Chem. Rec. 2021, 21, 4150–4173. 10.1002/tcr.202100137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Zhang Z. P.; Dong N.; Li X. Bismuth-catalyzed allylation of para-quinone methides. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 1301–1304. 10.1039/C6CC06605D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Huang G. B.; Huang W. H.; Guo J.; Xu D. L.; Qu X. C.; Zhai P. H.; Zheng X. H.; Weng J.; Lu G. Enantioselective Synthesis of Triarylmethanes via Organocatalytic 1, 6-Addition of Arylboronic Acids to para-Quinone Methides. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2019, 361, 1241–1246. 10.1002/adsc.201801446. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; f Wang B. Q.; Luo Q.; Xiao Q.; Lin J.; Yan S. J. Synthesis of Quinone Methide Substituted Neonicotinoid Derivatives via 1, 6-Conjugate Addition of N-Benzyl Nitro Ketene Aminals with para-Quinone Methides Accompanying Oxidation. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 8382–8389. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02166. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. a Goswami P.; Anand R. V. Bi(OTf)3 Catalyzed Solvent Free Approach to Unsymmetrical Diaryl (2-indolyl) methanes through 1,6-Conjugate Addition of 3-Substituted Indoles to para-Quinone Methides. ChemistrySelect 2016, 1, 2556–2559. 10.1002/slct.201600553. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Wang J. R.; Jiang X. L.; Hang Q. Q.; Zhang S.; Mei G. J.; Shi F. Catalytic asymmetric conjugate addition of indoles to para-quinone methide derivatives. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 84, 7829–7839. 10.1021/acs.joc.9b00710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Kumaran S.; Prabhakaran M.; Mariyammal N.; Parthasarathy K. Catalyst-free 1,6-conjugate addition of indoles and 4-hydroxycoumarins to para-quinone methides: synthesis of unsymmetrical triarylmethanes. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2020, 18, 7837–7841. 10.1039/D0OB01789B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Ranga P. K.; Ahmad F.; Nager P.; Rana P. S.; Vijaya Anand R. Bis(amino)cyclopropenium Ion as a Hydrogen-Bond Donor Catalyst for 1,6-Conjugate Addition Reactions. J. Org. Chem. 2021, 86, 4994–5010. 10.1021/acs.joc.0c02940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Wu G.; Li T.; Liu F.; Zhao Y.; Ma S.; Tang S.; Xie X.; She X. Thiourea catalyzed 1,6-conjugate addition of indoles to para-quinone methides. Tetrahedron Lett. 2021, 81, 153315. 10.1016/j.tetlet.2021.153315. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Yan J.; Zhang Z.; Chen M.; Lin Z.; Sun J. A Study of the Reactivity of (Aza-)Quinone Methides in Selective C6-Alkylations of Indoles. ChemCatChem. 2020, 12, 5053–5057. 10.1002/cctc.202000850. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Akyildiz V.; Lafzi F.; Kilic H.; Saracoglu N. Solvent-controlled regioselective C(5)–H/N(1)–H bond alkylations of indolines and C (6)–H bond alkylations of 1, 2, 3, 4-tetrahydroquinolines with para-quinone methides. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2022, 20, 3570–3588. 10.1039/D2OB00035K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Cai L.; Jia X.; Zhao J. C7-Friedel–Crafts alkylation of 4-aminoindoles with para-quinone methide derivatives under catalyst-free conditions. Synth. Commun. 2020, 50, 1679–1686. 10.1080/00397911.2020.1751855. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Gao S.; Xu X.; Yuan Z.; Zhou H.; Yao H.; Lin A. 1, 6-Addition Arylation of para-Quinone Methides: An Approach to Unsymmetrical Triarylmethanes. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 2016, 3006–3012. 10.1002/ejoc.201600385. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Aslan M.; Taskesenligil Y.; Pıravadılı S.; Saracoglu N. Functionalization at Nonperipheral Positions of Triazatruxene: Modular Construction of 1, 6, 11-Triarylated-Triazatruxenes for Potentially Organic Electronics and Optoelectronics. J. Org. Chem. 2022, 87, 5037–5050. 10.1021/acs.joc.1c02150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Gaussian 16, Revision C.01: Frisch M. J.; Trucks G. W.; Schlegel H. B.; Scuseria G. E.; Robb M. A.; Cheeseman J. R.; Scalmani G.; Barone V.; Petersson G. A.; Nakatsuji H.; Li X.; Caricato M.; Marenich A. V.; Bloino J.; Janesko B. G.; Gomperts R.; Mennucci B.; Hratchian H. P.; Ortiz J. V.; Izmaylov A. F.; Sonnenberg J. L.; Williams-Young D.; Ding F.; Lipparini F.; Egidi F.; Goings J.; Peng B.; Petrone A.; Henderson T.; Ranasinghe D.; Zakrzewski V. G.; Gao J.; Rega N.; Zheng G.; Liang W.; Hada M.; Ehara M.; Toyota K.; Fukuda R.; Hasegawa J.; Ishida M.; Nakajima T.; Honda Y.; Kitao O.; Nakai H.; Vreven T.; Throssell K.; Jr. Montgomery J. A.; Peralta J. E.; Ogliaro F.; Bearpark M.; Heyd J. J.; Brothers E. N.; Kudin K. N.; Staroverov V. N.; Keith T. A.; Kobayashi R.; Normand J.; Raghavachari K.; Rendell A. P.; Burant J. C.; Iyengar S. S.; Tomasi J.; Cossi M.; Millam J. M.; Klene M.; Adamo C.; Cammi R.; Ochterski J. W.; Martin R. L.; Morokuma K.; Farkas O.; Foresman J. B.; Fox D. J.. Gaussian, Inc.; Wallingford, CT, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  32. Vosko S. H.; Wilk L.; Nusair M. Accurate spin-dependent electron liquid correlation energies for local spin density calculations: a critical analysis. Can. J. Phys. 1980, 58, 1200–1211. 10.1139/p80-159. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lee C.; Yang W.; Parr R. G. Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785. 10.1103/PhysRevB.37.785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Becke A. Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648–5652. 10.1063/1.464913. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Stephens P. J.; Devlin F. J.; Chabalowski C. F.; Frisch M. Ab initio calculation of vibrational absorption and circular dichroism spectra using density functional force fields. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 11623–11627. 10.1021/j100096a001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Schäfer A.; Huber C.; Ahlrichs R. Fully optimized contracted Gaussian basis sets of triple zeta valence quality for atoms Li to Kr. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 100, 5829–5835. 10.1063/1.467146. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Marenich A. V.; Cramer C. J.; Truhlar D. G. Universal solvation model based on solute electron density and on a continuum model of the solvent defined by the bulk dielectric constant and atomic surface tensions. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 6378–6396. 10.1021/jp810292n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. a Talaz O.; Saracoglu N. A study on the synthesis of structural analogs of bis-indole alkaloid caulerpin: a step-by-step synthesis of a cyclic indole-tetramer. Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 1902–1910. 10.1016/j.tet.2010.01.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Nakano Y.; Lupton D. W. Palladium [ii] catalysed C (sp3)–H oxidation of dimethyl carbamoyl tetrahydrocarbazoles. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 1757–1760. 10.1039/c3cc48545e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Berges J.; García B.; Muniz K. An Electrophilic Bromine Redox Catalysis for the Synthesis of Indole Alkaloid Building Blocks by Selective Aliphatic C– H Amination. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 15891–15895. 10.1002/anie.201808939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. a Jarava-Barrera C.; Parra A.; López A.; Cruz-Acosta F.; Collado-Sanz D.; Cárdenas D. J.; Tortosa M. Copper-catalyzed borylative aromatization of p-quinone methides: enantioselective synthesis of dibenzylic boronates. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 442–446. 10.1021/acscatal.5b02742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Lanzi M.; Merad J.; Boyarskaya D. V.; Maestri G.; Allain C.; Masson G. Visible-Light-Triggered C–C and C–N Bond Formation by C–S Bond Cleavage of Benzylic Thioethers. Org. lett. 2018, 20, 5247–5250. 10.1021/acs.orglett.8b02196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

jo2c02937_si_001.pdf (11.8MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The data underlying this study are available in the published article and its online Supporting Information.


Articles from The Journal of Organic Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES