Skip to main content
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2023 Mar 7;17(3):e0011127. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011127

Re-examination of the risk of autoimmune diseases after dengue virus infection: A population-based cohort study

Hsin-I Shih 1,2,3, Chia-Yu Chi 4,5, Pei-Fang Tsai 3,6, Yu-Ping Wang 3,4, Yu-Wen Chien 3,7,*
Editor: William B Messer8
PMCID: PMC9990932  PMID: 36881559

Abstract

Previous studies suggested that dengue was associated with an increased risk of several autoimmune diseases. However, this association still needs to be explored due to the limitations of these studies. A population-based cohort study was conducted using national health databases in Taiwan and included 63,814 newly diagnosed, laboratory-confirmed dengue patients between 2002 and 2015 and 1:4 controls (n = 255,256) matched by age, sex, area of residence and symptom onset time. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to investigate the risk of autoimmune diseases after dengue infection. Dengue patients had a slightly higher risk of overall autoimmune diseases than non-dengue controls (aHR 1.16; P = 0.0002). Stratified analyses by specific autoimmune diseases showed that only autoimmune encephalomyelitis remained statistically significant after Bonferroni correction for multiple testing (aHR 2.72; P < 0.0001). Sixteen (0.025%) dengue patients and no (0%) controls developed autoimmune encephalomyelitis in the first month of follow-up (HR >9999, P < 0.0001), but the risk between groups was not significantly different thereafter. Contrary to previous studies, our findings showed that dengue was associated with an increased short-term risk of a rare complication, autoimmune encephalomyelitis, but not associated with other autoimmune diseases.

Author summary

Dengue fever is a mosquito-borne tropical disease caused by the dengue virus. Antibodies produced during dengue infection can cross-react with several self-antigens to the tissues of the body and contribute to thrombocytopenia, coagulopathy, and vascular leakage in severe dengue. Autoimmunity might occur after dengue infection and cause some autoimmune diseases. Previous studies suggested some autoimmune diseases might be associated with dengue infection. Contrary to previous studies, our findings showed that dengue was associated with an increased short-term risk of a rare complication, autoimmune encephalomyelitis, but not associated with other autoimmune diseases.

Introduction

Dengue is an important mosquito-borne viral disease that has seen a dramatic increase in global incidence in recent decades, probably due to global warming and climate change, rapid urbanization, and the growing frequency of travel and trade [1]. Approximately four billion people are at risk of dengue virus (DENV) infection, particularly in tropical and subtropical countries [2]. It has been estimated that 390 million people are infected by DENV annually, of which 96 million are symptomatic with varying severity [3].

Previous studies also demonstrate that antibodies produced during DENV infection can cross-react with several self-antigens in humans, such as plasminogen, integrin, and platelet cells [4,5]. These autoantibodies can result in autoimmunity and possibly contribute to a clinical progression to severe dengue [4,6]. Although this autoimmunity has been considered transient, a small follow-up study in Cuba showed that over half of dengue patients suffered from persistent dengue symptoms in the two years following infections, and commonly showed altered autoimmune markers, such as antinuclear antibody [7]. Some case reports also suggest that dengue may be associated with several autoimmune diseases [812].

Recently, Li et al. conducted a population-based cohort study using the National Health Insurance Research Databases (NHIRD) in Taiwan, identifying 12,506 patients who were hospitalized with a diagnosis of dengue fever between 2000 and 2010 and selecting frequency-matched controls for comparison [13]. Their results revealed that dengue patients had a significantly higher risk of developing more than twenty autoimmune diseases within three years after infection (adjusted hazard ratio 1.88; 95% CI, 1.49–2.37), especially post-infectious arthritis, multiple sclerosis, autoimmune encephalomyelitis, systemic vasculitis, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and primary adrenocortical insufficiency [13]. Although that study provided epidemiological evidence for the association between dengue and autoimmune diseases, one of its major limitations was that hospitalized dengue patients with a diagnosis of dengue might not be laboratory-confirmed. Since clinical symptoms of dengue are non-specific, laboratory tests are required to verify the diagnosis, which might take days or even weeks because rapid diagnostic tests were not available in Taiwan during their study period. Recently, the Taiwan Centre for Disease Control (Taiwan CDC) released the Notifiable Disease Dataset of Confirmed Cases (NDDCC) to be linked to the NHIRD. We obtained the list of laboratory-confirmed dengue patients from the dataset and found that only 51.4% of hospitalized patients with a discharge diagnosis of dengue between 2000 and 2010 were finally laboratory-confirmed to have DENV infection. This misclassification bias makes the results from Li et al.’s study uncertain [13]. In addition, most dengue patients only have mild symptoms and are treated at outpatient clinics; thus, the inclusion of only hospitalized dengue patients in their study made their results not generalizable to most dengue patients.

Furthermore, southern Taiwan experienced the most severe dengue epidemics in its history in 2014 and 2015, causing over 58,000 confirmed dengue cases. Since autoimmune diseases are relatively rare, including more dengue cases for follow-up will help better elucidate the association between dengue and autoimmune diseases. The objective of this study was to use laboratory-confirmed dengue cases and to include patients diagnosed before the end of 2015 in Taiwan to re-examine the risk of autoimmune diseases after DENV infection.

Methods

Ethics statement

The national databases used in this study were obtained and analyzed at the Health and Welfare Data Science Center (HWDC), Ministry of Health and Welfare of Taiwan. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Cheng Kung University Hospital (approval no. B-ER-106-184). All the data were deidentified, and thus, the requirement for informed consent was waived.

Data sources and study populations

This retrospective cohort study utilized the NHIRD in Taiwan, which included detailed medical insurance claims data from the National Health Insurance (NHI) program since 1995, covering >99% of the population in Taiwan [14]. Through encrypted individual identification numbers, the personal information in the NHIRD could be linked to multiple national databases. The high coverage rate and comprehensiveness of the NHIRD in Taiwan provided valuable resources for long-term follow-up epidemiological studies [14].

In Taiwan, by law, suspected dengue patients should be reported to the local health department and Taiwan CDC within 24 hours of clinical diagnosis. Blood samples from suspected cases should be tested by approved laboratories to confirm the diagnosis. The laboratory criteria of DENV infection included virus isolation, positive real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR), detection of dengue-specific IgM and IgG antibody in a single serum sample in the acute phase, four-fold increase in IgG titer in paired acute- and convalescent-phase samples, or detection of the non-structural protein 1 (NS1) in the 2015 dengue epidemic [15,16].

In this study, newly diagnosed dengue patients with laboratory confirmation between 2002 and 2015 were identified from the NDDCC. By defining the index date of a dengue case as the date of symptom onset, four non-dengue controls were randomly selected for each dengue case by matching age, sex, area of residence (Tainan, Kaohsiung, Pingtung, and others), and the calendar year and month of the index date. In the dengue and non-dengue groups, people who were diagnosed with autoimmune diseases before the index date or had missing basic information were excluded. As done by Li et al. to minimize confounding by other infections [13], people with a diagnosis of HIV or TB before the index date or having bacterial, viral, or other infections within 60 days before the index date were also excluded. These diseases were defined as at least three outpatient visits or one hospital admission with relevant ICD-9-CM codes, as shown in S1 Table.

Study outcome and follow-up

The outcome of interest in this study was newly diagnosed autoimmune diseases after the index dates. In Taiwan, people with several autoimmune diseases can apply for catastrophic illness certification to receive a copayment exemption from the NHI program, and all the applications are reviewed by rheumatologists. These autoimmune diseases, including SLE, systemic sclerosis, Sjögren’s syndrome, inflammatory myopathy, rheumatoid arthritis, Behcet’s syndrome, systemic vasculitis, type I diabetes mellitus, multiple sclerosis, myasthenia gravis, inflammatory bowel diseases, autoimmune hemolytic anemia, and pemphigus, were identified from the Registry for Catastrophic Illness, and thus the diagnoses should be valid. For autoimmune diseases that did not fulfill the requirements to be considered catastrophic illnesses in Taiwan, including ankylosing spondylitis, post-infectious arthritis, uveitis, psoriasis, autoimmune thyroid disease, primary adrenocortical insufficiency, Guillain–Barré syndrome, autoimmune encephalomyelitis, and celiac disease, one hospital admission or at least three outpatient visits with relevant ICD-9-CM or ICD-10-CM codes were regarded as the confirmed diagnosis (S1 Table). The follow-up of study participants started on the index dates and continued until the confirmation of study outcomes, death, or August 31, 2018, whichever occurred first.

Covariates

The baseline characteristics considered in this study included age, sex, monthly income, area of residence, and comorbidities. Dengue outbreaks mainly occurred in southern Taiwan, including Tainan, Kaohsiung, and Pingtung. The urbanization level of townships was also adopted as a sociodemographic variable, in which one was the most urbanized and four was the least urbanized, as previously described [15,17]. Comorbidities considered as potential confounders in this study included cerebrovascular accident, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes mellitus (DM), dyslipidemia, hypertension, ischaemic heart disease, liver cirrhosis, malignancy, and renal failure; these coexisting conditions were defined as long as the corresponding ICD-9-CM codes were recorded in at least three outpatient visits or any hospital admission before the index date (S1 Table).

Statistical analysis

We assessed the differences in baseline characteristics between the dengue and non-dengue groups using the standardized mean differences (SMD), for which a number under 0.1 suggests no meaningful difference [18]. The cases of overall and specific autoimmune diseases during the follow-up period were counted separately and divided by person-years to obtain the incidence rates for different outcomes after DENV infection. Kaplan–Meier curves were plotted for the cumulative incidence of autoimmune disease in the dengue and non-dengue groups, and the log-rank test was used for comparison. The association between DENV infection and the occurrence of autoimmune diseases was estimated by hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) that were obtained from the Cox proportional hazard model to account for the competing risk of death adjusted for gender, age, sex, residential area, level of monthly income, degree of urbanization, and comorbidities. Subgroup analyses stratified by sex were also performed. The proportional hazard assumption was checked by using log-log survival plots. To account for multiple comparisons for many outcomes and stratified analyses by sex, a Bonferroni post-hoc correction was used to derive an adjusted threshold for p values. Data analysis was conducted using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

Results

A total of 319,070 subjects were included in this study, including 63,814 laboratory-confirmed dengue patients and 255,256 matched non-dengue controls (Fig 1). The mean follow-up period was 4.57 ± 3.45 years for the dengue group and 4.56 ± 3.42 years for the non-dengue group. The baseline characteristics for dengue and non-dengue cohorts showed no meaningful difference except that a higher percentage of dengue patients lived in urban areas (Table 1). The distribution of comorbidities was not significantly different between the two groups.

Fig 1. Flow diagram depicting the selection of the study population.

Fig 1

Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the dengue and non-dengue groups.

Dengue cohort (n = 63814) Non-dengue cohort (n = 255256) Standardized mean difference
Sex
    Female 31551 (49.4) 126204 (49.4) -
    Male 32263 (50.6) 129052 (50.6) -
Age (years) 44.6 (20.0) 44.6 (20.0) -
    0–17 6806 (10.7) 27224 (10.7) -
    18–35 15528 (24.3) 62112 (24.3) -
    36–50 14111 (22.1) 56444 (22.1) -
    51–64 16368 (25.7) 65472 (25.7) -
    ≥ 65 11001 (17.2) 44004 (17.2) -
Area of residence
    Tainan 22407 (35.1) 89628 (35.1) -
    Kaohsiung 37770 (59.2) 151080 (59.2) -
    Pingtung 1587 (2.5) 6348 (2.5) -
    Others 2050 (3.2) 8200 (3.2) -
Income
    ≤ 1249 11869 (18.6) 45365 (17.8) 0.022
    1250–21899 11631 (18.2) 48622 (19.1) 0.021
    21900–34799 23930 (37.5) 100214 (39.3) 0.036
    ≥ 34800 16384 (25.7) 61055 (23.9) 0.041
Urbanization
    1 (most urbanized) 23142 (36.3) 60459 (23.7) 0.285
    2 25345 (39.7) 82721 (32.4) 0.155
    3 12752 (20.0) 68176 (26.7) 0.154
    4–7 (least urbanized) 2575 (4.0) 43900 (17.2) 0.356
Comorbidity
    Hypertension 15709 (24.36) 57080 (22.4) 0.054
    DM 7975 (12.5) 28650 (11.2) 0.040
    Dyslipidaemia 13511 (21.2) 45433 (17.8) 0.087
    COPD 8394 (13.2) 29183 (11.4) 0.053
    Cerebrovascular accident 3819 (6.0) 14401 (5.6) 0.015
    Renal failure 1797 (2.8) 6147 (2.4) 0.026
    Liver cirrhosis 755 (1.2) 2753 (1.1) 0.010
    Ischaemic heart disease 6565 (10.3) 22401 (8.8) 0.053
    Malignancy 2645 (4.1) 9599 (3.8) 0.020

Data are represented as the number (%) or mean (standard deviation), unless otherwise stated. COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. DM = diabetes mellitus.

The overall incidence rate of autoimmune diseases in the dengue group was 27.73 per 10,000 person-years, which was slightly higher than the 23.47 per 10,000 person-years in the non-dengue group (Table 2). Dengue patients also had a higher incidence of autoimmune diseases than non-dengue controls after stratification by sex. Data on Type I DM, systemic sclerosis, inflammatory myopathy, Behcet’s syndrome, systemic vasculitis, multiple sclerosis, autoimmune hemolytic anemia, inflammatory myopathy, pemphigus, and celiac disease cases were not shown because case numbers of less than three were not allowed to be exported under the regulations of the Health and Welfare Data Science Center of Taiwan to prevent re-identification.

Table 2. Incidence (per 10,000) of autoimmune diseases between the dengue and control groups.

Autoimmune disease Dengue group Control group
Total (n = 63814) Male (n = 32263) Female (n = 31551) Total (n = 255256) Male (n = 129052) Female (n = 126204)
n IR n IR n IR n IR n IR n IR
All 809 27.73 349 23.89 460 31.59 2733 23.47 1161 19.93 1572 27.01
Autoimmune thyroid disease 236 8.03 64 4.35 172 11.71 782 6.67 183 3.12 599 10.22
Uveitis 179 6.08 88 5.98 91 6.19 554 4.72 267 4.56 287 4.89
Psoriasis 119 4.04 63 4.28 56 3.80 477 4.07 313 5.34 164 2.79
Primary adrenocortical insufficiency 69 2.34 32 2.17 37 2.51 260 2.21 127 2.17 133 2.26
Ankylosing spondylitis 66 2.24 50 3.40 16 1.09 271 2.31 162 2.76 109 1.85
Autoimmune encephalomyelitis 45 1.53 25 1.70 20 1.36 63 0.54 38 0.65 25 0.43
Rheumatoid arthritis 35 1.19 9 0.61 26 1.76 139 1.18 25 0.43 114 1.94
Sjögren’s syndrome 21 0.71 b b b b 99 0.84 b b b b
Systemic lupus erythematosus 12 0.41 3 0.20 9 0.61 31 0.26 8 0.14 23 0.39
Myasthenia gravis 11 0.37 7 0.48 4 0.27 33 0.28 16 0.27 17 0.29
Guillain–Barré syndrome 10 0.34 4 0.27 6 0.41 30 0.26 17 0.29 13 0.22
Inflammatory bowel diseases 4 0.14 b b b b 9 0.08 b b b b
Post-infectious arthritis 4 0.14 b b b b 17 0.14 b b b b

Abbreviation: IR, incidence rate per 10,000 person-years.

b The cells left blank indicated that the number of events was less than three and were therefore not allowed to be exported under the regulations of the Health and Welfare Data Science Center of Taiwan to prevent re-identification.

*Data on Type I DM, systemic sclerosis, inflammatory myopathy, Behcet’s syndrome, systemic vasculitis, multiple sclerosis, autoimmune hemolytic anemia, inflammatory myopathy, pemphigus, and celiac disease cases were not shown because case numbers were less than three.

This study evaluated the risk of overall and specific autoimmune diseases after DENV infection, stratified by sex. To account for multiple comparisons, the Bonferroni post-hoc method required a significance level of P<0.0012 (14 outcomes and analyses stratified by sex; total 42 tests in Table 3). After adjusting for age, sex, area of residence, urbanization level, monthly income level, and comorbidities using the sub-distribution hazard model, the risk of overall autoimmune diseases in the dengue group was significantly higher than that in the non-dengue group (aHR 1.16; P = 0.0002; Table 3). Stratified analyses by specific autoimmune diseases showed that DENV infection seemed to be associated with a higher risk of autoimmune thyroid disease, uveitis, and autoimmune encephalomyelitis at the significance level of 0.05; however, only autoimmune encephalomyelitis remained statistically significant after Bonferroni correction (aHR 2.72; P < 0.0001; Table 3). After stratification by sex, dengue infection was associated with a higher risk of autoimmune encephalomyelitis in males (aHR 32; P = 0.0010) and females (aHR 3.44; P = 0.0001; Table 3).

Table 3. Risk of autoimmune diseases after adjusting for competing mortality.

Autoimmune disease Total Male Female
aHRa (95% CI)b p valuec aHRa (95% CI)b p valuec aHRa (95% CI)b p valuec
All 1.16 (1.07–1.26) 0.0002* 1.18 (1.04–1.33) 0.0094 1.15 (1.04–1.28) 0.0092
Autoimmune thyroid disease 1.18 (1.02–1.37) 0.0295 1.37 (1.02–1.83) 0.0389 1.13 (0.95–1.34) 0.1809
Uveitis 1.23 (1.03–1.46) 0.0190 1.26 (0.98–1.61) 0.0694 1.19 (0.94–1.51) 0.1487
Psoriasis 0.97 (0.79–1.20) 0.7856 0.77 (0.58–1.01) 0.0594 1.38 (1.00–1.90) 0.0472
Primary adrenocortical insufficiency 1.10 (0.84–1.44) 0.5040 1.14 (0.76–1.70) 0.5256 1.07 (0.74–1.55) 0.7240
Ankylosing spondylitis 0.98 (0.74–1.28) 0.8615 1.26 (0.91–1.73) 0.1696 0.58 (0.34–0.97) 0.0392
Autoimmune encephalomyelitis 2.72 (1.84–4.02) <0.0001* 2.32 (1.41–3.83) 0.0010* 3.44 (1.84–6.41) 0.0001*
Rheumatoid arthritis 0.99 (0.68–1.44) 0.9456 1.62 (0.73–3.62) 0.2386 0.87 (0.57–1.34) 0.5339
Sjögren’s syndrome 0.87 (0.53–1.41) 0.5632 0.50 (0.06–4.09) 0.5159 0.90 (0.54–1.48) 0.6742
Systemic lupus erythematosus 1.86 (0.93–3.72) 0.0817 1.87 (0.49–7.11) 0.3606 1.86 (0.83–4.16) 0.1334
Myasthenia gravis 1.36 (0.69–2.68) 0.3744 1.80 (0.75–4.30) 0.1874 0.96 (0.32–2.87) 0.9445
Guillain–Barré syndrome 1.29 (0.61–2.72) 0.5106 0.78 (0.26–2.35) 0.6542 2.31 (0.81–6.58) 0.1181
Inflammatory bowel diseases 2.01 (0.57–7.05) 0.2748 2.31 (0.47–11.34) 0.3024 1.11 (0.12–10.37) 0.9256
Post-infectious arthritis 0.97 (0.33–2.82) 0.9515 1.13 (0.32–4.01) 0.8551 0.65 (0.08–5.04) 0.6769

Abbreviations: aHR, adjusted hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.

a Adjusted Cox proportional hazard model by sex, age, area of residence, income, urbanization, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, COPD, cerebrovascular accident, renal failure, liver cirrhosis, ischaemic heart disease, and malignancy.

b 95% CIs were not adjusted for multiple comparisons and thus cannot be directly used for hypothesis testing or inference.

c Post hoc adjustment for multiple comparisons by the Bonferroni method required a significance level of P<0.0012.

*Achieved statistical significance after Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons (P<0.0012).

The Kaplan–Meier curves show that dengue patients had a significantly higher cumulative incidence of overall autoimmune diseases and autoimmune encephalomyelitis than the non-dengue cohort (p<0.0001, Fig 2A and 2B). Of 63,814 dengue patients, sixteen (0.025%) developed autoimmune encephalomyelitis within the first month after the index date, while none of the non-dengue controls had the disease during this period. Stratified analyses by follow-up time revealed that DENV infection was associated with a significantly higher risk of autoimmune encephalomyelitis in the first month after the onset of dengue symptoms (HR >9999, P < 0.0001) but not thereafter (aHR 1.76, P = 0.012) after considering multiple comparison correction.

Fig 2. Kaplan–Meier curves for the cumulative incidence of autoimmune disease (A) and autoimmune encephalomyelitis (B) between the dengue and non-dengue groups.

Fig 2

Discussion

This study suggests that the overall incidence of autoimmune diseases was slightly higher after DENV infection. Looking at specific autoimmune diseases, dengue was associated with an increased risk of autoimmune thyroid disease, uveitis, and autoimmune encephalomyelitis, but only autoimmune encephalomyelitis remained statistically significant after Bonferroni correction. Our results are very different from those reported by Li et al., which suggested that dengue was associated with a wide spectrum of autoimmune diseases, including primary adrenocortical insufficiency, autoimmune encephalomyelitis, SLE, post-infectious arthritis, systemic vasculitis, myasthenia gravis, and multiple sclerosis [13]. In addition, another case-control study using NHIRD in Taiwan also showed that dengue was associated with SLE [19]. Three reasons may explain the difference. First, many dengue patients in the previous two studies were only suspected cases based on clinical symptoms, not laboratory-confirmed. The laboratory criteria for dengue diagnosis before 2015 in Taiwan included virus isolation, RNA detection by RT–PCR, a 4-fold increase in IgG titer in paired acute- and convalescent-phase samples, and dengue-specific IgM and IgG antibody detection in single serum samples. These tests were unavailable in most hospitals and clinics before 2014, and the samples needed to be delivered to certified laboratories approved by the Taiwan CDC. Therefore, the final laboratory-confirmed dengue diagnosis might have been delayed. The wide availability of non-structural protein 1 (NS1) rapid antigen tests from 2015 onwards shortened the confirmation time and improved the accuracy of dengue diagnosis [20]. In addition, symptoms associated with autoimmune diseases, such as fever, skin rash, and thrombocytopenia, were very similar to the clinical presentation of dengue. In the Li et al. study, some patients with autoimmune diseases might have been initially misdiagnosed as having dengue during local dengue outbreaks and received the correct diagnosis later [13]. Second, multiple comparison problems were not considered in previous studies. Approximately 20 different outcomes were investigated, but the significance level was set at 0.05, which increased the probability of type I errors. Third, our study included inpatient and outpatient dengue cases, while the previous study only included hospitalized patients. However, we performed subgroup analyses of hospitalized dengue cases, revealing that dengue was only associated with autoimmune encephalitis but not other autoimmune diseases (S2 and S3 Tables).

Autoimmunity has been shown to be involved in dengue pathogenesis [21]. Autoantibodies produced during DENV infection can cross-react with several self-antigens on endothelial cells, platelets or coagulatory molecules, which may contribute to thrombocytopenia, coagulopathy, and vascular leakage in severe dengue [2123]. Titers of DENV-induced autoantibodies reach peak levels in the acute phase, decline during the convalescent stage, and last for several months [21]. In addition, cases reports of SLE [8], systemic vasculitis [9], acute disseminated encephalomyelitis [10], neuromyelitis optica [11], and transverse myelitis [12] after dengue infection have been documented. However, our study found that DENV infection was only associated with short-term increased risk of autoimmune encephalomyelitis, but not other autoimmune diseases. The results suggest that some of the case reports might occur by chance and that the autoimmunity in dengue patients is transient.

Neuropathogenesis of DENV may occur in three ways: systematic or metabolic disturbance causing encephalopathy, direct central nervous system invasion (especially by DENV-2 and -3) causing mainly encephalitis, and autoimmunity-mediated complications including Guillain–Barré syndrome and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) [10,24]. Our study did not find a significant association between DENV and Guillain–Barré syndrome. Previous evidence suggests that ADEM, also known as postinfectious encephalomyelitis, results from a transient autoimmune response directed at myelin or other self-antigens, possibly by molecular mimicry or non-specific activation of auto-reactive T-cell clones [10,25]. A meta-analysis showed that 0.4% of dengue patients developed ADEM, which was much higher than in our study (0.025%) [10]. Our study was a population-based study including all laboratory-confirmed dengue cases diagnosed in hospitals and clinics, while previous studies only included patients treated in hospitals, which may explain the difference. The reported onset of neurological symptoms of ADEM ranges from day 3 to day 19 after initial dengue symptoms [10], which is consistent with our findings that the risk of autoimmune encephalomyelitis significantly increased within 30 days of DENV infection. Similar mosquito-borne single-stranded RNA flaviviruses, such as West Nile, Zika, and Chikungunya, have also been reported to be associated with autoimmune encephalomyelitis [26,27]. However, detailed mechanisms of dengue-associated autoimmune encephalomyelitis need further studies to clarify the pathogenesis.

Our study has several strengths. First, the sample size was large, with over 63,000 dengue patients and 255,000 controls, and the follow-up time was long. Second, this cohort study used national databases with a high coverage rate, minimizing selection bias caused by loss to follow-up. Third, all the dengue cases were laboratory-confirmed, minimizing the misclassification bias of the exposure status. Finally, our analyses made corrections for multiple testing by the Bonferroni method, which reduced the chance of false-positive findings. However, the Bonferroni correction is sometimes too conservative and may lead to a high rate of false negatives. Therefore, the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure to control the false discovery rate <0.05 was also performed [28], which yielded a critical P value of 0.0060. The number of hypotheses in Table 3 that reached the significance level remained the same, so our results were robust to Benjamini–Hochberg correction.

Several limitations in this study need to be addressed. First, although all dengue cases were laboratory-confirmed, some of the non-dengue controls might have been misclassified because some people with DENV infections were asymptomatic or only had mild symptoms and thus were not reported. However, since dengue has not been endemic in Taiwan and the overall incidence and seroprevalence remained low in most parts of Taiwan [29,30], this misclassification bias should be relatively low. Second, the data in NHIRD were originally collected for reimbursement purposes; therefore, information on some potential confounders that might contribute to autoimmune diseases, such as smoking habits, body weight, family history, chemical exposures, and genetics, was not available. Detailed clinical information such as duration of symptoms, severity, laboratory results and therapeutic interventions was also unavailable. Third, although the diagnosis of autoimmune diseases identified from the Registry for Catastrophic Illness should be 100% valid, the diagnosis of other autoimmune diseases might be less valid. To increase the accuracy of the diagnosis, we used hospital admission or at least three outpatient visits with relevant ICD-9-CM or ICD-10-CM codes to identify cases. We believed that the diagnosis of autoimmune encephalomyelitis should be relatively accurate because this diagnosis was usually made by neurologists, infectious disease specialists or rheumatologists in Taiwan; however, the validity of remaining autoimmune diseases was less certain. Fourth, data on the serotypes of dengue infection and whether patients had primary or secondary infection were unavailable; therefore, further investigation on the association between autoimmune diseases and DENV infection status could not be performed. Finally, several autoimmune diseases with fewer than three cases were unable to be reported because of the human subject protection regulations of the Health and Welfare Data Science Center, Ministry of Health and Welfare. Therefore, the risk of some autoimmune diseases could not be evaluated.

In conclusion, this large cohort study showed that dengue was associated with a short-term increased risk of autoimmune encephalomyelitis, a rare complication of dengue. The risk of other autoimmune diseases did not seem to increase after DENV infection.

Supporting information

S1 Table. List of ICD codes for identifying diseases in this study.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Incidence (per 10,000) of autoimmune diseases between the hospitalized dengue cases and control groups.

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Risk of autoimmune diseases among hospitalized dengue cases after adjusting for competing mortality.

(DOCX)

Data Availability

This study used national databases obtained from the Health and Welfare Data Science Center (HWDC), Ministry of Health and Welfare in Taiwan (https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/dos/cp-5119-59201-113.html). All data obtained were anonymized and deidentified by the HWDC. The data used in this study must be accessed and analyzed in the HWDC after filling out an application according to the relevant regulations and thus cannot be shared. Contact information for data application, analysis and inquiry (https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/dos/cp-2516-59203-113.html).

Funding Statement

This study was partially supported by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 107-2314-B-006 -075 -MY3[YWC], MOST 110-2625-M-006 -009- [HIS], MOST 111-2625-M-006-016 [HIS]), National Health Research Institute (MR-108-GP-03 [CYC], MR-110-GP-03 [CYC], and MR-111-GP-05 [CYC]), and National Cheng Kung University Hospital (NCKUH-11103007[HIS]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Funder’s website: Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan: https://www.most.gov.tw/ National Health Research Institutes: https://www.nhri.edu.tw/.

References

  • 1.Wilder-Smith A, Ooi EE, Horstick O, Wills B. Dengue. Lancet (London, England). 2019;393(10169):350–63. Epub 2019/01/31. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32560-1 MID: Accession Number|. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Brady OJ, Gething PW, Bhatt S, Messina JP, Brownstein JS, Hoen AG, et al. Refining the global spatial limits of dengue virus transmission by evidence-based consensus. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2012;6(8):e1760. Epub 2012/08/11. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001760 MID: Accession Number|. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bhatt S, Gething PW, Brady OJ, Messina JP, Farlow AW, Moyes CL, et al. The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature. 2013;496(7446):504–7. Epub 2013/04/09. doi: 10.1038/nature12060 MID: Accession Number|. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bhatt P, Sabeena SP, Varma M, Arunkumar G. Current Understanding of the Pathogenesis of Dengue Virus Infection. Current Microbiology. 2021;78(1):17–32. doi: 10.1007/s00284-020-02284-w MID: Accession Number|. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Guzman MG, Gubler DJ, Izquierdo A, Martinez E, Halstead SB. Dengue infection. Nature Reviews Disease Primers. 2016;2(1):16055. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.55 MID: Accession Number|. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pang X, Zhang R, Cheng G. Progress towards understanding the pathogenesis of dengue hemorrhagic fever. Virol Sin. 2017;32(1):16–22. Epub 2016/11/18. doi: 10.1007/s12250-016-3855-9 MID: Accession Number|. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Garcia G, Gonzalez N, Perez AB, Sierra B, Aguirre E, Rizo D, et al. Long-term persistence of clinical symptoms in dengue-infected persons and its association with immunological disorders. International journal of infectious diseases: IJID: official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases. 2011;15(1):e38–43. Epub 2010/11/30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2010.09.008 MID: Accession Number|. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Talib S, Bhattu S, Bhattu R, Deshpande S, Dahiphale D. Dengue fever triggering systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis: a case report. Int Med Case Rep J. 2013;6:71–5. Epub 2013/11/10. doi: 10.2147/IMCRJ.S50708 MID: Accession Number|. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ghosh A, Banerjee A, Saha S, Pande A, Ghosh B. Wegener’s granulomatosis with dengue fever: an unusual association. Int J Rheum Dis. 2012;15(3):e47–9. Epub 2012/06/20. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-185X.2011.01692.x MID: Accession Number|. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kamel MG, Nam NT, Han NHB, El-Shabouny AE, Makram AM, Abd-Elhay FA, et al. Post-dengue acute disseminated encephalomyelitis: A case report and meta-analysis. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2017;11(6):e0005715. Epub 2017/07/01. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005715 MID: Accession Number|. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.de Sousa AM, Puccioni-Sohler M, Alvarenga MP, Alvarenga RMP, Borges AD, Adorno LF. Post-dengue neuromyelitis optica: case report of a Japanese-descendent Brazilian child. Journal of infection and chemotherapy. 2006;12(6):396–8. MID: Accession Number|. doi: 10.1007/s10156-006-0475-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fong CY, Hlaing CS, Tay CG, Abdul Kadir KA, Goh KJ, Ong LC. Longitudinal extensive transverse myelitis with cervical epidural haematoma following dengue virus infection. European Journal of Paediatric Neurology. 2016;20(3):449–53. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2016.01.012 MID: Accession Number|. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Li HM, Huang YK, Su YC, Kao CH. Increased risk of autoimmune diseases in dengue patients: A population-based cohort study. The Journal of infection. 2018;77(3):212–9. Epub 2018/05/11. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2018.03.014 MID: Accession Number|. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lin LY, Warren-Gash C, Smeeth L, Chen PC. Data resource profile: the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). Epidemiology and health. 2018;40:e2018062. Epub 2019/02/08. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2018062 MID: Accession Number|. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chien YW, Wang CC, Wang YP, Lee CY, Perng GC. Risk of Leukemia after Dengue Virus Infection: A Population-Based Cohort Study. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention: a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology. 2020;29(3):558–64. Epub 2020/02/14. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-1214 MID: Accession Number|. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yeh CY, Chen PL, Chuang KT, Shu YC, Chien YW, Perng GC, et al. Symptoms associated with adverse dengue fever prognoses at the time of reporting in the 2015 dengue outbreak in Taiwan. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2017;11(12):e0006091. Epub 2017/12/07. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006091 MID: Accession Number|. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Liu CY, Hung YT, Chuang YL, Chen YJ, Weng WS, Liu JS, et al. Incorporating development stratification of Taiwan townships into sampling design of large scale health interview survey. Journal of Health Management. 2006;4(1):1–22. MID: Accession Number|. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mamdani M, Sykora K, Li P, Normand SL, Streiner DL, Austin PC, et al. Reader’s guide to critical appraisal of cohort studies: 2. Assessing potential for confounding. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2005;330(7497):960–2. Epub 2005/04/23. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7497.960 MID: Accession Number|. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chen YW, Hsieh TY, Lin CH, Chen HM, Lin CC, Chen HH. Association Between a History of Dengue Fever and the Risk of Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases: A Nationwide, Population-Based Case-Control Study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:738291. Epub 2021/11/23. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.738291 MID: Accession Number|. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Shukla MK, Singh N, Sharma RK, Barde PV. Utility of dengue NS1 antigen rapid diagnostic test for use in difficult to reach areas and its comparison with dengue NS1 ELISA and qRT-PCR. J Med Virol. 2017;89(7):1146–50. Epub 2017/01/04. doi: 10.1002/jmv.24764 MID: Accession Number|. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wan SW, Lin CF, Yeh TM, Liu CC, Liu HS, Wang S, et al. Autoimmunity in dengue pathogenesis. J Formos Med Assoc. 2013;112(1):3–11. Epub 2013/01/22. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2012.11.006 MID: Accession Number|. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chuang YC, Lin YS, Liu HS, Yeh TM. Molecular mimicry between dengue virus and coagulation factors induces antibodies to inhibit thrombin activity and enhance fibrinolysis. J Virol. 2014;88(23):13759–68. Epub 2014/09/19. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02166-14 MID: Accession Number|. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bhatt P, Sabeena SP, Varma M, Arunkumar G. Current Understanding of the Pathogenesis of Dengue Virus Infection. Curr Microbiol. 2021;78(1):17–32. Epub 2020/11/25. doi: 10.1007/s00284-020-02284-w MID: Accession Number|. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Noorbakhsh F, Johnson RT, Emery D, Power C. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis: clinical and pathogenesis features. Neurol Clin. 2008;26(3):759–80, ix. Epub 2008/07/29. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2008.03.009 MID: Accession Number|. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Murthy JM. Neurological complication of dengue infection. Neurol India. 2010;58(4):581–4. Epub 2010/08/27. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.68654 MID: Accession Number|. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Karagianni P, Alexopoulos H, Sourdi A, Papadimitriou D, Dimitrakopoulos AN, Moutsopoulos HM. West Nile Virus infection triggering autoimmune encephalitis: Pathophysiological and therapeutic implications. Clin Immunol. 2019;207:97–9. Epub 2019/08/28. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2019.07.007 MID: Accession Number|. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Anaya JM, Rodriguez Y, Monsalve DM, Vega D, Ojeda E, Gonzalez-Bravo D, et al. A comprehensive analysis and immunobiology of autoimmune neurological syndromes during the Zika virus outbreak in Cucuta, Colombia. J Autoimmun. 2017;77:123–38. Epub 2017/01/08. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2016.12.007 MID: Accession Number|. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Methodological). 1995;57(1):289–300. MID: Accession Number|. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chien YW, Huang HM, Ho TC, Tseng FC, Ko NY, Ko WC, et al. Seroepidemiology of dengue virus infection among adults during the ending phase of a severe dengue epidemic in southern Taiwan, 2015. BMC infectious diseases. 2019;19(1):338. Epub 2019/04/25. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-3946-y MID: Accession Number|. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lee YH, Hsieh YC, Chen CJ, Lin TY, Huang YC. Retrospective Seroepidemiology study of dengue virus infection in Taiwan. BMC infectious diseases. 2021;21(1):96. Epub 2021/01/23. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-05809-1 MID: Accession Number|. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011127.r001

Decision Letter 0

William B Messer, Elvina Viennet

5 Oct 2022

Dear Dr. Chien,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Re-examination of the risk of autoimmune diseases after dengue virus infection: A population-based cohort study" for consideration at PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. In light of the reviews (below this email), we would like to invite the resubmission of a significantly-revised version that takes into account the reviewers' comments.

We cannot make any decision about publication until we have seen the revised manuscript and your response to the reviewers' comments. Your revised manuscript is also likely to be sent to reviewers for further evaluation.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript. Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 60 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email. Please note that revised manuscripts received after the 60-day due date may require evaluation and peer review similar to newly submitted manuscripts.

Thank you again for your submission. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

William B Messer

Academic Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Elvina Viennet

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: This retrospective cohort study using laboratory-confirmed dengue cases evaluated the risk of autoimmune diseases after DENV infection. It was found that dengue was associated with an increased short-term risk of a rare disorder, “autoimmune” encephalomyelitis, but not with other autoimmune diseases.

In the Author Summary the sentence “Autoantibodies produced during dengue infection can cross-react with several self-antigens…..” should change to: “Antibodies produced during dengue infection can cross-react with several self-antigens…..”

In the Introduction 2nd paragraph line 7-8 “autoimmune markers”, such as antinuclear antibody (ANA), immune complex (IC), and C-reactive protein (CRP)” IC and CRP are not autoimmune markers, ICs can be found in many chronic infectious diseases and CRP is an indicator of inflammation.

The term Reiter’s syndrome has to be changed to “post infectious arthritis”.

Reviewer #2: This is a well written study based on health records of dengue patients in Taiwan. The objectives are clearly articulated and the study design is appropriate. A strength of the study is the very large sample size. Correct statical analyses support the conclusion and indeed are essential to reach the conclusions. There are no ethical or regulatory concerns.

--------------------

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: s not clear to reviewer on what basis the authors use the term autoimmune encephalomyelitis for the syndrome following the DENV infection; did they tested the patients’ sera for specific autoantibodies? Also the length of encephalomyelitis symptoms , the severity of the disorder and the therapeutic interventions to combat the encephalomyelitis should be presented .

The term Reiter’s syndrome should be changed to “post infectious arthritis”

Reviewer #2: The results are clearly presented. Dengue patients had a slightly higher risk of overall autoimmune diseases than non-dengue controls (aHR 1.16; P =0.0002). Only autoimmune encephalomyelitis remained statistically significant after Bonferroni correction for multiple testing (aHR 2.72; P < 0.0001). All the Table are presently clearly.

--------------------

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: AS ABOVE

Reviewer #2: The conclusion of the study are justified and limitations are described appropriately. The discussion is appropriate and the public health relevance is addressed appropriately.

--------------------

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: As Above

Reviewer #2: The results are different than a previous smaller study that identified several autoimmune disease that were increased in hospitalized dengue patients. The authors do a good job of describing the differences in the studies, bit I think imless they did the sub-analysis of only hospitalized patients they should explicitly state that hospitalization might mean more severe dengue and that more severe dengue might in fact lead to autoimmune disease.

--------------------

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: As Above

Reviewer #2: This is a solid study. The authors should clarify that it remains possible that more severe dengue can lead to autoimmune disease.

--------------------

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Haralampos M. Moutsopoulos

Reviewer #2: No

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011127.r003

Decision Letter 1

William B Messer, Elvina Viennet

30 Jan 2023

Dear Dr. Chien,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Re-examination of the risk of autoimmune diseases after dengue virus infection: A population-based cohort study' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

William B Messer

Academic Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Elvina Viennet

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************************************************

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: The authors responded satisfactorily to reviewers' suggestions

Reviewer #2: This revised manuscript meets all review criteria for accepotance.

**********

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: The analysis presented match the analysis plan

The results are clearly and completely presented

The figures (Tables, Images) are of sufficient quality for clarity

Reviewer #2: The results are clearly presented

**********

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: The conclusions are supported.

**********

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: none

**********

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: I have np further comments.

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011127.r004

Acceptance letter

William B Messer, Elvina Viennet

21 Feb 2023

Dear Dr. Chien,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Re-examination of the risk of autoimmune diseases after dengue virus infection: A population-based cohort study," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Editorial, Viewpoint, Symposium, Review, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript will be published online unless you opted out of this process. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Shaden Kamhawi

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Paul Brindley

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. List of ICD codes for identifying diseases in this study.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Table. Incidence (per 10,000) of autoimmune diseases between the hospitalized dengue cases and control groups.

    (DOCX)

    S3 Table. Risk of autoimmune diseases among hospitalized dengue cases after adjusting for competing mortality.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: reply1015-chien_RC_1127-chien.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    This study used national databases obtained from the Health and Welfare Data Science Center (HWDC), Ministry of Health and Welfare in Taiwan (https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/dos/cp-5119-59201-113.html). All data obtained were anonymized and deidentified by the HWDC. The data used in this study must be accessed and analyzed in the HWDC after filling out an application according to the relevant regulations and thus cannot be shared. Contact information for data application, analysis and inquiry (https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/dos/cp-2516-59203-113.html).


    Articles from PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES